Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Affect

In psychology, affect refers to the experience of feeling or emotion, representing a subjective state of mind that encompasses valenced reactions to internal or external stimuli.^[1] It serves as a broad umbrella term for various emotional phenomena, including transient moods, discrete emotions, and more enduring feeling states, distinct from cognition (thoughts) and behavior (actions).^[2] As a core element of human psychology, affect arises from neurophysiological processes and influences perception, decision-making, social interactions, and overall well-being.^[3] Central to contemporary understandings of affect is the concept of core affect, a fundamental, primitive state characterized by dimensions of pleasure-displeasure and arousal-activation, which underlies more complex emotional experiences without necessarily involving specific appraisals or labels.^[3] Proposed by psychologist James A. Russell, core affect is consciously accessible as simple feelings of being good or bad, energized or enervated, and it integrates with cognitive processes to construct full-fledged emotions.^[4] For instance, positive affect promotes approach behaviors and creative problem-solving, while negative affect signals potential threats and fosters avoidance or caution.^[5] Affect is often distinguished from emotion, though the terms overlap: affect broadly denotes any emotional state or its expression, whereas emotion typically implies a more organized, episodic response involving physiological changes, cognitive appraisal, and behavioral tendencies, such as fear or joy.^[6] Research highlights affect's bidirectional interplay with cognition—for example, accessible thoughts can amplify or alter affective states, and vice versa—shaping judgments, memory, and motivation through principles like relevance (affect's impact depends on perceived applicability) and accessibility (affect ties to mentally prominent content).^[7] In clinical contexts, dysregulation of affect is linked to disorders like depression (characterized by low positive affect) and anxiety (marked by heightened negative affect), underscoring its role in mental health.^[2]

Definition and Overview

Core Definition

Affect in psychology refers to the experience of feeling or emotion, encompassing a range of states from suffering to elation and from the simplest to the most complex sensations.^[1] It includes subjective feelings, such as the internal sense of pleasure or displeasure, along with physiological changes like alterations in heart rate or hormonal responses, and behavioral expressions manifested through facial expressions, gestures, or vocal tones.^[1]^[6] As a foundational psychological construct, affect represents the mental counterpart to internal bodily representations associated with emotions and motivation, often operating as a basic, irreducible element of mental experience.^[6] The term "affect" derives from the Latin afficere, meaning "to act upon" or "to influence," which originally connoted a passive influence on the body or mind; in modern psychological usage, however, it specifically denotes the conscious or unconscious emotional state underlying subjective experiences.^[8] This shift emphasizes affect's role as a primitive property of the mind, distinct in its immediacy and generality from more elaborated cognitive processes.^[6] Examples of affect include transient feelings such as joy, characterized by a sense of pleasure and activation, or irritation, marked by displeasure and moderate tension; these are more general and immediate than specific emotions, which incorporate additional cognitive appraisals and contextual elements.^[6] Core dimensions of affect, such as valence (pleasantness versus unpleasantness) and arousal (level of activation), provide a framework for understanding these basic states.^[6] Affect is often distinguished from emotion in psychological literature as a more fundamental, primitive neurophysiological state that underlies emotional experiences, rather than a fully formed response. Core affect, as proposed by psychologist James A. Russell, refers to a consciously accessible elemental process characterized by feelings of pleasure or displeasure and high or low activation, which is always present and can arise from diverse causes without necessarily involving cognitive interpretation.^[3] In contrast, emotions are prototypical episodes that integrate core affect with cognitive appraisal, attribution of cause, and instrumental behaviors, resulting in organized, labeled responses directed at specific objects or situations. For instance, a sudden displeasure (core affect) might evolve into fear (emotion) through appraisal of a threat. Affect also differs from mood in terms of duration, specificity, and object-directedness. While affect encompasses short-term, reactive feeling states that are often intense and tied to immediate stimuli, moods are more prolonged, diffuse emotional tones that persist over time without a clear object or cause. Moods influence broader cognitive processes like judgment, whereas affects more directly prompt behavioral reactions. An example is momentary irritation from a loud noise (affect) versus a general sense of unease lasting hours (mood). Regarding motivation, affect represents the subjective, felt dimension of experience, whereas motivation denotes the energizing force that propels goal-directed behavior, often emerging as a consequence of affective states. In the motivational dimensional model, affect incorporates valence and motivational direction (approach or withdrawal), but motivation specifically entails the intensity of urge toward or away from incentives, distinct from the raw feeling itself. Thus, positive affect might generate approach motivation without being synonymous with it.

Term	Duration	Intensity	Consciousness	Example
Affect	Short-term, reactive	Variable, often high	Basic, non-reflective feeling	Momentary displeasure from pain
Emotion	Brief episode	High, focused	Involves appraisal and labeling	Fear in response to danger
Mood	Prolonged, enduring	Mild, diffuse	Pervasive but less object-specific	General sadness without cause
Motivation	Variable, goal-linked	High drive intensity	Directed toward action tendencies	Urge to approach a reward arising from joy

