Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

National Center for Education Statistics


The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal agency tasked with collecting, analyzing, and reporting statistical data on the condition and progress of , spanning through graduate levels. Established by congressional in 1867 as the first federal agency dedicated to education statistics, NCES has evolved into one of thirteen principal federal statistical agencies, operating under the Institute of Education Sciences within the U.S. Department of Education since 2002. Its mandate emphasizes producing objective, timely data to support evidence-based policymaking, free from political influence, though institutional challenges in academia and government have periodically raised questions about interpretive biases in downstream analyses.
NCES conducts nationwide surveys and assessments, including the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) for institutions and the of Data for public schools, yielding insights into enrollment trends, financial expenditures, teacher qualifications, and student outcomes. Key publications such as the annual Digest of Education Statistics and The Condition of Education aggregate these findings into accessible compendia, enabling longitudinal tracking of metrics like graduation rates and per-pupil spending. A hallmark achievement is the administration of the (NAEP), dubbed the Nation's Report Card, which since 1969 has provided trend data on student proficiency in core subjects, revealing persistent achievement gaps uncorrelated with prevailing equity narratives. In recent years, NCES has encountered operational hurdles, including significant staffing reductions and delays in data releases as of 2025, attributed to budgetary constraints and administrative , which have slowed production of flagship reports and sparked debates over the sustainability of amid efforts to curb overreach. These issues underscore NCES's defining role in furnishing empirical baselines for of educational efficacy, rather than prescriptive ideologies, though remains paramount given academia's systemic skew toward non-falsifiable assumptions in policy advocacy.

History

Founding and Early Development (1867–1960s)

The origins of the National Center for Education Statistics trace to March 2, 1867, when Congress established the first U.S. Department of Education through legislation signed by President Andrew Johnson, with the explicit mandate to collect and disseminate statistics on the condition and progress of education in the United States. Headed by Commissioner Henry Barnard, the department's primary function was to gather empirical data to inform national understanding of educational needs, starting with basic indicators such as school enrollment, attendance rates, teacher numbers, and expenditures; this marked the federal government's initial systematic effort to compile education statistics amid post-Civil War reconstruction priorities. The agency's modest resources—initially a commissioner with a $4,000 annual salary and three clerks—reflected its limited scope, focused on aggregating state-reported data rather than direct surveys. By 1868, congressional concerns over the department's narrow role led to its reorganization as the Office of Education within the Department of the Interior, reducing staff to two clerks and subordinating it to broader administrative functions. Statistical collection persisted, with the first comprehensive surveys in 1870 documenting approximately 7.6 million pupils, 120,000 teachers, and related fiscal data, published annually in the Commissioner's reports through 1917. Expansions in the 1890s incorporated enrollments, high school curricula, and revenues, reflecting growing federal interest in comprehensive national portraits amid industrialization and immigration-driven enrollment surges. These efforts relied on voluntary state submissions, yielding datasets prone to inconsistencies but foundational for tracking trends like rising and school infrastructure. Throughout the early , the Office of Education underwent administrative shifts—renamed in 1929, transferred to the in 1939, and to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1953—while steadily broadening data scopes to include vocational training and postsecondary institutions amid economic depressions and world wars. By the , post-Sputnik pressures for scientific and technical education underscored the need for more rigorous, centralized statistics, culminating in the formal establishment of the National Center for Education Statistics in as a dedicated unit within the Office of Education, which issued the inaugural Digest of Education Statistics that year to consolidate historical and current data. This development institutionalized prior ad hoc collections into a structured federal statistical agency, emphasizing methodological consistency for policy analysis.

Expansion Under Key Legislation (1970s–1990s)

The Education Amendments of 1974 (P.L. 93-380) formalized the agency's designation as the National Center for Education Statistics within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, expanding its statutory mandate to collect, collate, and report statistics on the condition and progress of education in the United States and other nations. This legislation authorized the development of probability-based sample surveys and early longitudinal studies, such as the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972, which tracked over 22,000 respondents from high school through postsecondary education and early career stages using computerized data processing to analyze factors like access to higher education amid growing concerns over socioeconomic disparities. By 1972, NCES had shifted from aggregate census-style data collection—rooted in 19th-century practices—to these probabilistic methods, enabling more granular insights into educational outcomes and resource allocation. The Department of Education Organization Act of 1979 (P.L. 96-88) restructured federal education functions by creating the U.S. Department of Education and transferring NCES to its Office of Educational Research and Improvement, which integrated statistical activities with broader research efforts and increased funding for data infrastructure. This move supported the launch of major surveys in the 1980s, including the High School and Beyond study in 1980, which followed two cohorts of over 58,000 students to examine transitions into adulthood, and expanded postsecondary data collection on student aid and institutional finances under mandates from the Higher Education Act amendments. These initiatives grew NCES's portfolio to include private school enumerations and safety indicators, reflecting legislative priorities for accountability in federal aid programs amid debates on and equity. In the 1990s, the National Education Statistics Act of 1994 (part of P.L. 103-382) further broadened NCES's authority by emphasizing independence from programmatic influences, requiring adherence to high methodological standards, and mandating annual reports on education trends with a focus on full and open data dissemination. This act enabled the initiation of household-based surveys like the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (beginning in 1998) and state-level assessments aligned with the Improving America's Schools Act, which tracked over 20,000 kindergarteners longitudinally to postsecondary outcomes, incorporating international benchmarks for comparability. By 1994, NCES's budget had risen to support these expansions, with staff growing to over 400 and data products disseminated via emerging digital platforms, prioritizing empirical rigor over policy advocacy as stipulated in the legislation.

Modern Era and Institutional Reforms (2000s–Present)

In 2002, the Education Sciences Reform Act reorganized the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) by placing it under the newly established (IES) within the U.S. Department of Education, aiming to enhance the scientific rigor and independence of federal education research and statistics. This structural shift transferred oversight of NCES from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement to IES, which mandates adherence to high standards of objectivity, , and methodological transparency in and dissemination. The integration disbanded NCES's prior advisory panel, consolidating authority under the IES Director while preserving NCES's congressional mandate for statistical reporting. Subsequent operational reforms emphasized technological modernization, with NCES transitioning from paper-based to electronic systems in the early , accelerating processing speeds and improving data accuracy amid rising demands from laws like the of 2001. By the mid-, NCES expanded online survey platforms for programs such as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), enabling real-time reporting and broader institutional compliance, with annual updates refining components like tuition cost tracking and metrics. These changes supported adaptations to the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, which altered state accountability reporting and necessitated enhanced longitudinal data linkages for tracking student outcomes across K-12 and postsecondary levels. In the and , NCES faced budgetary pressures and program adjustments, including proposed cuts to certain surveys amid fiscal constraints, prompting refinements in prioritization to focus on core indicators like trends and achievement gaps. enhancements became central, with implementations of protocols under the Family Educational Rights and Act to address growing concerns over student record security in digitized systems. As of 2025, NCES encountered significant institutional disruption from IES-wide staff reductions under the second administration, slashing federal personnel from over 175 to fewer than 20, severely limiting data production capacity and prompting delays in key releases like the Digest of Education Statistics. These layoffs, part of broader Department of workforce cuts totaling around 466 positions, have fueled debates over sustaining NCES's mandate, with coalitions advocating retention of its federal structure amid proposals for interstate alternatives. Despite operational challenges, NCES continues mandated activities, including public access plans for research data set for full implementation by 2026.

