Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Yoav

Operation Yoav, launched by the (IDF) on 15 October 1948, was a major offensive in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War aimed at breaking the Egyptian army's siege of Israeli settlements in the desert, severing Egyptian supply lines along the coastal road and the Beersheba-Hebron-Jerusalem axis, and securing the region through the capture of strategic positions including the city of . Commanded by from the Southern Front headquarters, the operation involved coordinated assaults by multiple IDF brigades, including the Negev, Givati, Yiftach, 8th Armored, Oded, and Harel units, supported by artillery, air force strikes, and naval engagements to divide and isolate Egyptian forces into separate pockets. The offensive exploited a temporary lull following the second truce of the war, with initial deception operations misleading Egyptian commanders about the main axis of attack, allowing forces to penetrate Egyptian defenses at key junctions such as Huleiqat and Kaukaba while advancing three wedges to split enemy lines. A pivotal sub-operation, dubbed Operation Moshe, culminated in the rapid capture of on 21 October after Egyptian defenders—numbering several thousand—abandoned the city with minimal resistance, yielding vital water sources and positioning the for further southern advances. Despite heavy fighting at strongpoints like (later taken in November) and El-Manshiyeh, where units sustained significant losses, the operation's use of armor, infantry maneuvers, and aerial bombardment overwhelmed Egyptian positions, leading to their fragmentation into isolated groups confined to , Majdal, Faluja, and Hebron-Jerusalem areas. By 22 October, Operation Yoav had successfully opened the Tel Aviv-Beersheba road, restoring supply lines to settlements and enabling geographic continuity for Israeli-held territory in the south, while forcing Egyptian retreats that limited their hold to the except for the encircled Faluja pocket. This victory marked a turning point in the southern theater, bolstering Israel's negotiating position ahead of talks by demonstrating the IDF's capacity for large-scale, multi-brigade operations and shifting momentum against Egyptian forces that had previously threatened central . The operation's success, achieved with deception and rapid exploitation of weak points, underscored the IDF's evolving tactical proficiency despite resource constraints, though it also involved the depopulation of several Arab villages in the path of advance as part of securing rear areas.

Historical Context

Origins in the 1948 War

forces invaded southern on May 15, 1948, immediately following Israel's declaration of independence, launching a two-pronged advance: one column along the coastal road toward and another southeast toward in the Desert. These troops targeted Jewish settlements, repelling initial defenses at on May 14-15 before capturing after five days of heavy combat on May 24, which inflicted approximately 400 casualties. An armored column supported by air strikes reached Kibbutz Negbah on May 21, further pressuring Israeli outposts and opening pathways into Israel's interior. The Egyptian offensives severed ground supply lines to the , isolating the Negev Brigade's defenders in roughly a dozen scattered kibbutzim such as and Negbah, where sustenance relied primarily on precarious airdrops amid ongoing raids. By the second truce's onset on July 18, 1948, Egyptian units occupied most of the except these enclaves, fortifying positions that controlled the coastal corridor and the Beersheba-Hebron-Jerusalem axis, thereby maintaining a strategic . Truce violations exacerbated the crisis, as Egyptian forces denied Jewish convoys passage through critical gaps like Hatta-Karatiya, seized territories beyond agreed lines, disrupted inter-settlement routes, and assaulted outposts. This isolation threatened the viability of settlements and compelled Israeli planners to prioritize southern relief amid successes elsewhere, culminating in a decision for a major push to restore connectivity. The operation's launch on , 1948, was directly precipitated by an Egyptian assault on an Israeli supply convoy bound for the , underscoring the urgent need to fracture Egyptian dominance and secure overland access.

Egyptian Positions in the

Prior to Operation Yoav, forces controlled much of the Desert, isolating Israeli settlements such as those of the by dominating key roads and strongholds. Their deployment included three infantry brigades positioned along the southern front: one between Majdal and Rafiah, another between Majdal and , and a third between Majdal and Beit Jibrin, supported by two artillery battalions and armored units. These forces maintained a siege on the , blocking supply lines via routes like the Majdal-Beit Hanun road and the . Key Egyptian strongholds in the included the police fort at , which overlooked and controlled access to kibbutz Negba and surrounding areas, held by Egyptian troops since May 1948. Another critical position was Huleiqat, featuring a formidable defense system of trenches and fortifications near the Faluja pocket, dominating crossroads and hindering movement. Positions on Hills 113 and 100, also near Faluja, served as elevated defensive points along the Majdal-Faluja axis. In , Egyptians maintained a garrison of approximately 500 troops, securing the city's strategic position at the northern edge of the and along the Hebron-Jerusalem road. Further east, two battalions were deployed in the Hebron-Jerusalem region, extending Egyptian influence over eastern approaches. Coastal brigades at Rafah-Gaza and Majdal reinforced the overall control of access to the from the west. These positions collectively aimed to sever territorial continuity and prevent reinforcement of isolated Negev outposts.

