Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Praying Mantis


Operation Praying Mantis was a one-day U.S. Navy retaliatory operation launched on April 18, 1988, targeting Iranian naval vessels and oil platforms in the Persian Gulf following the mining of the guided-missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58) by Iranian forces on April 14. The action formed part of broader U.S. efforts under Operation Earnest Will to protect international shipping from Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq War's Tanker Phase, where Iran had mined international waters to disrupt oil exports and targeted neutral vessels. In the operation, U.S. forces, including surface action groups from destroyers and frigates alongside air support from the carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65), systematically neutralized two Iranian oil platforms—the Rostam and Reshadat installations—used as command-and-control centers for speedboat attacks and mining operations. They sank the Iranian frigate IRIS Sahand (F-74) with air-launched missiles and the Boghammer-class gunboat IRIS Joshan after it fired on U.S. ships, while severely damaging the frigate IRIS Sabalan (F-73) despite its defensive efforts. No U.S. warships were sunk or significantly damaged, marking a decisive tactical victory that destroyed or crippled roughly half of Iran's operational surface fleet at the time and demonstrated the superiority of integrated U.S. naval firepower, including the first combat use of Harpoon anti-ship missiles from U.S. surface ships. The engagement, the largest U.S. naval surface battle since , underscored Iran's asymmetric threats through mines and small boats but highlighted the effectiveness of proportional U.S. retaliation in deterring further aggression without escalating to full-scale war. Iranian casualties exceeded 50 personnel, with U.S. losses limited to two aviators killed in a between A-6 Intruders during the strikes. Operation Praying Mantis reinforced U.S. commitment to in the Gulf, prompting to temporarily restrain naval provocations amid its ongoing conflict with .

Historical Context

Iran-Iraq War and the Tanker War

The Iran–Iraq War erupted on September 22, 1980, when Iraqi forces under launched a full-scale invasion of western , aiming to seize the oil-rich and exploit post-revolutionary disarray in . 's leadership, dominated by Khomeini, rebuffed United Nations-mediated cease-fire initiatives and pursued a strategy of attrition, employing mass human-wave assaults that inflicted heavy casualties but yielded limited territorial gains. These tactics, often involving minimally trained militias charging fortified Iraqi positions, reflected 's ideological commitment to exporting its revolution and refusing negotiations until Iraq's . The maritime dimension, known as the , intensified from early 1984 as both sides sought to disrupt the other's oil revenues, with shifting focus to asymmetric attacks on shipping to coerce 's Arab supporters. had initiated strikes on Iranian-bound tankers in 1981 using air-launched missiles, primarily targeting vessels destined for 's export terminal, but Iranian responses broadened the conflict by mining sea lanes and employing small boats and missiles against ships flagged by states like and . This extension of hostilities to third-party commerce aimed to pressure providing financial and logistical aid to , resulting in conducting attacks that disproportionately affected non-Iraqi flagged merchant vessels compared to 's more targeted operations against Iranian-linked traffic. In total, the Tanker War saw over 411 merchant ships assaulted between 1980 and 1988, including 239 oil tankers, with attacks causing 116 merchant mariner deaths and widespread disruptions to Gulf trade. By late 1987, Iraq accounted for 283 such incidents versus Iran's 168, yet Iran's strategy inflicted broader economic ripple effects, including sharp rises in war risk insurance premiums for transiting vessels and episodic volatility in global oil markets as exporters rerouted cargoes and absorbed heightened costs. These dynamics underscored Iran's role in internationalizing the naval conflict, straining neutral shipping and contributing to a protracted stalemate until the 1988 cease-fire.

Operation Earnest Will

Operation Earnest Will commenced on July 24, 1987, when the U.S. Navy began escorting 11 Kuwaiti-owned supertankers reflagged with the American ensign through the to protect them from Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq War's phase. Kuwait had sought U.S. assistance following repeated Iranian strikes on its oil exports, which supplied Iraq's , prompting Tehran to target neutral shipping to coerce into neutrality. The reflagging extended U.S. naval protection under , aiming to deter interference with in vital oil transit routes. Iranian provocations, primarily by the (IRGC) , involved swarms of fast-attack speedboats—such as Boghammar-type vessels—conducting hit-and-run assaults with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades on , directly challenging established maritime norms against attacks on traffic. These operations represented calculated to disrupt global energy flows and punish supporters of , with U.S. intelligence detecting specific IRGC plans to target the initial reflagged using such tactics. By mid-1987, Iranian actions had escalated to include mining international lanes, further evidencing deliberate efforts to deny safe passage to neutral vessels and heighten risks for any intervening power. Although an Iraqi missile struck the USS Stark on May 17, 1987, killing 37 U.S. sailors, the operation's rationale centered on countering Iran's persistent small-boat and campaigns, which systematically undermined the of transit independent of Iraqi errors. Earnest Will thus embodied a U.S. commitment to causal deterrence against Iran's revisionist maritime strategy, prioritizing empirical threat mitigation over broader regional escalations.

Iranian Mining Incidents

Beginning in mid-1987, Iranian forces, primarily the (IRGC) Navy, deployed naval mines in the Persian Gulf's international shipping lanes as part of their escalation in the , employing moored contact mines designed to damage or sink vessels transiting key oil routes. These actions violated principles of the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), including freedoms of navigation and overflight in exclusive economic zones and rights through straits like the , by indiscriminately endangering neutral and commercial shipping in non-belligerent areas. Iranian officials later admitted to the mining but claimed it was defensive, though intelligence assessments linked the devices directly to IRGC operations originating from offshore oil platforms used as forward bases for small-boat deployments and reconnaissance. Key pre-1988 incidents underscored the pattern: on July 24, 1987, the U.S.-escorted supertanker SS Bridgeton (reflagged under ) struck a mine approximately 120 miles southeast of Farsi Island, sustaining hull damage but continuing transit without casualties, marking the first such attack on a protected . On August 10, 1987, the U.S.-chartered tanker Caribbean hit another mine off , , in the approaches, alongside strikes on nearby vessels, further disrupting international commerce. Additional mines were detected and neutralized in shipping channels throughout late 1987, with U.S. forces documenting over a dozen such threats in the central Gulf. U.S. intelligence confirmed Iranian responsibility through forensic evidence, including unique serial numbers stenciled on recovered mines matching IRGC production batches—described in assessments as "Iran's calling card" due to their consistent appearance near attack sites—and the September 21, 1987, interception of the Iranian vessel Iran Ajr. Operating from the Rostam oil platform, Iran Ajr was caught laying mines by U.S. Army MH-6 helicopters from USS Jarrett, yielding nine contact mines on deck, minelaying charts, and logs of prior deployments; 26 crew were detained, and the ship scuttled after evidence extraction. This capture, combined with platform-based IRGC activities, established a deliberate Iranian strategy of asymmetric mining to impede Gulf tanker traffic, prompting heightened U.S. mine countermeasures.

