Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Planetary migration

Planetary migration is the process by which a planet's orbit around its host star changes over time, primarily due to gravitational interactions with the protoplanetary disk of gas and dust from which the planet formed.^[1] This phenomenon can cause planets to move inward toward the star, outward to larger orbits, or exhibit more complex trajectories, fundamentally shaping the architecture of planetary systems.^[2] In low-mass cases, migration occurs through tidal torques that exchange angular momentum between the planet and the disk, while higher-mass planets may carve gaps in the disk, altering the interaction dynamics.^[1] The theoretical foundation for planetary migration was established in the late 1970s through studies of disk-planet gravitational interactions, with key contributions from Goldreich and Tremaine (1979) and Lin and Papaloizou (1979), who described how density waves in the disk could drive orbital changes. Interest surged in 1995 with the discovery of the hot Jupiter 51 Pegasi b, a gas giant orbiting unexpectedly close to its star, which suggested that migration must play a central role in forming such close-in exoplanets rather than in situ formation. Subsequent observations of diverse exoplanet architectures, including resonant chains and circumbinary systems, have provided indirect evidence for migration processes. Migration is classified into distinct types based on planet mass and disk properties. Type I migration affects low-mass planets (up to a few Earth masses) that do not open gaps in the disk; it is driven by Lindblad and corotation torques and typically results in rapid inward drift on timescales of 10^4 to 10^6 years, though outward migration is possible under certain disk conditions like entropy gradients. Type II migration involves more massive planets (roughly Saturn-mass or larger) that create gaps, migrating at the disk's viscous evolution rate, which is slower and can be inward or outward depending on the disk's surface density profile. Type III migration, a rarer runaway process, occurs for intermediate-mass planets in low-viscosity disks, leading to rapid orbital shifts over just tens of orbits. Factors such as disk viscosity, temperature, turbulence, and magnetic fields significantly influence migration direction and speed.^[2] In the Solar System, planetary migration is evidenced by the orbital configurations of the giant planets and the structure of the Kuiper Belt. The Grand Tack model posits that Jupiter migrated inward to about 1.5 AU before reversing outward due to interactions with the gas disk and Saturn, reshaping the asteroid belt and influencing terrestrial planet formation. Similarly, the Nice model describes an instability among the outer giant planets around 4 billion years ago, causing Neptune to migrate outward and scatter trans-Neptunian objects into resonant populations like the Plutinos, consistent with meteoritic evidence of outer Solar System material in inner system regolith breccias.^[3] For exoplanetary systems, migration explains the prevalence of hot Jupiters and compact multi-planet configurations observed by missions like Kepler, where planets often reside in mean-motion resonances indicative of disk-driven orbital adjustments. These processes highlight migration's role in determining planetary compositions, as inward-moving giants may accrete volatile-rich material, while outward migration can preserve super-Earths at stable distances.^[4] Overall, planetary migration remains a cornerstone of planet formation theory, with ongoing research addressing how disk evolution and planet-disk interactions lead to the observed diversity of worlds.^[2]

Overview

Definition and mechanisms

Planetary migration refers to the radial displacement of a planet's orbit after its formation, primarily driven by gravitational interactions with the surrounding protoplanetary disk material or other celestial bodies. This process can alter a planet's semi-major axis, typically resulting in inward migration toward the central star, though outward migration is possible under certain conditions. Such movements occur as planets exchange angular momentum with the disk, reshaping orbital configurations during the early stages of planetary system evolution. The significance of planetary migration lies in its role in explaining observed exoplanetary architectures, including the prevalence of hot Jupiters—gas giants orbiting perilously close to their host stars—and the diverse spacing of planets in multi-planet systems. It connects directly to formation paradigms like core accretion, where solid cores grow by accreting gas and solids, and pebble accretion, which emphasizes the role of centimeter-to-meter-sized particles in rapid core growth; migration influences whether planets remain in their birth regions or are transported elsewhere, affecting final system layouts. At its core, planetary migration is governed by gravitational torques arising from density waves excited in the protoplanetary disk by the planet's gravitational perturbations. These torques, denoted as \Gamma, represent the rate of angular momentum transfer to or from the planet, expressed as \Gamma = \frac{dL}{dt}, where L is the planet's angular momentum; positive torques lead to outward migration, while negative ones drive inward motion. The balance of these torques determines the net migration direction and speed. Migration timescales typically range from thousands to millions of years, often comparable to or shorter than the lifetime of the gas-rich protoplanetary disk, which dissipates over 1–10 million years due to accretion and photoevaporation processes. Inward migration predominates in gas-dominated disks, potentially transporting planets across vast radial distances before the disk clears.

Historical development

The theoretical foundations of planetary migration were laid in the late 1970s and early 1980s through pioneering work on gravitational interactions between orbiting bodies and gaseous disks. Peter Goldreich and Scott Tremaine developed the framework for understanding torques arising from density waves excited by a planet in a protoplanetary disk, initially motivated by satellite rings in the solar system but applicable to planet formation. These analytic models highlighted how differential Lindblad resonances could drive angular momentum exchange, leading to orbital changes, though early planet formation theories, such as those focused on planetesimal accretion, largely overlooked migration as a dominant process. Interest in planetary migration surged following the 1995 discovery of the hot Jupiter 51 Pegasi b, which challenged in situ formation models and prompted explanations involving inward migration from farther orbits. A key breakthrough came in 1997 when William Ward classified migration regimes into Type I, for low-mass planets below the gap-opening threshold, and Type II, for more massive planets locked to disk evolution after opening a gap. Building on this, the 2000s saw the introduction of Type III migration by François Masset and John Papaloizou for intermediate-mass planets, characterized by rapid, nonlinear co-orbital dynamics in low-viscosity disks. Influential contributions from Douglas Lin, Richard Nelson, and others integrated these ideas with exoplanet observations, emphasizing how migration shapes system architectures. Modern advancements from the 2010s onward shifted emphasis from purely analytic approaches to sophisticated numerical simulations, capturing complex disk physics like magnetorotational instability (MRI)-driven turbulence and dead zones where ionization is low. The FARGO code, introduced by Masset in 2000, revolutionized this field by enabling efficient two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of planet-disk interactions and torque calculations. These tools revealed how turbulence can alter torque balances and slow migration rates. Recent studies, including those by Masahiro Ogihara and collaborators in 2024, have highlighted outward migration possibilities in wind-driven disks, where magnetocentrifugal winds modify surface density profiles to reverse torque directions for low-mass planets. This evolution from linear theory to full simulations has provided critical insights into reconciling migration with observed exoplanet demographics.

