Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Phoenix Lights

The Phoenix Lights consisted of two distinct mass sightings of unidentified aerial lights over Arizona on March 13, 1997, with thousands of witnesses reporting a large V-shaped formation of orbs moving silently southward across the state, including over Phoenix. The primary event, occurring between approximately 7:55 p.m. and 8:40 p.m., was described by observers as an enormous, boomerang- or carpenter's square-shaped object up to a mile in length, featuring five to ten lights that maintained a fixed geometric pattern while blocking out background stars, with no audible engine noise despite its slow speed. A secondary event around 9:15–9:35 p.m. involved a linear array of hovering lights south of Phoenix, officially attributed to parachute flares dropped by A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft from the Maryland Air National Guard during training exercises over the Barry M. Goldwater Range. Arizona Governor Fife Symington III, who witnessed the leading formation from his home, initially downplayed the reports but later affirmed seeing "an enormous and inexplicable craft of unknown origin" that exhibited structured symmetry inconsistent with flares or conventional aircraft. While skeptics propose the initial lights resulted from A-10 jets in loose formation during Operation Snowbird, eyewitness testimonies emphasize the object's solidity, silence, and scale, rendering the incident one of the largest and most corroborated unidentified aerial phenomena events in modern history, without a fully reconciling prosaic explanation.

The 1997 Incident

Timeline and Locations

The sightings associated with the Phoenix Lights commenced on March 13, 1997, in the early evening hours near the Nevada-Arizona border, with initial reports from areas including Henderson, Nevada, around 7:30-8:00 PM MST describing a chevron-shaped formation of lights approaching from the northwest. These observations progressed southward along a roughly 300-mile corridor, reaching Prescott and Paulden, Arizona, by approximately 8:00 PM, where witnesses noted the formation's steady movement. By 8:00-8:40 PM, the lights were visible over the Phoenix metropolitan area, spanning multiple suburbs and drawing reports from civilians and pilots alike. The primary formation continued its trajectory, appearing over Tucson, Arizona, between 8:30 and 9:00 PM, before sightings extended into the Mexican state of Sonora by around 10:00 PM, marking the southern extent of the event's geographic spread. Distinct from this transit was a secondary cluster of stationary lights reported specifically over Phoenix after 9:15 PM, observed until approximately 10:30 PM, involving thousands of witnesses across the affected cities. The overall sequence covered a north-to-south path without reported deviations, encompassing reports from over 700 individuals in structured compilations of eyewitness accounts.

Eyewitness Descriptions

Eyewitnesses across reported observing a V- or boomerang-shaped array of 5 to 7 amber or orange lights traversing the sky in formation on the evening of , 1997. These accounts emphasized the object's slow, steady progression without accompanying engine noise, turbulence, or exhaust signatures, with lights maintaining fixed positions relative to one another. Lynne Kitei, among those in the area, described a mile-wide V-shaped formation of glowing orbs gliding silently overhead. Multiple ground-based observers noted the formation's apparent solidity, as it occluded stars in its path, delineating a dark, triangular or carpenter's square silhouette against the rather than appearing as isolated . Size estimates varied but commonly exceeded a mile in width, with some likening it to the span of several jumbo jets, observed from locations including Paulden, Prescott Valley, and . A former in Paulden reported 4-5 red-orange lights in tight passing silently at low altitude. The primary sighting typically lasted 3 to 5 minutes in central , though durations extended to 15 minutes farther south near Tucson, with the object moving at perceived speeds slower than conventional , around 200-300 mph based on and transit observations. No heat or sonic disturbances were reported, and some witnesses in elevated positions, including near air traffic vantage points, corroborated the silent, low-noise profile from multiple angles.

