Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Normalized difference vegetation index

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is a widely used metric that quantifies vegetation greenness by calculating the normalized difference between and reflectance values from or aerial , with the formula NDVI = ( - ) / ( + ). Values of NDVI typically range from -1 to 1, where negative values or those near zero indicate non-vegetated surfaces such as , bare , or , while values approaching 1 signify dense, healthy vegetation like forests or crops. Developed in the early 1970s, NDVI originated from studies using data from the Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS-1, later Landsat-1), where researchers John Rouse and colleagues introduced a based on the normalized difference between near-infrared and red reflectance to monitor crop seasonality in the U.S. . It was formalized and popularized by Compton Tucker in 1979, who applied the normalized difference approach to better account for atmospheric effects and solar illumination variations, enabling its application with instruments like the (AVHRR) on NOAA satellites for global monitoring. Since then, NDVI has been integrated into major programs, including Landsat missions by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), where it is derived from specific band combinations such as (Band 5 – Band 4) / (Band 5 + Band 4) for and 9. NDVI plays a critical role in , , and climate research by assessing density, health, and phenological changes over time and space. Key applications include tracking crop productivity and yield predictions, detecting stress through indices like the Temperature Vegetation Dryness Index, evaluating the impacts of such as wildfires or floods, and studying long-term trends in amid . Its simplicity and sensitivity to content make it a foundational tool in satellite-based , though it can be affected by atmospheric conditions, background, and saturation in dense canopies, prompting the development of enhanced variants.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is a widely used in that derives from the contrast between and red light to quantify the vigor and density of . It serves as a standardized metric for evaluating the presence and condition of plant cover across landscapes, leveraging the distinct spectral signatures of living . The primary purpose of NDVI is to distinguish vegetated areas from non-vegetated surfaces, such as bare , , or environments, while also monitoring health and phenological changes. This is achieved by exploiting the biophysical properties of : healthy strongly absorb due to pigmentation for , while they scatter and reflect a high proportion of NIR through internal structure, resulting in a pronounced spectral contrast compared to non-vegetated materials that reflect both wavelengths more evenly. In contrast, bare or typically shows lower NIR and minimal differences, allowing NDVI to highlight coverage effectively. NDVI produces a unitless value ranging from -1 to +1, where negative values generally indicate non-vegetated surfaces like or clouds, values near zero represent bare or sparse , and positive values—approaching 1—denote dense, healthy cover. Higher positive values correlate with greater and photosynthetic activity, providing a simple yet robust indicator of vegetation status. Developed in the , NDVI has become a foundational tool in for its sensitivity to these spectral dynamics.

Mathematical Formulation

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is defined by the following equation: \text{NDVI} = \frac{\rho_{\text{NIR}} - \rho_{\text{red}}}{\rho_{\text{NIR}} + \rho_{\text{red}}} where \rho_{\text{NIR}} denotes the surface reflectance in the near-infrared band (typically 0.7–1.1 \mum) and \rho_{\text{red}} the surface reflectance in the red band (typically 0.6–0.7 \mum). This formulation yields values ranging from -1 to +1, with higher positive values indicating denser, healthier vegetation due to stronger NIR reflectance from chlorophyll and leaf structure contrasted against red light absorption. The NDVI derives from the earlier Difference Vegetation Index (DVI), defined as DVI = \rho_{\text{[NIR](/page/NIR)}} - \rho_{\text{[red](/page/Red)}}, which highlights vegetation signals but is sensitive to absolute reflectance scales influenced by sensor calibration differences. Normalization by the denominator (\rho_{\text{[NIR](/page/NIR)}} + \rho_{\text{[red](/page/Red)}}) transforms DVI into a scale-invariant , mitigating variations from differing illumination conditions, such as solar angle changes, and sensor-specific response functions by preserving the relative contrast between bands under linear transformations. This normalization also diminishes certain external influences on the index; for instance, it reduces sensitivity to topographic effects like slope-induced compared to non-normalized indices, as the form compensates for cosine variations in incident light. Similarly, it partially alleviates atmospheric and impacts by normalizing against total , though full atmospheric correction remains advisable for precise applications. Computation requires surface values rather than raw digital numbers (DN), as DN represent uncalibrated outputs that introduce and errors distorting the ; is obtained via radiometric calibration and atmospheric correction from s such as Landsat Thematic Mapper or MODIS.

Historical Development

Origins and Invention

The Normalized Difference Index (NDVI) was first proposed in 1973 by John W. Rouse Jr., Robert H. Haas, John A. Schell, and Dwight W. Deering at A&M University's Center, as part of NASA's Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS-1) program, later renamed Landsat-1. This index emerged from efforts to quantify vigor using multispectral data from the satellite's Multispectral Scanner (MSS), which provided the first systematic observations of Earth's land surface starting in 1972. The development built on prior assessment techniques, including the simple difference introduced by C. Fred Jordan in 1969, which subtracted red from near-infrared (NIR) to highlight absorption and properties. Rouse et al. formalized NDVI as a normalized to enhance sensitivity to cover while minimizing soil background and atmospheric influences, enabling repeatable assessments of crop and natural conditions across large areas. The primary motivation for NDVI's creation stemmed from NASA's Landsat initiative in the early 1970s, aimed at addressing agricultural and needs amid rapid and expanding global food demands. Launched in response to U.S. government interests in , the program sought tools to track dynamics in regions like the , where traditional ground surveys were inefficient. Early Landsat data revealed strong spectral contrasts between healthy (high , low red ) and bare or stressed plants, prompting the need for a robust index to map photosynthetic activity and biomass non-destructively. This aligned with broader 1970s advancements in satellite remote sensing, including the push for operational applications in , assessment, and surveillance. Compton J. Tucker, a researcher at NASA's , advanced NDVI's practical utility through his influential 1979 publication, which demonstrated its effectiveness for regional vegetation monitoring using Landsat MSS data over test sites in the Midwest and . Tucker's analysis introduced linear combinations of and photographic infrared bands, confirming NDVI's formulation and showing its direct proportionality to green biomass and canopy development. Initial validations in this work and contemporaneous studies revealed NDVI's sensitivity to (LAI), with values increasing linearly with LAI up to moderate canopy densities, allowing differentiation between sparse and dense vegetation based on intercepted . These early tests established NDVI as a foundational metric for satellite-based tracking, paving the way for its integration into global observation frameworks.

Evolution and Adoption

Following its initial development, NDVI saw significant adoption in the 1980s through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) (AVHRR) sensor, which enabled global-scale vegetation monitoring starting with data from 1981. This integration facilitated the creation of long-term datasets, such as the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) NDVI archive, which provided consistent time-series data for analyzing vegetation dynamics and trends over large areas. By the mid-1980s, AVHRR-derived NDVI had become a cornerstone for operational , supporting early efforts in and assessment. In the , NDVI expanded to higher-resolution platforms like the Système Pour l'Observation de la Terre () satellite's High Resolution Visible (HRV) instrument, launched in 1986 but widely adopted for vegetation studies by the early 1990s, allowing for more detailed regional analyses compared to AVHRR's coarser scale. Concurrently, NDVI processing became embedded in (GIS) software, such as ERDAS Imagine and Arc/Info, enabling seamless integration of satellite data with tools for enhanced mapping and workflows. This period marked a shift toward practical, user-friendly applications in , broadening NDVI's accessibility beyond specialized communities. By the 2000s, organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) advanced NDVI standardization for drought and crop monitoring protocols. The FAO incorporated NDVI into systems like the precursors to the Agricultural Stress Index System (ASIS), utilizing AVHRR data from the 1980s onward but formalizing protocols for global crop yield estimation and early warning in the early 2000s. Similarly, the USGS developed the Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI) in 2008, standardizing NDVI with climate and biophysical models to produce weekly drought maps across the U.S., improving operational reliability for agricultural and ecological assessments. Post-2010 advancements have focused on enhancing NDVI accuracy through hyperspectral data and techniques, addressing limitations in and atmospheric interference. Hyperspectral sensors, such as those on the Hyperion instrument (2000–2017) and later missions like PRISMA (launched 2019), have enabled refined NDVI derivations with narrower bands for better discrimination. models, including random forests and neural networks, have been applied to fuse multispectral NDVI with hyperspectral inputs, improving predictive accuracy for by up to 20% in datasets. These integrations, evident in projects like the 2023 GIMMS NDVI update, represent a modern evolution toward more robust, data-driven monitoring.

Calculation and Interpretation

Data Requirements and Processing

Computing the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) requires multispectral data capturing in the near-infrared (, typically 0.7-1.1 μm) and (0.6-0.7 μm) bands, as these wavelengths are essential for distinguishing vigor through absorption in the and reflection in the . These bands are available from various satellite platforms equipped with multispectral imagers. Common data sources include Landsat satellites, which provide 30 m imagery with (Band 4: 0.64-0.67 μm) and (Band 5: 0.85-0.88 μm) bands suitable for regional-scale analysis. offers higher resolution at 10 m for the (Band 4: 0.665 μm) and (Band 8: 0.842 μm) bands, enabling detailed monitoring over diverse landscapes. For global-scale applications, MODIS delivers NDVI products at 250 m resolution using (Band 1: 0.62-0.67 μm) and (Band 2: 0.841-0.876 μm) bands, supporting broad temporal coverage. Prior to NDVI calculation, raw satellite data undergoes several preprocessing steps to ensure accuracy and comparability. Atmospheric correction is critical to remove and effects from aerosols and gases, with methods like FLAASH (Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes) in ENVI software converting radiance to surface by modeling atmospheric conditions. Geometric aligns the imagery to a standard map projection, correcting for sensor distortions and earth curvature using ground control points to achieve sub-pixel accuracy. Additionally, data is often converted to top-of-atmosphere (TOA) , which normalizes for solar illumination and sensor gains, providing a baseline for further processing into bottom-of-atmosphere values if needed. Various software tools facilitate NDVI processing, from desktop applications to cloud-based platforms. ENVI supports advanced preprocessing like FLAASH for atmospheric correction and band math for index computation on individual images. , an open-source GIS tool, enables geometric rectification and NDVI calculation via raster calculator plugins, suitable for local workflows. excels in large datasets, allowing scripted atmospheric correction, mosaicking, and NDVI generation across without downloading data. An example workflow for a single Landsat image in involves loading the collection, applying a cloud mask, performing TOA reflectance conversion, and computing NDVI as ( - ) / ( + ) using the image reducer, followed by or .

Interpretation of Values

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) produces values ranging from -1 to +1, where the specific range provides insights into surface characteristics and vegetation status. Values between -1 and 0 typically correspond to non-vegetated or non-photosynthetic surfaces, such as , clouds, or , due to high in the near-infrared relative to . Values from 0 to 0.2 indicate bare , areas, or very sparse cover, reflecting minimal photosynthetic activity and dominance of reflectance. In the range of 0.2 to 0.5, NDVI signifies sparse to moderate , such as shrubs or grasslands, where plant cover begins to dominate but remains incomplete. Values from 0.5 to 1 denote dense and healthy , like forests or crops at peak growth, characterized by strong near-infrared reflectance from healthy leaves. Temporally, NDVI values fluctuate with seasonal cycles, typically peaking during the growing season when content is high and declining during or , enabling the tracking of phenological stages such as leaf emergence and fall. For instance, in temperate regions, NDVI may rise from below 0.3 in winter to over 0.7 in summer, reflecting active . Spatially, NDVI patterns facilitate mapping of vegetation cover fraction, where continuous gradients from low to high values delineate areas of increasing plant density across landscapes. Anomalies, such as unexpected low values in vegetated regions, signal stress from factors like or pests by deviating from baseline spatial distributions. NDVI readings are influenced by soil background, particularly in partially vegetated areas, where brighter soils can elevate values by 0.1 or more compared to darker soils for equivalent vegetation cover, leading to overestimation of greenness. Similarly, leaf angle distribution affects NDVI through changes in canopy light scattering; for example, canopies with more horizontal leaves (planophile structure) exhibit higher NDVI than those with vertical leaves (erectophile) at the same , due to enhanced near-infrared reflectance, necessitating structural adjustments for accurate comparisons.

Applications

Agricultural Monitoring

In agricultural monitoring, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) plays a pivotal role in assessing health through time-series analysis, enabling the detection of stressors such as deficiencies, infestations, and issues. By tracking changes in NDVI values over the , farmers can identify areas where vegetation vigor declines, often indicating underlying problems like shortages that reduce content and lower NDVI below typical thresholds (e.g., <0.4 for stressed ). Similarly, sudden drops in NDVI can signal damage or stress, allowing for targeted interventions such as adjusted applications or schedules to mitigate losses. This approach is particularly effective when integrated with multispectral sensors on ground-based equipment or aerial platforms, providing high-resolution maps for real-time decision-making in . NDVI also supports yield prediction models by correlating with biomass accumulation, especially through the integration of NDVI values (iNDVI) across key growth stages. Studies have shown strong relationships between seasonal NDVI integrals and final yields, with coefficients of determination (r²) exceeding 0.7 in wheat fields, demonstrating reliable forecasting for harvest planning and resource allocation. For instance, models using NDVI time series from satellite or proximal sensors during vegetative and reproductive phases can predict yields with sufficient accuracy to inform market strategies and insurance assessments, prioritizing cumulative greenness over single-date measurements. A key application of NDVI in farming is variable rate application (VRA), where spatial variability in health guides site-specific inputs like fertilizers and pesticides. Drones and satellites deliver NDVI maps that delineate zones of high and low vigor, enabling automated equipment to apply resources only where needed, such as increasing in low-NDVI areas to address deficiencies. This technology has transitioned from tractor-mounted sensors to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and orbital platforms, optimizing input costs and reducing environmental impacts by up to 20-30% in nitrogen use efficiency for cereals. Notable case studies highlight NDVI's impact on drought assessment and global food security. In the U.S. Corn Belt during the 2012 drought, NDVI-derived indices from MODIS data accurately mapped yield reductions in affected counties, predicting national corn shortfalls weeks ahead of official reports and aiding emergency responses. Globally, the Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO) Global Information and Early Warning System (GIEWS) incorporates NDVI into its Agricultural Stress Index System (ASIS) to monitor crop conditions in vulnerable regions, issuing alerts for potential food crises based on vegetation anomalies and supporting anticipatory actions for food security.

