Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open Software Foundation

The Open Software Foundation (OSF) was a non-profit consortium founded in May 1988 by seven leading computer companies to develop an open, vendor-neutral operating system and portable application environment based on Unix, free from the control of AT&T. Its founding members included Digital Equipment Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, Apollo Computer Inc., International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Nixdorf Computer AG (West Germany), Siemens AG (West Germany), and Groupe Bull (France). The OSF emerged amid the "Unix wars," a period of fragmentation in Unix development following the 1982 AT&T divestiture, as an alternative to the AT&T- and Sun Microsystems-led UNIX International. Its primary goal was to foster and portability across diverse hardware platforms by collaboratively building software technologies that multiple vendors could adopt without proprietary restrictions. Headquartered in —chosen for its proximity to academic institutions like and Harvard—the OSF rapidly expanded, planning to grow its staff from 75 to 250 employees by 1989 to support these efforts. Among its most notable contributions was the operating system, released in 1990 as a -based implementation of Unix that integrated the from with elements of 4.3BSD Unix. served as the foundation for later systems like Digital UNIX (later True64 UNIX) and emphasized for better scalability and distributed computing. The consortium also developed the (DCE), a framework for building distributed applications that included the Distributed File System (DFS) for cross-platform , though the DCE faced complexity and adoption challenges. These projects influenced broader Unix standardization, including contributions to the through collaborative efforts like the Spec 1170 group involving OSF members and others. By the mid-1990s, as Unix fragmentation lessened and industry focus shifted toward unified standards, the OSF merged with the X/Open Company (founded in ) in February 1996 to form The Open Group, a dedicated to advancing open systems and . The Open Group continues to certify Unix and promote related technologies today.

Formation and Early Development

Founding and Initial Goals

The Open Software Foundation (OSF) was proposed by Armando Stettner, an engineer at (DEC), during an invitation-only meeting of the Hamilton Group on January 7, 1988, hosted by DEC at its Palo Alto office on Hamilton Avenue. The Hamilton Group included key Unix vendors such as Apollo, , Gould Electronics, , Honeywell-Bull, InfoCorp, , NCR, , UniSoft, and , who gathered to counter the growing fragmentation in the Unix ecosystem amid intensifying vendor rivalries. Stettner, who had long advocated for DEC's deeper engagement with Unix, urged the group's formation as a response to alliances like the 1987 partnership between and , which threatened to consolidate control over Unix standards. Subsequent meetings, including one in on February 9, 1988, and the invitation of in March, solidified the initiative, leading to the public announcement of OSF's creation in May 1988. OSF was formally registered as a not-for-profit industry consortium under the U.S. National Cooperative Research Act of 1984, which facilitated collaborative while providing antitrust protections for joint ventures. This legal structure, notified to the Department of Justice and on August 25, 1988, enabled OSF to operate as Open Software Foundation, Inc., and its affiliated Open Software Foundation Research Institute, Inc., focusing on shared technological advancements without favoring any single vendor. The core goals of OSF centered on developing an open, vendor-neutral standard for Unix to resolve the ""—a period of competing proprietary extensions that hindered —and to foster a unified for multi-vendor computing. Specifically, OSF aimed to produce reference implementations free from licensing dependencies, including a new Unix , environments, and user interfaces, thereby enabling portable applications across diverse hardware platforms. These efforts prioritized collaborative development of application programming interfaces (), advanced system extensions, and graphical user environments to promote widespread adoption and innovation in open software standards.

Sponsors and Membership Growth

The Open Software Foundation (OSF) was established in May by an initial group of seven major computer companies, often referred to as the "Gang of Seven." These founding sponsors included , , (DEC), (HP), , , and . Each committed significant financial resources, collectively raising over $90 million in initial funding to support the development of open software standards, particularly for Unix-based systems. This sponsorship model positioned OSF as a vendor-driven consortium aimed at fostering and reducing fragmentation in enterprise computing. Sponsorship expanded shortly after formation, with joining as the eighth sponsor in June 1988 and following as a subsequent addition. These corporate backers played a pivotal role in funding OSF's efforts, providing not only capital but also technical contributions to create vendor-neutral standards for operating systems, , and graphical interfaces. By 1991, OSF's broader membership had grown to encompass over 100 companies, reflecting rapid adoption among hardware vendors, software developers, and users seeking unified Unix implementations. This growth underscored the foundation's momentum in attracting industry support to counter competing standards bodies during the . It is important to distinguish OSF from unrelated organizations in the software ecosystem, such as the (FSF) and the (OSI). Founded in 1985 by , the FSF focused on promoting user freedoms through the GNU Project and licensing, emphasizing ethical and ideological aspects of software distribution rather than corporate-led standardization. In contrast, OSF was a nonprofit industry consortium driven by commercial interests to develop practical, open standards for proprietary Unix variants. The OSI, established in 1998, later defined and certified open-source licenses to encourage business adoption of collaboratively developed software, but it postdated OSF's activities and lacked the vendor-specific focus on Unix interoperability.

