Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Strait of Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow situated between to the north and the of to the south, linking the with the and thereby providing the primary sea access from the to the . It spans approximately 167 kilometers in length and narrows to about 33 kilometers at its most constricted point, with designated shipping lanes roughly 3 kilometers wide on each side. The waterway's shallow depths and confined navigation channels heighten risks for large vessels, including supertankers transporting hydrocarbons. As one of the world's premier oil chokepoints, the Strait of Hormuz facilitates the transit of roughly 20 million barrels per day of crude , , and products, equivalent to about 20% of liquids consumption in 2024. This volume underscores its indispensable role in energy supply chains, with the majority originating from Gulf producers such as , , the , , and itself, destined primarily for Asian markets. Disruptions here could precipitate sharp spikes in international prices due to the absence of viable alternatives capable of fully bypassing the . The strait holds profound strategic significance, bordered by —which exerts control over the northern shores and adjacent islands—and , with the maintaining a naval presence to safeguard freedom amid recurrent tensions. has repeatedly threatened to mine or the strait in retaliation against perceived aggressions, including sanctions or actions, leveraging asymmetric tactics like fast-attack boats and missiles to challenge superior naval forces. Such threats, rooted in 's deterrence strategy, amplify geopolitical volatility, as evidenced by episodic seizures of tankers and heightened patrols during escalations with and Western powers.

Geography and Physical Characteristics

Location and Boundaries

The Strait of Hormuz constitutes the primary maritime passage linking the to the and, by extension, the . Positioned at the southeastern terminus of the , it forms a critical chokepoint approximately 167 kilometers in length. To the north, the strait is delimited by the Iranian coastline, encompassing the and extending toward and Baluchestan, with key ports such as situated nearby. The southern boundary aligns with the , an exclave of protruding into the strait, alongside territorial waters of the . This configuration results in a navigable channel varying in width from 55 to 95 kilometers, constricting to about 33 kilometers at its narrowest span between Iranian and Omani shores. Maritime boundaries in the strait reflect bilateral agreements between and , which delineate divisions, though segments in the adjacent remain under negotiation. The strait's are divided roughly equally, with controlling the northern two-thirds of the Persian Gulf's outlet and and the UAE sharing the southern approaches, underscoring overlapping claims in this contested region.

Dimensions and Topography

The Strait of Hormuz spans approximately 167 kilometers in length, connecting the to the . Its width varies significantly, measuring about 56 kilometers on average but narrowing to as little as 39 kilometers at certain points between Iran's and Oman's , while broadening to around 95 kilometers eastward. Water depths in the strait average roughly 90 meters, with shallower sills around 80 meters restricting flow and deeper troughs exceeding 200 meters, particularly near the where drops sharply. The seabed consists of a complex arrangement of channels, shoals, and islands, including Hormuz and Larak islands on the Iranian side, which create navigational hazards and influence tidal currents. The northern Iranian features relatively gentle slopes and sediment deposits, contrasting with the steeper, more rugged along Oman's southern boundary, facilitating stronger subsurface flows in southern channels.

Oceanography and Environmental Features

The Strait of Hormuz features variable , with widths ranging from approximately 39 km to 56 km and depths averaging around 90 meters, though a deeper trough exceeding 120 meters exists near the , facilitating water exchange between the and the . Shallower areas, particularly those under 25 meters, pose navigational hazards for large vessels such as tankers. Hydrographic conditions in the strait are characterized by high salinity and temperature gradients driven by the outflow of dense Persian Gulf Water (PGW), which exhibits salinities exceeding 40 practical salinity units (psu) in deeper layers and temperatures decreasing by up to 3°C along its downstream path into the Gulf of Oman. At the strait's mouth, average salinity measures 36.5 to 37 psu, with seasonal stratification influencing internal tides, where semidiurnal tides dominate but diurnal components vary with water column stability. Tidal mixing significantly enhances vertical exchange, cooling surface waters while increasing bottom salinity, and rectification of currents occurs prominently in the strait due to tidal residuals. Currents are predominantly tidally driven, with semidiurnal impacting volume and ; modeling indicates boost net exchange across vertical sections, modulated by winds and river inflows. The strait's semi-enclosed nature relative to the , which has an average depth of 35–40 meters, promotes limited water renewal, exacerbating hypersaline conditions and thermal extremes. Environmentally, the strait supports a unique , including habitats critical for and rays as identified in the Strait of Hormuz Corridor Important Shark and Ray Area, though constrained circulation heightens vulnerability to pollutants. Oil-related hydrocarbons, in sediments, and accumulate in coastal zones, with beach surveys revealing widespread plastic debris distribution linked to shipping and land-based sources. Additional threats include organochlorine pesticides and , contributing to broader risks such as acidification, , and from industrial effluents and vessel traffic.

Historical Background

Ancient and Medieval Significance

The Strait of Hormuz functioned as a pivotal chokepoint in ancient trade networks, connecting Mesopotamian civilizations to the Indus Valley Civilization over four millennia ago. By 3000 BCE, merchants established direct sea links through the to the Indus region, spanning approximately 1,850 kilometers and enabling the exchange of goods such as copper from , beads, , and etched seals. Archaeological finds, including Indus pottery and seals at Gulf coastal sites like those near modern Ras al-Jinz, confirm robust sea-borne commerce between and Harappan ports in the late third and early second millennia BCE, predating overland routes in volume for certain commodities. Under the Achaemenid (550–330 BCE) and Sassanid (224–651 CE) Empires, rulers exerted control over the strait and adjacent Gulf ports, integrating it into broader imperial trade and naval strategies. The Sassanids, in particular, governed territories including (known as Mazun), bolstering maritime security for exchanges with , , and the , where ports facilitated the flow of , textiles, and pearls. This oversight ensured the strait's role in sustaining economic and military projection across the periphery. In the medieval Islamic era, following the Arab conquest of Hormuz in 650–651 CE, the strait anchored expanding caliphal trade systems under the Umayyads and Abbasids. By the , Hormuz had become the primary port for and provinces, channeling goods from the to inland markets. The independent Kingdom of Hormuz, emerging amid Abbasid fragmentation around the and peaking as a Gulf hegemon by the 15th, dominated commerce through enforced route security, port monopolies, and tolls on cargoes including spices, silks from and , Arabian horses, dates, and pearls destined for , , and beyond. Its cosmopolitan status, drawing , , , and merchants, underscored the strait's enduring strategic value for controlling Gulf access and regional wealth accumulation.

Colonial and Early Modern Developments

In 1507, Portuguese forces under captured the island of Hormuz, establishing a fortress that enabled to control maritime trade through the strait and impose tolls on vessels transiting between the and the . This conquest, consolidated in 1515 with the full subjugation of local rulers, positioned Hormuz as a key node in 's maritime empire, facilitating the redirection of spice and silk routes away from traditional intermediaries. dominance persisted for over a century, marked by naval patrols that enforced monopolies but also provoked resistance from and forces seeking to reclaim Gulf commerce. The Portuguese hold ended in 1622 when Shah Abbas I of Safavid Persia, allied with four ships from the English East India Company, besieged and captured Hormuz after a brief land assault supported by British naval bombardment; the Portuguese garrison surrendered following the fall of the fortress. This joint operation shifted control southward to Persian Bandar Abbas (formerly Gombroon), where the English established a trading factory in 1616, leveraging the strait for intra-Asian trade in textiles, spices, and later, Gulf pearls. The expulsion fragmented Portuguese influence, opening the strait to intensified European rivalry as the Dutch United East India Company (VOC) challenged English interests through blockades and seizures in the Gulf during the mid-17th century. By the late 17th and 18th centuries, English and companies vied for supremacy, with the Dutch temporarily dominating regional trade until British naval victories during the Seven Years' War (1756–1763) expelled them from key Gulf ports, allowing the East India Company to secure exclusive trading privileges at and Bushire. influence expanded through diplomatic treaties, such as the 1766 agreement with Persia granting factory rights and the 1798 pact with the Sultan of Muscat permitting naval basing, aimed at safeguarding shipping lanes to amid Omani resurgence under the Ya'ariba and Al Bu Sa'id dynasties. These arrangements prioritized suppression of by Qawasim tribes, whose raids disrupted transit; the 1809 British expedition against Ras al-Khaimah demonstrated this policy, though full pacification required the 1819–1820 Persian Gulf campaign, which destroyed 20 pirate vessels and led to the 1820 General Maritime Treaty imposing truces on coastal sheikhdoms. In the , Britain's solidified control over the strait without direct territorial annexation, enforcing free navigation via and residency agents who mediated between , Omani, and tribal authorities to prevent disruptions to growing steamship traffic carrying , dates, and pearls. This era saw the strait evolve from a contested chokepoint of early modern to a of British , underpinning the security of routes to amid advances in .

20th Century Strategic Emergence

The discovery of commercially viable oil reserves in Persia in 1908 at the Masjed Soleyman field by explorer William Knox D'Arcy marked the initial catalyst for the Strait of Hormuz's elevated strategic profile, as exports commenced via the newly constructed Abadan refinery on the Shatt al-Arab waterway, with tankers transiting the strait to reach global markets. The Anglo-Persian Oil Company (predecessor to BP), granted exclusive concessions, rapidly scaled production, supplying fuel critical for British naval operations during World War I and underscoring the strait's role in imperial energy logistics. By the interwar period, British dominance in the Persian Gulf—enforced through naval patrols and treaties with local sheikhdoms—extended to safeguarding tanker routes through the strait, transforming it from a mere maritime passage into a defended artery for an emerging global oil economy. World War II intensified this importance, as Allied forces relied on Iranian oil—peaking at over 10 million tons annually by 1944—transported exclusively via Hormuz-bound tankers, prompting to target the route with submarines and air raids, though disruptions remained limited. Postwar reconstruction and the (1950–1953) drove demand surges, with production rising from 0.5 million barrels per day in 1945 to over 2 million by 1955, nearly all exiting through the strait, heightening Western dependence on uninterrupted access. Decolonization accelerated the shift: Britain's 1971 withdrawal from Gulf protectorates, including termination of treaties with , , and the (forming the UAE), vacated its naval oversight of Hormuz, compelling the to prioritize the strait amid rising Soviet influence and local instabilities. The 1973 Arab oil embargo, imposed by states including in response to Western support for during the , crystallized the strait's chokepoint status, as export halts quadrupled global prices from $3 to $12 per barrel and exposed vulnerabilities in the 15–20% of world oil then transiting Hormuz. This crisis, affecting 7 million barrels daily in disrupted flows, prompted strategic reevaluations, including U.S. contingency planning for strait defense and diversification efforts like Alaskan pipelines, while Iran's 1979 revolution further weaponized the waterway's leverage in regional power dynamics. By the late , with Gulf exports comprising over 30% of seaborne oil trade, the strait had evolved into an indispensable node for , dictating geopolitical alignments and military postures.

Economic and Strategic Importance

The Strait of Hormuz facilitates the transit of a significant portion of global seaborne trade, with average annual flows of crude , , and refined products ranging from 18.5 to 21.6 million barrels per day (mb/d) between 2016 and 2022. These volumes represented over one-quarter of total global seaborne traded in 2022 and the first half of 2023. In 2023, flows averaged 20.9 mb/d, equivalent to approximately 20% of global liquids consumption. By 2024, daily averages declined to 20 mb/d, with crude and specifically dropping 1.6 mb/d from 2022 levels due to reduced Iranian exports under sanctions and partial shifts to pipelines like the UAE's Habshan-Fujairah line.
YearAverage Oil Flows (mb/d)
201618.7
201718.5
201820.7
201920.7
19.7
202121.6
202220.5
202320.9
202420.0
Flows peaked at 21.6 mb/d in 2021 amid post-COVID recovery and + production increases, but dipped to 19.7 mb/d in due to pandemic-driven collapse. , , and the UAE accounted for 69% of 2024 crude oil and condensate transits, with , , and contributing the balance despite sanctions limiting Tehran's volumes to under 2 mb/d. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) transits, primarily from and the UAE, comprised about 20% of global LNG trade in 2024, underscoring the strait's role in gas supply chains. alone exported approximately 9.3 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of LNG through the strait that year, with the UAE adding 0.7 Bcf/d; nearly all of these exports (94% from , 100% from UAE) depend on the route, directing most cargoes to Asian markets like and . LNG volumes have trended upward with 's capacity expansions, including new trains at Ras Laffan, though they remain vulnerable to disruptions given limited alternative export paths. In the first five months of 2025, LNG flows exceeded 50 billion cubic meters, maintaining the 20% global share amid steady Qatari production.

Global Energy Security Implications

The Strait of Hormuz serves as a vital chokepoint for global supplies, with approximately 20 million barrels per day (b/d) of crude and transiting in 2024, equivalent to about 20% of worldwide liquids consumption. This volume, primarily from producers including , , UAE, , and , underscores the strait's centrality to seaborne trade, where disruptions could immediately constrict supply and elevate prices due to limited alternative export routes. Additionally, around 20% of global (LNG) flows through the strait, mainly from , amplifying risks to gas markets. A closure or significant , such as through , missile strikes on tankers, or swarming by fast-attack craft—capabilities has demonstrated in exercises and proxy actions—would trigger sharp oil price surges, potentially exceeding $80 per barrel for even in partial scenarios, with full blockades risking far higher levels and cascading economic effects like and slowed growth. Such events disproportionately threaten energy-importing economies in , where nations like , , , and receive nearly 70% of Hormuz oil flows, facing supply shortages absent substantial stockpiles or rapid diversification. Europe's exposure includes about 10% of LNG imports from , heightening vulnerability amid ongoing transitions from Russian gas. Iran's repeated threats to blockade the , often in response to sanctions or pressures, highlight its leverage via asymmetric tactics, though self-imposed limits arise from reliance on the route for its own exports, which fund roughly 35% of government revenues. Historical precedents, including the 1980s , show that even sporadic attacks can double insurance premiums and reroute shipping, inflating costs without total shutdowns, yet underscore the strait's fragility given its 21-mile minimum width and proximity to Iranian territory. Sustained tensions thus compel naval patrols, primarily U.S.-led, to deter , but persistent geopolitical risks from Iran's ambitions and regional proxies perpetuate uncertainty in global energy planning.

