Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Galilean transformation

The Galilean transformation is a fundamental concept in classical mechanics that describes the relationship between the coordinates of events in two inertial reference frames moving at a constant relative velocity, with time remaining absolute and unchanged between the frames.^[1] It assumes that velocities add vectorially and that the laws of physics, such as Newton's laws of motion, remain invariant under this transformation, ensuring the principle of relativity holds for low-speed phenomena.^[2] Named after Galileo Galilei, who first articulated the principle of relativity in the early 17th century through thought experiments involving uniform motion (such as observations from a moving ship), the transformation formalizes how position and velocity transform between frames.^[1] For frames S and S' where S' moves with constant velocity v along the x-axis relative to S, the key equations are:

x' = x - vt
y' = y
z' = z
t' = t

These yield velocity transformations like u'_x = u_x - v and acceleration invariance a'_x = a_x, preserving the form of mechanical equations.^[1]^[2] While central to Newtonian physics, the Galilean transformation breaks down at speeds approaching the speed of light, where it conflicts with the invariance of the speed of light established by Maxwell's equations; this limitation led to Einstein's development of the Lorentz transformation in special relativity.^[1] It remains essential for everyday engineering and low-velocity approximations in physics.^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition and Motivation

In classical Newtonian mechanics, an inertial frame of reference is defined as a coordinate system in which Newton's laws of motion hold without fictitious forces, meaning that objects not subject to external forces move with constant velocity in straight lines.^[3] The principle of relativity in this context states that the laws of physics, particularly those of mechanics, are identical in all inertial frames moving at constant velocity relative to one another, ensuring that no experiment can distinguish between such frames.^[4] This principle finds its foundational motivation in Galileo's famous ship thought experiment, outlined in his 1632 Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, where he imagines observers inside a smoothly sailing ship unable to detect the vessel's uniform motion through experiments involving dropped objects, flying insects, or splashing water, which behave identically whether the ship is at rest or in steady motion.^[5] The experiment illustrates that uniform rectilinear motion is indistinguishable from rest within the frame, underscoring the relativity of motion and the equivalence of inertial frames for describing physical phenomena without acceleration.^[4] To relate coordinates between two such inertial frames moving at constant relative velocity v along the x-axis, the Galilean transformation in one dimension takes the simple form x' = x - vt, t' = t, where the primed frame moves with velocity [v](/page/V.) relative to the unprimed frame./02%3A_Review_of_Newtonian_Mechanics/2.03%3A_Inertial_Frames_of_reference) In three dimensions, this extends to vector notation as \vec{r}' = \vec{r} - \vec{v}t, t' = t, preserving the spatial displacement while accounting for the relative boost.^[1] Central to these transformations is the assumption of absolute time in classical physics, as articulated by Newton, whereby time flows uniformly and independently of spatial motion or observers, allowing t' = t and enabling simultaneous events to be universally defined across frames.^[6]

