Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Merensky Reef

The Merensky Reef is a thin, layered formation within the Bushveld Complex, a large mafic-ultramafic intrusion in , renowned as one of the world's richest sources of elements (PGEs). It consists primarily of melanoritic to orthopyroxenitic rocks bearing sulphides and , forming continuous layers typically a few centimeters to a few meters thick, enriched in PGEs including (Pt), palladium (Pd), rhodium (Rh), ruthenium (Ru), iridium (Ir), and osmium (Os), along with associated , , and . Discovered in 1924 by prospector A.F. Lombaard and Hans Merensky on the farm Maandagshoek in the eastern Bushveld Complex, it was named after Merensky and quickly recognized for its economic potential, with initial commercial mining commencing in 1929 at the Rustenburg Platinum Mines. Geologically, the reef occurs near the top of the Upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex's Layered Suite, formed through cyclic influxes of fresh into a crystallizing chamber, leading to in situ crystallization and the development of -enriched layers draped over irregular features like potholes. It can be traced laterally for over 280 kilometers around the complex, primarily in the eastern and western limbs, with thicknesses averaging about 1 meter and average grades of around 7 grams per , though grades are often highest in the thinnest sections. The mineralization is hosted in discrete minerals such as laurite, braggite, and cooperite, interstitial to thin chromitite layers within pegmatoidal feldspathic . Economically, the Merensky Reef accounts for a significant portion of global supply, with known reserves (as of 2010) including approximately 4,600 tonnes of , 3,200 tonnes of , and 800 tonnes of , supporting production that has historically provided about 75% of the world's prior to the expansion of UG2 Reef mining in the 1990s. Large-scale expanded in the due to rising demand for PGEs in autocatalysts and other industrial applications, and operations continue at depths exceeding 2 kilometers in major mines like those operated by and . Challenges include geological irregularities like potholes that disrupt continuity and increase complexity, but the reef remains a of South Africa's , which dominates global PGE output.

Geological Context

Location and Extent

The Merensky Reef is situated within the Bushveld Igneous Complex, spanning the North West, Limpopo, Gauteng, and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa. It was discovered in August 1924 on the farm Maandagshoek, located approximately 20 km west of Burgersfort in the eastern limb of the complex. This site, at roughly 24°40′S 30°20′E, marks the initial identification of the reef's platiniferous layer during stream sediment prospecting. The reef constitutes a persistent layer within the Upper Critical Zone of the , typically around 1 m thick (ranging from a few centimeters to several meters) and bounded by thin chromitite seams. It extends over a strike length exceeding 280 km across the eastern and western limbs, with each limb encompassing about 140 km. Regional variations in thickness occur, ranging from less than 1 cm to up to 14 m in places, influenced by local structural features. The reef's strike direction and dip vary by limb: in the western limb, it generally dips at an average of 9° northward, while in the eastern limb, the dip averages 10° southward. These geometric characteristics contribute to its extensive mappable distribution, though mining operations primarily exploit segments in the western and eastern limbs.

Relation to Bushveld Igneous Complex

The (BIC) is a layered mafic-ultramafic intrusion emplaced approximately 2.06 billion years ago, representing one of the largest known igneous bodies on with an exposed surface area exceeding 66,000 km² and a thickness of up to 9 km. It formed through the repeated injection of mantle-derived magmas into the upper crust, resulting in a well-differentiated sequence of cumulate rocks characterized by rhythmic layering due to fractional processes. The complex's vast scale and mineral richness make it a critical site for understanding ancient magmatic systems and ore formation. The Merensky Reef occupies a specific stratigraphic position within the BIC's Rustenburg Layered Suite, located in the Upper Critical Zone, which is part of the broader Critical Zone subdivision. It lies above the UG2 chromitite layer and below the Bastard Reef, forming a thin, laterally extensive horizon typically encountered at depths of around 1,800 m from the complex's roof. The overall stratigraphic sequence of the BIC progresses from the basal Marginal Zone through the Lower Zone (ultramafic-dominated), the Critical Zone (with its subdivided Lower and Upper parts hosting the Merensky Reef), the Main Zone (gabbroic rocks), and culminating in the Upper Zone (more evolved components). This layering reflects sequential magma replenishment and differentiation within a large crustal . Tectonically, the intruded into the , a stable block in , during a period of intraplate driven by activity around 2.06 Ga. The plume-induced upwelling likely triggered widespread decompression melting in the , leading to the emplacement of voluminous magmas that ponded beneath the Transvaal Supergroup sedimentary cover. This setting preserved the complex's internal structures despite subsequent erosion and tectonic tilting.