Economic Vulnerabilities and Dependencies

The Strait of Hormuz serves as a critical chokepoint for global supplies, with approximately 20 million barrels per day (b/d) of crude , , and products transiting it in 2024, equivalent to about 20% of worldwide petroleum liquids consumption. This volume primarily originates from producers including , , the (UAE), , , and , rendering these nations economically dependent on unimpeded access for export revenues that constitute a significant portion of their GDPs—such as over 30% for and . Additionally, around 22% of global (LNG) trade passes through the strait, heightening vulnerabilities for importers reliant on Qatari supplies, which account for roughly one-fifth of the world's LNG exports. Asian economies exhibit the highest import dependencies, with 84% of Hormuz oil flows destined for markets like , , , and ; Japan sources 80% of its crude imports—about 1.8 million b/d—from the strait, primarily from and the UAE. imports around 40% of its oil from Middle Eastern nations via the strait, exposing it to supply shocks that could exacerbate domestic and costs. European nations face LNG risks, with the strait facilitating about 10% of the continent's imports; countries like , , and are particularly exposed to Qatari volumes. , , , and remain fully reliant on the for all exports, lacking viable alternatives and thus vulnerable to even short-term blockades that could halt billions in annual revenues. Limited bypass infrastructure underscores these dependencies, as only and the UAE operate pipelines circumventing the strait: 's East-West Pipeline has a 5 million b/d capacity but effective spare capacity estimated at around 2.5 million b/d, while the UAE's Habshan-Fujairah Pipeline handles 1.8 million b/d, covering most but not all of its production. Combined, these offer roughly 2.6 to 3.5 million b/d of unused potential, insufficient to offset a full closure of the strait's 20 million b/d flow. Iran's Goreh-Jask provides a minor 0.3 million b/d , but it serves limited strategic purposes amid sanctions constraining its output. A disruption, such as mining or blockades threatened by in response to geopolitical tensions, could spike prices above $100 per barrel due to immediate supply reductions, elevated shipping risks, and a geopolitical , potentially triggering global surges and recessions in import-dependent economies. Historical precedents, like the , demonstrate causal links between strait attacks and oil price volatility, with even partial interruptions raising insurance costs and rerouting expenses that amplify economic strain without adequate stockpiles or alternatives. Gulf exporters would face revenue losses exceeding $100 billion annually from a month-long closure, while importers contend with and industrial slowdowns, as global spare production capacity outside + remains inadequate to fully mitigate the shortfall.

Shipping Lanes and Traffic Regulations

The Strait of Hormuz is governed by a (TSS) adopted by the (IMO) to organize commercial shipping and reduce collision risks in this narrow chokepoint, which measures 21 miles across at its narrowest point. The TSS designates two parallel lanes—each two miles wide—for directional traffic: one inbound toward the and one outbound toward the , separated by a two-mile to prevent cross-traffic. These lanes lie predominantly within Omani , enabling vessels to avoid Iranian waters during periods of heightened security concerns, such as Iranian threats of disruption. Under the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the strait operates under the regime of , permitting ships of all flags without prior notification or authorization, provided they proceed without delay and refrain from activities prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal states. The IMO's TSS supplements this by mandating adherence to International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) Rule 10, which requires vessels to join or leave a traffic lane at small angles, proceed in the general direction of established , and avoid crossing lanes except in cases of immediate danger. An inshore traffic zone exists adjacent to the main lanes for vessels accessing local ports, such as those in the UAE or , but its use is restricted to avoid congestion in the primary channels. In practice, advisories from bodies like the U.S. Administration recommend eastbound transits hug Oman's territorial sea boundary to mitigate risks of Iranian interdiction, a measure reinforced during tensions such as the seizures of foreign tankers. No mandatory or reporting system is imposed strait-wide, though voluntary coordination via Omani or UAE ports and tracking (e.g., AIS) aids monitoring; violations of the TSS can result in fines or under coastal state enforcement, as seen in Iranian boardings of non-compliant ships. Amendments to the TSS, such as those adopted by IMO's Safety Committee in the , have refined lane alignments to account for and traffic volumes, ensuring lanes avoid shallow hazards like the Iranian shoals. The Strait of Hormuz features relatively deep waters, with depths exceeding 300 feet (90 meters) in parts, and is generally free of major physical obstructions like extensive reefs, though complex currents and high gradients contribute to variable conditions. The primary navigational hazards stem from its narrow width—approximately 21 nautical miles at the narrowest point—and extreme traffic density, as it handles around 20% of global seaborne trade, leading to congested shipping lanes prone to collisions without strict adherence to protocols. Recent escalations in , including persistent GPS jamming and interference with (AIS) signals, have affected nearly 1,000 vessels daily, falsifying positions and heightening collision risks amid geopolitical tensions. Additionally, threats of illegal boardings or seizures by Iranian forces in the and strait vicinity pose direct security hazards to commercial shipping. To address these challenges, the (IMO) enforces a (TSS) adopted under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs), featuring two 2-mile-wide inbound and outbound lanes separated by a 2-mile , designed to streamline and reduce crossing maneuvers. This scheme, effective since amendments in the 1980s, mandates vessels to follow designated paths, with the lanes positioned to favor Omani waters where possible to avoid disputed Iranian claims. Maritime advisories from bodies like the Joint Maritime Information Centre (JMIC) and UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) urge ships to report suspicious activities, maintain heightened vigilance, and implement defensive measures such as armed guards or citadels as outlined in BIMCO guidelines. International naval patrols, particularly by U.S. forces, support safe transit by conducting operations and deterring disruptions, operating in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the (UNCLOS) provisions for non-suspendable through straits used for international navigation. Joint industry guidance emphasizes pre-transit planning, including reviews for risks and coordination with states to ensure compliance with safety protocols amid ongoing regional instability. While no unified (VTS) oversees the entire strait, coastal monitoring by and , combined with satellite and , aids in deconflicting military and commercial movements.

Environmental and Collision Risks

The Strait of Hormuz, at its narrowest point spanning approximately 33 kilometers (21 miles), features designated shipping lanes that are only 3 kilometers (2 miles) wide in each direction, constraining maneuverability for large vessels such as very large crude carriers (VLCCs). This configuration, combined with daily transit volumes exceeding 30 oil tankers amid broader traffic of hundreds of vessels, elevates collision probabilities, particularly in conditions of high congestion. Recent escalations, including GPS jamming affecting up to 970 ships per day in the adjacent and Strait areas, have exacerbated these risks by disrupting navigation systems and forcing deviations that increase near-miss incidents. A June 2025 collision between two oil tankers near the Strait, attributed to navigational errors amid jamming, underscores how electronic interference compounds inherent spatial limitations. Natural hazards further amplify collision vulnerabilities. Strong tidal currents and rapid changes in flow, reaching speeds that challenge control, interact with seasonal , dust storms, and , which routinely reduce visibility to hazardous levels. The Strait's relatively deep waters (up to 100 meters in channels) mitigate some grounding risks but do not offset the cumulative effects of traffic density and weather, where narrow channels limit evasive actions during close-quarters encounters. Studies of similar confined waterways indicate that such environments account for disproportionately high accident rates due to restricted space for corrective maneuvers. Potential collisions carry severe environmental repercussions, given the cargoes involved—primarily crude oil and comprising about 20% of global liquids trade. A major spill in the semi-enclosed , characterized by low water exchange (renewal time of 3–5 years), high temperatures retarding oil , and elevated stressing microbial dispersants, could devastate ecosystems including coral reefs, forests, and fisheries supporting regional livelihoods. Historical precedents, such as chronic inputs, have already impaired , with pollutants accumulating in sediments and bioaccumulating in species like turtles, dolphins, and seabirds. Assessments highlight shoreline segments near the as high-risk for spill dispersion, where even modest releases (e.g., from unattributable small-scale incidents) propagate widely due to prevailing currents, threatening over 24 kilometers of vulnerable coastlines. In a 2025 incident, a tanker collision prompted warnings of ecosystem-wide disruption, as oil slicks could smother benthic habitats and enter food chains with persistent toxic effects.

Military Conflicts and Incidents

Iran-Iraq War: Tanker War (1980-1988)

The emerged as a naval extension of the Iran-Iraq War, with both nations targeting merchant vessels in the to economically pressure each other, particularly through disruptions to oil exports transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Iraq launched the initial attacks in May 1981 against Iranian oil tankers and facilities near , employing French-supplied Super Étendard aircraft armed with missiles to reduce Iran's oil revenues, which constituted over 90% of its war funding. By 1982, Iraq had sunk or damaged several Iranian tankers, prompting Iran to retaliate in 1984 by striking ships destined for Iraqi ports or allied states like and , including neutral third-party vessels carrying approximately 50% of exports through the Strait. This escalation transformed the conflict into a broader campaign against international shipping, with attacks concentrated in the Gulf's shipping lanes leading to and from the Hormuz chokepoint. Iran's strategy relied on asymmetric tactics, including speedboat swarms, missiles, and naval mines, while Iraq favored air-launched strikes; over half of all attacks utilized anti-ship missiles. By late 1987, had executed 283 strikes on shipping, compared to Iran's 168, damaging or sinking 411 vessels total, of which 239 were petroleum tankers, resulting in at least 116 deaths. Iranian intensified in 1987, with covert operations seeding the Strait's approaches using disguised dhows and , damaging neutral ships and prompting heightened international concern over Hormuz ; despite threats to mine the Strait en masse or it, Iran never fully executed closure, as such action would have alienated neutral exporters and risked broader intervention. Attacks peaked in 1987 amid Iraq's advances on land, with Iran targeting Kuwaiti tankers—carrying 40% of 's oil exports under charter—to compensate for its weaker . The campaign's impact on the Strait manifested in surged insurance premiums—rising up to 400% for Gulf transits—and partial rerouting of some shipping, yet global oil flows through Hormuz declined only modestly, from 11 million barrels per day in 1980 to about 8 million by 1987, underscoring the route's resilience due to limited alternatives and tanker durability against missile hits. , facing disproportionate Iranian attacks (over 50% of its tankers hit), sought protection in 1987, leading the U.S. to reflag 11 of its vessels under American registry under , initiating naval escorts from Hormuz through the Gulf starting July 24, 1987, with surface action groups and mine countermeasures. This U.S. commitment, involving up to 30 warships at peak, deterred direct assaults on convoys but heightened tensions, as Iranian forces probed escorts with harassment tactics; a notable incident occurred on April 14, 1988, when the USS struck an Iranian in the central Gulf near Hormuz, injuring 10 sailors but highlighting the mine threat's persistence. The concluded with the broader Iran-Iraq ceasefire on August 20, 1988, after which attacks ceased, though it demonstrated Iran's willingness to impose costs on global without achieving decisive economic strangulation of Iraq or its backers.

Operation Praying Mantis (1988)

was a one-day U.S. retaliatory operation launched on April 18, 1988, in the against Iranian targets, in direct response to Iran's mining of that damaged the guided-missile USS * four days earlier. On April 14, 1988, the Roberts struck an Iranian-laid moored contact while escorting reflagged Kuwaiti tankers under , resulting in 10 U.S. sailors injured (four seriously) and severe hull damage aft, though the ship was preserved through aggressive damage control efforts. The was traced to Iranian stockpiles previously captured aboard the smuggler vessel , confirming Tehran's responsibility for endangering neutral shipping lanes critical to global oil transit through the Strait of Hormuz. The operation targeted two Iranian oil platforms—Sassan (SAS) and Sirri (SIRRI)—utilized by the (IRGCN) as forward bases for surveillance, command, and launching small-boat attacks on merchant vessels. U.S. forces included Surface Action Groups (SAGs) comprising destroyers and frigates such as USS Merrill (DD-976), USS Lynde McCormick (DD-976), USS Wainwright (CG-28), USS Simpson (FFG-56), and USS Bagley (FFG-106), supported by Marine AH-1 Cobra helicopters from USS Trenton (LPD-14) and aircraft from 11 aboard USS Enterprise (CVN-65). At approximately 0800 Gulf time, from SAG Bravo raided the platforms, issuing warnings via for Iranian personnel to evacuate before destroying structures with .50-caliber machine guns, shoulder-fired rockets, and C-4 explosives; the platforms were then demolished by naval gunfire. Iranian naval forces responded aggressively, initiating multiple engagements throughout the day. IRGCN speedboats attacked U.S. ships and were sunk by helicopter-fired missiles and shipboard guns, with three boats destroyed and others damaged. The Iranian Joshan (P-228) fired an at SAG Charlie but missed; it was sunk by SM-1MR missiles from Simpson and Bagley. Later, the IRIS (F-74) sortied and launched missiles at U.S. aircraft, prompting A-6 Intruders to strike it with missiles, glide bombs, and , followed by Harpoons from SAG Delta; sank with 45 crew killed and 87 injured. The IRIS Sabalan (F-72) was then targeted, crippled by a from an A-6, leaving it disabled but afloat with 29 injured; U.S. forces withheld further strikes to avoid escalation. U.S. losses were limited to a single AH-1 Sea Cobra helicopter crash at 1700, killing two Marine captains, Stephen Leslie and Kenneth Hill, with no other personnel or ship damage. Iranian exceeded 60 dead and 100 wounded, including the destruction of the two platforms, sinking of and Joshan, damage to Sabalan, and loss of multiple speedboats; one Iranian F-4 was damaged but returned to base after firing on U.S. helicopters. The operation, the largest U.S. surface engagement since , effectively neutralized key IRGCN assets threatening Gulf shipping and demonstrated the superiority of integrated U.S. air-surface tactics, contributing to Iran's restraint in mine-laying and attacks during the final months of the Iran-Iraq War.

Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 (1988)

On July 3, 1988, the U.S. Navy guided-missile cruiser USS Vincennes (CG-49), operating in the Strait of Hormuz as part of Operation Earnest Will to protect neutral shipping during the Iran-Iraq War's Tanker War phase, fired two SM-2MR Standard missiles at Iran Air Flight 655, an Airbus A300B2-203 registered as EP-IBU. The flight, a scheduled international service from Bandar Abbas, Iran, to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, had departed Bandar Abbas Airport at approximately 9:12 a.m. local time (Iran Standard Time) on runway 21, following a standard commercial route over international waters in the Persian Gulf. Earlier that morning, Vincennes had engaged three Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) Boghammer speedboats in a firefight after they reportedly fired on a U.S.-flagged merchant vessel, escalating the tactical environment and prompting heightened alert status aboard the ship. The aircraft was detected by Vincennes' radar at around 10:17 a.m. , approximately 37 minutes after takeoff, while climbing through 12,000 feet en route to its assigned cruising altitude; the crew misinterpreted its signals—squawking civil III code 6760—as military IFF responses and erroneously assessed the track as descending and accelerating like an attacking F-14 fighter jet, despite the flight operating on a published civil air corridor (Victor 59 airway). At 10:54 a.m., with the plane at about 13,500 feet and roughly 20 miles northwest of Vincennes in international airspace, authorized the missile launch under permitting defensive fire against perceived imminent threats in the combat zone; the missiles struck the aircraft, causing it to crash into the Gulf off , with no survivors among the 290 people aboard—comprising 274 passengers (including 66 children), 16 crew, primarily Iranian nationals but also including citizens of , the UAE, and . Post-incident analysis revealed systemic errors, including over-reliance on flawed data displays showing erroneous altitude and bearing, in a high-stress " fulfillment" mindset amid ongoing Iranian threats, and failure to cross-verify with adjacent U.S. assets like the USS Sides, which correctly identified the target as civil. The U.S. government initially described the shootdown as a "proper defensive action" against a perceived hostile aircraft in Iranian airspace, per President Ronald Reagan's statement, but subsequent investigations by the Department of Defense and Navy confirmed it occurred in international airspace with the plane descending on a non-threatening profile, labeling it a "tragic and regrettable accident" attributable to human and technical failures rather than intent. No criminal charges were filed against the crew, who were exonerated, though critics, including Iranian officials, alleged recklessness or deliberate provocation amid U.S.-Iran tensions; Iran pursued claims at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, resulting in a 1996 ex gratia settlement of $61.8 million to victims' families ($300,000 per wage earner, $150,000 per non-wage earner) plus $13.4 million for the aircraft, without admission of liability. The incident underscored vulnerabilities in automated identification systems and rules of engagement during naval operations in chokepoints like the Strait, contributing to de-escalation in the Tanker War but fueling long-term Iranian grievances over perceived U.S. impunity.

Post-1988 Seizures, Collisions, and Minor Incidents

In the decades following the 1988 cease-fire in the Iran-Iraq War, the Strait of Hormuz has seen recurrent minor incidents primarily involving the (IRGCN), which employs fast-attack boats for harassment, close-quarters maneuvers, and occasional seizures of foreign vessels. These actions, frequently characterized by the as "unsafe and unprofessional," have included high-speed approaches within 100-300 yards, simulated , deployment of vessels in shipping lanes, and radio threats, escalating risks in the narrow waterway. Between 2015 and 2016 alone, U.S. Central Command recorded over 300 interactions with Iranian forces, with approximately 35 deemed unsafe, including near-collisions and laser illuminations of U.S. aircraft. Such incidents have prompted U.S. responses like warning flares, shots, and smoke grenades, without resulting in casualties or major escalation. Seizures of commercial shipping have been sporadic but tied to Iranian claims of legal or territorial violations. On April 28, 2015, IRGCN forces boarded and seized the Marshall Islands-flagged container ship Maersk Tigris in the Strait, diverting it to port; Iran cited a judicial order stemming from a 2008 commercial dispute involving Maersk's subsidiary over unpaid debts exceeding $600,000. The 26 crew members, including 10 Indians and , were detained briefly, and the vessel was released on May 7 after the issue was resolved through payment and . This event prompted temporary U.S. Navy escorts for American-flagged ships transiting the Strait. Smaller-scale seizures have included unmanned U.S. Saildrones in 2022, where IRGCN vessels confiscated two devices in the approaches to the Strait, releasing them after hours with missing components. Collisions and near-collisions have featured Iranian tactics resembling "shoulder checks," where fast boats maneuver aggressively to force evasive actions by larger vessels. The U.S. Navy has reported dozens of such collisions between 2008 and 2017, often during periods of heightened tension like nuclear negotiations, with Iranian craft ramming or scraping U.S. patrol boats to assert dominance. A notable example occurred on June 20, 2022, when three IRGCN fast-attack craft approached within 50 yards of the U.S. coastal patrol ship USS Sirocco and expeditionary sea base USNS Choctaw County during a transit, creating an imminent collision risk; U.S. forces fired a , and the boats departed after about an hour. Earlier, on August 23, 2016, four IRGCN boats harassed the USS Nitze within 300 yards in the , prompting and a blast to avert impact. Harassment by swarms of speedboats has been a recurring asymmetric , exemplified by the January 6, 2008, incident where five IRGCN craft aggressively circled three U.S. warships—including the cruiser USS Port Royal—in of the , dropping white objects into the path and broadcasting threats like "I am coming to you... you will explode." The U.S. vessels prepared to fire but held after the boats withdrew, with attributing the radio provocation to possible third-party interference rather than direct Iranian action. Similar swarm tactics persisted, such as the April 15, 2020, approach of 11 IRGCN speedboats to six U.S. ships in the central near the , involving provocative passes at high speeds. These patterns reflect IRGCN emphasizing small-boat disruptions over conventional engagements, contributing to navigational hazards without full-scale conflict.

Iranian Threats and Disruptive Actions

Preparations for Mining and Blockade

Iran possesses an estimated stockpile of over 5,000 naval mines, including , acoustic, magnetic, and moored varieties, which U.S. assessments indicate could be deployed rapidly across the Strait of Hormuz using small, high-speed boats operated by the (IRGC) Navy or commercial dhows disguised as civilian vessels. These mines are stored at IRGC facilities along 's southern coast, with deployment exercises historically practiced via submarines like the Ghadir-class midget submarines, helicopters, and swarm tactics to sow fields in chokepoints. In preparation for potential blockades, the IRGC has conducted mine-laying drills as part of broader training, emphasizing low-cost disruption of merchant traffic in the Strait's 21-mile-wide shipping lanes. U.S. reports from the onward note Iranian personnel training in mine warfare, with recent capabilities enhanced by indigenous of mines resistant to countermeasures. August 2025 naval exercises in the Strait and simulated scenarios, including mine deployment, heightening concerns over Tehran's readiness to up to 20% of global flows transiting the waterway. A notable instance of active preparation occurred in June-July 2025, following Israel's initial strikes on Iranian targets, when U.S. sources detected IRGC forces loading mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf, positioning them for potential deployment without executing the mining operation. This action, per U.S. officials, served as a deterrent signal amid escalating tensions, leveraging the Strait's vulnerability where even sparse minefields could halt tanker traffic for weeks due to clearance challenges. Such preparations align with Iran's doctrine of using mining to impose asymmetric costs on superior naval forces, though self-imposed economic damage from oil export disruptions limits full execution.

Threats to Close the Strait: Key Episodes (2008, 2011-2012, 2018-2019)

In 2008, Iranian officials escalated warnings about disrupting the Strait of Hormuz amid U.S. threats of military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and increased naval patrols in the region. On June 29, Brigadier General Mohammad Hejazi, a deputy commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), stated that Iran would target U.S. interests, including shipping in the Strait, if attacked, emphasizing asymmetric tactics like mining and fast-boat swarms. A subsequent analysis by Caitlin Talmadge assessed Iran's capacity for temporary disruptions—potentially halting 20-30% of tanker traffic for days via mines, anti-ship missiles, and ambushes—but concluded a sustained closure was unlikely due to limited munitions stocks, vulnerability to U.S. countermeasures, and Iran's dependence on the Strait for 90% of its oil exports. Tensions manifested in a January 6 incident where five Iranian Revolutionary Guard speedboats aggressively approached three U.S. warships, prompting U.S. warnings of defensive fire before the boats withdrew, an event the Pentagon described as provocative but not an explicit closure attempt. These threats aligned with Iran's broader military posturing, including IRGC exercises demonstrating mine-laying, though no blockade materialized, and oil flows remained uninterrupted. From December 2011 to January 2012, issued multiple explicit threats to close the in response to impending sanctions targeting its exports, which accounted for over 80% of at the time. On December 28, 2011, First Mohammad Reza Rahimi declared that if sanctions blocked Iranian , "not a drop" would pass through the , a statement followed by Habibollah Sayyari's claim that was "easier than drinking a glass of water." These remarks, amid IRGC naval drills simulating blockades with mine deployments and tests, drove prices above $110 per barrel temporarily. On January 3, 2012, Iran's army chief warned of action against any U.S. aircraft carrier entering the Gulf, referencing the , while Defense Minister reiterated Hormuz as a vulnerability for adversaries. A analysis noted the threats' intent to deter the oil embargo effective 2012 and U.S. financial restrictions, but highlighted Iran's self-defeating economics, as would accelerate its own regime instability without allies to offset lost exports. No ensued; instead, the U.S. Fifth Fleet affirmed , and Iranian rhetoric subsided as sanctions took effect, with tanker traffic volumes holding steady at around 17 million barrels per day. In 2018 and 2019, threats resurfaced after the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 deal and reimposition of "maximum pressure" sanctions slashing 's exports from 2.5 million to under 300,000 barrels per day by mid-2019. On July 2, 2018, IRGC commander Major General warned that possessed the means to close the Strait if its security was threatened, framing it as retaliation for economic strangulation. Escalation intensified in 2019 amid six tanker attacks in May and June—four in the , attributed by U.S. intelligence to IRGC limpet mines—and the June 20 downing of a U.S. , prompting President to declare reduced compliance with limits while lawmakers like Esmail Kosari affirmed readiness to "secure" Hormuz, implying options. On July 20, after seized an Iranian tanker in , Foreign Minister Javad Zarif invoked "" concerns, and IRGC officials threatened reciprocal seizures, raising insurance premiums and briefly spiking prices by 5-10%. Assessments from the time, including U.S. simulations, estimated could disrupt traffic for weeks using over 5,000 naval mines and shore-launched missiles but faced rapid clearance by minehunters and air superiority disadvantages, with self-harm from severed exports exacerbating domestic unrest. Threats de-escalated without closure as pursued shadow fleet evasions and proxy actions elsewhere, maintaining average daily transits near 21 million barrels despite incidents.

2019 Tanker Attacks and Escalations

On May 12, 2019, four commercial vessels—two Saudi-flagged oil tankers (Amjad and ), the Emirati vessel UAE Tai'wan, and the Norwegian-owned Maritime Commercial International—sustained hull damage from apparent near the , UAE, in the adjacent to the Strait of Hormuz. The attacks involved explosives attached to the ships' hulls below the waterline, causing no crew injuries but necessitating repairs and disrupting operations; a subsequent UAE-led investigation identified an unnamed state actor but stopped short of direct attribution. Tensions escalated on , 2019, when two oil tankers, the Panama-flagged Kokuka Courageous (Japanese-operated) and the Norwegian-owned Front , were struck by explosions while transiting the near the Strait of Hormuz, resulting in fires on the Kokuka Courageous and structural damage to both vessels, with crews safely evacuated. The attributed the incidents to , citing intelligence assessments, analysis of mine fragments recovered from the Kokuka Courageous that matched Iranian mines in design, and U.S. video footage showing an (IRGC) vessel removing an unexploded from the tanker's hull. The , , and endorsed the U.S. findings, pointing to Iran's history of maritime disruptions and regional proxy capabilities as supporting evidence, though independent verification remained limited. rejected the accusations, with Foreign Minister Javad Zarif dismissing them as unfounded and suggesting possible false-flag operations by U.S. adversaries to provoke conflict. These attacks prompted immediate U.S. military deployments, including additional patrols and the acceleration of movements to the region, amid broader U.S. "maximum pressure" sanctions on following the 2018 withdrawal from the JCPOA deal. On June 20, 2019, shot down a U.S. RQ-4A Global Hawk , claiming it violated Iranian over the ; the U.S. countered that the drone operated in international , releasing GPS data to substantiate the claim, heightening risks of miscalculation. Further retaliatory actions included Iranian attempts on July 11 to impede the British-flagged tanker British Heritage in the , repelled by a escort, and the IRGC's seizure of the British tanker Stena Impero on July 19 for alleged navigation violations, which linked to prior British detention of an Iranian vessel in . The Stena Impero was released after six weeks, but the incidents contributed to a 10-20% spike in shipping insurance premiums and temporary rerouting of some vessels, underscoring 's asymmetric leverage despite lacking definitive capacity for full closure.

2025 Israel-Iran Conflict and Closure Attempts

In June 2025, escalating tensions between and culminated in direct military confrontation, known as the Twelve-Day War, beginning with airstrikes on Iranian facilities on June 13. These strikes targeted sites including and Fordow, prompting to retaliate with over 500 ballistic missiles and approximately 1,100 drones launched at territory, resulting in at least 28 deaths and widespread damage. Amid the exchanges, Iranian officials intensified threats to disrupt maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliatory measure against and potential U.S. involvement. On June 21, a prominent adviser to Iran's called for missile strikes on U.S. vessels in the region alongside an immediate of the strait to halt oil exports and pressure adversaries economically. The Iranian subsequently voted to authorize the shortly after reported U.S. strikes supporting , though ultimate authority rests with the , which did not approve execution. U.S. intelligence sources reported that prepared to mine the strait following the onset of strikes, deploying assets from the (IRGCN) to lay naval mines and conduct asymmetric disruptions, though no mines were confirmed deployed. These preparations echoed prior IRGCN exercises but stopped short of implementation, as analysts assessed that a full would inflict severe on Iran's oil-dependent economy, which relies on the strait for over 90% of its exports. By late June, the de-escalated without Hormuz closure, as U.S. and allied naval forces, including the Fifth Fleet, maintained freedom-of-navigation operations to deter interference, underscoring the strait's role as a global chokepoint where temporary disruptions via mines or fast-attack boats were feasible but sustained unlikely against superior naval capabilities. Iranian threats persisted into October, linked to broader deterrence against sanctions enforcement, but shipping volumes through the strait remained largely unaffected, with no verified incidents of closure attempts materializing.

Iran's Military Capabilities in the Strait

IRGC Navy Assets and Asymmetric Tactics

The (IRGCN), distinct from Iran's regular , prioritizes asymmetric operations in the littoral environments of the and Strait of Hormuz, employing a doctrine centered on mobility, deception, and numerical superiority over conventional naval . This approach evolved from experiences in the Iran-Iraq War, where small craft proved effective against larger adversaries through and harassment of shipping. The IRGCN's fleet composition reflects this focus, comprising primarily low-cost, high-agility platforms rather than capital ships, with an estimated 1,500 speedboats across classes such as , , and Dhul-Janah, capable of speeds exceeding 50 knots and armed with short-range anti-ship missiles like the (), unguided rockets, torpedoes, and heavy machine guns. Supporting these are approximately 46 of various classes, including 10 Chinese-supplied Houdong vessels upgraded with Ghader anti-ship cruise missiles (range up to 200 km), and up to 1,000 additional paramilitary boats for mass mobilization. IRGCN asymmetric tactics emphasize "" engagements, deploying 20 or more small boats in dispersed formations from multiple approach vectors to saturate enemy sensors, defenses, and firepower, exploiting the Strait's narrow chokepoints (as little as 21 nautical miles wide at its narrowest) for rapid ingress and evasion. These operations integrate for jamming, decoys to mimic threats, and coordinated strikes combining surface craft with shore-launched missiles or unmanned surface vessels, aiming to disrupt merchant traffic through boardings, rammings, or attachments rather than sustained fleet battles. Doctrinally, such tactics seek to impose asymmetric costs on superior forces like the U.S. Navy by forcing resource-intensive responses to low-signature threats, as evidenced in periodic exercises unveiling batches of 100+ new speedboats (e.g., 112 offensive craft added in May 2020) and real-world demonstrations like the 2019 seizure of the tanker Stena Impero via speedboat boarding. The IRGCN maintains forward bases on islands such as and the Tunbs, enabling quick sorties into the , though vulnerabilities include limited endurance (most boats range only 100-200 nautical miles) and susceptibility to air superiority.

Mine Warfare, Missiles, and Swarm Strategies

Iran's mine warfare capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz rely on a stockpile exceeding 5,000 naval , including moored, bottom, and potentially advanced influenced types, which can be deployed rapidly using small, high-speed boats operated by the (IRGC-N). These , predominantly static and anchored to the at varying depths, are designed to create hazardous fields that complicate in the strait’s narrow 21-mile-wide shipping lanes, though their effectiveness remains unproven due to limited historical testing beyond the . Deployment could occur covertly from coastal sites or dispersed vessels, leveraging Iran's geographic advantage along the strait’s northern shores to deny access without requiring large surface combatants. Complementing mines, fields an array of anti-ship missiles tailored for the Persian Gulf's confined waters, emphasizing coastal defense and over-the-horizon strikes. Key systems include the Khalij Fars quasi-ballistic missile with a 300 km range and supersonic terminal phase for maneuvering against moving targets, alongside cruise missiles like the Abu Mahdi capable of engaging defended assets such as aircraft carriers. The Ghadr-380 and other precision-guided anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs) provide high-speed, time-sensitive attacks, with ranges up to 1,000 km and anti-jamming features, enabling saturation of enemy defenses from mobile launchers hidden along 's coastline. These assets, integrated with and UAV targeting, form part of 's anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) doctrine, prioritizing disruption over sustained naval engagements. Swarm strategies represent a core asymmetric tactic of the IRGC-N, employing fleets of fast-attack craft—often exceeding 1,000 small boats—to overwhelm larger adversaries through dispersed, multi-axis attacks in the Strait of Hormuz. These vessels, achieving speeds of 50–70 knots with low signatures, are armed with anti-ship missiles, torpedoes, RPGs, or mines, and operate in coordinated groups of 20 or more to isolate and harass targets, preventing reinforcement as demonstrated in exercises and provocations. Recent enhancements, including over 340 new craft delivered since 2021, emphasize hydrodynamic efficiency and maneuverability for hit-and-run operations, exploiting the strait's shallow waters where superior naval forces face vulnerability to massed, low-cost threats. This approach, refined since the , aims to impose asymmetric costs by forcing opponents into reactive postures amid dense commercial traffic.

Assessments of Closure Feasibility and Self-Inflicted Costs

Analyses of Iran's capacity to close the Strait of Hormuz emphasize that while disruptive actions such as , barrages, and fast-attack boat swarms could temporarily halt or impede tanker traffic, sustained closure against determined countermeasures remains improbable due to disparities in naval and air superiority held by the U.S. Fifth Fleet and allied forces. A 2012 assessment by Caitlin Talmadge, updated in subsequent analyses, projected that integrated Iranian asymmetric operations might delay reopening for 17 to 30 days or longer if is extensive, based on U.S. mine countermeasures timelines from historical operations like Operations Praying Mantis and Earnest Will. However, recent 2025 evaluations, including those from the Strauss Center and U.S. intelligence, conclude that full closure is unlikely beyond brief periods, as coalition forces could clear threats via air strikes on launch sites, mine-sweeping with advanced assets like the Avenger-class ships, and dominance in to counter GPS . Iran's preparations for observed in July 2025 were interpreted by U.S. sources as signaling intent rather than commitment to execution, given the vulnerability of IRGC assets to preemptive neutralization. The self-inflicted economic repercussions for would be severe, as approximately 1.4 million barrels per day of its crude oil exports—critical to funding over 40% of the national budget—transit the strait daily, primarily to , rendering closure tantamount to "economic " per U.S. assessments. Blocking the would immediately halt these revenues, estimated at tens of billions annually, while exposing terminals and onshore facilities to retaliatory precision strikes, as demonstrated in prior U.S. and operations against Iranian proxies. This dependency, coupled with limited alternative export pipelines like Goreh-Jask (capacity under 1 million bpd and geographically exposed), would amplify domestic fuel shortages and inflation, potentially fueling internal dissent amid Iran's sanctioned economy. Expert consensus holds that such costs deter sustained action, as Iran's threats serve more as leverage than viable strategy, alienating key buyers and inviting escalated sanctions or military isolation.

International Responses and Counterstrategies

US-Led Naval Presence and Freedom of Navigation Operations

The United States established a sustained naval presence in the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq War through Operation Earnest Will, launched on July 24, 1987, to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers reflagged under the U.S. flag from Iranian attacks. This operation, the largest U.S. naval convoy effort since World War II, involved escorting over 100 transits by U.S. warships, including surface combatants and minesweepers, demonstrating commitment to securing commercial shipping lanes amid Iranian mining and small-boat threats. The effort escalated tensions, culminating in Operation Praying Mantis on April 18, 1988, where U.S. forces destroyed two Iranian oil platforms, sank the frigate Sahand, and damaged other vessels in retaliation for the mining of USS Samuel B. Roberts. Post-1988, the U.S. maintained forward-deployed forces via the Fifth Fleet, headquartered in since 1948 but expanded for Gulf operations, to deter disruptions and uphold rights under . Routine transits, often at night to minimize provocation, assert without requiring prior consent, countering Iranian claims of territorial control over the strait. Carrier strike groups, such as the in November 2023—the first since 2020—periodically traverse the strait to project power and reassure allies, with deployments intensified during escalations like the 2019 tanker attacks. U.S.-led multinational coalitions under the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), established in 2002, coordinate presence through task forces like CTF-152, focused on security cooperation against illicit activities, and CTF-Sentinel, protecting oil infrastructure since 2009. The U.S. frequently contributes to or leads these, as in joint sails involving , , and others, enhancing domain awareness and interoperability. In response to 2019 Iranian seizures, the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC) formed in 2019, with U.S. participation alongside 12 partners, to monitor and deter threats in the and strait. Recent operations reflect heightened deterrence amid Iranian threats, including the deployment of amphibious group in August 2023 and carrier in August 2025 to support stability during regional conflicts. U.S. Central Command conducts operations (FONOPs) to challenge perceived excessive maritime claims, emphasizing the strait's status as an international waterway open to unimpeded transit for all nations' vessels. These efforts prioritize empirical deterrence against asymmetric Iranian tactics, ensuring the flow of approximately 21 million barrels of oil daily without yielding to coercion.

Diplomatic and Sanctions Frameworks

The primary diplomatic framework governing navigation through the Strait of Hormuz is the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which establishes the regime of for straits used for international navigation. Under Articles 37–44 of UNCLOS, all states enjoy the right of continuous and expeditious through such straits, applicable where territorial seas of bordering states overlap, as in the Hormuz where the waterway narrows to less than 24 nautical miles. This regime prohibits coastal states, including and , from hampering or suspending , even in response to threats or security concerns, except in cases of imminent or distress. ratified UNCLOS in 1996, thereby committing to these provisions, though it has periodically contested full application to foreign warships and submarines, asserting requirements for prior notification or authorization that deviate from the treaty's terms. Diplomatic efforts to reinforce stability in the have often intersected with broader and regional security negotiations, such as the (JCPOA) endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in 2015. The JCPOA provided temporary sanctions relief in exchange for restrictions, aiming to reduce escalatory incentives that could manifest in strait disruptions, with provisions urging restraint on ballistic missiles and proxy activities potentially affecting . Following the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018, diplomatic channels like the —comprising JCPOA parties (, , , , , , and EU coordinator)—have convened sporadically to address compliance and spillover effects on Gulf navigation, though progress stalled amid 's stepwise advances and threats to close the strait during heightened tensions, such as the 2019 tanker incidents and 2025 Israel- exchanges. Sanctions frameworks, primarily U.S.-led and unilateral since , serve as an economic deterrent against Iranian threats to interdict the , targeting exports and financial networks to erode Tehran's revenue base and coercive leverage. The "maximum " campaign, initiated under the administration and renewed via Presidential Memorandum 2 on February 4, , imposed secondary sanctions on entities purchasing Iranian petroleum, reducing Iran's crude exports from approximately 2.5 million barrels per day in to under 0.5 million by , with sustained low volumes through despite evasion via "ghost fleets" and proxies. These measures, building on earlier UN sanctions like Resolution 1737 (2006) for , explicitly link economic isolation to behavioral changes, including cessation of threats, as evidenced by U.S. designations of over 1,500 Iran-related entities by . While critics argue sanctions exacerbate Iran's incentives for closure as a counterleverage, empirical data shows they have constrained its sustainment capabilities, with budgets contracting by up to 25% in peak sanction years, thereby raising self-inflicted costs of attempts. In practice, these frameworks intersect during crises, with UN Security Council briefings—such as those in June 2025 on Iranian interferences—reaffirming UNCLOS obligations and calling for de-escalation, though veto dynamics have precluded binding resolutions. U.S. policy integrates sanctions with diplomatic overtures, as in 2025 negotiations aimed at a revised nuclear accord incorporating regional stability clauses, underscoring that sustained pressure has historically compelled Iranian restraint without full strait closure, despite repeated rhetoric.

Allied Coalitions and Deterrence Efforts

The Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), a multinational naval partnership comprising 47 nations, operates several task forces to uphold maritime security in the Arabian Gulf, including the Strait of Hormuz, through coordinated patrols and exercises aimed at deterring threats from state and non-state actors. Established in 2004, CMF's Combined Task Force 152 (CTF-152) specifically focuses on Gulf maritime security, fostering cooperation among Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members and other partners to counter illicit activities and ensure safe passage of commercial shipping. CTF-152 projects a multinational presence via joint operations and professional exchanges, as demonstrated in exercises involving unmanned vessels and interactions among naval units from participating countries. In September 2025, Qatar assumed command of CTF-152 from Kuwait, continuing efforts to enhance regional deterrence against disruptions in the Strait. Complementing CMF, the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC), launched in 2019 following Iranian-attributed tanker attacks, unites nations including the , , , , , and the to safeguard commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz and . IMSC's operational arm, Combined Sentinel (CTF Sentinel), monitors maritime activity, shares intelligence, and escorts ships to deter seizures or attacks, promoting the free flow of commerce while de-escalating tensions. ceremonies, such as in February 2024, underscore ongoing commitment, with IMSC facilitating coordinated responses to Iranian maritime provocations. These coalitions bolster deterrence by maintaining persistent naval presence and conducting multinational exercises, signaling collective resolve to counter Iranian threats to close the , as evidenced by states' alignment with U.S.-led efforts amid heightened tensions. Saudi Arabia's prior command of CTF-152 and CTF in 2023 further integrated Gulf partners into these frameworks, enhancing despite periodic détentes with . U.S. cooperation with allies extends deterrence through forward-deployed forces and joint operations, reducing the feasibility of Iranian disruptions by raising the costs of aggression.

Alternative Routes and Mitigation Options

Existing Pipeline Bypasses

Saudi Arabia's East-West Crude Oil Pipeline, also known as Petroline, connects the Abqaiq processing facility in the Eastern Province to the Yanbu port on the Red Sea, spanning approximately 1,200 kilometers and allowing exports to bypass the Strait of Hormuz entirely. Constructed in 1981 with initial capacity expansions over time, the pipeline consists of twinned lines capable of transporting up to 5 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. In practice, it operates below full capacity, providing an estimated spare bypass potential of around 2 million bpd or more during disruptions, as demonstrated by temporary expansions to 7 million bpd in 2019 following attacks on Saudi facilities. The ' Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, operated by the (ADNOC), runs 360 kilometers from the Habshan gas processing plant in to the Fujairah export terminal on the , enabling crude oil and exports without transiting the . Completed in 2012 at a cost of approximately $3.3 billion, it has a design capacity of 1.5 million , with potential expansion to 1.8 million , handling roughly two-thirds of UAE's crude exports in recent years. Recent upgrades as of 2024 aim to further double throughput to mitigate Hormuz risks. Iran's Goreh-Jask pipeline links the Goreh terminal near on the to the export terminal on the , covering about 1,000 kilometers to provide an alternative southern route for its crude exports. Inaugurated in July 2021 after delays, the pipeline has a stated capacity of 1 million but has operated at significantly lower levels, around 300,000 initially, with minimal usage since due to technical, economic, and sanctions-related constraints. As of 2024, sporadic exports via totaled under 100,000 , limiting its role as a reliable amid Iran's domestic priorities and international restrictions. Collectively, these pipelines offer approximately 2.6 to 3.5 million of unused bypass capacity from producers, primarily and the UAE, though this represents only a fraction of the Strait's typical 20 million oil flow and excludes LNG or non-oil cargoes. No major bypasses exist for or , which remain fully dependent on the Strait, underscoring the infrastructure's limited mitigation against prolonged closures.

Potential Diversification Strategies

In response to persistent threats of disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, Gulf producers have explored new pipeline infrastructure to enable direct exports via the Gulf of Oman or Red Sea, thereby circumventing the chokepoint. A prominent proposal involves a joint Iraq-Oman pipeline connecting Iraq's Basra oil fields to Oman's Duqm port, with an initial capacity of 1 to 1.5 million barrels per day (b/d), potentially via overland routes through Kuwait and Saudi Arabia or an undersea path across the Arabian Gulf. This project, formalized through memoranda of understanding signed on September 3, 2025, aims to diversify Iraq's export routes amid regional instability, with construction possibly starting within 12-18 months and operations targeted for 2028-2030. Complementing such initiatives, and have advanced complementary storage and logistics facilities, including a 10-million-barrel crude storage project at 's Ras Markaz site, expandable as needed, to support joint marketing and loading operations for non-Hormuz exports. has shown interest in reviving or extending access through Yemen's Al-Mahra governorate to access the , potentially bypassing both Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, as part of broader efforts to secure alternative southern outlets for its crude. These developments position as an emerging export hub, leveraging Oman's neutral geopolitical stance to attract investment in terminal expansions capable of handling increased volumes from multiple producers. Further potential lies in capacity enhancements to existing bypass systems, such as upgrading Saudi Arabia's East-West beyond its current 5 million b/d operational limit (expanded to 7 million b/d in 2019) or the UAE's Habshan-Fujairah line at 1.8 million b/d, which together could theoretically divert up to 2.6 million b/d from Hormuz under duress. Iran's Goreh-Jask pipeline, operational since 2021 with 300,000 b/d capacity to the terminal, represents another avenue for expansion, though utilization has fluctuated below 70,000 b/d in recent periods due to sanctions and market factors. For , lacking dedicated crude bypasses, strategies may emphasize LNG terminal diversification on the side, though oil-focused proposals remain limited. Overall, these efforts prioritize infrastructure investments to mitigate closure risks, with collective alternative capacities potentially reaching 3.5 million b/d if fully realized.

Limitations of Alternatives in Crisis Scenarios

Alternative pipelines, such as 's East-West Crude Oil Pipeline with a of 5 million barrels per day (b/d) and the UAE's Habshan-Fujairah pipeline at 1.5 million b/d, offer only partial for disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, which handled an average of 20 million b/d of oil in —equivalent to about 20% of global liquids consumption. Even at maximum utilization, these routes combined could redirect roughly 6.5 million b/d, covering less than one-third of the strait's typical flow, and primarily benefit exports from and the UAE rather than the broader cargo including Iraqi, Kuwaiti, and Iranian shipments transiting the strait. Actual available bypass is estimated at around 2.6 million b/d under normal operations, as these pipelines rarely run at full throttle due to economic factors like lower transportation costs via the strait. In scenarios involving a or sustained attacks, these land-based alternatives face heightened vulnerabilities to , as pipelines traverse territories potentially within reach of Iranian missiles or proxies, rendering them susceptible to the same asymmetric threats that could close the itself. Iran's proximity to UAE export terminals and amplifies this risk, potentially forcing shutdowns for safety or under diplomatic coercion from , which has historically leveraged regional alliances to influence Gulf state decisions. Moreover, surging volumes onto pipelines during a could strain not optimized for prolonged overload, leading to bottlenecks, maintenance halts, or reduced efficiency, as evidenced by historical underutilization even in non-emergency periods. Rerouting via longer maritime paths, such as around Africa's , introduces further constraints, including tanker shortages, elevated fuel demands, and delays of weeks per shipment, which could exacerbate global supply tightness amid already disrupted flows. Insurance premiums for vessels avoiding the strait would likely , deterring usage and compounding costs, while the sheer scale of Hormuz-dependent LNG (about 20% of global supply) lacks viable pipeline equivalents, heightening risks for energy importers in , which receives nearly 70% of the strait's oil exports. Collectively, these factors limit alternatives to marginal relief, unable to avert sharp price spikes or shortages in a full , as the strait's chokepoint role stems from irreplaceable volume and geographic centrality.

Geopolitical Controversies and Perspectives

Iranian Rationale: Deterrence vs. Economic Leverage

has repeatedly articulated threats to disrupt or close the Strait of Hormuz as a core element of its asymmetric defense doctrine, positioning the as a strategic equalizer against superior conventional forces of adversaries like the and . Iranian officials, including lawmakers and (IRGC) commanders, have framed such actions as proportionate responses to perceived foreign aggression, such as sanctions or military strikes, rather than proactive aggression. For instance, on June 19, 2025, an Iranian parliamentarian stated that closing the Strait remains an option against "foreign aggression," echoing historical threats during the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the (JCPOA) and amid escalating -Iran tensions in 2025. This rationale underscores 's reliance on the Strait's vulnerability—through which approximately 21 million barrels of oil and petroleum products flow daily, representing about 20% of global consumption—to impose costs disproportionate to its own military limitations. In terms of deterrence, employs the Strait threat primarily to dissuade direct kinetic attacks on its territory, facilities, or regional proxies, leveraging the chokepoint's —narrow shipping lanes and shallow waters conducive to mines, fast-attack boats, and anti-ship missiles—for credible denial of access. IRGC naval doctrine emphasizes "gray zone" tactics, such as sporadic seizures of tankers (e.g., the incidents involving and other flagged vessels), to signal resolve without escalating to full closure, thereby maintaining a posture of controlled escalation that raises the risks for interveners. Analysts note this as akin to a "" surrogate, where the mere possibility of global energy disruption deters preemptive strikes, as evidenced by Iran's restraint during the 1980s despite Iraqi attacks, prioritizing long-term survivability over immediate retaliation. Tehran's strategy exploits mutual vulnerability: while closure would spike oil prices and invite responses, it forces adversaries to weigh economic fallout against gains, reinforcing Iran's of defensive necessity amid encirclement by U.S. bases and Gulf allies. Conversely, the economic dimension involves wielding the threat offensively to extract concessions, particularly sanctions relief, by amplifying market uncertainty and pressuring Iran's economic adversaries without committing to irreversible actions that would harm its own oil exports (which constituted over 90% of its in recent years). Threats in 2011-2012 and correlated with intensified U.S. sanctions, aiming to inflate global oil prices—potentially by 20-50% in simulations—and compel diplomatic reevaluation, as has lacked viable alternative export routes for much of its 2.5 million barrels per day production. Iranian and officials portray this as reciprocal pressure against "" via sanctions, which reduced Iran's GDP by an estimated 6-10% annually post-, though experts assess the bluff's diminishes with repeated invocations, as markets now discount full closure due to Iran's self-inflicted costs and limited sustainment capability (e.g., inability to beyond weeks against U.S. naval superiority). This duality—deterrence as preservation versus as chip—reflects causal trade-offs: while deterrence aligns with survival amid conventional inferiority, over-reliance on risks alienating neutral actors like and , major Strait users dependent on Iranian stability.

Western and Gulf State Views: Aggression vs. Stability Threats

Western governments, particularly the , characterize Iranian threats to disrupt or close the Strait of Hormuz as deliberate acts of aimed at coercing adversaries and undermining global , rather than legitimate defensive measures. In a September 2019 address, then-Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale described Iran's pattern of maritime interference, including mine-laying and tanker seizures, as part of broader that awakens international resolve to counter , emphasizing the regime's exploitation of the strait to beyond its borders. More recently, amid escalated tensions in June 2025, U.S. Marco warned that any Iranian attempt to block the strait would be "suicidal" for the regime, framing such moves as retaliatory escalation against U.S. and allied actions rather than responses to existential threats. These views align with assessments that Iran's asymmetric tactics, such as the 2019 attacks on six oil tankers near the strait attributed to Iranian forces by U.S. intelligence, prioritize economic leverage over stability, risking a spike in global oil prices—potentially exceeding $100 per barrel—and broader disruptions to 21% of worldwide petroleum trade. European allies echo this framing, viewing Iranian saber-rattling as a destabilizing factor that contravenes the Convention on the Law of the Sea's rights through international straits, with officials from the and joining U.S.-led naval patrols to deter interference. The emphasis on aggression stems from empirical patterns: Iran's (IRGC) has seized foreign vessels 15 times since 2019, per U.S. maritime advisories, actions seen as escalatory bids to offset sanctions and military disadvantages rather than proportionate deterrence. Gulf Arab states, heavily reliant on the strait for over 80% of their crude oil exports—totaling around 20 million barrels per day in 2024—perceive Iranian threats as existential risks to , interpreting them as hegemonic bids to dominate regional waterways and proxy warfare extensions. and the (UAE) have repeatedly highlighted how Iran's support for Houthi attacks on shipping and direct strikes, such as the September 2019 Abqaiq-Khurais assault (halting 5.7 million barrels per day), signal intent to weaponize chokepoints against Gulf competitors. Officials from and , in joint statements via the (GCC), decry these as "blunt threats to all Gulf states," arguing that closure scenarios could slash regional GDP by 10-15% annually due to export halts, far outweighing any Iranian gains. While pursuing pragmatic —evident in 2023 China-brokered Saudi-Iran —these states maintain that Iran's IRGC naval mines and fast-boat swarms represent aggressive posturing, not mere leverage, prompting investments in bypass pipelines like 's East-West line (5 million barrels per day capacity) as hedges against instability. This perspective underscores causal links between Iranian actions and heightened insurance premiums for Gulf tankers, which surged 30-fold after 2019 incidents, directly eroding stability without commensurate defensive justification. The Strait of Hormuz is recognized under international maritime law as a strait used for international navigation, qualifying for the transit passage regime outlined in Articles 37–44 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which permits continuous and expeditious passage for ships and aircraft, including warships, without coastal state interference or suspension. This regime supersedes the narrower innocent passage rules applicable in territorial seas, as transit passage applies to the entire width of the strait and cannot be hampered for security reasons, reflecting customary international law binding on states regardless of ratification status. Iran, having signed but not ratified UNCLOS in 1982, rejects the transit passage doctrine, asserting sovereignty over its territorial sea extending 12 nautical miles into the strait and permitting only innocent passage, which it claims can be temporarily suspended for national security under its 1993 domestic law on territorial waters. This position stems from Iran's 1959 declaration expanding its territorial claims, viewing the strait as internal waters subject to full control rather than an international waterway, a stance it has reiterated in threats to disrupt navigation during tensions, such as in 2011–2012 and 2019. Critics, including the United States, argue that Iran's non-ratification does not exempt it from customary obligations, as over 160 states adhere to UNCLOS provisions on straits, evidenced by consistent global practice in similar chokepoints like the Strait of Malacca. Debates intensify over the non-party status of both and the to UNCLOS, creating legal ambiguity that heightens conflict risks, as neither is formally bound yet both invoke selective provisions—the U.S. asserting transit rights as custom while rejecting compulsory dispute settlement. , bordering the Omani side, has ratified UNCLOS and supports , but Iran's dominance over narrower segments allows enforcement actions like vessel seizures, as seen in incidents involving alleged violations of rules. Legal scholars contend that nonsuspendable , as an alternative regime under UNCLOS Article 45 for straits formed by islands, does not apply here, reinforcing as the prevailing norm to prevent unilateral closures that could disrupt 20–30% of global oil trade. International tribunals have not directly adjudicated Hormuz disputes, but analogous rulings, such as the of Justice's emphasis on customary freedoms in the (1949), underscore that coastal states cannot impede passage in historic international routes without justification, a principle challenges by prioritizing deterrence over navigational freedoms. This tension persists, with Western states viewing Iranian restrictions as violations of custom, while frames them as defensive responses to sanctions, though empirical data from U.S. Navy operations demonstrates uninterrupted passage as de facto enforcement of broader rights.

References

  1. [1]
    Strait of Hormuz - Geography - The Strauss Center
    The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow channel, approximately 30 miles wide at the narrowest point, between the Omani Musandam Peninsula and Iran.Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
  2. [2]
    Places in news: Strait of Hormuz - CivilsDaily
    Jun 23, 2025 · Dimensions: It is about 167 km long and 33 km wide at its narrowest, making it one of the world's most strategic maritime chokepoints. Bordering ...
  3. [3]
    Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil ... - EIA
    Jun 16, 2025 · In 2024, oil flow through the strait averaged 20 million barrels per day (b/d), or the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Iran Conflict and the Strait of Hormuz: Oil and Gas Market Impacts
    Jun 19, 2025 · Most of these oil exports are loaded in the Gulf and transit the Strait of Hormuz for delivery to buyers in Asia, including China, India, South ...
  5. [5]
    World Oil Transit Chokepoints - EIA
    Between 2020 and 2022, volumes of crude oil, condensate, and petroleum products transiting the Strait of Hormuz rose by 2.7 million b/d as oil demand increased ...
  6. [6]
    Iran Conflict and the Strait of Hormuz: Oil and Gas Market Impacts
    Aug 4, 2025 · During calendar year 2024, approximately 20 million barrels per day of oil (crude oil and petroleum products) moved through the Strait of Hormuz ...
  7. [7]
    Strait of Hormuz and the strategic calculus of Iran's deterrence doctrine
    Jul 22, 2025 · Beyond economics, the closure or militarization of the Strait of Hormuz would stress existing regional alliances. The U.S. currently maintains ...
  8. [8]
    Strait Of Hormuz - World Atlas
    Mar 4, 2021 · The strait is 167 kilometers long, with its width varying from 39 kilometers to 95 kilometers. Its width narrows towards the north but still ...Missing: coordinates | Show results with:coordinates
  9. [9]
    Strait of Hormuz 2025: Countries, Location, Map, Importance
    Jun 24, 2025 · Length, ~167 km ; Narrowest width, ~33 km ; Adjacent countries, Iran (north), Oman (south) ; Connected bodies, Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman.Missing: coordinates | Show results with:coordinates
  10. [10]
    Strait of Hormuz | Map, Importance, Conflict and Closure, Control, Oil ...
    Geography and shipping ... The strait is 35 to 60 miles (55 to 95 km) wide and separates Iran (north) from Oman's Musandam exclave on the Arabian Peninsula (south) ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] LIS No. 94 - The Persian Gulf Continental Shelf Boundaries
    A boundary segment in the Gulf of Oman remains to be negotiated. Iran and Oman have opposing coasts in the Strait of Hormuz area. The northern Oman coast ...
  12. [12]
    Hydrology and circulation in the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of ...
    The Strait of Hormuz is 56 km wide and roughly 90 m deep but for a trough near and around the Musandam Peninsula. Atmospheric conditions over these two gulfs ...Abstract · Introduction · Hydrology and Currents in the... · Temporal Variations of...
  13. [13]
    THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ: A VULNERABLE LIFELINE - CIA
    Regional Geography Strait of Hormuz Limits of Strait Bathymetry 0 10 30 50 fathoms I I 0 18 54 92 meters The Strait The Strait of Hormuz is about 275 ...
  14. [14]
    Persian Gulf | Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and ...
    The measured average salinity at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz is approximately 36.5 to 37 psu.
  15. [15]
    Seasonality of Internal Tides in the Strait of Hormuz: Observations ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · This study explores how semidiurnal and diurnal internal tides respond differently to seasonal stratification, using mooring observations and ...
  16. [16]
    Role of tidal mixing on ocean exchange through the Strait of Hormuz
    Jul 17, 2024 · The salinity in the presence of tides is decreased at the bottom. In summary, tidal-induced mixing acts to cool and increase salinity at the ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Role of tides in Arabian Gulf circulation and long-term exchange ...
    Tide-induced residual currents are found to be significant in the Strait of Hormuz where they cause major rectification of current speeds and patterns in the ...
  18. [18]
    Tidal impacts on volume and salt transport through the Strait of ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · This study uses high-resolution numerical modelling to quantify the impact of tidal forcing on water and salt transport through the Strait ...
  19. [19]
    Water exchange across the Strait of Hormuz. Effects of tides and ...
    We found that the mean exchange across a vertical section in the Strait of Hormuz is significantly sensitive to the addition of rivers and tides.
  20. [20]
    Numerical Investigation of Wind Waves in the Persian Gulf
    Jan 1, 2016 · The Strait of Hormuz, located in the south of the basin with a narrow opening of 56 km, is the only passage connecting the Persian Gulf to the ...
  21. [21]
    Strait of Hormuz Corridor ISRA - Important Shark Ray Areas
    The maximum depth of the Gulf is 120 m near the Strait of Hormuz, with an average depth of 40 m (Pous et al. 2015). There is low water exchange between the Gulf ...Missing: profile | Show results with:profile
  22. [22]
    Long-term trends in heavy metal contamination of marine sediments ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · Heavy metal (HM) contamination in marine sediments is a critical environmental concern due to its potential ecological and human health ...
  23. [23]
    Plastic debris and microplastics along the beaches of the Strait of ...
    Jan 30, 2017 · This study presents the first report on occurrence and distribution of MPs in beach sediment of the northern part of Persian Gulf.
  24. [24]
    Distribution, environmental risks, and conservation challenges of ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · This study investigates the occurrence and distribution of chemical pollutants, including total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs),
  25. [25]
    Ecology and Environmental Challenges of the Persian Gulf
    Jan 1, 2022 · Various kinds of pollution threaten this environment. These threats include oil, high levels of ship traffic, untreated sewage, and industrial ...
  26. [26]
    The Strategic History of Conflict and Trade in the Strait of Hormuz
    Jun 23, 2025 · For over four thousand years, it has served as a maritime crossroads—first for ancient traders navigating between Mesopotamia and the Indus ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Origins of the Spice Trade in the Indian Ocean - CABI Digital Library
    By 3000 BCE, Mesopotamia had maritime links through the Persian. Gulf all the way to the Indus Valley, a network covering over 1850 kilometres. (1150 miles) ( ...
  28. [28]
    Shipping and Maritime Trade of the Indus People - Penn Museum
    A brisk sea-borne trade between the Indus people and the Sumerians in the late third and early second millenniums BC.<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Geopolitics of the Strait of Hormuz and the Iran-Oman Relations
    Under the Sassanian dynasty (224-651 ce over Oman further strengthened. According to Yacoubi. Tabari, Oman, called Mazun at the time, was under Sassanid rule.
  30. [30]
    HORMUZ ii. ISLAMIC PERIOD - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    Hormuz fell to the Arabs in 650-51. In the 10th century, the town of Hormuz was the chief port for Kermān and Sistān, although the main Persian Gulf port ...
  31. [31]
    The Kingdom of Hormuz - Iranologie.com
    The Kingdom of Hormuz rose from conflicts after the Abbasid power, becoming a major trading port, and later a sea-empire with a mixed population.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The beginning of Portuguese control over the ports of the Arabian Gulf
    Portugal took control of Hormuz Island during 1515 because it offered strategic oversight of the critical Strait of Hormuz trade route.
  34. [34]
    Struggle for the Strait of Hormuz | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Significance. The struggles for the Strait of Hormuz in 1552 did not mean the end of Ottoman attempts to gain control of the Persian Gulf. The Ottomans were ...Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient
  35. [35]
    Fort of Our Lady of the Conception Hormuz, Iran - Starforts.com
    In 1622, Persia, led by Shah Abbas I (1571-1629), allied with the East India Company to cleanse Hormuz Island of Portuguese presence. With the Persians on land ...
  36. [36]
    The British in the Gulf: an Overview | Qatar Digital Library
    Following the Indian Rebellion in 1857, the British Government took control of the EIC's possessions in India (thus beginning the formal British Empire in India) ...
  37. [37]
    Dutch, British and Persian Rivalry in the Gulf 17th – 18th centuries
    A period of Dutch presence in the Gulf that would last until the end of the Seven Years War in 1763 when the British defeated the Dutch.
  38. [38]
    GREAT BRITAIN iii. British influence in Persia in the 19th century
    British imperial interests in Persia in the Qajar period were primarily determined by the concern for the security of colonial India.
  39. [39]
    Persian Gulf: An Imperial and Global Space During the Nineteenth ...
    In the nineteenth century, the Gulf was an imperial space that played a special role in the British Empire in India, namely that of a frontier of water and sand ...
  40. [40]
    Oil Is Discovered in Persia | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The discovery of oil in Persia (modern-day Iran) in 1908 marked a significant turning point in the region's economic and political landscape.
  41. [41]
    Almost Everything is About Oil in the Middle East | Art Berman
    Apr 18, 2024 · Almost everything in the Middle East is about oil. The strategic and military importance of oil began early in the 20th century.
  42. [42]
    Oil in the Middle East - The map as History
    At the time, almost all oil was transported via the Strait of Hormuz, and then the Suez Canal for delivery to Europe and the United States. From the 1967 War ...Missing: Persian | Show results with:Persian
  43. [43]
    The Changing of the Guard: The Persian Gulf between Two ... - PBS
    Dec 15, 2010 · The British Empire needed to protect the critical gateway to its crown jewel, India. The strategic importance of the Persian Gulf in the ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Oil Embargo, 1973–1974 - Office of the Historian
    The 1973 Oil Embargo acutely strained a US economy that had grown increasingly dependent on foreign oil.
  45. [45]
    What is the Strait of Hormuz and why is it so important for oil? - Reuters
    Oct 20, 2023 · HISTORY OF TENSIONS. In 1973, Arab producers led by Saudi Arabia slapped an oil embargo on Western supporters of Israel in its war with Egypt.
  46. [46]
    The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most important oil transit chokepoint
    Nov 21, 2023 · The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most important oil chokepoint because large volumes of oil flow through the strait.
  47. [47]
    Strait of Hormuz crude oil and LNG flows under growing threat, EIA ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Between 2022 and 2024, crude oil and condensate transiting the Strait of Hormuz declined by 1.6 million b/d, the EIA notes. This decline ...
  48. [48]
    About one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade flows ... - EIA
    Jun 24, 2025 · In 2024, about 20% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade transited the Strait of Hormuz, primarily from Qatar. The strait is a ...Missing: transit | Show results with:transit
  49. [49]
    EIA: About one-fifth of global LNG trade flows through Strait of Hormuz
    Jun 25, 2025 · The EIA estimates that 83% of the LNG that moved through the Strait of Hormuz in 2024 went from Persian Gulf countries to Asian markets. China, ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Strait of Hormuz Factsheet - NET
    while the total volume of LNG transiting the Strait of Hormuz was just over 50 bcm in the first five months of 2025, equating to 20% of global LNG trade.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  51. [51]
    Chokepoints under pressure: The fragile lifelines of global energy
    Sep 8, 2025 · In 2023, approximately 3.5 million bpd of crude oil and 0.5 Bcfd of LNG passed through the straits. Similar volumes are projected for 2025.
  52. [52]
    What does the widening military conflict in Iran mean for oil prices ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · But if it were to do so, such strikes could disrupt the flow of several million barrels per day, sending Brent crude prices above $80 per barrel ...
  53. [53]
    What's That: Strait of Hormuz - Mansfield Energy
    Jun 25, 2025 · The Strait of Hormuz, between Iran and Oman, is a narrow waterway carrying 20 million barrels of oil daily and is a global energy artery.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  54. [54]
    Strait of Hormuz disruption would jeopardise 10% of Europe's LNG ...
    Jun 27, 2025 · A potential disruption in the Strait of Hormuz would jeopardise the 10% of Europe's LNG imports that come from Qatar.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  55. [55]
    The Strait of Hormuz: how would a closure impact trade?
    Aug 20, 2025 · Ultimately, much like 1973, cutting off energy supplies from the region would in fact hurt the countries of the region the most.
  56. [56]
    How War with Iran Could Disrupt Energy Exports at the Strait ... - CSIS
    Jun 23, 2025 · The worst-case scenario for global energy security would be an Iranian-imposed physical cutoff of oil and gas shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
  57. [57]
    Strait of Hormuz: What happens if Iran shuts global oil corridor? - BBC
    Jun 23, 2025 · Bounded to the north by Iran and to the south by Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the corridor – which is only about 50km (31 miles) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    What countries will be most affected by Iran's closure of Strait of ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · Around 84 percent of oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz is destined for Asia, leaving the economies of China, India, South Korea and others vulnerable.
  59. [59]
    Strait of Hormuz: Top 5 countries that would be most impacted due ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · Japan depends on the Strait for 80 per cent of its crude oil imports, about 1.8 million barrels daily, mainly from Saudi Arabia and UAE. South ...
  60. [60]
    Strait of Hormuz Closure? India sitting pretty on oil front, no ... - TaxTMI
    Jun 22, 2025 · IMPACT ON INDIA: India sources about 40 per cent of its supplies from Middle East nations such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, ...
  61. [61]
    Strait of Hormuz: Here are alternate routes around the choke point
    Jun 23, 2025 · Iran also has a pipeline and export terminal on the Gulf of Oman that could bypass the Strait of Hormuz. The pipeline's capacity is about 300, ...
  62. [62]
    Why the world can't afford a blockade in the Strait of Hormuz
    Jun 21, 2025 · “The closure of the Strait of Hormuz will inevitably lead to a rise in the price of a barrel of oil to over $100, meaning the price will ...
  63. [63]
    How Strait of Hormuz disruption could harm the economy
    Jun 25, 2025 · The combination of reduced oil supply, higher shipping costs, plus a surge in the geopolitical risk premium could trigger a spike in oil prices.
  64. [64]
    The economic cost of closure of the Strait of Hormuz for the world
    Jul 9, 2025 · The economic impact of a closure would be swift and severe. A mere disruption of this artery could send energy markets into turmoil, inflation.
  65. [65]
    Strait of Hormuz - About the Strait - The Strauss Center
    The Strait is among the world's most important oil chokepoints. Oil tankers carry approximately 17 million barrels of oil each day through the Strait, or 20 to ...
  66. [66]
    The Strait of Hormuz: What It Is, Where It Is, and Why It Matters
    Jun 23, 2025 · The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow sea channel that links the Persian Gulf in the west with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea in the southeast.Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Vessels Now Keeping to Omani Waters in Strait of Hormuz Traffic ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · The plot of the sea lanes is primarily designed for times of peace and stability, with optimal channels minimizing passage times and fuel costs.
  68. [68]
    Threatened closure of the Straits of Hormuz - Hill Dickinson
    Jun 16, 2025 · The Strait is regulated by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982. The Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) recognised by the UN's ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] RESOLUTION A.284 (VIII) adopted on 20 November 1973 ...
    Dec 19, 1973 · 5. A vessel using a traffic separation scheme shall: (i) proceed in the appropriate traffic lane in the general direction of traffic flow for ...
  70. [70]
    OCIMF launches guidance for vessels sailing in Strait of Hormuz
    Jul 23, 2019 · The use of the inshore traffic zone for navigation should only be undertaken for those vessels calling at ports within the inshore area.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    2025-009-Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman-Iranian Illegal ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · When transiting eastbound in the Strait of Hormuz, it is recommended that vessels transit close to Oman's territorial sea. Industry transit ...Missing: regulations IMO
  72. [72]
    STRAIT OF HORMUZ – MARITIME SECURITY - Britannia P&I Club
    Jul 24, 2019 · Comply with the navigational norms in the Strait of Hormuz, including the COLREGs Rule 10 (Traffic Separation Schemes); Observe any exclusion ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] COLREG. 2/Circ.11 - navcen
    Resolution A.376(X), the Maritime Safety Committee at its fortieth session adopted the amended traffic separation scheme "In the Strait of Hormuz". (MSC XL ...
  74. [74]
    What is the Strait of Hormuz and why is it so important for global ...
    Jul 10, 2025 · The Strait of Hormuz is bordered by active, assertive states such as Iran, which means the potential for interstate conflict is relatively high.
  75. [75]
    The Strait of Hormuz: A Dangerous Chokepoint Amid GPS Jamming ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · According to Windward, a maritime analytics firm, nearly 1,000 ships daily are experiencing navigational disruptions, with faulty Automatic ...
  76. [76]
    Shipping disruption surges around Hormuz amid Israeli attacks on ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · Electronic interference with commercial ship navigation systems has surged in recent days around the Strait of Hormuz and the wider Gulf, ...
  77. [77]
    JMIC: Key recommendations for Strait of Hormuz transits - Safety4Sea
    Jun 18, 2025 · Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) has issued a 16 June 2025 advisory on maritime threats in the Arabian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.
  78. [78]
    Freight ships prepare for Israel-Iran conflict, Strait of Hormuz risks
    Jun 13, 2025 · BIMCO has advised ship owners to implement ship defense measures outlined in industry documents, report suspicious sightings to the UK's ...
  79. [79]
    Strait of Hormuz | International Crisis Group
    Jun 11, 2025 · The US and Iranian navies have had numerous tense encounters in the Persian Gulf, where 30 per cent of the world's seaborne-traded crude oil passes through the ...
  80. [80]
    Strait of Hormuz Tensions: Law, Security & Global Trade
    Jun 24, 2025 · Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Strait of Hormuz tensions have re-emerged as a central concern in global security and energy ...
  81. [81]
    Guidance on safety and security in Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz ...
    A joint industry guidance on safety and security in Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman, dated 3 Jul 2019, is issued to offer risk mitigation ...
  82. [82]
    The Strategic Hydrography of the Strait of Hormuz
    including over 30 oil tankers — navigate through Hormuz. This immense density creates ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Sperry Marine FOG Cuts Through Ship Jamming and Spoofing
    Aug 20, 2025 · Windward also reported “970 ships per day” on average as affected by GPS jamming in the Arabian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz over the four day ...
  84. [84]
    Oil Tanker Collision Near Strait of Hormuz Raises Security Fears
    Jun 19, 2025 · Oil Tanker Collision Near Strait of Hormuz Raises ... oil spills endanger marine life and can lead to widespread environmental damage.
  85. [85]
    The Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz
    Mar 25, 2025 · The Strait of Hormuz is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is a vital passageway for approximately 20% of the world's oil supply, ...
  86. [86]
    Real-Time Intelligent Maritime Accident Prediction and Prevention ...
    Sep 27, 2025 · Narrow waterways are among the riskiest areas where maritime accidents occur most frequently due to the limited maneuvering space available ...
  87. [87]
    Environmental Impact of Oil Spills in the Persian Gulf
    Rating 4.0 (1) What makes the Persian Gulf especially vulnerable to oil spills is a combination of geographical, ecological, and geopolitical factors. Geography: A Semi- ...
  88. [88]
    The Effects of Oil Spills on Ecosystem at the Persian Gulf
    This has led to serious damage to mangrove forests, fishery, turtles, shoreline, sediments, birds, dolphins, corals and even deep-sea creatures.
  89. [89]
    Mapping the shoreline risk assessment of oil spill in the eastern ...
    The results indicate that high-risk levels are not excessively prevalent overall and are confined to approximately 24 km. The shape of the channel and ...
  90. [90]
    Greenpeace warns of potential environmental disaster as oil tankers ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Greenpeace has warned of a “potential environmental disaster” after two oil tankers collided near the Strait of Hormuz.
  91. [91]
    Strait of Hormuz - Tanker War - The Strauss Center
    The first phase of the Tanker war began in May 1981, when Iraq declared that all ships going to or from Iranian ports in the northern zone of the Gulf were ...
  92. [92]
    The Tanker War | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    The tanker war was a sideshow of the Iran-Iraq war, involving attacks on ships to reduce oil exports and intimidate Gulf states. It started in 1981.
  93. [93]
    H-018-1 Tanker War - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 18, 2018 · By the end of 1987, Iraq had conducted 283 attacks on shipping, while Iran attacked 168 times. Combined, the attacks had killed 116 merchant ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  94. [94]
    Strait of Hormuz - FAQ - The Strauss Center
    During this eight year war, 411 ships were attacked, 239 of which were petroleum tankers. However, despite repeated Iranian threats to close the Strait of ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  95. [95]
    Operation Praying Mantis - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Sep 20, 2023 · In the one-day operation, the U.S. Navy destroyed two Iranian surveillance platforms, sank two of their ships, and severely damaged another.
  96. [96]
    One Day of War | Naval History Magazine - U.S. Naval Institute
    The fighting in the gulf became known as the Tanker War, as both sides attacked hundreds of oil tankers in an effort to disrupt the economy of the other side.Missing: phases | Show results with:phases
  97. [97]
    H-Gram 018 - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 13, 2018 · Operation Praying Mantis, 18 April 1988: Jets flying from aircraft carrier Enterprise (CVN-65) sink Iranian frigate Sahand (F-74) in retaliation for the mining ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    H-020-1: USS Vincennes Tragedy
    Jul 3, 2018 · Vincennes fired almost 100 5-inch rounds, hitting and sinking two IRGCN boats and damaging a third with a near miss. At 0947, Iran Air Flight ...
  99. [99]
    When the US Navy shot down Iran Air flight 655 in 1988 | CNN
    Jan 10, 2020 · Iran Air Flight 655, an Airbus A300 with 290 people on board, was blown from the skies by a missile fired from the guided-missile cruiser USS Vincennes.
  100. [100]
    Unlawful Interference Airbus A300B2-203 EP-IBU, Sunday 3 July 1988
    Iran Air flight IR655, an Airbus A300, was shot down by a US Navy frigate and crashed into the Strait of Hormuz off Qeshm Island, Iran, killing all 290 ...
  101. [101]
    Iran Air flight 655 | Background, Events, Investigation, & Facts
    Iran Air flight 655, flight of an Iranian airliner that was shot down by the USS Vincennes on July 3, 1988, over the Strait of Hormuz, killing all 290 ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Investigation Report DTIC
    Aug 19, 1988 · Iran Air Flight 655 took off on runway 21 (heading 210 degrees true), was directed by the Bandar Abbas Tower to squawk. IFF mode III code 6760, ...
  103. [103]
    Vincennes: A Case Study | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    It's been five years since two Standard missiles fired from the USS Vincennes (CG-49)—here, the first missile leaves the rail—brought down the Iranian airliner.
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Reflections on the Shootdown of Flight 655 - DTIC
    It was also reported that the was Vincennes rushing to defend a merchantman under attack by Iran in international waters.
  105. [105]
    [PDF] USS Vincennes Incident
    Although many analysts have tried in the past 15 years to point to a single factor theory, the general consensus remains that the shoot down of Iran Flight 655 ...
  106. [106]
    Statement on the Destruction of an Iranian Jetliner by the United ...
    It appears that in a proper defensive action by the USS Vincennes this morning in the Persian Gulf an Iranian airliner was shot down over the Strait of Hormuz.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Investigation Report
    (U) The downing of civilian Iran Air Flight 655 on 3 July was a tragic and regrettable accident and, as is so often the case in a combat environment, there were ...
  108. [108]
    Reagan on Iran Air 655 - War on the Rocks
    Jul 20, 2014 · Editor's Note: Yesterday, we published President Ronald Reagan's speech in reaction to the downing of Korean Airlines Flight 007 by a Soviet ...
  109. [109]
    Timeline: U.S.-Iran Naval Encounters | The Iran Primer
    May 6, 2021 · Iranian and U.S. naval forces have had sporadic and occasional hostile encounters since the 1980s. Most encounters – largely by the Islamic ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  110. [110]
    Iran's History of Naval Provocations - state.gov
    Apr 22, 2020 · In 2015, during negotiations of the Iran Deal and after its adoption, the U.S. Navy recorded 22 incidents of unsafe and unprofessional conduct ...
  111. [111]
    U.S. Sailors Fire Warning Shots to Ward Off Harassing Iranian Fast ...
    Apr 27, 2021 · US sailors fired warning shots to ward off a trio of Iranian fast attack boats harassing US Navy and Coast Guard vessels in the Persian Gulf on Monday.Missing: minor | Show results with:minor
  112. [112]
    Maersk Tigris: Iran releases seized cargo ship - BBC News
    May 7, 2015 · A container ship seized in the Strait of Hormuz by Iran last week has been released, its operator has confirmed.
  113. [113]
    Iran Releases Maersk Tigris - USNI News
    May 7, 2015 · The seizure of the ship by the IRGCN came at a sensitive time between Iran and the U.S., both embroiled in a negotiation of a nuclear deal.
  114. [114]
    Strait of Hormuz Once Again at Center of U.S.-Iran Strife
    May 1, 2015 · After Iran seized a cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz this week, the United States Navy has accompanied American-flagged vessels to protect ...
  115. [115]
    VIDEO: 3 Iranian Fast Attack Craft Harass U.S. Navy Ships in Strait ...
    Jun 21, 2022 · Three Iranian fast attack craft harassed two US Navy ships entering the Persian Gulf on Tuesday, Navy officials told USNI News.
  116. [116]
    U.S. Describes Confrontation With Iranian Boats - The New York Times
    Jan 8, 2008 · Five armed Iranian speedboats approached three United States Navy warships in international waters in the strategic Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, then maneuvered ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  117. [117]
    U.S. Navy Surveillance Ship Harassed by Iranian Attack Boat
    Mar 6, 2017 · A U.S. Navy surveillance ship was harassed by an Iranian fast attack craft while entering the Persian Gulf on Saturday.
  118. [118]
    Iran made preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz, US sources say
    Jul 2, 2025 · The Iranians could have prepared the mines to convince Washington that Tehran was serious about closing the strait, but without intending to do ...
  119. [119]
    US fears Iran could use mine-loaded vessels to choke Strait of Hormuz
    Jul 2, 2025 · The US intelligence has assessed that Iran may be preparing to block the Strait of Hormuz by deploying naval mines.
  120. [120]
    [PDF] The Iranian Maritime Challenge - DTIC
    The Ghadir also possesses the capability to lay naval mines, which makes it perhaps the greatest threat to U.S. naval forces in the Persian. Gulf and Strait of ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] The IRGC and the Persian Gulf Region in a Period of Contested ...
    The Iranian navy's submarines can lay large offensive minefields, the so-called mine barrages, in the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea as well. Some observers ...
  122. [122]
    Strait of Hormuz - Mines - The Strauss Center
    Mines would be beneficial for use in the shipping lanes of the Strait of Hormuz as either a direct damage mechanism or as a deterrent.
  123. [123]
    [PDF] THE IRANIAN MINE WARFARE THREAT - CIA
    It is almost 1,000 km in length and 330 km at its widest but is ... The Strait of Hormuz is about 275 km long and an aver- age of 80 km wide. At ...
  124. [124]
    Iran drills revive fears of disruption in Strait of Hormuz, think tank says
    Sep 4, 2025 · In August, Iran staged its first major naval exercise since the June war with Israel. The two-day drill covered the Strait of Hormuz, the Gulf ...
  125. [125]
    Iran readied to mine key Strait of Hormuz after Israel began strikes ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by US intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial attacks ...
  126. [126]
    Report: Iran Loaded Out Naval Mines in Preparation to Close Hormuz
    Jul 1, 2025 · Iran's naval forces were loading up mines in preparation for a possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz, two US officials told Reuters this week.
  127. [127]
    Iranian mines in the Straits of Hormuz could shut down a fifth of oil ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · Iranian mines in the Straits of Hormuz could shut down a fifth of oil flows in a week. Iran has somewhere between 5,000 and 6,000 naval mines, ...
  128. [128]
    Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz
    Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz. Download ... Published: Summer 2008. Author. Summary. How might Iran retaliate in the ...
  129. [129]
    Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz
    Jul 1, 2008 · July 01 2008. Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz Available. Caitlin Talmadge. Caitlin Talmadge. Caitlin Talmadge ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Iran and the Threat to “Close” the Gulf
    High risk of US and allied intervention. • Limited threat power projection and sustainability. • Unclear strategic goal. Page 52 ...
  131. [131]
    Iran threatens to block Strait of Hormuz oil route - BBC News
    Dec 28, 2011 · Iran threatens to close a vital oil-trade route if the West imposes more sanctions over its controversial nuclear programme.
  132. [132]
    Iran-U.S. tensions flare in the Strait of Hormuz - POLITICO
    Dec 28, 2011 · The fleet's threats come after the head of Iran's navy told state TV that closing the shipping lane would be "easier than drinking a glass of ...
  133. [133]
    Iran's Threat to the Strait of Hormuz - EveryCRSReport.com
    Jan 23, 2012 · From December 2011 to January 2012, some Iranian government officials openly threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a major artery of the ...
  134. [134]
    Iran threatens U.S. Navy as sanctions hit economy | Reuters
    Jan 3, 2012 · Iran threatened on Tuesday to take action if the U.S. Navy moves an aircraft carrier into the Gulf, Tehran's most aggressive statement yet ...
  135. [135]
    Can Iran Close The World's Most Important Oil Route? - NPR
    Jan 11, 2012 · Tehran is threatening to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, in retaliation for new sanctions by the West.
  136. [136]
    Four questions (and expert answers) about Iran's threats to close the ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · Higher energy prices would impact the price of oil globally, so even regions that don't rely on oil from the Persian Gulf would see higher ...
  137. [137]
    Strait of Hormuz: Why does Iran threaten to close it? - Euronews.com
    Jun 28, 2019 · Strait of Hormuz: Why does Iran threaten to close it? · Control of the strategically-important Strait of Hormuz has been at the heart of Iran's ...
  138. [138]
    Amid Rising Tensions in Persian Gulf, Speakers in Security Council ...
    Jun 26, 2019 · Emphasizing that Iran's pattern of destabilizing behaviour poses a threat to the region, she said it is almost certain that the Islamic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  139. [139]
    How the Oman tanker attack played out | CNN
    Jun 14, 2019 · The most recent attack occurred a week later on June 13, when two tankers – one carrying oil and the other transporting a cargo of chemicals – ...
  140. [140]
    May 2019 Gulf of Oman incident - Wikipedia
    On 12 May 2019, four commercial ships were damaged off Fujairah's coast in the Gulf of Oman. The ships included two Saudi Arabian registered oil tankers, ...
  141. [141]
    Inquiry into oil tanker attacks stops short of blaming Iran
    Jun 7, 2019 · An unidentified state actor has been blamed for attacks on four oil tankers in the Gulf last month, according to an inconclusive inquiry.<|separator|>
  142. [142]
    A visual guide to the Gulf tanker attacks - The Guardian
    Jun 13, 2019 · Two oil tankers were attacked, leaving one ablaze and the other adrift, in the second such incident in a month near the strait of Hormuz.
  143. [143]
    U.S. blames Iran for tanker attacks in Gulf of Oman, Iran ... - Reuters
    Jun 12, 2019 · The United States blamed Iran for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday that drove up oil prices and raised concerns ...
  144. [144]
    U.S. Navy Says Mine Fragments Point to Iran in Tanker Attack
    Jun 19, 2019 · Fragments recovered from one of two tankers crippled by explosions in the Gulf of Oman last week bear a “striking resemblance” to limpet mines that Iran has ...Missing: attribution | Show results with:attribution
  145. [145]
    UK joins US in accusing Iran of tanker attacks as crew held
    Jun 14, 2019 · The US has accused Iran of detaining the crew of one of two oil tankers attacked in the Gulf of Oman this week, as the UK also joined in formally blaming the ...
  146. [146]
    June 2019 Gulf of Oman incident - Wikipedia
    Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom supported the United States' accusation. Germany has stated that there is "strong evidence" that Iran was responsible for ...Missing: attribution | Show results with:attribution<|separator|>
  147. [147]
    Iran Denies U.S. Claim That It Attacked Tankers In Gulf Of Oman - NPR
    Jun 14, 2019 · Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has rejected the U.S. accusations, tweeting that the Trump administration "immediately jumped to ...
  148. [148]
    The Strait of Hormuz: Tensions rise between Iran and the U.S.
    Attacks on cargo vessels in the Strait of Hormuz have raised concerns about how disruptive a conflict in the Gulf could be for the global oil trade.
  149. [149]
    A timeline of the escalation in the Gulf | The Times of Israel
    Jul 20, 2019 · Tankers in flames. In the early hours of June 13, two fuel-loaded tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz towards the Indian Ocean are hit ...
  150. [150]
    Iranian boats 'attempted to impede' British oil tanker in strait of Hormuz
    Jul 11, 2019 · Three Iranian boats tried to intercept a British oil tanker in the Gulf before being driven off by a Royal Navy warship, the UK said.
  151. [151]
    Iran seizes British tanker in Strait of Hormuz - BBC
    Jul 19, 2019 · Meanwhile, the US claims to have destroyed an Iranian drone in the Gulf, after Iran shot down an American military drone in the area in June.
  152. [152]
    Iran seizes tanker in Strait of Hormuz, raising tensions with Britain
    Jul 19, 2019 · Iran seized a British tanker in the Strait of Hormuz for alleged marine violations and allowed a second one to proceed after issuing a warning.
  153. [153]
    Israel strikes Iran. What happens next? - Brookings Institution
    Jun 16, 2025 · On June 12, Israel carried out a series of airstrikes in Iran targeting the country's nuclear sites. The surprise attack was followed by several days of Israel ...
  154. [154]
    Updates: Iran hits Israel with air strikes after nuclear site attacks
    Jun 13, 2025 · Iranian missiles hit sites across Israel killing at least four people and injuring dozens in retaliation for ongoing Israeli attacks on Iran ...
  155. [155]
    June 21, 2025 – Israel-Iran conflict | CNN
    Jun 21, 2025 · A prominent adviser to Iran's supreme leader has called for missile strikes on US Navy ships and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil ...Pauline Lockwood · Sophie Tanno · Kaanita Iyer · Adrienne Vogt
  156. [156]
    Can Iran really shut down the Strait of Hormuz? - Al Jazeera
    Jun 23, 2025 · Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, but has never followed through on the threat. Iran's Supreme National Security ...
  157. [157]
    Iran Update, October 8, 2025 | ISW - Institute for the Study of War
    Oct 8, 2025 · Iranian Threats to Close the Strait of Hormuz: Iranian officials have threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, likely to try to discourage ...
  158. [158]
    Iran's Conflict With Israel and the United States
    Oct 3, 2025 · Over the next month, six oil tankers in or near the Strait of Hormuz were attacked, which U.S. government officials blamed on Iran. In late ...
  159. [159]
    None
    ### Summary of IRGC Navy's Asymmetric Capabilities and Fleet Assets
  160. [160]
    The IRGC Navy's long-term strategy of asymmetrical warfare
    May 6, 2024 · Officially, the IRGC-N's task is to patrol the Iranian coast and the Strait of Hormuz. Its mission is to rescue ships in distress, monitor ...
  161. [161]
    Strait of Hormuz - Small Boats - The Strauss Center
    [i] The Iranians harassed tanker traffic during the Tanker War using small boats. Many, including the U.S. Navy, suspect that any Iranian effort to close ...
  162. [162]
    The Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz
    Sep 3, 2025 · ... shallow waters averaging 50 meters in depth. The Strait of Hormuz is an even smaller maritime zone, approximately 180 kilometers long and 35 ...Missing: hazards reefs
  163. [163]
    If Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz, these are the ballistic missiles it ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · Missile analyst Ralph Savelsberg walks through Iran's anti-ship ballistic missile capabilities, and how the US and its partners might try to ...
  164. [164]
    Iran's Cruise Missiles Summed Up in 4 Words
    Jun 23, 2025 · The Abu Mahdi is designed for both anti-ship and land-attack missions, capable of engaging heavily defended targets such as aircraft carriers ...
  165. [165]
    Iran's Ghadr-380 Anti-Ship Missile Could “Create Hell” for the US Navy
    Oct 6, 2025 · The missile is part of Iran's broader strategy to enhance its asymmetric warfare capabilities, particularly in the Persian Gulf and the Sea ...
  166. [166]
    Iran Tests New Missile That Could Target U.S. Forces “Create Hell”
    Feb 3, 2025 · It has over 1,000 kilometers range. It has anti-jamming capability." He warned that these weapons could "create hell for the enemy's warships.".<|separator|>
  167. [167]
    Iran Boosts IRCG Navy's Swarm Attack Capabilities - Naval News
    Dec 14, 2021 · The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy received 110 indigenously made combat speedboats on December 11 during a ceremony in Bandar Abbas.
  168. [168]
    Iranian Naval "Swarming" Tactics - CNAS
    Jan 7, 2008 · Iranian naval swarming tactics focus on surprising and isolating the enemy's forces and preventing their reinforcement or resupply.
  169. [169]
    [PDF] Closing Time Caitlin Talmadge Assessing the Iranian Threat to the ...
    Projections based on past instances of U.S. MCM op- erations indicate that it could take a month or more to reopen the Strait of. Hormuz if Iran were allowed to ...
  170. [170]
    Strait of Hormuz - Assessing the Threat - The Strauss Center
    The Strauss Center project team produced an analytical report estimating the effectiveness of an Iranian attack on oil tankers.
  171. [171]
    Experts Assess Iran Strikes, Response and What Comes Next
    Jun 22, 2025 · Potential Gulf Closure Scenarios: Iran could disrupt the Strait using mines, GPS jamming, speedboats, and coastal missiles, but would likely be ...<|separator|>
  172. [172]
    U.S. calls on China to prevent Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
    Jun 22, 2025 · Rubio said it would be "economic suicide" for Iran to close the strait because the Islamic Republic's oil exports pass through the waterway.
  173. [173]
    Iran Won't Dare Close the Strait of Hormuz for 1 Reason
    Jun 24, 2025 · Why Iran Won't Close Hormuz – A full closure is considered an “economic self-inflicted wound” for Iran and would alienate key partners like ...
  174. [174]
    What If: Iran Closed the Strait of Hormuz?
    Jun 19, 2025 · Reflecting on numbers, oil flow through the Strait in 2024 averaged 20 million (b/d), or the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids ...<|separator|>
  175. [175]
    Strait of Hormuz closure unlikely, say industry experts
    Jun 30, 2025 · “Our current assessment is that it is very unlikely that Iran would try to close the shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz. There are several ...Missing: feasibility | Show results with:feasibility
  176. [176]
    Operation Earnest Will - GlobalSecurity.org
    Within a few weeks of the Stark incident, Iraq resumed its raids on tankers but moved its attacks farther south, near the Strait of Hormuz.
  177. [177]
    Operation Earnest Will | Bradley Peniston
    The U.S. Navy prepared for the world's largest maritime convoy operation since World War II. It was to be called Operation Earnest Will, and it would involve ...
  178. [178]
    United States Navy and the Persian Gulf
    The Navy was as critical to American interests in the Persian Gulf after Desert Storm as it had been in the 40 years before.
  179. [179]
    [PDF] U.S. Naval Options for Influencing Iran
    It is reported that most U.S. Navy ships transit the Strait of Hormuz at night, so as not to attract attention, and rarely in large num- bers. On at least one ...<|separator|>
  180. [180]
    IKE Strike Group Transits the Strait of Hormuz
    The IKECSG's transit through the Strait of Hormuz marks the first aircraft carrier to operate in the Arabian Gulf since the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group in ...
  181. [181]
    CTF 152: Gulf Maritime Security
    CTF 152 enhances regional maritime cooperation focusing on illicit non-state actors in the Arabian Gulf, especially between Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) ...Missing: Strait Hormuz
  182. [182]
    Combined Task Force 152 Projects Multinational Presence in ...
    Mar 1, 2023 · CTF 152 is CMF's task force focused on maritime security in the Arabian Gulf. Crewmembers from various units interacted, conducted professional ...Missing: Strait Hormuz
  183. [183]
    Qatar Assumes Command of Combined Maritime Forces ... - Centcom
    Sep 16, 2025 · Established in March 2004, CTF 152 is one of five task forces operated by CMF. It enhances regional maritime cooperation focusing on illicit non ...Missing: Strait Hormuz
  184. [184]
    U.S. Forces Arrive to Support Deterrence Efforts at Strait of Hormuz
    Aug 7, 2023 · Sailors and Marines aboard the USS Bataan and the USS Carter Hall arrived in the Middle East to support deterrence efforts in the Strait of ...
  185. [185]
    Satellites Capture US Carrier Back on Iran's Doorstep - Newsweek
    Aug 12, 2025 · A satellite image captured the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and its escorts approaching the Strait of Hormuz on Monday during a northbound transit ...
  186. [186]
    Clarifying Freedom of Navigation in the Gulf | The Washington Institute
    Jul 24, 2019 · To ensure the safety and security of navigation through international waterways like the Strait of Hormuz, the UN's International Maritime ...
  187. [187]
    The Strait of Hormuz - QIL QDI
    Dec 31, 2020 · The complete submission to coastal sovereignty of about two thirds of the international straits was clearly leading to a progressive restriction ...
  188. [188]
    UNCLOS, the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's Big Gamble on the High ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · As tensions with Iran escalate, the Strait of Hormuz has become a flashpoint where global energy, military power and int'l law converge.
  189. [189]
    Transit Passage Rights in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's Threats to ...
    May 3, 2012 · The question this Insight will address is whether under international law Iran can block the passage of merchant vessels through the Strait of Hormuz.<|separator|>
  190. [190]
    Iran: Non-proliferation Briefing - Security Council Report
    Jun 23, 2025 · The commission comprises the current parties to the JCPOA—China, France, Germany, Iran, Russia, and the UK—and the EU serves as its coordinator.
  191. [191]
  192. [192]
    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Maximum Pressure ...
    Feb 4, 2025 · Trump signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) restoring maximum pressure on the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, ...
  193. [193]
    Trump reimposes 'maximum pressure' on Iran, aims to drive oil ...
    Feb 4, 2025 · U.S. President Donald Trumpon Tuesday restored his "maximum pressure" campaign on Iran that includes efforts to drive its oil exports down ...
  194. [194]
    Iran Sanctions - United States Department of State
    UNSCR 1737 (2006). Tags. Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions Iran Sanctions and Designations.
  195. [195]
    [PDF] Maximum Pressure Policy on Iran
    President Trump's successful maximum pressure campaign on Iran in the first term led to real results including shrinking the Iranian defense budget by 25 ...
  196. [196]
    [PDF] S/2023/588 - Security Council - the United Nations
    Aug 7, 2023 · This means that Iran cannot legally block the lawful passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Since 2021, Iran has interfered with the ...
  197. [197]
    Where does Trump's renewed 'maximum pressure' leave any Iran ...
    Feb 6, 2025 · On Tuesday, the US president signed a national security presidential memorandum to enforce his restored maximum pressure on Iran policy.
  198. [198]
    2025 Iran-United States negotiations - Wikipedia
    In February 2025, Trump reinstated the maximum pressure campaign to push Iran into a new nuclear deal, prevent its development of nuclear weapons, and counter ...2025 Iranian protests · Steve Witkoff · Iranian economic crisis · Majid Takht-Ravanchi<|control11|><|separator|>
  199. [199]
    Combined Maritime Forces – A 47-nation naval partnership
    Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) is a 47-nation naval partnership, which exists to promote security, stability and prosperity across approximately 3.2 million ...CTF 150: Maritime Security · About CMF · CTF 152: Gulf Maritime Security · CTF 153
  200. [200]
    Combined Task Force 152 Projects Multinational Presence in ...
    Mar 1, 2023 · CTF 152 is CMF's task force focused on maritime security in the Arabian Gulf. Crewmembers from various units interacted, conducted professional ...Missing: Strait Hormuz
  201. [201]
    Combined Task Force 152 Conducts Exercise in Arabian Gulf with ...
    Established in 2004, CTF 152 is one of four task forces under the Combined Maritime Forces, the largest international naval partnership in the world, consisting ...
  202. [202]
    Operation Sentinel International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC)
    The goal of Operation Sentinel is to promote maritime stability, ensure safe passage, and de-escalate tensions in international waters.
  203. [203]
    Safeguarding shipping in the Middle East: IMSC - Naval Technology
    Feb 2, 2021 · An eight-nation coalition established the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC) in 2019 to safeguard commercial vessels passing through the region.
  204. [204]
    International Maritime Security Construct Main Planning Conference ...
    The IMSC is enabling nations to work cooperatively to promote the free flow of commerce, deter threats to shipping, and enhance maritime domain awareness and ...
  205. [205]
    Coalition Task Force Sentinel Moves to New HQ in Bahrain
    The International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC) held a ribbon-cutting ceremony Aug. 6 on board Naval Support Activity Bahrain to formally ...<|separator|>
  206. [206]
    International Maritime Security Construct Holds Change of Command
    Feb 20, 2024 · The International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC) held a change of command ceremony onboard Naval Support Activity Bahrain, Feb. 20.,
  207. [207]
    Saudi Arabia takes command of 2 maritime task forces, months after ...
    Aug 29, 2023 · The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has taken command of two coalition, maritime task forces in the Gulf: Combined Task Force 152 and Coalition Task Force Sentinel.<|separator|>
  208. [208]
    Deterrence of North Korea and Iran: Interests-Objectives-Analysis ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · The United States supports deterrence in the Middle East by deploying its military forces and cooperating with allies and partners. However, ...
  209. [209]
    Strait of Hormuz - Alternate Export Routes - The Strauss Center
    As of 2006, the East-West Pipeline operated at only 50% capacity, leaving “slack” capacity of about 2.5 million barrels per day.[iii] Other pipelines in the ...
  210. [210]
    Iran oil doomsday in Hormuz may be more fear than reality - Reuters
    Jun 23, 2025 · During the 1980s Iran-Iraq war, the two sides engaged in the so-called "Tanker Wars" in the Gulf. Iraq targeted Iranian ships, and Iran attacked ...
  211. [211]
    Bab-Habshan–Fujairah Oil Pipeline - Global Energy Monitor
    Dec 4, 2024 · Bab-Habshan–Fujairah Oil Pipeline, also known as Abu Dhabi Crude Oil ... Capacity: 1,500,000 bpd; Length: 360 km; Diameter: 48 in ...
  212. [212]
    Iran-Israel war: UAE oil pipeline offers safe alternative in case of ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · As of the latest available data, the pipeline is operational and functioning near or at full capacity, transporting up to 1.5 million bpd of ...
  213. [213]
    Adnoc Flexes Crude Export Options With Expansion Of 'Horm...
    Oct 18, 2024 · The pipeline will essentially double the capacity to transfer crude from Habshan to Fujairah, which currently stands at 1.8mn b/d through the ...
  214. [214]
    Goureh-Jask Crude Oil Pipeline - Global Energy Monitor - GEM.wiki
    Dec 4, 2024 · The Goureh-Jask Crude Oil Pipeline is an operating pipeline in Iran, running from Goureh to Jask, with a capacity of 1 million bpd, built to ...Location · Project details · Background · Articles and resources
  215. [215]
    Iran begins exporting crude from Jask, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz
    Oct 23, 2024 · Out of the terminal's projected 1 Mbd pipeline capacity, which transports crude from the Goureh pumping station in the southwest to Jask in the ...
  216. [216]
    Iraq-Oman Pipeline Deal: Creating New Middle East Oil Export Route
    Sep 24, 2025 · Discover how the Iraq-Oman oil pipeline creates a vital export route, bypassing vulnerable chokepoints for regional security.
  217. [217]
    Iraq and Oman Consider Joint Oil Pipeline to Diversify Export Routes
    Sep 15, 2025 · The proposed pipeline would run from the southern city of Basra to Duqm, either overland or undersea through the Arabian Gulf. An undersea route ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  218. [218]
    Iraq moves to secure Basra-Oman pipeline, boosting export route ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · Iraq has signed two memoranda of understanding with Oman on 3/9/2025 to explore a Basra-Oman crude pipeline and joint marketing strategies.
  219. [219]
    Oman-Iraq pact on new 10m-barrel crude storage project
    Sep 3, 2025 · Oman and Iraq have signed key agreements to develop a 10-million-barrel crude storage facility at Ras Markaz near Duqm.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  220. [220]
    Oman-Iraq Crude Storage Pact: What the 10M-Barrel Project Means ...
    Sep 4, 2025 · Initially, the project will feature storage, loading, and unloading facilities with a starting capacity of 10 million barrels, with plans for ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  221. [221]
    Bypassing Hormuz: Saudi Arabia's pipeline push in Yemen's Al-Mahra
    Feb 26, 2025 · Saudi Arabia seeks to revive a strategic oil pipeline through Yemen's Al-Mahra to bypass the Strait of Hormuz and gain hegemony over its Arab neighbors.
  222. [222]
    Persian Gulf oil producers face hard choices if Strait of Hormuz is ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · For the rest of the major producers in the Gulf, including Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain, alternatives to the Strait of Hormuz are nonexistent.
  223. [223]
    Iran's parliament backs blocking Strait of Hormuz - CNBC
    Jun 23, 2025 · The Commonwealth Bank of Australia pointed out that "there is limited scope to bypass the Strait of Hormuz." Pipelines in Saudi Arabia and the ...Missing: feasibility | Show results with:feasibility
  224. [224]
    Iran's options against foreign aggression include closing Strait of ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz to traffic in retaliation for Western pressure, and shipping sources said on ...
  225. [225]
    [PDF] IN DIRE STRAITS? IMPLICATIONS OF US-IRAN TENSIONS FOR ...
    From a defensive posture, the threat to “close the Strait” and throw global oil prices into disarray is the closest option Iran has to a nuclear option. Iran's ...
  226. [226]
    Iran's Gray Zone Strategy: Cornerstone of its Asymmetric Way of War
    Mar 19, 2021 · Iran also relies on a variety of nonmilitary means to bolster deterrence—creating economic dependencies in neighboring states (for example, ...<|separator|>
  227. [227]
    Naval Power and Deterrence: Iran's Role in Regional and Global ...
    May 28, 2025 · The shallow waters of the Gulf and narrow lanes of the Strait of Hormuz give Iran warfighting advantages that offer leverage over global energy ...
  228. [228]
    Why Iran Is Threatening to Close the Strait of Hormuz
    Jul 6, 2018 · The mere threat of closing the strait increases market uncertainty, stokes oil prices and creates some leverage for Iran without requiring that it follow ...<|separator|>
  229. [229]
    Iranian Aggression: The World Awakes - state.gov
    Sep 25, 2019 · Iranian Aggression: The World Awakes. Speech. Michael R ... They know the threat Iran poses to peace and are united around stopping it.
  230. [230]
    Strait of Hormuz becomes flash point in US-Iran conflict - The Hill
    Jun 22, 2025 · Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in several Sunday interviews, warned against shutting down the strait, calling the move “suicidal” for the ...
  231. [231]
    2025-002A-Strait of Hormuz, Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Status: Cancelled. Geographic Location: Strait of Hormuz, Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Arabian Sea. Threat Type: Potential Retaliatory Strikes by Iranian ...Missing: led 2020-2025
  232. [232]
    How the Iran-Israel Conflict Is Affecting Gulf Energy and Maritime ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · Further, depending on how the conflict evolves, the Houthis may resume their threats to attack infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, and any ...<|separator|>
  233. [233]
    Gulf States to the World: Not Our War, Not on Our Soil
    Jun 14, 2025 · The GCC states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE, have spent years building a pragmatic détente with Iran. ... threaten the Gulf's long-term ...
  234. [234]
    Legal ambiguity in the Strait of Hormuz due to U.S. and Iranian non ...
    Legal ambiguity in the Strait of Hormuz due to U.S. and Iranian non-party status to UNCLOS increases risks of conflict. The disagreement between Iran and the ...
  235. [235]
    The Legal Regime of the Strait of Hormuz and Attacks Against Oil ...
    Density of Ship Traffic and the Strait's Significance for the Global Economy ... ships and aircraft transiting this area may be at increased risk of collision.
  236. [236]
    Iran-Israel conflict and the Strait of Hormuz: Charterparty implications
    Jun 18, 2025 · The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important shipping channels in the world and is the only sea passage from the Persian ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  237. [237]
    [PDF] LIS No. 114 - Iran Maritime Claims
    The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important in the world. While Iran is not obliged to affirm the right in its national law, failure to address the right ...<|separator|>
  238. [238]