Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Neospora

Neospora is a genus of obligate intracellular protozoan parasites belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, family Sarcocystidae, known for infecting a wide range of mammalian hosts and causing the disease neosporosis.^[1] The primary species, Neospora caninum, was first identified in dogs in 1984 and distinguished from the morphologically similar Toxoplasma gondii in 1988, while a second species, Neospora hughesi, was isolated from horses in 1998.^[1] These parasites exhibit a complex life cycle involving sexual reproduction in definitive hosts (primarily canids) and asexual stages in intermediate hosts (such as ruminants and equids), with transmission occurring through ingestion of oocysts, consumption of infected tissues, or vertical transplacental passage.^[1] N. caninum has a worldwide distribution and is recognized as a major veterinary pathogen, particularly in livestock.^[2] The biology of Neospora involves tachyzoites for dissemination, bradyzoites for chronic persistence, and oocysts shed by definitive hosts. Dogs and other canids serve as definitive hosts, while intermediate hosts include ruminants like cattle, sheep, and goats, as well as horses, deer, water buffaloes, and some wild mammals and birds, though clinical disease is most prominent in cattle and dogs. In intermediate hosts, the parasite invades host cells, particularly in the placenta and nervous system.^[2]^[3] Neosporosis manifests differently across species but is best characterized in cattle, where it is a leading infectious cause of abortion, often resulting in fetal death or stillbirths. In dogs, especially puppies, it causes a progressive neuromuscular syndrome; adult dogs may show milder or subclinical infections. Transmission in cattle is predominantly vertical, perpetuating endemic cycles on farms, with horizontal transmission less common.^[1]^[3] Diagnosis typically involves serology (e.g., IFAT with titers ≥1:50), PCR detection of parasite DNA, or histopathological identification of parasites in tissues.^[3] The economic impact of N. caninum is substantial, particularly in the cattle industry, where it contributes to over $1.3 billion in annual losses globally due to abortions, culling, and reduced productivity; seroprevalence in cattle herds can exceed 50% in endemic regions.^[1] Control strategies focus on preventing vertical transmission through selective breeding, embryo transfer, and restricting dog access to livestock areas. Treatment options are limited and supportive; in dogs, drugs like clindamycin (12.5–25 mg/kg) or trimethoprim-sulfadiazine combined with pyrimethamine for at least 4 weeks may reduce parasite burden, though no curative therapy exists for cattle. Recent advances include field trials showing toltrazuril and ponazuril reducing abortion rates by over 90% in infected herds, highlighting potential for improved management.^[2]^[3] N. caninum is not considered zoonotic, with no confirmed human clinical cases despite occasional seropositivity.^[3]

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Classification

Neospora is a genus of obligate intracellular protozoan parasites classified within the phylum Apicomplexa, class Conoidasida, subclass Coccidia, order Eucoccidiorida, suborder Eimeriorina, and family Sarcocystidae.^[4] This placement reflects its coccidian nature, sharing key apicomplexan features such as a conoid, apical complex for host cell invasion, and a heteroxenous life cycle involving definitive and intermediate hosts. The type species, Neospora caninum, was formally described in 1988 following its initial identification in 1984 as a Toxoplasma gondii-like organism causing neuromuscular disease in dogs.^[5] A second species, N. hughesi, was delineated in 1998 from equine central nervous system tissue, primarily associated with protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses.^[6] These species represent the primary recognized members of the genus, with N. caninum being the most studied due to its veterinary significance in multiple hosts. The genus Neospora is diagnosed morphologically by the presence of tachyzoites, which are rapidly dividing forms in acute infections, and bradyzoites enclosed in tissue cysts during chronic stages. A key distinguishing feature from closely related genera like Toxoplasma is the absence of oocysts within tissue cysts, alongside ultrastructural differences such as thicker cyst walls (up to 4 μm) and specific organelle arrangements in bradyzoites, including prominent amylopectin granules and micropores.^[7] These criteria, combined with antigenic and genetic distinctions, confirm genus assignment.^[7] Neospora caninum exhibits close phylogenetic relationships with Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia species, particularly H. heydorni and H. hammondi, within the subfamily Toxoplasmatinae of the Apicomplexa phylum. Molecular analyses of ribosomal RNA genes reveal high sequence similarity among these parasites; for instance, the 18S rRNA gene shows nearly identical sequences with only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distinguishing N. caninum from T. gondii and H. hammondi, enabling differentiation via targeted PCR-RFLP or nested PCR methods.^[8] In contrast, the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region displays greater variability, with nucleotide differences of approximately 20% between N. caninum and T. gondii, or between N. caninum and H. heydorni, facilitating species-specific identification.^[9] These genetic markers underscore the monophyletic clustering of N. caninum with H. heydorni in large subunit (LSU) rDNA phylogenies, while T. gondii aligns more closely with H. hammondi, highlighting the paraphyletic nature of the Hammondia genus.^[10] Evolutionary divergence among these parasites is linked to adaptations in host specificity, with N. caninum emerging as a sarcosporidian-like coccidian utilizing canids (e.g., dogs) as definitive hosts for sexual reproduction and oocyst shedding, distinct from the felid-hosted T. gondii.^[11] Genome comparisons indicate that N. caninum and T. gondii diverged approximately 28 million years ago, yet retain highly syntenic genomes with minimal chromosomal rearrangements, reflecting shared ancestry while allowing host-specific evolution.^[8] A notable distinction lies in the life cycle: unlike Hammondia species, which involve an enteric (intestinal) merogonic stage in intermediate hosts without persistent tissue cysts, N. caninum and T. gondii lack such an enteric cycle in intermediates, relying instead on extraintestinal tissue cyst formation for chronic persistence.^[12] Key antigenic differences further delineate N. caninum from its relatives, particularly in tissue cyst-specific surface proteins. The major tachyzoite surface antigen 1 (NcSAG1) in N. caninum shares structural homology with TgSAG1 in T. gondii but exhibits sequence variations, including amino acid differences that enable serological discrimination and reflect adaptations to distinct host immune responses.^[13] These proteins play roles in host cell invasion and immune evasion, with N. caninum possessing an expanded repertoire of SRS (SAG1-related sequence) genes compared to T. gondii.^[8] A minor species, Neospora hughesi, has been identified primarily in equids, including potential wildlife reservoirs, causing equine protozoal myeloencephalitis; however, data on its phylogeny and epidemiology remain limited, with genetic divergence from N. caninum evident in surface antigens (e.g., ~6% amino acid difference in SAG1) and ribosomal sequences.^[8]^[14]

Biology

Life Cycle

Neospora caninum, the primary species in the genus Neospora, exhibits a heteroxenous life cycle involving definitive hosts such as dogs (Canis familiaris) and other canids, where sexual reproduction occurs, and intermediate hosts including cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), and various wildlife species. A similar heteroxenous life cycle is exhibited by N. hughesi, primarily affecting horses, though definitive hosts remain unidentified.^[1] In definitive hosts, ingestion of infected tissues containing bradyzoites from intermediate hosts leads to the formation of schizonts in the intestinal epithelium, followed by gametogony and the production of unsporulated oocysts that are shed in feces.^[15] These oocysts are environmentally robust and can contaminate feed, water, or soil, facilitating horizontal transmission to intermediate hosts via fecal-oral route.^[16] Oocysts shed unsporulated in the feces undergo sporogony in the external environment, typically within 24 hours at temperatures of 22–26°C, developing into sporulated oocysts containing two sporocysts, each with four sporozoites.^[1] Upon ingestion by intermediate hosts, excystation in the host's gastrointestinal tract releases the sporozoites, which invade intestinal cells and rapidly differentiate into tachyzoites, the proliferative stage that disseminates systemically through blood and tissues, causing acute infection.^[15] Under host immune pressure, tachyzoites convert to bradyzoites, forming persistent tissue cysts primarily in the central nervous system, skeletal muscle, and heart, which can remain viable for the host's lifetime and serve as a source for recrudescence or further transmission.^[16] Vertical transmission is a hallmark of the cycle in intermediate hosts like cattle and sheep, where infected dams congenitally pass the parasite transplacentally to offspring, often resulting in lifelong chronic infection without immediate clinical signs.^[15] This endogenous route perpetuates the parasite across generations, with efficiency up to 95% in bovine fetuses following maternal recrudescence of bradyzoites during pregnancy.^[15] Oocysts demonstrate significant environmental persistence, remaining infectious for months in cool, moist soil or water, and are resistant to many common disinfectants, though they are inactivated by heating to 60°C or exposure to ammonia-based solutions.^[16]

Morphology and Ultrastructure

Neospora caninum tachyzoites are the rapidly dividing invasive stage of the parasite, typically crescent-shaped or lunate, measuring 3–7 μm in length and 1–2 μm in width.^[17] These forms possess characteristic apical secretory organelles, including a conoid, rhoptries (typically 8–12, approximately 1.5–2.5 μm long), and micronemes (about 0.23 × 0.06 μm), which are essential for host cell attachment and penetration.^[18] Under transmission electron microscopy, tachyzoites replicate by endodyogeny within a parasitophorous vacuole (PV) in the host cell cytoplasm, featuring a single nucleus, mitochondria, apicoplast, and dense granules; the PV membrane contains tubulovesicular structures but lacks intimate association with host endoplasmic reticulum, distinguishing it from related parasites.^[18]^[19] Bradyzoites represent the dormant, slowly replicating stage, enclosed in tissue cysts primarily in neural and muscular tissues. These forms are slender and elongated, measuring 4.5–8 μm in length and 1.2–1.9 μm in width, with a subterminal nucleus and fewer micronemes compared to tachyzoites.^[17] Tissue cysts range from 30–107 μm in diameter, with walls 0.5–4 μm thick that stain positive with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), providing structural integrity and resistance to digestion; ultrastructurally, the cyst wall consists of an outer electron-lucent layer and an inner granular layer, containing numerous bradyzoites (up to hundreds per cyst).^[18]^[17] Sporulated oocysts, the environmentally resistant stage shed in the feces of definitive hosts like dogs, are spherical to subspherical, measuring 10.6–12.4 μm in diameter with a bilayered wall 0.6–0.8 μm thick.^[17] Each oocyst contains two sporocysts (7.4–9.4 × 5.6–6.4 μm), each enclosing four sporozoites (5.8–7 × 1.8–2.2 μm) arranged in a linear fashion; notably, oocysts lack a micropyle and residuum, and sporocysts have a Stieda body but no residuum.^[17]^[20] Ultrastructural comparisons with Toxoplasma gondii reveal subtle but diagnostic differences: N. caninum tachyzoites possess more rhoptries (typically 8–12 versus 2 in T. gondii) and more prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum in the posterior end, while bradyzoite-containing tissue cysts have markedly thicker walls (1–4 μm versus <0.5 μm in T. gondii).^[18]^[19] These features, observed via electron microscopy, aid in distinguishing the parasites despite their overall morphological similarity under light microscopy.^[18]

Genomics

Genome Organization

The genome of Neospora caninum, exemplified by the Liverpool strain (NcLiv), spans approximately 61 Mb and is assembled into 585 supercontigs with an N50 of 359 kb.^[21] A 2021 reevaluation aligned these supercontigs and revised the karyotype to 13 chromosomes (from an initial 14 pseudo-chromosomes) based on fusion of chromosomes VIIb and VIII, using improved assemblies and synteny with Toxoplasma gondii for comparative analyses.^[22] The nuclear genome exhibits a GC content of 59.2%, reflecting a moderately AT-biased composition typical of apicomplexans.^[22] Annotation of the NcLiv genome identifies 7,121 protein-coding genes, with reannotation efforts adding over 500 additional genes, yielding a total of around 7,540.^[21]^[22] Among the gene repertoire are apicomplexan-specific families, such as the surface antigen glycoproteins (SAGs), represented by 227 NcSRS genes (including 52 pseudogenes) that contribute to host-parasite interactions.^[21] The overall gene organization shows substantial conservation, with large-scale synteny to T. gondii across most chromosomes, though some rearrangements and expansions in multigene families distinguish the two species.^[21]^[22] Organellar genomes complement the nuclear structure. The apicoplast genome is a 35 kb circular molecule containing an inverted repeat and encoding 60 open reading frames, including 27 protein-coding genes such as ribosomal proteins, RNA polymerase subunits, and components of the SUF iron-sulfur cluster pathway; this represents the first full annotation for N. caninum.^[22] The mitochondrial genome, approximately 6 kb in size, is linear and highly fragmented, featuring split rRNA genes and protein-coding sequences for cytochrome genes (cox1, cox3, cob) interspersed with endonuclease elements; it was also sequenced and annotated for the first time in 2021.^[22] These organellar elements underscore the reductive evolution common to apicomplexan parasites, with nuclear genes compensating for many organellar functions.^[22]

Genetic Variation

Genetic variation within Neospora caninum is characterized by low intraspecies diversity, primarily driven by clonal propagation rather than frequent sexual recombination. Genome-wide analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have revealed only 5,766 biallelic SNPs across six isolates, corresponding to a polymorphism rate of 0.0005–0.0059%, indicating a highly inbred population structure. Microsatellite and multilocus genotyping studies further support this, with high linkage disequilibrium (LD) observed globally (e.g., standardized index of association IAS values ranging from 0.109 to 0.283 across populations), suggesting dominant asexual reproduction in intermediate hosts like cattle.^[23]^[24] Population structure analyses have identified limited multilocus genotypes worldwide, with one predominant haplotype accounting for the majority of isolates genotyped using 19 markers across 50 samples from diverse hosts and regions. Earlier microsatellite-based studies using 7 loci reported higher apparent diversity (e.g., 96 multilocus genotypes from 108 bovine samples), but these resolve into a few main clonal groups upon broader examination, with significant geographic sub-structuring (F_ST up to 0.1247 between European and South American populations). Two primary clonal subpopulations are evident, one dominant in Europe and another in the Americas, reflecting historical migration patterns of cattle.^[23]^[24] Strain-specific differences in virulence are linked to this limited variation, with isolates like NC-1 (originally from a dog) exhibiting high pathogenicity in cattle, inducing abortion rates of up to 100% in experimental infections during early gestation (39–44 days post-inoculation). Such strains highlight how subtle genetic differences can influence disease outcomes, with NC-1 associated with severe transplacental transmission and fetal loss. Evidence of recombination is rare and largely confined to definitive hosts like dogs, where sexual reproduction may occur; multilocus sequence typing and LD metrics show minimal genetic exchange, contrasting with more frequent recombination in related parasites.^[23]^[24] Compared to Toxoplasma gondii, which features three major clonal lineages with higher recombination rates (1–2% polymorphism) and greater genotypic diversity, N. caninum displays reduced variability and stronger clonality, likely due to a recent global selective sweep tied to cattle domestication and expansion approximately 100–10,000 years ago. This low diversity may limit adaptive potential but facilitates efficient vertical transmission in livestock.^[23]

Neosporosis

Pathogenesis

Neospora caninum, an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite, initiates infection through the invasion of host cells by its tachyzoite stage, which actively penetrates via microneme proteins such as NcMIC1 and NcMIC2 that facilitate attachment to host cell surfaces and gliding motility.^[25] Upon entry, tachyzoites form a parasitophorous vacuole (PV) that avoids lysosomal fusion, enabling intracellular replication by endodyogeny; dense granule proteins like NcGRA7 are secreted into the PV to modify its membrane, recruiting host nutrients and modulating host cell signaling to support parasite survival.^[26] This invasion process, completed within minutes, is crucial for dissemination during acute infection and transplacental transmission.^[27] The parasite evades host immunity primarily through the conversion of tachyzoites to bradyzoites, which form persistent tissue cysts in the central nervous system and skeletal muscle, shielded by a thick cyst wall that resists immune clearance.^[17] During acute infection, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) produced by CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells activates a Th1-biased response, restricting tachyzoite replication via induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase and control of parasite load.^[28] However, in congenital infections, a pregnancy-associated Th2 shift suppresses this IFN-γ response, allowing recrudescence and fetal infection, as maternal immune tolerance favors parasite persistence over fetal protection.^[29] Tissue tropism of N. caninum favors neural, muscular, and placental sites, with tachyzoites preferentially infecting endothelial and epithelial cells to cross the placenta and disrupt trophoblast function through necrosis and mononuclear inflammation, leading to impaired nutrient exchange and fetal hypoxia.^[30] In dogs, the parasite targets cardiac myocytes, inducing nonsuppurative myocarditis characterized by tachyzoite-laden lesions that contribute to neuromuscular disease.^[31] Virulence is mediated by key proteins including NcGRA7, which is essential for tachyzoite replication and PV maintenance, and microneme antigens like NcMIC family members, which are critical for host cell invasion and egress.^[26]^[25] Recent studies have identified rhoptry protein 2 (NcROP2) as a key virulence factor that modulates host immune responses and parasite proliferation.^[32] Experimental models demonstrate dose-dependent outcomes, where higher inoculum loads of virulent strains correlate with increased placental damage and abortion rates in cattle, underscoring the role of parasite burden in pathogenesis severity.^[33]

Clinical Effects

Neospora caninum infection in cattle primarily manifests as reproductive failure, with abortions occurring most commonly during mid-gestation, between 3 and 7 months (approximately 90 to 210 days). Infected pregnant cows may abort, deliver stillborn calves, or give birth to weak, low-birth-weight calves exhibiting neurological signs such as ataxia or tremors. These outcomes are particularly prevalent in dairy herds, where seropositive animals face a 2- to 3-fold higher risk of abortion compared to seronegative counterparts. Adult cattle, whether pregnant or not, typically show no clinical signs beyond seroconversion and the development of immunity upon initial infection.^[34] In dogs, the definitive host of N. caninum, clinical effects vary by age and immune status. Puppies under 6 months of age commonly develop acute neuromuscular disease characterized by ascending paralysis starting in the hindlimbs, rigid hyperextension leading to contracture, muscle atrophy, cervical weakness, and dysphagia, often progressing to fatal outcomes without intervention. Adult dogs experience milder, often subclinical infections, though novel or reactivated cases can present with multifocal central nervous system signs (e.g., tremors, generalized paralysis), myositis (muscle pain, swelling, and weakness), dermatitis, hepatitis, pneumonia, or myocarditis, particularly in immunocompromised individuals; however, cases from 2010–2023 show variable clinical presentations and potential for relapse after treatment.^[35]^[36] Neosporosis in other intermediate hosts is less common but significant in specific species. In horses, N. hughesi causes equine protozoal myeloencephalitis-like syndrome, featuring asymmetric ataxia, limb weakness, regional muscle atrophy (e.g., in gluteal or epaxial muscles), head tilt, dysphagia, and behavioral changes, potentially leading to recumbency or death over weeks to years. In sheep and goats, N. caninum is rarely associated with clinical disease but has been linked to sporadic abortions, with pooled prevalence in aborted fetuses estimated at 15% in sheep and 7% in goats based on molecular detection.^[37]^[38] The economic burden of neosporosis in the cattle industry is substantial, driven by abortion-related losses, reduced fertility, and decreased calf production, with global annual median losses exceeding US$1.3 billion (as estimated in 2013) across dairy and beef sectors—primarily from impacts on reproductive efficiency.^[39]

Epidemiology

Hosts and Transmission

Neospora caninum is an apicomplexan protozoan parasite with a heteroxenous life cycle involving definitive and intermediate hosts. Definitive hosts are canids, including domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), which excrete environmentally resistant oocysts in their feces after ingesting tissues containing parasite bradyzoites or tachyzoites. Other canids, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) and dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), have also been confirmed as definitive hosts capable of oocyst shedding following ingestion of infected intermediate host tissues.^[16]^[40]^[41] Intermediate hosts primarily include ruminants such as cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), and goats (Capra hircus), as well as equids like horses (Equus caballus). These hosts become infected by ingesting oocysts from contaminated feed or water, leading to tissue cyst formation in muscles and other organs. Wildlife species, including deer (Cervidae family) and foxes (Vulpes spp.), serve as potential reservoirs and amplifiers, maintaining the parasite in natural ecosystems through similar infection routes. No confirmed cases of natural human infection with N. caninum have been reported, despite occasional serological evidence suggesting possible exposure.^[16]^[42]^[43] Transmission occurs mainly through two pathways: horizontal and vertical. Horizontal transmission involves ingestion of sporulated oocysts shed by definitive hosts, with experimental models have shown that relatively low doses of oocysts, such as 3,000–5,000, can establish infection in intermediate hosts.^[44] Vertical transmission, the dominant route in ruminants, happens transplacentally from dam to fetus, with efficiencies reaching up to 95% in congenitally infected cattle herds. Postnatal transmission via colostrum or milk is rare and not considered a significant natural route, as experimental attempts have largely failed to demonstrate reliable infectivity.^[45]^[46]^[47]

Global Distribution and Risk Factors

Neospora caninum exhibits a worldwide distribution, with seroprevalence in cattle typically ranging from 10% to 20% globally, though rates vary significantly by region and production system. In dairy herds, prevalence is often higher, reaching up to 40% in parts of Europe and the Americas, where intensive farming practices facilitate transmission. Emerging reports indicate lower but increasing seropositivity in Asia and Africa, with pooled estimates around 13-14% in some Asian countries like China.^[48]^[49]^[50] The parasite is endemic in temperate regions, particularly in North America and Europe, where stable patterns persist; for instance, recent 2025 data from the United States link N. caninum to approximately 15% of bovine abortions, maintaining consistent seroprevalence around 20% in surveyed herds. In contrast, prevalence appears to be rising in tropical areas like Brazil, where high rates (up to 91% in some studies) are associated with increased dog-cattle contact on farms. These geographic patterns underscore the role of environmental and management factors in sustaining infection.^[51]^[52]^[53] Key risk factors for N. caninum infection in cattle include the presence of farm dogs, which elevates odds ratios to around 3.4-4.7 due to potential oocyst shedding, as well as use of imported semen from endemic areas and larger herd sizes exceeding 100 animals, which correlate with higher exposure opportunities. Vertical transmission is the predominant mode, sustaining up to 80-95% of cases across generations in infected herds. Initial outbreaks were recognized in the 1990s in regions like the UK and Australia, highlighting the parasite's rapid emergence in livestock populations, while the role of wildlife reservoirs remains understudied despite potential implications for horizontal spread.^[54]^[55]^[56]^[45]^[57]^[58]

Diagnosis

Serological Methods

Serological methods for diagnosing Neospora caninum infection primarily detect host antibodies indicative of exposure, with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) serving as the most widely adopted technique due to its high throughput and ease of use in veterinary settings.^[59] Indirect ELISAs commonly employ crude antigens derived from tachyzoites or recombinant proteins such as rNcGRA7, which targets dense granule antigen 7 for improved specificity in identifying active infections.^[60] These assays typically achieve sensitivities of 90-95% and specificities of 96-98% when validated against reference standards, making them suitable for large-scale screening in livestock populations.^[61] The indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) remains the gold standard for serological confirmation, relying on fluorescence microscopy to detect antibodies binding to fixed N. caninum tachyzoites, with a titer threshold of greater than 1:200 considered diagnostic in adult cattle.^[62] In dogs, IFAT cut-offs are typically ≥1:50 for screening, particularly in puppies with neuromuscular signs. Competitive ELISA (cELISA) variants, particularly those targeting bovine IgG, offer advantages in cattle diagnostics by incorporating monoclonal antibodies to compete with sample antibodies, thereby enhancing discrimination between acute and chronic infections through avidity assessments.^[63] However, cELISAs can yield false positives due to cross-reactivity with Toxoplasma gondii, necessitating confirmatory testing in endemic areas.^[64] Key limitations of serological methods include the persistence of maternal antibodies in calves, which can confound results for up to 4-6 months post-birth, requiring presuckling serum collection or adjusted cut-off values for accurate interpretation.^[65] For detecting acute infections, paired serum samples collected 2-4 weeks apart are recommended to monitor rising antibody titers.^[59] In field applications, milk-based ELISAs enable non-invasive herd-level screening in dairy operations, correlating well with serum results (kappa >0.8) and facilitating prevalence estimation without individual animal handling.^[66] These antibody-based approaches indicate exposure but should be paired with pathological confirmation for definitive diagnosis of active disease.^[67]

Molecular and Pathological Detection

Molecular detection of Neospora caninum primarily relies on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting parasite-specific genes such as Nc5 and ITS1, enabling direct identification of N. caninum DNA in clinical samples. Nested PCR, using external and internal primer sets for the Nc5 gene (e.g., Np21/Np6 and Np9/Np10) or ITS1 region (e.g., NN1/NN2 and NP1/NP2), enhances detection rates in tissues like brain by amplifying low-copy DNA templates, with reported positivity in 1.7–2.9% of wildlife samples compared to single-round PCR.^[68] Real-time PCR assays, often SYBR Green I-based and targeting a 76-bp fragment of the Nc5 gene, achieve high analytical sensitivity with a detection limit of 0.1 tachyzoite per reaction and demonstrate substantial agreement (κ = 0.86) with nested PCR in bovine aborted fetus brain tissues.^[69] These methods exhibit >95% sensitivity in detecting N. caninum DNA from tissues and fluids of aborted fetuses when parasite loads exceed 1–10 tachyzoites per sample, making them valuable for confirming active infection in veterinary diagnostics.^[70] Pathological detection involves histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to visualize parasite stages and associated lesions. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining reveals tachyzoites within inflammatory lesions, such as multifocal nonsuppurative encephalomyelitis or placentitis, in infected tissues from aborted fetuses or clinical cases.^[71] IHC, employing monoclonal antibodies against the surface antigen NcSAG1 (e.g., mouse anti-NcSAG1), specifically labels tachyzoites and confirms N. caninum in lesions, improving diagnostic accuracy over H&E alone by distinguishing it from similar protozoa like Toxoplasma gondii.^[72]^[73] In post-mortem examinations, tissue cysts in brain and placenta are identified using periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining, which highlights the thick cyst wall (up to 4 μm) and PAS-positive bradyzoites, aiding differentiation from other coccidia.^[74] Transmission electron microscopy further characterizes ultrastructure, revealing electron-dense rhoptries in tachyzoites and intact cysts in neural or placental tissues, providing confirmatory evidence in research and complex cases.^[75] Recent advances include loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays, such as a 2024 colorimetric variant, which detects N. caninum DNA with high sensitivity surpassing traditional PCR and enables rapid field diagnosis using simple heating devices without thermal cyclers.^[76] This method visualizes results via color change, achieving near-perfect correlation (ICC = 0.999) with qPCR in serum samples from livestock.^[76]

Prevention and Control

Management in Livestock

Management of Neospora caninum in livestock focuses on integrated strategies to mitigate economic losses from abortions, emphasizing prevention of both horizontal and vertical transmission without relying on pharmacological interventions. Biosecurity measures are foundational, including strict exclusion of farm dogs from cattle housing, calving areas, feed storage, and water sources to prevent oocyst shedding and contamination. Feed facilities should be secured with covers, fences, or elevated silos to avoid access by dogs or other canids, as oocysts excreted in feces can sporulate and remain infectious in the environment for months. Additionally, prompt and secure disposal of aborted fetuses, placentas, and afterbirths is critical to deter canine scavenging and subsequent oocyst dissemination. Testing and culling seropositive breeding animals upon herd introduction further bolsters biosecurity, prioritizing purchases from certified negative herds.^[77]^[78]^[34] Herd management strategies target vertical transmission, which maintains infection within populations. Cows that have aborted due to neosporosis should be avoided for future breeding, as the congenital transmission rate from infected dams to offspring can exceed 90%, with up to 95% of resulting calves appearing clinically normal yet harboring the parasite. Serological screening of heifers and adult cattle using ELISA allows selection of seronegative replacements, while seropositive animals are culled or diverted to beef production to reduce herd prevalence over time. Artificial insemination with semen from seronegative bulls is preferred over natural service to limit potential horizontal spread, though bulls themselves do not transmit vertically. In closed herds, embryo transfer from seropositive donors to seronegative recipients can preserve valuable genetics without propagating infection.^[79]^[2]^[34] Environmental controls complement biosecurity by addressing oocyst persistence. Water sources should be protected from contamination through enclosed systems or treatment, as oocysts can survive in moist conditions; ultraviolet (UV) irradiation has shown promise in inactivating similar protozoan oocysts in water supplies. Surface disinfection of calving pens and equipment with ammonia-based solutions (e.g., 10% ammonium hydroxide) can reduce oocyst viability, though thorough cleaning is prerequisite due to the parasite's resistance to many common disinfectants. Wildlife monitoring, including surveillance for canid reservoirs like coyotes or foxes near farm boundaries, helps identify potential transmission risks, with fencing or habitat management to limit access. Rodents and wild birds should also be controlled, as they may mechanically transport oocysts.^[80]^[2]^[42] Economic thresholds guide culling decisions to balance costs and benefits. In herds with seroprevalence above 30%, systematic culling of confirmed positives via repeat testing is recommended to curb abortion rates and long-term losses, estimated at hundreds of dollars per infected cow annually from reduced productivity. Integrated pest management, as outlined in recent veterinary reviews, prioritizes these non-immunological interventions for sustainable control in endemic areas.^[34]^[2]

Vaccination and Research Advances

Despite significant efforts, no commercially licensed vaccine exists for Neospora caninum infections in cattle as of 2025; the only previously available commercial vaccine, Bovilis Neoguard (an inactivated tachyzoite vaccine), was withdrawn due to limited efficacy, particularly against vertical transmission.^[81]^[82] Experimental vaccines, particularly live-attenuated strains, have shown promise in reducing vertical transmission and abortions. For instance, the attenuated NC-Spain7 strain, when administered to pregnant mice, reduced fetal mortality by up to 75% in challenge studies by eliciting strong humoral and cellular immune responses that limit parasite dissemination to the placenta.^[83] However, safety concerns, including potential reversion to virulence and regulatory hurdles for live parasites, have prevented commercialization.^[84] Subunit vaccines targeting surface antigens like recombinant NcSAG1 (rNcSAG1) have been tested, demonstrating moderate efficacy in preventing infection in mouse models, with partial protection against cerebral infection and survival rates up to 60%.^[85] These vaccines induce targeted antibody responses against tachyzoite invasion but often require adjuvants to enhance Th1-biased immunity for broader protection. Recent experimental approaches include DNA vaccines encoding dense granule proteins such as GRA6, which in mouse models partially interrupt vertical transmission by boosting IFN-γ production, with 28.8% offspring survival compared to 0% in controls and non-significant reductions in parasite burden. Other DNA vaccines with GRA proteins (e.g., GRA4) have reduced parasite burden by up to 75% in acute infection models.^[86]^[87] Ongoing research leverages advanced genetic tools, such as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockouts of virulence genes like NcROP2 and NcGRA7, to create safer attenuated strains that impair parasite stage conversion and host cell invasion, offering potential live vaccine candidates with reduced pathogenicity in ruminant models.^[88]^[89] Studies on nanoparticle-based delivery systems, including nanogels for intranasal administration of N. caninum antigens (e.g., recNcPDI), have achieved up to 80% protection against acute infection in mice by improving mucosal immunity and antigen stability.^[90] Additionally, investigations into host genetics reveal breed-specific resistance in cattle, with polymorphisms in MHC class II genes and small GTPase pathways correlating with lower susceptibility, guiding selective breeding strategies to enhance innate immunity.^[91]^[92] Key challenges persist, including the difficulty in fully blocking transplacental transmission due to the parasite's dormant bradyzoite stage, and variable efficacy in field trials from endemic regions where maternal immunity influences outcomes.^[93] Future advances prioritize multi-antigen cocktails, such as NcGRA9 combined with AMA1 delivered via adenoviral vectors, which showed superior protection in bovine models by targeting both tachyzoite and bradyzoite stages.^[94]

References

[1]
Epidemiology and Control of Neosporosis and Neospora caninum
Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite of animals. Until 1988, it was misidentified as Toxoplasma gondii. Since its first recognition in dogs in 1984 and ...
[2]
[PDF] Review of neosporosis: Disease insights and control approaches
Mar 31, 2025 · The protozoan parasite Neospora caninum is a cause of infectious disease neosporosis. Neospora caninum is a major parasite affecting dogs and ...
[3]
Neosporosis - Companion Animal Parasite Council
Feb 7, 2025 · Neospora caninum is not considered zoonotic. · Seropositive humans have been documented, but no clinical cases have been identified, and the ...
[4]
Taxonomy browser (Neospora caninum) - NCBI - NIH
Lineage (full): cellular organisms; Eukaryota; Sar; Alveolata; Apicomplexa; Conoidasida; Coccidia; Eucoccidiorida; Eimeriorina; Sarcocystidae; Neospora.
[5]
Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs - PubMed
A newly identified parasite, Neospora caninum, structurally distinct from T gondii, was found in 10 dogs. The newly discovered organism, belonging to a new ...
[6]
Description of a New Neospora Species (Protozoa: Apicomplexa
Description of a New Neospora Species (Protozoa: Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) ... Neospora / classification*; Neospora / genetics; Neospora / immunology ...
[7]
Redescription of Neospora caninum and its differentiation ... - PubMed
In this article, the authors redescribe the parasite, distinguish it from related coccidia, and provide accession numbers to its type specimens deposited in ...
[8]
Neosporosis: An Overview of Its Molecular Epidemiology and ...
Although 18S rRNA can be utilized to differentiate between closely related parasites, no sequence differences have thus far been detected between different ...
[9]
The genus Hammondia is paraphyletic - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The placement of Neospora spp. as sister group of T. gondii/H. hammondi was also difficult to demonstrate with Hsp70-and 18S rRNA phylogenies ( ...
[10]
Phylogenetic analysis based on full-length large subunit ribosomal ...
Neospora caninum was shown to form a monophyletic clade with H. heydorni instead of T. gondii, which in turn was shown to be most closely related to H. hammondi ...
[11]
On the Biological and Genetic Diversity in Neospora caninum - MDPI
Neospora caninum is a cyst-forming apicomplexan parasite [1], which infects many different hosts, cell types and tissues. It causes neosporosis, namely ...
[12]
Molecular phylogenetic analysis in Hammondia-like organisms ...
Apr 27, 2007 · ... Neospora caninum is more closely related to Hammondia heydorni than to Toxoplasma gondii. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 1545 ...
[13]
Comparison of the major antigens of Neospora caninum and ...
These two organisms have nearly identical morphology and can cause similar pathology and disease. Consequently, N. caninum has often been incorrectly identified ...
[14]
Differentiation of Neospora hughesi from Neospora caninum based ...
Neospora hughesi is a newly recognised parasite that is closely related to Neospora caninum, and is a cause of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis.
[15]
A review of neosporosis and pathologic findings of Neospora ...
Neospora caninum is an apicomplexan parasite that is the etiologic agent of neosporosis, a devastating infectious disease regarded as a major cause of ...
[16]
Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals - PMC
The life cycle is typified by 3 infectious stages: tachyzoites, tissue cysts, and oocysts (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Tachyzoites and tissue cysts are the stages ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
[17]
Review of neosporosis: Disease insights and control approaches
Neospora caninum goes through three different stages in its life cycle: sporozoites, tachyzoite, and bradyzoite. The primary method of N. caninum transmission ...
[18]
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00132-0
[19]
https://avmajournals.avma.org/view/journals/ajvr/54/1/ajvr.1993.54.01.103.xml
[20]
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00135-7
[21]
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002567
[22]
Global selective sweep of a highly inbred genome of the cattle ...
Oct 21, 2019 · Here, we sought to improve the understanding of Neospora's population genetic structure by analyzing genome-wide genetic diversity using next- ...
[23]
Genetic Diversity and Geographic Population Structure of Bovine ...
Neospora caninum is a cyst-forming obligate intracellular parasite that is phylogenetically related to Toxoplasma gondii and has been recognised as a worldwide ...
[24]
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072678
[25]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC127992/
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00262-14
[27]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2005.11.004
[28]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.07.004
[29]
https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-44-91
[30]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.09.015
[31]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8226237/
[32]
A review of Neospora caninum in dairy and beef cattle
Neospora caninum is one of the most important causes of abortion in cows. The occurrence of N. caninum infection in beef and dairy cattle has been reported ...
[33]
Neosporosis in Dogs - Infectious Diseases - Merck Veterinary Manual
Neosporosis in dogs and wild canids is a disease caused by an infection with the protozoal parasite Neospora caninum. Clinical signs are generally absent in ...Missing: rauschii | Show results with:rauschii
[34]
Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis - Nervous System
... Neospora hughesi. Clinical signs can mimic other common neurological diseases and can be highly variable, with the most common being asymmetric ataxia and ...
[35]
The Global Prevalence of Neospora caninum Infection in Sheep and ...
Apr 26, 2022 · The pooled prevalence of N. caninum in aborted fetuses of sheep and goats globally was estimated to be 15% (95% CI: 9–21%) and 7% (95% CI: 2–12%) using ...
[36]
What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle
Dec 12, 2012 · The estimate for the total median N. caninum-related losses exceeded US $1.298 billion per annum, ranging as high as US $2.380 billion.
[37]
Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum
Coyotes are the second discovered definitive host of N. caninum, after dogs. In North America, the expanding coyote ranges and population increase the ...
[38]
Epidemiology and Control of Neosporosis and Neospora caninum
Apr 1, 2007 · Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite of animals. Until 1988, it was misidentified as Toxoplasma gondii. Since its first recognition in ...
[39]
Neospora caninum and Wildlife - PMC
Neospora caninum has a wide host range (ruminants such as bovine, goats, sheep, or water buffalo, equids, and carnivorous species, including many wild species)Missing: rauschii | Show results with:rauschii
[40]
Absence of Neospora caninum DNA in Human Clinical Samples ...
Low antibody titers to Neospora caninum have been reported in humans, but infection has not been confirmed. We used N. caninum–specific PCR to test 600 clinical ...
[41]
Estimation of vertical and horizontal transmission parameters of ...
Transmission parameters of Neospora caninum infections in dairy cattle were ... The probability of vertical transmission was very high; 95.2% (95 ...
[42]
Experimental studies on the transmission of Neospora caninum ...
The results confirm that calves up to 1 week of age can be experimentally infected via the oral route, but suggest that this is not an important natural route ...
[43]
The role of the colostrum and milk in Neospora caninum transmission
The transmission of N. caninum is possible through vertical transmission in utero, or according to the modern nomenclature endogenous and exogenous infection ...
[44]
Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle in Egypt - Nature
Sep 19, 2023 · The findings proved that N. caninum infection was one of the factors contributing to abortion and financial losses in dairy cattle in Egypt.
[45]
Prevalence and associated risk factors of Neospora caninum ...
The pooled prevalence of Neospora caninum among cattle in mainland China was 13.69% (95% CI: 10.86%−17.12%) through the random-effects model.
[46]
Switzerland-wide Neospora caninum seroprevalence in female ...
Nov 16, 2022 · In European countries N. caninum seroprevalences varied between 16 and 76% for dairy cattle and 41–61% for beef cattle [reviewed in (20)]. Since ...
[47]
Risk perception and transmission potential of Neospora caninum at ...
Mar 5, 2025 · A pilot study to assess the understanding and significance of Neospora caninum on Minnesota cattle farms and address the biases of producers.
[48]
Seroprevalence of Anti-Neospora caninum and Anti-Toxoplasma ...
The results showed that 8.2% of the animals were infected with N. caninum and 18.2% with T. gondii. The analysis identified that the extensive farming system is ...
[49]
Research into Neospora caninum—What Have We Learnt in the ...
Jun 23, 2020 · Neospora caninum has been recognised world-wide, first as a disease of dogs, then as an important cause of abortions in cattle for the past thirty years.
[50]
The first study on seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora ...
Risk factors found by multivariable logistic regression included: Presence of dogs (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95 CI 2.9-7.3); age ≥84 months (OR 4.9, 95 CI 2.8 ...
[51]
Factors associated with infection by Neospora caninum in dogs in ...
Odds ratio, 95% CI, p. Contact with other dogs (Yes/No), 3.4056, 1.4223–8.1545 ... Analysis of risk factors associated with seropositivity to Neospora caninum in ...Short Communication · 2. Materials And Methods · 4. Discussion
[52]
Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and associated risk factors in ...
Aug 7, 2025 · A trend of prevalence increment was observed for large herd sizes (OR: 1.8). Other factors that were associated with seropositivity were: ...
[53]
[PDF] Neospora - a major problem for the British dairy industry - CHECS
Since diagnostic reagents for Neospora became available in the early 1990s, bovine neosporosis was reported in many countries including the UK, Ireland, USA,.
[54]
Neospora caninum infections in Australia and New Zealand - 2000
Mar 10, 2008 · Objective To review the current state of knowledge of Neospora caninum infections with particular reference to Australia and New Zealand.Missing: UK | Show results with:UK
[55]
[PDF] Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals
Several serologic tests can be used to detect N. caninum antibodies including various ELISAs, the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), and the. Neospora ...
[56]
ELISAs based on rNcGRA7 and rNcSAG1 antigens as an ... - PubMed
Jul 6, 2012 · Abstract. Bovine abortion caused by the Apicomplexa parasite Neospora caninum is a major economical problem in the livestock industry worldwide.
[57]
Development of an indirect ELISA-NcSRS2 for detection of ...
Apr 19, 2011 · Development of an indirect ELISA-NcSRS2 for detection of Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle ... specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 95%.
[58]
Comparison of different serological methods to detect antibodies ...
Jan 7, 2014 · For dog sera, the sensitivity and the specificity of the LAT was 76% and 100%, respectively. The McNemar test showed that the LAT was not ...
[59]
Evaluation of a Commercial Serum Competitive Enzyme-Linked ...
In the present study, we aimed at the evaluation of a widely available serum an indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) (ID Screen® Neospora caninum ...
[60]
Importance of serological cross-reactivity among Toxoplasma gondii ...
We review serologic cross-reactivity among animals and/or humans infected with T. gondii, Neospora spp., Sarcocystis spp., Hammondia spp. and B. besnoiti.Missing: cELISA | Show results with:cELISA
[61]
Use of adjusted cut-off values for Neospora caninum antibody ELISA ...
Use of adjusted cut-off values for Neospora caninum antibody ELISA in calves after colostrum intake: on-farm evaluation as part of a neosporosis eradication ...
[62]
Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in bulk milk to ... - NIH
This study evaluated the use of bulk milk as a diagnostic tool for estimation of herd-level Neospora caninum exposure in Atlantic Canada.
[63]
An analysis of the performance characteristics of serological tests for ...
In the present paper we review histologic, serologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular methods for dignosis of bovine neosporosis.
[64]
Detection of Neospora caninum DNA by polymerase chain reaction ...
caninum, and the sensitivity of detection methods. We used nested-PCR methods targeting Nc-5 and ITS1 genes to detect N. caninum DNA in bats, which may be ...
[65]
Quantitative Detection of Neospora caninum in Bovine Aborted ...
A real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green I and a 76-bp DNA fragment was developed to detect Neospora caninum, with a detection limit of 10^-1 tachyzoite.
[66]
Detection of Neospora caninum in aborted bovine fetuses and dam ...
Aug 7, 2009 · Most published PCR methods are used to detect N. caninum DNA in the tissues of aborted fetuses or adult animals, although body fluids, such as ...<|separator|>
[67]
Neospora caninum infection in birds
Aug 9, 2007 · Standard Haematoxylin and Eosin histostain (H&E) and IHC assays were performed in paraffin-embedded tissues of experimentally infected chickens ...Neospora Caninum Infection... · Materials And Methods · Results
[68]
Neosporosis: quest for better diagnostics and interventions - Vet Times
Tachyzoites and bradyzoites occur in the tissues of infected hosts (intermediate and definitive), whereas sporozoites are present in oocysts excreted in the ...Neosporosis: Quest For... · Epidemiology · Diagnostic Methods
[69]
Comparative Evaluation of Four Potent Neospora caninum ... - NIH
We evaluated the performance of four frequently used antigens in the diagnosis of N. caninum infection using immunochromatographic tests (ICTs)
[70]
Neospora caninum and Wildlife - Almería - 2013 - Wiley Online Library
Jun 24, 2013 · The wall of the cyst is thick (up to 4 microns), smooth, and devoided of septa; it is positively stained by the PAS stain (reviewed by [3]).
[71]
A review of neosporosis and pathologic findings of Neospora ...
Comparative ultrastructure of tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and tissue cysts of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol, 29 (1999), pp. 1509 ...
[72]
A colorimetric assay for Neospora caninum utilizing the loop ...
LAMP assay outperforms PCR techniques in the detection of N. caninum. •. LAMP method effectively detect N. caninum using universal heating equipment.
[73]
Neospora caninum - Cattle Diseases - Farm Health Online
Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite causing abortions and reproductive problems in cattle, and disease in canids. It can cause weak calves.
[74]
[PDF] neosporosis abortion in cattle
Neospora caninum is a very common protozoal organism and a common cause of abortion in cattle. Minor reductions in milk yield in dairy cows or reduced ...
[75]
Neospora caninum infection in aborting bovines and lost fetuses
May 23, 2022 · The results of this study showed the high prevalence of N. caninum infection in bovines that had an abortion and aborted fetuses.
[76]
Viability of sporulated oocysts of Neospora caninum after exposure ...
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the viability of Neospora caninum sporulated oocysts after various chemical and physical treatments.Missing: UV water
[77]
Towards a preventive strategy for neosporosis - PubMed Central - NIH
Currently, there are no vaccines on the market against infection with N. caninum. Because live and attenuated vaccines against N. caninum have had safety and ...
[78]
Comparison of the protective immune response of Live vs ...
Oct 3, 2025 · Therefore, based on such results, we have also used the inactivated vaccine platform to develop a vaccine against the Neospora caninum. ... 2025 ...
[79]
Vaccines and drugs against Neospora caninum, an important ...
Sep 18, 2015 · Live-attenuated vaccines have been shown to confer some protection against N. caninum infection, but may cause problems due to regulatory issues ...Missing: Spain7 | Show results with:Spain7<|separator|>
[80]
Protective efficacy of vaccination with Neospora caninum multiple ...
Vaccination of mice against experimental Neospora caninum infection using NcSAG1- and NcSRS2-based recombinant antigens and DNA vaccines. Parasitology. 2003 ...Missing: rNcSAG1 | Show results with:rNcSAG1
[81]
Vaccination with Neospora GRA6 Interrupts the Vertical ... - NIH
This study revealed the partial ability of NcGRA6+GST to protect the dams and offspring from N. caninum infection during the critical period of pregnancy.
[82]
Immune Protective Evaluation Elicited by DNA Vaccination With ...
Feb 25, 2021 · Neospora GRA6 possesses immune-stimulating activity and confers ... DNA Vaccination With Neospora caninum Dense Granules Proteins in Mice.Abstract · Introduction · Materials and Methods · Discussion
[83]
NcROP2 deletion reduces Neospora caninum virulence by altering ...
In this study, we generated NcRop2 knockout (NcΔROP2) mutants using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to assess their role in parasite virulence.
[84]
NcGRA7 and NcROP40 Play a Role in the Virulence of Neospora ...
The objective of this study was to characterize the role of these proteins using CRISPR/Cas9 knockout (KO) parasites in a well-established pregnant BALB/c mouse ...
[85]
Recent advances in nanogels in veterinary medicine - PMC
Aug 7, 2025 · Intranasal or intraperitoneal vaccine against Neospora caninum tachyzoites as a possible treatment for infections in production animals ...<|separator|>
[86]
The role of genetic variability of the host on the resistance to ...
Feb 28, 2024 · Neospora caninum is one of the most frequently diagnosed abortifacient pathogens in cattle. There is abundant genomic information about the ...
[87]
Upregulated small GTPase immunity-associated proteins confer ...
Oct 13, 2025 · Together, these findings confirmed that the LEW rat is highly resistant to N. caninum infection, and that the infection induces the upregulation ...
[88]
Neospora caninum – How close are we to development of an ...
Aug 6, 2025 · In this review, we focus on the approach influencing vaccine development against Neospora caninum, which can be generalized to other pathogenic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[89]
Studies on experimental animals immunized with different antigenic ...
Feb 10, 2025 · Our results indicate that combined immunization with NcGRA9 + Ad5-NcAMA1 may be a candidate for bovine neosporosis vaccination.