Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pregaming

Pregaming, also known as pre-drinking or pre-loading, is the practice of consuming alcohol in private settings, such as one's home, prior to attending social events like parties or bars where alcohol is served but often more expensive.^[1] This behavior allows participants to achieve higher levels of intoxication at lower cost, bypassing venue pricing, but frequently results in heavier episodic drinking without the moderating influences present in licensed establishments.^[2] Among young adults, particularly college students, pregaming is highly prevalent, with over 40% reporting it in the past month and approximately two-thirds of drinkers engaging in it at least once during that period.^[3]^[1] Motives include cost-saving, enhancing social confidence, and amplifying enjoyment at the subsequent event, though empirical studies link it to elevated risks such as alcohol poisoning, polysubstance use, physical injuries, and sexual misconduct due to unchecked consumption volumes.^[4]^[5]^[6] Despite its economic rationale rooted in market disincentives for on-site drinking, pregaming empirically correlates with more severe negative consequences than equivalent alcohol intake in supervised venues, highlighting causal pathways from reduced oversight to heightened harm.^[2]^[3]

Definition and Motivations

Core Definition

Pregaming, also known as pre-drinking, pre-loading, or pre-partying, refers to the intentional consumption of alcohol prior to attending a social event or gathering, often at a private location such as a residence, with the aim of achieving partial intoxication before arriving at the primary venue.^[7]^[1] This practice typically involves heavier episodic drinking compared to on-site consumption, as participants seek to minimize expenditures at commercial establishments where alcohol prices are elevated or access is regulated.^[8] The term "pregaming" derives from the preposition "pre-" combined with "gaming," originally linked to preparatory drinking during tailgating at sports events, but has broadened to encompass pre-event alcohol intake across various social contexts.^[9] In scholarly contexts, pregaming is distinguished from casual home drinking by its anticipatory nature, targeting an "anticipated event" such as a party, bar outing, or concert, where additional alcohol may be available but is often cost-prohibitive or limited.^[10] This definition emphasizes the strategic aspect, where individuals or groups consume larger quantities—frequently exceeding standard drink limits—in a controlled environment to enhance sociability, reduce financial outlay, or circumvent venue-specific restrictions like age checks or cover charges.^[3] The Oxford English Dictionary records the noun form "pregaming" emerging in the early 2000s, with initial documented use in 2004 among U.S. college populations, reflecting its roots in youth-oriented social rituals.^[11]

Primary Motivations and Rationales

The primary motivations for pregaming, particularly among college students and young adults, revolve around economic efficiency, enhanced intoxication upon arrival at social events, and social facilitation. Individuals often cite the substantial cost savings of consuming alcohol at home or in private settings compared to commercial venues, where markups can exceed 300-500% on drinks; for instance, a 2010 study of U.S. college students found saving money to be a leading rationale, endorsed by a significant portion of participants pregaming before bar outings.^[12]^[13] This financial incentive is amplified by limited disposable income among younger demographics, making pregaming a pragmatic strategy to extend budgets for extended evenings out.^[13] A second key rationale is the desire to arrive at events already intoxicated or "buzzed," allowing for quicker escalation of effects in controlled environments and avoidance of initial sobriety in high-stimulation settings. Empirical data from Canadian undergraduates indicate that showing up to parties or social events partially intoxicated ranks as the most prevalent motive, often tied to "fun/intoxication" orientations that prioritize rapid mood elevation.^[14]^[15] This approach leverages the lower marginal cost and higher alcohol concentration of home-mixed drinks, enabling participants to bypass slower, more diluted consumption at bars.^[13] Social and interpersonal factors also drive pregaming, including group bonding in relaxed pre-event gatherings and using alcohol as a lubricant for subsequent interactions. Research highlights motives such as catching up with friends in low-pressure settings or preparing mentally for larger crowds, with pregaming serving as a ritual to build camaraderie before transitioning to public venues.^[16] For underage individuals, pregaming circumvents legal access barriers, though this is secondary to broader enhancement goals in most samples.^[12] These rationales reflect causal dynamics where pregaming optimizes resource allocation and experiential outcomes, though they correlate with elevated overall consumption risks.^[1]^[17]