Historical Context

The origins of the Galilean transformation trace back to Galileo Galilei's seminal work Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632), where he articulated the principle of relativity for uniform motion through a famous thought experiment involving a ship. In this scenario, Salviati explains: "Shut yourself up with some friend in the main cabin below decks on some large ship, and have with you there some flies, butterflies, and other small flying animals. Have a large bowl of water with some fish in it; hang up a bottle that empties drop by drop into a wide vessel beneath it. With the ship standing still, observe carefully how the little animals fly with equal speed to all sides of the cabin. The fish swim indifferently in all directions; the drops fall into the vessel beneath; and, in throwing something to your friend, you need throw it no more strongly in one direction than another, the distances being equal; jumping with your feet together, you pass equal spaces in every direction. When you have observed all these things carefully (though there is no doubt that when the ship is standing still everything must happen in this way), have the ship proceed with any speed you like, so long as the motion is uniform and not fluctuating this way and that. You will discover not the least change in all the effects named, nor could you tell from any of them whether the ship was moving or standing still."[](https://pages.jh.edu/rrynasi1/PrincipleOfRelativity/Literature/Galileo/Galileo1632(1967)DialogueConcerningTheTwoChiefWorldSystemsPtolemaic+Copernican.Stillman Drake(trans.).pdf) This illustrates that observers in uniform motion relative to each other cannot detect absolute motion through local experiments, laying the conceptual groundwork for transformations between inertial frames.^[7] Isaac Newton formalized these ideas in Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), integrating the relativity of uniform motion into his laws of motion while distinguishing between absolute and relative quantities. In the Scholium following the definitions, Newton states: "Absolute motion is the translation of a body from one absolute place to another; and relative motion the translation from one relative place to another. And thus in the former sense it is said that the earth, if rotating about its own axis, is moved, and in the latter sense that it is moved if it is carried along with the sun or if the sun is carried along with it."^[6] This linkage ensured that Newton's laws remain invariant under changes in reference frames moving at constant velocity relative to one another, embedding the transformation implicitly within classical mechanics.^[8] In the 19th century, the explicit coordinate form of the Galilean transformation emerged as part of efforts to reconcile Newtonian mechanics with emerging theories of electromagnetism and wave propagation, assuming universal time and Euclidean space-time structure. This period saw debates over wave mechanics, particularly in optics, where assumptions akin to Galilean velocity addition were applied to light propagation in a luminiferous ether. A notable example is Siméon-Denis Poisson's 1818 analysis of Augustin-Jean Fresnel's diffraction theory, where Poisson, a proponent of the corpuscular model, derived a prediction of a bright spot at the center of a circular shadow to discredit the wave theory; its experimental confirmation instead bolstered wave optics under classical kinematic assumptions.^[4]^[9] These developments highlighted tensions in applying Galilean invariance to electromagnetic waves, as Maxwell's equations (1860s) implied a constant speed of light incompatible with simple velocity addition. By the early 20th century, the Galilean transformation was recognized as the low-speed approximation of the Lorentz transformation in Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity (1905), resolving the ether debates by showing that Newtonian mechanics holds for velocities much less than the speed of light. Einstein's framework demonstrated that while Galilean transformations suffice for classical scales, they fail at relativistic speeds, marking the transition from absolute to observer-dependent space-time.

Mathematical Formulation

Transformation Equations

The Galilean transformation describes the coordinate changes between two inertial reference frames in classical mechanics, incorporating spatial rotations, translations, boosts, and time shifts to maintain the form-invariance of physical laws.^[10] In its most general form, the transformation for position and time coordinates is given by

\vec{r}' = R(\vec{r} - \vec{v} t) + \vec{a}, \quad t' = t + b,

where \vec{r} and \vec{r}' are the position vectors in the original and transformed frames, respectively; R is a $3 \times 3 orthogonal rotation matrix with \det R = 1; \vec{v} is the relative boost velocity; \vec{a} is the spatial translation vector; and b is the time translation, which is often set to zero in standard treatments for simplicity but included here for completeness.^[11] This form is derived by requiring that Newton's second law, \vec{F} = m \vec{a}, remains unchanged in form across inertial frames related by constant relative motion. Assuming linear coordinate transformations and absolute time (t' = t + b), the velocity transforms as \vec{u}' = \vec{u} - \vec{v} (for b = 0), leading to invariant acceleration \vec{a}' = \vec{a}, which preserves the equality \vec{F}' = m \vec{a}' if forces transform appropriately under rotations and translations.^[10]^[1] Extending to include rotations R and translations \vec{a}, the full equations ensure that relative positions and accelerations are preserved in the rotated and shifted frame. For a compact representation, the Galilean transformations can be expressed in a 5D homogeneous coordinate system for spacetime events ( \vec{r}, t, 1 ), using the matrix

\begin{pmatrix} R & \vec{v} & \vec{a} \\ 0 & 1 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

which acts on the augmented vector to yield the transformed coordinates. This matrix form highlights the affine structure, combining linear (rotations and boosts) and inhomogeneous (translations) parts. These transformations preserve a degenerate metric on the 4D spacetime, defined by the quadratic form \eta = \delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j + 2 dt \, d\tau (or equivalently, a metric with signature (3,0|1) where time is null), making the Galilean group a subgroup of the orthogonal group O(3,0,1) for this indefinite, degenerate bilinear form. To see this, the infinitesimal generators (rotations, boosts, translations) satisfy the algebra that leaves \eta invariant, as boosts mix space and the auxiliary null direction without altering the metric's degeneracy.

Velocity and Acceleration Transformations

The velocity transformation under a Galilean boost arises from differentiating the position transformation equations with respect to time, assuming time is invariant between inertial frames. For frames S and S' where S' moves with constant velocity \vec{v} relative to S along the x-axis, the position coordinates transform as x' = x - v t, y' = y, z' = z, and t' = t. The x-component of velocity in S' is then u'_x = \frac{dx'}{dt'} = \frac{dx}{dt} - v = u_x - v, while the transverse components remain unchanged: u'_y = u_y and u'_z = u_z. In vector form, this is \vec{u}' = \vec{u} - \vec{v}.^[1]^[12] This additive rule applies to both collinear and non-collinear cases. For collinear motion, where the particle's velocity is parallel to \vec{v}, the transformation simplifies to scalar subtraction along that direction. For non-collinear motion, only the component parallel to \vec{v} is shifted by -\vec{v}, leaving perpendicular components invariant, preserving the directionality of transverse velocities.^[12] Differentiating the velocity equations once more yields the acceleration transformation. Since \vec{v} is constant, \vec{a}' = \frac{d\vec{u}'}{dt'} = \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = \vec{a}, showing that acceleration is invariant under Galilean boosts. This invariance implies that forces, which relate to mass times acceleration in Newtonian mechanics (F = m a), appear the same in all inertial frames, ensuring the consistency of classical dynamics across relative motion at constant velocity.^[1]^[12] A representative example is projectile motion observed from two frames. Consider a ball thrown upward with initial velocity u_0 in a frame S' moving horizontally at constant speed v relative to ground frame S. In S', the motion is a standard parabola under gravity, with horizontal velocity zero and vertical acceleration -g. In S, the horizontal velocity becomes v, but the vertical acceleration remains -g, so the trajectory is still parabolic, merely displaced horizontally, demonstrating the invariance of acceleration.^[13] The Galilean velocity addition fails for speeds approaching that of light, as it predicts the observed speed of light would vary with the source's motion (e.g., adding to c for a moving emitter), contradicting the empirical constancy of light speed in vacuum across inertial frames.^[13]^[1]

Physical Implications

Invariance of Newtonian Laws

The Galilean transformation ensures that inertial reference frames remain inertial under changes between them, thereby preserving Newton's first law of motion. In an inertial frame S, a body at rest or moving with constant velocity experiences no net force, resulting in zero acceleration. When transforming to another inertial frame S' moving at constant velocity \vec{u} relative to S, the transformation equations for position and velocity imply that accelerations are unchanged (\vec{a}' = \vec{a}), so the body appears at rest or in uniform motion in S' as well, with no fictitious forces introduced.^[10] This invariance confirms that all inertial frames are equivalent for describing unaccelerated motion, as originally posited by Galileo and formalized in Newtonian mechanics.^[14] Newton's second law, \vec{F} = m \vec{a}, is similarly invariant under Galilean transformations. The force \vec{F} on a particle, which is the sum of interaction forces from other particles and external forces, remains the same in both frames because forces depend on relative positions and velocities, which transform consistently. Since acceleration is invariant (\vec{a}' = \vec{a}) and mass m is an intrinsic scalar quantity unchanged by the transformation, the equation takes the identical form \vec{F}' = m \vec{a}' in the primed frame.^[10] This preservation holds for the vector equation in three dimensions, ensuring that the dynamical behavior predicted by the law is frame-independent in classical mechanics. The third law of motion, stating that if particle i exerts force \vec{f}_{ij} on particle j, then particle j exerts an equal and opposite force \vec{f}_{ji} = -\vec{f}_{ij} on i, is also invariant. Under simultaneous Galilean transformations applied to both particles, the interaction forces transform identically because they arise from relative separations and velocities, which are preserved in form across inertial frames.^[10] Thus, the action-reaction pairs maintain their equality and opposition, supporting the overall consistency of Newtonian dynamics.^[15] This invariance extends to Newton's law of universal gravitation, F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}, where G is the gravitational constant, m_1 and m_2 are masses, and r is the distance between the masses. Unlike in special relativity, there is no length contraction under Galilean boosts, so the distance r and the direction \hat{r} remain unchanged between frames.^[1] Accelerations due to gravity are invariant, and masses are scalar invariants, ensuring the force magnitude and the resulting dynamical equations take the same form in all inertial frames.^[10] Collectively, these invariances underpin the absolute space-time structure of classical physics, where time is universal and space is Euclidean, independent of the observer's motion.^[16] This framework posits a fixed, absolute backdrop for all mechanical phenomena, allowing Newton's laws to hold uniformly without reference to an observer's velocity, in contrast to the observer-dependent structure of relativistic space-time.^[2]

Applications in Classical Mechanics

Galilean transformations are essential for analyzing relative motion in classical mechanics, allowing physicists to shift between inertial reference frames moving at constant velocities relative to each other. A classic example involves a collision observed from different frames, such as two objects colliding on a moving train. From the ground frame, the train's uniform velocity adds to the objects' velocities, but applying the Galilean velocity transformation \mathbf{v}' = \mathbf{v} - \mathbf{u}, where \mathbf{u} is the train's velocity, simplifies the analysis in the train frame to a stationary collision, preserving momentum conservation and enabling straightforward calculations of post-collision trajectories.^[17] This approach extends to planetary scenarios, where relative motions of satellites or asteroids around a planet can be transformed to the planet's frame, facilitating the study of impacts without accounting for the planet's orbital velocity around the Sun.^[18] In celestial mechanics, Galilean transformations approximate the conversion of Keplerian orbits between different reference frames, such as from heliocentric to geocentric coordinates, under non-relativistic assumptions where orbital velocities are much less than the speed of light. For instance, the orbit of a planet around the Sun, described by Kepler's laws in the heliocentric frame, in the geocentric frame appears as an epicycle obtained by subtracting the position and velocity vectors of the Earth from those of the planet, yielding paths that approximate historical observations before precise relativity corrections.^[19] This transformation maintains the form of the two-body equations of motion, with the effective potential U_{\text{eff}}(r) = -\frac{k}{r} + \frac{\ell^2}{2 \mu r^2} invariant, allowing analysts to compute relative positions and velocities for multi-body systems like the Solar System.^[18] Galilean transformations play a key role in fluid dynamics under non-relativistic conditions, particularly in ensuring the invariance of the Navier-Stokes equations and facilitating the study of wave propagation. In analyzing sound waves in a moving fluid, a Galilean boost to a frame fixed relative to the wave front transforms the wave equation into a form where the propagation speed c = \sqrt{\partial p / \partial \rho} appears stationary, simplifying the derivation of pressure perturbations \partial^2 \delta \rho / \partial t^2 = c^2 \nabla^2 \delta \rho.^[20] This invariance allows modelers to shift to convenient frames, such as the rest frame of a fluid element, to compute vorticity or energy transport in low-speed flows without altering the underlying dynamics.^[21] Extensions of Galilean transformations to non-inertial frames, incorporating rotations, lead to fictitious forces like the Coriolis effect, which arises when observing motion in a rotating reference frame such as Earth's surface. For a particle with velocity \mathbf{v} in the rotating frame, the Coriolis acceleration [is -2](/page/IS-2) \boldsymbol{\Omega} \times \mathbf{v}, where \boldsymbol{\Omega} is the angular velocity vector, deflecting paths to the right in the Northern Hemisphere—for example, causing eastward deviation in falling projectiles by about 1.5 cm for a 100 m drop at 45° latitude.^[22] This effect, derived by transforming inertial-frame equations to the rotating frame, explains phenomena like trade winds without invoking real forces.^[18] While powerful in classical contexts, Galilean transformations fail in high-speed scenarios or those involving electromagnetism, where velocities approach the speed of light or Maxwell's equations are not invariant, as seen in the Michelson-Morley experiment, thus motivating the development of special relativity to restore consistency.^[1]

Group-Theoretic Structure

The Galilean Group

The Galilean group is the ten-parameter Lie group embodying the symmetries of Newtonian spacetime, comprising three parameters for spatial rotations, three for spatial translations, three for Galilean boosts (changes of inertial frame velocity), and one for uniform time translations.^[23] This structure arises from the affine transformations that preserve the absolute time and Euclidean geometry of classical space, ensuring the invariance of Newtonian laws under changes of reference frames.^[23] The group possesses a semi-direct product structure, denoted as \mathrm{ISO}(3) \ltimes (\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^3), where \mathrm{ISO}(3) = \mathrm{SO}(3) \ltimes \mathbb{R}^3 represents the Euclidean group of rotations and spatial translations, while \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^3 accounts for time translations and boosts.^[24] In this construction, boosts act non-trivially on spatial translations, reflecting how a change in velocity couples with positional shifts in spacetime. Elements of the group can be parameterized as (R, \vec{v}, \vec{a}, t), with R \in \mathrm{SO}(3), \vec{v}, \vec{a} \in \mathbb{R}^3, and t \in \mathbb{R}. The group multiplication rule, which encodes this semi-direct action, is given by

(R_1, \vec{v}_1, \vec{a}_1, t_1) \circ (R_2, \vec{v}_2, \vec{a}_2, t_2) = (R_1 R_2, \vec{v}_1 + R_1 \vec{v}_2, \vec{a}_1 + R_1 \vec{a}_2 + \vec{v}_1 t_2, t_1 + t_2),

illustrating the cross term \vec{v}_1 t_2 that arises from composing a boost followed by a time translation.^[24] For the subgroup of boosts and spatial translations alone (with R = I and t=0), the composition simplifies to (\vec{v}_1, \vec{a}_1) \circ (\vec{v}_2, \vec{a}_2) = (\vec{v}_1 + \vec{v}_2, \vec{a}_1 + \vec{a}_2 + \vec{v}_1 t_2), though t_2 here would stem from an associated time shift in the full group element.^[24] Due to its inclusion of translations and boosts, the Galilean group is inhomogeneous, extending beyond the homogeneous orthogonal transformations of space. This inhomogeneity implies that linear representations may not suffice in certain physical contexts, such as quantum mechanics, where the group is realized through projective unitary representations that account for phase factors under composition.^[24] As the full symmetry group of Newtonian spacetime, it underpins the relativity principle in classical mechanics, ensuring that physical laws remain form-invariant across inertial frames.^[23]

Lie Algebra and Generators

The Lie algebra of the Galilean group captures the infinitesimal structure of its transformations, consisting of ten generators in three spatial dimensions: the three rotation generators J_i (for i=1,2,3), the three translation generators P_i (spatial momentum operators), the three boost generators K_i (Galilean velocity shifts), and the time translation generator H (Hamiltonian or energy operator).^[25] These generators satisfy the commutation relations of the special orthogonal algebra for rotations, along with specific brackets involving translations, boosts, and time shifts, reflecting the non-relativistic structure where space and time are treated asymmetrically. The full set of commutation relations for the unextended classical Lie algebra is given by:

[J_i, J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,

[J_i, P_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} P_k, \quad [J_i, K_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k, \quad [J_i, H] = 0,

[H, P_i] = 0, \quad [H, K_i] = i P_i, \quad [K_i, K_j] = 0, \quad [P_i, P_j] = 0,

with all unspecified brackets vanishing, where \epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol and the factor of i follows quantum mechanical conventions adapted to the classical case (with \hbar = 1).^[25] In the centrally extended form, relevant for projective representations and incorporating an internal mass parameter m, the boost-translation bracket becomes [K_i, P_j] = i \delta_{ij} m, where m is a central element commuting with all other generators; in the classical limit, m=1 normalizes the structure for unit mass systems. This extension introduces a degenerate structure in the algebra, arising from the potential for a non-trivial 2-cocycle in the group cohomology that modifies the infinitesimal composition without altering the unextended brackets involving time translations directly. The infinitesimal transformations generated by these elements act on spacetime coordinates (t, \mathbf{x}) as Lie derivatives, corresponding to vector fields on the manifold. For rotations, the generator J_i induces \delta x^j = \epsilon_{ijk} \omega^k x^k (with \omega^k the infinitesimal rotation angle); for translations, P_i gives \delta x^j = a_i \delta^j_i (spatial shift a_i); for boosts, K_i yields \delta x^j = v_i t \delta^j_i (velocity shift v_i); and for time translation, H produces \delta t = \tau, \delta x^j = 0 (time shift \tau), where the general form is \delta x^\mu = \xi^\nu \partial_\nu x^\mu for the appropriate parameter \xi.^[25] These actions ensure the algebra closes under the Lie bracket of vector fields, preserving the affine structure of non-relativistic spacetime. Through Noether's theorem, the symmetries generated by this Lie algebra correspond to conserved quantities in Lagrangian mechanics invariant under Galilean transformations: H generates conservation of energy, P_i of linear momentum, J_i of angular momentum, and K_i of the Galilean boost invariant (total momentum integrated over time minus mass-weighted center-of-mass position).^[25] This connection underscores the foundational role of the Lie algebra in deriving conservation laws for classical systems without external forces.

Advanced Topics

Inönü–Wigner Contraction

The Inönü–Wigner contraction, introduced by Erdal Inönü and Eugene P. Wigner in their seminal 1953 paper on the contraction of groups and their representations, provides a systematic method to derive the Galilean group from the Poincaré group as a limiting case. This approach involves rescaling the parameters of the group and its Lie algebra generators, allowing one Lie group to emerge from another through an infinite parameter limit, while preserving the group structure in a contracted form. In the case of space-time symmetries, the contraction corresponds to taking the speed of light c \to \infty, which aligns with the transition from relativistic to non-relativistic physics.^[26] Mathematically, the Poincaré Lie algebra generators—rotations J_i, boosts K_i, spatial translations P_j, and time translations H = P^0—undergo rescaling to obtain the Galilean algebra. The key step defines the contracted boost generators as L_i = K_i / c, with spatial translations and rotations unchanged (P_j' = P_j, J_i' = J_i), while the time translation is rescaled as H' = c H to preserve the structure. In the Poincaré algebra, the relevant commutator is [K_i, P_j] = i \delta_{ij} H. Upon rescaling, this becomes [L_i, P_j] = i \delta_{ij} (H / c), and in the limit c \to \infty, it approaches 0, reflecting the classical Galilean algebra where boosts and spatial translations commute. The rescaling of H ensures [L_i, H'] = i P_i, and other commutators, such as those involving rotations and translations, remain finite and unchanged, ensuring the contracted algebra closes properly.^[27] Physically, this contraction captures the Newtonian limit of special relativity, applicable when particle velocities v \ll c. In this regime, the full Lorentz transformation for a boost with velocity \vec{v} reduces to the Galilean form by neglecting higher-order terms in v/c. The contracted transformation equations are:

\vec{r}' = \vec{r} - \vec{v} t + O(1/c^2),

t' = t + O(v/c^2).

This limit preserves absolute time and Euclidean space, restoring the additivity of velocities and the invariance of Newtonian mechanics under the resulting Galilean boosts, while the Poincaré group's relativistic features, like time dilation and length contraction, vanish.^[28]

Central Extension

In quantum mechanics, the Galilean group admits no faithful unitary representations on Hilbert space due to the Stone-von Neumann theorem and the structure of its Lie algebra, necessitating projective representations that incorporate a central extension to faithfully capture boost transformations. This extension, known as the Bargmann group, arises as a central extension of the Galilean group by the U(1) phase group, where the two-cocycle is proportional to the particle mass m, ensuring the consistency of quantum states under Galilean boosts. The Bargmann group thus provides the appropriate symmetry structure for non-relativistic quantum systems, resolving the anomaly in representing the original group unitarily. The Lie algebra of the Bargmann group modifies the boost-momentum commutator of the classical Galilean algebra to include a central charge:

[K_i, P_j] = i \delta_{ij} M,

where K_i are the boost generators, P_j the momentum generators, M is the central mass generator commuting with all other elements, and units are chosen such that \hbar = 1. This central extension is nontrivial and universal for the Galilean group in three spatial dimensions, with the mass M acting as the extension parameter that labels irreducible representations. Projective representations of the unextended Galilean group correspond precisely to unitary representations of this extended algebra, where the phase factor under successive boosts and translations encodes the mass-dependent cocycle, essential for preserving the unitarity of quantum evolution. The Lévy-Leblond formulation extends this framework to non-relativistic quantum mechanics for particles of arbitrary spin, deriving wave equations that transform covariantly under the Bargmann group. These equations, such as the four-component form for spin-1/2 particles, linearize the Schrödinger equation while incorporating the central extension to ensure Galilean invariance, including the correct boost-induced phase shifts proportional to mass and velocity. This approach highlights how the central charge M enforces superselection rules for mass, preventing superpositions between states of different masses. Applications of the central extension include deriving the symmetries of the Schrödinger equation from the representation theory of the Bargmann group, where the Hamiltonian emerges as the Casimir operator in the extended algebra, guaranteeing conservation laws like total energy and momentum. Furthermore, the extension yields conserved quantities associated with center-of-mass motion, such as the boost-invariant position operator \mathbf{X} = \mathbf{x} - \frac{\mathbf{p} t}{M}, which remains constant for isolated systems and underscores the separation of internal and external dynamics in multi-particle quantum mechanics.

References

[1]
[PDF] SPECIAL RELATIVITY 1. Galilean transformation of coordinates ...
The Galilean transformation for two coordinate systems moving relative to each other is: x/ = x − vt, x = x/ + vt, y = y/, z = z/, t = t/.
[2]
[PDF] 1.1. Galilean Relativity
1.1. Galilean Relativity. The fundamental laws of physics are the same in all frames of reference moving with constant velocity with respect to one another. ...
[3]
Space and Time: Inertial Frames
Mar 30, 2002 · An inertial frame is a reference-frame with a time-scale, relative to which the motion of a body not subject to forces is always rectilinear and uniform.
[4]
Galilei proposed the principle of relativity, but not the “Galilean ...
Mar 1, 2020 · ... experiments on a ship as a means ... : “He asserted that all inertial frames are equivalent for the performance of all physical experiments.”.
[5]
Galileo's ship and the relativity principle - Wiley Online Library
Sep 13, 2024 · The thought experiment, which was used by Galileo to illustrate that we cannot tell that the Earth is moving simply by observing how objects ...
[6]
Newton's views on space, time, and motion
Aug 12, 2004 · Absolute, true, and mathematical time, from its own nature, passes equably without relation to anything external, and thus without reference to ...Overview of the Scholium · The Legacy from Antiquity · The Structure of Newton's...
[7]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932798011107
[8]
Galileo's ship thought experiment and relativity principles
In a famous thought experiment Galileo asserted the experimental equivalence of two ships in uniform relative motion. ... Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World ...<|separator|>
[9]
Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
Dec 20, 2007 · He says, “relative, apparent, and common time is any sensible and external measure (precise or imprecise) of duration by motion,” adding a ...
[10]
July 1816: Fresnel's Evidence for the Wave Theory of Light
namely, that if parallel light hit an opaque disk, there ...Missing: hypothesis | Show results with:hypothesis
[11]
Galilean Invariance
The fact that Newton's laws of motion take the same form in all inertial reference frames is known as Galilean invariance.
[12]
[PDF] Lecture 1. Classical space-time - People
Every Galilean transformation is a combination of a rotation, a boost, and a translation. (exercise). In the classical picture, the coordinate systems of any ...
[13]
[PDF] 1 Principle of relativity, Galilean transformations, Michelson-Morley ...
the velocity transformation equations: vx. = v/ x + u vy. = v/ y vz. = v/ z ... (recall that acceleration is the time derivative of velocity). We get: dvx.
[14]
[PDF] Special Relativity
In Galilean relativity, velocities transform by simple vector addition. For example, suppose a man standing in a train car throws a ball with a speed of 30 m/s ...
[15]
[PDF] Lecture 4: Newton's Laws Newton's Laws & Galilean Relativity
Feb 6, 2015 · ✦ Newton's second law requires modification if the effects of special relativity are to be taken into account, because at high speeds the.
[16]
[PDF] Transformations and conservation laws
This is the principle of the. Galilean invariance, i.e., invariance with resperct to Galilean transfromations, that is valid in the classical mechanics.
[17]
[PDF] Time in fundamental physics
Oct 3, 2014 · Thus, the flow of time is absolute in spite of Galilean relativity. If we wish, we can compare the lengths of these intervals and conclude that ...
[18]
The Lorentz Transformation – University Physics Volume 3
The Galilean transformation equations describe how, in classical nonrelativistic mechanics, the position, velocity, and accelerations measured in one frame ...<|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] Lecture Notes on Classical Mechanics (A Work in Progress)
Jan 13, 2022 · A transformation from one frame K to another frame K′ which moves at constant velocity V relative to K is called a Galilean transformation.
[20]
[PDF] mechanics - V.P. Nair
Keplerian orbits given in that chapter is recovered. 7.6 Action-angle ... Galilean transformation, 11. Galilei group, 11. Geodesics on a sphere, 31.
[21]
[PDF] Speed of Sound
An Internet Book on Fluid Dynamics ... To do so we examine the flow in a frame fixed in the wave as sketched in Figure. 2 by applying a Galilean transformation to ...
[22]
[PDF] Computational Eulerian Hydrodynamics and Galilean Invariance
Eulerian hydrodynamical simulations are a powerful and popular tool for modeling fluids in astrophysical systems. In this work, we critically examine recent ...Missing: propagation | Show results with:propagation
[23]
28. Motion in a Non-inertial Frame of Reference - Galileo and Einstein
Notice the Coriolis force depends on the velocity of the particle, and is reminiscent of the magnetic force on a charged particle. For example, it does no work ...Missing: Galilean | Show results with:Galilean
[24]
[PDF] The Euclidean Group, the Galilei Group and the Free Particle
As a set we have G(n + 1) = E(n) × Rn × R. However, it is again not the direct product of these groups, but only a semidirect product. 9. Describe some ...
[25]
[PDF] Appendix A The Symmetry Representation Theorem
Thus the Galilean group G is the set of all elements G = (R, v, a, τ), consisting of ten real parameters, three for the rotation matrix R, three each for boosts ...
[26]
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.39.6.510
[27]
[PDF] arXiv:1103.3447v3 [hep-th] 8 Oct 2011
Oct 8, 2011 · First, following ˙Inönü and Wigner the Poincaré algebra has to be contracted to the Galilean one. Second, the Galilean algebra is to be extended ...