Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ontario Science Centre

The Ontario Science Centre is an interactive science museum located in , , , dedicated to public education through hands-on exhibits demonstrating scientific principles across disciplines such as physics, , and . Commissioned by the provincial government in 1964 as a project and designed by architect , it opened to the public in September 1969 at 770 Don Mills Road in the area of , featuring innovative terraced architecture integrated with the ravine landscape. Pioneering the interactive museum format, the centre attracted millions of visitors over its 55 years of operation with permanent galleries like the Innovation Centre for maker activities, the Rainforest for ecological simulations, and the OMNIMAX Theatre for immersive films, fostering that emphasized curiosity and experimentation. It served as a key educational resource, including specialized programs like the Ontario Science Centre School for immersive learning residencies, until its abrupt closure. In June 2024, the facility permanently closed following an engineering assessment identifying distressed concrete roof slabs posing a high of , prompting safety-driven evacuation despite prior knowledge of the material's vulnerabilities in similar structures. This decision aligned with the provincial government's 2023 announcement to relocate operations to a new, smaller venue at on Toronto's waterfront, with construction slated to begin in 2025 amid ongoing procurement and public debate over the original site's architectural heritage and repair feasibility. While temporary exhibits continue at sites like , the closure has drawn criticism for job losses, program disruptions, and questions about whether interim reinforcements could have sustained operations, highlighting tensions between maintenance costs—estimated at $22–40 million—and redevelopment priorities.

History

Founding and Construction (1964-1969)

The Ontario Science Centre originated as a provincial initiative to commemorate Canada's Centennial in 1967, with the Government of Ontario announcing the project in 1964 under Premier John Robarts as a marquee gift to the public emphasizing science and technology amid the era's space race enthusiasm. The facility, initially named the Ontario Centennial Centre of Science and Technology, was commissioned to pioneer interactive, hands-on exhibits under the motto "Please Touch," departing from traditional passive museum formats. Architect of Moriyama & Teshima Architects was selected in 1964 to lead the design, envisioning a structure integrated with the natural ravine landscape of Toronto's Don Valley while fostering participatory learning through human-scale exhibit halls and sensory engagement. Construction proceeded on the 28-hectare site, spanning approximately 500,000 square feet, with work documented as underway by January 1967 after initial planning delays prevented alignment with the opening target. The centre's modular, terraced concrete design accommodated future expansions and emphasized environmental harmony, reflecting mid-1960s architectural trends toward brutalism adapted to educational purposes. Completion occurred in 1969, enabling public access on September 27 of that year, two years post-Centennial.

Opening and Early Operations (1969-1990)

The Ontario Science Centre opened to the public on September 26, 1969, following an official ceremony the next day attended by dignitaries including Lieutenant Governor W. Ross Macdonald. Proposed in 1964 by Premier John Robarts as Ontario's centennial project amid the space race era, construction began in 1967 but faced delays and cost overruns, completing at $30 million against an initial $5 million estimate. Architect Raymond Moriyama's design integrated the facility into the Don Valley's ravine landscape, emphasizing natural flow and accessibility via the Don Valley Parkway, while pioneering interactive exhibits that set it apart as the world's first hands-on science centre. Early operations centered on 450 exhibits encouraging direct visitor interaction under the guiding principle "please touch everything," including demonstrations of , gyroscopic bicycle wheels, and electronic calculators. The centre drew 55,000 visitors in its first three weeks and averaged 20,000 weekly by year's end, prompting responses to such as extended hours and repairs to damaged displays from heavy use, like re-welded bicycle frames. Educational began immediately, with 11 science teachers hired to support 750 daily school groups, fostering hands-on learning in subjects from physics to . In October 1969, Prince Philip toured the facility, describing the exhibits as "fascinating" during a demonstration of signals converted to visible light. Through the and , operations maintained a focus on exhibit rotation—about 15% annually—to incorporate emerging technologies like simulators, while sustaining high family and school attendance through free admission policies until fees were introduced in later decades. A event was the 1982 ": 7,000 Years of " , co-produced with China's Science and Technology Museum and running from May 1 to October 31, which displayed over 500 artifacts spanning ancient innovations to modern science, achieving record-breaking visitor numbers. This period solidified the centre's role in public , influencing global models despite ongoing maintenance demands from constant interaction.