Historical Development

Philosophical and Early Psychological Origins

The concept of affect traces its philosophical origins to ancient Greece, where Aristotle employed the term pathos (plural pathē) to denote emotions as passive states influenced by external stimuli, integral to human experience and moral reasoning. In works such as the Nicomachean Ethics and Rhetoric, Aristotle described pathos as involving feelings of pleasure or pain, directed toward specific objects, and capable of swaying judgment and action, though they could be moderated by rational deliberation to achieve virtue.^[9] This view positioned emotions not as irrational forces but as responsive capacities of the soul intertwined with the body, laying groundwork for understanding affect as an emotional influence on cognition and behavior.^[9] In the 17th century, René Descartes advanced a dualistic framework that sharply distinguished affect—termed "passions"—from rational thought, emphasizing the separation of mind and body. Descartes posited that the mind, as a non-extended thinking substance, and the body, as an extended non-thinking substance, interact through the pineal gland, with passions arising from this union as bodily influences on the soul, such as desires or aversions triggered by external causes.^[10] In his Passions of the Soul, he classified these passions as perceptions dependent on the body's disposition to affect the mind, often overwhelming reason unless controlled by the will, thus framing affect as a mechanistic response rooted in physiological processes rather than pure intellect.^[10] The 19th century marked a pivotal shift toward empirical study of affect within experimental psychology, spearheaded by Wilhelm Wundt, who introduced the concept of Gefühl (feeling) as a fundamental, introspectively accessible element of consciousness. Establishing the first psychology laboratory in Leipzig in 1879, Wundt analyzed Gefühl—or feeling-tones—as the affective quality accompanying sensations, characterized by dimensions of pleasure-displeasure, excitement-calm, and strain-relaxation, which could be systematically observed through self-report methods.^[11] This approach treated affect as an immediate, elemental psychic process, bridging sensory input and higher cognition, and distinguished it from mere sensations by its subjective emotional valence.^[11] Preceding Wundt's structuralism, Charles Darwin's 1872 book The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals provided an evolutionary perspective on emotions and affects, arguing that emotional expressions are innate, adaptive traits shared across species, serving survival functions through physiological and behavioral displays. Darwin's observational studies of facial expressions and bodily reactions emphasized continuity between human affects and animal instincts, influencing later theories by highlighting the biological and functional basis of emotional responses.^[12] Early 20th-century developments further emphasized affect's bodily foundations through the James-Lange theory, independently proposed by William James and Carl Lange, which asserted that physiological arousal precedes and gives rise to emotional experience. According to this view, an external stimulus triggers autonomic bodily changes—such as increased heart rate or trembling—which the brain then interprets as the emotion itself, inverting the common intuition that feelings cause physical reactions.^[13] James articulated this in his 1884 essay "What Is an Emotion?", arguing that emotions are essentially perceptions of these visceral perturbations, underscoring affect's dependence on somatic feedback for its experiential quality.^[13]

Key Theorists and Modern Evolution

In the mid-20th century, Silvan Tomkins developed a foundational affect theory positing that affects are innate biological programs hardwired into humans, serving as primary motivators of behavior and personality. Tomkins identified nine basic affects—interest-excitement, enjoyment-joy, surprise-startle, distress-anguish, fear-terror, shame-humiliation, anger-rage, disgust, and dissmell—each triggered by specific facial-affective displays and environmental stimuli, functioning as amplifiers or density mechanisms to organize human experience without requiring cognitive mediation.^[14] This framework, detailed across his multi-volume work Affect Imagery Consciousness, emphasized affects as autonomous scripts that amplify rewarding or punishing stimuli, influencing subsequent emotional complexes and social interactions.^[15] By the late 20th century, the interplay between affect and cognition became a central debate, highlighted by Robert Zajonc's 1980 argument that affective responses precede and can occur independently of cognitive processing. In his seminal paper, Zajonc contended that "preferences need no inferences," demonstrating through experiments on mere exposure effects and subliminal priming that positive or negative affect can emerge rapidly from minimal perceptual input, challenging the dominance of cognitive theories in emotion research.^[16] This pre-cognitive view of affect as a primary, holistic judgment system spurred empirical investigations into non-conscious emotional influences on decision-making and attitudes. In response, Richard Lazarus's 1982 appraisal theory countered by asserting that cognition is a necessary condition for differentiated emotions, including affect, through ongoing evaluations of personal relevance and coping potential. Lazarus argued that while automatic appraisals may underpin initial affective tones, full emotional experiences require interpretive thought, integrating Zajonc's insights while maintaining cognitive primacy in his process model of stress and emotion. The modern evolution of affect theory has increasingly integrated these perspectives into broader psychological paradigms, particularly positive psychology, where affect is seen as a resource for growth and resilience. Barbara Fredrickson's 1998 broaden-and-build theory exemplifies this shift, proposing that positive affects—such as joy, interest, and contentment—temporarily broaden individuals' thought-action repertoires, fostering creativity, social bonding, and problem-solving, which in turn build enduring personal resources like social connections and coping skills. Unlike negative affects that narrow focus for immediate threat response, this model highlights positive affect's role in undoing stress effects and promoting upward spirals of well-being, supported by empirical evidence from laboratory inductions of positive states enhancing cognitive flexibility. This integration reflects affect's evolution from isolated innate programs or cognitive byproducts to a dynamic system central to human flourishing in contemporary research.

Dimensions and Components

Valence, Arousal, and Intensity

In the study of affect, three primary dimensions—valence, arousal, and motivational intensity—provide a foundational framework for characterizing the qualitative and quantitative aspects of emotional experiences. These dimensions allow researchers to map affective states in a structured manner, emphasizing how emotions vary in hedonic tone, activation level, and behavioral urgency. Valence refers to the hedonic quality of an affective state, ranging from positive (associated with pleasure and approach tendencies) to negative (linked to displeasure and avoidance tendencies). Positive valence motivates engagement and approach behaviors toward rewarding stimuli, while negative valence prompts withdrawal or avoidance to mitigate threats. This bipolar dimension forms one axis in models of affect, capturing the intrinsic goodness or badness perceived in an experience. Arousal describes the degree of physiological and psychological activation underlying an affective state, typically spanning from low (calm, relaxed) to high (excited, agitated). Low arousal corresponds to states of tranquility or drowsiness, whereas high arousal involves heightened alertness and energy mobilization. Arousal is often assessed on continuous scales, such as 0-10, where 0 indicates minimal activation and 10 represents maximal intensity, facilitating precise quantification in empirical studies.^[17] Motivational intensity captures the strength of the urge to act in response to an affective stimulus, ranging from low (permitting broad exploration, as in contentment) to high (driving focused action, such as escape in fear). Unlike arousal, which primarily reflects general activation, motivational intensity is specifically tied to the imperative for approach or avoidance, influencing behavioral prioritization independently of overall energy levels. For instance, high motivational intensity in fear narrows attention toward evasion, while low intensity in contentment fosters openness to environmental scanning.^[18] Valence and arousal are integrated in the circumplex model of affect, which visualizes affective states as points on a two-dimensional plane. Valence occupies the horizontal x-axis (from displeasure at the left to pleasure at the right), while arousal spans the vertical y-axis (from low at the bottom to high at the top), forming quadrants that accommodate diverse emotions—such as distress (negative valence, high arousal) or relaxation (positive valence, low arousal). An individual affect can be positioned using coordinates (v, a), where v represents the valence value (e.g., -1 for extreme displeasure to +1 for extreme pleasure) and a the arousal value (e.g., 0 for sleepiness to 1 for high activation).

(v, a)

This Cartesian representation enables the interpolation of affective experiences along a continuum, underscoring the model's utility in predicting emotional dynamics. Motivational intensity, while related, is considered a distinct dimension in other theoretical frameworks.

Positive and Negative Affect

Positive affect represents the experiential pole of pleasant emotional states, characterized by feelings of enthusiasm, alertness, and energy that promote engagement with the environment.^[19] These states, such as joy and interest, function to broaden individuals' momentary thought-action repertoires, encouraging playful experimentation and exploratory behaviors that foster creativity and build enduring psychological resources.^[20] For instance, joy sparks the urge to play, leading to novel actions and social bonds, while interest drives discovery of ideas, enhancing intellectual resilience against stress.^[20] Positive affect also contributes to overall well-being, with studies showing that positive and negative affect together explain 30-53% of the variance in life satisfaction across age groups, underscoring its role in subjective happiness.^[21] In contrast, negative affect encompasses unpleasant emotional experiences, including types such as anger, fear, and sadness, which serve adaptive purposes in signaling and responding to environmental challenges.^[22] Anger motivates confrontation of obstacles and injustices, promoting goal persistence and protective actions; fear heightens vigilance for potential threats, facilitating avoidance and conscientious decision-making; and sadness encourages reflection on losses, aiding problem analysis and eliciting social support.^[22] These functions support threat detection and survival, as negative emotions prioritize relevant information processing during adversity.^[22] However, chronic negative affect, such as prolonged anxiety, impairs cognitive performance and increases risks for psychopathology by overwhelming adaptive responses.^[22] The poles of positive and negative affect are not mutually exclusive but largely independent, allowing their co-occurrence in complex emotional states like bittersweet feelings of joy tinged with sadness.^[19] According to Watson and Tellegen's two-factor model, positive affect (high activation, pleasant) and negative affect (high activation, unpleasant) form orthogonal dimensions in a circumplex structure, with low or zero correlation enabling simultaneous experiences rather than simple opposition.^[19] This independence highlights how affect can modulate arousal levels, as mixed states often involve moderate intensity without extreme highs or lows.^[19]

Measurement Methods

Self-Report and Psychometric Tools

Self-report measures are widely used to assess affect through subjective introspection, allowing individuals to rate their emotional experiences via standardized questionnaires. These tools provide quantifiable data on affective states, often focusing on dimensions such as positive and negative affect or discrete emotions, and are valued for their ease of administration and direct capture of personal feelings.^[23] One of the most influential self-report instruments is the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), developed by Watson, Clark, and Tellegen in 1988. This 20-item scale consists of 10 adjectives for positive affect (e.g., excited, enthusiastic) and 10 for negative affect (e.g., distressed, upset), rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). Scores are computed separately for positive and negative affect subscales, with higher scores indicating greater intensity in each domain. The PANAS demonstrates high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients exceeding 0.85 for both subscales across multiple studies, and has been extensively validated for reliability and convergent validity with other mood measures.^[24]^[25] A shorter, internationally adapted version, the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (I-PANAS-SF), was introduced by Thompson in 2007 to facilitate cross-cultural research. This 10-item instrument selects five high-loading items from each PANAS subscale (e.g., active for positive affect and nervous for negative affect), maintaining the 5-point Likert response format. It exhibits strong psychometric properties, including factorial invariance across diverse cultural samples and internal reliabilities comparable to the original PANAS (alphas around 0.80-0.85), making it suitable for global applications where brevity is essential.^[26]^[27] Other notable psychometric tools include the Differential Emotions Scale (DES), developed by Izard, which targets discrete basic emotions such as interest, joy, and anger. The standard DES comprises 30 items, with three adjectives per emotion (e.g., happy, joyful, pleased for joy), rated on a 5-point intensity scale from rarely or never to very often. It has shown adequate reliability (alphas typically 0.70-0.85 per subscale) and validity in distinguishing fundamental emotional experiences, particularly in developmental and clinical contexts.^[28]^[29] The Profile of Mood States (POMS), created by McNair, Lorr, and Droppleman in 1971, assesses transient mood disturbances rather than pure affect. This 65-item questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate six subscales: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. It yields a global mood disturbance score and has demonstrated high test-retest reliability (rs > 0.65 over short intervals) and sensitivity to changes in affective states, commonly applied in sports psychology and stress research.^[30] Despite their utility, self-report tools like these are susceptible to biases that can compromise accuracy. Social desirability bias, where respondents alter answers to present themselves favorably, is a primary limitation, potentially inflating positive affect reports or underreporting negative emotions in sensitive contexts. This bias has been linked to distorted self-assessments in affective measures, underscoring the need for multi-method validation.^[31]

Physiological and Observational Techniques

Physiological techniques for assessing affect rely on autonomic nervous system responses that provide objective indicators of emotional arousal and intensity, bypassing self-reports to capture involuntary bodily changes. Heart rate variability (HRV), particularly respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), serves as a key measure of parasympathetic nervous system activity, with decreases in RSA often signaling heightened arousal or negative affect due to reduced vagal tone during emotional stress. For instance, in laboratory tasks eliciting fear or sadness, RSA typically diminishes, reflecting the body's shift toward sympathetic dominance.^[32] Similarly, skin conductance response (SCR) tracks electrodermal activity, which increases with emotional intensity and arousal across both positive and negative affects, as sweat gland activation amplifies conductance during stimuli like startling images or social threats. These measures are widely used in controlled settings, such as emotion induction experiments, where SCR amplitude can rise by 0.5–2.0 microsiemens in response to affective cues, establishing baseline arousal levels.^[33] Observational techniques complement physiological data by analyzing overt behavioral cues, enabling the detection of affect through visible or audible expressions without invasive monitoring. Facial coding, pioneered by Paul Ekman's Facial Action Coding System (FACS), systematically decomposes facial movements into action units (AUs) to identify discrete emotions, including micro-expressions that last under 0.5 seconds and reveal concealed affects.^[34] For example, AU12 (lip corner puller) combined with AU6 (cheek raiser) reliably indicates happiness, while AU4 (brow lowerer) signals anger, allowing coders to score expressions from video recordings with inter-rater reliability exceeding 80% after training.^[35] Vocal analysis extends this to auditory cues, focusing on prosody variations such as fundamental frequency (pitch) rises during excitement or arousal, where positive affects like joy elevate mean pitch by 10–20 Hz compared to neutral speech. Automated AI tools, leveraging machine learning on features like pitch contour and speech rate, now enable real-time detection with accuracies up to 70% in naturalistic settings, as reviewed in computational models of speech emotion recognition.^[36] In laboratory environments, behavioral checklists provide structured observational coding of affect-related actions, such as withdrawal behaviors during negative affect episodes, where individuals exhibit reduced eye contact, slumped posture, or avoidance gestures. Systems like the Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System track these sequences in dyadic interactions, revealing patterns where negative affect prompts withdrawal in over 60% of conflict discussions, offering insights into relational dynamics.^[37] These methods, often integrated with physiological recordings, enhance reliability by correlating behavioral signs with autonomic shifts, though they require trained observers to minimize subjectivity.^[38]

Theoretical Frameworks

Cognitive and Appraisal Theories

Cognitive and appraisal theories of affect emphasize the role of cognitive processes in the generation, interpretation, and regulation of emotional responses, positing that emotions do not arise directly from stimuli but through evaluative judgments about their personal significance. These frameworks highlight how individuals actively appraise events in relation to their goals, resources, and situational contexts, thereby shaping the quality and intensity of affective experiences. Unlike purely instinctive models that prioritize automatic physiological reactions, cognitive theories underscore the mediating influence of thought, allowing for variability in emotional outcomes based on interpretive frameworks. Richard S. Lazarus's appraisal theory, articulated in his 1982 paper, proposes that affect emerges from a dynamic process of cognitive appraisal, where individuals evaluate environmental stimuli for their relevance to well-being. Primary appraisal assesses the personal stakes of an event, determining whether it is irrelevant, benign-positive, or stressful (including harm/loss, threat, or challenge), with threat appraisals typically eliciting fear by signaling potential future harm. Secondary appraisal follows, evaluating coping options such as the adequacy of resources, perceived control, and support, which further modulate the emotional response—for instance, high coping potential in a challenge scenario may generate enthusiasm rather than anxiety. Lazarus argued that this appraisal sequence is essential, as emotions are inherently tied to such evaluations, integrating cognition as a necessary condition for differentiated affective states. This theory has been influential in explaining why identical stimuli can produce divergent emotions across individuals or contexts, based on subjective interpretations. The Schachter-Singer two-factor theory, proposed in their 1962 seminal paper, integrates physiological arousal with cognitive labeling to account for emotional experience. According to this model, an undifferentiated state of autonomic arousal—such as increased heart rate from epinephrine injection—requires cognitive interpretation based on environmental cues to be attributed to a specific emotion. In their classic experiment, participants injected with epinephrine and exposed to a euphoric confederate labeled their arousal as amusement, while those in an anger-provoking context interpreted it as hostility, demonstrating how situational attributions direct the emotional outcome. This theory underscores the constructivist nature of affect, where cognition provides the "label" that transforms raw physiological signals into named emotions like joy or rage. Antonio Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis, introduced in his 1994 book, extends cognitive influences on affect by proposing that bodily-based emotional signals, or "somatic markers," bias decision-making through interactions with higher-order cognition. These markers arise from past emotional experiences stored in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, where they tag options as advantageous or disadvantageous, facilitating rapid choices under uncertainty—for example, a somatic signal of unease might steer avoidance of risky prospects. Damasio's framework illustrates how affect, informed by cognitive recall of bodily states, enhances rational deliberation rather than undermining it, as evidenced in studies of patients with prefrontal damage who exhibit impaired emotional guidance despite intact intellect. A core conceptual sequence in these appraisal models can be represented as stimulus (A) → cognition (C) → affect (A), where initial environmental input undergoes cognitive processing to produce an emotional response tailored to the individual's appraisal.

Instinctive and Non-Conscious Perspectives

The instinctive perspective on affect emphasizes its roots in evolutionary adaptations, where emotional responses serve survival functions without requiring conscious deliberation. Charles Darwin's seminal work proposed that facial expressions of emotions are innate and universal across species, functioning as instinctive signals for communication and adaptation.^[39] This view was empirically advanced by Paul Ekman, whose cross-cultural studies identified six basic emotions—happiness, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, and surprise—manifested through consistent facial expressions that promote survival, such as disgust averting ingestion of harmful substances. Building on this evolutionary foundation, Robert Zajonc introduced the concept of affective primacy in 1980, arguing that affective reactions can precede and occur independently of cognitive processing. According to this hypothesis, preferences and emotional evaluations form rapidly through minimal sensory input, bypassing deliberate thought. A key demonstration is the mere exposure effect, where repeated, often unconscious, encounters with a neutral stimulus increase liking for it, as shown in experiments where participants preferred unfamiliar figures after subliminal repetitions without awareness of exposure. Non-conscious affect is also measurable through indirect methods that capture automatic associations rather than explicit reports. The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT), developed in 2009, assesses implicit affect by having participants rate artificial words for emotional connotations, revealing underlying positive or negative biases via factor-analyzed response patterns.^[40] Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies further support the rapidity of non-conscious affective processing, showing that subliminal emotional primes presented for as little as 50 milliseconds can evoke neural responses in emotion-related brain regions, such as the amygdala, indicating instinctive activation without awareness.^[41] This contrasts with appraisal theories, which emphasize conscious evaluations, by highlighting bottom-up, automatic pathways in affective responses.

Neural and Biological Basis

Brain Structures and Pathways

The limbic system forms the core neural circuitry for affective processing, with the amygdala playing a pivotal role in the rapid detection of threats that elicit negative affect. Seminal research has established the amygdala as essential for automatic fear responses, integrating sensory inputs to prioritize potential dangers and initiate defensive behaviors.^[42] In contrast, the nucleus accumbens within the ventral striatum is central to reward processing and positive affect, encoding the motivational value of pleasurable stimuli and facilitating approach-oriented responses through its connections to dopaminergic pathways.^[43] Affective information reaches the amygdala via two primary pathways, enabling both instinctive and deliberative processing. The fast subcortical route, originating from the sensory thalamus directly to the amygdala, supports immediate, non-conscious affective reactions, particularly to negative stimuli like threats, with early activation observed as soon as 40-50 ms post-stimulus.^[44] This "low road" pathway bypasses extensive cortical analysis, allowing for swift mobilization of affective responses essential for survival. Complementing this, the slower cortical route involves relay through sensory cortices for detailed appraisal of affective significance, integrating contextual information to refine emotional evaluations over longer timescales, typically exceeding 100 ms.^[45] The prefrontal cortex modulates affective processing through specialized subregions. The orbitofrontal cortex evaluates the valence of stimuli, representing the positive or negative affective quality of rewards and punishments to guide decision-making and emotional interpretation.^[46] Meanwhile, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex regulates affective intensity by inhibiting amygdala activity during emotional challenges, promoting adaptive control over negative states and facilitating extinction of fear responses.^[47] Hormonal systems intersect with these neural structures to sustain affective states. Elevated cortisol levels, released via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to stress, amplify negative affect by enhancing amygdala sensitivity and impairing prefrontal regulation, contributing to prolonged anxiety and aversion.^[48] Conversely, dopamine signaling in mesolimbic pathways, particularly projecting to the nucleus accumbens, drives positive reinforcement by encoding reward prediction errors, thereby strengthening associations between actions and pleasurable outcomes to motivate goal-directed behavior.^[49]

Neuroimaging and Physiological Correlates

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have consistently demonstrated heightened activation in the amygdala during the processing of fear-related stimuli, particularly in individuals with specific phobias. For instance, exposure to phobic images elicits significantly greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the amygdala compared to neutral stimuli, with phobic subjects showing stronger and more rapid activation patterns that differentiate them from non-phobic controls.^[50] Similarly, the insula exhibits selective activation in response to disgust-inducing stimuli, such as images of contamination or mutilation, supporting its role in processing core disgust emotions distinct from other affective states.^[51] Electroencephalography (EEG) research has identified frontal alpha asymmetry as a reliable neural correlate of affective valence. Greater relative left frontal alpha power suppression (indicating higher activation) is associated with positive affect, while right frontal dominance correlates with negative affect, a pattern observed across various emotional tasks and resting states.^[52] This asymmetry reflects underlying motivational systems, with seminal work establishing its link to approach (positive) versus withdrawal (negative) behaviors. Physiological correlates of affect involve the autonomic nervous system, where high-arousal states, such as fear or excitement, activate the sympathetic branch, leading to increased heart rate, skin conductance, and cortisol release to prepare for action. In contrast, the parasympathetic system promotes recovery and low-arousal states, facilitating relaxation and emotional downregulation following affective episodes.^[53] Recent advancements post-2020 have utilized optogenetics in rodent models to modulate affective circuits, revealing bidirectional control over fear responses; for example, stimulating anterior insular cortex projections to the amygdala enhances conditioned fear expression, while inhibiting them reduces it.^[54] Additionally, AI-enhanced EEG techniques, employing deep learning models like long short-term memory networks, have improved real-time decoding of affective states from brain signals, achieving accuracies over 80% for emotion classification in dynamic settings.^[55] These innovations extend beyond traditional neuroimaging by enabling precise, temporally resolved insights into affect dynamics.

Influences on Cognition and Behavior

Effects on Attention and Decision-Making

Affect influences attentional scope through its motivational intensity, independent of valence. Affective states high in motivational intensity, such as intense fear or enthusiasm, narrow attentional focus, while those low in intensity, like mild contentment or sadness, broaden it. This model posits that motivational intensity drives attentional breadth, with high intensity promoting focused processing to facilitate goal pursuit and low intensity encouraging expansive exploration for opportunities or coping.^[56] For instance, high motivational intensity negative affects like fear narrow attention, reducing interference from peripheral distractors. In a study using the Eriksen flanker task, participants exposed to fearful stimuli showed enhanced executive attention, with a reduced congruency effect in reaction times, indicating less susceptibility to flanker interference due to narrowed focus. Conversely, low-intensity negative affects like sadness broaden attention, enhancing global processing. Research employing Navon hierarchical letter tasks demonstrated that sadness induction led to faster identification of global letters relative to local ones, with a significant global precedence effect (reaction time advantage of approximately 50 ms), facilitating broader perceptual integration.^[57]^[58] In decision-making, positive affect generally promotes risk-taking, particularly in the domain of gains, by adjusting perceptions in line with prospect theory's value function. Individuals in positive states exhibit reduced risk aversion, opting more frequently for probabilistic gains over certain smaller rewards. Negative affect, especially fear, biases decisions toward caution, amplifying loss aversion and pessimistic probability estimates under uncertainty. Studies show that fear induction leads to more conservative choices, such as preferring sure losses over gambles with equivalent expected value. Approach-motivated positive affect, like anger or desire, further narrows cognitive scope to support decisive action, reinforcing risk-tolerant outcomes in goal-directed contexts. Affect plays a central role in social interactions by facilitating nonverbal communication through displays such as facial expressions, vocal tones, and gestures, which convey emotional states and intentions to others. These displays often follow cultural display rules, which are socially learned norms dictating when, how, and to whom emotions should be expressed, as proposed in Ekman's neurocultural theory of emotion.^[59] For instance, the Duchenne smile, characterized by the contraction of both the zygomatic major muscle (elevating the cheeks) and the orbicularis oculi muscle (forming crow's feet around the eyes), signals genuine positive emotions like joy and amusement, distinguishing it from polite or false smiles that lack eye involvement.^[60] Vocal cues, such as variations in pitch and prosody, and gestural signals, like open postures indicating approachability, further enhance the clarity of these emotional transmissions in interpersonal exchanges.^[59] Emotional contagion, the automatic mimicking and synchronization of affective states among individuals, amplifies affect's influence in group settings through mechanisms involving mirror neurons, which activate both when observing and performing similar actions. This process is evident in phenomena like contagious yawning, where visual or auditory cues trigger imitative responses to foster group alertness and bonding, and contagious laughter, which spreads rapidly in social contexts to build cohesion and reduce tension.^[61] Mirror neuron systems in the premotor cortex and inferior frontal gyrus facilitate this spread by simulating observed emotions, enabling rapid empathy and alignment in interactions, such as synchronized smiling during shared positive experiences.^[62] In broader social functions, affect signals intentions and fosters rapport by communicating approach or avoidance motives; for example, expressions of happiness indicate non-threatening, affiliative intent, encouraging reciprocal engagement and trust-building in relationships. Deficits in affect recognition, particularly of facial expressions, are prominent in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), where individuals exhibit impaired decoding of emotions like fear or sadness, leading to challenges in interpreting social cues and forming connections.^[63] Meta-analyses confirm these impairments across multiple expressions, with effect sizes indicating moderate to large deficits that hinder everyday social navigation.^[64] In ASD interventions, VR training improves affect recognition through repeated exposure to dynamic emotional scenarios, underscoring its potential for supporting social skills in digital contexts.^[65]

Clinical and Cultural Aspects

Affect Regulation and Psychopathology

Affect regulation encompasses a range of strategies individuals employ to influence their emotional experiences, with cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression being among the most studied. Cognitive reappraisal involves reframing the meaning of an emotion-eliciting situation to alter its emotional impact, such as viewing a challenging event as an opportunity for growth; meta-analyses indicate this strategy effectively reduces negative affect, with effect sizes around d = 0.36 for reappraising emotional stimuli.^[66] In contrast, expressive suppression entails inhibiting the outward display of emotions, which has limited effects on experiential negative affect but incurs significant physiological costs, including increased sympathetic nervous system activation and cardiovascular strain, as evidenced by heightened skin conductance and heart rate during suppression tasks.^[66]^[67] Dysregulation of affect is central to various psychopathologies, where impaired regulation contributes to symptom persistence. Alexithymia, characterized by difficulties in identifying and describing emotions, reflects low affect tolerance and affects approximately 10% of the general population, often leading to heightened distress from unmanaged emotional arousal.^[68] In depression, anhedonia manifests as reduced positive affect with increased variability, reducing the capacity to experience pleasure and exacerbating motivational deficits, with neuroimaging studies linking it to diminished reward processing in the brain's ventral striatum.^[69] This dysregulated affect perpetuates depressive cycles by impairing engagement in rewarding activities, distinguishing it from broader negative affectivity. Interventions targeting affect tolerance, such as mindfulness-based approaches, enhance emotional identification and regulation. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) integrates mindfulness practices with cognitive techniques to foster awareness of affective states, showing benefits in delaying relapse for recurrent depression in high-risk patients, though a cited replication found relapse rates of 33% with MBCT versus 36% without over 14 months.^[70] These gains arise from improved affect tolerance, enabling individuals to observe emotions without overwhelm and reducing rumination on negative states. In clinical settings, such tools are often measured via self-report scales to track progress in emotional awareness. Affect dysregulation is particularly pronounced in borderline personality disorder (BPD), where affective instability—defined as rapid, intense mood shifts lasting hours—forms a core diagnostic feature, driven by heightened emotional reactivity and impaired modulation.^[71] Patients with BPD exhibit greater variability in emotional valence and distress compared to healthy controls, contributing to impulsive behaviors and interpersonal difficulties, though targeted therapies like dialectical behavior therapy can mitigate this instability by building regulation skills.^[72]

Cross-Cultural Variations and Applications

Cultural differences in the experience and expression of affect are prominently shaped by societal structures, particularly the distinction between collectivist and individualist orientations. In collectivist societies, such as those in East Asia and Latin America, individuals often prioritize relational harmony, leading to the suppression of negative affect to avoid disrupting group cohesion.^[73] This is reflected in display rules that encourage masking emotions like anger or sadness in social contexts, as suppressing such expressions maintains interpersonal balance and collective well-being.^[74] In contrast, individualist cultures, prevalent in Western societies like the United States and much of Europe, promote more direct emotional expression to assert personal autonomy and authenticity, allowing negative affect to be voiced openly without as much concern for group consensus.^[75] These patterns, first systematically outlined in cross-cultural research, underscore how societal values influence the regulation and visibility of affect. A notable aspect of these variations is the greater tolerance for dialectical emotions—simultaneous experiences of opposing valences, such as happiness and sadness—in East Asian cultures compared to Western ones. Rooted in dialectical thinking, which views reality as inherently contradictory and ever-changing, East Asians report mixed emotional states; studies indicate comparable frequencies to Westerners but higher discomfort differences mediated by dialectical thinking.^[76] This tolerance fosters emotional complexity, where conflicting feelings are seen as natural rather than resolved, differing from the Western preference for univalent emotions that align with ideals of high positive affect.^[77] Empirical evidence from daily diaries and event-recall tasks confirms cultural influences on affective integration, with subgroups like Han Chinese showing stronger correlations between positive and negative emotions compared to others.^[78] Contemporary applications of affect research leverage these cross-cultural insights in technology and organizational settings. In mental health, AI-driven emotion recognition tools integrated into therapy apps use facial analysis to detect affective states, achieving accuracies of around 75-80% for basic emotions like joy or anger, enabling personalized interventions while accounting for cultural display variations.^[79] Similarly, workplace programs focused on affect training, often through emotional intelligence workshops, enhance emotional competencies with moderate effect sizes, aiding collaboration in diverse teams.^[80] As of March 2025, the World Health Organization's updated mental health policy guidance emphasizes tailored, human rights-based approaches in global services to improve equity in diagnosis and treatment across diverse populations.^[81]

References

[1]
APA Dictionary of Psychology
- **Definition of 'affect'**: The APA Dictionary of Psychology defines "affect" as the experience of feeling or emotion.
[2]
Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis - PMC
The word “affect” is generally used to refer to any state that represents how an object or situation impacts a person. The term “core affect” has been recently ...
[3]
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion - PubMed
These states--called core affect--influence reflexes, perception, cognition, and behavior and are influenced by many causes internal and external.
[4]
[PDF] Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion - iViz Lab
At the heart of emotion, mood, and any other emotionally charged event are states experienced as simply feeling good or bad, energized or enervated.
[5]
[PDF] A R T I C L E S Why Does Affect Matter in Organizations?
Affect. Umbrella term encompassing a broad range of feelings that individuals experience, including feeling states, such as moods and discrete emotions, and ...
[6]
Affect as a Psychological Primitive - PMC - PubMed Central
In the science of emotion, “affect” is a general term that has come to mean anything emotional. A cautious term, it allows reference to something's effect or ...
[7]
Affect and Cognition: Three Principles - PMC - NIH
The three principles are: (1) affect's impact depends on what it appears to be about; (2) affect is about what is mentally accessible; (3) positive/negative ...
[8]
Affect - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in late 14c. Latin affectus, meaning "mental state" or "disposition," affect derives from afficere "to do, act on," meaning to influence or ...
[9]
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotions-17th18th/LD1Background.html
[10]
Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Theories of the Emotions
1. Aristotle. Aristotle's preferred term for the emotions was pathos [pl. pathē], which makes the emotions largely passive states, located within a general ...
[11]
René Descartes: The Mind-Body Distinction
One of the deepest and most lasting legacies of Descartes' philosophy is his thesis that mind and body are really distinct—a thesis now called “mind-body ...
[12]
Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 16, 2006 · Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt (1832–1920) is known to posterity as the “father of experimental psychology” and the founder of the first psychology laboratory.Missing: Gefühl | Show results with:Gefühl
[13]
James-Lange Theory – Psychology of Human Emotion
James-Lange Theory proposes that emotions are essentially the way our physical body reacts to an eliciting event.
[14]
Affect Imagery Consciousness: Volume I: The Positive Affects
Affect Imagery Consciousness: Volume I: The Positive Affects. Front Cover. Silvan Tomkins. Springer Publishing Company, Jan 15, 1962 - ...
[15]
https://www.springerpub.com/affect-imagery-consciousness-the-complete-edition-9780826144041.html
[16]
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. - APA PsycNet
Affective reactions can occur without extensive perceptual and cognitive encoding, are made with greater confidence than cognitive judgments, and can be made ...
[17]
Circumplex Model of Affect: A Measure of Pleasure and ... - PubMed
Subjects rated both their subjective pain intensity and fun using 0-10 Graphic Rating Scales, as well as the pleasantness of their emotional valence and their ...
[18]
The influence of affective states varying in motivational intensity on ...
Sep 10, 2012 · We review a program of research that has suggested that affective states high in motivationally intensity (eg, enthusiasm, disgust) narrow cognitive scope.<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
Watson and Tellegen's (1985) Circumplex Model
In this model, PA and NA are usually negatively correlated, such that an increase in negative affect should decrease positive affect. But these dimensions ...
[20]
The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions - PMC - NIH
The broaden-and-build theory describes the form and function of a subset of positive emotions, including joy, interest, contentment and love.
[21]
(PDF) The Contribution of Positive and Negative Affect to Life ...
Jan 19, 2021 · The results showed that positive affect had strong effects on life satisfaction across the groups, whereas negative affect had weak or ...
[22]
Understanding the Role of Negative Emotions in Adult Learning and ...
Feb 20, 2018 · Negative activating emotions include anger, frustration, anxiety, and shame while deactivating emotions include boredom, sadness, disappointment ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
[23]
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) - NovoPsych
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) is a 20-item self- report measure to assess positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA ...
[24]
Development and validation of brief measures of positive ... - PubMed
We developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent.Missing: 1985 | Show results with:1985
[25]
Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and ...
Oct 9, 2025 · We developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent.
[26]
Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short ...
The I-PANAS-SF is a 10-item short form of the PANAS, developed and validated using studies to select 10 items from the original 20.
[27]
Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short ...
The I-PANAS-SF is a 10-item short form of the PANAS, developed and validated using qualitative and quantitative studies, and found to be psychometrically ...
[28]
Reliability and validity of Izard's differential emotions scale
Izard's Differential Emotions Scale (DES) was administered to 204 University of Delaware undergraduates under each of four imaginal mood-induction conditions.
[29]
Validation of the Differential Emotions Scale in 613 mothers
Izard, C. E., Dougherty, F., Bloxom, B. M., & Kotsch, N. E.The differential emotions scale: A method of measuring the subjective experience of discrete emotions ...
[30]
Profile of Mood States (POMS) - BrianMac Sports Coach
Jun 26, 2025 · The POMS is a standardised, validated psychological test developed by McNair et al. (1971)[1]. The questionnaire contains 65 words or statements ...
[31]
The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of ...
Social desirability response bias may lead to inaccurate self-reports and erroneous study conclusions. The present study examined the relationship between ...
[32]
Adolescents' brain-autonomic coupling during emotion processing
Cardiac vagal tone, as indexed by high frequency heart rate variability (HRV ... RSA = respiratory sinus arrhythmia; SCRs = skin conductance responses. (A) ...2. Method · 2.3. The Emotional Faces... · 3. Results
[33]
Dataset of physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures ... - NIH
These data allowed us to derive Heart Rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and EDA measures. ... SCR, Total skin conductance level for each SCR. Interval ...
[34]
[PDF] Facial Expression and Emotion - Paul Ekman Group
We (Ekman &. Friesen, 1976, 1978) developed the Facial Action Coding. System, which was the first, and still is the only, compre- hensive technique for scoring ...
[35]
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=ADetnc0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=ADetnc0AAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
[36]
An ongoing review of speech emotion recognition - ScienceDirect
Apr 1, 2023 · Speech emotion recognition (SER) is a very active area of research that involves the application of current machine learning and neural networks tools.
[37]
A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of ...
The RATS is an observational coding system developed to measure different types of affective ... negative affect on husband demand or wife withdraw. Discussion.
[38]
Behavioral Observation and Coding (Chapter 16) - Handbook of ...
We provide a practical overview of the most important steps of behavioral observation and coding, with a focus on how these processes are typically executed ...
[39]
The Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals, by Charles Darwin
The expression of the emotions in man and animals by Charles Darwin with photographic and other illustrations. New York D. Appleton And Company 1899.
[40]
The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) - PubMed
This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT).
[41]
Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in ...
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) demonstrates that the subliminal presentation of arousing stimuli can activate subcortical brain regions ...
[42]
The role of the amygdala in human fear: automatic detection of threat
Consistent with this view, brain imaging studies show that masked facial stimuli activate the amygdala as do masked pictures of threatening animals such as ...
[43]
Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals
Mar 3, 2008 · Introduction. Pleasure and reward are generated by brain circuits that are largely shared between humans and other animals.<|separator|>
[44]
Functional Evidence for a Dual Route to Amygdala - PMC
Dec 29, 2011 · In addition, this subcortical pathway causes short-latency amygdala activation, which would otherwise be delayed, in keeping with an ...
[45]
Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many ...
A subcortical pathway through the superior colliculus and pulvinar to the amygdala is commonly assumed to mediate the non-conscious processing of affective ...
[46]
Tracking emotional valence: The role of the orbitofrontal cortex - NIH
In this procedure, participants made continuous ratings of the valence (positive‐neutral‐negative) of the character's emotions. Valence is considered to be the ...
[47]
Functions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion regulation ...
Sep 14, 2021 · The vmPFC appears to be involved in adaptive responses, including emotion regulation, during stress, although detailed mechanisms are largely unknown.
[48]
Day-to-day dynamics of experience–cortisol associations in ... - PNAS
Prior studies have shown that negative emotional states including anger are associated with higher cortisol levels a few minutes later in naturalistic settings ...Results · Discussion · Methods
[49]
Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning - PNAS
If dopamine neurons are an iteratively computed reward prediction error system, then increasing reward on the current trial should increase firing rates.
[50]
Disgust and the Insula: fMRI Responses to Pictures of Mutilation and ...
These results support selective disgust processing at the insula, and suggest distinct neural responses to contamination and mutilation.
[51]
Frontal Alpha Asymmetry and Its Modulation by Monoaminergic ...
This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the left frontal region is specialized for positive affect, and the right for negative affect [45].<|separator|>
[52]
Anatomy, Autonomic Nervous System - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
The autonomic nervous system is a component of the peripheral nervous system that regulates involuntary physiologic processes including heart rate, blood ...
[53]
Bidirectional fear modulation by discrete anterior insular circuits in ...
Mar 19, 2024 · Specifically, optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-amygdala pathway increased conditioned freezing, while optogenetic stimulation of the aIC- ...
[54]
Real-Time EEG-Based Emotion Recognition - MDPI
Sep 13, 2023 · In this paper, the real-time problem of emotion recognition based on EEG is explained and analyzed.
[55]
Does Negative Affect Always Narrow and Positive ... - Sage Journals
Gable P. A., Poole B. D., Harmon-Jones E. (2013). Anger perceptually and conceptually narrows cognitive scope. Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar.
[56]
The effect of fear on attentional processing in a sample of healthy ...
The present study shows that fear enhances executive attention irrespective of target valence. When experiencing fear, individuals are better able to ...
[57]
(PDF) The Blues Broaden, but the Nasty Narrows: Attentional ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Positive and negative affects high in motivational intensity cause a narrowing of attentional focus. In contrast, positive affects low in ...
[58]
[PDF] Universals and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion
Habits regarding the control of facial appearance (soon to be discussed as display rules) can interfere with the operation of the facial affect program, early ...
[59]
[PDF] The Duchenne Smile: Emotional Expression and Brain Physiology II
Ekman and Friesen (1982) predicted that Duchenne smiles are the signal for any of the positive emotions, such as amuse- ment, relief, contentment ...Missing: genuine | Show results with:genuine
[60]
Contagious yawning and the brain - ScienceDirect
That is, contagious yawning is presumed to be an automatic mirroring mechanism related to synchronizing one's own behaviors with others.
[61]
Modality-Specific Contagion of Laughter and Yawning in the ... - NIH
Feb 17, 2022 · Contagious responses differed for laughter and yawning: overall, laughter elicited more contagious responses than yawning, albeit mostly smiling rather than ...
[62]
The Social Effects of Emotions - Annual Reviews
Jan 4, 2022 · We review the burgeoning literature on the social effects of emotions, documenting the impact of emotional expressions on observers' affect, ...Missing: rapport | Show results with:rapport
[63]
A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition ...
This review assessed the specificity of facial emotion recognition impairment and the role of task characteristics in facial emotion recognition in autism ...Missing: affect | Show results with:affect
[64]
In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during ...
Both studies indicate that voice calling, group calling, and online messaging are associated with increased social connection and positive affect in the short- ...
[65]
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Technology Interventions in ... - NIH
This systematic review found that VR technology interventions positively impact social skills in children and adolescents with ASD.Missing: online | Show results with:online
[66]
a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived ... - PubMed
The present meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation in modifying emotional outcomes.
[67]
Psychophysiological Effects of Downregulating Negative Emotions
The enhanced sympathetic activation following suppression has led researchers to conclude that suppression “exacts a palpable physiological cost” (Gross and ...
[68]
Alexithymia in Neurological Disease: A Review - Psychiatry Online
Feb 6, 2015 · The prevalence of alexithymia in the general population is approximately 10%. Alexithymia seems to be normally distributed in the ...Results · Alexithymia And Traumatic... · Discussion
[69]
Alexithymia is associated with low tolerance to experimental painful ...
Alexithymia is associated with low tolerance to experimental painful stimulation. Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):471-475.Missing: affect | Show results with:affect
[70]
Positive affective functioning in anhedonic individuals' daily life
Aug 15, 2017 · Anhedonia, the decreased interest and pleasure, is often described as 'flat' or 'blunted' positive affect (PA). Yet, little is known about PA functioning in ...
[71]
Depression relapse prophylaxis with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive ...
For patients with three or more previous depressive episodes (77% of the study sample), results showed much lower relapse rates for MBCT + TAU patients (40% of ...
[72]
Affective instability in borderline personality disorder - PubMed
Affective instability, defined as repeated, rapid, and abrupt shifts in mood, is considered the core pathology in borderline personality disorder.
[73]
Specificity of Affective Instability in Patients With Borderline ...
Patients with BPD displayed heightened affective instability for emotional valence and distress compared with healthy controls, regardless of the specific ...
[74]
Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. - APA PsycNET
Presents a theoretical framework that predicts cultural differences in display rules according to cultural differences in individualism–collectivism and power
[75]
Cultural similarities and differences in display rules
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1989a). American-Japanese cultural differences in judgments of facial expressions of emotion.
[76]
Mapping Expressive Differences Around the World - Sage Journals
Mapping Expressive Differences Around the World: The Relationship Between Emotional Display Rules and Individualism Versus Collectivism. David Matsumoto, Seung ...
[77]
Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical ... - NIH
Jan 11, 2021 · This study aimed to investigate the cultural differences in mixed emotional experiences induced by conflict stimuli among American and Chinese undergraduate ...
[78]
Dialectical Emotions | Oxford Academic
Results demonstrated that whereas only 16% of students reported feeling both happy and sad on a typical day, significantly more (54%) reported mixed emotions on ...
[79]
Feeling Happy and Sad at the Same Time? Subcultural Differences ...
Happiness and sadness occur systematically with mixed affective cues (Hunter et al., 2008). Of note, such mixed emotions are more prevalent in East Asians ...
[80]
How Accurate is Facial Emotion Recognition (FER)? - MorphCast
Jul 11, 2023 · The most advanced and state-of-the-art FER software can achieve an accuracy rate of around 75% to 80%. This should be compared to the average natural human ...
[81]
Training emotional competencies at the workplace - BMC Psychology
Dec 4, 2024 · Our metaanalysis demonstrates that workplace training interventions can significantly improve these competencies, underscoring the benefit of ...
[82]
New WHO guidance calls for urgent transformation of mental health ...
Mar 25, 2025 · The guidance provides a clear framework to transform mental health services in line with the latest evidence and international human rights standards.Missing: culturally 2024