Organizational Operations

Headquarters and Staffing

The Open Software Foundation established its headquarters at 11 Cambridge Center in , shortly after its founding in 1988, positioning itself in proximity to the to facilitate collaboration with academic and research communities. This central location served as the primary hub for administrative, technical, and strategic operations, reflecting the consortium's focus on developing open software standards through industry-wide cooperation. To support its growing international membership, which exceeded 100 organizations by 1990, OSF opened field offices in key global locations, including , ; , ; , ; and Tokyo, Japan. These offices enabled regional engagement with members, coordination of standards development, and adaptation of technologies to diverse markets, particularly in and . As a not-for-profit , OSF's organizational structure emphasized collaborative research and technology dissemination, featuring a dedicated to advancing open systems innovations alongside programs for cataloging and distributing developed technologies. Staffing expanded rapidly to meet these demands, reaching over 300 employees worldwide by 1990, just two years after inception, with teams comprising engineers, researchers, and support personnel focused on standards creation rather than commercial product sales. This growth underscored OSF's role as a major industry initiative, drawing talent from sponsor companies to build a for software .

Legal and Regulatory Challenges

The Open Software Foundation (OSF) encountered significant legal scrutiny in its early years, primarily stemming from allegations that its collaborative model violated antitrust laws by exerting undue influence over the Unix operating system market. In April 1991, Addamax Corporation, a joint venture between Unisys and Parametric Resources formed to develop computer security software, filed a federal antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against OSF, along with key sponsors Digital Equipment Corporation and Hewlett-Packard Company. Addamax claimed that OSF's procurement process for security features in its OSF/1 operating system was rigged to favor a competitor's product, SecureWare, thereby creating an illegal buying cartel that suppressed competition and damaged Addamax's business prospects; the suit sought over $100 million in damages. The lawsuit tested the boundaries of OSF's structure as a joint venture. OSF had registered under the National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 (NCRA), which shields such collaborations from per se antitrust illegality by subjecting their activities to a "rule of reason" analysis, focusing on whether the conduct actually harms competition rather than presuming harm from the collaboration itself. In a 1993 ruling, the district court dismissed key claims, finding that OSF's procurement decisions did not constitute monopsony price-fixing or an unlawful under the NCRA's protections, as Addamax failed to demonstrate anticompetitive effects in the broader market. The case proceeded to a on causation and damages, but in 1997, the court ruled that even assuming antitrust violations, OSF's actions were not a material cause of Addamax's losses; this decision was affirmed on appeal in 1998 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Concurrently, in 1990-1991, the U.S. launched an investigation into potential monopolistic practices within the computer industry, including scrutiny of OSF's role in Unix development amid broader concerns over collaborative efforts excluding rivals. OSF publicly denied being a primary target but acknowledged the inquiry as part of industry-wide probes into anticompetitive behavior. The investigation concluded without formal charges against OSF, reflecting the NCRA's role in legitimizing such ventures and mitigating regulatory risks. These challenges imposed temporary operational scrutiny on OSF, requiring legal defenses and document productions that diverted resources during its formative period, but they did not halt core development activities, such as the release of in 1990 or subsequent membership growth. The resolutions reinforced the viability of NCRA-registered consortia in fostering innovation without undue antitrust liability.