Strategic Planning

Israeli Objectives

Operation Yoav, launched on 15 October 1948, sought primarily to break the Egyptian-imposed isolation of Jewish settlements in the Desert by establishing a secure land corridor linking them to central , as these outposts had been reliant on air supplies amid Egyptian blockades and attacks during the second truce period. This relief effort addressed Egyptian violations of the truce, including interdiction of convoys and assaults on (IDF) positions, which had exacerbated the siege on kibbutzim such as those in the northern . A central tactical objective was the capture of , a strategically vital town serving as the administrative hub of the and a nexus for Egyptian reinforcements and supply routes, thereby enabling control over the region's water sources and transportation arteries. By seizing , Israeli forces aimed to disrupt Egyptian operational coherence in the south, preventing effective reinforcement of forward positions. Broader goals encompassed severing Egyptian lines of communication along the coastal road from Majdal to and the inland Beersheba-Hebron-Jerusalem , driving a between coastal units and those entrenched in the Hebron Mountains to isolate and neutralize disparate salients. These actions were intended to compel Egyptian withdrawal from southern territories, enhancing Israel's territorial position ahead of potential negotiations while minimizing the risk of Egyptian counteroffensives.

Force Composition and Preparation

The Israeli forces for Operation Yoav were commanded by , head of the Southern Front, and comprised primarily three infantry brigades: the with three s and one 65 mm cannon battery; the with five s and five artillery batteries; and the with two s and two 65/75 mm cannon batteries. An armored from the 8th Armored Brigade, including elements of the 82nd Armored , provided mechanized support, while the operation featured the largest artillery concentration assembled by Israeli forces to date, supplemented by engineering units, squadrons for close support, and naval elements to interdict Egyptian supply lines. The Oded Brigade, with three s, joined on October 18 to reinforce advances. Preparation began with the establishment of Southern Front in September 1948, focusing on assembling forces in Israeli-controlled inland areas east of the coast between and to avoid detection. By October 11, scouts and the 7th Battalion infiltrated Egyptian lines for reconnaissance, followed on October 13 by the deployment of 250 troops from the 8th Battalion to relieve Yiftach units, and on October 14 by the 9th Battalion positioning near Gevulot for a on to mislead defenders. Logistical emphasis was placed on tactical near Mishmar HaNegev, repositioning battalions for multi-pronged wedges to divide positions, and coordinating barrages with air strikes to soften targets prior to the October 15 launch. Opposing Egyptian forces consisted of three infantry brigades supported by two artillery battalions and two armored battalions, deployed across the coastal strip: the 1st Brigade from Majdal to , the 2nd from Majdal to , and the 3rd from Majdal to Beit Jibrin, with a 500-man garrison holding . These units, part of the Egyptian , relied on fortified positions and supply lines vulnerable to , but specific preparatory adjustments in response to Israeli movements remain undocumented in available accounts.

Execution of the Operation

Initial Assaults (15-17 October 1948)

