Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Media Development Authority

The Media Development Authority (MDA) was a statutory board of the under the , formed on 1 January 2003 through the merger of the Singapore Broadcasting Authority, Singapore Film Commission, and Films and Publications Department to oversee sector development and regulation. Its primary mandate involved fostering a vibrant industry by attracting investments, creating jobs, and promoting as a global hub while regulating content to uphold standards, classify films and publications, and safeguard public interests such as racial and religious harmony. The agency provided grants and incentives for production, supported initiatives, and enforced licensing requirements for broadcasters and online sites, which contributed to industry growth but also sparked debates over content controls. In 2016, MDA merged with the Infocomm Development Authority to form the (IMDA), consolidating oversight of infocomm and sectors amid 's push toward a . Notable controversies included a 2007 state-produced promoting regulations that faced public backlash for perceived , and broader critiques of MDA's licensing for potentially restricting independent under the guise of industry standards.

History

Establishment in 2003

The Media Development Authority (MDA) was established on 1 January 2003 as a statutory board under the , Communications and the Arts through the Media Development Authority of Singapore Act 2002, which provided for its incorporation, functions, and powers to oversee and advance the media sector. This formation addressed the demands of rapid media convergence and globalization by integrating regulatory supervision—such as content standards and licensing—with proactive industry development initiatives, enabling to adapt its media framework to technological shifts while prioritizing structured growth over unrestricted expansion. The authority's founding mandate emphasized dual objectives: enforcing compliance to safeguard public order and national cohesion, alongside stimulating economic contributions from activities, in line with Singapore's of calibrated that privileges empirical outcomes like sector viability amid external pressures. Early operations under CEO-designate Lim Hock Chuan, appointed in late , focused on foundational policies treating as a strategic asset for in a globalized , where unchecked risked fragmentation without corresponding safeguards. In 2003, introduced the Media 21 blueprint as its guiding strategy, aiming to elevate the media industry's GDP share to 3% by 2012 and generate over 10,000 jobs through targeted investments and ecosystem building, underscoring a causal emphasis on policy-driven innovation to counterbalance regulatory constraints with competitive positioning. This approach marked the authority's initial commitment to evidence-based advancement, drawing on data from prior sector analyses to justify interventions that aligned development with societal stability.

Integration of Preceding Bodies

The Media Development Authority (MDA) was established on 1 January 2003 via the merger of three predecessor entities: the Broadcasting Authority (SBA), responsible for regulating broadcasting services; the Films and Publications Department (FPD), tasked with and publications oversight; and the Film Commission (SFC), dedicated to fostering the industry's growth and international outreach. This consolidation integrated their distinct yet complementary roles—SBA's focus on broadcast licensing and standards, FPD's content evaluation mechanisms, and SFC's promotional initiatives—under a unified statutory board to centralize . The merger addressed functional overlaps in content regulation and sector development, enabling a more efficient regulatory framework amid evolving landscapes, in line with 's policy emphasis on lean structures and enhanced inter-agency coordination. By amalgamating these bodies, the aimed to reduce administrative redundancies while bolstering capabilities to promote as a global hub, as outlined in the enabling legislation's objectives to develop, regulate, and nurture the . Under the Media Development Authority of Singapore Act 2002, the transition transferred all property, assets, liabilities, employees, licenses, and archives from the SBA, FPD, and SFC to MDA, with transitional provisions ensuring continuity of prior acts, decisions, and obligations without disruption to ongoing operations or industry stakeholders. This seamless handover preserved regulatory enforcement, such as existing broadcast and film licenses, and maintained archival records for compliance and historical reference, facilitating MDA's immediate assumption of responsibilities.

Major Milestones Until Merger

In 2006, the Media Development Authority advanced its regulatory approach by emphasizing in sectors such as , , and publications, enabling lighter-touch industry self-governance alongside government oversight. During the , MDA adapted to the rise of platforms by extending its framework to , including support for emerging services through initiatives like the Singapore Media Fusion Plan launched in June 2009, which sought to fuse media with cross-sector applications for . This expansion addressed the blurring lines between traditional and online content distribution. In September 2014, MDA banned the documentary To Singapore, with Love directed by Tan Pin Pin, classifying it as Not Allowed for All Ratings on grounds that it undermined national security by featuring interviews with political exiles. By early 2016, increasing technological convergence between infocommunications and media prompted the Singapore government to announce the merger of MDA with the Infocomm Development Authority, forming the Infocomm Media Development Authority effective 1 October 2016, to streamline regulation amid bundled services and digital integration.

Organizational Framework

Governance and Leadership

The Board of the Media Development Authority (MDA) was appointed by the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts, comprising a chairman and members drawn from media industry experts, business leaders, and officials to facilitate informed aligned with Singapore's media regulatory and developmental goals. This structure ensured accountability through ministerial oversight while incorporating specialized input for policy formulation. Niam Chiang Meng held the position of Chairman in the Authority's later phase. The (CEO), appointed by the Board subject to ministerial concurrence, reported directly to it and oversaw executive functions, emphasizing statutory autonomy in operational execution within the broader governmental framework. Dr. Christopher Chia served as CEO during MDA's early development period post-2003 establishment, focusing on integrating merged entities and advancing media sector growth. Gabriel Lim assumed the CEO role in December 2014, leading up to the 2016 merger with the Infocomm Development Authority. Sector-specific advisory councils and committees augmented governance by soliciting input from stakeholders in areas like and . These panels, including programme advisory committees under broadcasting regulations and film advisory bodies per the Films Act, advised on guidelines, , and industry schemes, promoting evidence-based refinements to regulatory practices.

Operational Structure

The Media Development Authority (MDA) operationalized its dual regulatory and developmental mandates through a network of specialized departments focused on formulation, licensing , evaluation, and support. Key divisions included the Department, responsible for developing regulatory frameworks; the Licensing Department, handling application processing and compliance monitoring; the and Standards group, subdivided into units for broadcast, , publications, films, , and to assess adherence to guidelines; and the Industry Operations Department, which facilitated partnerships and grant disbursements for sector growth. These structures enabled integrated workflows, where directives informed licensing decisions and reviews, ensuring balanced of standards alongside of creative outputs. Resource allocation emphasized high-impact regulatory priorities, such as content standards enforcement and broadcasting oversight, while allocating grants—totaling S$12.32 million across 1,033 projects in 2013—for developmental initiatives in , , and . The Broadcast Department managed funding for 6,039.5 hours of programming, prioritizing local content quality, with overall government grants reaching S$69.8 million in 2014 to support and innovation. This approach directed resources toward areas yielding measurable economic and social benefits, including reduced administrative burdens like waived security deposits for licensees to encourage participation. MDA collaborated with agencies like the (MCI), Infocomm Development Authority (IDA), and (EDB) to align media policies with broader national strategies, such as the Infocomm Media Masterplan. Internal advisory committees, including the Programme Advisory Council for and Classification , incorporated input on workflows. For integrated , MDA coordinated with enforcement bodies on compliance matters, leveraging inter-agency partnerships to address issues like undesirable without duplicating oversight roles.

Core Regulatory Functions

Oversight of Traditional Media

The Media Development Authority (MDA) exercises statutory oversight over traditional media in Singapore, including broadcast, print, and film sectors, primarily through the Broadcasting Act 1994, Newspaper and Printing Presses Act 1974, and Films Act 1981. Under the Broadcasting Act, MDA requires licences for television and radio services, categorizing them as class licences for broad applicability or individual licences for specific operations, ensuring only approved entities provide licensable broadcasting services such as free-to-air or pay-TV channels. For print media, the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act mandates annual permits for newspaper publication and separate licences for printing presses, restricting ownership to Singapore-registered companies with specified local equity to prevent foreign dominance. Film oversight under the Films Act involves mandatory classification for public exhibition and distribution, prohibiting unapproved importation or screening to control content access. Content standards enforced by emphasize impartiality, safeguarding national interests, and averting across these media. Broadcast programme codes require "due impartiality" in coverage of or controversial issues, prohibiting biased presentations that could mislead audiences on matters of national significance. These standards align with broader objectives under the Broadcasting to promote Singapore's , public order, and moral values, including restrictions on content undermining security or fostering ethnic tensions. prevention features in guidelines, where films and broadcasts are rated (e.g., up to PG13 for TV with time-slot restrictions) to exclude indecent material, supplemented by the Undesirable Publications for print matter deemed obscene or seditious. MDA monitors compliance through ongoing content reviews, licensee reporting, and response to public complaints, with authority to issue directions or investigate breaches under the relevant acts. Penalties for non-compliance include fines up to S$100,000 for violations, potential , or licence ; for instance, unauthorized operations or infractions can trigger immediate . Print and breaches similarly incur fines or prohibitions, enforced to maintain regulatory adherence without routine public audits detailed in statutes but via targeted enforcement actions.

Content Classification and Enforcement

The Media Development Authority (MDA) administers Singapore's film classification system via the Board of Film Censors, established under the Films Act of to evaluate content for potential harm to public order, youth, and social cohesion. Ratings are assigned based on assessed impacts of elements like violence, sex, drug use, and political themes, with decisions calibrated to prevent imitable behaviors or disturbances verifiable through societal feedback mechanisms. G and PG/PG13 ratings are advisory, signaling suitability for younger viewers absent explicit restrictions, while NC16, M18, and R21 impose statutory age barriers enforceable at cinemas and distributors. Guidelines prioritize context and frequency over isolated depictions; for violence, mild, non-gratuitous instances permit G ratings, but escalating intensity—such as prolonged or sadistic acts—triggers higher categories or refusal if deemed to glorify harm without offsetting narrative purpose. Sex and follow similar thresholds, prohibiting explicit content in lower ratings and barring exploitative portrayals that could normalize deviance, while political material is scrutinized for risks to harmony, refusing classification for distortions likely to incite unrest based on historical patterns of social disruption. Drug references remain discreet or absent in family-oriented films, with promotional glorification rejected across ratings to avert emulation risks evidenced in youth exposure studies informing policy. Enforcement mechanisms include mandatory edits to excise non-compliant segments prior to approval, outright refusals equivalent to bans for irredeemable violations, and licensing audits to ensure age verification and content adherence. These thresholds draw from public consultations and surveys capturing community norms, providing an empirical anchor for harm assessments rather than prescriptive ideology, with adjustments reflecting aggregated views on tolerable impacts like complaint trends tied to viewer desensitization or behavioral shifts. Compliance violations trigger fines or operational halts, prioritizing verifiable prevention of societal erosion over permissive access.

Licensing and Compliance Mechanisms

The (MDA) administered licensing for various media services under statutes such as the Broadcasting Act, requiring entities to obtain specific classes of licences for operations like television broadcasting and, from 2013, online news websites that reported regularly on issues. Licences for online news sites, introduced via a class licence scheme, were valid for one year and subject to annual renewal, during which MDA assessed compliance with conditions including the posting of a S$50,000 to ensure adherence to content standards. Renewal processes incorporated performance reviews linked to public interest obligations (PIOs) detailed in the for Market Conduct, which mandated actions such as broadcasting events of national significance, providing access to specified materials for persons with disabilities, and maintaining programming diversity. Failure to meet these PIOs, including obligations for taste, decency, and standards, could result in non-renewal if deemed contrary to , with notifying licensees in advance to allow representations. For non-compliance with licence conditions, employed graduated enforcement responses, beginning with warnings or directions to rectify breaches, escalating to financial penalties, temporary suspensions, or full revocations under powers in the Broadcasting Act and Media Development Authority Act. Non-compliant online news sites, for instance, faced potential fines or suspensions for violations like failing to appoint a valid editorial executive or breaching guidelines. MDA promoted procedural fairness through opportunities for licensees to make representations before adverse decisions and rights to appeal revocations or refusals to the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts, with further available in courts. To foster industry involvement, MDA piloted initiatives, such as self-classification schemes for arts entertainment groups in 2014, enabling qualifying entities to classify content up to Restricted (18) ratings under MDA-developed guidelines and oversight, though these faced criticism for encouraging and were later discontinued.

Industry Promotion Initiatives

Support for Media Production and Growth

The Media Development Authority (MDA) facilitated media through targeted grants administered via the Singapore Film Commission (SFC), an entity under its purview. In 2008, the SFC introduced the New Feature Film Fund to nurture emerging local filmmakers by providing financial assistance for script development and of debut features, with grants covering up to a portion of qualifying costs. By 2010, this initiative had supported at least four new local , enabling independent producers to advance projects from concept to completion. MDA also pursued catalytic investments via public-private partnerships to enhance co-production capabilities and . A notable example was the collaboration with South Korea's , establishing a US$50 million fund over five years dedicated to financing Singapore-based projects, including co-productions that leveraged expertise for local . Such partnerships aimed to seed investments, attract foreign collaborators, and expand Singapore's role in regional content pipelines without imposing regulatory hurdles. These non-regulatory efforts contributed to ecosystem building by fostering a of original and skills . Under MDA's from 2003 to 2016, initiatives like the SFC grants stimulated job creation in production roles, with supported projects employing local crews and post- talent, though precise export metrics for the era remain documented primarily in aggregate industry reports rather than isolated attributions. Overall, MDA's focus on investment seeding laid groundwork for sustained sector expansion, evidenced by increased local output prior to its merger into the .

Funding Schemes and Incentives

The Media Development Authority () administered a range of grant schemes to support and innovation across media sectors, including , broadcast, , games, , , and print, targeting projects that enhanced local production capabilities and international competitiveness. These grants funded development stages such as scripting, , and pilot episodes, with allocations prioritized for initiatives demonstrating potential for market viability and economic impact. In , committed approximately S$1 billion (equivalent to $740 million USD at the time) through its core funding pool, distributed across infrastructure projects, original content production, and in like digital and interactive formats, aiming to position as a regional . Specific sectoral investments included S$6 million allocated through 2012 for serious games applications, focusing on educational and simulation-based content to drive technological innovation and commercial applications. Tax incentives under MDA's purview were limited but included facilitation for media-related investments, such as the scheme, which provided assistance and attracted ancillary services like facilities, often tied to qualifying expenditures that generated measurable economic multipliers through job creation and export revenue. Grants and incentives emphasized project-specific evaluations based on projected returns on , potential, and alignment with metrics, rather than open-ended subsidies for non-viable endeavors.

Talent and Skills Development Programs

The (MDA) of administered grant schemes aimed at enhancing in the sector, including the Talent Assistance Grant Scheme, which supported training requirements and work attachments for media professionals to acquire specialized skills from international partners. This initiative facilitated attachments to global firms, enabling local talent to gain exposure to advanced techniques and practices overseas. MDA also offered scholarships for undergraduate and postgraduate studies in media-related fields, targeting aspiring professionals to build a pipeline of skilled workers addressing gaps in areas such as and production. Complementary to these, the Media Education Scheme groomed entry-level through targeted educational support, focusing on foundational media competencies to foster long-term growth. In 2012, enhanced its Talent Assistance framework by introducing a Allowance component, allocating resources under a S$20 million boost package specifically for freelancers and entities to undertake upskilling in emerging areas like digital content development. These efforts emphasized practical attachments and skill-building in and domains, contributing to greater among Singapore's prior to 's merger into the in 2016.

Adaptation to Digital Media

Regulation of Online Content

In June 2013, the Media Development Authority (MDA) introduced a class licence regime for online news sites providing regular coverage of with significant reach, defined as attracting at least 50,000 unique visitors from per month over a three-month period. This measure extended traditional media standards to digital platforms, requiring licensed sites to comply with guidelines on political and election advertising, accuracy, and removal of prohibited material within 24 hours of a directive. Initially affecting ten sites including Yahoo Singapore and , the regime mirrored broadcasting rules to ensure accountability for news dissemination, with non-compliance risking licence revocation or fines up to S$50,000 per breach. The MDA's Internet Code of Practice, first issued in 1997 and revised periodically, imposed obligations on internet service providers (ISPs) and content hosts to prevent the spread of objectionable material, including content deemed harmful to public order, racial or religious harmony, or . Under this framework, accessible content providers—such as platforms hosting user-generated videos like —were required to implement age-appropriate ratings, labelling for objectionable content, and proactive measures to restrict access, with empowered to issue takedown notices for violations. For sites featuring comments or forums alongside , the licence mandated to align with these standards, prefiguring stricter by treating editorial and interactive content equivalently to offline broadcasts. To enforce restrictions, directed ISPs to block public access to websites containing mass-impact prohibited content, such as those promoting , child exploitation, or to , maintaining a dynamic list of restricted URLs enforced through technical filters. These directives, issued under section 12 of the Internet Code, compelled ISPs to take "all reasonable steps" to prevent access, with over 100 sites blocked annually in the early for categories like illegal and extremist , though exact figures varied by threat assessment. This mechanism extended MDA's oversight beyond content providers to infrastructure, ensuring swift mitigation of online harms without relying solely on voluntary platform cooperation.

Responses to Emerging Challenges Like Fake News

The Media Development Authority (MDA) addressed emerging digital threats such as online misinformation through its regulatory framework for internet content providers, emphasizing proactive enforcement via licensing and compliance directives. In May 2013, MDA introduced a Class Licence for Online News Informational Sites, targeting sites with significant reach—defined as at least 50,000 unique visitors per month from Singapore IP addresses or those providing political or news content of public interest—which automatically licensed 10 major providers including Yahoo! Singapore and AsiaOne. This scheme mandated adherence to content standards equivalent to those for traditional media, including requirements for factual accuracy, balanced reporting, and the removal of content deemed against public interest, such as material inciting ethnic or religious tensions or containing falsehoods that could undermine social cohesion. Under this regime, MDA issued advisories and takedown requests to compel swift action against false or harmful content, with licensees required to comply within 24 hours of a directive. For instance, the framework enabled MDA to direct the removal or correction of misleading articles, as seen in pre-2016 incidents where advisories targeted on licensed platforms that risked amplifying divisions in Singapore's multi-ethnic society. These measures were grounded in the causal understanding that unchecked online falsehoods could escalate into real-world harms, such as communal discord, given Singapore's of race-related sensitivities and vulnerability to rapid viral spread on digital platforms. MDA collaborated with technology firms and licensed online news operators to enhance , integrating self-regulatory practices with regulatory oversight. Providers were expected to implement internal mechanisms for and flagging, supported by MDA's guidelines, which facilitated joint efforts to identify and mitigate before it proliferated. Empirical outcomes included case studies of reduced ; for example, directives during sensitive periods like national events led to prompt content adjustments, correlating with lower incidences of sustained false narratives compared to unregulated environments elsewhere, as evidenced by Singapore's relative stability amid regional disruptions. This approach demonstrated causal efficacy in curbing the spread of divisive falsehoods by leveraging compliance to interrupt misinformation cycles early.

Positive Impacts and Achievements

Economic Contributions to Singapore's Media Sector

The Media Development Authority (MDA), established in , drove economic expansion in Singapore's media sector via the Media 21 blueprint, which targeted raising the industry's GDP share from 1.6% in 2000 to 3% by 2012 through investments in , infrastructure, and talent pipelines. This framework emphasized high-value activities like film, television, animation, and , channeling government funding to stimulate involvement and output growth. By 2012, these measures had positioned the sector for sustained contributions, with media output reflecting compounded annual increases aligned with national development goals. Job creation formed a core pillar of MDA's strategy, aiming to generate over 10,000 new positions for in creative and technical roles by 2012. Initiatives such as skills upgrading programs and partnerships with expanded employment in sub-sectors including and interactive content, supporting a workforce that leveraged Singapore's strategic location for regional operations. The resulting labor market growth enhanced productivity, with media establishments benefiting from MDA-backed incentives that attracted and retained local talent. MDA's promotion of export-oriented content further amplified economic returns, as supported productions in and secured international distribution deals, generating revenues from Asian and global markets. This focus yielded comparative edges over less structured peers in , where inconsistent policy frameworks hindered scalability; Singapore's coordinated approach under facilitated reliable pipelines for high-quality, commercially viable outputs.

Contributions to Social Cohesion and Stability

The Media Development Authority (MDA) enforced content guidelines under the Broadcasting Act and Films Act that explicitly prohibited materials inciting ill-will or hostility between racial, religious, or other groups, aiming to safeguard Singapore's multi-ethnic fabric amid historical vulnerabilities to communal discord. These measures, including pre-publication reviews and classification systems, drew from precedents like the 1964 racial riots, where inflammatory media reporting amplified tensions leading to violence that claimed dozens of lives. By restricting divisive narratives, MDA's framework helped avert the amplification of imported global conflicts—such as sectarian strife or identity-based —through local media channels, maintaining a domestic environment insulated from external dynamics. This regulatory approach correlated with Singapore's sustained low incidence of ethnic or religious unrest, registering no major race or religion-fueled riots or widespread disturbances since , in stark contrast to recurrent communal clashes in less-regulated regional peers. assessments attribute such stability partly to controls that curb and falsehoods capable of eroding inter-group trust, as evidenced by proactive interventions against threatening during episodes like the aftermath. Empirical outcomes include minimal polarization metrics, with Singapore consistently scoring high on social cohesion indicators relative to counterparts, underscoring the causal link between preemptive and preserved order in a diverse . Public sentiment has broadly endorsed these safeguards, with officials citing community feedback favoring regulated discourse over unrestricted expression when it risks societal fracture, as articulated in parliamentary defenses of similar mechanisms. Such preferences reflect a pragmatic consensus prioritizing collective stability—evident in the polity's to imported ideological disruptions—over absolute freedoms, enabling sustained prosperity without the disruptions seen in unregulated landscapes elsewhere.

Criticisms and Controversies

Claims of Censorship and Bias

Critics have alleged that the Media Development Authority (MDA) fostered a biased media environment by enforcing licensing requirements and content codes that incentivized alignment with government perspectives, effectively suppressing dissenting narratives. Under the Broadcasting Act and Newspapers and Printing Presses Act, which MDA administered, media outlets faced annual license renewals contingent on compliance with guidelines prohibiting content deemed to undermine racial harmony, national security, or public order, leading to claims of indirect censorship favoring official viewpoints. International organizations such as (RSF) have repeatedly criticized 's press freedom, attributing low rankings to 's regulatory controls. In the 2023 World Press Freedom Index, placed 129th out of 180 countries, with RSF highlighting the government's dominance over media through licensing and content restrictions enforced by , which they argue stifles independent journalism. Similarly, reports have described 's framework as enabling among journalists wary of repercussions, resulting in coverage that rarely challenges ruling party policies. Opposition figures and local analysts have contended that MDA's oversight perpetuated by creating economic dependencies and professional risks for critical reporting. Singapore's opposition, including voices from outlets like The Online Citizen, has argued that the threat of license suspension or content takedowns discourages probing government accountability, fostering a landscape where pro-establishment narratives predominate. Academic studies echo this, noting a pervasive culture of anticipatory restraint among editors to avoid regulatory scrutiny. Concerns over state influence via media ownership structures have amplified bias allegations against MDA. Major outlets like , fully owned by state investment arm , and , with historical ties to the ruling , operated under MDA's licensing, critics claim, ensuring content harmony with state priorities over diverse viewpoints. Human rights groups have linked this concentration—where state-linked entities control over 90% of domestic media reach—to systemic underrepresentation of opposition perspectives.

Notable Incidents and Case Studies

In 2014, the Media Development Authority (MDA) banned the documentary film To Singapore, with Love, directed by Tan Pin Pin, classifying it as Not Allowed for All Ratings (NAR). The film features interviews with nine Singaporean political exiles who fled after opposing national service and government policies in the 1960s and 1970s, which MDA stated undermined national service and national security by glorifying their actions. Director Tan appealed the decision, arguing it restricted artistic expression, while supporters highlighted the ban's potential to amplify interest via the Streisand effect; the classification remained in place as of 2024, prohibiting public screenings in Singapore. In May 2015, MDA ordered the shutdown of The Real Singapore (TRS), an online news website, requiring its editors to cease operations within hours or face fines or under the Protection from Harassment Act. The authority cited TRS for publishing false information and content inciting racial and religious tensions, including anti-foreigner sentiment that risked public disorder. Affected editors and a coalition of bloggers condemned the move as opaque threatening independent media survival, prompting calls for transparency and rescission; MDA maintained the action protected public interest against harmful falsehoods. During the 2011 , enforced the Films Act against online videos, issuing advisories and takedown notices to platforms hosting content deemed to promote or oppose , aiming to maintain electoral fairness. Affected creators, including opposition-aligned producers, criticized the interventions as stifling discourse, while defended them as preventing undue foreign or biased influence on voters. Public backlash included petitions and debates on free speech limits, with no successful legal reversals reported.

Government Defenses and Empirical Justifications

The government has defended the Media Development Authority's (MDA) regulatory framework as a calibrated mechanism to safeguard multiracial harmony in a diverse society, arguing that unrestricted media content risks inciting tensions that could escalate into violence, as seen in historical events like the 1964 racial riots. Officials emphasized that MDA's content codes and licensing requirements ensure media outlets promote responsible reporting aligned with community standards, thereby minimizing harms such as or divisive narratives. This approach, they contended, has empirically contributed to low incidences of racial or religious conflicts, with recording no major riots since 1969 and fewer cases of offensive speech relative to population size compared to other nations. In contrast to Western models prioritizing absolute free speech protections, which government spokespersons critiqued for enabling social media-fueled and —such as anti-Semitic in the or rising right-wing and Islamist violence in the UK—Singapore's MDA-enforced standards prioritize outcomes like societal stability over unfettered expression. For instance, while courts uphold high thresholds for restricting speech under the First Amendment, leading to persistent divisions, Singapore's proactive has fostered environments where prevails, evidenced by a 2016 Gallup poll the country first out of 140 for acceptance of ethnic minorities and a 2016 CNA-IPS survey showing 96% of respondents respecting people of all races. Compliance with guidelines has yielded a landscape perceived as reliable and conducive to , with recent indicators reinforcing sustained : a 2024 IPS-OnePeople. survey found 65.4% rating racial and religious as high or very high, alongside low self-reported encounters with upsetting incidents (e.g., only 9.3% noting issues like loud religious events in prior years). Government data further highlight that 85% of citizens support reporting racial or religious insults, underscoring broad endorsement of regulatory measures that prevent escalation and maintain trust in mediated public discourse.

Dissolution and Legacy

Merger into Infocomm Media Development Authority

The merger of the with the into the was announced on 18 January 2016 by Singapore's to create a single entity capable of regulating the increasingly intertwined infocomm and media sectors. Administrative reorganisation began on 1 2016, allowing for preparatory while maintaining operational continuity. The statutory framework was enacted through the Info-communications Media Development Authority Act 2016, passed in in August and commencing on 1 October 2016, which formally dissolved the MDA and IDA while vesting their powers in IMDA. The restructuring was driven by rapid technological convergence, where traditional boundaries between telecommunications infrastructure and media content delivery had blurred, as seen in telecom operators like and expanding into pay-TV and digital streaming services. This overlap demanded unified regulatory capabilities to promote competition, protect consumers, and support Singapore's ambitions, rather than siloed oversight that could hinder or create enforcement gaps. Government statements emphasized that the merger would enable more effective policy formulation for emerging digital services without disrupting existing licenses or initiatives. The transition process ensured minimal disruption through the direct transfer of regulatory functions, assets, and personnel—totaling approximately 750 staff to IMDA, with more than half from —to the new authority. No major interruptions to public services or industry compliance were reported, as 2016 policy programs from both agencies continued unchanged during the integration. This streamlined approach facilitated IMDA's immediate oversight of converged sectors, positioning it to address challenges like spectrum allocation for media delivery and content regulation in IP-based networks.

Enduring Influence on Singapore's Media Policy

The (IMDA), formed by the 2016 merger of the (MDA) and Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore, retained core elements of MDA's regulatory framework, including content classification standards that reflect community norms while protecting minors from unsuitable material. These standards, originally codified under MDA, mandate licensing for broadcasters and require compliance with guidelines on , , and political content, ensuring takedown of non-compliant material within specified timelines. Licensing regimes for linear , video-on-demand, and online news sites with significant an audiences—introduced by MDA in 2013—persist under IMDA, enforcing accountability for content accuracy and . MDA's approach to industry support through targeted funds transitioned seamlessly into IMDA's schemes, fostering creation and capabilities development. Programs like the Media Enterprise Programme's Development Grant, which builds media firms' competencies in quality , echo MDA's prior investments in local scripting, , and innovation. IMDA has allocated resources such as the S$30 million International Co-Production Fund (launched 2023) and S$10 million Singapore On-Screen Fund (2023) to enhance virtual and attract global partnerships, sustaining MDA's emphasis on economic viability amid convergence. MDA's groundwork in online content oversight laid the basis for subsequent tools like the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) of 2019, administered by IMDA, which empowers correction directions for falsehoods deemed against . This builds on MDA's licensing for high-reach news sites, requiring adherence to content standards and rapid remediation, extending regulatory logic to broader digital falsehoods without altering core compliance mechanisms. Post-merger metrics indicate enduring efficacy in sector stability and expansion: Singapore's infocomm (ICM) industry achieved nominal of 7.9% from 2015 levels by 2023, rebounding from disruptions, while the digital economy—encompassing contributions—grew at a compound annual rate of 11.2% from 2018 to 2023, comprising 17.7% of GDP in 2023. These outcomes align with MDA's pre-merger strategies under the Infocomm Media 2025 Masterplan, which IMDA operationalized to prioritize resilient and content ecosystem vitality.

References

  1. [1]
    Singapore Broadcasting Authority (SBA) - Article Detail
    On 1 January 2003, a new statutory board, the Media Development Authority, was formed with the merger of SBA, the Films and Publications Department and the ...
  2. [2]
    Media Development Authority - Crunchbase Company Profile ...
    The Media Development Authority (MDA) was created to develop Singapore into a vibrant global media city as well as foster a creative economy and a connected ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Controversy Continues Over Singapore Licensing Requirements for ...
    So far, the MDA have only listed 10 websites that require a new individual licence, which includes channelnewsasia. com, businesstimes.com.sg and sg.news.yahoo.
  4. [4]
    Singapore's media and infocomm authorities IDA and MDA will ...
    Jan 18, 2016 · The Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) and the Media Development Authority (MDA) will merge to form the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA ...
  5. [5]
    Singapore Takes the 'Bad' Rap: A State-Produced Music Video ...
    This was the case in a 2007 controversy involving a music video produced by the Media Development Authority (MDA), the state governing body for print, film, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Page Not Found - Singapore Statutes Online
    **Summary:**
  7. [7]
    [PDF] TO DEVELOP SINGAPORE INTO A VIBRANT GLOBAL MEDIA CITY ...
    The Media Development Authority (MDA) was formed in 2002 by the merger of the Singapore Broadcasting Authority, Films and Publications. Department of the ...
  8. [8]
    Appointment of Media Development Authority Board
    Dec 3, 2002 · Mr Lim Hock Chuan, who is now the Chief Executive Officer of SBA and the CEO-designate of MDA, has been named as a Board Member. The full list ...
  9. [9]
    Singapore Broadcasting Authority
    On 1 January 2003, a new statutory board, the Media Development Authority, was formed with the merger of SBA, the Films and Publications Department and the ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] About the SFC - Singapore - IMDA
    • In 2003, merged with the Singapore Broadcasting Authority and Film & Publications. Department to form the Media Development Authority of Singapore. • In ...
  11. [11]
    PRESS RELEASE Report
    This is part of MDA's continuous efforts to encourage industry co-regulation, which is already the case for video games, broadcast and publications.Missing: Singapore 2006
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Singapore Media Fusion Plan launched to propel media sector ...
    Jun 16, 2009 · Building on the previous Media 21 blueprint, the SMFP supports the country's transition to a creative economy by laying the directions to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Road to New Asia Media - IMDA
    The Media Development Authority (MDA) was formed in 2003 to champion the development of a vibrant media industry in Singapore. A core function is nurturing ...
  14. [14]
    'To Singapore With Love' Banned in Its Home Country - Variety
    Sep 10, 2014 · Singapore has banned the film “To Singapore With Love,” by director Tan Pin Pin, from receiving any kind of screening in Singapore.
  15. [15]
    Singapore's Media Development Authority bans documentary To ...
    Sep 11, 2014 · Singapore's media authority has banned the documentary To Singapore, With Love saying the film undermines national security.
  16. [16]
    Merger of IDA, MDA spurred by changes in tech | The Straits Times
    Jan 27, 2016 · Dr Yaacob said IMDA will continue the work of its two predecessors, in teaming up with companies in Singapore and abroad to groom local talent.
  17. [17]
    IDA And MDA Merge, Because This Is How The Government Wants ...
    Aug 17, 2016 · Called the Info-communication Media Development Authority (IMDA) Bill, the reason ... IDA And MDA Merge, Because This Is How The Government ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  18. [18]
    Broadcasting Act 1994 - Singapore Statutes Online
    An Act to regulate dealing in, the operation of and ownership in broadcasting services and broadcasting apparatus, to regulate online communication services.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] BOARD OF DIRECTORS - Singapore - IMDA
    Assistant Managing Director. Singapore Economic. Development Board. Mr. Niam Chiang Meng. Chairman. Media Development. Authority Singapore. Mr. Gabriel Lim.
  20. [20]
    Christopher Chia - Singapore - Article Detail
    Christopher Chia (Dr) (b. 1954, Singapore–) is the former chief executive of the National Library Board (NLB) and of the Media Development Authority (MDA)
  21. [21]
    Singapore's IMDA Sets Tan Kiat How as new CEO - Variety
    Dec 16, 2016 · Tan Kiat How will take over as CEO of Singapore's Infocomm Media Development Authority with effect from January. The IMDA is both regulator of ...Missing: Siew Kee
  22. [22]
    Films Act 1981 - Singapore Statutes Online
    —(1) The Minister may appoint one or more advisory committees to provide advice to the Authority with regard to the performance of any of its functions in ...
  23. [23]
    Consultation with Committees - Singapore - IMDA
    Provide advice to IMDA in the formulation and review of broadcast content guidelines. The four committees are: Programme Advisory Committee for English ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] contents - IMDA
    The Media Development Authority of Singapore (MDA), a statutory board under the Ministry of Communications and. Information (MCI), promotes and regulates the ...Missing: archives | Show results with:archives
  25. [25]
    Newspaper and Printing Presses Act 1974 - Singapore Statutes Online
    An Act for the licensing of newspaper companies and for matters connected therewith. [1 January 1975]
  26. [26]
    https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/BA1994?ProvIds=pr8-
  27. [27]
    Television and Radio - Singapore - IMDA
    IMDA regulates television and radio content in SG to promote compliance with industry guidelines and standards for content standards and classification.Missing: MDA | Show results with:MDA
  28. [28]
    https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/NPPA1974?ProvIds=pr3-
  29. [29]
    Newspaper Permit - Singapore - IMDA
    Looking to publish a newspaper in Singapore? Learn more about the requirements and regulations you need to follow to obtain a Newspaper Permit from IMDA.
  30. [30]
    https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/BA1994?ProvIds=pr45L-
  31. [31]
    Undesirable Publications Act 1967 - Singapore Statutes Online
    For the purposes of this Act, a publication is obscene if its effect or (where the publication comprises 2 or more distinct parts or items) the effect of any ...Missing: national | Show results with:national
  32. [32]
    In brief: media law and regulation in Singapore - Lexology
    Jun 11, 2025 · Such mergers and acquisitions between media companies are regulated by the IMDA. The prior written approval of the IMDA is required for all ...
  33. [33]
    https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/NPPA1974?ProvIds=pr21-
  34. [34]
    https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/FA1981?ProvIds=pr23-
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Film Classification Guidelines - Singapore - IMDA
    Apr 29, 2019 · The Guidelines sets out the general principles and content concerns that the IMDA considers in its classification process and aims to ...Missing: system | Show results with:system
  36. [36]
    Singapore announces new licence for online news sites - Lexology
    Jun 25, 2013 · The Licence would be valid for a year, and the MDA will determine whether the Licence should be renewed. Prior to the new licensing regime, ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  37. [37]
    [PDF] MDA Rolls out Licence Scheme for News Websites
    Licences must be renewed yearly, similar to permits for newspapers under the Newspaper and. Printing Presses Act. The sites must also put up a performance bond ...Missing: radio | Show results with:radio
  38. [38]
    Media Development Authority of Singapore Act — Code of Practice ...
    The Media Development Authority of Singapore hereby issues the following Code of Practice for Market Conduct in the Provision of Media Services.Missing: 2006 | Show results with:2006
  39. [39]
    [PDF] MEDIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE ACT ... - IMDA
    Media Development Authority of Singapore ... (a) In competitive markets, enterprises often seek to merge with, acquire or otherwise consolidate with other.
  40. [40]
    Singapore imposes licensing fees on news websites - IFEX
    May 30, 2013 · Any websites that do not comply with the conditions would be fined or suspended, news reports said. The MDA said that the policy could be ...
  41. [41]
    MDA scraps self-classification scheme - TODAY - Today Online
    Aug 23, 2014 · The Media Development Authority (MDA) has decided to scrap it, putting a dampener on its vision of co-regulation for the sector.
  42. [42]
    MDA scraps self-classification scheme for arts groups
    The MDA views this as a step towards "co-regulation", its term for empowering and working together with artists to define classification boundaries. The idea ...
  43. [43]
    Establishment of Singapore Film Commission - Article Detail
    In 2003, the SFC merged with the Singapore Broadcasting Authority and the Films ... Media Development Authority, 5 Aug 2014, Film. Categories. Arts ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] News Release
    Mar 3, 2010 · Formed in 2003, the Media Development Authority of Singapore (MDA) plays a vital role in ... BLUE RIVER PICTURES is a one-stop turnkey media production company ...
  45. [45]
    Singapore's Media Development Authority, CJ Entertainment ...
    A $50 million film fund to support five years of filmmaking in Singapore was announced Friday at AFM by the country's Media Development Authority and South ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Media Development Authority - Wikipedia
    The Media Development Authority (MDA) was a statutory board of the Singapore Government, under the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI).History · Preceding statutory boards · Next-Ggeneration media...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] MDA Brochure_v11print - Singapore - IMDA
    These grant schemes support projects, individuals and companies from all media sectors, namely Animation,. Broadcast, Film, Games, Interactive Media, Music and ...
  48. [48]
    MDA fund boasts $740 million - The Hollywood Reporter
    Apr 16, 2008 · SINGAPORE -- About $740 million worth of funding -- split among media projects, content production and new-media research and development ...
  49. [49]
    Media Development Authority of Singapore Invests $6M in Serious ...
    The Media Development Authority of Singapore has announced plans to invest $6 million into the development of serious game applications into the year 2012.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Film Financing and Television Programming
    The MDA will also develop incentives to attract financial and ancillary support services for media into Singapore. “Film in Singapore” scheme. The “Film in ...
  51. [51]
    MDA Grant Schemes for media industry - fundsforNGOs
    To support your training needs and work attachments; To offer scholarships for undergraduate and post-graduate media-related studies. Research & Development ...
  52. [52]
    Revolutionising The Media Landscape By Gerald Goh - BrightSparks
    The Media Education Scheme (MES) is one of the Media Development Authority's initiatives to groom aspiring talent in the media sector.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] $20 million to boost media sector productivity growth
    This new Training Allowance is administered under MDA's existing 'Talent Assistance'. Grant Scheme. With effect from 1 July 2012, freelancers ...
  54. [54]
    Singapore's Regulation of Online Media - Access Partnership
    Singapore recently announced a move to extend its regulation of local media to cover Internet news websites. The regulation came into effect on 1 June 2013, ...
  55. [55]
    Singapore bloggers wary of news site license scheme
    Jun 4, 2013 · Under the scheme, licensed sites must take down content within 24 hours of an order by the Media Development Authority (MDA), an arm of the ...Missing: licence | Show results with:licence
  56. [56]
    Singapore: Licensing Regime Chills News Climate
    Jun 7, 2013 · The licensing regime took effect on June 1, and the Media Development Authority released a list of 10 websites that will initially be impacted, ...Missing: licence | Show results with:licence
  57. [57]
    Broadcasting (Class Licence) (Amendment) Notification 2013
    May 29, 2013 · Paragraph 3 of the Broadcasting (Class Licence) Notification (N 1) is amended by inserting, immediately after the words “a class licence”, ...Missing: regulation | Show results with:regulation
  58. [58]
    [PDF] INTERNET CODE OF PRACTICE - Singapore - IMDA
    This Code of Practice has been produced by the Info-communications. Media Development Authority for this purpose. (2) All Internet Service Providers and ...
  59. [59]
    Change in Singapore media law could restrict Internet freedom
    Jun 6, 2013 · The MDA Internet Code of Practice considers “prohibited content” any “content that undermines racial or religious harmony.” Singapore's Minister ...
  60. [60]
    Singapore Puts Online on a Leash - Variety
    Jul 25, 2013 · The hurried introduction of regulations that require popular websites to put up coin as a surety and adhere to government censorship rules.
  61. [61]
    Singapore's online licensing rule a sign of more to come - ZDNET
    May 29, 2013 · Starting June 2013, online news sites reporting on local "news and ... content regulator, Media Development Authority (MDA). Sites that ...
  62. [62]
    Internet - Singapore - IMDA
    Local ISPs are required to restrict public access to a limited number of mass impact websites which contain content that the community regards as offensive or ...Missing: directives | Show results with:directives
  63. [63]
    Singapore: Freedom on the Net 2022 Country Report
    174 Penalties for noncompliance can include a fine of up to S$5,000 (US$3,700), six months in jail, or both. According to information leaked by former US ...
  64. [64]
    Singapore: Freedom on the Net 2020 Country Report
    When they refused to comply, the IMDA directed ISPs to temporarily block the pages (see B1). In September 2018, Terry Xu, chief editor of the Online Citizen, ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] VISION IN ACTION - IMDA
    The MDA launched Media 21, its blueprint for taking the industry forward, in July 2003 and set out immediately to consolidate resources, plunge into many public ...
  66. [66]
    International Experts Commend the Progress of Singapore's Media ...
    Jun 2, 2010 · Early this year, MDA also announced the Cross-Sector initiative, which seeks to deploy digital media technologies in different economic sectors ...
  67. [67]
    S'pore not immune to global religious tensions, don't take racial ...
    Through social media and the internet, Singaporeans are more exposed to happenings around the world, he noted, including religious tensions. Still, Singapore ...
  68. [68]
    Strengthening social cohesion in the face of deliberate online ...
    Dec 19, 2018 · While most faith-based organizations made significant contribution to helping the needy and promoted moral values in accordance to their faiths, ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] SOUTHEAST ASIAN SOCIAL COHESION RADAR
    This inaugural research study is a modest attempt to understand the nature of social cohesion within ASEAN against the changing and varying cultural and ...
  70. [70]
    How multicultural cohesion can survive - The Istana
    Jun 28, 2025 · Cohesive societies can only last, and diversity remain a strength, if people have shared hopes, and a sense of shared endeavour and purpose.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    [PDF] freedom of expression and th e media in sing apore - Article 19
    To this end, the State Media. Development Authority plans to invest nearly 100 million Euros in the media sector over the next five years. In return, the ...
  72. [72]
    Singapore: Freedom on the Net 2019 Country Report
    In November and December 2018, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) temporarily blocked online news outlets the States Times Review and the Singapore ...
  73. [73]
    The Big Chill? How Journalists and Sources Perceive and Respond ...
    May 3, 2023 · Since the rise of online misinformation and disinformation, concern is growing that governments are using fake news language and related laws to ...
  74. [74]
    Singapore's Fake News Law: For or Against Democracy?
    May 27, 2022 · Looking at the track record of POFMA so far, I argue that it exacerbates Singapore's culture of self-censorship and calibrated political ...
  75. [75]
    Singapore media guide - BBC News
    May 23, 2023 · Singapore Press Holdings is linked to the ruling party and has a near-monopoly of the press. MediaCorp, owned by a state investment agency, runs ...Missing: MDA | Show results with:MDA
  76. [76]
    'Hard choices' for Singapore media after controversial law passed
    Oct 13, 2021 · Concerns about the effect of 'foreign interference' law in the country where media already operate under strict regulation.
  77. [77]
    On the Banning of a Film: Tan Pin Pin's To Singapore, with Love
    Sep 8, 2015 · “MDA has classified the film 'To Singapore, with Love' as Not Allowed for All Ratings (NAR),” Media Development Authority, 10 September 2014 ...
  78. [78]
    "To Singapore, with Love" ban appealed - Yale Daily News
    Oct 4, 2014 · Yale-NUS administrators said they planned to show “To Singapore, with Love” in one of its film courses after receiving permission from the MDA, ...
  79. [79]
    After a decade, 'To Singapore, with Love' still banned from public ...
    Apr 18, 2024 · Filmmaker Tan Pin Pin confirmed that a decade later, “To Singapore, with Love” remains banned from public screening in Singapore.
  80. [80]
    To Singapore, With Love: Does the MDA appreciate the Streisand ...
    Sep 13, 2014 · That's why they ban it, despite the Streisand Effect. To ... 2014 July 2, 2017 visakanvcensorshipbanned films, MDA, To Singapore With Love ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    Singaporean authorities shut down The Real Singapore news website
    May 5, 2015 · The agency ordered the website's editors to shut down its online and social media platforms by 8 p.m. on Sunday or face fines or imprisonment, ...
  82. [82]
    Unprecedented orders issued to TRS to shut down
    May 4, 2015 · In an unprecedented move on Sunday, the Media Development Authority (MDA) of Singapore ordered a website to shut itself down within six ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Singapore bloggers slam shutdown of website deemed 'anti-foreigner'
    May 4, 2015 · A group of bloggers on Monday urged Singapore's media regulator to rescind an order to shut down a website accused of fanning anti-foreigner ...Missing: fines | Show results with:fines
  84. [84]
    Blogger group slams shutdown of website as blatant censorship
    May 4, 2015 · The MDA's lack of transparency, according to TOC commentaries editor Howard Lee, threatens the survival of the Singapore online media.Missing: fines | Show results with:fines
  85. [85]
    Advisory on political films and paid internet ads | IMDA
    Jun 30, 2020 · All political parties, candidates and voters are reminded that they must not make, reproduce, import, exhibit or distribute party political films (PPFs).Missing: coverage interventions
  86. [86]
    The problem with Singapore's media
    Apr 10, 2011 · Singaporeans are treated to some shameless gloating and back-patting about Singapore's media—how it is so objective, fact-based and unbiased ...Missing: notable controversies
  87. [87]
    Ministerial Statement on Restricting Hate Speech to Maintain Racial ...
    Apr 1, 2019 · Ministerial Statement on Restricting Hate Speech to Maintain Racial and Religious Harmony in Singapore, Speech by Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for ...
  88. [88]
    Racial and religious harmony scores rise in Singapore: IPS study
    Feb 3, 2025 · For instance, when it comes to racial harmony, 65.4 per cent of respondents rated Singapore's racial and religious harmony as high or very high ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Results from the IPS-OnePeople.sg Indicators of Racial and ...
    encountered racial or religious incidents that upset them in the past year. These trends were further augmented by responses to specific examples of racial or.
  90. [90]
    Singapore IDA, MDA to merge for more holistic approach to ICT and ...
    Jan 18, 2016 · The MCI said on Monday that the new IMDA will develop and regulate the converging infocomm and media sectors in a holistic way. It will ...
  91. [91]
    Info-communications Media Development Authority Act 2016 - Singapore Statutes Online
    ### Summary of Commencement Date
  92. [92]
    Acts and Regulations - Singapore - IMDA
    Nov 20, 2023 · As a statutory body, IMDA's various roles are enshrined in the Info-communications Media Development Authority Act, passed in August 2016.
  93. [93]
    Merger of Singapore Infocomm and Media Regulators - Lexology
    Jan 21, 2016 · The IDA and the MDA will be administratively re-organised and replaced by the IMDA and the GTO from 1 April 2016. The new entities will be ...Missing: 2017 | Show results with:2017
  94. [94]
    IDA, MDA to be merged to ride digital wave - Today Online
    Jan 18, 2016 · SINGAPORE ... It has brought up considerations to merge the infocomm and media's development and regulatory functions from time to time.
  95. [95]
    Content Standards and Classification - Singapore - IMDA
    Ensure a responsible and cohesive media landscape in Singapore with IMDA's content standards and classification regulations. Learn more about the ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  96. [96]
    Content Regulation - Singapore - IMDA
    IMDA's content regulatory approach aims to reflect community standards while providing more choices for adults and protecting the young.
  97. [97]
    Q&A: telecoms and media law in Singapore - Lexology
    Jun 14, 2019 · A Q&A guide to telecoms and media law in Singapore, covering regulatory frameworks and enforcement agencies, licensing requirements, ...
  98. [98]
    Media Enterprise Programme - Development Grant - IMDA
    The grant supports development of episodic series (up to $100,000) and feature films (up to $50,000) for Singapore-registered businesses, with a max of $500, ...
  99. [99]
    New S$55m media funding aims to enhance virtual production in ...
    Dec 7, 2023 · The co-production fund aims to bring Singapore stories to a global audience through streaming platforms, in collaboration with production partners overseas.<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    IMDA and STB launch S$10 million Singapore on-screen fund to ...
    Apr 5, 2023 · IMDA and STB launch S$10 million Singapore on-screen fund to inspire travel to Singapore through TV series and films.
  101. [101]
    Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019
    An Act to prevent the electronic communication in Singapore of false statements of fact, to suppress support for and counteract the effects of such ...
  102. [102]
    Online news licensing regime will not stifle internet freedom, says ...
    Jul 11, 2013 · Licensees will be required to take down content that breaches the content standards within 24 hours after being directed to do so by the MDA.Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy
  103. [103]
    Transforming Singapore's I&C Industry 2023 | IMDA
    May 8, 2023 · While Covid-19 had slowed the sector's growth, the ICM sector has rebounded since and managed to achieve a nominal growth rate of 7.9% from 2015 ...
  104. [104]
    Singapore's Digital Economy remains robust - IMDA
    Oct 29, 2024 · From 2018 – 2023, the digital economy grew at a healthy compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.2%, nearly double the nominal GDP growth rate ...
  105. [105]
    Merger Of Singapore Infocomm And Media Regulators
    The IDA and MDA reorganisation will commence from 1 April 2016. However, the IMDA is expected to be established and fully operational in the second half of 2016 ...