Protoplanetary Disk Environments

Gas-dominated disks

Gas-dominated protoplanetary disks represent the early evolutionary stage of circumstellar disks around young stars, where gas constitutes the majority of the mass (typically 99% or more) and governs the dynamics, including the torques that induce planetary migration. These disks form from the gravitational collapse of molecular cloud cores and persist for several million years, providing the environment for planet formation and subsequent orbital evolution. Their physical properties, such as density and temperature gradients, create density waves and pressure gradients that interact with embedded protoplanets. The radial structure of gas-dominated disks features a surface density profile often parameterized as \Sigma(r) \propto r^{-p}, with p \approx 1 to $1.5, indicating a gradual decline in gas density outward from the central star; this form is derived from minimum-mass models benchmarked against solar system constraints. The temperature profile similarly decreases with radius as T(r) \propto r^{-q}, where q \approx 0.5, primarily due to heating from stellar irradiation on the disk's flared surface.^[5] Vertically, the disk maintains hydrostatic equilibrium, with the scale height H = c_s / \Omega, where c_s is the isothermal sound speed (c_s = \sqrt{kT / \mu m_H}, with k Boltzmann's constant, \mu the mean molecular weight, and m_H the hydrogen mass) and \Omega = \sqrt{GM_\star / r^3} the Keplerian frequency around a central star of mass M_\star. This results in H/r \propto r^{1/4} for the standard temperature profile, producing a geometrically thin but radially extended disk with aspect ratios H/r \sim 0.03 to $0.1 at 1 AU. Evolution of these disks is driven by viscous transport of angular momentum, leading to inward accretion onto the star and outward spreading of material. The minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN) model estimates a baseline disk mass of \sim 0.01 M_\sun, sufficient to form the observed planetary systems when assuming in situ formation and solar metallicity. Viscosity is commonly described using the \alpha-prescription, \nu = \alpha c_s H, with \alpha \sim [10^{-2}](/page/10+2) to $10^{-4}, capturing turbulent stresses without specifying their microscopic origin; this parameter governs the accretion rate \dot{M} \approx 3\pi \nu \Sigma. Disk lifetimes span 1 to 10 Myr, after which dispersal occurs primarily through photoevaporation by stellar far- and extreme-ultraviolet radiation, which creates ionized winds that erode the outer disk and eventually carve an inner hole. Key physical parameters include a gas surface density \Sigma \sim 1000 g cm^{-2} at 1 AU in MMSN-like models, though observational constraints suggest a broader range of 10 to 1000 g cm^{-2} depending on age and stellar mass, with total disk masses of 0.01 to 0.1 M_\sun. Turbulence within these disks arises from mechanisms such as the magneto-rotational instability (MRI) in regions with sufficient ionization, amplifying weak magnetic fields to drive angular momentum transport, or gravitational instability in massive, cold outer zones where the Toomre parameter Q < 1. Recent Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations from the 2020s have revealed prevalent ringed substructures and gaps in gas-dominated disks, such as in HL Tau and GW Lupi, attributed to dust trapping at pressure maxima potentially sculpted by forming planets or ice lines, which modulate local migration pathways.

Planetesimal-dominated disks

Planetesimals in protoplanetary disks primarily form through the streaming instability, a hydrodynamic process that concentrates dust particles into dense filaments, enabling gravitational collapse into kilometer-scale bodies.^[6] This mechanism operates in the midplane of gas-rich disks where aerodynamic drag couples solids to the gas, leading to clumping when the particle concentration exceeds a critical threshold of about 1-2 times the gas density.^[6] The resulting planetesimals exhibit a size distribution spanning from meter-sized pebbles to several kilometers in diameter, with the upper end determined by the balance between gravitational binding and tidal shear from the central star.^[7] In planetesimal-dominated environments, typical surface densities range from 1 to 10 g/cm², reflecting the solid mass fraction after gas dispersal or in depleted outer disk regions.^[8] Eccentricities and inclinations of these bodies are initially low but can be excited by mutual gravitational interactions; however, damping occurs through dynamical friction from smaller particles and inelastic collisions, maintaining relatively flat and circular orbits on average.^[9] The dynamics of planetesimal-dominated disks are governed by gravitational scattering among bodies, which randomizes orbits and drives angular momentum exchange, alongside dynamical friction that preferentially slows massive planets embedded within the swarm.^[9] Scattering events increase eccentricities and inclinations of smaller planetesimals while transferring momentum to larger ones, potentially inducing inward or outward migration depending on the mass gradient.^[9] The characteristic two-body relaxation timescale, over which velocities diffuse significantly, scales as t_\mathrm{relax} \sim \sqrt{N} \, P_\mathrm{orb}, where N is the number of planetesimals and P_\mathrm{orb} is the orbital period; this timescale governs the rate of orbital stirring and is typically shorter in denser inner disks.^[10] In collisionless regimes, these processes lead to a Maxwellian velocity distribution after several relaxation times, with the disk evolving toward equipartition of kinetic energy among particles of different masses.^[11] Following gas dispersal, planetesimal-dominated disks evolve over 10-100 Myr, during which accretion, scattering, and erosion shape the architecture of planetary systems in the absence of hydrodynamic torques.^[12] Ice lines, marking transitions in volatile condensation (e.g., water at ~2.5 AU), influence composition by directing planetesimal flux and altering scattering efficiencies as bodies cross these boundaries.^[13] Residual pebble flux from inner regions can seed additional growth if hybrid gas remnants persist, but primarily, the disk's evolution is driven by planetesimal interactions that clear gaps and implant material across radial zones.^[13] Recent high-resolution N-body simulations from 2024 have refined models of planetesimal drag on giant planets, updating earlier frameworks by Ida and Lin to include self-gravity and realistic size distributions, revealing that massive cores can experience prolonged inward migration before stalling due to disk depletion.^[14] These studies demonstrate that drag forces scale with the planetesimal mass interior to the planet's orbit, enabling quantitative predictions for post-formation orbital rearrangements in systems like the outer Solar System.^[14]

Disk-Driven Migration

Type I migration

Type I migration describes the orbital evolution of low-mass planets embedded in a gaseous protoplanetary disk, where the planet's mass is insufficient to open a gap in the disk structure. This regime applies to planets with masses m_p < m_{\rm gap} \sim (H/r)^3 M_\star, where H/r is the disk aspect ratio, typically around 0.05 at 1 AU, yielding m_{\rm gap} \approx 40 M_\oplus for solar-mass stars and corresponding to Earth-mass planets or super-Earths at that distance.^[15] In this limit, the planet does not substantially perturb the disk's global density profile, allowing linear perturbation theory to approximate the gravitational interactions.^[16] The primary torques arise from asymmetric gravitational interactions between the planet and the disk gas. One-sided Lindblad torques, excited at the inner and outer Lindblad resonances, are negative and drive inward migration because the inner disk material, orbiting faster, exerts a greater torque than the outer material.^[16] The corotation torque, originating from material in horseshoe orbits around the planet, can be positive under certain disk conditions, particularly when the surface density vortensity gradient (related to the density slope) is negative, potentially slowing or reversing migration.^[17] In the isothermal, three-dimensional case, the net torque is given by