Key Technologies and Products

OSF/1 Operating System

was released in December 1990 by the Open Software Foundation as a modular, open Unix designed to serve as a for portable, vendor-neutral Unix systems. It combined elements from multiple sources to promote and extensibility, avoiding proprietary code to foster widespread adoption across hardware architectures like , , and . The core of centered on the 2.5 developed at , which handled multitasking through tasks, threads, , and management, replacing traditional Unix kernel components for improved modularity and performance in multiprocessor environments. Key integrations included IBM's Logical Volume Manager from AIX for spanning file systems across disks with dynamic resizing and mirroring; the Berkeley Fast File System (UFS) from 4.3BSD Reno for efficient storage; the BSD networking stack supporting sockets, /, , and NFS version 2 for robust connectivity; and SecureWare's subsystem for C2 and B1-level compliance via lists, privileges, and auditing. 's management, built on 's framework, enabled demand paging, , and shadow objects to support large, sparse address spaces with external pagers for file-backed and anonymous memory. Adoption of was led by (DEC), which used it as the foundation for its OSF/1 AXP release in 1992 on Alpha processors, succeeding the BSD-based and evolving into Digital UNIX (version 3.2 in 1995) and later Tru64 UNIX under and ownership until 2012. Other vendors, including and , contributed components but primarily adapted elements rather than full implementations, with influencing hybrid Unix variants for enterprise servers. As a neutral reference, played a pivotal role in compliance by providing a standardized for application portability and system calls like sigaction and sigprocmask, enabling testing across Unix variants during the era's standards efforts. Its design facilitated certification against .1 and related profiles, promoting consistent behavior in multithreaded and networked environments without .

Motif, DCE, and Other Tools

The Open Software Foundation (OSF) developed the widget toolkit starting in 1989 as a standard for systems, aiming to provide a consistent across applications through a set of widgets, gadgets, and style guidelines. was announced on December 30, 1988, as the user environment for OSF's planned operating system, emphasizing ease of use and portability over existing toolkits like widgets. It became widely adopted in the late 1980s and early 1990s for building professional Unix applications, serving as the foundation for the (CDE), a joint effort among multiple vendors to standardize desktop functionality. In 1994, the IEEE standardized as P1295, defining its () based directly on OSF's specifications to promote . In 2012, was released as under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).) OSF's Distributed Computing Environment (DCE), released in the early 1990s with initial vendor products emerging between late 1992 and mid-1993, provided a middleware platform for building distributed applications across heterogeneous networks. DCE integrated key components including Remote Procedure Call (RPC) for transparent inter-process communication, a security service based on Kerberos for authentication and authorization, and directory services such as the Cell Directory Service (CDS) and Global Directory Service (GDS) for resource location and naming. These elements enabled secure, scalable distributed computing, with RPC leveraging security and directory services to support location-transparent operations, making DCE a competitor to proprietary systems like those in System V. Beyond core products, OSF produced several specialized tools to support development and management in open systems environments. The Distributed Management Environment (DME) offered a framework for administering distributed resources, incorporating technologies selected through OSF's Request for Technology process to handle tasks like configuration and monitoring across networks. The Architecture Neutral Distribution Format (ANDF) enabled the creation of portable binary software packages that could be customized and installed on different hardware architectures without recompilation, facilitating vendor-neutral software distribution. OSF's Open Development Environment (ODE) provided an integrated set of tools for software engineering, including build and version control systems, and has since been released as open source on GitHub by IBM. Additionally, the Test Environment Toolkit (TET) served as an open framework for developing and executing test suites, resulting from collaborative efforts with UNIX International and X/Open to ensure conformance in open systems standards. OSF documented these technologies extensively through technical manuals published by Prentice-Hall, including programmer's guides and reference works that detailed APIs and implementation strategies.

Context of the Unix Wars

Rivalry with System V and Unix International

The Unix Wars emerged from the growing fragmentation of the Unix operating system in the late 1970s and early 1980s, as various vendors and institutions developed incompatible variants based on AT&T's original release from 1983 and the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD), which originated from Unix Version 6 in 1975 and gained prominence with 4.2BSD in 1983 that introduced TCP/IP networking. This divergence was driven by the AT&T divestiture, which took effect in 1984 and allowed commercialization, leading to proprietary enhancements that prioritized vendor differentiation over and creating a cultural and technical rift between AT&T-backed , favored by business users, and the more innovative, academic-oriented BSD. The situation intensified in 1987 when announced a with to unify Unix variants under an enhanced System V, raising concerns among other licensees that Sun would gain undue commercial advantages through preferential access to AT&T's technology. In direct response, major Unix vendors including , , and formed the Open Software Foundation (OSF) in May 1988 to promote a more open, collaborative approach to Unix development, countering what they perceived as the proprietary direction of AT&T's System V efforts. To oppose OSF, AT&T and Sun established later in 1988 as a dedicated to advancing System V as the industry standard, allowing members to influence its evolution while maintaining vendor control. This rivalry deepened the , with OSF emphasizing openness and broad participation in standards development, in contrast to UI's focus on controlled, AT&T-led unification, resulting in parallel efforts that further divided the vendor community and complicated .

Collaborative Initiatives like COSE

In the early 1990s, amid the ongoing that had pitted the (OSF) against (UI), collaborative efforts emerged to reconcile competing factions and unify Unix development. A pivotal initiative was the launch of the Common Open Software Environment (COSE) on March 17, 1993, by , , SunSoft, (USL, AT&T's Unix division), the (SCO), and Univel. COSE aimed to foster a unified , later known as the (CDE), and establish open application programming interfaces (APIs) to reduce fragmentation in Unix systems. In March 1994, OSF reorganized its structure and adopted COSE's collaborative technology model as its Pre-Structured Technology (PST) process, enabling multi-vendor development of shared specifications and reference implementations. As part of these reconciliation steps, and (via USL) joined OSF as sponsor members, while OSF submitted its user interface toolkit to the X/Open Consortium for standardization and branding. This shift toward collaboration was largely driven by the rising dominance of Microsoft's platform, which threatened to erode Unix's and compelled former rivals to prioritize over infighting.

Merger and Transition

Path to Consolidation

In the early to mid-1990s, the Open Software Foundation (OSF) executed a strategic pivot, scaling back its commitment to comprehensive operating system development after the maturation of and redirecting resources toward modular components, particularly desktop environments and application portability tools. This shift was formalized through a major reorganization announced on March 23, 1994, which established a new emphasizing collaborative, pre-integrated technologies to foster broader adoption and reduce redundant efforts in full-stack OS creation. A key element of this reorganization involved OSF's absorption of and related technologies from in 1994, effectively dissolving UI as an independent entity and incorporating its sponsor companies—such as and —directly into OSF's structure. This integration ended the parallel development tracks of the era, consolidating UI's contributions on standards like the (CDE) under OSF's umbrella and streamlining efforts toward unified open systems architectures. The reorganization also introduced OSF's Pre-Structured Technology (PST) process in March 1994, adapting the collaborative framework from the Common Open Software Environment (COSE) initiative to accelerate multi-vendor technology delivery, with a heightened emphasis on desktop usability and cross-platform portability. Building on this, OSF announced in 1995 the merger of the OSF/ toolkit and CDE into a unified CDE/Motif project, sponsored by major vendors including , , , and SunSoft, aimed at converging these technologies into a single, enhanced development stream compatible with existing CDE 1.0 implementations. Concurrently, OSF pursued negotiations with X/Open throughout 1994 and 1995 to harmonize their respective standards processes, including alignment on specifications for Unix branding and desktop services, which laid the groundwork for deeper integration of OSF's technology outputs with X/Open's portability guidelines.

Formation of The Open Group

In February 1996, the Open Software Foundation (OSF) and X/Open Company Ltd. announced their merger during a at the UniForum 96 conference, formally establishing The Open Group as the successor organization. This merger combined OSF's focus on developing open software technologies with X/Open's emphasis on defining portability standards, aiming to create a unified entity to advance open systems . The Open Group was tasked with managing key Unix-related standards, trademarks—including the UNIX trademark held by X/Open—and technologies to streamline industry-wide adoption of open specifications. As part of the merger mechanics, OSF's primary assets, such as the operating system, user interface toolkit, and (DCE), were transferred to The Open Group, enabling centralized stewardship of these resources. This transfer was facilitated by OSF's earlier absorption of Unix International in March 1994, which had already consolidated competing Unix development efforts and reduced overlapping initiatives. The immediate outcomes included the dissolution of OSF as an independent entity and the unification of branding under The Open Group for the , which integrated elements from both organizations' prior work to promote a single, vendor-neutral Unix conformance standard. This consolidation marked the end of fragmented Unix standardization efforts and positioned The Open Group as the primary authority for open systems development moving forward.

