Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nevada Gaming Control Board

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) is a Nevada state agency established in 1955 to enforce gaming regulations, investigate licensing applicants, audit casino operations, and recommend actions to prevent criminal influence in the industry. Comprising three full-time members appointed by the to staggered four-year terms, the Board operates as the investigative and executive arm of Nevada's gaming oversight, distinct from the five-member , which holds final policymaking and licensing authority on a part-time basis. This two-tiered structure, designed to ensure rigorous background checks and compliance amid the legalization of gaming in , has sustained Nevada's position as the preeminent U.S. jurisdiction for regulated , with the industry yielding $10.9 billion in taxable revenue in 2023 alone. The Board's enforcement efforts, including its divisions for audits, investigations, and corporate securities, have been instrumental in transforming Nevada's gaming sector from a mid-20th-century haven for to a model of financial transparency and operational integrity.

History

Establishment in 1955 and Pre-1959 Regulation

Gambling was legalized in on March 19, 1931, through Assembly Bill 98 signed by Fred B. Balzar, amid economic pressures from the . Initially, no state-level was required; fell to authorities such as sheriffs and officials, who issued licenses and collected fees of $25 per month per and $10 per month per , with revenues split among state (25%), (25%), and (50%). This decentralized system persisted until 1945, when the state introduced a casino taxed at 1% of gross revenues exceeding $3,000 monthly, yielding approximately $100,000 annually and vesting primary regulatory authority in the Nevada Tax Commission, though without explicit powers for character screening of applicants. In 1947, an opinion from Alan Bible empowered the Tax Commission to investigate applicants' , resulting in five license denials in January 1948. Legislative amendments in further authorized fingerprinting of casino employees to identify and exclude known cheaters, marking incremental steps toward centralized oversight. However, pre-1955 regulation remained limited, with the Tax Commission adopting only five pages of rules focused primarily on taxation rather than comprehensive or probity assessments, allowing infiltration amid booming post-World War II casino growth. On March 22, 1955, the established the State Gaming Control Board as a full-time administrative agency within the Tax Commission structure to address these deficiencies. The Board was granted sweeping investigative and enforcement powers, including mandatory background checks on applicants to evaluate probity, , and moral fitness, with recommendations forwarded to the Tax Commission for final licensing decisions. From 1955 to 1959, the Board conducted thorough probes into applicants and operations, inaugurating a policy of stricter controls amid ongoing concerns over failures and criminal associations, though ultimate authority rested with the part-time Tax Commission.

Gaming Control Act of 1959 and Anti-Mob Reforms

The Gaming Control Act of 1959, enacted by the , established the as the policymaking body overseeing gaming regulation, building on the investigative role of the Nevada Gaming Control Board created four years earlier. Codified as Chapter 463 of the Nevada Revised Statutes and cited as the Nevada Gaming Control Act, the legislation formalized a structured regulatory framework to enforce licensing standards and operational controls amid growing concerns over infiltration in casinos. Governor Grant Sawyer, who took office in 1959, championed the Act following public exposés like the 1950-1951 Kefauver Committee hearings, which highlighted mob figures' hidden interests in gaming operations through skimming and proxy ownership. Central to the anti-mob reforms were provisions mandating exhaustive background investigations for all gaming licensees, including fingerprinting and scrutiny of associates to exclude "criminal elements, mobs, and hoodlums" from the industry. The Act empowered the Gaming Commission to deny or revoke licenses based on an applicant's "suitability," a criterion encompassing moral character, financial stability, and disassociation from organized crime, thereby enabling proactive exclusion of undesirable influences. It also introduced corporate licensing requirements, obligating publicly traded gaming entities to disclose all stockholders holding more than 5% ownership and submit to ongoing regulatory audits, which curtailed anonymous mob funding through shell companies or front men. Regulations adopted by the Commission on July 1, 1959, further implemented these measures, including Regulation 5.010, which permitted license revocation for mere association with known organized crime figures, shifting from reactive enforcement to preventive oversight. These reforms marked a causal pivot from Nevada's pre-1959 lax regime, where local tax commissions handled approvals with minimal scrutiny, allowing mob syndicates from Chicago and New York to dominate properties like the Stardust and Desert Inn. By institutionalizing the dual structure of the investigative Gaming Control Board and decisional Gaming Commission, the Act fostered accountability, with the Board recommending actions based on evidence gathered through field agents and financial audits. Subsequent enforcement, though evolving into the 1960s, traced directly to 1959's foundation, reducing overt mob visibility and enabling corporate entrants like Howard Hughes by the late 1960s, as suitability probes deterred concealed criminal ties.

Post-1959 Developments and Expansion of Oversight

Following the enactment of the Gaming Control Act in 1959, which established the as the policymaking body overseeing the Gaming Control Board's enforcement recommendations, regulators intensified efforts to exclude influences through rigorous background investigations and of known associates from casino operations. This shift facilitated the entry of legitimate investors, exemplified by the Commission's approval of ' acquisitions of several casinos between 1967 and 1970, marking a transition toward corporate ownership while subjecting applicants to exhaustive suitability determinations. In 1961, the created the Gaming Policy Committee, empowering it to conduct hearings on regulatory policy and provide advisory recommendations to the Board and , thereby institutionalizing a mechanism for ongoing evaluation and adaptation of oversight practices. A pivotal expansion occurred with the passage of the Corporate Gaming Act in 1967 (Senate Bill 470), which authorized publicly traded corporations to hold gaming licenses for the first time, provided that institutional investors and key employees underwent Board investigations for suitability and that the approved significant stock issuances or transfers. This legislation broadened the Board's investigative mandate to encompass complex , including restrictions on hidden interests and requirements for reporting changes in corporate control, thereby extending regulatory scrutiny beyond individual proprietors to shareholders and affiliates. Subsequent refinements in 1969 via Senate Bill 353 further strengthened state authority by mandating enhanced disclosures from corporate licensees and empowering the to impose conditions or deny approvals based on findings of unsuitable associations, solidifying oversight over diversified ownership structures that fueled industry growth. By the , amid revelations of skimming operations linked to , the Board amplified enforcement through coordinated investigations with federal agencies, leading to indictments and license revocations that underscored the regulators' expanded role in financial auditing and compliance monitoring. The 1977 foreign gaming statutes represented another key development, permitting Nevada-licensed operators to conduct abroad only if the foreign demonstrated effective comparable to Nevada's standards, with the Board retaining to investigate and discipline licensees for violations occurring overseas. This provision, amended in 1993 to replace prior approval with mandatory reporting, extended Nevada's oversight extraterritorially to safeguard the integrity of licensees' domestic operations. Into the , the Board and adapted to technological advancements; in 2001, statutes authorized licensing of interactive systems, including network-based platforms, thereby incorporating regulatory powers over emerging digital wagering formats such as , which Nevada pioneered with intrastate operations launching in 2013. These evolutions reflect a consistent expansion of the Board's investigative and enforcement toolkit to address evolving industry complexities while maintaining Nevada's model of stringent, probity-focused .

