Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orbit of Mars

The orbit of Mars is an elliptical path , with the central positioned at one , characterized by a semi-major of 1.5237 , an of 0.0934, and a sidereal period of 686.98 days. This configuration places Mars at an average distance of approximately 228 million kilometers from , making it the outermost of the terrestrial planets. The of Mars' orbit leads to substantial variations in its heliocentric distance, ranging from 206.62 million km (1.381 ) at perihelion to 249.23 million km (1.666 ) at aphelion—a 20% fluctuation that is roughly twice that of Earth's. These distance changes influence the planet's solar insolation, contributing to climatic extremes such as more intense summers and the potential triggering of global dust storms during perihelion alignments. The orbital plane is inclined by 1.85° relative to the , with a at 49.56° and an argument of perihelion at approximately 286.5°, ensuring relatively stable alignment with the solar system’s primary plane over short timescales. Unequal seasonal durations arise from the orbit's , as Mars travels faster near perihelion and slower near aphelion per Kepler's second law; southern summer, coinciding with perihelion, lasts about 154 Martian days and is warmer, while northern summer, near aphelion, lasts about 178 Martian days but receives less heat. This asymmetry, combined with long-term orbital (e.g., the longitude of perihelion advances by 0.44° per century), modulates frequencies and polar cap dynamics over millennia.

Fundamental Characteristics

Sidereal Orbit

The sidereal orbital period of Mars, the time required for the planet to complete one full revolution around the Sun relative to the fixed stars, is 686.98 Earth days, equivalent to approximately 1.881 Earth years. This duration arises from Kepler's third law of planetary motion, which states that the square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the cube of its semi-major axis, reflecting the gravitational influence of the Sun on Mars' more distant orbit compared to Earth's. For Mars, this law applies to its semi-major axis of 227.94 million km (1.5237 AU), yielding the longer period relative to Earth's 365.25-day orbit. Mars' orbit is elliptical, with an of 0.0934, which imparts a noticeable deviation from a circular path and leads to significant variations in its distance from . At perihelion, the closest point to , Mars reaches 206.7 million km (1.381 ), while at aphelion, the farthest point, it extends to 249.2 million km (1.666 ). This eccentricity causes seasonal intensity differences on Mars, with summers being warmer and shorter due to the proximity at perihelion. The orbital plane of Mars is inclined by 1.85° relative to the ecliptic, the reference plane defined by Earth's orbit around the Sun. This modest inclination means Mars' path is nearly coplanar with the major planets, facilitating gravitational interactions but requiring slight adjustments in predictive models for interplanetary trajectories. The average orbital speed of Mars is 24.1 km/s, though eccentricity induces variations: speeds increase to about 26.5 km/s near perihelion and decrease to around 22 km/s at aphelion, conserving angular momentum as per Kepler's second law. The instantaneous radial distance r from along Mars' orbit is described by the polar of a conic section: r = \frac{a(1 - e^2)}{1 + e \cos \theta} where a = 227.94 million km is the semi-major axis, e = 0.0934 is the , and \theta is the (the angle from perihelion). This captures the elliptical geometry, enabling precise computation of Mars' position independent of observational perspectives from .

Synodic Relations

The synodic period of Mars refers to the time required for the to return to the same configuration relative to and , as observed from our , and measures approximately 779.94 days. This governs the recurring alignments between , Mars, and , influencing and relative positions for astronomical observations. As a superior —meaning its orbit lies outside 's—Mars exhibits a synodic derived from the difference in orbital motions around . The formula for this is given by \frac{1}{S} = \frac{1}{E} - \frac{1}{M}, where S is the synodic period in days, E is Earth's sidereal orbital period of 365.25 days, and M is Mars' sidereal orbital period of 686.98 days. Substituting these values yields S \approx 779.94 days, confirming the observed interval. These sidereal periods serve as the baseline for the calculation. The underlying relative motion stems from the differing mean angular speeds of Earth and Mars in their orbits: Earth traverses 360° in one year, while Mars covers 360° in 1.881 years. This disparity—Earth's faster orbital pace—results in Mars appearing to move eastward against the background stars from Earth's viewpoint over the synodic cycle, at a relative angular speed of approximately 0.461° per day. Key configurations include conjunctions, where Mars aligns with as seen from (superior conjunction, with Mars on the far side of the Sun), occurring once every synodic period or about 2.135 years. These events mark the points of minimal elongation, temporarily limiting Earth-based observations of Mars due to solar proximity.

Orbital Parameters

Keplerian Elements

The Keplerian elements provide a classical description of Mars' under the two-body , assuming a fixed elliptical path around influenced solely by gravitational attraction, without perturbations from other bodies. These six parameters define the size, shape, and orientation of the relative to a reference plane () and (J2000.0), enabling the computation of the planet's position at any time by solving . This idealized model serves as a foundational reference for understanding Mars' heliocentric motion, with actual positions refined using numerical ephemerides like DE430 for higher accuracy. The semi-major axis a establishes the primary scale of the orbit, representing half the length of the major axis of the ellipse and corresponding to the time-averaged distance from . For Mars, a = 1.52371 , equivalent to approximately 227.94 million km, which determines the via Kepler's third law as roughly 1.881 years. e quantifies the deviation from a , where e = 0 indicates a and e = 1 a parabola; Mars' modest value of e = 0.09339 results in a noticeably elliptical path, with perihelion (closest approach) at a(1 - e) \approx 1.381 and aphelion at a(1 + e) \approx 1.666 . Inclination i measures the tilt of the relative to the , with i = 0^\circ denoting ; Mars' i = 1.8497^\circ implies a nearly aligned , facilitating predictable alignments with . The \Omega specifies the angular position where the crosses the from south to north, measured from the vernal equinox; for Mars, \Omega = 49.5595^\circ. The argument of periapsis \omega indicates the angular orientation of the perihelion point within the , measured eastward from the ascending node; Mars' \omega = 286.497^\circ positions the closest solar approach in the southern hemisphere. The M describes the angular position of the in its at a reference , expressed as M = n(t - \tau), where n is the and \tau is the time of periapsis passage; at J2000.0, Mars' M = 19.390^\circ. To derive the true position, solve for the E: M = E - e \sin E This transcendental equation is typically solved numerically (e.g., via Newton-Raphson iteration), yielding E and subsequently the true anomaly \nu via \tan(\nu/2) = \sqrt{(1+e)/(1-e)} \tan(E/2), which locates the planet along the ellipse. The following table summarizes Mars' Keplerian elements at epoch J2000.0, with respect to the mean ecliptic and equinox of J2000, derived from fits to planetary ephemerides for approximate positions over 1800–2050 AD. These values exhibit slow secular variations due to underlying dynamics but are treated as fixed in the basic model.
ElementSymbolValue at J2000.0Unit
Semi-major axisa1.52371034
Eccentricitye0.09339410-
Inclinationi1.84969142degrees
Longitude of ascending node\Omega49.55953891degrees
Argument of periapsis\omega286.497degrees
Mean anomalyM19.390degrees

Distance and Velocity Profiles

The heliocentric distance of Mars varies significantly along its elliptical orbit due to its of approximately 0.093, ranging from a minimum of 1.381 astronomical units () at perihelion to a maximum of 1.666 at aphelion. This variation is described by the polar equation of the conic section for the orbit: r(\theta) = \frac{a(1 - e^2)}{1 + e \cos \theta}, where r is the distance from , \theta is the (measured from perihelion), a is the semi-major axis (1.524 for Mars), and e is the eccentricity. As Mars progresses from perihelion through true anomalies of 0° to 180°, the distance increases nonlinearly, spending more time near aphelion due to slower motion there, consistent with Kepler's second law. The orbital profile follows from the , which governs the speed in a two-body Keplerian : v = \sqrt{[GM](/page/GM) \left( \frac{2}{r} - \frac{1}{a} \right)}, with [GM](/page/GM) being the solar gravitational parameter of $1.327 \times 10^{20} m³ s⁻². At perihelion, where r is minimized, the reaches a maximum of approximately 26.5 km/s; at aphelion, it drops to a minimum of about 22.0 km/s. Plotting against true anomaly reveals a smooth decline from perihelion to aphelion, mirroring the inverse trend with distance, with the overall speed varying by roughly 20% across the owing to the moderate eccentricity. This inverse relationship between distance and velocity arises from the conservation of angular momentum in the orbit. The specific angular momentum h = \sqrt{GM a (1 - e^2)} remains constant, implying that the tangential component of velocity scales as v_\theta = h / r, leading to higher speeds closer to the Sun where the orbital radius is smaller. These profiles, derived from the Keplerian elements, provide essential context for understanding Mars' dynamical behavior under ideal two-body motion, highlighting how eccentricity shapes the planet's heliocentric journey without external perturbations.

Dynamical Evolution

Perturbations and Resonances

The orbit of Mars deviates from a pure Keplerian due to gravitational perturbations from other solar system bodies, which introduce short-term oscillatory changes in its . These perturbations arise primarily from the differential gravitational forces exerted by nearby massive objects, leading to variations in position, velocity, and orientation over timescales of years to centuries. exerts the dominant perturbing influence on Mars' orbit owing to its substantial mass (approximately 318 times Earth's) and relative proximity within the solar system, resulting in perturbations of about 0.1° per . This effect manifests as a slight shift in Mars' heliocentric , driven by Jupiter's gravitational pull during conjunctions, with peak accelerations on Mars reaching around 5.26 × 10^{-7} m/s². Other contributors include Saturn, whose more distant but still significant mass induces weaker secular shifts in Mars' orbital plane, and asteroids such as , which collectively produce minor perturbations estimated at the of their masses (totaling effects comparable to 30–70 m in Earth-Mars distance over a century when aggregated). Relativistic corrections from further refine the orbit, contributing a small of approximately 1.35 arcsec per century. Orbital resonances play a key role in modulating these perturbations, with Mars' orbital semi-major axis of 1.524 positions it outside the main , avoiding the destabilizing Kirkwood gaps—regions depleted by strong mean-motion resonances with (e.g., 3:1, 5:2)—which would otherwise amplify via repeated close encounters with resonant asteroids. The perturbing on Mars due to a distant body, such as , can be approximated in the tidal regime as \mathbf{a} \approx \frac{GM_\text{pert}}{d^3} \mathbf{r}, where G is the , M_\text{pert} is the perturber's mass, d is the between Mars and the perturber, and \mathbf{r} is Mars' relative to the Sun; this formulation captures the differential force leading to tidal distortions in the orbit. Numerical simulations using N-body integrators, which model the full gravitational interactions among solar system bodies, reveal oscillation amplitudes in Mars' eccentricity of about 0.001 over decadal timescales, reflecting the cumulative short-term effects of these perturbers before long-term averaging dominates. Over longer intervals, these episodic oscillations contribute to secular variations in the .

Long-Term Changes

Over timescales of millennia to billions of years, Mars' orbit undergoes gradual secular modifications primarily due to averaged gravitational perturbations from the other , leading to long-term trends distinct from short-term oscillatory effects. These changes include the of the perihelion and variations in key such as and inclination. The perihelion of Mars precesses in the prograde direction at a secular rate of approximately 16.28 arcseconds per year, driven mainly by the combined influences of oblateness and perturbations from the other , with a negligible contribution from compared to closer like Mercury, whose total precession rate is about 5.75 arcseconds per year. A simplified expression for the apsidal rate induced by a dominant perturber such as is given by \frac{d\omega}{dt} \approx \frac{3}{2} \frac{n e}{1 - e^2} \left( \frac{m_\mathrm{pert}}{M_\sun} \right) \left( \frac{a}{a_\mathrm{pert}} \right)^2, where n is Mars' mean motion, e its eccentricity, a its semi-major axis, m_\mathrm{pert} and a_\mathrm{pert} are Jupiter's mass and semi-major axis, and M_\sun is the solar mass; this approximation highlights Jupiter's outsized role in the inner Solar System's dynamics. Secular variations in the orbital elements further shape these long-term trends, with Mars' eccentricity oscillating between roughly 0.067 and 0.127 over cycles of about $10^5 years, while the orbital inclination to the ecliptic varies by approximately 0.5° per million years. These secular shifts contribute to Milankovitch-like on Mars' , where variations can modulate the planet's global insolation by up to 40%, amplifying seasonal contrasts and influencing atmospheric and surface processes over extended periods. Numerical simulations incorporating planetary formation scenarios, such as the Nice model of migration, demonstrate that Mars' has maintained overall stability for billions of years following an early dynamical instability around 4 Gyr ago, with ejection events remaining rare due to the damping effects of disks and resonant configurations.

Interactions with Earth

Oppositions

An opposition of Mars occurs when the planet is positioned directly opposite in 's sky, with situated between the two bodies, resulting in Mars rising at sunset and remaining visible throughout the night. This alignment happens approximately every 26 months, corresponding to the synodic period between and Mars. Perihelic oppositions, which take place every 15 to 17 years when Mars is near its perihelion, offer particularly favorable viewing conditions due to the planet's closer proximity to . During these events, Mars reaches its peak brightness, achieving an apparent magnitude of up to -2.9, and its angular diameter expands to a maximum of about 25.1 arcseconds, making surface features more discernible through telescopes. The pattern of oppositions arises from the orbital commensurability between and Mars, with notable close approaches recurring in cycles influenced by their relative periods. For instance, the 2018 opposition marked the closest such event in 15 years, with Mars approaching to 57.6 million kilometers from . Oppositions have historically provided optimal opportunities for detailed telescopic observations, enabling early discoveries such as the polar ice caps noted by Giovanni Cassini in 1666 and the seasonal shrinking and growing of these caps observed in subsequent apparitions. The 1877 perihelic opposition led Giovanni Schiaparelli to report linear features he termed "canali," later interpreted as artificial canals but ultimately debunked as optical illusions by higher-resolution imaging in the . The next major perihelic opposition is projected for 2035, when Mars will come within approximately 56.9 million kilometers of .

Close Approaches

Close approaches between Mars and occur near the time of opposition, when the two planets are aligned on the same side of , minimizing their separation. The nominal minimum distance during these events is approximately 78 million kilometers, representing the difference in their average orbital radii adjusted for circular orbits. However, due to the eccentricities of both orbits (0.0934 for Mars and 0.0167 for ) and the relative phasing of their perihelia, actual distances vary significantly, ranging from a theoretical minimum of 54.6 million kilometers to a maximum of about 100.7 million kilometers at opposition. The closest recorded modern approach was on August 27, 2003, at 55.76 million kilometers, the nearest in nearly 60,000 years. The theoretical absolute minimum of 54.6 million kilometers would require perfect alignment of Mars at perihelion during opposition, a configuration not achieved in but approached in events like the projected 2287 opposition. Conversely, the farthest opposition distance in recent centuries was 100.78 million kilometers on , 2012. These varying distances result in light-time delays of 3 to 7 minutes one way during close approaches, compared to up to 20 minutes at greater separations, directly impacting communication and autonomous operations in Mars missions. For crewed or robotic exploration, optimal launch windows align with these oppositions via Hohmann transfer orbits, occurring every 26 months to minimize delta-v requirements.
DateClosest Approach Distance (million km)Notes
Aug 27, 200355.76Closest modern approach
Jul 31, 201857.59Perihelic opposition
Oct 6, 202062.07Closest until 2035
Dec 1, 202281.87Post-2020 opposition
Jan 12, 202596.08Recent aphelic opposition (as of 2025)
Mar 3, 2012100.78Farthest recent opposition
Aug 15, 205055.96Next major close approach
Note: Distances are minimum separation near opposition; dates are for closest approach.

Historical Context

Pre-Telescopic Observations

Ancient Babylonian astronomers, beginning around the BCE, meticulously tracked the positions of , associating the with the Nergal, the deity of war, fire, and destruction, due to its reddish hue. Their records, preserved in tablets such as the Astronomical Diaries dating from approximately 650 to 50 BCE, documented Mars' apparent motion across the sky, including its distinctive retrograde loops that occurred roughly every two years, corresponding to its synodic period of about 780 days. These observations formed the foundation of early predictive arithmetic methods for planetary positions, highlighting Mars' irregular path relative to the . In , Claudius Ptolemy synthesized centuries of observations in his (circa 150 ), modeling Mars' orbit within a geocentric framework using a deferent circle offset by an of approximately 0.1 and an epicycle to account for retrograde motion. This configuration allowed predictions of Mars' position with an accuracy of about 1 degree, sufficient for naked-eye astronomy but revealing discrepancies during oppositions when the planet's brightness and backward loop were most pronounced. Ptolemy's parameters, derived from earlier Hipparchan data and his own measurements, emphasized Mars' greater compared to inner planets, underscoring the challenges in fitting uniform circular motions to its path. Meanwhile, in and , Mars was observed and mythologized independently around 500 BCE. texts, such as those from the , named the planet Yinghuo ("fire star") and described its variable reddish glow and opposition events, interpreting these as omens of conflict or instability. Similarly, Indian astronomical treatises referred to Mars as Angaraka ("burning coal"), noting its color variations and periodic retrogrades in works like the early , which integrated planetary tracking with calendrical calculations. These cultures recognized Mars' non-uniform speed and brightness fluctuations, which strained geocentric explanations and prompted refinements in predictive tables. During the , astronomers like (9th century CE) built upon Ptolemaic and Babylonian legacies, refining Mars' sidereal orbital period to approximately 686.5 days in his Zij al-Sabi, based on extended observations that improved the accuracy of tables. This adjustment enhanced forecasts of Mars' positions and reduced errors in ephemerides, while the planet's pronounced irregularities—such as elongated arcs—continued to test the limits of epicycle models, foreshadowing later heliocentric innovations.

Post-Kepler Developments

utilized Brahe's meticulous observations of Mars, particularly its opposition in 1600, to derive the elliptical nature of its orbit, establishing of planetary motion in 1609 and in 1611, with law following in 1619; these demonstrated Mars' path as an with at one focus and a sidereal period of about 687 days. Kepler's analysis resolved discrepancies in models, which showed errors up to 8 arcminutes at Mars' octants, by fitting an oval path to Brahe's data spanning multiple oppositions. His findings were refined and tabulated in the , published in 1627, which provided accurate ephemerides for Mars based on Brahe's observations and Kepler's laws. In his (1687), provided a theoretical foundation for Kepler's empirical laws by applying the of gravitation, demonstrating that mutual attractions among bodies produce elliptical orbits and qualitatively anticipating perturbations in Mars' path due to influences from and other planets. Newton's framework explained the stability and variations in planetary motions without quantitative perturbation calculations for Mars at the time, but it set the stage for later dynamical analyses. Nineteenth-century astronomers refined these models through , computing the secular advance of Mars' perihelion due to gravitational interactions with other planets and improving orbital predictions beyond Keplerian ideals. Complementing this, Asaph Hall's discovery of Mars' moons and Deimos in during a close opposition enabled precise measurements of Mars' mass and rotational dynamics, validating Newtonian predictions and enhancing orbital element determinations. The brought direct verification and refinement via spacecraft; NASA's flyby in July 1965 passed within 9,846 km of Mars, confirming precomputed orbital parameters through trajectory tracking and data, while revealing a thinner-than-expected atmosphere. The and 2 orbiters, inserted in 1976, conducted radio science experiments that mapped Mars' to degree and order 50, identifying mass concentrations and refining the planet's oblateness for more accurate orbital models. Modern missions continue this progression; the (MRO), operational since 2006, has contributed to orbital element updates achieving high precision through high-fidelity tracking and gravity mapping. NASA's , entering orbit in 2014, uses accelerometer data during deep-dip campaigns to quantify atmospheric drag effects, showing density variations that alter low-altitude orbits by up to several kilometers per pass and informing long-term evolutionary models. Subsequent missions, including China's orbiter since 2021 and extended operations of MRO, have produced advanced gravity field models up to degree and order 120 as of 2024, further improving the accuracy of orbital ephemerides.

Predictive Modeling

Accuracy of Ephemerides

The Laboratory's Development Ephemeris (JPL DE) series, particularly DE440, provides the current high-precision standard for Mars' orbital modeling, spanning from 1550 to 2650 AD and achieving position accuracies of approximately 1 km for predictions up to 2050 through of N-body dynamics that account for gravitational interactions among , planets, , and 343 major asteroids. These incorporate general relativistic effects and are generated using least-squares fits to observational data, ensuring for near-term applications like spacecraft navigation. DE441 extends the span to years −13,200 to +17,191 but with slightly lower precision for the current era. Key sources of error in these models include unmodeled perturbations from the thousands of smaller not explicitly included, contributing uncertainties of about 10 in Mars' position over decadal timescales; uncertainties in solar oblateness, which introduce 1-2 level effects on inner planet orbits including Mars; and inherent limits from steps, though these are minimized to below 100 m for short-term forecasts. Perturbations from major bodies are the primary driver of model complexity, but residual asteroid influences remain the dominant uncertainty for Mars. Validation of these ephemerides relies on radar ranging observations initiated in the 1960s, which provided early sub-arcminute positional data, and ongoing spacecraft tracking, such as from the Perseverance rover since 2021, confirming predictions to within 0.01 arcseconds via very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) and radio ranging residuals. These measurements, including over 6,000 ranges from Mars orbiters like Odyssey, tie the ephemeris frame to the International Celestial Reference Frame with sub-kilometer precision. Historically, predictive accuracy has improved dramatically: Ptolemy's in the 2nd century AD yielded errors up to about 10 degrees in Mars' position due to its epicycle approximations, while ' 19th-century perturbation methods reduced uncertainties to around 1 arcminute by incorporating elliptical orbits and least-squares fitting. Modern ephemerides now achieve sub-meter precision for near-term forecasts, reflecting advances in computational power and data volume. Mars' orbital predictability rivals that of , owing to fewer massive close perturbers like or the , allowing similar sub-kilometer accuracies despite the asteroid belt's influence.

Future Orbital Projections

Over the short term, extending to the year 2100, Mars' opposition cycles with Earth are projected to remain stable, allowing for predictable viewing opportunities and mission planning windows. The closest approach during this period is anticipated in 2287, when the distance between Mars and Earth will reach approximately 54 million kilometers, facilitating exceptional observational conditions. On medium-term timescales of about 200,000 years, Mars' orbital eccentricity undergoes oscillations driven by gravitational interactions with other planets, peaking at around 0.12 and thereby altering the planet's perihelion distance and associated solar heating. These eccentricity changes influence the frequency and severity of global dust storms, as higher eccentricity aligns southern summer with perihelion, enhancing atmospheric instability and dust lifting during warmer conditions. In the long term, spanning 10^6 years and longer, Mars' orbital inclination relative to the ecliptic experiences small secular variations with amplitudes of about 0.1–0.2 degrees due to perturbations, yet the orbit is expected to remain securely bound within the solar system. Note that while orbital inclination remains relatively stable, the planet's axial obliquity exhibits larger chaotic variations (up to ~50 degrees over millions of years), which significantly modulate surface insolation. Chaotic effects stemming from mean-motion resonances among the inner planets, however, impose fundamental limits on predictive accuracy, confining reliable detailed forecasts to roughly 10^3 years before uncertainties dominate. These orbital shifts are linked to projected variations in insolation across Mars' surface, which could drive cycles of accumulation and in the polar ice caps, analogous to Earth's Milankovitch-driven glacial periods. Enhanced perihelion heating during high-eccentricity phases may accelerate CO2 ice loss from the south polar cap, while lower insolation at other orbital configurations promotes ice buildup. Obliquity variations further amplify these effects by altering seasonal insolation distribution. Advanced numerical simulations employing integrators, such as the MERCURY N-body code, demonstrate that Mars' exhibits no significant risk of ejection or over the next 5 billion years, with perturbations remaining insufficient to disrupt its heliocentric path until the Sun's phase alters systemic dynamics. These projections rely on initial conditions derived from high-precision like those from JPL's Development Ephemeris series.

References

  1. [1]
    Approximate Positions of the Planets - JPL Solar System Dynamics
    Approximate positions of the planets may be found by using Keplerian formulae with their associated elements and rates.
  2. [2]
    Allison and McEwen 2000: A post-Pathfinder evaluation of ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · ... Mars orbits spanning the calendar years 1874-2127. The implied tropical orbit period for Mars, 686.9726d, closely agrees with the recent ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] 1. Introduction - DESCANSO - NASA
    The Martian orbit eccentricity is 0.093, in contrast to the near-circular Earth orbit (0.017). This high eccentricity affects Mars in a number of ways, as show ...
  4. [4]
    NASA Mars Orbiters Reveal Seasonal Dust Storm Pattern
    Jun 9, 2016 · Southern hemisphere spring and summer on modern-day Mars are much warmer than northern spring and summer, because the eccentricity of Mars' ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Mars Transportation Environment Definition Document
    Obliquity relative to orbital plane. Table A-3. Time Properties. Length of sidereal day. Mean orbital period (1). Length of mean solar day (2). 3170.61. [A-I].
  6. [6]
    Mars: Facts - NASA Science
    Mars – the fourth planet from the Sun – is a dusty, cold, desert world with a very thin atmosphere. This dynamic planet has seasons, polar ice caps, extinct ...
  7. [7]
    Orbits and Kepler's Laws - NASA Science
    May 2, 2024 · Kepler's Third Law: The orbital period of a planet, squared, is directly proportional to the semi-major axes of its orbit, cubed. This is ...Kepler's Laws of Planetary... · Kepler and the Mars Problem
  8. [8]
    Mars By the Numbers - Solar System Exploration - NASA
    May 16, 2024 · ORBIT ECCENTRICITY. The amount an object's orbit deviates from a perfect circle. 0.0933941. 0.01671123. EQUATORIAL INCLINATION. The tilt of an ...
  9. [9]
    THE OPPOSITION CYCLE OF MARS
    Aug 3, 2021 · The mean synodic period is 779.94 mean days. We find the synodic period from the mathematical expression: 1/s = 1/Pe - 1/Pm, where Pe ...
  10. [10]
    Planetary Physical Parameters - JPL Solar System Dynamics
    Planetary Physical Parameters ; Mars, 3396.19 [D] ±0.1, 3389.50 [D] ±0.2, 0.641691 [I] ±0.000030, 3.9340 [*] ±0.0007 ...
  11. [11]
    The JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE440 and DE441
    Feb 8, 2021 · The shape of Mars' orbit is mainly constrained by the radio range data of Mars orbiters, and Figure 7 shows the one-way range residuals of Mars ...
  12. [12]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Astrodynamic Parameters - JPL Solar System Dynamics
    Planetary Masses ; Earth, 398600.435507 ; Moon, 4902.800118 ; Mars system, 42828.375816 ; Jupiter system, 126712764.100000.
  14. [14]
    planet - How much does the orbit of Mars deviate when it is in linear ...
    Oct 17, 2017 · These are sometimes called orbital perturbations. 1 part in 7,200 works out to about 0.14% and that's the peak Jupiter effect. Rounding down, a ...What would happen if the earth's orbit were slightly perturbed?If suddenly "knocked" or perturbed from its orbit, would gravity ...More results from astronomy.stackexchange.com
  15. [15]
    Constructing a refined model of small bodies in the solar system
    Perturbation on the Earth–Mars distance induced by the Jupiter Trojans in ... perturbation amplitude |Δ EMD| to a notable degree. But when we expand ...
  16. [16]
    Second order theory of the inner planets
    - **Summary**: The provided content from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980A&A....84..329B/abstract does not contain specific information on relativistic corrections to Mars' orbit or magnitudes in arcsec/century. It only includes a title ("Second order theory of the inner planets") and metadata (e.g., ADS full text sources), with no detailed abstract or numerical data accessible.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Orbital resonance and Solar cycles - arXiv
    There is no apparent resonance between Mars and Jupiter (ratio of orbital periods 6.30792 which is close to. 82/13) and the resonance between Jupiter and ...
  18. [18]
    Kirkwood gaps | Asteroids, Orbital Resonance, Jupiter - Britannica
    Sep 12, 2025 · Kirkwood gaps, interruptions that appear in the distribution of asteroid semimajor axes where the orbital period of any small body present would be a simple ...
  19. [19]
    Orbit Perturbations — Space Systems Engineering notes
    The perturbing acceleration is →aP=−∇Φ. The gravitational perturbation ... Then, solving the equation of motion yields the perturbed orbit: →¨r=−μ ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] 19700015828.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
    Its orbital eccentricity then, could be expected to change almost as if no oblateness were present. Conversely, an orbit whose pericenter argument is minimally ...
  21. [21]
    Perihelion precession of planets
    Thus, the rate of perihelion precession, in arc seconds per year, is given by ... Mars, $16.28$, $17.75$. Jupiter, $6.55$, $7.51$. Saturn, $19.50$, $18.59$.
  22. [22]
    Perihelion Precession of the Planets - Richard Fitzpatrick
    . Thus, the rate of perihelion precession, in arc seconds per year, is given by ... Mars, $3.23\times 10^{-7}$, $1.881$, $1.52$. Jupiter, $9.55\times 10^{-4} ...
  23. [23]
    2016 Mars Opposition - NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
    May 19, 2016 · Mars opposition occurs when Mars and the sun are on opposite sides of Earth. In 2016, this happened on May 22, with close approach on May 30.
  24. [24]
    Guide to Mars' opposition on May 22 | Astronomy Essentials - EarthSky
    May 6, 2016 · Astronomers call a Mars opposition coinciding with Mars' closest point to the sun a perihelic opposition. For example, the angular size of ...
  25. [25]
    Chart showing Mars oppositions from 2018 to 2033 - EarthSky
    Dec 31, 2023 · It shows the distance between Earth and Mars at every opposition between 2018 and 2033. Mars will reach opposition next in January 2025. As ...
  26. [26]
    Mars Opposition 2018 - NASA Science
    This picture of Mars was captured on July 18, at just 36.9 million miles from Earth, near its July 27 opposition. The biennial close approaches between Mars ...
  27. [27]
    Mars: Closest Encounter - NASA Science
    Aug 27, 2003 · While there is no danger of the two planets colliding, they will be a mere 34.7 million miles (55.8 million kilometers) apart, enough to make ...
  28. [28]
    In praise of nothing | Astronomy.com
    Apr 2, 2020 · The most famous example is the martian canals. When Giovanni Schiaparelli observed a supersized, 25-arcsecond Mars during its 1877 opposition, ...
  29. [29]
    2025, January 15: Mars at Opposition - When the Curves Line Up
    Oct 6, 2024 · ... Mars sync every 15-17 years for these close oppositions. The next one occurs in 2035, when Earth passes 35.4 million miles from Mars. Mars ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    The cycle of close and far Martian oppositions | Astronomy Essentials
    Oct 6, 2020 · Mars' next extra-close opposition will be September 15, 2035. However, – like the 2018 opposition – it won't be quite as close as the ...
  31. [31]
    Jacques Laskar • Primer on Mars oppositions - IMCCE
    There will be thus a favorable opposition every approximately 15 years, after 7 oppositions, but one will approach the starting configuration still better ...
  32. [32]
    Mars close approach: Get a look at the red planet - BBC Newsround
    Jul 25, 2018 · In 2003, the red planet came 34.8 million miles close to Earth, which was the closest it's been to us in 59,619 years. It won't come that close ...
  33. [33]
    Hazard: Distance From Earth - NASA
    Aug 1, 2024 · Mars is, on average, 140 million miles from Earth. Rather than a three-day lunar trip, astronauts bound for Mars would be leaving our planet for roughly three ...Missing: theoretical | Show results with:theoretical
  34. [34]
    Chapter 4: Trajectories - NASA Science
    Nov 4, 2024 · ... (perihelion) will cause its new orbit to have an aphelion equal to Mars' orbit. The acceleration is tangential to the existing orbit. How ...
  35. [35]
    A study of Babylonian planetary theory I. The outer planets
    Sep 24, 2018 · In this study I attempt to provide an answer to the question how the Babylonian scholars arrived at their mathematical theory of planetary motion.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Ptolemy's Almagest: Fact and Fiction - Richard Fitzpatrick
    Constraint that deferents and epicycles must be circular actually excellent approximation.
  37. [37]
    Ptolemy and the Geocentric Model - Teach Astronomy
    Initially, the predictions were accurate to one or two arc minutes (this is about as good as the resolution of the human eye).
  38. [38]
    An Introduction to the Historical Records of China About Mars
    **Summary of Ancient Chinese Observations of Mars (Yinghuo):**
  39. [39]
    (PDF) THE STORY OF ASTRONOMY IN INDIA - ResearchGate
    It is bluish white in colour. Anatares is a star which lies south of the celestial equator. Some stars and star groups are not visible through out ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The great Martian catastrophe and how Kepler fixed it
    In tracking the heliocentric positions of Mars, Kepler found that the use of a circular orbit led to an 8' error at the octants of its orbit. Because God had.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion: 1609-1666 JL Russell
    Feb 12, 2008 · Rudolphinae-Kepler's astronomical tables based upon Tycho Brahe's observations, published at Ulm, 1627, with several later and more or less.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Johannes Kepler and the Rudolphine Tables
    The chief duty of this post was to complete the great set of planetary tables originally envisioned by Tycho, to be based on his incomparable set of precisely ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  44. [44]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · ... inverse-square,” namely, “If the orbit is nearly stationary, then the centripetal force is nearly inverse-square.” Using Newton's preferred ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] arXiv:1503.06861v1 [physics.hist-ph] 23 Mar 2015
    Mar 23, 2015 · Halley, namely given that the orbit is an ellipse, to prove that the central force obeys the inverse square law, or as Newton formulated in 1687 ...
  46. [46]
    Mariner 4 - NASA Science
    The Mariner 4 mission, the second of two Mars flyby attempts launched in 1964 by NASA, was one of the great early successes of the agency, and indeed the Space ...Missing: parameters | Show results with:parameters
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Mariner Mars 7964 Project Report: Scientific Experiments
    On July 14, 1965, Mariner IV photographed the surface of Mars and telemetered to earth the most advanced scientific and technical data regarding the planet ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The JPL Mars Gravity Field, Mars50c, Based Upon Viking and ...
    1976, the Viking. 1 and 2 orbiters produced a new unique set of data where periapsis altitudes were near 300 km, as compared to 1400 for Mariner. 9. However ...
  49. [49]
    Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter - NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
    The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, or MRO, has studied the Red Planet's atmosphere and terrain from orbit since 2006 and also serves as a key data relay station ...
  50. [50]
    Mars thermosphere as seen in MAVEN accelerometer data - Zurek
    Feb 14, 2017 · ... effects of atmospheric drag caused by the low periapsis altitudes (<200 km). The resulting altitudes are shown in Figure 2. Orbit trim ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    MAVEN Aerobraking to Achieve Science and Relay Orbit - NASA SVS
    Feb 11, 2019 · ... Mars at lowest altitude, causing drag from the atmosphere slow down the spacecraft. Over roughly three-hundred and sixty orbits spanning ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE430 and DE431 - NASA
    Feb 15, 2014 · DE430 and DE431 are planetary and lunar ephemerides generated by fitting orbits to observations. DE430 is for modern data, DE431 for historical ...Missing: Keplerian | Show results with:Keplerian
  53. [53]
    Accuracy limit of modern ephemerides imposed by the uncertainties ...
    Accuracy limits in the ephemerides of the four inner planets, imposed by uncertainties in the masses of the asteroids, are investigated and illustrated.
  54. [54]
    On the possibility of measuring the solar oblateness and some ...
    the ephemerides of the inner planets, especially Mars, will de- teriorate over time; the ephemerides have uncertainties at the. 1–2 km level over the span of ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] TO SEE THE UNSEEN - NASA Technical Reports Server
    "To See the Unseen" is a history of planetary radar astronomy by Andrew J. Butrica, part of the NASA History Series.Missing: Perseverance | Show results with:Perseverance
  56. [56]
    [PDF] study of ephemeris accuracy of the minor planets
    Apr 27, 1974 · The problem was solved by. Gauss, who invented a complicated and ... arc through 3000 seconds of arc. Thus, the presumed accuracy of the ...
  57. [57]
    Mars Is At Its Closest to Earth Since 2003 Today! It Won't Be ... - Space
    Jul 31, 2018 · In August 2003, Mars was a smidge closer: 34.6 million miles (55.6 million km). Mars won't be that close to Earth until 2287, according to a ...
  58. [58]
    Time‐history influence of global dust storms on the upper ...
    Jun 2, 2012 · Dust storms typically occur on Mars in the southern spring, when Mars is near perihelion along its eccentric orbit about the Sun. This dust ...
  59. [59]
    Reduced Variations in Earth's and Mars' Orbital Inclination and ...
    Aug 23, 2022 · Here we show that ZB18a and integration of Earth's and Mars' spin vector based on ZB18a yield reduced variations in Earth's and Mars' orbital inclination and ...
  60. [60]
    Temperature response of Mars to Milankovitch cycles - AGU Journals
    Sep 23, 2008 · Mars' orbital eccentricity varies with a period of 95 ka; the precession period is 51 ka, and the obliquity changes with a 120 ka periodicity, ...Missing: secular | Show results with:secular