\Gamma_{\rm I} \approx -(1.36 + 0.54 \alpha + 0.5 \beta) \left( \frac{m_p}{M_\star} \right) \left( \frac{\Sigma r^2}{H^2} \right) \left( \frac{G M_\star}{r} \right) r^2 \Omega,

where \alpha is the power-law index of the surface density profile (\Sigma \propto r^{-\alpha}), \beta is the temperature slope index, \Sigma is the surface density, H is the scale height, and \Omega is the orbital frequency.^[16] This formula captures the balance of Lindblad and linear corotation contributions, with the negative sign indicating predominantly inward migration for standard disk profiles (\alpha \approx 1.5, \beta \approx 0.5). The migration rate follows from the torque via the change in the planet's specific angular momentum, yielding

\frac{da}{dt} = \frac{2 \Gamma_{\rm I}}{m_p \sqrt{G M_\star / a}},

where a is the semi-major axis; for an Earth-mass planet at 1 AU in a minimum-mass solar nebula-like disk, this results in inward rates of approximately 10–100 m/yr.^[18] The corotation torque's horseshoe drag component, which dominates for partially nonlinear interactions, arises from the adiabatic compression and rarefaction of gas librating through the planet's horseshoe region, with strength scaling as \Gamma_{\rm HS} \propto (3/2 - \partial \ln \Sigma / \partial \ln r) \Sigma r^4 \Omega^2 (r_H / r)^4, where r_H is the planet's Hill radius; this can partially offset Lindblad torques if the disk density decreases outward.^[17] Modifications to the basic picture include three-dimensional effects, which reduce the torque magnitude compared to two-dimensional approximations due to vertical averaging of perturbations, often leading to slower migration rates by a factor of ~2–3.^[16] Disk-planet interactions also damp the planet's eccentricity on timescales \tau_e \approx (H/r)^2 \tau_a, where \tau_a is the migration timescale, typically maintaining low eccentricities (<0.01) for low-mass planets.^[18] Recent studies highlight the role of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in protoplanetary disks, where stochastic density fluctuations induce chaotic, time-variable torques that disrupt classical Type I migration, leading to highly stochastic behavior for Earth-mass planets.^[19]

Type II migration

Type II migration occurs in the regime where a planet's mass m_p exceeds the gap-opening threshold m_\mathrm{gap}, typically for Jovian-mass planets or more massive ones embedded in gaseous protoplanetary disks.^[20] Gap formation requires satisfying both thermal and viscous criteria: thermally, the planet must be sufficiently massive such that its Hill radius exceeds a significant fraction of the disk scale height H, roughly m_p / M_\star \gtrsim (H/r)^3; viscously, the torque exerted by the planet must overcome the disk's viscous spreading, approximated as m_p / M_\star \gtrsim 50 \alpha (H/r)^5, where \alpha is the Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity parameter, M_\star is the stellar mass, and r is the orbital radius.^[21] Once opened, the gap width scales approximately as \Delta \sim r (m_p / M_\star)^{1/2} (H/r)^{-5/2}, reflecting the balance between gravitational torques and disk pressure support in the nonlinear regime. In this regime, the planet's migration is governed by torque balance, where the one-sided Lindblad torques from the disk on the planet are counteracted by the viscous torque transporting angular momentum across the gap.^[20] The net migration rate is then determined by the disk's viscous evolution, yielding

\frac{da}{dt} \approx -\frac{3}{2} \frac{\nu}{r^2} \left( \frac{r}{H} \right)^2 \frac{\Sigma r^2}{m_p} r,

where \nu = \alpha c_s H is the kinematic viscosity, c_s is the sound speed, \Sigma is the disk surface density, and a is the semi-major axis.^[22] This rate arises because the planet effectively "locks" to the gap, migrating inward as disk material accretes viscously onto the central star, with the planet's motion coupled to the net mass flow through the gap.^[23] Dynamically, Type II migration proceeds at rates slower than Type I, typically on the order of 1–10 m/yr for standard disk parameters, due to the barrier imposed by the gap, which reduces direct torque exchange with the disk gas.^[22] The migration is inherently asymmetric, driven by imbalances in disk mass accretion from inner and outer regions, causing the planet to follow the disk's global evolution rather than undergoing rapid radial drift.^[23] Hydrodynamic simulations have revealed that partial gaps—formed by planets near the threshold mass—lead to hybrid migration rates intermediate between Type I and classical Type II, with torques modulated by vortex formation at gap edges and radiative cooling effects. These findings suggest Type II processes play a key role in shaping resonant chains of super-Earths by halting inward migration of inner planets once outer ones open gaps, preserving compact architectures observed in exoplanet systems. As of 2025, radiation hydrodynamics simulations further indicate that efficient gap opening can halt super-Earth migration, supporting the formation of resonant configurations.^[24]^[25]

Type III migration

Type III migration represents a rapid, nonlinear regime of planetary migration applicable to massive protoplanets with masses ranging from approximately 10 to 100 Earth masses embedded in protoplanetary disks containing substantial co-orbital material, such as gas or planetesimals. In this regime, the planet partially opens a gap but does not fully clear its co-orbital zone, leading to unstable dynamics in the horseshoe regions where material librates around the planet's orbit. This instability causes a pile-up or depletion of co-orbital material, creating an asymmetric distribution that exerts unbalanced gravitational forces on the planet. Unlike slower migration modes, Type III is characterized by a runaway feedback mechanism where the planet's motion amplifies the imbalance, potentially leading to extremely fast orbital changes over short timescales.^[26]^[27] The primary mechanism driving Type III migration is the asymmetric torque generated by the uneven co-orbital mass distribution, which dominates over standard Lindblad and corotation torques. As the planet begins to migrate, material in the co-orbital region is unevenly accreted or scattered, resulting in a net torque that accelerates the planet's drift. This torque arises from the imbalance in the horseshoe regions and can be approximated as

