Reverse engineering
Reverse engineering is the process of disassembling and examining a physical object, software, or system to deduce its design principles, internal structure, and functional mechanisms, typically to enable replication, improvement, or analysis when original documentation is unavailable or proprietary.[1][2][3] This method contrasts with forward engineering by starting from the finished product and working backward to uncover causal relationships in its construction and operation, relying on empirical measurement, material analysis, and performance testing rather than theoretical blueprints.[4] Applied across disciplines including mechanical, electrical, software, and biological engineering, reverse engineering supports tasks such as legacy part remanufacturing, cybersecurity vulnerability assessment, and competitive product development.[5][6] In software contexts, it involves decompiling binaries to recover algorithms and interfaces, aiding interoperability and malware dissection.[7] A defining historical instance occurred post-World War II when Soviet engineers meticulously reverse-engineered three interned Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers to produce the Tupolev Tu-4, achieving near-identical replication within years and thereby accelerating Soviet long-range bomber capabilities despite lacking licensed access.[8][9][10] Though instrumental in technological catch-up and innovation—such as enabling domestic production of obsolete components or forensic analysis of enemy hardware—reverse engineering often provokes disputes over intellectual property infringement, with legality varying by jurisdiction; for instance, it is generally permissible for achieving compatibility under U.S. fair use doctrines but restricted where it facilitates unauthorized duplication of patented inventions.[11][12] Empirical evidence from military applications underscores its dual-edged nature: while it democratizes advanced designs through direct observation, outcomes depend on the reverse-engineer's technical proficiency, as incomplete replication can yield inferior performance, evident in the Tu-4's marginally reduced speed compared to the original B-29.[8]