Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Musalla complex

The Musalla Complex is a ruined Timurid architectural ensemble in , , constructed primarily between 1417 and 1438 under the patronage of , wife of the ruler , comprising a , , , and more than twenty minarets that showcased advanced techniques in tilework, domes, and urban religious design. As a cornerstone of 's status as the Timurid capital, the complex integrated educational, devotional, and commemorative functions, with later additions by extending its scope into the late 15th century. Its defining characteristics include elaborate ceramic decorations and monumental scale, reflecting the era's synthesis of Persian and Central Asian influences in . The site's most notable stems from its near-total destruction in 1885 by British artillery during the Second , undertaken to eliminate strategic observation points amid tensions with , an act that preserved only isolated minarets and the Mausoleum amid the rubble. Subsequent military conflicts, including Soviet incursions, exacerbated the decay, highlighting how repeated warfare has eroded this exemplar of pre-modern engineering prowess.

Historical Background

Timurid Patronage and Gawhar Shad's Role

Gawhar Shad, the principal wife of Timurid ruler (r. 1405–1447), initiated the Musalla complex in in 1417 as a major architectural endowment, underscoring her status as a leading in the empire's cultural transformation of the city into a hub of learning and piety. Her commissions, including the complex's and prayer facilities, aligned with 's relocation of the capital to , where she actively supported scholarly and religious institutions to foster intellectual vitality. Timurid rulers, building on Timur's legacy, invested in monumental architecture to legitimize their authority, drawing from established traditions of construction and Islamic imperatives for communal worship spaces that symbolized dynastic stability and . Such not only emulated Seljuq and Ilkhanid precedents but also served to integrate Turkic-Mongol rulers into sedentary Persianate culture, reinforcing rule through displays of piety and urban development. As a exerting influence in a patrilineal , Gawhar Shad's role in the project highlighted her exceptional agency, channeling resources toward and architectural grandeur to enhance Herat's prestige and sustain Timurid . Her endowments, managed through foundations, prioritized madrasa-based scholarship in Sunni , reflecting a strategic emphasis on doctrinal consolidation amid regional rivalries.

Construction Phase (1417–1438)

The Musalla Complex was commissioned in 1417 by , wife of Timurid ruler , as a religious ensemble including a , , and situated north of Herat's city walls to serve as an open-air prayer ground for congregational events. The architect Qavam al-Din b. Zayn al-Din Shirazi, originating from , directed the project after completing Gawhar Shad's in in 1418, drawing on Timurid court expertise to coordinate construction across the and components. Primary construction materials consisted of baked bricks for structural elements, combined with -glazed tiles and painted motifs for facades and interiors, enabling durable yet ornate surfaces typical of Timurid techniques. The adopted a rectangular plan centered on a grand western leading to classrooms, flanked by student cells with smaller , while featured diamond-patterned shafts, muqarnas-supported balconies, and inscriptions. The employed a layout with a five-sided bay and squinch-net vaulting under a dome clad in monochrome bricks. By 1438, the core structures were completed, with the mausoleum finalized in 1432, establishing the as a focal point for Herat's ritual gatherings amid the Timurid capital's expansion. This phase integrated the complex into the urban fabric via axial alignments and endowments documented in inscriptions, supporting ongoing maintenance through dedicated revenues.

Original Scale and Function

The Musalla Complex, commissioned by between 1417 and 1438, originally comprised a vast - ensemble and an adjacent , representing a pinnacle of Timurid monumental in . The adopted a classic four-iwan plan with an inner measuring 106 by 64 meters, supported by four minarets at its corners, while the integrated formed a rectangular structure of 83 by 60.75 meters, featuring two additional minarets and student cells arranged around its . The , positioned in the 's southwestern corner, measured 16.8 by 16.1 meters externally and served as a dynastic chamber containing six burials from four generations of Timurid rulers and elites. Subsequent expansions under Timurid patronage, particularly by in the late 15th century, augmented the complex to include up to twenty minarets across its mosques, madrasas, and open prayer grounds, creating an expansive religious precinct capable of accommodating thousands for congregational activities. This scale reflected deliberate to dominate Herat's skyline and integrate prayer halls with educational facilities, though precise overall dimensions of the unified precinct remain unquantified in surviving records beyond the core buildings' measurements. Functionally, the complex operated as a multifaceted , centering on daily and prayers in the —where the khutba was initially delivered—and large-scale outdoor assemblies in the for festivals like . The provided theological and , functioning as a scholarly hub that drew students for advanced studies in Hanafi and related disciplines, akin to a proto-university under royal endowment. The mausoleum hosted funerary rites and commemorative ceremonies for Timurid , reinforcing familial legitimacy through its placement within the educational-religious core. Collectively, these roles projected Timurid , blending with to legitimize rule via architectural grandeur and charitable foundations that sustained communal welfare.

Periods of Destruction

British Bombardment (1885)

During the Panjdeh Crisis of 1885, escalating tensions between the and forces over Central Asian territories prompted defensive preparations in , . British authorities, concerned that invaders could exploit the elevated Musalla Complex for cover or vantage points, directed its systematic to ensure clear fields of fire for artillery defenses. Under the influence of British military engineers, Emir Abdur Rahman Khan's forces, supported by British advisors, employed to raze most of the complex's structures over a few days. This included the collapse of numerous minarets and central edifices such as the Mosque and , reducing the once-grand ensemble—originally featuring around 20 minarets—to scattered remnants. The destruction averted potential Russian tactical advantages but irreparably damaged the Timurid-era site's core, with only peripheral elements like select minarets and the Mausoleum's dome partially surviving. Contemporary accounts from personnel, including watercolors by officer Henry Marion Durand, document the site's compromised state immediately following the operation, confirming the near-total ruin of its primary architectural features.

Earthquakes and 20th-Century Damage

The Musalla complex experienced severe structural losses due to earthquakes in the early and mid-20th century, exacerbating vulnerabilities inherent to its tall, brick minarets. In 1931, a seismic event toppled two of the remaining minarets, reducing the count from nine at the century's start. Another minaret collapsed in a 1951 earthquake, leaving only five standing by mid-century. These incidents highlighted the fragility of the complex's towering structures, constructed from sun-dried bricks without modern reinforcement, which amplified sway and resonance during ground shaking. Neglect and urban pressures in the mid-20th century accelerated deterioration beyond geophysical causes. Encroaching settlements and insufficient maintenance allowed erosion, dampness, and decay to weaken surviving elements, including the mausoleum and adjacent ruins. Lack of systematic conservation efforts during this period permitted to compound prior seismic damage, with tall minarets particularly prone to incremental instability from weathering. Military activities during the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989) inflicted further collapses through human-induced factors distinct from natural events. Soviet forces repurposed the site as a vantage point and , leading to the toppling of at least one additional amid urban combat in . Subsequent civil conflicts in the late continued this pattern of misuse, hastening structural failures without direct but via and .

Conflicts and Neglect in Modern Era

During the Afghan civil war of the 1990s and subsequent rule from 1995 to 2001, the Musalla Complex experienced further deterioration due to neglect and the prioritization of conflict over heritage preservation. , as a contested urban center, saw limited direct bombardment of the site, but the era's instability contributed to unmaintained structures vulnerable to environmental decay. Post-2001, amid ongoing and weak , the complex faced threats from of artifacts and encroachment by illegal constructions in surrounding areas, exacerbating structural without systematic intervention. Reports highlight how fragile monuments like those in the were left to crumble under oversight after 2021, with industrial-scale site destruction and abandonment of maintenance efforts. The inflicted additional damage on the Musalla Complex, affecting approximately 6% of the province's cultural infrastructure, including historic buildings at the site. Pre-existing vulnerabilities from insufficient funding, limited technical capacity, and conflict-induced neglect amplified the impacts, with cracks and collapses worsened by years of unaddressed maintenance. assessments estimate recovery needs at US$4.8 million for stabilization and restoration of such assets.

Preservation and Reconstruction

Early 20th-Century Efforts

Following the partial survival of nine minarets into the early 20th century after prior destructions, an on November 20, 1931, toppled two more, exacerbating the site's instability. archaeological activities, which commenced officially in 1922 alongside efforts, included limited surveys of Herat's sites during the and under governments seeking modernization. These focused on cataloging like the Musalla complex rather than extensive rebuilding, hampered by fiscal limitations and political instability post-Amanullah Khan's reign. Partial reinforcements, such as basic bracing of remaining minarets, were attempted locally in the to avert further seismic or erosional damage, though records indicate modest success amid resource scarcity. Documentation prevailed, with European travelers like Swiss photographer capturing the decaying complex in 1939, aiding later assessments. Local Herati communities informally shielded remnants from and quarrying, using the area for markets while informally patrolling against illicit removal of tiles or bricks, preserving what formal interventions could not. These measures, though unstructured, mitigated additional human-induced degradation until mid-century conflicts intensified neglect.

International Interventions Post-2001

Following the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan, international organizations initiated targeted preservation activities at the Musalla Complex in , focusing on surveys, nominations, and limited structural interventions amid ongoing instability. These efforts, primarily funded by foreign donors, produced archaeological insights and preliminary safeguards but highlighted the site's reliance on external expertise and resources, as local Afghan institutions lacked sufficient capacity for independent execution. In 2004, inscribed the City of Herat—explicitly including the Musalla Complex—on its Tentative List of World Heritage Sites, citing the ensemble's role as one of the largest surviving Timurid architectural groups in the region and its embodiment of 15th-century Islamic . This nomination facilitated subsequent funding for site assessments, underscoring the complex's global cultural value while prompting calls for against and neglect. In 2007, 's Norway Funds-in-Trust project allocated resources for capacity-building and initial safeguarding of the Gawhar Shad Mausoleum, part of the complex's core structures, though implementation was constrained by security issues and prioritized documentation over full reconstruction. A key collaborative effort occurred in 2010, when the German-Afghan Archaeological Mission to , commissioned by , conducted a excavation at the Madrasa within the Musalla Complex. The mission cleared approximately 100 cubic meters of soil in a systematic layout, uncovering buried foundations that confirmed the existence of an incomplete "lost " and revealed pre-Timurid elements, including 10th-11th century walls and indicative of earlier Islamic layers. These findings exposed structural vulnerabilities, such as weaknesses exacerbated by historical damage and modern traffic, informing potential stabilization plans but remaining limited to diagnostic rather than restorative work due to funding and access constraints. The (AKTC), through its Afghan branch, contributed to Herat's broader cultural rehabilitation post-2001, including assessments and partial interventions at the Complex's Fifth , which tilts at 3.8 degrees from cumulative environmental and conflict-related degradation. While emphasizing original Timurid techniques like traditional in planning documents, these activities underscored a pattern of donor-driven outputs—such as hazard mitigation surveys—that advanced knowledge but perpetuated dependency on international financing, with limited transfer of skills to counterparts by the early .

Recent Developments (2010s–2025)

In 2010, a German-Afghan archaeological mission conducted a reconnaissance at the Gawhar Shad Madrasa within the Musalla complex on behalf of UNESCO, documenting structural remains and contributing to preservation planning. The Aga Khan Trust for Culture (AKTC), as part of its Herat Old City rehabilitation program, completed restoration of the Fifth Minaret, integrating it into broader urban heritage efforts that emphasized structural stabilization and contextual reconnection with surrounding sites. The ALIPH Foundation supported emergency structural consolidation of the Fifth Minaret in the late 2010s, focusing on preventing collapse through targeted reinforcements while adhering to original Timurid materials and techniques. In December 2019, Afghan National Security Adviser pledged financial support for further Musalla complex restoration during a site visit, aiming to address ongoing decay amid limited prior funding. Following the Taliban's 2021 takeover of , preservation initiatives faced funding disruptions due to and restricted aid flows, though the group has expressed willingness to permit externally financed work on Islamic heritage sites like the Musalla complex. The October , registering magnitudes up to 6.3 and causing widespread structural damage in the region, affected key monuments in but lacked specific reported impacts on the Musalla complex beyond general vulnerability assessments for unreinforced minarets. As of 2025, seismic retrofitting discussions within Old City programs have prioritized adjacent sites, with Musalla efforts remaining incremental and dependent on sporadic international partnerships amid political isolation.

Architectural Description

Overall Layout and Minarets

The Musalla complex in exemplifies Timurid through its rectangular layout, bisected by an east-west irrigation canal that separated functional zones: open congregational prayer grounds and to the south, and enclosed to the north. Both primary structures adopted symmetrical four-iwan plans centered on large courtyards, with east-west orientations aligning iwans and arcades to create axial processional paths emphasizing hierarchical spatial progression from public exteriors to intimate interiors. Minarets anchored this symmetry, positioned at building corners and portal flanks to serve as vertical beacons for the adhan and skyline markers asserting the complex's dominance over Herat's horizon. The Gawhar Shad mosque originally featured four to six minarets, while the adjoining madrasa had at least two, integrated to frame open spaces for mass prayers flanking the enclosed educational and liturgical cores; traditional accounts extend the total across the broader to 20 towers, enhancing panoramic . Of these, five minarets persist, varying in height from about 42 meters to 55 meters, their tapering forms punctuated by balconies and adorned with geometric mosaics in and blues that differentiate patterns per structure—such as interlocking stars on Bayqara-era towers versus floral on Gawhar Shad remnants. This zoning preserved expansive, unroofed prayer arenas for seasonal gatherings adjacent to vaulted halls, underscoring the design's adaptation of Persianate principles to accommodate both communal rituals and institutional functions.

Gawhar Shad Mosque and Madrasa

The Gawhar Shad Mosque and adjacent madrasa, commissioned by Gawhar Shad—principal wife of Timurid ruler Shah Rukh—were erected in Herat between 820 and 841 AH (1417–1438 CE) as the foundational elements of the Musalla complex. Construction likely began with the madrasa around 1417 CE, followed by the mosque by 1426 CE, reflecting Gawhar Shad's patronage of religious and educational institutions. These structures exemplified Timurid architectural principles, integrating mosque and madrasa functions to support communal prayer and scholarly pursuits in Islamic theology. The mosque adopted a classic four-iwan courtyard layout, with vaulted halls opening onto a central sahn capable of accommodating large congregations, though exact capacity figures remain undocumented in surviving records. Its facades featured portals enhanced by squinches transitioning from square bases to domed roofs, a prevalent in Timurid designs for both structural support and ornate decoration. Surviving elements, including southeast No. 8, display with blue accents in diamond patterns and interlaced floral motifs, underscoring the mosque's role as a site. Adjoining the , the occupied a rectangular plan measuring approximately 83 by 61 meters, organized around an internal flanked by student cells (hujras) along the northern and southern sides for residential study and theological instruction. A prominent western served as the primary classroom, with corner minarets marking the quadrangular perimeter and providing vantage for calls. The eastern portal, among the few intact features, bears inscriptions in glazed brick praising Gawhar Shad's endowment, evidencing her direct involvement in funding and oversight. This layout prioritized pedagogical efficiency, housing scholars in proximity to teaching spaces while integrating facilities and libraries essential for operations.

Sultan Husayn Bayqara Madrasa and Mausoleum

The Sultan Husayn Bayqara Madrasa, constructed in 1492–1493 CE (898 AH), formed a later Timurid addition to the Musalla complex in Herat, built during the rule of Sultan Husayn Bayqara (1469–1506). Positioned north of the Gawhar Shad ensemble, this smaller-scale madrasa reflected the architectural continuity of the site while showcasing refinements suited to Herat's late 15th-century cultural peak, marked by patronage of arts and scholarship. Its decorations emphasized advanced tile mosaics, featuring geometric patterns, arabesque motifs, and script, which built upon earlier Timurid techniques with greater intricacy in work. Archaeological investigations have uncovered foundations linking the to the pre-existing structures, evidencing intentional integration that expanded the complex's layout without disrupting its cohesive design. The incorporated an adjacent with a domed chamber designated for elite burials, aligning with Timurid practices of combining educational and commemorative functions. Geometric on the evoked principles of and central to Islamic architectural symbolism, as seen in surviving fragments and contemporary depictions.

Significance and Legacy

Innovations in Timurid Architecture

The Musalla complex introduced advanced double-shell dome construction in the Gawhar Shad mausoleum, built between 1417 and 1438 under the design of architect . This featured an inner dome at 10.8 meters in height visible from within, paired with an outer shell reaching 25 meters, reinforced by a hidden secondary and transitions from a square base to octagonal drum. Such engineering mitigated collapse risks associated with height by distributing loads across parallel shells connected by brick buttresses, a technique that enhanced stability over single-shell predecessors and influenced subsequent Timurid and dome designs. Tilework at the complex pioneered "blue-and-white" techniques using glazes over tin-opacified white grounds, alongside cut-tile mosaics in , black, , and green. Predominant blues evoked symbolic associations with the heavens in Islamic architectural , while the uniform fine clay paste base and metallic oxide additions—copper for , lead and iron for —ensured chemical compatibility and resistance to , as evidenced by surviving fragments despite centuries of exposure. These innovations in formulation and application represented a departure from earlier banna'i , prioritizing aesthetic intricacy without sacrificing material integrity. The complex's vast scale underscored load-bearing advancements, with the mosque measuring 106 by 64 meters and the madrasa 83 by 60.75 meters, encompassing four-iwan courtyards flanked by multi-story arcades. Minarets, such as the southeast example at 42.4 meters tall with a 6-meter base diameter, incorporated dodecagonal foundations 7.75–8.25 meters wide and quoining beam reinforcements at multiple levels to counter seismic and wind loads. These structural solutions enabled enclosure of expansive spaces unprecedented in prior regional architecture, demonstrating empirical mastery of brick masonry and proportional scaling that prefigured larger Timurid ensembles.

Cultural and Historical Impact

The Musalla Complex significantly elevated 's status within the , positioning it as a cultural rival to through sustained of arts, architecture, and scholarship. During the reign of (1405–1447), emerged as the empire's primary center of intellectual and artistic production, with the complex's construction beginning in 1417 under exemplifying royal investment in monumental projects that attracted artisans and scholars from across the Persianate world. This fostered a vibrant ecosystem of creativity, including and , which disseminated Timurid cultural ideals and reinforced 's urban development as a hub of Persianate refinement. Educationally, the madrasas within the Musalla Complex, particularly Gawhar Shad's, trained generations of scholars in Islamic , , and sciences, contributing to the continuity of Persianate intellectual traditions beyond the Timurid period. These institutions operated as key nodes in a network of learning that influenced subsequent and Safavid scholarly circles, with Herat's output in and underscoring the complex's role in preserving and evolving classical systems. The emphasis on education here paralleled broader Timurid efforts to legitimize rule through cultural prestige, yielding long-term impacts on regional intellectual heritage. In the , partial restorations of the complex have bolstered its function in , serving as a symbol of pre-modern grandeur amid efforts to promote in . Initiatives since the early 2000s, including work on surviving minarets and the Mausoleum, have drawn visitors interested in Timurid history, indirectly supporting local economies through guided tours and site management that highlight the site's enduring legacy. While comprehensive economic data specific to the remains limited, analogous heritage projects in demonstrate tourism's potential to generate revenue via cultural attractions, aiding urban revitalization.

Criticisms and Debates on Destruction

The primary debate surrounding the 19th-century destruction of the Musalla complex centers on whether Abd Khan's 1885 demolition order, backed by imperial interests to thwart advances during the , represented pragmatic or egregious cultural erasure. Historical accounts indicate the emir razed the site to eliminate potential fortifications, a decision facilitated by British provision of explosives and political support, as the complex's elevated position posed a tactical threat amid fears of Russian incursion into . Proponents of the strategic view, drawing from contemporaneous geopolitical records, contend the action averted a fortified enemy foothold, prioritizing security over heritage in a volatile context. Critics, however, decry it as imperial-enabled , emphasizing the irreplaceable loss of Timurid architectural mastery without equivalent logs justifying the scale of obliteration, and note underrepresented attributions to localized Afghan agency under external pressure. While human agency dominated the complex's major ruinations, disputes persist over the relative weight of natural versus factors, with some analyses highlighting earthquakes and as accelerators of decay rather than sole culprits. Evidence from site surveys attributes primary structural collapses to deliberate demolitions in , which toppled most minarets and core buildings, though seismic events in subsequent centuries exacerbated fragmentation of surviving elements like the Gawhar Shad mausoleum. This tension underscores causal realism in preservation debates, where overemphasizing imperial blame may underplay endogenous vulnerabilities, yet empirical inventories confirm man-made interventions as the decisive trigger for the site's near-total disassembly. Post-independence Afghan regimes, including Taliban governance periods (1996–2001 and post-2021), have drawn criticism for systemic neglect enabling further deterioration through inaction on stabilization, contrasting with sporadic international interventions. Under Taliban rule, heritage sites faced heightened risks of iconoclastic purges akin to the 2001 Bamiyan Buddha demolitions, though the Musalla's Islamic pedigree mitigated direct assaults; nonetheless, administrative disinterest and resource diversion perpetuated erosion, with reports citing unaddressed structural threats by 2023 earthquakes as emblematic of custodial failure. Such lapses fuel ethical debates on sovereignty versus global stewardship, where regime opacity—compounded by ideological priors against perceived idolatrous remnants—has stymied verifiable maintenance logs. Restoration authenticity remains contested, with archaeologists cautioning against anachronistic rebuilds that prioritize visual spectacle over fidelity to Timurid originals, potentially fabricating a sanitized detached from layered historical scars. German-Afghan surveys from 2010 revealed discrepancies in proposed reconstructions at the , advocating minimal intervention to preserve stratigraphic integrity against modern impositions like incongruent materials or conjectural elevations. Critics of aggressive UNESCO-backed efforts argue they risk commodifying ruins for , diluting evidential value from destruction phases, while proponents cite ethical imperatives for stabilization sans wholesale recreation; unresolved tensions highlight source credibility issues in Afghan heritage reporting, often skewed by donor agendas over impartial excavation data.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Complex of Gawhar Shad in Herat - HAL-SHS
    The architectural complex commissioned by Gawhar Shad in Herat (820–841/1417–1438) constitutes one of the major foundations of the Timurid capital city.
  2. [2]
    Archnet > Site > Madrasah-i Gawhar Shad
    Only one minaret and the founder's mausoleum remain of the Madrasa of Gawhar Shad in the Musalla Complex, which was constructed between 1417-1438.
  3. [3]
    The 'Musalla'-Complex in Herat Revisited: Recent Archaeological ...
    Fig. 1 Herat, Afghanistan. The Gawhar Shad 'Musalla' Complex with domed tomb and two minarets (left) and the four minarets of the Sultan Hussain Baiqara ...
  4. [4]
    The sad story of the Musalla Complex: art crime and destruction
    Nov 16, 2017 · The Musalla Complex, once a cluster of Timurid architecture, was mostly destroyed by British troops in 1885, with only a few minarets and domes ...
  5. [5]
    Masjid-i Jami'-i Gawhar Shad Herat, Afghanistan - Archnet
    This madrasa was built in 1492-1493 (898 A.H.) and was reportedly designed in a style similar to the Madrasa of Gawhar Shad, but on a larger scale.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  6. [6]
    Architecture, monuments and urbanism, Part I
    Shah Rukh, Timur's eventual successor (r. 1409–47), transferred the capital to the city of Herat where he had formerly been governor. He himself built a ...
  7. [7]
    HISTORIOGRAPHY v. TIMURID PERIOD - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    The universal patronage of arts and sciences by the Timurid rulers, members of the dynastic family, and court and provincial dignitaries became an important ...
  8. [8]
    Timurid dynasty | History, Architecture, & Meaning - Britannica
    Oct 17, 2025 · In the realm of architecture, the Timurids drew on and developed many Seljuq traditions. Turquoise and blue tiles forming intricate linear and ...
  9. [9]
    Patrons of Art, Architecture, and the Urban Environment (Chapter 11)
    Apr 12, 2025 · In the former, she was the patron of the Gawhar Shad musalla complex west of the city, consisting of a madrasa, mosque, and the patron's own ...
  10. [10]
    Archnet > Authority > Qavam al-Din Shirazi
    Born in Shiraz, Qavam al-Din became one of the best-known Timurid court architects. ... building her Musalla Complex in Herat in 1417 (820 A.H.). Work on the ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Musalla Complex & Minarets | Afghanistan, Asia - Lonely Planet
    The Musalla Complex, commissioned by Gowhar Shad, included a mosque, madrassa, mausoleum, and over twenty minarets. Today, only five minarets and the mausoleum ...
  13. [13]
    Ancient Minaret In Herat On The Verge Of Destruction - TOLOnews
    The Musalla complex with 20 minarets was fully intact and magnificent until 1885 when the complex was destroyed by the British in a conflict with Russia.
  14. [14]
    A Sufi Lodge, a Leaning Minaret and a Polymath's Shrine: A look at ...
    Jan 29, 2021 · The data shows that even a very modest earthquake or strong wind could cause the collapse of the Minaret, as has already happened to the other ...
  15. [15]
    7 must-see minarets in Central Asia - Caravanistan
    Apr 8, 2015 · 6. Musalla minarets. musalla. Deliberately dynamited by British engineers in 1885, the destruction of the magnificent Musalla complex in Herat ...Missing: bombardment | Show results with:bombardment
  16. [16]
    Silk Road Seattle - HERAT - University of Washington
    The Afghans, with British support held the city against the Russian empire; the Musalla, on the city's outskirts, fell victims to those maneuverings in 1885, ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Monuments Of Herat, Afghanistan's Ancient Cultural Capital, In ...
    Nov 28, 2002 · The minaret of Jam is also in danger of toppling. A flood earlier this year raised the level of two rivers that pass beside it, causing water to ...
  18. [18]
    Musalla Complex Tourism History - Herat - Travelsetu.com
    What remained was further damaged by earthquakes and neglect, with the complex suffering significant destruction during civil conflicts in the late 20th century ...
  19. [19]
    How Afghan Monuments Survived Ages of Turmoil - Al Majalla
    Sep 28, 2021 · ... Soviet occupation, and through the civil war until Taliban's governance in 1990s and US invasion in 2001. According to the official website ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    In the Queen's Footsteps: Evolution and Challenges of Architectural ...
    May 24, 2024 · The October 2023 earthquakes caused major damage to many monuments, including the Mosalla Complex. The architectural heritage in Herat was not ...
  21. [21]
    Can Taliban be Trusted to Preserve Afghan Heritage?
    Apr 21, 2023 · Afghanistan's Taliban take the position today that preserving cultural heritage is a good thing, especially if someone else is willing to pay for it.
  22. [22]
    Why Extending the Afghanistan “Emergency” Makes Law and Ethics ...
    Sep 6, 2025 · Conservator Sherazuddin Saifi works on pieces of a small statue damaged by the Taliban ... Photograph Frédéric Gadmer. Herat's Musalla complex ...
  23. [23]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the damage to the Musalla Complex from the 2023 Herat Earthquakes, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a single, comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I will use a table in CSV format to organize the key information (damage, prior damage/neglect, recovery needs, and context) across the segments, followed by a narrative summary and a list of useful URLs. Since the system has a "no thinking token" limit, I’ll focus on directly compiling and presenting the data without additional analysis or inference beyond what’s explicitly stated.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Impact of War upon Afghanistan's Cultural Heritage
    Official archaeological excavations were carried out from 1922 onwards by French, Japa- nese, British, American, Italian, Indian, ex-Soviet Union, and Afghan ...
  25. [25]
    Beyond Afghanistan and the present: an historical overview of the ...
    The major archaeological discoveries in Afghanistan during the 1920s, 1930s or 1950s were thus de facto shared between the two museums: the Graeco-Afghan ...
  26. [26]
    City of Herat - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
    ... musalla, which had a total of four minarets, and represents the zenith of Timurid architectural achievement. The Masjid-e Jami in Herat dates from an original ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 3rd Expert Working Group Meeting for the Old City of Herat and The ...
    Sep 6, 2012 · The present Expert Working Group Meeting has been made possible thanks to generous funding from the UNESCO/Italy Funds-in-Trust project for the ...
  28. [28]
    Restoration in Herat - AKDN
    While the invasion did not occur, the damage to Timurid heritage in Herat was irreversible. The Fifth Minaret is in an advanced state of deterioration, tilting ...Missing: Soviet | Show results with:Soviet
  29. [29]
    The 'Musalla'-Complex in Herat Revisited:: Recent Archaeological ...
    PDF | The paper presents the results of an archaeological reconnaissance carried out 2010 on behalf of the Unesco by the German-Afghan Archaeological.Missing: government 20th century
  30. [30]
    Emergency Consolidation and Stabilization of the Musalla ...
    Prolonged conflict, flooding, earthquakes, and extensive changes to the site's environment have put the overall structure at risk of collapse. The project ...Missing: 1931 | Show results with:1931
  31. [31]
    Earthquakes Decimate Ancient Afghani Villages and Historic ...
    Nov 10, 2023 · At least 1,500 people died in the two quakes, and thousands were left injured, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Herat's Most Resilient War Survivors, its Historical Monuments ...
    Oct 16, 2023 · It also partially damaged the peak of one of the five 55-meter-tall minarets, survivors of 22 previous minarets, at the Mosalla Complex, which ...
  33. [33]
    What remains of the Madrasa of Gawhar Shad - SquareKufic
    Nov 27, 2017 · From the 15th century until 1885, the shaft proudly stood next to the entrance of the Madrasa of Gawhar Shad. On archnet.org we read that ...Missing: materials | Show results with:materials
  34. [34]
    A Study of the Decorations in the Four Minarets of Sultan Hussein ...
    Jul 2, 2020 · The results show that all four minarets in school are decorated. Its decorations include geometric patterns, Arabesque motifs, Kufic ...Missing: Musalla | Show results with:Musalla
  35. [35]
    The Art of the Timurid Period (ca. 1370–1507)
    Oct 1, 2002 · Timurid rulers were sympathetic to Persian culture and lured artists, architects, and men of letters who would contribute to their high court culture.Missing: legitimize | Show results with:legitimize
  36. [36]
    Herāt school | Persian Miniature Art, Illuminated Manuscripts
    Herāt school, 15th-century style of miniature painting that flourished in Herāt, western Afghanistan, under the patronage of the Timurids.
  37. [37]
    Herat: the pearl of Khorasan - Shabnam Nasimi | Substack
    Feb 14, 2025 · She turned Herat into a cultural and artistic powerhouse, with a focus on Persian miniature painting, literature, and architecture, ...
  38. [38]
    Gawhar Shad Mausoleum, Herat, Afghanistan - Darya Expeditions
    The Gawhar Shad Mausoleum stands as a testament to a period in Afghan history when Herat was a city of immense importance, both politically and culturally.Missing: artisans | Show results with:artisans
  39. [39]
    The Timurid capitals of Samarqand and Herat
    The important buildings made of baked bricks were often decorated with plaster, tiles and wooden panels. Although practical, the mud-brick buildings were ...
  40. [40]
    The Minarets of Herat: Majestic Remnants of the Timurid Era | EciEco
    Oct 16, 2025 · The Musalla and the schools that were once part of the complex have completely disappeared. After the death of Timur, during the rule of Shah ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The Impact of Restoration on the Sacred Preservation in Attracting ...
    - Promoting Cultural Tourism: Restored historical buildings often become major tourist attractions, contributing to the economic development of their regions.Missing: Musalla | Show results with:Musalla
  42. [42]
    The Fortress of Herat - Turkestan Vedomosti, 1885
    Jun 6, 2023 · The article “Herat” was published in the midst of the Panjdeh Incident in 1885, where Russia and Great Britain nearly went to war over the Panjdeh oasis, near ...Missing: bombardment | Show results with:bombardment
  43. [43]
    Déjà vu all over again in Afghanistan: Negotiating with the Taliban to ...
    Sep 1, 2021 · After dynamiting the statues, the Taliban moved on to anti-aircraft guns and artillery, which caused significant damage but did not destroy them ...