Petrology and Composition

Mineral and Rock Types

The Merensky Reef is primarily composed of ultramafic to cumulate rocks, including , chromitite, , leuconorite, and melanorite, which exhibit modal layering characteristic of the . dominates the central and hanging-wall portions, consisting mainly of orthopyroxene with subordinate , while chromitite forms thin seams at the base and top of the reef, rich in chromite crystals. occurs as a distinct layer in the footwall, with comprising up to 95% of the rock, and leuconorite represents a more balanced mixture in the underlying sequence, typically featuring 60-70% and 25-30% orthopyroxene. Melanorite appears locally as darker, pyroxene-enriched variants interlayered within these units. The primary minerals include , which forms subhedral cumulus grains and dominates in anorthositic and leuconoritic rocks, and orthopyroxene, which occurs as coarse oikocrysts enclosing in and melanorite. is concentrated in the chromitite seams, appearing as blocky or amoeboidal crystals disseminated within a matrix of and orthopyroxene. Sulfide minerals, such as , , and , are disseminated throughout the reef, particularly associated with the chromitite layers and pegmatoidal zones. Accessory minerals are sparse but economically significant, with platinum-group minerals (PGMs) occurring as discrete grains or alloys, including isoferroplatinum and laurite, often enclosed in silicates or sulfides. Other PGMs, such as cooperite and moncheite, form subhedral grains up to 100 μm in size within spaces. The rocks display adcumulate to mesocumulate textures, with orthopyroxene oikocrysts poikilitically enclosing , and modal variations across the reef show upward grading from pyroxene-rich bases to plagioclase-enriched tops. These textural features reflect gravitational settling and compaction during crystallization, influencing mineral distribution along the layered sequence.

Layer Structure

The Merensky Reef exhibits a distinctive layered consisting of five primary units, from bottom to top: a footwall typically of mottled or , a lower chromitite seam, a central pegmatoid, an upper chromitite seam, and a hangingwall of . The footwall forms the basal contact, typically a medium- to coarse-grained noritic rock that underlies the reef sequence. The lower chromitite seam directly overlies this, followed by the pegmatoid, which is the dominant economic layer comprising coarse-grained, feldspathic or . The upper chromitite seam caps the pegmatoid, and the hangingwall , which may include minor anorthositic layers, immediately succeeds it. The total thickness of the reef varies typically between 30 cm and 1.5 m (averaging about 1 m), though it can exceed 3 m in thicker sections influenced by geological structures, with the chromitite seams typically measuring 1-2 cm thick and the pegmatoid reaching up to 1 m, while the hangingwall ranges from 0 to 30 cm. These variations occur regionally, influenced by local magmatic conditions during formation. Boundaries between layers are generally sharp, particularly at the interfaces of the chromitite seams with the adjacent silicate rocks, where chromite enrichment is pronounced, forming distinct seams that delineate the reef's economic horizons. Laterally, the reef demonstrates excellent continuity along strike over hundreds of kilometers within the Bushveld Complex, though it exhibits pinch-and-swell features, especially in association with pothole structures that cause localized thinning or thickening.

