Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orthotropic deck

An orthotropic is a lightweight system composed of a thin plate, typically 12 to 16 mm thick, stiffened by closely spaced longitudinal U-shaped and supported by transverse floor beams, which together form a monolithic exhibiting different properties in the orthogonal (longitudinal and transverse) directions. This design allows the to efficiently distribute loads as both a flange for the main girders and a primary load-carrying surface for , minimizing the need for additional concrete elements. Developed in during and inspired by the steel decking used on battleships, orthotropic decks represent an early innovation in steel bridge that has since been adopted worldwide. By the mid-20th century, the technology had spread to major projects, with over 40 such decks constructed in by 1960. As of the early , there were approximately 100 in the , part of thousands worldwide, including notable examples like the in Washington and the Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge in . The design's evolution has incorporated advanced welding techniques and fatigue-resistant details, enabling service lives of up to 100 years with proper maintenance. Adoption continues to grow globally as of 2025, driven by ongoing research into durability enhancements. Key advantages of orthotropic decks include their lightweight construction, which reduces overall dead load by up to 40% compared to traditional decks, making them ideal for long-span, movable, or seismically active bridges. Their prefabricated, modular nature allows for shop fabrication and rapid on-site erection, often in weeks rather than months, while providing a smooth riding surface with fewer joints to minimize water infiltration and . However, design challenges such as fatigue cracking at weld connections, particularly in rib-to-floor beam joints, require careful detailing and ongoing research to ensure long-term durability. Orthotropic decks are particularly suited for applications like bascule and bridges, as well as deck replacements in rehabilitation projects, such as the Wittpenn Bridge over the in , where modular sections were erected in just 14 days to minimize traffic disruptions. Their use continues to grow in modern infrastructure due to lower life-cycle costs and adaptability to demanding environments, supported by standards from organizations like the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).

Definition and Properties

Structural Composition

An orthotropic deck consists of a thin plate stiffened by longitudinal and supported by transverse beams, all welded together to form a continuous structural plate that acts as the bridge's roadway surface. The longitudinal , typically closed sections such as U-shaped or trapezoidal profiles, provide primary stiffening in the direction of traffic, while the transverse beams offer orthogonal and transfer loads to the main girders. This arrangement creates a yet rigid system where the deck plate serves as the common top for underlying structural elements. The deck plate forms the upper surface, directly supporting traffic loads and wearing surfaces, with ribs welded to its underside for enhanced rigidity. Longitudinal ribs are commonly closed trapezoidal shapes for optimal and , though open U-shaped or sections are used in some designs; they between floor beams and are often continuous through cutouts in the beams. Transverse floor beams, typically fabricated from plates or rolled sections like T-beams, are spaced to align with supports and intersect the ribs at right angles. Assembly relies on full-penetration or partial-penetration welds to join components, with rib-to-deck using fillet or groove welds (often 70-80% ) and rib-to-floor joints employing continuous welds through beam cutouts for continuity. In systems, the orthotropic deck integrates as the top flange for I-girders, girders, or trusses, distributing loads efficiently across the structure. The stiffener arrangement imparts directional stiffness properties essential to its performance. Typical dimensions vary by design but follow established ranges for durability and load capacity. The deck plate thickness is generally 12-20 mm, with minimums as low as 9 mm in some European applications but often 14-16 mm for U.S. bridges to resist fatigue. Longitudinal rib heights range from 150-300 mm (up to 356 mm for longer spans), with thicknesses of 6-13 mm; rib spacing is 300-600 mm center-to-center longitudinally. Transverse floor beam spacing is typically 2-3 m, though it can extend to 6-7 m in wider structures.
ComponentTypical RangeNotes/Example
Deck Plate Thickness12-20 mm16 mm common for fatigue resistance
Rib Height150-300 mmTrapezoidal closed ribs, up to 356 mm
Longitudinal Rib Spacing300-600 mm600 mm center-to-center typical
Transverse Beam Spacing2-3 mUp to 6 m in box designs
Materials are predominantly high-strength structural steels, such as ASTM A709 50 (yield strength 345 ), selected for and in bridge environments. variants, like ASTM A709 50W, are options for in non-deicing exposures, forming a protective without . All components must conform to ASTM standards for and mechanical properties to ensure uniformity.

Orthotropic Behavior

An orthotropic deck exhibits orthotropy, meaning it displays anisotropic mechanical properties with distinct characteristics in the longitudinal direction (parallel to the ) and the transverse direction (perpendicular to the ), in contrast to isotropic materials that have uniform in all directions. This behavior arises from the orthogonal arrangement of longitudinal stiffening and transverse floorbeams attached to a thin deck plate, which together provide tailored elastic responses to applied loads. The longitudinal direction typically offers higher due to the continuous nature of the , enabling efficient resistance to along the bridge , while the transverse direction relies on the spaced floorbeams for load transfer, resulting in relatively lower . Under loading, the orthotropic deck resists and forces through a stiffened plate , where the longitudinal primarily carry wheel loads by acting as closely spaced miniature girders, and the transverse floorbeams distribute these loads to the main girders. This load path ensures that concentrated vehicle loads are spread transversely via the deck plate and ' torsional rigidity, particularly in closed-rib configurations that enhance lateral distribution compared to open . The plate and stiffener components enable this directional load handling, optimizing the deck's overall structural efficiency. The composite stiffness of the orthotropic deck is quantified using the effective moment of inertia, calculated as I_{eff} = I_{plate} + \sum (I_{rib} + A_{rib} \cdot d^2), where I_{plate} is the of the deck plate, I_{rib} is the individual of each , A_{rib} is the cross-sectional area of the , and d is the distance from the rib's to the of the composite section. This formula, derived from the parallel axis theorem, accounts for the combined contribution of the plate and to per unit width, essential for predicting deflections and stresses in design. Fatigue in orthotropic decks is a critical concern, particularly at the rib-to-plate welds, where cyclic loading from repeated wheel passages induces out-of-plane , , and stresses that can lead to and at the weld or . These welds, typically partial for closed or fillet for open , must achieve at least 60% to mitigate risks, with stresses often evaluated against AASHTO thresholds (e.g., 10 for Category C details). Proper , including deeper floorbeams and automated to minimize gaps, helps achieve infinite life under typical loads of up to 83 kips per .

History

Invention and Early Development

The concept of the orthotropic was developed by engineers in , with the first such constructed in 1936. A key advancement came with No. 847014 in 1948, issued to Dr. Cornelis, an engineer at the MAN Corporation, for a stiffened designed to act compositely with supporting beams, optimizing material use through directional . This innovation built on principles of orthotropic , where the plate and stiffeners provide different rigidity in longitudinal and transverse directions to efficiently distribute loads. Although initial applications appeared in , with the first orthotropic deck bridge constructed in in , early post-war prototypes emerged in the late and , addressing acute material shortages in , particularly , by enabling lighter structures that supported longer spans without excessive weight, facilitating rapid of war-damaged . German engineers drew inspiration from techniques, adapting methods for stiffened plating to create robust, lightweight deck systems suitable for bridges. The design's efficiency in material utilization was critical amid economic constraints, allowing for innovative composite action between the deck and girders. The Kurpfalz Bridge over the River in , , completed in 1950, served as one of the first major post-war applications where the steel plate deck functioned as the top flange of the main girders in spans of 184-246-184 feet. This bridge demonstrated the practical viability of the system in real-world conditions, marking a shift toward welded orthotropic configurations over earlier bolted designs. Subsequent prototypes in further refined the closed-rib stiffening to enhance torsional rigidity and load transfer. Initial challenges centered on validating the long-term durability of the welded connections, particularly proving under repeated traffic loads through rigorous testing programs conducted in the . These tests focused on simulating cyclic stresses to ensure the deck's stiffeners and welds could withstand millions of load cycles without cracking, addressing concerns about the novel fabrication methods in an era of limited computational tools. Successful outcomes from these evaluations paved the way for broader confidence in the technology's reliability.

Adoption and Standardization

Following the initial development of orthotropic decks in the mid-20th century, formal standardization began with the publication of the first comprehensive design manual in 1957 by Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg (MAN), titled "Die Stahlfahrbahn: Berechnung und Konstruktion," which provided detailed guidelines for calculation and construction based on orthotropic plate theory. This German initiative, authored by W. Pelikan and M. Esslinger, marked a pivotal step in engineering practice, emphasizing efficient load distribution and material use for steel bridge decks. In the United States, adoption was facilitated by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), which incorporated orthotropic deck provisions into its 1963 Design Manual for Orthotropic Steel Plate Deck Bridges, adapting European principles to North American codes and promoting their use in long-span applications. By the 1960s, orthotropic decks saw widespread implementation in , particularly in and , where they became a preferred solution for efficient, lightweight bridge construction amid post-war infrastructure expansion. Their adoption extended to during the same decade, driven by the need for durable, high-strength decks in urban and coastal projects. By 1980, over 1,000 orthotropic steel bridges had been constructed across , reflecting rapid proliferation supported by evolving national standards like those from the German Steel Construction Association. In the United States, early adoption was cautious but gained momentum with projects like the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge in 1967, which featured one of the first major orthotropic decks on a multi-span crossing. As of the early 2010s, approximately 100 such decks were in service nationwide, with the majority concentrated in due to seismic and coastal demands. Internationally, advanced orthotropic deck design in the 1970s by integrating enhanced seismic resilience, incorporating ductile detailing and rib configurations to withstand earthquakes prevalent in the region. More recently, the technology expanded to with the 2024 completion of the (Atal Setu), which utilized 32 orthotropic steel deck spans—the first such application in the country—for its 21.8 km length, enabling efficient prefabrication and rapid installation.

Design and Fabrication

Design Principles

Orthotropic steel decks are designed to integrate seamlessly with the , functioning as the top of plate girders or box sections to enhance overall structural rigidity and load distribution. This integration promotes composite action between the deck plate, longitudinal ribs, transverse floorbeams, and main girders, often achieved through welded connections, with shear studs incorporated where additional composite behavior with elements is required for medium-span applications. The orthotropic stiffness arises from the strategic arrangement of stiffening ribs, which directs load paths longitudinally while allowing transverse flexibility. For simplified design processes, the Federal Highway Administration's 2022 Guide for Orthotropic Steel Deck Level 1 Design provides general details for typical open- or closed-rib systems compliant with AASHTO standards. Design load considerations follow established standards such as AASHTO LRFD or Eurocode EN 1993-2, accounting for live loads like the HL-93 design truck (with 71 kN wheel loads) or the equivalent Load Model 1 (up to 900 kN), alongside dead loads from the deck components and wearing surface (factored at 1.25 for structural dead load and 1.50 for superimposed). is a primary concern due to cyclic traffic loading, with welds classified under AASHTO categories such as C (constant amplitude fatigue threshold of 69 MPa) or higher-risk E for certain rib-to-floor beam joints, requiring evaluation via hot-spot stress methods or S-N curves. Serviceability is ensured through deflection limits, typically \Delta \leq L/800 for the overall span L, with stricter criteria for local components such as L/300 for the deck plate and L/1000 for ribs. Stress distribution is analyzed using orthotropic plate theory, where bending stresses are computed as \sigma = \frac{M \cdot y}{I_{\text{eff}}}, with M as the moment, y the distance from the neutral axis, and I_{\text{eff}} the effective moment of inertia incorporating the rib contributions. Corrosion protection is integral to longevity, employing coatings or hot-dip galvanizing on the deck plate and ribs, though galvanizing is sometimes avoided in fatigue-prone areas due to risks. Wearing surfaces, such as bituminous or overlays, provide additional barrier protection and distribute loads, with typical thicknesses ranging from 10-50 mm for or systems and up to 80 mm for to mitigate underlying stresses by factors of 1-6.

Construction Methods

Orthotropic decks are typically prefabricated in controlled environments to ensure and . The process begins with the longitudinal —either closed trapezoidal or open stiffeners—to the underside of the deck plate using partial joint (PJP) welds, often achieving 60-80% to minimize while maintaining structural . These are then attached to transverse floorbeams, forming modular panels that can measure up to 20 m in length and 4 m in width, allowing for and assembly on site. This shop-based approach, guided by standards such as AASHTO and AWS D1.5, facilitates high-quality fabrication and supports accelerated by reducing field labor. Erection involves crane-lifting these prefabricated panels into position over the bridge's main structure. Panels are aligned and connected via field splicing, which may use high-strength bolted connections for rapid assembly or complete joint penetration (CJP) groove welds for permanent fixation, depending on the project's requirements. These techniques enable accelerated bridge construction () methods, such as overnight installations, minimizing traffic disruptions and enabling completion in phases that would otherwise require extended closures. In applications like movable bridges, such as bascules, the lightweight nature of orthotropic decks—due to their efficient usage—reduces dead load, facilitating easier operation and design. Quality control is integral throughout fabrication and to ensure , particularly against . Non-destructive testing methods, including ultrasonic and radiographic examinations, are applied to verify weld , detecting defects like cracks or incomplete . Strict tolerances are enforced, such as fit-up gaps limited to 1/16 inch (approximately 1.6 mm) between ribs and deck plate, and rib alignment deviations kept below 3 mm to prevent stress concentrations. Flatness tolerances of 1/8 inch over 10 ft are also maintained during shop assembly to guarantee proper fit-up in the field. Recent advances in fabrication include the of robotic and automated welding systems since the , which enhance precision, reduce human error, and improve consistency in rib-to-deck joints, particularly for complex geometries. As of 2025, orthotropic decks have gained broader adoption, with new concepts such as built-up closed-rib sections and hot-rolled longitudinal ribs improving and in fabrication.

Applications

Notable Orthotropic Deck Bridges

The in , completed in 2004, exemplifies advanced engineering with its extensive use of an orthotropic . Spanning a total length of 2,460 meters across the Tarn Valley, the structure features a continuous steel box-girder with a depth of 4.2 meters, supporting four lanes of traffic plus emergency shoulders on a 32-meter-wide roadway. This design contributes to one of the largest orthotropic implementations globally, enabling the bridge to harmonize with the challenging while minimizing material use. The Akashi Kaikyō Bridge in , opened in , represents a pinnacle of design, incorporating an orthotropic deck to enhance structural efficiency over its immense 1,991-meter central span. The deck's orthotropic configuration, featuring stiffened plates, supports the bridge's ability to withstand severe seismic events, typhoons, and strong sea currents through integrated systems and flexible supports. This engineering approach ensures resilience in a high-risk , connecting to and facilitating vital transportation links. In , the , inaugurated in 2001, holds the distinction of featuring the longest movable orthotropic deck as a over the . The structure's 680-meter swing span utilizes an orthotropic steel deck on a 12.6-meter-wide , accommodating a single while allowing full canal navigation when rotated 90 degrees. This innovative application demonstrates the deck's suitability for dynamic, heavy-load environments, replacing earlier versions and restoring critical rail connectivity between and . India's , completed in 2024 and known as Atal Setu, marks the country's first major orthotropic deck sea bridge, stretching 21.8 kilometers across . The bridge employs 70 orthotropic steel deck segments, enabling longer spans up to 180 meters and faster construction, which has reduced travel time between and from over two hours to approximately 20 minutes. This project highlights the technology's role in addressing urban congestion and boosting regional .

Bridge Deck Replacements

Orthotropic decks are commonly employed in bridge rehabilitation projects to replace deteriorated decks, extending the overall of the structure to 50 years or more while achieving significant weight reductions of 20-30% compared to traditional systems. This approach is particularly beneficial for aging and long-span , where reduced dead loads alleviate stress on existing girders and enhance seismic performance. A prominent example is the in , , where the original concrete deck was replaced with an orthotropic steel deck between 1982 and 1986. This project removed 12,300 tons of concrete, resulting in a lighter structure that improved seismic capacity by reducing the overall dead load by approximately 10%. The replacement covered 567,000 square feet and was completed at a cost of about $40 million, demonstrating the feasibility of orthotropic decks in high-profile retrofits. Similarly, the in , , underwent phased orthotropic deck replacements to combat corrosion from road salt exposure and accommodate increased traffic volumes. The approach viaduct was retrofitted in 1975, converting a reinforced concrete deck to an orthotropic system, while the main span received a new prefabricated orthotropic deck in 2000-2001, including widening for additional lanes. These upgrades addressed structural deterioration accumulated over decades of service and enhanced load-carrying capacity. The replacement process typically involves prefabricated panels installed panel-by-panel during off-peak hours to minimize traffic disruption, with new connections integrating the orthotropic deck to existing girders. Prefabrication enables rapid on-site assembly, often completing significant portions overnight. Outcomes include substantial cost efficiencies and extended longevity, as evidenced by the project's minimal ongoing maintenance needs; in the United States, orthotropic decks are increasingly applied to replacements, with several major projects illustrating their role in preserving historic infrastructure.

Advantages and Challenges

Benefits

Orthotropic steel decks provide substantial engineering advantages, primarily through their lightweight design. Compared to traditional decks, they achieve a weight reduction of 25-35%, which allows for longer bridge spans up to 100 meters without intermediate supports and enables shallower structural depths, typically 1-2 meters overall. This reduction stems from the orthotropic properties, where material stiffness is directionally optimized to efficiently distribute loads with minimal mass. In terms of durability, the all-steel composition resists cracking far better than , avoiding issues like spalling or under thermal and traffic stresses. Properly designed and maintained orthotropic decks exhibit a lifespan exceeding 100 years, as demonstrated by global in-service performance data. Furthermore, their inherently smooth surface, when paired with appropriate wearing courses, delivers a superior riding quality that reduces dynamic impacts and associated vehicle wear. Construction efficiency is enhanced by , where deck modules are shop-welded for rapid on-site assembly, significantly shortening erection timelines compared to systems. The lower dead load also translates to economic benefits, including reductions in foundation requirements and costs due to decreased substructure demands. The versatility of orthotropic decks makes them ideal for challenging applications, such as long-span crossings, movable bridges like bascules, and constrained urban environments where minimizing disruption is critical. Their adaptability supports innovative aesthetic forms, including slender cable-stayed configurations, by integrating seamlessly as the top of the .

Limitations and Mitigation

One primary limitation of orthotropic decks is their susceptibility to fatigue cracking, particularly at weld toes and roots in rib-to-deck connections, which can initiate under high-cycle loading exceeding 10^6 load cycles due to repeated traffic stresses. These cracks often propagate from weld imperfections or stress concentrations, compromising long-term structural integrity in high-traffic environments. To mitigate this, design practices have evolved to incorporate improved weld details, such as double-sided full-penetration welds or partial-penetration configurations with grinding to reduce stress raisers, which enhance fatigue resistance compared to traditional single-sided welds. Additionally, regular non-destructive inspections, including ultrasonic testing every 5 years for critical welds, enable early detection and repair, preventing crack growth to critical levels. Corrosion represents another significant challenge, as wear in the surfacing layer allows water and salts to ingress, leading to of overlays and subsequent plate deterioration, particularly in harsh climates. This ingress accelerates pitting and section loss at stiffeners and welds, reducing load-carrying capacity over time. Mitigation strategies include the application of polymer-modified overlays, which enhance and to resist , and systems that apply a protective electrical to inhibit electrochemical on the components. These measures, combined with routine maintenance, have demonstrated effectiveness in extending by minimizing penetration in field applications. Orthotropic decks also face higher initial fabrication costs than conventional concrete decks, owing to the precision welding, stiffener integration, and specialized shop fabrication required. This premium arises from labor-intensive processes and material handling for the anisotropic steel assembly. However, these costs are often offset by lifecycle savings, driven by reduced dead load enabling lighter substructures, faster erection times, and lower maintenance needs compared to heavier alternatives. Current knowledge on orthotropic decks in the U.S. reveals gaps, with much foundational data stemming from pre-2005 designs that underestimated and risks in modern traffic volumes. Emerging post-2020 addresses these through systems combining orthotropic with ultra-high-performance (UHPC) overlays, which improve resistance and by distributing stresses and sealing surfaces more effectively than traditional surfacings. Recent advancements as of 2025 include a new AISC/FHWA promoting broader adoption and studies on OSD-UHPC composites for enhanced resistance and detection.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  2. [2]
    Focus - A Guide to Today's Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges - April 2012
    Originally developed in Germany, the OSD system generally consists of a flat, thin steel plate that is stiffened by a series of closely spaced longitudinal ribs ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Fundamentals of Orthotropic Plate Design - Engineering Journal
    Because of the monolithic construction, a deck plate is called upon to serve three distinct structural functions: (1) together with the stiffeners, to serve as ...
  4. [4]
    Orthotropic Deck in New Jersey, Route 7 Wittpenn Bridge ...
    Jan 19, 2021 · Developed in Germany in the 1930's, similar to United States (U.S) Battleship decks. · A thin steel plate has a series of longitudinal “ribs” and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    [PDF] if12027.pdf - Federal Highway Administration
    Abstract. This Manual covers the relevant issues related to orthotropic steel deck bridge engineering, including analysis, design, detailing, fabrication, ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Guide for Orthotropic Steel Deck Level 1 Design
    Rib span: The span length of a longitudinal rib member between supporting floorbeams (or diaphragms). Wearing surface: A top layer placed on the deck plate to.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Finite Element Design of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
    ABSTRACT. Orthotropic steel deck bridges consist of a thin deck plate, supported by longitudinal stiffeners, main girders and transversal stiffeners.<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Fatigue Resistant Rib-to-Floor Beam Connections for Orthotropic ...
    An OSD consists of a continuous steel deck plate on top of longitudinal open or closed ribs that pass through transverse floor beams. All of these components ...
  9. [9]
    SPS – ein neues Verfahren zur Instandsetzung und Ertüchtigung ...
    Jun 29, 2007 · Literatur. [1] Patentschrift Nr. 847014, Dr. Cornelius/ MAN, Straßenbrücke mit Flachblech, 1948. ... [2] MAN-Forschungsheft Nr. 7, Die ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Design Manual for Orthotropic Steel Plate Deck Bridges
    The rib sizes vary in the longitudinal and the transverse direction of the bridge. The light intermediate floor beams are 20 in. deep at the middle of the ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Orthotropic Design Meets Cold Weather Challenges
    Initially developed by German engineers following World War II, orthotropic bridge design was a creative response to material shortages during the post- war ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] HIGH FATIGUE RESISTANT ORTHOTROPIC STEEL BRIDGE DECKS
    Orthotropic steel decks were developed during the 1940s–50s in Germany, where re- constructions after the 2nd world war were required under a limited steel ...
  13. [13]
    (PDF) About the history of orthotropic bridge decks - Academia.edu
    The orthotropic plate theory revolutionized bridge design by optimizing load distribution and material efficiency. Bulgaria's bridge construction advanced ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Next Generation Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges - AISC
    welded together system steel bridge system (see Reference 8). Germany began to use steel deck bridges as grade separation bridges for their “Autobahn” in 1934.Missing: Dudweiler | Show results with:Dudweiler
  15. [15]
    Award of Merit, Bridge/Tunnel: Mumbai Trans Harbour Link (Atal Setu)
    Dec 13, 2024 · An orthotropic steel deck design was employed for the first time in India, with 32 total used on the bridge. The approach allowed crews to build ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Design of steel-bridges - Eurocodes
    Standard orthotropic steel deck with continuous stringers with cope holes in the web of the cross beam. Substitution of fatigue checks by structural detailing.Missing: integration AASHTO<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Engineering Design, Fabrication, and Erection of Prefabricated ...
    This manual has been developed for the purposes of enhancing the use of Prefabricated Bridge. Elements and Systems (PBES) as part of accelerated ...
  18. [18]
    Millau Viaduct (Millau/Creissels, 2004) | Structurae
    Dimensions ; span lengths, 204 m - 6 x 342 m - 204 m ; number of spans, 8 ; horizontal radius of curvature, 20 000 m ; deck, deck depth, 4.20 m ; deck · height above ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The design of the Millau Viaduct Summary 1. Introduction - AFGC
    The deck consists of a trapezoidal profiled metal box girder with a maximum height of 4.20 m at the axis with an upper orthotropic decking made up of metal ...Missing: depth | Show results with:depth
  20. [20]
    Introduction of Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge
    Although the central span length of the Bridge is about twice as long as those of previous suspension bridges, the girder of 1,991m long had to be erected.Missing: orthotropic deck resilience
  21. [21]
    [PDF] fatigue design, evaluation and inspectoion for orthotropic steel ...
    The Akashi Kaikyo Bridge, which has a large traffic volume, is excluded because the details of the orthotropic steel decks are partly improved during ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Seismic design and seismic performance retrofit study for the Akashi ...
    This paper describes the original seismic design, the influence of the Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake and seismic performance retrofit study for the Akashi. Kaikyo ...Missing: orthotropic resilience
  23. [23]
    Longest swing span bridge opens at Suez<!-- --> - Gulf Construction
    Feb 14, 2002 · The 12.6 m wide truss is 60 m high at the pivot reducing to 15 m at mid-span and the orthotropic steel deck carries a single railway track and ...
  24. [24]
    EL-FERDAN RAILWAY BRIDGE - Maffeis Engineering
    Sep 3, 2024 · Maffeis executed the detail design for the two double swing bridges at El Ferdan, Ismailia. ... The total length of the bridge is 640 m ...Missing: orthotropic | Show results with:orthotropic
  25. [25]
    Mumbai Trans Harbour Link - mmrda
    The Orthotropic Steel Deck technology helps protect the flight paths of flamingos, minimalizing distractions to their natural habits. Noise barriers have been ...
  26. [26]
    First Orthotropic Steel Deck (OSD) Erected in Package 1 of JICA ...
    Jan 14, 2022 · The first Orthotropic Steel Deck (OSD) span for the 10.380 km of civil work Package 1 section, western half of the bridge, was erected today.
  27. [27]
    75 Years of Howrah Bridge-A Typical Saga of Energy Conservation
    ... orthotropic deck system-and that too in 1937. The designers decided on a balanced cantilever suspension bridge: a 1,500ft. long ropeway of steel, slung on ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Applications of Orthotopic Decks in Bridge Rehabilitation
    Advantages of orthotropic redecking are illus- trated by four examples of recent bridge rehabilitation projects. FOUR REDECKING CASE HISTORIES. George ...Missing: Lions | Show results with:Lions<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Golden Gate Bridge seismic retrofit project
    The original concrete deck of the suspension bridge was replaced in 1985 with a lightweight orthotropic steel deck with a net reduction in weight of about 10, ...
  30. [30]
    Design & Construction Stats - Statistics & Data | Golden Gate
    This is a total reduction in weight of the deck of 12,300 tons (11,158,400 kg), or 1.37 tons (1133 kg) per lineal foot of deck.Missing: US | Show results with:US<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] renovation of lions' gate bridge north viaduct
    Under the cumulative effects of road salt and traffic for 35 years, the deck was cracked through in places and the rebar was heavily corroded, resulting in ...Missing: 1975 | Show results with:1975
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Lions' Gate Bridge Suspended Span Replacement
    Apr 30, 2009 · This option involved replacing the narrow concrete deck with a new, wider orthotropic steel deck during short night closures, while maintaining ...Missing: corrosion | Show results with:corrosion
  33. [33]
    Orthotropic Steel Bridge - Cherubini Metal Works
    With a 25 - 35% reduction in weight (compared to a traditional concrete bridge system), minimal traffic disruptions, and the reduction in life cycle maintenance ...
  34. [34]
    Behavior and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic steel decks
    Furthermore, laboratory tests and in-service performance of OSDs show that, if properly designed and built, OSDs could provide a 100-year service life with ...Missing: durability | Show results with:durability
  35. [35]
    Influence of Wearing Surfacing on Performance of Orthotropic Steel ...
    An orthotropic steel deck plate requires a wearing surfacing for skid resistance, for smooth riding, and for corrosion protection. The wearing surfacing is ...Missing: vehicle | Show results with:vehicle
  36. [36]
    What Are The Advantages Of Using An Orthotropic Steel Bridge Deck?
    Nov 16, 2024 · This article explores the various benefits of using orthotropic steel bridge decks, including their lightweight design, durability, and cost-effectiveness.
  37. [37]
    What are Orthotropic steel bridge decks? - ConstroFacilitator
    May 18, 2023 · It is a specific type of bridge deck where steel plates are used as the primary load-carrying element.
  38. [38]
    Orthotropic Steel Deck: a Solution for Sustainable Development
    Jul 16, 2014 · Orthotropic steel deck can easily satisfy a designated service life of 75 years or longer. Orthotropic-Steel-Deck-01.Missing: 50 | Show results with:50
  39. [39]
    Fatigue reliability assessment of rib-to-deck double-sided welded ...
    Dec 28, 2024 · Evaluating stress intensity factors for surface cracks in an orthotropic steel deck accounting for the welding residual stresses. Theor ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Optimization of Rib-to-Deck Welds for Steel Orthotropic Bridge Decks
    This report documents fatigue testing results of full-scale geometries of various orthotropic rib- to-deck weld geometries.
  41. [41]
    Monitoring fatigue cracks in rib-to-deck joints of orthotropic steel ...
    Visual inspection is usually performed on demand or periodically with a relatively long interval such as 5–10 years. Second, the reliability of inspection ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Decks - Engineering Journal
    Some engineers feel the surfacing systems should also be of sufficient thickness to reduce noise and dampen vibrations caused by vehicles passing over the steel.Missing: riding | Show results with:riding
  43. [43]
    [PDF] FHWA-HRT-25-009 - ROSA P
    Dec 1, 2024 · membrane, leading to water and chloride ingress and corrosion of the deck reinforcement. PMA Overlays. PMA overlays are relatively uncommon ...
  44. [44]
    Structural design and lifecycle analysis of an orthotropic steel deck ...
    Specifically, the bending moment at ULS is approximately 38% higher than at SLS. Similarly, the shear and axial forces are about 36% and 36% higher under ULS, ...Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
  45. [45]
    A Review on Behavior and Fatigue Performance of Orthotropic Steel ...
    This paper summarizes the literature on the mechanical and fatigue properties of orthotropic steel–UHPC composite deck structures, briefly compares and analyzes ...