Photographic and Video Evidence

Amateur video footage recorded by Phoenix resident Krzyston on the evening of March 13, 1997, captured a linear array of five to seven stationary lights moving in a V-shaped formation across the sky at an estimated altitude of several thousand feet. The recording, typical of mid-1990s , suffered from low frame rates, poor low-light sensitivity, and handheld shake, resulting in blurred edges and indistinct separation between lights. Similar videos from other Phoenix-area observers documented comparable light sequences, with durations ranging from 30 seconds to several minutes, showing no visible modulation in brightness or color during transit. Still photographs taken by witnesses, including some against the urban skyline, depicted the lights as points forming a outline, with exposure times limited to fractions of a second due to the formations' slow apparent speed of approximately 1-2 degrees per second. These images, developed from 35mm film or early cameras, lacked sufficient to reveal underlying dark masses or structural details amid the nighttime backdrop, constrained by the era's photographic absent specialized long-exposure or capabilities. No or radar returns were publicly documented correlating to the visual timings and trajectories in the Phoenix vicinity. Post-event digital enhancements, such as frame stabilization and applied to Krzyston's and analogous , preserved the lights' uniform spacing and lack of trailing artifacts, but failed to uncover propulsion signatures like blooms or vectored . The visuals empirically confine observations to luminous orbs in geometric , without resolvable evidence of interconnecting framework or aerodynamic features beyond the light array itself. Later Tucson-area videos from the same night showed a separate stationary cluster of lights descending and extinguishing sequentially, captured under comparable amateur conditions but distinct in motion from the northward-moving formations.

Official Responses and Investigations

Military and Government Statements

The U.S. initially denied involvement in the V-shaped formation of lights observed around 8:00–9:00 p.m. MST on March 13, 1997, with representatives from stating there was no unusual activity in the area at that time. No returns were reported for the formation by or civilian authorities, and subsequent inquiries yielded no attribution to U.S. operations. In contrast, the U.S. Air Force later attributed the subsequent stationary lights seen around 10:00 p.m. MST to illumination flares deployed during a training exercise. Specifically, slow-descending LUU-2B/B flares, dropped from approximately 10,000 feet by A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft of the Maryland Air National Guard's 104th Fighter Squadron as part of Operation Snowbird, were released over the Barry M. Goldwater Air Force Range south of Phoenix. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials reported no radar detections of unidentified objects corresponding to the sightings, and no alerts were issued, as the phenomena did not trigger threat protocols due to their non-aggressive trajectory and appearance. (NORAD) similarly noted no unidentified tracks warranting , consistent with the absence of signatures or hostile indicators.

Governor Fife Symington's Account and Actions

In June 1997, shortly after the March 13 incident, III convened a to address public concerns over the Phoenix Lights, during which his appeared dressed as an to lampoon the reports and reduce hysteria, a move Symington later attributed to his efforts to maintain calm amid ongoing state investigations into his dealings that would lead to his resignation later that year. Symington did not disclose his personal observation at the time, instead aligning with initial official dismissals of the sightings as non-threatening. On March 23, 2007, Symington publicly acknowledged witnessing the event firsthand from the balcony of his office, describing a V-shaped formation spanning approximately one mile, featuring five bright lights at its points that remained steady and did not flicker like flares, while the craft itself was silent, blocked out stars overhead, and proceeded slowly before accelerating at extraordinary speed beyond conventional capabilities. He characterized the phenomenon as "otherworldly" and explicitly rejected prosaic explanations such as military flares or planes, noting the object's immense scale, lack of noise, and maneuverability defied known . Symington's stance evolved into advocacy for official scrutiny, as evidenced by his moderation of a November 12, 2007, panel at the National Press Club discussing the incident's implications, and in a , 2014, where he reiterated the absence of any fitting conventional account for the craft's characteristics, urging of related military data to resolve lingering questions. He maintained that the event warranted serious inquiry due to its mass observation and his direct sensory evidence, positioning it as distinct from misidentifications.

Explanations and Hypotheses

Prosaic Interpretations

The lights observed later in the evening of March 13, 1997, have been attributed to LUU-2B/B illumination flares deployed during a Maryland Air National Guard training exercise over the Barry M. Goldwater Range south of . These flares, weighing approximately 30 pounds each and encased in three-foot canisters, were dropped in pairs from A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft at altitudes around 10,000 feet, descending slowly under parachutes while burning for several minutes to illuminate ground targets. The observed hovering and gradual descent matched the flares' behavior, as wind drift caused them to spread and appear against the dark sky, with videos capturing their ignition sequence and extinguishment patterns consistent with sequential deployment from multiple aircraft passes. Flight records from the exercise, involving A-10s returning from operations, corroborated the timing and location, with flares visible from due to their high luminosity and the range's proximity, approximately 40 miles southwest of the city. Similar flare drops over the same range in 2007 and 2008 produced identical misidentifications as unidentified lights by observers, demonstrating repeatable optical effects under low-light conditions where the flares' slow fall and ballooning ascent from heat mimic hovering craft. The earlier V-shaped formation sighted between approximately 8:00 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. aligns with a flight of from Davis-Monthan Air Force Base participating in Operation Snowbird, a winter training program for out-of-state units, flying in a loose or line-abreast formation toward Tucson. Navigation lights on the 's wingtips and possibly , viewed edge-on from below in the twilight sky, created the illusion of connected orbs spanning up to a mile wide, with the formation's slow apparent speed (estimated at 200-300 mph from ground perspective) resulting from high-altitude flight over 100 miles away. Optical illusions contributed to perceptions of solidity and uniform motion: autokinesis, where prolonged fixation on dim, unstabilized lights in darkness causes perceived drift or stationarity, combined with bending light paths over distance, could merge discrete points into a boomerang shape, especially under partial cloud cover scattering illumination. These prosaic elements, grounded in aircraft performance data and meteorological conditions ( at 10-15 knots from the southwest), provide causal mechanisms testable against trajectories and light persistence without invoking extraordinary phenomena.

Anomalous Interpretations

Anomalous interpretations of the Phoenix Lights focus on unresolved empirical features reported by multiple eyewitnesses on , 1997, including the object's estimated of one mile, its silent passage at low altitude without sonic booms, and the V-formation's apparent of stars as it traversed the sky from northwest to southeast. These characteristics deviate from expected signatures of known aerodynamic vehicles, such as engine noise or contrails, and lack corroboration from routine operations in the area that evening beyond later flare deployments. The hypothesis posits that the formation represented an advanced or crafts of origin, capable of systems enabling noiseless, controlled motion inconsistent with terrestrial or . This view draws on the scale exceeding any disclosed —witnesses likened it to a "mile-wide carpenter's square"—and parallels unresolved cases featuring similar silent, high-performance envelopes, though direct causal links remain speculative absent physical evidence. Alternative anomalous explanations invoke classified human technology, such as experimental blimps, drones, or exotic prototypes, potentially evading detection via or electronic countermeasures while maintaining formation integrity. Such systems could theoretically produce the observed silence and size, but the hypothesis struggles with the causal implausibility of authorizing overflights above major population centers like , risking of black projects. Proposals of natural atmospheric effects, including ionized formations or temperature inversions refracting distant lights into apparent structures, have been suggested to account for the visuals without mechanical origins. However, these lack documented precedents for coherent, mile-spanning V-shapes that maneuvered deliberately and blocked stellar backgrounds, as typically dissipates irregularly without sustained geometry.

Controversies and Critiques

Challenges to Conventional Explanations

Witness reports of the primary V-shaped lights on March 13, 1997, describe them maintaining a constant altitude without the gradual descent or sequential ignition observed in standard flare deployments, where parachute-suspended illuminators slowly drop while burning for 3-5 minutes before extinguishing. The lights instead traversed roughly 300 miles southeastward from near , to , in a controlled, steady progression inconsistent with the erratic, wind-influenced drift of passively falling . The formation's rigidity—lights holding exact spacing without fusing upon proximity, separating due to differential descent rates, or scattering as independent pyrotechnics would—poses a causal mismatch under basic , as flares lack propulsion to sustain such geometric integrity over extended durations and distances. Official attribution to A-10 Thunderbolt II flares emerged only in July 1997, over four months post-event, with no declassified tracks, flight manifests, or confirming aircraft positions aligned with the 8:00-8:30 p.m. MST timeline of the V-formation sightings from Paulden to . This temporal gap in disclosure, coupled with the conflation of the earlier V-event with a later 10:00 p.m. flare drop south of , leaves unresolved whether operational records fully account for the northward-to-southeast observed statewide. Ground-based angular size estimates, corroborated by multiple observers including then-Governor , placed the apparent span at 1-2 miles—comparable to several 747s end-to-end—precluding prosaic aircraft or clusters, which at visibility distances yielding such would exhibit measurable separation or rather than the reported solid occlusion of stars across the formation's breadth. , who viewed the object overhead from his vantage, described it as a "craft the size of many fields" gliding silently, incompatible with the engine roar and signatures of A-10 formations spaced to mimic mile-scale visuals without structural interconnectivity.