Chemical Composition

The Merensky Reef exhibits a characteristic whole-rock major composition typical of layered intrusions, with SiO₂ ranging from 50 to 55 wt%, MgO from 10 to 15 wt%, and Al₂O₃ from 15 to 20 wt%; TiO₂ remains low at less than 0.5 wt%. These values reflect the predominance of orthopyroxene, , and minor in the reef's assemblage, with variations attributable to the relative proportions of and facies. Platinum-group element (PGE) concentrations in the Merensky Reef are economically significant, totaling 3 to 10 , with at approximately 3 to 6 g/t, at 1 to 2 g/t, and at 0.1 to 0.3 g/t across different limbs of the Bushveld Complex. () accompanies the PGE at 0.5 to 1 g/t, while base metals include at 0.1 to 0.2 wt% and at 0.05 to 0.1 wt%. These concentrations vary regionally, with higher values in the Western Limb (e.g., up to 4.46 g/t) compared to the Eastern Limb ( around 2.36 g/t). Trace elements in the reef show elevations consistent with magmatic differentiation and sulfide segregation, including at 500 to 2000 ppm, at 0.5 to 1 wt%, and chalcophile elements such as , , and As. Chromium enrichment derives primarily from cumulus , while sulfur and associated elements are linked to disseminated sulfides like and . Isotopic signatures indicate a mantle-derived parental magma with crustal contamination, as evidenced by initial ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios of approximately 0.707. These values, averaging around 0.7065 but reaching up to 0.7068 in the reef proper, reflect interaction between primitive melts and evolved components during crystallization. Layer-specific variations occur within the reef, with the basal pyroxenite showing higher MgO and PGE enrichment relative to the overlying norite.
ComponentTypical Range/Value
Major Oxides (wt%)SiO₂: 50–55
MgO: 10–15
Al₂O₃: 15–20
TiO₂: <0.5
PGE (g/t)Total: 3–10
Pt: 3–6
Pd: 1–2
Rh: 0.1–0.3
Associated Metals (wt% or g/t)Au: 0.5–1
: 0.1–0.2
: 0.05–0.1
Trace Elements: 500–2000 ppm
S: 0.5–1 wt%
Se, Te, As: elevated
Isotopes⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Srᵢ: ~0.707

Formation Processes

Crystallization Mechanisms

The Merensky Reef forms as a layered cumulate deposit within the through at the interface between the resident and the crystal mush on the chamber floor. In this process, minerals nucleate and grow directly on the chamber floor, building stratified layers over time. This mechanism is characteristic of ultramafic-mafic intrusions and explains the rhythmic layering observed in the reef. The crystallization sequence begins with the early precipitation of orthopyroxene and , which form first due to their in the primitive . As proceeds, joins the assemblage, followed by the crystallization of intercumulus liquids that fill the interstices between cumulus grains. This progression reflects decreasing temperature and evolving melt composition in the . Convection within the plays a role by promoting efficient mixing and , which sustains and growth at the . Additionally, compaction of the developing mush expels excess intercumulus , enhancing the and consolidation of the layers while contributing to the sharpness of contacts between units. These dynamic processes ensure uniform layer development across the extensive extent. Textural supports this model, with the exhibiting a from adcumulate fabrics—characterized by minimal trapped melt and tightly packed cumulus crystals—to mesocumulate textures showing moderate post-cumulus growth. Trapped melt fractions typically range from 5-10%, as inferred from incompatible abundances and modal proportions, indicating efficient drainage during accumulation.

Origin Theories

The origin of the Merensky Reef and its exceptional enrichment in has been a subject of intense debate among geologists, with multiple competing models proposed to explain the formation of its distinctive seams and associated mineralization. Early theories emphasized gravitational settling of crystals from hybrid magmas, but more recent interpretations favor crystallization processes driven by open-system dynamics in the . These models highlight the role of magma chamber replenishment, where influxes of primitive magma interact with resident differentiated melts, leading to and precipitation of and at the crystal-mush interface. PGE enrichment is generally attributed to high ratios of melt to liquid (R factors) during these events, allowing efficient partitioning of PGE into and subsequent exsolution into discrete grains. One foundational model, often referred to as the chromitite seam model, posits that PGE concentrations formed at crystal-liquid interfaces through magma mixing-induced supercooling, promoting the nucleation and growth of layers in . In this scenario, replenishing magmas of contrasting composition and temperature mix with evolved resident magma, causing rapid undercooling that triggers heterogeneous nucleation of on pre-existing crystals or interfaces, followed by attachment of PGE-bearing sulfides. Textural evidence, such as skeletal and dendritic morphologies at the base of the reef, supports this mechanism, indicating growth under non-equilibrium conditions rather than prolonged . This model underscores the hybrid nature of the Merensky Reef, combining elements of primary magmatic with secondary remobilization, and has been refined through studies showing that seams act as traps for immiscible sulfide droplets enriched in PGE. The inoculation theory builds on these ideas by emphasizing the introduction of foreign crystals from replenishing magmas or wall-rock contamination as catalysts for nucleation. These xenocrysts or entrained grains lower the energy barrier for chromite precipitation, initiating widespread crystallization across the chamber floor and facilitating the formation of laterally extensive seams. During chamber replenishment events, such foreign nuclei promote heterogeneous nucleation, leading to the development of the reef's characteristic thin chromitite layers and overlying pegmatoidal pyroxenites. This process is linked to PGE enrichment through enhanced sulfide immiscibility, where the influx of fresh, chalcophile-undepleted magma supplies PGE that partition into the newly formed sulfides. Evidence from isotopic discontinuities and sharp geochemical breaks at the reef level supports multiple such replenishment pulses, each contributing to layered mineralization. Post-2015 research has integrated advanced techniques like high-resolution element mapping to further elucidate these processes, revealing diverse mechanisms within the reef. Studies from 2020 demonstrate that grains exhibit patterns indicative of protracted growth, with and s concentrated along grain boundaries via late-stage or recrystallization. Chamber replenishment by fresh is invoked to explain the of footwall anorthosites and the injection of sulfide-rich melts, while sulfide liquid immiscibility drives downward migration of droplets into the forming cumulates. Roof contamination models, involving Cl-rich fluids from the chamber roof mobilizing chalcophile elements, are also considered but less dominant, as mapping shows primary magmatic signatures prevail. As of 2025, recent reviews highlight ongoing debates, with emerging models incorporating hydromagmatic processes alongside magmatic replenishment to explain pegmatoidal textures and fluid interactions. Collectively, these recent models portray the Merensky Reef as a product of dynamic, multi-stage magmatic evolution rather than a single event. In comparison to the underlying UG2 chromitite layer, the Merensky Reef exhibits a more hybrid character, incorporating both primary magmatic seams and secondary features like pegmatoidal textures from fluid interaction, whereas the UG2 is interpreted as a predominantly primary magmatic deposit formed by straightforward chromite saturation without significant hybridization. This distinction arises from the Merensky's position higher in the , where repeated replenishments amplified complexity and tenors, contrasting with the UG2's more uniform, chromite-dominated origin driven by simpler cooling and settling.

History and Exploitation

Discovery and Early Exploration

The Merensky Reef was initially identified through the efforts of farmer Andries Lombaard, who panned platinum grains from a dry riverbed on his farm Maandagshoek in , , during June 1924. Lombaard sent the sample, contained in an aspirin bottle, to geologist Hans Merensky via prospector H.C. Dunne on 7 June 1924, after chemical analysis in confirmed the presence of . Merensky, recognizing the significance of the coarser platinum grains (10–200 microns) compared to those from known chromitite layers, visited the site briefly and returned to secure funding before rejoining Lombaard on 12 August 1924 to systematically prospect the area. This work culminated in the discovery of the primary source—a thin, platiniferous layer within the eastern limb of the —during the first half of September 1924, approximately 700 yards north of the farm's southern boundary. From 1924 to 1930, Merensky led an extensive tracing campaign, employing stream sediment geochemistry through panning and chemical of alluvial concentrates to delineate the reef's extent. This approach revealed anomalies in platinum-group elements () upstream from outcrops, allowing the reef to be mapped over approximately 150 km by early 1926, primarily within pyroxenitic and noritic rocks. The method proved effective in identifying the concordant layer despite limited surface exposures, as the reef's position was inferred from detrital indicators rather than direct observation. Early assays of samples from the discovered layer confirmed exceptionally high PGE concentrations, with platinum values reaching up to 10 g/t and a Pt/Au ratio of about 12:1, distinguishing it from lower-grade chromitite sources. The deposit was initially termed the Lombaard Reef but renamed the Merensky Reef in honor of Hans Merensky's pivotal role, at Lombaard's own insistence. Prospecting faced significant hurdles due to the reef's thinness—typically 30–100 cm—and its burial at depths of several hundred meters beneath overburden, complicating direct access and economic evaluation in the pre-commercial phase.

Mining Development

The first commercial mining operations on the Merensky Reef commenced in 1926 at the Onverwacht Platinum Mine, operated by the Eastern Platinum Mines syndicate, targeting high-grade surface exposures in the eastern limb of the Bushveld Complex. These efforts yielded exceptionally rich assays, with some samples reaching up to 2,086 g/t -group metals (PGMs), but production ceased in 1929 when ore grades declined below economic thresholds amid low global demand during the . Mining activities revived in the 1930s through the formation of Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited in 1932, consolidating smaller operations in the western limb near to address falling platinum prices and enable more viable extraction. A recovery plant began processing oxidized ores in 1930, marking the shift to systematic , with full-scale production ramping up in the as wartime demand for PGMs in spurred . By this period, operations extended to depths of approximately 300–1,000 meters via vertical shafts and inclines, allowing access to the reef's consistent layering despite its shallow of 9–12 degrees. Technological progress in the mid-20th century transformed extraction methods, introducing mechanized underground with pneumatic tools and electric locomotives for transport, which improved efficiency in the reef's narrow, tabular . Selective mining techniques, such as scattered and longwall methods, were adopted to minimize dilution from hangingwall and footwall rocks, particularly in areas affected by geological disruptions like potholes, ensuring higher-grade . Production reached its historical peaks during the –1970s, driven by surging demand for PGMs in the petroleum and automotive sectors, with output expanding through additional shafts and smelters, including a second facility commissioned in 1953. By 1960, the Bushveld Complex, primarily via Merensky Reef operations, accounted for approximately 70% of global PGM supply, underscoring South Africa's dominance in the industry.

Economic and Modern Significance

The Merensky Reef remains a of global metals () production, with remaining reserves across major operations estimated in the order of hundreds of millions of tonnes at average grades of 3-7 g/t 4E/6E (as of 2025), primarily from the Merensky and associated UG2 reefs. These reserves underpin South Africa's commanding position in the PGM market, where the country supplies about 70-80% of worldwide and output, and over 50% of total PGMs, primarily from the Merensky and associated UG2 reefs. Key producers include and , which together account for a significant portion of annual PGM output from the Merensky Reef, contributing to South Africa's total production of roughly 4-5 million ounces of 6E PGMs per year. While mining has shifted toward the higher-volume UG2 reef in recent decades due to its greater accessibility and reserves, the Merensky Reef continues to be vital for its higher-grade content and remains a primary target in several operations. Recent developments from 2020 to 2025 highlight ongoing investment in the reef, exemplified by the Two Rivers Merensky Project, approved in March 2021 by and at a cost of R5.7 billion. This initiative involves underground of the Merensky Reef to produce 182,000 ounces of PGMs annually once fully ramped up; it includes construction of a dedicated concentrator and to process 50,000 tonnes of ore per month. As of 2025, due to challenging market conditions, the project has been placed on care and maintenance, with long-term prospects remaining positive pending economic viability assessment. However, operations face challenges such as increasing depths exceeding 2 kilometers, which complicate rock engineering and seismicity management, alongside periodic labor strikes that have disrupted production in the South African sector during this period. PGMs from the Merensky Reef are essential for applications including autocatalysts in (accounting for over 40% of demand), jewelry, and such as hard disk drives and capacitors. South Africa's 80% share of the global market amplifies the reef's economic significance, supporting exports worth billions and thousands of jobs, though environmental concerns like (AMD) from sulphide-rich pose ongoing risks to , prompting research into AMD reuse in ore flotation processes.

References

  1. [1]
    Merensky-type platinum deposits and a reappraisal of magma ...
    Jun 19, 2019 · The Merensky-type platinum deposits occur as thin, continuous layers of sulphide- and chromite-bearing silicate rocks anomalously enriched in ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Platinum-Group Elements in Southern Africa—Mineral Inventory and ...
    ... platinum deposits and mines of South Africa with descriptions of the principal deposits ... Merensky Reef in 1924: South African Journal of Geology, v. 102, p.
  3. [3]
    Geology of the PGE Deposits in the Bushveld Complex, South Africa
    Sep 18, 2020 · The Merensky Reef has been the world's most important platinum resource since extraction began in 1928. The Merensky Reef can be traced for more ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Seventy-fifth Anniversary of the Discovery of the Platiniferous ...
    The Merensky Reef is a thin layer of igneous rock in the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, which, with an underlying layer, the Upper Group 2.
  6. [6]
    A stream sediment geochemical re-investigation of the discovery of ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The platiniferous Merensky Reef was discovered on the farm Maandagshoek in the Bushveld Complex in August 1924. A historical review of these ...
  7. [7]
    Platinum-group Elements and Microstructures of Normal Merensky ...
    Platinum-group Elements and Microstructures of Normal Merensky Reef from Impala Platinum Mines, Bushveld Complex ... The Reef is 46 cm thick and consists from ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Results of a - UFS
    Sep 23, 2020 · The Merensky reef can be traced for a total strike extent of over. 280 km, 140 km in both the Western and Eastern limbs. The average dip of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The nature and origin of the Merensky Reef of the western Bushveld ...
    Dramatic variations in character and thickness, from a chromitite contact less than 1 cm in thickness to a 14-m-thick feldspathic pyroxenite, are evident in the ...Missing: limbs provinces
  10. [10]
    The Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex: A New Economic ...
    The Merensky Reef can be traced across the extent of the Bushveld Complex, displaying remarkable uniformity in thickness and lithology (Vermaak 1976;Leeb du ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Bushveld Large Igneous Province
    The interpretation of the extent of the northern and south-eastern limbs is based on the gravity data shown in Figure 9. J. Figure 9. Gravity map of the ...
  12. [12]
    Bushveld Complex - PorterGeo Database - Ore Deposit Description
    Jul 22, 2019 · The composite Rooiberg-Bushveld Complex is located in northern South Africa to the north of Johannesburg and Pretoria,
  13. [13]
    The Bushveld Complex; introduction and review - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · This is the preface to a special issue on various aspects of the Bushveld complex, Transvaal basin, South Africa. The geology is described ...
  14. [14]
    The Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa: Mineral ...
    Oct 23, 2025 · The pegmatoid veins pond beneath and break the upper chromitite layer, forming liquid escape features at the top contact of the Merensky Layer.
  15. [15]
    Element mapping the Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex
    The present study provides detailed element maps of several dm-sized samples of the Merensky Reef (MR) from four localities in the western Bushveld Complex ( ...
  16. [16]
    Role of Chamber Replenishment in the Formation of the Merensky ...
    The Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex represents a magmatic unconformity that some researchers attribute to chamber replenishment by relatively primitive ...
  17. [17]
    Bushveld superplume drove Proterozoic magmatism and ... - Nature
    Nov 12, 2020 · ... mantle plume under the Kaapvaal Craton at ~ 2.06 Ga. This craton had already formed a deep, buoyant and refractory lithospheric root by ~ 3 ...
  18. [18]
    Tectonic triggers for the intrusion of the Great Dyke (Zimbabwe) and ...
    Jun 14, 2025 · The Bushveld Complex is considered to be related to a diverse array of over 30 magmatic bodies, emplaced at ~2.056 Ga, which have collectively ...
  19. [19]
    Petrogenesis of the Merensky Reef in the Rustenburg section of the ...
    A petrogenetic model for the Merensky Reef in the Rustenburg section of the Bushveld Complex has been developed based on detailed field and petrographic ob.Petrogenesis Of The Merensky... · Article Pdf · Similar Content Being Viewed...
  20. [20]
    The mineralogy, petrology, and origin of the Merensky cyclic unit in ...
    Mar 2, 2017 · The Merensky pegmatoid situated at the base of the cyclic unit commonly, but not everywhere, contains the nickel, copper, and platinum-group ...
  21. [21]
    Platinum-group Element Mineralization in the Merensky Reef of the ...
    This study presents various textures of platinum group minerals (PGMs) found in the Merensky Reef in the. Limpopo mine to discuss the PGE mineralization process ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The application of modifying factors to the Merensky Reef and UG2 ...
    The chromite layers have variable thicknesses up to some 5 cm with one being thicker than the other and the other chromite layer being generally thinner or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] NORMAL REEF SUBFACIES OF THE MERENSKY REEF AT ...
    Features of the Normal Merensky Reef, Northam Platinum mine. a) Typical <160-cm-thick Merensky Normal Reef (11–. 37 1E Panel), showing the distribution of ...Missing: average | Show results with:average
  24. [24]
    The Merensky Reef in retrospect: a century of challenges ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · The Merensky Unit usually grades from the base upwards through the chromitite layer and pegmatoidal feldspathic orthopyroxenite/harzburgite ...
  25. [25]
    Geochemistry of the Merensky reef, Rustenburg Section, Bushveld ...