\Delta \Gamma \approx \left( \frac{\Delta M_{\rm co}}{m_p} \right) \Gamma_{\rm hs},

where \Delta M_{\rm co} is the co-orbital mass imbalance, m_p is the planet's mass, and \Gamma_{\rm hs} is the baseline horseshoe torque. The direction of migration—either inward or outward—depends on the initial conditions and disk properties, with the possibility of reversal if the co-orbital pile-up shifts. Migration speeds in this regime are dramatically enhanced, reaching 10 to 100 times those of Type II migration, up to several AU per million years, enabling a planet to traverse significant portions of the disk in mere thousands of orbital periods. This rapid pace is sustained by a positive feedback loop, where faster migration exacerbates the co-orbital asymmetry, further boosting the torque.^[28] Numerical simulations first revealed Type III migration in the early 2000s, with seminal work demonstrating its occurrence through global hydrodynamic models of Jupiter-mass planets in viscous disks. These studies highlighted the role of co-orbital gas flows in triggering the runaway phase, showing how the planet's Hill sphere interacts with streaming material to build the necessary imbalance. More recent investigations, including three-dimensional simulations from the late 2000s, have refined these findings by exploring convergence and the influence of disk viscosity on migration direction and rate. Although less emphasized in current literature, explorations of solid co-orbital planetesimals versus gaseous material suggest that planetesimal-driven imbalances may produce more erratic trajectories, with potential relevance to transitional disks where hybrid gas-dust environments could sustain partial gaps conducive to this regime.^[26]^[29]

Nongaseous Migration Mechanisms

Gravitational scattering

Gravitational scattering refers to the dynamical process in multi-planet systems where close encounters between bodies lead to significant alterations in their orbital velocities through two-body or multi-body gravitational interactions. These encounters impart velocity kicks that change the specific energy of the orbits, resulting in modifications to the semi-major axis. Over multiple such events, this process induces a random walk or diffusion in the semi-major axis, akin to dynamical relaxation in N-body systems, where the orbital elements evolve stochastically without the presence of a gaseous disk. This mechanism is particularly relevant in sparse or unstable planetary configurations, such as those following the dispersal of a protoplanetary disk. The characteristic rate of semi-major axis change from these scatterings can be estimated for systems of equal-mass planets as

\frac{da}{dt} \sim \left( \frac{G m_p}{v_\mathrm{rel} \, a} \right) N_\mathrm{enc},

where G is the gravitational constant, m_p is the planet mass, v_\mathrm{rel} is the relative encounter velocity, a is the semi-major axis, and N_\mathrm{enc} is the number of close encounters per unit time. This rate reflects the cumulative effect of velocity perturbations, with \Delta v \sim G m_p / (b v_\mathrm{rel}) for impact parameter b, leading to \Delta a / a \sim 2 (\Delta v / v_\mathrm{orb}) per encounter, where v_\mathrm{orb} is the orbital velocity. For massive perturbers, the net migration tends to be outward due to asymmetric scattering outcomes favoring energy gain in surviving orbits. In velocity space, these interactions produce scattering cones, defining the range of possible post-encounter velocities centered on the pre-encounter direction, which facilitates the excitation of eccentricities alongside semi-major axis diffusion. This mechanism has been applied to explain instabilities in the early Solar System, where mutual scatterings among giant planets rearranged their orbits, capturing planetesimals into resonant configurations. Recent N-body simulations using the REBOUND code, exploring multi-planet instabilities, reveal stochastic jumps in semi-major axis of approximately 0.1–1 AU over timescales of $10^8–$10^9 years, highlighting the chaotic nature of these events in shaping final architectures.

Planetesimal-driven migration

Planetesimal-driven migration refers to the organized radial drift of planets induced by asymmetric gravitational interactions with a surrounding disk of planetesimals, primarily through gravitational drag resulting from an eccentricity gradient in the planetesimal population. This process is closely analogous to dynamical friction in stellar systems, where the planet experiences a net torque due to the imbalance in scattering from planetesimals on co-rotating and counter-rotating orbits. The torque on the planet can be approximated as

\Gamma_p \approx - \frac{4\pi G^2 m_p^2 \Sigma_p}{v_\mathrm{rel}} \ln \Lambda,

where m_p is the planet's mass, \Sigma_p is the surface density of planetesimals, v_\mathrm{rel} is the relative velocity between the planet and planetesimals, G is the gravitational constant, and \ln \Lambda is the Coulomb logarithm accounting for the range of encounter impact parameters.^[30] The direction of migration depends on the eccentricity distribution of the planetesimals: inward migration dominates for low-eccentricity swarms, as the inner disk provides stronger drag due to higher encounter rates, while outward migration can occur if the planetesimals are dynamically excited to higher eccentricities, leading to a reversal in torque asymmetry. For a Jupiter-mass planet interacting with a massive planetesimal disk (e.g., 20–50 Earth masses), typical migration rates range from 0.01 to 0.1 AU/Myr (equivalent to approximately 1.5 × 10^6 to 1.5 × 10^7 m/yr), sufficient to traverse several astronomical units over tens of millions of years.^[30] This mechanism operates predominantly in the post-gas phase of protoplanetary disk evolution, after the dissipation of the nebular gas, when planetesimals dominate the disk dynamics and can drive significant orbital changes in growing protoplanets. In systems with residual low-density gas, aerodynamical drag on smaller planetesimals can further modulate their orbits, enhancing the eccentricity gradient and amplifying the torque on embedded planets, though gravitational interactions remain the primary driver.^[31]^[30] Recent models from 2021 to 2024 have advanced understanding by integrating planetesimal-driven migration with oligarchic growth phases, where protoplanets grow through accretion while undergoing radial diffusion due to unbalanced torques from scattered planetesimals. These simulations demonstrate that migration rates accelerate during oligarchic stages as protoplanet masses increase, enabling significant inward or outward excursions that reshape the inner disk. For instance, 2024 N-body simulations show even small protoplanets can actively migrate via planetesimal scattering. Such dynamics play a crucial role in terrestrial planet delivery by transporting volatile-rich planetesimals from outer regions into the habitable zone, facilitating the accretion of water and organics onto Earth-like worlds while explaining isotopic similarities in Solar System bodies.^[32]^[14]^[33]

