Neuropathology is a subspecialty of anatomic pathology dedicated to the diagnosis of diseases affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems, skeletal muscle, and eye through the microscopic and molecular examination of tissue specimens obtained via surgical biopsies or postmortem autopsies.[1][2]This field plays a critical role in identifying and characterizing a broad spectrum of neurological conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, neoplasms like gliomas and meningiomas, infectious processes, vascular pathologies, traumatic injuries, and congenital malformations.[1][2] Neuropathologists employ advanced techniques, including histopathology, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and methylation profiling, to provide precise diagnoses that inform clinical management, surgical decisions, and research into disease mechanisms.[1] These experts often collaborate with neurologists, neurosurgeons, and oncologists, contributing to intraoperative consultations and forensic analyses while advancing understanding of complex pathologies like amyloid plaques and tau tangles in dementia.[2][1]The origins of neuropathology trace back to the late 19th century in Europe, where pioneers in Vienna and elsewhere integrated neuroanatomy with emerging staining methods to study brain tissue abnormalities, evolving from informal apprenticeships to formalized training programs by the mid-20th century.[3] A landmark achievement came in 1906 when Alois Alzheimer detailed the characteristic neuropathological hallmarks of what would become known as Alzheimer's disease, establishing the foundation for modern neurodegenerative research.[2] In the United States, the field gained structure with the formation of the American Association of Neuropathologists in 1933—stemming from earlier neuropathology clubs founded in 1925—and the issuance of the first board certifications in 1948 by the American Board of Pathology.[4] Today, training typically involves a two-year fellowship following residency in anatomic pathology, with global variations emphasizing molecular diagnostics and competency-based assessments to address evolving challenges like workforce shortages and precision medicine.[1][3]
Overview and Fundamentals
Definition and Scope
Neuropathology is a subspecialty of anatomical pathology that focuses on the diagnosis of diseases affecting the nervous system through the morphological, cellular, and molecular analysis of tissue specimens.[5] This discipline involves the examination of structural alterations in nervous tissue to identify pathological changes, integrating traditional histological techniques with advanced molecular methods to elucidate disease mechanisms.[6] As a branch of pathology, it emphasizes the laboratory-based study of disease processes rather than clinical management.[1]The scope of neuropathology encompasses disorders of both the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) and the peripheral nervous system, as well as skeletal muscle and ocular structures.[1] It addresses a wide array of pathologies, including neoplastic conditions such as brain tumors, degenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, infectious processes from bacterial meningitis to viral encephalitides, and vascular disorders such as strokes and aneurysms.[7][8] This broad coverage extends to non-neoplastic entities, including developmental malformations, demyelinating diseases, traumatic injuries, and toxic-metabolic encephalopathies, providing essential diagnostic insights across the lifespan from embryonic stages to advanced age.[5][8]Neuropathology is distinct from neurology, which is a clinical medical specialty centered on the diagnosis and treatment of nervous system disorders through patient evaluation and non-invasive methods, whereas neuropathology relies on direct tissueexamination for definitive pathological confirmation.[5] It also differs from neurobiology, a basic research field exploring the fundamental structure, function, and development of the nervous system without a primary emphasis on disease pathology.[5] Central to neuropathological practice are key procedures such as autopsies for postmortem analysis of brain and nervetissue, biopsies for intraoperative or diagnostic sampling of lesions, and intraoperative consultations to guide neurosurgical decisions in real time.[1][5] These techniques enable precise characterization of disease at the tissue level, supporting clinical care and advancing understanding of neurological conditions.[7]
Historical Development
The foundations of neuropathology were laid in the early 19th century through the pioneering application of microscopic examination to neural tissues. Jean-Martin Charcot, often regarded as the father of modern neurology, integrated microscopy with the anatomoclinical method at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, enabling detailed correlations between clinical symptoms and pathological findings in nervous system diseases such as multiple sclerosis.[9] Concurrently, Rudolf Virchow advanced the field by emphasizing cellular pathology and incorporating microscopic analysis into brain autopsies, which became a standard for identifying tissue abnormalities and laid the groundwork for understanding neuroglial elements.[10]Key milestones in the late 19th and early 20th centuries solidified neuropathology's scientific basis. In the 1890s, Santiago Ramón y Cajal's elaboration of the neuron doctrine, building on Camillo Golgi's staining techniques, established neurons as discrete cellular units rather than a continuous network, fundamentally shaping the histological study of the nervous system.[11] Advancements in staining methods further enhanced visualization: Franz Nissl's technique, developed around 1894, selectively stained neuronal cell bodies to reveal cytoarchitecture and distinguish neurons from glia, while Max Bielschowsky's silver impregnation method, introduced in the early 1900s, highlighted axons, neurofibrillary tangles, and degenerative changes, proving invaluable for diagnosing conditions like Alzheimer's disease.[12][13]Post-World War II developments marked a technological leap in neuropathology. The introduction of electron microscopy in the 1950s allowed ultrastructural analysis of neural tissues, revealing synaptic details and subcellular pathologies previously invisible under light microscopy, as exemplified by early studies on vertebratecentral nervous system synapses.[14] By the 1970s, immunohistochemistry revolutionized diagnostic capabilities by enabling the localization of specific proteins and antigens in neural tissues using antibody-based detection, with the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) method providing high sensitivity for identifying disease markers in neuropathological specimens.[15]The professionalization of neuropathology accelerated with the formation of dedicated societies. In 1933, the American Association of Neuropathologists was established, evolving from an informal Neuropathology Club founded in 1925, to foster collaboration, standardize practices, and promote research among specialists in the United States.[4]
Methods and Techniques
Sample Preparation and Examination
Gross examination in neuropathology begins with the careful dissection of the brain and spinal cord to identify and document macroscopic features. For the brain, the procedure typically involves incising the scalp from ear to ear, reflecting it forward and backward, and using an electrical saw to open the cranial cavity circumferentially, creating a shelf for reapproximation.[16] The dura is then removed, the falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli incised, and the brain freed by cutting cranial nerves and vertebral arteries, with the spinal cord transected at the foramen magnum if not removed separately.[16] The brain is weighed post-fixation, often with posterior fossa structures measured separately if indicated, to assess for atrophy or mass effects.[16] Macroscopic lesions, such as infarcts or tumors, are documented by describing their location, multiplicity, dimensions, color, and consistency through coronal sections approximately 1 cm thick, noting asymmetries, discolorations, softened areas, or herniations like tonsillar or uncal types.[16][17] Digital photographs with a centimeter scale are taken, and vascular structures are sectioned to grade atherosclerosis.[17]Spinal cord dissection employs either an anterior or posterior approach. In the anterior method, vertebral peduncles are cut, the cord transected rostrally, and nerve roots dissected; the posterior approach involves incising spinous processes, sectioning laminae, and removing the cord similarly.[16] Lesions in the spinal cord, including infarcts or compressive tumors, are documented analogously to brain findings, with measurements and photographic records.[17] For autopsy brains, routine sections encompass mid-frontal cortex, basal ganglia, hippocampus, cerebellum, midbrain, pons, medulla, spinal cord at three levels, and the pituitary gland.[17]Fixation methods are essential for preserving neural tissues, with 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) serving as the standard fixative to prevent autolysis and maintain morphology.[18] Tissues are immersed in formalin immediately after gross examination, ensuring a volume ratio of at least 10:1 fixative to tissue, with agitation to enhance penetration.[19] For autolyzed tissues, which may result from delayed postmortem intervals, formalin fixation is still applied but with extended times to compensate for degradation, though optimal results require processing within 24 hours of death.[20] Intraoperative frozen sections, used for rapid diagnosis during surgery, involve snap-freezing unfixed tissue in isopentane cooled to -80°C using dry ice or to -160°C with liquid nitrogen to avoid artifacts that could compromise interpretation.[21][22] Post-freezing, sections are cut at 5-10 µm on a cryostat and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, with any fixed remnants handled per standard protocols.[23]Tissue sampling in neuropathology differs between biopsies and autopsies, emphasizing systematic sectioning to ensure representative coverage. In biopsies, such as open cortical or stereotactic CNS samples, tissue is sectioned every 3 mm perpendicular to the gray-white junction, with the entirety submitted if small (<5 cm) or using a "one-block-per-centimeter" rule for larger specimens; portions are saved frozen at -80°C or in glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy.[17] Autopsies involve broader sampling, including multiple coronal brain slices and spinal cord levels, to capture diffuse pathologies like infarcts.[17] For peripheral nerve biopsies, typically from the sural nerve (5-10 fascicles), a 5 cm segment is excised, with proximal 1.5-2 cm frozen in isopentane/liquid nitrogen, distal fixed in 10% formalin for paraffin embedding (3-4 µm sections), and a central piece in glutaraldehyde/osmium for resin embedding (0.6 µm semi-thin sections).[24] Serial sectioning is recommended for detecting vasculitis.[24]Muscle biopsies, often from open procedures using a clamp, yield samples subdivided for freezing in isopentane at -155°C to -160°C (mounted in OCT for 8-12 µm sections), snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen for biochemistry, or fixation in 4% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy; formalin-fixed paraffin sections (3-5 µm) are optional.[25][26] In autopsies, muscle from sites like the diaphragm or deltoid is sampled similarly, though postmortem delays may affect enzyme histochemistry viability.[25] Blocks are uniquely labeled (e.g., 1A, 1B) in blue cassettes for neuropathology.[17]Safety protocols are critical when handling biohazards like prions in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) cases, requiring biosafety level 3 conditions or equivalent precautions to prevent transmission.[27] High-infectivity tissues (brain, spinal cord, eyes) must be double-bagged in biohazard containers, with instruments kept moist during procedures to avoid drying.[28] Decontamination involves, for 1N NaOH immersion, autoclaving at 121°C for 30 minutes; for 20,000 ppm sodium hypochlorite immersion for 1 hour, autoclaving at 121°C for 1 hour, followed by cleaning and routine sterilization; or alternative WHO methods combining chemical treatment and extended autoclaving; disposables contacting these tissues are incinerated.[28][29] Personnel use personal protective equipment, including gloves, gowns, and eye protection, minimizing aerosols and percutaneous injuries; heat-sensitive items are soaked in 2N NaOH for 1 hour before disposal.[28][29] Autopsies on suspected CJD cases mandate these measures, with notification to lab staff for specialized handling.[29]
Diagnostic Tools and Imaging
Light microscopy remains a cornerstone of neuropathological diagnosis, enabling the visualization of cellular and tissue structures at the resolution necessary for identifying pathological changes in neural tissue. Routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is widely employed to assess general morphology, highlighting nuclei, cytoplasm, and extracellular matrix components to detect abnormalities such as neuronal loss, gliosis, or vascular changes.[30] Special stains enhance specificity; for instance, Luxol fast blue stains myelin sheaths blue, facilitating the evaluation of demyelinating disorders by revealing areas of myelin preservation or loss, often counterstained with cresyl violet to delineate neuronal cell bodies.[31] Silver-based stains, such as Bielschowsky's method, are particularly valuable for demonstrating neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, where they impregnate argyrophilic structures to outline cytoskeletal abnormalities.[32]Electron microscopy provides ultrastructural insights unattainable with light microscopy, allowing examination of subcellular components at nanometer scales to uncover fine details of neuropathological processes. This technique is essential for analyzing synaptic pathology, such as alterations in synaptic vesicle distribution or dendritic spine morphology in conditions like synaptic degeneration.[33] It also excels in detecting viral inclusions, including intranuclear or cytoplasmic aggregates characteristic of infections like progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, by resolving viral particles and host cell responses.[34] Sample preparation for electron microscopy involves fixation, dehydration, and embedding in epoxy resin to preserve tissue integrity, enabling thin sectioning (typically 50-100 nm) for high-contrast imaging under transmission electron microscopes.[14]Immunohistochemistry (IHC) leverages antigen-antibody interactions to detect specific proteins within tissue sections, offering targeted identification of neuropathological markers that routine stains cannot resolve. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a key marker for astrocytes, with IHC revealing reactive astrogliosis through intensified staining around lesions or plaques, aiding in the assessment of inflammatory responses in the central nervous system.[35] In Alzheimer's disease, IHC for beta-amyloid highlights extracellular plaques using antibodies against amyloid-beta peptides, enabling quantification of plaque burden and correlation with disease severity.[36] This method typically involves paraffin-embedded sections treated with primary antibodies, followed by secondary detection systems like peroxidase-DAB chromogen for visible localization.Molecular diagnostic techniques have become integral to neuropathology, providing genetic and epigenetic insights for precise classification and targeted therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detects chromosomal abnormalities, such as gene amplifications or fusions in gliomas (e.g., EGFR or 1p/19q codeletion). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identifies somatic mutations, like IDH1/2 or TP53 in brain tumors, enabling molecular subtyping per WHO classifications. Methylation profiling, often using array-based methods, classifies tumors like ependymomas or CNS lymphomas by DNA methylation patterns, improving diagnostic accuracy beyond histology.[1][37]Integration of neuropathological findings with neuroimaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) enhances diagnostic accuracy by bridging macroscopic and microscopic scales. MRI features, including T1/T2 signal intensities and contrast enhancement patterns, are correlated with histological hallmarks to refine tumor grading; for example, peritumoral edema on MRI often aligns with gliosis or vascular proliferation observed in high-grade gliomas.[38] CT contributes by delineating calcifications or hemorrhages that correspond to histological calcific deposits or necrotic areas, supporting integrated assessments in cases like meningiomas or metastatic lesions.[39] Such correlations, often guided by stereotactic sampling, allow pathologists to validate imaging-based provisional diagnoses against tissue-specific features.[40]
Training and Professional Practice
Specialization Pathways in the United States
To become a neuropathologist in the United States, individuals must first complete medical school to earn a Doctor of Medicine (MD) or Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree, which typically takes four years following an undergraduate education.[41] This is followed by a residency in anatomic pathology (AP) or combined anatomic and clinical pathology (AP/CP), lasting four years in total, with at least the first two years focused on anatomic pathology to build foundational skills in tissue diagnosis.[42][43] Completion of this residency qualifies graduates for primary board certification in AP or AP/CP through the American Board of Pathology (ABPath), a prerequisite for subspecialty training in neuropathology.[44]The core of neuropathology specialization occurs during a two-year Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited fellowship in neuropathology, which follows the residency and provides advanced training in the diagnosis of nervous system disorders.[43] Fellows gain hands-on experience with a minimum of 150 brain necropsies involving nervous system examinations (including forensic and pediatric cases), 300 neurosurgical specimens, and 50 intraoperative consultations, ensuring exposure to a broad spectrum of pathologies such as central nervous system (CNS) tumors, neurodegenerative diseases, infectious processes, and neuromuscular disorders.[43][45] Alternative combined AP/neuropathology pathways exist, requiring 24 months of AP training integrated with 24 months of neuropathology fellowship for dual certification eligibility.[44]Following fellowship, certification as a neuropathologist is obtained through the ABPath subspecialty examination in neuropathology, a one-day computer-based test comprising written/practical components and virtual microscopy sections, administered annually to those who have completed the requisite training and hold primary AP or AP/CP certification.[46][44] Board-certified neuropathologists must participate in the ABPath's Continuing Certification (CC) program, involving periodic assessments, continuing medical education, and practice improvement activities every three to ten years to maintain their credentials.[44]Certified neuropathologists pursue diverse career roles, including academic positions at universities where they conduct research, teach residents and fellows, and contribute to scholarly publications on neurological diseases.[1] In hospital settings, they perform diagnostic sign-out of neuropathology cases, consulting on biopsies, resections, and autopsies to guide patient care in neurology and neurosurgery.[41] Forensic roles are also common, particularly in medical examiner offices, where they examine brain and spinal cord specimens in suspicious or unnatural deaths, provide expert testimony, and support public health investigations.[47] These pathways emphasize a blend of clinical service, research, and education, reflecting the subspecialty's integration within broader pathology and neuroscience communities.[1]
Specialization Pathways in the United Kingdom and Commonwealth
In the United Kingdom, aspiring neuropathologists begin with a medical degree, followed by the two-year Foundation Programme, which provides broad clinical exposure. Entry into specialty training requires competitive selection into the Integrated Cellular Pathology Training (ICPT) programme, a core histopathology training lasting 2.5 years that covers foundational skills in cellular pathology, including basic autopsy techniques and molecular diagnostics. This is succeeded by 3 to 3.5 years of higher specialty training (HST) in diagnostic neuropathology, focusing on central and peripheral nervous system diseases, integration with neurosurgery, and advanced diagnostics. The total specialty training duration is typically 5.5 to 6 years, during which trainees progress through increasing levels of responsibility, from supervised laboratory work to independent reporting.Higher specialty training emphasizes practical expertise in coronial autopsies, involving medico-legal reporting and interaction with coroners, as well as neuromuscular pathology, including analysis of muscle and nerve biopsies. Trainees must demonstrate competence through supervised learning events, such as case-based discussions and direct observations, alongside multidisciplinary team participation. Certification is achieved via the Fellowship of the Royal College of Pathologists (FRCPath) examinations: Part 1 after approximately 18 months of training, assessing foundational knowledge, and Part 2 in the penultimate year, evaluating integrated clinical-pathological correlations through written, practical, and viva components. Successful completion grants entry to the Specialist Register with the General Medical Council, enabling consultant practice.In Canada, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) oversees neuropathology training, which mirrors the UK's integrated approach but offers two pathways: a direct five-year residency for those entering from medical school, comprising one year of broad clinical training (including six months in neurosciences), one year in anatomical pathology, two years in neuropathology, and one elective year; or a two-year subspecialty programme following prior certification in anatomical or general pathology. A scholarly project in research, quality assurance, or education is mandatory, alongside rotations emphasizing surgical and autopsy neuropathology. Certification requires passing the RCPSC Neuropathology examination, a written test with three papers assessing diagnostic proficiency. Post-certification, practitioners must obtain provincial licensing through bodies like the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario to practice independently.[48]Commonwealth countries like Australia and New Zealand adapt the UK model through the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), where neuropathology is pursued as a subspecialty after completing a five-year fellowship in anatomical pathology. This is followed by a one-year Post-Fellowship Certificate in Neuropathology, focusing on advanced diagnostic skills, multidisciplinary case reviews, and attendance at least 30 clinical meetings. Training includes exposure to coronial autopsies and neuromuscular pathology, with assessments via case discussions and examinations leading to the Diploma in Neuropathology. Certification as a Fellow of the RCPA (FRCPA) in anatomical pathology, combined with the subspecialty certificate, qualifies individuals for specialist registration with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or Medical Council of New Zealand.[49][3]
Key Contributors
Pioneering Figures
Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–1893), often regarded as the founder of modern neurology, made seminal contributions to neuropathology through his clinicopathological studies that correlated clinical symptoms with anatomical findings in the nervous system. In 1868, Charcot provided the first detailed clinical and pathological description of multiple sclerosis (MS), establishing it as a distinct entity characterized by disseminated plaques of demyelination in the central nervous system, which he linked to symptoms such as nystagmus, intention tremor, and scanning speech.[50] His work emphasized the integration of gross and microscopic examination of postmortem tissues to elucidate neuroanatomical correlations, laying the groundwork for neuropathological diagnosis in demyelinating diseases.Alois Alzheimer (1864–1915), a German psychiatrist and neuropathologist, advanced the field by identifying key histopathological features of neurodegenerative diseases. In 1906, during a presentation at the 37th Meeting of Southwest German Psychiatrists in Tübingen, Alzheimer described the case of Auguste Deter, a 51-year-old woman with presenile dementia, whose autopsy revealed dense amyloid plaques and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles in the cerebral cortex—hallmarks that distinguished her condition from typical senile dementia.[51] Using silver-staining techniques developed by contemporaries like Max Bielschowsky, Alzheimer demonstrated these abnormalities as primary pathological substrates, establishing a foundation for understanding Alzheimer's disease as a distinct neuropathological entity.[52]Wilder Penfield (1891–1976), a pioneering neurosurgeon at the Montreal Neurological Institute, transformed epilepsy treatment through intraoperative neuropathological techniques from the 1930s to the 1950s. Penfield developed the "Montreal procedure," which involved direct electrical stimulation of the exposed cortex during awake craniotomy to map epileptogenic foci, allowing precise resection while preserving eloquent brain areas; this approach relied on real-time neuropathological assessment of abnormal gyral architecture, such as focal microgyria, to guide surgery.[53] His work not only improved outcomes for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy but also contributed to the understanding of cortical organization and seizure pathology through systematic histological examination of resected tissues.[54]Early neuropathologists also drove the development of classification systems for brain tumors and vascular lesions, providing structured frameworks for diagnosis and prognosis. Percival Bailey (1892–1973), collaborating with Harvey Cushing, introduced a histogenetic classification of gliomas in 1926 based on cellular resemblance to embryonic neuroglia, dividing tumors into categories like astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas to predict survival and inform surgical intervention; this system marked a shift from descriptive morphology to prognostic utility in neuropathology.[55] For vascular malformations, foundational classifications emerged from 19th-century anatomists like Rudolf Virchow, who differentiated angiomas and cavernomas through histopathological analysis, influencing later neuropathological schemas that integrated gross and microscopic features to distinguish benign from malignant variants.[56]
Modern Influencers
Henryk M. Wisniewski (1931–1995) was a pivotal figure in late 20th-century neuropathology, particularly for his pioneering use of electron microscopy to elucidate the structure of beta-amyloid in Alzheimer's disease during the 1980s. His work provided critical visualizations of amyloid plaques, demonstrating their fibrillar composition and contributing to the foundational amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's pathogenesis. Through detailed ultrastructural analyses, Wisniewski established that beta-amyloid filaments form the core of senile plaques, influencing subsequent research on amyloid aggregation and toxicity.[57]Dennis W. Dickson, a leading contemporary neuropathologist active as of 2025, has significantly advanced the understanding of proteinopathies, with a focus on alpha-synuclein pathology in Parkinson's disease and related disorders. His research has characterized the biochemical and neuropathological features of Lewy bodies, identifying alpha-synuclein aggregation as a central mechanism in synucleinopathies, including parkinsonism and dementia with Lewy bodies. Key publications by Dickson highlight conformational changes and post-translational modifications of alpha-synuclein that promote fibrillization in neurons and glia, bridging clinical phenotypes with molecular pathology.[58]Suzanne de la Monte, also active in 2025, has made groundbreaking contributions to the intersection of metabolic disorders and neurodegeneration, particularly by linking brain insulin resistance to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Her studies demonstrate that insulin deficiency and resistance in the brain mediate cognitive impairment, neuronal survival deficits, and amyloid-related neurodegeneration, akin to a "type 3 diabetes." De la Monte's work reveals how peripheral insulin resistance, such as in type 2 diabetes, exacerbates central nervous system pathology via mechanisms like ceramide-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation.[59]A notable collective impact of modern neuropathologists in the 2000s includes the development of consensus criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), which standardized neuropathological diagnosis and incorporated advances in proteinopathies like TDP-43 and tau inclusions. This framework, led by consortia involving experts such as Dennis W. Dickson, integrated genetic, immunohistochemical, and biochemical insights to distinguish FTLD subtypes, facilitating clinical correlations and research progress.[60]
Advances and Applications
Recent Scientific Progress
The integration of genomics into neuropathology has revolutionized the classification and diagnosis of brain tumors since the early 2000s, particularly through next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that enable the detection of recurrent mutations. A seminal discovery occurred in 2008 when exome sequencing of glioblastoma multiforme samples identified frequent mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene, occurring in over 70% of low-grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas, which produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate and drive epigenetic alterations.[61] This finding, confirmed in subsequent studies, established IDH1 as a prognostic biomarker, with mutant tumors showing improved survival compared to wild-type counterparts, and prompted the World Health Organization to incorporate IDH status into glioma grading criteria by 2016.[62]Advances in proteomics and biomarker development have enhanced the in vivo detection of neurodegenerative pathologies, notably through tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for Alzheimer's disease, which emerged around 2013 with the first human trials of tracers like [18F]T807 (flortaucipir). These ligands selectively bind paired helical filament tau aggregates, allowing quantification of tau burden in regions like the entorhinal cortex and correlating with cognitive decline in prodromal stages.[63] By the mid-2010s, multiple tracers such as [18F]AV-1451 demonstrated high specificity (>90%) for neurofibrillary tangles, facilitating longitudinal tracking of disease progression. Complementing this, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for prion diseases has been bolstered by real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays, which amplify misfolded prion protein (PrP^Sc) with sensitivities exceeding 90% for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease since their validation in the 2010s.[64] RT-QuIC outperforms traditional surrogate markers like 14-3-3 protein or total tau in specificity, enabling earlier diagnosis across prion subtypes.[65]Digital pathology has transformed neuropathological workflows with whole-slide imaging (WSI) and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools, accelerating tumor grading and reducing interobserver variability. WSI systems, approved for primary diagnosis by the FDA in 2017, digitize entire slides for computational analysis, while AI algorithms for glioma grading emerged in the late 2010s, achieving accuracies of 85-95% in distinguishing low- from high-grade tumors via features like mitotic index and microvascular proliferation. The first FDA-cleared AI tool for digital pathology, Paige Prostate in 2021, exemplifies this shift by assisting in cancer detection on WSI, though similar applications for neuropathology tumors followed shortly, enabling faster, scalable diagnostics in resource-limited settings.[66] Recent advancements as of 2025 have expanded AI applications to neurodegenerative diseases, with machine learning models enhancing the quantitative assessment of taupathology and other protein aggregates in digital slides, improving diagnostic precision for conditions like Alzheimer's disease.[67]The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid neuropathological investigations from 2020 onward, revealing microvascular thrombosis as a dominant feature in central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Autopsy studies of fatal cases demonstrated widespread endothelial damage and fibrin microthrombi in cerebral vessels, contributing to hypoxic-ischemic injury and inflammation without direct SARS-CoV-2 neuronal infection in most instances. High-resolution imaging and histopathology confirmed punctate hyperintensities on MRI corresponding to microvascular occlusions, with thrombosis rates up to 30% in severe CNS cases during 2020-2022. These findings underscored the role of coagulopathy in neurological complications like stroke and encephalopathy.[68]Building on genomic integrations, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has become a cornerstone for CNS tumor classification by 2025, as recommended in cIMPACT-NOW Update 9. This technique refines tumor subtyping by identifying epigenetic signatures, complementing IDH and 1p/19q testing, and aids in diagnosing challenging cases with high accuracy when integrated with histopathology.[69]
Clinical and Research Impacts
Neuropathological evaluation plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of central nervous system (CNS) tumors through standardized grading systems, such as the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumors, which integrates molecular markers like IDH mutations and 1p/19q codeletion to refine tumor subtypes and prognostication.[70] This classification updates enable precise grading that directly influences therapeutic decisions, including the selection of chemotherapy regimens like temozolomide for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and radiation therapy protocols tailored to tumor grade and molecular profile, thereby improving patient outcomes by aligning treatments with tumor biology.[71]In research, neuropathological tissue banks serve as critical repositories for investigating rare neurodegenerative diseases, exemplified by their contributions to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) studies, where postmortem brain and spinal cord samples have facilitated the identification of TDP-43 pathology and motor neuron loss patterns over longitudinal analyses spanning 15 years.[72] These banks enable large-scale comparative studies of neuronal degeneration, revealing genotype-specific vulnerabilities in the primary motor cortex and advancing understanding of ALS progression mechanisms beyond clinical observations alone.[73]Therapeutically, neuropathological assessments identify key immunotherapy targets in aggressive tumors like glioblastoma, where immunohistochemical detection of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells and infiltrating immune components correlates with immune evasion and guides the application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as nivolumab.[74] High PD-L1 levels, often exceeding 50% in glioblastoma tissues, predict poorer survival but also indicate potential responsiveness to checkpoint blockade therapies, influencing clinical trial eligibility and personalized treatment strategies.[75]Despite these advances, neuropathology faces significant challenges, including ethical concerns in brain banking such as informed consent for posthumous donation and equitable access to diverse populations, which can introduce biases in research cohorts.[76] Additionally, the reliance on postmortem sampling limits real-time insights into living patients, as antemortem biopsies often yield insufficient tissue for comprehensive analysis, hindering dynamic monitoring of disease evolution and therapeutic responses.[77]
Resources and Publications
Major Journals
Acta Neuropathologica, established in 1961, is a leading peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the pathology and pathogenesis of neurological diseases, with a primary emphasis on experimental and molecular neuropathology.[78][79] Published by Springer, it features original research articles, reviews, and short reports on structural and molecular alterations in the nervous system, maintaining a high standard for contributions that advance understanding of disease mechanisms.[79] The journal's 2024 impact factor stands at 9.3, reflecting its influence in the field.[79]The Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, founded in 1942, serves as the official publication of the American Association of Neuropathologists (AANP) and focuses on peer-reviewed studies in neuropathology and experimental neuroscience, particularly emphasizing clinical-pathological correlations. It includes original articles, case reports, and reviews that bridge human disease pathology with experimental models, supporting the AANP's mission to foster neuropathology research.[80] With a 2024 impact factor of 5.5, it remains a key venue for clinicians and researchers exploring diagnostic and therapeutic implications of neurological disorders.[81]Brain Pathology, launched in 1990 as the official journal of the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN), specializes in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders through original research, review articles, symposia, and its signature "Case of the Month" feature, which often highlights tumor classifications and diagnostic challenges.[82] Published bimonthly by Wiley, it promotes interdisciplinary insights into brain diseases, including updates on classifications like those from the World Health Organization for CNS tumors.[82] The journal achieved a 2024 impact factor of 6.2, underscoring its role in disseminating high-quality neuropathology content globally.[83]In recent years, major neuropathology journals have increasingly adopted open-access models to enhance global accessibility, a trend accelerating post-2015 amid broader scientific publishing shifts toward equitable dissemination.[84] For instance, Brain Pathology transitioned to full open access in 2021, while hybrid options and spin-off open-access companions like Acta Neuropathologica Communications (launched in 2011) have facilitated wider submission and readership of cutting-edge research.[85] This evolution reflects rising submission volumes—exemplified by Acta Neuropathologica exceeding 1,000 manuscripts in 2019—and supports inclusive participation from diverse global researchers.[86]
Essential Textbooks and References
One of the cornerstone references in neuropathology is Greenfield's Neuropathology, a comprehensive two-volume set that covers the pathology of diseases affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems, including detailed discussions on neurodegeneration, tumors, infections, and vascular disorders. The ninth edition, edited by Seth Love, Arie Perry, James Ironside, and Herbert Budka, was published in 2016 by CRC Press and spans nearly 2,000 pages with extensive illustrations and updated molecular insights.[87] The tenth edition, edited by Colin Smith, Arie Perry, Gabor Kovacs, and Thomas Jacques, released in late 2024, incorporates further advancements such as refined classifications for CNS tumors, expanded coverage of skeletal muscle and epilepsy-related pathology, and enhanced sections on pediatric and forensic neuropathology, maintaining its status as an authoritative resource for both trainees and experts.[88]For practical diagnostic applications, Practical Surgical Neuropathology: A Diagnostic Approach, second edition, edited by Arie Perry and Daniel J. Brat and published in 2018 by Elsevier, provides a pattern-based framework essential for evaluating surgical biopsies and resections, particularly in tumor pathology. This volume emphasizes histologic patterns, differential diagnoses, and integration of immunohistochemical and molecular findings to guide accurate CNS tumor classification, with over 1,900 high-quality images supporting its utility in daily practice.The WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, fifth edition, published in 2021 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), serves as the global standard for typing and grading CNS neoplasms, introducing integrated histomolecular diagnoses for entities like gliomas and meningiomas based on key genetic alterations such as IDH mutations and 1p/19q codeletion. This "blue book" consolidates multidisciplinary input to reflect evolving molecular data, facilitating precise prognostication and treatment planning.[89] Post-2020, digital supplements and online updates from IARC and initiatives like cIMPACT-NOW have extended these classifications with additional molecular subtypes, such as refinements for pediatric tumors and methylation-based profiling, accessible via the WHO Tumour Classification online platform.[90]