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Analogues

In ancient civilizations, alcohol frequently played a role in preparatory rituals leading into public festivals or communal gatherings, facilitating social cohesion and psychological preparation rather than economic savings. Archaeological evidence indicates that fermented beverages were consumed in domestic or semi-private settings prior to larger events, as seen in Mesopotamian and Egyptian practices where beer served both daily sustenance and ritual prelude to celebrations honoring deities or harvests, with production dating back to approximately 7000 BCE in the Near East.^[18] Similarly, in classical Greece (circa 5th-4th centuries BCE), wine—a ubiquitous household staple diluted for everyday use—was routinely imbibed by commoners in private homes, often as a precursor to symposia or public festivals like the Dionysia, where it helped establish a state of mild euphoria conducive to participatory revelry. This pattern reflects causal links between alcohol's disinhibiting effects and enhanced group dynamics, though documentation emphasizes integration with the event rather than isolation as "pre-" consumption.^[19] Medieval European households (roughly 5th-15th centuries CE) paralleled these habits through widespread production and intake of weak ale or small beer, averaging about 1-2 pints daily per adult for hydration in water-scarce environments, before venturing to markets, fairs, or alehouses for structured socializing. Such home-brewed drinks, safer than untreated water due to boiling in fermentation, provided a foundational mild intoxication that could amplify subsequent public imbibing, as taverns focused more on camaraderie than primary supply. Unlike modern pregaming, these practices stemmed from necessity and cultural embedding rather than venue pricing disparities, with limited textual evidence of deliberate "pre-loading" to circumvent costs, given ale's affordability via home or local production.^[20]^[21]

Emergence in Contemporary Culture

The practice of pregaming emerged in the United States during the 1990s, evolving from tailgating traditions—where fans consumed alcohol in parking lots before sporting events, a custom traceable to early 20th-century college football gatherings—into a broader ritual of home-based drinking prior to nightlife or social events. This expansion coincided with economic incentives, as rising bar prices and cover charges made on-site consumption costlier, prompting groups, particularly college students, to pre-consume cheaper alcohol at private residences to achieve desired intoxication levels more affordably.^[22]^[23] The term "pregaming" derives etymologically from these pre-sporting event rituals, with the verb form "to pregame" first documented in 2004, reflecting its assimilation into vernacular descriptions of strategic alcohol intake before parties or bars. This development was amplified by the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, which uniformly set the legal drinking age at 21 nationwide, inadvertently fostering pregaming among young adults aged 19–20 who sought to circumvent age restrictions or high venue costs by initiating consumption off-premises.^[24]^[23] By the mid-2000s, pregaming had solidified as a normative element of contemporary youth culture, especially on college campuses, where empirical studies began documenting its role in escalating overall alcohol intake and associated risks like binge drinking. Initial research, such as surveys of undergraduates, revealed pregaming's ties to social enhancement motives, with participants often engaging in rapid consumption via games or shots to build group cohesion and confidence for subsequent outings.^[25]^[22]

Prevalence and Patterns

Demographic Trends

Pregaming is most prevalent among young adults aged 18 to 25, particularly college students, where past-month rates exceed 40% overall and reach 50% to 85% among drinkers.^[3] ^[8] In a sample of 18- to 25-year-olds, 66.2% reported pregaming at least once, accounting for 36.7% of drinking days, with 87.8% of participants enrolled in college.^[1] College attendees show higher engagement than same-age non-students, correlating with elevated binge drinking.^[10] Prevalence increases from high school to college, with high school pregaming linked to older students (mean age 16.1) and frequent participation in drinking games or parties.^[26] Among adolescents, males pregame more often than females, with stronger ties to hazardous use (AUDIT scores of 8.77 versus 4.92 for non-pregamers).^[26] Gender patterns persist into young adulthood, where males consume more pre-drinks on average (e.g., 9.8 standard units in UK youth samples versus 7.4 for females) and favor beer, while females average fewer drinks and prefer wine or vodka.^[27] ^[10] No significant sex-based moderation appears in associations between pregaming and alcohol consequences among young adults.^[1] Older demographics engage less intensely, with Baby Boomers and Gen X averaging about one pre-drink compared to higher volumes in younger groups, though pre-drinking occurs across ages for social meetups.^[10] ^[28] Fraternity members and those without college degrees report higher negative experiences from pregaming, suggesting subgroup variations within education levels.^[10] Cross-sectional data dominate, with limited evidence of shifting demographic patterns over time.^[1]

Statistical Data and Variations

Among U.S. college students, pregaming prevalence exceeds 40% in the past month, with rates reaching up to 66.7% among current alcohol users in specific cohorts such as male undergraduates.^[3]^[29] Among drinkers overall, 41% report pregaming involving heavy episodic drinking (defined as 4+ drinks for women or 5+ for men in a short period), occurring on approximately 15% of drinking days and 38% of pregaming occasions.^[2] Frequency among regular pregamers typically ranges from 3 to 4 instances per month.^[30] Demographic variations show elevated rates among certain subgroups; for instance, Latina/o emerging adults exhibit higher pregaming engagement compared to other ethnic minorities, potentially linked to acculturation factors.^[31] Sexual and gender minority (SGM) college students report greater pregaming frequency and intensity than non-SGM peers, often tied to distinct motives like social enhancement.^[32] Athlete status also influences patterns, with in-season athletes displaying lower pregaming volumes but similar consequences to non-athletes, while overall student alcohol use hovers around 61.7%.^[33] Data remain predominantly U.S.-centric and self-reported from undergraduate samples, limiting generalizability to broader populations or international contexts where analogous practices may vary by cultural norms around alcohol access and pricing.^[8]

Typical Activities

Pregaming sessions typically involve small groups of friends gathering in private residences, such as apartments or dormitories, to consume alcohol before heading to bars, parties, or events. The core activity centers on drinking, with participants aiming for rapid intoxication through multiple servings of beer, liquor, or mixed drinks, often selected for affordability compared to venue prices.^[34]^[1] Men tend to favor beer, while women more commonly opt for hard alcohol, reflecting gendered consumption patterns observed in surveys of young adults.^[34] Beyond alcohol intake, participants frequently engage in social rituals to build camaraderie and accelerate drinking, such as playing organized games like flip cup, kings, or never have I ever, which structure consumption around rules that penalize slower drinkers with additional shots or sips.^[35]^[36] Background music, casual conversations, and light preparations—like selecting outfits or applying makeup—occur concurrently, though these serve secondary roles to the primary focus on preemptive inebriation.^[37] Some groups incorporate preparatory eating, such as carbohydrate-heavy snacks to mitigate later nausea, aligning with informal guidelines for sustaining intoxication without immediate impairment.^[37] These activities unfold over 1-2 hours, calibrated to achieve a moderate blood alcohol level upon arrival at the main event, thereby reducing perceived social inhibitions or venue costs. Empirical studies confirm pregaming's emphasis on group-based heavy episodic drinking, with average intakes exceeding four standard drinks per session among college participants.^[4]^[38]

Group Dynamics and Norms

Pregaming frequently takes place in small, same-gender groups among college students, facilitating shared alcohol consumption in private settings before transitioning to public venues.^[39] This composition aligns with patterns observed in U.S. surveys, where males and females report similar pregaming prevalence rates of 64%–98% in the past month, alongside comparable total alcohol intake per session, though males tend to consume drinks more rapidly, accelerating intoxication.^[39] Coed groups, when they occur, are associated with elevated consumption among females compared to same-sex settings, potentially due to social facilitation effects.^[40] Social norms within these groups emphasize conformity to perceived peer behaviors, with descriptive norms—beliefs about how frequently others pregame—strongly predicting individual participation. In a study of 198 college drinkers (92% of whom pregamed), higher perceived descriptive norms correlated with increased personal pregaming frequency (β = .34, p < .001), independent of factors like gender or injunctive norms approving the behavior.^[41] Stronger identification with peers' drinking habits further amplifies this effect (β = .25, p < .001), suggesting that group cohesion reinforces pregaming as a normative ritual for bonding, alleviating social anxiety, or enhancing event anticipation.^[41]^[39] These dynamics often involve implicit pressures to match group consumption levels, contributing to binge drinking patterns where participants aim for synchronized intoxication upon arrival at destinations. High-status subgroups, such as white, male, or affluent students, may leverage pregaming to signal dominance or social power, while lower-status individuals use it to elevate their standing, underscoring how norms intersect with status hierarchies to sustain the practice.^[39] Underreporting of intake in self-reports indicates potential norm-driven concealment within groups to normalize heavier drinking.^[39]

Economic Dimensions

Cost-Saving Benefits for Individuals

Pregaming enables individuals to minimize alcohol expenditures by consuming beverages purchased at retail prices prior to patronizing commercial venues, where markups significantly inflate costs per unit of alcohol. For example, a standard 1.5-ounce pour of liquor in a mixed drink typically retails for $1–2 when bought in bottles for home use, compared to $5–15 charged at bars after accounting for overhead, labor, and profit margins.^[42] This disparity arises from bars' standard pour costs of around 20%, meaning the liquor itself represents a small fraction of the final price, with the balance covering venue operations.^[42] Empirical studies consistently identify cost reduction as a principal motive for pregaming among young adults, particularly college students. In a 2010 analysis of U.S. undergraduates, saving money ranked among the top reasons for pre-drinking, alongside access for those under legal purchase age.^[12] Similarly, a review of pre-loading behaviors highlighted alcohol pricing as a primary driver, with participants opting for home consumption to achieve intoxication affordably before outings.^[43] Surveys of high school and college pregamers further corroborate this, noting that underage individuals pregame more frequently to circumvent bar costs.^[26] These savings extend nights out by conserving budgets for non-alcohol expenses such as entry fees, transportation, or food, without curtailing overall consumption. While some research suggests pregaming may correlate with higher total intake—and thus potential offsets through increased volume—the per-unit economics still yield net reductions for the pre-consumed portion, as home preparation avoids venue surcharges.^[16]^[44]

Impacts on Hospitality Industries

Pregaming shifts a portion of alcohol consumption from high-margin on-premise venues, such as bars and nightclubs, to lower-cost off-premise retail sources, thereby reducing expenditures on alcohol within hospitality establishments. Research consistently identifies cost-saving as a primary motive for pregaming, with participants reporting that drinks in licensed premises can cost several times more than equivalent retail purchases; for instance, one Australian study found 67% of pre-drinkers citing expense avoidance as a key driver.^[45] This substitution effect diminishes on-premise alcohol sales, which often account for 70-80% of bar revenues due to markups of 300-400% on liquor costs.^[46] Event-level analyses further reveal that while total alcohol intake may rise on pregaming nights—averaging 7.1 drinks compared to 4.2 on on-premise-only evenings—the pre-consumed volume (typically 2-4 standard drinks at home) displaces equivalent on-site purchases, leading to net revenue losses for venues.^[47] Pre-drinkers arrive with elevated blood alcohol concentrations (mean BAC of 0.071% in one Brisbane district study of over 2,700 patrons), prompting reduced further drinking, selection of cheaper non-alcoholic options, or refusal of service to avoid overserving liabilities, all of which compound the sales shortfall.^[45] Hospitality operators report this pattern erodes profitability, particularly in nightlife districts where fixed costs like staffing and licensing remain high despite lower per-patron spend.^[46] Although pregaming sustains venue foot traffic for ambiance, entertainment, or cover charges, the alcohol revenue gap prompts adaptive strategies like promotional pricing or bundled experiences, yet these often fail to fully offset the trend amid rising off-premise availability via supermarkets and delivery services.^[48] In regions with strict on-premise regulations, such as Australia and New Zealand, pre-drinking prevalence exceeds 70-80% among nightlife entrants, correlating with broader economic pressures on the sector, including venue closures and reduced employment in alcohol service roles.^[45] Empirical evidence counters claims of simple additionality, showing pre-drinking primarily supplements rather than replaces on-site intake only when total consumption escalates unchecked, but cost motives ensure persistent diversion.^[49]

Health and Behavioral Effects

Potential Upsides

Pregaming, the consumption of alcohol prior to attending a social event such as a bar or party, has been linked to self-reported increases in positive alcohol-related consequences among young adults, including enhanced enjoyment, relaxation, and sociability.^[1] In a daily diary study of 187 participants aged 18-30, those who pregamed reported 44% more positive consequences—such as feeling exhilarated or more social—on pregaming days compared to non-pregaming drinking days, an association that persisted even after controlling for total alcohol intake in multivariable models.^[1] Similarly, a 2013 analysis of college students found greater endorsement of positive consequences during weeks involving pregaming, independent of the number of drinks consumed.^[1] Participants in pregaming often describe it as a strategy to reduce initial inhibitions in a controlled, familiar setting, facilitating easier entry into larger social gatherings.^[22] Among U.S. college students, surveys indicate that pregaming promotes loosening up before events, making conversations and interactions more fluid once at the venue.^[22] This behavioral pattern aligns with motives for social enhancement, where moderate pre-event intake is perceived to boost confidence and group cohesion without immediate exposure to unfamiliar environments.^[50] For some demographics, such as female college students, pregaming serves to synchronize intoxication levels among peers, potentially mitigating risks associated with mismatched drinking paces in public nightlife settings.^[51] Qualitative accounts highlight its role in fostering a sense of preparedness and shared experience, contributing to perceived behavioral benefits like reduced social anxiety during transitions to high-stimulation venues.^[51] However, these upsides are subjective and context-dependent, with empirical data emphasizing experiential gains rather than objective reductions in harm.^[1]

Empirical Risks and Consequences

Pregaming is empirically associated with accelerated alcohol consumption, often involving 3–5 standard drinks within 1–2 hours prior to social events, which elevates blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) before participants engage in further drinking at the venue.^[3] This front-loading pattern contributes to high-intensity drinking, defined as 10 or more drinks per night, and distinguishes pregaming as one of the riskiest alcohol behaviors among young adults, particularly college students where over 40% report past-month participation.^[3] On average, pregaming days involve nearly double the alcohol intake of non-pregaming drinking days, with participants consuming 8.94 drinks versus 4.53 drinks.^[1] Negative consequences are more frequent on pregaming days, with studies reporting 25% higher incidence of adverse outcomes such as rude or aggressive behavior prior to adjustments for total alcohol volume.^[1] Specific harms include blackouts, passing out, regretted sexual activity, driving after drinking, and alcohol-related hospitalizations, often exacerbated by the combination of rapid initial intoxication and continued consumption.^[3] Longitudinal analyses indicate that pregaming frequency prospectively predicts heavier overall drinking patterns and persistent alcohol problems for up to one year.^[3] Behavioral risks extend to impulsivity-amplified outcomes, where pregaming potentiates associations between traits like negative urgency and daily-level problems such as hangovers or interpersonal conflicts.^[52] Among high school students, pregaming correlates with hazardous drinking levels and elevated intoxication, foreshadowing similar trajectories into young adulthood.^[53] Frequent pregaming also heightens vulnerability to concurrent substance use, including illegal drugs, and long-term sequelae like academic impairment and mental health deterioration.^[8]^[30]

Debates and Perspectives

Public Health Critiques

Public health researchers have identified pregaming as a high-risk form of alcohol consumption that often precedes heavy episodic drinking, leading to elevated blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) and increased incidence of acute harms such as blackouts, injuries, and alcohol poisoning.^[2] ^[3] A 2013 event-level analysis found that pregaming significantly predicted higher subsequent BAC levels among college students, independent of total alcohol intake, due to the rapid consumption in unregulated home settings without immediate oversight.^[54] This pattern contributes to a cycle where individuals arrive at public venues already intoxicated, amplifying risks of impaired decision-making and vulnerability to violence or sexual assault.^[10] Longitudinal studies link pregaming to broader negative consequences, including greater overall alcohol dependence trajectories and co-occurring substance use, particularly among young adults in college environments.^[55] ^[5] For instance, research from 2022 highlights pregaming as one of the riskiest behaviors for mandated students, correlating with elevated BAC and events like falls, fights, or driving under the influence, often because it normalizes rapid intake without protective strategies like pacing or hydration.^[3] Critics argue this practice undermines harm reduction efforts, as pregamers report more blackouts and regrets compared to non-pregamers, with daily-level data showing unique associations with physical and social harms even after controlling for drink volume.^[56] ^[2] From a causal perspective, pregaming's structure—often involving shots or games in peer groups—facilitates binge patterns that exceed safe thresholds, with empirical evidence from national surveys indicating heightened odds of adverse health outcomes like hangovers, vomiting, and emergency room visits.^[4] ^[53] Public health interventions, such as mobile-based prevention programs tested in 2022, target pregaming specifically due to its role in escalating from moderate to hazardous use, yet persistence of the behavior underscores challenges in countering social norms that prioritize intoxication over safety.^[3] While some defend pregaming for controlled environments, data consistently show it correlates with poorer outcomes than venue-only drinking, prompting calls for policy measures like stricter home alcohol regulations to mitigate population-level risks.^[1]

Pro-Liberty and Economic Defenses

Advocates for individual liberty argue that pregaming embodies rational self-determination in the consumption of a legal substance, allowing adults to privately optimize their alcohol intake without state-imposed constraints on timing, location, or quantity, as long as no harm is inflicted on third parties. This aligns with broader libertarian critiques of alcohol regulations, which are seen as paternalistic overreaches that prioritize perceived societal protection over personal agency and responsibility. The Cato Institute, for instance, has documented how historical and ongoing alcohol controls, from Prohibition to modern distribution limits, fail to curb abuse while eroding economic freedoms and consumer choice, implicitly endorsing private strategies like pregaming as market-responsive behaviors.^[57]^[58] From an economic standpoint, pregaming enables substantial cost efficiencies for participants by shifting consumption to off-premise purchases, where alcohol prices are typically 50-100% lower than at licensed venues due to reduced markups, taxes, and operational overheads. Peer-reviewed research confirms cost-saving as a dominant motive, with 85% of college pregamers in one study explicitly citing it as a key reason, often tied to the disparity between retail bottle prices and per-drink bar charges.^[13] This practice promotes fiscal prudence among younger or budget-constrained adults, potentially redirecting savings toward other expenditures and countering narratives that frame it solely as risky without acknowledging its utility in a high-cost hospitality environment. Surveys of U.S. undergraduates further identify financial accessibility—bypassing age-restricted or expensive bar service—as a strategic driver, underscoring pregaming's role in democratizing alcohol enjoyment amid regulatory barriers.^[12] Pro-liberty economists contend that such consumer adaptations enhance overall welfare by fostering competition and efficiency in alcohol markets, where individuals arbitrage price differences rather than subsidizing venue profits through inflated on-site sales. While critics highlight potential overconsumption, defenders emphasize that voluntary pregaming reflects informed trade-offs, with empirical data showing it as a calculated response to economic incentives rather than mere impulsivity. This perspective challenges interventionist policies, arguing they distort incentives and overlook how personal cost management mitigates broader fiscal burdens like public health subsidies for venue-driven bingeing.^[59]

References

[1]
Pre-game Drinking among Young Adults and Its Association ... - NIH
Pre-gaming, or drinking before going out, is common among young adults and associated with heavier drinking and negative consequences.
[2]
Pregame Heavy Episodic Drinking and Its Association With Negative ...
Pregaming, or drinking before going out, is common among college students and has been linked with greater alcohol use and experiencing more negative ...
[3]
A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for ...
Jun 18, 2022 · Over 15 years of research studies have demonstrated that pregaming represents one of the riskiest known behaviors among college students, yet no ...
[4]
A national study on pregaming motives, frequency, consumption ...
Sep 1, 2023 · Students who pregame to make the night more fun or to meet potential dating partners appear to be at particular risk for negative alcohol consequences.
[5]
'Pregaming' linked to risky substance use among college students
Aug 14, 2023 · The researchers found that pregaming was associated with alcohol use by college students who had violated their university's alcohol policy, ...
[6]
The Alcohol and Polysubstance Behaviors of Mandated College ...
Sep 6, 2023 · Students that were involved in pregaming were 2.5 times more likely to engage in polysubstance use. As stated before, polysubstance use poses a ...
[7]
What Is Pregaming and How Prevalent Is It Among U.S. College ...
Pregaming (or prepartying) can be defined as drinking before going to an event or gathering. The heavy consumption of alcohol and resulting negative ...
[8]
What Is Pregaming and How Prevalent Is It Among U.S. College ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Pregaming (or prepartying) can be defined as drinking before going to an event or gathering. The heavy consumption of alcohol and resulting ...
[9]
pregame, v. meanings, etymology and more
What does the verb pregame mean? There is one meaning in OED's entry for the verb pregame. See 'Meaning & use' for definition, usage, and quotation evidence. ...
[10]
Prevalence of Pregaming - Alcohol.org
Jan 17, 2023 · First, we defined pregaming as the “consumption of alcohol before an anticipated event.” We then asked each respondent which events they ...
[11]
pregaming, n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the noun pregaming is in the 2000s. OED's earliest evidence for pregaming is from 2004, in University Wire: Daily Pennsylvanian.
[12]
Risk Factors and Reasons for “Pregaming” in College Students
Oct 22, 2010 · Specific reasons for pregaming were identified, including saving money and obtaining alcohol when under 21.
[13]
Knowing Where They're Going: Destination-Specific Pregaming ...
Oct 8, 2012 · Among students who reported pregaming for a bar, the top three reasons were social (32%), financial (28%), and legal (15%; see Table 1). Among ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
[14]
Pre-drinking motives in Canadian undergraduate students
They found the most popular motive for pre-drinking was “to show up to a party/social event buzzed”.
[15]
Fun/intoxication pre-drinking motives lead indirectly to more alcohol ...
This study shows that predominantly 'fun/intoxication' predrinkers are at increased risk for alcohol consumption and consequences.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[16]
Want to pre-drink before going out? It probably won't save you ...
Dec 15, 2022 · Research shows pre-drinking serves important practical and social functions – catching up with friends in a more relaxed environment, and warming up for a ...
[17]
A National Study on Pregaming Motives, Frequency, Consumption ...
Conclusions: Students who pregame to make the night more fun or to meet potential dating partners appear to be at particular risk for negative alcohol ...<|separator|>
[18]
The History of Alcohol Throughout The World - Recovery.org
Jul 10, 2025 · From ancient times, when beer recipes were recorded on tablets, to Prohibition in the United States, to the staggering modern rates of ...How Long Has Alcohol Been... · Greeks · 19th And 20th Centuries<|separator|>
[19]
10000 years of cheers: why social drinking is an ancient ritual | Alcohol
Sep 1, 2018 · In other words, alcohol was vital in helping to strengthen social bonding and break down inhibitions – and has done so since the early days of ...
[20]
Did Medieval People Drink Beer Instead of Water? | HowStuffWorks
Water in the Middle Ages was polluted, full of bacteria and, frankly, not fit to drink. This forced everyone -- from commoners to royalty -- to hydrate by way ...Missing: tavern | Show results with:tavern<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
So how much ale did a medieval peasant actually drink ... - Zythophile
Jul 12, 2022 · Medieval peasants drank less than half the modern recommended alcohol intake, about 2.36 pints of ale per week, or a third of a pint a day.Missing: tavern | Show results with:tavern
[22]
Drinking before Drinking: Pre-gaming and Drinking Games in ... - NIH
Pre-gaming (also called pre-loading, pre-bar, or pre-partying) occurs when students drink alcohol before a primary social gathering or event. Pre-gaming may ...
[23]
pre-gaming - Word Spy
Jan 16, 2009 · ... pre-gaming is that it actually precedes a game. In the two decades since the legal drinking age was raised to 21, the term has come to ...
[24]
PREGAME Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
: to begin drinking alcohol before an event or activity (such as a party or a night out) Her friends, all in their 20s and pregaming for a Saturday night out ...
[25]
Pregaming: An Exploratory Study of Strategic Drinking by College ...
Jul 8, 2010 · *Pregaming is defined as having consumed alcohol in a private setting prior to attending an organized event/social activity on 1 or more ...
[26]
Pregaming in High School Students: Relevance to Risky Drinking ...
In sum, pregaming is prevalent among high school students, particularly among boys and older high school students, and is associated with risky alcohol use and ...
[27]
Who pre-drinks before a night out and why? Socioeconomic status ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Results: Young males drink on average 9.8 and females 7.4 standard units of alcohol before a night out. Saving money is the most prevalent ...
[28]
Pre-drinking not just for the young - UQ News
May 13, 2019 · “The pre-drinking behaviour among the over-30s, we suspect, could be due to people meeting up for one to two drinks at home before they go out ...<|separator|>
[29]
Pregaming on Alcohol Products among Male College Students...
The most common complications stated was blackouts, vomiting, gastritis, physical assaults, and high-risk sexual behavior. Many of them purposefully pregame to ...<|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] beyond heavy episodic drinking: multi-level models linking pregame ...
Students were more likely to engage in HID and to use illegal drugs and experienced more negative consequences on Pregame. HED days than on Moderate Pregaming ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Pregaming among Latina/o Emerging Adults: Do Acculturation and ...
Among ethnic minority groups, Latina/o emerging adults are most likely to engage in pregaming, a risky drinking practice. This study examined how U.S. ...Missing: global habits variations
[32]
An Examination of Pregaming Behavior and Motives Among Sexual ...
Feb 6, 2024 · Pregaming is a popular but high-risk drinking behavior common among college students. Although sexual and gender minority (SGM) college ...
[33]
Comparison of Pregaming Alcohol Use and Consequences by ...
Nov 30, 2020 · Student alcohol use on college campuses is a nationwide problem, with nearly two thirds (61.7%) of college students indicating alcohol use ...<|separator|>
[34]
[PDF] Pregaming - University of Colorado Boulder
Pregaming is when someone drinks large amounts of alcohol before attending a party or event, often to get drunk or reduce social anxiety.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[35]
9 Drinking Games for Your Next Pregame (21+) - Her Campus
Dec 11, 2015 · 1. Kings · 2. Slap Cup · 3. Most Likely · 4. Chinese Flip Cup · 5. Chesties · 6. Sink The Battleship · 7. Thumper · 8. Never Have I Ever.
[36]
A Student's Guide to Pre-Drinks: Everything You Need to Know
Game Boards: These are a great way to get everyone involved and impress your guests. Game boards such as Shots and Ladders, Battle Shots, Ring of Fire are ...
[37]
How to Pregame: The 10 Pregame Drinking Commandments - Thrillist
Mar 8, 2017 · Thou shalt take it easy. · Thou shalt not fall asleep. · Thou shalt be dressed and ready to go BEFORE the pregame. · Thou shalt carbo-load. · Thou ...<|separator|>
[38]
Pregame Heavy Episodic Drinking and its Association with Negative ...
Sep 6, 2023 · Past studies have shown that pregaming leads to greater alcohol consumption and more alcohol-related negative effects. In addition, students may ...
[39]
None
### Summary of Group Dynamics, Social Norms, and Composition in Pregaming Among College Students
[40]
Prevalence, Social Contexts, and Risks for Prepartying Among ...
Females drink more when prepartying when they are in coed groups than when they are in same sex groups. This result adds evidence to a growing body of research ...
[41]
The Effect of Descriptive Norms on Pregaming Frequency
To our knowledge, only two studies have examined the effects of injunctive norms on pregaming. In Caudwell and Hagger's (2015) study, greater perceived ...
[42]
Alcohol Pricing: How to Price Liquor for Bars or Restaurants - BinWise
Most restaurants are aiming for 20% pour cost and 80% margin on liquor sales. That means the average drink prices at bars are between $5 and $15.
[43]
Alcohol 'Pre-loading': A Review of the Literature - Oxford Academic
The price of alcohol and achieving intoxication were the main motivations for PL. However, other reasons included a chance to meet members of the opposite sex ...
[44]
Drinking Location and Pregaming as Predictors of Alcohol ... - NIH
College students report pregaming for a variety of reasons, including saving money, loosening up, getting a buzz, and hanging out with friends before going ...Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
[45]
Results of a large point of entry study into preloading alcohol and ...
There is a growing trend of preloading with alcohol before entering entertainment districts. It is claimed that this occurs to save money and that ...
[46]
“Fourteen Dollars for One Beer!” Pre‐drinking is associated with ...
Research suggests that when people pre‐drink they increase the amount of alcohol consumed over the night, rather than merely substituting cheaper off‐premises ...
[47]
an event-level analysis of predrinking, alcohol consumption, and ...
Results: Higher alcohol consumption occurred on evenings with predrinking (7.1 drinks on average) compared with on-premise only (4.2 drinks) and off-premise ...Missing: reduces expenditure
[48]
Reducing alcohol harms whilst minimising impact on hospitality ...
Alcohol tends to be sold much more cheaply in off-trade outlets. Pre-drinking alcohol in domestic settings prior to attending on-trade premises (Foster ...
[49]
Drinking Before Going to Licensed Premises: An Event‐Level ...
Nov 8, 2012 · The results show that alcohol consumption was almost twice as high on predrinking evenings as on either off- or on-premise only evenings. This ...Missing: reduces expenditure study
[50]
A latent profile analysis of social anxiety, depression, and ...
Jan 7, 2024 · This study examined heterogeneity in how pregaming motives, social anxiety, and depression associate with past 30-day pregaming variables.
[51]
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2785
[52]
Pregaming potentiates risk between UPPS-P impulsivity and day ...
Pregaming represents a uniquely high-risk drinking event for young adults, and subfacets of impulsivity are robust predictors of alcohol use and related ...
[53]
Pregaming in high school students: Relevance to risky drinking ...
Results indicate that pregaming was significantly associated with being older, being a male, having high levels of hazardous alcohol use, and participating in ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
[54]
The Impact of Pregaming on Subsequent Blood Alcohol ...
This event-level study highlights the practice of pregaming as an insidious behavior associated with enhanced levels of drinking behavior and overall ...
[55]
Longitudinal examination of high‐risk drinking contexts: Daytime ...
May 1, 2023 · This study assessed young adults' frequency of pregaming, playing drinking games, and daytime drinking each month for 24 consecutive months.
[56]
"Pre-gaming" may lead heavier drinking, blackouts - CBS News
Nov 12, 2012 · In the study, subjects told researchers that they often pre-gamed in order to save money, to get in the mood for partying, to get drunk and ...
[57]
Alcohol Prohibition Was a Failure - Cato Institute
the “noble experiment” — was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve social problems, ...
[58]
Nearly a Century Later, We Are Still Fighting Alcohol Prohibition
Dec 5, 2024 · Allowing people the opportunity to drink freely in public teaches them to be more responsible and spread their drinking out rather than getting ...
[59]
Supreme Court Toasts Economic Liberty in Tennessee Wine Case
Jun 26, 2019 · The Supreme Court struck down a heavily restrictive Tennessee law that prevented anyone but longtime state residents from getting liquor licenses.