Secular perturbations and resonances

Secular perturbations arise from the long-term, averaged gravitational interactions between planets, excluding short-period terms, and are crucial for understanding the evolution of orbital eccentricities and inclinations in planetary systems. The Laplace-Lagrange theory provides a linear approximation to these perturbations for small eccentricities and inclinations, decomposing the planetary orbits into a set of eigenmodes with uniform precession frequencies g_i. These frequencies are derived from the secular part of the disturbing function, which expands the gravitational potential in Laplace coefficients and yields the rates at which pericenters precess due to mutual interactions. In this framework, the eccentricity vector of each planet evolves as a linear combination of these modes, with the proper eccentricities and inclinations oscillating at frequencies determined by the differences in g_i. For coplanar systems, the theory predicts bounded evolution unless secular resonances occur, where a planet's free precession frequency aligns with another g_i, leading to amplified eccentricities over long timescales. This approximation holds well for the outer Solar System planets, where eccentricities remain below 0.1, but breaks down for higher values or close-in configurations.^[34] Resonant perturbations, in contrast, involve periodic terms in the disturbing function that become dominant near mean-motion resonances (MMRs), where the orbital periods of two bodies are commensurable. The dynamics near a first-order MMR can be modeled using the pendulum approximation, treating the resonant argument as an angle in a pendulum equation, which exhibits libration within a separatrix bounded by circulation. The libration width in semi-major axis, \Delta a / a, scales as \sim (m_\mathrm{pert} / M_\star)^{2/3}, where m_\mathrm{pert} is the perturbing planet's mass and M_\star is the central star's mass, reflecting the resonance strength for low eccentricities. This width determines the capture probability during migration and the stability against perturbations. During the protoplanetary disk phase, disk-planet interactions can pump eccentricities through secular torques, particularly in gas-rich environments where Lindblad resonances transfer angular momentum unevenly, exciting pericenter precession and leading to eccentricity growth rates of order \dot{e} \sim e (m_p / M_\star) (\Sigma_p a_p^2 / M_\star)^{1/2} \Omega_p \Sigma_p / M_\star, though damping from other disk processes often limits net growth. In planetesimal-driven migration, scattering events further excite eccentricities, but secular evolution averages these to produce gradual pumping aligned with precession modes. Adiabatic invariants, such as the action integrals over libration cycles in resonances, preserve the resonant configuration during slow migration, ensuring that chains of planets maintain approximate commensurabilities as the disk dissipates.^[35]^[36]^[37] Recent advances combine analytic secular models with numerical simulations to explore multi-resonant chains, such as in the TRAPPIST-1 system, where seven planets form overlapping MMRs likely sculpted by disk migration. These hybrid approaches reveal how initial eccentricities and migration rates influence the final spacing, with analytic estimates of libration amplitudes matching N-body results to within 10% for low-mass planets, providing constraints on disk properties like surface density profiles.^[38]

Tidal and Secular Effects

Tidal migration

Tidal migration refers to the radial drift of a planet's orbit due to gravitational interactions that raise tidal bulges on the star or the planet itself, with dissipation in these bulges producing a net torque that alters the orbital angular momentum. The primary mechanism involves the planet inducing a tidal bulge on the star, which lags behind the line connecting the two bodies due to the star's finite response time, resulting in a torque that typically transfers angular momentum from the orbit to the star's spin. This process is distinct from disk-driven migration, as it operates in the absence of a protoplanetary disk and persists over long timescales after disk dispersal. The magnitude of the tidal torque \Gamma_\text{tide} from tides raised on the star is approximated by

\Gamma_\text{tide} \approx \frac{3}{2} \frac{k_2}{Q} \left( \frac{M_p}{M_\star} \right)^2 \frac{R_\star^5}{a^6} \frac{G M_\star^2}{R_\star} \operatorname{sign}(\Omega_\star - n),

where k_2 is the star's quadrupolar Love number measuring tidal deformability, Q is the tidal quality factor characterizing dissipation efficiency, M_p and M_\star are the planet and star masses, R_\star is the stellar radius, a is the semi-major axis, G is the gravitational constant, \Omega_\star is the stellar spin angular velocity, and n = \sqrt{G M_\star / a^3} is the mean orbital motion.^[39] This torque leads to orbital evolution via \dot{a}/a = 2 \Gamma_\text{tide} / (M_p \sqrt{G M_\star a}), causing inward or outward migration depending on the sign term. For close-in planets like hot Jupiters, where the orbital period is shorter than the stellar rotation period (n > \Omega_\star), the torque drives inward migration, shrinking the orbit as angular momentum is transferred to the star's spin. Conversely, if the body raising the tide spins faster than the orbital motion, the torque can drive outward migration, though this is rare for close-in exoplanets and more relevant for systems where the planet's spin exceeds n. In the Solar System, tides raised on the Sun by Earth produce a weak inward torque, but the effect is negligible over the system's age. Migration timescales vary inversely with the torque strength, scaling as \tau_a \propto a^{13/2} Q / (k_2 M_p^2 R_\star^4). For the Earth-Sun system, the timescale for significant orbital decay due to stellar tides is on the order of $10^9 years or longer, reflecting the small planet mass and large separation. For gas giant planets like hot Jupiters, with larger masses and smaller a, timescales shorten to $10^7--$10^9 years, enabling substantial inward drift from initial orbits of \sim 0.05 AU to current positions in \sim 5 Gyr. Recent tidal models have incorporated more realistic physics, such as frequency-dependent dissipation in planetary oceans and interactions with residual disk material, improving predictions for migration rates in diverse systems.^[40] For instance, ocean tides on asynchronously rotating planets orbiting low-mass stars can enhance dissipation by orders of magnitude compared to Earth-like cases, potentially accelerating migration for habitable-zone worlds.^[40] These updates emphasize the role of internal structure in modulating k_2/Q values, with implications for interpreting observed close-in exoplanet architectures.

Kozai-Lidov cycles with tidal friction

The Kozai-Lidov mechanism arises from quadrupolar secular perturbations induced by a distant companion, such as a binary star or an outer planet, on an inclined planetary orbit, leading to coupled oscillations in eccentricity e and inclination i relative to the companion's orbital plane. These cycles occur over timescales of approximately $10^3 to $10^5 years for typical exoplanetary systems with semi-major axes around 1 au and outer companions at tens of au. During each cycle, the eccentricity reaches a maximum value given by e_{\max} \approx \sqrt{1 - \frac{5}{3} \cos^2 i}, where i > 39.2^\circ is required for oscillations to commence, while the argument of pericenter librates around $90^\circ or $270^\circ. This periodic excitation contrasts with steady tidal migration by amplifying tidal effects intermittently through high-eccentricity phases. Tidal friction within the planet, primarily from turbulent convection in its convective envelope, plays a crucial role by damping the eccentricity most effectively at pericenter passages when the planet approaches its host star closely. This damping extracts angular momentum, causing the semi-major axis to decay at an averaged rate \frac{da}{dt} \propto -\frac{e^2}{(1 - e^2)^{13/2}}, where the strong dependence on e ensures rapid inward migration during eccentricity peaks. Over multiple cycles, the combined action of secular perturbations and tides results in a net inward spiral, with the orbit gradually circularizing as e decreases and i increases to conserve angular momentum.^[41] This process builds on the basic tidal interactions described in isolated systems but is uniquely driven by the inclination-dependent amplification from the distant perturber. The outcomes of these cycles often produce close-in planets on low-eccentricity, low-inclination orbits, particularly explaining the formation of some hot Jupiters that originate from wider, highly inclined configurations around 1–5 au. For instance, the mechanism can account for observed spin-orbit misalignments in systems like WASP-12b, where the planet's orbit is tilted relative to the stellar equator.^[41] In stellar binaries, steady-state population studies show that this migration efficiently populates short-period orbits while depleting intermediate separations, consistent with exoplanet demographics.^[41] Recent investigations in 2025 have extended the model to include octupole-level perturbations, known as the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (ZLK) effect, which introduce chaotic variations in the cycles and enable the formation of double hot Jupiter systems through asymmetric eccentricity excitation.^[42] Additionally, studies incorporating protoplanetary disk damping have shown that gas drag can suppress or modify early-stage Kozai-Lidov oscillations, potentially reducing migration efficiency in young systems while allowing tidal friction to dominate later.^[43] These refinements highlight the mechanism's sensitivity to higher-order effects and environmental influences.

Resonance Dynamics

Resonance capture processes

Resonance capture refers to the process by which two planets become locked into a mean-motion resonance (MMR) during convergent orbital migration, where the outer planet migrates inward relative to the inner one or vice versa. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in protoplanetary disks, where disk torques drive differential migration. For capture to occur, the migration must be adiabatic, meaning the rate is slow enough that the system evolves through many libration cycles of the resonance without crossing it abruptly. Under these conditions, the probability of capture into a first-order MMR approaches unity for low-eccentricity orbits in convergent scenarios.^[44] The critical migration velocity delineating adiabatic from non-adiabatic regimes scales approximately as v_{\rm crit} \sim \left( \frac{m_{\rm pert}}{M_{\star}} \right) v_{\rm Kep}, where m_{\rm pert} is the mass of the perturbing planet, M_{\star} is the stellar mass, and v_{\rm Kep} is the local Keplerian velocity; migration slower than this threshold ensures capture, while faster rates lead to resonance passage without trapping.^[45] Post-capture, the planets' resonant angles librate around stable fixed points, with the resonance width expanding as eccentricities grow due to continued migration. However, without dissipative mechanisms like disk torques or tidal friction to damp these eccentricities, the resonance may become unstable and break, as eccentricity excitation can push orbits beyond the resonance separatrix. Overlapping resonances, such as in closely spaced MMRs, can introduce chaos, potentially resulting in orbital instability.^[44] Key factors influencing capture include the migration speed relative to the resonance libration timescale, which must be much shorter than the migration time across the resonance width for adiabaticity. First-order MMRs (e.g., 3:2 or 2:1) facilitate capture more readily than higher-order ones due to stronger resonant torques and wider separatrices. Recent hydrodynamic and N-body simulations (2022–2025) have elucidated sequential capture processes, showing how migrating planet pairs or chains form stable MMR configurations during type I disk migration, with disk surface density and planet mass playing dominant roles in determining chain length and resonance indices. For instance, these models demonstrate the formation of resonant pairs in systems undergoing gradual inward migration.^[44]

Outcomes in multiplanet systems

In multiplanet systems, planetary migration often leads to the formation of resonant chains, where planets become trapped in mean-motion resonances such as 3:2 or more complex configurations like 4:2:1. These chains arise from convergent migration driven by disk-planet interactions, resulting in tightly packed architectures that enhance long-term stability. For instance, the Kepler-223 system exhibits a chain of four sub-Neptune planets in a 4:3:2:1 resonance, maintained through ongoing librations of resonant angles. Such configurations are common in compact systems, with observed resonant pairs comprising about 30% of multiplanet exoplanets detected by transit surveys. The dynamical stability of these resonant chains depends on the orbital spacing between planets, typically requiring normalized separations Δa / a ≳ several times (m_p / M_star)^{1/3}, scaled by the mutual Hill radius to prevent close encounters and ejections. This criterion ensures that planets remain separated by at least 5–10 Hill radii on average, avoiding chaotic overlaps in mean-motion resonances. In resonant setups, the chains act as "trains" during continued migration, with inner planets pulling outer ones inward while preserving commensurabilities. However, these trains can break due to dynamical instabilities like planet-planet scattering or tidal dissipation in the dissipating protoplanetary disk, leading to period ratios clustered just outside nominal mean-motion resonances (e.g., slightly above 2:1 or 3:2). Simulations show that such disruptions occur in up to 50% of migrating systems, sculpting diverse architectures from initially uniform chains.^[24] These outcomes have significant implications for system architectures, particularly in compact multiplanet setups like those observed in Kepler data, where migration fosters resilient, coplanar configurations resistant to external perturbations. Resonant migration also plays a role in positioning terrestrial planets within habitable zones by inward transport of outer material, potentially delivering volatiles while maintaining dynamical stability. Recent statistical analyses of period ratio distributions from transit surveys reveal migration-sculpted gaps, with resonant piles and depleted zones indicating chain formation and partial disruptions in young systems. These patterns underscore how migration shapes the observed diversity of close-in multiplanet systems.^[46]

Observational Evidence and Applications

Migration in the Solar System

The Grand Tack model posits that Jupiter underwent Type II migration in the gaseous protoplanetary disk, initially forming at approximately 3.5 AU from the Sun before migrating inward to about 1.5 AU and then reversing direction to migrate outward to roughly 5 AU, a process driven by interactions with the disk that sculpted the inner Solar System.^[47] This inward-then-outward trajectory depleted the planetesimal population between 1 and 3 AU, truncating the asteroid belt and preventing excessive growth of terrestrial planets in that region.^[47] The model's implications extend to the terrestrial planets, particularly explaining Mars' anomalously small mass—about 10% of Earth's—by demonstrating how Jupiter's passage cleared much of the solid material available for accretion beyond 1 AU, leaving insufficient mass for Mars to grow larger while allowing Earth and Venus to form from a repopulated but limited inner disk.^[47] Simulations incorporating this migration reproduce Mars' low mass and the observed compositional dichotomy in meteorites, with distinct inner and outer Solar System reservoirs mixed by Jupiter's motion, as non-carbonaceous chondrites (inner) and carbonaceous chondrites (outer) show a clear separation.^[47] In contrast, the Nice model addresses the later dynamical evolution of the giant planets, proposing an orbital instability approximately 4 billion years ago when the planets, initially in a compact configuration beyond 5 AU, underwent scattering and capture into mutual resonances, such as the 2:1 resonance between Jupiter and Saturn, which rearranged their orbits to near-current positions.^[48] This instability, triggered by interactions with a massive planetesimal disk, dynamically excited the outer Solar System and explaining the sharp "Kuiper cliff" at around 30 AU where trans-Neptunian object densities drop abruptly due to resonant clearing and scattering.^[48] Supporting evidence for the Nice model includes analyses of enstatite chondrites, which indicate that the giant planet instability occurred more than 60 million years after Solar System formation, as thermochronometry shows late implantation of outer Solar System material into the asteroid belt consistent with scattering during the event.^[49] Recent refinements, informed by Cassini spacecraft data, have linked the instability timing to estimates of Saturn's rings' age, previously thought to be less than 400 million years based on pollution rates, implying possible formation or restructuring post-instability from debris during giant planet rearrangements; however, as of 2024, alternative models suggest the rings could be significantly older, up to several billion years.^[50]^[51]

