Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Parity bit

A parity bit is a single bit appended to a binary data string to detect single-bit errors during or by ensuring the total number of 1-bits (set bits) in the is either even or odd. This simple error-detection mechanism, derived from the concept of meaning , has been a fundamental tool in digital computing since the mid-20th century. The parity bit functions as a : on the sender's side, it is calculated and added based on the data bits to achieve the desired (even or odd); the receiver then recalculates the parity and compares it to detect discrepancies indicating an . There are two primary variants—even , which sets the bit so the total number of 1s is even (adding a 0 if already even, or 1 if odd), and odd , which ensures an odd total (adding a 1 if even, or 0 if odd). For example, the 7-bit ASCII data "1011000" (three 1s, odd) would receive a 1 parity bit for even , resulting in "10110001" (four 1s, even), while for odd it would receive a 0, yielding "10110000" (three 1s, odd). Parity bits are widely applied in memory systems like for error detection, serial communications such as , bus interfaces like , and storage arrays including levels 4, 5, and 6, where they enhance data reliability without correcting errors. Their primary advantage lies in simplicity and low overhead, making them effective for detecting isolated bit flips caused by noise or hardware faults. However, they have limitations, as they cannot detect even-numbered errors (e.g., two bit flips may preserve ) and provide no correction capability, often requiring more advanced methods like or Hamming codes for robust systems.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A parity bit is an additional bit appended to a group of digits, known as a word, to establish a specific —either even or odd—based on the total count of 1s in the word. In even parity, the parity bit is set to ensure the overall number of 1s is even; in odd parity, it ensures an odd count. This mechanism serves as a fundamental error-detection code in systems, adding minimal overhead while enabling basic integrity checks on transmitted or stored . The primary purpose of a parity bit is to detect single-bit errors that may occur during data transmission or storage, without providing correction capabilities. At the receiving end, the parity is recalculated and compared to the received parity bit; a mismatch indicates a potential error, prompting actions such as retransmission or system alerts. This approach is effective for identifying odd numbers of bit flips, such as a single error, but fails to detect even-numbered errors, limiting its scope to simple detection rather than robust error handling. For example, consider the word 1011, which contains three 1s (an count). To achieve even , a bit of 1 is appended, resulting in 10111 with four 1s (even count). If a bit flips during —say, to 00111—the would count three 1s, detecting the mismatch and flagging the .

Types of Parity Bits

bits are primarily classified into even and odd variants based on the desired count of 1-bits in the transmitted data word, including the bit itself. In even parity, the parity bit is set to ensure the total number of 1s is even; for data "" (which has two 1s), the parity bit is 0 to maintain an even count. In odd parity, the parity bit is set to make the total number of 1s odd; for the same data "," the parity bit is 1 to achieve an odd count. The choice between even and odd parity depends on system requirements and error patterns; even parity is commonly used in systems like ASCII transmission for its simplicity in handling typical distributions, while odd parity is preferred in some contexts to better detect unidirectional errors, such as stuck-at-zero faults where all bits might default to 0 (valid under even parity but invalid under odd). In serial transmission, additional variants include space parity, where the parity bit is always 0 (acting as a filler for 7-bit in 8-bit frames), and mark parity, where it is always 1; these are used when no checking is needed but the parity position must be occupied to match expectations. can also be applied at different granularities: standard character (or bit-wise) adds a single bit per data word or byte for individual detection, while block computes a parity bit over an entire of multiple bytes, often in two dimensions (horizontal per byte and vertical across bytes) to enhance detection of multi-bit errors across the block.

