Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Model 1816 Musket

The Model 1816 Musket was a .69-caliber adopted by the as its primary infantry shoulder arm, characterized by a 42-inch barrel, an overall length of approximately 57.5 inches, and a weight of about 10 pounds. It featured a with a combless design, brass pan, and iron furniture, and was produced using methods aimed at , marking a significant early advancement in American arms manufacturing. Production of the Model 1816 began in 1816 at the federal armories in , and Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now ), and continued until the mid-1840s, with Springfield ceasing output in 1840 and Harpers Ferry in 1844. Over 675,000 units were manufactured in total, including contributions from private contractors such as those at , making it one of the most prolifically produced U.S. of the era. The design evolved through three types: Type I (1816–1822) with a bright finish, Type II (1822–1832) with a browned barrel, and Type III (1835–1844) reverting to bright finish with minor refinements. Influenced by the French Model 1777 Charleville musket, the Model 1816 incorporated improvements for reliability and ease of production, including a reinforced lock plate measuring 6 5/16 inches wide and a for attaching a socket . Its design allowed for rapid loading with loose powder and ball, effective at short ranges up to 100 yards, though accuracy was limited compared to later rifled arms. The musket saw extensive service in U.S. conflicts, including the First Seminole War (1816–1818), (1832), and (1846–1848), where it equipped federal troops and state militias. Many surviving examples were converted to percussion ignition in the 1840s and 1850s, extending their utility into the (1861–1865), particularly among Confederate forces and second-line Union units, until largely supplanted by more modern rifles. Its long production run and widespread adoption underscored its role as a cornerstone of early 19th-century American military standardization.

Design

Specifications

The Model 1816 Musket measured approximately 57.5 inches (146 cm) in overall length, providing a balance of maneuverability and reach suitable for use. Its barrel was 42 inches (107 cm) long, , and chambered in to accommodate standard balls. Unloaded, the musket weighed approximately 10 pounds (4.5 kg), making it relatively lightweight for a full-length arm of the era. In terms of performance, it achieved an of up to 100 yards for aimed individual fire, extending to up to 200 yards for massed , though accuracy diminished significantly beyond point-blank distances due to the design. With a standard round ball and powder charge, reached 1,000–1,200 feet per second (305–366 m/s), delivering sufficient for antipersonnel effects at short ranges. Trained soldiers could sustain a of 2-3 rounds per minute, limited by the need to manually load powder, ball, and prime the pan after each shot. The ignition system employed a traditional , featuring a case-hardened for striking sparks and a rounded, fenceless pan to contain priming powder.

Key Features

The Model 1816 Musket was patterned after the Charleville Model , which had been widely used by the Continental Army during the , but adapted for American manufacturing with simplified tooling to facilitate domestic production. Its stock was constructed from a full-length piece measuring approximately 54¼ inches, featuring a combless design that marked the first such configuration in U.S. military longarms for improved . The primary metal fittings included a flat brass buttplate (4⅝ inches long and 2 inches wide with a 2⅜-inch ), a (9⅜ inches long with rounded ends), and a nose cap, while the barrel was secured by three iron bands and retained an iron with a head. The employed a traditional , with a frizzen pitched forward to enhance sparking efficiency, a rounded and fenceless pan that was detachable and sloped downward for better powder retention, and an external featuring a round face with a heart-shaped cutout. To mitigate misfires in adverse weather, the lock components were often treated with a mixture of , , and applied via lacquering. Sighting was provided by a simple fixed front blade and a rear notch, lacking any adjustable elements to prioritize rugged simplicity over precision. For , a was positioned on the upper barrel to accommodate a triangular . Overall, the design emphasized to support and field repairs, though full interchangeability was refined in later iterations.

Production

Armory Manufacturing

The primary production of the Model 1816 Musket occurred at the in , beginning in and emphasizing the development of standardized tooling to facilitate and uniform manufacturing. This approach marked an early effort in American arms production to implement precision machinery, including water-powered trip hammers and lathes, for consistent output following the approval of the pattern model in November 1816. The in joined as the second federal production site in 1816 and continued operations until 1844, with a particular focus on through the use of detailed gauges, pattern muskets, and inspection processes to ensure compliance with specifications. Innovations at Harpers Ferry, such as the introduction of a stock duplicating machine in 1819, helped streamline production while maintaining high standards for component fit and finish. Key elements of the manufacturing process at both armories included the barrel from using trip hammers or rolling mills (introduced at in 1829), hand-filing the stock to precise contours after rough shaping, and assembling the via milling machines for the lock plates and other metal components. These labor-intensive methods, supported by early like barrel-turning lathes that produced 20–25 barrels per day by 1817, reduced costs significantly while prioritizing durability for use. Production timelines began with initial runs of Type I muskets from 1816 to 1821 at both armories, scaling up substantially after the War of 1812 to address the U.S. Army's need for reliable, domestically produced small arms amid ongoing frontier conflicts and national defense requirements. Overall, the armories' combined output reached approximately 675,000 units, with Springfield producing about 325,000 and Harpers Ferry about 350,000, establishing the Model 1816 as a cornerstone of early American federal arms manufacturing.

Contractor Production

To supplement the production capacity of the national armories at and Harpers Ferry, the U.S. government awarded contracts to private firms for manufacturing Model 1816 muskets from 1816 to 1844, involving at least 14 contractors such as Nathan Starr of ; Eli of ; Asa Waters of ; and Marine T. Wickham of , . These contracts were essential after the to rapidly expand the federal arsenal, as armory output alone could not meet demand for equipping the military and state militias. Contractor production totaled over 146,000 Model 1816 muskets, with output peaking in the 1820s when armory facilities faced capacity constraints and additional federal orders surged to prepare for potential conflicts. Notable examples include Nathan Starr's contracts, which delivered thousands of units between 1816 and the early 1830s, and Eli Whitney's 1819 agreement for 15,000 muskets. A specific highlight was the July 19, 1822, contract awarded to Wickham for 5,000 Type II muskets at $12 each, to be delivered at a rate of 2,000 annually starting in 1823, though completion extended due to production hurdles. Federal inspectors, such as those from the Ordnance Department, rigorously evaluated completed arms, often rejecting substandard items for issues like poor barrel or misaligned components, which underscored the variability in private output. Private production encountered significant challenges, including inconsistent quality arising from the absence of uniform federal gauges and specifications until the late , leading to non-interchangeable parts across batches. Delays were common due to limited oversight, with contractors like the Henry Gun Works facing repeated rejections during inspections that halted deliveries and imposed financial penalties. Material shortages, particularly for iron and , further slowed progress, exacerbating timelines in an era of nascent U.S. industrial infrastructure. Economically, these contracts stimulated early American manufacturing by injecting federal funds into private workshops post-1812 War, fostering skills in and machinery that influenced broader industrialization. However, persistent quality and efficiency issues revealed the limitations of decentralized production, prompting greater reliance on centralized armories for and cost control in subsequent decades.

Variants

Type I

The Type I variant of the Model 1816 Musket represents the initial production run of this firearm, manufactured primarily at the and Harpers Ferry Armories from 1816 to 1822. This early iteration was developed to standardize U.S. military small arms following the , incorporating design elements that emphasized reliability for use while leveraging emerging techniques at the federal armories. Distinctive features of the Type I included a prominent high hump on the lock plate, which provided additional clearance for the and , a front sight blade for improved visibility, and a full-length forend that extended all the way to the muzzle for enhanced structural support and handling. Over predecessors such as the Model 1812, it incorporated thicker barrel walls—measuring about 42 inches in length with a .69-caliber bore—to enhance durability against field abuse, alongside simplified stock inletting that reduced complexity and material waste during assembly. These modifications aimed to balance robustness with cost-effective production, reflecting the Department's push for in the post-war era. Despite these advances, the Type I exhibited limitations, particularly in its early frizzen design, which was susceptible to and mechanical failures in humid environments, leading to misfires during prolonged exposure to moisture. This vulnerability stemmed from the iron pan and 's reliance on basic lubrication without advanced , a common challenge for mechanisms of the time. By 1822, these issues prompted a redesign, transitioning to the Type II variant with refinements for greater manufacturability, including adjustments to the lock profile and furniture to streamline assembly processes.

Type II

The Type II variant of the Model 1816 Musket, serving as a refinement of the initial Type I design, was produced from 1822 to 1832 at both national armories and private contractors. This mid-production phase emphasized manufacturing efficiencies, balancing output between government facilities like and Harpers Ferry and external firms. Distinctive features of the Type II included a low-profile on the lock plate for a sleeker profile, an iron front sight integrated into the barrel , and a shortened forend secured by a band retention spring to enhance durability during handling. The lock plate was slightly lengthened compared to earlier models, and the sling was relocated to the bow, while the trigger plate was discontinued to simplify assembly. Key enhancements focused on reliability and preservation, such as an improved design that provided more consistent sparking under varied conditions and a brighter bluing process—known as National Armory Brown—applied to iron components to resist corrosion during storage and use. This browning technique, standardized by late 1822 using a of spirits of wine and tincture of steel, marked a significant step in finish quality. Contractor production played a prominent role, with firms like M. T. Wickham of delivering notable quantities—such as 5,000 units under a federal —though finish quality varied across makers due to differences in tooling and materials. Other contractors, including P. & E. W. Blake and N. Starr, contributed to the variant's output, often incorporating reinforced cocks in the for stronger ignition. In its evolutionary role, the Type II bridged persistent issues from the Type I, such as inconsistent metal finishes, toward more modern designs by promoting parts interchangeability and standardized processes that influenced later alterations like the Model 1835.

Type III

The Type III variant represented the culminating refinement of the Model 1816 Musket, manufactured from 1835 to 1844 primarily at armories such as and Harpers . This period leveraged accumulated experience, including barrel turning and stock duplication techniques introduced earlier but optimized for higher volume, resulting in the variant's prevalence among surviving examples today. Key distinct features included a flat lock plate with shallower engravings for simplified production, a reinforced wrist to bolster integrity at the area, and a tapered entry pipe designed to ease insertion and reduce wear during loading. Final tweaks focused on efficiency, such as streamlined carving that eliminated unnecessary recesses—like the clearance behind the fired position—to accelerate , alongside heavier barrel band springs for improved retention under field conditions. The last units of this type signified the close of the era in U.S. military service, as percussion systems began supplanting flintlocks by the mid-1840s.

Operational History

Pre-Civil War Use

The Model 1816 Musket served as the primary infantry weapon for the U.S. Army starting in 1816, marking the first standard-issue longarm produced at both the and Harpers Ferry Armories, with nearly 675,000 units manufactured overall. It was also distributed to state militias as their standard arm through the 1840s, equipping irregular forces for local defense and federal call-ups. This widespread adoption reflected the musket's role in maintaining a unified military supply chain amid limited federal resources. It saw use in conflicts such as the (1832). During the Second Seminole War (1835–1842), the Model 1816 was the principal martial firearm issued to U.S. forces in Florida's challenging campaigns, distributed from depots such as and Palatka to and units. Its .69-caliber design, paired with buck-and-ball cartridges containing a and three buckshot, proved effective for in swampy, dense terrain where individual accuracy was secondary to suppressive spread patterns. In engagements like Dade's Massacre on December 28, 1835, troops fired multiple volleys at effective ranges of 100 to 200 yards, though guerrilla tactics often limited sustained linear engagements. In the Mexican–American War (1846–1848), the Model 1816 armed the majority of U.S. , including units like the , and played a key role in battles such as Buena Vista, where its reliable supported aimed volleys against Mexican lancers. Over 675,000 total production allowed issuance to tens of thousands of troops mobilized for the conflict, bolstering the war effort through armory output. However, its limitations—effective to about 220 yards but unreliable beyond—highlighted disadvantages against rifled carbines and rifles, which offered roughly twice the range and accuracy in open terrain. U.S. Army training with the Model 1816 emphasized linear tactics derived from European traditions, with soldiers drilled in forming two- to four-rank lines for massed volleys followed by charges to exploit and effects. Bayonets, typically 15- to 16-inch triangular blades, were , as commanders like prioritized close-quarters assaults over long-range precision, aligning with the musket's short effective range. By the , significant stockpiles were maintained in federal arsenals, reserved for emergencies and mobilization to ensure rapid deployment.

Civil War Role

By the outset of the in 1861, the had largely phased out the Model 1816 musket in favor of more advanced rifled muskets, relegating surviving examples primarily to training roles and equipping units or state militias. These older flintlocks, often converted to percussion ignition, saw limited frontline deployment among volunteer regiments in the war's initial phases but were increasingly seen as inadequate against rifled weapons. Confederate forces, facing severe shortages of modern arms, relied heavily on captured Union stockpiles and pre-war arsenals to acquire tens of thousands of Model 1816 muskets, which were quickly adapted for service through percussion conversions. These weapons armed many early volunteer units and played a role in key engagements during the war's opening phases, such as the in July 1861, where smoothbores supported Confederate volleys. At the in April 1862, elements of Confederate brigades, including some smoothbore-armed units, employed older muskets in where bayonet charges could close the distance on rifled opponents. Similarly, during the in July 1863, militia and reserve units on both sides carried converted smoothbores, highlighting their persistent but marginal presence amid broader tactical shifts. The Model 1816's design, with limited to about 100 yards and accuracy falling sharply beyond 200 yards, exposed users to heavy in open-field engagements against Minié ball-firing . By 1863, it had become largely obsolete as Confederate armies prioritized imported rifle-muskets, which offered superior range and precision, relegating the Model 1816 to secondary roles or surplus.

Legacy

Modifications

The most significant post-production modification to the Model 1816 Musket was the conversion from to ignition, which addressed the unreliability of flint and steel mechanisms in adverse weather. A large majority of the produced Model 1816 muskets were converted to ignition during the and , primarily through the replacement of the frizzen and pan with a percussion nipple fitted to the barrel and a new designed to strike percussion caps. These conversions were authorized by the U.S. Ordnance Department to modernize existing stockpiles without the need for full replacement, preserving the musket's .69-caliber barrel and overall configuration. The conversion process typically involved machining a or lug onto the side of the barrel by and fitting a reinforced section to hold the percussion nipple securely, followed by the installation of a modified lock plate with a percussion hammer. This work was conducted at federal armories, notably , where gunsmiths ensured compatibility with standard military percussion caps while retaining the original trigger assembly and furniture. Variations in technique included the "cone-in-vent" method, where the nipple was simply into the existing , and more robust bolster additions brazed or welded to the barrel for durability. Conversions peaked between 1848 and 1852, driven by Ordnance Department directives to equip units ahead of potential conflicts, with alone processing over 86,000 Model 1816 muskets in 1851 and 1852. Beyond upgrades, other modifications were less common but addressed specific performance issues; for instance, approximately 20,000 converted muskets received rifled barrels as part of the Remington-Maynard primer system alterations to improve long-range accuracy, though these were not widely adopted due to the added complexity and cost. Stock repairs were also routine, involving the replacement or reinforcement of walnut stocks damaged by field wear, often using period-appropriate techniques at armories to restore structural integrity. These modifications significantly prolonged the operational utility of the Model 1816 into the 1860s, allowing it to serve in secondary roles during the despite the introduction of newer designs. However, post-war surplus led to many converted examples being decommissioned, scrapped for parts, or sold off, with few retaining their original configurations due to the irreversible nature of the alterations.

Collectibility

The Model 1816 Musket holds significant appeal among collectors due to its historical role as a cornerstone of early American military arms production, with rarity varying markedly by variant. Type I examples, produced in limited numbers by private contractors such as William L. Evans and Marine T. Wickham under contracts totaling around 5,000 units, are the scarcest and command the highest values, often exceeding $5,000 at for well-preserved specimens. In contrast, Type III muskets, manufactured in greater quantities at the national armories from 1835 to 1844, are more readily available and typically valued between $1,500 and $3,000 for original configurations in good condition. Condition plays a pivotal role in determining collectible value, with original flintlock mechanisms far more prized than percussion conversions, which can reduce worth by up to 50% due to their altered historical . Matching numbers on major components, such as the barrel and lockplate, further enhance desirability by confirming , often increasing market value by 20-50% compared to mismatched examples. Collectors prioritize untouched s for their representation of 19th-century technology, while conversions—common during the era—are valued lower unless tied to documented military provenance. Preservation efforts underscore the musket's enduring legacy, with notable examples housed in prominent institutions. The National Historic Site displays original Model 1816 flintlocks, including three early 1830s specimens recovered from the armory grounds, highlighting their role in U.S. history. Similarly, the NRA National Firearms Museum features multiple variants, such as a Harpers Ferry-produced example, emphasizing the model's standardization across federal armories. Modern replicas cater to reenactors and enthusiasts, enabling accurate historical recreation without compromising originals. Italian manufacturer produces faithful reproductions of the Model 1816, particularly the Harpers Ferry variant with Type II specifications, including a 42-inch barrel and .69-caliber , designed for black powder shooting in period events. These high-quality copies, available in configuration, support demonstrations while adhering closely to original dimensions and materials. The musket's collectibility is amplified by its symbolic importance as an emblem of early industrialization, representing the first widespread adoption of in U.S. arms production at and Harpers Ferry armories. With over 675,000 units produced between 1816 and 1844, it marked a shift toward domestic manufacturing independence post-War of 1812, influencing global arms development through copied designs and contributing to studies on 19th-century military-industrial competition.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] NOTES ON THE MODEL 1816 U.S. FLINTLOCK MUSKET
    The Model 1816 was produced from 1816 to the mid-1840s, had a .69 caliber, was slightly over 5 1/2" long, and had a 6 5/16" wide lock plate.
  2. [2]
    The U.S. Model 1816 Flintlock Musket - TEHS - Quarterly Archives
    Jun 24, 2014 · 69 caliber muzzle-loading musket weighed about 10 pounds. This musket was the standard firearm carried by U.S. infantry forces from 1816 to 1842 ...
  3. [3]
    U.S. Harpers Ferry Model 1816 Flintlock Musket - NRA Museums:
    The Model 1816 Musket was manufactured at the U.S. Armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia between 1816 and 1844, with over 350,000 produced during this period.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    1816 Springfield Musket - United States Infantry - Military Heritage
    This reproduction of a 1816 Model US Infantry Musket has a .69 calibre, 42 inch long, round barrel that is made of tempered seamless carbon steel.Missing: production | Show results with:production
  5. [5]
    Original U.S. Springfield Model 1816 Percussion Converted Musket ...
    Overall Length: 55 Inches Action type: Side Action Flintlock Feed System: Muzzle Loading. History of the Model 1816 Musket: The War of 1812 had revealed many ...
  6. [6]
    U.S. Springfield Model 1816 Flintlock Musket - NRA Museums:
    Production of arms at Springfield began in 1795, with 245 muskets manufactured during that year, and approximately 80,000 were turned out before production was ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  7. [7]
    Civil War Muskets and Rifles-Fall Creek Suttlery- LDS
    Harpers Ferry produced 103,000 while Springfield produced 172,000 for a total production surpassing a quarter of a million arms. Many of these arms had been ...
  8. [8]
    A Glossary of Small Arms Across Three Wars
    The effective range of the Land Patterns was up to 300 yards, accuracy was limited to about 100 yards, but most commanders favored volley fire at 50 yards, or ...
  9. [9]
    Range, Power, Penetration, Velocity of a Brown Bess - Bow Vs. Musket
    Apr 29, 2019 · Brown bess circa1700,500 grain ball at 1200 fps muzzle energy 1600 ft lbs! Modern nato round such as the sa80,63 grain ball ,3100 fps muzzle ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Henry Gun Works and the impact of the federal contract system ...
    The Henrys, like many private contractors signed on with the government and began producing muskets under the War Department's special guidelines which called ...
  11. [11]
    Lot - Antique U.S Springfield Model 1816 Flintlock Percussion ...
    May 11, 2024 · Additionally, more than a dozen contractors also made Model 1816 Muskets during its production years, adding more than 146,000 muskets for a ...
  12. [12]
    The "Privy" Musket: Uncovering The Story Behind A Forgotten Model ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · On the grounds of the present-day Alexandria, Va., courthouse, an interesting Model 1816 Springfield musket was found, muzzle-down, ...
  13. [13]
    Harpers Ferry Model 1816 Flintlock Musket / Percussion Cap Rifle
    Model 1816 muskets/rifles were in used until 1865. Her high production total of 675,000 units marked her as the most-produced flintlock firearm in American ...
  14. [14]
    US Springfield Model 1816 Type III Flintlock Musket with Bayonet ...
    Springfield Type III Model 1816 muskets were manufactured between 1831-1844. According to page 426 of the book "American Military Shoulder Arms, Volume II" ...
  15. [15]
    Lot 218:US Harpers Ferry 1816 Type III Flintlock Musket Dated 1837
    Aug 15, 2025 · ... American Military Shoulder Arms, Volume II" by George D. Moller, with the Model 1816 Type III muskets described on pages 424-425. Model 1816 ...
  16. [16]
    Springfield U.S. Model 1816 Musket - Bonhams Skinner
    ... flat lock plate with convex tail stamped "SPRING/FIELD/1818" and with a ... Springfield U.S. Model 1816 Musket, image 3. Springfield U.S. Model 1816 ...
  17. [17]
    US Springfield Model 1816 Flintlock Musket - NRA Museums:
    Made with existing stores of parts, this .69 caliber flint-lock musket represents the end of an era. Percussion-lock arms use a more efficient means of ignition ...Missing: velocity | Show results with:velocity
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Rifle-Musket vs. The Smoothbore Musket, a Comparison of the ...
    Model 1816 Musket Length: 56.75" Weight: about 9 lbs. Caliber: .69 (Earl 8). The Model 1842 Musket (fig. 2) was another example of a smoothbore weapon that ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Notes on U. S. Arsenals, Depots, and Martial Firearms of the Second ...
    The primary martial firearm employed against the Seminoles and their allies was the M1816 musket, a formidable flintlock firearm provided with a socket bayonet ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Staff Ride Handbook for Dade's Battle, Florida, 28 December 1835
    It was the 1816 model . 69 caliber weapon with an effective range between 100 and 200 yards, firing a rounded 120 grain powder musket ball.
  21. [21]
    None
    ### Summary of Model 1816 Musket in the Mexican-American War
  22. [22]
    Lock, Stock, & Barrel - Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · To feed the U.S. war effort, the armories at Harpers Ferry and Springfield churned out thousands of Model 1816 muskets. Armed with newer ...
  23. [23]
    Palo Alto Battlefield NHS:A Thunder of Cannon (Chapter 4)
    Feb 25, 2009 · The bayonets for U.S. Models 1816/1822 and 1835 muskets were triangular sectioned, with a 15 inch blade attached to a cylindrical socket. ...Missing: lug | Show results with:lug
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The BaTTle Raged…wiTh TeRRiBle FuRy - National Park Service
    percussion conversion Model 1816 muskets, and the Model 1842 smoothbore musket. ... Confederate musket fire coming from Morgan's woods some part of the Union line.
  25. [25]
    Small Arms of the Civil War | American Battlefield Trust
    Jan 6, 2009 · Most Civil War infantrymen, both Federal and Confederate, carried .58 or .577 caliber rifle-muskets. The rifle-musket was first manufactured in ...
  26. [26]
    Springfield Armory M1816 altered to percussion - American Longrifles
    Nov 9, 2020 · Those alterations were performed at the armories and arsenals in 1851 and 1852. Springfield Armory altered 86,565 Model 1816 muskets and 26.841 ...Missing: records | Show results with:records
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The U.S. Flintlock Musket - American Society of Arms Collectors
    There is no doubt but what the standard percussion cap conversions were widely used during the hostilities of 1860 as evidenced by original parts for these ...
  28. [28]
    Percussion Conversion of Lemuel Pomeroy ... - NRA Museums:
    Many flintlock muskets were converted to percussion ignition and rifled for military issue. Percussion Conversion of Lemuel Pomeroy Percussion Model 1816 Musket
  29. [29]
    1816 U.S. Musket (Percussion Conversion) Issuance??? - Authentic
    May 27, 2004 · Between 1856 and 1859, the national armories altered a total of 14,182 Model 1842 muskets, 4,363 being rifled only. In addition, 9,126 ...Model 1816 Conversions being used in the unionPedersoli's 1816 conversion Musket - Authentic CampaignerMore results from www.authentic-campaigner.com<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    VALLEY FORGE Antique W.L. EVANS Contract U.S M1816 ...
    VALLEY FORGE Antique W.L. EVANS Contract U.S M1816 FLINTLOCK Musket SCARCE One of Only 5,000 Type I Muskets Produced for sale. Click Photo to Enlarge
  31. [31]
    U.S. Model 1822/28 (1816 Type III) Flintlock Musket by Springfield ...
    U.S. Model 1822/28 (1816 Type III) Flintlock Musket by Springfield with Bayonet ; Lots Open. Nov 27, 2023 ; Lots Close. Dec 8, 2023 ; Estimate. $1,800 - 2,400.
  32. [32]
    Lot 330:US Springfield Model 1816 Type III Flintlock Musket
    Dec 8, 2023 · Springfield Type III Model 1816 muskets were manufactured between 1831-1844. The Model 1816 Musket was the primary infantry long arm during ...
  33. [33]
    Recent Discoveries on the Organ of Muskets - Springfield Armory ...
    Here may be seen the three original Springfield US M1816 flintlock muskets resting on the original early 1830's floor alongside the later Springfield US M1861 ...Missing: NRA | Show results with:NRA
  34. [34]
    1816 Harper's Ferry Musket flintlock model - Rifles - Davide Pedersoli
    Davide Pedersoli sells and produces reproductions of 0 Rifles such as 1816 Harper's Ferry Rifle flintlock model of the product line 1816 Harper's Ferry.