Organizational Structure

Board Composition and Appointment Process

The Nevada Gaming Control Board consists of three full-time members responsible for investigating license applications, conducting audits, and recommending actions to the . These members serve staggered four-year terms, commencing on the last Monday in of the appointment year, ensuring continuity in oversight. Appointments are made exclusively by the of , who selects members based on qualifications outlined in Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 463.040, including U.S. citizenship, at least two years of residency prior to appointment, and absence of any direct or indirect financial interest in gaming enterprises or related activities. The also designates one appointee as Chair and Executive Director, a role that involves coordinating Board operations with the and serving at the 's pleasure rather than a fixed term. No legislative confirmation, such as approval, is required for Board members, distinguishing the process from certain other state commissions. Members may be removed by the for cause, including , malfeasance, or nonfeasance in office, following provisions under NRS 463.050. Recent examples include Lombardo's of Dreitzer as in June 2025 and Chandeni Sendall as a member in January 2025, reflecting the executive branch's direct authority over Board composition. This structure emphasizes rapid responsiveness to gubernatorial priorities in gaming regulation while maintaining statutory independence from industry influences.

Key Divisions and Their Roles

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) is structured into six primary divisions—, , , Investigations, , and —that execute its regulatory mandate over Nevada's gaming industry. These divisions collaborate to investigate applicants, audit operations, enforce compliance, collect revenues, and validate equipment integrity, thereby safeguarding and economic stability. The Administration Division delivers critical support services, including , , and general administration, to enable the Board's investigative, licensing, and enforcement activities across its Las Vegas and Carson City offices. Led by a chief and deputy, it ensures operational efficiency without direct involvement in field regulation. The Audit Division focuses on financial oversight by conducting comprehensive audits of Group I licensees—casinos generating over $5 million in annual gross gaming revenue—as well as smaller operations, examining records for with accounting regulations, , and remittances. Operating from Las Vegas and Reno, it processes internal control submissions, oversees live entertainment taxes and race meet filings, and performs field audits to detect irregularities, contributing to the prevention of fiscal misconduct. The Enforcement Division functions as the NGCB's dedicated unit, maintaining five statewide offices with 24/7 availability to investigate criminal violations of gaming statutes, regulatory breaches, and patron disputes between licensees. It gathers intelligence on infiltration, recommends individuals for the List of Excluded Persons, conducts background checks for work permits, and approves elements like new games, systems, , , and charitable setups to maintain operational security and fairness. The Investigations Division, based in Carson City and , specializes in pre- and post-licensing scrutiny, performing detailed background, financial, and viability assessments of applicants, key employees, and entities to inform Board recommendations on suitability. It continuously monitors registered public companies and their subsidiaries, evaluating major events such as control changes, recapitalizations, public offerings, and international ties to mitigate risks to industry integrity. The Tax and License Division administers Nevada's gaming framework through three sections—Collections, , and Licensing—responsible for monthly remittances (typically 6.75% of gross gaming revenue), verification of reports, and issuance of operational licenses and fees. It enforces obligations, audits , and supports revenue collection exceeding $1 billion annually, directly funding state programs while ensuring maintain accurate records under NRS Chapter 463. The Technology Division, which includes the Gaming Laboratory, tests and evaluates gaming devices, interactive systems, and associated equipment for compliance with technical standards, recommending approvals or rejections to the Board based on fairness, security, and regulatory adherence. Staffed by engineers in , it scrutinizes hardware and software to prevent manipulation, handling submissions for slot machines, systems, and amid Nevada's $15 billion-plus annual gaming market.

Functions and Regulatory Powers

Licensing and Suitability Determinations

The Nevada (NGCB) investigates applicants for licenses and related approvals, assessing their suitability based on statutory criteria to ensure the integrity of Nevada's . Suitability determinations evaluate whether individuals, entities, or locations pose no threat to , focusing on character, financial fitness, and associations. The NGCB recommends findings to the , which holds final authority to approve, deny, or condition licenses. Qualifications for licensing require applicants to demonstrate good , honesty, and ; adequate business competence and experience; with funding from suitable sources; and no history of illegal or associations that undermine . The burden of proof rests on the applicant, with denials possible if premises are unsuitable—such as locations near schools or churches without justification, or those violating laws—or if affiliates fail suitability standards. Key employees exerting significant influence over operations must obtain licenses within 30 days of identification. The application process begins with submission to the NGCB, including fees ($500 for preliminary suitability or location assessments, $1,000 for full licenses) and detailed disclosures such as business plans, diagrams, and fingerprints for FBI and repository checks. The NGCB conducts thorough investigations, including premises inspections and financial audits, before recommending action; preliminary suitability findings, valid for up to two years (extendable), allow interim progress on nonrestricted licenses. The must act within 120 days of application receipt, or approval is deemed granted; hearings occur if contested, with appeals available within 20 days. Separate gaming licenses are required for each gaming establishment, race book, or sports pool, while suitability applies to service providers, financial interest holders exceeding certain thresholds, and tournament organizers.

Investigations and Enforcement Mechanisms

The Nevada Gaming Control Board's investigations into gaming operations and personnel are conducted primarily by the Investigations Division, which scrutinizes all applicants for gaming licenses and key employee positions to evaluate their financial viability, business integrity, and overall suitability under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 463. This division employs comprehensive background checks, financial analyses, and reviews of corporate activities, including changes in control, public offerings, and recapitalizations of publicly traded gaming entities, to produce detailed reports recommending approval or denial to the Board and . These investigations draw on absolute investigative powers granted by NRS 463.1405, enabling observation of licensees' conduct and identification of potential risks to the industry's integrity. The Enforcement Division functions as the Board's law enforcement arm, maintaining five offices statewide and operating 24 hours a day to perform criminal and regulatory investigations, gather intelligence on organized crime infiltrating gaming, and conduct background checks for work card applicants. agents, certified as peace officers under NRS 289.360, possess authority to execute arrests, seize evidence, and enforce gaming regulations through on-site inspections of surveillance systems, games, chips, and tokens. This division also arbitrates disputes between patrons and licensees, recommending exclusions for individuals posing threats via the List of Excluded Persons, and coordinates with local for broader criminal probes. Enforcement mechanisms culminate in formal complaints or emergency orders filed with the Gaming Commission, which may impose penalties such as fines, license suspensions, or revocations following hearings, as outlined in the Nevada Gaming Control Act. The Board's divisions collaborate to monitor ongoing compliance, with investigations often triggered by audits, tips, or observed violations, ensuring causal links between detected irregularities and regulatory breaches are rigorously documented before recommendations. This dual-division approach prioritizes empirical evidence from field operations and data analysis to deter , , and unsuitability, with outcomes directly influencing licensing decisions and operational approvals.

Regulation of Gaming Operations and Technology

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) enforces Regulation 5, which governs the operation of gaming establishments, mandating that licensees maintain continuous compliance with standards for games such as slots, table games, , and sports wagering to ensure integrity and prevent manipulation. This includes requirements for accurate game outcomes, secure handling of wagers, and immediate reporting of irregularities, with licensees subject to unannounced audits and operational reviews by the Enforcement . Operations must adhere to Minimum Standards (MICS), updated periodically—such as Version 9 adopted in September 2025—which specify procedures for cash transactions, surveillance, and accounting to minimize fraud risks. For technology, Regulation 14 establishes approval processes for gaming devices, including slot machines and inter-casino linked systems, requiring manufacturers to submit detailed applications, prototypes, and test models for NGCB evaluation prior to deployment. Devices must meet minimum standards under NGCB 14.040, such as resisting forced entry and retaining evidence of tampering until cleared, with protective covers over critical circuitry to safeguard generators. Technical Standards, outlined in documents like Standard 1 for device integrity and Standard 3 for on-line monitoring systems, mandate secure program access controls, accurate metering of plays and payouts, and compatibility with central monitoring for real-time oversight. Advancements in technology, including cashless wagering systems and approved under NGCB guidelines since 2011 updates, require "assume responsibility" protocols where operators gain full control over to prevent unauthorized alterations. Cybersecurity regulations, effective December 31, 2023, compel covered entities to implement risk assessments, , and incident reporting to counter digital threats to networks. Violations, such as possessing under NRS 465.075, trigger enforcement actions including seizures and revocations, with NGCB prioritizing empirical testing to verify payout percentages and .

Economic Role

Oversight of Gaming Revenues and Taxation

The Nevada Gaming Control Board's Tax and License Division oversees the reporting, auditing, and collection of gross gaming revenue (GGR) from licensed operators, ensuring compliance with taxation requirements under the Nevada Gaming Control Act. GGR, defined in Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 463.0161 as the total sums wagered minus amounts paid out as winnings to patrons, forms the taxable base for monthly percentage fees. Licensed establishments must submit monthly gross revenue statistical reports detailing GGR by game type, including slots, table games, and sports books, to the by the 15th day following each month. These reports enable the calculation of tiered percentage fees for nonrestricted licensees: 3.5% on the first $50,000 of monthly GGR, 4.5% on the subsequent $84,000 (up to $134,000 total), and 6.75% on all amounts exceeding $134,000. The verifies these submissions through compliance reviews and audits, particularly for Group II nonrestricted licensees and slot route operators, to detect underreporting or discrepancies. Collected fees, penalties, and interest are deposited daily into state accounts and distributed according to statutory allocations, primarily supporting Nevada's general fund and services. In 2024, these efforts yielded approximately $1.2 billion in , reflecting robust oversight amid record statewide GGR exceeding $15 billion for calendar year 2024. The Division also publishes aggregated data via monthly revenue reports and abbreviated releases, providing on statewide GGR trends and fee collections while adjusting thresholds annually for via the . Enforcement extends to investigations of potential evasion, with authority to impose fines or revoke licenses for non-compliance, thereby safeguarding revenue essential to Nevada's regulatory framework. For specialized activities like , the same 6.75% rate applies to net win, underscoring uniform oversight across sectors.

Impact on Nevada's Economy and Industry Stability

The Nevada Gaming Control Board's regulatory oversight ensures the stability of Nevada's industry by licensing suitable operators, investigating potential violations, and enforcing compliance with laws that deter criminal infiltration and maintain operational . This framework, designed to protect industry stability since its inception in , fosters public and investor confidence, preventing the reputational damage that could arise from unchecked or , as occurred in earlier unregulated periods. By upholding these standards, the Board contributes to the gaming sector's role as a cornerstone of Nevada's economy, where revenues reached approximately $15.8 billion in 2024, supporting over 436,000 jobs through direct and indirect impacts. This stability enables consistent tax revenues and economic multipliers, with the broader industry—driven largely by —generating over $98 billion in total economic output that year. Enforcement actions against and non-compliance further bolster industry resilience, as lapses could trigger federal scrutiny or loss of patronage, undermining the sector's ability to weather economic fluctuations. For instance, the Board's investigations into anti-money laundering failures at operators like in 2024 highlight proactive measures that preserve the clean image essential for attracting high-volume tourism, which sustains Nevada's dependence on for general and growth.

Enforcement Actions and Compliance

Major Historical and Recent Cases

One of the earliest major enforcement efforts by the Nevada Gaming Control Board involved combating infiltration in the 1950s and 1960s, culminating in the Gaming Control Act of 1959, which empowered the Board to impose strict licensing requirements and blacklist mob-associated individuals from casinos. This led to the exclusion of figures like and other known syndicate members, facilitating the transition to corporate ownership and reducing underworld influence in gaming operations. A prominent historical case was the 1981 denial of a gaming license to , who managed the Resort & Casino through associates; the Board cited his ties to , including prior associations with Chicago mob elements, despite Rosenthal's lack of felony convictions. The U.S. District Court upheld the denial, affirming the Board's discretionary authority under Nevada's regulatory framework to prioritize public trust over individual claims of rehabilitation. In recent enforcement, the Board has intensified scrutiny on anti-money laundering (AML) compliance and patron monitoring. In August 2024, the Board filed a against alleging failures to detect and report suspicious wagering by patrons linked to illegal bookmaking operations, including over $100 million in high-volume bets from individuals like Matthew Bowyer, prompting demands for fines, license conditions, and potential supervisory oversight. The approved a $10.5 million settlement in March 2025 to resolve a related 10-count , marking one of several AML-related penalties amid a multiyear regulatory push. Other significant 2025 actions include a May stipulated settlement with Wynn Las Vegas for $5.5 million over violations tied to prior workplace conduct investigations, imposing ongoing license conditions to ensure compliance. Concurrently, the Board launched an AML probe into Fontainebleau Las Vegas in May 2025, focusing on unreported suspicious activities during its opening phase, while a separate April complaint against MGM Resorts detailed failures by hosts to flag illicit funds from cyber fraud schemes. These cases underscore heightened federal-state coordination on Bank Secrecy Act obligations, with fines totaling millions to deter systemic lapses in high-stakes environments.