Expansion and Peak Operations (1990-2010)

In the , the Ontario Science Centre pursued targeted expansions to modernize facilities and boost capacity amid rising public interest in . A key development occurred in 1996 with the opening of a redesigned entranceway that incorporated Ontario's first IMAX Dome theatre, known as the OMNIMAX Theatre, on December 7. This addition, which reconfigured the front facade and entry sequence, enhanced accessibility and visual appeal while adding immersive projection capabilities using Canadian-invented technology. By 2021, the theatre had screened 65 films to 7.3 million visitors since its debut, underscoring its role in sustaining long-term attendance growth during the era. Operational peaks aligned with these infrastructural upgrades and rotating special exhibits, which drew record crowds and diversified programming. Annual attendance climbed steadily, reflecting broader economic expansion in and increased tourism to , with visitor numbers exceeding 1 million by the mid-2000s. The centre reached its highest recorded attendance of 1.287 million in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, driven by popular temporary installations and school outreach programs that engaged over 100,000 students annually. In 1990, a campaign successfully preserved the on-site Science School amid funding threats, ensuring continuity in residential educational programs that hosted thousands of students for hands-on learning residencies. These efforts, supported by provincial grants and private partnerships, positioned the centre as a leading North American institution during a period of financial stability and programmatic innovation prior to subsequent maintenance challenges.

Operational Challenges and Maintenance (2010-2022)

During the 2010s, the Ontario Science Centre experienced a steady decline in attendance, dropping from a peak of 1.287 million visitors in 2009/10 to 932,258 in 2015/16, a reduction of approximately 28-30 percent, attributed to outdated exhibits, increased competition from newer attractions like Ripley's Aquarium, and the centre's isolated location. Pre-pandemic figures further reflected this trend, with attendance falling 12.5 percent from 920,000 in 2013/14 to 805,000 in 2018/19, while memberships declined 31 percent from 20,677 in 2012/13 to 14,312 by 2022/23. These trends strained revenues, as the centre relied heavily on admissions and memberships, exacerbating financial pressures amid stagnant provincial operating grants of approximately $19.4 million annually since 2012/13. Maintenance challenges intensified due to the facility's aging , built in , with a 2013 facility condition index rating it at 38 percent—indicating poor overall state—and projecting $194.8 million in deferred maintenance costs over 20 years from 2016. By April 2022, assessments estimated $370 million needed for deferred maintenance and critical repairs, excluding additional costs for structural elements like the pedestrian bridge, which closed in June 2022 after inspections revealed cracks and leaks posing safety risks. This closure incurred $2.4 million in 2022/23 for shuttle services to transport visitors between buildings, highlighting operational disruptions from unaddressed issues. Since 2017, 42 critical projects totaling $16 million remained unfunded, including repeated requests for $4 million in plumbing renewals, contributing to broader inefficiencies in the 568,000-square-foot building where only 18-30 percent of supported exhibits. Funding constraints compounded these problems, with support comprising 64 percent of revenues ($24.7 million total in 2022/23), yet insufficient to cover rising costs exceeding $6.7 million annually or the $48.3 million in critical repairs projected by 2018/19. Outdated , including aging exhibits averaging 14 years old and obsolete IT systems, limited programming effectiveness, with the shuttered in September 2022 due to repair needs. External factors like Eglinton Crosstown LRT construction further hampered access, while internal inefficiencies—such as single-purpose visitor trips and underutilized space—drove operating costs to unsustainable levels, prompting business cases to deem the unviable without major intervention.