Environmental and Ecological Uses

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) plays a crucial role in tracking in natural ecosystems, particularly in the , where it helps quantify vegetation loss through changes in spectral reflectance. Studies utilizing MODIS satellite data have employed NDVI to detect and annual deforestation hotspots, revealing that the Brazilian experienced peak annual losses of approximately 29,000 km² in 2003–2004, followed by a decline to under 6,000 km² per year in the due to policy interventions. Over the 2000–2020 period, cumulative in the region totaled around 400,000 km², with NDVI enabling the differentiation of forest clearance from degradation, thus informing conservation strategies. In assessing , NDVI is widely applied to monitor the impacts of disturbances like and on non-agricultural landscapes such as grasslands and . For instance, multi-index analyses combining NDVI with other metrics have tracked post- in desert grasslands, showing delayed regreening after severe burns and heightened vulnerability during in . Similarly, in wetland systems, NDVI-derived trends in vegetation greenness have revealed patterns following scars, with normalized difference indices highlighting moisture-dependent resilience in areas like the , where extreme reduced NDVI by up to 23% in affected zones. These applications underscore NDVI's utility in evaluating stress without ground-based interventions. NDVI serves as a proxy for biodiversity through its established relationship with leaf area index (LAI), which correlates positively with habitat quality and in conservation efforts. Empirical studies demonstrate moderate to strong linear relationships between NDVI and LAI (r ≈ 0.5–0.7), allowing remote estimation of canopy density as an indicator of suitable habitats for wildlife. In diverse systems like Hawaiian dry forests and urban avian habitats, higher NDVI values predict increased taxonomic and functional diversity, aiding prioritization of protected areas. This linkage supports broader ecological assessments, such as dynamic habitat indices derived from NDVI for global biodiversity monitoring. For climate change applications, long-term NDVI datasets reveal global greening trends, reflecting enhanced vegetation productivity amid rising CO₂ levels. analyses of AVHRR data since the 1980s indicate a persistent increase in global NDVI at a rate of 0.0008 per year, equivalent to roughly a 14% expansion in vegetated leaf area over four decades, primarily in northern high latitudes and . This greening has mitigated some warming effects through increased , though it masks regional browning in stressed ecosystems like parts of the . Such trends inform models of and ecosystem shifts under future climate scenarios.

Other Remote Sensing Applications

Beyond its primary roles in and natural ecosystems, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) finds applications in , where it is employed to map green spaces and assess vegetation cover for mitigating urban heat islands. Studies utilizing Landsat imagery have demonstrated that higher NDVI values correlate with cooler land surface temperatures in densely built environments, enabling planners to identify areas for development to reduce heat island effects. For instance, geospatial analyses of urban vegetation using NDVI-derived maps have shown that increasing canopy cover by 10-20% can lower surface temperatures by up to 2-4°C in metropolitan areas. In disaster , NDVI facilitates post-event monitoring through techniques, particularly for wildfires and floods. Following wildfires, pre- and post-fire NDVI comparisons reveal loss and regeneration rates, with studies indicating that burned areas often exhibit NDVI drops of 0.2-0.5, followed by partial within 1-3 years depending on practices. Similarly, in flood scenarios, NDVI-based identifies inundated zones, aiding in damage assessment and restoration prioritization by highlighting areas where NDVI values remain suppressed below 0.2 for extended periods post-flood. NDVI is integrated into land use classification workflows, often combined with supervised machine learning algorithms to delineate urban-rural boundaries. By thresholding NDVI values—typically above 0.3 for vegetated rural areas and below 0.2 for urban impervious surfaces—models like support vector machines or random forests achieve classification accuracies exceeding 85% when fused with multispectral data. This approach supports urban expansion monitoring and zoning decisions by mapping gradients from high-NDVI rural landscapes to low-NDVI city cores. Emerging applications extend NDVI to and aquatic environments. In planetary analogs, such as greenhouses simulating Mars habitats, NDVI monitors plant growth under extreme conditions, with values used to optimize controlled environments for potential agriculture. For studies, low or negative NDVI values (often below 0) effectively delineate water bodies from land, supporting the isolation of coastal zones in broader analyses.

Performance and Limitations

Strengths and Advantages

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) offers significant simplicity in its computation, requiring only two spectral bands—near-infrared () and light—from standard imagery, which allows for straightforward implementation without complex algorithms or additional preprocessing steps. This ease of calculation stems from its ratio-based formula, which normalizes differences between the bands to reduce multiplicative noise such as variations in illumination or atmospheric effects. NDVI demonstrates exceptional scalability, applicable across spatial resolutions from local field-level assessments using drones to continental and global monitoring via satellites like MODIS, facilitating the creation of consistent long-term datasets spanning decades. This versatility enables seamless integration of multi-scale observations, supporting analyses from individual plots to planetary trends without requiring sensor-specific adjustments. The index exhibits high sensitivity to vegetation characteristics, with strong correlations to key biophysical parameters such as (LAI) and photosynthetic activity; for instance, studies report strong correlations (R² typically 0.70-0.90) with LAI in various vegetation types, accurately detecting greenness levels indicative of plant vigor. Similarly, NDVI values align closely with rates of , particularly in canopies where chlorophyll absorption in the red band and NIR reflectance from healthy leaves enhance detection of physiological health. NDVI's cost-effectiveness is a major advantage, leveraging freely available satellite data from sources like Landsat and MODIS, which minimizes the need for expensive fieldwork and ground surveys while providing repeatable, large-area coverage. This accessibility democratizes vegetation monitoring, allowing resource-limited researchers and organizations to conduct analyses that would otherwise require substantial on-site measurements.

Challenges and Constraints

One prominent limitation of the NDVI is its saturation effect, where the index reaches a plateau at values above approximately 0.8, rendering it insensitive to further increases in , particularly in dense forests with (LAI) exceeding 2-3. This underestimation occurs because the near-infrared reflectance, which drives higher NDVI values, asymptotes in high- environments, leading to reduced discrimination of productivity variations in tropical rainforests and other closed-canopy ecosystems. Atmospheric interference poses another significant challenge, as clouds, , and can distort NDVI readings by or absorbing , particularly in the and near-infrared bands, without appropriate . For instance, aerosol presence reduces the contrast between and near-infrared reflectances, systematically lowering NDVI values and introducing biases that propagate through analyses. Soil background and geometric factors further complicate NDVI accuracy, with soil reflectance biasing results in areas of low vegetation cover, where bare soil brightness can inflate or deflate the index by up to 0.30 units depending on soil type and color. Additionally, view angle and effects, influenced by sun-target-sensor geometry, cause variability in NDVI measurements, exacerbating inconsistencies in off-nadir observations from satellites. Temporal resolution is constrained by frequent cloud cover in optical remote sensing data, creating gaps in NDVI time series that hinder continuous monitoring, though alternatives such as synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can provide complementary data unaffected by clouds.

Related Concepts

Similar Vegetation Indices

The Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) addresses limitations of NDVI by incorporating a blue band to mitigate atmospheric and soil background noise, providing improved sensitivity in high-biomass regions. Its formulation is given by EVI = 2.5 \frac{NIR - Red}{NIR + 6 \cdot Red - 7.5 \cdot Blue + 1}, where NIR, Red, and Blue represent near-infrared, red, and blue reflectance values, respectively. The Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) corrects for soil brightness influences in areas with sparse vegetation cover by introducing a soil adjustment factor L, typically set to 0.5 for general use. The index is calculated as SAVI = \frac{NIR - Red}{NIR + Red + L} \cdot (1 + L), enhancing the detection of vegetation signals over variable soil backgrounds. The Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) modifies the NDVI approach by substituting the green band for the red band, making it particularly sensitive to content and suitable for monitoring early growth stages or low-biomass conditions. Its formula is GNDVI = \frac{[NIR](/page/NIR) - [Green](/page/Green)}{[NIR](/page/NIR) + [Green](/page/Green)}. This index leverages the green reflectances to better capture photosynthetic activity in developing canopies. Related but distinct indices include the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), which uses green and near-infrared bands to delineate open water bodies via the formula NDWI = \frac{Green - NIR}{Green + NIR}, and the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR), designed for assessing fire severity with near-infrared and shortwave infrared bands in NBR = \frac{NIR - SWIR}{NIR + SWIR}.

Comparisons and Alternatives

The (EVI) addresses key limitations of NDVI in areas with high (LAI), where NDVI often saturates and loses sensitivity to further increases in density. EVI incorporates a to correct for atmospheric and background noise, providing greater and accuracy in dense canopies, such as forests or crops with LAI exceeding 3 m²/m². In contrast, NDVI remains simpler and more computationally efficient for regions with sparse or low , where its near-infrared-red contrast suffices without additional bands. The Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) improves upon NDVI in environments with partial vegetation cover and prominent exposure, such as arid and semi-arid regions, by introducing a soil brightness correction factor to reduce background . Studies in semi-arid zones like Kuwait's Sulaibiya area demonstrate that SAVI achieves higher with ground-measured vegetation cover (R² ≈ 0.88 at 30 m ) compared to NDVI (R² ≈ 0.66), SAVI is thus preferred for monitoring sparse canopies in , where NDVI underestimates due to reflectance dominance. Alternatives like the Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI), a hyperspectral index, are selected for detecting vegetation stress and rather than overall , as PRI tracks pigment changes responsive to water or light stress before structural damage appears. In cloud-prone tropical or rainy regions, radar-based approaches using () backscatter serve as robust alternatives to NDVI, penetrating clouds to provide consistent vegetation proxies with mean absolute errors around 0.10 when modeling NDVI equivalents globally. NDVI benefits from its long-standing global legacy and simplicity, enabling decades of standardized datasets, but newer indices like EVI and SAVI offer greater specificity to environmental confounders at the cost of added complexity. Ensemble methods combining multiple indices, including NDVI with EVI or SAVI, enhance overall accuracy in applications like classification, achieving up to 81.6% detection rates for land changes compared to single-index baselines.

References

  1. [1]
    Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) - NASA Earthdata
    NASA's Earth satellites collect NDVI data to measure the “greenness” of vegetation for studies of climate change, agriculture, and natural disasters.Missing: formula history
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Historical Perspectives on AVHRR NDVI and Vegetation Drought ...
    Eventually, researchers agreed upon the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as the most efficient and simple metric to identify vegetated areas and ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  3. [3]
    [PDF] NOAA NESDIS R for SATELLITE APPLICATIONS and RESEARCH
    Aug 27, 2010 · Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is an important land surface characteristic derived from satellite data. It is widely used to ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  4. [4]
    Landsat Normalized Difference Vegetation Index - USGS.gov
    In Landsat 8-9, NDVI = (Band 5 – Band 4) / (Band 5 + Band 4). NDVI is delivered as a single band product, specified as shown in the table below. Landsat ...
  5. [5]
    Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS
    A method has been developed for quantitative measurement of vegetation conditions over broad regions using ERTS-1 MSS data.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Why Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)? - UTEP CS
    In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for the formula (1). 2 Towards an Explanation: General Analysis of the Problem. Different scales. When we ...
  7. [7]
    USGS EROS Archive - Vegetation Monitoring - NOAA CDR NDVI
    Jul 17, 2018 · This NDVI collection provides the global change and resource management communities with vegetation data for historical trend analysis and ...
  8. [8]
    Effect of radiometric corrections on NDVI-determined from SPOT ...
    In this article, the main factors affecting NDVI are analyzed: proper characteristics (MTF) and absolute calibration of the satellite sensor, Sun zenith angle, ...
  9. [9]
    A Systematic Review on the Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · Remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) applications in ecosystem health monitoring are becoming more universal ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Automated Update of an Irrigated Lands GIS Using SPOT HRV ...
    Pixels with Greenness values above a minimum. Greenness threshold were identified as having a significant amount of green vegetation, indicating irrigation, ...
  11. [11]
    FAO Agriculture Stress Index System (ASIS)
    Data at 1 km resolution for the period 1984-2006 was derived from the NOAA-AVHRR dataset at 16 km resolution. The crop mask is FAO GLC-SHARE.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and ...
    Research on VegDRI began in 2002 when scientists from the USGS EROS and the University of Nebraska–Lin- coln began developing a drought monitoring tool with ...
  13. [13]
    Toward Automated Machine Learning-Based Hyperspectral Image ...
    Feb 24, 2022 · This research integrated two important open-sourced systems (R and Python) combined with automated hyperspectral narrowband vegetation index calculation.
  14. [14]
    Spatiotemporally consistent global dataset of the GIMMS ... - ESSD
    Sep 25, 2023 · In this study, we presented a machine learning model that employed massive high-quality global Landsat NDVI samples and a data consolidation method.Missing: HRV | Show results with:HRV<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Spectral Indices for Land and Aquatic Applications Part 2
    Nov 2, 2023 · The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is one of the most used indices for analyzing vegetation health. – It is a simple relationship ...
  16. [16]
    Characterization of Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 top of atmosphere ...
    Sep 15, 2018 · First, the satellite data and pre-processing required to allow their meaningful comparison are described, and then the analysis methodology and ...Missing: preprocessing steps
  17. [17]
    MODIS Web
    ### MODIS NDVI Product Summary
  18. [18]
    Atmospheric Corrections with FLAASH - NV5GeospatialSoftware.com
    FLAASH is a first-principles atmospheric correction tool that corrects wavelengths in the visible through near-infrared and shortwave infrared regions, up to 3 ...
  19. [19]
    A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing - ESA Journals - Wiley
    Jan 10, 2017 · Preprocessing steps commonly applied to Landsat data are differentiated and explained, including georeferencing and co-registration, conversion ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Atmospheric Correction Module: QUAC and FLAASH User's Guide
    The parameters for ENVI FLAASH include selecting an input radiance image, setting output file defaults, entering information about the sensor and scene, ...
  21. [21]
    QGIS Python Plugins Repository - Google Earth Engine
    Integrates Google Earth Engine (GEE) by wrapping GEE Python API. Author: Gennadii Donchyts, Xavier C. Llano, Fedor Baart, Zac Deziel, Anthony Lukach.
  22. [22]
    NDVI, Mapping a Function over a Collection, Quality Mosaicking
    Oct 6, 2023 · You want to add NDVI to every image in an image collection. The way to do that in Earth Engine is to map() a function over the collection.
  23. [23]
    NDVI, the Foundation for Remote Sensing Phenology - USGS.gov
    Remote sensing phenology studies use data gathered by satellite sensors that measure wavelengths of light absorbed and reflected by green plants.
  24. [24]
    Measuring Vegetation (NDVI & EVI) - NASA Earth Observatory
    Aug 30, 2000 · Moderate values represent shrub and grassland (0.2 to 0.3), while high values indicate temperate and tropical rainforests (0.6 to 0.8). In an ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] modis vegetation index (mod 13)
    Apr 30, 1999 · He showed the NDVI to vary greatly with leaf angle which alters the optical thickness of the canopy. He also showed that due to the non-linear ...
  26. [26]
    Crowd-Driven Deep Learning Tracks Amazon Deforestation - MDPI
    Deforestation rates reached their peak in the Brazilian Amazon in the period 2003–2004 [7] at 29,000 km2 per year, thereafter declining to below 6000 km2 per ...
  27. [27]
    Deforestation and fires in the Brazilian Amazon from 2001 to 2020
    Jan 15, 2023 · This study aims to analyze the deforestation and burned areas in the Amazon from 2001 to 2020, considering their impacts on rainfall variability and LST.
  28. [28]
    Multi-index time series monitoring of drought and fire effects on ...
    Sep 15, 2016 · In this research paper we describe the temporal response of grassland communities to drought and fire in southern Arizona.Missing: wetlands | Show results with:wetlands
  29. [29]
    Wetland Fire Scar Monitoring and Its Response to Changes of the ...
    Fire is an important disturbance factor which results in the irreversible change of land surface ecosystems and leads to a new ecological status after the fire ...
  30. [30]
    Relationship between observed LAI to NDVI. - ResearchGate
    Pearson correlations indicated moderate positive relationships between LAI and both DBH (r = 0.49) and BA (r = 0.53), whereas NDVI displayed the strongest ...
  31. [31]
    EVI and NDVI as proxies for multifaceted avian diversity in urban areas
    Jan 23, 2023 · NDVI mean was the best predictor for most avian diversity facets: taxonomic diversity, functional richness and evenness, phylogenetic diversity ...
  32. [32]
    Bridging Satellite Productivity and Global Biodiversity: Unveiling ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · This study examines the effectiveness of dynamic habitat indices (DHIs) derived from satellite vegetation products.
  33. [33]
    Persistent global greening over the last four decades using novel ...
    Sep 1, 2024 · Our refined NDVI and NIRv datasets showed a persistent global greening trend over the last four decades (NDVI: 0.0008 yr −1 ; NIRv: 0.0003 yr −1 ).
  34. [34]
    Global Green Up Slows Warming - NASA Earth Observatory
    Feb 17, 2020 · Scientists say that global greening since the early 1980s may have reduced global warming by as much as 0.2° to 0.25° Celsius (0.36° to 0.45° Fahrenheit).Missing: NDVI | Show results with:NDVI
  35. [35]
    Global Greening - Climate at a Glance
    NDVI also identifies water, deserts, and ice. NASA's results confirm earlier research which found that the 14 percent increase in atmospheric CO2 between 1982 ...
  36. [36]
    Measuring the cooling effects of green cover on urban heat island ...
    May 28, 2024 · Our study demonstrates that the cooling mechanism of UGS on UHI includes radiation range, types and spatial distribution of UGS.
  37. [37]
    Determination of land surface temperature and urban heat island ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · This study, utilizing Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 satellite imagery, investigates the evolution of land surface temperatures (LST) and urban heat island (UHI) ...
  38. [38]
    Geospatial analysis of vegetation and land surface temperature for ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · To mitigate urban heat islands, it is crucial to use advanced geospatial techniques to map and analyze vegetation and land surface temperature ...
  39. [39]
    Vegetation change detection and recovery assessment based on ...
    Jun 1, 2024 · In this study, we provide a novel methodology to understand and evaluate post-fire effects on vegetation. In regions affected by wildfires, ...
  40. [40]
    Post-Disaster Wildfire Recovery and Monitoring
    Jan 27, 2025 · Normalised Burn Ratio (NBR) and Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are consistently used to evaluate vegetation loss and recovery.
  41. [41]
    The effect of post-wildfire management practices on vegetation ...
    Apr 6, 2023 · Results show that mean NDVI values in areas affected by post-fire management practices have ∼50% recovery between 2017 and 2021. On the other ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Evaluating Flood Damages using Land Cover Changes Detection
    May 26, 2025 · The study uses satellite imagery and change detection to map flooded areas and land use shifts, focusing on the Karlovo region in Bulgaria.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Mapping urban-rural gradients of settlements and vegetation at ...
    Sep 1, 2020 · Temporal Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) metrics were, together with phenometrics or land surface temperature, shown to be useful ...Missing: supervised | Show results with:supervised
  44. [44]
    A Land Cover Classification Method for High-Resolution Remote ...
    Oct 30, 2022 · Here, we propose a deep learning fusion network that effectively utilizes NDVI, called the Dense-Spectral-Location-NDVI network (DSLN).
  45. [45]
    Land cover and land use classification performance of machine ...
    In this article, I compare the classification performance of four non-parametric algorithms: support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), extreme ...Missing: rural | Show results with:rural
  46. [46]
    NDVI imaging within space exploration plant growth modules
    This project examines the deployment of NDVI-like capabilities within a planetary analog greenhouse on the Antarctic ice shelf. The EDEN ISS Antarctica project ...
  47. [47]
    5 Things To Know About NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation ...
    Sep 1, 2020 · NDVI was created in 1973 when a research team at Texas A&M University studied data beamed back from earliest Earth observation satellites ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the ...
    The strength of the NDVI is in its ratioing concept, which reduces many forms of multiplicative noise (illumination differences, cloud shadows, atmospheric ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Estimating LAI of Rice Using NDVI Derived from MODIS Surface ...
    Dec 14, 2020 · Yang and Su then developed a correlation between the computed LAI and in-situ NDVI. A linear regression gave results with R2=0.982 for SPOT HRV ...
  50. [50]
    Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and ... - ESA Journals
    Feb 1, 1995 · Maximum daily photosynthetic rates were positively correlated with NDVI and SR in annual grassland and semideciduous shrubs where canopy ...
  51. [51]
    Reliability of vegetation resilience estimates depends on biomass ...
    Sep 14, 2023 · It is well known that using NDVI over dense tropical forests is problematic due to NDVI saturation32,33; signal saturation damps variability ...
  52. [52]
    Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the ...
    Non-ratioing vegetation indices such as the perpendicular vegetation index (PVI) and the green vegetation index (GVI) are generally more linear with less ...
  53. [53]
    A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) - ScienceDirect.com
    August 1988, Pages 295-309. Remote Sensing of Environment. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Author links open overlay panel A.R Huete. Show more. Add to ...
  54. [54]
    The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the ...
    The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. S. K. McFEETERS Center for Advanced Land Management ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Comparative Study of SAVI and NDVI Vegetation Indices in ...
    This study confirmed the adequacy of SAVI vegetation index over the more popular NDVI in arid and semiarid zones especially in medium ... correlated to percentage ...
  56. [56]
    A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in ...
    We present a new “physiological reflectance index” (PRI) isolated from narrow waveband spectral measurements of sunflower canopies.
  57. [57]
    A Globally Applicable Method for NDVI Estimation from Sentinel-1 ...
    Apr 13, 2023 · This paper presents a globally applicable model for the estimation of NDVI values from Sentinel-1 C-band SAR backscatter data.Missing: alternatives prone
  58. [58]
    Full article: Integration of Landsat time-series vegetation indices ...
    This study examined the spatial and temporal consistency of five VIs (EVI; NBR; NDMI; NDVI; and NIRv) in detecting abrupt and gradual vegetation changes.Missing: SPOT | Show results with:SPOT