Legacy and Influence

Adoption and Technological Impact

The OSF/1 operating system served as the foundational basis for Digital Equipment Corporation's (DEC) Tru64 UNIX, which evolved from DEC OSF/1 and remained in commercial use through various iterations until its end-of-life support in 2012. Elements of OSF/1, particularly its integration of the microkernel (version 3.0 developed under OSF auspices), influenced the kernel architecture of Apple's early macOS releases, known then as OS X, where Mach provided core and multitasking capabilities atop a BSD layer. The widget toolkit and (CDE), both developed under OSF, saw widespread adoption in commercial Unix variants during the 1990s and early 2000s. In ' , CDE became the default desktop, leveraging Motif 1.2 for its graphical user interface and application development, ensuring consistent look-and-feel across X11-based environments. Similarly, integrated CDE as the standard user environment in starting with version 10.20, replacing earlier interfaces like HP VUE and promoting interoperability in enterprise Unix deployments. These technologies indirectly shaped open-source desktops such as and , which drew inspiration from CDE's session management, file manager paradigms, and widget standards to establish modern graphical environments. OSF's Distributed Computing Environment (DCE) established key principles for distributed systems , acting as a procedural RPC precursor to object-oriented frameworks like CORBA by defining standardized interfaces for remote procedure calls, security, and across heterogeneous networks. DCE's RPC model was adopted by for , where it formed the basis of MSRPC, enabling and client-server interactions in enterprise Windows environments. Additionally, DCE's , such as the Cell Directory Service (), prefigured LDAP protocols, with later DCE implementations incorporating LDAP clients to bridge legacy directory access with emerging standards. OSF technologies contributed to the evolution of POSIX and IEEE standards by promoting compliant implementations in OSF/1 and related tools, influencing areas like system interfaces and portability in IEEE Std 1003.1. Following the merger into The Open Group, OSF tools including the Open Development Environment (ODE) and Test Environment Toolkit (TET) were open-sourced; ODE, focused on integrated development for C/C++/Java projects, became available via repositories like IBM's modifications, while TET provided a cross-platform testing framework released as free open-source software with full documentation.

Modern Relevance and Successors

Following the merger that formed The Open Group in 1996, OSF's mission evolved into the ongoing stewardship of open systems standards, with the organization managing the UNIX trademark on behalf of the industry to ensure consistent certification and interoperability. This includes oversight of the , where OSF-developed technologies such as components of and (DCE) tools underpin the certification criteria for compliant operating systems; the specification's latest edition, Version 4 (2018), aligns with UNIX V7 and incorporates standards extended by OSF contributions. Through these efforts, The Open Group maintains OSF's emphasis on vendor-neutral standards, enabling reduced in enterprise environments as of 2025. Several OSF technologies have seen open-source revivals, preserving their utility in contemporary development and testing. The Open Development Environment (ODE), originally created by OSF for Unix application building, has been released by on as a modified supporting C, C++, and projects across platforms like and Windows, facilitating legacy code maintenance and cross-platform builds. Similarly, the Test Environment Toolkit (TET), an OSF-initiated framework for automated testing, remains in use for conformance validation of open systems standards, including and compliance, through its evolution into TETware maintained by The Open Group. DCE components continue to influence secure distributed systems, with its 5-based authentication integrated into modern protocols and its Distributed File System (DFS) elements appearing in enterprise file-sharing solutions like 's DFS implementations. OSF's work prefigured the open standards movement that accelerated with Linux's rise in the mid-1990s, by fostering collaborative, non-proprietary development during the and contributing to as a foundational portability standard. DCE concepts, such as remote procedure calls (RPC) and cell-based distributed architectures, provide an indirect foundation for paradigms, influencing scalable, secure distributed environments in platforms like modern container orchestration systems. Although no direct organizational revival of OSF exists today, its legacy persists in enterprise Unix variants—such as AIX and Tru64 UNIX—that incorporate OSF-derived elements for compliance, ensuring ongoing relevance in high-reliability computing sectors.

References

  1. [1]
    Software Consortium Selects Cambridge - Los Angeles Times
    Aug 23, 1988 · The Open Software Foundation was created in May with the backing of Digital Equipment Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co., Apollo Computer Inc ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] UNIX Filesystems: Evolution, Design, and Implementation
    ... UNIX International and OSF. The Open Software Foundation (OSF) was founded in 1988 by seven leading computer companies with the goal of producing an ...
  3. [3]
    Untitled
    Formed in 1996 by the merger of the X/Open Company Ltd. (founded in 1984) and the Open Software Foundation (founded in 1988), The Open Group is supported by ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] HISTORY - USENIX
    In May 1988, they announced the formation of the Open Software Foundation to be dedicated to the production of an operating system, a user interface, a.
  5. [5]
    UNIX Wars - The Battle for Standards - Klara Systems
    Dec 1, 2021 · The Open Software Foundation and Unix International gained members over the years. They both ended up with over two hundred members. As time ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Federal Register / Vol. 53, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 1988 ...
    Sep 7, 1988 · National Cooperative Research Act of. 1984; Open Software Foundation, Inc. and Open Software Foundation. Research Institute, Inc.
  7. [7]
    New Foundation to Advance Software Standards, Develop and ...
    May 17, 1988 · The Open Software Foundation (OSF) will develop a software environment, including application interfaces, advanced system extensions and a new ...
  8. [8]
    COMPANY NEWS; Coalition Is Set For Software - The New York Times
    May 18, 1988 · The seven companies said they had raised more than $90 million to form a nonprofit corporation named the Open Software Foundation. The ...Missing: sponsors | Show results with:sponsors
  9. [9]
    https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/26/business/hewlett-sun-in-venture-on-software.html
  10. [10]
    Origins and History of Unix, 1969-1995 - catb. Org
    In 1995 SCO bought UnixWare (and the rights to the original Unix sources) from Novell. In 1996, X/Open and OSF merged, creating one big Unix standards group.
  11. [11]
    SOFTWARE
    The first Open Software Foundation RFT, issued in July 1988, was for the graphical user interface component of OSF-I. It resulted in 39 SUbmissions, 23 of ...
  12. [12]
    Kathryn DeNitto - Center for Retirement Research - Boston College
    Previously, she operated her own marketing and business development consulting firm and was part of the Open Software Foundation in Cambridge, MA, and Munich, ...
  13. [13]
    Oral-History:Dejan Milojicic
    Apr 21, 2020 · I was hoping to start working in Grenoble at the Open Software Foundation Research Institute, I really liked it. Actually, I spent more time ...
  14. [14]
    http://people.cs.kuleuven.be/~dirk.craeynest/ada-belgium/events/97/971128-abs-cfp.html
  15. [15]
    [PDF] General Distribution OCDE/GD(96)159 - OECD
    From 1988 until 1993 Dr. Morel was the Managing Director for Japan and Asia Pacific divisions of the. Open Software Foundation (OSF). At present, OSF is the j/ ...
  16. [16]
    https://www.faqs.org/faqs/dce/faq/
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Distributed Computing Environment: An Architecture for Supporting ...
    It was developed by the Open Software Foundation (OSF) which is a consortium of over 360 members including commercial, government, and university groups. OSF ...
  18. [18]
    COMPANY NEWS; Addamax in Suit On Software Prices - The New ...
    Addamax, a Champaign, Ill., maker of computer security software, filed an antitrust lawsuit against the Open Software Foundation and two of its sponsors ...
  19. [19]
    Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc., 888 F. Supp. 274 ...
    B.​​ The Open Software Foundation ("OSF"), was formed in 1988 by a group of eight computer manufacturers. OSF exists as a not-for-profit joint venture, and is ...Missing: Gang | Show results with:Gang
  20. [20]
    ADDAMAX CORPORATION v. OPEN SOFTWARE FOUNDATION ...
    Addamax Corporation brought a federal antitrust suit against Open Software Foundation (“OSF”), Hewlett-Packard Company and Digital Equipment Corporation.
  21. [21]
    Software Group Denies Probe: The Open ... - Los Angeles Times
    Feb 6, 1991 · Software Group Denies Probe: The Open Software Foundation, a ... FTC opens investigation into Big Tech's partnerships with leading AI startups.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Design of the . OSF /1 Operating System - Bitsavers.org
    ... OPEN SOFTWARE FOUNDATION™. INFORMATION REQUEST FORM. Please send to me the following: ( ) OSF™ Membership Information. ( ) OSF/lTM License Materials. ( ) OSF/l ...
  23. [23]
    OSF/1 - ArchiveOS
    Dec 11, 2024 · OSF/1 (Open Software Foundation 1) – an operating system released by the OSF (Open Software Foundation) in 1990. It is a UNIX that uses Mach as ...
  24. [24]
    OSF releases OSF/1 Version 1.0
    Oct 23, 1990 · The OSF/1 operating system offers a breakthrough in operating system technology while protecting the industry's investment in existing software.Missing: modular | Show results with:modular
  25. [25]
    Digital UNIX - Computer History Wiki
    Feb 11, 2024 · Digital UNIX, initially named DEC OSF/1, is Digital Equipment Corporation ... After the merger of DEC and Compaq, it was re-named Tru64 UNIX.Missing: successor | Show results with:successor
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A Trusted, Scalable, Real-Time Operating System Environment
    OSF/1 is a commercial-quality, Mach-based version of UNIX providing compliance with SVID, POSIX,. XPG3, and numerous other standards. Release 1.0 of. OSF/1 ...
  27. [27]
    X/Motif Programming - ACM Digital Library
    The Motif Toolkit. Motif is a widely accepted set of user interface guidelines developed by the Open Software Foundation and its member companies around 1989, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Motif 1.2.3 Runtime and Development System for Linux
    Oct 1, 1994 · The Motif “shell” program provided with the libraries gives this history of Motif: On December 30, 1988, OSF announced that the user environment ...
  29. [29]
    Desktop Technologies -- Motif - The Open Group
    Motif is also the base graphical user interface toolkit for the Common Desktop Environment (CDE). CDE, originally developed by Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Novell ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Application portability profile (APP) the U.s. government's open ...
    Level of consensus: The IEEE P1295 Working Group has advanced the toolkit API originally based on the OSF MOTIF Application Environment Specification User ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Introduction to OSFTMDCE - Bitsavers.org
    DCE RPC is integrated with the DCE Security Service component to ... both the lower-level DCE services (such as RPC, Security, and Directory) and ...
  32. [32]
    DCE Frequently Asked Questions - The Open Group
    DCE consists of multiple components which have been integrated to work closely together. They are the Remote Procedure Call (RPC), the Cell and Global Directory ...
  33. [33]
    Untitled
    To remedy this situation, OSF has selected several technologies for its Distributed Management Environment (DME). Through the RFT process, OSF has identified a ...
  34. [34]
    IBM/ode: OSF Open Development Environment as modified by IBM
    OSF Open Development Environment as modified by IBM - IBM ... A sample project buildable with ODE is available with git clone git@github.com:IBM/BlueMatter.git.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Xlib and X Protocol Test Suite X Version 11 Release 6.1 User Guide ...
    The "Test Environment Toolkit" is a software tool developed by X/Open, UNIX International, and the Open Software. Foundation. More details of the TET appear in ...Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  36. [36]
    [PDF] User's Guide - Bitsavers.org
    Figure 1-1. Shell Interaction with the User and the Operating System. Figure 2-1. A Typical OSF/l File System. Figure 2-2. Relative and Full Pathnames. Figure 3 ...
  37. [37]
    The UNIX System -- History and Timeline
    1990, XPG3, X/Open launches XPG3 Brand. OSF/1 debuts. Plan 9 from Bell Labs ships. ; 1991, UNIX System Laboratories (USL) becomes a company - majority-owned by ...
  38. [38]
    The Creation of the UNIX* Operating System: The UNIX wars - Nokia
    AT&T entered into an alliance with Sun Microsystems to bring the best features from the many versions of UNIX into a single unified system.Missing: rivalry | Show results with:rivalry
  39. [39]
    Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Company-Histories.com
    In 1987 Sun signed an agreement with AT&T to develop an enhanced version of the UNIX operating system to make it the software standard for workstations.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  40. [40]
    Section 2. Sun and standardization wars - ACM Digital Library
    Sun was to join OSF, and a new OSF was to emerge. Soon after- ward, X/Open announced that it was going to create a common UNIX, called SPEC 1170 UNIX, ...
  41. [41]
    Unix Leaders Complete First Release of Specification for Common ...
    Jun 30, 1993 · The common open software environment process was announced by HP, IBM, SCO, SunSoft, Univel and USL in March 1993. It is intended to ...
  42. [42]
    OSF Announces Reorganization/New Sponsors
    **Summary of OSF Announcement (1994 Reorganization):**
  43. [43]
    OSF Announces Formal Launch of CDE/Motif Project
    Sep 7, 1995 · ... Open Software Foundation's Pre-Structured Technology (PST) development process. The seven sponsors of the CDE/Motif PST are Digital ...Missing: 1994 | Show results with:1994<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    X/Open and OSF Join to Create The Open Group - Tech Insider
    Feb 14, 1996 · The new entity has been formed to strengthen and streamline the entire open systems process, including adoption of open systems specifications, ...
  45. [45]
    Frontmatter - The Open Group Publications Catalog
    Formed in 1996 by the merger of the X/Open Company Ltd. (founded in 1984) and the Open Software Foundation (founded in 1988), The Open Group is supported by ...
  46. [46]
    Definition of Open Group - PCMag
    (The Open Group, Boston, MA) Formed in 1996 as the merger of the Open Software Foundation (OSF) and X/Open organizations, The Open Group is dedicated to ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] UNIX® - The Open Group
    The Open Group forms as a merger of OSF and X/Open. 1996. 1994. SINGLE UNIX ... Open. Software Foundation (OSF) and. UNIX International (UI) formed. Ultrix ...Missing: absorption | Show results with:absorption
  48. [48]
    Distributed Software Administration - Frontmatter
    (founded in 1984) and the Open Software Foundation (founded in 1988) ... IEEE Std 100-1992, IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Mac OS X for UNIX Users - BSD-BOX on SERVERS
    Apple has enhanced BSD by adding Mach 3.0 technology based on the OSF/mk micro- kernel from the Open Software Foundation, providing memory management, thread.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    What Is the Solaris Common Desktop Environment?
    The CDE development environment is based on the X11R5 server and produces applications with a look and feel based on the Open Software Foundation's Motif 1.2 ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Graphics Administration Guide for HP-UX 10.20
    were shipped with hp-UX 10.20: hp VUE and hp CDE (Common Desktop Environment). As of hp-UX. 10.20, hp CDE is the default user environment, and although hp ...
  52. [52]
    Linux Desktop Comparisons (X11, CDE, KDE, Gnome, Unity, Xfce, etc)
    Apr 28, 2012 · This pages is my opinion on various unix/linux Window Managers. (If you want a technical intro, see: Linux: How to Install New Window ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Strategies for Migrating from DCE to CORBA
    In general, CORBA enhances conventional procedural. RPC middleware (such as OSF DCE and ONC RPC) by supporting object-oriented language features (such as en ...Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy
  54. [54]
    Microsoft Windows NT Server From a UNIX Point of View
    The Microsoft DCE-compatible remote procedure call (RPC) is the preferred technique for passing these messages across a network. The client/server relationship ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] DCE Directory & LDAP - The Open Group Archive Server
    Mar 18, 1997 · GOAL: Move DCE forward to embrace. Internet technologies. Step 1: introduction of existing services to exploit ldap client.
  56. [56]
    POSIX retrospective - ACM Digital Library
    The Open Software Foundation fired the first shot by requesting a Project ... Open systems without formal standards are merely marketing fictions. Page ...
  57. [57]
    TETworks: Home page for the Test Environment ... - The Open Group
    Provided as both a freely available Open Source product and a fully supported product, known as TETware (which also includes additional platform support) ...Missing: ODE | Show results with:ODE
  58. [58]
    The UNIX® Standard | www.opengroup.org
    UNIX, an open standard owned and managed by The Open Group, is an enabler of key technologies and delivers reduced total cost of ownership.
  59. [59]
    TET History - TETware
    The TET project started in September of 1989, when the Open Software Foundation, UNIX International, and X/Open entered into an announced agreement to produce a ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Introduction to DCE - IBM
    First Edition (August, 1999). This edition applies to Version 3.1 of IBM Distributed Computing Environment for AIX and Solaris and to all.
  61. [61]
    USENIX ;login: - Single UNIX Specification, Version 2
    Dec 4, 1997 · The Single UNIX Specification, Version 2, provides enhanced support for 64-bit programming models by being n-bit clean and data size neutral.Missing: OSF | Show results with:OSF
  62. [62]
    [PDF] distributed computing environment
    The DCE cloud refers to the distributed computing environment tools that facilitate distributed computing. The DCE Cloud Consists of the Following ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence