Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Modular Body Armor Vest

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) is a , scalable developed by Eagle Industries for , introduced around 2005, featuring a that enables operators to customize ballistic protection by integrating or omitting soft armor inserts and hard plates tailored to mission requirements. It provides enhanced mobility and reduced bulk compared to earlier rigid systems, while maintaining core protection against small arms fire and fragmentation threats when fully configured. Introduced as part of the Special Operations Forces Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements () program, the MBAV builds on predecessor systems like the Body Armor Load Carriage System (BALCS) and Releasable Body Armor Vest (RBAV) by eliminating unnecessary soft armor layers in certain configurations to prioritize operator . The vest includes specialized variants, such as a version that pairs with a low-visibility under-vest for comprehensive coverage in aquatic operations, and a variant equipped with a plate-sized soft armor insert for standalone use, though with trade-offs in fragmentation resistance. These adaptations reflect the SPEAR program's emphasis on mission-tailored gear for high-risk environments, including raids and .

History and Development

Origins in US Military Body Armor

The development of military body armor began in earnest during , driven by the need to protect against shrapnel and fragmentation from aerial bombardments. In 1943, the Army introduced the M1 flak vest, a 17.5-pound garment featuring plates designed primarily for members in bombers, with over 300,000 units produced by the war's end. Experimental efforts also included the M12 vest, developed late in the war using lighter aluminum plates layered with fabric, weighing about 12 pounds, though it saw limited fielding until the as a stopgap measure. These early systems marked a shift from rigid plates tested in the to more wearable designs, focusing on fragmentation rather than direct small-arms fire. Following the Vietnam War, where fragmentation remained the primary threat, the US Army advanced with the Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops (PASGT) vest in the early 1980s. Introduced in 1983 and first deployed during the invasion of , the PASGT utilized 13 layers of fabric to provide enhanced fragmentation protection while weighing approximately 9 pounds, a significant improvement over earlier nylon-based vests like the M69 from the 1960s. This system, developed at the Natick Soldier Systems Center since the 1950s, prioritized mobility and was paired with a matching helmet, becoming the standard upper-torso armor through the . By the late 1990s and early 2000s, evolving combat threats prompted a transition from soft armor vests to modular plate carriers capable of integrating rigid inserts for rifle-round protection. The Interceptor Body Armor (IBA), introduced in June 1999 and fielded widely by 2001, consisted of a outer tactical vest supplemented by ceramic Small Arms Protective Inserts (SAPIs) made of or aluminum oxide, offering defense against 7.62mm rounds while maintaining fragmentation coverage at a base weight of 16.4 pounds. This was followed by the (IOTV) in 2007, which debuted in combat during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, featuring a quick-release mechanism and enhanced side protection with Enhanced Small Arms Protective Inserts (ESAPIs), though at a higher total weight of around 32 pounds when fully loaded. These advancements were largely propelled by the surge in (IED) attacks during the and wars, which accounted for over 60% of US casualties in by the mid-2000s and necessitated lighter, more adaptable systems to improve soldier mobility without sacrificing vital organ protection. Combat wound analyses from these theaters drove iterative upgrades to the IBA and IOTV, such as deltoid and axillary protectors added in 2004, emphasizing torso coverage against blast fragments. Parallel efforts in the Marine Corps introduced modular concepts with the in 2006, influencing broader demands for customizable load-bearing armor.

Specific Development of the MBAV

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) was developed under the U.S. Command's () Forces Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements () program, initiated in , as an evolution of earlier systems like the Body Armor Load Carriage System (BALCS) from the and the Releasable Body Armor Vest (RBAV). Eagle Industries Unlimited was selected to produce the MBAV, focusing on scalability for varying mission profiles to enhance operator mobility and customization. The MBAV was first fielded to units, including the , in the mid-2000s. Central design goals included significant weight reduction, with a base vest weight of 16 pounds (7.3 kg), while incorporating removable (SAPI) or Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert (ESAPI) plates selectively in vital areas like the chest and back, with optional side coverage to balance protection and agility. As an interim measure amid delays in the U.S. Marine Corps' Scalable Plate Carrier program, approximately 10,000 MBAV units were provided to Marine forces in 2009 to meet urgent operational needs.

