Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nephroid

A nephroid is a kidney-shaped in , defined as a two-cusped generated by the path of a point on the of a of a rolling externally around a fixed of $2a. The term "nephroid," from the Greek nephros meaning "kidney," was coined by English mathematician Richard A. Proctor in his 1878 book The Geometry of Cycloids, where he applied it to this specific . Earlier, identified the curve in 1678 as the catacaustic of a circle with a source at infinity, publishing the result in his 1690 treatise Traité de la Lumière. In 1838, astronomer provided a theoretical explanation using the wave theory of , linking the nephroid to optical phenomena such as caustics observed in reflections. Mathematically, the nephroid can be parameterized as
x = a(3\cos t - \cos 3t), \quad y = a(3\sin t - \sin 3t)
for t \in [0, 2\pi), or in Cartesian form as
(x^2 + y^2 - 4a^2)^3 = 108 a^4 y^2. It features two cusps at ( \pm 2a, 0 ), symmetric about the x-axis, and is also the of centered on a and tangent to a fixed of that or the catacaustic of a cardioid. The curve's total is $24a, and it encloses an area of $12\pi a^2. Its is Cayley's sextic, highlighting connections to other algebraic curves.
Beyond , the nephroid appears in as a pattern and has been studied in contexts like wave propagation and .

History and Name

Etymology

The term nephroid derives from the words nephros (νεφρός), meaning "," and eidos (εἶδος), meaning "form" or "shape," alluding to the curve's distinctive kidney-like silhouette. This nomenclature emphasizes the visual resemblance of the two-cusped to a kidney, a descriptor that has persisted in mathematical literature. The word nephroid was first applied specifically to this epicycloid by the English astronomer and mathematician Richard A. Proctor in his 1878 treatise The Geometry of Cycloids.

Discovery and Development

The nephroid emerged in mathematical studies during the late as part of investigations into curves in . identified it in 1678 as the catacaustic formed by rays from a with the light source at infinity, a result he published in his Traité de la lumière in 1690. Independently, Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhausen examined the curve around 1679 in connection with theory. In 1692, Jacques Bernoulli demonstrated that the nephroid arises as the catacaustic of a cardioid when the light source is positioned at the cardioid's cusp, linking it further to reflection properties in optics. This work built on earlier caustic explorations and highlighted the curve's role in understanding light envelopes. Early 18th-century developments included Daniel Bernoulli's 1725 discovery of a double generation method for the nephroid, expanding its constructive representations. During the 19th century, the curve received more systematic analysis, including detailed examinations of its metric properties such as and by British mathematicians. In 1838, astronomer provided a theoretical explanation of the nephroid using the wave theory of light, connecting it to observed caustics in reflections. contributed significantly through his study of related higher-degree curves, notably the sextic whose is the nephroid, first detailed in the mid-1800s as part of broader work on classifications. In 1878, Richard A. formally named the two-cusped the "nephroid," drawing attention to its kidney-like shape in The Geometry of Cycloids. In the 20th century and beyond, the nephroid evolved into a standard example in algebraic geometry, valued for its singular sextic structure and applications in computational methods for curve analysis.

Mathematical Definition

Parametric Representation

The nephroid is generated as the roulette curve traced by a point on the circumference of a circle of radius a that rolls externally around a fixed circle of radius $2a. The standard parametric equations for the nephroid, scaled by the parameter a, are \begin{align} x(\theta) &= a \left( 3 \cos \theta - \cos 3\theta \right), \\ y(\theta) &= a \left( 3 \sin \theta - \sin 3\theta \right), \end{align} where \theta ranges from $0 to $2\pi. These equations arise from the geometry of the rolling motion. The center of the rolling circle traces a path on a circle of radius $3a (the sum of the fixed and rolling radii) as it orbits with angular position \theta. The rolling circle itself rotates at an angular speed such that its orientation relative to the fixed frame is given by an angle of -2\theta due to the radius ratio of $2:1, leading to the multiple-angle terms \cos 3\theta and \sin 3\theta when combining the orbital and rotational contributions. The parameter \theta corresponds to the orbital angle of the rolling circle's center around the fixed circle's center. Cusps form at \theta = 0 and \theta = \pi, located at the coordinates (2a, 0) and (-2a, 0), where the tracing point aligns radially with the line connecting the centers, causing the curve to come to a sharp point with zero tangential velocity. The parametric representation exhibits two-fold rotational symmetry about the origin, reflecting the even number of cusps, and is periodic with period $2\pi in \theta, closing the curve after one full orbit.

Implicit Representation

The nephroid admits an implicit algebraic representation given by the equation (x^2 + y^2 - 4a^2)^3 = 108 a^4 y^2, where a > 0 is a scaling parameter. This sextic equation, of degree 6, defines the curve in the plane without reference to a parameter. To derive this form from the parametric equations, trigonometric identities are first applied to express x and y in terms of powers of \sin \theta and \cos \theta. Specifically, the multiple-angle formulas \cos 3\theta = 4\cos^3 \theta - 3\cos \theta and \sin 3\theta = 3\sin \theta - 4\sin^3 \theta yield y = 4a \sin^3 \theta and x = a(6\cos \theta - 4\cos^3 \theta). Substituting u = \sin \theta and v = \cos \theta with the constraint u^2 + v^2 = 1 forms a polynomial system, from which the parameter \theta (or equivalently u and v) is eliminated using resultant computations or Gröbner bases to obtain the implicit equation. As a sextic curve, the nephroid exhibits singularities at its two cusps, where the partial derivatives of the defining vanish, resulting in points without a well-defined . In , this representation facilitates the analysis of intersections, , and computation of singular sets via conditions.

Standard Orientation

The conventional orientation of the nephroid, as derived from the epicycloid generation, positions its two cusps at the coordinates (2a, 0) and (-2a, 0) on the x-axis, with the curve symmetric about both axes and extending vertically from y = -4a to y = 4a at x = 0. This horizontal presentation emphasizes the curve's shape with cusps on the sides and elongation along the vertical direction. An alternative vertical orientation, often used in the context of optical caustics, is obtained by rotating the 90 degrees and positions the cusps at (0, 2a) and (0, -2a), symmetric about the y-axis and spanning horizontally from x = -4a to x = 4a. In this setup, the reflected rays from parallel light incident on a envelope the nephroid, with the cusps corresponding to reflections from the 's endpoints. The nephroid exhibits 180-degree about the origin, mapping the curve onto itself under a half-turn, alongside symmetries across both principal axes. Visually, it consists of two convex arches connecting the cusps, bulging outward to create a bilobed, kidney-shaped profile that tapers sharply at the cusps. Certain representations, obtained by rotating the equations, yield the vertical orientation.

Intrinsic Properties

Metric Characteristics

The nephroid, in its standard parameterization x = a (3 \cos \theta - \cos 3\theta), y = a (3 \sin \theta - \sin 3\theta) for \theta \in [0, 2\pi), possesses several key metric properties derived from its parametric form. The total arc length of the curve is $24a, obtained by integrating the speed \frac{ds}{d\theta} = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{dx}{d\theta} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{dy}{d\theta} \right)^2 } = 6a |\sin \theta| over one full period, yielding four symmetric lobes each contributing $6a. The enclosed area within the nephroid is $12 \pi a^2, computed via applied to the equations, which simplifies to twice the area swept by the radius vector due to the epicycloid's . The radius of curvature \rho(\theta) varies along the nephroid and is given by \rho(\theta) = 3a |\sin \theta|, reflecting the curve's smooth arcs punctuated by sharp cusps. At the cusps, located at \theta = 0 and \theta = \pi, \rho = 0, indicating infinite curvature and the points where the rolling circle's point traces backward. The minimum curvature (maximum \rho = 3a) occurs at \theta = \pi/2 and \theta = 3\pi/2, midway along the principal lobes, where the curve exhibits its gentlest bend. The of the nephroid, defined as the distance from the to the tangent line in the direction \theta, encapsulates its convex envelope properties and facilitates derivations of parallel curves, though explicit forms are complex due to the cusps. The pedal curve with respect to the is a two-petalled rose curve with polar equation r = \cos \frac{\theta}{2}, obtained as the locus of the feet of the perpendiculars from the to the tangents, highlighting the nephroid's and providing insight into its structure.

Evolute and Involute

The of a is the locus of the centers of its osculating circles, parametrically expressed as \mathbf{r}_e(t) = \mathbf{r}(t) + \rho(t) \mathbf{n}(t), where \mathbf{r}(t) is the position vector, \rho(t) is the , and \mathbf{n}(t) is the unit normal vector. For the nephroid with parametric equations x(t) = \frac{1}{2}(3\cos t - \cos 3t), y(t) = \frac{1}{2}(3\sin t - \sin 3t), the takes the form x_e(t) = \cos^3 t, y_e(t) = \frac{1}{4}(3\sin t + \sin 3t). This evolute is another nephroid, similar to the original but scaled by a factor of $1/2 and rotated by 90 degrees. To sketch the proof, substitute the trigonometric identities into the evolute equations: \cos^3 t = \frac{3\cos t + \cos 3t}{4} and \frac{1}{4}(3\sin t + \sin 3t) = \frac{3\sin t + (3\sin t - 4\sin^3 t)}{4} = \frac{6\sin t - 4\sin^3 t}{4}. These match the standard nephroid form x = \frac{1}{2}(3\cos \theta - \cos 3\theta), y = \frac{1}{2}(3\sin \theta - \sin 3\theta) after replacing t with \theta + \pi/2 (inducing the rotation via \cos(\theta + \pi/2) = -\sin \theta, \sin(\theta + \pi/2) = \cos \theta, with sign adjustments for the harmonic terms) and halving the coefficients of the leading trigonometric terms, confirming the scaling. The of the nephroid, traced by the endpoint of a taut string unwrapping tangentially from the , is another nephroid when starting from the intersection with the y-axis, with equations x_i(t) = 4\cos^3 t, y_i(t) = 3\sin t + \sin [3t](/page/3t). If the unwrapping begins at a cusp, the involute instead yields Cayley's sextic, a of degree six related through parallel properties. These properties highlight the nephroid's self-similarity: both its evolute and certain involutes are scaled and rotated versions of itself, a characteristic shared with other epicycloids due to their roulette construction. This invariance under evolute and involute transformations underscores the curve's geometric coherence.

Geometric Constructions

Envelope of a Pencil of Circles

The nephroid arises as the envelope of a one-parameter family (pencil) of circles, each centered on a fixed circle of radius $2a and tangent to one of its diameters, such as the x-axis. The centers of these circles are parametrized as (2a \cos \phi, 2a \sin \phi), where \phi ranges from $0 to $2\pi, and the radius of each circle is $2a |\sin \phi| to ensure tangency to the x-axis. This construction generates a family of circles that "sweep" the region around the fixed circle, with their envelope tracing the kidney-shaped nephroid curve. To derive the envelope mathematically, consider the equation of a circle in the family: F(x, y, \phi) = (x - 2a \cos \phi)^2 + (y - 2a \sin \phi)^2 - (2a \sin \phi)^2 = 0. The envelope is found by solving this simultaneously with the condition that the partial derivative with respect to the parameter \phi vanishes: \frac{\partial F}{\partial \phi} = 2a (x \sin \phi - y \cos \phi - 2a \cos \phi \sin \phi) = 0, which simplifies to x \sin \phi - y \cos \phi = 2a \cos \phi \sin \phi. Substituting and solving the system yields the parametric equations of the envelope: x = 6a \cos \phi - 4a \cos^3 \phi, \quad y = 4a \sin^3 \phi. These equations match the standard parametric form of the nephroid, x = a(3\cos t - \cos 3t), y = a(3\sin t - \sin 3t), up to reparametrization, with cusps at (\pm 2a, 0). The cusps of the nephroid emerge as singular points in this envelope construction, occurring when \sin \phi = 0 (at \phi = 0 and \phi = \pi), where the points of tangency coincide and the curve exhibits sharp corners at (2a, 0) and (-2a, 0). At these parameter values, the family of circles degenerates or aligns such that the envelope's becomes undefined, leading to the characteristic two-cusped shape. Geometrically, the nephroid represents the inner boundary of the of all disks bounded by these circles, delineating the maximally filled by the overlapping circles without extending beyond their collective outline.

Envelope of a Pencil of Lines

A pencil of lines is a one-parameter family of lines in the , often generated by varying a in a geometric such as rotating positions on a fixed to form with fixed angular separation. The nephroid arises as the of such a family, specifically the family of in a fixed that subtend a of 120 degrees (or 2π/3 radians). As the starting point of the chord rotates around the , the family of lines envelopes the nephroid . To derive this mathematically, consider a centered at the . The endpoints of the are the points P = ( θ, θ) and Q = ( (θ + 2π/3), (θ + 2π/3)), where θ is the . The of the line passing through P and Q can be written in or implicit form. The general line is obtained by the two-point form: \frac{y - \sin \theta}{\cos (θ + 2π/3) - \cos θ} = \frac{x - \cos θ}{\sin (θ + 2π/3) - \sin θ}. Simplifying using trigonometric identities, the line F(θ, x, y) = 0 can be expressed as a in x and y for fixed θ. The is found by solving the system F(θ, x, y) = 0 and ∂F/∂θ (θ, x, y) = 0, then eliminating θ to obtain the implicit of the . This condition ensures the line is to the at the point (x, y). The resulting implicit equation, after elimination, is a of the form 4(x^2 + y^2 - 1)^3 = 27 y^2 (up to ), which is the implicit of the nephroid for a (corresponding to a = 1/2). This algebraic 6 with two cusps confirms the is the nephroid. In dual conic theory, the nephroid, as a plane of 6 and class 4, is the to a quartic curve. The lines to this quartic form the of lines whose is the nephroid. The quartic can be associated with a of conics in , where the transformation maps the to the linewise , yielding the nephroid as the boundary . This duality highlights the nephroid's role in , where the corresponds to the class of the .

Caustic of a Semicircle

The nephroid arises as the catacaustic formed by the of light rays off a mirror. Consider a arc of radius r positioned with its along the x-axis from (-r, 0) to (r, 0) and the arc in the lower half-plane, defined by x^2 + y^2 = r^2, y \leq 0. rays approach the arc from above, directed downward along the negative y-direction, simulating a at . Upon at points on the arc, these rays form a family of lines whose traces (part of) the nephroid curve. The law of states that the incident ray, the reflected ray, and at the point of incidence lie in the same plane, with the angle of incidence equal to the angle of . Parameterize the point of incidence P on the by the angle [\theta](/page/Theta) (where $0 < \theta < \pi):
P = (r \sin \theta, -r \cos \theta).
The unit normal vector at P, pointing inward toward the center, is \mathbf{n} = (\sin \theta, -\cos \theta). The incident ray direction is \mathbf{d}_\text{in} = (0, -1). The reflected direction \mathbf{d}_\text{out} is computed as
\mathbf{d}_\text{out} = \mathbf{d}_\text{in} - 2 (\mathbf{d}_\text{in} \cdot \mathbf{n}) \mathbf{n}.
The dot product \mathbf{d}_\text{in} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \cos \theta, so
\mathbf{d}_\text{out} = (0, -1) - 2 \cos \theta (\sin \theta, -\cos \theta) = (-\sin 2\theta, \cos 2\theta).
Thus, the parametric equations for the reflected ray starting at P are
x(\theta, s) = r \sin \theta - s \sin 2\theta,
y(\theta, s) = -r \cos \theta + s \cos 2\theta,
where s \geq 0 is the parameter along the ray.
To find the caustic as the envelope of this family of rays, solve the system consisting of the ray equations and the condition that differentiates with respect to the parameter \theta, ensuring tangency:
\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta} = r \cos \theta - \frac{ds}{d\theta} \sin 2\theta - s \cdot 2 \cos 2\theta = 0,
\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} = r \sin \theta + \frac{ds}{d\theta} \cos 2\theta - s \cdot 2 \sin 2\theta = 0.
Solving this system for s and substituting back yields the envelope points. For r = 1, the resulting parametric form corresponds to a scaled and oriented , with one cusp at (0, -1/2). The full caustic for a complete circular mirror is a nephroid symmetric about the axis of incidence, matching the standard form up to rotation and scaling.
This optical property of the nephroid was first demonstrated by Christiaan Huygens in 1678, who identified it as the catacaustic of a circle under parallel illumination, published in his 1690 work Traité de la Lumière. The investigation of such reflection caustics emerged amid 17th-century advancements in optics, including Isaac Newton's Opticks (1704), which analyzed ray paths after reflection from curved mirrors and motivated precise geometric studies of light focusing to explain phenomena like rainbows and lenses.

Curve Transformations

Inversion Properties

The inversion of a plane curve with respect to a circle of radius k centered at the origin is a conformal transformation that maps a point (x, y) to (k^2 x / r^2, k^2 y / r^2), where r^2 = x^2 + y^2. This mapping preserves angles and transforms circles and lines into circles or lines, making it a useful tool for analyzing geometric properties of curves. For the nephroid, which is a two-cusped epicycloid, the standard parametric equations are x = 3a \cos t - a \cos 3t, y = 3a \sin t - a \sin 3t, where a > 0 is a scaling parameter and t \in [0, 2\pi). To obtain the parametric equations of the inverted nephroid, substitute these expressions into the inversion mapping, yielding new coordinates: X = \frac{k^2 x}{x^2 + y^2} = \frac{k^2 (3a \cos t - a \cos 3t)}{(3a \cos t - a \cos 3t)^2 + (3a \sin t - a \sin 3t)^2}, Y = \frac{k^2 y}{x^2 + y^2} = \frac{k^2 (3a \sin t - a \sin 3t)}{(3a \cos t - a \cos 3t)^2 + (3a \sin t - a \sin 3t)^2}. Simplifying the denominator using trigonometric identities, such as \cos 3t = 4\cos^3 t - 3\cos t and \sin 3t = 3\sin t - 4\sin^3 t, leads to a rational expression in terms of \cos t and \sin t. Further algebraic manipulation reduces the form to parametric equations of the inverted curve. The resulting curve depends on the choice of inversion center and radius k. This transformation is particularly useful in studying , as the nephroid itself arises as a of a on a ; inversion can simplify the analysis of such generating motions by converting cusps and symmetries into more tractable forms. Additionally, inversion aids in examining singularities, such as the cusps of the nephroid, by them to points at or altering their local to facilitate computation of or properties.

References

  1. [1]
    Nephroid -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The 2-cusped epicycloid is called a nephroid. The name nephroid means "kidney shaped" and was first used for the two-cusped epicycloid by Proctor in 1878.
  2. [2]
    Nephroid - MacTutor History of Mathematics - University of St Andrews
    The name nephroid (meaning 'kidney shaped') was used for the two-cusped epicycloid by Proctor in 1878. The nephroid is the epicycloid formed by a circle of ...
  3. [3]
    Nephroid
    Nephroid can be defined as the trace of a point fixed on a circle of radius 1/2 r that rolls outside a fixed circle with radius r.
  4. [4]
    Nephroid - MATHCURVE.COM
    The name nephroid (meaning 'kidney shaped') was used for the two-cusped epicycloid by Proctor in 1878. The nephroid is the epicycloid formed by a circle of ...
  5. [5]
    The Nephroid Family of Curves
    For example, in 1692 Jakob Bernoulli (1654 - 1705) showed that when a light source is placed at the cusp of a cardioid, the catacaustic, or envelope of the ...Missing: Jacques | Show results with:Jacques
  6. [6]
    Cayley's Sextic - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    This was first discovered by Maclaurin but studied in detail by Cayley. The ... The evolute of Cayley's Sextic is a nephroid curve. Associated Curves.
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Parametrizing the Nephroid
    Apr 4, 1996 · Use this write down a parametrization for the nephroid as x = x(t), y=y(t), where x(t), y(t) are some trigonometric functions of t. Check that ...
  9. [9]
    The Nephroid Lab: Singular Sets
    Apr 25, 1996 · Singular Sets of Algebraic Curves and Surfaces. If we are given a curve f(x,y)=0 in the plane, or a surface f(t,x,y)=0 in 3-space, there are ...Missing: sextic geometry
  10. [10]
    Transforming a Parametrization into an Implicit Algebraic Equaion
    Apr 14, 1996 · We would like to use the parametrization x=x(t), y=y(t) for the nephroid that you just computed to get an equation that only involves x and y. ...Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
  11. [11]
    The Nephroid Lab: The Geometry of Reflecting Light Rays
    Apr 15, 1996 · Therefore using the point-slope formula for a line, you should be able to write down an equation in t,x,y that defines the line reflected from ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Evolute -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    An evolute is the locus of centers of curvature (the envelope) of a plane curve's normals. The original curve is then said to be the involute of its evolute.<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Nephroid Evolute -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The evolute of the nephroid given by x = 1/2[3cost-cos(3t)] (1) y = 1/2[3sint-sin(3t)] (2) is given by x = cos^3t (3) y = 1/4[3sint+sin(3t)], ...
  14. [14]
    Nephroids and evolutes - Applied Mathematics Consulting
    Nov 4, 2022 · Nephroid curve​​ Let's apply this to a nephroid. This word comes from the Greek for kidney-shaped.Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  15. [15]
    Nephroid Involute -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The involute of the nephroid given by x = 1/2[3cost-cos(3t)] (1) y = 1/2[3sint-sin(3t)] (2) beginning at the point where the nephroid cuts the y-axis is ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Iterating evolutes and involutes - The University of Texas at Dallas
    Oct 28, 2015 · The evolute of a closed curve has total length zero. The length is alge- braic: its sign changes each time that one passes a cusp. We shall ...Missing: arc | Show results with:arc
  17. [17]
    The Nephroid Family of Curves - National Curve Bank
    A nephroid is a "kidney-shaped" curve, traced by an epicycloid of two cusps, and is the catacaustic of a cardioid with a light source at its cusp.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  18. [18]
    The Nephroid Lab: Computing the Envelope of a Family of Curves
    Apr 16, 1996 · There is a way to use elimination of variables to compute the equation of a curve containing an envelope to the family C t.Missing: pencil circles proof<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Plane curves revisited
    May 12, 2025 · • the reciprocal (dual) curve. • the curve of normals. • the evolute ... The nephroid 4(x2 + y2 − 1)3 − 27y2 = 0 deg D = 6, deg D∗ = 4 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] CAUSTIC-BY-RAY-REFLECTION.pdf
    May 25, 2018 · want in this article to use optical ray tracing to show how such a caustic is generated and how the caustic relates to the nephroid and a ...
  21. [21]
    Circle Inversion -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    **Summary of Circle Inversion from Wolfram MathWorld:**
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    What is the inversion of an offset nephroid across the unit circle?
    Feb 5, 2020 · More specifically, if I have the nephroid ((x+.5)2+y2−4a2)3=108a4y2: What is its polar representation? What is its inversion across the unit ...Where do people learn about things like caustics, evolutes, inverse ...What is inversion and how does it act on figure inscribed in a circle?More results from math.stackexchange.com
  24. [24]