Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Network monitoring

Network monitoring is the practice of using specialized software and hardware tools to continuously oversee the performance, health, security, and reliability of a computer network, enabling administrators to detect, diagnose, and resolve issues in real time.^[1]^[2]^[3] This process involves collecting data on key metrics such as bandwidth usage, traffic flow, device uptime, latency, and packet loss to ensure optimal operation and prevent disruptions.^[1]^[3] As networks grow more complex with the integration of cloud services, IoT devices, and software-defined infrastructures, network monitoring has become essential for maintaining visibility across distributed environments.^[2]^[3] At its core, network monitoring operates through protocols and methods like Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) for querying device status, Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) for detecting connectivity failures, and flow-based analysis for examining traffic patterns.^[1]^[2] Tools scan network components—such as routers, switches, servers, and endpoints—either actively by injecting test packets or passively by observing existing traffic, then apply thresholds and machine learning algorithms to generate alerts or dashboards for administrators.^[2]^[3] This proactive approach allows for rapid troubleshooting, reducing mean time to resolution (MTTR) and minimizing downtime, which can cost large enterprises an average of $300,000 per hour.^[2] Key benefits of network monitoring include enhanced security by identifying anomalous traffic indicative of threats, optimized resource allocation through performance insights, and support for compliance with regulatory standards.^[1]^[3] It encompasses various types, such as performance monitoring (focusing on latency and jitter), security monitoring (detecting intrusions), traffic monitoring (analyzing data flows), and application performance monitoring (ensuring end-user experience).^[2]^[3] Common tools range from open-source options to commercial platforms like those using agentless or agent-based deployment, often integrated with automation for scalable management in hybrid cloud setups.^[1]^[2] Overall, effective network monitoring not only sustains operational efficiency but also informs strategic decisions for infrastructure upgrades and capacity planning.^[1]^[3]

Overview

Definition

Network monitoring is the systematic process of observing, analyzing, and reporting on the performance, availability, and security of computer networks through the use of specialized software tools and techniques.^[2] This involves collecting data from network devices such as routers, switches, and servers to assess operational health in real time, enabling administrators to detect issues like bottlenecks, outages, or unauthorized access before they escalate.^[1] At its core, network monitoring encompasses both proactive and reactive measures to maintain network integrity, distinguishing it from one-time diagnostics by emphasizing continuous surveillance.^[4] The fundamental principles of network monitoring revolve around real-time data collection from diverse sources within the network infrastructure, followed by in-depth traffic analysis and anomaly detection to ensure operational efficiency and reliability.^[5] Data collection typically occurs via polling devices for metrics like bandwidth usage and latency, while analysis identifies patterns or deviations that could indicate problems such as congestion or security threats.^[6] Anomaly detection, a key principle, relies on baseline comparisons to flag unusual behaviors, thereby supporting timely interventions that minimize downtime and optimize resource allocation.^[7] The concept of network monitoring originated in the 1980s alongside the widespread adoption of TCP/IP protocols, evolving from rudimentary packet sniffing tools to sophisticated, integrated systems for managing complex enterprise networks.^[8] Early implementations focused on basic traffic observation in ARPANET successors, with the development of standards like SNMP in 1988 marking a pivotal advancement in standardized monitoring practices.^[9] Over time, it has grown to address the demands of modern, distributed networks, incorporating automation and AI-driven insights while retaining its foundational emphasis on visibility and control.^[10] Key components unique to network monitoring include probes for active testing of network paths, agents installed on devices to gather local metrics, and dashboards that provide centralized visualizations of collected data.^[11] Probes simulate traffic to measure end-to-end performance, agents facilitate passive data reporting without disrupting operations, and dashboards aggregate this information into actionable graphs and alerts for quick decision-making.^[12] These elements work in tandem to form a cohesive monitoring framework, essential for maintaining the robustness of IT infrastructure.^[13]

Importance and Objectives

Network monitoring plays a pivotal role in modern IT infrastructure by mitigating the financial and operational risks associated with network disruptions. Unplanned outages can cost enterprises an average of $14,056 per minute as of 2024, encompassing direct losses from lost productivity, recovery efforts, and indirect impacts like reputational damage.^[14] Furthermore, effective monitoring enhances security by enabling early detection of threats such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which can overwhelm networks and cause widespread downtime; continuous traffic analysis allows for anomaly identification and rapid mitigation to prevent escalation.^[15] The primary objectives of network monitoring center on maintaining high availability, optimizing performance, planning for capacity, and ensuring regulatory compliance. It targets uptime levels such as 99.9%, which translates to no more than about 8.76 hours of annual downtime, a standard often embedded in service level agreements (SLAs) for critical systems.^[16] Performance optimization focuses on reducing latency and bottlenecks to support seamless user experiences, while capacity planning forecasts resource needs to avoid overloads during peak usage. Additionally, monitoring supports compliance with regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by tracking data flows, access patterns, and potential breaches to safeguard personal information.^[17] From a business perspective, network monitoring facilitates fault detection, root cause analysis, and predictive maintenance, all of which minimize outage durations and frequencies. By identifying issues in real-time, it reduces mean time to repair (MTTR), a key metric that measures the average duration to resolve incidents, often aiming for targets under one hour in high-stakes environments. Uptime percentage serves as a core performance indicator, directly tying to SLA fulfillment and contractual penalties, while overall it enables proactive strategies that sustain operational continuity and support scalable growth.^[5]

Types of Monitoring

Active Monitoring

Active monitoring in network management refers to the process of injecting synthetic or test traffic into the network from designated probes to proactively evaluate performance metrics such as response times, packet loss, and available bandwidth. This method employs controlled probes, often deployed at strategic points like endpoints or routers, to generate artificial data packets that traverse the network, allowing for the simulation of real-world conditions without relying on live user traffic. By actively probing the network, administrators can isolate and quantify issues like latency or congestion in a targeted manner.^[18]^[19] Key techniques in active monitoring include ping-based tests using Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) echo requests, traceroute simulations to map packet paths, and HTTP synthetic transactions for validating end-to-end application performance. Ping tests send ICMP echo requests to a target device and measure the time until an echo reply is received, providing a basic assessment of reachability and delay. Traceroute, by incrementing the time-to-live (TTL) value in probe packets, reveals the sequence of routers along the path, helping identify potential bottlenecks or routing anomalies. HTTP synthetic transactions mimic user interactions, such as webpage loads or API calls, by scripting automated requests to endpoints, thereby testing not only network layers but also application-layer responsiveness from multiple vantage points.^[20]^[21] A core example of active monitoring's utility is the calculation of round-trip time (RTT) via ICMP echoes, which quantifies the duration for a packet to travel to a destination and return. The RTT is computed using the formula:

\text{RTT} = t_{\text{receive}} - t_{\text{send}}

where t_{\text{send}} is the timestamp when the echo request is transmitted, and t_{\text{receive}} is the timestamp upon receiving the reply. This measures the full round-trip time directly. For estimating one-way delay assuming symmetric paths, it is approximately \frac{\text{RTT}}{2}. This enables precise tracking of propagation delays and helps in diagnosing asymmetric performance in bidirectional links.^[18] The primary advantages of active monitoring lie in its proactive nature, allowing for the early detection of performance degradation or failures before they affect end-users, thus minimizing downtime and optimizing resource allocation. For instance, by simulating traffic under varying loads, it can reveal latent issues like intermittent packet loss that might not surface in low-traffic periods. Unlike passive monitoring, which observes existing traffic flows, active monitoring generates dedicated test traffic to ensure comprehensive, on-demand validation of network health.^[22]^[23] Active monitoring finds particular application in pre-deployment testing, where simulated traffic verifies new configurations or hardware without risking production environments, and in service level agreement (SLA) verification across wide area networks (WANs). In WAN scenarios, probes deployed at branch offices or data centers can continuously test links against contractual thresholds for latency, jitter, and throughput, generating alerts or reports to enforce provider accountability. A notable implementation involves deploying agents to inject synthetic traffic, measuring end-to-end metrics to confirm compliance during global network upgrades.^[24] Systems like SolarWinds integrate active probes through protocols such as Cisco IP SLA, enabling automated generation of test traffic from routers to monitor metrics like jitter and loss in real-time, with data aggregated for historical analysis and alerting. This facilitates seamless incorporation into broader network management workflows, though detailed tool configurations are addressed elsewhere.^[25]

Passive Monitoring

Passive monitoring captures and analyzes live network packets from existing traffic flows without generating synthetic probes or injecting additional data into the network. This approach typically employs hardware like network taps, which passively split signals to duplicate traffic, or switch-based mechanisms such as Switched Port Analyzer (SPAN) ports and port mirroring, which replicate packets to a dedicated monitoring interface for analysis. By observing these copies, metrics such as packet loss, delay, and bandwidth utilization can be inferred directly from production traffic, enabling real-time assessment of network health.^[26]^[27]^[28] Key methods in passive monitoring include deep packet inspection (DPI), which examines both packet headers and payloads to decode protocols, identify applications, and extract detailed flow information, and statistical sampling techniques to manage the volume of data in high-speed environments. DPI allows for granular protocol analysis, such as reconstructing TCP sessions or detecting application-layer anomalies, while sampling—such as random or deterministic packet selection—reduces processing overhead by analyzing representative subsets of traffic, maintaining accuracy for aggregate metrics like flow rates. These methods ensure scalability in backbone or enterprise networks where full capture is resource-intensive.^[29]^[30]^[31] A primary advantage of passive monitoring is its non-intrusive nature, as it avoids impacting network performance or latency by not altering traffic flows, while delivering authentic insights into user behavior and application usage patterns derived from organic data. For instance, it can detect congestion by tracking TCP retransmissions; upon detecting packet loss, TCP congestion control halves the congestion window according to the formula \text{CWND} = \frac{\text{CWND}}{2}, signaling reduced sending rates to mitigate overload. This provides a realistic view of operational dynamics that simulated tests might overlook.^[32]^[22]^[33] In security applications, passive monitoring excels at event detection by scanning for deviations like unusual payload signatures or protocol violations in real-time traffic. It also supports baseline traffic profiling in data centers, where historical patterns of host communications and bandwidth allocation establish norms for anomaly detection and capacity planning.^[34]^[32] However, passive monitoring has limitations, including its inability to observe unused network paths where no traffic is present, potentially missing latent issues in idle links, and its restricted visibility into encrypted traffic, as it cannot decode payloads without additional decryption capabilities. Passive monitoring complements active techniques by focusing on real-world traffic for a more complete performance picture.^[35]^[36]^[23]

Core Techniques

Network Tomography

Network tomography is a mathematical inference technique that estimates internal network properties, such as topology, link delays, and loss rates, using only end-to-end measurements from the network edges, without requiring direct access to internal nodes or links.^[37] This approach addresses the challenge of limited observability in large-scale networks like the Internet, where deploying sensors at every router is impractical, by modeling the network as a graph and applying statistical methods to reconstruct hidden characteristics from observable path-level data.^[38] The core concepts of network tomography include active variants, which involve injecting probe packets to measure correlations, and passive variants, which analyze existing traffic patterns. For instance, delay tomography uses correlated probe packets sent along shared paths to infer link delays; these measurements capture the additive nature of delays across links, solved via maximum likelihood estimation to maximize the probability of observed end-to-end delays given assumed link delay distributions.^[39] This estimation often assumes independent link delays and employs iterative algorithms to fit parametric models, such as Gaussian mixtures, to the data.^[40] Key algorithms in network tomography include traceroute-based mapping, which identifies paths by sending probes with incrementing time-to-live values to detect intermediate routers, and multicast probing, which sends packets from a source to multiple receivers to observe branching correlations for topology inference. In loss tomography, the probability of packet loss on path i is modeled as the product of individual link loss rates \epsilon_j along the path, assuming independence: p_i = 1 - \prod_{j \in \text{path } i} (1 - \epsilon_j). This system of equations is typically underdetermined and solved using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, which iteratively refines estimates by computing expected complete-data log-likelihoods from partial observations of received probes.^[41]^[42] Applications of network tomography include fault localization in ISP backbones, where it pinpoints failed or congested links by analyzing discrepancies in end-to-end loss patterns across multiple paths, enabling targeted diagnostics without full network instrumentation. It also supports overlay network optimization, such as in peer-to-peer systems, by inferring underlying link qualities to select efficient routing paths that minimize latency or loss.^[43]^[44] Network tomography emerged in the late 1990s as researchers sought scalable ways to monitor opaque networks, with foundational work on multicast-based loss inference appearing around 2002.^[45] Recent adaptations integrate it with software-defined networking (SDN), leveraging centralized controllers to generate targeted probes and enhance inference accuracy in programmable environments like 5G infrastructures.^[46]^[47]

Route Analytics

Route analytics involves the examination of routing protocols and paths to identify and mitigate issues such as route instability, blackholing—where traffic is discarded due to invalid routes—and suboptimal paths that degrade performance. In BGP-dominated environments, this process entails collecting and analyzing update messages, routing information bases (RIBs), and adjacency RIBs (Adj-RIBs) to ensure stable inter-domain connectivity across autonomous systems (ASes). Blackholing often manifests as sudden prefix withdrawals without re-announcements, while suboptimal routes may result from policy misconfigurations leading to longer AS paths.^[48] Core methods in route analytics include BGP monitoring through looking-glass tools, which enable operators to query remote routers for real-time BGP table snapshots and traceroutes from multiple vantage points, and path visualization to graphically represent AS-level routes. For instance, route flaps—repetitive advertisement and withdrawal of the same prefix—are detected by tracking update frequency metrics exceeding configurable thresholds, such as more than 10 changes per hour, which triggers damping mechanisms to suppress unstable announcements. These tools, often integrated with public collectors like RouteViews and RIPE RIS, facilitate proactive detection of disruptions in dynamic Internet routing.^[49]^[50]^[51] Key techniques encompass AS-path analysis, which scrutinizes the sequence of AS numbers in BGP updates to identify anomalies like unexpected path lengths or rare AS insertions indicative of hijacks, and prefix monitoring, which observes announcements and withdrawals for specific IP prefixes to verify origin AS legitimacy and reachability. These approaches leverage historical data from BGP streams to baseline normal behavior.^[52]^[53] In applications, route analytics is essential for troubleshooting inter-domain routing issues, such as resolving BGP leaks that propagate incorrect paths globally, and optimizing peering arrangements by evaluating AS-path efficiencies to select lower-latency or cost-effective transit providers in large-scale networks. For example, operators use it to diagnose blackholing during outages affecting millions of prefixes, ensuring rapid restoration of global reachability. Recent advances integrate machine learning for predictive anomaly detection, with models like BEAM employing graph embeddings of AS relationships to forecast route instabilities from semantic patterns in BGP updates, achieving near-zero false positives on datasets exceeding 11 billion announcements. These 2020s enhancements, including support vector machines and random forests applied to graph-derived features, enable real-time prediction of flaps and hijacks, surpassing traditional statistical methods in accuracy for dynamic environments.^[54]^[55]

Protocols and Standards

The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) is an Internet Standard protocol developed to facilitate the collection and organization of information about managed devices on IP networks, enabling centralized monitoring and management through interactions between SNMP agents on devices and SNMP managers on monitoring stations. SNMP operates over UDP and uses a manager-agent model, where agents expose device-specific data and managers poll for statistics or receive asynchronous notifications. SNMP has evolved through multiple versions to address performance and security needs. SNMPv1, defined in RFC 1157, provides basic functionality for simple polling and alerting but lacks robust error handling and security beyond community strings. SNMPv2c, outlined in RFC 1901, introduces enhancements like bulk data retrieval via GetBulk operations for efficient polling of large datasets, along with improved error reporting, while retaining the community-based authentication of v1. SNMPv3, standardized in RFC 3411 through RFC 3418 in December 2002, adds comprehensive security via the User-based Security Model (USM), incorporating authentication, integrity checks, and optional encryption to mitigate vulnerabilities in prior versions, such as plaintext transmission and weak access controls. Central to SNMP across versions is the Management Information Base (MIB), a hierarchical database of managed objects defined using Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), where each object is uniquely identified by an Object Identifier (OID) in a dotted decimal notation, such as those under the enterprises subtree (1.3.6.1.4.1). Key SNMP operations include Get for retrieving specific object values, Set for configuring device parameters, and Trap (or Inform in v2c/v3) for agents to asynchronously notify managers of events like threshold breaches. For instance, a manager can poll the percentage of idle CPU time on a Linux device using the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.11.0 from the UCD-SNMP-MIB, which returns an integer value representing idle processor time over the last minute; CPU utilization can then be calculated as 100 minus this value to assess load.^[56] SNMP extends its capabilities through protocols like Remote Monitoring (RMON), defined in RFC 2819, which allows agents to perform local analysis of LAN traffic and store statistics for manager retrieval, reducing polling overhead compared to standard SNMP. RMON1 focuses on Layer 2 metrics such as packet counts and error rates across Ethernet segments, while RMON2, specified in RFC 2021 and refined in RFC 4502, expands to higher-layer monitoring, including protocol distribution (e.g., IP vs. non-IP traffic) and host matrix tables for traffic between address pairs, enabling detailed segmentation analysis of multi-protocol LANs without constant manager intervention.^[57] Additionally, SNMP Trap messages can be forwarded by management systems to Syslog servers (per RFC 3164) for event logging, allowing correlated analysis of device alerts with system logs in monitoring platforms.^[58] SNMPv3's 2002 adoption specifically addressed early flaws like unencrypted community strings in v1 and v2c, which exposed sensitive data to interception, by mandating privacy mechanisms for secure remote management.

Flow-Based Protocols

Flow-based protocols enable the collection and export of aggregated network traffic statistics by sampling and recording flow data from network devices such as routers and switches. A flow is typically defined as a unidirectional sequence of packets sharing common attributes, including source and destination IP addresses, source and destination ports, protocol type, and packet/byte counts. These protocols generate flow records that capture this information without inspecting every packet, allowing for efficient analysis of traffic patterns, such as identifying top talkers—devices or applications consuming the most bandwidth. Key protocols in this category include Cisco NetFlow, IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX), and sFlow. NetFlow, originally developed by Cisco, has evolved through versions like v5, which provides a fixed set of fields for IPv4 traffic, and v9, which introduces flexible templates for customizable data export. IPFIX, standardized in RFC 7011 in 2013, extends NetFlow v9 into an open IETF protocol, supporting variable-length fields, bidirectional flows, and transport over UDP, TCP, or SCTP for greater interoperability. sFlow, a multi-vendor sampling technology, focuses on high-speed packet sampling at wire speed, combining random flow samples with interface counters to provide a network-wide view of traffic without maintaining full flow state.^[59]^[60] The mechanics of these protocols involve flow caching on the exporting device, where incoming packets are matched against active flows based on key fields; if no match exists, a new cache entry is created. Cache entries expire due to inactivity, TCP FIN/RST flags, or cache limits, triggering export of the aggregated record via UDP datagrams to a collector for processing. For example, a NetFlow v5 record includes fields such as packet count (total packets in the flow) and octet total (total bytes), which are used to compute metrics like average packet size. Flow duration, calculated as

\text{Flow duration} = \text{End_time} - \text{Start_time}

, where timestamps mark the first and last packet, supports applications like usage-based billing by quantifying session lengths.^[61]^[61] These protocols offer advantages in scalability, particularly for high-bandwidth links exceeding 10 Gbps, as they impose minimal overhead by aggregating data rather than mirroring full packets. sFlow, for instance, enables monitoring of thousands of devices per collector without performance degradation, making it suitable for large-scale environments. NetFlow and IPFIX similarly reduce data volume for analysis while preserving essential traffic insights.^[60]^[62] The evolution of flow-based protocols began with NetFlow v1 in 1996, an early Cisco implementation limited to IPv4 and fixed fields, progressing to v9 for template-based extensibility and finally to IPFIX for standardization and broader adoption. In cloud-native contexts, adaptations like Cisco's Model-Driven Telemetry extend flow data export over gRPC, enabling streaming of operational statistics in containerized environments for real-time analytics.^[63]^[64]

Tools and Systems

Software Tools

Network monitoring software tools enable the collection, analysis, and visualization of network data to ensure performance, security, and reliability. These tools are broadly categorized into agent-based and agentless approaches. Agent-based tools install lightweight software agents on monitored devices to gather detailed metrics such as CPU usage, memory, and application performance, offering granular insights but requiring deployment effort. In contrast, agentless tools rely on standard protocols like SNMP, WMI, or ICMP to remotely query devices without additional software installation, simplifying setup while potentially limiting depth of data collection. Both types typically provide dashboards for real-time visualization and alerting mechanisms to notify administrators of thresholds, such as bandwidth utilization exceeding 80% or device downtime. Open-source software tools are widely adopted for their flexibility and cost-effectiveness in network monitoring. Nagios, an enterprise-grade platform, supports threshold-based monitoring through plugins that check service availability and performance metrics, generating alerts via email or SMS when predefined limits are breached; it accommodates both agent-based (via Nagios Cross-Platform Agent) and agentless modes using SNMP for network devices. Zabbix offers similar threshold-based capabilities with customizable triggers for alerting on anomalies like high latency, featuring interactive dashboards for visualizing network topology and trends; it supports agent-based deployment for detailed host monitoring and agentless polling via SNMP or IPMI. Wireshark serves as a specialized tool for packet-level analysis, capturing and dissecting network traffic to identify issues like protocol errors or security threats, operating in a passive, agentless manner across multiple platforms. Uniquely, Prometheus employs a pull-based model for metrics scraping from endpoints, storing data in an integrated time-series database optimized for high-dimensional monitoring of dynamic environments like containerized networks, enabling efficient querying for alerting and historical analysis. As of 2025, integrations with AI for predictive analytics, such as anomaly detection in time-series data, have enhanced tools like Prometheus and Grafana for proactive issue resolution.^[65] Commercial software tools provide advanced features for larger-scale deployments, often with enhanced support and automation. SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) excels in topology mapping, automatically discovering and visualizing network dependencies across hybrid environments to pinpoint faults, complemented by customizable dashboards and anomaly-based alerting powered by AIOps. PRTG Network Monitor uses a sensor-based architecture, where over 250 sensor types monitor elements like bandwidth and uptime; it includes auto-discovery to map devices quickly and supports custom sensors via scripting for tailored integrations. These tools frequently incorporate auto-discovery to dynamically inventory networks and custom plugins or extensions to adapt to specific needs, such as integrating with ticketing systems. Integration capabilities enhance orchestration in modern setups, with many tools offering robust APIs for automation and interoperability. For instance, Prometheus exposes a RESTful API for querying time-series data, while Grafana, an open-source visualization platform, integrates via APIs with sources like Prometheus and SNMP exporters to create dynamic dashboards; recent updates as of 2025 include AI-assisted onboarding for faster configuration. SolarWinds NPM provides SDKs and REST APIs for embedding monitoring into workflows, facilitating automation with orchestration tools like Ansible. Deployment options vary: on-premises installations suit environments with strict data sovereignty, as seen in self-hosted Prometheus or Nagios, whereas cloud-based variants like Grafana Cloud or PRTG's hosted edition offer scalability without infrastructure management, supporting hybrid models for monitoring distributed networks.