Witness Credibility and Mass Observation Dynamics

The Phoenix Lights sighting elicited reports from a demographically diverse array of observers, including commercial and private pilots, personnel, physicians, architects, and civilians across professional and socioeconomic backgrounds, as compiled in (NUFORC) submissions from the event. These accounts were not limited to enthusiasts or those predisposed to anomalous phenomena; multiple pilots, for instance, described encountering a large, silent V-formation while airborne, with one member corroborating a driver's of aircraft-like maneuvers by the lights to NUFORC. officers flooded local stations with contemporaneous reports, contributing to the event's documentation independent of later influence. In the 1997 context, prior to widespread and viral amplification, participants faced negligible incentives for fabrication, such as fame or financial gain, as smartphone recording was unavailable and public discourse on UFOs carried potential without reward. The scale of observation—estimated at several thousand witnesses spanning to —demonstrates convergent independent testimonies rather than collective hysteria or . NUFORC received dozens of detailed reports from technically oriented individuals, including those noting the formation's estimated mile-wide span and steady progression without erratic motion typical of misidentified . Archival coverage captured real-time viewer calls to television stations describing the lights' appearance, underscoring spontaneous, uncoordinated observations from disparate locations before any unified narrative emerged. This pattern aligns with dynamics where widespread visibility prompts parallel reporting absent priming effects, as evidenced by the lack of prior publicity for the sighting path. Critiques of prosaic explanations, such as illuminating flares from , highlight methodological flaws in retrospective simulations that overlook key empirical details from primary accounts. Witnesses consistently reported the primary formation's transit as acoustically silent, incompatible with the audible engine noise and flare deployment signatures of A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft involved in Operation Snowbird exercises. Furthermore, multiple observers described the lights occluding background stars, indicating a solid, contiguous structure per basic optical principles of light blockage, rather than spaced, flickering pyrotechnics that would not uniformly eclipse celestial points. Such discrepancies undermine reliance on hindsight recreations, which prioritize visual similarity over integrated sensory data like silence and geometric coherence reported in real time.

Cultural Impact and Legacy

Media Coverage and Public Reaction

The Phoenix Lights incident prompted an immediate surge in reports to local media outlets on March 13, 1997, with television stations such as those affiliated with and fielding hundreds of viewer calls describing V-shaped formations of lights silently traversing the sky. Amateur video footage captured by residents, including a V-formation over , was aired locally that night, fueling a regional frenzy of eyewitness accounts spanning from Tucson to . In contrast, national coverage adopted a more restrained tone, often deferring to initial statements attributing the later stationary lights to military flares dropped during a training exercise over the Barry M. Goldwater Range, which shaped early skeptical narratives despite discrepancies with witness descriptions of the earlier, mile-wide craft. A contemporaneous Rocky Mountain Poll conducted in 1997 estimated that approximately 10% of residents—potentially thousands—claimed to have witnessed the event, reflecting widespread local intrigue and persistence in anomalous interpretations amid official prosaic explanations. Public discourse highlighted tensions between mass observations and institutional dismissals, with many residents expressing frustration over perceived lack of transparency from authorities. Former Governor Fife Symington's 2007 public reversal, admitting he personally observed an "enormous and inexplicable craft" during the incident despite his initial 1997 mocking UFO claims with an aide in alien costume, further eroded confidence in government accounts and reignited media interest. This disclosure, covered by outlets including , amplified perceptions of official obfuscation, contributing to sustained skepticism among witnesses and observers. Interest persisted into the 2000s through online discussions, though empirical resolution remained elusive amid competing hypotheses. The Phoenix Lights (2005), directed by Lynne D. Kitei and based on her book documenting the event, compiles eyewitness interviews from March 13, 1997, alongside attempts to recreate the military's A-10 Thunderbolt II flare-drop explanation, which the film argues inadequately matches the reported stationary V-formation's size, silence, and uniform motion. James Fox's I Know What I Saw (2009) includes testimony from former Governor asserting the lights constituted massive, otherworldly craft rather than flares, and presents critiques of simulations by highlighting discrepancies such as the lights' lack of descent, erratic flare trajectories in tests, and absence of audible aircraft noise reported by observers. The Showtime docuseries UFO (2021), episode 1, revisits the incident via Symington's reiterated conviction of involvement, drawing on archival and recollections but offering no novel like corroboration or photometric analysis to challenge prosaic accounts. These productions, produced by filmmakers sympathetic to anomalous hypotheses, prioritize anecdotal testimonies over quantitative metrics such as calculations or multi-spectral imaging, potentially amplifying perceptual illusions common in low-light mass sightings while underemphasizing verifiable physics from USAF documentation.

References

  1. [1]
    Phoenix Lights explained: Everything to know about the legendary ...
    Jun 3, 2024 · The Phoenix Lights were two separate UFO sightings on the same night in March 1997 over Arizona. The first was a V-shaped formation of six to ...
  2. [2]
    Former Arizona Governor Now Admits Seeing UFO | The Real Story
    Fife Symington decides to set record straight on 10th anniversary of Famed “PHOENIX LIGHTS” incident.
  3. [3]
    Did You Know: Phoenix Lights Still Unexplainable Today - KJZZ
    Jun 12, 2015 · Sightings actually happened near the Nevada-Arizona border. A man said that in the early evening hours he saw a chevron-shaped object with six ...
  4. [4]
    Phoenix Lights UFO mystery 28 years later: What's the truth?
    Mar 13, 2024 · On March 13, 1997, thousands of witnesses reported seeing a series of mysterious lights forming a distinct V-shaped pattern in the night sky.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    The Phoenix Lights | NUFORC
    Aug 13, 1997 · A preliminary summary of perhaps the most dramatic UFO sighting that has been reported to the National UFO Reporting Center over the last 2-3 years.
  6. [6]
    Phoenix Lights witness still seeking answers decades later
    Jun 4, 2025 · On March 13, 1999, residents of Phoenix, Arizona, looked up to see orbs of light hovering over the city. The unexplained sighting had tens of ...Missing: eyewitness evidence
  7. [7]
    The Phoenix Lights - Mark Joseph Jochim
    Mar 13, 2019 · Witnesses claim to have observed a huge carpenter's square-shaped UFO, containing five spherical lights or possibly light-emitting engines. Fife ...
  8. [8]
    Phoenix Mystery Lights
    Eyewitnesses claim lights seen and recorded in the skies over Phoenix are UFOs. Read more about this mystery and watch the case now.
  9. [9]
    Why didn't anyone photograph the Phoenix lights? - Quora
    Jul 15, 2021 · There are no known images taken by equipment designed for scientific analysis, nor are there any known images taken using high-powered optics or ...What interesting details have been uncovered about the “Phoenix ...What is the Phoenix Lights phenomenon? What are your thoughts ...More results from www.quora.com
  10. [10]
    The Alien Invasion of Phoenix, Arizona - Skeptoid Podcast
    Apr 26, 2007 · Much has been made of a ham-handed spectral analysis of Phoenix Lights photographs and videos by prominent UFO advocate Jim Dilletoso, whose ...
  11. [11]
    Phoenix Lights Footage Stabilized : r/videos - Reddit
    Feb 18, 2020 · Any time I see light formations like this they seem like a drone swarm. But this was back in 1997. Perhaps they were super experimental drones?
  12. [12]
    The Phoenix Lights - Plane & Pilot Magazine
    Sep 20, 2022 · The most popular and intriguing explanation to emerge is that the lights were emitted by extraterrestrial spacecraft.
  13. [13]
    Military now says flares may be cause of mysterious Arizona lights
    Jul 25, 1997 · It turns out visiting jets from the Maryland Air National Guard were using high-intensity flares over a bombing range south of Phoenix the ...
  14. [14]
    Air Traffic Controllers Who Saw UFO Muzzled by FAA
    Apr 22, 2008 · Gregor confirmed that “several” air traffic controllers in the tower saw the staggered formation of mysterious lights moving in the sky, ...Missing: NORAD | Show results with:NORAD<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Former Ariz. governor boosts UFO claims - NBC News
    Mar 23, 2007 · Former Arizona Gov. Fife Symington, who trotted out an aide dressed as an alien 10 years ago to spoof the frenzy surrounding mysterious lights in the Phoenix ...
  16. [16]
    WORTH NOTING: Former Gov Saw 'UFO' - Stateline.org
    Mar 30, 2007 · Symington, then governor, publicly dismissed reports of UFO sightings at the time and even staged a press conference with his top aide dressed ...
  17. [17]
    Symington: I saw a UFO in the Arizona sky - CNN.com
    Nov 9, 2007 · Former Arizona Governor Fife Symington will be moderating a November 12 event at the National Press Club where he will discuss the Phoenix Lights incident.Missing: statement | Show results with:statement
  18. [18]
    Former Arizona Governor's Close Encounter With UFO - ABC News
    Mar 30, 2007 · "It was moving real slow, and I went in and jokingly said to my wife, 'We have a UFO coming over,'" Bob Nelson, a Phoenix eyewitness, said.Missing: statement | Show results with:statement
  19. [19]
    What was the 'Phoenix Lights' incident of 1997? - NewsNation
    May 10, 2025 · Arizona physician Dr. Lynne Kitei was one of many to witness the famed “Phoenix Lights” incident on March 13, 1997.
  20. [20]
    Former Arizona Governor Fife Symington on witnessing the Phoenix ...
    May 8, 2014 · While many people think the Phoenix Lights have a mundane explanation, former Arizona Governor Fife Symington is not among them.Missing: statement | Show results with:statement
  21. [21]
    On this day: 25 years ago, the Phoenix Lights were seen over ...
    Mar 13, 2022 · The U.S. Air Force explained the exercise as utilizing slow-falling, long-burning LUU-2B/B illumination flares dropped by a flight of four A-10 ...
  22. [22]
    The Phoenix Lights: 28 years later, the mystery endures
    Mar 13, 2025 · ... A-10 aircraft flying in a chevron formation, followed by military flares. And sometimes, he adds, people may just be seeing the planet Venus ...
  23. [23]
    The Phoenix Lights Phenomenon: An Unsolved UFO Mystery
    May 14, 2024 · The first occurrence – between approximately 7.30pm and 8.45pm on March 13, 1997 – was observed as a massive, V-shaped object with five or six ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    20 years later: What were the Phoenix Lights? | 12news.com
    Mar 13, 2017 · Finally, Luke Air Force Base provided one: flares, dropped at high altitude. The questioned turned from what the lights were, to whether you ...
  25. [25]
    The Phoenix Lights – 2 Years Later | NUFORC
    Mar 13, 1999 · 9) The witnesses who reported their sightings of the object over northern Arizona and Phoenix include architects, physicians, law enforcement ...
  26. [26]
    the phoenix lights - RISEUP PARANORMAL
    By now literally thousands of people were witnessing the scene with many snapping still photographs and others capturing the event on video cameras. The lights ...
  27. [27]
    Seeking genuine evidence regarding the 1997 Phoenix lights. - Reddit
    May 16, 2021 · On March 13, 1997 thousands of Arizona residents witnessed a Large Unidentified Flying Objects moving across the Night Sky. High profile ...Need help finding video that explains Phoenix Lights : r/skepticWhat were The Phoenix Lights? : r/UnresolvedMysteries - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  28. [28]
    Mysterious Phoenix Lights a UFO Hoax | Live Science
    Apr 23, 2008 · The evidence is overwhelming that the Phoenix Lights were indeed a hoax. Let's consider the facts. 1) The formation of the lights is consistent with ...Missing: autokinesis refraction
  29. [29]
    Phoenix UFO Mystery Solved: What Were Those Lights? - ABC News
    In 1997, bright flare-like lights were seen in the night sky, causing a surge of UFO reports. It was soon revealed that high-intensity flares had been dropped ...
  30. [30]
    The Phoenix Lights (2005) - IMDb
    Rating 6.5/10 (268) Celebrating the historic and still unexplained Arizona mass sighting of 1997 this critically acclaimed and internationally award winning Documentary is based ...
  31. [31]
    The Phoenix Lights - Top Documentary Films
    Rating 8/10 (36) The Phoenix Lights (sometimes referred to as the lights over Phoenix) were a series of widely sighted optical phenomena (generally unidentified flying objects)
  32. [32]
    I Know What I Saw - Top Documentary Films
    I Know What I Saw is a documentary guaranteed to change the way we see the universe. Director James Fox assembled the most credible UFO witnesses from around ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Showtime 'UFO' Phoenix Lights True Story - Esquire
    Aug 8, 2021 · The Phoenix Lights refers to a pair of UFO sightings in Arizona in 1997. The infamous incident anchors the first episode of the docuseries.
  35. [35]
    'UFO' docuseries reopens case of 1997 Phoenix Lights - SYFY
    Aug 2, 2021 · The first episode of the docuseries takes a compelling deep dive into one of the best-known UFO sightings in the United States.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact