Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mon kingdoms

The Mon kingdoms designate the historical states established and ruled by the Mon people, an Austroasiatic ethnic group long settled in the regions of present-day southern Myanmar and central Thailand, with their core territories in the Irrawaddy Delta and coastal Lower Burma. These polities, emerging prominently from the 13th century onward, centered on capitals such as Pegu (Bago) in the Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1287–1539), which functioned as a Theravada Buddhist hub and maritime trading power connecting India, Southeast Asia, and China. Earlier Mon cultural spheres, including the Dvaravati polity (c. 6th–11th centuries) in the Chao Phraya basin, laid foundational influences through rice agriculture, urbanism, and Buddhist iconography, though political unity remains archaeologically ambiguous. Traditional Burmese chronicles portray an antecedent Mon kingdom of Ramannadesa or , allegedly centered in Lower Burma from the 4th century and overrun by Pagan's King in 1057 CE, crediting it with transmitting scriptures northward; however, the absence of pre-13th-century epigraphic or material evidence has prompted scholars to interpret this narrative as a retrospective legend crafted to validate Pagan's religious and imperial claims rather than a verifiable historical entity. The later Hanthawaddy era marked a zenith of Mon , fostering advancements in Mon script-based literature, quadrangular architecture, and defensive innovations amid recurrent warfare with Burmese, , and Portuguese forces, before its dismantling by the in 1539 and partial revival until final subjugation in 1757. Despite territorial losses, Mon cultural exports—encompassing linguistic borrowings, calendrical systems, and courtly etiologies—profoundly shaped Burmese statecraft and societal norms, underscoring their disproportionate historical impact relative to demographic scale.

Origins and Foundations

Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence

Archaeological investigations in and reveal evidence of early urbanized societies linked to -speaking populations during the first millennium . Sites such as those around in feature large walled enclosures, brick monasteries, and bases, indicating organized polities with Buddhist influences by the 5th–6th centuries . In , Dvaravati-period settlements like and U Thong yield terracotta plaques depicting Buddhist motifs, wheel-turned ceramics, and Indian-derived artifacts, dated paleographically and radiometrically to the 6th–7th centuries , supporting cultural presence through trade networks evidenced by imported goods from and . These findings suggest proto-urban -related development from the 4th century onward, though multi-ethnic influences complicate exclusive attribution to ethnicity. Direct epigraphic confirmation remains limited in Myanmar, where the earliest dated Mon inscriptions appear in the (1086 and 1093 ), postdating Pyu and potentially reflecting later Mon consolidation rather than foundational origins. In contrast, undated Old Mon inscriptions from sites, paleographically assigned to the 6th–13th centuries , provide the oldest textual artifacts, including stone slabs and votive tablets bearing Mon script adapted from South Indian models. Linguistically, the belongs to the Monic branch of the Austroasiatic family, with comparative reconstructions indicating a proto-Austroasiatic homeland in southern or northern among Neolithic rice-farming groups around 3000–2000 BCE. Southward dispersals, evidenced by shared lexical and morphological features with and other Mon-Khmer languages, align with archaeological patterns of into lower MSEA by the mid-first millennium BCE. Old Mon inscriptions further demonstrate the language's role in recording and administrative records, influencing later Burmese and Thai scripts from the onward. Genetic-linguistic correlations, including Y-chromosome haplogroups, support Austroasiatic speakers' eastern Asian origins with from local hunter-gatherers during MSEA .

Migration Theories and Early Settlements

The , speakers of a Monic language within the Austroasiatic family, trace their origins to the broader dispersal of Proto-Austroasiatic populations from southern , where Neolithic rice-farming communities emerged around 7,000 years . Linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence indicates that these ancestors migrated southward between approximately 4,500 and 3,000 years , reaching via routes through and , eventually settling in the Chao Phraya basin of and the Irrawaddy Delta of . This migration introduced wet-rice cultivation, shouldered stone adzes, and early metallurgical practices, as evidenced by artifact distributions correlating with Austroasiatic linguistic spread. Genetic markers, particularly the Y-chromosome O-M95 at high frequencies among modern groups, corroborate a southern homeland followed by admixture with local hunter-gatherers in , rather than a direct Indian origin as suggested in some traditional Burmese chronicles. These chronicles, often composed centuries after events and influenced by later political narratives, claim descent from South Indian migrants like the Tondamans or Cholas, but such links conflict with the Austroasiatic typology of , which shares core vocabulary and typology with and rather than or Indo-Aryan tongues. Scholarly consensus favors the East Asian migration model, as Indian cultural influences on society—such as and loanwords—arrived via trade and religious diffusion after initial settlement, not as part of the ethnic founding population. Early Mon settlements coalesced in lower Myanmar by the late first millennium BCE, with communities documented around the Sittang and mouths and the Irrawaddy Delta, facilitating control over coastal ports by the 7th–9th centuries . Archaeological traces in the region include platforms and brick structures indicative of proto-urban organization, potentially dating to the 5th century , though earlier precursors (c. 500 BCE) show continuity in rice-farming settlements without definitive attribution due to sparse inscriptions. In , proto-Dvaravati sites like U Thong yield terracotta plaques and foundations from the , reflecting early -linked urbanization with Buddhist iconography and for paddy fields. These settlements, often moated and fortified, supported populations of several thousand, blending local traditions with incoming Austroasiatic , as seen in shared styles across Mon-Khmer zones. Limited epigraphic evidence, primarily from later inscriptions, confirms presence but highlights interpretive challenges from post-conquest Burmese , which may exaggerate or retroject formation to legitimize claims.

Early Kingdoms

Dvaravati Kingdom (c. 6th–11th centuries)

The Dvaravati polity encompassed a constellation of city-states in central Thailand's Chao Phraya River basin, primarily inhabited by Mon-speaking populations from approximately the 6th to the 11th centuries CE. Archaeological surveys identify over 50 moated settlements, with major centers including U Thong, Nakhon Pathom, and Si Thep, featuring earthen ramparts, reservoirs, and brick stupas constructed between the 6th and 9th centuries. Inscriptions in Pallava-derived Mon script, dating to the 7th century, corroborate the use of the Mon language alongside Pali for Buddhist texts, indicating a sophisticated administrative and religious framework influenced by Indian maritime trade networks. Dvaravati society centered on Buddhism, transmitted likely via Sri Lankan or Pyu intermediaries, as evidenced by disc-shaped dhammacetis (relic containers) and terracotta plaques illustrating Jataka narratives and life events from sites like . Artifacts such as standing images in the subduing pose, cast in bronze or carved in stone, exhibit stylized features—broad faces, almond-shaped eyes, and flame shoulders—blending prototypes with local adaptations, with production peaking in the 7th–9th centuries. Hindu elements coexisted, seen in lingas and reliefs, suggesting syncretic practices amid wet-rice agriculture and riverine commerce in rice, textiles, and forest products. By the , Khmer military incursions fragmented Dvaravati cohesion, with eastern frontiers like Si Thep showing hybrid Khmer-Mon architectural motifs by the 11th century. The polity's effective end came through conquests by around 1113–1150 CE, which sacked key cities such as Lavo (Lopburi) and integrated surviving Mon elites into the Angkorian sphere, displacing populations northward and facilitating cultural transmission to emerging Thai polities. Surviving Dvaravati artifacts, including coinage with bull emblems, underscore a decentralized reliant on Buddhist monastic networks rather than a monolithic .