Prelude to the Operation

USS Samuel B. Roberts Incident

On April 14, 1988, the Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided-missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58) struck a moored contact mine while escorting Kuwaiti oil tankers through the central Persian Gulf's main eastbound shipping channel, approximately 65 miles northeast of Bahrain. The incident occurred around 4:50 p.m. local time after lookouts spotted floating mines, but the ship could not avoid the submerged explosive device. The mine detonation ripped a 15-foot hole in the , flooded the port-side main engineering spaces, dislodged both engines from their mounts, ignited fires, and nearly broke the , rendering the nearly inoperable. Despite severe damage, the crew under Paul X. Rinn executed rapid damage control measures, prioritizing structural shoring over immediate firefighting to prevent and further flooding, ultimately saving the ship without . For their actions, 25 crew members received the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal with "V" device for valor, while Rinn was awarded the . U.S. and forensic analysis confirmed the as an Iranian M-08 contact type, matching those previously recovered and linked to Iranian naval forces through residue , design, and serial numbers. This attribution was bolstered by the September 1987 capture of the Iranian vessel actively deploying identical mines in the same region, providing direct evidence of systematic Iranian minelaying operations. The incident exemplified Iran's broader campaign of , involving at least a dozen documented minelaying efforts in the from late 1987 through mid-1988, which endangered international shipping lanes despite Iranian denials of intentional placement. U.S. and allied forces had neutralized over 50 such devices by April 1988, underscoring the deliberate and recurrent nature of these actions amid the .

US Decision-Making Process

Following the USS Samuel B. Roberts striking an Iranian-laid M-08 mine in of the on April 14, 1988—which caused a 9-foot hull breach, structural damage, fires, and injuries to 10 sailors—the U.S. apparatus initiated urgent deliberations on retaliation. The mines matched those previously emplaced by Iranian vessels like the , with forensic evidence indicating recent placement devoid of marine growth, directly implicating despite prior U.S. warnings against such escalatory actions. From April 14 to 17, the convened on April 16 to evaluate response options, with the , led by Chairman Admiral Jr., and Secretary of Defense advocating a restrained yet decisive counter to Iranian aggression. authorized limited strikes on April 17, framing the action under Article 51 of the UN Charter as inherent against repeated threats to U.S. forces protecting neutral shipping. The rationale centered on proportional restoration of deterrence, targeting only military assets after failed diplomatic and warning measures, to signal resolve without broader escalation. Signals intelligence (SIGINT) intercepted Iranian communications confirming minelaying coordination, while (IMINT) from the National Photographic Interpretation Center verified that platforms like Sassan and Sirri functioned as forward bases for (IRGC) speedboats, where arming for attacks and mine emplacement occurred. These dual-use facilities, integrated into Iran's asymmetric naval strategy, had been repeatedly linked to assaults on U.S. and vessels, justifying their neutralization as verifiable enablers of rather than infrastructure. The approved plan extended to Iranian naval vessels only if they initiated hostilities, ensuring the response remained tied to immediate defensive imperatives.

Operational Planning

Strategic Objectives

The primary strategic objective of Operation Praying Mantis was to degrade the (IRGC) Navy's capacity to conduct offensive operations in the by targeting key forward operating bases, specifically the Sassan and Sirri gas-oil separation platforms (GOSPs), which served as surveillance, command-and-control, and staging points for small-boat attacks and mine-laying activities. These platforms had been empirically linked to prior Iranian aggressions, mirroring the rationale in (October 19, 1987), where U.S. forces destroyed and Reshadat platforms after an IRGC-linked attack on a reflagged Kuwaiti tanker, demonstrating a pattern of proportionate retaliation to disrupt such capabilities without broader territorial incursion. A secondary aim was to neutralize any Iranian dispatched in response, thereby ensuring the safety of U.S. forces executing the assaults and compelling Iranian commanders to reconsider escalatory risks, while avoiding strikes on mainland targets or major fleet units to prevent full-scale . This deterrence-focused approach sought measurable reduction in IRGC naval projection, calibrated to inflict sufficient damage—such as halving Iran's operational surface fleet—to halt mine deployments and asymmetric threats in , as evidenced by the absence of new minefields following the .

Composition of US Naval Forces

The U.S. naval forces deployed for Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, were structured into three surface action groups (SAGs) under Commander, , emphasizing multi-mission destroyers, frigates, and cruisers equipped with advanced , systems, and anti-ship capabilities to counter Iranian threats in the . These groups totaled approximately 10 surface combatants, including guided-missile cruisers and frigates with Aegis precursors and missiles, alongside support from carrier air wings for standoff strikes. SAG Bravo, tasked with operations against specified oil platforms, included the destroyer USS Merrill (DD-976), guided-missile destroyer USS Lynde McCormick (DDG-8), and amphibious transport dock USS Trenton (LPD-14) serving as a command and helicopter platform. SAG Charlie comprised the guided-missile cruiser USS Wainwright (CG-28), frigate USS Bagley (FF-1069), and guided-missile frigate USS Simpson (FFG-56), leveraging their combined sonar and missile suites for layered defense and offense. SAG Delta featured the guided-missile destroyer USS Joseph Strauss (DDG-16), supported by A-6 Intruder aircraft from Carrier Air Wing 11 aboard the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65). Additional escorts and assets bolstered the formation, including frigates USS Reasoner (FF-1063), USS Gary (FFG-51), and USS Jack Williams (FFG-24); destroyers USS O'Brien (DD-975); guided-missile cruisers USS Truxtun (CGN-35); and the command ship USS Coronado (AGF-11). Three submarines provided underwater presence, though without specified engagements. This composition highlighted U.S. technological edges in electronic warfare, precision-guided munitions, and integrated air-surface operations over Iran's reliance on asymmetric tactics like small craft and mines.

Execution of the Operation

Assault on Iranian Oil Platforms

The assault on the Sassan commenced at approximately 0755 local time on April 18, 1988, when U.S. forces from Surface Action Group (SAG) Bravo issued a radio warning to Iranian personnel to evacuate, citing the platform's documented use as a command-and-control site for attacks on neutral shipping. U.S. intelligence had previously identified Sassan as militarized by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), featuring equipment for , storage for armaments, and facilities accommodating speedboat operations that supported small-craft assaults during the . At 0804, destroyers USS Merrill (DD-976) and USS Lynde McCormick (DD-976) initiated bombardment with naval gunfire, including airburst rounds to encourage evacuation. A raid force from , supported by AH-1 Cobra helicopters, fast-roped onto Sassan at 0925, securing the structure in about 30 minutes despite sporadic ammunition cook-offs from stored munitions. The team documented a manned 23-mm anti-aircraft —a Soviet ZU-23—which had fired on approaching helicopters before being silenced by a missile, along with command-and-control antennae confirming its military role. Intelligence materials were gathered, after which approximately 1,500 pounds of explosives were detonated around 1130, followed by sustained destroyer gunfire that reduced the platform to an inferno; resistance was minimal, with most personnel having evacuated per warnings. Concurrently, SAG Charlie targeted the Sirri platform eastward of Sassan, issuing similar evacuation warnings before opening fire at 0815 with gunfire from USS Wainwright (CG-28), USS Simpson (FFG-14), and USS Bagley (FF-1069). Like Sassan, Sirri served as an IRGC forward base with radar for coordinating speedboat swarms and armament caches, as verified by pre-strike U.S. assessments of its role in harassing Gulf shipping. A direct hit on a gas storage tank ignited uncontrollable fires, obviating the need for a Marine boarding raid and rendering demolition charges unnecessary; the platform burned fiercely with negligible opposition. Both assaults concluded by mid-morning, demonstrating the platforms' tactical value as military nodes while limiting escalation through prior warnings and rapid execution.

Engagements with Iranian Naval Vessels

Following the assault on Iranian oil platforms, U.S. naval forces shifted focus to Iranian surface combatants detected in the Persian Gulf on April 18, 1988. Surface Action Group Charlie, comprising USS Simpson (FFG-56), USS Bagley (FFG-106), and guided-missile destroyers, encountered the Iranian gunboat Joshan approximately 20 miles northeast of the platforms. Joshan ignored multiple radio warnings and visual signals to halt, then launched an anti-ship missile toward USS Wainwright, which successfully decoyed the incoming threat. In response, Simpson and Bagley fired four Harpoon missiles, two of which struck Joshan, causing it to sink with all hands lost, totaling 28 Iranian sailors. Concurrently, Surface Action Group Delta engaged the Iranian Sahand, a key asset of the equipped with anti-ship missiles and artillery. Sahand maneuvered aggressively toward U.S. forces, prompting USS Joseph Strauss (DD-954) to launch two missiles that struck the frigate's superstructure, disabling its fire control systems. U.S. A-6 Intruder aircraft from USS Enterprise then delivered laser-guided bombs, igniting fires that led to secondary explosions in Sahand's magazine. The frigate sank approximately two hours after the initial strikes, resulting in 45 deaths and rendering Iran's surface fleet severely compromised. The frigate Sabalan, Sahand's sister ship, was also targeted after firing surface-to-air missiles at U.S. aircraft. USS Joseph Strauss launched a Harpoon missile, which malfunctioned, followed by additional strikes from A-6 aircraft using bombs and a successful Harpoon hit that damaged the bridge and flight deck. Sabalan ceased hostilities and withdrew under its own power, avoiding sinking but sustaining heavy damage that sidelined it for repairs. This engagement highlighted U.S. tactical restraint when the threat diminished. Throughout the operation, U.S. forces neutralized several Iranian Boghammar-class speedboats armed with rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns. AH-6 Little Bird helicopters from the Forces contingent strafed and destroyed up to six such vessels attempting tactics against U.S. ships, preventing close-quarters boarding attempts through superior air support and stand-off weaponry. These engagements demonstrated U.S. naval dominance via integrated and strikes, minimizing risks to surface units.

Iranian Response and Operational Disengagement

During Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, Iranian naval forces mounted limited counterattacks using , including (IRGC) Boghammer speedboats, which sortied toward U.S. and allied vessels near the Mubarak oil fields around 1048 local time. These swarms targeted a U.S. supply boat but were repelled by strikes from A-6 Intruder aircraft deploying Rockeye cluster bombs, deterring further advances and forcing the boats to retreat without achieving significant disruption. Larger Iranian vessels also attempted escalation, with the patrol boat Joshan approaching U.S. surface action groups and firing a around 1215, followed by sorties from frigates Sahand at 1459 and Sabalan at 1700 from . These efforts represented uncoordinated probes rather than a cohesive fleet engagement, reflecting higher command caution to preserve remaining naval assets amid the risk of total , as evidenced by the failure to commit additional forces after initial repulses. Iranian air responses were minimal and non-committal; F-4 Phantom sorties launched from remained primarily over land, with one F-4 briefly engaging near the Joshan incident at 1244 before sustaining damage from U.S. surface-to-air missiles and withdrawing. The absence of sustained aerial escalation stemmed from Iran's degraded air capabilities—depleted by prior losses in the Iran-Iraq War and engagements—and the overwhelming U.S. air superiority provided by from USS Enterprise, supported by E-2C Hawkeye early warning and EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare assets that jammed and deterred incursions. U.S. forces adhered to , ceasing offensive actions once immediate threats were neutralized, as directed by Chairman of the Admiral William Crowe around 1715 after disabling Sabalan, marking the operational halt by late afternoon. This disengagement concluded the day's hostilities, with Iranian elements withdrawing to port without mounting a broader counteroffensive, thereby averting a wider fleet confrontation.

Immediate Results

Damage to Iranian Assets

U.S. forces targeted two Iranian oil platforms utilized as surveillance and command centers by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps , rendering them inoperable through demolition charges and naval gunfire on April 18, 1988. These platforms, including those in the field, served as hubs for coordinating attacks on maritime traffic, and their destruction eliminated key nodes for Iranian asymmetric naval operations in the . The Iranian Sahand, a Sa'am-class vessel equipped with anti-ship missiles and capable of launching coordinated strikes, was struck by laser-guided bombs and missiles from U.S. A-6 Intruder aircraft, igniting uncontrollable fires that led to the explosion of its ammunition magazine and subsequent sinking later that day. Post-strike observations confirmed the vessel's loss, with no further signals detected from it. The Iranian missile boat Joshan was sunk after attempting to engage U.S. surface ships with a Harpoon missile; it sustained hits from Standard missiles and 5-inch gunfire from USS Simpson and USS Wainwright, resulting in its rapid foundering. Additionally, at least three armed Boghammer-class speedboats, used for swarming tactics, were destroyed by U.S. helicopter and surface gunfire during encounters in the operational area. These losses degraded Iran's surface fleet capabilities, with confirmed sinkings verified through direct visual by U.S. aircraft and ships, alongside indicating cessation of emissions from the affected units. The Sabalan, another missile-armed vessel, was damaged by cluster bombs but remained afloat and was towed for repairs, though its operational readiness was temporarily compromised.

US Losses and Casualties

The United States experienced no combat-related losses or casualties during Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988. The sole fatalities were two U.S. Marine Corps aviators, Captains Stephen Leslie and Kenneth Hill of HMLA-167, killed in a non-combat accident when their AH-1T Sea Cobra attack helicopter crashed into the Persian Gulf after dark while conducting a reconnaissance mission in pursuit of Iranian speedboats approximately 15 nautical miles from the main task force. No U.S. warships were sunk, damaged by enemy fire, or lost during the operation's engagements with Iranian surface vessels and platforms, underscoring the resilience of U.S. naval forces and the efficacy of damage control training. This was validated by the survival of USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58), which had struck an Iranian moored contact mine four days earlier on April 14, 1988, sustaining severe hull damage and flooding yet remaining afloat through rapid crew countermeasures, with zero fatalities or serious injuries among its 235 personnel. U.S. forces successfully neutralized aerial threats without incurring aviation losses, including the downing of two Iranian F-4 Phantom II fighters that approached U.S. ships in attack postures—one via a from (DDG-16) and the other through coordinated air defense measures—further evidencing the asymmetric qualitative advantages in , technology, and integrated combat systems that minimized risks to American assets amid Iran's numerically larger but technologically inferior .

Legal Proceedings

International Court of Justice Case

Iran instituted proceedings against the before the on November 2, 1992, alleging that U.S. naval forces violated the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights through the destruction of Iranian oil platforms Reshadat and Resalat on October 19, 1987, and Sassan and Sirri on April 18, 1988, during Operation Praying Mantis. The application invoked Article XXI, paragraph 2, of the Treaty as the basis for jurisdiction, which provides for compulsory settlement of disputes arising under the Treaty. The Court later upheld its jurisdiction in a 1996 judgment but confined it to evaluating whether the U.S. actions constituted measures "necessary to protect [the United States'] essential security interests" under Article XX, paragraph 1(d), excluding broader claims under general or the UN Charter. Iran argued that the targeted platforms were installations dedicated to oil production and export, with no legitimate function, rendering the U.S. attacks unlawful breaches of the Treaty's protections for economic rights and property. Iranian submissions emphasized that the Reshadat and Resalat platforms were under repair and non-operational at the time of the 1987 strike, precluding any ongoing threat, and portrayed the 1988 assault as a disproportionate unrelated to immediate needs. Empirical disputes centered on the platforms' status, with Iran contesting U.S. intelligence claims of armaments, installations, and coordination of attacks on neutral shipping, asserting instead that any observed equipment served routine operations. The countered that the platforms had been militarized by Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps elements, functioning as forward bases for surveillance, missile launches, and small-boat attacks on U.S.-flagged vessels during the , supported by intercepted communications and post-strike forensic of weaponry. U.S. arguments framed the April 1988 response as a lawful measure under the following Iran's mining of , exemplified by the April 14 hit on USS , which U.S. forensic analysis attributed to Iranian-supplied mines via explosive residue matching and design provenance, constituting an armed attack justifying proportionate retaliation. Disputes over included Iran's of mine attribution and claims that U.S. overstated platform threats to retroactively justify preemptive strikes, while the U.S. maintained that de-escalatory warnings were issued prior to engagement.

Key Rulings and Their Basis

The , in its judgment of 6 November 2003, dismissed Iran's principal claim that the ' destruction of Iranian oil platforms on 19 October 1987 (Reshadat and Resalat complexes) and 18 April 1988 ( and Salman/Sassan complexes) violated Article X(1) of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights, which protects freedom of commerce and navigation. For the 1987 platforms, the Court found insufficient evidence that they were actively contributing to military operations at the time of attack, but noted their inoperability and the absence of ongoing commercial activity between the parties due to the U.S. trade embargo imposed by Executive Order 12613 on 29 October 1987, rendering no breach of the Treaty's commercial protections. Regarding the 1988 platforms, the Court determined by 14 votes to 2 that the Salman (Sassan) platform had been used by Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces to fire upon a U.S. earlier that day, establishing it as a military site not entitled to protection under Article X(1) as a commercial installation; the platform was similarly assessed in the context of coordinated Iranian naval threats. The rejected, by 11 votes to 5, the ' invocation of under and XX(1)(d) of the (essential security interests) as justification for the attacks. It held that the U.S. failed to prove attributable for an "armed attack" triggering Article 51 of the UN Charter: for the 1987 response, no conclusive linked to the strike on the reflagged Kuwaiti tanker Sea Isle City on 16 October 1987; for 1988, while Iranian mines matching those recovered from the vessel (captured laying mines on 14 July 1987) damaged the USS on 14 April 1988, the found the specific mining incident did not rise to a scale justifying platform destruction as a proportionate , emphasizing that requires , immediacy, and against the originating threat. This narrow evidentiary threshold precluded broader validation of U.S. claims, despite the 's acknowledgment of 's pattern of interference with neutral shipping in the amid the Iran-Iraq War, including threats to close the . On the U.S. counterclaim alleging Iranian breaches of Article X(1) through mining and attacks on neutral vessels, including the Roberts, the Court unanimously dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction and merits, as the incidents did not impede commerce or navigation specifically "between the territories" of the U.S. and Iran under the Treaty's terms; affected vessels operated in international waters of the Gulf, not direct bilateral trade routes. Nonetheless, the ruling implicitly upheld the principle of unimpeded navigation rights for neutral flagged vessels in international straits, attributing general responsibility to Iran for endangering such traffic through its mining campaign, which involved over 100 incidents documented by U.S. naval reports from 1987-1988. The decisions rested on strict factual attributions, with the Court requiring direct evidentiary links rather than presumptions from circumstantial patterns of Iranian Revolutionary Guard activities.

Aftermath and Strategic Impact

Effects on Iranian Naval Capabilities

Operation Praying Mantis inflicted severe damage on Iran's surface naval assets, sinking the Sahand (a 1,100-ton vessel equipped with missiles and guns) and the Joshan, while heavily damaging the Sabalan. Additionally, six (IRGCN) speedboats were destroyed, along with two oil platforms used for surveillance and potential attack coordination. These losses eliminated two of Iran's three operational s—the Sahand and Sabalan being the primary active combatants in its regular navy fleet—effectively neutralizing over half of its major surface warship capacity at the time. The degradation compelled an immediate operational stand-down, as Iran's remaining surface vessels required extensive repairs and the IRGCN's small-boat tactics proved ineffective against U.S. forces during the , resulting in over 50 personnel killed. Gulf shipping records reflect this deterrence, with Iranian attacks on neutral tankers ceasing in the weeks following , 1988, marking a sharp decline from the prior escalation in the . In the short term, the navy's conventional capabilities were halved in terms of deployable combat power, shifting emphasis to defensive postures and accelerating post-operation adaptations toward mines, , and asymmetric IRGCN reliance, though direct Gulf patrols halted to avoid further .

Influence on the Broader Conflict

Following Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, Iranian naval forces curtailed aggressive operations in the , reducing direct threats to international shipping and contributing to de-escalation in the phase of the Iran-Iraq conflict. The U.S. response, limited to targeted retaliation without broader , avoided provoking a wider confrontation while signaling credible deterrence against mine-laying and attacks on neutral vessels. This restraint, paired with the destruction of key Iranian assets including the frigates Sahand and Sabalan, demonstrated that provocations would elicit disproportionate naval losses, altering Iran's tactical calculus without escalating to full-scale war. The operation facilitated the success of Operation Earnest Will by securing reflagged Kuwaiti tankers, which carried approximately 20% of Gulf oil exports, thereby restoring safer passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Attacks on commercial shipping declined sharply afterward, lowering war risk insurance premiums from peaks above 300% in 1987 to more manageable levels by mid-1988 and preventing severe disruptions to global energy markets. This stabilization benefited Gulf allies reliant on oil revenues and underscored the causal link between enforced naval presence and economic continuity amid the conflict. In Iran's strategic assessment, the tangible costs of naval engagements—exacerbated by concurrent Iraqi ground advances—highlighted the futility of sustaining the against a committed U.S. deterrent. These pressures culminated in Iran's acceptance of United Nations Security Council Resolution 598 on July 18, 1988, which Iraq had endorsed a year prior, leading to a on August 20, 1988. The operation's empirical demonstration of retaliatory capacity, without U.S. overreach, thus incentivized Iranian restraint by raising the expected costs of continued disruption, aligning with the war's termination dynamics driven by battlefield realities rather than diplomatic concessions alone.

Long-term Deterrence Outcomes

Following Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, curtailed direct naval provocations against U.S. forces, marking a shift from routine and speedboat attacks to more indirect asymmetric strategies, such as operations, for over two decades. This restraint stemmed from the operation's destruction of key Iranian surface assets, including the frigates and Sabalan, which exposed the limitations of 's conventional against U.S. technological and tactical superiority. Iranian leadership reevaluated its maritime posture, prioritizing small-boat swarms and mines over fleet engagements to avoid further catastrophic losses. Empirical data from the post-operation reflect this deterrence: Iranian attacks on neutral shipping, which had averaged dozens monthly during the Tanker War's peak, declined sharply by late 1988, aligning with the broader de-escalation that ended the Iran-Iraq War in August. U.S. naval records indicate no major direct Iranian naval challenges to American vessels until the , when and tactics reemerged, underscoring Praying Mantis's role in enforcing a long-term pattern break without eliminating Iran's incentive for low-level harassment. Contemporary strategic analyses, including a 2024 review by U.S. Military Academy scholars, cite the operation as a for decisive retaliation against (IRGC) threats, arguing that swift, disproportionate strikes deter escalation by credibly signaling resolve and capacity for punishment. Such assessments, grounded in declassified naval after-action reports, emphasize causal links between the 1988 losses—totaling half of Iran's operational surface fleet—and sustained behavioral modification, though critics note confounding factors like the war's end. This enduring lesson informs debates on balancing denial and punishment in gray-zone conflicts.

Controversies and Differing Perspectives

US Rationales and Empirical Justifications

The United States justified Operation Praying Mantis as a legitimate exercise of self-defense under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which permits measures against an armed attack until the Security Council takes action. On April 14, 1988, the guided-missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts struck an Iranian-laid moored contact mine in international waters of the Persian Gulf, causing severe damage but no fatalities due to the crew's rapid damage control efforts. Navy divers recovered additional mines from the vicinity bearing serial numbers matching those on Iranian Boghammar speedboats previously observed laying mines, providing direct intelligence linkage to Iranian naval forces. This incident was framed not as an isolated event but as part of a pattern of Iranian aggression during the Iran-Iraq Tanker War, including over 100 attacks on neutral shipping since 1984, which threatened U.S. forces conducting Operation Earnest Will to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers. President Ronald Reagan authorized the operation on April 18, 1988, explicitly citing the inherent right of self-defense in a letter to Congress, emphasizing that the mining constituted an armed attack requiring immediate retaliation to neutralize the threat. U.S. intelligence identified two Iranian oil platforms—Sassan and Sirri—as command-and-control hubs for mine-laying operations and speedboat attacks, justifying their targeted destruction after warnings to evacuate personnel. The strikes focused on Iranian naval combatants, sinking the frigate Sahand, corvette Sabalan (severely damaged), and several armed speedboats involved in prior mining and harassment, while avoiding broader escalation. This precision limited civilian impact and aligned with international law principles by responding only to verified military threats. Proportionality was maintained by calibrating the response to the scale of Iranian violations, which had repeatedly endangered U.S. and international navigation; the operation destroyed approximately half of Iran's operational surface fleet in the Gulf without invading territory or targeting population centers. Empirical outcomes validated this approach: post-operation mine-clearing efforts restored safe passage for over 140 million barrels of oil monthly through the , with no documented Iranian incidents recurring in the immediate aftermath. Iranian naval aggression shifted away from toward less effective asymmetric tactics, demonstrating deterrence efficacy without provoking wider , as U.S. forces maintained presence under Earnest Will until the Tanker War's end in 1988.

Iranian Claims of Aggression

Iranian state media and officials portrayed Operation Praying Mantis as an unprovoked U.S. assault aimed at tipping the balance in favor of during the Iran-Iraq War, framing the strikes on oil platforms and as deliberate attacks on sovereign economic infrastructure to secure Western-aligned shipping lanes in the . This narrative positioned the platforms, such as the Sassan and Sirri complexes targeted on April 18, 1988, exclusively as civilian assets for oil production, ignoring intelligence indicating their role in coordinating attacks on neutral vessels. Iranian reports emphasized inflated casualty figures and alleged atrocities, including claims that U.S. forces fired upon survivors in the water following the sinking of vessels like the frigate , to evoke national outrage and consolidate domestic unity amid wartime hardships. Official tallies cited dozens of deaths across the , with broadcasts amplifying these losses to depict the U.S. as the initiator of escalation, while downplaying Iran's laying of mines that had damaged the USS Samuel B. Roberts four days prior. The , adjudicating Iran's claims in the , rejected the assertion that the platforms served solely economic functions, finding evidence of their military utility in supporting Iranian naval , which precluded violations warranting despite ruling out self-defense justification for some U.S. strikes. This judicial scrutiny exposed gaps in the Iranian account, as it overlooked the causal chain of Iranian mining operations in that prompted the retaliatory action on April 18, 1988.

Debates on Proportionality and International Law

The principle of in , as applied to self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter, requires that any countermeasures taken in response to an armed attack be strictly limited to repelling the attack and preventing future threats, without exceeding what is necessary to achieve those objectives. In the context of Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, the justified its destruction of two Iranian oil platforms (Salman and ) and several naval vessels as a proportionate response to Iran's of the USS on April 14, 1988, which damaged the ship but caused no fatalities; U.S. officials emphasized the operation's role in neutralizing Iranian assets used for military surveillance and attacks on neutral shipping amid the ongoing . Proponents of the U.S. position, drawing from military analyses, contended that proportionality must account for the asymmetric nature of the threat—Iran's use of mines, speedboats, and platforms to conduct against superior U.S. forces—necessitating overwhelming force to ensure deterrence rather than symmetric retaliation, which could invite repeated low-level attacks. The (ICJ), in its November 6, 2003, judgment in the ( v. ), rejected the U.S. claim of lawful for Operation Praying Mantis, ruling that neither the operation as a whole nor the specific destruction of the Salman and platforms qualified as proportionate ; the Court determined that the mining incident, while attributable to , did not constitute an "armed attack" of sufficient gravity to justify the scale of U.S. retaliation, which included sinking the frigate and corvette Sabalan, damaging multiple vessels, and causing an estimated 56 Iranian deaths. The ICJ emphasized that measures must remain calibrated to the of immediate threat repulsion, critiquing the U.S. actions as exceeding this threshold despite acknowledging 's prior violations of its obligations to protect neutral shipping. Critics, including some international legal scholars, have echoed this view, arguing that the U.S. response risked broader escalation in the and deviated from by targeting economic infrastructure with dual-use military functions, potentially undermining the framework's emphasis on restraint. From a realist prioritizing empirical outcomes over strict , defenders of the operation highlight its causal effectiveness in achieving deterrence: following Praying Mantis, Iran halted mining operations and significantly reduced attacks on international shipping, contributing to the Tanker War's de-escalation by July 1988 without precipitating full-scale war, as evidenced by the subsequent UN-brokered . This outcome-oriented analysis posits that assessments should incorporate long-term security gains against persistent asymmetric aggression, where measured restraint might have prolonged vulnerabilities for U.S. and neutral vessels; such views, often advanced in strategic military reviews rather than purely juridical ones, contrast with the ICJ's ex post focus on incident-specific calibration, noting the Court's own affirmation of Iranian culpability as contextually relevant yet insufficient to legitimize the U.S. . While academic and institutional sources like the ICJ may exhibit interpretive biases toward restrictive readings of state force—potentially underweighting dynamics in non-state-like conflicts—the verifiable cessation of Iranian naval provocations post-operation underscores the practical efficacy of decisive action in restoring stability.

References

  1. [1]
    Operation Praying Mantis - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Sep 20, 2023 · On 18 April 1988, the US Navy launched Operation Praying Mantis against Iranian targets in the Arabian Gulf in retaliation for USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58) ...
  2. [2]
    The Surface View: Operation Praying Mantis | Proceedings
    Operation Praying Mantis aimed to sink an Iranian frigate or a substitute, and neutralize surveillance posts on oil platforms. It involved three surface action ...
  3. [3]
    One Day of War | Naval History Magazine - U.S. Naval Institute
    When Iran challenged American sea power in the spring of 1988, the Navy's response in Operation Praying Mantis was swift and deadly.
  4. [4]
    Yes, Reagan destroyed about half of Iran's Navy in 1988 - PolitiFact
    Jan 15, 2020 · In 1988, in response to Iran's attack on the USS Samuel Roberts, President Ronald Reagan "destroyed half of Iran's Navy." The statement is accurate.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Intelligence Support During Operation Earnest Will, 1987–88 - CIA
    Operation Earnest Will was a US Navy operation to protect Kuwaiti tankers from Iranian attacks, in response to Kuwait's request for maritime protection during ...
  6. [6]
    Iran-Iraq War - Summary, Timeline & Legacy
    In September 1980, Iraqi forces launched a full-scale invasion of neighboring Iran, beginning the Iran-Iraq War. Fuel...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Lessons Learned: The Iran-Iraq War - DTIC
    Once again, their main tactic was the human wave attack, which continued from February 6 to 10. As in the previous year, the invasion failed. The Iranians.
  8. [8]
    The Iran-Iraq War | UANI
    Although Iran's human wave strategy failed to gain territory and created large casualties, Khomeini continued to stonewall international demands for a ceasefire ...Missing: refusal | Show results with:refusal<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    The Tanker War | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    But Iraq started the tanker war in the Gulf proper in 1981 by initiating attacks on ships steaming to or from Iranian ports at the extreme northern end of the ...
  10. [10]
    H-018-1 Tanker War - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 18, 2018 · Iran retaliated by attacking neutral ships in the Arabian Gulf, many of which were carrying supplies and some war materials to Kuwait, where ...
  11. [11]
    Strait of Hormuz - FAQ - The Strauss Center
    During this eight year war, 411 ships were attacked, 239 of which were petroleum tankers. However, despite repeated Iranian threats to close the Strait of ...Missing: merchant | Show results with:merchant
  12. [12]
    Revisiting the Tanker War
    Mar 20, 2024 · Eventually, the Tanker War led to an increase in insurance rates for shipping, which affected the entire oil market.
  13. [13]
    The Tanker War | Naval History - June 2025, Volume 39, Number 3
    Attacks targeting oil platforms and cargo ships launched “a campaign of economic attrition and political intimidation.” While the Iran-Iraq War was primarily a ...
  14. [14]
    Operation Earnest Will - GlobalSecurity.org
    On 7 March 1987, the United States offered to reflag 11 Kuwaiti tankers and provide U.S. Navy protection. Kuwait accepted. On 17 May 1987, an Iraqi attack ...
  15. [15]
    Fresh Insights into U.S. Decisionmaking During Operation Earnest Will
    Jul 27, 2022 · Kuwait in December 1986 asked Moscow to protect its tankers, and the U.S. Government seriously began considering a similar request by the spring ...
  16. [16]
    Iran vs. America: In 1987, the "Tanker War" Began in Earnest
    Nov 28, 2020 · This led to the controversial policy of reflagging Kuwaiti tankers so they could be escorted by U.S. warships in Operation Earnest Will. The ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Operation Earnest Will. - DTIC
    Mar 8, 1994 · Initially, the mine threat gave. Iran an "advantage" that jeopardized the mission. The United. States had limited mine countermeasures ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] International Law Applicable to Naval Mines - Chatham House
    ... Iran and Iraq had deployed mines in the Persian Gulf in 1987 and 1988 during the Iran–Iraq war. 5 The 1971 Seabed Treaty applies in peacetime and armed ...
  19. [19]
    Iran Admits It Mined Gulf but Says It Was for Defense
    Aug 21, 1987 · Iran acknowledged for the first time Thursday night that it has mined the Persian Gulf, but it insisted that the explosive devices were ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Caught In The Act - Time Magazine
    Oct 5, 1987 · The incriminating evidence of Iran's lawlessness consisted of nine deadly mines whose horns bristled from the deck of the crippled vessel Iran ...
  21. [21]
    Public sitting held on Friday 21 February 2003, at 10 a.m., at the ...
    Feb 21, 2003 · ... Iran's calling card ¾ more Iranian mines ¾ were always found at or near the scene. You have seen a photograph of an Iranian mine anchored in ...
  22. [22]
    Samuel B. Roberts III (FFG-58) - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 4, 2019 · During the first dog watch on 14 April 1988, Samuel B. Roberts steamed at 28 knots about 55 miles northeast of Qatar in the Arabian Gulf. The ...
  23. [23]
    The Time the U.S. Navy Unloaded on the Iranians in ... - Coffee or Die
    Sep 2, 2020 · At 105 km east of Bahrain, it was close to Iran's maritime boundary but still well outside. The mine blew a 15-foot hole in the ship's hull, ...
  24. [24]
    Mine Strike! - Bradley Peniston
    Just before 5 pm on 14 April 1988, USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58) found itself in a minefield laid in the central Persian Gulf's main eastbound shipping ...Missing: incident details time
  25. [25]
    The Story of Samuel B. Roberts FFG-58 - The Sextant
    In September 1987, U.S. forces caught the Iranian ship IRAN AJR red-handed in the act of laying mines and captured her. Over the next months, U.S. Navy and ...
  26. [26]
    How Leadership, Trust Saved the Samuel B. Roberts
    Sep 10, 2018 · Retired Navy Capt. Paul Rinn, first commanding officer (CO) of the guided-missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58), addressed Naval ...Missing: control | Show results with:control
  27. [27]
    Saving Sammy B: A frigate's heroic legacy - Military Times
    May 21, 2015 · A port quarter view of the guided missile frigate USS SAMUEL B. ROBERTS (FFG-58) underway after the ship struck a mine on Apr. 14, 1988.
  28. [28]
    Capturing the Iran Ajr | Bradley Peniston
    The Iran Ajr was captured after U.S. forces tracked it, helicopters fired on it, and Navy SEALs boarded and detained the crew. The ship was later scuttled.
  29. [29]
    U.S. forces destroyed five suspected Iranian mines in the... - UPI
    Apr 22, 1988 · The five mines destroyed Friday by U.S. forces brought to 57 the number of the sea explosives neutralized in the gulf by American and allied ...Missing: 1987-1988 | Show results with:1987-1988
  30. [30]
    Letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the ...
    On April 14, 1988, the USS SAMUEL B. ROBERTS struck a mine in international waters of the Persian Gulf. Lookouts on the ROBERTS had spotted three mines lying ...
  31. [31]
    https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-106/jfq-106_71-81_Mobley.pdf
  32. [32]
    Operation Praying Mantis - Naval Historical Society of Australia
    Dec 21, 2015 · Operation Praying Mantis was a planned naval response by the United States to Iranian aggression in the Persian Gulf that occurred on 18 April 1988.
  33. [33]
    H-Gram 018 - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 13, 2018 · Operation Praying Mantis, 18 April 1988: Jets flying from aircraft ... Nevertheless, the battle failed in its objective, which was to ...
  34. [34]
    U.S. STRIKES IRANIAN TARGETS - Chicago Tribune
    Apr 19, 1988 · They said the two platforms were manned by Iranian Revolutionary Guards and were used as radar- equipped military command and control centers.
  35. [35]
    Operation Praying Mantis: Showdown on the Persian Gulf
    The attack was part of Operation Praying Mantis which was launched after the guided missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts hit an Iranian mine on April 14, 1988 ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] H-Gram 018: 30th Anniversary of Operation Praying Mantis
    Apr 13, 2018 · Operation Praying Mantis, 18 April 1988: Jets flying from aircraft carrier Enterprise (CVN-65) sink Iranian frigate Sahand (F-74) in ...
  37. [37]
    The Air View: Operation Praying Mantis | Proceedings
    On 14 April 1988, the USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58) struck an Iranian mine in the central Persian Gulf. The explosion nearly forced the crew to abandon ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)
    The Court first considered whether the actions by American naval forces against the Iranian oil complexes were justified under the 1955 Treaty as measures ...Judgments · Preliminary objections · Oral proceedings · Other documents
  39. [39]
    Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)
    Dec 12, 1996 · 1. That the Preliminary Objection of the United States is rejected in its entirety; · 2. That, consequently, the Court bas jurisdiction under ...
  40. [40]
    The World Court Finds that U.S. Attacks on Iranian Oil Platforms in ...
    Nov 11, 2003 · During the Tanker War, Iran retaliated against Iraqi attacks by attacking and mining mostly neutral-flag ships coming from or destined for ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision
    12 Several days later, after concluding that Iran was responsible for the mine attack,13 U.S. naval forces, in an effort to prevent further attacks, took action ...
  42. [42]
    Summary of the Judgment of 6 November 2003
    Nov 6, 2003 · (2) that the claims of the Islamic Republic of Iran are accordingly dismissed. With respect to its counter-claim, the United States requests ...
  43. [43]
    Oil Platforms (Iran v. U.S.), 2003 I.C.J. 161 (Nov. 6) - WorldCourts
    Nov 6, 2024 · The Judgment is formulated as if in this case the United States has formulated its main defence as an invocation of the right of self-defence.
  44. [44]
    Operation Praying Mantis: The Navy Already Went to War with Iran ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · -The one-day battle on April 18, 1988, was a swift and fierce US retaliation after an Iranian mine severely damaged the USS Samuel B. Roberts.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Gulf of Conflict - The Washington Institute
    security challenges in the Persian Gulf. The Islamic. Revolution in Iran had replaced Washington's ally, the shah, with a decidedly hostile regime in Tehran. In ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Operation Praying Mantis IV - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Praying Mantis was also a model of what defense policy analysts were calling “jointness.” Powerful as the U.S. Navy was in 1988, it was even ...
  47. [47]
    Gulf Ops | Proceedings - May 1989 Vol. 115/5/1,035
    May 22, 1989 · Six days later, Iran announced that it would join Iraq in accepting U. N. Security Council Resolution 598 as the basis for cease-fire ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  48. [48]
    https://www.wsj.com/opinion/how-we-deterred-iran-in-the-gulf-last-time-reagan-navy-operation-praying-mantis-580b3c95
  49. [49]
    [PDF] NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS - DTIC
    Iran leverages its asymmetric naval threats to increase the costs and risks of U.S. Navy operations in the Persian Gulf. By submitting this challenge, Iran ...
  50. [50]
    How Should the United States Respond to Iran after the Tower 22 ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Operation Praying Mantis was part of a larger operation, Earnest Will, which began in 1987 when Iraqi and Iranian forces increased attacks on ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  51. [51]
    Denial or Punishment? The U.S.-Israel Debate About How Best to ...
    Apr 26, 2024 · Experience shows that a balanced strategy blending deterrence by denial and deterrence by punishment can more effectively contain Iran.
  52. [52]
    Judgment of 6 November 2003 - Cour internationale de Justice
    Nov 6, 2003 · the Iranian oil platforms, the United States breached the object and purpose of the Treaty of Amity, including Articles 1 and X (l), andMissing: key | Show results with:key
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Strategic Imperatives: Economic Warfare at Sea
    In the. Praying Mantis operation, the u.S. required positive visual identification before permitting ships and aircraft to attack surface combatants with ...
  54. [54]
    Necessity and Proportionality in International Law (Chapter 14)
    The ICJ found that “neither 'Operation Praying Mantis' as a whole, nor even that part of it that destroyed the Salman and Nasr platforms, can be regarded ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Doctrine of Proportionality in a Time of War
    The U.S. attacks on Iranian oil platforms during Operation. Praying Mantis in the late 1980s provide an example of how the principle of proportionality helps ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Fresh Insights into U.S. Decisionmaking During Operation Earnest Will
    Sassan and Sirri oil platforms and sank or disabled three Iranian naval combatants and three small boats. • July 3: USS Vincennes mistakenly shot down Iranian ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Exploring the Limits of International Law relating to the Use of Force ...
    This paper examines the contribution of the judgment to international law on the use of force in self-defence, focusing on two topics: firstly, the relationship ...