Operation

Calculating Parity Bits

The parity bit is computed using the (XOR) operation applied to the data bits, which effectively counts the number of 1s 2. For even parity, the parity bit P is set to the result of the XOR of all data bits, ensuring the total number of 1s (including P) is even: if the XOR yields 0 (even number of 1s in data), P = 0; if 1 (odd), P = 1. For odd parity, P is the inversion of this XOR result, making the total number of 1s odd. The mathematical formula for even parity is P = b_1 \oplus b_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus b_n, where b_i are the data bits and \oplus denotes XOR; for odd parity, P = \overline{b_1 \oplus b_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus b_n}, with the overline indicating logical NOT. Consider an 8-bit data word 10110011, which has five 1s (odd parity). Compute the XOR step-by-step:
$1 \oplus 0 = 1
$1 \oplus 1 = 0
$0 \oplus 1 = 1
$1 \oplus 0 = 1
$1 \oplus 0 = 1
$1 \oplus 1 = 0
$0 \oplus 1 = 1
The final XOR is 1, so for even parity, P = 1 (adding a sixth 1 for even total); for odd parity, P = 0 (preserving the odd count).
In hardware, parity bits are generated using a tree of XOR gates in digital circuits, where inputs connect to multi-input XOR gates or cascaded pairs to compute the overall XOR efficiently for multiple bits. Software implementations typically use a to accumulate the XOR iteratively. for even parity is:
[function](/page/Function) calculate_even_parity(data_bits):
    parity = 0
    for each bit in data_bits:
        parity = parity XOR bit
    return parity
For odd parity, invert the result after the .

Encoding and Verification Processes

In the encoding process, a parity bit is calculated based on the data bits and appended to the original data word, forming an extended codeword. For instance, a 7-bit character is combined with a parity bit to create an 8-bit codeword, where the parity bit is set to achieve either even or odd parity across the entire codeword. This addition introduces minimal overhead while enabling basic error detection. The codeword is then transmitted over a , such as a serial link or memory bus, under the assumption that the primary error mode is a single-bit due to or . This model relies on the channel introducing at most one per codeword to ensure reliable detection. At the , verification begins by recalculating the expected from the received bits and comparing it to the received bit. The is computed as the XOR of the recalculated and the received bit: if the result is 0, the codeword is valid; if 1, an is detected. This process, often implemented using XOR gates for efficiency, confirms the without identifying the error's . Upon detecting a mismatch, the indicates an through mechanisms such as generating an , discarding the affected packet, or triggering a retransmission request, depending on the context. The process cannot correct the or pinpoint its location, limiting it to detection only. The overall workflow can be described as follows:
  1. Input the original data word (e.g., n bits).
  2. Compute and append the parity bit to form the n+1 bit codeword.
  3. Transmit the codeword over the .
  4. Receive the codeword and extract the and parity bits.
  5. Recalculate parity on the bits and compare to the received parity bit via computation.
  6. If is 0, output the as valid; otherwise, alert an error and handle accordingly (e.g., discard or retry).
This sequence ensures a straightforward, low-latency error-checking mechanism suitable for applications.

Applications

In Data Storage and RAID

Parity plays a central role in Redundant Array of Independent Disks () configurations, particularly in levels 5 and 6, where it provides block-level distributed across multiple drives to enable from drive failures. In 5, parity information is striped across all drives in the , calculated as the bitwise XOR of corresponding data blocks from other drives, forming a parity stripe that occupies the space of one drive. For example, with three data blocks D_1, D_2, and D_3, the parity block P is computed as: P = D_1 \oplus D_2 \oplus D_3 This allows reconstruction of a block, such as D_1, by XORing the parity with the remaining blocks: D_1 = P \oplus D_2 \oplus D_3 6 extends this approach by using two independent blocks per —typically one even and one computed over a different set (e.g., via a second XOR or Reed-Solomon )—to tolerate up to two simultaneous drive , with involving solving the of equations across surviving drives. The advantages of these -based levels include cost-effective compared to full ( 1), as they dedicate only a of to ; for instance, a three-drive 5 uses one-third of the total space for while providing equivalent to protecting against one . In modern implementations, such as enterprise SSD arrays, parity mechanisms integrate with wear-leveling algorithms to detect and mitigate errors arising from uneven usage, where repeated program/erase cycles degrade bit reliability; superpage-level checks, for example, help identify failures during host accesses exacerbated by wear. This enhances overall storage reliability in high-density environments without requiring additional hardware overhead.

In Telecommunications and Networking

In and networking, parity bits play a crucial role in protocols, where they enable detection of errors in frames over potentially noisy channels. These bits are appended to data bytes to maintain either even or odd , allowing receivers to flag and discard corrupted frames promptly, which is essential for maintaining link integrity in point-to-point or multi-drop setups. This approach contrasts with more complex error-correcting codes by prioritizing low-latency detection over correction, facilitating quick retransmissions in bandwidth-constrained environments. A prominent example is the Universal Asynchronous Receiver-Transmitter (UART) protocol, commonly used in serial interfaces for device interconnects in networking equipment. In UART, a typical consists of a start bit, 7 or 8 bits (least significant bit first), an optional parity bit, and one or two stop bits, with the parity bit ensuring an even or odd number of 1s across the and parity fields to detect single-bit errors. For instance, in an 8--bit configuration with parity, the parity bit is set to make the total count of 1s even (even parity) or (odd parity), enabling the to verify without additional overhead beyond the single bit. This setup is widely employed in legacy links and embedded network controllers for its simplicity and effectiveness in asynchronous transmission. In industrial networking protocols like over serial lines, parity bits are integrated into the RTU () mode for byte-level error checking in master-slave communications. Modbus RTU frames use 8 data bits per byte, with configurable (even, odd, or none) followed by 1 or 2 stop bits, where the parity bit guards against bit flips during transmission over or buses common in supervisory control and () systems. Upon detecting a parity mismatch, the receiver discards the erroneous byte or frame and may initiate a retransmission request via acknowledgment () or negative acknowledgment (NACK) mechanisms at the level, ensuring reliable polling of remote devices in applications. Overall, upon parity failure, the typically aborts the , logs the error, and prompts higher-layer protocols for retransmission via /NACK, preserving end-to-end reliability without delving into correction.

In Memory Systems

Parity bits have been employed in systems, such as (), to detect single-bit transient errors that can arise during data storage and retrieval. In basic implementations, particularly in cost-sensitive consumer and embedded systems, parity checking provides error detection without correction capability, using a single parity bit for every 8 bits of data to maintain even or odd parity across the byte. This approach allows systems to identify bit flips caused by electrical noise, strikes, or other transient faults, though it cannot pinpoint or fix the erroneous bit. For example, in older modules, the parity bit is computed during writes and verified during reads to ensure in operations. Implementation in memory modules typically involves dedicated hardware for parity generation and checking. Single in-line memory modules (SIMMs) and dual in-line memory modules (DIMMs) often include additional pins or chips for bits; a standard 8-bit data word pairs with 1 bit, resulting in 9-bit wide modules. In SIMMs, for instance, a MB module might use 12 chips—eight for 32-bit data and four for corresponding —expanding the bus width to 36 bits (32 data + 4 ). DIMMs follow a similar pattern but scale to 64-bit data paths with 8 bits in non-ECC configurations. Central processing units (CPUs) in x86 architectures integrate verification during memory reads; the 80386, for example, supports -checked system RAM through external logic that monitors the bus for mismatches. Upon detecting a parity mismatch, the system triggers an immediate response to prevent propagation of corrupted data. In early x86 systems, this typically generates a non-maskable interrupt (NMI), which halts normal operation and vectors to interrupt descriptor table position 2 for handling, often requiring a system reboot or diagnostic intervention. Later architectures evolved this to machine check exceptions (MCEs), introduced with the Pentium processor, allowing more granular error reporting via machine-specific registers without always crashing the system. These mechanisms ensure that transient errors, such as those in CPU caches or main RAM, are flagged promptly during runtime access. While effective for basic detection, parity-only memory has largely declined in modern high-reliability applications, particularly servers, where error-correcting code () memory predominates. ECC extends parity principles using variants for single-error correction (), employing multiple check bits (e.g., 8 bits for 64 data bits) to both detect and correct single-bit errors while identifying multi-bit faults. This shift was motivated by increasing rates from cosmic ray-induced neutron strikes on cells, which can cause bit flips at rates of approximately 1 error every 10-14 days per at , rendering detection-only parity insufficient for mission-critical computing. Parity persists in legacy systems and low-cost hardware where error correction overhead is unacceptable.

Limitations and Enhancements

Detection Capabilities and False Positives

Parity bits provide reliable detection of single-bit errors, achieving 100% success in identifying such flips because altering one bit changes the overall parity from even to odd or vice versa. This capability extends to all odd numbers of bit errors, which are detected with complete certainty regardless of their positions within the data word. In contrast, parity bits offer no detection for even numbers of errors, failing entirely in these cases. A common failure mode occurs with two bit flips, such as in adjacent positions, where the changes cancel each other out modulo 2, preserving the original parity and allowing the corruption to go unnoticed. Regarding error signaling, parity checks produce no false positives: a mismatch in computed and received parity definitively signals an error, as valid transmissions always match. However, false negatives arise with even-error patterns, where the data appears correct despite corruption, leading to undetected issues. In a random bit-flip model that assumes across all possible non-zero patterns, bits detect approximately 50% of multi-bit , since exactly half of these patterns involve an odd number of flips that alter the . Within the context of communication characterized by a (BER), detection performance varies with noise levels; in low-BER scenarios where single-bit dominate, nearly all are caught, but higher BER increases the incidence of even-multi-bit , raising the undetected probability to roughly the chance of even-weight vectors. For instance, in a symmetric with small flip probability ε, the undetected rate approximates the sum over even error counts, which approaches 0.5 as noise grows but remains low (≈ Nε/2 detected) under minimal interference. To address these detection gaps, parity bits are frequently paired with cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) for enhanced coverage, where parity handles odd errors quickly while CRC catches most even and burst errors in noisy settings. This combination significantly reduces false negatives; for example, in channels with moderate BER (e.g., 10^{-5}), standalone parity misses all double errors (and other even-numbered errors), but adding CRC boosts overall detection to over 99.999% for typical frame lengths.

Comparison to Other Error-Correcting Codes

Parity bits offer a simple mechanism for detecting single-bit errors with minimal overhead, typically adding just one bit to a block of data via an exclusive-OR (XOR) operation, but they cannot correct errors or reliably detect multiple-bit errors. In contrast, the extends this concept by employing multiple parity bits to enable both detection and correction of single-bit errors; for instance, the (7,4) encodes 4 data bits into 7 total bits using 3 parity bits, allowing the exact location of a single error to be identified and fixed through syndrome calculation. This correction capability comes at the cost of higher redundancy and compared to basic parity, which remains detection-only. Compared to cyclic redundancy checks (), parity bits are limited to detecting odd numbers of single-bit errors but fail against even-numbered or burst errors, as they only verify overall parity without positional information. , based on polynomial division modulo 2, can detect all single-bit errors and burst errors up to a length determined by the polynomial degree (e.g., a 16-bit detects bursts up to 16 bits), providing stronger protection for data transmission in noisy channels. While parity's XOR-based computation is extremely lightweight and suitable for real-time applications, requires more involved shift-and-XOR operations simulating division, increasing processing overhead but enhancing reliability. Reed-Solomon codes surpass in both detection and correction scope, operating on symbols (groups of bits) rather than individual bits to correct multiple errors per block, making them ideal for storage media like and DVDs where scratches cause burst errors spanning bytes. For example, Reed-Solomon codes in optical discs can correct up to several corrupted symbols by treating data as polynomials over finite fields, far beyond parity's single-bit detection limit, which proves inadequate for such multi-byte error scenarios. This advanced error-handling renders parity too simplistic for high-reliability storage, though Reed-Solomon's encoding involves more complex finite-field arithmetic. The primary trade-offs of parity bits lie in their low computational cost—relying on simple XOR gates for encoding and verification—versus the polynomial division or matrix operations in advanced codes like , Hamming, or Reed-Solomon, which demand greater resources but achieve superior rates essential for high-reliability environments. Parity suits systems where speed trumps robustness, but it is insufficient standalone for applications prone to multiple errors, prompting upgrades to more capable codes. In modern systems, parity often serves as a first-stage, low-overhead check to quickly flag potential errors before invoking resource-intensive error-correcting codes () like Hamming or Reed-Solomon, optimizing performance in hybrid architectures such as memory modules or arrays. This layered approach leverages parity's efficiency for common single-error cases while reserving advanced for correction in high-stakes scenarios.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Implementations

The concept of the parity bit emerged in the amid efforts to enhance reliability in early electromechanical computers. , a mathematician at Bell Laboratories, pioneered self-checking circuits and error detection mechanisms for -based machines, including the Error Detector Mark 22, a special-purpose device designed to identify computational faults caused by relay failures. These innovations addressed the absence of built-in verification in primitive digital systems, where undetected errors could propagate silently through calculations. Stibitz's work on duplicate computations and parity-like checks formed the foundational approach to simple error detection in binary computing. Post-World War II computing amplified the need for such techniques due to the inherent unreliability of technology. Systems like the and subsequent machines relied on thousands of fragile tubes, where a single failure could introduce undetectable errors, compromising critical military and scientific applications. In 1950, at developed the , extending parity bits to enable single-error correction, further advancing error detection in computing systems. Parity bits offered a straightforward solution by appending an extra bit to ensure an even or odd count of 1s in a word, enabling basic verification without complex circuitry. This era's focus on error detection paved the way for parity as a precursor to advanced error-correcting codes. Initial implementations integrated parity into storage and transmission media during the early . The (1951) featured the first with a dedicated parity track alongside six data tracks, allowing detection of single-bit errors in recorded bytes. The SAGE air defense network's AN/FSQ-7 computers (operational from 1958) incorporated parity bits in their core memory—32-bit words plus one parity bit—to support real-time error alarms in data processing, marking an early use in large-scale memory systems. IBM's 701 (1952) applied parity checks to its units for reliable data transfer, while the 1963 ASCII standard formalized an optional parity bit for 7-bit characters transmitted over 8-bit channels. In these systems, parity calculation often relied on manual or software-based methods, such as repeated addition to tally 1s, prior to the availability of hardware XOR circuits for automated generation.

Evolution in Computing Standards

The integration of parity bits into computing standards began in the late with the (ANSI) X3.4-1968 specification for the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), which defined a 7-bit often transmitted as 8 bits with an optional parity bit for error detection in data interchange among information processing and communication systems. This standard facilitated reliable serial transmission by appending a parity bit to ensure even or odd parity across the byte, becoming a foundational practice for early protocols. In the 1970s, the standard for the General Purpose Interface Bus (GPIB), initially developed by as HP-IB, incorporated parity bits into its handshaking protocol for instrumentation control, using the eighth data line (DIO8) for parity on 7-bit ASCII commands and data to detect transmission errors during device-to-device byte transfers. Concurrently, hardware advancements in transistor-transistor logic () integrated circuits, such as the 74180 9-bit parity generator/checker introduced by , enabled built-in parity computation and verification directly on chips, simplifying error detection in digital systems like memory and bus interfaces. By the mid-1990s, parity bits saw a decline in memory systems as (DRAM) manufacturers phased out dedicated parity lines, relying instead on for more robust single-bit error correction in and environments, while consumer PCs often omitted error checking altogether due to improved component reliability. This shift marked a transition from universal parity use to selective application, evident in the to encoding in the 1990s and 2000s, which operates as an variable-width format without inherent parity bits to support international character sets efficiently. However, parity persisted in and protocols. In modern standards, parity bits maintain relevance in specific low-level protocols; for instance, USB 2.0 and 3.0 specifications include parity-like checks in packet identifier () fields of control packets, where the lower four bits are the bitwise complement of the upper four to detect transmission errors during device enumeration and configuration. Similarly, 5G New Radio (NR) telecommunications standards from the 3rd Generation Partnership Project () incorporate low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, which rely on parity-check matrices for efficient in high-throughput, low-latency channels, as defined in Release 15 onward. Looking to the , research post-2010 has explored -based measurements for quantum detection, adapting classical concepts to systems; for example, a 2015 experiment demonstrated bit-flip detection on a logical using checks across four superconducting qubits in a square lattice code. These developments highlight 's enduring role in evolving standards, from classical to quantum architectures, prioritizing detection in resource-constrained settings.

References

  1. [1]
    What is parity in computing? | Definition from TechTarget
    Jul 25, 2024 · The job of the parity bit is to help the data recipient detect any errors that might have occurred during the transmission of that data. Parity ...
  2. [2]
    Error Detection Codes - Parity Bit - GeeksforGeeks
    Oct 7, 2025 · Parity Bit Method​​ A parity bit is an extra bit that is added to the message bits or data-word bits on the sender side. Data-word bits, along ...
  3. [3]
    PARITY CHECK Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    Word History and Origins. Origin of parity check. First recorded in 1945–50. Discover More. Example Sentences. Examples are provided to illustrate real-world ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 4 - Errors - MIT
    4.6.1 Parity. Consider a byte, which is 8 bits. To enable detection of single errors, a “parity” bit can be added, changing. the 8-bit string into 9 bits. The ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Announcements - Tao Xie
    Parity Bit. • To detect errors in data communication and processing, an additional bit is sometimes added to a binary code word to define its parity.
  6. [6]
    AIX
    ### Summary of Parity Bit Types in Serial Communications
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Parity Checking - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    In even parity, the parity bit is set so that the codeword always contains an even number of bits set, while in odd parity, the parity bit ensures the codeword ...Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
  9. [9]
    Serial Settings:Parity - NI
    ### Summary of Parity Types
  10. [10]
    Character Parity - University of Aberdeen
    When used, each character is protected at the sender by adding a single parity baud (also known as a parity bit) to each character (byte) that is transmitted.
  11. [11]
    Classes of Errors
    Parity · one way to detect all single-bit errors is to compute the XOR of all the bits in the message, and send that bit: this is the even parity bit · a single ...
  12. [12]
    Error detecting and correcting codes
    We can detect single errors with a parity bit. The parity bit is computed as the exclusive-OR (even parity) or exclusive-NOR (odd parity) of all of the other ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    CMSC 121: Error Detection: Parity Bits and Check Digits
    Parity bits use an extra bit to detect errors by checking if the total number of 1s is odd or even. Check digits use the sum of digits to detect errors.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  14. [14]
    Calculating the Parity Bit of a Bit Sequence - Baeldung
    Mar 18, 2024 · If within a byte, the bits at 1 are even in number, the additional bit will be set at 0. If the bits at 1 are odd, we add a bit at 1. The sent ...
  15. [15]
    Bit Twiddling Hacks - Stanford Computer Graphics Laboratory
    Counting bits set, computing parity (1 if an odd number of bits set, 0 otherwise), swapping values, reversing bit sequences, modulus division.
  16. [16]
    Compute the parity of a number using XOR and table look-up
    Aug 28, 2022 · The idea is to create a look up table to store parities of all 8 bit numbers. Then compute parity of whole number by dividing it into 8 bit numbers and using ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Codewords and Hamming Distance • Error Detection: parity - MIT
    We'll add redundant information to the transmitted bit stream. (a process called channel coding) so that we can detect errors at the receiver.Missing: verification | Show results with:verification
  18. [18]
    None
    ### Summary of Parity Check Code Section
  19. [19]
    Disk Scheduling and Management
    Aug 23, 1999 · Rather than using Hamming Codes for redundancy, a disk is used to just hold the parity bit. Upon disk failure, the data on the failed disk can ...Missing: hard | Show results with:hard
  20. [20]
    Operating Systems: Mass-Storage Structure
    Protecting more disks per parity bit saves cost, but increases the likelihood that a second disk will fail before the first bad disk is repaired. 10.7.5 ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID)
    A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID). Davtd A Patterson, Garth Gibson, and Randy H Katz ... reconstructed by calculatmg the parity of the ...
  22. [22]
    Dual RAID technique for ensuring high reliability and performance in ...
    These RAID techniques exploit parity to recover failures, it is updated whenever data renewed. ... In the RAID 6 technique, however, parity is written to double.
  23. [23]
    Understanding UART | Rohde & Schwarz
    If using odd parity, then the parity bit has to be one in order to make the frame have an odd number of 1s. The parity bit can only detect a single flipped bit.
  24. [24]
    Parity bits - IBM
    The parity bit, unlike the start and stop bits, is an optional parameter, used in serial communications to determine if the data character being transmitted ...
  25. [25]
    Serial Communication - SparkFun Learn
    Parity is a form of very simple, low-level error checking. It comes in two flavors: odd or even. To produce the parity bit, all 5-9 bits of the data byte are ...
  26. [26]
    Modbus Protocol
    1 start bit 7 data bits, least significant bit sent first 1 bit for even / odd parity-no bit for no parity 1 stop bit if parity is used-2 bits if no parity
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Empirical Analysis of a Token Ring Network, - DTIC
    The low bit error rate suggests that nothing more complex than a parity bit is ... The first packet after a ring recovery or the first packet in a compressed data.Missing: frames | Show results with:frames
  29. [29]
    Software Serial (USB) parity bit - Teensy Forum - PJRC
    Nov 20, 2019 · The parity bits are only used with actual hardware serial ports. Software emulation of those port (eg, the SoftwareSerial and AltSoftSerial libs) do not ...
  30. [30]
    Do HDMI/DVI-D signals have parity bits? - AVForums
    Aug 6, 2008 · So, the question is quite simple: do DVI and HDMI video signals contain parity bits, or any other similar form of built-in error checking and ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  31. [31]
    RS232: To parity or not to parity? - Stack Overflow
    Feb 11, 2014 · Parity is a very crude, old-fashioned way of error detection. And it adds a lot of overhead to your transmission: actually it adds far more latency than a ...What happens in rs232 if both sender and receiver are following odd ...Does parity check includes start and stop bits on RS-232?More results from stackoverflow.com
  32. [32]
    Disadvantages of Parity Bits - Stack Overflow
    Dec 5, 2010 · Parity bits can't detect all errors, don't show which bit is false, require extra bits, and need higher-level error detection like CRC.<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Parity and ECC - How They Work - Real World Tech
    Jun 13, 2000 · A true parity module can be used in either non-parity, parity or ECC mode, but it is more expensive than an ECC module.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] 80386 Hardware Reference Manual - Bitsavers.org
    HARDWARE SUPPORT. Hardware Support Services provides maintenance on Intel supported products at board and system level. Both field and factory services are ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Machine check handling on Linux - Andi Kleen
    The original IBM PCs had parity memory and caused Non Maskable Interrupts. (NMIs) when a memory error occurred. Later PCs dropped parity memory, but still ...
  36. [36]
    Memory Error Correction - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    Oct 6, 2025 · In the event of a parity error, the system generates a non-maskable interrupt (NMI) which halts the system. Double bit errors are undetected ...
  37. [37]
    Cosmic ray soft error rates of 16-Mb DRAM memory chips
    Feb 1, 1998 · We have measured the soft fail probability of 26 different 16-Mb chips produced by nine vendors to evaluate whether the different cell ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] 2c >n + c + 1 - UCSD CSE
    ... odd number of errors can be detected). It does not detect multiple errors (even in number). The parity-checking concept can be easily extended to detection ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Communication and Networking Error Detection Basics - spinlab
    Main idea: Let N1 be the number of bits equal to one in a F-bit frame. ▷ “Even parity”: make the number of 1's even. ▻ If N1 is odd, append a one to the message ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 5 - Coping with Bit Errors using Error Correction Codes
    The second big idea is to use parity calculations, which are linear functions over the bits we wish to send, to generate the redundancy in the bits that are ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Lecture 18: Error Detection and Correction
    Nov 27, 2021 · ▷ A single parity equation error is an error in the parity bit. ▷ Multiple parity equation errors is an error in the bit shared by these.
  42. [42]
    Lecture 5: Hamming Codes
    This code turns a 4 bit message into a 7 bit codeword that contains the 4 original message bits plus 3 more parity check bits, which we will get by applying ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Error Correcting Codes - Electrical and Computer Engineering
    Hamming Code uses multiple parity bits. It can detect and correct error bits. A Hamming Code with n parity bits can have up to 2n – n -1 data bits ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Detecting and Correcting Bit Errors - cs.Princeton
    – Change one data bit → change parity bit, so dmin. = 2. • So parity bit detects 1 bit error, corrects 0. • Can we detect and correct more errors, in general?Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Error Detection and Correction - Network Protocols Lab
    • Excellent error detection capabilities. – An r-bit CRC can detect all but 1/2r error patterns. • Assumption: bursts are limited in length. – Example: CRC-16.
  46. [46]
    CRC Series, Part 2: CRC Mathematics and Theory - Barr Group
    Dec 1, 1999 · This article describes a stronger type of checksum, commonly known as a CRC. A cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is based on division instead of addition.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Error Detection
    Apr 29, 2013 · • XOR all the bits of the data word together to form 1 bit of parity ... • Also detects any odd number of bit errors (includes a classical parity ...
  48. [48]
    reed-solomon codes
    Reed-Solomon codes are used to correct errors in many systems including: Storage devices (including tape, Compact Disk, DVD, barcodes, etc)
  49. [49]
    Error Correction
    Max correction: (n-k)/2, which is pretty good. n-k = # of extra bits. RS works well for burst errors (hence CDs/DVDs); not as efficient as others for single-bit ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Reed-Solomon Codes - Duke Computer Science
    A Reed-Solomon (RS) code is an error-correcting code that encodes groups of bits, unlike Hamming codes which encode one bit at a time.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] 1 Reed-Solomon Codes - People @EECS
    Sep 12, 2022 · Reed-Solomon codes are defined over a field F with evaluation points, and are a type of Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) code.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] A tutorial on CRC computations - IEEE Micro
    From the addition table, we see that an EXOR gate is all that we need to perform the addition operation in the binary field. Moreover, we see 0 and.
  53. [53]
    Hamming code vs parity check: Trade-offs in error correction ...
    Jul 14, 2025 · Parity check is one of the simplest forms of error detection. It works by adding an extra bit, known as the parity bit, to a block of data. This ...
  54. [54]
    Error Correction Code - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Parity, which is a simpler form of error checking, adds an extra bit to a set of data to ensure an even or odd parity (the sum of the bits being even or odd).Definition Of Topic · 6. Conclusion · Recommended Publications (4)
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Design and Evaluation of Hybrid Fault-Detection Systems
    Error correcting codes (ECC) and parity bits have been widely used to protect various hardware structures at a very fine granularity. However, it is tedious and ...
  56. [56]
    A hybrid erasure-coded ECC scheme to improve performance and ...
    In this paper, we present a hybrid erasure-coded (EECC) architecture that incorporates ECC schemes and erasure codes to improve both performance and reliability ...
  57. [57]
    George Stibitz : Bio - Denison University
    Apr 30, 2004 · Stibitz was awarded 34 patents. George R. Stibitz is ... He is also responsible for the error-detector which, according to ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  58. [58]
    George Stibitz - Computer Timeline
    The next two machines, designed by Stibitz—the Ballistic Computer and the Error Detector Mark 22 (later known as Models III and IV), were identical machines ...Missing: 2499357 | Show results with:2499357
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Mechanical Monsters: Part II Bell Lab Relay Computers
    Stibitz was concerned that if a relay failed an incorrect result could be produced without any way of knowing about the error. • Consequently the machine used a ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] A Short History of Reliability - NASA
    Apr 28, 2010 · The main military application for reliability was still the vacuum tube, whether it was in radar systems or other electronics. These systems ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  61. [61]
    First Computer Tape Drive Originated From Remington Rand
    May 31, 2012 · ... 1951, the first ... first to use plastic rather than magnetic tape. The seven parallel track tape recorded 6 bits bytes plus one for parity.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] From 1959: Theory of Programming for the SAGE AN/FSQ-7
    OB Drum Parity Alarm. 147. 5.5.4. Illegal Address or Section Alarm. 147. 5.5.5. G/G Parity Alarm. 147. 5.5.6. TTY Parity Alarm. 147. 5.5.7. G/A-TD Parity Alarm.
  63. [63]
    IBM 701 I/O
    The 701 tapes were 100 characters per inch. They had six bit characters and six data tracks plus one parity track. The 704 tapes were 200 and later 556 cpi. The ...
  64. [64]
    ASCII | Definition, History, Trivia, & Facts | Britannica
    Sep 12, 2025 · On June 17, 1963, ASCII was approved as the American standard. ... parity bit that is used for error checking or for representing special symbols.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] code for information interchange - NIST Technical Series Publications
    ANSI X3.4-1977. Page 2. This standard has been adopted for Federal Government ... X3.4-1968. American National Standard. Code for Information Interchange.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] USAS X3.4-1968
    This coded character set is to be used for the general interchange of information among information processing systems, communication systems, and associated ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] GPIB TUTORIAL - Tayloredge
    All commands and most data use the 7-bit ASCII or. ISO code set, in which case the eighth bit, DIO8, is either unused or used for parity. Handshake Lines. Three ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Designing with TTL Integrated Circuits - Bitsavers.org
    It will familiarize the reader with the entire TTL family, their basic descriptions, electrical per- formance, and applications. Since the intelligent selection ...
  69. [69]
    Cyclic redundancy check in CAN frames: CAN in Automation (CiA)
    The stuff bit count is protected by a parity bit and the following fixed stuff-bit is a second parity bit, so to speak, because the fixed stuff-bits always have ...
  70. [70]
    Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer ... - Nature
    Apr 29, 2015 · We demonstrate stabilizer-based QEC on the minimal unit of encoded quantum information, a logical qubit, restricting to bit-flip errors.
  71. [71]
    Quantum error correction for quantum memories | Rev. Mod. Phys.
    Apr 7, 2015 · Active quantum error correction using qubit stabilizer codes has emerged as a promising, but experimentally challenging, engineering program ...