Architecture and Grounds

Design Principles and Architectural Significance

The Ontario Science Centre was designed by of Moriyama & Teshima Architects, commissioned in 1964 as Ontario's project for Canada's celebrations and completed in 1969. Moriyama's design philosophy emphasized a "sequence of experiences" to guide visitors through discovery, structured in zones including a forecourt with cooling and , a mundane entrance building, a psychological break via a 260-foot over the ravine, the core , escalators for adjustment, and valley-level exhibits. This progression integrated architectural elements with natural transitions, using the bridge's blue walls to create visual afterimages enhancing ravine views. Central to the principles was harmonious site integration within the Don River Valley and Ernest Thompson Seton Park, respecting local topography from tableland to valley floor while minimizing environmental disruption—such as fining $1,000 per unauthorized tree cut—and incorporating flood-control berms designed for an 800-year event following . The structure employed durable poured and with board-form patterns and "ooze joints" to evoke natural textures, blending modernist aesthetics with rough-hewn forms reminiscent of temples, rather than strict Brutalism. Human-scale exhibit halls promoted participatory, hands-on learning engaging all senses, with modular flexibility for evolving displays and constant vistas of the landscape underscoring nature's role in scientific inquiry. Architecturally significant as Canada's inaugural interactive —and among North America's pioneers—the Centre exemplified innovative public fusing , , and , influencing global science centre designs. Its technical achievements, including innovation, earned a 1969 Institute award, while later recognitions include the Ontario Association of Architects (OAA) Landmark Designation and heritage status under seven of nine Ontario Heritage Act criteria for , historical , and contextual . The building's adaptability, durability, and experiential narrative have positioned it as a of humane , though recent maintenance debates highlight ongoing preservation challenges.

Building Structure and Key Features

The Ontario Science Centre comprises three main buildings designed by Raymond Moriyama of Moriyama & Teshima Architects, constructed between 1966 and 1969 on a 45-acre site in the Don River Valley. The structure totals approximately 568,000 square feet, distributed across multiple terraced levels that adapt to the ravine's natural contours, promoting an organic integration with the landscape through cascading forms and elevated connections. Brutalist in style, the buildings feature exposed concrete with diverse textures—such as smooth, wood-form imprints, and bush-hammered finishes—to evoke geological and natural motifs while ensuring durability in the humid environment. Inter-building connectivity relies on a series of skybridges, escalators, and walkways spanning the ravine, enabling efficient vertical circulation across up to six levels in some sections, with mezzanines for exhibits and secondary floors for offices. Key interior features include expansive exhibition halls, such as the Procter & Gamble Great Hall, designed for large-scale displays, and specialized spaces like amateur radio stations on lower levels. The original entrance façade in Building C bears Moriyama's name in Japanese kanji on the exhibition hall roof, a subtle nod to the architect's heritage. In 1996, the Zeidler Roberts Partnership added a glass-enclosed, two-level lobby and the OMNIMAX Theatre to the front, enhancing with a domed screen for 360-degree projections while preserving the core Moriyama design. This expansion introduced modern amenities like natural light-flooded entryways, contrasting the original's rugged concrete aesthetic but improving visitor flow without altering the primary structural envelope.

Outdoor Spaces and Accessibility

The Ontario Science Centre occupies a 45-hectare site in the Don Valley, characterized by a steep ravine carved by the Don River, with buildings terraced across wooded slopes and a central knoll. The grounds feature natural vegetation along the valley banks, integrating the complex with the surrounding ecosystem and providing scenic outdoor areas that enhanced the visitor experience through views of the ravine and river. This design emphasized harmony between architecture and landscape, spanning the terrain with pedestrian bridges and paths that navigated the elevation changes. Outdoor trails on and adjacent to the property connected to the broader Don Valley trail system, including the West Don Trail, a 2.3-mile out-and-back path from the centre to Wilket Creek with minimal elevation gain of 59 feet, suitable for walking and amid natural settings. Fountains and landscaped elements, such as those visible in historical photographs from , added aesthetic and interactive water features to the exterior spaces. Accessibility to the outdoor areas and overall site included designated extra-wide parking spaces in on-site lots for users, with maintained ramps providing access from parking to sidewalks and workshop zones. Automated entry doors at main entrances and paved pathways supported mobility, though the site's steep required elevators and escalators for full navigation across levels. All building levels were reachable by elevators, and courtesy s were available for loan, alongside accessible washrooms on multiple floors. Limited seating existed in the OMNIMAX , and staff training addressed assistive devices.

Exhibitions and Programs

Permanent Galleries and Interactive Exhibits

The Ontario Science Centre housed over 500 interactive exhibits across ten halls on , designed to engage visitors through hands-on exploration of scientific principles in fields such as physics, , astronomy, and human . These permanent installations emphasized , with activities encouraging manipulation of objects, observation of phenomena, and experimentation to demonstrate concepts like force, energy, and ecosystems. Key exhibits included the Rain Forest on Level 6, a simulated tropical featuring live , humidity-controlled air, and uneven terrain to immerse visitors in and climatic conditions, complete with resident animals like . Adjacent in the Bruce Poon Tip Living Earth Hall, displays explored global ecosystems and environmental interactions through interactive models of geological processes and wildlife habitats. On Level 4, KidSpark provided a dedicated for children aged 10 and under, offering learn-through-play stations focused on basic , , and sensory development, such as building structures and simulating veterinary care. The nearby exhibit allowed interaction with models of bodies, simulations, and demonstrations to convey astronomical scales and . Level 6's Rock Paper Science Hall and Hot Zone featured physics-based challenges, including torque experiments with levers and tests using heated objects, promoting understanding of material properties and . The Human Edge explored and sensory perception via stations on muscle function, balance, and reaction times, while the Innovation Centre showcased prototyping tools for visitor-designed inventions, fostering creativity in . The Science Arcade, a fixture since the centre's 1969 opening, occupied multiple levels with arcade-style games illustrating , , and motion, such as giant machines for probability and illusion rooms for . Level 5's A Question of Truth delved into scientific methods, with puzzles and interpretation tasks to highlight evidence-based reasoning and testing. These exhibits collectively prioritized direct interaction over passive viewing, aligning with the centre's founding as one of the world's first interactive science museums.

Educational Initiatives Including Science School

The Ontario Science Centre Science School, established in , provided a tuition-free, semester-long program for up to 36 selected Grade 12 students from across , allowing them to earn credits in science and while engaging in hands-on learning within the centre's facilities. The curriculum emphasized collaborative projects, , laboratory work, and real-world applications of , guiding students through the full process from research to prototyping. Small class sizes enabled personalized instruction, fostering skills in and preparation for postsecondary studies. Beyond the Science School, the centre offered eight distinct types of school programs as of the 2022/23 , including on-site and options tailored to needs in subjects like chemistry, physics, and Earth and space science. Field trips provided discounted group access for hands-on exploration of exhibits, with teachers receiving complimentary admission upon verification of employment. During the , programs adapted to formats, such as livestreamed demonstrations and packages for remote delivery of like chemical and physics principles. Additional resources supported educators through downloadable lesson plans, experiments, videos led by specialists, and curriculum-aligned materials for Grades 11 and 12, distributed via the centre's website and teacher eNewsletter. extended to livestream events with educators, promoting interactive for broader student audiences, though specific participation metrics were not publicly detailed. Following the centre's closure in 2023, the Science School program relocated to for continued delivery, while other initiatives shifted to temporary venues like and .

Special Events and Temporary Programming

The Ontario Science Centre supplemented its permanent galleries with temporary exhibitions and special events designed to explore emerging scientific topics, historical innovations, and interactive themes, often attracting record visitor numbers. These programs rotated periodically to maintain public interest and educational relevance, featuring traveling displays from international partners and hands-on workshops tied to seasonal or topical events. A landmark temporary exhibition was "China, 7000 Years of Discovery," organized in cooperation with the Science and Technology Museum and held from May 1 to October 31, 1982. This display showcased over 200 artifacts illustrating Chinese scientific and technological advancements spanning millennia, including early astronomical instruments, medical tools, and engineering feats, drawing significant crowds during its Toronto run before touring other North American venues. In later years, the centre hosted themed temporary exhibits such as a six-month display on history around , which examined the of digital technology through interactive simulations and historical consoles. Special events included live demonstrations and pop-up activities, like eco-science workshops at partner sites and circus-themed programming exploring physics in performance arts, though these intensified post-2023 closure as satellite experiences at locations including and .