Hardware and Integrated Systems

Dedicated hardware appliances form the backbone of scalable network monitoring, enabling precise traffic mirroring and on-the-fly processing in environments with massive data volumes. These systems deploy as physical probes or embedded components to capture packets without altering network performance, offering superior fidelity compared to virtual alternatives in bandwidth-intensive scenarios.^[66] For instance, they facilitate full-stream analysis by aggregating mirrored traffic from multiple links, supporting diagnostics in data centers and service provider backbones.^[27] Network TAPs exemplify passive capture hardware, operating as inline splitters that duplicate full-duplex traffic to monitoring ports while maintaining zero latency and error-free transmission of physical layer details.^[67] In contrast, SPAN ports on network switches provide configurable mirroring by directing copies of ingress/egress packets to designated outputs, though they risk frame drops during peak loads due to shared switch resources.^[68] A prominent example is Riverbed's SteelCentral AppResponse series, which consists of rack-mountable appliances equipped with high-speed interfaces for real-time packet capture, flow analysis, and application-layer insights, deployed in enterprises to troubleshoot performance bottlenecks.^[69] Integrated systems further enhance monitoring by fusing hardware with orchestration layers, such as Cisco's Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI), an SDN fabric where controllers natively collect telemetry from leaf and spine switches to enforce policies and detect anomalies across multicloud setups.^[70] FPGA-based accelerators push boundaries in processing efficiency, with designs like those in high-performance flow monitors achieving 100 Gbps line-rate inspection through parallelized packet parsing and classification on reconfigurable logic.^[71] These offer reliability in high-traffic scenarios by offloading intensive computations from general-purpose CPUs, ensuring low latencies, such as a few microseconds, for security and analytics tasks.^[72] Emerging trends emphasize hardware's role in edge computing, where distributed probes process data closer to sources for reduced latency in real-time applications.^[73] Post-2020 developments in IoT hardware monitoring have introduced compact, power-efficient sensors and gateways that enable continuous oversight of device fleets, integrating with edge nodes to manage health metrics and predict failures in smart ecosystems.^[74]

Applications

Enterprise Network Monitoring

Enterprise network monitoring encompasses the proactive oversight of internal local area networks (LANs) and wide area networks (WANs) to facilitate secure employee access, support voice over IP (VoIP) communications, and manage virtualized infrastructures. This practice involves continuous evaluation of core network components, including routers, switches, firewalls, servers, and virtual machines, to detect performance bottlenecks and ensure operational reliability across distributed environments. By employing distributed monitoring architectures, such as probe-central systems, organizations can maintain visibility into remote sites and behind firewalls, addressing the complexities of large-scale IT ecosystems.^[75]^[76] Key elements include tracking bandwidth allocation to analyze data consumption patterns and optimize resource distribution, alongside evaluating virtual private network (VPN) performance through metrics like latency, throughput, and packet loss to sustain remote connectivity. A practical example is the integration of Network Access Control (NAC) solutions, which profile devices and users in real-time to monitor behavior, enforce access policies based on compliance checks, and integrate with broader security tools via APIs for enhanced visibility into employee activities.^[77]^[78]^[79] From a security perspective, monitoring correlates alerts from Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) against established traffic baselines, using anomaly detection algorithms to identify deviations indicative of threats while minimizing false positives. Adoption of comprehensive enterprise monitoring accelerated post-2010, driven by the proliferation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies that pressured corporate networks; by 2011, 40% of devices accessing business applications were personally owned, necessitating advanced device authentication and traffic oversight. Gartner reports that by 2026, 30% of enterprises will automate over half of their network activities with AI-based analytics and intelligent automation, rising from under 10% in mid-2023, to bolster efficiency and threat response.^[80]^[81]^[82] Best practices emphasize segmentation monitoring in zero-trust architectures, where micro-segmentation deploys policy enforcement points like next-generation firewalls to isolate resources, coupled with continuous diagnostics for real-time asset and traffic pattern analysis to prevent lateral movement. As enterprises navigate hybrid cloud transitions, monitoring solutions extend to unified observability across on-premises and public cloud platforms (e.g., AWS, Azure), tracking network latency, bandwidth, and application performance to enable seamless workload migration without disruptions. Server monitoring functions as a targeted subset for overseeing web-facing elements within these hybrid setups.^[83]^[84]

Internet Server and Web Monitoring

Internet server and web monitoring focuses on ensuring the availability, performance, and reliability of publicly accessible web infrastructure, including web servers, content delivery networks (CDNs), and load balancers that serve global user traffic. This involves proactive detection of downtime, latency issues, and service degradations that directly impact end-user experience, such as slow page loads or failed connections. Tools and services in this domain emphasize external observability, simulating user interactions to validate that websites and applications remain responsive from various global vantage points.^[85]^[86] A key aspect of this monitoring is addressing global distribution challenges, where servers are deployed across multiple regions to minimize latency and enhance redundancy. For instance, platforms like AWS Global Accelerator route traffic to the nearest regional endpoints in AWS Regions, continuously measuring inter-region latency to ensure optimal performance and failover during outages. Geo-redundancy is often verified through anycast DNS, which directs users to the closest available server instance by advertising the same IP address from multiple locations, thereby reducing propagation delays and improving fault tolerance. This approach is critical for CDNs and load balancers, which distribute content and requests across edge servers worldwide to handle varying loads and regional disruptions.^[87]^[88]^[89] Core processes in internet server and web monitoring include synthetic transactions that mimic real user behaviors to assess end-to-end performance. These simulations measure metrics like page load times by executing scripted browser actions from distributed agents, identifying bottlenecks in rendering, resource fetching, or API responses. Additionally, monitoring tracks HTTP status codes to differentiate successful responses (e.g., 200 OK) from errors (e.g., 5xx server faults), enabling rapid diagnosis of availability issues. SSL certificate expiry alerts are another essential process, where automated checks scan for impending renewals—typically alerting 30 days in advance—to prevent service interruptions due to expired or invalid certificates on web servers and load balancers.^[90]^[91]^[92]^[93]^[94] Notifications in this monitoring ecosystem rely on threshold-based alerts triggered by predefined performance criteria, such as latency exceeding 500 ms or uptime dropping below 99.9%. These alerts are delivered via email or SMS to on-call teams, ensuring timely intervention for issues like CDN origin failures or load balancer overloads. Integration with incident management platforms like PagerDuty further enhances this by routing alerts through escalation policies, combining email and SMS with mobile push notifications for faster resolution of web service disruptions.^[95]^[96]^[97] A prominent metric for quantifying user satisfaction in web monitoring is the Apdex score, which evaluates response times against satisfaction thresholds. Defined as the ratio of satisfied and tolerating requests to total samples, the formula is:

\text{Apdex} = \frac{\text{satisfied} + \frac{\text{tolerating}}{2}}{\text{total samples}}

Here, "satisfied" requests meet or exceed a target threshold (e.g., under 2 seconds for page loads), "tolerating" fall within an acceptable range (e.g., 2-4 seconds), and frustrated requests exceed it; scores range from 0 (no satisfaction) to 1 (full satisfaction), providing a standardized view of web performance impact on users.^[98]^[99]^[100]

Challenges and Advances

Common Challenges

Network monitoring faces significant scalability challenges, particularly in handling the petabyte-scale data volumes generated by 5G and edge computing environments. Large 5G networks can produce petabytes of data daily across multiple domains, overwhelming traditional monitoring systems designed for smaller-scale operations. This explosion in data volume complicates real-time analysis and storage, often leading to delays in detecting performance issues or threats. For instance, anomaly detection algorithms in these high-velocity networks frequently generate false positives, which desensitize analysts and divert resources from genuine incidents, thereby reducing overall alert efficacy.^[101]^[102] Privacy and security issues further exacerbate monitoring difficulties, as the prevalence of encrypted traffic creates substantial blind spots. Over 90% of network traffic is now encrypted, primarily through HTTPS, making it challenging to inspect for malicious activity without decryption, which raises legal and performance concerns. This encryption obscures threats hidden within legitimate channels, with studies showing that a significant portion of malware exploits SSL/TLS to evade detection. Additionally, compliance with standards like PCI-DSS imposes heavy burdens, requiring continuous monitoring, logging, and auditing of cardholder data environments, which can increase operational costs and complexity for organizations handling payment transactions.^[103]^[104] Integration hurdles arise from siloed monitoring tools, which fragment visibility and hinder holistic network oversight. When tools for flow analysis, metrics collection, and application performance operate in isolation, administrators gain incomplete views of the infrastructure, missing correlations between issues like latency spikes and underlying causes. Vendor lock-in compounds this problem, as proprietary systems limit interoperability and force organizations into costly, inflexible ecosystems that restrict multi-vendor deployments. Such dependencies can consume a substantial portion of IT resources, amplifying the challenges of maintaining unified monitoring across diverse environments. Resource demands also pose ongoing issues, with polling-based methods like SNMP imposing notable CPU overhead on network devices. Frequent polling intervals strain device processors, potentially degrading performance in resource-constrained setups such as edge nodes. To mitigate this, techniques like flow sampling—where only a subset of packets is analyzed—reduce overhead while preserving essential insights, though they trade off some granularity for efficiency. Emerging approaches, such as AI-driven mitigations, offer potential to optimize these processes without excessive computational burden.^[105]^[106]^[107]

Emerging Trends

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into network monitoring has enabled predictive analytics for failure forecasting and advanced anomaly detection. In predictive analytics, ML models analyze historical network data to anticipate potential failures, such as link degradations or node overloads, allowing proactive interventions that reduce downtime in large-scale deployments. A prominent example is anomaly detection using autoencoders, unsupervised neural networks trained to reconstruct normal network traffic patterns; deviations indicate anomalies like DDoS attacks or misconfigurations. The reconstruction error is typically measured via the mean squared error (MSE) loss function, defined as:

\text{MSE} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (y_i - \hat{y}_i)^2

where n is the number of samples, y_i the observed values, and \hat{y}_i the reconstructed values. This approach has been applied effectively in 5G networks for real-time threat identification.^[108]^[109] In cloud and software-defined networking (SDN) environments, intent-based monitoring within network function virtualization (NFV) represents a shift toward automated, policy-driven oversight. Intent-based systems translate high-level user intents—such as "ensure 99.99% uptime for video streaming"—into executable configurations across virtualized functions, using SDN controllers to dynamically adjust resources and monitor compliance in real time. This facilitates zero-touch provisioning, where devices and services are automatically configured without manual intervention, projected to see significant market growth with the zero-touch provisioning sector valued at approximately USD 3.76 billion in 2025.^[110]^[111]^[112] The observability paradigm has evolved network monitoring from reactive metric collection to holistic full-stack tracing, incorporating logs, metrics, and traces for deeper system insights. Tools like OpenTelemetry, an open-source observability framework, standardize the collection and export of telemetry data across distributed systems, enabling correlation of network events with application performance in cloud-native setups. This shift addresses scalability challenges by providing context-rich data for debugging complex, microservices-based architectures.^[113]^[114]^[115] Sustainability efforts in network monitoring emphasize energy-efficient practices, particularly in green data centers and IoT/5G ecosystems. AI-optimized monitoring reduces power consumption by dynamically scaling data collection and analysis, with 5G networks achieving up to 90% energy savings through intelligent resource allocation compared to 4G. In green data centers, techniques like edge computing offload processing to minimize central server loads, supporting carbon-neutral operations. Additionally, monitoring for quantum-safe encryption—using post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum key distribution (QKD)—ensures secure oversight of sensitive traffic in future-proof networks, with fiber monitoring tools integrating PQC to detect tampering without compromising efficiency.^[116]^[117]^[118]

References

[1]
What Is Network Monitoring? - Cisco
Network monitoring provides information network administrators use to see whether a network is running optimally and to identify deficiencies in real time.
[2]
What is Network Monitoring? | IBM
Network monitoring means using network monitoring software to monitor a computer network's ongoing health and reliability.What is network monitoring? · Why is network monitoring...
[3]
What is Network Monitoring? How it Works and Key Benefits
Jan 31, 2025 · Network monitoring, also frequently called network management, is the practice of consistently overseeing a computer network for any failures or deficiencies.
[4]
What Is Network Monitoring? Ensuring Uptime, Security ... - Splunk
Oct 6, 2025 · Network monitoring is the practice of observing and analyzing network performance, health, and traffic patterns to ensure optimal network ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[5]
What is Network Monitoring? Why is it Important? - Fortinet
Network monitoring involves the identification of underperforming or failing components before they can negatively impact operations.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[6]
What Is Network Monitoring? - IT Glossary - SolarWinds
Network monitoring is a critical IT process to discover, map, and monitor computer networks and network components, including routers, switches, servers, ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[7]
What Is Network Monitoring? Definition & How It Works - Nile Secure
Network monitoring is the process of systematically monitoring a network for problems such as poor connections, slow applications or failing components.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[8]
A Brief History of Network Monitoring - WhatsUp Gold
Oct 26, 2020 · Network monitoring began with the need for management, SNMP in 1988, 90s tools like nmon, and 21st century web-based interfaces.
[9]
A Brief History of Network Monitoring Tools - LiveAction
Feb 24, 2022 · Early tools used token-passing protocols, then TCP/IP. SNMP was created, followed by Unix commands, and later web-based tools like Zabbix and ...
[10]
Understanding the 5 Key Concepts of Network Monitoring
Feb 11, 2025 · Network monitoring involves discovering devices, mapping their connections, tracking performance, reporting on trends, and alerting to issues.
[11]
Network Monitoring: A Reference Guide - NetBeez
Jul 31, 2019 · The central server hosts the database and the dashboard. The remote agents runs the performance tests, collect the tests' results, and send the ...Snmp-Based Tools · Collectors · Network Monitoring Tools...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
How to Build an Effective Network Monitoring Dashboard - Obkio
Rating 4.9 (161) Apr 15, 2024 · A network monitoring dashboard is a centralized platform that provides real-time visibility into your network's performance and health.
[13]
How Network Monitoring Works, What to Monitor & Tips for Success
Network monitoring involves observing and analyzing network performance and health through various devices and software tools.Network Monitoring Metrics... · Common Metrics Monitored · Snmp (simple Network...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[14]
2016 Cost of Data Center Outages - Ponemon Institute
Jan 19, 2016 · The purpose of the third study is to continue to analyze the cost behavior of unplanned data center outages for data centers.
[15]
Defending against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks
Feb 23, 2024 · Continuous monitoring (CM) and real-time analysis of network traffic offers several benefits for identifying and mitigating potential DDoS ...
[16]
Amazon CloudWatch Service Level Agreement
Apr 22, 2025 · This Amazon CloudWatch Service Level Agreement (SLA) is a policy governing the use of Amazon CloudWatch and applies separately to each account using Amazon ...Amazon Cloudwatch Service... · Last Updated: April 22, 2025 · Service Credits
[17]
GDPR Compliance: 6 Steps to Get Your Network Ready for GDPR IT ...
May 10, 2023 · Visualize and document your IT network; Take appropriate measures and put automated processes in place for your network environment; Ensure ...
[18]
IP SLAs Configuration Guide - Configuring IP SLAs ICMP Echo Operations [Cisco ASR 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers]
### Summary of IP SLAs ICMP Echo Operations
[19]
Top 3 Network Monitoring Techniques - NetBeez
Aug 19, 2020 · An active network monitoring system works by sending real traffic across a network. When testing an application or a service, the system ...
[20]
Understand the Ping and Traceroute Commands - Cisco
Oct 4, 2022 · The ping command is a very common method used to troubleshoot accessibility of devices. It uses a series of Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) Echo ...
[21]
What is synthetic monitoring - Dynatrace
Nov 25, 2024 · Synthetic monitoring is an application performance monitoring practice that emulates the paths users might take when engaging with an application.4.Why use synthetic monitoring? · 5.Types of synthetic monitoring
[22]
Active vs. Passive Monitoring: What's The Difference? - Splunk
Active monitoring proactively simulates user interactions with synthetic tests, enabling early detection of availability and performance issues before they ...
[23]
Active vs. Passive Network Monitoring: Which Method is Right for You
Rating 4.9 (161) Jul 13, 2023 · Network Performance Testing: Active monitoring is commonly used to measure and validate network performance during or after infrastructure ...
[24]
SLA Verification of WAN Links - Keysight
Keysight Technologies shares a case study of how a large European bank deploys Hawkeye, Keysight's active network performance monitoring solution, to verify ...
[25]
IP SLA Monitoring and Management - Free Trial - SolarWinds
Support better network performance with IP SLA monitoring and Network Service Assurance Management. Try SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager.
[26]
Understanding Network TAPs – The First Step to Visibility - Gigamon
A network TAP is a simple device that connects directly to the cabling infrastructure to split or copy packets for use in analysis, security or general ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[27]
Explain Network TAP Vs. SPAN Port - Niagara Networks
Network TAPs are purpose-built devices that see all the traffic all the time, and are not dependent on the switch's resources and limitations.
[28]
Network Tap vs Port Mirroring - Corning
A network tap is a passive component that allows non-intrusive access to data flowing across the network and enables monitoring of network links.Missing: definition mechanism
[29]
What Is Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)? - Fortinet
Deep packet inspection (DPI), also known as packet sniffing, is a method of examining the content of data packets as they pass by a checkpoint on the network.
[30]
Deep Network Packet Inspection: What It Is and How It Works
Deep Network Packet Inspection (DPI) analyzes both headers and payloads in real time, unlike basic packet filtering that only checks headers. · It strengthens ...2. Protocol Anomaly... · Enhanced Threat Detection · Deep Network Packet...
[31]
Sampling for Passive Internet Measurement: A Review - Project Euclid
The SNMP statistics are commonly polled every 5 min, although polling at intervals down to a few seconds is claimed to not impair router performance; see [18].
[32]
Passive monitoring vs. active monitoring - Paessler Blog
Oct 30, 2025 · Active monitoring is preventive in nature. It enables proactive detection of problems before they impact operations. Continuous testing around ...
[33]
RFC 5681 - TCP Congestion Control - IETF Datatracker
This document specifies four TCP [RFC793] congestion control algorithms: slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit and fast recovery.<|separator|>
[34]
Active Monitoring vs. Passive Monitoring – Which is Better? - SecuLore
Passive monitoring captures real traffic and data, analyzes it and can create a baseline of patterns in order to identify actual suspicious traffic in real time ...
[35]
Network Traffic Monitoring with and without Encrypted Traffic
Mar 6, 2020 · Having or not having an encrypted traffic analysis feature in your network monitoring system makes a huge difference.
[36]
The Challenges of Inspecting Encrypted Network Traffic - Fortinet
Aug 4, 2020 · Inspecting encrypted traffic is difficult due to lack of decryption, time-consuming decryption, high CPU usage, and some security products not ...
[37]
Network Tomography - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Providing the first truly comprehensive overview of Network Tomography - a novel network monitoring approach that makes use of inference techniques to ...Missing: concepts | Show results with:concepts
[38]
[PDF] Internet Tomography 1 Introduction
This article attempts to be fairly self-contained; only a modest familiarity with network- ing principles is required and basic concepts are defined as ...
[39]
Network delay tomography | IEEE Journals & Magazine
In this paper, we present a novel methodology for inferring the queuing delay distributions across internal links in the network based solely on unicast, end-to ...
[40]
[PDF] Network delay tomography
3) The use of a multiscale maximum penalized likelihood estimator (MMPLE) provides a computationally fast method for balancing the bias-variance tradeoff and ...
[41]
[PDF] Network Tomography on General Topologies - Nick Duffield
In this paper we consider the problem of inferring link-level loss rates from end-to-end multicast measurements taken from a col- lection of trees. We give ...
[42]
Passive network tomography using EM algorithms - IEEE Xplore
More specifically, we devise a novel expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to infer internal packet loss rates (at routers inside the network) using only ...
[43]
[PDF] Node Failure Localization via Network Tomography ∗ - Events
In this paper, we study an application of Boolean network tomography to localize node failures from measurements of path states. Assuming that a measurement ...
[44]
An adaptive compressive sensing scheme for network tomography ...
A scalable network fault localization scheme based on compressive sensing is proposed. Aimed at large networks, the proposed scheme monitors a network with ...
[45]
[PDF] Network Tomography: A Review and Recent Developments
Sep 15, 2005 · The modeling and analysis of computer communications networks give rise to a variety of interesting statistical problems.<|separator|>
[46]
SDN enhanced tomography for performance profiling in cloud network
Mar 1, 2017 · For cloud network performance profiling, network tomography is useful for deducing the network performance based on end-to-end measurement.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
[47]
Network Tomography for Efficient Monitoring in SDN-Enabled 5G ...
Efficient monitoring plays a vital role in software-defined networking (SDN)-enabled 5G networks, involving the monitoring of performance metrics for both ...
[48]
BGP Anomaly Detection Techniques: A Survey
Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7723902) points to a page requiring access, and no full text or detailed content is available without subscription or purchase. Thus, specific BGP anomaly detection techniques focusing on route instability, flaps, blackholing, and suboptimal routes cannot be extracted or summarized.
[49]
[PDF] BGP measurement and live data analysis - CAIDA
Jun 19, 2017 · Paths made of ASN hops) to its local prefixes and the preferred routes learned from its neighbors. (Path Vector routing protocol).<|separator|>
[50]
RFC 2439: BGP Route Flap Damping
### Summary of BGP Route Flap Damping (RFC 2439)
[51]
BGP.Tools
Near Realtime BGP Data; User Friendly interfaces; Frequently updated external data. We offer for paid users: BGP Network Monitoring · IRR Database Monitoring.Jump to Looking Glass · Setup BGP Sessions for Route... · AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
[52]
None
Summary of each segment:
[53]
https://personals.ac.upc.edu/acabello/PDF/Path-vector%20Routing%20Stability%20Analysis%20(ACM%20SIGMETRICS%20Performance%20Evaluation%20Review%20-%20final%20version).pdf
[54]
[PDF] Towards a Semantics-Aware Routing Anomaly Detection System
To address these challenges, we present a routing anomaly detection system centering around a novel network representa- tion learning model, BEAM (BGP sEmAntics ...
[55]
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for BGP Anomaly ...
In this work, we identified different graph features to detect BGP anomalies, which are arguably more robust than traditional features.
[56]
RFC 4789 - Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) over ...
This document specifies how Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) messages can be transmitted directly over IEEE 802 networks.
[57]
OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.11 ssCpuIdle reference info
The percentage of processor time spent idle, calculated over the last minute. This object has been deprecated in favour of 'ssCpuRawIdle(53)'.Missing: structure example
[58]
RFC 4502 - Remote Network Monitoring Management Information ...
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets.
[59]
RFC 7011 - Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX ...
RFC 7011 specifies the IPFIX protocol for transmitting Traffic Flow information over the network, providing a common representation of flow data.
[60]
[PDF] Traffic Monitoring using sFlow®
sFlow provides a network-wide view of usage and active routes. It is a scalable technique for measuring network traffic, collecting, storing, and analyzing ...
[61]
[PDF] Cisco NetFlow Configuration
NetFlow is based on 7 key fields • Source IP address • Destination IP address • Source port number • Destination port number • Layer 3 protocol type (ex. TCP, ...
[62]
What is Network Flow Monitoring? - Progress Flowmon
Nov 24, 2022 · Flowmon is a flow-based network performance monitoring solution that tracks bandwidth usage, helps IT understand their traffic structure.
[63]
Evolution of Network Flow Monitoring - from NetFlow to IPFIX - Noction
Jul 8, 2020 · The Evolution of Network Flow Monitoring, from NetFlow to IPFIX ... NetFlow v1 became the basis of the flow monitoring protocols we have today.
[64]
Model Driven Telemetry White Paper - Cisco
Apr 3, 2024 · This fully declarative provider allows users to get, create, and edit Cisco IOS XE features using a single cloud-native provider. There is a ...
[65]
TAP vs. SPAN: Which Option is Right for You? - Gigamon
TAPs create an exact copy of the bi-directional network traffic at full line rate, providing full fidelity for network monitoring, analytics and security.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[66]
Comparing Network Monitoring Tools - TAP vs. SPAN - Profitap Blog
Unlike a network TAP, SPAN ports filter out physical layer errors, making some types of analyses more difficult, and as we have seen, incorrect delta times and ...
[67]
Network TAP vs SPAN Port: Technical Deep Dive & Cost-Benefit ...
Network TAPs (Test Access Points) and SPAN (Switched Port Analyzer) ports represent fundamentally different approaches to network monitoring.Missing: hardware appliances probes
[68]
Riverbed AppResponse
Riverbed AppResponse captures and analyzes every packet in real time, translating rich network and application data into actionable insight. A key component in ...
[69]
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI) Solution Overview
Cisco ACI is a secure, open, comprehensive SDN solution that enables automation, simplifies management, and helps move workloads across multicloud environments.
[70]
A High-Performance and Accurate FPGA-Based Flow Monitor for ...
In this paper, an accurate FPGA-based flow monitor that is capable of processing 100 Gbps networks is proposed. The design can accurately calculate flow ...
[71]
[PDF] Achieving 100Gbps Intrusion Prevention on a Single Server - USENIX
Nov 4, 2020 · The paper achieves 100Gbps intrusion prevention on a single server using Pigasus, an FPGA-based system, using 5 cores and 1 FPGA, with 38x less ...
[72]
Edge Computing Trends in Industrial and Enterprise Applications
Jun 20, 2025 · Edge computing trends indicate a shift to edge network devices that reducing latency, improve security, and make real-time processing a ...
[73]
IoT-Based Healthcare-Monitoring System towards Improving Quality ...
This review paper explores the latest trends in healthcare-monitoring systems by implementing the role of the IoT.
[74]
Enterprise Network Monitoring: Why You Need It - Obkio
Rating 4.9 (161) Jan 30, 2024 · Enterprise network monitoring stands as a pivotal IT procedure, overseeing the health and efficiency of all network elements.Missing: scope | Show results with:scope
[75]
Enterprise Network Monitoring & Management - ManageEngine
Enterprise network monitoring is the practice of proactively monitoring and managing a business network to ensure seamless performance and boost reliability ...
[76]
Bandwidth Monitoring: What It Is and Why It's Important - Infraon
Oct 16, 2025 · Bandwidth monitoring is the process of measuring and analyzing how much data is moving across a network at any given time.
[77]
Solving Performance Issues with Proactive VPN Monitoring
Monitoring VPN performance metrics like latency, throughput, and packet loss helps network administrators quickly detect and respond to performance degradation.Missing: allocation | Show results with:allocation
[78]
What Is Network Access Control (NAC)? - Cisco
Network access control (NAC) is a security solution that enforces policy on devices that access networks to increase network visibility and reduce risk.
[79]
Replace Your Legacy Intrusion Detection System (IDS)
It works by establishing a baseline for normal activity by statistically analyzing network traffic or system activity over time. This baseline becomes a ...
[80]
BYOD Trend Pressures Corporate Networks - eWeek
Sep 5, 2011 · Businesses can save money by letting employees buy their own devices, but they must then find secure, efficient ways to let employees, ...
[81]
Gartner Says 30% of Enterprises Will Automate More Than Half of ...
Sep 18, 2024 · By 2026, 30% of enterprises will automate more than half of their network activities, an increase from under 10% in mid-2023, according to Gartner, Inc.
[82]
[PDF] Zero Trust Architecture - NIST Technical Series Publications
This document contains an abstract definition of zero trust architecture (ZTA) and gives general deployment models and use cases where zero trust could improve ...
[83]
What is Hybrid Cloud Monitoring and Why is it Important - LiveAction
By using hybrid cloud monitoring solutions, IT teams can gain insights into resource utilization, network latency, application performance, and security issues, ...
[84]
Website & application availability | Monitor uptime - Cloudflare
Cloudflare ensures your web applications are available by monitoring network latency and server health. Keep your applications online with Cloudflare.
[85]
What is a content delivery network (CDN)? | How do CDNs work?
A content delivery network is a distributed group of servers that caches content near end users. Learn how CDNs improve load times and reduce costs.CDN performance · Internet exchange point (IXP) · CDN reliability and redundancy
[86]
How AWS Global Accelerator works
When you set up your accelerator with Global Accelerator, you associate the static IP addresses to regional endpoints in one or more AWS Regions. For standard ...
[87]
Monitoring AWS Global Network Performance
Mar 21, 2023 · You can monitor the real-time inter-Region, inter-AZ, and intra-AZ latency, and the health status of the AWS Global Network.Missing: anycast DNS geo- redundancy
[88]
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/networking-and-content-delivery/monitoring-aws-global-network-performance/
[89]
Synthetic Testing: What It Is & How It Works | Datadog
Synthetic tests can be used to monitor website transactions and ... These tests can also evaluate page load times, status codes, and header/body content.
[90]
What is Synthetic Monitoring? Challenges & Best Practices
Oct 23, 2024 · Synthetic monitoring is the process of continually monitoring your application performance, whether proactive or active.
[91]
Synthetic Transaction Monitoring: The ultimate guide 2025 - Uptrends
Apr 10, 2025 · STM that's supported by API monitoring lets you synthetically test custom API calls for availability, response time, status codes, and ...Why Broken Or Slow... · Frontend Issues · Network Latency And Regional...
[92]
SSL Monitoring - Datadog
Datadog SSL API tests allow you to detect when certificates are about to expire or if they are misconfigured across public or internal hosts and multiple ...
[93]
SSL Certificate Management and Expiration Monitoring Tool
The tool automates SSL certificate expiration monitoring, tests secure connections, and sets alerts to help manage and renew certificates.
[94]
The OpManager-PagerDuty integration - ManageEngine
PagerDuty ensures on-call users never miss an alert by notifying them via SMS, email, call, and mobile app. This guarantees quick attention and immediate ...
[95]
SMS Notifications - PagerDuty Knowledge Base
PagerDuty can notify users via SMS when various incident lifecycle events occur. Many factors, such as laws and regulations in your region, may affect the ...Missing: threshold- | Show results with:threshold-
[96]
Email Integration Guide - PagerDuty Knowledge Base
Events and alerts from monitoring tools will be sent as emails to your desired PagerDuty integration email address. PagerDuty will open and trigger an incident ...Missing: threshold- | Show results with:threshold-
[97]
What Is Apdex Score: Definition, Calculation & How to Improve It
Mar 26, 2025 · Application Performance Index, or Apdex, is a measurement of your users' level of satisfaction based on the response time of request(s) when ...
[98]
Apdex: Measure user satisfaction - New Relic Documentation
The Apdex score is a ratio value of the number of satisfied and tolerating requests to the total requests made. Each satisfied request counts as one request, ...
[99]
What is an Apdex Score? | IBM
An Apdex score is an open standard quantitative metric that measures end user satisfaction with an organization's web application and service response time.
[100]
Taking an AIOps Approach to Improve Network Performance ...
Jul 17, 2024 · Because large 5G networks can generate petabytes of data daily across many different domains, as well as third parties, operators are left ...
[101]
Reducing false positives of network anomaly detection by local ...
This work proposes a method designed to decrease the rate of unstructured false positives by smoothing anomaly values with respect to time.
[102]
How Fidelis Inspect Encrypted Traffic Without Breaking Privacy
Aug 8, 2025 · In today's networks, more than 90% of traffic is encrypted, obscuring both legitimate business data and increasingly sophisticated threats.Missing: percentage 2023
[103]
How Much Does PCI Compliance Cost? - Security Metrics
If you're a small business, PCI DSS compliance should cost from $300 per year (depending on your environment). · Self-Assessment Questionnaire: $50 - $200 ...
[104]
Network Monitoring Protocols: 6 Essential Guide - ProLink IT Solutions
Aug 18, 2025 · Reduced Overhead: The efficient push model can have lower CPU overhead on devices than frequent SNMP polling. Scalability: Ideal for large-scale ...
[105]
How accurate is sampled NetFlow? - Plixer
While it is true that a sampling rate of 1 out of 100 packets may reduce the export of NetFlow data by as much as 50 percent.
[106]
How Data Siloes Hinder Visibility and What to Do About It - SolarWinds
May 21, 2025 · Siloed tools generate siloed data. A network monitoring solution might be flagging increased latency, but if the application team doesn't see ...Missing: incomplete | Show results with:incomplete<|separator|>
[107]
Unsupervised Anomaly Prediction with N-BEATS and Graph Neural ...
Oct 23, 2025 · This paper proposes two novel approaches to advance the field from anomaly detection to anomaly prediction, an essential step toward enabling ...Missing: AI | Show results with:AI<|separator|>
[108]
Development of deep autoencoder-based anomaly detection system ...
MSE was used as the loss function for the training of the autoencoder and the network was trained for 100 epochs with a batch size of 32. In addition, the ...
[109]
Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection are Unreliable - arXiv
Jan 23, 2025 · Anomaly detection using autoencoders typically relies on using the reconstruction loss, often the mean squared error (MSE), as a proxy for “ ...
[110]
Intent-based network slicing for SDN vertical services with assurance
In this paper, we present an Intent-based deployment of a NFV orchestration stack that allows for the setup of Qos-aware and SDN-enabled network slices.
[111]
(PDF) INTENT-BASED NETWORKING IN SDN: AUTOMATING ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Intent-Based Networking (IBN) represents this next evolutionary leap, where we can express our business needs in human terms, and our networks ...
[112]
Zero-Touch Provisioning Market Size, Trends & Forecast 2025-2035
In 2025, the zero-touch provisioning market is expected to be valued at approximately USD 3,759.01 million. By 2035, it is projected to reach around USD 10,019 ...Missing: IDC | Show results with:IDC
[113]
What is OpenTelemetry?
Jun 24, 2025 · OpenTelemetry is not an observability backend itself. A major goal of OpenTelemetry is to enable easy instrumentation of your applications and ...
[114]
https://www.solarwinds.com/blog/how-opentelemetry-is-redefining-application-performance-monitoring
[115]
The Case for Bringing Network Visibility Data into OpenTelemetry
May 9, 2023 · ITOps teams can export data northbound from the ThousandEyes platform in an OpenTelemetry format, making it possible to combine cloud and Internet intelligence.
[116]
A Study on the Energy Efficiency of AI-Based 5G Networks - MDPI
Energy-efficient 5G networks can help minimize the environmental impact, reduce operational costs, and support sustainable development. In addition to the ...
[117]
ICT energy evolution: Telecom, data centers, and AI - Ericsson
Legacy technologies with low energy efficiencies, such as fixed telephony, 2G, and 3G will be phased out in favor of energy-efficient standards such as 5G.<|separator|>
[118]
[PDF] future-proofing-communications-rise-quantum-safe-technology ...
Sep 26, 2025 · Quantum-secured encryption: fiber monitoring helps maintain secure data transmission by integrating QKD and PQC into optical networks. This ...<|control11|><|separator|>