Efforts Against Money Laundering and Fraud

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) requires licensed gaming establishments to maintain comprehensive anti-money laundering (AML) programs compliant with the federal Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), encompassing customer identification, due diligence, transaction monitoring, and filing of suspicious activity reports (SARs) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). These mandates are enforced through Nevada Gaming Commission regulations, which empower the NGCB to conduct audits and investigations into compliance failures. Non-compliance can result in fines, license conditions, or revocation, as the NGCB views AML lapses as threats to the industry's integrity and public trust. The NGCB's Audit Division performs regular examinations of licensees' AML controls, evaluating internal procedures for detecting , unusual wagering patterns, and associations with illicit actors, with findings reported to the full Board for potential enforcement recommendations. In parallel, the Enforcement Division targets through proactive investigations into cheating devices, , and operational manipulations, often coordinating with agencies like the FBI and IRS. For example, starting in December 2022, the NGCB probed fraudulent cash adjustments at sports wagering kiosks across multiple properties, uncovering an scheme that led to the arrest of two men in February 2023 on charges including and . Enforcement actions have intensified in recent years, with the NGCB filing complaints against major operators for AML deficiencies tied to high-risk patrons. In August 2024, the NGCB accused of failing to identify and restrict wagering by customers linked to illegal bookmaking, including executives' awareness of such activities, culminating in a $10.5 million fine approved in March 2025. Similar scrutiny prompted a May 2025 settlement with , mandating AML program upgrades, enhanced employee training, and ongoing monitoring. By May 2025, these and related cases against three operators had yielded $24.5 million in fines, directed toward bolstering the state's gaming regulation fund. An April 2025 complaint against Resorts further highlighted persistent issues in team oversight and risk assessments. These initiatives reflect the NGCB's emphasis on preventive controls, such as mandatory internal audits and technology for transaction flagging, alongside punitive measures to deter financial crimes in an industry handling billions in annual wagers. The Board's compliance unit continues to evolve regulations, prioritizing empirical detection of laundering vectors like cash-heavy play and ties, while addressing through swift disruption of schemes that undermine fair .

Controversies and Criticisms

Transparency and Accountability Concerns

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) operates under statutory exemptions from Nevada's laws, particularly for investigative files and certain matters, which has drawn for limiting public oversight. Unlike most state agencies, the NGCB is not required to disclose records related to ongoing or closed investigations unless explicitly authorized by statute or , a provision rooted in Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 239.011 and gaming-specific rules. This exemption, intended to protect sensitive industry operations and proprietary information, has been cited by experts as fostering opacity that impedes accountability, with law professor David Tanenbaum noting it creates "a " around regulatory actions. In May 2024, the NGCB denied a request from the Las Vegas Review-Journal seeking details on an into a casino's handling of a suspicious high-roller patron, exemplifying how such denials prevent scrutiny of potential regulatory lapses or favoritism toward licensees. Critics, including former Frankie Sue Del Papa, argue that this secrecy undermines public trust in an generating over $15 billion in annual gaming taxes, as it shields details on decisions that could reveal inconsistencies or undue industry influence. The structure allows the NGCB, as the investigative arm recommending actions to the , to withhold even basic outcomes of probes without justification, contrasting with federal requirements under the for anti-money laundering disclosures. A Nevada Current report highlighted internal NGCB documents revealing undertrained IT staff and unaddressed vulnerabilities, which contradicted agency assurances to lawmakers, yet these were not proactively disclosed, fueling concerns over self-policing efficacy. Stakeholder groups have amplified these issues, such as the Culinary Union Local 226's December 2024 call for greater disclosure in the gaming license application process, where regulators' agenda omitted clarity on funding sources and control structures despite in labor and financial stability. Academic and legal analyses, including a University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee study on gaming regulation, recommend reforms like mandatory redacted summaries of investigations to balance confidentiality with , arguing current practices enable of regulatory ambiguities without sufficient external checks. While NGCB officials defend the exemptions as essential for maintaining 's competitive edge in gaming, no major legislative changes have been enacted as of October 2025, perpetuating debates over whether the "gold standard" of regulation prioritizes industry protection over public accountability.

Disputes with Industry Stakeholders

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) has encountered disputes with gaming operators over stringent enforcement of anti-money laundering (AML) requirements and operational compliance, often resulting in multi-million-dollar fines following complaints and negotiated settlements. In August 2024, the NGCB issued a 12-count complaint against Resorts World Las Vegas for failing to bar suspected illegal bookmakers, verify fund sources, and address wagering red flags despite internal alerts, culminating in a $10.5 million stipulated fine approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission in March 2025. Similarly, an April 2025 complaint targeted MGM Resorts for AML program deficiencies at properties including MGM Grand and The Cosmopolitan, where executives like Scott Sibella engaged in unreported financial transactions with prohibited persons, leading to an $8.5 million settlement in October 2025. Operators have also clashed with the NGCB over integrity and payout disputes. The board filed a complaint against CG Technology (operating as seven Las Vegas-area sportsbooks) in 2025 for underpaying bettors on exotic wagers by miscalculating odds, affecting payouts totaling thousands of dollars across multiple incidents. These actions underscore tensions arising from the NGCB's periodic audits, which have imposed escalating penalties—up to $250,000 per violation under revised statutes—to deter fraud, though operators argue such scrutiny burdens legitimate operations. Broader industry criticism has focused on the NGCB's internal challenges, including high leadership turnover (five chairs since A.G. Burnett's 2017 departure) and perceived reactive enforcement. Gaming analyst Bernard W. Andrews Schuetz contended in May 2024 that this instability fosters regulatory lapses, such as overlooking Sibella's felony-level ties to illegal bookmakers at MGM Grand until federal probes in January 2024, eroding proactive oversight and inviting U.S. Department of Justice interventions that damage Nevada's gaming reputation. Licensing delays have compounded frustrations, with recent NGCB hearings in 2025 imposing extended scrutiny on applications, delaying approvals and highlighting operator concerns over opaque criteria and potential denials despite substantial investments. These disputes reflect a core tension: the NGCB's mandate to safeguard industry integrity versus operators' views of overreach amid evolving threats like digital wagering.

Recent Developments

2024 Virgin Hotels Las Vegas Strike

On November 15, 2024, approximately 700 members of the Local 226, including housekeepers, bartenders, and other non-gaming hospitality staff, initiated an open-ended strike at , marking the first such action by the union in over two decades. The dispute stemmed from the expiration of the agreement on June 1, 2023, with workers demanding wage increases and improved benefits amid rising living costs, while management initially proposed minimal raises, such as 30 cents per hour for the first three years of a five-year contract. The Nevada Gaming Control Board became directly involved when striking workers attended its December 4, 2024, meeting to deliver public comments and urge scrutiny of the casino's operations during the labor unrest. On the same day, the Board recommended approval for a new gaming operator, C&C 4455 LLC—a entity formed by Virgin Hotels' top executives, including CEO Rich Mirman—to assume full control of day-to-day casino operations from the previous licensee, JL Hospitality LLC. This transition, which granted the executives unrestricted gaming licenses, occurred amid escalating picketing and union accusations of unfair labor practices, though the Board focused its review on compliance with gaming regulations rather than resolving the contract dispute. The strike persisted for 69 days, with workers facing financial hardship and management hiring replacement staff, until January 22, 2025, when the announced a tentative five-year agreement, which members ratified unanimously the following day. The Board's operator approval proceeded independently of the resolution, enabling to restructure its gaming arm as a "fully integrated " post-strike, though representatives expressed ongoing concerns about in the licensing during the labor .

Sports Betting Integrity and 2025 Investigations

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) enforces integrity through Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 22 and 6A, which mandate licensed operators to monitor wagering transactions in real-time for unusual patterns indicative of match-fixing, , or other irregularities. Licensees must file Suspicious Wagering Activity Reports (SWARs) with the NGCB upon detecting anomalies, such as disproportionate bets on specific outcomes, enabling rapid coordination with leagues, , and integrity firms like U.S. Integrity. This framework, rooted in the Nevada Gaming Control Act of 1955, prioritizes data-driven surveillance over self-regulation, contrasting with unregulated offshore markets where detection lags due to opacity. In 2025, NGCB investigations highlighted vulnerabilities in emerging wagering products and illegal schemes. On October 16, the Board issued a letter to licensees warning against partnerships with platforms offering sports event contracts or prediction markets, deeming them unlawful sports wagering that circumvents licensing and integrity protocols. This targeted , which faced a cease-and-desist order earlier in the year for providing binary options on sports outcomes to residents, potentially enabling anonymous, unregulated bets that evade monitoring. Following a federal judge's denial of Crypto.com's request on October 25, the company agreed to suspend such offerings to users after November 3, pending appeal, underscoring NGCB's stance that such instruments question licensees' character and gaming suitability. Nevada's regulated sportsbooks also contributed to exposing a federal probe into NBA-related illegal gambling in October 2025, where suspicious prop bets on Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier's performance during a March 2023 game triggered line freezes and alerts. Analytics from Nevada monitors identified irregular patterns, prompting reports that aided FBI indictments of 34 individuals, including Rozier, Portland Trail Blazers coach Chauncey Billups, and organized crime figures linked to rigged outcomes and money laundering across 11 states. While the scheme involved offshore books evading U.S. oversight, NGCB-enforced compliance in legal markets—such as mandatory disclosures and anti-money laundering checks—facilitated early detection, validating regulated wagering's role in surfacing threats absent in illicit channels. Las Vegas operators, reporting directly to NGCB enforcement divisions, have historically flagged similar anomalies, as in prior point-shaving cases, reinforcing the Board's emphasis on empirical pattern recognition over league self-policing.

References

  1. [1]
    Gaming Control Board: Home - Nevada State Library and Archives
    Nov 1, 2024 · This collection (NvSA-000079) contains the records of the Gaming Control Board from 1955-1992. The 58 c.f. of materials consist of minutes and ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Gaming in Nevada - POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT
    In 1955, the Legislature organized the State Gaming Control Board to regulate the industry. Comprehensive background checks of license applicants were also ...
  3. [3]
    About Us - Nevada Gaming Control Board - NV.gov
    Aug 27, 2025 · The Board consists of three full-time members appointed by the Governor for four-year terms, with one member acting as Chairman, and is ...
  4. [4]
    Nevada Gaming Control Board and the Gaming Commission
    Mar 12, 2024 · The Control Board oversees gambling and is full-time, while the Commission makes final licensing decisions and is part-time. The Control Board ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] JANUARY 2025 - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Jan 26, 2025 · The Nevada Gaming Commission and Control Board regulate the gaming industry, which generated $10.9 billion in revenue in 2023. The Board ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Nevada Gaming Statutes: Their Evolution and History
    Sep 10, 2011 · Nevada legalized gambling in 1931, with no state license needed. In 1945, a state casino license was created, and the tax was 1% of gross ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Nevada Gaming Control Board: Agency and Revenue Overview
    Dec 5, 2016 · NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD: Investigates applicants and audit licensees, makes licensing recommendations, enforces gaming laws and collects ...
  8. [8]
    History of Gaming in Nevada | Nevada Resort Association
    A division of the Nevada Tax Commission, the board's primary purpose was to oversee the licensing and operation of Nevada casinos, all the while eliminating the ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Nevada Gaming Commission - NV.gov
    Aug 21, 2025 · The Nevada Gaming Commission, created in 1959, has five members and is the final authority on licensing, and enforces gaming regulations.Online Gaming · About the Commission Members · Refunds / Redeterminations
  10. [10]
    NRS 463.010 Short title. :: Chapter 463 Licensing and Control of ...
    NRS 463.010 Short title. This chapter may be known and cited as the Nevada Gaming Control Act. [1:429:1955]-(NRS A 1959, 427). Disclaimer ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] INFORMATIONAL - Gaming Control Board - State of Nevada
    Oct 14, 2025 · In 1959, the Nevada Gaming Commission (“Commission”) was created by the passage of the Gaming. Control Act (“Act”). The Act laid the foundation ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] AllRegulations.pdf - Gaming Control Board - State of Nevada
    Page 1. STATE OF NEVADA. REGULATIONS. OF THE. NEVADA GAMING COMMISSION. &. NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD. CARSON CITY, NEVADA. As adopted July 1, 1959. Current as ...
  13. [13]
    How Nevada Began Rooting the Mob Out of Casinos “In the late ...
    Mar 2, 2025 · ... changes to Nevada's gambling regulations to distance the state from its Mob- controlled reputation. Elected in 1958, Sawyer oversaw the ...Missing: anti- | Show results with:anti-<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Nevada's Gaming Control Board | Police Magazine
    Jan 2, 2013 · Nevada legalized gambling in 1931, and it wasn't until 1959 that "gaming" enforcement began. Prior to the arrival of Los Angeles mobster ...
  15. [15]
    Gaming: The Class of 1960 - Nevada Public Radio
    Jan 1, 2020 · As governor, Sawyer called out organized crime in his inaugural address and pushed through the Gaming Control Act of 1959, setting in motion the ...
  16. [16]
    Sixty years ago, Nevada entered the modern era of gambling ...
    Jul 1, 2019 · Gaming Control Act of 1959 led to blacklisting of mobsters known to frequent Nevada casinos. Published: July 1st, 2019.
  17. [17]
    NRS: CHAPTER 463 - LICENSING AND CONTROL OF GAMING
    Dec 31, 1996 · NRS 463.162 State gaming license required where equipment, services or property delivered or furnished for gaming interest or revenue; ...
  18. [18]
    NRS 463.050 – Members: Appointment - Nevada.Public.Law
    1. The term of office of each member of the Board is 4 years, commencing on the last Monday in January. 2. The Governor shall appoint the members of the Board ...
  19. [19]
    https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-463.html#NRS463Sec040
  20. [20]
    2024 Nevada Revised Statutes :: Chapter 463 - Justia Law
    NRS 463.169 - Registration or licensing of person conducting certain tournaments or contests in association with gaming licensee; termination of association.Missing: 1959 | Show results with:1959
  21. [21]
    Nevada Revised Statutes § 463.050 (2024) - Members: Appointment ...
    The Governor shall appoint the members of the Board and designate one member to serve as Chair and Executive Director, who shall coordinate the activities of ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  22. [22]
    https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-463.html#NRS463Sec050
  23. [23]
    About GCB Members - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Sep 8, 2025 · Mike Dreitzer serves as Chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, appointed by Governor Joe Lombardo in June of 2025.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  24. [24]
    2025-01-29_appointment-chandeni-sendall - Nevada Governor
    Jan 29, 2025 · Governor Lombardo Appoints Chandeni Sendall to Nevada Gaming Control Board. LAS VEGAS, NV – January 29, 2025. Today, Governor Joe Lombardo ...Missing: NRS confirmation
  25. [25]
    Divisions - Nevada Gaming Control Board - NV.gov
    Sep 23, 2025 · Administration Division · Audit Division · Enforcement Division · Investigations Division · Tax & License Division · Gaming Lab.
  26. [26]
    Admin Division
    ### Summary of Administration Division Responsibilities
  27. [27]
    Audit Division Overview - Nevada Gaming Control Board - NV.gov
    Aug 20, 2025 · 1. Audits - The Audit Division is primarily responsible for auditing Group I casinos throughout the state (i.e., those casinos with annual ...
  28. [28]
    Audit Division
    ### Summary of Audit Division Responsibilities
  29. [29]
    Enforcement Division - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Aug 20, 2025 · Primary responsibilities are to conduct criminal and regulatory investigations, arbitrate disputes between patrons and licensees, gather ...
  30. [30]
    Investigations Division
    ### Summary of Investigations Division Responsibilities
  31. [31]
    ADMINISTRATION OF TAX BY NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD
    § 368A.490 - Responsibilities of persons licensed to conduct gaming: Payment of tax; records; reports · § 368A.500 - Maintenance and availability of records ...
  32. [32]
    Working at the Board - Nevada Gaming Control Board - NV.gov
    Aug 20, 2025 · All the divisions are managed by the Chairman and two Board Members who are appointed to four year terms by the Governor. Employees of the Board ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Technology Division Duties and Requirements
    Mar 30, 2018 · Electronics Lab Engineer. An Electronics Lab Engineer is responsible for evaluating gaming devices, gaming associated equipment,.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] REGULATION 4 APPLICATIONS: PROCEDURE
    An application for a license, determination of suitability, or registration, besides any other factor attaching to such an application by virtue of the Nevada ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  35. [35]
    [PDF] REGULATION 3 LICENSING: QUALIFICATIONS
    Gaming license qualifications include unsuitable locations, ownership of rights, time and financial requirements, and the number of premises and slot machines.
  36. [36]
    NRS 289.360 - Members and agents of Nevada Gaming Control Board
    An agent of the Nevada Gaming Control Board whose duties include the enforcement, or the investigation of suspected violations, of statutes or regulations,Missing: procedures | Show results with:procedures
  37. [37]
    Gaming Statutes & Regulations - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Technical Standard 6 - Interactive Gaming Systems and Associated Equipment. Regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission and Nevada Gaming Control Board.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] REGULATION 5 OPERATION OF GAMING ESTABLISHMENTS
    “Chair” means the Chair of the Nevada Gaming Control Board or the Chair's designee. 4. “Form for application” means the application form prescribed by the Board ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  39. [39]
    Minimum Internal Control Standards - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Sep 5, 2025 · Version 9 Minimum Internal Control Standards - Group 1. PDF Version of Documents. Overview of MICS Adoption Process (PDF).
  40. [40]
    [PDF] regulation 14 - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    14.040. Minimum standards for gaming devices. 14.045. Minimum standards for inter-casino linked systems. 14.050. Technical standards. 14.060. Employment of ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR GAMING DEVICES AND ...
    Feb 15, 2016 · A conventional gaming device must resist forced illegal entry and must retain evidence of any entry until properly cleared or until a new play ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR GAMING DEVICES AND ...
    1. Documentation generated for a system based game shall be available on a day, month, year-to- date basis and for at least a previous two-year cumulative ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] REGULATION 14 - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    1. "Assume Responsibility" means to acquire complete control over, or ownership of, a gaming device, cashless wagering system, mobile gaming system ...
  44. [44]
    Nevada Gaming Cybersecurity Law Requires Action in 2023
    Jun 2, 2023 · The Nevada Gaming Control Board is requiring covered entities to put additional cybersecurity measures into place by December 2023.
  45. [45]
    Cheating With Gaming Devices (N.R.S. 465.075) | Half Price Lawyers
    NRS 456.0751 states that the possession of any device, software or hardware to obtain an advantage at playing a game is prohibited. The law bans individuals ...
  46. [46]
    https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-463.html#NRS463Sec0161
  47. [47]
    Tax & License Division - Nevada Gaming Control Board - NV.gov
    Aug 20, 2025 · The Tax and License Division collects, deposits, distributes and dedicates all gaming taxes, fees, penalties, interest and fines. The Division ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] INSTRUCTIONS - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    DROP AND GROSS REVENUE: Enter the amounts applicable to slot machines, table games, counter games, and card games (i.e., poker, pan) by descriptive units. In ...
  49. [49]
    License Fees and Tax Rate Schedule - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Monthly Percentage Fee (Nonrestricted Gaming License) · 3.5% of the first $50,000 during the month, plus · 4.5% of the next $84,000 plus · 6.75% of revenue ...Missing: calculation | Show results with:calculation
  50. [50]
    Nevada Gaming Control Board reports $1.2B in tax revenue for ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · The meeting highlighted the vital role of the Tax and License Division, which is responsible for collecting taxes, fees, penalties, and fines ...
  51. [51]
    2024 was a record year for Nevada gaming revenue, but not on the ...
    Jan 30, 2025 · Nevada casino revenue tops $15.6 billion while Las Vegas resorts saw a 1 percent dip in 2024 to $8.8 billion.Missing: fiscal | Show results with:fiscal
  52. [52]
    Gaming Revenue Information - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    The Monthly Revenue Report is a summary of revenue information for nonrestricted gaming activity. Each report reflects 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month data.
  53. [53]
    Abbreviated Revenue Release (ARR) - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Sep 26, 2025 · The Abbreviated Revenue Release is a two-page document reflecting total gaming revenues (win) and percentage fee collections generated by ...
  54. [54]
    Nevada Sports Betting Revenue Insights October 2025 - RG.org
    Sep 30, 2025 · Nevada applies a 6.75% tax on sportsbook revenue, one of the lowest rates in the United States. This structure has been in place for decades and ...
  55. [55]
    Nevada tourism generated $100B in economic activity, 436K jobs in ...
    Mar 26, 2025 · The gaming industry in Nevada reported roughly $15.8 billion in revenue last year, more than three times as much as the next closest state ( ...
  56. [56]
    The Impact of Gaming in Nevada
    $$6.0 B Total General Fund Tax Revenue · $2.1 B Hotel-Casino Industry Contributions · 34%. Hotel-Casino Industry Share of Total ...
  57. [57]
    Nevada Gaming Control Board Alleges Casino AML Failures Based ...
    Aug 26, 2024 · Resorts World is accused of failing to bar suspected illegal bookmakers, not confirming fund sources, and not acting on red flags, despite ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  58. [58]
    'Not a sunny day for our industry:' Nevada gaming regulators OK ...
    May 28, 2025 · All together, the gaming commission has accepted $24.5 million from the three Strip operators in AML fines. The funds will help replenish the ...
  59. [59]
    Rosenthal v. State of Nev., 514 F. Supp. 907 (D. Nev. 1981)
    The plaintiff, Frank Rosenthal, brought this suit on March 13, 1979, against the defendants State of Nevada, the Nevada Gaming Commission, certain members and ...
  60. [60]
    State v. Rosenthal – Case Brief Summary - Studicata
    The main issues were whether the Nevada Gaming Control Act's licensing provisions were unconstitutional for lack of standards, and whether Rosenthal was denied ...
  61. [61]
    Gaming Commission accepts $10.5M settlement to end case against ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · The commission's 4-0 vote to accept Resorts World's agreement to pay a $10.5 million fine to settle a 10-count complaint.Missing: major | Show results with:major
  62. [62]
    Here are the highest fines imposed by Nevada Gaming Commission
    Jun 14, 2024 · A $20 million fine paid by Wynn Resorts Ltd. in 2019 connected to sexual harassment allegations holds the record for the highest fine ever paid in Nevada.<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    [PDF] May 15, 2025 News Release - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    May 15, 2025 · The Stipulation includes a fine of $5,500,000 payable to Nevada's General Fund, and dictates specific conditions be placed on the gaming license ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  64. [64]
    Money laundering investigation into Fontainebleau revealed as ...
    May 22, 2025 · Fontainebleau Las Vegas is under investigation by state gaming regulators for potentially violating anti-money laundering laws (AML).Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Complaint - Nevada Gaming Control Board
    Apr 17, 2025 · Violation of any provision of the Nevada Gaming Control Act or of these regulations by a licensee, the licensee's agent or employee shall be ...
  66. [66]
    Recent Enforcement Actions a Reminder of the Importance of BSA ...
    May 29, 2025 · One way in which Nevada regulators review licensees' BSA compliance is through the Nevada Gaming Control Board's (“NGCB”) periodic compliance ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Money Laundering Risks for Online Gambling - State Bar of Nevada
    In short, FinCEN expects casinos to have the same robust. Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”) programs to detect and deter money laundering ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Safeguards for Nevada Gaming Licensees and Operators
    The Nevada Gaming Control. Board will continue to work to enforce the Nevada's gaming laws and regulations, thus requiring Nevada casinos to navigate this ...
  69. [69]
    Two Las Vegas men arrested in alleged embezzlement scheme ...
    Feb 11, 2023 · Two Las Vegas men arrested in alleged embezzlement scheme following Nevada Gaming Control Board investigation. Super Bowl ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Nevada Gaming Control Board disrupts embezzlment scheme
    Apr 3, 2024 · Beginning in December of 2022, the Board began an investigation into the fraudulent cash adjustments being made at various sports wagering ...
  71. [71]
    Resorts World faces $10.5 million fine from Nevada gaming regulators
    Mar 20, 2025 · Nevada gaming authorities are seeking a $10.5 million fine against Resorts World and its parent companies, according to a Thursday news release.
  72. [72]
    Casinos can do more with AI than enhance customer service and ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Additionally, it can monitor transactions to flag efforts to avoid cash reporting thresholds, and large cash deposits that are cashed out in ...
  73. [73]
    ACAMS Southern Nevada Chapter July 2025 Event
    Jul 23, 2025 · ACAMS Southern Nevada Chapter July 2025 Event: The Nevada Gaming Control Board's Role in Compliance, Enforcement, and AML Oversight.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Compliance Unit - State Bar of Nevada
    Internal testing of procedures and processes required by the compliance plan, as well as an examination of requisite due diligence efforts and recordkeeping,.Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  75. [75]
    What are they hiding?: Gaming Control Board plays by a different set ...
    May 23, 2024 · The Nevada Gaming Control Board has an exemption that most other law enforcement does not. That, experts say, prevents transparency and accountability.Missing: concerns | Show results with:concerns
  76. [76]
    Confidential documents contradict Gaming Control Board's claims to ...
    Jun 5, 2023 · “IT staff are woefully undertrained,” wrote a Nevada Gaming Control Board official. (Ronda Churchill/Nevada Current). Character, honesty, and ...
  77. [77]
    Culinary Union raises transparency concerns regarding Virgin Las ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · The Nevada Gaming Control Board's agenda for Virgin Las Vegas' gaming license application does not make it clear whether state regulators have ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] License To Cheat The Hypocrisy Of Nevada Gaming Regulation ...
    While these actions might have some legal merit, critics argue they're often employed as delaying tactics or as a means to undermine the NGCB's authority. The ...
  79. [79]
    Resorts World fields 'dream team' as Gaming Commission signs off ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · The Nevada Gaming Commission on Thursday agreed to a stipulated agreement and $10.5 million fine against Resorts World Las Vegas.
  80. [80]
    Unpacking the NGCB Resorts World Complaint - Kinectify
    Aug 19, 2024 · The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) filed a 12-count complaint against Resorts World Las Vegas (RWLV) alleging significant regulatory violations.
  81. [81]
    Nevada Gaming Control Board settles complaint with MGM Resorts ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Nevada Gaming Control Board settles complaint with MGM Resorts for $8.5M ... The April 2025 Nevada Gaming Commission meeting highlighted ...<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29/news-views-gossip/sports-book-operator-cantor-gaming-accused-short-changing-sports-bettors-ngcb-1610121-post50054747/
  83. [83]
    Here's a recap of this session's Nevada legislation impacting the ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Existing law established fines of not more than $100,000 for certain violations and not more than $250,000 for each separate violation. “They ...
  84. [84]
    Schuetz: Nevada Gaming Control Board Has Officially Lost Its Way
    May 28, 2024 · Schuetz: The Nevada Gaming Control Board Has Officially Lost Its Way. The type of turnover seen at the top of the NGCB is a recipe for disaster, ...
  85. [85]
    https://www.womblebonddickinson.com/us/insights/alerts/navigating-nevada-gaming-applications-lessons-recent-hearings
  86. [86]
    Culinary ends strike at Virgin, reaching an agreement after 69 days
    Jan 22, 2025 · A 69-day strike by some 700 non-gaming workers at Virgin Hotels Las Vegas quietly ended Wednesday with a joint announcement that a new contract had been ...
  87. [87]
    Workers at a Las Vegas casino are on strike. Here's what to know
    Nov 28, 2024 · The work stoppage at Virgin Hotels Las Vegas marks the first open-ended strike in more than two decades for the Culinary Workers Union, ...
  88. [88]
    1 month into strike, Culinary Union launches VirginLasVegasAlert ...
    Dec 17, 2024 · The contract at Virgin Las Vegas expired on June 1, 2023. For months, the Culinary Union has been reaching out to locals, venue performers, ...
  89. [89]
    This Union-Owned Vegas Hotel is Hiring Scabs to Break a Strike
    Nov 21, 2024 · Virgin Hotels Las Vegas was still proposing a $0 raise for the first three years of a five-year contract. That's why Gonzalez and her 700 co-workers walked out.
  90. [90]
    Culinary Union to bring Virgin Las Vegas strikers to the Nevada ...
    Dec 3, 2024 · Virgin Las Vegas strikers will be attending the Nevada Gaming Control Board meeting to provide public comment and share updates about the on-going strike.
  91. [91]
    Regulators OK new Virgin casino operator as striking union ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · Virgin Hotels Las Vegas' top two executives were granted full control of casino operations amid an intensifying labor dispute with striking workers.
  92. [92]
    Amid strike, Nevada regulators recommend new operators for Virgin ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · Amid strike, Nevada regulators recommend new operators for Virgin Hotels Las Vegas ... Nevada Gaming Control Board. Buck Wargo, CDC Gaming.
  93. [93]
    Virgin Hotels Las Vegas Leadership Transition Amid Union Strike
    Dec 6, 2024 · The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) granted preliminary approval to the newly formed entity C&C 4455, which will manage day-to-day gaming ...
  94. [94]
    New Virgin Hotels Las Vegas casino operator approved as labor ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · Nevada gaming regulators on Wednesday approved a new casino operator for Virgin Hotels Las Vegas as a prolonged labor dispute with striking ...
  95. [95]
    Las Vegas hotel workers union reaches deal with casino ... - AP News
    Jan 23, 2025 · The Culinary Workers Union announced Wednesday that workers voted unanimously to ratify a new contract with Virgin Hotels Las Vegas. Workers ...
  96. [96]
    Hospitality workers at Virgin Las Vegas reach deal to end strike
    Jan 24, 2025 · The Culinary Union ratified a new five-year contract with the hotel, ending one of the longest strikes in the city's recent history.
  97. [97]
    With strike settled, Virgin Las Vegas shifts focus to becoming a 'fully ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · The hotel and casino are no longer separate businesses at the off-Strip resort that used March Madness to tip off its new structure.<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Hospitality Workers Taking Contract Fight to Nevada Gaming ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · The contract at Virgin Las Vegas expired on June 1, 2023, and just before the strike started, Virgin offered a contract proposing a 30-cent ...
  99. [99]
    Nevada integrity system vital in detecting alleged NBA betting scheme
    ### Summary of Nevada's Gaming Control Detecting NBA Betting Scheme (2025 Investigation)
  100. [100]
    https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/betting/sportsbooks-react-to-nba-betting-scandal-shocked-shoulder-shrug-3512108/
  101. [101]
    Nevada Regulators Warn Licensees Over Sports Contracts
    Oct 16, 2025 · The NGCB is currently embroiled in two separate lawsuits challenging the legality of sports-related prediction markets in the state. In one case ...
  102. [102]
    https://sbcamericas.com/2025/10/27/cryptocom-sports-contracts-nevada/
  103. [103]
    https://news.worldcasinodirectory.com/crypto-com-suspends-nevada-sports-prediction-markets-pending-court-appeal-120326
  104. [104]
    https://www.covers.com/industry/draftkings-defends-regulated-market-amid-nba-betting-scandal-oct-27-2025