Design and Components

Core Structure and Fit

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) features a core structure built around a lightweight outer carrier system designed for modularity and operator mobility within the U.S. Command's (USSOCOM) . The carrier, produced by Industries, is constructed from durable materials including mesh fabrics and woven , with variants using hydrophobic coatings like toll-coated rubber for water resistance, quick drying, and compatibility with / webbing across the torso for integrating load-bearing equipment. Adjustability is achieved through padded shoulder straps with detachable retention loops, a skeletal for side closure, and quick-release configurations, supporting sizes from small to extra-large (S-XL) to accommodate diverse body types and mission-specific loadouts. The base weighs approximately 5.8 lb (2.6 kg) without soft armor inserts, while the fully equipped , including plates and soft armor panels for fragmentation , totals around 22 lb (10 kg). Ergonomic elements prioritize wearability, including breathable lining for , padded shoulders to minimize chafing during extended use, and side-release fasteners along with a removable front flap for rapid doffing in emergency situations. Integration points consist of front and rear plate pockets compatible with 10x12 inch /ESAPI plates, supplemented by optional side armor sleeves, groin protectors, and lower back options for scalable coverage.

Modular Attachments and Customization

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) incorporates a universal /PALS grid system across its front, back, and side panels, enabling operators to attach a variety of mission-essential pouches and equipment, such as magazine holders, radio carriers, and medical kits, for tailored loadouts. This webbing compatibility stems from the vest's design under the U.S. Command's program, which prioritizes modularity to support diverse operational environments. Plate coverage in the MBAV is highly scalable, with optional side plates and trauma pads that can be inserted or removed without tools, allowing users to switch between lightweight configurations covering only vital torso areas and fuller setups for enhanced peripheral protection. This tool-free adjustability facilitates rapid reconfiguration in , based on requirements like or levels, as determined by unit commanders. The vest maintains broad compatibility with supplementary accessories, including hydration bladders that integrate via rear attachments for sustained operations, as well as attachment points on the shoulders and for linking to ballistic helmets or auxiliary load-bearing systems like the Fighting Load . In practice, U.S. Army Rangers often customize the MBAV for missions by adding extra ammunition pouches to the front grid, while evaluation units in have incorporated side soft armor panels for roles. These modular features provide key operational advantages, such as the ability to reduce overall weight by 20-30% through the omission of non-essential attachments and plates, thereby enhancing and endurance during extended patrols or assaults.

Materials and Protection Standards

Ballistic Materials and Insert Plates

The soft armor panels of the Modular Body Armor Vest consist of multi-layer fibers, such as , or (UHMWPE), such as Dyneema or Spectra, arranged in woven or unidirectional configurations to provide flexible protection against fragmentation and low-velocity threats. These materials are encased in a durable cover to maintain integrity during use. Hard armor inserts for the vest are removable plates, typically in the standard 10x12-inch size, designed for insertion into front and rear pockets. Protective Inserts (SAPI) and Enhanced SAPI (ESAPI) plates feature a strike face made from or , backed by a composite layer of UHMWPE or fibers to capture fragments and absorb residual ; each plate weighs approximately 3-4 pounds depending on the variant. The outer shell of the vest is constructed from water-resistant fabric, such as 1000-denier , treated with hydrophobic coatings to minimize water retention and facilitate quick drying in wet environments. To mitigate blunt force from impacts, the vest includes integrated pads positioned behind the hard plates, typically made from closed-cell that absorbs and disperses without adding significant bulk. Maintenance of the vest involves replacing damaged hard plates after any ballistic impact, as the ceramic components may shatter upon defeating a , while the soft armor panels have a rated of five years under normal storage and usage conditions to account for material degradation from environmental factors like and UV . The modular design permits selective plate use, enabling weight savings of up to several pounds compared to non-modular systems by omitting coverage in low-threat areas.

Protection Levels and Certification

The soft armor components of the Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) meet NIJ Standard-0101.06 Level IIIA, providing protection against handgun threats including 9mm full metal jacket rounds and semi-jacketed hollow point rounds at velocities up to 1,400 ft/s. This level ensures the vest stops multiple impacts from common sidearms while maintaining flexibility for operational mobility. The MBAV incorporates (SAPI) plates under MIL-DTL-46027, providing protection equivalent to NIJ Level III, capable of defeating rifle threats such as ball ammunition at 2,750 ft/s. Enhanced SAPI (ESAPI) plates upgrade the system to protection equivalent to Level IV, stopping armor-piercing rounds like the .30-06 M2 AP at designated velocities. These ceramic-composite inserts are modular, allowing operators to scale protection based on mission requirements without compromising the vest's lightweight design. Fragmentation protection in the MBAV adheres to MIL-STD-662F, with the system designed to achieve a V50 ballistic limit against 17-grain fragment simulator projectiles at velocities up to 4,000 ft/s. The MBAV lacks integrated stab or spike resistance, relying solely on ballistic materials like fibers that offer no certified defense against edged weapons or ice picks under NIJ Standard-0115.00. Additionally, without ESAPI plates, the vest remains vulnerable to high-velocity armor-piercing rifle rounds beyond Level III capabilities. The MBAV was developed under the Special Operations Forces Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements (SPEAR) program, involving testing to confirm compliance with ballistic and fragmentation standards.

Operational Deployment and Evaluation

Adoption by Special Operations Forces

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) was adopted by U.S. Command (USSOCOM) units, including the and Groups, as part of the Special Operations Forces Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements (SPEAR) program. The vest became a standard issue for these elite forces, enabling enhanced mobility in missions due to its lighter design compared to the (IOTV). It supported operations through dedicated supply chains. In high-mobility raids in , the MBAV's lightweight configuration allowed operators to maintain agility in demanding terrain and rapid assault scenarios. The vest's modular nature facilitated quick adjustments for mission-specific needs, contributing to its preference in environments. On an interim basis, the U.S. Marine Corps deployed MBAV units while awaiting the Scalable Plate Carrier. Feedback from operators highlighted the MBAV's benefits in mobility and reduced heat stress, leading to better overall performance during extended engagements. These attributes were particularly valued in arid, high-temperature theaters like . Logistically, the MBAV was distributed via USSOCOM's specialized supply networks, ensuring rapid issuance to deploying units. The MBAV continues to be used by special operations forces as of 2025.

Testing and Non-Selection for Broader Use

In early 2009, the U.S. Army planned an evaluation of approximately 500 Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) units in Afghanistan, targeting a battalion of soldiers operating in eastern regions such as the Korengal Valley. The deployment, initially slated for March, was delayed due to ongoing safety certification reviews ordered by senior Army leadership to assess not only the vest but also the overall soldier load configuration. This left roughly $3 million worth of equipment, including the MBAVs, stored in a U.S. warehouse until approvals were granted, with limited fielding resuming later that year to select deploying brigades like the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division. A key component of the evaluation was the Soldier Protection Demonstration VII, conducted in May 2009 at , . This 11-day event involved 36 airborne soldiers from the and testing eight plate carrier designs, including the MBAV, through rigorous scenarios such as 10,000-step road marches, obstacle courses, weapons familiarization, vehicle ingress/egress drills, and room-clearing exercises. The assessments focused on mobility, heat dissipation, form, fit, function, and plate retention under load, generating over 10,000 pages of soldier feedback to inform future requirements. Subsequent ballistic and flame resistance testing was performed at the Aberdeen Test Center to verify protection levels. Testing results highlighted the MBAV's advantages in weight reduction, reducing weight by 10-15 pounds compared to the Improved Outer Tactical Vest with front and side plates, enhancing agility in Afghanistan's high-altitude, mountainous terrain. However, concerns were raised regarding inconsistent side protection due to the plate carrier's reduced torso coverage compared to the IOTV's side plates, potentially leaving vulnerabilities in fragmentation-heavy environments. Compatibility issues with existing gear, such as the Land Warrior system, were also noted in feedback. Despite positive operational feedback from forces, where the MBAV saw continued adoption for its modularity and load savings, the U.S. declined broader for conventional units. Classified as an interim solution originating from requirements, the MBAV was not selected for the 's $18.6 million plate carrier contract in 2009, with approximately 1,000 additional units fielded alongside the new (SPCS) beginning in 2010.

Comparisons and Legacy

Differences from Predecessor Vests

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) marks a departure from the Interceptor Body Armor (IBA), fielded in , by shifting from a full-torso soft armor to a plate-centric design that emphasizes scalability and reduced bulk. The IBA provided extensive soft armor coverage across the torso, supplemented by optional deltoid and axillary protectors, but its rigid structure limited and contributed to operator fatigue during prolonged missions. In comparison, the MBAV prioritizes targeted hard armor with modular attachments, resulting in a lighter overall system—approximately 4–8 (1.8–3.6 ) empty for the base vest—compared to the IBA's system weight of 16–24 (7.3–10.9 ) depending on , enabling better airflow through an improved fit and less encumbering materials. Relative to the (IOTV), introduced in 2007 as an upgrade to the IBA, the MBAV offers greater weight savings and flexibility, typically 5–10 lb (2.3–4.5 kg) lighter than the IOTV's loaded weight of 25–35 lb (11.3–15.9 kg) depending on . While the IOTV mandates integrated side protection pockets for enhanced torso coverage, the MBAV treats side plates as optional, allowing operators to scale armor based on mission threats and thereby improving . This design choice supports faster transitions in dynamic environments, though exact metrics like movement speed vary by . A in the MBAV is its transition from the rigid, heavy frameworks of predecessors to scalable , where components like pouches and panels can be rapidly attached or removed without tools. The IOTV relies on a fixed for stabilization, which provides consistent fit but restricts adjustability during wear; the MBAV counters this with an adjustable quick-release system that facilitates on-the-fly customization and emergency doffing. These changes reflect a broader emphasis on operator-centric in contexts. In terms of performance, the MBAV trades some fragmentation —due to reduced soft armor extent—for enhanced , covering vital areas with plates while allowing greater ventilation and less restrictive layering compared to the IOTV's near-full soft armor overlay. Evaluations configured the MBAV for loads up to around 20 (9 ), contrasting the IOTV's setups up to 35 (15.9 ), which prioritize comprehensive blast and resistance at the expense of agility. This balance suits high-tempo operations where speed outweighs maximal static coverage.

Influence on Successor Systems

The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV)'s emphasis on and directly informed the development of subsequent U.S. military systems, particularly within the Marine Corps and . Fielded as an interim solution for the U.S. Marine Corps around 2006–2007, the MBAV served as a lightweight plate carrier basis for the Scalable Plate Carrier (SPC), fielded in 2011, which adopted the MBAV's optional ballistic plates and universal attachment system for enhanced customization and reduced weight during missions. Similarly, through the U.S. Special Operations Command's () Special Operations Forces Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements (SPEAR) program, the MBAV influenced designs, contributing to the (MSV), fielded in 2018 as part of the Soldier Protection System (SPS). The MSV incorporated comparable features, allowing soldiers to configure protection levels with optional plates and MOLLE-compatible pouches for mission-specific loads. The MSV advanced beyond the MBAV by prioritizing weight reduction and integration capabilities, weighing approximately 5 pounds less than its predecessor, the (IOTV), when fully loaded with plates, thereby improving soldier mobility without compromising core protection. While traditional ceramic plates remained standard, the enabled lighter configurations, and initial fielding to units like the occurred in 2021, emphasizing rapid scalability for airborne operations. Additionally, the broader framework supports integration with soldier-worn sensors, such as those in the Integrated Soldier Sensor System for vitals and environmental data, building on the MBAV's modular foundation to enable networked protection. Within , the MBAV's design influenced more advanced variants, transitioning to systems like Crye Precision's Adaptive Vest System (AVS) adopted around 2020, which retained quick-release mechanisms and plate scalability while enhancing durability. As of 2025, continues refining these modular systems with lighter to defeat armor-piercing and non-AP rifle rounds, along with integrated and monitoring sensors, extending the MBAV's legacy of versatile, low-profile design. The MBAV's modular architecture also extended its impact beyond U.S. forces, contributing to the standardization of scalable compliant with STANAG 2920 ballistic testing protocols, which emphasize fragment protection in interchangeable systems. In the civilian and tactical markets, it influenced designs like the Crye Precision Jumpable Plate Carrier (JPC), a lightweight, MOLLE-universal vest that echoes the MBAV's emphasis on and rapid attachment for non-military users. As of 2025, the MBAV has been phased out for regular U.S. military units in favor of newer scalable carriers like the MSV and Marine Plate Carrier Generation III, but it remains in use for training and select missions due to its proven reliability.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  2. [2]
    "This Vest May Save Your Life!": U.S. Army Body Armor from World ...
    'Modularity' and 'scalability' refer to soldiers' ability to adjust protective gear to best accomplish the mission; the Army Modular Scalable Vest (MSV) and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Systems Command improves Marines' combat effectiveness with ...
    Nov 20, 2006 · The MTV revolutionizes body armor into a load bearing vest to better carry assault loads such as magazines, water and grenades.
  4. [4]
    Portfolio - PM SSV - Modular Scalable Vest (MSV) - PEO Soldier
    The modular scalable vest (MSV) is a lightweight modular, scalable, and tailorable vest. The MSV has the ability to scale between Low Vis carrier (concealable, ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Modular Tactical Vest: A Case Study in Success and Failure
    The Marine Corps has used Kevlar body armor since the 1980's to provide ballistic protection for Marines and Sailors in harms way. Th.e Corps initially. fielded ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] US Army Body Armor from World War II to Present - ARSOF History
    US Army body armor evolved from the M1 'flak vest' in WWII, to the M12, M1952, and M1952A, with continuous development to increase survivability.
  7. [7]
    Armour - Ballistic, Kevlar, Plates | Britannica
    In the 1980s the U.S. Army developed the Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops (PASGT), which was composed of a newly designed Kevlar helmet and a Kevlar ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Army's Management of the Operations and Support Phase of ... - DoD
    Dec 8, 2009 · The Army's Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) is a modular system that consists of a vest, ballistic plates, and additional components, such as the ...
  9. [9]
    #AAC25 Improved Outer Tactical Vest - USAASC - Army.mil
    Oct 1, 2014 · The IOTV is more than three pounds lighter than the current OTV, but provides an equal level of protection over an increased area.
  10. [10]
    Army and Marine Corps's Individual Body Armor System Issues - GAO
    Apr 26, 2007 · Since combat operations began in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. forces have been subjected to frequent and deadly attacks from insurgents using ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  11. [11]
    Wars in Iraq, Afghanistan Drove Developments in Body, Vehicle Armor
    IDGA provides industry-leading events, news and content for the U.S. Defense & Security Sector.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] This Vest May Save Your Life - ARSOF History
    This article summarizes the advancements in. U.S. Army body armor from World War II to the pres- ent. It also includes a brief description of U.S. Special.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] maritime body armor vest (mbav) - Vista Outdoor Media
    The MBAV is made from a combination of lightweight and durable hydrophobic mate- rials that will hold minimal water, drain and dry quickly.
  14. [14]
    Modular Body Armor Vest - Gladius Defense & Security
    Type Tactical Body Armor Manufacture Eagle Industries Weight 16 lb (7.3 kg) Attachments Tactical equipment including magazine racks.
  15. [15]
    The Soldier’s Heavy Load
    ### Summary of Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) or USSOCOM Body Armor
  16. [16]
    The Soldier Plate Carrier System - A Journey - Soldier Systems
    Dec 16, 2009 · The Eagle Industries Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV) in use with SOF was chosen and fielded to support this immediate need and also later ...Missing: SOCOM | Show results with:SOCOM
  17. [17]
    [PDF] NPS-AM-23-001.pdf - DAIR - Acquisition Research Program
    This study examines two of the 10 functional areas of Naval Special Warfare's (NSW) next- generation SPEAR loadout, the Load Carriage System and Body Armor Vest ...
  18. [18]
    https://webbingbabel.blogspot.com/2021/08/eagle-industries-mbav-hypalon-hank-mbav.html
  19. [19]
    Buy MBAV Soft Armor Inserts Online - Velocity Systems
    30-day returnsBallistic Material: 100% Dyneema; Ballistic Panel Thinness: .22 inches; Weight: .99 lbs./sq.ft; Fragmentation: Meets/Exceeds USSOCOM & IOTV requirements. 06 ...
  20. [20]
    Understanding the Materials Used in SAPI Plates - Shanghai H Win
    Mar 19, 2025 · SAPI plates use boron carbide, silicon carbide ceramics, and Kevlar. Boron carbide is lightweight, silicon carbide is cost-effective, and ...
  21. [21]
    https://rmadefense.com/does-body-armor-expire/
  22. [22]
    Eagle Industries MBAV Hypalon-Hank / MBAV 2.0 and Pouches
    Aug 23, 2021 · The toll coated rubber materials are hydrophobic, anti-microbial, low IR and flame resistant (FR). The mesh fabrics and woven fabrics are water ...Missing: outer | Show results with:outer
  23. [23]
    https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/nlectc/250144.pdf
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Low-Emissivity Topcoats for the - American Coatings Association
    Apr 20, 2020 · Infrared-(IR) based weaponry and surveillance systems utilizing the short-wave, mid-wave, and long- wave IR emissions produced by ambient.Missing: armor | Show results with:armor
  25. [25]
    https://www.congress.gov/111/chrg/CHRG-111shrg53693/CHRG-111shrg53693.pdf
  26. [26]
    https://www.army.mil/article/28822/army_looks_to_lighten_load_for_soldiers_in_afghanistan
  27. [27]
    Eagle Industries SOFBAV Aero Assault | Soldier Systems Daily
    Apr 9, 2013 · The Eagle Industries SOFBAV Aero Assault is one of two armor system solutions adopted by USSOCOM as a replacement for the decade-old MBAV.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Understanding NIJ 0101.06 Armor Protection Levels
    IIA ammunition fired from short barrel. IIIA ammunition fired from longer barrel handguns. No rifle ammunition handguns. No rifle ammunition protection.
  29. [29]
    MIL-STD-662 F V50 BALLISTIC TEST ARMOR - EverySpec
    This test method standard is intended for use in ballistic acceptance testing of armor and for the research and development of new armor materials.Missing: fragmentation 17- grain 4000 ft/ s
  30. [30]
    [PDF] DoD Testing Requirements for Body Armor
    Jan 29, 2009 · DoD issued Military Standard 662F to provide V50 acceptance criteria for body armor. Specifically, the standard provides guidance for ...Missing: grain 4000 ft/
  31. [31]
    [PDF] THE CURRENT STATUS OF U.S. GROUND FORCES HEARING ...
    The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV), already in use by Special. Operations Command, uses smaller bulletproof plates on the chest and back, mak- ing it ...
  32. [32]
    S.Hrg. 111-166 — THE CURRENT STATUS OF U.S. GROUND ...
    The Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV), already in use by Special Operations Command, uses smaller bulletproof plates on the chest and back, making it ...
  33. [33]
    Army looks to lighten load for Soldiers in Afghanistan | Article
    Oct 15, 2009 · ... body armor and to significantly reduce heat stress, enhancing combat performance in extreme temperatures, PEO Soldier officials said. The ...
  34. [34]
    Lightweight Armor Is Slow to Reach Troops - The New York Times
    Apr 17, 2009 · All involved in the debate agree that the lighter plates and vest do not cover as much of the torso as the current Army body armor. But ...
  35. [35]
    - THE CURRENT STATUS OF U.S. GROUND FORCES
    In May, the Maneuver Battle Lab conducted a Soldier Plate Carrier Demonstration at Yuma Proving Ground, AZ, to test the performance of lighter ballistic ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Infantry - Fort Benning - Army.mil
    Aug 19, 2009 · the four commercial vests; the U.S. Marine. Corp's Scalable Plate Carrier; the Modular. Body Armor Vest used by Army Special. Forces; and an ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Investigators: Army tests of body armor flawed - NBC News
    Oct 16, 2009 · The U.S. Army made critical mistakes in tests of a new body armor design, according to congressional investigators who recommend an ...
  38. [38]
    Army Orders $40 Million of its Newest Body Armor | Military.com
    Aug 2, 2019 · Army equipment officials have begun fielding the new Modular Scalable Vest, or MSV. But now they're looking to invest in even lighter armor.<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    New Army and Air Force body armor gets fielded to the 82nd ...
    Sep 17, 2021 · Katiushka Rivera, a soldier with the 82nd Airborne gets fitted for a modular scalable vest (MSV) during a fielding event in Fort Bragg, North ...Missing: titanium sensors
  40. [40]
    Army Combat Shirt with Modular Scalable Vest - PEO SOLDIER
    Army Combat Shirt with Modular Scalable Vest. Army Combat Shirt with Modular ... It also provides an Integrated Soldier Sensor System (ISSS), which ...
  41. [41]
    Lighter but Tougher Combat Vests and Helmets - Armada International
    Dec 10, 2020 · ... Modular Scalable Vest (MSV) is essentially a 'plates-only' body armour variant. While these are certainly lighter they also cover less than ...Missing: Armor MBAV USMC
  42. [42]
    Corps fields next-generation body armor to Marines
    Apr 7, 2020 · The Marine Corps has begun fielding a next-generation protective vest that provides improved fit, form and function for Marines.Missing: Modular influence successor MSV