Operation Yoav commenced on 15 October 1948, immediately following the end of the second truce, when Egyptian forces fired upon an Israeli supply convoy en route to the Negev settlements, providing the pretext for Israeli retaliation. The initial phase emphasized rapid ground probes and aerial strikes to disrupt Egyptian command, achieve local air superiority, and create breaches in defensive lines blocking access to Beersheba. Israeli forces, under Southern Front commander Yigal Allon, mobilized approximately 30,000 troops across multiple brigades, including the Givati, Yiftach, and Negev Brigades, supported by the newly expanded air force. Aerial operations opened the assaults, with Israeli aircraft bombing Egyptian positions in , Majdal, and Beit Hanun, while strikes targeted the airfield at El-Arish to neutralize threats. These attacks crippled Egyptian logistics, including railway lines between El-Arish and , mined by commandos, and forced Egyptian convoys into vulnerability. Ground actions began concurrently as diversionary raids: the Negev Brigade's 9th Battalion conducted incursions into the Han-Yunis-Rafiah sector to draw Egyptian reserves eastward along the coastal bypass road. On the night of 15-16 October, the initiated a wedge into Egyptian lines at Beit Hanun, bombarding convoys and raiding installations in the Rafah-Gaza area, though full occupation of Hulayqat (Hill 138) eluded them on 17 October. Simultaneously, the assaulted positions west of , capturing junction posts and Hill 113 after intense on 16 October, which enabled a breakthrough toward Kaukaba. These successes fragmented Egyptian coastal defenses but came at cost, as a coordinated probe by the 8th Armored Brigade's tanks and Negev infantry against the fortified Iraq al-Manshiyya stronghold failed decisively on 16 October, inflicting heavy Israeli casualties without penetration. By 17 October, renewed Givati advances secured additional junction positions and pressured Kaukaba, setting conditions for deeper incursions while Egyptian forces, surprised by the multi-axis offensive, struggled to reinforce isolated strongpoints.

Breakthrough to Beersheba (18-22 October 1948)

On 18 October, the Oded Brigade integrated into the operation, while the Givati Brigade achieved a breakthrough west of al-Faluja, capturing Hills 113 and 100 through intense , followed by positions at the Junction and Kaukaba. These actions disrupted Egyptian defenses and facilitated further advances toward the interior. From 19 to 20 October, the assaulted the Huleiqat fortified line, overcoming stubborn resistance to open the coastal road southward, severing Egyptian supply routes and isolating their forward positions. Concurrently, commander Nahum Sarig persuaded Southern Front headquarters to prioritize over , shifting focus to exploit the momentum. The repositioned its 7th and 8th Battalions at Mishmar HaNegev and the 9th Battalion at Urim, preparing for the push. The decisive assault on , codenamed , commenced at 04:00 on 21 October with elements of the , reinforced by the 82nd Armored Battalion and an 88mm mortar battalion from the 8th Brigade, alongside the 89th Battalion of the 8th Brigade. forces blocked reinforcements from the north and south, employing a feint toward , before storming the town. The approximately 500-strong garrison, facing artillery and infantry assaults, surrendered by 09:00 after brief but fierce engagements, allowing troops to occupy before noon. By 22 October, Egyptian units west of the pocket withdrew toward the , consolidating Israeli control over the captured territory and establishing as a forward base for subsequent operations. This breakthrough effectively cleaved Egyptian lines, enabling resupply to isolated Negev settlements and altering the southern front's dynamics.

Supporting Naval and Air Operations

The initiated support for Operation Yoav with preemptive strikes on the evening of 15 October 1948, bombing Egyptian positions at , Majdal, and Beit Hanun to disrupt reinforcements and communications. Concurrently, two Israeli B-17 heavy bombers targeted air facilities at El-Arish, destroying aircraft and fuel supplies on the ground, which temporarily neutralized a portion of the Air Force and prevented interference with ground operations. These aerial actions, involving reconnaissance, bombing, and , continued throughout the operation, enabling to exploit breakthroughs by suppressing artillery and troop concentrations. The Israeli Navy, still in its infancy, contributed to the southern flank by enforcing a of and Majdal, shelling coastal Egyptian installations to interdict supplies and command centers. On 18 October at 04:00, naval gunfire targeted in coordination with air strikes, followed by similar bombardment of Majdal on 21 October. The navy's first engagement occurred on 19 October off , where Israeli vessels clashed with Egyptian forces attempting coastal reinforcement. A pivotal action came on 22 October, when explosive motor boats rammed and sank the Egyptian flagship Emir Farouk, a former carrying up to 600-700 troops and disrupting the Egyptian naval of the corridor; this improvised assault, involving commandeered vessels and volunteers, eliminated a key Egyptian asset threatening Israeli supply lines.

Captured Territories

Military Strongholds

![Iraqi Suwaydan police fort][float-right] The primary military objective of Operation Yoav was the capture of , a strategically vital Egyptian-held stronghold controlling access to the Desert. On October 21, 1948, elements of the Israeli 8th Armored Brigade and assaulted the town, overcoming a of approximately 500 Egyptian soldiers after intense urban combat. By 09:00 the following morning, the Egyptian forces surrendered, yielding control of the position and enabling Israeli advances southward. Among the fortified Egyptian positions targeted were the Huleiqat defense system, a series of entrenched strongpoints blocking the coastal road to the . The captured these on October 19-20, 1948, following prolonged and bitter fighting that neutralized the Egyptian artillery and infantry defenses, thus opening the primary supply route. Further inland, the Bet Guvrin police fort fell to the on October 27, 1948, disrupting Egyptian reinforcements and communications in the northern . This British-era structure had served as a key bastion for Egyptian troops, and its seizure facilitated subsequent Israeli maneuvers. The police fort, a longstanding stronghold at a critical north of Negba, resisted multiple prior assaults but was finally captured on , 1948, by units of the 8th Brigade. Renamed the Yoav Fortress in commemoration of the , its fall isolated remaining pockets and solidified control over the region.

Arab Villages and Settlements

During Operation Yoav and its extended phases from 15 to early 1948, forces advanced through the northern and , capturing several villages that lay along supply routes or near positions. These actions facilitated the breakthrough to and disrupted logistics, with villages often serving as auxiliary points for forces. To prepare for assaults, artillery barrages were employed more intensively than in prior operations to demoralize defenders and induce civilian flight from targeted villages, as documented by historian based on Israeli military records. By the operation's conclusion, most villages in the Gaza District fell to control following Egyptian defeats. Specific captures included Hamama on 28 October, during the operation's third phase, and nearby Dimra, taken concurrently as Egyptian troops withdrew. Al-Jiyya, located west of Gaza, was seized in the late stages on 4–5 November. The fortified village of Iraq Suwaydan, a key Egyptian outpost repeatedly assaulted earlier in the war, was finally overrun on 9 November after Negev Brigade forces used explosives to breach its police station. In these engagements, Arab inhabitants predominantly evacuated ahead of or during the fighting, driven by the intensity of bombardments and reports of prior expulsions elsewhere, leading to widespread depopulation. Remaining structures in captured villages were often demolished to prevent reuse by enemy forces, aligning with to secure gains amid ongoing hostilities. Bedouin settlements in the deeper , less formalized than fellahin villages, were also displaced as Israeli units linked isolated southern enclaves, though permanent structures were scarce in those arid zones.

Casualties and Controversies

Combat Losses

Israeli forces experienced relatively light combat losses relative to the operation's scope and achievements, with total fatalities numbering approximately 89 soldiers killed and 186 wounded across participating units including the , Yiftach, 8th, and Brigades. The alone reported 33 killed or missing and 100 wounded, as documented in the official History of the . These figures reflect effective tactics, including barrages and air superiority, which minimized direct infantry engagements and exposed advances. Egyptian army combat losses were substantially higher, though precise aggregates remain elusive due to fragmented records and the chaos of retreats. In isolated engagements, such as the defense of Iraqi Suwaydan on 19 , Egyptian regulars suffered around 100 killed among 600 defenders. Ground fighting overall likely claimed several hundred Egyptian soldiers, compounded by surrenders and encirclements that led to additional non-combat deaths from exposure and lack of supplies. Naval components of the operation inflicted severe blows, including the sinking of two Egyptian vessels during interdiction efforts off the coast; the flagship Farouk, loaded with reinforcements and supplies, went down with an estimated 700 troops aboard.
SideKilledWoundedNotes
89186Aggregate from IDF units; light relative to gains.
~500+ (est.)UnknownIncludes ground and naval; higher due to defensive positions and supply disruptions.
Disparities in losses underscore operational advantages in coordination and , though forces demonstrated resilience in fortified positions like Bayt Hanun and Majdal. Post-operation analyses by historians attribute higher toll to overextended supply lines and ineffective counterattacks.

Alleged Massacres and Civilian Incidents

During the course of and immediately following Operation Yoav, forces captured several villages in the and subdistricts, leading to reports of civilian casualties amid the fighting and subsequent expulsions. While most engagements involved combat against positions or irregulars, allegations of deliberate killings of non-combatants emerged primarily in connection with the village of al-Dawayima (also spelled Dawayima). On 29 October 1948, one week after the main phase of Yoav concluded with the fall of , units of the IDF's 8th Armored Brigade entered al-Dawayima, a village of approximately 3,700 residents located southwest of , encountering minimal resistance after Egyptian forces had withdrawn. Eyewitness accounts from soldiers described systematic killings of civilians, including men, women, and children, with estimates of deaths ranging from 80 to over 100. One soldier's , written to a and later cited in internal debates, reported that initial assault troops killed 80 to 100 , including women and children whose skulls were smashed with sticks, while subsequent units continued executions in homes and a , with some victims shoved into a and grenaded. Higher figures, up to 455 killed, have been claimed by Palestinian sources based on testimonies, though these lack corroboration from records and are considered inflated by historians relying on declassified documents. The incident prompted an internal investigation ordered by senior officers, including future Yitzhak Rabin, but no prosecutions followed, with reports attributing the acts to a loss of discipline among troops rather than explicit orders. In the broader context of village clearances during Yoav, such as at Bayt Tima and Kawkaba on 18-20 October, civilians largely fled ahead of advancing forces due to prior barrages and warnings, resulting in depopulation without documented mass killings on the scale of al-Dawayima. These actions aligned with directives to secure supply routes by emptying hostile areas, though isolated reports of summary executions during surrenders surfaced without independent verification. Palestinian narratives frame al-Dawayima as part of a pattern of , while archival , including testimonies, confirms atrocities but attributes them to wartime excesses rather than , amid the operation's goal of breaking the Egyptian siege in the .

Outcomes and Legacy

Tactical and Strategic Achievements

Operation Yoav achieved several key tactical successes, including the capture of the strategic town of on 21 October 1948 by the and 54th Battalion, which severed Egyptian supply lines to their eastern forces and enabled Israeli consolidation in the northern . The operation also resulted in the fall of Egyptian strongholds such as Iraq al-Suwaydan after repeated assaults, disrupting coastal Egyptian communications and isolating pockets of their expeditionary force. Naval actions complemented ground efforts by sinking the Egyptian flagship Emir Farouk on 22 October, drowning approximately 700 Egyptian soldiers and further hampering reinforcements from . Air operations provided forces with temporary superiority, bombing Egyptian positions and supply convoys to support breakthroughs. Strategically, the operation opened a vital corridor linking isolated Negev settlements to central , alleviating the Egyptian siege and improving logistics for future advances. It divided the Egyptian army into fragmented groups, with the eastern wing cut off from coastal units, compelling Egypt to withdraw forces toward and ceding control of much of the to . This positioned the IDF for subsequent offensives, such as , and contributed to the armistice negotiations by demonstrating Israeli offensive capability against a numerically superior foe. The achievements underscored the IDF's effective use of and surprise to overcome initial logistical deficits, though Egyptian accounts emphasize defensive resilience rather than total defeat.

Refugee Movements and Territorial Changes

The Israeli advance during Operation Yoav, launched on 15 October 1948, captured on 21 October after brief resistance from forces and local irregulars, securing a vital inland hub previously isolated from central . This breakthrough severed supply lines along the coastal road and the -Hebron-Jerusalem axis, enabling i forces to establish a continuous land corridor through the northern to besieged Jewish settlements like those in the western . By the operation's conclusion on 22 October, had gained control over key positions including Iraqi Suwaydan and much of the terrain between Majdal and , expanding its effective territory southward by hundreds of square kilometers and weakening holdings in the region. These territorial shifts displaced Palestinian Arab populations in the path of the offensive, as residents of villages such as those near and the northern fled advancing Israeli units amid heavy artillery and aerial bombardment. Many sought refuge in Egyptian-controlled or the Hebron district, contributing to the broader fourth wave of Palestinian flight in October-November 1948. Historian documents that Operations Hiram and Yoav together prompted the exodus of 200,000 to 230,000 Palestinians, driven by combat fears, the collapse of Arab defenses, and instances of direct expulsion or village clearance to secure flanks. The depopulation of these areas, including the evacuation or flight from 's approximately 4,000 Arab inhabitants, prevented subsequent returns and facilitated Israeli consolidation, with Jewish settlements repopulating former sites. Post-operation, the redrawn front lines held through armistice talks, with Israel retaining the Negev gains despite UN proposals allocating much of the area to an state; Egyptian pockets south of persisted until in December. flows intensified pressure on host territories, swelling 's displaced population amid limited resources, though leadership's collapse accelerated voluntary flight in unsecured villages. Israeli policy emphasized over , viewing the demographic vacuum as strategic amid ongoing threats.

Historiographical Perspectives

Historiographical interpretations of Operation Yoav have been shaped by broader debates on the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, contrasting traditional Israeli narratives of defensive necessity with revisionist emphases on Palestinian displacement. Early official Israeli accounts, drawing from military records, depicted the operation as a critical counteroffensive launched on October 15, 1948, to relieve the siege of settlements, sever Egyptian supply lines, and secure territorial contiguity, resulting in the capture of on October 21 and the rout of Egyptian forces without systematic civilian targeting. Historians like reinforced this view, arguing that Palestinian flight during Yoav stemmed primarily from the collapse of Arab societal structures, fear of impending conquest, and prior Arab evacuation orders rather than Israeli expulsion policies, with archival evidence showing minimal pre-planned demographic engineering on the southern front. The advent of the in the , leveraging declassified Israeli archives, introduced empirical scrutiny of refugee dynamics, estimating that Operation Yoav contributed to the fourth wave of Palestinian exodus involving 200,000–230,000 displacements across the south and , driven by a combination of battlefield , direct expulsions from conquered villages, and atrocities such as the on October 29, where forces from the 89th Battalion killed 80–100 civilians in reprisal after resistance. , whose data-driven analyses prioritize military documents over ideological framing, documented these events as ad hoc responses to operational exigencies—expulsions to deny rear threats and secure flanks—rather than a centralized directive, though he acknowledged local commanders' excesses amid the chaos of conquest. In contrast, interpreted Yoav within a systematic expulsion framework, portraying it as deliberate demographic clearance aligned with Zionist territorial aims, but such claims have faced criticism for subordinating evidence to narrative, with selective sourcing that overlooks Arab agency in flight. Critics of revisionist schools, including and Gelber, contend that New Historian findings, while valuable for exposing incidents like al-Dawayima, overstate Israeli intent by underplaying Arab strategic collapses and internal exhortations to evacuate, as evidenced by contemporary Arab broadcasts and leadership directives; Karsh highlights expulsions as occasional wartime measures amid existential threats, not , attributing the refugee crisis's scale to self-inflicted Arab disarray. This debate underscores challenges: Israeli military archives provide granular operational details but reflect victors' perspectives, while Palestinian narratives often amplify victimhood without equivalent self-critique of ; academic institutions' left-leaning orientations have amplified , yet cross-verification with and records supports a causal favoring multifaceted war-induced flight over monocausal expulsion theories.

