Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

nth root

In , the nth root of a number x is a number y such that y^n = x, where n is a positive greater than 1; this operation is the inverse of by n. For x and any n, there exists a unique positive real nth root y > 0; however, if n is even and x < 0, no real nth root exists, while for odd n and negative x, the real nth root is negative. In the complex numbers, every nonzero complex number has exactly n distinct nth roots, which can be found using polar form: if x = r e^{i\theta}, the roots are \sqrt{r} e^{i(\theta + 2\pi k)/n} for k = 0, 1, \dots, n-1, with the principal root defined as the one with the smallest nonnegative argument. The notation for the nth root, \sqrt{x}, emerged in the 16th century as part of the broader acceptance of irrational numbers and radical expressions; earlier, roots were handled geometrically, as seen in Omar Khayyam's 11th-century constructions for cube roots using conic sections. The concept traces back to ancient discoveries of incommensurable lengths, such as the Pythagoreans' realization around 500 BCE that \sqrt{2} is irrational, challenging their view of numbers as discrete rationals, with further proofs of irrationality for roots like \sqrt{3} to \sqrt{17} by Theodorus around 400 BCE and formalized by Euclid in his Elements. By the 16th century, mathematicians like Michael Stifel argued for the validity of irrational roots as numbers, and Simon Stevin in 1585 advocated treating roots alongside rationals in a unified arithmetic system. Key properties of nth roots include the product rule \sqrt{xy} = \sqrt{x} \sqrt{y} for nonnegative real x, y when n is odd or both positive when even, and the quotient rule \sqrt{x/y} = \sqrt{x} / \sqrt{y} under similar conditions, enabling simplification of radical expressions in algebra. In complex analysis, nth roots are essential for solving polynomial equations via the , which guarantees n roots (counting multiplicity) for degree-n polynomials, and for , which facilitates computing powers and roots in polar form. Applications extend to roots of unity—solutions to z^n = 1—which form cyclic groups under multiplication and underpin , cyclotomic polynomials, and signal processing.

Definition and Notation

General Definition

In mathematics, for a real number x \geq 0 and an integer n \geq 2, the principal nth root of x is defined as the unique non-negative real number y \geq 0 such that y^n = x. This principal root represents the primary real solution emphasized in real analysis and algebra, ensuring a consistent non-negative value for non-negative inputs. For x > 0, the equation y^n = x has exactly one positive real solution y > 0, which is the principal nth root; for even n, a corresponding negative real solution -y also exists, but the principal is the positive one. When x = 0, the unique solution is y = 0, serving as the principal root for any n \geq 2. These properties guarantee existence and uniqueness of the principal root in the non-negative domain. For x < 0, no real nth root exists if n is even, since y^n \geq 0 for all real y. However, if n is odd, there is exactly one real solution y < 0 such that y^n = x. The principal root is distinguished as the positive real value applicable to non-negative x, while all roots encompass additional solutions, including negatives for even n and positive x, or the negative real root for odd n and negative x. This relation is equivalently expressed in exponential form as y = x^{1/n}, where the domain is restricted to x \geq 0 for even n to ensure real values, and extends to all real x for odd n.

Notation and Conventions

The principal nth root of a number x is commonly denoted using radical notation as \sqrt{x}, where n is the index placed above the radical symbol, indicating the degree of the root. This notation extends the square root symbol \sqrt{x} (where the index is implicitly 2) to higher orders, with the radicand x placed under the radical sign. An equivalent form is the exponential notation x^{1/n}, which expresses the nth root as a fractional exponent, where the numerator 1 signifies the power and the denominator n the root index. Both notations are interchangeable in most mathematical contexts, though radical notation is often preferred for its visual clarity in algebraic expressions, while exponential form facilitates operations involving exponents. By convention, the principal nth root is defined to be nonnegative for even indices n when x \geq 0, ensuring a unique real value in the nonnegative domain. For odd indices n, the principal root preserves the sign of the radicand, allowing real values for negative x; for instance, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{-8} = -2. These conventions maintain consistency in real analysis, where even roots of negative numbers are not real, but odd roots extend to the negatives. The radical symbol evolved historically from earlier notations, such as the vinculum (an overbar) used in medieval texts to denote roots, transitioning to the modern elongated "r" form derived from the Latin radix (root) by the 16th century. German mathematician Christoff Rudolff introduced a precursor in 1525, and René Descartes standardized the current radical with its index in 1637, replacing horizontal bars for compactness. In terms of placement, the index n is positioned to the left and slightly above the radical's opening arm, with the radicand centered beneath the symbol; for nested radicals, each successive root is enclosed within the previous radicand, as in \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a + \sqrt{b}}, where the inner square root forms part of the outer cube root's argument. This hierarchical structure ensures unambiguous parsing, with indices applying only to their immediate radicands unless specified otherwise.

Special Cases: Square and Cube Roots

The square root of a non-negative real number x, denoted \sqrt{x} or x^{1/2}, is the principal (non-negative) real number y such that y^2 = x. This equation has two real solutions, y and -y, but the principal root is defined as the positive one for x > 0 (and for x = 0). Geometrically, \sqrt{x} represents the length of the side of with area x. For example, \sqrt{4} = 2, as $2^2 = 4. The cube root of any real number x, denoted \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{x} or x^{1/3}, is the unique y such that y^3 = x. This function is defined for all real x, including negatives, where the cube root is negative; for instance, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{-27} = -3. In the complex numbers, the equation y^3 = x has three roots: one real and two complex that form a conjugate pair. Geometrically, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{x} corresponds to the edge length of a cube with volume x. For example, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{8} = 2, as $2^3 = 8./06%3A_Complex_Numbers/6.03%3A_Roots_of_Complex_Numbers) Unlike higher even-order roots (such as fourth roots), which lack real solutions for negative x, square roots provide real solutions only for x \geq 0, while cube roots guarantee a real solution for every real x. This distinction arises because even powers preserve the sign of negatives as positive, yielding no real roots, whereas odd powers like cubing allow negative inputs to produce negative outputs./09%3A_Roots_and_Radicals/9.07%3A_Higher_Roots)

Properties and Identities

Basic Algebraic Properties

The principal nth root function, denoted \sqrt{x} for x \in \mathbb{R}, satisfies several fundamental algebraic properties when restricted to real numbers, particularly for the principal (nonnegative) branch. One key property is the product rule: for x, y \geq 0, \sqrt{xy} = \sqrt{x} \cdot \sqrt{y}. This holds for even n where roots are defined only for nonnegative arguments, and extends to all real x, y for odd n, where \sqrt{x} can be negative if x < 0. Similarly, the quotient rule states that for y \neq 0 and appropriate signs, \sqrt{x/y} = \sqrt{x} / \sqrt{y}, with the same domain restrictions: x, y \geq 0 for even n, or any real x, y (with y \neq 0) for odd n. Another essential relation is the power rule, which connects roots to exponents: for integer m and x \geq 0 (or any real x if n is odd), (\sqrt{x})^m = x^{m/n} = \sqrt{x^n}. This identity assumes the principal root, ensuring the result remains real and nonnegative when applicable. However, care must be taken with negative bases: for even n, \sqrt{x} is undefined in the reals if x < 0, while for odd n, it is defined and negative, preserving the rules but requiring consistent handling of signs in products or quotients. The nth root function also exhibits monotonicity, which underpins inequalities involving roots. Specifically, for x > y > 0, \sqrt{x} > \sqrt{y}, reflecting its strictly increasing nature on the positive reals regardless of whether n is even or . For odd n, this extends to all reals, where the function is strictly increasing overall. These properties facilitate algebraic manipulations but are valid only under the specified conditions to avoid complex values or inconsistencies in the real domain.

Relation to Exponents

The nth root of a positive x, denoted \sqrt{x}, is mathematically equivalent to x^{1/n}, where n is a positive greater than 1. This representation treats the root extraction as the inverse operation of to the nth power, aligning radicals with the broader framework of . The equivalence holds for (positive) real root when x > 0, and it facilitates the use of exponent properties in algebraic manipulations involving roots. This connection extends naturally to rational exponents. For positive integers m and n with n > 1, the expression x^{m/n} can be interpreted as \sqrt{x^m} or (\sqrt{x})^m, providing a consistent way to handle fractional powers through roots. The relation's consistency is verified by the exponent multiplication rule: (x^{1/n})^n = x^{(1/n) \cdot n} = x^1 = x, and conversely, x^{n \cdot (1/n)} = x^1 = x. These identities confirm that exponentiation and root extraction are mutual inverses for positive x and integer n. The concept generalizes to real exponents beyond rationals. For x > 0 and any r, x^r is defined as \exp(r \ln x), where \exp is the and \ln is the natural logarithm; here, the nth root appears as the specific case r = 1/n. This exponential-logarithmic definition ensures and differentiability for real exponents, with roots serving as a foundational special case. For non-integer exponents, including fractional and irrational ones, the domain is restricted to x > 0 to keep \ln x defined in the reals and to circumvent issues with negative or zero bases, such as non-real results or undefined expressions.

Identities Involving Multiple Roots

One key identity involving multiple roots is that for nested radicals. For positive real numbers x and positive integers m and n, the expression \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} simplifies to x^{1/(nm)}. This follows directly from roots as exponents, where \sqrt{x} = x^{1/m} and then \sqrt{x^{1/m}} = (x^{1/m})^{1/n} = x^{1/(nm)}. A related identity concerns the change of index for powers within roots. For positive real x and nonnegative integer m, \sqrt{x^m} = (\sqrt{x})^m. Both sides equal x^{m/n}, allowing simplification of radical expressions by adjusting the index and exponent, particularly when m is a multiple of n to eliminate the root entirely if x is a perfect power. Sums of nth roots, such as \sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b} for distinct positive a and b, generally lack a simple closed-form expression in terms of elementary functions. Such sums are rarely rational unless a = b, and their algebraic structure often requires considering minimal polynomials of higher degree. However, identities exist for rationalizing expressions involving sums or differences of roots, extending the conjugate method. For square roots (n=2), the difference of squares gives (\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b})(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b}) = a - b, which rationalizes denominators like $1/(\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b}) by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate \sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b}. For cube roots (n=3), (\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a} + \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{b})(\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a^2} - \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{ab} + \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{b^2}) = a + b, allowing rationalization of 1/(\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a} + \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{b}). In general, for nth roots, the rationalizing factor for $1/(\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b}) is the polynomial \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k (\sqrt{a})^{n-1-k} (\sqrt{b})^k, derived from the identity a - (-1)^n b = (\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b}) \cdot P, where P is that sum.

Radical Expressions and Simplification

Forms of Radical Expressions

Radical expressions represent nth roots using the radical symbol, denoted as \sqrt{a}, where n is the index indicating the degree of the root and a is the radicand. For simple radicals, this takes the form \sqrt{a x^k}, where a is an integer coefficient and k is an integer exponent on the variable x, allowing the expression to capture basic polynomial terms under the root. When the index is omitted, the defaults to a , equivalent to an index of 2, as in \sqrt{a} for \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=2&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a}. This convention simplifies notation for the most common case while requiring explicit indices for higher-order , such as cube roots (\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a}) or fourth roots (\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=4&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a}). Nested radicals extend this by embedding one radical within another, typically in forms like \sqrt{a + \sqrt{b + \sqrt{c + \dots}}}, where each successive radicand includes the prior radical expression. These can involve the same index throughout or vary, but the structure emphasizes the hierarchical nesting without specifying evaluation. Canonical forms of radical expressions often rewrite them using rational exponents for algebraic manipulation, such that \sqrt{a} = a^{1/n}, converting the radical notation directly to exponential form while preserving the principal root. This equivalence applies similarly to simple and nested radicals, enabling consistent representation across different mathematical contexts.

Techniques for Simplification

Simplification of nth root expressions begins with factoring out perfect nth powers from the radicand. For an expression of the form \sqrt{a^k b}, where k is divisible by n, it simplifies to a \sqrt{b}, assuming a > 0 and b \geq 0 for real numbers. This process extends the product rule for radicals, \sqrt{xy} = \sqrt{x} \sqrt{y}, by identifying factors that are perfect nth powers. A systematic algorithm for this simplification relies on prime of the radicand. First, decompose the radicand into its prime factors; then, for each prime p with exponent e in the , extract groups of n factors by reducing the exponent by multiples of n, placing the extracted base outside the root. For instance, in \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{54} = \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2 \cdot 3^3} = 3 \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2}, using the full $54 = 2^1 \cdot 3^3. This method ensures the radicand has no perfect nth power factors greater than 1, achieving simplest form where all exponents in the prime are less than n. Denesting radicals removes nested roots by expressing them as sums or differences of simpler roots. For square roots, an expression \sqrt{a + b + 2\sqrt{ab}} denests to \sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b} when a, b > 0, derived from squaring the right-hand side to match the left. More generally, \sqrt{a + b \pm 2\sqrt{ab}} denests to \sqrt{a} \pm \sqrt{b}. This technique applies when the nested radical satisfies a with rational coefficients, allowing resolution via the . Denesting of cube roots is more complex and typically applies to expressions like \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{a + b \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{c}} under conditions where the minimal polynomial allows resolution by radicals of degree at most 3. Not all nested cube roots denest over the rationals; denestability depends on the minimal polynomial's degree and field extensions, with algorithms checking solvability by radicals. Rationalizing denominators eliminates roots from the bottom of fractions. For a denominator with a single nth root, such as $1 / \sqrt{a}, multiply numerator and denominator by \sqrt{a^{n-1}} to yield \sqrt{a^{n-1}} / a. For square roots, the conjugate \sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b} is used when the denominator is \sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b}, as (\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b})(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b}) = a - b. For higher roots, the full set of conjugates or powers up to n-1 may be needed, though this generalizes the process for binomials. This ensures the denominator is rational while preserving the expression's value.

Computation of Principal Roots

Numerical Iterative Methods

Numerical iterative methods provide efficient ways to approximate the principal nth root of a positive real number x, denoted as \sqrt{x}, by solving the equation y^n = x for y > 0. One of the most widely used approaches is Newton's method, a root-finding algorithm that generates successively better approximations through an iterative process. To apply Newton's method, consider the function f(y) = y^n - x, where the goal is to find the root y = \sqrt{x} such that f(y) = 0. The derivative is f'(y) = n y^{n-1}, leading to the iteration formula: y_{k+1} = y_k - \frac{f(y_k)}{f'(y_k)} = \frac{(n-1) y_k + \frac{x}{y_k^{n-1}}}{n}. This update rule refines the estimate starting from an initial guess y_0. For values of x near 1, a simple initial guess is y_0 = x, which often suffices for rapid convergence. Under suitable conditions, such as a sufficiently close initial guess and smoothness of f near the root, exhibits quadratic convergence, meaning the number of correct digits roughly doubles with each iteration. This property makes it particularly effective for high-precision computations once the approximation is reasonably accurate. For example, to approximate \sqrt{2} (the case n=2), start with y_0 = 1. The first iteration yields y_1 = \frac{1 + \frac{2}{1}}{2} = 1.5. The second gives y_2 = \frac{1.5 + \frac{2}{1.5}}{2} \approx 1.4167, and the third y_3 \approx 1.4142, converging quickly to the true value ≈1.414213562. The method's advantages include its rapid convergence on modern computers, enabling high accuracy in few steps, and its adaptability to large n or , as implemented in libraries for integer nth roots.

Digit-by-Digit Algorithms

Digit-by-digit algorithms provide a method for computing the principal nth root of a number in base 10, analogous to the process for roots of specific orders like squares and cubes. These methods proceed iteratively, determining one of the root at a time by grouping the digits of the radicand into sets of n and testing trial digits against the current remainder using expansions derived from the . The approach ensures each digit is exact before proceeding, making it suitable for pencil-and-paper calculations despite being computationally intensive for higher n. For square roots (n=2), the algorithm begins by pairing the digits of the number from the decimal point, working leftward for the part and rightward for the . If the number of is , the leftmost group has one . The largest whose square is less than or equal to the first group is placed as the first of the ; its square is subtracted from the group, leaving a . The next pair of is brought down and appended to the . The current is doubled, and a d is found such that (20 × current + d) × d does not exceed the new . This value is subtracted, and the process repeats with the doubled updated to include the new . For example, to compute √66564 (5 , groups 6 | 65 | 64), the first is 2 (2²=4 ≤6), 2; bring down 65 (265), doubled 4 yields d=5 where (40 + 5) × 5 = 225 ≤265, 40; bring down 64 (4064), doubled 50 yields d=8 where (500 + 8) × 8 = 4064 ≤4064, 0, yielding 258 exactly. The method generalizes to arbitrary nth roots by grouping digits into sets of n instead of pairs and using the to evaluate trial multiples efficiently. For a current partial root y (shifted by the base, e.g., ×10 for the next digit), the next d (0-9) is the largest such that the expansion of (10y + d)^n does not exceed the current after bringing down the next n digits. The full expansion is ∑_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} (10y)^{n-k} d^k, but only the terms involving d are computed incrementally for the trial, subtracting the known (10y)^n from the previous . This requires precomputing or calculating coefficients for each step, increasing complexity with n but allowing sequential extraction. Historical formulations, such as those by Al-Kashi in 1427, formalized this iterative process for higher roots using similar cycle groupings and polynomial evaluations. As an illustration for cube roots (n=3), consider computing ∛208 to two decimal places. Group as 208 | 000 | 000. The largest A with A³ ≤208 is 5 (125), 83. Bring down 000 to get 83000; current 5, scaled to 50 for the next place, test d=9 where 3(50)²(9) + 3(50)(9)² + 9³ = 67500 + 12150 + 729 = 80379 ≤83000, subtract to 2621. Bring down 000 to 2621000; updated 59, scaled to 590, test d=2 where 3(590)²(2) + 3(590)(2)² + 2³ = 2088600 + 7080 + 8 = 2095688 ≤2621000, subtract to 525312. Thus, ∛208 ≈5.92 (verifiable as 5.92³ ≈207.59, close to 208). This process can continue for more digits.

Series Expansions and Approximations

One effective method for approximating nth roots involves the expansion, which is particularly useful for values close to 1. For a r with |r| < 1 and positive integer n, the function (1 + r)^{1/n} can be expanded as an infinite series: (1 + r)^{1/n} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \binom{1/n}{k} r^k, where the generalized binomial coefficient is defined as \binom{1/n}{k} = \frac{(1/n)(1/n - 1) \cdots (1/n - k + 1)}{k!} for k \geq 1, and \binom{1/n}{0} = 1. This series converges absolutely within the unit disk |r| < 1, providing a rapid approximation when truncating after a finite number of terms; the error after m terms is bounded by the next term in the alternating series for appropriate r, or more generally by the remainder term in the binomial expansion. To apply this to the principal nth root \sqrt{x} for x > 0 near a perfect nth power, select an a \geq 1 such that a^n \leq x < (a+1)^n. Then rewrite \sqrt{x} = a \left(1 + \frac{x - a^n}{a^n}\right)^{1/n} = a (1 + r)^{1/n}, where r = (x - a^n)/a^n with $0 \leq r < ((a+1)^n - a^n)/a^n. This r < 1 only if the interval length relative to a^n is <1, which holds for large a but not always (e.g., small a or x near (a+1)^n). For |r| ≥ 1, choose a closer approximation or use alternative methods to ensure convergence. Substituting the binomial series yields an approximation for \sqrt{x} by computing the first few terms, with convergence guaranteed by the radius of 1 in r. For example, approximating the cube root of 10 uses a = 2 since $8 \leq 10 < 27, so r = 2/8 = 0.25, and the series provides terms like $2 \left(1 + \frac{1}{3}(0.25) - \frac{2}{9 \cdot 2}(0.25)^2 + \cdots \right) \approx 2.154, close to the true value of approximately 2.15443. A more general approach uses the Taylor series expansion of f(y) = y^{1/n} around a point a > 0, which approximates \sqrt{y} for y near a: f(y) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (y - a)^k, where the kth derivative is f^{(k)}(y) = (1/n)(1/n - 1) \cdots (1/n - k + 1) y^{1/n - k}, so at y = a, f^{(k)}(a) = (1/n)(1/n - 1) \cdots (1/n - k + 1) a^{1/n - k}. Thus, the series is y^{1/n} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(1/n)(1/n - 1) \cdots (1/n - k + 1)}{k!} a^{1/n - k} (y - a)^k. This converges for |y - a| < a, as the radius of convergence is the distance to the nearest singularity at y = 0, the branch point of the function. The Lagrange form of the remainder provides error bounds: after m terms, the error is at most \frac{|f^{(m+1)}(\xi)|}{(m+1)!} |y - a|^{m+1} for some \xi between a and y, allowing precise control over approximation accuracy.

Geometry and Constructibility

Constructions for Square Roots

Square roots of constructible lengths, such as positive rationals, can be constructed precisely using only a compass and straightedge, forming a cornerstone of Euclidean geometry. This capability stems from the closure of constructible numbers under square root extraction, enabling the building of lengths like \sqrt{2} as the hypotenuse of a unit square. A primary method employs the geometric mean construction, which produces \sqrt{ab} for given positive lengths a and b via circle intersection, grounded in Thales' theorem. Thales' theorem asserts that an angle inscribed in a semicircle is a right angle, providing the necessary right triangle for the Pythagorean relation. To adapt this for \sqrt{x} specifically (setting a = 1 and b = x), the steps are as follows:
  • Draw a straight line segment and mark points A and B such that AB = 1.
  • Extend from B to point C such that BC = x, making the diameter AC = 1 + x.
  • Construct a semicircle with diameter AC.
  • Erect a perpendicular to AC at B, intersecting the semicircle at point D.
The segment BD then has length \sqrt{x}, as the right angle at D (by Thales' theorem) and the power of point B with respect to the circle yield BD^2 = AB \cdot BC = 1 \cdot x = x. Thales' theorem also facilitates iterative constructions, such as forming a right triangle with legs of lengths 1 and \sqrt{x} to obtain the hypotenuse \sqrt{1 + x}, by copying the existing \sqrt{x} segment with the compass and erecting a perpendicular. These methods achieve exact results in the ideal Euclidean plane, where compass and straightedge operations preserve geometric precision without approximation.

Limitations for Higher-Order Roots

In classical Greek geometry, constructions using only a compass and straightedge are limited to operations that correspond to solving linear and quadratic equations over the rational numbers. Pierre Wantzel proved in 1837 that a real number is constructible if and only if it lies in a field extension of the rationals \mathbb{Q} obtained by a finite tower of quadratic extensions, meaning the degree of the extension [\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}] must be a power of 2 for any constructible \alpha. This restriction arises because each compass and straightedge operation—such as drawing lines, circles, or finding intersections—effectively adjoins square roots, iteratively building extensions of degree 2. Higher-order roots, such as cube roots, violate this condition. For example, the real cube root \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2} generates the extension \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2}) over \mathbb{Q}, which has degree 3 because the minimal polynomial x^3 - 2 = 0 is irreducible over \mathbb{Q}. Irreducibility follows from the rational root theorem, as possible rational roots \pm1, \pm2 do not satisfy the equation, and for cubics, the absence of rational roots implies irreducibility. Since 3 is not a power of 2, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2} cannot lie in any tower of quadratic extensions, rendering it non-constructible. This limitation generalizes to nth roots where n is not a power of 2. Adjoining the real nth root \sqrt{a} of a rational a not a perfect nth power yields the extension \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{a}) of degree n over \mathbb{Q}, as the minimal polynomial x^n - a = 0 is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion with prime 2 (assuming a = 2 for simplicity, where 2 divides the constant term but $2^2 does not, and divides all other coefficients of 0). If n is not a power of 2, the degree n cannot divide any power of 2, so \sqrt{a} is non-constructible. A famous implication is the impossibility of doubling the cube, the Delian problem of constructing a cube with volume twice that of a unit cube using compass and straightedge. This requires constructing an edge of length \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2}, which is impossible by the above reasoning.

Complex Nth Roots

Definition and Principal Value

In the context of complex numbers, the nth root function is extended using the polar representation. A nonzero complex number z can be expressed as z = r e^{i \theta}, where r = |z| > 0 and \theta = \mathrm{Arg}(z) is the principal argument in the interval (-\pi, \pi]. The principal nth root is then defined as z^{1/n} = r^{1/n} \, e^{i \theta / n}, where r^{1/n} is the unique positive real nth root of r. This formulation selects the unique root whose argument lies within (-\pi/n, \pi/n]. The choice of the principal argument for z ensures that the principal nth root defines a single-valued on the minus the nonpositive real axis (the branch cut). The resulting principal branch of the nth root has its restricted to (-\pi/n, \pi/n], which minimizes discontinuities and aligns with the standard convention for multi-valued functions in . For positive real numbers x > 0, the principal argument \theta = 0, so the complex definition yields x^{1/n} = x^{1/n} e^{i \cdot 0 / n}, which matches the real principal nth root—the unique positive y > 0 satisfying y^n = x. A key example is the principal (n=2) of -1. Representing z = -1 as $1 \cdot e^{i \pi}, the principal root is (-1)^{1/2} = 1^{1/2} \, e^{i \pi / 2} = \cos(\pi/2) + i \sin(\pi/2) = i, selecting i over the alternative root -i.

All Complex Roots and Branches

For a nonzero z = r e^{i \theta} with r > 0 and principal \theta \in (-\pi, \pi], the equation w^n = z has exactly n distinct solutions in the , known as the nth roots of z. These roots are given by w_k = r^{1/n} \exp\left( i \frac{\theta + 2\pi k}{n} \right), \quad k = 0, 1, \dots, n-1, where r^{1/n} denotes the unique positive real nth root of r. This polar form arises from solving using the exponential representation and accounting for the n-fold periodicity of the , ensuring all roots lie on a of r^{1/n} equally spaced by angles of $2\pi / n. The nth root function is multivalued, requiring the selection of n distinct branches to cover all solutions. Each branch corresponds to a choice of argument differing by multiples of $2\pi, and to define a single-valued analytic branch on a simply connected domain, a branch cut is introduced, typically along the negative real axis from $0 to -\infty. This cut connects the branch points at z = 0 and z = \infty, where the function exhibits logarithmic branching behavior: encircling z = 0 once permutes the branches cyclically, returning to the original after n loops. On the Riemann surface for the nth root, which consists of n sheets forming an n-fold branched cover of the punctured complex plane \mathbb{C} \setminus \{0\}, the function becomes single-valued and holomorphic everywhere except at the branch points. The branch points at $0 and \infty are algebraic singularities of order n, reflecting the multivaluedness inherent to the logarithm in the expression z^{1/n} = \exp\left( \frac{1}{n} \Log z \right), where \Log z is the . The Riemann surface resolves this by gluing the sheets along the branch cut, creating a connected manifold that uniformizes the ; for instance, it can be parameterized via the inverse map w \mapsto w^n, which is an n-to-1 covering ramified at the origin. A concrete example is the three cube roots of $1, which are the solutions to w^3 = 1. These are $1, \omega = e^{2\pi i / 3} = -\frac{1}{2} + i \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, and \omega^2 = e^{4\pi i / 3} = -\frac{1}{2} - i \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, forming an in the .

Connection to Roots of Unity

The nth roots of unity are the complex numbers \zeta_k = e^{2\pi i k / n} for k = 0, 1, \dots, n-1, which satisfy \zeta_k^n = 1. These form a under multiplication, generated by the primitive nth root of unity \zeta = e^{2\pi i / n}. A key property of the nth roots of unity is that their sum is zero for n > 1: \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \zeta_k = 0. This follows from the formula for the sum of a geometric series, \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \zeta^k = \frac{1 - \zeta^n}{1 - \zeta} = 0, since \zeta^n = 1 and \zeta \neq 1. Another fundamental property is that the minimal polynomial over the rationals for a primitive nth root of unity is the nth cyclotomic polynomial \Phi_n(x), defined as the monic polynomial whose roots are exactly the primitive nth roots of unity. The connection to general nth roots arises in the , where all nth roots of a nonzero z = r e^{i\theta} (with principal \theta) are given by r^{1/n} e^{i(\theta + 2\pi k)/n} = \rho \cdot \zeta_k for k = 0, 1, \dots, n-1, with \rho = r^{1/n} e^{i\theta / n} the principal nth root. Thus, multiplying the principal nth root by the nth roots of unity yields all nth roots. This relationship has applications in , notably in factoring the x^n - 1 = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} (x - \zeta_k), which decomposes into cyclotomic factors \prod_{d \mid n} \Phi_d(x).

Applications in Algebra

Role in Solving Equations

Nth roots play a central role in solving polynomial equations by enabling the expression of roots through radical expressions. For quadratic equations of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 where a \neq 0, the provides the solutions explicitly using square roots: x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}. This formula, derived by , allows the roots to be computed directly from the coefficients via arithmetic operations and extraction of a square root. For cubic equations ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0, Cardano's formula expresses one root as a combination of roots and square roots after a to depress the equation. Specifically, for the depressed cubic x^3 + px + q = 0, the root is given by x = \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{-\frac{q}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{p}{3}\right)^3}} + \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{-\frac{q}{2} - \sqrt{\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{p}{3}\right)^3}}, with the other roots obtainable via quadratic factors. The quartic formula, developed by Ferrari, similarly reduces the equation to solving a cubic resolvent and then applying square and roots to find the roots. However, the Abel–Ruffini theorem establishes that no such general formula using only radicals exists for polynomials of degree five or higher over the rationals or reals. The theorem proves that general quintic equations are not solvable by radicals, meaning their roots cannot be expressed using finitely many additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions, and nth root extractions starting from the coefficients. In algebraic terms, solvability by radicals corresponds to the splitting field of the polynomial being contained within a radical extension of the base field. A radical extension is obtained by successively adjoining nth roots of elements from the previous field, forming a tower K = K_0 \subset K_1 \subset \cdots \subset K_m = L where each K_{i} = K_{i-1}(\alpha_i) with \alpha_i^{n_i} \in K_{i-1} for some integer n_i \geq 2. This structure underpins the criteria for when higher-degree polynomials can be solved explicitly using nth roots.

Proofs of Irrationality

The irrationality of the of a p can be established by . Assume \sqrt{p} = a/b where a and b are positive integers with \gcd(a, b) = 1 and b > 1. Then a^2 = p b^2, implying that p divides a^2 and thus p divides a by . Let a = p k for some integer k; substituting yields p^2 k^2 = p b^2, so p k^2 = b^2, meaning p divides b^2 and hence b, contradicting \gcd(a, b) = 1. Therefore, \sqrt{p} is unless p is a , which it is not for primes. This argument extends to the square root of any positive m that is not a . If \sqrt{m} = a/b in lowest terms, then a^2 = m b^2. In the prime of m, at least one prime has an odd exponent; the equation requires all exponents in a^2 to be even, forcing corresponding exponents in m b^2 to match, but the odd exponent in m cannot be balanced without common factors in a and b, leading to a . For the general case of the nth root of a positive m that is not a perfect nth power, assume \sqrt{m} = a/b with \gcd(a, b) = 1 and b > 1. Then a^n = m b^n. By unique prime , the exponents in the prime factorization of m must be multiples of n for the equation to hold with a and b coprime; if any exponent is not a multiple of n, it leads to a contradiction similar to the square root case, as the left side has exponents divisible by n while the right does not without shared factors. For example, \sqrt{{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=3&&&citation_type=wikipedia}}{2} is irrational because the prime factorization of 2 has exponent 1, not a multiple of 3. A more advanced approach uses the and irreducibility criteria. The states that any rational root r/s in lowest terms of the x^n - m must have r dividing m and s dividing , so possible rational roots are factors of m. If m is not a perfect nth power, no such root exists. To confirm no rational roots, can show x^n - p is irreducible over \mathbb{Q} for prime p not dividing n: choose a prime q dividing p (so q = p) but q^2 not dividing p, and q not dividing the leading coefficient ; then all non-leading coefficients (0 except constant -p) are divisible by q but not q^2, proving irreducibility and thus irrational roots. This applies generally when m has a prime factor with exponent not divisible by n.

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Contributions

The earliest known approximations of square roots date back to the Babylonians around 1800 BCE, who employed the (base-60) system to compute numerical values with remarkable precision. A notable example is the from the Old Babylonian period (circa 1800–1600 BCE), which records an approximation of \sqrt{2} as $1;24,51,10$ in notation, equivalent to approximately 1.41421296 in , accurate to about six decimal places. This tablet, likely a scribal school exercise, demonstrates the use of iterative methods derived from geometric principles or coefficient lists to estimate roots, reflecting a practical approach to solving problems in and astronomy without algebraic notation. In , the Pythagoreans (circa 6th–5th century BCE) advanced the conceptual understanding of square roots through geometric constructions, viewing them as lengths incommensurable with rational units in certain cases. They constructed square roots geometrically, such as using the diagonal of a to represent \sqrt{2}, which led to the discovery that some roots could not be expressed as ratios of integers. Around 500 BCE, the Pythagorean philosopher of reportedly proved the of \sqrt{2} via a geometric argument, revealing that the diagonal of a square exceeds any rational multiple of its side, a revelation that challenged the school's belief in the harmony of and reportedly led to his or mythical drowning. The also grappled with s, particularly through the Delian problem posed around 400 BCE, which required constructing a with double the volume of a given —equivalent to finding the of 2 using only and . This challenge, originating from an oracle at to avert a , spurred geometric solutions by figures like and , though exact constructions proved impossible with classical tools. (circa 287–212 BCE) contributed to root approximations more broadly through iterative numerical methods, achieving high accuracy in related calculations, such as bounding square roots in his work on circles and spheres, which influenced later approaches to higher roots. In , around 500 CE, the mathematician described systematic methods for extracting both square and cube in his , employing algorithms akin to modern but adapted for ancient systems. These techniques allowed for efficient computation of up to higher orders by successive approximations, building on earlier geometric traditions and facilitating astronomical calculations. Aryabhata's methods, which involved pairing digits and iterative subtractions, marked a significant advancement in numerical root extraction, predating similar European developments by centuries. During the , mathematicians built upon these traditions with geometric approaches to higher roots. Notably, (1048–1131) in his Treatise on Demonstration of Problems of Algebra (circa 1070) developed constructions for solving cubic equations, including cube roots, by finding intersections of conic sections such as circles and hyperbolas. This method allowed for the geometric extraction of roots without numerical approximation, influencing later algebraic developments.

Modern Formalization and Extensions

The marked a pivotal shift toward algebraic formalization of roots, exemplified by Gerolamo Cardano's Ars Magna (1545), which provided explicit formulas for extracting cube roots as part of solving general cubic equations, integrating them into a systematic treatment of higher-degree polynomials. This work extended earlier Italian algebraic traditions by incorporating roots of negative quantities, laying groundwork for extensions despite initial reluctance to embrace imaginaries fully. In the 17th and 18th centuries, infinite series emerged as a tool for approximating roots, with John Wallis's Arithmetica Infinitorum (1656) introducing interpolation techniques that facilitated series expansions for fractional powers, influencing subsequent developments in analysis. Isaac Newton advanced this in his unpublished 1665 manuscript (circulated and published later), generalizing the binomial theorem to fractional exponents, enabling infinite series representations for nth roots such as \sqrt{1+x} = (1+x)^{1/n}. Leonhard Euler further integrated complex numbers into root extractions in his Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum (1748), systematically exploring nth roots of unity and their geometric interpretation on the complex plane, solidifying complex roots as fundamental objects. The 19th century brought rigorous handling of multivaluedness in , with defining principal branches for functions like the logarithm (around 1825–1830), from which principal nth roots follow via z^{1/n} = \exp\left(\frac{1}{n} \Log z\right), where \Log z uses the principal argument in (-\pi, \pi]. revolutionized the subject in the 1850s by introducing Riemann surfaces—multi-sheeted coverings of the —to resolve branch points of multivalued functions, such as the nth root, allowing single-valued across sheets. Twentieth-century reframed nth roots through , originally sketched by in the 1830s and fully formalized by (1920s–1930s) and others, establishing that solvability of polynomials by radicals corresponds to solvable Galois groups, thus delimiting when roots can be expressed using nested nth roots. Post-1950s computational advances in , including iterative methods like Newton-Raphson adaptations for domains, enabled efficient principal nth root computation via series or functional , integral to scientific .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] REVIEW OF ROOTS AND RADICALS Definition
    Definition: For any real number x and natural number n, the real number r is an nth root of x if rn = x. x. n. denotes the nth root of x. x is the radicand.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] 1.4 The Complex Numbers.
    There are n different nth roots of any complex number except for 0, which always has only one nth root! Proof: Let z = (r; θ) in polar coordinates. Taking an ...
  3. [3]
    Real numbers 1 - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    ... nth roots. These are called radical expressions. By the sixteenth century rational numbers and roots of numbers were becoming accepted as numbers although ...
  4. [4]
    ORCCA Square and \(n\)th Root Properties
    In this section, we learn what expressions like √25 25 and 3√27 27 3 mean, and some of the properties they have that allow for simplification.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Lecture 3: Complex n-th roots and roots of complex polynomials
    A complex n-th root of w is z if zn=w. The roots are given by zk = n p|w|eiϑk, where ϑk = t + 2kπ/n, and t is the argument of w.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] roots on a circle - keith conrad
    The nth roots of unity obviously all lie on the unit circle (see Figure 1 with n = 7). Algebraic integers that are not roots of unity can also appear there.
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    nth Root -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    ### Summary of nth Root from Wolfram MathWorld
  9. [9]
    nth Roots - Math is Fun
    The nth Root Symbol​​ This is the special symbol that means "nth root", it is the "radical" symbol (used for square roots) with a little n to mean nth root.
  10. [10]
    Nth Roots and Rational Exponents | College Algebra
    The principal nth root of a is written as a n , where n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2. In the radical expression, n is called the index of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    2.4: Higher Order Roots | Introductory Algebra - Lumen Learning
    The principal nth root of a is written as a n , where n is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2 . In the radical expression, n is called the index of ...
  12. [12]
    13.8.7: Higher Roots - Mathematics LibreTexts
    Aug 13, 2020 · Definition: NTH ROOT OF A NUMBER. If b n = a , then b is an nth root of a number a. The principal nth root of a is written a n = b ... real ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A History of Mathematical Notations, 2 Vols - Monoskop
    This book covers the history of mathematical notations, divided into two volumes: elementary and higher mathematics. Originally published in 1928-1929.
  14. [14]
    Radical Notation | - AMS Blogs - American Mathematical Society
    Apr 9, 2018 · Folklore abounds, and notations evolve, and the origin of mathematical notation is an endless source of fascinating speculation. sin-1(x)= ...
  15. [15]
    Nested Radical -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Expressions of the form lim_(k->infty)x_0+sqrt(x_1+sqrt(x_2+sqrt(...+x_k))) (1) are called nested radicals. Herschfeld (1935) proved that a nested radical ...
  16. [16]
    Square Root | Definition, Sign & Problems - Lesson - Study.com
    A square root takes the area of a square as its input and outputs the side length of that square. For instance, the square root of 9 is 3.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Intro to cube roots (video) | Radicals - Khan Academy
    Feb 24, 2019 · An imaginary number is a complex number that can be written as a real number ... The cube root of a number can be thought of as the edge length of a cube ...Missing: conjugate | Show results with:conjugate
  18. [18]
    5.1: Roots and Radicals
    ### Summary of Properties of nth Roots
  19. [19]
    Sum of n-th roots is rarely rational - MathOverflow
    May 8, 2010 · Let yi be the N!-th root of xi. Then the power sum symmetric functions of the yi are all rational, hence the elementary symmetric functions are ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] A.10. nth Roots; Rational Exponents
    Aug 16, 2021 · This process is called “rationalizing the denominator.” We often take advantage of the identity (a+b)(a−b) = a2 −b2. Examples. Page A88 numbers ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Radicals - Algebra - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will define radical notation and relate radicals to rational exponents. We will also give the properties of radicals and ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Lecture 23 with Solutions
    Nov 8, 2009 · Using these rules, the first thing we want to do when simplifying a radical expression with an nth root is remove perfect nth power factors.Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  23. [23]
    [PDF] How To Simplify Radicals
    roots, or nested radicals. Using Prime Factorization Efficiently. Prime factorization is often the most straightforward method to identify perfect powers.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] On the denesting of nested square roots - UTRGV Faculty Web
    We present the basic theory of denesting nested square roots, from an elementary point of view, suitable for lower-level coursework.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] How to Tangle with a Nested Radical
    Jul 13, 1993 · Is there a technique for finding it? How long does it take? In this article, we will briefly present some recent theorems for radical ...
  26. [26]
    [2403.04776] Denesting cubic radicals - arXiv
    Feb 29, 2024 · Abstract:We study in details how and when the radical \sqrt[3]{a+b\sqrt p} with rational numbers a,b and p positive can be simplified, ...
  27. [27]
    Simplification of Nested Radicals | SIAM Journal on Computing
    Radical simplification is an important part of symbolic computation systems. Until now no algorithms were known for the general denesting problem.
  28. [28]
    Rationalizing Denominators and Numerators of Radical Expressions
    Jul 21, 2011 · Step 1: Find the conjugate of the denominator.​​ In general the conjugate of a + b is a - b and vice versa.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] 10.5 Multiplying with More Than One Term and Rationalizing ...
    When the denominator contains a single radical with an nth root, multiply the numerator and the denominator by a radical of index n that produces a perfect nth.Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  30. [30]
    Newton's method for finding roots - CP-Algorithms
    Jul 14, 2023 · This is an iterative method invented by Isaac Newton around 1664. However, this method is also sometimes called the Raphson method.
  31. [31]
    Nth Root Algorithm (GNU MP 6.3.0)
    Integer Nth roots are taken using Newton's method with the following iteration, where A is the input and n is the root to be taken.Missing: computing | Show results with:computing
  32. [32]
    4.9: Newton's Method - Mathematics LibreTexts
    Jan 17, 2025 · \) No simple formula exists for the solutions of this equation. In cases such as these, we can use Newton's method to approximate the roots.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Square Roots via Newton's Method - MIT Mathematics
    Feb 4, 2015 · Recall that Newton's method finds an approximate root of f(x)=0 from a guess xn by approximating f(x) as its tangent line f(xn) + f0(xn)(x − xn ...
  34. [34]
    (PDF) Root extraction by Al-Kashi and Stevin - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · In this paper, we study the extraction of roots as presented by Al-Kashi in his 1427 book “Key to Arithmetic” and Stevin in his 1585 book “Arithmetic”.Missing: nth | Show results with:nth
  35. [35]
    square root
    ### Summary of Manual Square Root Calculation Method
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Nth ROOT COMPUTING METHODS - DTIC
    Five main classes of nth rooting methods are die- cussed in this report. An nth rooting method derivable from the binomial series expansion is developed, and ...
  37. [37]
    cube root
    A cube root is calculated manually by finding the largest number whose cube is less than or equal to the given number, similar to long-hand division. For ...
  38. [38]
    Calculus II - Binomial Series - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will give the Binomial Theorem and illustrate how it can be used to quickly expand terms in the form (a+b)^n when n is an ...
  39. [39]
    Taylor Series -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A Taylor series is a series expansion of a function about a point. A one-dimensional Taylor series is an expansion of a real function f(x) about a point x=a ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] compass and straightedge applications of field theory
    Sep 15, 2014 · Simply construct a semicircle with a radius of unit length plus the rational number of which you wish to take the square root. Then ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Constructions with Compass and Straightedge
    The square root of two is constructible as the hypotenuse of a square who side length is 1. By several arguments given in class, √2 is not a rational number.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Exploring Geometry
    The construction of the ratio of two numbers is left as an exercise, as is the construction of the square root of a positive number. d. Starting with a unit ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Exploring Geometry - James Madison University - ('educ.jmu.edu')
    Apr 1, 2013 · The last result has become known as “The Theorem of Thales. ... the construction of the square root of a positive number. d. Starting ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] galois theory : lecture 12
    Mar 12, 2018 · Wantzel's key insight was the following: Page 3. Theorem 2.2. If β is constructible, then [Q(β) : Q]=2k for some k ∈ Z. Remark. The converse ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Constructible numbers: Euclid and beyond - CSUSB ScholarWorks
    It follows that a number is constructible if and only if it is in a tower of quadratic field extensions over the rationals. A quadratic extension, F(y/d), ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Lecture 6.3: Polynomials and irreducibility
    x3 − 2 is irreducible over Q. If we could factor it, then one of the factors would have degree 1. But x3 − 2 has no roots in Q.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Compass at the Foundations: Constructible Numbers Definition
    • The cube root of 2 is not constructible, since: p(x) = x3 - 2 has degree 3 ... is not constructible, since it has minimal polynomial: p(x) = x3 - 3x ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Number Theory - Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion
    Thus p divides each coefficient except the leading coefficient, and p 2 does not divide the constant term p , hence f ( x ) is irreducible over the rationals. ◁ ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Constructions with ruler and compass - webspace.science.uu.nl
    Theorem 1.1.6 The constructible numbers form a subfield of R containing Q. We shall denote the field of constructible numbers by Qconstr. Proof: We ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Complex VARIABLES AND APPLICATIONS, EIGHTH EDITION
    ... principal nth root of a nonzero complex number z0 that was defined in. Sec. 9 is the same as the principal value of z. 1/n. 0 defined by equation (5), Sec. 33 ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Complex nth Roots
    For n ∈ N, the complex solutions of the equation zn = 1 are called the nth roots of unity. We let µn denote the set of nth roots of unity in C. Note that we ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] A concise course in complex analysis and Riemann surfaces ...
    RS(U), and pick a branch ρ0 of the nth root z. 1 n locally around z0 = φ(p) ... Riemann surface behaves the same as the nth root. And, moreover ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Complex Numbers
    It would appear that the nth roots of any complex number are always spaced evenly around a circle. Equivalently, their sum always seems to be zero. In fact, a ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] arXiv:1101.1152v2 [math.NT] 9 Aug 2011
    Aug 9, 2011 · Let Un = {z ∈ C | zn = 1} denote the set of nth roots of unity. Un is a group under complex multiplication, in fact a cyclic group.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Chapter 6 Complex Numbers
    We define the principal branch of the logarithm Log z to be the branch that satisfies −π < =(Log z) ≤ π. For positive, real numbers the principal branch, Log x ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] A Survey on Coefficients of Cyclotomic Polynomials - arXiv
    Dec 15, 2021 · The nth cyclotomic polynomial Φn(X) is defined as the monic polynomial whose roots are the nth primitive roots of unity, that is,. Φn(X) := Y.
  58. [58]
    derivation of quadratic formula - PlanetMath.org
    Mar 22, 2013 · (x+b2)2=b24−c. ( x + b 2 ) 2 = b 2 4 - c . −B±√B2−4AC2A, - B ± B 2 - 4 ⁢ ⁢ ⁢ and the derivation is completed.
  59. [59]
    Cardano's method - UC Davis Math
    Cardano's method provides a technique for solving the general cubic equation ax 3 + bx 2 + cx + d = 0 in terms of radicals.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] MATH 4552 Cubic equations and Cardano's formulae
    Cubic equations and Cardano's formulae. Consider a cubic equation with the unknown z and fixed complex coefficients a, b, c, d. (where a 6= 0):. (1) az3 + bz2 ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] galois theory and the abel-ruffini theorem
    Abel-Ruffini Theorem. Theorem 5.26. A polynomial f(x) is solvable by radicals if and only if its Galois group is solvable. Proof ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Simple radical extensions - Keith Conrad
    A field extension L/K is called simple radical if L = K(α) where αn ... in a splitting field of Tn - a over K then βn = a = αn, so (β/α)n = 1. Set ζ ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] 2.3 Roots
    None of the nth roots n. √. 2 is rational (for n > 1). Proof: An nth root of 2 is, by definition, a root of the polynomial: f(x) = xn − 2.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Math 126 Number Theory - Clark University
    Feb 3, 2006 · Some applications of the unique factoriza- tion theorem including irrationality of surds. Some of these theorems are interesting, like the ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Spring 2002 Week Four MATH 534 1 Continuation of Polynomials ...
    The Eisenstein criterion gives a quick proof of the irrationality of the Ф-th roots of certain integers. ... Clearly, no root of n(x) is a root of n ' (x).Missing: nth | Show results with:nth
  66. [66]
    [PDF] another short proof that rational algebraic integers are ... - OU Math
    Gary Lawlor gave a wonderfully short, clever proof that the nth root of a positive integer is an integer or irrational [4]. We show that his method also ...
  67. [67]
    The Best Known Old Babylonian Tablet?
    YBC 7289 is an Old Babylonian clay tablet (circa 1800–1600 BCE) from the Yale Babylonian Collection. A hand tablet, it appears to be a practice school exercise.
  68. [68]
    Square Root Approximations in Old Babylonian Mathematics
    The Old Babylonian tablet YBC 7289 uses a four-sexagesimal-place approximation for square roots, likely from a coefficient list, and is likely a school ...
  69. [69]
    Pythagoras's Constant -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    ... square root of 2, sqrt(2) ... . Legend has it that the Pythagorean philosopher Hippasus used geometric methods to demonstrate the irrationality of ...
  70. [70]
    How a Secret Society Discovered Irrational Numbers
    Jun 13, 2024 · The ancient scholar Hippasus of Metapontum was punished with death for his discovery of irrational numbers—or at least that's the legend.
  71. [71]
    Archimedes - Biography - MacTutor - University of St Andrews
    Archimedes also gave an accurate approximation to π and showed that he could approximate square roots accurately. He invented a system for expressing large ...
  72. [72]
    Doubling the cube - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    The present article studies the problem of doubling the cube, or duplicating the cube, or the Delian problem which are three different names given to the same ...Missing: approximations | Show results with:approximations
  73. [73]
    [math/0608793] Aryabhata's Root Extraction Methods - arXiv
    Aug 31, 2006 · We investigate the mathematics behind 1500 year old root extraction methods presented by Aryabhata in his famous mathematical treatise " ...
  74. [74]
    Cardano's formulae - PlanetMath.org
    Nov 27, 2014 · Cardano's formulae, essentially (2) and (3), were first published in 1545 in Geronimo Cardano's book “Ars magna”. The idea of (2) and (3) is ...
  75. [75]
    Mathematical Treasure: Cardano's Ars Magna
    Page 7 from Cardano's 1545 Ars Magna. Using his techniques, Cardano encountered a square root of a negative integer while solving a certain quadratic equation.
  76. [76]
    John Wallis (1616 - Biography - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    In Treatise on Algebra Wallis accepts negative roots and complex roots. He shows that a 3 − 7 a = 6 a^{3} - 7a = 6 a3−7a=6 has exactly three roots and that ...
  77. [77]
    Binomial theorem - Wikipedia
    In elementary algebra, the binomial theorem (or binomial expansion) describes the algebraic expansion of powers of a binomial. According to the theorem, ...Binomial series · Binomial (polynomial) · Falling and rising factorials
  78. [78]
    Reading Euler's Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum | Ex Libris
    essentially all the complex roots of 1 around the unit circle.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] 18.04 Complex analysis with applications - MIT Mathematics
    2.6.5 The geometry of Nth roots. Looking at the examples above we see that roots are always spaced evenly around a circle centered at the origin. For example ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Riemann Surfaces - UC Berkeley math
    This is clear for a Riemann surface defined as the zero-set of an algebraic equation P(z, w(z)) = 0; it projects surjectively to the complex z-plane, Because ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Galois Theory
    We say that f is solvable (soluble) by radicals if there exists a field E containing a splitting field for f such that E/F is a radical extension. We want to ...
  82. [82]
    nth root by Newton's method - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · The Newton's method is very suitable for computing approximate values of higher nth roots (http://planetmath.org/NthRoot) of positive numbers ( ...Missing: infinite | Show results with:infinite