Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Male submission

Male submission denotes the psychological, sexual, or relational preference of males to relinquish control and authority to a dominant partner, typically within consensual power exchange dynamics such as BDSM practices, erotic fantasies, or intimate relationships.^[1] This orientation contrasts with prevailing cultural stereotypes of innate male dominance, emphasizing instead voluntary subordination for gratification, which may involve elements like bondage, discipline, humiliation, or service.^[2] Empirical surveys of general populations reveal substantial male interest in submissive roles, with one internet-based study finding 36.6% of men preferring a submissive position in partnered sexual scenarios compared to 13.8% opting for dominance, a pattern theorized to reflect strategies for respecting achieved social ranks or fostering pair bonds.^[3] In BDSM-specific research, while a majority of males report preferences for dominant roles—around 61% exclusively or primarily—approximately 26% identify as submissive, often facing challenges in finding compatible partners due to lower prevalence of female dominants.^[4] Sexual fantasies further underscore this, as analyses of self-reported data indicate that roughly two-thirds of men's erotic imaginings feature submissive themes, such as being overpowered or controlled.^[2] From an evolutionary standpoint, male submission may represent an adaptive variant linked to hierarchical signaling or vulnerability displays that enhance reproductive success in certain contexts, rather than a deviation from normative masculinity.^[1] Controversies arise in interpreting these preferences, with some psychological frameworks questioning pathologization while others highlight potential overlaps with broader sociosexual behaviors, though data consistently affirm its non-clinical status among consenting adults.^[3]^[5]

Biological and Evolutionary Foundations

Dominance Hierarchies and Adaptive Submission

Dominance hierarchies, characterized by linear or near-linear rankings among group members, are prevalent in many social species, including nonhuman primates such as chimpanzees and bonobos, where pairwise agonistic interactions establish stable orders that persist over time.^[6] In humans, analogous structures emerge in small-scale societies and experimental settings, reflecting evolved mechanisms for organizing competitive interactions over resources like food, territory, and mates.^[7] Empirical observations indicate that these hierarchies stabilize once formed, with subordinates rarely challenging superiors, thereby reducing the frequency and intensity of conflicts within the group.^[6] From an evolutionary perspective, submission functions as an adaptive strategy in dominance hierarchies, enabling lower-ranked individuals to avoid severe injury or death from escalated fights while still gaining indirect access to resources controlled by dominants.^[8] Models of hierarchy formation posit that submissive behaviors, such as avoidance, appeasement signals, or deference, serve as honest indicators of rank acceptance, minimizing the energetic and fitness costs of repeated aggression.^[9] This dynamic promotes group cohesion by channeling competition into predictable outcomes rather than chaotic violence, with evidence from primate studies showing that hierarchies form self-organizing patterns through iterative contests where losers calibrate future responses to prevent wasteful re-engagement.^[8] In male behavior specifically, testosterone facilitates competitive striving for higher rank, as elevated levels correlate with increased motivation to dominate in agonistic contexts, aligning with selection pressures for reproductive success in polygynous systems.^[10] However, this drive manifests submission as a context-dependent tactic rather than a fixed trait; males exhibit submissive postures primarily when confronting physically or socially superior rivals, de-escalating to preserve survival and future opportunities rather than pursuing futile dominance.^[11] Such flexibility underscores submission's role as a proximate mechanism supporting ultimate fitness, distinct from baseline competitive tendencies shaped by hormonal influences.^[12]

Hormonal and Genetic Influences on Male Behavior

Testosterone, the primary androgen in males, exerts a causal influence on behaviors promoting social dominance, assertiveness, and status-seeking. Experimental administration of testosterone has been shown to increase both prosocial and antisocial actions aimed at enhancing social position, supporting the social status hypothesis in human males.^[13] Higher baseline salivary testosterone levels correlate with greater dominance displays as individuals ascend hierarchies in competitive settings, such as economic games.^[14] Endogenous testosterone elevations encourage behaviors intended to dominate others and elevate personal status, with meta-analyses confirming positive associations between testosterone and aggressive dominance in men across populations.^[15] These effects stem from testosterone's modulation of neural circuits involved in reward processing and risk assessment, favoring adaptive strategies in dominance hierarchies where high status yields reproductive advantages.^[16] Genetic factors contribute substantially to individual differences in dominance-related traits, with twin studies estimating heritability of social status and leadership at 35-45%.^[17] Behavioral genetic research indicates that variance in traits underpinning hierarchy formation, such as aggression and extraversion, arises partly from additive genetic effects, as evidenced by higher concordance in monozygotic versus dizygotic twins.^[18] In primates, including humans, phylogenetic analyses reveal conserved genetic underpinnings for social hierarchies, where male dominance predominates in most species unless ecological pressures—such as female reproductive control—shift dynamics toward variability or female-biased relations.^[19] This heritability manifests in stable individual rankings within groups, suggesting evolutionary selection for genetic predispositions that prioritize competitive ascent over passive positioning. Chronic adoption of submissive roles deviates from these normative male patterns, often correlating with suppressed testosterone via stress-induced feedback loops. Prolonged subordination activates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, inhibiting Leydig cell testosterone synthesis and perpetuating low-androgen states that reinforce avoidance of dominance challenges.^[20] In hierarchical contexts, testosterone may amplify submission strategically among low-status males to avert conflict, but sustained low levels impair the physiological drive for status elevation, creating biopsychosocial cycles where genetic baselines interact with experiential defeat to favor acquiescence over contest.^[21] Such deviations highlight how hormonal-genetic alignments typically propel males toward dominance, with submission emerging as a maladaptive outlier in resource-scarce or high-conflict environments.^[19]

Psychological Dimensions

Personality Traits and Motivations for Submission

Psychological profiles of men exhibiting submissive behaviors often align with specific Big Five personality traits, including elevated agreeableness, which reflects tendencies toward cooperation, compliance, and avoidance of confrontation, as well as higher neuroticism characterized by emotional sensitivity and anxiety proneness.^[22]^[23] These traits contrast with dominance, which correlates positively with extraversion's assertiveness facet and negatively with agreeableness in competitive contexts.^[24] Within the dominance behavioral system (DBS) framework, low dominance motivation—manifesting as submissive postures—shows empirical links to reduced extraversion and increased neuroticism, based on self-report and observational data integrating personality measures.^[23] Motivations for male submission frequently stem from desires to evade social threats, inferiority perceptions, and interpersonal conflict, thereby fostering affiliation and group cohesion as adaptive strategies.^[23] Qualitative analyses of role-fluid individuals, including those alternating between dominant and submissive orientations, reveal additional drivers such as pursuing emotional release from daily responsibilities or attaining affection through yielding control.^[25] These incentives prioritize relational harmony over power assertion, with empirical patterns indicating submission enhances bonding in non-adversarial dynamics.^[23] Distinguishing non-pathological submission, research on community samples emphasizes its role in facilitating secure attachments and reducing aggression without comorbid psychopathology, unlike extreme cases tied to persistent depressive symptoms or social avoidance post-remission.^[23] In such contexts, submissive traits support prosocial outcomes, such as de-escalating tensions, rather than signaling disorder, as evidenced by correlations where moderate low DBS activation correlates with lower conflict but not elevated internalizing pathology.^[23]^[26]

Empirical Studies on Submission and Psychopathology

Research on the dominance behavioral system (DBS) has established that individual differences in dominance and submission motivations predict distinct psychopathological profiles. Heightened dominance motivation correlates with externalizing disorders, including antisocial behavior and substance use disorders, whereas low dominance motivation—reflecting submissive orientations—is associated with internalizing disorders such as major depression and social anxiety. This pattern holds across multiple studies, with meta-analytic evidence linking DBS dysregulation to affective and anxiety pathologies via submissive behavioral inhibition.^[23] Submissive tendencies further covary with diminished self-esteem and self-criticism, particularly in contexts of interpersonal stress. In a sample of 128 young adults, self-reported submissive behaviors mediated the relationship between self-criticism and depressive symptoms, independent of gender. Depressed individuals consistently exhibit involuntary submissive signals, such as gaze aversion and postural defeat, as adaptive responses to perceived social defeat but at the cost of prolonged low mood.^[27] Studies of BDSM practitioners, where submission is volitional, often derive from self-selected community samples and report submissive participants scoring lower on neuroticism and higher on secure attachment than population norms. However, these findings are constrained by volunteer bias and recruitment from established kink networks, which favor psychologically resilient individuals and overlook non-consensual or maladaptive submission; broader clinical data do not replicate such null or positive associations outside niche consensual practices.^[28]^[29] Population surveys underscore the rarity of extreme male submission, with only 2.2% of Australian men aged 16-59 reporting BDSM participation in the prior year, and heterosexual males disproportionately preferring dominant roles in power-exchange fantasies. Generalizability remains limited, as extreme submission prevalence likely falls below 5% when excluding mild or occasional interests.^[30] Adaptive benefits of submission appear confined to signaling loyalty in stable pair-bonds, yet evolutionary analyses reveal dominant males achieve superior reproductive outcomes through elevated status and mating access, whereas persistent submissiveness aligns more with psychopathology than reproductive fitness.^[31]^[32]

Contexts of Practice

In BDSM and Sexual Dynamics

In BDSM contexts, male submission refers to a consensual power exchange dynamic where the male participant voluntarily relinquishes control to a dominant partner, typically involving structured roles, rituals, and eroticized vulnerability.^[1] This practice often manifests as the submissive male engaging in obedience, restraint, or service-oriented tasks, contrasting with societal expectations of male dominance. Empirical data indicate that among men practicing sadomasochistic (SM) activities, approximately 33.4% prefer the submissive role, though overall male participation in BDSM leans toward dominance.^[33] Motivations for male submission frequently include psychological catharsis and temporary role reversal, allowing high-achieving or dominant men in daily life to experience relief from decision-making burdens through surrender.^[1] Submissives report achieving altered states of consciousness, such as "subspace," characterized by endorphin release and reduced cortisol stress responses post-session, which may serve as a form of stress regulation.^[34] From an evolutionary psychological perspective, these preferences may represent exaggerated expressions of adaptive behaviors, such as signaling submission to build trust or facilitate bonding in pair relationships, akin to deference in dominance hierarchies that historically secured alliances or mating opportunities without direct conflict.^[1] Sex differences in role preferences—women more often favoring submission—align with mate selection pressures favoring dominant males, suggesting male submission as a variant pursuit of relational intensity or novelty rather than normative adaptation.^[33] Common practices encompass bondage (restraining the submissive), protocol enforcement (rules of deference like kneeling or verbal address), and sensory play (e.g., impact or temperature stimuli), all negotiated via explicit consent frameworks like safe words and aftercare.^[1] Biopsychosocial models highlight how genetic predispositions, hormonal influences (e.g., testosterone variations), and learned experiences converge to shape these interests, with no evidence of inherent psychopathology in consensual practitioners.^[1] When practiced with risk-aware protocols, BDSM interactions show low incidence of harm, but escalation risks persist; a review of fatalities found strangulation during solo or partnered asphyxiation play as the primary cause, underscoring the need for partner monitoring and physiological limits.^[35] In organizational settings, male submission manifests as compliance within dominance hierarchies, which empirical analyses describe as male-specific mechanisms for coordinating group efforts and minimizing intra-male conflict. A 2023 study posits that these hierarchies rely on distinct submission signals among males—such as averted gaze or postural deference—facilitating adaptive resource allocation and alliance formation without escalating to physical dominance, contrasting with less hierarchical female social structures.^[36] Such submission enables lower-ranked males to access group benefits, as evidenced by observations in primate analogs and human teams where hierarchical yielding correlates with sustained cooperation rather than egalitarian disruption.^[37] Within family dynamics, male deference often involves yielding decision-making to spouses or elders to preserve relational stability, rooted in evolutionary pressures for paternal investment amid resource scarcity. Longitudinal data from heterosexual couples indicate that submissive postures during conflicts—such as acquiescence to partner demands—temporarily reduce immediate discord by signaling non-threat, yet predict diminished relationship quality over 2-5 years due to eroded personal agency and unmet needs.^[38] For instance, men exhibiting higher deference report initial harmony gains from conflict avoidance, but aggregate studies link this pattern to lower long-term satisfaction, as dominant partners perceive reduced mutual respect, echoing findings from dominance-submission asymmetries in pair-bonding primates.^[38] Cross-cultural surveys of urban European couples reveal that while some women select submissive male partners (chosen by 36.6% of men in preference data), such pairings yield mixed reproductive outcomes: hierarchically disparate unions (dominant female, submissive male) achieve marginally higher fertility in modern contexts, potentially via complementary roles, but at the cost of male-initiated initiatives declining post-marriage.^[39] However, broader meta-analyses of power dynamics underscore risks of resentment accumulation, with submissive males experiencing 15-20% lower agency scores in decision domains like finances and parenting, correlating with higher divorce initiation rates by dominant spouses after 10 years.^[38] These patterns highlight submission's utility for short-term cohesion in non-egalitarian realities, yet its long-term viability hinges on balanced reciprocity to avert motivational deficits.

Historical and Cultural Evolution

Pre-Modern and Traditional Views

In ancient Greek epics, such as Homer's Iliad composed circa 750–725 BCE, male warriors exemplified dominance through prowess in combat and pursuit of glory (kleos), with submission portrayed as a reluctant concession to superior force or divine will rather than a celebrated trait.^[40] Achilles, the archetype of heroic masculinity, rejects subordination to Agamemnon not out of egalitarian principle but to assert personal honor, ultimately yielding only after divine intervention and personal loss.^[41] Such narratives reinforced hierarchies where tactical deference preserved alliances or avoided annihilation, but voluntary male submission absent coercion was rare and unidealized.^[42] Biblical texts from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, spanning circa 1000 BCE to 100 CE, embedded male submission within patriarchal chains of authority, where men exercised headship in families while submitting to God, kings, or ecclesiastical leaders. Ephesians 5:23, written by Paul circa 60 CE, designates the husband as "head of the wife" analogous to Christ's authority over the church, framing intra-male relations as ordered submission to higher powers for societal stability rather than intrinsic humility. Proverbs 25:15 (circa 700 BCE) likens yielding to a ruler as wise restraint, but celebrates the king's dominion, underscoring submission as pragmatic fealty in divinely ordained hierarchies. Medieval feudal systems, evolving from the 9th century CE onward in Europe, institutionalized male submission through vassalage contracts, where knights pledged homage—kneeling bareheaded to place hands in their lord's—swearing fealty for land (fief) and protection in exchange for military service.^[43] This ritual, documented in charters like the 843 Treaty of Verdun, bound vassals to "life and limb" loyalty against all others, viewing submission as a calculated exchange in a pyramid of reciprocal obligations rather than egalitarian virtue.^[44] Breaches, such as in the 1066 Norman Conquest, invited forfeiture, highlighting enforcement via dominance norms over celebratory submission. Ethnographic records of pre-20th century hunter-gatherer bands, such as those among Australian Aboriginal groups observed in the 19th century, depict male hierarchies formed via physical contests for resources and mates, with subordinates acquiescing to alphas to avert lethal conflict.^[45] Analysis of 190 such societies shows male dominance in mate guarding and provisioning, where submission manifested as deference to stronger hunters, yielding survival benefits but lacking ritual praise beyond defeat scenarios.^[45] Traditional male initiation rites, from Spartan agoge training (circa 7th century BCE) to Aboriginal walkabouts, emphasized endurance trials forging dominance, with scant evidence of honoring submissive postures outside tactical yields.^[46] This pattern contrasts sharply with modern valorizations, as pre-modern sources privilege empirical hierarchies rooted in physical and martial capacity.

Emergence in Modern Psychology and Media

Sigmund Freud introduced concepts of masochism in the early 20th century, framing it as a perversion involving the inversion of sadistic impulses, with "feminine masochism" specifically denoting male pleasure derived from passive suffering or submission, often tied to unconscious guilt or castration anxiety.^[47] In works like "A Child Is Being Beaten" (1919), Freud described masochistic fantasies as prevalent among males, where submission served as a regressive defense against aggressive drives, distinguishing erotic masochism (sexual arousal from pain) from moral forms (self-punishment).^[48] These theories positioned male submission as a pathological deviation from normative assertive sexuality, influencing psychoanalytic views until mid-century critiques shifted focus toward behavioral conditioning over innate perversion. The sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s catalyzed the organization of BDSM communities, where male submission emerged from underground leather scenes into structured practices emphasizing consent and role-play.^[49] Post-Kinsey reports documenting variant sexualities, groups like the Society of Janus (founded 1974) formalized dominance-submission dynamics, including male subs yielding control to female dominants, diverging from Freudian pathology toward recreational exploration amid broader destigmatization of non-monogamous and power-exchange behaviors.^[50] This era's liberalization, fueled by feminist challenges to traditional gender roles and legal decriminalization efforts, amplified male submission as a countercultural expression, though empirical data from the period remains anecdotal, with community growth tied to urban enclaves rather than widespread prevalence. Media depictions in the 2010s, exemplified by E.L. James's Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy (2011–2012), propelled BDSM visibility, correlating with self-reported increases in exploratory interest, though primarily reinforcing female submission archetypes over male equivalents.^[51] A 2017 Belgian survey of over 1,000 adults found 46.8% had engaged in at least one BDSM activity, with submissive interests comparable across genders (around 30–40%), attributing partial rises to cultural normalization post-Fifty Shades films (2015 onward), which grossed over $1.3 billion globally and prompted mainstream discourse on kink.^[52] However, male-specific surveys indicate persistent stigma, with 2020 studies showing BDSM practitioners, including male subs, facing higher self-stigmatization linked to societal expectations of male agency, potentially exacerbating anxiety amid destigmatization unevenness.^[53] In the 2020s, online platforms have intensified niche amplification of male submission practices, with forums facilitating anonymous sharing and community-building beyond physical events curtailed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Evolutionary psychology literature from 2024 reframes submission interests through adaptive lenses, positing them as potential strategies for signaling commitment in pair-bonding contexts, where male deference could enhance relational stability under high-competition environments, though critiqued for overemphasizing cultural variance over species-typical male dominance hierarchies evidenced in cross-cultural data.^[1] This media-driven normalization, while reducing overt pathologization, has been argued to diverge from empirical baselines of male-initiated courtship and provisioning, correlating with reported upticks in male relational dissatisfaction per longitudinal mental health surveys.^[54]

Societal Implications and Debates

Impacts on Family and Gender Roles

The promotion of male submission in gender dynamics has coincided with a marked erosion of traditional male provider roles, contributing to diminished family stability. Since 1960, the proportion of U.S. families relying solely on male earnings has declined substantially, from over 70% to around 30% by the 2010s, paralleling shifts toward egalitarian norms that discourage male dominance in provisioning. ^[55] Empirical analyses indicate that adherence to male breadwinner norms buffers against marital dissolution, as men's unemployment—often interpreted as failure in provider capacity—elevates separation risk by up to 2-3 times in households expecting male leadership. ^[56] In contrast, environments emphasizing shared or female-led provisioning show higher rates of relational discord, with disempowered paternal figures linked to poorer child outcomes, including reduced economic mobility and increased behavioral issues. ^[57] Demographic trends reveal higher divorce initiation by women—approximately 70% of cases overall, rising to 90% among college-educated couples—amid expectations of male accommodation to submissive or egalitarian postures, which strain traditional structures without equivalent stability gains. ^[58] ^[59] Studies of recent cohorts suggest that while initial egalitarian shifts predicted elevated divorce, contemporary specialized arrangements retain parity in dissolution risk only among highly educated pairs, implying broader dysfunction in less resourced families where male submission undermines provisioning incentives. ^[60] ^[61] Generational transmission amplifies these effects, as boys socialized in submissive-leaning environments exhibit persistent achievement deficits, widening education gaps that perpetuate provider role decline. Post-1970s, women have surpassed men in college completion rates, with females earning 57% of U.S. bachelor's degrees by 2020, correlating with male withdrawal from higher education and labor market engagement. ^[62] ^[63] This gap, evident in boys' lower gifted program participation (since mid-1970s) and 10-15 percentage point deficits in GCSE-equivalent attainment, forecasts intergenerational instability, as underachieving males struggle to fulfill familial leadership, fostering cycles of absent fatherhood and economic dependency. ^[64] ^[65] Assertions that male submission reduces familial conflict, such as by mitigating dominance-related tensions, encounter countervailing data on male disengagement; unaddressed provider instincts prompt withdrawal into isolation or vice, eroding role fulfillment without verifiable violence declines. ^[66] Working-class men, detached from anchoring roles, exhibit heightened family formation avoidance, with marriage rates halving since 1970 amid role ambiguity. ^[67] Causal patterns suggest that suppressing male agency yields relational voids, as evidenced by elevated separation in norm-deviant setups, outweighing purported harmony benefits. ^[68]

Controversies: Feminist Perspectives vs. Evolutionary Realism

Feminist scholars have portrayed male submission as a pathway to liberation from the constraints of "toxic masculinity," which they define as culturally imposed norms of dominance, aggression, and emotional suppression that perpetuate patriarchal control.^[69] In this view, encouraging submission in men challenges these norms, allowing for more egalitarian relationships and reducing harm associated with rigid gender roles, as articulated in critiques emphasizing that traditional masculinity harms both sexes by enforcing hierarchy over mutual vulnerability.^[70] Such perspectives often frame dominance as inherently oppressive, with submission reframed as empowering through its rejection of power imbalances rooted in historical patriarchy.^[71] In contrast, evolutionary psychology posits that male dominance behaviors evolved as adaptive traits for reproductive success and social coordination, with submission in males generally maladaptive outside niche contexts like deference to higher-status competitors.^[72] Empirical evidence indicates women across cultures preferentially select mates exhibiting assertiveness, status-seeking, and resource control—traits linked to dominance—which enhance offspring survival through provisioning and protection, as demonstrated in meta-analyses of mate preferences showing consistent female valuation of these qualities over submissiveness.^[73] This aligns with sexual selection theory, where male hierarchies stabilize group dynamics and resource allocation, favoring dominant individuals in ancestral environments where physical and social prowess directly correlated with fitness.^[74] These perspectives clash empirically on the viability of enforced gender equity models, which feminist equity advocates promote to dismantle hierarchies, versus data revealing innate sex differences that render broad male submission destabilizing. Studies on social dominance orientation find that hierarchies, rather than flat equality, promote societal stability by aligning with evolved male competitive drives, with attempts at forced egalitarianism correlating with reduced male participation in cooperative structures due to unmet status needs.^[75] Critiques highlight that bisexual or multi-sex hierarchies—where males opt out of dominance—undermine reproductive and group fitness, as evidenced by cross-cultural patterns where male assertiveness sustains functional divisions of labor, countering equity-driven suppression of dimorphic traits.^[76] Evolutionary models thus prioritize causal mechanisms of selection pressures over ideological deconstructions, underscoring dominance's role in causal chains from mate choice to lineage persistence.^[77]

Criticisms and Empirical Outcomes

Potential Dysfunctions and Health Risks

In BDSM practices involving male submission, participants face elevated risks of physical injury, with surveys indicating that approximately 13.5% to 14% of kink-identified individuals experience injuries or medical complications such as bruises, scratches, nerve damage, or back injuries at some point.^[78]^[79] These risks are particularly pronounced for submissives, who often endure impacts, restraints, or other forms of physical stress, though fatal outcomes remain rare compared to other sexual activities.^[35] Psychological integration of pain and submission can also intertwine neural pathways for arousal, aggression, and fear, potentially leading to maladaptive responses outside consensual play.^[80] Hormonal studies link submissive postures in men to altered stress responses, where low testosterone reactivity serves as a biomarker for social submission, potentially exacerbating chronic cortisol elevation when dominance drives are chronically suppressed.^[81]^[82] This mismatch—rooted in evolved preferences for hierarchical assertion—may foster sustained physiological strain, as evidenced by cortisol-testosterone interactions that heighten submissive avoidance behaviors under threat, contrasting with dominance-facilitating effects of elevated testosterone.^[83]^[84] Broader societal shifts toward diminished male assertiveness correlate with adverse mental health outcomes, including rising male suicide rates; for instance, after a decline through the mid-1970s, U.S. and U.K. male suicide rates increased steadily into the 1990s, paralleling cultural erosion of traditional provider and hierarchical roles.^[85] Empirical analyses attribute this gender disparity partly to reduced social role opportunities for men, leading to alienation and premature mortality rather than adaptive fulfillment.^[86] Such patterns underscore how thwarting innate status-seeking imperatives can precipitate dysfunction, including heightened vulnerability to isolation and self-destructive behaviors.^[87]

Evidence of Adaptive Benefits in Specific Contexts

In stable dominance hierarchies observed in primate groups, male submission to alpha individuals can secure protective alliances and reduce lethal intra-group conflict, thereby enhancing survival probabilities in environments where direct challenges would incur high energetic or injury costs. For instance, subordinate male chimpanzees often defer to dominants to gain coalitionary support during intergroup raids or mating opportunities, aligning with evolutionary strategies that favor indirect fitness benefits over risky dominance bids.^[6]^[88] Within consensual BDSM practices, male submission facilitates therapeutic catharsis for individuals under chronic stress, as the structured release of control induces subspace—an altered psychological state characterized by endorphin surges and post-session cortisol normalization, leading to reported reductions in anxiety and emotional tension. Peer-reviewed analyses of subspace experiences document benefits such as reframed pain perception and temporary escape from daily responsibilities, particularly among high-achieving males seeking counterbalance to assertive roles elsewhere.^[1]^[89]^[34] In select unequal romantic partnerships, such as consensual female-led relationships, male submission correlates with bolstered pair bonds through clarified role expectations and mutual satisfaction, evidenced by self-reported higher relationship quality metrics in surveys of participants embracing power asymmetries. These dynamics, however, remain rare, with studies estimating adoption rates below 5% in general populations and success confined to contexts of explicit negotiation and compatibility, without broader applicability to egalitarian norms.^[90]^[91]

References

[1]
An Evolutionary Psychological Approach Toward BDSM Interest and ...
May 20, 2024 · Evolutionary psychology offers a unique perspective of why some individuals are interested in BDSM and why some prefer certain elements of BDSM ...
[2]
[PDF] Sexual bondage: A review and unobtrusive investigation - Sinceriously
Scott (t983) reported that about two thirds of the male sexual fantasies described by Friday (1980) contained elements of male submission. In a study of sexual ...Missing: BDSM | Show results with:BDSM
[3]
Evolutional background of dominance/submissivity in sex ... - PubMed
We theorize that sexual arousal by dominance and submission may be connected to a reproduction strategy respecting a reached social dominance rank.
[4]
The Evaluation of Psychosexual Profiles in Dominant and ... - MDPI
Most males preferred to assume exclusively dominant roles during BDSM practices, while females mostly assumed exclusively submissive or both roles.
[5]
Bondage-Discipline, Dominance-Submission and Sadomasochism ...
Apr 5, 2019 · An Australian study found that 2.2% of men and 1.3% of women between ages 16–59 years had engaged in BDSM activity during the previous year. On ...
[6]
The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies
Jan 10, 2022 · Many social groups have linear or near-linear dominance hierarchies. ... Empirical work indicates that dominance hierarchies are largely stable.
[7]
[PDF] DOMINANCE IN HUMANS - Scholars at Harvard
Empirically, pairwise dominance relations often form a linear order or dominance hierarchy in an enormous range of species, including chimpanzees and bonobos ( ...
[8]
Dominance in humans - PMC - NIH
Such models frame dominance hierarchies as the product of evolved strategies for resolving disputes over limited resources and for minimizing repeated, ...
[9]
Dominance in humans | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal ...
Jan 10, 2022 · Such models frame dominance hierarchies as the product of evolved strategies for resolving disputes over limited resources and for minimizing ...
[10]
TESTOSTERONE AND DOMINANCE IN MEN
In men, high levels of endogenous testosterone (T) seem to encourage behavior apparently intended to dominate -- to enhance one's status over -- other people.
[11]
Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in ... - NIH
Jul 13, 2017 · Our results suggest that testosterone may enhance socially dominant behaviour among high-status persons, but strategic submission to seniority among lower- ...
[12]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5509644
[13]
Testosterone causes both prosocial and antisocial status-enhancing ...
These findings show that testosterone can cause prosocial behavior in males and provide causal evidence for the social status hypothesis in men.
[14]
Testosterone promotes dominance behaviors in the Ultimatum ...
Oct 21, 2023 · Our analysis reveals that individuals with higher baseline salivary testosterone levels exhibited more dominance as their position in the hierarchy increased ...
[15]
Testosterone and dominance in men - PubMed
In men, high levels of endogenous testosterone (T) seem to encourage behavior intended to dominate--to enhance one's status over--other people.
[16]
Testosterone and Aggressive Behavior in Man - PMC - NIH
There is evidence that testosterone levels are higher in individuals with aggressive behavior, such as prisoners who have committed violent crimes.
[17]
Heritability of class and status: Implications for sociological theory ...
The study found that genetics account for 35-45% of class and status variation, shared environments 10-15%, and unshared environment the largest portion.Heritability Of Class And... · 3. Bringing In Genetics: The... · 6. Results
[18]
Behavioral Genetics--A second look at twin studies
Apr 1, 2004 · Researchers have used twin studies to try to disentangle the environmental and genetic backgrounds of a cornucopia of traits.
[19]
The evolution of male–female dominance relations in primate societies
Jul 7, 2025 · We found that female-biased dominance primarily occurs in primate societies where females have substantial reproductive control.
[20]
Chronic stress inhibits testosterone synthesis in Leydig cells ... - NIH
Dec 10, 2021 · We found that adult male rats show a decrease in bodyweight, genital index and serum testosterone level after continual chronic stress for 21 ...
[21]
Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the ...
Jul 13, 2017 · Our results suggest that testosterone may enhance socially dominant behaviour among high-status persons, but strategic submission to seniority among lower- ...
[22]
[PDF] Analysis of the Big‐five Personality Factors in Terms of the PAD ...
Results showed that extraverts were primarily dominant and secondarily pleasant. Agreeableness resembled dependency with pleasant, arousable. and submissive ...
[23]
The Dominance Behavioral System and Psychopathology
Extensive research suggests that externalizing disorders, mania-proneness, and narcissistic traits are related to heightened dominance motivation and behaviors.
[24]
Analysis of the big-five personality factors in terms of the PAD ...
The big-five personality factors were investigated using the trait pleasure–arousability–dominance (PAD) temperament model to assess overlap.<|separator|>
[25]
“Switch it up”: A qualitative analysis of BDSM switches - Sage Journals
This analysis generates a complex account of BDSM switches that conceptualises how switches are open to diverse BDSM activities/roles, connect ...
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00116-7
[27]
The relationships between self-criticism, submissive behavior and ...
There are studies that provide evidence that depressed people see themselves as inferior to others and tend to adopt submissive behaviors (Allan and Gilbert, ...
[28]
Psychological Characteristics of BDSM Practitioners
The results mostly suggest favorable psychological characteristics of BDSM practitioners compared with the control group; BDSM practitioners were less neurotic, ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[29]
Psychological Characteristics of BDSM Practitioners - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The aim of this study was to compare scores of BDSM practitioners and a control group on various fundamental psychological characteristics. For ...
[30]
Bondage-Discipline, Dominance-Submission and Sadomasochism ...
Apr 4, 2019 · An Australian study18 found that 2.2% of men and 1.3% of women between ages 16–59 years had engaged in BDSM activity during the previous year.
[31]
Men's status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies
Sep 6, 2016 · We find that status is significantly associated with men's reproductive success, consistent with an evolved basis for status pursuit.
[32]
Sexual arousal by dominance and submission in relation ... - PubMed
The main findings: Here we show that sexual arousal by dominance and submissiveness confers an increased capacity to pass on genes in the general population.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[33]
An Evolutionary Psychological Approach Toward BDSM Interest and ...
May 20, 2024 · Of the SM-practicing men in this sample, only one in three (33.4%) indicated a preference to occupy the submissive role, whereas playing the ...
[34]
https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article/19/1/144/6961196
[35]
How safe is BDSM? A literature review on fatal outcome in BDSM play
Aug 12, 2021 · Our results show that strangulation in the course of erotic asphyxiation is the most common cause of death in fatal BDSM play. BDSM ...
[36]
(PDF) DOMINANCE HIERARCHY IS MALE-SPECIFIC: IT IS NOT BI ...
Jul 26, 2023 · Further, receiving social support does slightly help immigrant males elicit submission from adult females compared to immigrant males acting ...
[37]
Dominance Hierarchy is Male-Specific - Steve Moxon
If male supposed submission signals are very different from any signals females use to each other, then the basis of submission signalling cannot pertain to ...
[38]
Is Low Power Associated with Submission During Marital Conflict ...
Apr 9, 2020 · Lower power during marital interactions predicts greater aggression by men, but no research has identified women's response to lower power.
[39]
(PDF) Why do some women prefer submissive men? Hierarchically ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Conclusion: The preference for sexual arousal by dominance and submission may be connected to strategy respecting rank, while the preference for ...
[40]
Heroes and the Homeric Iliad
Let us begin with Achilles. Here is a monolithic and fiercely uncompromising man who actively chooses violent death over life in order to win the glory of being ...
[41]
Ethics and War in Homer's Iliad
Mar 27, 2012 · Because it requires so much effort and self-sacrifice—because it fills men with elevated notions of duty and comraderie—war becomes noble, even ...
[42]
War and Masculinity in The Iliad - New Thoughts about Ancient Greece
Jan 18, 2017 · In the Iliad, combat is clearly associated with masculinity. The warriors from both the Trojan and Greek armies (exclusively male) know that they will probably ...<|separator|>
[43]
Feudalism | World History - Lumen Learning
During homage, the lord and vassal entered into a contract in which the vassal promised to fight for the lord at his command, while the lord agreed to protect ...
[44]
Oath of Fealty - Middle Ages
The Oath of Fealty was sworn during a solemn ceremony necessitating an act of homage. The vassal would appear before the lord bareheaded and without and weapons ...
[45]
Against Human Sexual Selection - The Scholar's Stage
May 12, 2019 · In his work examining ethnographic evidence from 190 hunter-gatherer societies, evolutionary psychologist Menlaos Apostolou notes the prevalence ...Missing: contests | Show results with:contests
[46]
Male Rites of Passages From Around the World | The Art of Manliness
Feb 21, 2010 · Examples of male rites of passage include land diving in Vanuatu, subincision for Mardudjara Aborigines, and jumping over cows for Hamar.
[47]
Freud and Masochism - European Journal of Psychoanalysis
Freud distinguishes three types of masochism: erotic, feminine and moral. Erotic masochism is the sexual perversion. Feminine masochism—which attains pleasure, ...
[48]
[PDF] Sadomasochism According to Freud's Psychosexual Stages of ...
According to Freud, it is the suffering or self-injury itself that matters, no matter who inflicts it, weather some person or fate. The moral form of masochism ...
[49]
[PDF] the deepest intimacy. a sociological account of bondage, domination ...
“Fantasy then (24/7 female to male submission) is distinguishable from reality (patriarchal oppression and traditional domestic servitude) when it involves ...
[50]
Visualizing BDSM and AIDS Activism: Archiving Pleasures ...
Apr 3, 2023 · From the 1960s, the leather scene gave rise to a plurality of fetish communities and practices, such as “fist-fuckers” and BDSM subcultures.<|separator|>
[51]
The Prevalence of BDSM-Related Fantasies and Activities in the ...
A high interest in BDSM-related activities in the general population was found because 46.8% of the total sample had ever performed at least one BDSM-related ...
[52]
[PDF] the prevalence of BDSM-related fantasies and activities in the ...
Aug 8, 2018 · Interests in dominant and submissive activities were comparable and, remarkably, were highly intercorrelated. Both BDSM and fetish interests ...
[53]
Perceptions of and stigma toward BDSM practitioners - PMC
Apr 26, 2022 · In the current study, we found that the general population (N = 257) does stigmatize BDSM practitioners more than the gay/lesbian population.
[54]
[PDF] Psychological and Demographic Differences of BDSM Practitioners
Dec 6, 2018 · Thus, this study focuses on the BDSM community and possible differences in personality traits such as depression, anxiety, narcissism, self- ...
[55]
Changes in U.S. Men's Attitudes toward the Family Provider Role ...
past ideology. Since 1960, there has been a significant decline in the role of men as family providers. The proportion of families solely supported by a man ...Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
[56]
Marriage and Masculinity: Male-Breadwinner Culture ...
Our results provide robust evidence that male-breadwinner norms are a key driver of the association between men's unemployment and the risk of separation.
[57]
Societal Role Reversal: Impacts on Family Stability - SoulMatcher
Aug 4, 2025 · The analysis highlights global patterns: families with absent or disempowered fathers show worse outcomes for children, couples experience loss ...
[58]
The Impact of Gender Roles on Marriage and Divorce.
Rating 4.1 (73) Jul 16, 2024 · Women initiate about 70% of divorces, citing factors such as emotional labor, financial independence, and changing social norms. Women often ...
[59]
70% of divorces are filed by women, this increases to 90% if we only ...
Mar 22, 2023 · 70% of divorces are filed by women, this increases to 90% if we only focus on college educated women. This doesn't apply to regular ...
[60]
Gender Egalitarianism and Marital Dissolution - Sage Journals
Sep 19, 2025 · Among college-educated couples, gender egalitarian and gender-specialized arrangements have similar risks of divorce in recent years, in line ...
[61]
Changing Gender Norms and Marriage Dynamics in the United States
An initial increase in the prevalence of egalitarian gender norms is predicted to lead to lower marriage rates and higher divorce rates. As egalitarian gender ...
[62]
The Deepening Gender Divide in Credentials, 2000–2020
Jan 1, 2025 · In the United States, women have earned more bachelor's degrees than men since the mid-1980s. We examine the historical continuities in this ...
[63]
[PDF] The Reversal of the College Gender Gap - Harvard University
Not only has the gender gap in college attendance and graduation reversed in the United States in the past decades, but almost all countries in the OECD now.
[64]
Boys left behind: Education gender gaps across the US | Brookings
a gap of eight percentage ...
[65]
Troubling Gender Gaps in Education - Applerouth
Aug 15, 2017 · Since the mid-1970s female students have outnumbered males in gifted and talented education programs. Females also have a 25% higher rate of ...Missing: feminism | Show results with:feminism
[66]
Why many men feel lost in an age of shifting roles and expectations
Mar 12, 2025 · In this demographic, men frequently find themselves without the traditional anchors of family, stable friendships or secure employment.
[67]
Getting More Men Into HEAL Jobs Won't Solve the Working-class ...
Oct 1, 2025 · A substantial portion of the decline in marriage and family formation rates among working-class men is likely explained by deteriorating job ...
[68]
Lingering Male Breadwinner Norms as Predictors of Family ... - MDPI
This study investigates how the norms about gender roles are associated with marital instability. The analysis is based on two propositions.
[69]
How Toxic Is Masculinity? - The New Yorker
Aug 1, 2022 · Zoë Heller surveys a number of recent feminist critiques of men and masculinity, including Laurie Penny's “Sexual Revolution” and Katherine ...
[70]
Combating Toxic Masculinity - Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
Dec 8, 2018 · Feminism and socialist feminism rightly identify this “toxic” masculinity as unacceptable and have pushed this criticism to the forefront of ...
[71]
Dear Men: Toxic Masculinity Is Imprisoning Us, and It's Time to Set ...
Jan 8, 2016 · As a feminist, I know that breaking down the toxic social expectations around women is work intended to free them.Missing: submission | Show results with:submission
[72]
[PDF] Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human ...
In human evolutionary history both men and women have pursued short-term and long-term matings under certain conditions where the reproductive benefits have ...
[73]
A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism ... - NIH
Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more 'masculine' men may have acquired more mates and/or sired more viable offspring. Thus far, however, ...
[74]
Dominance as adaptive stressing and ranking of males, serving to ...
The evolution of sex and of the male sheds light on the function of dominance hierarchy. The origin and function of dominance as primarily a means of ...
[75]
When Inequality Fails: Power, Group Dominance, and Societal ...
Social dominance theory therefore makes a different assumption about the stability of group-based dominance hierarchy than the Marxist concept of revolution, ...
[76]
Men's Gender Norms and Gender-Hierarchy-Legitimizing Ideologies
Jan 16, 2023 · Our research aims to better understand the influence of changing masculine norms on men's endorsement of gender-hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies.Missing: submission | Show results with:submission
[77]
Evolutionary Basis of Gender Dynamics: Understanding Patriarchy ...
Mar 27, 2025 · This article examines the patriarchy through evolutionary psychology, economics, and biology (primarily hormones), suggesting it stems from ...
[78]
Rates of Injury and Healthcare Utilization for Kink-Identified Patients
The survey found that 13.50% of participants experienced an injury or medical complication related to their kink or BDSM activities at some point in their ...
[79]
How Often Do People Delay or Forgo Treatment for Kink-Related ...
Nov 16, 2021 · Fourteen percent of the participants reported experiencing a kink-related injury at some point in their life, with kink-related injury being ...
[80]
Hooked Up and Tied Down: The Neurological Consequences of ...
Feb 17, 2015 · BDSM causes the neural networks controlling sexual arousal, aggression, and fear to become dangerously intertwined.
[81]
The consequences of having a dominant romantic partner on ...
Testosterone reactivity has been conceptualized as a marker of social submission at low levels and social dominance at high levels.Missing: driven competition
[82]
Testosterone, cortisol, dominance, and submission: Biologically ...
Feb 1, 2004 · A recent line of evidence from human research on the relation between testosterone, cortisol, and vigilant (dominant) and avoidant (submissive) responses to ...
[83]
Testosterone promotes dominance behaviors in the Ultimatum ... - NIH
Oct 21, 2023 · Our analysis reveals that individuals with higher baseline salivary testosterone levels exhibited more dominance as their position in the hierarchy increased ...
[84]
Testosterone eliminates strategic prosocial behavior through ...
Apr 3, 2023 · Exogenous testosterone alleviates subordination to the dominance of others [10,11,12] and reduces the physiological response to being evaluated ...
[85]
Changes in suicide in England and Wales, 1960–1997
Jan 2, 2018 · Suicide rates decreased in both genders between the early 1960s and the mid-1970s. The rate for males then increased between 1975 and 1990, while the rate for ...
[86]
The Gender Gap in Suicide and Premature Death or: Why Are Men ...
Aug 9, 2025 · It is concluded that the gender gap in suicide and premature death can most likely be explained by perceived reduction in social role opportunities leading to ...
[87]
Are male and female suicide rates converging? - SpringerLink
The data reveal that the SD narrowed from 1960–1967, held steady from 1968–1972, and then widened slightly from 1973–1978.
[88]
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior ...
The male warrior hypothesis argues that, for men, intergroup conflict represents an opportunity to gain access to mates, territory and increased status.
[89]
[PDF] Therapeutic and Relational Benefits of Subspace in BDSM Contexts
From an analysis of the literature, I conclude that achieving subspace during consensual BDSM interactions might result in a reduction of physical and emotional.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[90]
Scientists uncover intriguing evolutionary psychology insights with ...
Nov 5, 2024 · A recent study in Deviant Behavior suggests that certain submissive behaviors in relationships may align with human evolutionary strategies ...
[91]
Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced ...
May 17, 2021 · Power dynamics have been described as being constitutive of romantic relationships and can impact outcomes such as relationship quality.Relationship Quality · Results · Discussion