Thaton Kingdom (c. 9th–11th centuries)

The Thaton Kingdom, centered on the city of Thaton in present-day Mon State, Myanmar, was a key Mon-speaking polity in lower Burma, flourishing from approximately the 9th to 11th centuries CE. Also referred to as Sudhammavati in Pali sources or Sadhuim in Mon, the kingdom encompassed southern regions conducive to trade and agriculture, serving as an important port linking Indian Ocean routes. Archaeological findings, including large walled enclosures, brick monasteries, and laterite stupa bases, indicate organized urban centers and Buddhist institutions emerging in lower Burma by the first millennium CE, with continued development into the specified period. Historical accounts of the kingdom derive primarily from later Mon and Burmese chronicles, such as the Thaton Razawun, which list a genealogy of up to 24 kings, including a ruler named Thudhamanawa, though these narratives blend elements with verifiable events and lack precise dating for early reigns. Corroborating evidence from is sparse but includes Hindu-Buddhist images from sites like Kawgun Cave near , dated variably to the 9th–10th or 11th centuries, suggesting syncretic religious practices amid predominant Buddhism. The kingdom's script, derived from South Indian Brahmi influences, laid groundwork for later Burmese writing, with the earliest Burmese inscriptions appearing around 1058 . Theravada formed the cultural core, fostering monastic centers that preserved texts and influenced regional art, as evidenced by architecture and relic veneration practices. Economically, Thaton's strategic position facilitated maritime trade in , timber, and precious goods, attracting settlers and supporting urban growth alongside agricultural surplus from fertile delta lands. The kingdom's decline culminated in its conquest by King of the in 1057 CE, an event chronicled as involving the capture of scriptures, artisans, and monks, which spurred to upper Burma, though the scale—allegedly 30,000 deportees—remains exaggerated in traditional accounts without archaeological confirmation. This integration marked the end of as an independent entity, yet Mon linguistic and religious elements persisted in shaping subsequent Burmese polities.

Hanthawaddy Kingdom

Founding and Expansion (1287–14th century)

The , known to the Mon as Ramaññadesa, was established in 1287 amid the disintegration of the Pagan Empire following Mongol invasions that sacked its capital in 1287. Wareru, a leader of origin who had served under the and risen as governor of Martaban, capitalized on the power vacuum by allying with local forces, including the prince of Pegu, to expel lingering Pagan Burmese administrators from the Delta and coastal regions. He declared himself king, adopting the Mon royal title and establishing Martaban (Mottama) as the initial capital, thereby unifying fragmented Mon polities in lower under a single authority that encompassed Martaban, Pegu (Bago), and the delta lowlands. Wareru's reign, lasting until his assassination by rivals in 1296, focused on consolidation rather than aggressive expansion; he secured from Sukhothai in 1294, symbolized by the gift of a , which affirmed Hanthawaddy's status as a but autonomous entity. He also promulgated the Dhammathat, a legal code blending Mon with Buddhist principles, to legitimize his rule over the predominantly population despite his non- ethnicity. His successors—Hkun Law (r. 1306–1310), Saw O (r. 1310–1324), and others in the unstable early dynasty—presided over a decentralized of regional lords, with limited central control, yet maintained the kingdom's coherence through maritime ties and defenses against Thai incursions. Formal from Sukhothai influence was achieved by approximately 1330, allowing Hanthawaddy to assert over its core territories without external overlordship. By the mid-14th century, the kingdom began transitioning toward greater centralization and territorial firmness under rulers such as Binnya U (r. 1353–1385), who shifted emphasis toward Pegu as an emerging administrative hub. The pivotal expansion occurred under Razadarit (r. 1384/1385–1421), who ascended amid internal strife but methodically subdued rebellious vassals, integrating () as a key western province alongside Bago and Martaban, thus solidifying control over lower Burma's rice-rich delta, coastal ports, and hinterlands essential for trade with and . This phase marked the kingdom's shift from loose federation to a more cohesive state capable of projecting power northward, initiating the against the Ava Kingdom in 1385 to repel Burmese expansionism, though early campaigns ended in stalemates that preserved Hanthawaddy's borders.

Zenith and Administration (14th–15th centuries)

The achieved its military zenith under King Razadarit (r. 1384–1421), who consolidated control over the core Mon territories by subduing rebellious provincial lords and capturing key ports such as Martaban in 1406 and Myaungmya, thereby unifying Pegu, the Irrawaddy Delta, and coastal enclaves into a cohesive polity capable of resisting northern incursions. His reign featured protracted conflicts with the Ava Kingdom, including the (c. 1385–1421), where Hanthawaddy forces, leveraging naval superiority and alliances with Delta warlords, repelled multiple Burmese invasions, securing dominance over and maritime approaches. Administratively, Razadarit's rule centralized authority in Pegu while maintaining a federated structure of semi-autonomous provinces governed by appointed viceroys, often kin or loyal commanders, who collected from rice surpluses in the and customs duties at ports like Martaban and Tavoy; this system balanced royal oversight with local incentives, funding a and fleet estimated at tens of thousands. Revenue streams emphasized trade monopolies on , , and textiles exported to and , with Pegu emerging as a commercial hub fostering economic interdependence over strict territorial . In the latter , under King Dhammazedi (r. 1471–1492), Hanthawaddy transitioned to cultural and economic prosperity, with Pegu serving as a Buddhist scholarly center; Dhammazedi, a former , unified monastic orders, standardized procedures, and commissioned inscriptions and artifacts like the cast in 1484, enhancing royal legitimacy through religious patronage. His averted conflicts with via tribute exchanges and fostered links, yielding peak prosperity evidenced by expanded urban and epigraphic records of fifty-seven Middle inscriptions reflecting administrative stability and legal codification drawing on dhammasattha traditions. This era's emphasis on merit-making and commerce solidified Hanthawaddy's regional influence until internal divisions emerged post-1492.

Decline and Conquest (1539)

The Hanthawaddy Kingdom entered a phase of decline in the early , marked by ineffective leadership following the prosperous era under King Dhammazedi. Successive rulers struggled with internal rebellions and factionalism among the nobility, which eroded central authority and military cohesion. By the of King Takayutpi (r. c. 1526–1539), a young and inexperienced monarch, the kingdom's administrative mismanagement exacerbated vulnerabilities, including disunity in the royal court and failure to maintain alliances against emerging threats from the Burmese . The rise of Toungoo under King (r. 1530–1550), son of Mingyinyo, initiated direct pressure on Hanthawaddy through the Toungoo–Hanthawaddy War (1534–1541). , leveraging mercenaries and firearms acquired via coastal trade, first secured Prome in 1535, gaining a foothold in central Burma. Despite Hanthawaddy's larger resources and initial repulses of Toungoo incursions, Takayutpi's weak strategic responses allowed to exploit divisions, including through misinformation campaigns that sowed distrust among Hanthawaddy's ministers and commanders. The conquest culminated in early 1539 when Toungoo forces, employing guile and sustained assaults, captured the capital Pegu (Bago) after overcoming internal splits in the Hanthawaddy camp. Takayutpi was deposed, and annexed the kingdom, relocating his capital to Pegu to harness its maritime wealth, manpower, and trade networks for further expansion. This event ended Hanthawaddy's after over two centuries, integrating territories into the burgeoning , though underlying ethnic tensions persisted.

Later Restorations

Interim Revival (1550–1552)

Following the assassination of on 30 May 1550 amid growing unrest in Pegu, rebels exploited the ensuing to challenge Burmese authority. A local leader, Smim Htaw, mobilized forces and defeated the interim Burmese appointee Smim Sawhtut near Pegu in August 1550, capturing the city and declaring himself in a nominal of the . This interim regime, however, exercised control only over Pegu and its immediate environs, failing to rally widespread loyalty or reclaim lost territories like Martaban or the Irrawaddy Delta due to fragmented alliances and limited resources. Bayinnaung, Tabinshwehti's brother-in-law and de facto successor, prioritized consolidating holdings elsewhere before addressing the revolt. By late 1551, having secured central Burma, he advanced on Pegu with a reinforced army, besieging the capital. Smim Htaw's attempts to negotiate or counterattack faltered amid internal disputes, culminating in a decisive confrontation on 12 March 1552, when Smim Htaw challenged to ritual combat atop war elephants; 's victory shattered resistance, leading to Pegu's swift surrender and the execution of Smim Htaw. This brief revival underscored the 's persistent ethnic grievances post-1539 conquest but highlighted their inability to mount a sustained without unified leadership or external aid, paving the way for 's firmer integration of Lower Burma.

Restored Hanthawaddy (1740–1757)

In November 1740, the Mon population of Pegu (Bago), supported by Delta Bama and Karen allies, initiated a rebellion against the declining , expelling Burmese garrisons and restoring the that had ruled Lower Burma from 1287 to 1539. Smim Htaw Buddhaketi emerged as the initial king, leading efforts bolstered by French encouragement from , which provided diplomatic and possibly material aid amid European rivalries in the region. By 1745, the kingdom had consolidated control over most of Lower Burma, including key ports and delta territories, though it did not extend to the northern Tenasserim coast, where local rulers sought Siamese protection. Binnya Dala (also known as Aung Hla or Banya Dala) ascended the throne in 1747 following Buddhaketi's death, becoming the last ruler and driving further expansion. Under his leadership, Hanthawaddy forces invaded Upper Burma in November 1751, capturing the Toungoo capital of on March 23, 1752, thereby terminating the 266-year-old dynasty. This victory briefly extended influence into parts of Upper Burma, but strategic errors—such as the execution of captive Toungoo royals and persecution of Burmese populations—fostered widespread resentment and facilitated resistance. The kingdom's fortunes reversed with the emergence of Alaungpaya, who founded the Konbaung Dynasty in Shwebo and rapidly unified northern forces. Konbaung armies recaptured Ava and much of Upper Burma by December 1753, repelled a Hanthawaddy counter-invasion in 1754, and launched incursions into Lower Burma by 1755. In the ensuing Konbaung–Hanthawaddy War (1752–1757), Mon general Talaban initially repelled Burmese advances near Pyay, but internal divisions and overextension undermined cohesion. Pegu surrendered after a prolonged , falling to Konbaung forces on May 6, 1757, marking the kingdom's collapse. The city was sacked and razed, with reports of over 3,000 Mon monks massacred and widespread reprisals against the , as documented in Mon chronicles like those of the Ramanya Nikaya sect. Binnya Dala was deposed and later executed in 1774; survivors fled to Mottama, Siam, or assimilated, contributing to the irreversible decline of Mon political in and a sharp reduction in their demographic presence by the early .

Society, Culture, and Economy

Religion, Art, and Literature

The Mon kingdoms, encompassing entities such as (c. 6th–11th centuries) and Hanthawaddy (1287–1539), served as pivotal centers for the dissemination and patronage of in , with archaeological evidence of monastic complexes and inscriptions dating from the 7th century onward confirming widespread adherence to this tradition among Mon-speaking populations. , emphasizing the and monastic discipline, was actively supported by Mon rulers who constructed stupas and viharas, as evidenced by sites like those in the region, where epigraphic records from the detail royal endowments to the for scriptural preservation and ceremonies. This patronage extended to the importation of Sinhalese monks and texts, fostering doctrinal purity that later influenced neighboring Pyu and Burmese polities following the 1057 sack of , during which Mon clergy reportedly relocated over 30 elephant-loads of canonical writings to Pagan. Mon artistic production, particularly in the Dvaravati phase, featured distinctive Theravada-inspired iconography, including seated images in the maravijaya posture with flame shoulders and terracotta plaques depicting , crafted from local clays and dated via radiocarbon analysis to the 7th–9th centuries at sites like U-Thong and . These works blended Indian influences with indigenous motifs, such as arched niches and wheel symbols on bases, reflecting a synthesis evident in over 200 excavated artifacts that prioritized narrative reliefs for didactic purposes in monastic settings. In the Hanthawaddy era, artisans contributed to gilded and brick temple architecture, including corbelled vaults and sikhara spires, as seen in Bago's Shwemawdaw Pagoda expansions around 1400, where stylistic continuity with earlier forms is confirmed by inscriptional dates and material sourcing from clays. Mon literature, composed in an indigenous script derived from Brahmi by the 6th century, primarily consisted of religious treatises and historical chronicles in the , with the earliest surviving manuscripts from the preserving Pali-Mon glosses on Abhidhamma and texts used in monastic . Key secular works include the Akruin Kamraulwi Rajadhiraj, a Mon chronicle detailing Hanthawaddy's founding under (r. 1287–1296) and military campaigns, corroborated by cross-references to Burmese inscriptions for events like the 1287 alliance with Sukhothai, though it incorporates legendary elements such as divine omens. This text, alongside the Slapak Chronicle fragments, represents an early , totaling around 50 known palm-leaf folios, which influenced later Burmese adaptations like the Yazadarit Ayedawbon while maintaining Mon linguistic features for oral recitation in courts and temples.

Trade, Agriculture, and Urban Centers

The economy of the Mon kingdoms, especially Hanthawaddy, rested on wet- agriculture in the fertile deltas of and Sittang rivers, where alluvial soils enabled intensive cultivation yielding surpluses for domestic use and export. This riverine system supported high population densities and formed the agrarian base, with as the primary crop grown through seasonal flooding and manual labor. Maritime trade amplified agricultural output, with Hanthawaddy's ports—such as Martaban (Mottama), , and Tavoy—linking inland production to networks extending to , Persia, and beyond. A liberal trade policy under kings like Razadarit (r. 1384–1421) drew diverse foreign merchants, who imported textiles, spices, and metals in exchange for , timber, and precious stones, fostering economic vitality in the 14th–15th centuries. Pegu (Bago), the capital, emerged as a central hub integrating trade revenues with administrative functions, while coastal entrepôts like in earlier periods handled between oceanic and overland routes. Urban development concentrated in port cities and royal centers, where agricultural surpluses and stimulated growth; Pegu's strategic inland position near riverine access supported a bustling and fortifications, accommodating multicultural trader communities by the . Martaban served as a fortified outpost pivotal for controlling Tenasserim corridors, blending oversight with commercial activity to sustain kingdom-wide prosperity. These centers exemplified causal linkages between delta productivity, access, and expansion, though reliant on monsoonal reliability and interstate stability.

Military Engagements and Interstate Relations

Conflicts with Pagan and Burmese Powers

The conquest of the kingdom of by Pagan's King in 1057 marked the first major clash between Mon polities and Burmese powers. Traditional Burmese chronicles recount that Anawrahta sought the Tripitaka scriptures and refused tribute from Thaton's King Manuha, leading to a campaign involving a large that besieged and captured the after three months, deporting approximately 30,000 Mon captives—including the royal family, monks, artisans, and sacred texts—to Pagan. This incursion halted potential expansion along the Tenasserim coast and facilitated the transfer of Mon-influenced , architecture, and craftsmanship to upper , strengthening Pagan's imperial foundations. After Pagan's fragmentation following Mongol incursions around 1287, Mon-ruled principalities in lower Burma, such as Martaban and Pegu, asserted amid power vacuums, resulting in sporadic border skirmishes with Burmese successor states like , though without decisive subjugation. Escalation intensified in the 16th century during the Toungoo–Hanthawaddy War (1534–1541), when Toungoo's , leveraging alliances and artillery, systematically dismantled the prosperous ; key victories included the capture of in 1535 and Pegu in 1539, followed by the execution of Hanthawaddy's last king in 1541. These campaigns, involving battles like Naungyo where Toungoo forces routed armies, enabled Toungoo unification of core Burmese territories and imposed Burmese overlordship on lands, disrupting Hanthawaddy's maritime trade dominance. A later Mon resurgence occurred in 1740 amid Toungoo decline, when rebellions in lower Burma restored the under leaders like Smim Htaw Buddhaketi, bolstered by French encouragement and Gwe Shan auxiliaries. forces invaded upper Burma, capturing in 1752 and briefly threatening total Mon hegemony, but internal divisions eroded their gains. The Konbaung Dynasty's founder, , rallied resistance from , launching a counteroffensive from 1755 that recaptured the Irrawaddy Delta and culminated in the 1757 siege and sack of Pegu, where Mon defenders suffered heavy casualties and leadership collapses, effectively ending organized Mon resistance and integrating lower Burma under Burmese control.

Interactions with Khmer, Thai, and Other Neighbors

The Dvaravati polity, a Mon-speaking kingdom centered in the Chao Phraya basin from the 6th to 11th centuries CE, maintained political boundaries with the expanding Khmer kingdoms in eastern Thailand during the 7th to 11th centuries, facilitating cultural exchanges including Buddhist iconography and architectural styles influenced by Khmer aesthetics in its later phases. By the 11th century, Khmer military aggression under Suryavarman I contributed to the disintegration of central Dvaravati polities, as Khmer forces overran key Mon territories, integrating them into the Angkorian sphere and diminishing Mon autonomy in the region. In lower Burma, the kingdom experienced indirect pressures from expansion eastward, though direct conflicts are sparsely documented; its conquest by Pagan's in 1057 CE effectively halted further incursions along the Tenasserim coast, preserving cultural continuity under Burmese suzerainty. Relations with emerging Thai kingdoms evolved from cultural symbiosis to episodic tribute and refuge. The acknowledged the suzerainty of Sukhothai's around 1290 CE, reflecting deference amid Thai consolidation in former territories like Lavo and Suphanburi. communities profoundly shaped early Thai adoption of , administrative scripts, and , with settlers integrating into Thai polities from the 13th century onward. Subsequent waves of refugees fleeing Burmese conquests—particularly after the 1539 fall of and during the 1740–1757 restoration—sought sanctuary in Siam's capitals, bolstering Ayutthaya's military and labor forces while fostering enduring enclaves in central and . Interactions with other neighbors, such as the polities, were limited and primarily mediated through maritime trade routes, with scant evidence of direct military engagements beyond occasional alliances against shared threats.

Historiographical Debates

Chronicle Reliability versus

Burmese chronicles, such as U Kala's Mahayazawin gyi (composed c. 1720) and the later Hmannan Yazawin (1829), form the primary narrative sources for Mon kingdoms like and Hanthawaddy, depicting them as centralized polities with sequenced rulers and pivotal events, including Anawrahta's purported conquest of in 1057 CE, which allegedly brought 30,000 captives, scriptures, and craftsmen to Pagan, marking a cultural infusion. These texts, drawn from earlier monastic and court records now lost, prioritize dynastic legitimacy and orthodoxy, often embedding legendary motifs—like divine omens or exaggerated military triumphs—to align with Burmese royal ideology, thereby subordinating agency to Burmese expansionism. However, these chronicles exhibit systemic limitations: compiled centuries after the events (e.g., post-16th century for 11th-century affairs), they lack cross-verification with contemporary records, which are scarce and often filtered through Burmese lenses, introducing anachronisms and ethnic framing that portrays as perennial tributaries rather than autonomous powers. No Mon-authored chronicles survive intact, and Burmese versions reflect court biases, such as inflating conquests to justify , as seen in unsubstantiated claims of 's wealth and abrupt fall without epigraphic corroboration. Archaeological surveys at reveal 11th-century Mon-style artifacts and stupas indicating continuity in settlement and Buddhist practice, but absent destruction layers or mass-grave indicators expected from a chronicle-described involving thousands. Empirical evidence from inscriptions and excavations prioritizes material traces over narrative claims: Mon-script epigraphs from the 6th–11th centuries (e.g., at Peikthagale and Yaygyi) confirm linguistic and artistic influence across Lower Burma and , evidencing decentralized chiefdoms with ties rather than the chronicle's imperial hierarchies. of Dvaravati-Mon sites (c. 6th–10th centuries) supports from Indianized precedents, but reveals no centralized "Mon empire" predating Pagan dominance, challenging the paradigm of a monolithic polity. Historiographical reassessments, drawing on such data, argue for fluid ethnolinguistic interactions over conquest-driven ruptures, with chronicles' timelines (e.g., precise regnal years) often unverifiable and likely retrojected from 18th-century compilations. This evidentiary gap underscores chronicles' utility for broad cultural motifs but unreliability for causal sequences, favoring archaeology's causal realism in reconstructing polities as adaptive networks amid regional and .

Contested Narratives of Mon Subjugation and Achievements

The traditional historiography of kingdoms, primarily derived from Burmese royal chronicles such as the Hmannan Yazawin compiled in the 19th century, portrays the as subjects of repeated subjugation by Burmese powers, beginning with King Anawrahta's purported of the kingdom of (Ramanna) in 1057 . These accounts claim Anawrahta's forces captured 30,000 monks, artisans, and texts, crediting the with transmitting , , and writing systems to Pagan, while depicting the event as a decisive subjugation that integrated cultural elements into Burmese society under Burmese dominance. However, these narratives have been contested by scholars examining archaeological and epigraphic evidence, which reveals no substantial urban centers or centralized polities in the Delta prior to Pagan's expansion in the , suggesting the "" may represent a legendary construct to legitimize Pagan's southward growth into sparsely settled wetlands rather than the fall of a flourishing kingdom. Revisionist analyses, notably by Michael Aung-Thwin, argue that the Mon presence in Lower Burma during the first millennium was limited to scattered settlements influenced by further north, with no material evidence—such as Mon-style inscriptions, temples, or fortifications predating Pagan—supporting the chronicles' depiction of a rival Mon empire capable of subjugating or rivaling early Burmese polities. This challenges the narrative of Mon subjugation as a causal driver of Burmese cultural florescence, positing instead that Pagan's achievements in , , and patronage arose indigenously, with Mon contributions overstated in later chronicles to emphasize Burmese martial prowess and unity against a "southern other." Empirical data from excavations at sites like Wiang Haeng and ancient delta settlements indicate Pyu-style artifacts and early practices predating alleged Mon dominance, undermining claims that Mon "achievements" in religious transmission were pivotal or unassimilated. Later episodes of alleged Mon subjugation, such as the Toungoo dynasty's destruction of the in 1539 CE under , are less contested in their occurrence—supported by contemporary accounts and Mon inscriptions recording resistance and forced migrations—but debates persist over the extent of cultural versus enduring Mon agency. Burmese chronicles glorify these campaigns as total victories leading to Mon , yet epigraphic records from Mon communities in 16th-18th century resettlement areas show persistent use of Mon script and monastic networks, indicating incomplete subjugation and selective integration rather than wholesale . Scholars note that Burmese , shaped by royal patronage and post-conquest rationalization, systematically diminishes Mon political to construct a narrative of inevitable Burman supremacy, while overlooking Mon economic roles in delta production and trade that sustained Burmese expansions. Mon achievements, including advancements in Mon-Khmer linguistics influencing regional scripts and contributions to Southeast Asian Theravada iconography, are acknowledged in Thai and Mon oral traditions but contested in Burmese-centric views that attribute innovations like the Burmese alphabet (derived around 1058 CE) to Anawrahta's "captives" without epigraphic corroboration of pre-conquest Mon primacy. In Thai historiography, Mon influences from Dvaravati (6th-11th centuries) on Sukhothai architecture and governance are sometimes minimized to emphasize Tai agency, reflecting nationalist biases that portray Mon as assimilated precursors rather than co-architects of cultural synthesis. These contested narratives highlight a broader historiographical tension: chronicles, as products of victorious elites, inflate subjugation to glorify conquerors and understate indigenous developments, while archaeological sparsity in flood-prone deltas limits definitive refutation, necessitating caution against accepting chronicle claims without cross-verification from inscriptions or artifacts.

Enduring Influence

Cultural and Linguistic Legacies

The Mon kingdoms, particularly (c. 6th–11th centuries ) and later polities in Lower Burma such as Ramanna, developed one of the earliest writing systems in by adapting Brahmi-derived scripts from around the 6th–7th centuries , which facilitated the recording of and administrative records. This Mon script directly influenced the creation of the Burmese script during the Pagan Kingdom's era, as evidenced by 11th-century inscriptions under King Kyanzittha (r. 1084–1112 ), who promoted Mon orthography and culture, leading to its integration into Burmese writing by aligning Pali phonetics more closely with Mon conventions rather than Khmer-derived systems. In , while the primarily derives from , Mon linguistic elements permeated through Dvaravati's , contributing loanwords in religious, legal, and artistic terminology, with Mon monasteries preserving scripts that informed early Ayutthaya-period (14th–18th centuries ) . Linguistically, the , an Austroasiatic tongue, exerted substrate effects on Burmese, particularly in Lower Burma's dialects, introducing grammatical features like certain classifiers and verb serializations absent in Upper Burmese varieties, a result of prolonged Mon-Burman contact following the 1057 CE conquest of by . Mon contributed over 1,000 loanwords to Burmese vocabulary, spanning agriculture (e.g., terms for cultivation techniques), , and Buddhist terminology, while reciprocal borrowing occurred, with Mon adopting Burmese administrative lexicon post-subjugation. In Thai, Mon influence is evident in central dialects, where Mon-Khmer substrates shaped phonological patterns and enriched lexicon in domains like monarchy and ritual, sustained by Mon migrant communities in and until the . These legacies persist in modern Mon revival efforts, such as script standardization in Thai Mon communities since the , countering pressures from dominant national languages. Culturally, the Mon kingdoms propagated Theravada Buddhism as a state religion from the 8th century onward, importing orthodox lineages from Sri Lanka via Thaton, which monks then disseminated to Pagan, catalyzing the religion's dominance in Upper Burma by the 11th century and influencing Thai kingdoms through Haripuñjaya (c. 7th–13th centuries CE). This transmission included standardized vinaya practices and paritta chants in Mon-Pali hybrids, foundational to regional monastic orders, with Mon-style Buddha images—characterized by slender, meditative forms and wheel motifs—shaping artistic canons in Myanmar's Bagan temples and Thailand's Lopburi art (11th–13th centuries CE). Literary legacies encompass Old Mon texts like the Dhammazat (a Mon adaptation of the Indian Vetala Pancavimsati, composed c. 15th century), which blended folklore with Buddhist ethics, influencing Burmese Zat theater and Thai Ramakien narratives through shared motifs of moral causation. Architectural hallmarks, such as octagonal stupas and terracotta plaques depicting jataka tales, originated in Dvaravati sites like Nakhon Pathom and endured in Myanmar's Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1287–1539 CE), symbolizing Mon emphasis on merit accumulation via communal piety. These elements underscore the Mon's role as cultural intermediaries, bridging Indian Buddhist esoterica with vernacular Southeast Asian expressions, though later Burmese and Siamese chronicles often understate this due to narratives of conquest.

Role in Regional Theravada Buddhism

The Mon kingdoms, particularly in present-day and in Lower Burma, served as early centers for the establishment and preservation of in , adopting the doctrine through maritime contacts with as early as the 8th century CE. Archaeological evidence from sites, dating from the 6th to 11th centuries, reveals widespread construction of brick stupas, monasteries, and Buddha images reflecting iconography, distinct from earlier or animist influences prevalent in neighboring Pyu states. , flourishing from the 4th to 11th centuries, further solidified this tradition by fostering monastic communities that emphasized canonical studies and discipline, drawing directly from Sinhalese orthodoxy to counter local syncretic practices. These kingdoms acted as conduits for 's regional dissemination, with Thaton's rulers maintaining active ties to Ceylon, importing scriptures and ordaining in the pure lineage, which helped reform and purify doctrinal practices amid broader networks. The script, derived from South Indian Pallava models and adapted by the , facilitated the transcription of texts, including portions of the Tipitaka, enabling the codification and dissemination of literature that influenced subsequent Burmese and Thai traditions. This scriptural tradition underpinned monastic education in Mon polities, where royal patronage supported complexes and veneration, embedding ethics into governance and society. The pivotal transmission occurred following the 1057 CE conquest of by Pagan's King , who transported approximately 30 elephant loads of Buddhist scriptures, along with over 1,000 monks and artisans, to Upper , integrating orthodoxy into the Pagan realm and supplanting its earlier esoteric . clergy, including the influential monk Shin Arahan from , advised and subsequent rulers, standardizing lineages and observance that radiated outward, shaping 's dominance in and contributing to its revival in by 1071 CE through Pagan- supported missions. This -mediated influx not only elevated Pagan as a scriptural hub but also embedded linguistic and artistic elements into regional expressions, evident in shared commentaries and temple architectures persisting into later and Toungoo eras.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Historical Perspective on Mon Settlements in Myanmar - Burma Library
    Jul 25, 2015 · Abstract. The Mon who belong to the Mon-‐Khmer stock of Austro-‐Asiatic sub-‐family were the old inhabitants of both Myanmar and Thailand.
  2. [2]
    The galactic polity in Southeast Asia | HAU
    For example, Thaton, the Mon kingdom overrun by Anawrahta in 1057, had thirty-two myos or provinces, each the seat of a subordinate prince, ringing the capital.
  3. [3]
    Political boundary between Dvāravatī and Ancient Khmer kingdoms
    This paper examines the nature of the political boundary between the Dvāravatī and Ancient Khmer kingdoms in eastern Thailand between the 7th and 11th ...
  4. [4]
    The Mists of Ramanna : The Legend That Was Lower Burma
    Scholars have long accepted the belief that a Theravada Buddhist Mon kingdom, Ramannadesa, flourished in coastal Lower Burma until it was conquered in 1057 ...
  5. [5]
    A Tale of Two Kingdoms</i> by Michael A. Aung-Thwin (review)
    Dec 19, 2019 · Aung-Thwin argues that there is no primary source evidence for an ancient Rman kingdom in Lower Burma, and that the idea [End Page 641] of ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] THE MAJOR ROLE OF THE MONS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
    The Mon-Khmer people's original homeland is proposed to be the valley of the Yangtze Kiang (Chiang), dwelling there before the Chinese.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  7. [7]
    [PDF] DEMYSTIFYING MISTS : THE CASE FOR THE MON | New Mandala
    Evidence from Lower Burma suggests that Mon civilization arose during the first millennium. Large walled enclosures, brick monasteries, laterite stupa bases ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Pierre Dupont's L'archéologie mône de Dvāravatī and Its English ...
    This magnificent overview of Mon archeology is presented in two volumes, the first of text (see figure 1) and the second of plates. After a general introduction ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The French Contribution to the Rediscovery of Dvāravatī Archaeology
    The French contributed significantly, starting from the end of the 19th century, to the rediscovery of Dvāravatī civilization in its various aspects—whether.
  10. [10]
    (PDF) The case for proto-Dvaravati: A review of the art historical and ...
    Archaeological evidence suggests early polities in central Thailand developed by the fourth century. Key characteristics of proto-Dvaravati culture include ...
  11. [11]
    Excising the 'Mon Paradigm' from Burmese Historiography - jstor
    In the traditional view, the earliest dated Mon inscriptions from Burma are from 1086 and 1093, while the earliest dated evidence of written. Burmese is the ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Old Mon inscriptions and the Dvāravatī culture
    Oct 28, 2019 · They date approximately from the sixth to the thirteenth century. Tentatively, I have identified around 100 artifacts in the region inscribed in ...Missing: earliest evidence
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF - OLD MON EPIGRAPHY AND ...
    archaeological and epigraphical evidence, a Mon kingdom known as Dvaravati ... one of Kyansitha's Old Mon inscriptions reads: When King Kyansitha ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Origin and Dispersal of Austroasiatic Languages from the ...
    Mar 15, 2024 · They mixed with local hunter-gatherers and expanded to the south of Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), giving rise to the Mon-Khmer, Aslian, and ...
  15. [15]
    (PDF) The Origin and Dispersal of Austroasiatic Languages from the ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · The ancestors of the AA-speaking populations were suggested to be the rice farmers living in the Neolithic Age in southern China. During 3000– ...
  16. [16]
    The Origin and Dispersal of Austroasiatic Languages from ... - BioOne
    Linguistic evidence suggests that the AA language family, besides the HM language, is the second linguistic group to have a large number of recon-.
  17. [17]
    Mon-Khmer Migrate into Southeast Asia | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Mon-Khmer migration began around 2000 BCE, with Mon in Myanmar/Thailand and Khmer in Cambodia/Vietnam. They introduced rice farming and influenced the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] the mon people of burma (myanmar) - Loc
    They are thought to have been the earliest group to reach Burma in ancient times as migrants from the northern part of the Asian mainland. Historical Background.
  19. [19]
    Multiple migrations from East Asia led to linguistic transformation in ...
    Oct 11, 2022 · We found the Khasi population to be genetically distinct from other Austroasiatic speakers, i.e. Mundaris and Mon-Khmers, but relatively similar ...
  20. [20]
    Cultural Profile: Dvaravati, Ancient Thailand's Lost Civilization
    Aug 4, 2020 · The earliest clear evidence for Mon settlement, and the beginning of Dvaravati culture— exists at U Thong, a town in modern Suphanburi province.
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Early States in Myanmar - ResearchGate
    Feb 14, 2022 · Current evidence suggests that while a brick city wall was an indicator of community endeavor and group longevity, the absence of a wall does ...
  22. [22]
    The Mon-Dvaravati Tradition of Early North-Central Thailand
    Aug 1, 2007 · By the seventh and eighth centuries, a characteristic Mon-Dvaravati Buddha type had emerged that, once established, would have a major ...
  23. [23]
    How Many Dvaravati Kingdoms? Locational Analysis of First ...
    Locational information about moated settlements derived from examination of aerial photographs of central Thailand is used to assess the degree of regional ...
  24. [24]
    Thailand - 457-957 - Dvaravati Period - GlobalSecurity.org
    Aug 4, 2012 · Taking advantage of Funan's decline in the sixth century AD, the Mon began to establish independent kingdoms, among them Dvaravati in the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Unexplored historical sites in Monland - UZH - ISLE
    The area that today is southern Burma was once part of the old Mon kingdom ... there should be some archaeological evidence of it, such as early human remains, ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] THE MON OF LOWER BURMA - The Siam Society
    Researchers have long suggested that Mon culture centered in Lower Burma contributed to the formation of Pagan in Upper Burma.
  27. [27]
    Chapter II The Pre-Pagan Period: The Urban Age of the Mon and the ...
    Most of what we do know of the Pyu is extrapolated from archeological excavations, surface finds and scant references in Chinese Dynastic Histories.
  28. [28]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of Hanthawaddy, Pegu, Wareru, and Ramannadesa based on the provided segments from *A History of Burma* by Maung Htin Aung. To retain all information in a dense and organized manner, I will use a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for key details. The narrative will provide an overview, while the table will consolidate specific data points (e.g., founding, rulers, events, territories, and relations) across the segments. Note that some segments lack information for certain periods or topics, and where contradictions or gaps exist, I will note them or prioritize the most detailed accounts.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] rmwdum - National Enlightenment Institute (NEI)
    Mar 5, 2016 · In fourteen century King Razadirit established Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1384-1421) with Bassein (Pathein), Bago and Martaban (Mottama) provinces ...
  30. [30]
    Hanthawaddy Kingdom - HistoryMaps
    Founded by King Wareru as a vassal state to the Sukhothai Kingdom and the Mongol Yuan dynasty, it eventually gained independence in 1330. However, the kingdom ...
  31. [31]
    History of Myanmar: Timeline - My Virtual World Trip
    Oct 5, 2022 · In the beginning, the Lower-Burma-based kingdom was a loose federation of regional power centre in the Mottama, the Pegu and the Irrawaddy Delta ...
  32. [32]
    Myanmar in the Fifteenth Century: A Tale of Two Kingdoms ...
    ... fourteenth and the first half of the fifteenth centuries, finally reaching its zenith during the second half of the fifteenth century. The foundations built ...
  33. [33]
    A tale of two kingdoms: Ava and Pegu in the fifteenth century
    Aug 6, 2025 · While Ava was an 'upstream' agrarian kingdom ruling mostly Upper Myanmar, Pegu was a 'downstream' commercial polity with hegemony over Lower ...
  34. [34]
    https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780824874117-006/pdf
  35. [35]
    http://www.maas.edu.mm/Research/Admin/pdf/5.%20Dr%20Tin%20Tin%20Win(59-74).pdf
  36. [36]
    ANCIENT MON, DVARAVATI AND MON KINGDOMS IN MYANMAR ...
    ... Lower Burma as early as the 6th century A.D. According to mainstream ... Irrawaddy delta. The kingdom's first capital was at Martaban but the capital ...
  37. [37]
    Myanmar - TaungNgoo Dynasty (1486-1599) - GlobalSecurity.org
    Aug 10, 2011 · He conquered Pega in 1539, extending his control to Martaban and the coastal area as far south as Tavoy. Tabtshwehti captured Prone from the ...
  38. [38]
    History of Myanmar | Map and Timeline - HistoryMaps
    Taungoo, surrounded by hostile kingdoms, managed to defeat the stronger Hanthawaddy Kingdom between 1534–1541. Turning its focus towards Prome and Bagan, ...
  39. [39]
    Myanmar - Pegu / Bago / Hantharwaddy Dynasty (1287-1599)
    Aug 10, 2011 · In 1740, the Mon revolted and founded the Restored Hanthawaddy Kingdom. But Burmese King Alaungpaya captured the city in May 1557, ending ...
  40. [40]
    Toungoo Dynasty - New World Encyclopedia
    The dynasty conquered the Mohnyin Shan peoples in northern Burma. Mingyinyo's son King, Tabinshwehti (1512–1550) (reigned 1531-1550), unified most of Burma (now ...
  41. [41]
    hanthawaddy kingdom - Phersu Atlas
    January 1404: In 1403, Upper Burma was under the rule of King Razadarit and King Minkhaung I of Ava. Despite ongoing conflicts, Ava's defenses held strong, ...
  42. [42]
    Mon History | Mon Buddhist Foundation (MBF), UK
    ... Mon rebel, Smim Htaw. Although Smim Htaw briefly captured Dagon and ousted the Burmese from Pegu, internal disputes among the Mon allowed Tabinshwehti's ...
  43. [43]
    The Kings of the Toungoo Empire
    In the mid 1050's, King Anawrahta founded the Pagan Empire. During the 12th and 13th centuries, the Pagan Empire and the Khmer Empire, to the east, were two ...
  44. [44]
    restored hanthawaddy kingdom - Phersu Atlas
    November 1740: In 1740 ... May 1757: The capital Pegu fell on 6 May 1757 to the Konbaung Dynasty, marking the end of the Restored Hanthawaddy Kingdom.
  45. [45]
    Restored Hanthawaddy Kingdom - HistoryMaps
    The rebellion succeeded in expelling Toungoo loyalists and restored the Mon-speaking Kingdom of Hanthawaddy which ruled Lower Burma from 1287 to 1539. The ...
  46. [46]
    TOUNGOO DYNASTY (1510–1752) - Taungoo - Facts and Details
    The kingdom entered a gradual decline due to the "palace rule" of its kings. Starting from the 1720s, the kingdom was beset with pesky raids by the Manipuris of ...
  47. [47]
    Prelude to the 268th Anniversary of the Fall of Hanthawaddy - LinkedIn
    May 22, 2025 · Approximately 268 years ago, on May 7, 1757, the historic Mon capital of Hanthawaddy succumbed to the forces of King Alaungpaya.
  48. [48]
    https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-561
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Theravada Buddhism in Myanmar - ijrpr
    This This paper serves as an overview of the historical and contemporary Buddhist practises in Myanmar. This paper tries to demonstrate how the Buddha's.
  50. [50]
    (DOC) The ART of DVARAWATI and what it tells us - Academia.edu
    Type 1: The first type of statues in Dvaravati Buddha statues were heavily influenced by Indian styles of Buddhist art. The Buddha images have no aureole ...
  51. [51]
    Ways of Seeing a Pyu, Mon and Dvaravati Artistic Continuum
    Aug 10, 2025 · Buddhism was the common catalyst for visual culture and the artistic repertoires of the Pyu, Mon and Dvāravatī share many similarities.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Burmese Buddhist Imagery of the Early Bagan Period (1044 – 1113)
    Buddhism is an integral part of Burmese culture. While Buddhism has been practiced in Burma for around 1500 years and evidence of the religion is found.
  53. [53]
    A Chronicle of The Mons – SEAMEO CHAT MYANMAR
    Apr 1, 2010 · The best known of the Mon chronicles is the Akruin Kamraulwi Rajadhiraj and its Myanmar translation, the Yazadarit Ayedawbon, “The Struggle of Rajadhiraj”.
  54. [54]
    The Chronicles of Pegu: A Text in the Mon Language - jstor
    The Mon, otherwise called Tabling or Peguan, language of Lower Burma is the oldest indigenous literary language of that country, but appears to have now ...
  55. [55]
    The Burma Delta : Economic Development and Social Change on ...
    The accounts of the merchants and missionaries who visited Pegu at this time indicate that the kingdom was based on a combination of trade and wet-rice ...
  56. [56]
    Coastal‐inland interactions in Burmese history: a long‐term ...
    May 14, 2013 · A very liberal trade regime encouraged foreign merchants to come to Pegu and the other ports and bring their wares and take out Burmese products ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] A History of Burma - Maung Htin Aung [PDF]
    Besides Tagaung, two kingdoms founded by the Pyus in Upper. Burma were Halingyi and Peikthanomyo. Archaeological evidence has been discovered in both places ...
  58. [58]
    KING ANAWRAHTA AND THE RISE AND FALL OF BAGAN
    ... conquest of the Thaton Kingdom in 1057. Supported by royal patronage, the ... Manuha refused, on which Anawrahta sent a mighty army, conquered Thaton ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Burma - IGNCA
    The conquest of Thaton in 1057 was a decisive event in. Burmese history. It brought the Burman into direct contact with the Indian civilizing influences in ...
  60. [60]
    Dvaravati | Mon-Khmer, Thailand, Cambodia - Britannica
    The Mon, who are believed to have originated in western China, entered the area in the 1st millennium bc, penetrating westward from the upper Mekong River.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] RECENT DVARAVATf DISCOVERIES AND SOME KHMER ...
    Dvaravati influence, even without claiming any Dvaravati political domination of the region. There is good reason to believe that in the seventh and eighth ...
  62. [62]
    Thailand - Mon-Khmer, Civilization, Culture | Britannica
    As the Tai moved into mainland Southeast Asia, they came in contact with peoples speaking Mon-Khmer languages who had long inhabited the region.
  63. [63]
    The Kings of Ayutthaya
    The Mon kingdom of Hanthawaddy to the west paid homage to King Ram Khamhaeng. Opposite: Map of Southeast Asia circa 1300 CE, showing Khmer Empire in red ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Safe Haven: Mon Refugees at the Capitals of Siam from the 1500s ...
    From the 16th to the early 19th centuries Siam received a series of migrations of Mon refugees fleeing Burmese oppression, as well as sporadic inflows of.
  65. [65]
    Khmer-Cham Wars | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Khmer-Cham Wars refers to a series of intermittent conflicts between the Khmer Empire and the Champa Dynasty that spanned several centuries.
  66. [66]
    How Reliable is U Kala's Burmese Chronicle? Some New ...
    Aug 24, 2009 · Rarely has a national historiographic tradition depended so heavily on a single author as the Burmese tradition has on U Kala.<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    (PDF) Pagan's King Anawrahta: Unraveling Fact & Myth, Journal of ...
    ... Thaton inscriptions assigned to the 11th century. (Luce 1969-1970: I. 24) No evidence suggests that Anawrahta's actual conquest was spurred by a desire to ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The Mists of Ramanna: The Legend That Was Lower Burma
    Thus there is no evidence to support: a) the presence of a Mon (or any other) kingdom in Lower Burma prior to the rise and development of Pagán, b) the ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] The Legend That Was Lower Burma - Semantic Scholar
    There is no historical record of Mon immigration from Dväravatï to Lower Burma, no evidence of written Mon in the Dväravatï script in Burma, no proven or demon-.
  70. [70]
    (PDF) "Review of Mon Inscriptions in Burma" - Academia.edu
    These Mon kingdoms actively produced inscriptions on stone and metal to document royal decrees, donations to monasteries, land grants, and religious dedications ...
  71. [71]
    Thailand's Historical Narrative and the Erasure of Mon Culture
    Dec 5, 2024 · If anything, the Mon were subjugated and assimilated into Thai culture during the rise of the Sukhothai and Ayutthaya kingdoms. Claiming Mon ...The Mon were originally a tribe in western China and around the 6th ...Mon groups The Mon people have lived in Southeast Asia for ...More results from www.facebook.com
  72. [72]
    [PDF] A Short Introduction to the Mon Language
    Haevy influence from the dominant national languages can be seen in both Burmese and. Thai varieties of Mon. 2. The Mon Script. The Mon script originates in a ...
  73. [73]
    (PDF) The Mon language:recipient and donor between Burmese ...
    Oct 13, 2015 · Mon is spoken in south Myanmar and parts of central and northern Thailand and has been in intense contact with its neighboring languages for many centuries.Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  74. [74]
    transnational movement to preserve Mon scripts in Thailand
    This paper examines the transnational movements among the Mons in Thailand, the oversea Mons and the Mon migrants from Myanmar to preserve Mon written language.
  75. [75]
    Buddhism in Myanmar: A Short History - Access to Insight
    The Ramanna Nikaya[46] was presumably founded by bhikkhus who had received ordination from Mon bhikkhus in the tradition of the Dhammazedi reforms and who ...
  76. [76]
    How to transcribe Pāḷi in Lanna and Burmese - Fifty Viss
    May 17, 2015 · As descendants of the Old Mon script, both Burmese and Lanna can and are used to transcribe Pāḷi, the liturgical language of Theravada ...
  77. [77]
    https://www.originalbuddhas.com/about-buddha-statues/styles-periods/dvaravati-period-buddha-statues
  78. [78]
    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/history-culture/buddhism-in-southeast-asia/history-of-the-theravada-ordination-lineages
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The Role Of Theravāda Buddhism In Shaping Early ... - IJCRT.org
    Abstract: The role played by Theravāda Buddhism in influencing the formation of early Myanmar kingdoms is a significant chapter in its history, ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Pagan (Bagan) - Buddhism - Oxford Bibliographies
    Feb 24, 2021 · Pagan was a capital with over 2,500 Buddhist monuments, a cosmopolitan network, and a key place for mixing Burmese Theravada features.