Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Leave.EU

Leave.EU was a British political campaign group founded in September 2015 by businessman Arron Banks and insurance broker Andy Wigmore to advocate for the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union ahead of the 2016 membership referendum.^[1]^[2] Unlike the officially designated Vote Leave campaign, Leave.EU operated independently, emphasizing direct voter outreach through social media advertising and grassroots mobilization, with Banks personally funding much of its £6 million expenditure.^[3]^[2] The group played a prominent role in promoting Brexit arguments, including sovereignty restoration and immigration control, and collaborated with figures like Nigel Farage, though it was barred from official status due to UK Independence Party affiliations.^[3] Leave.EU faced significant regulatory challenges, including a £70,000 fine from the Electoral Commission in 2018 for multiple breaches of referendum spending rules, such as unreported donations and joint campaigning violations, despite subsequent appeals and a 2020 settlement that reduced some penalties.^[4]^[5]^[6] Further investigations examined Banks's post-referendum contacts with Russian entities and unexplained insurance sale proceeds potentially linked to campaign financing, though no criminal charges resulted from these probes.^[7] The organization entered liquidation in 2022, leaving outstanding data protection fines unpaid amid claims of financial write-offs by its backers.^[8]

Founding and Organization

Establishment and Leadership

Leave.EU was established in July 2015 by Arron Banks, a businessman and former Conservative donor, and Andy Wigmore, his associate, as a pressure group campaigning for the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union. The initiative emerged shortly after Banks publicly shifted his political allegiance from the Conservative Party to the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in May 2015, motivated by dissatisfaction with the Conservatives' stance on EU membership and immigration controls.^[9]^[10] This switch reflected Banks' growing Euroscepticism and support for UKIP's advocacy of a referendum on EU membership, which had gained traction following Prime Minister David Cameron's promise of an in-out vote.^[9] The organization was formally incorporated as Leave.EU Group Limited on 4 September 2015 with Companies House as a private company limited by guarantee, without share capital, enabling it to function as a non-profit advocacy entity focused on influencing public opinion rather than as an official political party.^[1] This corporate structure distinguished Leave.EU from the eventual official Leave campaign designated by the Electoral Commission in April 2016, allowing it greater operational flexibility in pre-referendum activities, including grassroots outreach and digital campaigning, unbound by the stricter spending and reporting rules applied to designated groups during the regulated referendum period.^[1]^[11] In terms of leadership, Arron Banks acted as co-founder and principal funder, providing significant financial backing derived from his business interests in insurance and diamonds, while Andy Wigmore served as director of communications and handled day-to-day operations.^[11]^[12] The duo's approach emphasized populist critiques of EU overreach, bureaucratic inefficiency, and the erosion of national sovereignty, positioning Leave.EU as an outsider voice advocating for direct democratic input on Britain's EU future over elite-driven integration.^[13] This anti-establishment orientation was informed by the founders' personal experiences with regulatory hurdles and their alignment with UKIP's platform, prioritizing immigration control and economic independence from EU institutions.^[13]^[9]

Initial Objectives and Structure

Leave.EU's primary objective upon its formation in October 2015 was to campaign for a referendum on the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, advocating for the reclamation of national sovereignty from what it described as supranational overreach in areas including immigration control, border policies, and economic regulation.^[14] The group critiqued EU membership for diminishing British democratic authority, arguing that exit would enable independent policy-making free from Brussels-imposed directives, with a particular emphasis on curbing unrestricted migration from EU member states.^[15] Positioned explicitly as a "people's campaign," Leave.EU sought to mobilize public sentiment against an establishment-driven Remain effort, framing Brexit as essential to restoring control over domestic affairs to UK voters rather than unelected EU institutions.^[15] In its early operational framework, Leave.EU maintained deliberate independence from established political parties, eschewing formal affiliations to preserve autonomy and appeal broadly beyond partisan lines, in contrast to rival groups like Vote Leave which aligned with Conservative Party figures.^[16] The structure emphasized decentralized volunteer networks for local engagement alongside heavy reliance on digital platforms for rapid dissemination of messaging, enabling cost-effective outreach without initial dependence on public donations or bureaucratic hierarchies.^[17] This model facilitated agile responses to campaign dynamics, prioritizing private seed funding from co-founder Arron Banks to bootstrap activities while building supporter databases through online petitions and social media drives. Early momentum built through Banks' public funding commitments announced in late 2015, including pledges totaling millions to underwrite the initiative's launch and signal resolve in advancing sovereignty-focused arguments unbound by party constraints.^[13] These steps positioned Leave.EU as a challenger to official designations, highlighting its non-partisan ethos amid competition for Electoral Commission recognition.^[16]

Campaign Strategies

Leave.EU employed social media platforms, particularly Facebook and Twitter, as primary channels to disseminate pro-Brexit messaging, circumventing traditional media outlets perceived as hostile to the Leave cause. The campaign focused on data-driven targeted advertising to reach undecided voters with arguments centered on national sovereignty, border control, and the potential redirection of EU contributions to domestic priorities such as the National Health Service (NHS).^[18]^[19] This approach leveraged psychographic profiling techniques proposed by Cambridge Analytica, which aimed to segment audiences based on personality traits derived from online behavior for personalized appeals.^[17] Key strategies included the production of viral videos critiquing EU bureaucracy and memes highlighting immigration concerns and regulatory burdens, often shared to amplify reach organically. Leave.EU's Facebook page generated significant engagement, with posts averaging higher interaction rates than many Remain counterparts during the campaign period, contributing to millions of impressions among targeted demographics such as older voters and those in Leave-leaning regions.^[20]^[18] Post-referendum analyses indicated that Leave-oriented digital content correlated with shifts in sentiment among low-information voters, particularly in areas with strong social media penetration, where exposure to such ads aligned with higher Leave vote shares.^[21]^[22] In contrast to the official Vote Leave campaign's emphasis on economic modeling and regulatory freedom through a measured tone, Leave.EU adopted an irreverent, populist style that emphasized cultural identity and national control over borders, appealing to voters prioritizing emotional and identity-based arguments over fiscal projections.^[18]^[23] This differentiation allowed Leave.EU to engage audiences alienated by mainstream discourse, fostering a narrative of EU overreach that resonated in online echo chambers.^[24] Empirical data from Twitter sentiment tracking showed Leave proponents, including Leave.EU affiliates, dominating emotional discourse, which post-hoc studies linked to turnout mobilization in key demographics.^[25]^[22]

Grassroots Mobilization and Public Engagement

Leave.EU supported grassroots mobilization through financial backing and collaboration with Grassroots Out, a cross-party campaign group funded by co-founder Arron Banks, which organized local events, rallies, and canvassing drives across the UK to promote withdrawal from the EU. These activities focused on direct voter contact in communities affected by EU policies, highlighting the Common Fisheries Policy's role in reallocating UK fishing quotas to other member states, resulting in foreign vessels harvesting up to 60% of fish in former British waters by the 2010s and contributing to a decline in the UK fleet from over 40,000 vessels in the 1970s to around 12,000 by 2016.^[26] Events emphasized causal connections between EU integration and industrial challenges, such as regulatory burdens exacerbating manufacturing offshoring, where UK output share in EU trade fell from 20% in 1973 to under 15% by 2016 amid competition from lower-regulation economies.^[27] Public engagement targeted working-class demographics in deindustrialized regions, fostering unfiltered discussions on net migration figures—peaking at 333,000 in 2015—and the erosion of trade sovereignty, positioning Brexit as a reclamation of policy control over economic decisions.^[28] Grassroots Out's local meetups, including canvassing in areas like Rothwell, Northamptonshire, drew participants disillusioned with centralized EU governance, achieving notable volunteer participation that complemented broader Leave efforts.^[29] Ties to aligned initiatives, such as Fishing for Leave—which shared funding links to Banks—amplified advocacy in coastal communities, underscoring empirical data on quota losses tied to fleet capacity reductions of over 50% since EU accession.^[30] While commended for activating low-engagement voters—evident in the 72.2% national referendum turnout, highest since 1992, with Leave strongholds like Boston registering 68.5% participation—these efforts faced criticism for rhetoric perceived as divisive, though analysis attributes heightened mobilization in Leave-voting locales to targeted issue-based outreach rather than solely messaging style.^[31] Mainstream critiques often overlooked how such direct engagement countered Remain's institutional framing, empirically correlating with vote shares exceeding 70% in petition-signing hotspots for sovereignty reforms pre-referendum.^[16]

Funding and Financial Operations

Sources of Funding

Leave.EU's primary funding came from co-founder Arron Banks, who provided approximately £8 million in donations and loans between late 2015 and early 2016, enabling the group's operations ahead of the EU referendum.^[32] This included a £6 million donation directly to Leave.EU and a £2 million loan to its parent company, Better for the Country Limited, drawn from Banks' personal resources and his insurance businesses.^[32] Banks' wealth, accumulated through ventures like Eldon Insurance Services, formed the basis of these contributions, with no verifiable links to foreign state entities despite subsequent scrutiny.^[2] Smaller donations from individual supporters added to the total inflows, which exceeded £9 million from March 2016 until polling day, allowing Leave.EU to operate as a limited company and deploy resources swiftly without initial Electoral Commission pre-approval requirements for designated campaigns.^[2] Investigations by the Electoral Commission and the National Crime Agency into potential irregularities, including allegations of opaque or foreign-sourced funds, found no evidence of criminal offences or improper origins, closing the probes in 2019.^[33] Post-referendum public disclosures by Leave.EU countered claims of opacity, revealing the self-funded nature that rivaled official Leave campaign treasuries and supported competitive-scale advertising.^[32]

Expenditure Patterns

Leave.EU allocated the bulk of its resources to direct voter outreach efforts, with significant investments in digital advertising and public events rather than administrative or institutional overhead. Company accounts filed with Companies House indicate that Better for the Country Limited, controlled by Arron Banks, provided approximately £12.4 million in administrative services to Leave.EU during the year ending March 2017, encompassing operational support for campaign activities including targeted online promotions and rallies.^[34] Early in the referendum period, Leave.EU had already expended hundreds of thousands of pounds on Facebook advertising alone, focusing on micro-targeted messages to amplify reach in key demographics.^[35] This spending pattern emphasized efficiency, channeling funds into high-impact channels like social media ads and grassroots events over expansive staffing or perks, aligning with a model reliant on a compact core team and external service provision. In contrast to the Remain campaign's heavier reliance on established institutional networks and higher aggregate outlays (£19.3 million across registered campaigners), Leave.EU's approach within the broader Leave ecosystem contributed to total Leave-side spending of £13.3 million, demonstrating resource leverage through digital precision targeting.^[36] Verifiable filings and Electoral Commission oversight confirmed that reported expenditures stayed within advocacy parameters post-investigation, countering initial claims of disproportionate overspending not substantiated in final determinations.^[37]

Key Relationships and Alliances

Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore

Arron Banks, a British entrepreneur, built his fortune primarily through the insurance sector, co-founding firms such as Brightside Insurance and Go Skippy, alongside investments in diamond mining operations in South Africa and Lesotho.^[13]^[38] By 2017, his net worth was estimated at £250 million, much of it held in offshore entities in locations including Belize and the British Virgin Islands.^[13] Initially a supporter and donor to the Conservative Party, Banks pivoted to the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 2014 after feeling rebuffed by Conservatives, contributing £1 million to the party that year.^[13] This shift reflected his growing conviction that EU membership imposed unjust constraints on British autonomy, including regulatory impositions that hindered enterprise and sovereignty in economic decision-making.^[13] Andy Wigmore, Banks' business associate with a base in Bermuda and family connections to Belize—where he served as trade envoy to the UK until early 2016—partnered with Banks to co-found Leave.EU in 2015, taking on the role of communications director.^[38]^[39] Their collaboration stemmed from aligned perspectives favoring expansive global trade networks, such as revived Commonwealth ties, over deeper EU integration, which they viewed as limiting Britain's post-imperial opportunities for Atlantic-oriented partnerships.^[13] Wigmore's logistical expertise complemented Banks' financial backing, enabling a focus on direct voter outreach amid their shared skepticism of supranational bureaucracy. Banks personally financed Leave.EU with over £12 million in loans, donations, and in-kind services— the largest individual political contribution in UK history—demonstrating significant personal financial exposure to advance Brexit advocacy.^[38]^[40] Upon Leave.EU's liquidation in 2022, Banks wrote off a £7 million outstanding loan to the group, underscoring the unrecouped risks undertaken without reliance on external political funding mechanisms.^[8] Claims of Russian influence via Banks' business contacts, including embassy meetings discussing potential investments like gold mines shortly after the 2016 referendum, prompted investigations by the Electoral Commission and National Crime Agency; however, no evidence emerged linking these to Leave.EU's funding sources, with Banks maintaining the donations derived solely from his legitimate enterprises.^[13]^[2]^[7] Such allegations, often amplified in media scrutiny, remain unsubstantiated as causal factors in the campaign's operations or outcomes.^[13]

Ties to Nigel Farage and UKIP

Leave.EU developed a close operational synergy with Nigel Farage, the longtime leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), characterized by frequent joint appearances at public events and a shared emphasis on restoring UK sovereignty from EU institutions and restricting immigration.^[41] In October 2015, Farage publicly declared that UKIP would collaborate "hand in hand" with Leave.EU, which had been launched earlier that year at the UKIP annual conference in Margate, funded initially by UKIP donor Arron Banks.^[41] This alignment positioned Leave.EU as an unofficial grassroots complement to UKIP's formal party apparatus, enabling the group to amplify UKIP's long-standing Eurosceptic platform without direct party control. Despite the mutual reinforcement, Leave.EU maintained structural independence from both Farage and UKIP, pursuing its own digital advertising and voter outreach strategies separate from UKIP's electoral machinery or Farage's personal campaigns.^[42] Farage initially endorsed multiple Leave groups, including Leave.EU, but UKIP's official stance shifted toward supporting the designated Vote Leave campaign after the Electoral Commission's March 2016 decision, though informal coordination persisted through overlapping messaging on key issues like border control.^[41] Leave.EU's efforts provided supplementary resources—such as targeted social media amplification—that bolstered UKIP's referendum advocacy, particularly among working-class voters in regions underserved by mainstream conservative channels, contributing to observable upticks in Leave polling momentum during mid-2016.^[43] Post-referendum financial ties further illustrated the depth of this relationship, with Banks personally funding Farage to the tune of approximately £450,000 between July 2016 and June 2017, covering expenses including a £4.4 million rented London residence, a luxury vehicle, bodyguard services, utility bills, and U.S. travel arrangements.^[44] ^[42] These payments, sourced from Banks' personal accounts rather than Leave.EU's campaign funds, were later scrutinized by the European Parliament for potential undeclared interests but did not alter Leave.EU's autonomous status during the referendum period.^[45] Proponents of the collaboration argued it enhanced the Leave movement's grassroots authenticity by leveraging Farage's public profile, while critics alleged it skirted regulatory boundaries on influence, though no substantiated proof emerged of coordinated efforts to manipulate voter data or outcomes beyond permissible advocacy.^[44]

Role in the EU Referendum

Pre-Referendum Advocacy

Leave.EU escalated its pre-referendum efforts in early 2016, centering arguments on the EU's erosion of UK sovereignty through supranational decision-making and economic policies that imposed regulatory constraints linked to stagnant productivity growth across member states. The organization highlighted empirical fiscal data, noting the UK's net contribution to the EU budget reached £9.4 billion in 2016, positioning these outflows as evidence of imbalanced resource transfers that disadvantaged British taxpayers relative to returns in infrastructure or public services.^[46]^[47] High-impact advertisements and public initiatives from Leave.EU in the lead-up to the June 23 vote targeted these themes, using data visualizations of contribution-benefit asymmetries to argue for repatriation of funds and policy control. On April 13, 2016, the Electoral Commission rejected Leave.EU's application for official designation as the lead Leave campaigner, selecting Vote Leave instead due to criteria favoring broader cross-party support, which prompted Leave.EU to operate independently while occasionally coordinating on shared goals but criticizing Vote Leave's perceived restraint on contentious issues like migration enforcement.^[48]^[49] Leave.EU's advocacy, characterized by direct and populist messaging, helped frame the referendum debate around causal links between EU integration and domestic challenges, appealing particularly to demographics evidencing skepticism toward supranational governance. Polling trends from April to June 2016 showed Leave support rising among voters over 65 and in rural areas, where concerns over globalization and self-determination resonated, with analysts noting unofficial campaigns' role in amplifying these sentiments beyond the official group's economic focus.^[50]

Contributions to the Leave Victory

Leave.EU's digital campaigns complemented the official Vote Leave effort by emphasizing themes of national identity, border control, and democratic sovereignty, which appealed to voters prioritizing non-economic factors in the June 23, 2016, referendum. While Vote Leave highlighted fiscal arguments, such as the UK's gross weekly contribution to the EU of £350 million, Leave.EU's messaging focused on immigration pressures and loss of legislative autonomy, fostering a broader Leave coalition that addressed cultural anxieties not fully covered by the designated campaign.^[51]^[18] Funded primarily by Arron Banks with £6 million in loans provided in early 2016, Leave.EU allocated approximately £2.9 million toward campaign activities, including targeted social media advertisements that achieved high engagement rates on platforms like Facebook.^[8]^[52] This spending enabled outreach to demographics skeptical of EU integration, with content generating interaction levels that outpaced other Brexit-related pages, contributing to sentiment shifts observed in online discourse.^[20] Analyses of social media data from the referendum period show Leave-aligned posts, including those amplified by groups like Leave.EU, evoked stronger emotional responses and dominated viral sharing compared to Remain efforts, correlating with favorable public opinion trends in key voter segments.^[22] These strategies are argued to have mobilized support among undecided and low-propensity voters, particularly in regions with narrow Leave margins, by countering Remain's economic warnings—often termed "Project Fear"—with empirically grounded critiques of EU fiscal burdens, such as the UK's net contribution of £8.9 billion in 2015.^[21] Although Remain campaigns alleged misinformation, Leave.EU's core assertions on migration statistics and budgetary transfers aligned with official data from sources like the Office for National Statistics, undermining claims of systematic deception and reinforcing voter perceptions of EU overreach.^[53] The combined effect helped secure the 52-48% outcome, with Leave.EU's unofficial status permitting unfiltered advocacy that official channels avoided, thus expanding the electorate's exposure to sovereignty-focused rationales beyond traditional media.^[51]

Regulatory Scrutiny and Controversies

Electoral Commission Investigations

The Electoral Commission initiated an investigation into Leave.EU's spending during the 2016 EU referendum campaign in April 2017, focusing on the accuracy of its reported expenditures as a non-designated campaigner subject to a £700,000 limit.^[4] On 11 May 2018, the Commission concluded that Leave.EU had committed multiple breaches, including submitting an inaccurate spending return that understated costs by at least £77,380—exceeding the limit by over 10%—failing to maintain adequate records for 97 payments totaling £80,224, and inaccurately reporting £6 million in loans alongside omitting details of services provided by the U.S. firm Goddard Gunster.^[4] ^[5] These violations stemmed primarily from reporting and record-keeping deficiencies rather than evidence of unreported massive overspends capable of altering the referendum's outcome.^[54] Leave.EU was fined £70,000 for the breaches, a penalty later adjusted to £66,000 following a partial appeal upheld by the Central London County Court in judgments on 21 March 2019 (liability) and 8 April 2019 (penalties), with final payment confirmed by October 2019.^[4] The Commission also referred the campaign's responsible person—identified as its chief officer—for potential criminal offenses related to the inaccuracies, though no prosecutions ensued that invalidated campaign activities.^[5] Investigations found no improper coordination between Leave.EU and the designated lead campaigner Vote Leave that warranted additional sanctions against Leave.EU, distinguishing its case from separate probes into Vote Leave's activities.^[55] The breaches represented a small fraction of total Leave-side spending, estimated at over £10 million across groups, with no causal evidence linking them to the referendum's 51.9% Leave vote; the Commission emphasized regulatory enforcement over retrospective challenges to results, closing the probe without recommending invalidation of the advisory referendum.^[4] ^[5] This stance countered claims in some media outlets of systemic illegality undermining the vote, as the findings highlighted administrative lapses rather than outcome-determinative misconduct, consistent with the Commission's non-adjudicative role in referendum validity.^[56]

Data Protection and Privacy Allegations

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) launched an investigation in 2016 into data analytics practices in political campaigns, including Leave.EU's methods for building supporter databases through online quizzes, email sign-ups, and Facebook advertising, which amassed contacts exceeding 200,000 individuals by mid-2016.^[57] These opt-in techniques, such as personality quizzes prompting users to share email addresses for Brexit-related content, mirrored standard digital marketing practices used across campaigns, yielding high engagement rates with Leave.EU's Facebook page reaching over 1.2 million likes by the referendum date.^[57] Allegations of privacy misuse intensified post-referendum amid the Cambridge Analytica scandal, focusing on potential inadequate consent for data processing and sharing, though ICO audits found no evidence of non-consensual harvesting from third-party sources like Facebook or links to foreign entities.^[58] A key violation identified involved Leave.EU's use of approximately 300,000 customer email addresses from affiliated insurer Eldon Insurance (trading as GoSkippy) to send unsolicited political marketing emails in 2016 and 2017, without verifying explicit prior consent as required under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) 2003.^[59] The ICO issued a £15,000 monetary penalty notice to Leave.EU in February 2019 for this breach, part of broader fines totaling £120,000 across Leave.EU and Eldon for two campaigns sending over one million emails.^[60] Leave.EU appealed the penalties, arguing the data was shared under legitimate partnership arrangements and that recipients had opted into related communications, but the First-tier Tribunal and subsequent Upper Tribunal upheld the ICO's findings in 2020, confirming inadequate safeguards against spam complaints and non-compliant consent mechanisms.^[61] Despite the fines, the ICO's 2018 final report and 2020 closure of the analytics probe emphasized that Leave.EU's primary voter outreach data—gathered via voluntary sign-ups—did not constitute systematic abuse, distinguishing it from Cambridge Analytica's unauthorized scraping of 87 million Facebook profiles.^[57]^[58] Critics, including remain-aligned media, highlighted the email campaigns as emblematic of lax privacy standards, yet comparable opt-in data tactics by pro-remain groups like Britain Stronger in Europe drew minimal regulatory fines or scrutiny, suggesting selective emphasis on leave-side practices.^[57] The penalties addressed procedural lapses in marketing consent rather than invalidating the legitimacy of Leave.EU's engagement-driven data collection, which ICO deemed proportionate for non-profiling political advocacy under pre-GDPR rules.^[59]

Domain Name and Miscellaneous Disputes

In January 2022, the EU domain registry EURid revoked approximately 48,000 .eu domain names registered to UK-based entities, including Leave.EU's leave.eu, at the end of a six-month grace period following Brexit, as UK residents and organizations ceased to qualify under the eligibility criteria of Regulation (EC) No 733/2002 restricting .eu domains to EEA member state affiliates.^[62]^[63] This blanket enforcement affected numerous Brexit-related sites but stemmed from standardized post-transition rules rather than targeted scrutiny of Leave.EU's content.^[64] Leave.EU had preemptively transferred its .eu registration to an Irish entity in January 2021 to retain eligibility, a move that drew criticism for apparent inconsistency with its anti-EU stance but complied with EURid's residency requirements at the time.^[65] Temporary suspensions occurred amid compliance checks, yet the group swiftly redirected traffic to alternative domains like leave.eu.org, ensuring continuity of operations without measurable interruption to its communication or fundraising.^[66] Proponents viewed the revocation as emblematic of residual EU bureaucratic rigidity, imposing uniform penalties irrespective of individual merit. On the miscellaneous front, Leave.EU co-founder Arron Banks filed a libel suit in 2019 against journalist Carole Cadwalladr over her public statements alleging undisclosed Russian ties influencing Leave.EU's 2016 referendum funding, which he claimed damaged his reputation.^[67] The High Court dismissed the action in June 2022, upholding Cadwalladr's defense under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 on grounds of responsible journalism in the public interest, with no costs awarded against her at trial.^[68] The proceedings, while protracted, yielded no financial penalties or operational constraints for Leave.EU, underscoring the peripheral nature of such challenges amid broader regulatory focus elsewhere.

Post-Referendum Activities

Advocacy for Brexit Implementation

Leave.EU intensified its efforts to secure a complete detachment from EU institutions after the 2016 referendum, framing delays and compromises as failures to honor the 52% vote for withdrawal. The organization, leveraging its social media reach, criticized Prime Minister Theresa May's Chequers proposal unveiled on July 6, 2018, which envisioned a facilitated customs arrangement and common rulebook for goods, as retaining undue EU oversight on UK laws and trade.^[69] Arron Banks, Leave.EU's co-founder, publicly denounced such arrangements as a "betrayal," echoing the group's pre-referendum emphasis on restoring full national sovereignty over borders, regulations, and economy.^[70] By late 2018, Leave.EU targeted the emerging Withdrawal Agreement, particularly its Irish backstop provision, which risked indefinitely binding the UK to the EU customs union absent alternative solutions, thereby constraining independent trade deals—a core referendum promise. The group aligned with parliamentary hardliners like the European Research Group (ERG) in opposing the deal, advocating no-deal exit preparations as preferable to partial integration that could perpetuate supranational influence.^[71] This stance contributed to public discourse framing implementation hurdles as elite resistance rather than inevitable complexities, with Leave.EU highlighting empirical risks of the backstop's open-ended nature based on EU negotiation positions.^[72] Leave.EU's advocacy sustained pressure amid parliamentary gridlock, correlating with polls showing stable Leave sentiment—around 50-55% favoring departure even amid deal uncertainties through 2018-2019—preventing erosion toward softer options.^[73] Detractors, including mainstream outlets, accused the group of promoting "extremism" by endorsing no-deal scenarios, yet this reflected fidelity to the referendum's causal logic: absent full exit from EU frameworks, sovereignty gains remained illusory, as evidenced by the deal's thrice-rejected terms in Parliament.^[74] Such efforts arguably accelerated May's resignation in May 2019, paving the way for negotiations yielding greater divergence.^[75]

Involvement in Later Elections

In the 2019 European Parliament elections on 23 May, Leave.EU aligned with Nigel Farage's newly formed Brexit Party, drawing on its referendum-era networks and the personal ties of co-founders Arron Banks and Richard Tice—who had funded Farage with approximately £450,000 in the post-referendum year and co-founded the party, respectively—to amplify calls for a no-deal exit by 31 October.^[42]^[76] The Brexit Party secured 29 of the UK's 73 seats with 31.6% of the vote, outperforming the Conservatives' 9% share and four seats, which exerted pressure on Theresa May's government and reinforced demands for uncompromised withdrawal.^[77] Ahead of the 12 December 2019 UK general election, alliances evolved as Banks publicly urged Leave voters in target constituencies to prioritize Conservative candidates over the Brexit Party to deliver Brexit, a stance echoed by Farage's decision to stand down in 317 Tory-held seats.^[78]^[79] This tactical support contributed to Boris Johnson's Conservatives gaining an 80-seat majority, passing the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 on 20 December and enabling the UK's departure on 31 January 2020.^[80] With Brexit legislated, Leave.EU's electoral role receded, though it endorsed Johnson's October 2019 deal as a viable exit despite its perceived concessions on issues like the Irish backstop—contrasting with the Brexit Party's outright rejection—and later highlighted shortcomings in trade negotiations as dilutions of the 2016 mandate.^[81] This period saw no major regulatory probes tied to Leave.EU's activities, building instead on prior advocacy without fresh disputes.

Dissolution and Legacy

Liquidation Process

Leave.EU Limited entered creditors' voluntary liquidation on 31 August 2022, as documented in filings submitted to Companies House.^[82] The process involved total debts exceeding £7 million, primarily comprising unsecured loans provided by co-founder Arron Banks, which were subsequently written off to facilitate the wind-down.^[8] Remaining assets were minimal, consisting largely of negligible cash reserves and post-campaign expenditures already incurred, with no reported disputes from creditors beyond outstanding fines to the Information Commissioner's Office for prior data misuse violations.^[83] The liquidation concluded the organization's operations following the United Kingdom's completion of Brexit on 31 December 2020, marking the end of the transition period and fulfillment of its core advocacy objective to secure EU exit.^[84] With no further referendum or withdrawal negotiations pending, the entity lacked ongoing purpose, enabling a pragmatic closure without asset distribution or prolonged insolvency proceedings.^[82] Companies House records confirm the process as orderly, with the liquidator's statements indicating straightforward dissolution absent litigation or contested claims.^[83]

Enduring Impact on British Politics

Leave.EU's innovative use of digital advertising and social media during the 2016 referendum campaign exemplified early digital populism in British politics, mobilizing grassroots support for sovereignty-focused messaging that emphasized national control over borders, laws, and finances.^[85]^[86] This approach, involving targeted Facebook ads reaching millions, shifted public discourse toward pragmatic realism about EU integration costs, influencing subsequent political realignments by empowering voters to prioritize domestic policy autonomy over supranational commitments.^[87] The organization's efforts contributed to a lasting rightward ideological pivot, evident in the 2019 general election where Brexit implementation became the dominant issue, driving Conservative gains in traditional Labour heartlands and securing a parliamentary majority committed to regulatory divergence.^[88]^[89] Empirical data from post-election analyses show that Leave-aligned messaging, amplified by groups like Leave.EU, correlated with voter shifts favoring parties pledging to "get Brexit done," resulting in over 80 additional seats for the Conservatives in Brexit-voting regions.^[90] Post-Brexit policy outcomes underscore Leave.EU's role in fostering realism, with the UK securing independent trade deals—such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership accession in 2023—that expanded non-EU market access and boosted GDP projections by 0.2-0.7% through diversified partnerships.^[91] Regulatory divergence has enabled tailored standards, including faster approvals for gene therapies and reduced bureaucracy in sectors like agrifood, yielding efficiency gains estimated at £1 billion annually in avoided EU compliance costs.^[92] These achievements counter narratives of economic "disaster" by demonstrating causal benefits from regained legislative flexibility, though legal controversies around Leave.EU's funding were pursued amid broader scrutiny of pro-Leave entities, arguably reflecting enforcement asymmetry rather than undermining voter-driven empowerment.^[91] As of 2025, polls indicate sustained support for core Brexit elements like immigration control, with 52% favoring reduced inflows and 58% ranking it as a top national issue, enabling policies that have curbed EU free movement while addressing public demands unmet under prior frameworks.^[93]^[94] This contrasts with selective regret in left-leaning surveys, but first-principles assessment highlights avoided eurozone entanglements—sparing the UK bailouts exceeding €1 trillion in crisis lending and preserving independent monetary policy amid divergent economic cycles.^[95]^[91]

References

[1]
LEAVE.EU GROUP LIMITED overview - Companies House - GOV.UK
LEAVE.EU GROUP LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual return, ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
[2]
Brexit: Arron Banks challenged over Leave.EU funds - BBC
Nov 4, 2018 · Leave.EU founder Arron Banks comes under pressure to explain the source of funds for his campaign.
[3]
The battle to be the official EU referendum Leave campaign - BBC
Mar 14, 2016 · A referendum will be held on 23 June on whether the UK will remain a member of the European Union or not. Here's a guide to the two groups currently battling.<|separator|>
[4]
Leave.EU fined for multiple breaches of electoral law following ...
May 11, 2018 · Judgments were given on the appeal by the Central London County Court: firstly on liability for the offences, on 21 March 2019, and secondly ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[5]
Leave.EU fined £70000 for breaking electoral law during referendum
May 11, 2018 · The Electoral Commission calls the group's conduct "disappointing" and refers a senior figure to the police.
[6]
Brexit: Electoral Commission and Arron Banks reach settlement - BBC
May 1, 2020 · A dispute between the Electoral Commission and Brexit campaigner Arron Banks has been settled. Mr Banks, who funded Leave.EU, threatened to ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[7]
Arron Banks: UK investigates alleged Russian links to Brexit backer
Jul 4, 2018 · The UK's National Crime Agency is investigating his financial support for the campaign and his contacts with Russian officials, according to three sources ...
[8]
Aaron Banks 'writes off £7m loan' as Leave.EU goes into liquidation
Sep 3, 2022 · Brexit campaign group fronted by Nigel Farage leaves thousands in unpaid fines for data law breaches.
[9]
Tory donor Arron Banks switches to Ukip as David Cameron ...
Jun 7, 2019 · Banks will donate £100,000 to Nigel Farage's eurosceptic party and could stand as a Ukip candidate in the 2015 general election. An ...
[10]
Exclusive: Ukip donor Arron Banks calls for Douglas Carswell ...
May 14, 2015 · With every hour the civil war at the top of Ukip intensifies. Now Arron Banks, a top Ukip donor who has given A£1m to the party this year, ...
[11]
Investigation: Leave.EU Group Limited | Electoral Commission
May 11, 2018 · Public statements from both Cambridge Analytica and Leave.EU (including its directors Mr Arron Banks and Mr Andy Wigmore) from 2016-17 implied ...
[12]
Arron Banks 'met Russian officials multiple times before Brexit vote'
Jun 9, 2018 · Continued extensive contact in the run-up to the US election when Banks, his business partner and Leave.EU spokesman Andy Wigmore, and Nigel ...
[13]
The Chaotic Triumph of Arron Banks, the “Bad Boy of Brexit”
Mar 18, 2019 · As the sun came up in London on June 24, 2016, Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore were walking through Westminster, the political district of ...
[14]
Arron Banks' Leave.EU referendum campaign launches formal bid ...
Nov 23, 2015 · Exclusive The two campaigns – Leave.EU and Vote Leave – have been compared to the "Judean People's Front" and the "People's Front of Judea" ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[15]
Brexit as an Inelastic Good: A Microeconomic Theory of Direct ...
... Leave.eu: It was clear from the start that we wanted a people's campaign. We wanted to focus on sovereignty. “Take back control”, “I want my country back ...
[16]
The battle to be the official EU referendum Leave campaign - BBC
Mar 14, 2016 · A referendum will be held on 23 June on whether the UK will remain a member of the European Union or not. Here's a guide to the two groups currently battling.
[17]
[PDF] Leave.EU: Psychographic Targeting for Britain - UK Parliament
Cambridge Analytica proposes a multi-faceted approach to data collection and analysis, the end products of which will be a nationwide database of potential ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
[18]
Leave versus Remain: the digital battle
The results are in and the UK will #Brexit: What did social media tell us about the UK's EU referendum? ... Leave.EU played a significant role in the quest for ...
[19]
https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/files/78015767/P1_SoMe_Tambajang__Fuochi__Chahrour__Morasch__Vraadal__2_.pdf
[20]
How Leave.EU dominates the Brexit conversation on Facebook
Nov 20, 2019 · However, according to Analytics, a tool from social media monitoring firm NewsWhip, the average post by Leave.EU during the period examined ...
[21]
Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit ...
Using Twitter data on the 2016 E.U. Referendum (“Brexit”) and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, we find that diffusion of information on Twitter is largely ...
[22]
Impact of social media on the outcome of the EU referendum
Our large-scale social media data analysis shows that not only did Brexit supporters have a more powerful and emotional message, but they were also more ...
[23]
How Leave won Twitter: an analysis of 7.5m Brexit-related tweets
Aug 19, 2016 · How do tweets map onto the Brexit vote? Neatly, it turns out. Stefan Bauchowitz (left) and Max Hänska collected more than 7.5m ...
[24]
Brexit as 'politics of division': social media campaigning after the ...
The political battle over Brexit that continued after the June 2016 referendum intensified the fractures in British politics along ideological and ...
[25]
[PDF] SOCIAL MEDIA, SENTIMENT AND PUBLIC OPINIONS
Using Twitter data on the 2016 E.U. Referendum (“Brexit”) and the 2016 U.S.. Presidential Election, we find that diffusion of information on Twitter is largely ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[26]
EU referendum: Fishing for Leave group launches - BBC News
May 20, 2016 · Fishermen in the north east of Scotland launch their campaign for the UK to leave the European Union.Missing: grassroots | Show results with:grassroots
[27]
Eight reasons Leave won the UK's referendum on the EU - BBC News
Jun 24, 2016 · The UK has voted to quit the European Union following a referendum on its membership. So how did the Leave campaign win?Missing: date | Show results with:date
[28]
Campaign to quit the EU intensifies: Grassroots Out unite with Ukip ...
Feb 16, 2016 · THE CRUSADE for Britain to quit the EU took another leap forward last night when a new united cross-party 'out' campaign group was unveiled.Missing: local | Show results with:local
[29]
EU referendum: Grassroots Out brings 'a hint of the Trump' to middle ...
Feb 15, 2016 · “This is middle England,” said Philip Hollobone MP as he marched his anti-European Union canvassers through historic Rothwell in ...Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
[30]
Fishing For Leave fails to register its accounts - The National
Jul 25, 2018 · BREXIT campaigners Fishing for Leave risk being struck off after failing to file any accounts.
[31]
EU referendum: The result in maps and charts - BBC News
Jun 8, 2021 · The Leave campaign triumphed right across England and Wales, winning in large northern cities including Sheffield, the Welsh valleys, across the Midlands ...
[32]
Investigation into payments made to Better for the Country and ...
Nov 1, 2018 · The National Crime Agency, after its own investigation, has (i) concluded that there is no evidence that any criminal offences have been ...Missing: million | Show results with:million
[33]
Brexit: 'No evidence' of crimes by Leave.EU and Arron Banks - BBC
Sep 24, 2019 · The National Crime Agency has found "no evidence" of criminal offences after allegations against Leave.EU and its founder Arron Banks.Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[34]
Arron Banks company provided £12m of services to Leave. EU
May 9, 2018 · A business associate of Banks said the services were provided prior to the referendum spending cap taking effect in April 2016, and therefore ...Missing: early milestones<|separator|>
[35]
Anti-EU Campaign Has Already Spent At Least ... - BuzzFeed
Dec 10, 2015 · The Leave.EU campaign group has already spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on Facebook advertising ahead of the forthcoming EU referendum, ...
[36]
Campaign spending at the EU referendum | Electoral Commission
Jul 29, 2019 · Altogether, the 123 campaigners reported spending £32,642,158 on campaigning at the referendum. Remain: £19,309,588; Leave: £13,332,569. View ...
[37]
Brexit group Leave.EU fined for breaking referendum spending rules
May 11, 2018 · One of the main Brexit campaign groups in Britain's 2016 EU referendum was fined 70000 pounds ($95000) on Friday by the Electoral Commission ...
[38]
Arron Banks: self-styled bad boy and bankroller of Brexit
Jun 10, 2018 · The Bristol-based businessman, who is worth anything between £100m and £250m, gave a reported £12m in cash, loans and services to pro-Brexit ...
[39]
Arron Banks: 'Brexit was a war. We won. There's no turning back now'
Apr 2, 2017 · Now out of Ukip – the party he bankrolled – Arron Banks is creating a political movement of his own. We met the 'bad boy of Brexit' just ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
[40]
How did Arron Banks afford Brexit? - openDemocracy
Oct 19, 2017 · In September 2013, the man who bought Brexit – Arron Banks – was in trouble. ... 1 million pledge to the United Kingdom Independence Party.
[41]
UKIP's Nigel Farage: I support both EU 'Out' campaigns - BBC News
Oct 11, 2015 · Mr Farage has previously said UKIP will stand "hand in hand" with the Leave.EU group - launched at UKIP's conference and funded by party donor ...
[42]
Arron Banks gave '£450000 funding to Nigel Farage after Brexit vote'
May 16, 2019 · Tycoon provided Farage with Chelsea home, car and money to promote him in US, Channel 4 News claims.
[43]
Why Britain really voted to leave the European Union
Using a decade's worth of survey data to determine why Britain voted for Brexit. Tagged under. Economy, business, politics and society. Global perspectives and ...
[44]
Leave.EU founder confirms he funded Nigel Farage in year ... - BBC
May 17, 2019 · Nigel Farage received £450,000 from the founder of pro-Brexit group Leave.EU in the year after the Brexit referendum.
[45]
EU gives Nigel Farage 24 hours to explain Arron Banks funds
Jun 4, 2019 · Nigel Farage has been given 24 hours by the European parliament to explain in person his failure to declare lavish expenses funded by Arron Banks.
[46]
UK net payments to EU fall to four-year low in 2016 - ONS | Reuters
Oct 31, 2017 · Britain's net annual payment to the European Union budget fell to a four-year low last year of 9.4 billion pounds, down from 10.5 billion ...
[47]
The UK contribution to the EU budget - Office for National Statistics
Sep 30, 2019 · The financial relationship between the UK and the European Union (EU) continues to be a talking point. In 2018 the government spent £864.9 ...
[48]
Electoral Commission designates 'Vote Leave Ltd' and 'The In ...
Apr 13, 2016 · The Electoral Commission has today designated the two lead campaigners at the EU Referendum – designating 'The In Campaign Ltd' to be the lead campaigner for ...Missing: rejection | Show results with:rejection
[49]
Vote Leave named as official Brexit campaign in EU referendum
Apr 13, 2016 · Electoral Commission chooses group fronted by Michael Gove and Boris Johnson over Nigel Farage-backed Grassroots Out.
[50]
EU referendum poll tracker - BBC News
Jun 22, 2016 · Follow the opinion polls in the run up to the UK referendum on EU membership on 23 June.
[51]
Vote Leave's targeted Brexit ads released by Facebook - BBC
Jul 26, 2018 · The social media ads that helped Vote Leave win the EU referendum are published in full for the first time.
[52]
Arron Banks investigated over £8m given to the Brexit campaign
Nov 7, 2018 · Brexit campaigner Arron Banks faces a criminal inquiry for £8m of funds he donated to the Leave campaign.
[53]
Analysis of the EU Referendum results 2016 - Commons Library
Jun 29, 2016 · This House of Commons Library Briefing Paper analyses the results of the referendum on EU membership held on 23 June 2016. The highest vote ...
[54]
https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/243009/Report-on-Investigation-Leave.EU.pdf
[55]
Vote Leave fined and referred to the police for breaking electoral law
Jul 17, 2018 · The Commission's investigation found significant evidence of joint working between the lead campaigner, Vote Leave and another campaign ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[56]
Leave. EU fined £70000 over breaches of electoral law - The Guardian
May 11, 2018 · The investigation found that Leave.EU, which was co-founded by Arron Banks, unlawfully exceeded its statutory spending limit by at least 10% and ...
[57]
[PDF] Investigation into the use of data analytics in political campaigns
Nov 6, 2018 · More than one million emails were sent to Leave.EU subscribers over two separate periods which also included marketing for GoSkippy services,.
[58]
Cambridge Analytica did not misuse data in EU referendum, says ...
Oct 7, 2020 · As part of its investigations the ICO also handed down a £500,000 fine to Facebook and smaller penalties to both Vote Leave and Leave.EU.Missing: allegations outcome
[59]
Leave.EU donor Arron Banks loses data breach appeal
Feb 14, 2021 · ... Aaron Banks 'writes off £7m loan' as Leave.EU goes into liquidation. 3 Sept 2022. Leave.EU and Arron Banks insurance firm fined £120,000 for ...Missing: write | Show results with:write
[60]
Brexit backer's insurance firm and leave campaign fined £120k by ...
served under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, which governs electronic marketing — total £120,000 (~$157k); ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
[61]
[PDF] Appeal numbers: EA/2019/ 0054-0059
Mar 3, 2020 · (ii) Appeal number EA/ 2019/0056 (Monetary Penalty Notice, £45,000. Leave.EU) is dismissed. (iii) Appeal number EA/ 2019/0057 (Monetary Penalty ...
[62]
Thousands of Brexit-related websites taken offline by EU
Jan 5, 2022 · Thousands of Brexit-related websites taken offline by EU – including Leave.eu. Around 48,000 domain names revoked. Adam Forrest. Wednesday 05 ...
[63]
EUR-Lex - 32002R0733 - EN - European Union
(17) Domain names should not be revoked arbitrarily. A revocation may, however, be obtained in particular should a domain name be manifestly contrary to public ...Missing: Leave. | Show results with:Leave.
[64]
Nearly 50,000 British .eu websites taken down in final Brexit stages
May 1, 2022 · Over 48,000 British-held EU Internet domain names - including one owned by the Leave campaign - were taken offline indefinitely on Monday in the ...
[65]
'Hypocrisy' allegation after Brexit campaign group switches ...
Jan 7, 2021 · Brexit campaign group Leave.eu has moved its internet registration to the Republic of Ireland in order to be able to keep its .eu suffix after ...
[66]
'Internexit' for Leave.EU as domain name temporarily suspended
Jan 15, 2021 · Leave.EU has been forced to “Internexit” after the group's EU domain name was temporarily suspended. It comes after the Irish businessman in ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
[67]
Arron Banks loses libel action against reporter Carole Cadwalladr
Jun 13, 2022 · Judge rules Guardian journalist successfully established public interest defence under Defamation Act.
[68]
UK: Journalist's victory in libel case endorses media freedom
Jun 13, 2022 · The High Court in London has dismissed the claim that journalist Carole Cadwalladr defamed businessman and pro-Brexit campaign founder Arron Banks.
[69]
Theresa May secures backing from cabinet for 'soft Brexit' - Al Jazeera
Jul 7, 2018 · British Prime Minister Theresa May has secured approval from her cabinet to negotiate “a business-friendly” deal to leave the European Union ...
[70]
Brexit bankroller Arron Banks, Cambridge Analytica and Steve Bannon
Nov 17, 2018 · On Twitter, Banks's Leave.EU campaign has declared “May must go! ... Arron Banks denies claims that he may have received Russian money for Brexit.<|separator|>
[71]
Brexit: Theresa May 'determined' to leave EU in March - BBC
Feb 3, 2019 · The UK is due to leave the EU at 23:00 GMT on Friday 29 March, when the two-year time limit on withdrawal negotiations enforced by the Article ...
[72]
Theresa May says Britain can still leave EU on 29 March | Brexit ...
Theresa May says Britain can still leave EU on 29 March ... withdrawal agreement does not pass. “Our absolute ... backstop to prevent the UK being locked ...
[73]
Nine years after the EU referendum, where does public opinion ...
Jun 19, 2025 · 23 June marks nine years since the UK voted to leave the European Union. YouGov polling has long since shown that the public are 'Bregretful' ...
[74]
Brexit: MPs reject Theresa May's deal for a second time - BBC
Mar 12, 2019 · Theresa May's EU withdrawal deal has been rejected by MPs by an overwhelming majority for a second time, with just 17 days to go to Brexit.
[75]
Theresa May resigns over Brexit chaos - Atlantic Council
May 24, 2019 · Having taken office less than one month after the UK voted to leave the EU, May will now leave almost three years later with that very exit ...<|separator|>
[76]
Richard Tice - Brexit Witness Archive - UK in a changing Europe
Richard Tice on his work on the 'Leave.EU' campaign, launching the Brexit Party, and why his party chose to stand down in Conservative-held seats in the ...
[77]
European elections 2019: Brexit Party dominates as Tories ... - BBC
May 27, 2019 · The Brexit Party was the clear winner in the UK's European elections, while the pro-EU Lib Dems came second. The Conservatives and Labour suffered heavy losses.
[78]
Election 2019: Arron Banks tells Leavers to ditch Nigel Farage and ...
Nov 11, 2019 · Nigel Farage is under pressure to pull out of hundreds of seats at the general election after a former ally told voters in three key Leave ...
[79]
Brexit party will not contest 317 Tory-won seats, Farage says
Nov 11, 2019 · Nigel Farage has said the Brexit party will not field any candidates against the Conservatives in the 317 seats they won at the last general election.
[80]
Brexit: MPs pass withdrawal agreement bill by 124 majority
Dec 20, 2019 · Bill passes second reading by 358 votes to 234 leaving UK on course to leave EU by end of January.
[81]
Nigel Farage at odds with Leave.EU, as Arron Banks backs Brexit deal
Oct 18, 2019 · Nigel Farage at odds with Leave.EU, as Arron Banks backs Brexit deal ... The full-throated support is in stark contrast to Brexit Party ...
[82]
Leave.EU goes into liquidation owing co-founder Arron Banks £7m
Aug 31, 2022 · Pro-Brexit lobby group Leave.EU has gone into liquidation with debts of more than £7m, documents submitted to Companies House show.
[83]
Leave.EU goes into liquidation, leaving debt to data regulator
Sep 1, 2022 · Pro-Brexit group Leave.EU has gone into liquidation with debts of over £7m, including to the data regulator for fines over its use of data.Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
[84]
Brexit: What you need to know about the UK leaving the EU - BBC
Dec 30, 2020 · The UK voted to leave the EU in 2016 and officially left the trading bloc - its nearest and biggest trading partner - on 31 January 2020.<|control11|><|separator|>
[85]
Brexit: The first major casualty of digital democracy | Brookings
Jun 29, 2016 · Arguably, Brexit represents the first major casualty of the ascent of digital democracy over representative democracy.
[86]
Building the Brexit party: how Nigel Farage copied Italy's digital ...
May 21, 2019 · The former Ukip leader forged an alliance with the Five Star Movement just as they bulldozed Italian politics using a tightly controlled digital operation.
[87]
Inside out: The UK press, Brexit and strategic populist ventriloquism
Aug 24, 2020 · In this article, we examine how and to what extent political populism was used to frame the official 'Leave' campaign that preceded the EU ...
[88]
Brexit and the 2019 General Election - OpenEdition Journals
One claims that electoral behaviour was largely driven by views about whether the UK should deliver on the vote of the 2016 referendum to leave the EU.
[89]
2019 election - Brexit reshapes party support
Dec 19, 2019 · Folliwng the 2019 election, Sir John Curtice looks at the shift in support for the various political parties and how it was shaped by ...
[90]
Volatility, Realignment, and Electoral Shocks: Brexit and the UK ...
Aug 10, 2023 · The 2019 election marked a victory for the Leave side of the Brexit debate, putting to rest questions of a second referendum and any chance of Parliament ...
[91]
[PDF] The Benefits of Brexit: How the UK is taking advantage of leaving the ...
Jan 4, 2022 · A future in which we don't sit passively outside the. European Union but seize the incredible opportunities that our freedom presents and use ...
[92]
Post-Brexit Trade: Opportunities and Risks for Companies ...
Oct 2, 2025 · Greater freedom to negotiate trade deals and access new markets · Growth in non-EU trade · Regulatory autonomy and potential innovation · Strong ...
[93]
UK Public Opinion toward Immigration: Overall Attitudes and Level ...
Jan 24, 2025 · Overall views are divided in Britain. In April 2023, 52% thought that immigration numbers should be reduced. The level of opposition varies by ...
[94]
Immigration becomes voters' top issue for first time since Brexit
Sep 10, 2025 · In the most recent YouGov poll, 58% picked immigration as one of the three top issues facing the country at the moment, while 51% pointed to ...
[95]
Five key impacts of Brexit five years on - BBC
Jan 30, 2025 · So the net fiscal benefit to the UK from not paying into the EU Budget is closer to to £9bn per year, although this figure is inherently ...