Governance and Funding

Organizational Structure and Affiliations

The Ontario Science Centre, legally the Centennial Centre of Science and Technology, functions as a Crown agency under the , with its operations overseen through provincial accountability frameworks including memoranda of understanding with ministries for legal and advisory support. It is governed by a Board of Trustees appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, which sets organizational strategy, priorities, and addresses major financial or operational issues without direct involvement in day-to-day management. The board comprises 18 members, including Chair John Carmichael, a corporate director and former ; Vice-Chair Chris Tambakis, CEO of Adgar Canada; and 16 trustees from sectors such as , , consulting, and education, selected for expertise in governance and innovation. Executive leadership is provided by Paul Kortenaar, PhD, who directs operational activities, staff, and program delivery, supported by a team including roles in and facilities. Recent organizational transformations, initiated around 2020, have refined internal structures to align with strategic mandates, emphasizing efficiency amid fiscal constraints and relocation planning. The centre maintains affiliations with professional networks such as the (ASTC), enabling participation in the ASTC Passport Program for reciprocal member benefits, and the (CASC), which facilitates cross-institutional access agreements and collaborative programming. These memberships support educational outreach and resource sharing among science institutions, though corporate partnerships (e.g., with for environmental programming) are project-specific rather than structural.

Financial Model and Government Role

The Ontario Science Centre functions as an agency of the , classified as an operational enterprise Crown agency under the oversight of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming. The provincial government provides core operational funding through annual , which historically cover approximately 60-70% of expenses, with the remainder derived from self-generated revenues such as admission fees, educational program fees, memberships, corporate sponsorships, and donations. In the ending March 31, 2023, provincial totaled $19.4 million, supporting an operating budget that included additional revenue streams like $4.6 million from general admissions in the pre-COVID year of 2019-20. The government's role extends beyond funding to governance, including the appointment of the board of trustees, which holds ultimate responsibility for strategic direction and financial accountability. This structure ensures alignment with provincial priorities in science education and public engagement, though it has drawn scrutiny for dependency on taxpayer support amid fluctuating attendance and revenue, particularly post-COVID-19 when admissions revenue dropped significantly. Supplementary funding has been provided for specific needs, such as $4.92 million in additional provincial support during the 2023-24 fiscal year to address operational challenges. Efforts to enhance financial sustainability have included diversification through partnerships and , but the model remains heavily reliant on grants, reflecting the Centre's as a public rather than a fully commercial entity. Annual and business plans, publicly reported, demonstrate consistent deficits bridged by provincial allocations, underscoring the 's pivotal role in maintaining viability.

Operational Efficiency and Cost Management

The Ontario Science Centre's operations were funded primarily through a provincial of $19.4 million annually, supplemented by self-generated revenues targeting $16.4 million in 2023-24, amid pressures from declining attendance and post-COVID recovery. Total annual operating expenses reached approximately $36 million, with labour costs comprising about $22.6 million for roughly 244 full-time equivalents, reflecting for exhibits, , and maintenance. Cost management relied on strategies such as revenue diversification via and licensing, alongside digital efficiencies like tools to reduce manual processes, though persistent deficits were projected at $6.7 million for 2023-24 due to fixed costs outpacing revenues. Operational efficiency was hampered by the facility's 1960s-era design, utilizing less than 30% of its 568,000 square feet for exhibitions and allocating over 50% to non-public spaces, which constrained generation and exacerbated demands. Aging systems, including HVAC and electrical beyond their useful life, contributed to high occupancy costs of $5.4 million in 2019-20 and a deferred backlog of $370 million as of 2022, including $16 million for pedestrian bridge stabilization. The province absorbed certain major repairs, such as $1.188 million in 2023-24, but annual lifecycle costs were estimated at $7.5 million, underscoring inefficiencies from outdated layout and limited flexibility for modern programming. In response, the provincial government's advocated relocation to a smaller, modern facility at , projecting $8.2 million in annual operating savings through reduced staffing (from 250 to 215 FTEs) and lifecycle costs ($5.8 million annually), yielding $257 million in savings over 50 years compared to $1.3 billion for maintaining the site. However, the Office of the critiqued this analysis for incompleteness, omitting financing, transaction, and parking costs (e.g., $307 million for 2,000 spaces) while lacking full input on impacts, though it affirmed real deferred maintenance pressures without endorsing rushed decision-making. Independent reviews have questioned repair cost estimates, suggesting figures like $369-478 million for capital needs may overstate immediate requirements relative to historical annual maintenance under $4.8 million.

Closure and Relocation

Structural Assessment and Immediate Closure (2023-2024)

In early 2024, structural engineers conducted an assessment of the Science Centre's roof, revealing deficiencies in its panels, which were installed when the building opened in 1969. The report, delivered to Infrastructure around March 1, 2024, identified panels in a "distressed, high-risk condition" susceptible to failure under anticipated snow loads during the 2024-2025 winter. A subsequent analysis by Rimkus Consulting Group, received by the provincial in the week prior to June 21, 2024, confirmed the risk of potential roof panel collapse, prompting immediate action. On June 21, 2024, the Ford government announced the permanent closure of the facility effective at the end of that day, citing professional engineering advice to prioritize public safety over continued operations. The decision followed internal planning that began at least one week earlier, amid pre-existing relocation plans announced by Premier Doug Ford on April 18, 2023, to move operations to Ontario Place. Officials emphasized that repair costs, estimated in the tens of millions, would be uneconomical given the building's age and the government's commitment to a new facility, with contents to be cleared by late October 2024. A follow-up report released on July 11, 2024, expanded on broader infrastructure challenges, including degraded heating, ventilation, sprinkler, and electrical systems, reinforcing the government's stance against reopening. However, independent structural engineers, in a published in July 2024, argued that the original Rimkus assessment did not necessitate a full closure, asserting that targeted reinforcements could mitigate risks without evacuating the site, particularly as similar panels in schools have not prompted comparable shutdowns. The government dismissed repair proposals as "foolish," prioritizing the relocation timeline over interim fixes.

Government Rationale for Relocation

The Ontario government closed the Ontario Science Centre on June 21, 2024, following engineering assessments that identified risks from degraded reinforced (RAAC) roof panels, including potential panel failure and safety hazards to visitors and staff. Officials stated that immediate closure was necessary based on professional advice, with a subsequent in July 2024 affirming the decision due to widespread structural disrepair across the 50-year-old building. Repair estimates for the Don Mills Road facility ranged from $369 million to nearly $500 million, encompassing roof replacement, reinforcement of concrete elements, and addressing systemic issues like leaks and deterioration, which officials described as making full economically unviable. A November 2023 business case, prepared by Infrastructure , projected that relocating to a new facility at would save taxpayers $257 million in over 50 years compared to maintaining the existing site, factoring in lifecycle costs, ongoing maintenance, and operational inefficiencies of the aging structure. The relocation aligns with the broader revitalization of , positioning the Science Centre as an in a modern, purpose-built venue designed for enhanced educational programming and accessibility via improved public transit and waterfront integration. Government statements emphasized that the new site would deliver state-of-the-art exhibits, increased attendance potential, and long-term sustainability, avoiding repeated capital expenditures on a facility deemed a "mess from top to bottom" by .

Public and Expert Criticisms

Public backlash to the Science Centre's abrupt on June 21, 2024, included widespread protests and petitions demanding repairs over relocation, with advocates arguing the decision deprived families of a key educational resource during peak summer months. A September 2024 poll commissioned by the Public Service Employees Union found that nearly 80% of Ontarians favored renovating the existing facility rather than building a new one at , citing concerns over lost and . Community groups and former visitors expressed frustration with the government's prior neglect of , which they viewed as enabling the structural pretext for , leading to four months for staff to dismantle exhibits amid reports of inadequate storage conditions plagued by pests. Critics among the public and opposition politicians highlighted the relocation's ties to the broader Ontario Place redevelopment, accusing the Ford government of prioritizing private partnerships—such as with Therme Group for a spa—over public science education, with costs for the new facility escalating by approximately $400 million since 2023 according to the provincial auditor general's December 2024 report. The sudden shuttering was labeled a "betrayal" by laid-off employees, who noted the irony of a science institution closing due to deferred infrastructure upkeep, exacerbating shortages in hands-on STEM programming for schools. Local residents in Don Mills protested the potential demolition of the 1969 building, viewing it as an erasure of community identity tied to its forested hilltop location, distinct from the waterfront Ontario Place site seen as less suitable for immersive exhibits. Architectural experts, including the firm of original designer Raymond Moriyama (Moriyama Teshima Architects), contested the closure's necessity in June 2024, stating that targeted roof repairs—addressing the reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) panels flagged in the government's engineering report—could be implemented without full shutdown, and offering pro bono services to prove viability. Elsa Lam, editor of Canadian Architect, published analyses debunking the province's business case for relocation, arguing that projected savings of $257 million over 50 years ignored higher operational costs at the new site and underestimated renovation expenses, which independent estimates placed closer to feasible short-term fixes rather than the government's $1 billion-plus figure. Engineering critiques questioned the immediacy of the risk, noting that while some panels posed hazards, the peer-reviewed report did not indicate imminent whole-building collapse, and comparable RAAC issues in Ontario schools received mitigation without closure. Preservationists emphasized the structure's modernist significance, warning that relocation undermined decades of adaptive reuse precedents for aging public buildings.

Development of New Facility at Ontario Place

In April 2023, the Ontario government announced plans to relocate the to as part of a broader revitalization project that includes commercial developments such as a and waterpark operated by Therme Group. The new facility is intended to deliver science-based educational programming in a modern, sustainable structure using a design-build-finance-maintain (DBFM) model. Procurement advanced with a request for qualifications (RFQ) issued on May 9, 2024, followed by a request for proposals (RFP) on January 27, 2025, which closed in early October 2025. Three teams were shortlisted in January 2025 for further evaluation. Construction is scheduled to commence in 2025, with an opening now projected for 2029—delayed from an initial 2028 target. The proposed facility spans approximately 275,700 square feet, including 110,000 square feet of indoor exhibit space, representing an 18% reduction compared to the existing centre. Initial cost estimates from the March 2023 business case projected $387 million for design and construction borne by the , with additional operational and maintenance costs over 30 years. However, by late 2024, expenses had escalated by nearly $400 million from the 2023 baseline, exceeding $700 million according to the provincial auditor general's assessment, amid the larger $2.2 billion redevelopment.

Impact and Legacy

Educational and Scientific Contributions

The Ontario Science Centre has advanced education primarily through hands-on, interactive exhibits and targeted programs designed to foster curiosity and literacy among diverse audiences, including school groups and families. Since its establishment, the institution has prioritized , with exhibits such as KidSpark for young children emphasizing play-based discovery of physics and principles. This approach aligns with broader centre practices of developing displays that convey technological concepts to promote public understanding, as evaluated through visitor feedback and iterative exhibit modifications. A of its educational offerings is the Science School program, which provides semester-long, credit-bearing Grade 12 university preparation courses in subjects like physics and to around 30 students from across annually. These immersive experiences integrate facility resources for practical application, contributing to deeper engagement with scientific inquiry compared to traditional classroom settings. Complementing this, the Centre delivers school outreach, virtual lessons, and access programs reaching targeted demographics, with 46% of online attendance from schools in the 2022–2023 fiscal year. Initiatives like the Weston Youth Innovation Award recognize student-led projects, encouraging innovation among Canadian youth. In terms of measurable outcomes, internal surveys from 2012/13 to 2021/22 indicate visitor perceptions of enhanced learning, informing exhibit updates to maximize educational efficacy, though comprehensive longitudinal studies on long-term STEM career influences remain limited. Interactions with on-site facilitators have been shown to boost visitor engagement and learning behaviors at interactive stations, per observational studies. The 2023 Impact Report highlights self-assessed successes in inspiring STEM pursuits, with programs like Our Climate Quest addressing real-world issues such as environmental impacts to promote informed citizenship. Scientifically, the Centre contributes by curating and premiering exhibits on topics like , particle , and mysteries, making complex research accessible without conducting primary investigations itself. Features such as the A Question of Truth gallery challenge visitors' views on scientific practice, with studies revealing shifts in understandings of evidence-based reasoning post-visit. Overall, these efforts have positioned the Centre as a model for informal science education, influencing similar institutions globally through touring productions and pedagogical adaptations.

Cultural and Architectural Influence

The Ontario Science Centre, designed by architect and completed in 1969 as a project, pioneered an architectural approach that harmonized modernist structures with the rugged Don River ravine terrain in . Its design featured modular, adaptable pavilions linked by outdoor escalators and skybridges, enabling flexible reconfiguration for interactive exhibits and emphasizing over conventional museum layouts. This integration of built form with natural contours influenced subsequent public institutions by demonstrating how architecture could facilitate dynamic, participatory environments that encourage visitor immersion in scientific concepts. Brutalist elements, including raw walls with wood-imprinted and bush-hammered textures, reflected the site's while prioritizing durability and low-maintenance functionality for high-traffic educational use. Moriyama's emphasis on humane scale and democratic access—drawing from principles of and —established a template for Canadian civic , as seen in his later works like the , and inspired designs prioritizing adaptability amid technological evolution. The centre's legacy as Moriyama's debut major commission underscored a shift toward buildings that serve as active tools for public enlightenment rather than mere monuments. Culturally, the Science Centre advanced science education by introducing one of the world's earliest models of hands-on, interactive exhibits, departing from didactic displays to promote direct experimentation and problem-solving among visitors. This format, which engaged over 50 million attendees by 2023, cultivated widespread scientific curiosity and literacy in Ontario and beyond, shaping informal learning paradigms that influenced global science centres to adopt participatory methods for fostering innovation and critical thinking. By embedding exhibits within a landscape that mirrored natural processes, it reinforced a cultural narrative of science as intertwined with everyday environments, contributing to Canada's identity as a hub for accessible STEM engagement.

Ongoing Debates on Preservation vs. Modernization

The relocation of the to a new facility at has sparked debates over preserving the original 1969 structure, designed by , versus pursuing modernization to address aging infrastructure and operational inefficiencies. Preservation advocates, including architectural bodies, argue that the building's innovative, site-specific design—integrating natural ravine elements with modular exhibit spaces—holds enduring cultural and educational value, warranting rather than . The Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (RAIC) has opposed relocation, emphasizing the structure's role in pioneering interactive science museums and its potential for sustainable amid goals, as reusing existing buildings avoids high embodied carbon from new construction. A 2003 heritage significance study identified character-defining elements like the terraced form, raw concrete finishes, and landscape integration as meriting protection, supporting calls for formal designation despite its current listing only on Toronto's Heritage Register without legal safeguards. The Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) and Toronto Society of Architects (TSA) have advocated retaining the site for community facilities, critiquing demolition as cultural erasure and proposing phased repairs to reactive aggregate concrete (RAAC) roof panels without full closure. Legal challenges to halt redevelopment, including a June 2024 lawsuit alleging misrepresented safety risks, were dismissed, but they underscored claims that urgent collapse threats were overstated to justify relocation. Government proponents of modernization cite a 2023 business case estimating $1.3 billion in costs to repair and maintain the existing site—encompassing roof replacement, HVAC upgrades, electrical overhauls, and sprinkler systems—versus $1.05 billion for a consolidated new venue designed for higher efficiency and attendance. Officials, including Premier , have deemed full repairs "foolish" given the building's deferred maintenance and a July 2024 peer-reviewed assessment confirming vulnerabilities alongside systemic failures requiring nearly $500 million in interventions. The new facility promises updated exhibits, reduced operating costs through a smaller footprint, and integration with revitalization, aligning with fiscal priorities over retention. These positions reflect broader tensions: preservationists question the case's assumptions on repair scalability and long-term savings from new builds, while analyses prioritize verifiable structural and taxpayer value. As of April 2025, contracts for the project advanced amid ongoing protests, with no reversal on the June 2024 closure, though proposals persist in public discourse.