Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Neuroticism

Neuroticism is one of the five broad personality traits in the Big Five model of personality, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), and it represents a stable tendency to experience negative emotional states such as anxiety, anger, depression, and vulnerability.^[1] Individuals high in neuroticism are prone to emotional instability, interpreting ordinary situations as threatening, and responding with intense negative affect to stress or frustration.^[2] This trait, sometimes referred to as emotional instability, contrasts with emotional stability in those scoring low on neuroticism, who tend to remain calm and resilient under pressure.^[3] The concept originated in Hans Eysenck's work in the 1940s, where it was derived statistically from personality questionnaires and linked to the historical notion of neurosis, before being integrated into the comprehensive FFM framework developed by researchers like Paul Costa and Robert McCrae in the 1980s and 1990s.^[4] Within the FFM, neuroticism is further subdivided into six specific facets: anxiety (tendency to worry and feel fearful), angry hostility (propensity for irritation and bitterness), depression (feelings of guilt and sadness), self-consciousness (sensitivity to criticism and embarrassment), impulsiveness (difficulty controlling urges), and vulnerability (perceived inability to cope with stress).^[5] These facets capture the multidimensional nature of the trait, allowing for nuanced assessment of how neuroticism manifests in different emotional domains.^[6] Research consistently shows that neuroticism is heritable, with twin and family studies estimating that genetic factors account for 40% to 60% of the variance in this trait, while environmental influences, including life experiences, contribute the remainder.^[7] Neuroticism is commonly measured using self-report inventories like the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), which includes 48 items for neuroticism across its facets, providing scores that predict behavior in various contexts.^[8] High levels of neuroticism are associated with increased risk for mental health disorders, including anxiety disorders, major depression, and substance use problems, as well as physical health issues like cardiovascular disease due to chronic stress responses.^[9] Conversely, low neuroticism correlates with better psychological well-being, effective coping strategies, and longevity.^[2] Gender differences exist, with women typically scoring higher on neuroticism facets like anxiety and vulnerability, though effect sizes are moderate.^[10] Overall, neuroticism's stability across the lifespan—showing moderate rank-order consistency from adolescence to old age—underscores its role as a core dimension of human personality.^[11]

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition

Neuroticism is one of the five broad personality traits in the Big Five model, also known as the OCEAN model, characterized by a pervasive tendency to experience a range of negative emotions including anxiety, anger, depression, and vulnerability.^[12] This trait reflects an individual's general emotional instability and proneness to psychological distress, contrasting with emotional stability at the opposite end of the spectrum. High levels of neuroticism are associated with overreactivity to stressors, a pessimistic cognitive outlook, and difficulty in modulating emotional responses, leading to heightened vulnerability in challenging situations.^[9] While related to broader concepts of emotionality—the capacity to feel emotions intensely—neuroticism is specifically anchored in negative emotionality and chronic dysregulation, encompassing not only the frequency of negative affects but also impulsivity and poor coping mechanisms.^[12] Unlike general negative affectivity, which may describe transient mood states, neuroticism represents a stable disposition toward sustained emotional turbulence and self-doubt.^[9] In everyday life, neuroticism manifests through behaviors such as excessive worry over minor events, rapid mood swings in response to routine setbacks, and heightened self-consciousness in social interactions, often amplifying ordinary stressors into sources of significant discomfort.^[9]

Key Facets and Manifestations

Neuroticism, as measured by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), comprises six primary facets that capture its multidimensional nature: anxiety, angry hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, and vulnerability.^[13] These facets provide a finer-grained understanding of the trait, revealing how emotional instability manifests in varied ways across individuals.^[13] Anxiety reflects a tendency to experience fear, nervousness, and anticipatory worry about potential threats, with high scorers often feeling tense and apprehensive even in low-risk situations.^[13] Angry hostility involves a proneness to anger, frustration, and bitterness, where individuals are easily irritated and may express resentment toward others or circumstances.^[13] Depression encompasses tendencies toward sadness, hopelessness, and loneliness, leading to dejected moods and a pervasive sense of gloom.^[13] Self-consciousness is characterized by sensitivity to embarrassment, shame, and social disapproval, resulting in shyness and discomfort in interpersonal settings.^[13] Impulsiveness denotes difficulty controlling urges and cravings, prompting hasty actions without forethought.^[13] Vulnerability refers to feeling overwhelmed and helpless under stress, with individuals prone to panic when faced with challenges.^[13] These facets manifest differently across contexts, influencing daily functioning. In interpersonal domains, high anxiety and self-consciousness often contribute to jealousy in romantic relationships, as individuals perceive threats to bonds more acutely and respond with heightened insecurity.^[14] Occupationally, vulnerability and depression facets are linked to increased proneness to burnout, where chronic stress leads to emotional exhaustion and reduced professional efficacy among workers in demanding roles.^[15] Physiologically, facets like anxiety and depression are associated with somatic complaints, such as tension headaches and muscle pain, stemming from prolonged emotional arousal and heightened bodily awareness of distress.^[16] The facets of neuroticism are intercorrelated, contributing to synergistic effects in stress responses. This interplay underscores neuroticism's variability, where combinations of facets can heighten overall emotional reactivity beyond any single component.^[17]

Historical and Theoretical Foundations

Historical Development

The concept of neuroticism traces its origins to ancient Greek medicine, particularly Hippocrates' (c. 460–370 BCE) theory of the four humors—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—which posited that imbalances in these bodily fluids produced distinct temperaments, with an excess of black bile leading to the melancholic disposition characterized by sadness, anxiety, and emotional instability, precursors to modern neurotic traits.^[18] This humoral framework influenced subsequent Western thought on temperament and emotional vulnerability, evolving through Galen (129–c. 216 CE), who refined it into a typology linking physiological states to psychological tendencies.^[19] In the 19th century, the term "neurosis" emerged in psychiatry, initially coined by William Cullen in 1784 to describe disorders of the nervous system without evident organic pathology, but it gained prominence through German and French physicians who conceptualized it as a spectrum of emotional and functional disturbances, including anxiety and hypochondria, laying the groundwork for personality-based interpretations.^[20] By the late 1800s, figures like Moritz Heinrich Romberg and Jean-Pierre Falret expanded neurosis to encompass hereditary and constitutional factors in emotional reactivity, shifting focus from purely medical to psychological dimensions.^[21] The 20th century marked the formalization of neuroticism as a personality trait. In the 1930s, Gordon Allport advanced trait theory in works like Personality: A Psychological Interpretation (1937), identifying thousands of traits through lexical analysis and distinguishing stable dispositional characteristics, including those related to emotional maladjustment akin to neuroticism, emphasizing idiographic individual differences over typologies. Building on this, Raymond Cattell in the 1940s used factor analysis on large datasets to derive the 16 Personality Factors (16PF) model, first published in 1946, where primary factors like tenseness and guilt aggregated into a second-order "anxiety" dimension closely resembling neuroticism, highlighting its role in emotional instability. A pivotal milestone came with Hans Eysenck's Dimensions of Personality (1947), which, through statistical analysis of clinical data from neurotic patients, proposed neuroticism as a major supertrait orthogonal to extraversion, representing inherited liability to psychological distress and autonomic reactivity; Eysenck briefly referenced its potential biological underpinnings in arousal systems, though details emerged later.^[22] Post-1980s developments standardized neuroticism within the Big Five model, with Paul Costa and Robert McCrae's NEO Personality Inventory (1985) establishing it as a hierarchical broadband trait encompassing facets like anxiety, depression, and vulnerability, supported by convergent validity across self-reports and peer ratings.^[23] In the 1990s, meta-analyses, such as McCrae and Costa's cross-cultural review (1997), confirmed neuroticism's structural stability and replicability across diverse populations, solidifying its universal applicability in trait psychology.^[24]

Major Theoretical Models

One of the foundational theoretical models of neuroticism is Hans Eysenck's arousal theory, which posits that neuroticism represents individual differences in the lability of the autonomic nervous system and sensitivity to cortical arousal, particularly in the limbic system, leading to heightened emotional reactivity and instability under stress.^[25] This model links neuroticism closely to introversion, suggesting that introverted individuals high in neuroticism exhibit greater physiological arousal in response to environmental stimuli, predisposing them to anxiety and emotional distress.^[26] Building on Eysenck's framework, Jeffrey Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) reinterprets neuroticism as heightened activity in the behavioral inhibition system (BIS), a neurobiological mechanism that detects signals of punishment and novelty, thereby promoting avoidance behaviors and fear responses.^[27] In this model, high neuroticism correlates with BIS overreactivity, which inhibits approach behaviors and amplifies sensitivity to aversive stimuli, distinguishing it from impulsivity tied to the behavioral approach system.^[28] Auke Tellegen's multidimensional personality model further refines the conceptualization by differentiating negative emotionality—a core component akin to neuroticism—from constraint, where negative emotionality reflects a broad proneness to experiencing distress, alienation, and emotional turmoil across various contexts.^[29] This approach, operationalized in the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire, positions neuroticism as a higher-order trait encompassing primary emotional tendencies without conflating them with self-control mechanisms.^[30] Contemporary integrations, such as those by David Watson and Lee Anna Clark, advance a hierarchical model where neuroticism functions as negative affectivity, a superordinate factor subsuming lower-order affects like fear, sadness, and anger, providing a unified explanation for emotional instability across mood and anxiety domains.^[31] This perspective, refined in collaborative work, emphasizes neuroticism's role in shared vulnerabilities for psychopathology while allowing for specific subcomponent differentiations.^[32] Despite their influence, these models face critiques for inadequately addressing positive emotions within neuroticism, often overemphasizing negative reactivity without explaining variability in hedonic tone. Eysenck's arousal theory, in particular, has been challenged for lacking precise neural specificity and failing to account for cultural differences in emotional expression.^[33] Similarly, Gray's original RST was revised in 2000 due to limitations in modeling conflict resolution and its incomplete mapping onto broader personality dimensions like the Big Five.^[34] Tellegen's framework, while integrative, has been noted for overlaps with other models that dilute its unique contributions to constraint-emotion distinctions.^[35]

Etiology and Causation

Genetic and Biological Factors

Twin and adoption studies consistently indicate that neuroticism is moderately to highly heritable, with estimates ranging from 40% to 60% of the variance attributable to genetic factors.^[7] A comprehensive meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies synthesized data from numerous cohorts and reported an average heritability of 0.39 for neuroticism, underscoring its substantial genetic basis while highlighting variability across populations and measures.^[36] These findings derive primarily from classical twin designs, which compare monozygotic and dizygotic twins to partition variance into genetic and environmental components, and adoption studies that disentangle familial influences. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have advanced understanding of the genetic architecture of neuroticism, revealing it as a polygenic trait influenced by many common variants of small effect. Large-scale meta-analyses have identified hundreds of genetic loci associated with neuroticism, including regions near genes involved in serotonin signaling, such as SLC6A4, which encodes the serotonin transporter implicated in emotional regulation. A 2024 meta-analysis incorporating nearly 700,000 participants identified 208 genetic loci associated with neuroticism, further confirming its polygenic nature.^[37] Polygenic risk scores derived from these GWAS, including 2020s-era studies with hundreds of thousands of participants, explain approximately 2-4% of the phenotypic variance in neuroticism in independent samples, demonstrating predictive utility despite capturing only a fraction of the total heritability due to limitations in variant discovery and transferability across ancestries.^[38] These scores aggregate effects across loci to estimate individual liability, with seminal work emphasizing their role in bridging molecular genetics and behavioral phenotypes. Neuroimaging research links neuroticism to specific neurobiological mechanisms, particularly heightened emotional reactivity and stress responses. Functional MRI studies show amygdala hyperactivity in individuals high in neuroticism during exposure to negative emotional stimuli, reflecting exaggerated threat processing and poor habituation.^[39] Concurrently, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is evident, with elevated baseline and stress-induced cortisol levels in high-neuroticism individuals, suggesting chronic activation of the body's primary stress system.^[40] Structural neuroimaging in the 2020s further reveals associations with reduced gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex, a region critical for emotion regulation, and altered connectivity within the default mode network, which supports self-referential thinking and rumination.^[41]^[42] From an evolutionary perspective, neuroticism may have persisted as an adaptive trait promoting vigilance against environmental threats in ancestral settings, where heightened sensitivity to danger enhanced survival by facilitating rapid detection and avoidance of risks.^[43] However, in contemporary low-threat environments, extreme levels can become maladaptive, contributing to excessive anxiety and impaired functioning without proportional benefits.^[44] This hypothesis aligns with life history theory, positing neuroticism as a calibrated response to perceived uncertainty or danger, balanced by gene-environment interactions that modulate its expression.

Environmental and Developmental Influences

Environmental and developmental influences play a significant role in shaping neuroticism, with early life experiences often exerting lasting effects on emotional reactivity and stress vulnerability. Childhood adversity, such as parental rejection, abuse, or family instability, has been consistently linked to elevated neuroticism in adulthood. Longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, tracking over 1,000 individuals from birth, demonstrate that exposure to multiple adverse childhood experiences predicts higher neuroticism scores at midlife, independent of genetic factors, with effect sizes indicating a dose-response relationship where greater adversity correlates with more pronounced trait elevation.^[45] Similarly, negative emotionality in childhood, a precursor to neuroticism, mediates the continuity of adversity into adult stressful life events, as evidenced by prospective analyses showing that early instability amplifies later emotional dysregulation.^[46] Gene-environment interactions further elucidate how environmental stressors interact with predispositions to influence neuroticism, aligning with the diathesis-stress model. The serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), particularly the short allele variant, moderates the impact of life events on neuroticism, where carriers exhibit heightened trait levels following negative experiences, such as loss or trauma, compared to long allele homozygotes, though findings have been subject to replication debates in the literature.^[47]^[48] This interaction underscores differential susceptibility, wherein genetic vulnerabilities amplify environmental effects, leading to greater neuroticism in stressful contexts, as supported by family-based association studies confirming the polymorphism's role in anxiety-related traits.^[49] The developmental trajectory of neuroticism reveals moderate stability emerging from adolescence, with rank-order correlations typically ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 over decades into adulthood, reflecting both continuity and potential for change. Meta-analyses of longitudinal studies indicate that while neuroticism stabilizes after early adulthood, early life interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral programs targeting emotional regulation, can induce plasticity, reducing trait levels in at-risk youth by fostering adaptive coping mechanisms.^[50] This plasticity is most evident during sensitive periods in childhood and adolescence, where supportive environments mitigate rising neuroticism trajectories observed in unstable settings. Societal factors, including socioeconomic stress, act as moderators of neuroticism expression, often exacerbating the trait in disadvantaged groups. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher neuroticism, as global surveys from the 2020s, including analyses from large cohorts like the UK Biobank, show that individuals in low-SES environments report elevated emotional instability due to chronic stressors like financial strain and limited resources.^[51] Recent findings highlight the COVID-19 pandemic's role in elevating population-level neuroticism, particularly from 2020 to 2023, as prolonged uncertainty and isolation amplified stress responses. Meta-analyses of studies during this period reveal that neuroticism predicted greater anxiety and emotional distress, with trait levels showing temporary increases in affected cohorts, especially among young adults facing disrupted life transitions.^[52]

Measurement and Assessment

Psychometric Instruments

Psychometric instruments for assessing neuroticism primarily consist of self-report questionnaires designed to quantify this trait as a continuous dimension within broader personality models, such as the Five-Factor Model (FFM). These tools evaluate neuroticism through items that capture emotional instability, negative affect, and vulnerability to stress, often yielding scores that reflect overall trait levels and, in some cases, underlying facets like anxiety, depression, and self-consciousness.^[53]^[54] One of the most widely used instruments is the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), a 240-item questionnaire that measures neuroticism as one of the five major FFM domains, along with six specific facets: anxiety, angry hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, and vulnerability. Developed as a revision of the NEO-PI-R to improve readability and accessibility, the NEO-PI-3 uses a Likert-type response format where respondents rate statements on a 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. An example item from the depression facet is "I often feel blue," which contributes to scoring the overall neuroticism domain and its subcomponents. Scores are typically reported as T-scores, normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population, allowing for standardized interpretation across individuals.^[55]^[53] For shorter assessments, the Big Five Inventory (BFI) provides a 44-item measure of the FFM traits, including neuroticism, using simple phrases rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The neuroticism subscale comprises eight items, such as "I get nervous easily" and reverse-scored items like "Is relaxed, handles stress well," which aggregate to produce a continuous score indicating emotional stability versus instability. Designed for efficiency in research and clinical settings, the BFI emphasizes brevity while maintaining adequate coverage of core neuroticism aspects like worry and moodiness. Like the NEO-PI-3, BFI neuroticism scores are often standardized, though raw totals are commonly used for relative comparisons within samples.^[54]^[56] The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) short form, with 48 items, assesses neuroticism alongside extraversion and psychoticism through yes/no responses to statements reflecting emotional lability and autonomic reactivity. Neuroticism items in the EPQ-R target traits such as tension and reactivity to stressors, with the scale yielding a total score that aligns with Eysenck's biological model of personality. This instrument is particularly valued for its focus on neuroticism as a heritable dimension linked to arousal thresholds, and scores are interpreted continuously, often compared to normative data for high, medium, or low trait levels.^[57]^[58] Administration of these instruments is predominantly self-report via paper-and-pencil or digital formats, taking 10-40 minutes depending on length, and they are suitable for adults in non-clinical and research contexts. Adaptations for children include the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC), a 144-item parent- or teacher-rated tool that measures neuroticism (labeled as emotional instability) among the FFM domains in youth aged 6-12, with items like those assessing fearfulness and sadness. For clinical settings, abbreviated versions or observer-report forms of the NEO-PI-3 and BFI facilitate use with populations facing literacy challenges.^[59]^[53] Cross-cultural applications involve translated and validated versions to ensure equivalence across languages and populations. The International Personality Item Pool-NEO (IPIP-NEO), a public-domain alternative to the NEO-PI-3 with 300 items (including 60 for neuroticism facets), has been adapted in over 50 languages, demonstrating structural invariance and comparable mean levels of neuroticism in studies from East Asia to Europe. These versions maintain the original factor structure while adjusting for cultural nuances in emotional expression.^[60] In the 2020s, digital advancements have introduced app-based and AI-assisted assessments for neuroticism, enabling real-time tracking through smartphone interfaces and natural language processing of user responses. Studies have validated machine learning models for predicting neuroticism from open-ended text with accuracy comparable to human evaluators. These tools support longitudinal monitoring in everyday settings, though they complement rather than replace traditional instruments.^[61]

Validity, Reliability, and Limitations

Assessments of neuroticism, particularly through instruments like the NEO-PI-R, demonstrate strong reliability. Internal consistency for the neuroticism domain is typically high, with Cronbach's α exceeding 0.85 and reaching up to 0.92 in normative samples.^[13] A recent meta-analysis of the Big Five Inventory confirmed an average α of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88–0.89) for neuroticism across diverse studies.^[62] Test-retest reliability is also robust, with correlations around 0.8 over intervals as long as 6 years, indicating stable measurement of the trait over time.^[63] Validity evidence supports the construct's scientific foundation across multiple types. Convergent validity is evident in moderate to strong correlations with anxiety scales, typically ranging from 0.6 to 0.7, such as with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Predictive validity is demonstrated by neuroticism's ability to forecast responses to stress, including heightened emotional reactivity and vulnerability to adverse outcomes in longitudinal studies. Construct validity is bolstered by factor analytic studies confirming neuroticism's unidimensionality at the domain level within the Big Five framework, while allowing for multifaceted substructure at lower levels. Despite these strengths, neuroticism assessments face notable limitations. Self-report methods are susceptible to biases, including social desirability—where individuals underreport negative traits—and acquiescence, leading to inflated or inconsistent responses. Cultural invariance is another concern, as item phrasing often reflects Western individualistic perspectives, potentially reducing applicability in non-Western contexts. Recent critiques highlight an overemphasis on neuroticism's association with negative affect, potentially overlooking adaptive aspects such as heightened vigilance or empathy in certain situations.^[64] Meta-analyses from the 2020s have also identified measurement invariance issues in diverse populations, with factor loadings and residual variances differing by 10-20% across cultural and demographic groups, complicating cross-group comparisons.^[65] To address these limitations, alternatives such as observer ratings from peers or informants provide complementary perspectives, reducing self-report biases while maintaining convergent validity with self-assessments. Physiological measures, including heart rate variability, offer objective supplementation, as lower HRV correlates with higher neuroticism independently of self-reports.^[66]

Associations with Psychopathology

Mood and Anxiety Disorders

High neuroticism serves as a significant vulnerability factor for major depressive disorder (MDD). Similarly, neuroticism shows a strong positive correlation with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), estimated at r ≈ 0.45 in comprehensive meta-analyses of personality-psychopathology links, reflecting its role as a broad risk indicator for anxiety disorders.^[12] These associations position high neuroticism as a transdiagnostic predictor, increasing susceptibility to both disorders through heightened emotional reactivity. Shared symptomatic features between neuroticism and mood/anxiety disorders include rumination and emotional lability, which overlap substantially and contribute to disorder onset. For instance, brooding rumination—a repetitive focus on negative emotions—mediates the pathway from neuroticism to depressive symptoms.^[67] Longitudinal data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), spanning 2004–2020, demonstrate that baseline neuroticism prospectively predicts the course of MDD and GAD over multiple years, with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.24–1.66 after adjusting for confounders like demographics and prior symptoms.^[68] Mechanistically, common genetic factors underpin these links via pleiotropy, where polygenic scores for neuroticism share substantial heritability with depression (genetic correlation rg = 0.66, p = 2.75 × 10⁻¹⁴), implicating overlapping loci in emotional dysregulation pathways.^[69] Neuroticism also interacts with environmental stressors in predicting depression, though effects are primarily additive rather than amplifying over five-year follow-ups.^[70] Regarding specificity, the depression facet of neuroticism most strongly predicts MDD outcomes, while the anxiety facet shows preferential associations with GAD, as evidenced in adolescent cohorts where only the depression facet uniquely linked to depressive symptoms beyond a general neuroticism factor (β = 0.25, p < 0.01), whereas anxiety-related facets broadly predicted GAD (β = 0.15–0.30, p < 0.05).^[71] Recent longitudinal evidence from Mendelian randomization analyses in the 2020s supports causal precedence of neuroticism over mood and anxiety disorders, with genetically instrumented neuroticism increasing MDD risk (β = 0.834, p = 6.413 × 10⁻¹⁰³) and anxiety risk (β = 0.70, p = 5.767 × 10⁻⁶¹), though bidirectional effects exist.^[37] These findings, drawn from large-scale genomic data (e.g., UK Biobank), underscore neuroticism's role in initiating risk pathways rather than merely reflecting disorder states.

Personality and Other Disorders

Neuroticism is prominently elevated in several personality disorders, particularly those characterized by emotional instability and interpersonal difficulties. In borderline personality disorder (BPD), high levels of neuroticism are consistently observed, reflecting core features such as affective dysregulation and fear of abandonment, with meta-analytic evidence indicating moderate to strong phenotypic correlations (r ≈ 0.50) between the trait and BPD symptoms.^[72] Similarly, avoidant personality disorder (AvPD) shows strong associations with neuroticism, driven by heightened fear of rejection and social inhibition, where neuroticism predicts increased AvPD traits in longitudinal studies of adolescents.^[73] The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) integrates these traits by mapping neuroticism onto the domain of Negative Affectivity, which encompasses emotional lability, anxiousness, and separation insecurity, facilitating a dimensional approach to diagnosis that aligns personality pathology with the Five-Factor Model.^[74] Beyond personality disorders, neuroticism links to various non-affective psychopathologies, often amplifying vulnerability through specific facets. In schizophrenia, elevated neuroticism correlates with negative symptoms such as blunted affect and social withdrawal (r ≈ 0.40), contributing to poorer functional outcomes and potentially reflecting shared genetic liabilities.^[75] For substance use disorders, the impulsiveness facet of neuroticism acts as a key risk factor, promoting maladaptive coping and escalating dependence, as evidenced in prospective cohort studies linking high neuroticism to increased alcohol and drug misuse.^[76] In eating disorders, particularly anorexia nervosa, the self-consciousness facet of neuroticism is heightened, fostering body dissatisfaction and restrictive behaviors, with clinical samples showing elevated scores during acute illness phases.^[77] The continuum hypothesis posits neuroticism as a subthreshold expression of psychopathology, where extreme trait levels blend into disorder spectra. This is exemplified by the p-factor, a general psychopathology factor capturing shared variance across disorders, which overlaps substantially with neuroticism, representing a latent liability for emotional dysregulation and impairment.^[78] Recent 2020s research extends this to neurodevelopmental disorders, revealing that ADHD symptoms in childhood are associated with higher neuroticism in adolescence (r ≈ 0.19).^[79] These associations are bidirectional, with personality disorders intensifying neuroticism expression over time through chronic stress and interpersonal failures, while baseline high neuroticism prospectively heightens disorder risk via maladaptive emotional responses.^[80]

Behavioral and Health Outcomes

Maladaptive Behaviors

Individuals high in neuroticism often exhibit paradoxical impulsivity under stress, engaging in risk-taking behaviors as a maladaptive coping mechanism despite their general tendency toward caution and anxiety. For instance, this can manifest as emotional eating or binge eating episodes, where heightened emotional distress triggers impulsive consumption of food to alleviate negative feelings. Studies have shown that neuroticism combined with impulsivity significantly predicts lifetime prevalence of binge eating, with adolescents displaying higher rates linked to escape-avoidance coping strategies. Similarly, under perceived stress, neurotic individuals may resort to reckless spending or impulsive buying, driven by negative urgency—a facet of neuroticism involving rash actions in response to distress. Research indicates that neuroticism positively correlates with such financial impulsivity, increasing vulnerability to credit defaults and maladaptive consumption patterns. In interpersonal domains, neuroticism is associated with conflict proneness and dependency, fostering unstable relationships characterized by frequent arguments and emotional reliance on partners. High neuroticism predicts elevated self- and other-perceived conflict frequency in both romantic and familial ties, often due to heightened sensitivity to perceived threats and poor conflict management skills. This trait also contributes to dependency, where individuals seek excessive reassurance, leading to relational strain. Consequently, neuroticism elevates divorce risk; meta-analytic reviews reveal that it is the strongest Big Five predictor of marital separation, with affected couples experiencing up to 1.5 times higher odds of dissolution compared to those low in the trait. Avoidance patterns are prevalent among those high in neuroticism, stemming from chronic worry and anticipatory anxiety that prompt procrastination and social withdrawal. Procrastination arises as a self-regulatory failure, with meta-analyses confirming a positive correlation between neuroticism and task delay, often mediated by emotional dysregulation. Social withdrawal, in turn, serves as a protective strategy against perceived interpersonal risks, but it exacerbates isolation; neuroticism positively associates with avoidance behaviors and worry, reducing engagement in social activities. These patterns perpetuate a cycle of rumination and missed opportunities, distinct from clinical withdrawal but functionally impairing daily functioning. Health-risk behaviors like smoking and alcohol use frequently emerge as coping outlets for neurotic individuals, who turn to substances to manage persistent negative affect. Meta-analyses of large cohorts demonstrate that higher neuroticism correlates with increased smoking prevalence (r ≈ 0.15-0.25) and heavier cigarette consumption, independent of other traits like low conscientiousness. For alcohol, similar patterns hold, with neuroticism linked to greater intake and problematic use (r ≈ 0.20-0.30), often as a means to dampen anxiety or stress. These associations underscore substance use as a maladaptive emotion-regulation strategy rather than mere habit. In the digital era, neuroticism has been tied to emerging maladaptations such as cyberchondria and excessive social media rumination, particularly evident in studies from the 2020s. Cyberchondria, involving heightened health anxiety from online symptom searches, is strongly predicted by neuroticism, mediated by intolerance of uncertainty and metacognitive beliefs about health threats. Recent research during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted how neuroticism amplified cyberchondria, with individuals experiencing intensified worry from ambiguous online information. Likewise, problematic social media use, including rumination on negative content, correlates with neuroticism (r ≈ 0.25-0.35), fostering cycles of emotional distress through fear of missing out and upward social comparisons. These digital behaviors represent modern extensions of neurotic tendencies, amplifying subclinical dysfunction in everyday life.

Physical Health and Longevity Implications

Individuals with high levels of neuroticism exhibit elevated risks for cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension and coronary heart disease. Prospective studies, including analyses from the UK Biobank, have demonstrated that a one standard deviation increase in neuroticism is associated with a 5% higher hazard ratio for myocardial infarction (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.09).^[81] Meta-analytic evidence further indicates a 14% to 27% excess risk of coronary heart disease mortality among those scoring higher on neuroticism, independent of traditional risk factors like age and socioeconomic status.^[82] Neuroticism contributes to compromised immune function primarily through stress-induced chronic inflammation. Elevated emotional reactivity in high-neuroticism individuals triggers repeated activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to sustained proinflammatory responses and higher circulating levels of markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP). Regarding longevity, neuroticism shows an inverse relationship with lifespan, as evidenced by large-scale cohort data. In the UK Biobank study involving over 400,000 participants followed for more than a decade, a one standard deviation increase in neuroticism was linked to a 10% elevated hazard ratio for all-cause mortality (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09–1.11), after adjusting for demographics, lifestyle, and comorbidities.^[83] This association persists across causes of death, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, suggesting a modest reduction in expected lifespan, though precise estimates vary by population and mediators.^[82] The underlying mechanisms involve cumulative physiological strain from allostatic load, where frequent stress responses in neurotic individuals accelerate bodily wear through dysregulated cortisol and autonomic nervous system activity.^[84] Poor health behaviors, such as reduced physical activity and suboptimal adherence to medical regimens, partially mediate these effects, amplifying somatic vulnerabilities over time.^[82]

Epidemiology and Sociocultural Aspects

Prevalence and Distribution

Neuroticism exhibits a normal distribution in general populations, with scores typically centered around the mean at the 50th percentile on standardized measures. Approximately 15-20% of individuals score in the high range, defined as more than one standard deviation above the mean, reflecting a substantial minority prone to elevated emotional reactivity. This distribution underscores neuroticism as a continuous trait rather than a categorical disorder, with implications for population-level mental health risks.^[85] Global data reveal consistent patterns in neuroticism prevalence, including higher average scores among women compared to men, with a moderate effect size of d = 0.40 across diverse samples. Age-related variations show neuroticism levels peaking in early adulthood and generally declining thereafter, though some longitudinal studies indicate relative stability or slight elevations in midlife before further decreases in later years. These patterns hold across large-scale assessments, such as the Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment (SAPA) Project, which has analyzed data from over 300,000 participants to map trait distributions, and adaptations of Big Five inventories integrated into surveys like the World Values Survey for cross-national comparisons.^[10]^[86]^[87] Temporal trends indicate slight increases in neuroticism among younger cohorts compared to older generations, with cross-sectional surveys documenting a generational rise since the 1990s, potentially linked to shifting societal stressors.^[88] Recent data from the 2020s highlight pandemic-induced shifts, with longitudinal tracking showing temporary decreases in neuroticism overall early in the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by stability and notable increases among individuals under 30 in 2021–2022.^[89] This generational trend has continued into the 2020s, with young adults showing further elevations in neuroticism as of 2025, possibly due to increased social media use and lingering pandemic effects.^[90] These changes demonstrate neuroticism's sensitivity to historical events while maintaining overall trait stability over the lifespan.

Cultural and Demographic Variations

Cultural differences in self-reported neuroticism are evident across societies, with individuals in collectivist cultures, such as those in East Asia, typically scoring lower than those in individualist Western cultures. A large-scale study involving over 130,000 participants from 22 countries found mean Neuroticism z-scores of -0.35 in China and -0.10 in South Korea, compared to 0.18 in the United Kingdom, indicating small but consistent differences with an approximate effect size of d = 0.5 between East Asian and Western samples.^[91] These variations may stem from cultural response styles, where norms in collectivist societies emphasize emotional restraint, potentially leading to underreporting of negative emotionality on self-report measures.^[92] Gender differences in neuroticism are observed globally, with women scoring higher than men, as evidenced by meta-analyses reporting a standardized mean difference of d = 0.41.^[93] Contrary to expectations of convergence, this gap widens in more gender-egalitarian and prosperous countries, a phenomenon known as the gender-equality paradox, based on analyses of data from multiple nations up to the early 2020s.^[93] For instance, sex differences in Neuroticism facets like anxiety are more pronounced in high-living-condition countries (p < 0.05).^[93] Demographic factors also influence neuroticism levels. Research indicates higher neuroticism among rural residents compared to urban dwellers, with rural individuals scoring elevated on Neuroticism (e.g., increased anxiety and vulnerability) potentially due to greater exposure to isolation, limited mental health resources, and economic stressors.^[94] Similarly, socioeconomic gradients show an inverse relationship with education and income; low life-course socioeconomic status, including lower parental education, is associated with disproportionately higher neuroticism scores.^[95] A study of midlife adults confirmed that individuals with low socioeconomic status exhibited elevated Neuroticism, independent of other factors like age and gender.^[95] Measurement equivalence poses challenges for assessing neuroticism across cultures, particularly due to limitations in the lexical hypothesis underlying the Big Five model. This approach, which derives personality descriptors from language lexicons, assumes universality but shows incomplete replication in non-Indo-European languages, where trait structures may emphasize relational or contextual aspects over individual emotional instability. Lexical studies in languages like Hungarian or Filipino reveal deviations, suggesting that translated instruments may not fully capture neuroticism equivalently, leading to potential biases in cross-cultural comparisons.^[96] Recent research from the 2020s has increasingly addressed neuroticism in underrepresented groups, including indigenous and low-income populations, revealing heightened levels and vulnerability in contexts of environmental stress. For example, studies on climate change worry indicate that high neuroticism moderates the link between perceived threats and mental health outcomes, amplifying risks for low-income individuals facing climate-related stressors like extreme weather.^[97] Such findings highlight gaps in prior literature, emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive assessments in these demographics.

References

[1]
Neuroticism - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · neuroticism · the state of being neurotic or a proneness to neurosis. · a mild condition of neurosis. · one of the dimensions of the five-factor ...
[2]
Public Health Significance of Neuroticism - PMC - PubMed Central
The personality trait of neuroticism refers to relatively stable tendencies to respond with negative emotions to threat, frustration, or loss.
[3]
The Five Factor Model of personality structure: an update - PMC
Sep 9, 2019 · The Five Factor Model (FFM) of general personality structure consists of the five broad domains of neuroticism (or emotional instability vs. stability), ...
[4]
[PDF] The Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neuroticism
The label neuroticism was first used by Eysenck. (1947) to describe this statistically derived personality trait; Eysenck coined the term after the commonly ...
[5]
The link between facets of neuroticism and dimensions of ...
Within the Big Five model of personality (Costa & McCrae, 1992), Neuroticism is regarded as having six interrelated facets: anxiety, hostility, depression, self ...
[6]
[PDF] Domains and Facets: Hierarchical personality Assessment Using the ...
FIGURE 1 An illustration of how traits in the domain of Neuroticism might be grouped into facets. Overlapping groupings are less meaningful than mutually ...
[7]
Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on ... - NIH
Jul 14, 2015 · According to twin studies, the Big Five personality traits have substantial heritable components explaining 40–60% of the variance, ...
[8]
[PDF] The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement and Theoretical ...
The initial NEO Personality Inventory (Costa &. McCrae, 1985) included scales to measure six facets of Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Open- ness but did not ...
[9]
Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous ...
May 12, 2017 · Neuroticism is the trait disposition to experience negative affects, including anger, anxiety, self‐consciousness, irritability, emotional instability, and ...
[10]
Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big ...
At the facet level of Neuroticism, women have been found to show higher levels of anxiety, depression, self-consciousness, and vulnerability than men (Costa et ...Introduction · Gender Differences In Big... · Results
[11]
Stability and Change in the Big Five Personality Traits - NIH
76 for Extraversion, .60 to .79 for Agreeableness, .67 to .83 for Conscientiousness, .65 to .78 for Neuroticism (scored in the direction of Neuroticism) ...
[12]
Neuroticism and Common Mental Disorders: Meaning and Utility of ...
Costa and McCrae defined neuroticism as a dimension of maladjustment or negative emotionality versus adjustment and emotional stability (P. T. Costa Jr.
[13]
[PDF] NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) Paul Detrick ... - POST
These domains are: Neuroticism (N; the tendency to experience negative affects like sadness, anxiety, guilt, fear, anger, embarrassment; irrationality; ...
[14]
Adult Attachment and Personality as Predictors of Jealousy in ...
Apr 11, 2022 · In 847 participants, path modeling showed that higher neuroticism, lower agreeableness, and lower openness predicted higher romantic jealousy.
[15]
(PDF) The relationship between personality facets and burnout
Aug 7, 2025 · ... Professional Accomplishment is predicted by Extraversion, Conscientiousness, but not by Neuroticism. Results and discussions presented rely ...
[16]
Psychological factors and headache | MedLink Neurology
Neuroticism was defined as neurotic personality traits and symptoms of moodiness, nervousness, being easily irritated, lack of endurance, and feelings of guilt ...Missing: facets | Show results with:facets
[17]
[PDF] Facets of Neuroticism as Predictors of Heart Rate Variability and ...
Jul 8, 2024 · The five traits are: extroversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness (McCrae &. Costa, Jr., 2007). These traits ...
[18]
Personality facet of vulnerability is associated with cardiovascular ...
This study suggests that the facet of vulnerability is a critical component to consider in the context of cardiovascular stress adaptation.
[19]
The Origins of Neuroticism - PubMed
In this article, we provide a fresh perspective on the developmental origins of neuroticism--a dimension of temperament marked by elevated stress reactivity.
[20]
Balancing Your Humors | Psychology Today
Nov 2, 2013 · Starting with the classical Greek physician Hippocrates (460-377 BC) and disseminated even wider by the Roman Galen (129-216 AD), the basic ...Missing: neuroticism | Show results with:neuroticism
[21]
Neurosis: aspects of its conceptual development in the nineteenth ...
The concept of 'neurosis' does not have a very high priority in the history of psychiatry. The very few studies of the historical development of the concept ...
[22]
Neurosis: aspects of its conceptual development in the nineteenth ...
Mar 1, 2009 · The concept of `neurosis' does not have a very high priority in the history of psychiatry. The very few studies of the historical ...Missing: neuroticism | Show results with:neuroticism
[23]
[PDF] title: Dimensions of Personality author: Eysenck, H. J. publisher ...
I posited two major dimensions, neuroticism (N) and extraversion (E), to which I was later to add a third, psychoticism (P) (Eysenck, 1952). E and N now ...
[24]
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across ... - PubMed
As in a previous study of self-reports (McCrae & Costa, 1985b), adjective factors of neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness ...
[25]
(PDF) The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures
Comparisons of Varimax structures in 16 different cultures clearly show the cross-cultural geralizability of Neuroticism, Openness and Conscientiousness.
[26]
The Biological Basis of Personality | Hans Eysenck | Taylor & Francis
Sep 29, 2017 · Hans Eysenck presents a descriptive and causal model of human personality in accord with the major concepts of experimental psychology and the ...
[27]
[PDF] Extraversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism - Hans Jürgen Eysenck
At first sight, the hypothesis that limbic system activation is responsible for individual differences in neuroticism may seem unlikely because of the well.
[28]
The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the ... - APA PsycNet
Citation. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Clarendon Press/Oxford ...
[29]
(PDF) The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray
Aug 7, 2025 · Eysenck's theory concerns the extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism traits, whereas Gray proposes the use of new, rotated axes of impulsivity and anxiety.
[30]
implications for the construct of negative emotionality - PubMed
Construct validation work on Tellegen's (1982) Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) resulted in further ... (Neuroticism) domain. Furthermore, in the ...
[31]
[PDF] MPQ Manual - Pearson Clinical Assessment
Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press. Multidimensional ...
[32]
Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive ...
Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Publication Date. Nov 1984. Language. English. Author Identifier. Watson, David; ...
[33]
Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders - PubMed
Sophisticated phenotypic models have also emerged, with data converging on an integrative hierarchical model of mood and anxiety disorders in which each ...
[34]
A Critique of Eysenck's Theory of Personality | Semantic Scholar
... theory of extra version-introversion (E-I) and neuroticism (N) ... A commentary on Gray's critique of Eysenck's theory · D. Robinson.
[35]
Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a psychometric critique
... Neuroticism scales tend not to be predicted at all (except for Anxiety). Fourth, Gray's revised scales are unrelated to gender and age effects and show a ...
[36]
Relating the Tellegen and five-factor models of personality structure.
Tellegen's higher-order dimensions relate to components of the Big Five hierarchically: Negative Emotionality encompasses Big Five Neuroticism and ...
[37]
Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies
Authors. Tena Vukasović , Denis Bratko. Affiliation ... Personality model also was not a significant moderator of heritability estimates for neuroticism ...
[38]
Polygenic scores: prediction versus explanation | Molecular Psychiatry
Oct 22, 2021 · Polygenic scores can predict 2% of the liability variance for major depressive disorder [4], 5% for bipolar disorder [5], 3% for neuroticism [6] ...
[39]
Increased Amygdala and Insula Activation During Emotion ...
Feb 1, 2007 · Increased amygdala and insula reactivity to certain types of emotional processing is seen in young adults with increased anxiety-related temperamental traits.
[40]
Temperament and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function in ...
Two groups of investigators have found a relationship between neuroticism and plasma cortisol response to the Dex/CRH test.
[41]
High levels of neuroticism are associated with decreased cortical ...
Apr 6, 2017 · We found a highly significant negative correlation between the degree of neuroticism and local cortical folding of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( ...
[42]
Neuroticism and openness exhibit an anti-correlation pattern to ...
Feb 27, 2024 · Neuroticism and openness exhibit an anti-correlation pattern to dissociable default mode network: using resting connectivity and structural ...Missing: altered 2020s
[43]
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0003-066X.61.6.622
[44]
The evolutionary fitness of personality traits in a small-scale ... - NIH
Neurotic individuals may be prone to greater depression, anxiety and chronic stress, but may also be more risk-averse and vigilant concerning environmental ...
[45]
[PDF] Childhood Adversity and Midlife Health - The Dunedin Study
Each participant nominated up to three informants who then reported on five items assessing the participant's neuroticism. Items were asked on a three ...
[46]
The Continuity of Adversity: Negative Emotionality Links Early Life ...
Previous research has implicated negative emotionality/neuroticism in the experience of adversity (Kendler et al., 2003), but typically in a piecemeal ...
[47]
[PDF] 5-HTTLPR moderates effects of current life events on neuroticism
(2009) in which 5-HTTLPR interacted with recent life events in the prediction of neuroticism: individuals with short alleles had higher neuroticism scores in ...
[48]
Time moderates the interplay between 5-HTTLPR and stress on ...
Jul 11, 2022 · Family based association analyses between the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and neuroticism, anxiety and depression.
[49]
[PDF] Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal ...
... Neuroticism were reflected to indicate Emotional Stability). In situations in which a trait reflected a blend of mature and immature traits (e.g., low.
[50]
Socioeconomic status, personality, and major mental disorders
Apr 27, 2024 · We also revealed the role of neuroticism in mediating the association between SES and major depressive disorder, highlighting the importance of ...Missing: global surveys 2020s
[51]
[PDF] urban differences in personality traits and well- being in adulthood
Jan 30, 2023 · Generally, we found rural– urban differences in levels of conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness, and psychological well- being, with some ...
[52]
A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroticism and anxiety ...
This study aims to explore the relationship between neuroticism, a personality trait associated with emotional instability, and anxiety during the COVID-19 ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[53]
NEO-PI-3 (Normative Update) - PAR, Inc
The NEO PI-3 (Normative Update) is a 240-item measure of all five personality domains—Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C), Neuroticism (N), Extraversion (E) ...
[54]
Big Five Inventory (BFI) - Addiction Research Center
The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a self-report scale ... measure the big five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and
[55]
(PDF) The NEO–PI–3: a more readable revised NEO personality ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability.
[56]
[PDF] BIG FIVE INVENTORY (BFI) - ResearchGate
44-item inventory that measures an individual on the Big Five Factors (dimensions) of ... Neuroticism: 4, 9R, 14, 19, 24R, 29, 34R, 39. Openness: 5, 10, 15, 20, ...
[57]
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised (EPQ-R) — EdITS
The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised (EPQ-R) measures three major dimensions of personality: Extraversion/Introversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism ...
[58]
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, EPQ-R - Psytests.org
... Eysenck's model of personality: Extraversion/Introversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism. EPQ-R (Revised) is the latest revsion, published in 1985 by Hans ...
[59]
Australian Validation of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for ...
May 16, 2014 · ... Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness (NEO) trait model can be well identified in children as young as 12 years old. To this end, the most ...
[60]
Cross-cultural personality differences between East Asia and ...
Jan 16, 2017 · Similarly, Neuroticism was higher in East Asia than in Europe. The IPIP-NEO instrument was subjected to measurement equivalence testing, and ...
[61]
Aiberry: AI-Powered Mental Health Screening Platform
Aiberry is an AI-powered digital health platform that offers mental health screening and assessments using video, text, and audio.About Us · Contact Us · Get Started · News
[62]
Predicting neuroticism with open-ended response using natural ...
Aug 1, 2024 · Prediction models developed based on open-ended questions that theoretically aligned with neuroticism exhibited superior predictive performance.
[63]
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of ...
Jan 8, 2025 · ... neuroticism is estimated at 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88; 0.89). Conclusion. The current meta-analysis represents the first reliability analysis of the ...
[64]
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2177&context=art_sci_etds
[65]
[PDF] Building a theory of adaptive neuroticism
May 15, 2017 · In this model, neuroticism predicts adaptive or maladaptive behavior depending upon the situation at hand. Specifically, neuroticism will ...Missing: overemphasis | Show results with:overemphasis
[66]
[PDF] Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance ...
A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 315–327. https://doi.org ...
[67]
The Association between Neuroticism and Heart Rate Variability Is ...
May 7, 2015 · Higher neuroticism was associated with reduced heart rate variability equally under rest and stress. The baseline structural equation model ...
[68]
[PDF] Intelligence and neuroticism in relation to depression and ... - bioRxiv
... MDD (see Table 2). For every 1SD increase in neuroticism, the odds of having MDD increased by 2.39 (95% confidence intervals = [2.35, 2.43], p < 2.00x10ˉ¹⁶).<|separator|>
[69]
Brooding and neuroticism are strongly interrelated manifestations of ...
Rumination is positively associated with depression and neuroticism and may mediate the effects of neuroticism on depression.
[70]
Psychological risk factors and the course of depression and anxiety ...
Dec 1, 2021 · In this article we synthesize and evaluate fifteen years of NESDA research on prominent psychological risk factors for the onset, persistence, recurrence, and ...
[71]
Pleiotropy between neuroticism and physical and mental health
Genetic correlations were identified between neuroticism and anorexia nervosa (rg=0.17), major depressive disorder (rg=0.66) and schizophrenia (rg=0.21).
[72]
Five-Year Prospective Neuroticism-Stress Effects on Major ...
This study supports the depression-inducing main effects of the general neuroticism factor and life stress.
[73]
An Examination of Content Overlap and Disorder-Specific ... - PubMed
Only the GNF and the depression facet were significantly associated with depressive symptomatology. The GNF and all facets significantly predicted anxiety ...
[74]
A genome-wide investigation into the underlying genetic ... - Nature
Aug 12, 2024 · In this work, we conducted GWAS of each of the 'big five' personality traits in a sample of ~224,000 individuals with genotype data available ...
[75]
A bright side facet analysis of borderline personality disorder - PMC
They showed that Borderline was correlated positively with all six Neuroticism Facets (.34 < r < .50). Borderline was also correlated negatively with E1 ...
[76]
Childhood predictors of avoidant personality disorder traits in ...
Nov 4, 2024 · Neuroticism, low extraversion, social anxiety symptoms, passive onlooking behavior, and low self-worth predicted a higher number of AvPD traits in adolescence.Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Results
[77]
Five-Factor Model and DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality ...
The AMPD and FFM are both composed of five higher-order domain traits, four from each which are largely conceptually similar (e.g., neuroticism and negative ...
[78]
Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and ...
These studies have supported the theory that high neuroticism in particular may be a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia and worse outcomes and, ...
[79]
Personality and substance use disorders. - APA PsycNet
... use and misuse of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and other drugs. Broadly, personality characteristics of high neuroticism and behavioral undercontrol/impulsivity ...<|separator|>
[80]
Associations of self-reported eating disorder behaviors and ...
Mar 13, 2020 · In patients hospitalized for AN, facets of Neuroticism, including Self-Consciousness and Vulnerability to Stress, are elevated during ...
[81]
All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension
Apr 6, 2018 · One hypothesis is that p represents a diffuse unpleasant affective state, often termed neuroticism or negative emotionality (26). Cross- ...
[82]
ADHD Symptoms in Childhood and Big Five Personality Traits in ...
May 29, 2024 · We examined how parent- and teacher-reported ADHD in middle childhood relate to self-reported Big Five personality traits in adolescence.
[83]
Personality and psychopathology - PMC - NIH
This relationship is bidirectional, as psychopathology ... A spectrum relationship may also exist for personality disorders with other mental disorders.
[84]
[PDF] Association between neuroticism and risk of incident cardiovascular ...
In a meta-analysis review of prospective cohort studies, it has been observed that people with high degree of neuroticism are more vulnerable to high blood.<|control11|><|separator|>
[85]
Neuroticism, Worry, and Cardiometabolic Risk Trajectories: Findings ...
Jan 24, 2022 · We examined the prospective association of 2 anxiety facets, neuroticism and worry, with cardiometabolic risk (CMR) trajectories for 4 decades.
[86]
Serum Markers of Inflammation Mediate the Positive Association ...
Neuroticism may increase stress perception and, thus, increase the production of pro-inflammatory messenger molecules which are involved in the development of ...
[87]
Associations of Personality Traits With Chronic Low-Grade ...
We primarily explored whether individuals with higher Neuroticism and/or lower Conscientiousness have higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 ...
[88]
Neuroticism, loneliness, all-cause and cause-specific mortality - NIH
Sep 15, 2024 · Neuroticism was related to a higher risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in this large prospective cohort study that recorded over ...Neuroticism And All-Cause... · Neuroticism And... · DiscussionMissing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[89]
Allostatic Load and Personality: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study - LWW
Higher allostatic load was related to higher neuroticism (β = 0.03, p = .042), lower extraversion (β = −0.06, p < .001), and lower conscientiousness (β = −0.06, ...
[90]
Comparing personality traits of healthcare workers with and without ...
Oct 5, 2024 · We compared psychological differences between individuals with and without long COVID symptoms after initial COVID-19 infections.<|separator|>
[91]
High Neuroticism Is Related to More Overall Functional Problems ...
Aug 17, 2022 · Neuroticism has a skewed distribution in the general population, with 11 to 20% of males having high neuroticism depending on the cut-off level ...
[92]
Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 ...
Apr 12, 2016 · We found a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based heritability estimate for neuroticism of ∼15% (s.e.=0.7%). Meta-analysis identified nine novel ...Statistical Analysis · Polygenic Risk Score... · Results<|separator|>
[93]
Age Differences in the Big Five Across the Life Span - NIH
Average levels of Neuroticism are generally negatively associated with age although there are exceptions in the literature such that consistent age differences ...
[94]
SAPA Personality Inventory
Using the data contributed by about 125,000 visitors to this website, we have developed a hierarchical framework for assessing personality at two levels.
[95]
Differential personality change earlier and later in the coronavirus ...
Sep 28, 2022 · Strikingly, younger adults showed disrupted maturity in that they increased in neuroticism and declined in agreeableness and conscientiousness.
[96]
Personality traits across countries: Support for similarities rather than ...
Jun 16, 2017 · In all countries, women provided higher scores of Neuroticism (Cohen's d values ranged from -0.54 to -0.10) and Agreeableness (d values ranged ...
[97]
Social anxiety and social norms in individualistic and collectivistic ...
According to this view, higher self-reported levels of social anxiety may reflect a response style related to collectivistic values and low independent self- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[98]
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality ...
We found that sex differences in personality, verbal abilities, episodic memory, and negative emotions are more pronounced in countries with higher living ...
[99]
Rural-Urban Differences in Personality Traits and Well-Being in ...
... rural areas tended to have lower levels of conscientiousness and higher levels of neuroticism, compared to people who lived in more urban areas.
[100]
Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) is Associated with ...
A low life course SES (low participant's SES/low father's education) was associated with disproportionately high neuroticism and low conscientiousness.
[101]
[PDF] Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. - University of Oregon
The Big Five model does not define any limits for personality research. Rather, the ... non-Indo-European language: The Hungarian trait structure and its.
[102]
Do neuroticism and efficacy beliefs moderate the relationship ...
Nov 1, 2024 · The current research explored how two factors, neuroticism and efficacy beliefs, may plausibly moderate the relationship between climate change ...Missing: income populations