    Whole rocks were analysed for major and trace elements by. XRFS and orthopyroxene and plagioclase compositions were de- termined on mineral separates to provide ...Missing: oxides | Show results with:oxides
  26. [26]
    Geochemistry of the Merensky reef, Rustenburg Section, Bushveld ...
    The Merensky reef is a primary source of platinum-group elements (PGE) and Au, Cu, Ni, Co. Geochemical variations in the reef indicate complex processes ...
  27. [27]
    Trace Element and Platinum Group Element Distributions and the ...
    The Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex is one of the world's largest resources of platinum group elements (PGE); however, mechanisms for its formation remain ...
  28. [28]
    The Merensky-Bastard interval at Hackney, eastern Bushveld Complex
    Jun 24, 2024 · The lower Merensky Reef chromitite stringer (at depth – 1.69 m) has an irregular thickness (± 1 to 15 mm) with chromite occurring almost ...
  29. [29]
    Merensky-type platinum deposits and a reappraisal of magma ...
    Jun 19, 2019 · The Merensky-type platinum deposits occur as thin, continuous layers of sulphide- and chromite-bearing silicate rocks anomalously enriched in ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] MINERAL CHEMISTRY OF MERENSKY REEF ... - CORE
    crystallization of pyroxene and activity of Al2O3 ... layers which display TiO2 wt% values of above 1.5. ... Merensky Reef based on microstructural observations, ...
  31. [31]
    Field Evidence for the In Situ Crystallization of the Merensky Reef
    Jul 10, 2015 · The Merensky Reef (MR) in the Bushveld Complex has been variously interpreted as resulting from: magma mixing followed by gravitational settling ...Missing: mesocumulate | Show results with:mesocumulate
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    The discovery of the platiniferous Merensky Reef in 1924
    This special issue of the South African Journal of Geology commemorates the discovery, 75 years ago, of the largest platinum reserve in the world.
  37. [37]
    A stream sediment geochemical re-investigation of the discovery of ...
    The platiniferous Merensky Reef was discovered on the farm Maandagshoek in the Bushveld Complex in August 1924. A historical review of these events is ...Missing: extent provinces South Africa thickness length strike limbs
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Platinum-Group Elements in Sulphide Minerals ... - Oxford Academic
    The concentrations of platinum-group elements (PGE), Co, Re, Au and Ag have been determined in the base-metal sulphide (BMS) of a section of the Merensky Reef.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] History of Geological Endeavours along the Eastern Lobe ... - Ammsa
    During June 1924 a certain Andries Lombard panned native platinum from stream sediments on his farm Maandagshoek. The samples were sent to Hans Merensky who had ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] A BRIEF HISTORY OF PLATINUM MINING WITH A FOCUS ON THE ...
    In the late 1940s, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited began mining operations on the farm Swartklip, about 90 km north of Rustenburg and was the world's ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Platinum in South Africa - SAIMM
    Jun 22, 1985 · Substantial mining operations on the Merensky Reef began in the Rustenburg area, and for this reason the. Rustenburg area has always been ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Platinum-Group Metals—World Supply and Demand
    Dec 31, 2002 · South Africa's PGM production was derived principally from the Bushveld Complex, a 370-km diameter layered igneous intrusion. PGMs are ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Global Exploration and Production Capacity for Platinum-Group ...
    in the Northern limb and that about 57 percent of the PGM reserves occurred in the Merensky Reef; 38 percent, in the. UG2 seam; and 5 percent, in the Platreef.
  46. [46]
    South Africa Positioned to Leverage PGM Dominance for Greater In ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · South Africa's dominant role in the platinum group metals (PGMs) sector, producing 80% of the world's platinum, gives the country ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Statement - Implats
    Dec 31, 2023 · Cawthorn, R.G.(1999) The Discovery of the platiniferous Merensky Reef in 1924, S. Afr. J. Geol. 1999 pp178 – 183. 2. Davenport, J. (2013) ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Platinum Analysis (Ore Grades & S. African PGM Mines' Geological ...
    Jan 7, 2022 · The Ivanhoe Platreef project plans an initial average annual production rate of 476koz PGM plus Gold. Note however, that details of the ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    [PDF] PGM market report - Johnson Matthey
    Although refined PGM output and sales improved in 2024, we estimate that underlying mine production in South Africa fell by around 2%.
  50. [50]
    ARM board approves R5.7-billion Merensky project at Two Rivers ...
    Mar 3, 2021 · Mining Weekly can report that the new Two Rivers Merensky project will produce an additional 182 000 six-element (6E) PGM ounces, 1 600 t of ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    An intermediate depth platinum mine case study - SciELO South Africa
    Jan 22, 2025 · This study investigates seismicity and rockburst control within the Merensky Reef and UG2 orebody of an intermediate-depth platinum mine located ...Missing: Prospecting thinness
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Pgm market report - Johnson Matthey
    Outside the autocatalyst, jewellery and electronics markets, open-loop recycling is negligible. Autocatalyst recycling represents the weight of metal recovered ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] The Use of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) in the Flotation of a Platinum ...
    Oct 5, 2022 · The use of AMD in. Merensky ore processing plants not only conserves freshwater in minerals processing plants but also reduces high volumes of ...