References

  1. [1]
    Operation “Yoav” (October 1948) - Jewish Virtual Library
    The goal of Operation “Yoav” was to open a corridor to the Negev, cut the Egyptian lines of communications along the coast and on the Beersheba-Hebron-Jerusalem ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  2. [2]
    Operation "Yoav" - Palmach | מושגים
    The objective of the operation was to break the siege on the Negev and reconnect it to the south. Participants: Negev and lowland districts; Palmach Negev, ...Missing: casualties sources
  3. [3]
    The Negev and The South (May 1948)
    In the afternoon hours of May 21, 1948 kibbutz Negbah was attacked by an Egyptian armored column and strafed from the air. Source: Israel Defense Forces.
  4. [4]
    Operation Yoav- 1948 - Historycentral
    By the time the second truce was implemented, most of the Negev was occupied by the Egyptians, with the exception of only a few isolated kibbutzim. During the ...
  5. [5]
    Battles of Negba | Military Wiki - Fandom
    On May 12, 1948, even before Egypt's invasion, Egyptian volunteer units took control of the Iraq Suwaydan police fort following the British withdrawal. Two ...Missing: strongholds | Show results with:strongholds
  6. [6]
    [PDF] War of Independence: Operation Yoav Sunday European Campaign
    The war entered its 3rd phase. The IDF offensive Operation Yoav started at 15 October 1948. Its goal was to drive a wedge between the Egyptian forces along the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Operation Yoav - Interactive Encyclopedia of the Palestine Question
    Israeli historian Benny Morris writes that, in order to "soften up" the villages before their occupation, the Israeli army used artillery far more extensively ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  8. [8]
    Navy Fights First Major Battle | CIE - Center for Israel Education
    October 19, 1948. During the fourth day of Operation Yoav, the fledgling Israeli Navy engages in its first major battle off the coast of Ashkelon.Missing: objectives outcomes casualties
  9. [9]
    The Israeli Air Force (IAF) in the War of Independence - World Machal
    (Link “Spitfires over Israel”). 15TH OCTOBER, 1948 “Operation Yoav” (also known as “Operation Ten Plagues”) started on 15th October. Three 101 pilots – Rudi ...
  10. [10]
    The Sinking of the Egyptian Flagship "EMIR FAROUK" - World Machal
    On 22nd October 1948, the Israel Navy performed a feat of great daring and resourcefulness. ... The “Emir Farouk's” actions were seen as a threat to ”Operation ...
  11. [11]
    Operation Yoav - Zionism & Israel
    The original intent was to open the road to the Negev, but commander Yigal Allon broadened the aim to include the defeat and destruction of the Egyptian forces ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    palquest | military operations
    Israeli historian Benny Morris describes Operation Nachshon as "a watershed ... The operation was complementary to Operation Yoav, mounted further ...
  14. [14]
    Operation Yoav - Wikipedia
    Its goal was to drive a wedge between the Egyptian forces along the coast and the Beersheba–Hebron–Jerusalem road, and ultimately to conquer the whole Negev.Missing: outcomes casualties
  15. [15]
    1948 Arab-Israeli War | Summary, Outcome, Casualties, & Timeline
    On October 15, after Egyptians fired on an Israeli convoy, the IDF launched a campaign, Operation Yoav, that allowed Israel to regain access to the Negev. Two ...
  16. [16]
    Al-Dawayima, 29 October 1948
    The letter remained suppressed until the Israeli historian Benny Morris discovered it by chance and referred to it in his book The Birth of the Palestinian ...
  17. [17]
    Al-Dawayima Massacre, 29 October 1948 An Israeli Soldier Eye ...
    Al-Dawayima Massacre, 29 October 1948 An Israeli Soldier Eye-Witness Account 8 November 1948 To comrade Eliezer Peri, good day, Today I have read the ...
  18. [18]
    Dawayima massacre was worse than Deir Yassin - JVP
    Feb 7, 2016 · The first conquerors killed from eighty to a hundred Arabs [including] women and children. The children were killed by smashing of their skulls with sticks.
  19. [19]
    Gaza: A Refugee's Perspective - Al-Majdal
    The vast majority of my townspeople were forced out by Israeli aerial and marine bombardment as part of Operation Yoav in November 1948, while many of those who ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  20. [20]
    The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited
    Benny Morris' The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem was published in 1988. Its startling revelations about how and why 700,000 Palestinians left ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    1948: One Year, Countless Exiles - OpenEdition Journals
    The implementation of the plan opened the way for the destruction or clearing of Palestinian villages that eventually led to the mass exodus of refugees. 6 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Myths and Realities of the Palestinian Refugee Problem
    1948 has brought mass expulsion of Palestinians from one Arab state or another. Palestinian refugee families have suffered multiple displacements within the ...
  24. [24]
    Palestine, 1948 : war, escape and the emergence of the Palestinian ...
    Jul 1, 2021 · Palestine, 1948 : war, escape and the emergence of the Palestinian refugee problem. by: Gelber, Yoav. Publication date: 2006. Topics: Israel- ...
  25. [25]
    The fourth wave: the battles and exodus of October–November 1948
    The Egyptians, as expected, opened fire, providing a casus belli. The IDF immediately launched Operation Yoav, originally named 'Operation Ten Plagues,' which ...
  26. [26]
    1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War on JSTOR
    1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War. Benny Morris. Copyright Date ... 8 Operations Yoav and Hiram. (pp. 320-349). https://doi.org/10.2307/j ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Pappe-Ilan-The-Ethnic-Cleansing-of-Palestine.pdf - Yplus
    'Ilan Pappe has written an extraordinary book of profound relevance to the past, present, and future of Israel/Palestine relations.' —Richard Falk, Professor of ...
  28. [28]
    Why Did The Palestinians Run Away in 1948? - History News Network
    Why Did The Palestinians Run Away in 1948? by Yoav Gelber. Mr. Gelber is a professor in the Department of Land of Israel Studies at the University of Haifa.<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    The Historiography of the 1948 Wars | Sciences Po Mass Violence ...
    Nov 1, 2008 · The historiography of the 1948 events in Palestine remains a work in progress and a true battlefield, for in this case, writing history is one of the issues at ...