Migration signatures in exoplanet populations

Observational evidence for planetary migration is prominently featured in the demographics of hot Jupiters, which are gas giants with orbital periods less than about 3 days and occur around approximately 1% of Sun-like stars.^[52] These planets are thought to form at larger separations and migrate inward either through interactions with the protoplanetary disk or via high-eccentricity channels involving Kozai-Lidov cycles combined with tidal friction. A key signature of this migration is the anomalous inflation of their radii, where many hot Jupiters exhibit radii 20-30% larger than expected from stellar irradiation alone, attributed to residual heat deposited during the inward journey that enhances atmospheric heating and reduces opacity. In the realm of smaller planets, the radius valley among super-Earths and mini-Neptunes provides another clear indicator of migration's role in sculpting exoplanet populations. This gap in the radius distribution, centered around 1.8 Earth radii, separates rocky super-Earths (typically ~1.4 Earth radii) from gaseous mini-Neptunes (~2.4 Earth radii) and arises from inward gas-driven migration that brings planets close to their stars, where subsequent atmospheric loss—often core-powered by formation heat—strips primordial envelopes from lower-mass cores, halting further mass loss and preserving the dichotomy.^[53] Models incorporating migration followed by giant impacts or variable mass loss efficiency best reproduce this feature, with photoevaporation playing a secondary role compared to internal heating mechanisms.^[54] Architectural features in multiplanet systems further reveal migration signatures through statistical distributions of orbital periods and spin alignments. Kepler and TESS data show a peaked distribution of period ratios for adjacent planets, with a notable excess near the 3:2 mean-motion resonance, particularly in younger systems where up to 70% of close-in pairs exhibit ratios within a few percent of this value, suggesting convergent disk migration that captures planets into resonances before disk dispersal disrupts some chains. Additionally, observations of retrograde stellar spins, as in the K2-290 system where the host star's obliquity reaches 124 degrees relative to coplanar planets, indicate misaligned migration driven by external companions, leading to chaotic spin evolution and backward rotation in a small but detectable fraction of systems. Recent surveys from Kepler, K2, and TESS between 2020 and 2025 have refined these statistics, revealing that resonant architectures decline with age—from 86% incidence in systems younger than 100 million years to about 23% in mature ones—consistent with post-migration dynamical instabilities. Complementary James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) direct imaging from 2024-2025 has uncovered gaps in transitional protoplanetary disks, such as asymmetric structures and substructures interpreted as planet-induced torques during ongoing migration, providing snapshots of the process in action around young stars. Despite these advances, challenges persist in confirming certain migration aspects, including sparse evidence for outward (backward) migration, which theoretical models predict in regions of positive torques but remains difficult to detect observationally due to overlapping inward signatures and limited resolution in disk imaging. Open questions also surround the efficiency of migration mechanisms, such as the fraction of planets that survive resonant capture without ejection and the precise role of disk viscosity in halting inward drift, necessitating further multiwavelength observations to resolve these uncertainties.^[55]

References

[1]
[1804.10578] Planetary Migration in Protoplanetary Disks - arXiv
Apr 27, 2018 · In this review we focus on how disk-planet interactions drive the migration of planets when different assumptions are made about the physics of angular ...
[2]
[1203.3294] Recent developments in planet migration theory - arXiv
Mar 15, 2012 · Abstract:Planetary migration is the process by which a forming planet undergoes a drift of its semi-major axis caused by the tidal ...
[3]
Outer Solar System Material in Inner Solar System Regolith Breccias
Jul 22, 2018 · Giant planetary migration triggered by the instability dispersed a disk of primordial TNOs and created a number of small body reservoirs (e.g. ...
[4]
[2002.05756] Planet formation: key mechanisms and global models
Feb 13, 2020 · This review comes in two parts. The first part presents a detailed description of six key mechanisms of planet formation.
[5]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..368C/abstract
[6]
Streaming Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks - IOPscience
Interpenetrating streams of solids and gas in a Keplerian disk produce a local, linear instability. The two components mutually interact via aerodynamic drag.
[7]
The Mass and Size Distribution of Planetesimals Formed by the ...
We use streaming instability simulations that include particle self-gravity to study how the planetesimal initial mass function depends on the radial pressure ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Mass Distribution and Planet Formation in the Solar Nebula
We derive a surface density profile that is well approximated by the power law Σ(r) = 343(fp/0.5)-1(r/10 AU)-2.168 g cm-2, where fp is the fraction of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
Long-lived planetesimal discs - Oxford Academic
We investigate the survival of planetesimal discs over Gyr time-scales ... This feature appears to arise because the relaxation time trelax (equation ...INTRODUCTION · A SIMPLE MODEL FOR A... · DYNAMICAL PROCESSES IN...
[10]
Migration of giant planets in planetesimal discs - Oxford Academic
In this case also, the protoplanet migrates inwards, but on a time-scale even smaller than that of type II drift (Ward 1997). This is called type I drift.
[11]
On the Dynamics of the Inclination Instability - IOPscience
... disk as a function of time in units of orbital period. ... 3. Two-body relaxation. In a near-Keplerian system, the two-body relaxation time is given by.
[12]
Giant Planet Formation and Migration | Space Science Reviews
Jan 24, 2018 · The resulting migration is usually referred to as Type I migration (Ward 1997). ... Type I migration, and giant planets undergo Type II migration.
[13]
Challenges in planet formation - Morbidelli - 2016 - AGU Journals
Oct 31, 2016 · 3 How Did the First Planetesimals Form? The solid building blocks of planets are a trace component within gas-dominated protoplanetary disks.3 How Did The First... · 4 How Fast, And In What... · 5 What Is The Origin Of The...<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
body simulation of Planetesimal-Driven Migration I. The trajectories ...
May 12, 2024 · In this first paper (Paper I), we investigate the migration of a single planet through PDM within the framework of the classical standard disk model.
[15]
On the width and shape of gaps in protoplanetary disks - arXiv
Nov 2, 2005 · We provide a gap opening criterion that simultaneously involves the planet mass, the disk viscosity and the aspect ratio.
[16]
Three-Dimensional Interaction between a Planet and an Isothermal ...
In the present paper we mainly examine the torque on a planet and the resultant radial migration of the planet. A planet excites density waves at Lindblad and ...Missing: Type | Show results with:Type
[17]
torque formula for non-isothermal type I planetary migration
... torque formula for isothermal discs (Tanaka, Takeuchi & Ward 2002). This formula has been confirmed by fully non-linear, isothermal, hydrodynamical ...
[18]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1184.pdf
[19]
[2311.15747] Chaotic Type I Migration in Turbulent Discs - arXiv
Nov 27, 2023 · We demonstrate that elevated levels of turbulence induce highly stochastic migration torques on low-mass companions embedded in these discs.
[20]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...309..846L/abstract
[21]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Icar..181..587C/abstract
[22]
Toward a new paradigm for Type II migration
Results. We confirm that the migration rate of a gap-opening planet is indeed proportional to the disk's viscosity, but is not equal to the gas drift speed in ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[23]
Radial Migration of Gap-opening Planets in Protoplanetary Disks. I ...
Jul 13, 2018 · It is expected that in the ideal case, a gap-opening planet migrates at the viscous drift speed, which is referred to as type II migration.
[24]
Breaking the chains: hot super-Earth systems from migration and ...
Thus, for simplicity we have neglected effects of type-II migration in our simulations. Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of disc–star interaction suggest ...
[25]
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/542/3/1685/7692595
[26]
Numerical simulations of type III planetary migration - Oxford Academic
The horseshoe region becomes asymmetric and a gas flow across the co-orbital region develops, its streamlines connecting the inner and outer disc (we will refer ...
[27]
[PDF] PLANET–DISK INTERACTIONS
This means that for a planet to be in the type III migration regime it needs to significantly deplete its co-orbital region. Also, since the co-orbital mass ...
[28]
Numerical simulations of type III planetary migration - Oxford Academic
Abstract. We present a numerical study of rapid, so-called type III migration for Jupiter-sized planets embedded in a protoplanetary disc. We limit ourselv.
[29]
MIGRATION RATES OF PLANETS DUE TO SCATTERING OF ...
When the planet is small, the resulting migration from the gravitational interaction with the gas is known as Type-I (Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Ward 1986).
[30]
PLANET–PLANET SCATTERING IN PLANETESIMAL DISKS. II ...
Planetesimal-driven planetary migration can also provide plausible explanations for otherwise puzzling features of the solar system such as the large ...
[31]
[PDF] Dynamical evolution of planetary systems - HAL
For a system of giant planets, planetesimal-driven migration is relevant only after the disap- pearance of the gas. The reason is that the gas contains ...
[32]
The Role of Early Giant-planet Instability in Terrestrial ... - IOP Science
Jan 6, 2021 · The Role of Early Giant-planet Instability in Terrestrial Planet Formation. David Nesvorný, Fernando V. Roig, and Rogerio Deienno. Published ...
[33]
[PDF] The Disturbing Function
In this chapter, we show how these deviations can be calculated by defining and analysing the disturbing function.
[34]
Eccentricity evolution during planet–disc interaction - Oxford Academic
In our interpretation, at late times the planet eccentricity can increase more in low-mass discs rather than in high-mass discs, contrary to previous claims in ...Abstract · INTRODUCTION · INTERPRETATION IN THE... · CONCLUSIONS
[35]
[PDF] Planetary migration in a planetesimal disk: why did Neptune stop at ...
We study planetary migration in a gas-free disk of planetesimals. In the case of our Solar System we show that Neptune could have had either a damped.
[36]
Constructing the secular architecture of the solar system
As discussed in Sect. 2.1, they would not increase during the subsequent migration of the planets because they behave as adiabatic invariants. Even worse ...
[37]
Composition constraints of the TRAPPIST-1 planets from their ...
We study the formation of the TRAPPIST-1 (T1) planets starting shortly after Moon-sized bodies form just exterior to the ice line.
[38]
Influence of stellar structure, evolution, and rotation on the tidal ...
In the theory, for the quadrupolar term, Q always appears in the combination Q′≡ (3∕2)(Q∕k2), where k2 is the staticLove number of the star that measures its ...
[39]
Ocean Tides on Asynchronously Rotating Planets Orbiting Low ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Our results suggest that ocean tides on eccentric planets orbiting low-mass stars are orders of magnitude more powerful than those on Earth and ...Missing: migration disk
[40]
STEADY-STATE PLANET MIGRATION BY THE KOZAI–LIDOV ...
ABSTRACT. We study the steady-state orbital distributions of giant planets migrating through the combination of the Kozai–Lidov (KL) mechanism due to a stellar ...
[41]
The Formation of Double Hot Jupiter Systems through von Zeipel ...
Jun 10, 2025 · We investigate the ZLK mechanism with tidal friction as a potential mechanism to produce double hot Jupiter systems in stellar binaries.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[42]
the influence of a gas-rich accretion disc on hierarchical triples ...
The binary experiences both eccentricity excitation via the von Zeipel–Lidov–Kozai (ZLK) effect and drag forces from each time it penetrates the disc. We find ...
[43]
Mean motion resonance capture in the context of type I migration
If the planet becomes more massive than a few tens of Earth masses, it will open a gap within the protoplanetary disk, slowing or even halting the migration ( ...
[44]
Reducing the probability of capture into resonance - Oxford Academic
Resonances can capture particles in slowly varying dynamical systems. For example, a planet migrating outward can trap planetesimals in resonances exterior to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/365/4/1367/993573
[46]
Resonant Chains and the Convergent Migration of Planets in ...
The analytic criterion is applied to the Kepler-60, Kepler-80, Kepler-223, TOI-178, and TRAPPIST-1 systems. Due to the variation of planetary masses within the ...
[47]
A low mass for Mars from Jupiter's early gas-driven migration - Nature
Jun 5, 2011 · Walsh, K., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. et al. A low mass for Mars from Jupiter's early gas-driven migration. Nature 475, 206–209 (2011).
[48]
Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the ... - Nature
May 26, 2005 · Here we show that a planetary system with initial quasi-circular, coplanar orbits would have evolved to the current orbital configuration.
[49]
Dating the Solar System's giant planet orbital instability ... - Science
Apr 16, 2024 · We use meteorite data to show that the implantation occurred >60 million years (Myr) after the Solar System began to form.
[50]
Evidence That the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters around Sun-like ...
Oct 25, 2023 · We find evidence that the NPPS of hot Jupiters (orbital period P = 1–10 days) decreases roughly in the latter half of the main sequence.Abstract · Introduction · Sample Description · Planet Occurrence Rates...<|separator|>
[51]
The Exoplanet Radius Valley from Gas-driven Planet Migration and ...
Nov 2, 2022 · One model proposes that super-Earths are the outcome of photoevaporation or core-powered mass loss stripping the primordial atmospheres of the ...
[52]
The Exoplanet Radius Valley from Gas-driven Planet Migration and ...
Oct 11, 2022 · One model proposes that super-Earths are the outcome of photo-evaporation or core-powered mass-loss stripping the primordial atmospheres of the ...
[53]
Migration Traps as the Root Cause of the Kepler Dichotomy
Sep 27, 2022 · We propose an alternative explanation for the apparent Kepler dichotomy in which migration traps during formation lead to fewer planets within the Kepler ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges