Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Medical classification

Medical classification refers to the systematic organization of health-related , including diseases, procedures, disabilities, and clinical concepts, into standardized codes and categories to support consistent communication, exchange, and analysis in healthcare. These systems facilitate accurate recording of patient diagnoses and treatments, enable reimbursement from health insurers, inform policy, and underpin epidemiological research by allowing comparable across populations and regions. Prominent examples include the , maintained by the , which codes morbidity, mortality, and causes of death to track global health trends and resource allocation. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), developed by the American Medical Association (AMA), provides codes for medical, surgical, and diagnostic services performed by healthcare professionals. Complementing CPT, the Level II, overseen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), standardizes codes for supplies, equipment, and non-physician services in billing. Additionally, (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine—Clinical Terms), managed by SNOMED International, offers a comprehensive, multilingual for electronic health records, enabling detailed clinical documentation and interoperability. Other essential classifications address broader aspects of health, such as the International Classification of Functioning, and Health (ICF) from WHO, which frameworks the components of functioning—including body functions, activities, participation, and environmental factors—to measure health and beyond mere absence. These systems evolve through international collaboration to incorporate advances in medicine, with regular updates ensuring relevance; for instance, , adopted in 2019, enhances digital compatibility and in coding complex conditions like rare s and . Together, medical classifications form the backbone of modern healthcare informatics, promoting efficiency, equity, and evidence-based decision-making across clinical, administrative, and research domains.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Medical classification refers to a systematic arrangement of medical terms, codes, and concepts designed to represent diagnoses, procedures, drugs, and other health-related entities in a standardized manner. This process transforms descriptive clinical information into structured, alphanumeric codes that facilitate the organization and analysis of healthcare data across diverse settings. The primary purposes of medical classification include enabling uniform for statistical reporting, supporting epidemiological analysis to track disease patterns and health outcomes, and facilitating billing and reimbursement processes in healthcare systems. Additionally, these systems improve clinical by providing consistent for care planning and enhance among electronic health records and health information exchanges. The plays a central role in promoting global standardization through its family of international classifications. Key principles underlying medical classification encompass , where broad categories branch into more specific subcategories; exhaustiveness, ensuring coverage of all relevant entities without omissions; , preventing overlap between categories; and multiaxiality, allowing representation across multiple dimensions such as , , and severity. These principles, drawn from standards like ISO 17115, promote reliable aggregation and comparison of . The scope of medical classification extends from patient conditions, such as diseases and disabilities, to interventions like procedures and treatments, as well as outcomes including mortality and functional status. This broad coverage supports comprehensive health surveillance and resource allocation.

Historical Development

The systematic classification of diseases began in the 18th century with François Bossier de Lacroix, known as Sauvages, who published Nosologia Methodica in 1763, organizing diseases into ten classes based on symptoms and botanical analogies, marking the first comprehensive attempt at a hierarchical medical nosology. This work laid foundational principles for later systems by emphasizing systematic grouping, though it remained largely theoretical and limited to European medical circles. In the 19th century, efforts shifted toward practical applications in public health, particularly through vital statistics; William Farr, as superintendent of the Statistical Department of the General Register Office in England and Wales from 1839, developed a classification of causes of death that categorized diseases by etiology and anatomical site, enabling the first national mortality analyses and influencing international standardization to address inconsistencies in cross-border data reporting. These early milestones highlighted the need for uniform terminology amid varying national practices, which often led to incomparable statistics and hindered global epidemiological tracking. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the push for international harmonization, culminating in Jacques Bertillon's Bertillon Classification of Causes of Death in 1893, adopted by the International Statistical Institute as the first global standard for mortality coding with 161 categories focused on principal causes. This list underwent revisions every decade until 1929, but disruptions paused progress until the (WHO) assumed responsibility in 1946. In 1948, WHO's Sixth Revision Conference produced the (ICD-6), the first iteration to expand beyond mortality to include morbidity statistics, with dual coding for underlying causes and manifestations, thereby addressing prior limitations in tracking non-fatal illnesses and promoting consistent global health reporting. The ICD's adoption by WHO member states resolved many inconsistencies from disparate national systems, such as varying cause-of-death definitions that had plagued earlier vital statistics efforts. Post-World War II advancements accelerated in the 1970s with the establishment of WHO's Family of International Classifications (FIC) network in 1970, which coordinated the development of interconnected tools like the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH) alongside ICD, fostering a broader ecosystem for health data interoperability. By the 1990s, the transition from paper-based to digital systems transformed classifications; ICD-10, endorsed by WHO in 1990, incorporated alphanumeric codes and computer-friendly structures, enabling electronic implementation and automated coding that mitigated manual errors and inconsistencies in large-scale reporting. In the 21st century, ontologies like —originating from the U.S. ' SNOMED system in the 1960s for terms and merged with the UK's Read Codes (developed in the 1980s for ) to form the in 2002—integrated with ICD to support in electronic health records. The rise of and has further refined classifications, as seen in ICD-11's 2019 digital-first design, which uses ontology-based modeling to handle complex, data-driven refinements and address ongoing challenges like harmonizing diverse national adaptations for global surveillance. Subsequent updates, including the 2024 release with over 200 new codes for allergens and the 2025 update expanding modules and improving , continue to enhance its utility as of 2025.

Classification Frameworks

International Standards

The World Health Organization's Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC) serves as a conceptual framework that organizes reference, derived, and related classifications to provide comprehensive coverage of health data domains, including death, disease, functioning, disability, and interventions. This structure ensures semantic interoperability in health information systems, facilitating data storage, retrieval, analysis, and exchange across individuals and populations for purposes such as health system financing, decision-making, and research. By integrating these components, WHO-FIC supports monitoring of global health indicators, including Sustainable Development Goal 3 on health and well-being, and promotes universal health coverage. The (WHO) plays a central role in the governance of international medical classification standards, overseeing their development, maintenance, and promotion through the WHO-FIC Network, which coordinates implementation and updates of reference classifications. Under WHO's Constitution and Nomenclature Regulations, the organization manages revisions, with authority granted by the since 1948. For instance, systems like the (ICD) receive annual updates to incorporate new clinical knowledge, while WHO collaborates with the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO), now , to link classifications such as ICD and for enhanced interoperability. Core features of these international standards include multilingual support to promote global accessibility, with available in 14 languages as of 2025, with ongoing translations to improve accessibility. Periodic revisions ensure relevance, as seen with ICD's major updates approximately every decade, alongside alignment with statistical standards for comparable international health reporting; for example, the February 2025 update to introduced enhancements such as FHIR API integration for better interoperability, advanced , and expanded coding for . These elements enable standardized coding that supports epidemiological surveillance and resource allocation worldwide. Global adoption of WHO-FIC standards is widespread, with ICD used in more than 100 countries for health and by 132 WHO Member States or areas as of 2024, including 72 actively implementing it. For WHO Member States, use of ICD is mandatory for official mortality statistics to the organization, ensuring consistent cause-of-death data from systems. Despite their strengths, international standards face limitations in adapting to emerging diseases or new technologies due to the structured revision cycles, which can delay incorporation of novel conditions until annual updates or major overhauls. This rigidity has been noted in challenges, where and infrequent major revisions hinder rapid response to evolving health threats like pandemics.