Mission, Mandate, and Principles

Congressional Authorization and Core Responsibilities

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) operates under congressional authorization primarily established through the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (ESRA; Public Law 107-279, 20 U.S.C. §§ 9501 et seq.), which created the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) within the U.S. Department of Education and designated NCES as one of its four centers. This legislation reauthorized and formalized NCES's role, building on earlier statutory foundations such as the General Education Provisions Act amendments of 1974, while tracing its statistical mission to the original U.S. Department of Education Act of 1867 that initiated federal collection of education data. Prior to ESRA, NCES functioned as a statistical agency established by Congress in 1962 within the former Office of Education (now part of the Department of Education), with its mandate evolving through subsequent laws like the Education Amendments of 1974. Under ESRA § 153 (20 U.S.C. § 9543), NCES's core responsibilities encompass collecting, reporting, analyzing, and disseminating statistical data on and internationally, covering through levels. Specific duties include assessing the condition and progress of , such as state and local reform efforts, program readiness, achievement in core subjects like reading, , and , and dropout rates, postsecondary and , , school and , financing trends, and use in . The center must disaggregate data by factors including gender, race, ethnicity, disability status, and socioeconomic background to support evidence-based policymaking, while assisting states and localities in developing automated data systems, longitudinal studies, and methodologies for indicators like rates. Additionally, NCES conducts international comparisons of U.S. performance and prepares biennial Condition of Education reports summarizing key trends. NCES is further required to maintain methodological rigor, ensuring data objectivity and from political influence, as emphasized in ESRA's broader framework for IES to produce unbiased, high-quality statistics without prescriptive policy recommendations. This includes training programs for staff in statistical methods and offering fellowships to build expertise in and analysis. The center's outputs, such as national assessments and surveys, inform federal, state, and local decisions while adhering to privacy protections under laws like the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.

Commitments to Objectivity, Independence, and Methodological Rigor

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) operates under a statutory mandate to collect, analyze, and report education data in a manner that is objective, secular, neutral, non-ideological, and free from partisan political influence, as established by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-279), which created the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) to oversee NCES and prioritize rigorous, independent statistical work. This framework insulates NCES from direct policy-driven interference by requiring the dissemination of facts rather than advocacy, with the NCES Commissioner reporting to the IES Director—a position appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate—to maintain separation from the Department of Education's programmatic offices. NCES upholds methodological rigor through its Statistical Standards Program, which develops and enforces guidelines for survey design, data collection, analysis, and dissemination to ensure reliability, validity, and reproducibility, with standards last comprehensively revised in 2002 and applied across all major programs like the (NAEP). These standards emphasize scientific principles, including random sampling, testing, and transparency in handling nonresponse bias and imputation, while prohibiting the suppression or alteration of data to align with administrative priorities. Compliance is monitored internally, with consultations provided to align methodologies with federal best practices outlined in the Office of Management and Budget's Statistical Programs and Standards. Independence is further reinforced by NCES's adherence to the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics endorsed by international bodies like the , which prioritize impartiality and accessibility, though critics have noted vulnerabilities to departmental budget pressures, as evidenced by the 2025 layoffs affecting over 1,300 Department of Education staff, including IES components, potentially straining data continuity despite statutory protections. Multiple professional organizations, including the , have advocated for enhanced statutory to safeguard NCES from such risks, arguing that full is essential for public trust in outputs. Despite these challenges, NCES's track record includes consistent production of verifiable indicators, such as annual enrollment rates and achievement gaps, subjected to and external validation to mitigate institutional biases common in circles.

Organizational Structure

Leadership and Administration

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is directed by the of Education Statistics, who holds ultimate responsibility for the agency's operations, including the design, implementation, and integrity of statistical programs on U.S. . The ensures compliance with statutory requirements for data objectivity and methodological standards, while coordinating with the Department of Education to fulfill congressional mandates under laws such as the Sciences Reform Act of 2002. This role uniquely requires presidential with confirmation, distinguishing it from commissioners of other (IES) centers, who are appointed by the IES Director; the term is statutorily set at four years but has been implemented as six years in recent practice. As of July 2025, Dr. Matthew Soldner serves as Acting Commissioner of NCES and Acting Director of IES, appointed by the Department of Education amid leadership transitions; Soldner previously held senior roles within IES, including Associate Commissioner for Statistics. His predecessor, Peggy G. Carr, was appointed by President Biden in August 2021 to a six-year term but placed on administrative leave in February 2025 and subsequently removed, prompting concerns from statistical organizations about potential disruptions to data production and the politicization of the role. These events coincided with broader Department of Education staff reductions, including layoffs affecting NCES personnel involved in assessments like the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Administratively, the Commissioner manages NCES through a centralized Office of the Commissioner, which handles direction, allocation, and interagency coordination, while delegating operational execution to specialized units focused on survey operations, , and ; ultimate oversight resides with the IES Director and the Secretary of Education to maintain alignment with federal priorities. Senate-confirmed appointments for the Commissioner aim to insulate the agency from short-term political pressures, though vacancies and acting roles have historically delayed report releases and program continuity.

Key Divisions and Offices

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is structured under the leadership of the , who oversees policy, operations, and compliance with federal statistical standards, including data confidentiality and quality assurance protocols established under the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002. The Office of the Deputy Commissioner supports these functions by managing statistical methodologies, technology infrastructure, and coordination with other federal statistical agencies. As of the most recent organizational charts, NCES comprises three primary divisions focused on specialized and analysis: the Assessment Division, the Sample Surveys Division, and the Administrative Data Division. The Assessment Division directs the development, administration, and reporting of large-scale cognitive assessments, most notably the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as the Nation's Report Card, which measures student achievement in subjects like reading, mathematics, and science at grades 4, 8, and 12 on a biennial basis since its inception in 1969. This division ensures methodological rigor in assessment design, including psychometric validation and representative sampling, to provide comparable trend data over time, with the 2022 NAEP results, for instance, indicating stagnant or declining proficiency rates post-2019. The Sample Surveys Division conducts probability-based surveys to gather detailed data on experiences and institutions not captured through administrative records, encompassing programs such as the National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), which in 2020-21 surveyed over 10,000 public and private schools to assess staffing patterns and conditions, and the Longitudinal Study (ECLS), tracking developmental outcomes from through adulthood in cohorts starting in 1998 and 2010. These efforts prioritize nationally representative samples to enable inference on population parameters, with response rates maintained above 70% in recent cycles through rigorous follow-up protocols. The Administrative Data Division compiles and processes universe-level administrative datasets from state and local education agencies, producing annual statistics via initiatives like the of Data (), which reported 98,271 public schools serving 49.6 million students in the 2021-22 school year, and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), capturing and completion data from over 6,000 degree-granting institutions. This division facilitates linkages across datasets for longitudinal analysis while adhering to data minimization principles to protect , enabling insights into systemic trends such as declining in rural districts from 2019 to 2022.

Data Collection Programs and Methodologies

National Assessments and Longitudinal Studies

The (NAEP), administered by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), serves as the primary national assessment program, often referred to as the Nation's Report Card. Established in , NAEP provides congressionally mandated, continuing evaluations of student academic achievement and learning experiences across core subjects including reading, , , writing, , , , , U.S. history, and technology and engineering literacy. Assessments are conducted with representative samples of students in grades 4, 8, and 12, yielding results at national, state, and select urban district levels to inform and practice. Mathematics and reading assessments occur biennially at grades 4 and 8, while other subjects and grade 12 follow varying schedules, with frameworks developed by experts to ensure content validity. NCES also maintains long-term trend assessments within NAEP to track changes in achievement over decades, focusing on core subjects like reading and for ages 9, 13, and 17. These assessments emphasize methodological consistency, using fixed item sets to enable direct comparisons, though they underwent updates in 2022-2023 to incorporate digital formats while preserving trend comparability. In parallel, NCES oversees longitudinal studies through programs like the Secondary Longitudinal Studies Program, which track educational, vocational, and from through postsecondary transitions. These studies collect data via multiple waves of surveys, assessments, and administrative records from students, families, educators, and institutions, enabling analysis of factors influencing outcomes such as school readiness, persistence, and career paths. The Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) program exemplifies NCES efforts in early , comprising cohorts such as the Birth Cohort (ECLS-B, children born in 2001 followed to entry), Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (followed to ), Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 (to ), and the ongoing Kindergarten Class of 2023-24 (planned to ). Data encompass children's cognitive, social, and physical development alongside family, school, and community influences to support policy on early learning. For secondary education, the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) followed over 23,000 ninth-graders from 944 schools starting in 2009, with follow-ups in 2012, 2016, and beyond, including transcripts and administrative records up to 2021. It assesses algebraic skills, interests, and postsecondary trajectories via student, parent, teacher, and administrator surveys. Other notable longitudinal studies include the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002), tracking tenth-graders' transitions to postsecondary education and work; the Middle Grades Longitudinal Study of 2017-18 (MGLS), following entrants' academic and socioemotional growth; and historical cohorts like the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88).
StudyTarget PopulationStart YearKey Objectives
ECLSBirth to elementary school children1998 (cohorts vary)Track development, school readiness, and influencing factors
HSLS:09Ninth-graders2009Examine high school to postsecondary progression and STEM paths
ELS:2002Tenth-graders2002Analyze educational outcomes and workforce entry
MGLS:2017-18Middle grades entrants2017Study academic and socioemotional development through
These programs prioritize rigorous sampling, protections under , and public data access to facilitate while maintaining methodological independence.

Household and Institutional Surveys

The National Household Education Surveys Program (NHES), established by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), collects descriptive data directly from U.S. households on a range of educational activities and outcomes, serving to supplement school-based and institutional data collections. Launched in 1991, NHES has been fielded periodically, with surveys in 1991, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2012, 2016, and 2019, focusing on topics such as care and , school readiness, and involvement, , and participation. Each iteration typically includes multiple components, such as the Early Childhood Program Participation Survey and the Adult Education Survey, using address-based sampling to achieve nationally representative estimates while minimizing nonresponse bias through incentives and follow-ups. For instance, the 2019 NHES gathered responses from approximately 10,000 households, revealing data on rates and nonparental care arrangements for young children. NHES employs telephone and web-based methodologies, transitioning from random-digit-dial sampling in earlier years to address-based frames for broader coverage, including households without landlines, with response rates varying from 50-70% across cycles. This program addresses gaps in institutional data by capturing informal and home-based learning, such as prevalence, which NCES reports increased from 1.7% of school-age children in 1999 to 3.0% in 2019 based on NHES findings. Institutional surveys conducted by NCES target educational organizations to gather administrative and operational data, including the National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), successor to the Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), which queries public and private K-12 schools, principals, and s on staffing, school conditions, and . NTPS, fielded biennially since 2015-16 after SASS's final round in 2011-12, uses stratified probability sampling of approximately 10,000-12,000 schools and 50,000 s, yielding data on teacher turnover rates—for example, 8% of s left between 2020-21 and 2021-22—and principal characteristics. Response rates hover around 70-80% for schools and 60-70% for s, bolstered by multi-mode administration including web and paper questionnaires. At the postsecondary level, the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS) comprises annual mandatory surveys of over 7,000 U.S. colleges, universities, and vocational institutions, collecting standardized data on , program completions, finances, and student charges via 12 interrelated components like the Fall and Completions surveys. IPEDS data, reported directly by institutions under requirements, underpin metrics such as the 2022-23 total fall of 15.4 million undergraduates, with institutional coverage exceeding 99% due to compliance enforcement. Additional quick-response institutional surveys, such as those under the former Postsecondary Quick Information System (PEQIS), utilize pre-recruited panels of institutions for targeted topics like trends. These surveys emphasize methodological consistency, with imputation for nonresponse and audits to ensure data reliability, though institutional self-reporting can introduce variability addressed through NCES validation protocols.

Administrative Data and International Comparability Efforts

The Center for Statistics (NCES) collects administrative data primarily through its Administrative Data Division, which oversees annual reporting from all state and local K-12 agencies and postsecondary institutions to compile comprehensive national statistics on enrollment, staffing, finances, and school operations. Key programs include the of Data (CCD), established as the Department of Education's primary database for public elementary and secondary , capturing details on over 130,000 schools and 13,000 districts such as pupil counts, teacher salaries, and fiscal expenditures since its inception in the 1980s. Similarly, the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS), a mandatory annual collection since 1990, gathers data from approximately 7,000 institutions on completions, enrollment demographics, institutional revenues, and student financial aid, enabling longitudinal tracking of trends. These efforts emphasize through validation protocols, imputation for missing values, and linkages to other federal datasets like the Education Demographic and Establishment Estimates (EDEE) for geographic and socioeconomic context. NCES promotes the use of administrative data to supplement survey-based collections, reducing respondent burden and enhancing accuracy by integrating routine agency records—such as state-submitted enrollment rosters and financial ledgers—into unified national frames, though challenges persist in standardizing definitions across jurisdictions. For instance, data inform federal funding allocations under programs like Title I, while IPEDS supports metrics for outcomes, with recent enhancements including expanded / reporting and outcome measures like post-enrollment as of the 2024-25 cycle. Efforts also extend to research-ready processing, such as creating longitudinal files from annual snapshots to analyze trends like graduation rates, with methodological guides addressing issues like non-response bias via administrative linkages. In parallel, NCES advances international comparability through its International Affairs Program (IAP), coordinating U.S. participation in assessments like the (PISA), Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) to benchmark domestic performance against over 70 countries. The agency represents the in bodies such as the (OECD) and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), advocating for standardized methodologies to ensure cross-national data alignment on metrics including enrollment ratios, attainment levels, and per-pupil spending. This includes producing comparative indicators in the Condition of Education report, such as 2022 results showing U.S. 15-year-olds scoring above the OECD average in reading (504 vs. 476) but below in math (465 vs. 472), facilitating policy-relevant insights into systemic factors like instructional time and resource allocation. Historical initiatives underscore NCES's focus on methodological rigor for comparability, exemplified by the 1997 International Education Expenditure Comparability Study, which quantified discrepancies in national accounting—such as varying inclusions of or non-formal —potentially inflating or deflating cross-country spending ratios by up to 20-30% and recommending harmonized classifications akin to standards. Ongoing work involves adapting U.S. administrative data for global frameworks, like aligning IPEDS completion rates with tertiary attainment metrics, while IAP disseminates tools such as data tables for adult literacy trends from the Program for the Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), revealing stable U.S. scores (around 260) since the amid declines in select peers. These efforts prioritize empirical benchmarking over narrative-driven interpretations, though limitations in self-reported international data necessitate caution in causal attributions.

Data Dissemination and Public Access

Key Publications and Reports

The Digest of Education Statistics serves as NCES's primary annual compendium, aggregating data from federal, state, and private sources on topics spanning through postsecondary , including trends, characteristics, finances, and federal programs; the 2022 edition, for instance, includes over 400 tables updated with the most recent available figures. The congressionally mandated Condition of Education report, published annually since , distills key indicators into digestible summaries on education levels from to adulthood, labor market outcomes, and benchmarks; the 2024 edition highlights trends such as a projected 1% decline in public school enrollment from fall 2023 to fall 2031 and postsecondary attainment rates varying by demographics. NCES also oversees the dissemination of The Nation's Report Card through the (NAEP), which releases subject-specific reports—covering reading, , , and others—based on nationally representative samples of students in grades 4, 8, and 12; for example, the 2024 NAEP results for grade 8 and grades 4 and 12 and reading showed average scores largely stable or slightly improved post-pandemic in select areas, with detailed breakdowns by state and subgroup. Other notable recurring publications include the Projections of Education Statistics, which forecasts metrics like enrollment (e.g., total fall enrollment in degree-granting institutions projected to rise 2% from 2022 to 2031) and expenditures through mid-century using statistical models grounded in historical data. Fast Facts series provide concise, one-page overviews of targeted topics, such as back-to-school statistics or career and technical education rates, drawing directly from NCES surveys and external validations for quick policy reference.

Tools and Databases for Researchers and Policymakers

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) maintains an array of web-based tools and databases designed to facilitate data access, , and for researchers and policymakers evaluating trends, allocations, and program effectiveness. These resources draw from NCES's extensive data collections, including surveys, assessments, and administrative records, enabling users to generate custom queries without requiring advanced statistical expertise. Publicly available tools emphasize user-friendly interfaces, while restricted-use datasets offer deeper access for vetted researchers under data security protocols. DataLab serves as a primary platform, integrating tools such as PowerStats for conducting custom statistical analyses on datasets from surveys like the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) and the High School Longitudinal Study (HSLS). Users can produce weighted estimates, crosstabs, and regression outputs directly online, supporting policy inquiries into topics like , enrollment patterns, and institutional outcomes. Complementary components include the Online Codebook, which generates syntax files for replication in software like or , and the Tables Library, aggregating pre-generated tables from NCES studies for rapid reference. For assessment-specific analysis, the NAEP Data Explorer (NDE) provides interactive capabilities to explore results from the (NAEP), known as The Nation's . This tool allows creation of customizable tables, graphics, and maps disaggregating performance by demographics, jurisdiction, and subject areas such as and reading, with data spanning assessments from 1990 onward. Additional NAEP resources include the Questions Tool for reviewing released items and Item Maps linking scale scores to content objectives, aiding methodological evaluations of achievement trends. The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) database compiles annual submissions from over 7,000 U.S. postsecondary institutions, covering enrollment, completions, finances, and human resources across 12 survey components. Researchers access this via IPEDS Use the Data tools, which support downloading raw files or querying through dashboards for institution-level comparisons, essential for analyses of access, affordability, and equity in . Advanced users benefit from NCES-supported software, including the for handling complex survey designs in NCES datasets and the NAEP Data Toolkit for item response modeling. Restricted datasets, accessible via federal secure data centers, enable micro-level on topics like longitudinal trajectories while protecting under strict licensing agreements. These tools collectively underpin evidence-based policymaking, with NCES reporting over 1 million annual interactions via its portals as of fiscal year 2023.

Impact on Policy and Education Outcomes

Role in Federal Funding and Program Evaluation

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) supports federal funding allocation by annually computing distributions for up to 20 formula-based programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education, utilizing data on factors such as school enrollment, poverty levels, and population counts derived from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau. These calculations ensure that funds, including those for programs like Title I under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), are apportioned according to statutory formulas that prioritize high-need districts and schools. For instance, NCES-derived estimates of and free or reduced-price lunch eligibility directly influence the within-state allocations for Title I grants, which totaled approximately $18.4 billion in fiscal year 2023. In , NCES furnishes empirical data on program inputs, outputs, and outcomes to assess effectiveness and compliance with mandates. This includes annual reports on revenues and expenditures for public elementary and , which track contributions alongside and to evaluate utilization and fiscal . Under ESSA, enacted in 2015, NCES has conducted targeted studies of Title I formulas, analyzing their impacts on distribution and student subgroups to inform potential refinements. Similarly, NCES data from surveys like the of Data and fiscal audits support evaluations of programs such as the (IDEA), enabling assessments of per-pupil spending and service delivery in . NCES's statistical indicators, including those from the (NAEP), provide benchmarks for gauging program efficacy, such as Title I's influence on achievement gaps, with results periodically reported to for accountability purposes. These evaluations rely on NCES's longitudinal datasets to isolate program effects amid confounding variables like demographic shifts, though limitations in real-time data collection can delay insights into emerging fiscal pressures. By maintaining independence as a principal statistical , NCES data underpins evidence-based adjustments to funding priorities, such as increased allocations for pandemic recovery efforts documented in district-level expenditure analyses. Data from the (NAEP) long-term trend assessments, administered by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), reveal modest gains in average reading and mathematics scores for 9- and 13-year-olds from the 1970s to 2020, with 9-year-old reading scores rising 12 points from 1971 to 2020 and mathematics scores increasing similarly, though these improvements largely stalled after the 1980s. However, scores declined sharply post-2020, with 9-year-olds' reading scores dropping 5 points and mathematics scores falling 7 points by 2022 compared to 2012 levels, erasing prior progress and highlighting vulnerabilities to disruptions like the . These trends indicate systemic stagnation in core skills despite decades of policy interventions, as average scores for both age groups remained relatively flat from the late 1980s onward, suggesting from expanded access and funding rather than breakthroughs in instructional efficacy. Persistent achievement gaps underscore deeper structural issues, with NCES analyses showing that Black-White and Hispanic-White gaps in NAEP mathematics and reading scores narrowed modestly from the 1970s to the 2010s—by about 10-20 points in some cohorts—but have since widened or held steady, remaining at 20-30 points for 8th graders as of recent assessments. Socioeconomic disparities mirror this pattern, as students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch consistently score 20-40 points lower than non-eligible peers across subjects, with gaps exacerbating in urban districts and showing limited closure despite targeted programs. Internationally, NCES-reported and TIMSS results position U.S. students above OECD averages in reading (504 vs. 476 in 2022) and but at or below in (465 vs. 472), with TIMSS 2023 mathematics scores for 8th graders reverting to 1995 levels amid a global slide, indicating competitive mediocrity rather than leadership in domains critical for economic productivity. A key systemic challenge evident in NCES fiscal data is the weak linkage between escalating per-pupil expenditures—rising from about $5,000 (inflation-adjusted) in 1970 to over $14,000 by 2020—and corresponding achievement plateaus, as real spending tripled without proportional gains in NAEP scores, prompting questions about allocative inefficiencies such as administrative bloat or misaligned curricula over instructional quality. Recent NCES surveys further document operational strains, including widespread school-level hiring difficulties for qualified teachers in 2023-24, cited by over 80% of principals as a barrier due to applicant shortages, which correlates with uneven recovery in post-pandemic scores and perpetuates disparities in high-need areas. Rural districts, per NCES analyses, face compounded hurdles with lower average achievement and postsecondary attainment despite comparable graduation rates, attributable to resource concentration in urban centers rather than inherent geography. These patterns collectively point to causal factors beyond mere , including family socioeconomic influences and instructional consistency, as NCES longitudinal data like the Longitudinal Study reveal that early gaps tied to home environments predict later outcomes more reliably than inputs alone.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Limitations

Concerns Over Data Accuracy and Completeness

Critics have highlighted instances where the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) retains known errors in its datasets due to policies that lock data after fixed periods, limiting revisions to prioritize timeliness over ongoing accuracy. For example, the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) locks submissions after one year, preventing institutions like for-profit universities from correcting rates, while the of Data locks after three years. This approach has led to the persistence of errors discovered two to three years post-collection, as verified through direct school confirmations by investigative reporting. NCES officials, including former Commissioner Jack Buckley, have defended this tradeoff, arguing that indefinite revisions could undermine data stability, unlike practices at agencies such as the . Methodological choices in NCES analyses have also drawn scrutiny for potentially introducing inaccuracies in comparative assessments. In a 2006 study on private versus public school performance, NCES relied on federal program participation—such as Title I, eligibility, Limited English Proficient classification, and Individualized Education Programs—to proxy for student (SES) and disadvantage. However, private schools exhibit lower participation rates (e.g., 19% in Title I versus 54% in public schoolwide programs; 24% in versus 96% in public schools) due to administrative burdens rather than actual eligibility differences, leading to undercounting of disadvantaged students in private sectors and biased SES adjustments that favor public school estimates. Additionally, inclusion of school-influenced variables like and home resources in models risks school effects with background factors, violating standard econometric principles for . Concerns over data completeness extend to gaps in coverage and delays that hinder comprehensive . The 2024 Digest of Education Statistics, for instance, contained only 27 tables as of June 2025—far below the typical 270—omitting sections on education, teacher attitudes and mobility, school principals, state-level college degrees conferred, financial aid, and international comparisons. Similarly, the 2025 Condition of Education report missed its June 1 deadline, releasing only a partial "Part 1" amid broader slowdowns in federal data production. Such omissions limit insights into non-public education sectors, where NCES surveys like the National Household Education Survey may underrepresent due to definitional strictness (requiring exclusive home instruction) and nonresponse biases, yielding estimates (e.g., 3.4% in 2019) that diverge from higher figures reported by external analyses post-COVID-19 spikes. These issues underscore challenges in achieving reliable, holistic indicators of educational conditions.

Allegations of Political Influence and Resource Constraints

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) operates under a congressional mandate to produce statistics that are objective, neutral, and free from partisan political influence, as established by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. Despite this framework, allegations of political influence have surfaced periodically, often tied to executive branch appointments and policy directives rather than direct manipulation. For instance, the appointment of commissioners has been criticized for potentially introducing suspicion of , as political selections may prioritize alignment over technical expertise, though NCES production processes include safeguards against overt interference. In 2025, under the , renewed concerns emerged regarding potential politicization through resource reallocations and new mandates. A directive to collect detailed admissions on grades, , and other factors—aimed at identifying alleged biases—placed additional strain on NCES amid severe staffing reductions, prompting experts to warn that expedited collections could yield inaccurate or misleading statistics indicating where none exists. Separately, the placed the acting NCES on leave, accusing her of to undermine narratives, though such claims lacked substantiating and highlighted tensions over interpretive control. A former Trump-era expressed fears that aggressive cuts could erode the agency's independence, transforming it into a tool for partisan ends rather than neutral analysis. Resource constraints have long hampered NCES operations, with chronic underfunding leading to staffing shortages and delayed publications. A 2024 study identified serious capacity deficits, including outdated systems and insufficient personnel to handle growing data demands. By March 2025, Department of Education cuts reduced NCES to a skeletal staff of three employees, canceling contracts worth hundreds of millions and disrupting core data collections like the . These issues predate recent actions, as evidenced by 2020 program cuts tied to congressional appropriations shortfalls and a persistent mismatch where budget allocations favor contracts over salaries, exacerbating vacancies. Such limitations have resulted in publication delays, with the U.S. Department of Education falling behind on key statistics across multiple administrations.

Effects of Recent Budget Cuts and Operational Disruptions

In 2025, the U.S. Department of Education implemented severe budget reductions and cuts to the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the parent organization of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), resulting in the termination of nearly $900 million in IES contracts by February and mass layoffs that affected almost all NCES personnel. These actions, part of broader efforts to reduce federal bureaucracy, left NCES with a "skeletal ," severely curtailing its core operational capacity for data collection and analysis. The disruptions manifested in immediate delays and failures in statutory reporting obligations, including the first-ever missed deadline for the annual "Report on the Condition of Education" on June 1, 2025, which provides congressionally mandated insights into enrollment, achievement, and funding trends. Key assessments like the (NAEP), known as the Nation's , were placed on a "barebones" footing, with reduced staffing threatening the frequency, scope, and reliability of future administrations. Operational strain extended to ongoing surveys, such as those tracking postsecondary outcomes and school finance, leading to potential gaps in longitudinal data essential for monitoring disparities in rural and underserved areas. Longer-term effects include diminished capacity for evaluation, as researchers have warned that the cuts erode the for tracking trends, program , and , potentially exacerbating blind spots in federal decisions. The fired NCES director highlighted that fewer staff means "fewer eyes on the condition of schools," raising concerns over undetected declines in educational quality and metrics. Proposed fiscal year 2026 budgets further signal ongoing pressure, with IES slated for a 67% reduction to $261 million, which could compound these issues by limiting new data initiatives and contractor support. While aimed at fiscal restraint, such reductions risk undermining the empirical foundation for national education oversight, as corroborated by disruptions already evident in 2025 data pipelines.

References

  1. [1]
    The National Center for Education Statistics: Who We Are | IES
    History. NCES's mission to collect and report education statistics traces back to original legislation establishing a federal agency in 1867 to collect and ...About NCES · Matthew Soldner · History
  2. [2]
    National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) | IES
    National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) · Containing key indicators that summarize important developments and trends using the latest statistics · Built ...College Navigator · Search for Public Schools · Fast Facts · Data Tools
  3. [3]
    Digest of Education Statistics Home
    ... National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). To qualify for inclusion in the Digest, material must be nationwide in scope and of broad interest and ...
  4. [4]
    The US Department of Education is far behind on producing key ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · Federal education data releases have slowed dramatically, with major gaps in the 2024 Digest and Condition of Education report.
  5. [5]
    Is the Federal Agency That Tracks School Data Losing Steam?
    Jul 17, 2024 · A new study of U.S. data agencies finds serious capacity problems at the National Center for Education Statistics.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Federal Education Data Collection: Celebrating 150 Years
    Statistics paint a portrait of our Nation. Since 1870, the federal government has collected statistics on the condition and progress of American education.
  7. [7]
    Fast Facts: Historical reports (932)
    From 1867 through 1917, the statistics collected by the Office of Education appeared in the Annual Report of the Commissioner of Education. These large, ...
  8. [8]
    The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education
    The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) was formally established in 1962 and prepared and published the first Digest of Education Statistics ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Retrospective Report - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    This report is a commemorative guide that is intended to provide a better understanding of the history and use of federal education statistics.
  10. [10]
    National Longitudinal Study of 1972 (NLS -72) - Overview
    The NLS-72 describes the transition of young adults from high school through postsecondary education and the workplace. The data span 1972 through 1986 and ...
  11. [11]
    S.210 - An act to establish a Department of Education, and for other ...
    ... National Center for Education Statistics; and (3) any advisory committee giving advice or making recommendations principally concerning education functions ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  12. [12]
    [PDF] New Directions for the National Center for Education Statistics
    Section 402(b) of the National Education Statistics Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 9001). ... jurisdictions in 1970, 1980, and 1990. This mapping project is, in principle ...
  13. [13]
    S.1513 - Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 103rd Congress ...
    Reauthorizes and revises provisions for the National Center for Education Statistics (the Center) and the National Assessment of Educational Progress.Missing: key | Show results with:key<|separator|>
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    The Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA): A Primer | Congress.gov
    Mar 20, 2023 · The ESRA authorizes much of the federal government's efforts to collect statistics and conduct research on the US educational system.
  16. [16]
    National Center for Education Statistics Faces Program Cuts
    Jun 1, 2020 · NCES was moved under IES after the institute's legislative creation in 2002, leading to the disbandment of the agency's advisory panel and ...
  17. [17]
    From Paper to Cloud: The Evolution of NCES Data Stewardship ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · As NCES entered the 2000s, the agency faced increasingly complex challenges around data security and privacy. While public-use data could be ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  18. [18]
    Archived Changes - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Changes include moving cost/tuition to a new survey, combining IC elements, moving dual enrollment question, and moving cost/net price elements to a new survey.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Change in Number and Types of Postsecondary Institutions: 2000 to ...
    This Data Point presents IPEDS data for U.S. undergraduate institutions in 2000 and 2014, examining changes in institutions overall and among institutions that.Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  20. [20]
    IES, the Institute of Education Sciences, is in disarray after layoffs
    Mar 14, 2025 · Mass layoffs of 1300 Department of Education employees delivered a crippling blow to the statistics and research branch called IES.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Building a replacement for NCES - The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
    By updating and improving on the NCES model, we can lay the groundwork for a new cooperative, interstate research institution.
  23. [23]
    Public Access to Research Policy | IES
    IES is implementing a new Public Access Plan over the course of Fiscal Years (FY) 2025 and 2026 that will affect all new awardees.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    20 U.S. Code § 9543 - Duties
    ### Summary of 20 U.S.C. § 9543 - Duties of the National Center for Education Statistics
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Statistical Standards Program
    The Statistical Standards Program consults and advises on methodological and statistical aspects involved in the design, collection, and analysis of ...
  27. [27]
    NCES Statistical Standards | IES
    This publication contains the 2002 revised statistical standards and guidelines for the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Statistical Standards
    NCES acthdties are designed to address high priorii education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status ...
  29. [29]
    Statistical Standards Program - Overview
    This Program develops standards that ensure the quality of statistical surveys, analyses and products; consults and advises on the implementation of standards ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Ensuring Objective and Reliable Education Statistics
    Desired Outcome – We urge changes in the Education Sciences Reform. Act (ESRA) in order to: Ensure education statistics are objective, nonpartisan,.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    AERA Report Calls for More Independence for National Center for ...
    "NCES' autonomy and authority are a requisite for its products and data to be objective, accurate, and publicly accepted—all essential requirements to the ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] title 20—education § 9583 - GovInfo
    Each Commissioner appointed by the Director pursuant to section 9517 of this title may be re- moved by the Director prior to the expiration of the term of each ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Department of Education Announces Appointment of National ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · The US Department of Education announced Dr. Matthew Soldner will serve as the Acting Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
  36. [36]
    President Biden Appoints Peggy Carr to Serve as NCES ...
    Aug 16, 2021 · On August 16, President Joe Biden announced the appointment of Peggy G. Carr to serve as commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
  37. [37]
    [PDF] LinkedIn Post by Ron Wasserstein, Executive Director
    Feb 26, 2025 · The placement of Dr. Peggy Carr as Commissioner of the National Center for Education. Statistics on administrative leave is profoundly ...
  38. [38]
    What will NCES layoffs mean for the Nation's Report Card? | K-12 Dive
    Mar 18, 2025 · The U.S. Department of Education claims mandated tests like NAEP won't be impacted, but laid-off employees beg to differ.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    [PDF] National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Mission, Scope, and Products. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in the Department of Education's (ED) Institute of.
  40. [40]
    Another Education Department delay: Release of NAEP science ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · There is no commissioner of education statistics to sign off on the score report, a requirement before it is released, according to five ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    Organizational Charts | IES - Institute of Education Sciences
    Organizational Charts ; NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH (NCER). Elizabeth Albro. Commissioner ; NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS (NCES). Chris ...Missing: changes | Show results with:changes
  43. [43]
    The Nation's Report Card | NAEP
    Sep 9, 2025 · NAEP is an educational assessment. Often called The Nation's Report Card, it provides national, state, and district-level results about ...Assessments · About · Reading · NAEP Participation
  44. [44]
    CCD - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    The Common Core of Data (CCD) is the Department of Education's primary database on public elementary and secondary education in the United States.Data FilesSearch for Public SchoolsCCD Data FilesData ToolsData Tables
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    About | NAEP - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Apr 17, 2025 · NAEP is an educational assessment. Often called The Nation's Report Card, it provides national, state, and district-level results about ...Assessment Calendar · Frequently Asked Questions · NAEP AccommodationsMissing: details | Show results with:details
  47. [47]
    Assessments | NAEP - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Apr 17, 2025 · Each NAEP assessment is based on an organizing framework, similar to a blueprint, that is developed by education and assessment experts.
  48. [48]
    NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment Results
    The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is a continuing and nationally representative measure of trends in academic achievement of U.S. ...
  49. [49]
    NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment Results: Reading and ...
    NAEP reports scores at five selected percentiles to show the progress made by lower- (10th and 25th percentiles), middle- (50th percentile), and higher- (75th ...
  50. [50]
    Secondary Longitudinal Studies Program - Homepage
    The aim of this continuing program is to study the educational, vocational, and personal development of students at various stages in their educational careers.
  51. [51]
    Longitudinal Studies - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    NCES longitudinal studies have collected data since 1972. Each study presents their objectives, target populations, collection years, and data sources.
  52. [52]
    Early Childhood Longitudinal Studies Program (ECLS)-Overview
    The ECLS program includes four longitudinal studies that examine child development, school readiness, and early school experiences.Data Products · Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 · Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) · FAQs
  53. [53]
    High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) - Overview
    ### Summary of High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09)
  54. [54]
    About the NHES - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    The National Household Education Surveys Program (NHES) was developed by NCES to complement its school-based and institutional surveys.
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    [PDF] National Household Education Surveys Program of 2019
    NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status ...
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    [DOC] Part A NHES 2019.docx - Reginfo.gov
    The National Household Education Survey (NHES) is a data collection program of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) designed to provide ...
  59. [59]
    Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) - Overview
    The Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) was conducted by NCES seven times between 1987 through 2011. SASS was an integrated study public and private school ...Missing: based | Show results with:based
  60. [60]
    IPEDS - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    IPEDS is a system of 12 interrelated survey components conducted annually that gathers data from every college, university, and technical and vocational ...Use The Data · Find Your College · Report Your Data · About IPEDS
  61. [61]
    Use The Data - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Search for tables, charts, publications, or other products related to postsecondary education by keywords and filters.IPEDS Access Databases · Overview Of IPEDS Data · Ipeds · Trend Generator
  62. [62]
    Postsecondary Education Quick Information System (PEQIS)
    NCES has established PEQIS to collect ... Most PEQIS institutional surveys use a previously recruited, nationally representative panel of institutions.
  63. [63]
    Administrative Data Collections at NCES
    The Administrative Data Division at NCES collects data from all state and local K-12 education agencies and from all postsecondary schools or institutions of ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Data Quality Assessment Tool for Administrative Data
    Unlike survey data, which are collected for statistical purposes, administrative data are collected as part of a program agency's routine operations. Through a ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Investing in a data quality research program for administrative data ...
    Public program administrative data that are used to keep track of program enrollees and benefits received are often used in combination with survey data to ...
  66. [66]
    Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) 2024-25 ...
    Aug 15, 2025 · FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For specific questions related to collection activities, please contact Matthew Soldner, NCESCommissioner@ed.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Turning Administrative Data into Research-Ready Longitudinal ...
    However, because administrative data files are not created specifically for representative longitudinal research, there may be multiple steps involved in ...
  68. [68]
    IAP - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Part of the U.S. Department of Education, the IAP supports a variety of activities to make international comparative data available on education and learning.Missing: comparability | Show results with:comparability
  69. [69]
    About IAP - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    About IAP. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) coordinates the United States' participation in international studies.
  70. [70]
    Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy of 15-Year-Old Students
    In 2022, there were 5 PISA-participating education systems with higher average reading literacy scores for 15-year-olds than the United States.Missing: comparability | Show results with:comparability
  71. [71]
    International Education Expenditure Comparability Study
    This report is the first of two volumes. This, the main volume, examines the nature, prevalence, severity, and causes of problems in comparing education ...
  72. [72]
    International Comparisons of Adult Literacy and Numeracy Skills ...
    This Data Point summarizes trends in adult literacy and numeracy skills since the 1990s for countries that participated in all three international adult ...Missing: comparability | Show results with:comparability
  73. [73]
    Fast Facts: International comparisons of achievement (1)
    The NCES Fast Facts Tool provides quick answers to many education questions (National Center for Education Statistics). Get answers on Early Childhood ...
  74. [74]
    Condition of Education (COE) Home
    The Condition of Education contains key indicators on all levels of education, labor force outcomes, and international comparisons.COE 2024 At a Glance · Education Expenditures by · Postsecondary Education
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Report on the Condition of Education 2024
    The Report on the Condition of Education is an annual report from the National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES) that is mandated by the United States ...
  76. [76]
    Projections of Education Statistics Home
    The Projections of Education Statistics provides projections for key education statistics, including enrollment, graduates, teachers, and expenditures.
  77. [77]
    Fast Facts - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Fast Facts provide users with concise information on a range of educational issues, from early childhood to adult learning.Back-to-school statistics · Enrollment · Career and technical education · Child care<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Researchers | NAEP - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Aug 7, 2025 · Researchers can access public data, web tools, restricted datasets, statistical software, and learn NAEP procedures. The NAEP R&D program also ...
  79. [79]
    DataLab | Home - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Web-based tools that provide access to data from NCES studies. Use PowerStats to create custom online analyses. Use the Online Codebook to create syntax files.Online Codebook · Learning Center · Tables Library · About
  80. [80]
    DataLab | About
    DataLab is a platform of web-based tools providing public access to NCES data, including PowerStats, Online Codebook, and Tables Library.Missing: databases | Show results with:databases
  81. [81]
    Explore Assessment Data | NAEP
    Jul 2, 2025 · NCES provides several free tools for quick and easy access to results and resources from NAEP, also known as The Nation's Report Card.
  82. [82]
    NAEP Data Explorer - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    Dec 5, 2008 · The NAEP Data Explorer is a web-based system that provides the user with tables of detailed results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
  83. [83]
    Researchers - Data Analysis Tools | NAEP
    Apr 6, 2022 · Web-based tools include the NAEP Data Explorer (NDE) for tables/graphics, NAEP Questions Tools (NQT), and Item Maps for analyzing NAEP data.
  84. [84]
    Researchers - Software | NAEP
    May 24, 2024 · The software options for analyzing NAEP data include EdSurvey R Package, AM Statistical Software, and the NAEP Data Toolkit.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Who We Are - Treasury
    Reports and Tools: The Center's flagship annual reports, The Condition of Education and Digest of Education. Statistics, provide comprehensive, reliable, and ...
  86. [86]
    Allocations - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    NCES annually calculates the allocation of Federal funds for as many as 20 formula allocation programs sponsored by the Department.
  87. [87]
    Fast Facts: Title I (158)
    SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Table 401.70. Appropriations for Title I and selected other programs under the Every Student Succeeds ...
  88. [88]
    Introduction - National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), passed in December 2015, includes a mandate to study the Title I allocation funding formulas and the formulas' impact on ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary ...
    The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Fiscal Year 2025 Annual Evaluation and Evidence-Building Plan for ...
    This plan details the US Department of Education's FY25 evaluation activities, including implementation, outcome, and impact evaluations, organized topically.
  91. [91]
    The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as Amended ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · ... (ESSA): A Primer. CRS PRODUCT (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS). Hide ... Title I Evaluation (formerly referred to as the National Assessment of Title I).
  92. [92]
    Using Federal Education Data to Inform Policymaking: Part 2 ...
    Aug 31, 2023 · In part 1 of this blog series, we highlight the benefits and advantages of using federal education data for policymaking at the federal, state, and district ...Missing: allocation | Show results with:allocation
  93. [93]
    Study of District and School Uses of Federal Education Funds | IES
    This study examines the use of federal funds in K-12 education, collecting data from states and districts, and focused on pandemic relief funds. Data ...
  94. [94]
    COE - Reading and Mathematics Score Trends
    NAEP long-term trend results indicate that the average reading and mathematics achievement of 9- and 13-year-olds improved between the 1970s and 2020.
  95. [95]
    Long-term trends in reading and mathematics achievement (38)
    Average scores for age 9 students in 2022 declined 5 points in reading and 7 points in mathematics compared to 2020.
  96. [96]
    Methodology Studies - Achievement Gaps | NAEP
    Apr 3, 2024 · NCES explored the achievement gaps between Black and White, and Hispanic and White, students using NAEP data to illuminate patterns and changes in these gaps ...Black-White Gaps FAQs · 2011 Key Findings · Hispanic-White Gaps FAQs
  97. [97]
    Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups
    This website presents key indicators that examine the educational progress and challenges students face in the United States by race/ethnicity.Missing: gaps socioeconomic
  98. [98]
    Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)
    In 2023, the United States performed above the TIMSS 2023 international average in mathematics and science at both the 4th and 8th grades. Male students scored ...
  99. [99]
    Does Money Matter in Education? A Policymaker's Guide
    Despite this substantial increase in spending for education, many observers have pointed out that student outcomes have not improved substantially, if at all.
  100. [100]
    Most U.S. public elementary and secondary schools faced hiring ...
    Oct 17, 2024 · The top two challenges reported were an overall lack of qualified candidates and having too few applicants, federal data show.
  101. [101]
    Educational Outcomes
    Rural areas have lower academic achievement, lower postsecondary enrollment, and less bachelor's degree completion, but the highest high school graduation rate.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018
    Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups examines the educational progress and challenges students face in the United States by race/ ...
  103. [103]
    The accuracy of federal education data - The Hechinger Report
    May 9, 2013 · The National Center for Education Statistics knowingly leaves in errors that are discovered. And then this error-ridden data is used by ...Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    The NCES Private-Public School Study - Education Next
    Nov 10, 2006 · The NCES study repeatedly violates this rule when it infers a student's background from his or her participation in federal programs intended to ...Missing: reliability | Show results with:reliability
  105. [105]
    COE - Homeschooled Children and Reasons for Homeschooling
    In the NHES, students are considered to be homeschooled if all of the following conditions are met: their parents reported them being schooled at home instead ...
  106. [106]
    Fast Facts on Homeschooling | National Home Education Research ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · There were about 3.1 million homeschool students in 2021-2022 in grades K-12 in the United States. This is up from 2.5 million in spring ...Missing: underreporting | Show results with:underreporting
  107. [107]
    Full article: Bolstering Education Statistics to Serve the Nation
    1.1 Historical Overview. NCES' history dates to 1867 legislation establishing a “department” whose sole function was to gather statistics and facts needed to ...
  108. [108]
    Experts Knock New Trump Plan to Collect College Admissions Data
    Aug 18, 2025 · New data survey could produce statistics that indicate bias where none exists.
  109. [109]
    Trump Wants Admissions Data on Grades and Race, but Who Will ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The directive from Mr. Trump puts new pressure on the National Center for Education Statistics, which under federal law provides nonpartisan ...
  110. [110]
    Former Trump commissioner blasts DOGE education data cuts
    Mar 3, 2025 · A former Trump appointee who ran the education data unit fears the agency will become politicized and vital data will be lost.
  111. [111]
    Dramatic Cuts to Ed. Data Programs Will Have Far-Reaching ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · Dramatic cuts at the US Department of Education have left a “skeletal staff” at offices that oversee research and troves of education data.Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
  112. [112]
    $$900 Million in Institute of Education Sciences Contracts Axed
    Feb 12, 2025 · The Trump administration canceled nearly $900 million in Institute of Education Sciences contracts Monday—a massive blow to a U.S. Education ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Fix the Staffing Shortage at the National Center for Education ...
    NCES is understaffed due to budget allocation, with funds not for salaries. The FY26 request is to allow NCES to use its budget for salaries and expenses.
  114. [114]
    The collapse of America's education data infrastructure
    Apr 22, 2025 · The transparency enabled by NCES data has served as a cornerstone of democratic and market accountability in education—allowing parents and ...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    Education Department misses key deadline for delivering statistics ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · No “Report on the Condition of Education” was delivered by June 1 of this year, the first time the Education Department has failed to meet this statutory ...
  116. [116]
    The Data Divide: The Battle for Rural Education Data Amid NCES Cuts
    Feb 27, 2025 · The NCES cuts represent a significant threat to rural education, which depends on reliable data to access resources and improve outcomes.
  117. [117]
    Education Department Cuts Could Leave Colleges Without Critical ...
    May 27, 2025 · Cuts to the non-partisan Institute of Education Sciences could lead to gaps in the data that is used to analyze the U.S. higher education ...
  118. [118]
    The Trump Administration's Proposed Budget Cuts to IES Threaten ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · Proposed cuts would harm education research, remove critical insights, slash IES funding by 67%, and eliminate core data collections, ...Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints