Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lexmark

Lexmark International, Inc. is an American technology company specializing in laser printers, multifunction devices, and related solutions, with a focus on and managed print services. Headquartered in , it operates globally, providing hardware, cloud-enabled technologies, and services designed to optimize document workflows and reduce operational costs for businesses. Founded on March 27, 1991, Lexmark emerged from a of IBM's printer and divisions, enabling it to pursue independent innovation in printing technologies amid intensifying market competition. Over three decades, the company has achieved recognition for reliable hardware, sustainability initiatives—such as recycling and energy-efficient products—and awards in managed print services, while expanding into solutions. Lexmark's business model, however, has been marked by aggressive intellectual property enforcement, including multiple U.S. cases challenging third-party of its cartridges, where the company argued against patent exhaustion to restrict reuse and resale, ultimately losing key rulings that affirmed buyers' rights to refurbish and redistribute patented items post-sale. In December 2024, Corporation acquired Lexmark for $1.5 billion, integrating its portfolio to strengthen offerings in print management and amid industry consolidation.

History

Founding and Separation from IBM (1991–1995)

Lexmark International, Inc. was established on March 27, 1991, through a leveraged buyout of IBM's Information Products Corporation division by the private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R). This division, headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, encompassed IBM's typewriter, personal printer, keyboard, and related peripherals operations, which generated approximately $1.6 billion in annual revenue prior to the transaction. The sale, valued at $1.5 billion, represented IBM's strategic divestiture amid broader efforts under CEO John Akers to refocus on core computing businesses by shedding non-core units, including this peripherals segment previously seen as a low-growth "backwater." IBM retained a minority equity stake of about 10% in the new entity as part of the deal structure. The name "Lexmark" derived from "lexicon" (referring to language and printing) and "mark" (evoking marks on paper), signaling the company's emphasis on output technologies. CD&R installed operational leadership to drive turnaround, including Marvin J. Folkerts Jr. as president and CEO, who oversaw cost reductions such as trimming the workforce by one-third to around 4,000 employees by 1993. Under private ownership, Lexmark maintained manufacturing at the Lexington facility transferred from IBM and continued producing IBM-branded products under licensing agreements that extended IBM brand usage rights through 1996. In July 1991, the company announced its initial product releases post-spin-off, including the IBM Personal Printer Series II and IBM 4226 dot-matrix printer, reflecting the transitional reliance on IBM's established market channels. The separation process emphasized gradual rebranding to minimize disruption, with Lexmark investing in independent product development while phasing out IBM co-branding. By October 1994, Lexmark introduced the Optra series of laser printers, marking the first major line marketed exclusively under its own brand without IBM logos. This culminated at the end of 1994, when the IBM logo was fully removed from all products, completing the operational and visual separation from its parent and establishing Lexmark as an autonomous entity focused on printers and imaging. These steps positioned for its on the in 1995, though the core divestiture and independence were achieved by late 1994.

Growth as Independent Public Company (1995–2016)

Lexmark completed its on November 15, 1995, listing Class A on the under the LXK. The shares were offered at $20 each and closed the first day at $21.625, reflecting an 8% gain amid trading volume of 5.85 million shares. This IPO marked the full transition from its origins, with revenues reaching approximately $2.16 billion for fiscal 1995, driven primarily by printer sales comprising about 70% of total revenue. In the late , Lexmark expanded its product portfolio through innovations in laser and technologies. The company launched the Medley in 1995, the industry's first multifunction device combining printing, faxing, copying, and scanning with color capabilities. By 1999, Lexmark introduced Managed Print Services, offering comprehensive printer fleet management, alongside its first dedicated Lexmark-branded devices, and debuted six new corporate-targeted laser printers under the Optra line. These developments supported revenue growth and international expansion, with sales outside the U.S. increasing as the company established subsidiaries and manufacturing in regions like the following earlier acquisitions such as Lasers. During the 2000s, Lexmark diversified beyond hardware into software and services to counter intensifying competition in commoditized printing markets. In 1995, it released MarkVision, a pioneering for and maintenance. The firm pursued strategic acquisitions, including Perceptive Software in May 2010 for $280 million, enhancing its and capabilities. This shift emphasized higher-margin solutions, with becoming a growth driver; by fiscal 2015, non-GAAP operating margins in that segment exceeded 24% in the fourth quarter. Revenues grew to over $3.5 billion by 2015, with 56% derived from markets, though the company faced headwinds from declining demand and fluctuations, resulting in a 4% year-over-year drop that year. Lexmark's public tenure ended in 2016 when it agreed to a $3.6 billion all-cash by a led by Technology and PAG Asia Capital at $40.50 per share, delisting from the NYSE after two decades of operations as an independent entity.

Private Ownership and Xerox Acquisition (2016–present)

In November 2016, Lexmark International completed its transition to private ownership following an acquisition by a consortium of investors led by China's Ninestar Corporation (formerly Apex Technology), along with PAG Asia Capital and Legend Capital. The deal, announced on April 19, 2016, valued Lexmark at approximately $3.6 billion in an all-cash transaction at $40.50 per share, representing a 30% premium over the prior closing price. The acquisition, which received regulatory approvals including from the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), delisted Lexmark from the New York Stock Exchange and maintained its headquarters and primary operations in Lexington, Kentucky, with no immediate changes to its workforce or product strategy reported. Under private ownership from 2016 to 2025, Lexmark operated independently, emphasizing its imaging solutions, cloud-enabled , and services amid a shifting market for and . The consortium's investment supported continued innovation in printers and managed print services, though specific financial performance details remained undisclosed due to its private status. Ninestar, a major shareholder focused on technology and production, influenced alignments, including enhanced partnerships for compatible , while Lexmark retained its U.S.-based and R&D capabilities. On July 1, 2025, Holdings Corporation completed its acquisition of Lexmark from the Ninestar-led consortium for $1.5 billion, inclusive of net debt and assumed liabilities. The transaction, announced on December 23, 2024, aimed to consolidate 's position in enterprise printing by integrating Lexmark's and software , with expected synergies in global sales and service delivery. Post-acquisition, Lexmark operates as a of , preserving its headquarters and focusing on combined offerings for document management and intelligent automation.

Products and Technologies

Printer Hardware and Imaging Devices

Lexmark primarily manufactures -based printer and multifunction peripherals (MFPs) designed for small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprise environments, emphasizing reliability, high-volume output, and integration with services. Their portfolio includes and color printers, as well as MFPs capable of , scanning, , and faxing, with models supporting speeds up to 55 pages per minute (ppm) and monthly duties exceeding 200,000 pages for enterprise units. Devices feature automatic duplexing, connectivity, and compatibility, targeting workgroups with print volumes from 10,000 to 100,000 pages monthly. Key product series include the 5- and 6-series for mid-to-large workgroups, offering models like the MX532adwe MFP (46 , with scanning and faxing) and CS531dw color printer, and the newer 9-series MFPs such as the CX950se and MX953se, which incorporate cloud-powered maintenance, intuitive touch panels, and one-handed replacement for reduced downtime. These series prioritize and media versatility, handling substrates up to size and various finishes. For SMBs, compact models like the MC3224dwe provide color all-in-one functionality with automatic two-sided and faxing in a space-saving . In imaging devices, Lexmark integrates scanning capabilities into MFPs via automatic document feeders (ADFs) supporting up to 100 sheets and high-resolution capture, often enhanced by software for workflow automation and (OCR). Options like the 6500e MFP kit add scanning, copying, and a 10.2-inch to compatible printers, enabling fast . Enterprise MFPs, such as the MX331adn, include single-pass scanning and support for protocols like for integration with document management systems. Lexmark's hardware innovations focus on IoT-enabled , AI-driven print optimization, and , including recyclable components and low-energy systems to minimize environmental impact while ensuring consistent image quality. These features, powered by sensors, allow remote monitoring and automated alerts, extending device longevity in high-demand settings.

Consumables and Supplies

Lexmark's consumables primarily consist of cartridges for its printers and cartridges for inkjet models, with an emphasis on genuine supplies designed to optimize printer performance, image quality, and reliability. cartridges utilize Lexmark Unison , a formulation introduced in 2012 that incorporates low-friction particles to facilitate efficient flow, reduce internal component wear, and support a multi-piece print system separating from the unit and fuser for extended longevity. This technology enables consistent output with rich blacks, smooth grays, and vibrant colors, calibrated for compatibility with the color system on select devices, while eliminating the need for manual shaking even at low fill levels. Unison Toner also prioritizes , achieving up to a 46% smaller per page compared to Lexmark's largest competitor based on a 2012 lifecycle analysis, alongside over one-third reduction in energy consumption during printing. Cartridges are available in standard, high-, and extra high-yield variants to minimize replacement frequency and resource use, with yields ranging from approximately 3,000 pages for color sets in compact models to 20,000 pages for black in high-volume units, measured at 5% coverage. Lexmark promotes these through its Return Program, where participating cartridges are licensed for single use only, ceasing operation after delivering a predetermined to encourage via an award-winning collection initiative. Ink cartridges support Lexmark's legacy inkjet printers, such as the X-series, providing standard yields like 200 pages for black models, though production has shifted toward laser-focused with higher page outputs and durability. Genuine supplies include verification codes for authenticity checks, protecting against counterfeits that may degrade print quality or damage . Overall, these integrate with Lexmark's printers to lower cost per page via higher yields and efficiency, while maintaining warranty coverage exclusive to original products.

Software, Services, and Solutions

Lexmark develops software solutions focused on document capture and workflow automation, enabling the conversion of physical documents into digital formats to streamline processes and lower costs. Downloadable applications for its printers and multifunction products (MFPs) extend functionality, integrating features like enhanced scanning and to support enterprise operations. The company's cloud-based offerings include Lexmark Cloud Services, which reduce on-premises infrastructure needs through tools such as for remote device monitoring, for tracking and optimizing print usage, and for secure integration with existing systems. The provides for capturing, , and routing documents across various formats. Lexmark's Managed Print Services () deliver comprehensive oversight of printing environments, emphasizing cost control, security enhancements, and by minimizing waste and infrastructure complexity. In evaluations by analyst firm Quocirca, Lexmark has been positioned as a leader in MPS for 2023 and 2024, citing its capabilities in distributed workplace management. Specific tools like MarkVision Enterprise enable centralized administration of device fleets, allowing administrators to configure settings, apply updates, and implement protocols across networks. Lexmark also partners with third-party software providers to create tailored solutions addressing unique workflow inefficiencies, such as integration for mobile printing and secure data handling. These offerings incorporate , including reduced paper consumption via digital alternatives.

Business Model and Economics

Razor-and-Blades Approach

Lexmark has historically relied on the razor-and-blades pricing strategy, selling printers at low margins or below cost to stimulate demand while generating the majority of profits from proprietary consumables like inkjet cartridges and toner supplies. This approach, adapted from Gillette's model for razors and blades, positions the durable hardware as a "razor" to lock in customers for repeated purchases of high-margin "blades," with ink cartridges often priced at premiums exceeding $13 to $75 per ounce in equivalent costs. The strategy's effectiveness for Lexmark stems from technological integrations, such as chips in cartridges that communicate with printers to enforce and track usage, ensuring recapture over the device's lifecycle. In practice, this has meant subsidizing printer sales to capture in both and segments, where consumables accounted for a significant portion of gross margins—often over 50% in industry analogs—despite vulnerabilities to third-party generics that undercut OEM pricing by up to 30%. Over time, Lexmark refined the model by bundling initial cartridges with printers to accelerate adoption, particularly in inkjet markets, while facing profitability pressures from refurbished and compatible alternatives that reduced supplies revenue growth. By the mid-2000s, this dynamic contributed to revenue declines when generic penetration rose, prompting strategic shifts toward managed print services to bolster recurring consumables income.

Revenue Dynamics and Profit Drivers

Lexmark's revenue is predominantly generated through its imaging solutions, encompassing hardware sales (printers and multifunction devices), (toner cartridges, ink, and related supplies), and ancillary services such as managed print services (MPS) and software solutions. In 2015, the final year of , total revenue reached $3,551.2 million, with comprising approximately 60% of the total, reflecting their role as a high-volume, recurring tied to the company's installed base of devices. Hardware sales, which include printers and multifunction products, constituted a smaller portion and were subject to greater volatility due to competitive pricing pressures and cyclical demand, while services and software provided growing but marginal contributions through enterprise-focused offerings like document management and workflow automation. Profitability is heavily driven by the disparity in gross margins between product categories, with yielding significantly higher margins than due to lower costs relative to and the absence of intense end-user in replacement parts. This structure aligns with the industry's razor-and-blades model, where is often priced at or near cost to stimulate initial purchases and subsequent consumption; management discussions in financial filings emphasized supplies as the core profit engine, supported by efforts to expand the device base via high-end enterprise placements and MPS contracts that ensure predictable replenishment. Currency fluctuations and shifts toward services annuity streams have influenced margins, but ' recurring nature has historically buffered against downturns, as evidenced by supplies growth offsetting declines in printer shipments during periods of weak . Post-privatization in and amid a strategic pivot away from consumer inkjet markets toward , revenue dynamics have emphasized business segment stability over consumer volatility, with supplies revenue continuing to underpin profitability even as overall hardware volumes stabilized around 1.8 million laser units annually. Analyst estimates during the period projected sharper declines in hardware revenue compared to supplies, highlighting the latter's resilience from sustained print volumes in office environments. Following Xerox's acquisition of Lexmark's assets in late , integration efforts aim to leverage combined strengths in supplies and services for enhanced margins, though detailed breakdowns remain limited due to private status; nonetheless, the consumables-centric model persists as the primary driver of operating income.

Operations and Global Reach

Manufacturing and Supply Chain

Lexmark's primary manufacturing facilities are located in Boulder, Colorado, and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. The Boulder site focuses on processing toner and photoconductor drums used in laser print cartridges. The Juárez facility handles assembly and production of printers and supplies, incorporating imported components such as printer transports and printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs) from China, along with developing units, imaging units, and toner cartridges added during Mexican operations. The company sources hardware and supplies for the market from , while the Mexico plant produces for , , and other regions, reflecting a to regional assembly for cost efficiency and considerations. However, U.S. and Border Protection has ruled that certain Mexico-assembled printer models, due to substantial Chinese-origin components exceeding value thresholds, retain as the , impacting labeling and trade classifications as of rulings in 2023 and 2024. Lexmark operates 125 manufacturing and distribution facilities worldwide, distributed across 16 countries following its acquisition by on December 23, 2024, enabling support for customers in over 170 countries. In January 2024, Lexmark opened a 1 million-square-foot in , managed by , to enhance U.S. fulfillment and delivery capabilities for products. The emphasizes contract manufacturing for printers and paper-handling devices, with close collaboration among suppliers to promote environmental and social standards, including policies against forced and child labor. Lexmark developed an internal visibility tool in 2024 to proactively detect potential disruptions by integrating operational data across its global network. This approach addresses complexities from component sourcing in and final assembly in the Americas, amid ongoing challenges like labor disputes at the Juárez plant, where workers sought pay increases in leading to dismissals.

Workforce, Headquarters, and Organizational Structure

Lexmark International, Inc. maintains its global headquarters at 740 West New Circle Road in , . This facility serves as the central hub for executive leadership, , and shared services operations. As of 2024, Lexmark employed approximately 7,792 people worldwide, with about 1,555 based . The workforce spans manufacturing, engineering, sales, and administrative roles, with significant concentrations in , , and . Following Xerox's full acquisition of Lexmark in July 2025 for $1.5 billion, integration efforts have included workforce reductions to streamline operations and eliminate redundancies across the combined entity. Prior to the acquisition, Lexmark operated under a traditional corporate structure led by President and Allen Waugerman, who assumed the role in May 2019. Key executives included Senior and Chuck Butler, responsible for financial strategy and operations, and Senior and Chief Product Delivery Officer Billy Spears, overseeing product development and . The company was governed by a U.S.-based comprising experts and former officials. Post-acquisition, Lexmark's operations have been integrated into Xerox's broader organizational framework, with Butler and Spears joining Xerox's executive committee to facilitate alignment in print solutions and divisions. This shift emphasizes functional silos for , software, and services while retaining specialized teams for Lexmark's technologies.

Legal and Intellectual Property Disputes

Static Control Components Litigation

In 2002, Lexmark International, Inc. initiated litigation against Static Control Components, Inc. (SCC) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of , alleging that SCC's microchips violated the and the (DMCA). Lexmark marketed its laser printers at low prices while relying on proprietary toner cartridges with embedded microchips to prevent use of refilled or compatible third-party cartridges, enforcing a "razor-and-blades" model. SCC manufactured replacement microchips that replicated Lexmark's to enable remanufacturers to produce compatible cartridges, prompting Lexmark's claims that this infringed copyrights on the chip and circumvented technological measures controlling to the printers' software. The district granted Lexmark a preliminary , finding likely success on the merits for both and DMCA claims. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the in 2004, holding that portions of Lexmark's microchip software lacked sufficient originality for protection and that SCC's actions did not violate the DMCA's provisions, as they were necessary for functional rather than infringing access. SCC counterclaimed under 43(a) of the (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), asserting that Lexmark's preemptive letters to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and packaging notices falsely advertised that third-party cartridges like those enabled by SCC were illegal and incompatible, causing SCC lost sales and reputational harm estimated in the millions. The district court dismissed this in 2011, applying a narrow "prudential standing" test that limited suits to direct competitors within the "zone of interests," deeming SCC an indirect competitor insufficiently proximate. The Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal in 2012, adopting a broader zone-of-interests analysis and finding SCC's alleged commercial injuries proximately caused by Lexmark's statements sufficient for standing. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in 2013 to resolve a circuit split on Lanham Act standing and unanimously affirmed in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014), in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia issued on March 25, 2014. The Court rejected categorical direct-competitor rules, instead requiring that the plaintiff's injuries be proximately caused by the defendant's false advertising and fall within the Lanham Act's protective zone for commercial interests in sales and business reputation, without extending to incidental harms. It held SCC plausibly alleged such injuries, remanding for merits determination while clarifying that statutory standing turns on statutory interpretation rather than rigid prudential doctrines. Post-remand, the parties settled remaining claims in , with no admission of liability by either side, effectively resolving the dispute without a trial on the counterclaim. The litigation highlighted tensions between protections and competition in printer consumables markets, influencing subsequent DMCA defenses for interoperability and broadening enforcement against anticompetitive advertising. Parallel claims by Lexmark against SCC, filed in 2003 and involving four patents on printer components, proceeded separately; a found no induced infringement by SCC in 2007, and the Federal Circuit affirmed in 2009.

Impression Products Supreme Court Case

In 2004, Lexmark International, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Impression Products, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of , claiming that Impression infringed Lexmark's patents by acquiring empty toner cartridges, refurbishing them through refilling and part replacement, and reselling them in the United States without Lexmark's authorization. Lexmark's patents covered features of its cartridges designed for use in its printers, and the company enforced a "single-use" policy, particularly for its discounted "Return Program" cartridges, which buyers agreed to use only once and return to Lexmark for , with notices printed on packaging prohibiting refill or resale. Impression sourced cartridges from two channels: those originally sold domestically by Lexmark and empties purchased abroad (where Lexmark imposed similar single-use restrictions) before being imported, refurbished, and marketed in the U.S. at lower prices. The district court granted to Impression on the domestically sold cartridges, holding that Lexmark's U.S. sales exhausted its rights under the of patent exhaustion, which prevents patentees from controlling post-sale use of items after an authorized first sale. However, it permitted Lexmark's claims regarding foreign-sold cartridges to proceed, ruling that exhaustion does not apply to items first sold outside the U.S. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in 2016, holding that a patentee could retain rights through clearly communicated restrictions on conditional sales (domestic or foreign), and that foreign sales do not exhaust U.S. rights, allowing Lexmark to sue for unauthorized importation and resale. Impression petitioned for , which the granted in June 2016 to resolve whether post-sale restrictions or foreign sales affect patent exhaustion. Oral arguments occurred on March 21, 2017, focusing on the scope of the exhaustion doctrine established in cases like Quia Jadwyn Corp. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (1968), which limits patentees' control after an authorized sale to promote free alienability of goods. On May 30, 2017, the reversed the Federal Circuit in an opinion by Chief Justice , joined by Justices Kennedy, , Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, holding unanimously that a patentee's domestic sale exhausts all rights in the item, regardless of post-sale restrictions or notices, as exhaustion is a strict limit on , not overridden by contract-like conditions enforceable only via state remedies like of . For foreign sales, the majority extended exhaustion globally, ruling that an authorized sale abroad without reservation of rights depletes U.S. protections upon importation, rejecting the Federal Circuit's territorial limit and aligning with international exhaustion principles to avoid rewarding patentees for foreign sales while claiming downstream U.S. control. Justice Ginsburg concurred in the judgment on domestic sales but dissented in part on foreign sales, arguing that U.S. does not automatically exhaust rights for items sold abroad under foreign , though she agreed the case's foreign cartridges bore no enforceable U.S.-specific restrictions warranting infringement liability. The decision remanded the case for further proceedings but effectively barred Lexmark from using law to enforce its single-use policies against refurbishers like Impression, shifting reliance to contractual remedies or other statutes like the , which Lexmark had pursued in parallel litigation. This outcome undermined aspects of Lexmark's razor-and-blades model, where low-cost printers drove high-margin cartridge sales, by facilitating a for remanufactured products estimated to capture 20-30% of the U.S. volume by enabling competitors to refurbish without barriers. The ruling reinforced first-sale principles across , impacting not only printers but industries reliant on consumables with usage restrictions, though it preserved patentees' ability to avoid exhaustion via licensing rather than outright sales.

Other Patent and DMCA Challenges

In addition to the prominent litigations against Static Control Components and Impression Products, Lexmark International initiated suits against multiple third-party remanufacturers for activities involving the refilling, modification, and resale of its cartridges. In March 2010, Lexmark filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of against Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC, and affiliated entities, asserting claims of direct infringement, induced infringement, and contributory infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)-(c) for s including U.S. Patent Nos. 5,615,012, 5,625,749, and others related to cartridge microchip and containment. The suit alleged that defendants acquired spent Lexmark cartridges, replaced depleted components, reprogrammed or bypassed embedded to enable printer compatibility, and marketed the remanufactured products domestically and internationally, thereby exploiting Lexmark's patented technologies without license. These proceedings paralleled the broader 2010 campaign against remanufacturers, where Lexmark sought injunctions and damages to enforce post-sale restrictions on cartridge reuse, arguing that such practices extended beyond the scope of patent exhaustion for items sold with explicit single-use conditions. The district court granted partial dismissals, including for certain defendants like Impression Products on domestic sales claims due to exhaustion doctrine applications, though foreign resale claims proceeded initially before higher court reversals influenced outcomes. Several cases, including aspects involving Ink Technologies, resulted in settlements or voluntary dismissals without public admission of liability, reflecting Lexmark's strategy to deter aftermarket competition through cumulative enforcement actions. Regarding DMCA claims, Lexmark's invocations beyond the Static Control dispute were limited and largely unsuccessful or unlitigated as standalone actions; attempts to apply provisions (17 U.S.C. § 1201) to analogous chip-bypassing by other suppliers typically folded into or contract disputes rather than yielding separate federal challenges. No major independent DMCA litigations against distinct remanufacturers were reported post-2004, as courts' rejection of Lexmark's expansive DMCA interpretations in the core precedent constrained further aggressive filings under that statute.

Controversies and Criticisms

Cartridge Lock-in and Compatibility Issues

Lexmark printers incorporate microchips embedded in genuine cartridges that communicate with the printer's via a sequence to verify and enable operation. Third-party or remanufactured cartridges lacking identical chips trigger error messages, such as "32 Unsupported Print Cartridge" on models like the T644 or "32.52 Replace Unsupported Cartridge" on MS810/MS811 series, halting printing until an OEM cartridge is installed. These mechanisms, introduced in the early , aim to prevent use of potentially inferior supplies that could damage printers or produce substandard output, according to Lexmark. Firmware updates frequently intensify lock-in by updating authentication protocols, rendering compatible third-party cartridges obsolete post-installation. For example, Lexmark's LW71.xx.P025 update or later for MX711 models produces a 32.49 Unsupported Cartridge error specifically after upgrading, while a June 1, 2023, update for CX421 printers explicitly blocked remanufactured supplies. Users attempting workarounds, such as downgrading firmware or resetting via button combinations (e.g., holding 2+6 during power-on for some models), often face limited success due to Lexmark's advanced protective measures designed to disable printers upon detecting unauthorized cartridges. This has drawn criticism for increasing operational costs, as third-party cartridges can cost 50-70% less than OEM equivalents, forcing consumers and businesses into dependency on Lexmark's higher-priced supplies. Legal challenges highlight the contentious nature of these practices. In Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. (initiated 2002), Lexmark sued a chip manufacturer for reverse-engineering its sequence to produce compatible "Smartek" chips for remanufacturers; federal courts rejected most DMCA circumvention claims, affirming for , though the in 2014 permitted a false advertising counterclaim under the over Lexmark's assertions that rival chips were illegal. Separately, in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. (2017), the ruled 7-1 that exhaustion doctrine applies to single-use restrictions on sold cartridges, allowing resale of refilled imports and domestic empties without infringement, undermining Lexmark's post-sale controls. Critics, including right-to-repair advocates, argue these technologies exemplify anti-competitive that stifles innovation, while Lexmark maintains they safeguard against counterfeits comprising up to 20% of supplies in some markets.

Pricing Practices and Consumer Backlash

Lexmark's pricing model for printer consumables emphasizes high margins on and cartridges, often sold under a "Return Program" that offers discounts—typically around 20-30% off full price—in exchange for customers agreeing to return depleted units solely to Lexmark, barring resale, transfer, or third-party refilling. Unrestricted cartridges, available at full price without such conditions, allow greater flexibility but at a premium, effectively segmenting the to capture from loyal users while deterring competition from remanufacturers. This approach, detailed in U.S. proceedings, enables Lexmark to sustain elevated per-unit pricing by limiting the for refilled products. Operating costs under this model frequently exceed those of competitors, with genuine toner cartridges rarely available below $50 and high-yield options for models like the MX431adn reaching $170 or more, contributing to cost-per-page figures that strain budgets for moderate-volume . Consumer Reports evaluations underscore this, rating the yearly ink/ expense for the MC3426adw at $63—deemed very high for a color —and the MS317dn at $70, elevated for lasers, based on standardized testing of typical usage patterns including text, , and photos. reviews similarly highlight running costs for devices like the B3442dw surpassing rivals, attributing this to premium OEM supplies amid restricted alternatives. Consumer backlash has centered on these elevated expenses, prompting widespread avoidance of Lexmark products in user communities and reviews dating back over a , with frequent admonitions against purchase due to "ridiculously expensive" that undermine the low initial printer prices. Forums and expert analyses note frustration with blocked third-party options, exacerbating perceptions of economic infeasibility for non-commercial use, though some praise yield efficiency in high-volume scenarios; the 2017 Supreme Court ruling against Lexmark's patent-based restrictions on refills amplified calls for affordable alternatives, yet ongoing complaints persist into 2025.

Competitive and Regulatory Scrutiny

Lexmark has undergone antitrust reviews in connection with major corporate transactions. In 2016, its going-private acquisition by a consortium including Ninestar Corporation cleared U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino Act premerger notification requirements without conditions or challenges from the Department of Justice or Federal Trade Commission. Similarly, Xerox Holdings Corporation's $1.5 billion acquisition of Lexmark, announced in late 2024 and completed on July 1, 2025, received antitrust clearances from U.S., UK, Canadian, and European Commission authorities following standard Phase I reviews, with regulators concluding no significant competition harms due to sufficient alternative suppliers in printing markets. Aftermarket competitors have alleged anti-competitive conduct by Lexmark, particularly firmware updates that disable third-party remanufactured toner cartridges. On June 27, 2023, the European Toner and Inkjet Remanufacturing Association (ETIRA) and German Cartridge Remanufacturers Association (DKWU) filed a complaint with RAL gGmbH, the administrator of Germany's Blue Angel eco-label, claiming Lexmark's January 2023 firmware update (version FW CSNZJ.081.225) blocked compatible cartridges on 119 printer models, violating eco-label criteria for remanufacturing compatibility (DIN 33870-1/2) and impeding competition under the Lexmark Cartridge Collection Programme. No revocation of Lexmark's certifications resulted, and RAL gGmbH took no further action as of the complaint date. These claims echo broader industry criticisms but have not led to formal antitrust enforcement by bodies like the Bundeskartellamt or European Commission. U.S. courts have dismissed antitrust counterclaims in Lexmark's disputes with remanufacturers, such as in the Static Control Components litigation, where the Sixth Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of viable claims under federal antitrust law. No major government-led investigations into Lexmark's market practices, such as bundling or restrictions, have been initiated by the or DOJ, despite the printer industry's razor-and-blade model drawing general scrutiny for potential exclusionary effects.

References

  1. [1]
    Company Overview - Lexmark
    Lexmark is now part of Xerox, combining innovation and global scale to serve our customers with an expanded portfolio of print, MPS and digital solutions.FAQ and Fact Sheets · Lexmark Governance · Mission, Vision, Values
  2. [2]
    About Us - Lexmark
    Lexmark is a provider of printing and imaging products, software, solutions and services that help customers save time and money. Learn more about Lexmark.Company Overview · Careers · Sustainability
  3. [3]
    Lexmark celebrates history of excellence, innovation at 20-year ...
    Mar 27, 2011 · (NYSE: LXK) was founded as a spin-out of IBM, and its employees outlined an ambitious goal to become a dynamic, global technology company ...
  4. [4]
    Lexmark intentionally focuses on sustainability
    Lexmark focuses on sustainable solutions, using sustainable materials, long-life components, and aims for carbon neutrality by 2035, with a goal of 50% ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 15-1189 Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. (05/30/2017)
    May 30, 2017 · The case involves Lexmark's toner cartridges and whether selling them exhausts patent rights, allowing Impression Products to resell them. The ...
  6. [6]
    https://www.supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/118/
  7. [7]
    Clayton & Dubilier completes purchase of IBM unit - UPI Archives
    Mar 27, 1991 · When the deal had been originally announced last Aug. 1, analysts had estimated the transaction would carry a price tag of about $2.3 billion.Missing: 1991-1995 | Show results with:1991-1995
  8. [8]
    COMPANY NEWS; I.B.M. to Complete Unit Sale in March
    Jan 12, 1991 · The new company, to be named Lexmark International Inc., will manufacture personal printers, typewriters and keyboards and have annual revenues ...Missing: divestiture 1991-1995
  9. [9]
    Owing It All To Big Blue - Forbes
    Apr 2, 2002 · As part of an attempt to save itself, IBM in March 1991 sold its ... leveraged buyout firm for $1.5 billion. The company, Lexmark, was ...
  10. [10]
    https://www.barrons.com/articles/SB923113185902252259
  11. [11]
    List of Mergers and Acquisitions by IBM - Encyclopedia.pub
    1991 - Lexmark (keyboards, typewriters, and printers). IBM retained a 10% interest. Lexmark has sold its keyboard and typewriter businesses. 1991 - Kaleida ...
  12. [12]
    History of Lexmark International, Inc. - FundingUniverse
    The birth of Lexmark International was a result of IBM's attempt to remain competitive in the intense atmosphere of the late 1980s, when so many smaller firms ...Missing: spun | Show results with:spun
  13. [13]
    History of Lexmark International, Inc. - Reference For Business
    Since being spun off from International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in 1991, Lexmark has become a leader in the development and production of a broad ...
  14. [14]
    Lords Of Leverage For The '90s - Bloomberg.com
    Nov 14, 1993 · Since Clayton Dubilier bought the unit in 1991, it has trimmed Lexmark's payroll by a third, to 4,000 staffers. ... purchase price. Despite ...
  15. [15]
    Lexmark International Inc | Encyclopedia.com
    Since being spun off from International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in 1991, Lexmark has become a leader in the development and production of a broad ...
  16. [16]
    Lexmark's key milestones | Lexington Herald Leader
    Sep 30, 2013 · March 1991: Lexmark was formed as a spin-off of IBM. July 1991: Lexmark announced its first new products, the IBM Personal Printer Series II and IBM 4226 dot ...
  17. [17]
    LEXMARK @ 15 :A HISTORY OF PRINTING - Tonernews
    Oct. 24: Lexmark unveils the Optra series, left, the first printers marketed solely under the Lexmark brand.Missing: spin- details timeline<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    FAQ and Fact Sheets - Lexmark
    Lexmark is a privately held technology company headquartered in Lexington, KY, with offices throughout North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Africa.Lexmark Fast Facts · Lexmark Operations &... · Lexmark People, Partners &...
  19. [19]
    Lexmark International, Inc. 10-K - SEC.gov
    On November 15, 1995, Group completed its initial public offering of Class A common stock and Lexmark now trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ...
  20. [20]
    COMPANY NEWS;SHARES OF FORMER I.B.M. UNIT RISE 8% ON ...
    Nov 16, 1995 · The stock closed at $21.625, in trading of 5.85 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange, after being offered at $20 a share. Lexmark's ...
  21. [21]
    Lexmark International, Inc. - Company-Histories.com
    The close of 1994 marked a milestone in Lexmark history as the IBM logo was finally removed from all company products to be replaced by the Lexmark name.Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
  22. [22]
    [PDF] IBM Personal Printer Series II - Lexmark
    Launched industry's first color. 1995 printer-fax-copier-scanner combo product. 1999. Introduced Managed Print Services offering. Launched first Lexmark devices.
  23. [23]
    Lexmark - Wikipedia
    Lexmark International, Inc. is an American company that manufactures laser printers and imaging products. The company is headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky.History · Operations · Acquisitions · Divestitures
  24. [24]
    Lexmark reports fourth quarter and full year results - Feb 23, 2016
    Feb 23, 2016 · Lexmark had a good fourth quarter. We more than doubled fourth quarter Enterprise Software non-GAAP operating income margin year to year to 24 percent.Missing: public | Show results with:public
  25. [25]
    Lexmark announces completion of acquisition by Apex Technology ...
    Nov 29, 2016 · In 2015, Lexmark reported more than $3.5 billion in revenue, with 56% coming from outside the U.S.. The new shareholders will provide Lexmark ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  26. [26]
    10-K - SEC.gov
    Lexmark's 2015 revenue was down 4% YTY, primarily due to an unfavorable YTY currency impact of 6% and an unfavorable impact of approximately 3% due to the ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  27. [27]
    Lexmark agrees to be acquired by Apex Technology and PAG Asia ...
    Apr 19, 2016 · Lexmark agrees to be acquired by Apex Technology and PAG Asia Capital. All-cash transaction valued at approximately $3.6 billion, or $40.50 per share.
  28. [28]
    Lexmark Governance
    Lexmark is a privately held U.S.-based company, acquired in 2016 by a consortium of investors led by Ninestar. As required for all foreign investments in ...
  29. [29]
    Xerox to Acquire Lexmark
    Dec 23, 2024 · Transaction between printing industry icons is expected to close in second half of 2025. NORWALK, Conn. & LEXINGTON, Ky.
  30. [30]
    Xerox to Acquire Lexmark
    Under the terms of the agreement, Xerox will acquire Lexmark for total consideration of $1.5 billion, inclusive of net debt and other assumed liabilities. Xerox ...
  31. [31]
    Xerox Completes $1.5 Billion Acquisition of Lexmark | News & Events
    Jul 2, 2025 · Ropes & Gray represented Xerox Holdings Corporation in its acquisition of Lexmark International, Inc. from Ninestar Corporation, PAG Asia Capital and Shanghai ...
  32. [32]
    Lexmark printer
    Lexmark is a provider of printing and imaging products, software, solutions and services that help customers save time and money.Lexmark printer finder · Small and medium business · Enterprise printers and MFPs
  33. [33]
    Lexmark MS821dn
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsThe Lexmark MS821dn features a first page as fast as 4.5 seconds, output up to 55 pages per minute, and two-sided printing.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    New Lexmark 5- and 6-Series - Color and Mono
    New 5-series and 6-series · Lexmark CX532adwe · Lexmark CS531dw · Lexmark MX532adwe · Lexmark MS531dw · Lexmark CX635adwe · Lexmark CS632dwe · Lexmark MX632adwe.
  35. [35]
    Lexmark printer finder
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsView all (82 result results ) · Lexmark MX953se · Lexmark CX951se · Lexmark CX950se · Lexmark CX833xse · Lexmark CX833se · Lexmark CX963xse · Lexmark CX962tse.
  36. [36]
    New 9-Series Printers and MFPs Powered by Cloud Services
    Lexmark's 9-Series printers and MFPs are designed for effortless maintenance and servicing, featuring intuitive operator panels, one-handed toner replacement, ...
  37. [37]
    9-Series A3 and 8-Series Color A4 - Lexmark
    Welcome the new 9-Series A3 printer and multifunction products (MFPs) and 8-Series color A4 MFP from Lexmark. Explore all models. A3 family mpfs. Hardware.
  38. [38]
    Lexmark MC3224dwe
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsThe Lexmark MC3224dwe is a color laser all-in-one with automatic 2-sided printing, print, copy, scan, fax, wireless, and mobile-friendly features. It is also ...
  39. [39]
    Lexmark 6500e MFP Option
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsThe Lexmark 6500e MFP Option adds copy, scan, fax, and email to T650, T652, and T654 printers, with a 10.2-inch touch screen, 100-sheet ADF, and fast scanning.
  40. [40]
    Capture Solutions - Lexmark
    Our suite of tools help you transform paper into actionable electronic information. The results? Reduced costs, significantly improved workflows.
  41. [41]
    Lexmark MX331adn
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsGet output up to 40 pages per minute, plus single-side automatic scanning, copying, faxing and touch-screen convenience, all in the compact Lexmark MX331adn.Features · Marketing Description · Interact With Ease
  42. [42]
    Enterprise printers and MFPs - Lexmark
    Why choose Lexmark printers and MFPs? They're dependable, reliable and last for years. Advanced features allow you to print on most media and save you ...Why Choose Lexmark Printers... · Introducing The New Lexmark... · More Reasons To Choose...
  43. [43]
    Lexmark Expands 9-Series Printer Lineup, Adds Three Models
    Feb 5, 2025 · Lexmark unveils three new A3 models as part of its landmark 9-Series of printers and MFPs. They include models CX950, CX951 and MX953.
  44. [44]
    Sustainable software & solutions - Lexmark CSR
    Lexmark In-Store Capture's technology designed for retailers and Lexmark's smart MFP platform streamlines paper-based processes, driving greater efficiency and ...
  45. [45]
    Lexmark Unison Toner
    Lexmark Unison toner delivers outstanding image quality, long-life system reliability and remarkable sustainability.
  46. [46]
    Choose genuine Lexmark supplies
    Find the right Lexmark supplies for your printer. Original Lexmark toner cartridges are engineered specifically for your printer to deliver superior quality ...Lexmark Return Program · Lexmark Unison Toner · Lexmark supplies warranty
  47. [47]
    Lexmark Ink And Toner - Office Depot
    4.5 206 Lexmark™ C3210 Black; Cyan; Magenta; Yellow Return Program Toner Cartridges, Pack Of 4, C3210C0/C3210K0/C3210M0/C3210Y0. Item #9033249.
  48. [48]
    Lexmark Ink and Toner Cartridges - Staples.com
    Shop Lexmark ink and toner cartridges at Staples and get exceptional print results when paired with a Lexmark printer. Get free shipping on all ink & toner.
  49. [49]
    How to identify genuine Lexmark supplies
    Use the feature below to verify that you have a genuine Lexmark cartridge. By entering the 12-digit code (starting with CA) found on a toner cartridge.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Lexmark Downloadable Solutions
    Downloadable software helps make your compatible Lexmark printers and multifunction products (MFPs) even more indispensable to your organization.
  51. [51]
    Lexmark Cloud Services
    A cloud-based suite of services lets you reduce infrastructure requirements for print, simplify device management and provide print solutions.
  52. [52]
    Cloud Solution Center - Simplified cloud-based document ... - Lexmark
    Lexmark Cloud Solution Center (CSC) is a document workflow automation solution that delivers an intuitive way to capture, process and route every type of ...
  53. [53]
    Managed Print Services - Lexmark
    Lexmark is a provider of printing and imaging products, software, solutions and services that help customers save time and money.
  54. [54]
    Lexmark Named Managed Print Services Leader by Quocirca for ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · Lexmark, a global imaging and IoT solutions leader, has again been named a leader in managed print services (MPS) by global print and market ...
  55. [55]
    Lexmark Named 2023 Managed Print Services Leader by Quocirca
    Oct 4, 2023 · Lexmark, a global imaging and IoT solutions leader, has again been named a leader in cloud print services by global market insight and research ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Lexmark Markvision Enterprise
    Markvision Enterprise is a user-friendly print management solution that makes it easy to configure device settings and update security policies.Missing: offerings | Show results with:offerings
  57. [57]
    Software Partners - Lexmark
    Lexmark Software Partnerships help customers to identify business workflow challenges and develop solutions that address the unique needs of each organization.
  58. [58]
    Mobile Solutions - Print - Lexmark
    Free delivery Free 30-day returnsLexmark is a provider of printing and imaging products, software, solutions and services that help customers save time and money. See how far business can ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    I spent some of the formative time in my career at Lexmark. They ...
    - Lexmark became most well known for bringing the "razor blade" business model to consumer inkjet printing. They would literally give printers away with a ...
  60. [60]
    Why Aren't Consumers Buying Lexmark? - Forbes
    Oct 28, 2005 · But since ink-jet printers are a razor and razor-blade business model (meaning that the profits are in selling the replacement ink-cartridges, ...
  61. [61]
    https://slate.com/technology/2016/10/how-lexmark-is-redefining-ownership.html
  62. [62]
    How a Printer Company Redefined Ownership
    Oct 21, 2016 · But for Lexmark to profit off of ink and toner cartridges, the company had to be the primary vendor of those cartridges. That was a problem, ...
  63. [63]
    Printer Profits In Peril - Forbes
    Feb 6, 2003 · The remanufactured cartridges are then sold at a roughly 30% discount to new cartridges sold by Lexmark and other top-tier printer makers. Last ...
  64. [64]
    Generic cartridges leave mark on Lexmark profits - ZDNET
    Apr 27, 2005 · Customers are increasingly buying lower-priced 'generic' ink cartridges, which has reduced Lexmark's profits and revenue growth, according to ...
  65. [65]
    Fitch Affirms Lexmark at 'B-'; Outlook Stable
    May 22, 2020 · Fitch estimates Lexmark's hardware and supplies revenue will decline 10% and other revenue 5% in the second quarter, improving to 5% and 2 ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Weak Demand For Printer Supplies And Hardware Will Continue To ...
    Dec 10, 2015 · We estimate that laser hardware shipment will stabilize at 1.8 million (4.5% of estimated 40.3 million total laser units) for Lexmark, while ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] XRX-Lexmark Acquisition - Xerox Investor Relations
    Dec 23, 2024 · Source: Lexmark materials and filings. (1) Revenue, revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA are LTM figures as of 9/30/24. (2) Adjusted. Measures: ...
  68. [68]
    Explore business areas - Lexmark
    Manufacturing. Lexmark's Boulder, Colo., development and manufacturing facility processes toner and photoconductor drums for our laser print cartridges.<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    CROSS Ruling - Customs and Border Protection
    Lexmark will import the Chinese-origin printer transports into Mexico, where the PCBA, developing unit, imaging unit, and toner-filled toner cartridges, as ...Missing: plants | Show results with:plants
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Fighting Against Forced and Child Labour in Supply Chains Statement
    May 23, 2024 · Lexmark sources hardware and supplies for Asia Pacific from China, and our manufacturing plant in Mexico produces hardware and supplies for ...
  71. [71]
    Lexmark's challenge: CBP redefines country of origin - The Recycler
    Nov 27, 2023 · The US Customs and Border Protection's ruling identifies Lexmark's Mexico-assembled MS/MX and CS/CX series printers as originating from China.<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Lexmark printers redefined as 'Made in Mexico' - The Recycler
    Jun 27, 2024 · The ruling confirms that the Lexmark printers, under the revised production process, should be considered products of Mexico.
  73. [73]
    Xerox to Acquire Lexmark
    Dec 23, 2024 · The new organization will serve more than 200,000 clients in 170 countries with 125 manufacturing and distribution facilities in 16 countries.
  74. [74]
    Ryder opens fulfillment center for Lexmark - Supply Chain Dive
    Jan 16, 2024 · The 1 million-square-foot facility in Indiana will add new delivery capabilities for the imaging and technology company.<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Talking Supply Chain: Lexmark's missing piece
    Jul 11, 2024 · In need of supply chain visibility, Lexmark looked within and built a tool that is helping it identify potential issues before they occur.
  76. [76]
    Printer giant Lexmark fires Mexico factory workers demanding $0.35 ...
    Dec 15, 2015 · Printer and software giant Lexmark has fired dozens of workers from its factory in the Mexican city of Ciudad Júarez after they demanded a pay rise of $0.35 ...
  77. [77]
    Contact Us - Lexmark
    Georgia 400 Center, Suite 275. Alpharetta, GA 30009. Phone: 1-800-539-6275. Other locations. 22, Quai Gallieni Suresnes, 92150. France Phone: 01 46 67 40 00.Missing: facilities | Show results with:facilities
  78. [78]
    Lexmark Global Headquarters Earns CarbonNeutral® Office ...
    Nov 20, 2024 · The latest additions include Lexmark's global headquarters in Lexington, Ky., as well as its research, development and shared services facility ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] 2024 Community Fact Sheet - Lexmark
    and employee volunteerism. Workforce at a Glance. 2024 Worldwide Employees - Approximately 7,792. 2024 U.S. Employees - Approximately 1,555. The Lexmark Value ...
  80. [80]
    The $1.5 billion Xerox-Lexmark deal is now final. Here's what we know
    Jul 2, 2025 · In 2024, Lexmark employed approximately 1,555 U.S. employees and another almost 7,800 across the world. Commerce Lexington's Executive Vice ...
  81. [81]
    Xerox announces layoffs after Lexmark acquisition
    Oct 15, 2025 · Xerox employed 1,463 local workers at the end of 2024, according to the 2025 RBJ Manufacturers' List—down 17 percent from 1,754 employees ...
  82. [82]
    Allen Waugerman - Executive profiles - Lexmark
    Allen Waugerman is Lexmark's president and CEO. He was named to this position in May 2019. He was appointed to the Lexmark Board of Directors in April 2023.Missing: organizational | Show results with:organizational
  83. [83]
    Lexmark CEO and Key Executive Team - Craft.co
    Lexmark's President and Chief Executive Officer is Allen Waugerman. Other executives include Chuck Butler, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; ...Missing: organizational | Show results with:organizational
  84. [84]
    Xerox Unveils Post-Lexmark Acquisition Leadership Team
    May 14, 2025 · The company announced today that two distinguished Lexmark executives will join its Executive Committee at the close of the acquisition.
  85. [85]
    Lexmark Org Chart + Executive Team - The Official Board
    See the executive team of Lexmark and its org chart, featuring 55 leaders like Chuck Butler, Tonya Jackson and Vishal Gupta.
  86. [86]
    LEXMARK INT'L INC. v. STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
    Mar 25, 2014 · Lexmark sued for copyright infringement, but Static Control counterclaimed, alleging that Lexmark engaged in false or misleading advertising in ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  87. [87]
    Lexmark v. Static Control Case Archive
    Lexmark claimed that SCC circumvented Lexmark's access control technologies and infringed its copyrights by "reverse engineering" its printer toner cartridges ...
  88. [88]
    Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
    Lexmark sued Static for copyright infringement. Static countersued for false advertising, claiming that Lexmark's packaging notices and letters to ...
  89. [89]
    Lexmark International, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Static Control ...
    Lexmark International, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee, v. Static Control Components, Inc., Defendant-appellant, 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004). Annotate this Case.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  90. [90]
    Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
    At trial, the only issues presented to the jury were (1) whether Static induced patent infringement and (2) whether Lexmark misused its patents. The jury found ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  91. [91]
    Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
    Nov 10, 2014 · In 2002, Lexmark sued Static Control, alleging that Static Control's microchips violated the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Digital Millennium ...
  92. [92]
    Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. | 572 U.S. 118 ...
    Mar 25, 2014 · Lexmark sued Static Control for copyright infringement, but the Supreme Court ruled Static Control could sue under the Lanham Act for false ...
  93. [93]
    Lexmark International v. Static Control Components - Oyez
    Dec 3, 2013 · A case in which the Court held that the Lanham Act allowed any party to sue for injuries relating to false advertising, as long as the party ...
  94. [94]
    Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
    Lexmark sued SCC for violating 17 USC § 106 by selling a technology intended to circumvent Lexmark's access-control mechanism for operating its printers.
  95. [95]
    Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. | Oyez
    Mar 21, 2017 · Lexmark sued Impression and alleged that Impression infringed on Lexmark's patents because Impression Products acted without authorization from Lexmark to ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  96. [96]
    Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. | 581 U.S.
    May 30, 2017 · The Supreme Court ruled that selling a patented product exhausts all patent rights, and restrictions can only be enforced through contract law, ...
  97. [97]
    The Aftermath of Impression Products v. Lexmark | Articles | Finnegan
    Nov 13, 2017 · On May 30, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited patent exhaustion decision in Impression Products v. Lexmark International, 137 ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  98. [98]
    Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC ...
    Court Description: ORDER granting 395 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to Defendant Impression Products, Inc. Signed by Judge Michael R.Missing: lawsuit | Show results with:lawsuit
  99. [99]
    Lexmark Loss Good for Consumers - WIRED
    Oct 27, 2004 · Lexmark had sued the competitor, arguing that Static Control had no right under the DMCA to circumvent electronics that prevented Lexmark ...
  100. [100]
    '32 Unsupported Print Cartridge' error message | Lexmark T644
    The '32 Unsupported Print Cartridge' error occurs when the printer thinks the wrong toner is installed, or if it's a third-party, refilled, or incorrectly ...
  101. [101]
    32.52 replace unsupported cartridge error prompts after installing a ...
    The 32.52 error occurs after installing a new genuine cartridge. Ensure it's original, not damaged, and update the printer firmware to E402 or the latest level.
  102. [102]
    Firmware FAQ - Lexmark Support
    The advanced technical protective measures contained in Lexmark printers aim to disable the printer if a counterfeited or unauthorized third-party cartridge is ...Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
  103. [103]
    32.49 Unsupported Cartridge error after a firmware update
    After the user performs a firmware update using version LW71.xx.P025 or anything higher, the printer posts a 32.49 Unsupported Cartridge error message.
  104. [104]
    Lexmark firmware update locks our cartridges - The Recycler
    Jun 2, 2023 · The latest Lexmark firmware update locks out third-party remanufactured cartridges. Lexmark released a firmware update on 1 June 2023 for the CX421 printers.Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
  105. [105]
    Problem solved! Lexmark Unsupported Cartridge Error (32.49)
    Mar 17, 2021 · Press and hold numeric buttons 2+6 while turning the power back on, don't release until the progress bar appears - the printer should be ...Lexmark Unsupported Cartridge Error After Firmware Update - RedditBrother accused of locking down third-party printer ink cartridges via ...More results from www.reddit.com
  106. [106]
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-1189
  107. [107]
    IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC. v. LEXMARK INT'L, INC.
    May 30, 2017 · Lexmark argued that, because it expressly prohibited reuse and resale of these cartridges, Impression Products infringed the Lexmark patents ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Felony Contempt of Business Model: Lexmark's Anti-Competitive ...
    Jun 28, 2019 · Lexmark's lawsuit against Static Control made an unprecedented argument: that bypassing its lock-out chips was a violation of DMCA 1201.
  109. [109]
    https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/printers/lexmark-mc3426adw/m403272/
  110. [110]
    Lexmark MC3426adw Printer Review - Consumer Reports
    After 2 years of typical use, we estimate the total equivalent cost to be $775, very high for a color laser. The estimated yearly cost is $63, which is ...
  111. [111]
    Lexmark MS317dn Printer Review - Consumer Reports
    It prints black-and-white graphics well enough for most purposes, such as school reports, at 6.7 pages per minute, costing 15.5 cents per page. It has auto- ...
  112. [112]
    Lexmark B3442dw Review - PCMag
    Rating 3.5 · Review by William HarrelOct 6, 2020 · Lexmark's B3442dw mono laser does plenty right and churns pages at a decent clip, but its operating costs exceed most competitors', ...
  113. [113]
    Lexmark Printers are not the Most Sought after Brand for Cost Savings
    Jul 10, 2012 · The main reason is that the consumables needed to keep your printer running are ridiculously expensive. The cost of Lexmark ink cartridge is ...
  114. [114]
    Supreme Court Rules Patent Laws Can't Be Used to Prevent Reselling
    May 30, 2017 · The Supreme Court ruled that Lexmark International could not use patent law to stop companies from refilling and selling its toner cartridges.Missing: practices backlash
  115. [115]
    Lexmark MX431adn - expensive cartridges. What alternatives exist?
    Jun 20, 2025 · The cost of original cartridges is prohibitively high, making printing economically unfeasible. Looking for information about workable ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  116. [116]
    What Are the Regulatory Hurdles to the Lexmark Merger?
    Apr 26, 2016 · In the case of the Lexmark (LXK) merger, several conditions must be met before the transaction can close. While there will be an antitrust ...
  117. [117]
    Xerox Completes the Acquisition of Lexmark, Uniting Two Industry ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · The company continues to expect the transaction to be accretive to 2025 adjusted earnings per share and free cash flow and result in a lower ...Missing: scrutiny | Show results with:scrutiny
  118. [118]
    Xerox takeover of Lexmark approved by EU Commission
    Jun 19, 2025 · Following a standard Phase I review, the Commission concluded the deal would not harm competition. “There are sufficient alternative suppliers ...
  119. [119]
    ETIRA and DKWU File Complaint Against Lexmark Germany Over ...
    Jun 27, 2023 · The complaint addresses Lexmark's ongoing practice of impeding the use of remanufactured cartridges through firmware updates and the Lexmark ...
  120. [120]
    Static Control Components, Inc v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.
    Jan 31, 2023 · Static Control Components, Inc v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. ; Docket Number: 09-6287 ; Judge: Moore ; Opinion Date: August 29, 2012.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  121. [121]
    US Federal Circuit waves off antitrust concerns in Lexmark
    Feb 16, 2016 · Second Circuit: antitrust rulings signal tougher standards and growing judicial scepticism. Featured in Americas Antitrust Review 2026 · United ...