National and Regional Adaptations

National and regional adaptations of international medical classification standards, such as the WHO's (ICD), involve customizing global frameworks to address local healthcare contexts, regulatory requirements, and epidemiological priorities. These modifications typically include clinical expansions, the addition of country-specific codes for unique diseases, procedures, or billing needs, and translations to ensure usability. For instance, the process often entails collaboration between national health agencies and international bodies like the WHO, which authorizes adaptations while aiming to preserve core structures for global alignment. In the , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC/NCHS) develops and maintains the Clinical Modification (), which expands the base with additional detail for morbidity coding in clinical settings, including approximately 74,000 codes as of fiscal year 2025 to capture nuances in diagnoses relevant to U.S. healthcare delivery. Several countries have established prominent examples of such adaptations. In , the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHACPA), formerly the National Centre for Classification in Health, oversees the ICD-10 Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), which includes the Australian Classification of Health Interventions (ACHI) for procedures and the Australian Coding Standards (ACS) for implementation guidance; this system, now in its thirteenth edition effective from July 1, 2025, adds codes for indigenous health issues and local procedural variations to support national hospital funding and data collection. In , the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) maintains the ICD-10-CA (Canadian Adaptation), tailored for hospital morbidity data through the Hospital Morbidity Database (HMDB), incorporating enhancements for acute care separations and demographic tracking to improve accuracy in national health reporting. Germany's ICD-10 German Modification (ICD-10-GM), managed by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), adapts the ICD-10 to the statutory system by refining categories for reimbursement and , with annual updates to reflect evolving clinical practices. Regional variations further illustrate these adaptations, particularly in efforts to balance national customization with cross-border needs. Within the European Union, Eurostat promotes alignment of national ICD-10 versions, such as Germany's ICD-10-GM, through harmonized guidelines for health statistics, facilitating comparable data on morbidity and mortality across member states despite local modifications for billing or surveillance. In low-resource countries, adaptations face significant hurdles, including the need for accurate translations into local languages and comprehensive training for healthcare workers, which can delay implementation and increase costs due to limited digital infrastructure and expertise. These adaptations offer key benefits by enhancing the relevance of classifications to domestic systems. For example, in the U.S., supports (DRG) reimbursement under , enabling precise billing tied to clinical complexity, while also bolstering through detailed morbidity tracking. Similarly, Australia's ICD-10-AM/ACHI integration aids in activity-based funding for s and targeted epidemiological monitoring of conditions like chronic diseases. In , CIHI's adaptations improve data quality for policy-making and . However, extensive national modifications can undermine comparability, a core goal of WHO standards. Divergent codes and structures, such as those added for region-specific procedures or billing, complicate global aggregation of , potentially skewing cross-national analyses of trends and hindering collaborative efforts like response. This issue is exacerbated when countries adopt modifications asynchronously or without sufficient , as seen in varying European implementations.

WHO Family of International Classifications

Reference Classifications

The World Health Organization (WHO) designates reference classifications as core international standards within the Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC), providing comprehensive, hierarchical frameworks that cover essential dimensions of health data, including death, diseases, functioning, disability, and health interventions. These classifications serve as foundational models to ensure standardized collection and analysis of health information across countries, enabling global comparability for monitoring health trends, , and Universal Health Coverage. Key examples of reference classifications include the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), which categorizes mortality and morbidity data related to diseases, symptoms, and injuries; the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which addresses functioning and disability; and the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI), which describes procedures and interventions across healthcare settings. The ICD employs an alphanumeric coding system, where codes begin with a letter or number indicating the chapter (e.g., 1A for infectious diseases), followed by additional characters and dots for specificity, allowing three-character categories to expand up to six or more with extensions for details like severity or anatomy. In contrast, the ICF uses a multiaxial structure organized into components such as body functions and structures, activities, and participation, alongside environmental factors that influence these domains. The ICHI is structured around three axes—Target (the entity affected), Action (the deed performed), and Means (the method or instrument used)—to systematically classify interventions. Development of these classifications involves collaborative updates through the WHO-FIC Network, with the adopted by the in 2019 and becoming effective for implementation from January 1, 2022, to reflect advances in medical knowledge and needs. The ICF was endorsed by all 191 WHO Member States in 2001, building on earlier frameworks to integrate and metrics. ICHI's version was released in 2018, with subsequent versions including beta-3 in 2020 and the interventions component finalized in 2023; as of 2025, it remains under development for full release, marking its evolution as a neutral, system-independent tool for intervention coding. These updates aim to enhance and accuracy in statistics. Unique aspects distinguish these classifications: later versions of the ICD incorporate , such as external causes of injury and factors influencing health status, to broaden beyond purely biomedical perspectives. The ICF adopts a that contrasts with disease-focused systems by emphasizing interactions between biological, psychological, and social elements in assessing health and disability. ICHI's axis-based design allows for flexible description of diverse interventions, from clinical procedures to actions, without bias toward specific healthcare delivery models.

Derived and Related Classifications

Derived classifications within the WHO Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC) are specialized extensions of the core reference classifications, such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), designed to provide greater detail for specific clinical areas while ensuring compatibility with the foundational systems. These adaptations address limitations in the reference classifications by incorporating additional axes or granularity tailored to particular domains, facilitating targeted data collection and analysis in specialized settings. For instance, the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3), published in 2000, extends the ICD's topography codes to include morphology, behavior, and grading of neoplasms, enabling precise tumor registration and cancer epidemiology studies. Similarly, the ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders, derived from Chapter V (F00-F99) of ICD-10, offers a focused framework for diagnosing and classifying mental health conditions, supporting clinical practice and research in psychiatry while aligning with the broader ICD structure. Related classifications in the WHO-FIC complement the reference and derived systems without direct derivation, providing aligned tools for distinct aspects of , such as encounters or pharmaceutical categorization, to fill gaps in comprehensive health data coverage. The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC), for example, structures information around patient episodes in , capturing reasons for encounters, diagnoses, interventions, and functional status in an integrated manner suited to workflows. ICPC-2, released in 1998, serves as a reason-for-encounter classification endorsed by WHO for and . ICPC-3, released in December 2020, the latest iteration, aligns anatomical terms with ICD-11's foundational model and includes mappings for over 80% exact entity matches, promoting interoperability in systems while adopting a person-centered approach. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical () classification system, maintained by WHO, categorizes drugs by their anatomical, therapeutic, and chemical properties across five hierarchical levels, linking drug utilization data to ICD codes for epidemiological analysis of medication-related health outcomes. These derived and related classifications are maintained under WHO oversight through collaborations with international expert groups and collaborating centers, ensuring harmonization and periodic updates to reflect advances in medical knowledge. For example, updates to systems like occur annually to incorporate new pharmaceuticals, while derived classifications such as ICD-O are revised in coordination with ICD revisions to maintain linkage and relevance.

Domain-Specific Classifications

Diagnostic Classifications

Diagnostic classifications in encompass standardized systems designed to code and categorize diseases, symptoms, factors, and other states, facilitating consistent identification and communication across clinical, research, and contexts. These systems typically employ a hierarchical structure, organizing content into broad chapters—such as those covering infectious diseases, neoplasms, or mental disorders—progressing to increasingly specific subcategories and alphanumeric codes that pinpoint precise diagnoses. This layered approach enables efficient navigation and application, from general epidemiological to detailed assessments. A prominent example is the , published by the in 2013 and revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022. provides diagnostic criteria for over 150 mental health conditions, emphasizing observable symptoms and functional impairments to guide clinicians in identifying disorders like or . Unlike its predecessor DSM-IV, which used a multiaxial system to assess clinical syndromes (Axis I), personality disorders (Axis II), medical conditions (Axis III), psychosocial stressors (Axis IV), and global functioning (Axis V), DSM-5 streamlined this into a non-axial format to reduce complexity while incorporating dimensional assessments—such as severity scales—for certain disorders to better capture symptom gradients. Another key non-WHO system is the (), developed and maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine since 1960 as a for indexing biomedical literature. organizes over 30,000 descriptors into 16 top-level categories, including "Diseases" and "Pathological Conditions, ," with a tree-like allowing terms like "" to link to broader nodes such as "Virus Diseases" and narrower ones like "Post-Acute Syndrome." The 2025 update introduced new descriptors, including those for athletic trainers and autoencoders, to address evolving biomedical concepts. This structure supports probabilistic elements in search and retrieval, where related terms can be expanded algorithmically to encompass synonyms or subtypes. In applications, diagnostic classifications like underpin clinical documentation by standardizing entries in patient records, enabling accurate billing, treatment planning, and outcome tracking; they also facilitate research indexing, as seen with in , where it aids in aggregating studies on specific conditions for meta-analyses and epidemiological tracking of prevalence trends. has seen an evolution from purely categorical models, which assign discrete diagnoses, toward hybrid dimensional approaches in that quantify symptom severity on continua, reflecting evidence that many disorders exist on spectrums rather than strict binaries to improve diagnostic reliability and therapeutic targeting. Challenges in these systems include cultural biases embedded in diagnostic criteria, such as Western-centric assumptions in that may pathologize behaviors normative in other societies, like certain expressions of or spiritual experiences, potentially leading to in diverse populations. Additionally, adapting to emerging conditions like has prompted updates; for instance, non-WHO frameworks such as the RECOVER-Adult research index have incorporated symptom clusters (e.g., cardiopulmonary or neurological manifestations) persisting beyond 90 days post-infection to refine without definitive biomarkers. These issues underscore the need for ongoing revisions to ensure equity and relevance in practice.

Procedural Classifications

Procedural classifications encompass standardized coding systems designed to document and categorize medical actions, including surgeries, diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic interventions performed on patients. These systems facilitate uniform reporting of clinical activities across healthcare settings, enabling accurate for administrative, statistical, and analytical purposes. Unlike diagnostic classifications, which focus on patient conditions, procedural codes specifically capture what is done to address those conditions, often integrating with diagnosis codes—such as those from the (ICD)—in bundled payment models to link interventions directly to underlying health issues. Prominent examples include the , developed and maintained by the in the United States, which comprises over 10,000 codes describing a wide range of services and procedures. In the , the OPCS Classification of Interventions and Procedures version 4 (OPCS-4) serves the by coding hospital-based interventions and surgical procedures, supporting national healthcare data aggregation. These systems are tailored to regional needs but share the goal of standardizing procedural documentation to enhance and comparability. The structure of these classifications is typically hierarchical, organized by anatomical body systems or procedural categories to reflect clinical logic and ease of use. For instance, CPT is divided into sections such as evaluation and management, , , , pathology and laboratory, and , with codes arranged numerically within each to denote increasing specificity; modifiers—two-character add-ons—are appended to indicate variations in complexity, location, or other factors affecting the procedure. OPCS-4 employs a four-character alphanumeric code that similarly groups interventions by body site and type, allowing for detailed subclassification. This organization supports precise coding while accommodating the diversity of medical practices. Recent developments emphasize global harmonization, with the World Health Organization's International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) emerging as a comprehensive standard since its beta release in 2019, covering interventions across diagnostic, therapeutic, preventive, and rehabilitative domains performed by various health providers. ICHI promotes through mappings to established terminologies like , enabling cross-system data exchange and reducing redundancies in international reporting. These advancements address the need for adaptable classifications that incorporate evolving practices, such as minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures. Procedural classifications play a critical role in healthcare operations, particularly for , where systems like CPT are mandated by for billing services and determining payment rates based on procedure complexity and resource use. They also support quality metrics by tracking intervention outcomes in clinical audits and surgical registries, informing evidence-based improvements in care delivery. To remain relevant, these systems undergo annual updates by their governing bodies, incorporating new codes for technological innovations like robotic surgeries while retiring obsolete ones to maintain accuracy and relevance.

Drug and Medication Classifications

Drug and medication classifications encompass standardized systems for categorizing pharmaceuticals based on their anatomical, therapeutic, chemical, and administrative properties, facilitating global and national drug management, research, and regulation. The classification, maintained by the , organizes active substances into a hierarchical structure with five levels: the first level denotes anatomical groups (e.g., A for alimentary tract and ), the second therapeutic subgroups, the third pharmacological subgroups, the fourth chemical subgroups, and the fifth individual chemical substances. For instance, the code A10BA02 specifically identifies metformin as a antidiabetic agent. In the United States, the , administered by the , serves as a unique 10- or 11-digit identifier for drug products, comprising three segments: a labeler code (4-5 digits assigned by the FDA), a (3-4 digits for strength and ), and a package code (1-2 digits for container size). This system enables precise product identification for labeling, tracking, and regulatory compliance. Specialized terminologies extend these core systems by incorporating pharmacological and clinical attributes. The National Drug File-Reference Terminology (NDF-RT), developed by the (VA), models drug characteristics through a multiaxial framework that includes ingredients, chemical structures, dose forms, strengths, mechanisms of action (e.g., beta-adrenergic antagonist), and physiologic effects (e.g., decreased ). This allows for detailed linking of drugs to their therapeutic intents and related conditions. Complementing this, RxNorm, produced by the National Library of Medicine (NLM), provides normalized names for clinical drugs, bridging disparate vocabularies used in pharmacy systems and electronic health records (EHRs) by assigning unique codes to ingredients, branded products, and prescribable formulations. The evolution of these terminologies reflects ongoing efforts to enhance and precision. In the 2010s, the Medication Reference Terminology (MED-RT) emerged as the successor to NDF-RT, integrating it with broader ontologies such as RxNorm, (), and to support advanced pharmacologic modeling and external terminology referencing, with releases aligned to NLM's Unified Medical Language System updates. This progression addresses limitations in earlier systems by enabling more robust data mapping for clinical applications. These classifications underpin critical applications in healthcare. In , the system aids in monitoring adverse reactions by associating events with therapeutic classes, supporting international drug utilization studies and signal detection. NDC facilitates formulary by standardizing product listings for , , and regulatory enforcement in the U.S. healthcare system. RxNorm promotes prescription across EHRs, reducing errors through consistent naming and enabling seamless data exchange in clinical decision support tools. Additionally, NDF-RT and its successor integrate with ontologies to track adverse events by linking s to mechanisms and physiologic effects, enhancing post-market surveillance. Despite their utility, challenges persist, particularly with biologics and generics. Biologics, due to their complex manufacturing and variability, complicate equivalence demonstrations in classification systems like NDC and , often requiring additional regulatory pathways beyond simple chemical identifiers. Generics for complex drugs face hurdles in testing and standardized coding, leading to delays in market entry and potential gaps in formulary integration.

Medical Device Classifications

Medical device classifications provide standardized systems for categorizing equipment, implants, and technologies based on risk, intended use, and regulatory requirements, facilitating global trade, safety oversight, and interoperability. The (GMDN), managed by the GMDN Agency as the leading international standard, comprises over 25,000 terms that group similar devices using unique identifiers, supporting identification across borders without implying regulatory approval. In the United States, the (FDA) employs a risk-based framework dividing devices into three classes—Class I (low risk, such as bandages), Class II (moderate risk, like powered wheelchairs requiring special controls), and Class III (high risk, including life-sustaining implants)—with classification determined by 16 expert panels reviewing device descriptions against regulatory criteria. In the , the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 establishes a rule-based classification system with 22 rules outlined in Annex VIII, assigning devices to one of four risk categories: Class I (lowest risk, non-invasive devices like spectacles), Class IIa (short-term invasive, such as surgical gloves), Class IIb (medium-term invasive or active therapeutic, like infusion pumps), and Class III (highest risk, involving long-term implants or active devices altering physiology, such as pacemakers). This system emphasizes intended purpose, invasiveness, and duration of use to determine conformity assessment routes and notified body involvement. The GMDN structure enhances precision through a unique five-digit numeric code paired with a term name and definition, ensuring mutual exclusivity and comprehensive coverage of device variants; for instance, a term might describe a "" with qualifiers for specific features like rate-responsive models. Risk stratification in systems like the FDA's places high-risk devices, such as Class III pacemakers that sustain or support life, under stringent premarket approval to mitigate potential harm. Recent developments integrate classifications with the (UDI) system, mandated by the FDA since 2013, which assigns a static identifier (DI) and production identifier (PI) to track from manufacturing to use, often incorporating GMDN codes in databases like the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID). Updates address emerging technologies, including AI-enabled ; by July 2025, the FDA had authorized over 1,250 such , classified primarily under traditional risk categories but with evolving guidance for adaptive algorithms in and diagnostics. These classifications support regulatory approval by guiding submission pathways, enable post-market surveillance through adverse event reporting tied to identifiers, and streamline supply chain management via standardized nomenclature for procurement and inventory. Challenges persist in classifying software as a (SaMD), defined by the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) as standalone software for medical purposes without hardware; risk categorization under IMDRF frameworks assesses significance of information output (e.g., treat, diagnose, drive decisions) against patient state (critical, serious, non-serious), influencing global harmonization efforts.

Key Terminologies and Ontologies

SNOMED CT

, or Clinical Terms, originated as a merger in 1999 of (SNOMED RT), developed by the , and Clinical Terms Version 3, the successor to the UK's Read Codes developed by the [National Health Service](/page/National Health Service). This combination created a comprehensive clinical aimed at standardizing medical data representation. In 2002, the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO) was founded to oversee its development, acquiring full ownership in 2007; the organization rebranded as SNOMED International in 2018 to reflect its global focus. Maintained by SNOMED International, now encompasses over 370,000 active concepts organized into 19 top-level hierarchies, including clinical findings (e.g., diseases and symptoms), procedures, observable entities, body structures, and substances, enabling detailed modeling of healthcare information. A key feature of is its ontological design, which employs to define concepts through axioms such as "is-a" relationships (for hierarchical subsumption) and role-based definitional attributes (e.g., "finding site" or "causative agent"), allowing for machine-readable and logically consistent representations. This structure supports pre-coordination for common concepts and post-coordination, where users can compose complex expressions by combining primitives—for instance, expressing "fractured right due to fall" as a coordinated finding with anatomical , , and attributes—to capture nuanced clinical scenarios beyond predefined terms. The terminology's components include unique numeric concept identifiers, synonymous descriptions in multiple languages, and relational links, facilitating both human readability and computational processing across diverse healthcare contexts. SNOMED CT undergoes regular updates through its International Edition, released monthly on the first of each month to incorporate new concepts, refinements, and quality improvements based on global member input. National extensions, such as the Edition (updated bi-annually in March and September) and UK Edition, add country-specific content while aligning with the core international release. For example, the September 2025 Edition added 328 new active concepts specific to the Extension. In member countries—now over 80— is available free for non-commercial use, including implementation in systems and research, though commercial applications require licensing fees that vary by organization size and jurisdiction. Among its strengths, excels in promoting by enabling precise, context-independent data exchange across electronic health records (EHRs) and systems worldwide, as recognized by its designation as a core standard in over 50 countries. It also supports (NLP) in EHRs by mapping unstructured clinical text to standardized concepts through its rich descriptions and relationships, enhancing tasks like automated coding and . However, its ontological complexity demands specialized expertise for effective implementation and maintenance, potentially increasing the for users and developers. Additionally, while accessible for non-commercial purposes in many regions, licensing costs for commercial entities can pose barriers to broader adoption.

ICD System

The (ICD) serves as the foundational global standard for systematically recording diagnostic information across clinical, research, and epidemiological contexts, enabling comparable health data worldwide. Developed and maintained by the (WHO), it classifies diseases, health conditions, and causes of death, supporting morbidity and mortality statistics, , and . The ICD's origins trace back to the late with the 1893 International Statistical Institute's adoption of Jacques Bertillon's classification of causes of death, leading to the first formal revision, known as ICD-1, in 1900. Subsequent decennial revisions expanded its scope; WHO assumed responsibility in 1948, starting with ICD-6, which introduced morbidity coding alongside mortality. Key versions include ICD-7 (1955), ICD-8 (1965), ICD-9 (1975), and (1990), the latter adding alphanumeric codes and covering external causes of injury. The current iteration, , was adopted by the 72nd in 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2022, featuring approximately 17,000 diagnostic categories organized into 26 chapters that encompass morbidity, mortality, and external causes such as injuries and poisonings. ICD employs an alphanumeric coding structure for precise categorization, with codes typically ranging from three to seven characters, beginning with a letter followed by numbers or additional letters. For instance, in , E11.9 denotes mellitus without complications, where "E" indicates endocrine disorders, "11" specifies type 2 diabetes, and ".9" signifies unspecified complications. The system includes tabular lists detailing categories, subcategories, and inclusion/exclusion notes to guide accurate assignment, preventing overlap—such as excluding certain genetic conditions from broader chapters. Extensions enhance specificity; in adaptations like , a seventh character like ".A" indicates an initial encounter for active treatment of an injury. advances this with fully alphanumeric codes (e.g., 5A11 for mellitus) and a more flexible, ontology-based structure for postcoordination of multiple attributes. WHO oversees ICD maintenance through annual point updates to incorporate emerging health conditions, refine terminology, and ensure relevance, with major revisions every decade. For instance, the 2025 update, released in February, added over 200 new codes for allergens and a new module for conditions in and related systems. The digital browser at icd.who.int provides an interactive platform for searching, coding, and translating across languages, supporting online and offline use via integration for electronic health systems. Alignment with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) allows optional linking of ICD codes to functioning assessments, enabling holistic views of patient outcomes beyond diagnosis. As the cornerstone of international health statistics, ICD underpins data collection in all 194 WHO Member States, facilitating comparable mortality and morbidity reporting that informs global priorities like the . It is used to code causes for over 99% of registered deaths worldwide, enabling analysis of disease burdens and trends across populations. ICD-11 introduces significant enhancements for modern healthcare, including a foundational layer—a semantic network of approximately 85,000 entities—that supports and integration with digital tools like electronic health records, allowing automated mapping and machine-readable queries. A dedicated supplementary chapter on , with over 300 codes, enables optional dual coding of conditions like those treated in or , promoting inclusive global data capture without disrupting core classifications. Derived systems, such as for , build on this framework for specialized applications.

Comparisons and Data Mapping

Medical classifications such as the (ICD) and serve distinct purposes, leading to fundamental differences in their structure and application. ICD is primarily a system designed for aggregated data in , billing, and reporting, grouping conditions into broad, fixed categories to facilitate comparability across populations. In contrast, functions as a comprehensive clinical for detailed, patient-specific , enabling granular representation through composable expressions that combine concepts like anatomy, , and severity. This granularity allows to support both diagnostic and procedural details, whereas ICD focuses mainly on diagnoses with limited procedural coverage in extensions like ICD-10-PCS. While there is significant overlap in diagnostic concepts—enabling partial alignment—'s broader scope for procedures and contexts often requires aggregation to fit ICD's hierarchical structure. Mapping between these systems is essential for , employing techniques such as direct equivalence for correspondences, hierarchical grouping to aggregate SNOMED CT's detailed concepts into ICD categories, and algorithmic approaches that incorporate context like age or comorbidities. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus facilitates algorithmic mapping by linking synonymous terms across vocabularies. Tools like the SNOMED International Mapping Tool and the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) I-MAGIC algorithm support semi-automated processes, where dual expert mapping resolves ambiguities through rule-based evaluation. Challenges in mapping arise from semantic gaps, particularly SNOMED CT's support for postcoordination—combining atomic concepts dynamically—versus ICD's reliance on precoordinated, fixed codes that embed relationships statically, leading to incomplete representations for complex clinical scenarios. Maintenance of maps is resource-intensive, with the NLM's to crosswalk refreshed biannually to align with SNOMED CT releases in March and September, plus annual ICD updates. In complex cases, such as multifaceted procedures or rare conditions, unmapped concepts occur in approximately 5-10% of instances, necessitating manual review to ensure accuracy. Standards like HL7 (FHIR) address these issues by using the ConceptMap resource to define unidirectional or bidirectional translations between terminologies, enabling structured data exchanges in electronic health systems. This facilitates aggregation of granular data into ICD for epidemiological research, improving statistical reporting and analysis without losing clinical detail at the source. For example, the U.S. NLM's crosswalks provide a validated reference for converting clinical findings to codes, supporting over 96% coverage of common diagnostic subsets while aiding billing and surveillance.

Applications and Extensions

Integration with Electronic Health Records

Medical classifications play a pivotal role in electronic health records (EHRs) by enabling standardized coding for structured , which facilitates consistent documentation of clinical information such as diagnoses, procedures, and medications. For instance, is integrated into systems like as a reference terminology to support clinical data capture and automated mapping to other codes, enhancing the granularity of patient records. These classifications also underpin clinical decision support (CDS) systems within EHRs, where terminologies like allow for rule-based alerts and recommendations based on encoded patient data. Interoperability in EHRs is advanced through standards that incorporate medical classifications, such as HL7 FHIR profiles that bind resources to code sets like ICD and for semantic consistency across systems. of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) mandates the use of these code sets in its US Core Implementation Guide, requiring certified EHRs to support standardized data elements for exchange, including conditions coded with or . This alignment ensures that data from disparate EHRs can be reliably shared and interpreted, as seen in FHIR-based profiles that enforce vocabulary constraints for elements like diagnoses. The integration of medical classifications into EHRs yields significant benefits, including enhanced analytics through aggregated coded data that enables risk stratification and outcome tracking. Coded data also supports AI-driven insights, such as predictive modeling for disease trends, by providing machine-readable inputs that improve algorithmic accuracy in large-scale datasets. Regulatory frameworks, including the Promoting (formerly Meaningful Use), incentivize this integration by requiring certified EHRs to use standardized vocabularies like for problem lists and ICD for billing, thereby promoting data quality and exchange to meet federal criteria. Despite these advantages, challenges persist in EHR integration with medical classifications, particularly during migrations from systems, where incomplete data transfers and issues can compromise historical records and workflow continuity. Vocabulary binding—ensuring user interfaces and data models correctly link to classification codes—remains complex and time-intensive, often leading to errors in archetype-based representations when using ontology-driven systems like . Additionally, inconsistent coding practices contribute to issues, with studies showing documentation errors in up to 15% of EHR charts related to diagnoses and treatments. Looking ahead, future trends in EHR integration emphasize for secure sharing of coded medical data, enabling tamper-proof ledgers that enhance and while reducing fraud in claims processing.

Veterinary Medical Classifications

Veterinary medical classifications encompass systems tailored to health, adapting human-centric frameworks and developing species-specific standards to address diverse populations, from animals to . Adaptations of human classification systems for veterinary use include the Veterinary Extension of (VetSCT), an authorized formal extension launched in the that adds over 100,000 concepts relevant to animal health, such as species-specific diseases, procedures, and anatomical terms not covered in the core human-focused . This extension enables veterinarians to use standardized terminology for clinical documentation, with ongoing updates like the September 2025 production release incorporating terms commonly used in veterinary practice. Similarly, adaptations of the (ICD) have emerged, such as Vet-ICD-O-canine-1, a comparative coding system for neoplasms compatible with the human ICD-O-3.2, facilitating alignment between animal and human diagnostics. Efforts to integrate into veterinary contexts include automated coding tools like PetBERT-ICD, which classify syndromic diseases in electronic health records to support outbreak detection in companion animals. These adaptations often include veterinary subsets within SNOMED, linking animal conditions to human equivalents for zoonotic monitoring. Dedicated veterinary systems provide standalone frameworks for global animal health standardization. The (WOAH, formerly OIE) Terrestrial Animal Health Code and Aquatic Animal Health Code establish international standards for preventing disease spread, focusing on notifiable diseases like and through measures for veterinary authorities to implement health regulations and trade controls. These codes emphasize , , and , with the Terrestrial Code covering mammals and birds and the Aquatic Code addressing and pathogens. These classifications typically feature hierarchical structures organized by species, such as equine for or bovine for , allowing for precise of conditions like equine colic or within broader categories of anatomy, , and . Zoonoses are explicitly incorporated, with codes linking animal diseases to ICD equivalents—for instance, WOAH systems cross-reference pathogens like to enable alerts. This species-based hierarchy supports multi-taxa management but introduces challenges in multi-species , where varying anatomical and epidemiological differences across animals complicate uniform application and interoperability. In applications, these systems underpin and . The Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Animal Health Reporting System (NAHRS) relies on standardized codes for monthly state-level reports of confirmed reportable diseases, enabling early detection of threats like . For food safety, WOAH codes guide regulatory reporting on zoonotic risks in , ensuring in supply chains to prevent contaminants like from entering human food systems. Challenges persist in multi-species environments, such as farms with mixed herds, where inconsistent coding across hinders comprehensive and requires enhanced for veterinarians. Recent developments emphasize digital integration and interdisciplinary links. Veterinary electronic health records (EHRs) increasingly incorporate these classifications, with software like AVImark enabling seamless coding of diagnoses, treatments, and inventories to streamline practice management and regulatory submissions. The growing focus integrates veterinary classifications with human and environmental data, as outlined in joint initiatives by the for Veterinary Informatics and Clinical and Translational programs, to track zoonotic transmissions and improve outcomes.

References

  1. [1]
    About Clinical Classifications and Coding
    Clinical Classifications are the standardised groupings of information that allow specialist Clinical Coders to translate the medical terminology used in ...
  2. [2]
    Classification overview - IHACPA
    Classifications aim to provide the health care sector with a nationally consistent method of classifying all types of patients, their treatment and associated ...
  3. [3]
    Classification of Diseases, Functioning, and Disability - CDC
    Jun 7, 2024 · ICD-10 is used to code and classify disease, injury, and death information. It is made up of several coding systems that standardize medical ...ICD-10-CM · ICD-10 · Site Index · ICF
  4. [4]
    International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
    ICD serves a broad range of uses globally and provides critical knowledge on the extent, causes and consequences of human disease and death worldwide.
  5. [5]
    CPT® (Current Procedural Terminology) | CPT® Codes | AMA
    Review the criteria for CPT® Category I, Category II and Category III codes, access applications and read frequently asked questions.CPT Codes · CPT coding resources · CPT® Books & Products · CPT Smart App
  6. [6]
    Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) - CMS
    A standardized coding system that is used primarily to identify products, supplies, and services not included in the CPT® codes.HCPCS Quarterly Update · HCPCS Level II Public Meetings · HCPCS (Level II)
  7. [7]
    What is SNOMED CT
    SNOMED CT supports the development of comprehensive high-quality clinical content in electronic health records.
  8. [8]
    International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
    ICF is a classification of health and health-related domains, including environmental factors, and is the WHO framework for measuring health and disability.ICF practical manual (draft) · ICF Beginner's Guide · ICF Checklist
  9. [9]
    Home - Healthcare Classifications and Terminologies
    Feb 28, 2023 · A classification arranges terms according to established criteria into groups or categories. A terminology represents a set of terms that are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    https://www.aapc.com/resources/what-is-medical-coding
  11. [11]
    Classifications - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Classifications ensure health data is consistent, and enable governments, researchers, and the health care sector to exchange health data with each other.International Classification of... · Other Classifications · Data collection tools
  12. [12]
    [PDF] World Health Organization Family of International Classifications 2018
    • Classification: 'an exhaustive set of mutually exclusive categories to aggregate ... • each classification should have a hierarchical and/or multi-axial ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] World Health Organization Family of International Classifications
    ISO 17115 defines a classification as 'an exhaustive set of mutually exclusive categories to aggregate data at a pre-prescribed level of specialization for a.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] History of the development of the ICD
    ... François Bossier de Lacroix (1706-1777), better known as Sauvages, with the first attempt to classify diseases systematically (10). Sauvages' comprehensive ...
  15. [15]
    Vital Statistics: William Farr and the Creation of a System
    His standard classification of disease by diagnosis provided the basis for comparisons of mortality trends at local, national, and ultimately, at the ...
  16. [16]
    Historical development of the statistical classification of causes of ...
    International mortality classification using ILCD was introduced in 1893 to monitor the causes of death, with five revisions implemented between 1900 and 1938 ( ...
  17. [17]
    WHO Family of International Classifications Network
    The WHO-FIC Network, a network of WHO Collaborating Centres, NGOs, and selected experts, has been established since 1970 to support WHO's work on international ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] History of the statistical classification of diseases and causes ... - CDC
    Bertillon led the preparations for the initial decennial revisions of the International Lists of Causes of Death. Many others have contributed to preparatory ...
  19. [19]
    ICD-9 to ICD-10: Evolution, Revolution, and Current Debates in the ...
    As a result of this work, ICD-10, published in 1990, included significantly more codes and categories: while ICD-9 had only about 17,000 codes, ICD-10 included ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] In Further Pursuit of Excellence - College of American Pathologists
    SNOMED® CT was published in 2002 with the promise of serving a broader health care community, leveraging the clinical medicine coverage of the Read Codes with ...
  21. [21]
    SNOMED International: Home
    A library offering access to a wide range of official SNOMED CT materials including specifications and guides. Learn more. SNOMED International determines ...What is SNOMED CT · Use SNOMED CT · Snomed Ct · Our Members
  22. [22]
    Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects
    Jun 19, 2019 · In this review, we discuss about the basics of big data including its management, analysis and future prospects especially in healthcare sector.<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] World Health Organization Family of International Classifications 2021
    Since 1970 WHO has worked in partnership with its Network for the Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC), which includes Collaborating Centres, non- ...
  24. [24]
    List of Official ICD-10 updates - World Health Organization (WHO)
    The Official Updates to the published volumes of ICD-10 are available as annual lists of changes. The lists indicate the source of recommendation and ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  25. [25]
    Mapping SNOMED CT to ICD-10 - PubMed
    A collaboration between the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO®) and the World Health Organization (WHO) has ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related ...
    More than 100 countries use the system to report mortality data, a primary indicator of health status. About 70% of the world's health expenditures (USD ...
  27. [27]
    The application of the International Statistical Classification of ...
    The `Bertillon classification of causes of death', as it was at first called, received general approval and was adopted by several countries. It was revised ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    ICD-11 2024 release - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Feb 8, 2024 · Multilingual support: Embracing the World Health Organization's mission for global inclusivity, ICD-11 ICD-11 is now available 10 languages.
  29. [29]
    Facilitators and challenges to ICD-11 implementation: a qualitative ...
    Aug 21, 2025 · This study closes a significant gap and addresses the needs related to the ICD-11 implementation. Using qualitative research techniques (such as ...
  30. [30]
    ICD-10-CM | Classification of Diseases, Functioning, and Disability
    Jun 7, 2024 · ICD-10-CM—the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification—is used to code and classify medical diagnoses ...CDC ICD Tool · ICD-10-CM Files · Coding Guidelines · Site Index
  31. [31]
    CDCICD910CMDiagnosisCodes vs ... - HL7 FHIR Specification
    Feb 17, 2025 · WHO has authorized the development of an adaptation of ICD-9 and ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM for use in the United States for U.S. ...
  32. [32]
    ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS - IHACPA
    May 29, 2025 · ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS is used for all admitted episodes of care including acute, newborn, mental health, subacute and non-acute care.Missing: ACCD | Show results with:ACCD
  33. [33]
    ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Twelfth Edition | Resources - IHACPA
    Sep 15, 2023 · ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Twelfth Edition supersedes ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Eleventh Edition and is applicable for separations between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2025.Missing: ACCD | Show results with:ACCD
  34. [34]
    Codes, Classifications, and Terminologies
    Learn more about how CIHI develops classifications to collect, analyze and enhance the accuracy of health information in Canada.Codes, Classifications, And... · Canadian Classifications · Are You Looking For...?
  35. [35]
    Hospital Morbidity Database (HMDB) metadata | CIHI
    The HMDB is a national data holding that captures administrative, clinical and demographic information on inpatient separations from acute care hospitals.Hospital Morbidity Database... · Data Availability · ClassificationMissing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  36. [36]
    ICD-10-GM - BfArM
    ICD -10- GM is a version adapted to the specific requirements of the German health care system. In structure and design, it corresponds to the VAS (Tabular List ...
  37. [37]
    History and outlook - Adaptation steps - BfArM
    ICD -10- GM is a version of ICD -10- WHO adapted to the specific requirements of the German health care system. Until and including 2003, it was known as ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Mapping health data management systems through country visits
    Apr 28, 2023 · Semantic interoperability standards were noted to be widely used in many of the countries, including the use of ICD-10(13),. LOINC(14) and ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] IFHIMA Fosters Planning for ICD-11 Adoption with Global Case ...
    Feb 10, 2021 · Education and training initiatives for ICD-11 in developing nations will vary as a result of the challenging environment discussed above. In ...
  40. [40]
    ICD-10 - CMS
    The FY 2026 code update files are for use with discharges occurring from October 1, 2025 – September 30, 2026, and for patient encounters occurring from October ...ICD-10 Files & News Archive · ICD-10 Coordination and...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] APPENDIX M QHAPDC Standard: Clinical Coding
    ICD-10-AM and ACHI are statistical disease and intervention classifications. QHAPDC utilises these classifications as a means by which admitted patient activity ...
  42. [42]
    Better quality hospital data for identifying patients experiencing ...
    Jul 20, 2023 · Describes data to identify hospital patients experiencing homelessness and the trend in hospitalizations with recorded homelessness.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  43. [43]
    The Development, Evolution, and Modifications of ICD-10
    Aug 6, 2025 · Conclusion: The threat to the comparability of international clinical morbidity is growing with the development of many country-specific ICD-10 ...
  44. [44]
    Exploring the differences in ICD and hospital morbidity data ...
    Apr 7, 2021 · An online questionnaire was created to poll the World Health Organization (WHO) member countries that were using ICD. The survey included ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    ICD-10: History and Context - PMC - NIH
    The French physician and botanist Dr François Bossier de Sauvages de Lacroix developed a categorization of 10 distinct classes of diseases, which were further ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] ICD-11 Reference Guide - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Please refer to the reference guide for the correct use of ICD-11. (https://icdcdn.who.int/icd11referenceguide/en/html/index.html). For coding the API must be ...
  47. [47]
    International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI)
    The International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) is a common tool for reporting and analysing health interventions for clinical and statistical ...
  48. [48]
    ICD-11
    ICD-11. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. The global standard for diagnostic health information ...WHO-FIC Maintenance Platform · Coding Tool · ICD-11 Training Package · ICD-API
  49. [49]
    International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition ...
    ICD-O is a multi-axial classification of the site, morphology, behaviour, and grading of neoplasms. The topography axis uses the ICD-10 classification of ...Missing: derived | Show results with:derived
  50. [50]
    Other Classifications - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Derived classifications are extensions of the core reference classifications that allow for further depth within a particular area or setting.Missing: medical | Show results with:medical<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders
    This appendix contains a list of conditions in other chapters of ICD-10 that are often found in association with the disorders in Chapter V(F) itself. They.
  52. [52]
    International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition (ICPC-2)
    Purpose / Definition. WHO has accepted ICPC-2 within the WHO FIC mainly as a reason for encounter classification and users may use it as a classification ...
  53. [53]
    Related classifications - WHO-FIC Collaborating Centre
    ATC/DDD: The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System with Defined Daily Doses · ICPC-2: International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition.
  54. [54]
    Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification
    Drugs are classified in groups at five different levels. ATC 1st level. The system has fourteen main anatomical or pharmacological groups (1st level) ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] ICPC-3 User Manual
    These are explained in Chapter 4 of the book: ICPC-3 Manual and Classification. General rules for coding health problems and non-disease related care episodes.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] family of international classifications network annual meeting 2024
    Oct 18, 2024 · Mapping ICPC-3 to ICD-11. 306 ICPC-3 entities were mapped: • 246 ICPC-3 entities (80%) have a exact ICD-11 match. • 24 ICPC-3 entities (8%) have ...
  57. [57]
    About DSM-5-TR - American Psychiatric Association
    DSM-5-TR includes a new diagnosis, prolonged grief disorder and new symptom codes that allow clinicians to indicate the presence or history of suicidal behavior ...Search · On This Page · Diagnostic Criteria Sets
  58. [58]
    The Conceptual Development of DSM-V - Psychiatry Online
    Jun 1, 2009 · The only dimensional component of DSM-IV is axis V, which mixes both symptoms and functional impairment for a Global Assessment of Functioning ...Information & Authors · Metrics & Citations · Footnotes
  59. [59]
    Medical Subject Headings - Home Page - National Library of Medicine
    MeSH is a controlled, hierarchically-organized vocabulary used for indexing, cataloging, and searching biomedical and health-related information.MeSH for Authors · Medical Subject Headings RDF · Download MeSH Data
  60. [60]
    Introduction to MeSH - National Library of Medicine - NIH
    MeSH is a Medical Subject Headings thesaurus, including its use, structure, and data availability. It is accessed via the MeSH Browser.
  61. [61]
    What is the DSM? - Psychiatry.org
    The DSM® is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders® . The latest edition is DSM-5-TR® (Fifth Edition, Text Revision), published in 2022.Dsm Overview · How Dsm-5-Tr Was Developed · Dsm History: Development Of...
  62. [62]
    Dimensional models of personality disorders - PubMed Central - NIH
    Categorical models of personality disorders have been beneficial throughout psychiatric history, providing a mechanism for organizing and communicating research ...
  63. [63]
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028270/
  64. [64]
    Cultural inroads in DSM-5 - PMC - NIH
    Oct 1, 2014 · A lot has been said and written about the relevance of well-conceived cultural concepts in the diagnostic assessment of all kinds of patients.
  65. [65]
    THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR CULTURAL AND SOCIAL BIAS IN DSM ...
    Apr 8, 2011 · These criteria, such as hazardous use, carry a strong potential for cultural and/or social bias, which will certainly affect this new DSM‐V ...
  66. [66]
    2024 update of the RECOVER-adult Long COVID research index
    The 2024 LC research index for adults builds on the 2023 index with additional data and symptoms to help researchers classify symptomatic LC and its symptom ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  67. [67]
    CPT® overview and code approval | American Medical Association
    The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes offer doctors and health care professionals a uniform language for coding medical services and procedures.What is a CPT® code? · Types of CPT · How are CPT codes created...
  68. [68]
    Clinical Classifications - NHS England Digital
    Apr 10, 2025 · OPCS-4 is used to classify interventions and surgical procedures, while ICD-10 is used to classify diseases and other health conditions.
  69. [69]
    CPT® Codes - American Medical Association
    Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes provide a uniform nomenclature for coding medical procedures and services.CPT coding resources · CPT® licensing frequently... · Catalog of Topics
  70. [70]
    DAPB0084: OPCS Classification of Interventions and Procedures
    OPCS-4 is a statistical classification for clinical coding of hospital interventions and procedures undertaken by the NHS.
  71. [71]
    Current Procedural Terminology: History, Structure, and ... - NIH
    Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) is a set of standard terms and descriptors to document medical procedures, created by the AMA in 1966.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] National Clinical Coding Standards OPCS-4 (2024)
    The UK OPCS Classification of Interventions and Procedures (OPCS-4) was developed for use in the collection of intervention and surgical procedure information.
  73. [73]
    https://classbrowser.nhs.uk/ref_books/OPCS-4.10_NCCS-2024.pdf
  74. [74]
    How to Link SNOMED CT Procedure and WHO International ...
    We present ICHI coding structure, ISO 1828 CAST standard for surgical procedures and SNOMED CT procedures hierarchy concept model and their relations.
  75. [75]
    List of CPT/HCPCS Codes - CMS
    We maintain and annually update a List of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Codes (the Code List)
  76. [76]
    National Drug Code Database Background Information - FDA
    Mar 20, 2017 · Drug products are identified and reported using a unique, three-segment number, called the National Drug Code (NDC), which is a universal product identifier ...
  77. [77]
    National Drug File Reference Terminology (NDF-RT)
    NDF-RT is used for modeling drug characteristics including ingredients, chemical structure, dose form, physiologic effect, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics ...
  78. [78]
    RxNorm Overview - National Library of Medicine - NIH
    This overview is intended to give new users a general idea of the purpose and structure of RxNorm. The RxNorm Technical Documentation contains a ...
  79. [79]
    None
    ### Summary of MED-RT as Successor to NDF-RT, Timeline, and Integration with Ontologies
  80. [80]
    Applications of the ATC/DDD methodology
    - Pharmacovigilance: The ATC classification can be used in the monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) as the system helps to link ADRs to drug classes.
  81. [81]
    Overcoming Challenges to Evaluating Bioequivalence in Complex ...
    Feb 5, 2019 · The scientific challenges associated with demonstrating bioequivalence with these types of medications are among the reasons that generic drug ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
  82. [82]
    Home - GMDN
    The GMDN Agency is responsible for the Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) used to name and group medical devices.Help · Global Medical Device... · Using GMDN · Membership type comparison
  83. [83]
    Using GMDN
    All registered GMDN members can access the GMDN Database which currently has almost 25000 GMDN Term Names which group your medical devices.
  84. [84]
    Classify Your Medical Device | FDA
    Feb 7, 2020 · Class I includes devices with the lowest risk and Class III includes those with the greatest risk. As indicated above all classes of devices as ...510(k) Exemptions · Device Classification Panels · Overview of Device Regulation
  85. [85]
    Device Classification Panels - FDA
    Aug 31, 2018 · Most medical devices can be classified by finding the matching description of the device in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] MDCG 2021-24 Guidance on classification of medical devices
    This section is aimed at presenting definitions and terms useful for the application of the classification principles and rules. 3.1 Basic terms and definitions.Missing: hierarchy | Show results with:hierarchy<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Using Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) terms for ...
    Oct 1, 2021 · GMDN terms are made up of a five (5)-digit numeric code, a term name and a definition.Missing: format structure
  88. [88]
    UDI Basics - FDA
    Aug 17, 2022 · Device identifier (DI), a mandatory, fixed portion of a UDI that identifies the labeler and the specific version or model of a device.Am I a device labeler? · Understanding the UDI format
  89. [89]
    Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices - FDA
    Jul 10, 2025 · The AI-Enabled Medical Device List is a resource intended to identify AI-enabled medical devices that are authorized for marketing in the United ...
  90. [90]
    Overview of Device Regulation - FDA
    Jan 31, 2024 · Medical devices are classified into Class I, II, and III. Regulatory control increases from Class I to Class III. The device classification ...<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    [PDF] IMDRF/SaMD WG/N12FINAL:2014
    Sep 18, 2014 · The term “Software as a Medical Device” (SaMD) is defined as software intended to be used for one or more medical purposes that perform these ...
  92. [92]
    Clinical coding – SNOMED CT - NHS England
    SNOMED CT was created in 1999 by combining the SNOMED Reference Terminology (SNOMED RT, College of American Pathologists) and the NHS Clinical Terms Version 3 ( ...Missing: origins 1960s 2002
  93. [93]
    SNOMED CT - Digital Healthcare Research
    SNOMED CT is the most comprehensive clinical vocabulary in English (or any language), covering most aspects of clinical medicine.
  94. [94]
    2025 SNOMED International Products and Services Catalog - Issuu
    Feb 28, 2025 · SNOMED CT is the most comprehensive, multilingual, clinical health terminology in the world, containing over 370,000 active concepts. Developed ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    Our releases - SNOMED International
    The SNOMED CT International Edition is released monthly on the first of each month. View our annual release schedule.
  96. [96]
    SNOMED CT United States Edition - National Library of Medicine
    The SNOMED CT United States (US) Edition is the official source of SNOMED CT for use in US healthcare systems.
  97. [97]
    Licensing SNOMED CT - National Library of Medicine
    However, there is no limit on the number of individual licenses from an organization. I would like to use SNOMED CT in a Non-Member Country/Territory. What ...Missing: complexity | Show results with:complexity
  98. [98]
    Overview of SNOMED CT - National Library of Medicine
    Oct 14, 2016 · SNOMED CT originated from the Systematized Nomenclature of Pathology (SNOP), published by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to ...
  99. [99]
    Natural language processing | Implementation
    Clinical NLP, using SNOMED CT's concepts, descriptions, and relationships, may be applied to repositories of clinical information to search, index, selectively ...
  100. [100]
    A State-of-the Art Review of SNOMED CT Terminology Binding and ...
    Sep 28, 2021 · SNOMED CT is a complex terminology, more so than many of the alternatives. This complexity makes it possible to cater for diverse and ...
  101. [101]
    ICD-11 - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Feb 10, 2022 · New supplementary chapters and sections permit the assessment of functioning, and the optional recording of traditional medicine diagnoses.
  102. [102]
    https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/icd-11
  103. [103]
    https://icd.who.int/browse10/2019/en#/E11
  104. [104]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  105. [105]
    Resources - World Health Organization (WHO)
    This document describes WHO methods to compute national, regional and global causes of death, including methods for ill-defined (garbage) codes and completeness ...
  106. [106]
    Traditional medicine - World Health Organization (WHO)
    As a tool for counting and comparing Traditional Medicine conditions the Traditional Medicine Chapter of ICD-11 can provide the means for doing research and ...Missing: enhancements layer
  107. [107]
    What is the difference between a classification such as ICD-10 or ...
    Jul 9, 2020 · Compared to a classification, where elements are grouped into limited categories, SNOMED CT is large and comprehensive but can be broken down ...
  108. [108]
    a comparison between ICD-10 and SNOMED CT - PubMed
    Results: The chapter level comparison between ICD-10 and SNOMED CT showed minor differences except for infectious and digestive system disorders.
  109. [109]
    SNOMED CT to ICD-10-CM Map - National Library of Medicine
    The purpose of the SNOMED CT to ICD-10-CM map (herein referred to as "the Map") is to support semi-automated generation of ICD-10-CM codes from clinical data ...
  110. [110]
    SNOMED CT maps
    SNOMED International creates maps from SNOMED CT to other code systems, classifications or terminologies to support our Members and other stakeholders.
  111. [111]
    A Comparison between a SNOMED CT Problem List and the ICD-10 ...
    Overall only 6.0 percent of the concepts in the subset of SNOMED CT problems could not be matched to the ICD-10-CM/PCS code set in some fashion (see Table 1).
  112. [112]
    Terminology Maps - HL7 FHIR Specification
    The output of terminology mapping is a Terminology Map. This can be realized using multiple formats, including the FHIR ConceptMap resource. The same concept(s) ...
  113. [113]
    Epic - SNOMED International
    SNOMED CT-enabled solutions ... We use SNOMED as reference terminology to enable clinical decision support, reporting and patient population grouping.
  114. [114]
    Epic - SNOMED CT Document Library
    Sep 16, 2025 · This SNOMED CT encoding creates powerful possibilities within Epic's decision support and reporting facilities. Decision Support. The Epic ...
  115. [115]
    HL7 FHIR with SNOMED-CT to Achieve Semantic and Structural ...
    We successfully achieved structural interoperability and enhanced data quality with HL7 FHIR resource profiling and semantic interoperability with SNOMED-CT ...
  116. [116]
    US Core Condition Encounter Diagnosis Profile
    This profile meets the requirements of the U.S. Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) Encounter Diagnosis Data Element. It sets minimum expectations for the ...
  117. [117]
    Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability: Certification Program ...
    Jan 9, 2024 · ... U.S. Edition code set. ONC worked closely with HL7 Structured Documents and US Core teams to update the US Core Implementation Guide and the ...
  118. [118]
    Leveraging EHR Data for Predictive Analytics in Population Health ...
    A key benefit of EHRs is their ability to integrate data from diverse sources—primary care providers, specialists, hospitals, and laboratories. This integration ...
  119. [119]
    https://www.healthrise.com/insights/leveraging-ehr-data-for-predictive-analytics/
  120. [120]
    Promoting Interoperability Programs - CMS
    This change moved the programs beyond the existing requirements of meaningful use to a new phase of EHR measurement with an increased focus on interoperability ...
  121. [121]
    Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another - NIH
    Identified challenges include financial burdens, personnel resources, patient safety threats from limited access to legacy records, data integrity during ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Challenges in Archetypes Terminology Binding Using SNOMED-CT ...
    Archetypes terminology binding is a complex, time- consuming task. Such task is even more challenging when the terminology used is an ontology-based ...
  123. [123]
    Real world challenges in maintaining data integrity in electronic ...
    Fifteen percent of the reviewed EHR charts contains documentation errors related to cancer diagnosis and treatments.
  124. [124]
    Key Trends in Medical Coding for 2025 & Beyond - CombineHealth
    Blockchain technology is emerging as a transformative force in medical coding by enhancing data security, transparency, and interoperability across healthcare ...
  125. [125]
    Toward blockchain based electronic health record management with ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · ... real-time. By 2025, it is projected that electronic storage will encompass at least 15% of patient medical records, marking a 110% increase ...
  126. [126]
    UMLS - SNOMEDCT_VET - Synopsis - National Library of Medicine
    VetSCT is an authorized, formal extension to SNOMED CT which provides content of veterinary importance as well as terms (descriptions) used by veterinarians.
  127. [127]
    VetSCT|VTS - Veterinary Extension of SNOMED CT - Virginia Tech
    The Veterinary Extension of SNOMED CT (VetSCT) is being developed and maintained in order to extend SNOMED CT with additional animal-specific content.
  128. [128]
    September 2025 Veterinary Extension to SNOMED CT package ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · It contains content of veterinary importance as well as terms (descriptions) used by veterinarians that are not commonly used in human health.
  129. [129]
    Services unavailable 24+ hours starting 9 PM EDT. Learn more.
    Mar 16, 2022 · The GIVCS group have developed a comparative coding system for canine neoplasms—Vet-ICD-O-canine-1—compatible with the human ICD-O-3.2 and ...
  130. [130]
    PetBERT: automated ICD-11 disease coding for outbreak detection
    Oct 21, 2023 · Integrating the ICD framework into veterinary medicine, with a specific focus on monitoring the companion animal population for variations in ...
  131. [131]
    (PDF) PetBERT: automated ICD-11 syndromic disease coding for ...
    Oct 17, 2023 · PetBERT-ICD effectively identifies disease outbreaks, outperforming current clinician-assigned point-of-care labelling strategies up to 3 weeks ...<|separator|>
  132. [132]
    Codes and Manuals - WOAH - World Organisation for Animal Health
    Our Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Health Codes provide standards for the improvement of animal health and welfare and veterinary public health worldwide.
  133. [133]
    [PDF] OIE Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Health Code
    What is in the Codes? Recommend measures to be used by Veterinary. Authorities or other Competent Authorities. • to establish health regulations for ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] AVMA Guidelines for the Humane Slaughter of Animals: 2024 Edition
    Terrestrial animal health code. 28th ed. World Organisa- tion for Animal Health; 2019. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do ...<|separator|>
  135. [135]
    [PDF] National Aquatic Animal Health Plan for the United States
    Aug 18, 2008 · Aquatic Animal Health Code and the OIE Diagnostic Manual for Aquatic Animals. ... aquatic animal issues are developed in the AVMA's Aquatic ...Missing: nomenclature | Show results with:nomenclature
  136. [136]
    Veterinary Extension of SNOMED CT
    The Veterinary Extension of SNOMED CT (VetSCT) facilitates the fast and accurate sharing of data between federal, state, and university-associated animal health ...Missing: ICD adaptations
  137. [137]
    [PDF] The OIE Ad Hoc Group on animal health data codification system ...
    Jan 12, 2021 · - Cross-reference with existing information systems where applicable (e.g., ICD to allow specific human public health alert-coding human cases ...
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Challenges of animal health information systems and surveillance ...
    The effective containment and control of epidemic diseases depends on early notifica- tion of disease events or outbreaks, and the capacity to forecast the ...
  139. [139]
    National Animal Health Reporting System - usda aphis
    Under NAHRS, participating State animal health officials report monthly on the occurrence of confirmed NAHRS-reportable diseases and other diseases of interest ...Missing: safety challenges multi- coding
  140. [140]
    5 Detection, Data Collection, and Reporting | Emerging Animal ...
    There are various surveillance programs at the state level, including the National Animal Health Reporting System (NAHRS), she noted. State veterinary ...
  141. [141]
    Avimark Vet Appointment Scheduling Software - Covetrus.com
    Integrate vRxPro and Avimark to save time managing medical histories and inventory, limit paperwork, and reduce prescription delays. Digital prescriptions.Missing: One classifications