Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Model 1795 Musket

The Model 1795 Musket was the first standardized military firearm produced by the United States, a .69-caliber smoothbore flintlock musket designed for infantry use and manufactured primarily at the Springfield Armory in Massachusetts.^[1]^[2] It featured a muzzle-loading mechanism with a 42- to 45-inch barrel, an overall length of approximately 60 inches, and weighed about 10 pounds, allowing for an effective range of up to 200 yards though accurate only within 50-75 yards at a rate of fire of 2-3 rounds per minute.^[3] The musket included provisions for a 16-inch bayonet and was equipped with iron sights, a wooden stock, and three barrel bands for stability.^[3] Established under President George Washington's directive in 1794, the Springfield Armory began production of the Model 1795 in 1795 as part of efforts to build a domestic arms manufacturing capability, initially using salvaged parts from imported French muskets stored in U.S. arsenals.^[2] The design was directly patterned after the French Charleville Model 1763/1766 musket, which had been widely used by American forces during the Revolutionary War, reflecting the young nation's reliance on European influences for its early military equipment.^[1]^[2] Production continued until 1815 at Springfield, with an additional facility at Harpers Ferry Armory joining in 1801, resulting in over 150,000 units manufactured in total across both sites by 1818.^[3] The musket underwent several evolutionary changes during its production run, categorized by collectors into four types based on lockplate and frizzen variations: Type I (1799–1806) with a faceted detachable pan, Type II (1806–1809) with a round detachable pan, Type III (1809–1813) featuring an integral round pan, and Type IV (1813–1815) incorporating elements from later models like the 1812 and 1815 patterns.^[2] Lockplates were marked "SPRINGFIELD" with an eagle motif, and the arsenal's output improved over time through better machinery and quality control, though early models often incorporated refurbished components.^[2] As a primary U.S. infantry weapon, the Model 1795 saw extensive service in the War of 1812, where it armed American troops against British forces, and remained in use through the Mexican-American War and even into the early stages of the Civil War until 1865, when it was gradually replaced by more advanced rifled muskets.^[1]^[3] Its production marked a pivotal step in American industrial independence, transitioning from imported arms to a self-sufficient national armory system that influenced subsequent U.S. military firearms development.^[2]

Development and Design

Historical Background

The adoption of the Model 1795 Musket marked a pivotal moment in American military self-sufficiency, serving as the first standardized firearm produced at the newly established U.S. national armories under the authority of the Act of 1794. This legislation, signed by President George Washington on April 2, 1794, authorized the creation of federal armories to manufacture small arms domestically, addressing the vulnerabilities exposed by reliance on foreign imports during the Revolutionary War. The musket's formal adoption in 1795 represented the inaugural output of this system, with initial production focused on creating a reliable infantry weapon to equip the expanding U.S. Army. Initial production from 1795 to 1799 at Springfield Armory involved assembling approximately 3,200 muskets using salvaged parts from imported French Charleville muskets stored in U.S. arsenals.^[2] Post-Revolutionary War exigencies heavily influenced the push for the Model 1795, as the Continental Army had depended on imported French Charleville muskets, particularly the Models 1763 and 1766, which proved effective but were logistically challenging to obtain in sufficient quantities. The need to replace these aging and inconsistent supplies became urgent in the 1790s amid growing threats, including Native American conflicts in the Northwest Territory and the broader imperative to build a national defense infrastructure independent of European suppliers. This context underscored the musket's role in transitioning from wartime improvisation to peacetime standardization, ensuring uniformity in armament for federal forces. In 1798, Eli Whitney secured a landmark contract from the U.S. government to produce 10,000 muskets to the Model 1795 pattern. Although delayed by production challenges, his efforts demonstrated the feasibility of domestic mass production using standardized, interchangeable components, refining manufacturing techniques based on the existing design.^[4] The Quasi-War with France from 1798 to 1800 further accelerated the urgency for domestic production of the Model 1795, as naval and military engagements highlighted the risks of supply disruptions from European conflicts. This undeclared war, involving American merchant shipping and privateers, prompted Congress to expand armory operations and contracts, emphasizing the musket as a symbol of emerging U.S. industrial and military autonomy. The period's tensions reinforced the strategic necessity of the 1794 Act's implementation, propelling the musket from concept to production amid heightened national security concerns.

Design Features

The Model 1795 Musket was fundamentally derived from the French Charleville Model 1763/66, which had been widely imported during the American Revolution and served as the primary pattern for early U.S. military small arms.^[5] American designers at Springfield Armory adapted this predecessor by introducing modifications suited to domestic manufacturing capabilities, including a simplified lock mechanism that retained the core Charleville layout but incorporated streamlined components for easier production.^[6] A key change involved replacing the brass furnishings typical of the Charleville—such as trigger guards, ramrod pipes, and butt plates—with iron equivalents, which reduced material costs and facilitated forging in U.S. facilities while maintaining durability for field use.^[7] The musket's flintlock ignition system exemplified reliable period technology, centered on a gooseneck-style hammer that struck a case-hardened frizzen to produce consistent sparks into the priming pan.^[8] The frizzen, with its curled toe in early production (through 1803) and later straight configuration, worked in tandem with a robust frizzen spring featuring a teat-shaped finial, ensuring effective ignition even under adverse conditions like moisture or rapid firing.^[6] The lock plate evolved slightly over time, with markings shifting from vertical "SPRINGFIELD" script to horizontal by 1801, but the overall design prioritized simplicity and interchangeability within batches.^[2] As a muzzle-loading smoothbore firearm, the Model 1795 was optimized for line infantry tactics, loading powder and ball from the muzzle via a wooden ramrod secured in iron pipes along the stock.^[9] It included a bayonet lug: positioned on the top of the barrel for Springfield Armory production throughout, while Harpers Ferry used bottom-mounted lugs from c. 1800-1807 (including 1803 examples) before switching to top-mounted, allowing attachment of a socket bayonet for close-quarters combat in either configuration; and featured a full-length walnut stock that provided balance and protection for the iron-mounted components.^[6]^[10] Production at Springfield Armory represented an early U.S. effort toward interchangeable parts, with components like locks and barrels aimed for uniformity, though hand-fitting persisted and full interchangeability was not achieved until subsequent models like the Model 1816.^[11]

Specifications and Performance

Physical Dimensions

The Model 1795 Musket, as produced in its early Springfield Type I configuration, had an overall length of 59.5 inches, making it a substantial shoulder arm suited for line infantry formations. This dimension contributed to its balance and reach in drill and combat maneuvers. The total weight was approximately 9.5 pounds, providing stability for aimed fire while remaining manageable for prolonged marches when loaded with ammunition and accoutrements.^[12]^[13] The barrel measured 44.75 inches in length and was a smoothbore design chambered in .69 caliber, allowing for the use of standard musket balls measuring about 0.64 inches in diameter. This bore size was consistent with contemporary European standards and facilitated rapid loading under field conditions. The barrel profile transitioned from an octagonal breech section to a round contour for the majority of its length, a feature inherited from its French Charleville inspirations, which aided in manufacturing and attachment to the stock.^[14]^[12] The full-length stock, constructed from either maple in early productions or black walnut in later examples, extended approximately 57 inches and provided a robust wooden framework encasing the barrel and mechanisms. It incorporated brass fittings, including a buttplate for shouldering and a trigger guard for hand protection during operation. Additional features included a fixed blade front sight for basic sighting and an iron ramrod stored beneath the barrel for loading powder and projectile.^[15]^[16]

Operational Capabilities

The Model 1795 Musket, a smoothbore flintlock firearm, exhibited limited effective range typical of early 19th-century infantry weapons, with aimed fire achieving practical accuracy of 50–75 yards against individual targets due to the unrifled barrel's inherent lack of precision.^[17] For massed volleys, the weapon could deliver projectiles up to 200 yards, though accuracy diminished sharply beyond 100 yards, emphasizing its role in line infantry tactics rather than precision shooting.^[18] This range performance relied on the .69-caliber bore and black powder propulsion, which produced a relatively flat trajectory at short distances but significant drop-off at longer ones.^[19] Trained soldiers could sustain a rate of fire of 2–3 rounds per minute when using pre-rolled paper cartridges containing a standard black powder charge and .69-caliber lead ball, allowing for rapid muzzle-loading in combat formations. This cadence assumed dry conditions and practiced drill, as the process involved biting the cartridge, pouring powder into the pan and barrel, ramming the ball and wadding, and priming the flintlock mechanism—steps that could slow under stress or inexperience.^[20] Reliability posed significant challenges for the Model 1795, with flint breakage occurring frequently—often after 20–50 strikes—necessitating soldiers to carry spare flints and perform regular maintenance to replace fractured pieces and clean the frizzen.^[21] Misfire rates averaged 1 in 6 to 1 in 12 shots in ideal conditions due to powder ignition failures or flash pan spills, but these escalated in wet weather, where moisture could dampen the priming powder or pan, rendering up to half of attempts ineffective and demanding protective measures like oilcloth covers.^[22] These issues underscored the musket's dependence on environmental factors and routine upkeep to maintain operational readiness.^[23] Ballistic properties enhanced the Model 1795's versatility in close-quarters engagements through the buck and ball load, which combined a single .69-caliber lead ball with 3–6 smaller buckshot pellets wrapped in paper cartridge, increasing the probability of hits against clustered enemies at under 50 yards by dispersing projectiles like a shotgun.^[19] This ammunition type, standard for U.S. smoothbore muskets by the early 19th century, delivered a muzzle velocity of approximately 900–1,000 feet per second with a 110-grain powder charge, providing lethal stopping power in dense formations while compensating for the weapon's accuracy limitations.^[24]

Production

U.S. Armories

The U.S. Congress authorized the establishment of federal armories in April 1794 through an appropriation of $81,865 for erecting and repairing arsenals and magazines, leading to the creation of the Springfield Armory in Massachusetts as the nation's first such facility.^[25] Construction at Springfield began in 1795, with production of the Model 1795 Musket commencing the same year using a workforce of 40 skilled craftsmen.^[26] The Harpers Ferry Armory in Virginia followed, authorized under the same 1794 act, with land acquisition in 1796 and 1797 totaling over 400 acres and construction starting in 1799.^[27] Musket production at Harpers Ferry initiated in 1801 under superintendent Joseph Perkin, an expert gunsmith.^[27] Springfield Armory produced approximately 80,000 Model 1795 Muskets between 1795 and 1815, marking the facility's primary output during its early years.^[1] By 1800, output reached about 300 muskets per month, supported by water-powered machinery from a dam on the Mill River that drove early factory operations.^[2] Manufacturing involved traditional processes such as forging barrels and components, extensive filing for finishing, and hand assembly of locks and stocks, initially incorporating salvaged parts from imported French muskets to supplement domestic fabrication.^[26] These methods emphasized gradual standardization, with water power enabling consistent production of flintlock mechanisms and iron fittings.^[25] At Harpers Ferry, roughly 70,000 Model 1795 Muskets were manufactured starting in 1801 and continuing through the early 1810s, contributing significantly to federal stockpiles.^[27] The workforce expanded rapidly from 28 armorers in 1801 to 87 by 1807 and nearly 200 by 1810, facilitating output of over 61,000 small arms by 1812 alone.^[27] Production relied on water-powered systems along the Potomac and Shenandoah Rivers for powering forges, trip hammers, and boring mills, with processes including forging of locks and barrels, meticulous filing for fit and finish, and assembly into complete arms using both craft skills and emerging mechanization for part uniformity.^[27] This approach transitioned from artisanal methods to a proto-factory system, prioritizing interchangeable components by the War of 1812 era.^[27]

Contract Production

To meet the growing demand for standardized military arms in the late 1790s, the U.S. government awarded contracts to private manufacturers to supplement production at the national armories, initiating a decentralized approach to musket fabrication based on the Model 1795 pattern.^[28] One of the earliest and most notable contracts went to Eli Whitney, who established a factory in New Haven, Connecticut, in 1798 to produce 10,000 muskets for $134,000, with delivery expected within 28 months.^[4] However, Whitney's project faced significant delays due to challenges in developing and implementing specialized tooling, including water-powered machinery such as filing jigs, lathes, and stencils, as well as difficulties in training unskilled laborers and securing materials amid harsh winters.^[4] As a result, the first deliveries occurred in 1801, and the full 10,000 units were not completed until January 1809, nearly a decade late.^[4] Other private contractors contributed substantially to Model 1795 production, including Simeon North in Middletown, Connecticut, and Asa Waters in Massachusetts, alongside figures like Nathan Starr, Lemuel Pomeroy, and Marine T. Wickham, who collectively delivered approximately 20,000 units by 1815 through a series of government awards.^[28] These efforts were part of broader 1798 contracts distributed among 27 manufacturers, which yielded about 14,000 muskets by mid-1801 from non-Whitney participants, though many orders remained incomplete by the original deadlines.^[29] Private output focused on handcrafted assembly with emerging mechanized aids like trip hammers, but lacked the centralized oversight of armories, leading to inconsistent quality across batches.^[28] Contract production encountered persistent challenges, including uneven workmanship, reliance on substandard iron that caused high barrel failure rates, and parts that were not fully interchangeable due to the absence of uniform gauges and patterns in the early 1800s.^[28] These issues resulted in higher per-unit costs compared to armory methods, as well as frequent rejections during inspections, with some contractors like Wickham producing heavier models plagued by poor balance and design flaws.^[28] Limited skilled labor and dispersed facilities further hampered efficiency, often requiring government-provided model arms and inspectors from Springfield Armory to enforce basic standards.^[28] The Embargo Act of 1807, by halting foreign trade and imports of arms and raw materials, intensified pressure on domestic contractors to ramp up output, straining supplies of iron and exposing vulnerabilities in the supply chain.^[28] This reliance escalated dramatically with the outbreak of the War of 1812, which spurred additional contracts to seven private firms by 1815 and tripled armory production rates, though it also revealed procurement chaos that prompted the establishment of the Ordnance Department for better coordination.^[28]

Variants and Alterations

Springfield Types

The Springfield Armory's production of the Model 1795 Musket evolved through distinct subtypes, each incorporating incremental refinements to enhance manufacturability and reliability amid ongoing challenges like material shortages and the need for greater output efficiency. These changes primarily affected lock mechanisms, barrel configurations, and stock assembly, building on the baseline Charleville-inspired design while adapting to domestic production constraints. By standardizing components and shifting from imported or salvaged parts to locally forged elements, the armory transitioned from reliance on French surplus stocks to more self-sufficient operations.^[2] Type I muskets, produced from 1799 to 1806, featured a detachable faceted pan and lockplate marked "SPRINGFIELD" in a vertical arc with an eagle motif. Early production relied on repurposed components, with undated examples possibly from initial 1795-1798 output or refurbishments. The barrel length was approximately 44.75 inches.^[2]^[9] Type II muskets, manufactured from 1806 to 1809, introduced a round detachable pan for improved maintenance, with continued refinements to the lockplate. The barrel remained at standard length of about 44-45 inches.^[2] Type III muskets, spanning 1809 to 1813, featured an integral round pan to streamline assembly and reduce costs, along with other lock refinements. These supported increased production during the War of 1812. The barrel length was consistent with earlier types.^[2] Type IV muskets, produced from 1813 to 1815, incorporated an integral iron pan and hybrid elements from the Model 1812 and 1815 patterns, reflecting further evolution toward improved designs.^[2] Overall, these Springfield types illustrate a progression driven by pragmatic adaptations—such as optimizing lock components—to boost output from under 1,000 annually in the 1790s to peaks exceeding 10,000 by the 1810s, despite persistent raw material constraints. Approximately 85,000 Model 1795 muskets were produced at Springfield Armory from 1795 to 1815.^[2]^[9]

Harpers Ferry Model

The Harpers Ferry Armory, established in 1799, began production of the Model 1795 Musket in 1801 as the second federal facility to do so, focusing on standardized output for U.S. military needs.^[30] This variant featured a barrel length of approximately 44.5 inches and maintained the core Charleville-inspired design. Distinct lock markings featured "HARPERS FERRY" inscribed ahead of the cock, often accompanied by an eagle motif and date. The stock was constructed from walnut for durability. Approximately 70,000 units were produced between 1801 and 1815.^[3]^[31]

Percussion Conversions

In the 1840s, U.S. armories initiated the conversion of surplus Model 1795 flintlock muskets to percussion ignition systems to extend their utility amid the transition to more modern firearms technology. This process, primarily conducted at Springfield and Harpers Ferry Armories, replaced the unreliable flint-and-steel mechanism with a percussion lock employing copper fulminate caps, which detonated upon impact from a falling hammer. The Belgian-style "cone-in-barrel" method was adopted for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, allowing armories to process large numbers of older weapons without full replacement.^[32] Key alterations focused on minimal disruption to the original design while ensuring reliable function. The barrel's side-mounted touch-hole was plugged, and a new vertical vent was drilled atop the barrel, into which a threaded percussion nipple (or cone) was upset and secured directly into the metal for a secure fit. The lockplate retained its basic form, but the frizzen, pan, and cock were removed; the pan area was filled with a brass plug, and a new external hammer was fitted to strike the nipple. Where feasible, the original walnut stock was preserved, with only minor inletting adjustments for the new components, preserving the musket's overall .69-caliber smoothbore configuration.^[32] By 1861, approximately 20,000 Model 1795 muskets had undergone these conversions, enabling their continued issuance to militia units and extending their service life into the American Civil War. These modified arms provided practical benefits over flintlocks, including improved ignition consistency and reliability in damp conditions, though the rate of fire remained around 2-3 shots per minute and the smoothbore barrel's inherent limitations in accuracy and effective range (around 100 yards) persisted unchanged.^[1]^[32]

Service History

Early Deployments

The Model 1795 Musket began issuance to U.S. Army infantry units in 1799, marking the first domestic production of a standardized martial long arm for federal forces, with initial deliveries from the Springfield Armory totaling around 3,000 units by 1798.^[33] These muskets were also distributed to state militias to equip volunteer companies, helping to address the patchwork of imported arms previously in use and standardizing training across regular and irregular troops.^[34] Early recipients included frontier garrisons, where the weapon supported small-scale operations amid lingering tensions from the Northwest Indian War, such as patrols and skirmishes against Native American groups in the Ohio Valley during the early 1800s.^[2] A notable early deployment occurred during the Lewis and Clark Expedition from 1804 to 1806, where approximately 15 Model 1795 muskets were carried by enlisted personnel to supplement rifles for hunting and defense against potential threats in uncharted territories.^[13] These smoothbore flintlocks proved versatile for big game procurement but highlighted logistical strains in remote areas, including the need to cache powder and lead supplies—such as 176 pounds of powder stored in waterproof canisters—to prevent spoilage from moisture and ensure availability for roughly 11,700 rounds over the journey.^[35] Training challenges arose from the musket's weight and loading procedure, requiring soldiers to master rapid fire under field conditions, while inconsistent powder quality in isolated posts occasionally led to misfires during drills.^[13] Feedback from these initial uses revealed reliability concerns, particularly with early Type I models prone to frizzen and pan issues due to rudimentary manufacturing, prompting minor armory adjustments like the introduction of detachable pans in 1800 and integral pans by 1809 to improve ignition consistency.^[2] By the late 1810s, such refinements extended to frontier skirmishes in the First Seminole War (1816–1818), where militias armed with Model 1795s conducted raids and patrols in Florida swamps, though supply lines remained vulnerable to delays in powder resupply.^[33]

Major Wars

The Model 1795 Musket served as the primary infantry weapon for U.S. forces during the War of 1812, equipping regular army units and militia alike with its .69-caliber flintlock design copied from the French Charleville.^[36] The battle heightened tensions leading to war with Britain. In the climactic Battle of New Orleans on January 8, 1815, regular U.S. Army regiments armed with the Model 1795 delivered devastating volleys against British invaders, contributing to Andrew Jackson's decisive victory despite the war's official end weeks earlier.^[37] Tens of thousands of Model 1795 muskets were in service by the war's start, though production shortfalls and supply issues limited their distribution to the expanded forces. During the Mexican–American War of 1846–1848, the Model 1795 remained in widespread use by U.S. volunteers and regulars, supplementing newer rifled arms in line infantry tactics.^[34] The musket was employed in key engagements, contributing to victories through coordinated volley fire, even as rifled muskets began entering service. In the American Civil War of 1861–1865, surplus Model 1795 flintlocks and percussion conversions were issued to both Union and Confederate troops, particularly to Southern forces facing acute shortages of modern arms.^[34] Confederates, often equipping new regiments with whatever was available, distributed unaltered flintlock versions early in the war, while many underwent field conversions to percussion caps for improved reliability in wet conditions. At the Battle of Mill Springs on January 19, 1862, Confederate troops armed with older flintlocks like the Model 1795 suffered misfires in rainy weather, contributing to their defeat against Union forces.^[38] Both sides continued using these aging weapons in secondary roles until war's end, with conversions briefly referenced in arsenal records as stopgap measures. Across these conflicts, over 150,000 Model 1795 muskets were produced, though high attrition from overuse, battle damage, and exposure led to rapid depletion of stockpiles.^[39]

Legacy

Influence on Later Arms

The Model 1795 Musket served as the foundational design for subsequent U.S. military smoothbore firearms, particularly the Model 1816 Musket, which retained the .69-caliber bore and flintlock mechanism while incorporating minor improvements in stock configuration and barrel length for enhanced durability.^[19] This continuity in specifications ensured logistical compatibility for post-war needs, with the Model 1816 produced in far greater numbers.^[40] The smoothbore design persisted through the early 19th century, only giving way to rifled barrels in the 1840s with the adoption of percussion ignition systems, marking a gradual evolution toward greater accuracy and range.^[41] While Eli Whitney's 1798 contract for 10,000 Model 1795 Muskets intended to introduce interchangeable parts manufacturing in the United States, true interchangeability was not achieved during this effort and was realized later through advancements at federal armories.^[42] These methods laid the groundwork for mass production at federal armories, transforming artisanal gunsmithing into an industrial process that prioritized uniformity.^[4]^[43] The standardization legacy of the Model 1795 extended through federal armories at Springfield and Harpers Ferry, directly informing the design of the Model 1842 Percussion Musket, which converted the flintlock to percussion while maintaining the .69-caliber smoothbore for volley fire compatibility.^[1] This progression culminated in the Model 1855 Rifle-Musket, which introduced rifling and the .58-caliber Minié ball, enabling longer-range engagements while building on the interchangeable parts system refined since 1795.^[44] Both armories produced these successors, ensuring a consistent supply chain that supported U.S. military expansion.^[45] The smoothbore characteristics of the Model 1795 reinforced early U.S. infantry doctrine centered on line formations for coordinated volleys, but its evolutionary path to rifled percussion arms facilitated a doctrinal shift toward more mobile skirmisher tactics by the mid-19th century.^[46] As rifled muskets like the Model 1855 extended effective range beyond 300 yards, U.S. Army manuals began emphasizing dispersed lines and cover utilization, departing from rigid linear deployments to counter the increased lethality of individual aimed fire.^[47] This transition, rooted in the manufacturing and design standardization initiated with the Model 1795, adapted American forces to irregular warfare and open battlespaces.^[48]

Modern Reproductions

Modern reproductions of the Model 1795 Musket have been produced by Italian firearms manufacturer Davide Pedersoli since the 1970s, offering faithful replicas in .69 caliber for black powder shooting.^[49] These muskets feature tempered seamless carbon steel barrels measuring 44.75 inches, walnut stocks, and flintlock mechanisms, with overall lengths of 60 inches and weights around 10 pounds, closely mirroring the original design while incorporating modern manufacturing for reliability. Pedersoli also provides assembly kits with authentic flintlock components, allowing enthusiasts to build period-accurate pieces.^[50] These replicas are widely used in historical reenactments, including War of 1812 events and early American military encampments, where participants fire .69 caliber round balls with black powder loads to simulate battlefield conditions.^[51] Organizations such as the North-South Skirmish Association and various living history groups employ them to educate on 19th-century tactics without risking damage to original artifacts. As of 2025, original Model 1795 Muskets command collector values typically ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 depending on condition and provenance, as seen in auctions for well-preserved examples with matching components.^[52]^[53] Reproductions, priced around $1,500 to $2,000, support preservation efforts by enabling hands-on study and display, reducing wear on surviving antiques held by museums like the Springfield Armory National Historic Site. For sport shooting, modern adaptations include full-length target versions compliant with black powder cartridge regulations in competitions, while half-stock hunting variants—shortened for maneuverability—have been offered by custom builders inspired by the 1795's smoothbore design, suitable for big game in states allowing traditional muzzleloaders during primitive seasons.^[54] These adaptations maintain the .69 caliber flintlock ignition but incorporate ergonomic stocks for extended field use, promoting the musket's legacy in contemporary outdoor pursuits.^[55]

References

[1]
US Springfield Model 1795 Flintlock Musket - NRA Museums:
The Model 1795 muskets were the first standardized U.S. martial arms to be produced and were patterned after the French Model 1763 Charleville musket. Harpers ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[2]
[PDF] 1795 Springfield Muskets: 1795-1815
The purpose of this article is to give a brief history of the origination of the Springfield Arsenal and information on the production of the first muskets ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
Harpers Ferry / Springfield Model 1795 Musket - Military Factory
Mar 21, 2019 · The Model 1795 weighed in at a manageable 10lbs and featured a unwieldy 60-inch length (made even longer by the inclusion of the 16-inch bayonet) ...
[4]
Charleville Musket - The Army Historical Foundation
The Model 1766 would heavily influence the design of the Springfield Model 1795 Musket, the first regulation musket manufactured in the United States and ...Missing: 1763/66 | Show results with:1763/66
[5]
[PDF] Springfield Model 1795 Muskets to 1809: The Asheville Study
Eighty-two flintlock muskets produced at the Spring field Armory before 1810 were brought together at the April. 1996 meeting of the American Society of ...
[6]
[PDF] American gun makers including Supplement of ... - Internet Archive
... Model 1795 musket. Also lock mark- ing of a Model 1808 type flintlock pistol ... iron mounts. NORMAN, John—U. S. Inspector of Arms, in year 1830 ...
[7]
1795 Springfield Musket - United States Infantry - Military Heritage
This reproduction of a 1795 Model US Infantry Musket has a .69 calibre, 44 3/4 inch long, round barrel that is made of tempered seamless carbon steel.
[8]
U.S. Springfield Model 1795 Flintlock Musket Type I - NRA Museums:
The Model 1795 muskets were the first standardized US martial arms to be produced and were patterned after the French Model 1763 Charleville musket.Missing: 1763/66 influence
[9]
How to Make a Gun - Springfield Armory National Historic Site (U.S. ...
In the early days of the armory, much of this work was done by hand so the parts produced were not interchangeable with similar ones in other muskets.
[10]
Physical Evidence at Carthage Jail and What It Reveals about the ...
The Model 1795 musket had an overall length of 59.5 inches, and the Model 1816 musket was 57.5 inches long. The bayonet issued with both muskets added an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
Muskets and Rifles - Discover Lewis & Clark
The model 1795 muskets had a .69 caliber, 44-1/2″ barrel, an overall length of 59″ and a weight of about 9-1/2 lbs. When hunting big game such as deer, elk ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
[12]
[PDF] LONG IRON - The Black Powder Arms of Lewis & Clark
The Model 1795 musket was the army's standard shoulder weapon, based on the French Model. 1763. A .69 caliber, smoothbore gun with a 44.75-‐inch barrel and ...
[13]
The U.S. Model 1795 Springfield Musket | Smith & Wesson Forum
Jun 23, 2020 · The front sight was part of the forward barrel band and in front of it the bayonet lug was located on top of the barrel, although the first ...<|separator|>
[14]
Jean Lafitte NHP: Historic Resource Study (Chapter 4)
... Model 1795 musket, a .69 calibre piece that fired a ball measuring .64 inch in diameter. Ammunition for the musket consisted of paper cartridges containing ...
[15]
[PDF] Initial Data Sets for Explorations in Long-Range Forecasting of ...
“Typical of smoothbore muskets, the M1795 had an effective range of about 50 yd ... 25: A study of the accuracy, range, and rate of fire of the 0.58-cal. rifle.
[16]
A Glossary of Small Arms Across Three Wars
flintlock · 1722 to 1768 · 62.5 inches · about 10.5 pounds · variable, accurate up to 100, effective up to 200 yards ; flintlock smoothbore musket, muzzle loaded.
[17]
Palo Alto Battlefield NHS:A Thunder of Cannon (Chapter 7)
Feb 25, 2009 · Beginning with the Model 1795 musket, its design based on the French ... A trigger plate of almost identical weight and dimensions was ...
[18]
[PDF] The Rifle-Musket vs. The Smoothbore Musket, a Comparison of the ...
If the 68 yard range is indeed the true average of weapons fire, then the fire from a smoothbore musket like the Model 1842 would have been more effective ...
[19]
Flintlock vs. Percussion misfire rate | Small Arms & Ammunition
Mar 21, 2022 · The introduction of the percussion cap greatly increased the reliability of the musket, reducing the number of misfires from two in thirteen to almost nil.Missing: 1795 buck
[20]
Are Modern Flintlocks TOO Reliable? - The Muzzleloading Forum
Apr 18, 2025 · The French and British armies in the late 18th Century for instance, calculated that somewhere in the range of 1 in 12 to 1 in 8 shots from a ...Failure to fire rate | The Muzzleloading ForumFlint vs Percussion - Old Arguement | The Muzzleloading ForumMore results from www.muzzleloadingforum.comMissing: wet | Show results with:wet
[21]
The Revolutionary War Musket - TEHS - Quarterly Archives
May 12, 2009 · (An example of the effect of rain and wet weather on the functioning of the flintlock musket is the so-called "Battle of the Clouds" that did ...
[22]
Musket Ball & Buck Shot | Pritzker Military Museum & Library | Chicago
Soldiers would load a single full-size musket ball along with three to six smaller-sized “buck shot” balls, essentially turning the musket into a shotgun.<|separator|>
[23]
The Federal Armories - Springfield Armory National Historic Site ...
In April 1794, the Congress of the United States appropriated $81,865 “for the erecting and repairing of Arsenals and Magazines,” an act that created the ...
[24]
[PDF] DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CHIEF OF ORDNANCE ...
Armory began weapons production in 1795 with a workforce of forty skilled craftsmen manufacturing U.S. Model 1795 muskets. These early flintlock muskets were ...
[25]
[PDF] The U.S. Armory at Harpers Ferry, Historic Resource Study
The study covers the founding, early history, operations, improvements, destruction, and abandonment of the U.S. Armory at Harpers Ferry.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[26]
[PDF] RABER ASSOCIATES - National Park Service
Raber Associates are consultants in the historical and social sciences, who prepared a report on the Springfield Armory for the National Park Service.
[27]
The Factory | The Eli Whitney Museum and Workshop
In 1798 Eli Whitney built a firearms factory near New Haven. The muskets his workmen made by methods comparable to those of modern mass industrial ...
[28]
[PDF] U. S. 1798 CONTRACT MUSKETS
Eli Whitney was allowed to complete his contract. A large sum of money had been advanced to him before he made any deliveries. His superior workmanship and ...Missing: delayed | Show results with:delayed
[29]
1795 Springfield - Veteran Arms
The musket's hammer (frizzen) has been adequately hardened and comes with a lifetime re-hardening guarantee. Bayonets are available. Specifications: Overall ...Missing: system gooseneck
[30]
HISTORIC WAR OF 1812 NEW YORK STATE ISSUE MUSKET
This example draws influences from Eli Whitney's US Contract of 1798 and the 1795 National Armory Springfield model. Here we find the classic Pomeroy pattern ...
[31]
ARMORY - Harpers Ferry - NPS History
Sep 3, 1980 · Musket Factory yard near entrance to Yard from Ferry Lot ... 1795, was 3,228 and of this force, 2,251 officers and men, under the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
MODEL 1795 HARPERS FERRY FLINTLOCK MUSKET
The barrel is 45 inches in length and is stamped with the serial number 12697. Original button head ramrod shortened and with threads. Minor small wood ...
[33]
[PDF] Harpers Ferry Armory Guns | MH3WV
Original Harpers Ferry Model 1795 flintlock musket, .69 caliber, lockplate 1816. These guns were the first model produced by the Harpers Ferry & Springfield ...
[34]
[PDF] The Percussioning of U .S. Martial Longarms
When. Daniel Nippes delivered the last 600 flintlock muskets in 1848, percussion muskets had been in production about five years at the two Public Armories.<|separator|>
[35]
Springfield Model 1795 Musket: America's First Military Production
Apr 8, 2021 · Copied from the French 1766 model Charleville which made up the bulk of existing US arms supplies, this was a .69 caliber smoothbore flintlock ...Missing: features 1763/66 influence
[36]
Small Arms Across Three Wars | American Battlefield Trust
Apr 4, 2018 · The Model 1795 musket borrowed heavily from the Model 1763 and 1766 French Charleville musket, and was the first mass produced American ...Missing: buck | Show results with:buck
[37]
[PDF] The Logistics Preparation of the Lewis and Clark Expedition - DTIC
Captain Meriwether Lewis's task was to equip and man a party to traverse the unmapped middle third of the United States. Most studies of the expedition ...
[38]
[PDF] The U.S. Army and the War of 1812 - Scholars Crossing
May 22, 2024 · For the. United States Army, the standard weapon was the Model 1795 Springfield musket. This musket was based on the design of the French ...
[39]
Weapons of the Battle of New Orleans
The two regular American Army units used the .69 caliber 1795 Springfield musket. A veteran could fire off three shots a minute.It had a 15 inch bayonet .The ...
[40]
Artifacts bring War of 1812 to life | Article | The United States Army
Feb 28, 2013 · "It was an exact copy of the French Charleville musket that was used by American forces during the Revolutionary War.
[41]
Virginia Manufactory of Arms Model 1795 1808 Percussion Musket
Many older Virginia Manufactory firearms, including this specimen, were converted to percussion ignition and saw service with Confederate troops during the ...
[42]
1795 Springfield Pattern Musket - USS Constitution Museum
Creator Springfield Armory ; Date Created 1805 ; Medium Wood, Metal ; Dimensions [H]2 1/2 in. [W]6 1/8 in. ; Catalog Number 875.1a,b.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[43]
There Are Many Like It: 250 Years of Marine Corps Service Rifles
Jul 3, 2025 · This led to the creation of the U.S. Springfield Model 1795 flintlock musket, the first American-made long arm. ... accuracy and range due to its ...Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
[44]
250 Years of the American Infantry Rifle | Rock Island Auction
The Model 1795 Musket represents many firsts in U.S. martial arms including the first standardized and official model of musket manufactured for the United ...
[45]
The Legend of Eli Whitney and Interchangeable Parts - jstor
In fact, when Whitney finally completed delivery in January 1809 he received a payment of only $2450 as final settlement of the total contract of $134,000. Only ...
[46]
[PDF] small arms and ammunition in the - Smithsonian Institution
cataloging the small arms employed in the United States service in the early days as to models, fabricators, and dimensional details. However, when ...
[47]
U.S. Springfield Model 1855 Rifle Musket - NRA Museums:
The Model 1795 muskets were the first standardized U.S. martial arms to be produced and were patterned after the French Model 1763 Charleville musket. Harpers ...
[48]
U.S. Model 1855 Springfield: The Rifle-Musket of the Regulars
Jun 11, 2020 · The US Model 1855 percussion rifle-musket was state-of-the-art when adopted by the US Army. It was the standard longarm of regular Army forces at the start of ...
[49]
[PDF] Wall of Fire -- the Rifle and Civil War Infantry Tactics - DTIC
Due to a shortage of rifles at the beginning of the war, the Ordnance Department converted 1842 smoothbore flintlock muskets to rifle muskets. It retained a ...
[50]
[PDF] The Evolution of Infantry Tactics During the American Civil War
Sep 28, 2024 · skirmishers against Confederates and guerrillas armed with more rapid-firing rifle muskets. Most of the enlisted Soldiers of the regiment ...
[51]
[PDF] The Rifle-Musket and the Battle of Gettysburg
May 1, 2023 · First, U. S. Infantry & Rifle Tactics includes two manuals of arms sections: one for the rifle-musket; and the other for the smoothbore musket, ...
[52]
Muzzle Loading Rifles model 1795 Springfield Rifle - Davide Pedersoli
Technical specifications ; Barrel's length inches 44 11/16 ; Overall length mm 1525,00 ; Overall length inches 60 ; Weight kg 4,400 ; Weight lbs 10.13.
[53]
1795 Springfield - Davide Pedersoli
1795 Springfield Kit, Model: S298, 1795 Springfield mlaic, Historical re-enactment, Historical re-enactment, Target shooting, Target shooting.Missing: reproductions Armi Sport
[54]
https://www.muzzle-loaders.com/collections/musket-rifles
[55]
Lot 1148:US Springfield Model 1795 Flintlock Musket with Bayonet
Sep 11, 2021 · Type III Model 1795s are dated from 1809 to 1814 making this an early example given it is dated "1809" on the tail of the lock and the buttplate tang.
[56]
https://www.muzzle-loaders.com/collections/musket-rifles
[57]
Muzzleloaders - Traditions® Performance Firearms
Traditions® Firearms has the most extensive line of muzzleloaders in the industry. From break-action to sidelocks to the revolutionary NitroFire®, ...Cartridge Rifles · Sidelocks · Classic Pistols · AccessoriesMissing: 1795 half