Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Proclamation 4483

Proclamation 4483 was a presidential proclamation issued by Jimmy Carter on January 21, 1977, granting a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to individuals who committed nonviolent offenses under the Military Selective Service Act through draft-evasion acts or omissions between August 4, 1964, and March 28, 1973. This measure, enacted on Carter's first full day as president, targeted an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 draft evaders, many of whom had fled to Canada or other countries to avoid conscription during the Vietnam War. The proclamation, accompanied by Executive Order 11967 establishing an administrative process for pardon certificates, sought to reconcile national divisions by restoring civil rights and clearing records for eligible individuals, though it explicitly excluded military deserters, those who failed to report for induction after receiving orders, and persons convicted of violent crimes or other unrelated offenses. While praised by anti-war advocates for promoting healing, it drew sharp criticism from veterans' organizations and military families, who argued it dishonored those who served and failed to address deserters, estimated at over 500,000, leaving a perception of inequity in clemency. Empirical data indicate limited uptake, with only about 20,000 to 30,000 applications processed and fewer than half of known exiles returning to the United States, reflecting ambivalence among beneficiaries toward the conditional nature of restored rights like federal employment eligibility but not full veteran benefits equivalence.

Historical Context

Vietnam War Conscription System

The Selective Service System administered conscription for the under the authority of the of 1967, which required all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants aged 18 to 26 to register for potential . Local draft boards classified registrants into availability categories, including 1-A for those immediately eligible for induction, while deferments were granted for college students (2-S), married men with children (3-A), and medical or occupational disqualifications (4-F). Draft calls escalated with U.S. military involvement in , rising from 112,386 inductions in 1964 to a peak of 382,010 in 1966, as troop levels in grew from under 20,000 in 1964 to over 500,000 by 1968. Prior to 1969, the order of induction followed a "college-qualified" sequence prioritizing younger registrants without deferments, which critics argued favored educated, affluent men able to secure student postponements, resulting in disproportionate burdens on working-class and minority communities. To address perceived unfairness, Congress amended the 1967 Act on November 26, 1969, establishing a random lottery system based on birth dates for men born between 1944 and 1950. The first lottery drawing occurred on December 1, 1969, in Washington, D.C., where 366 blue capsules containing dates were manually drawn from a glass drum, assigning sequence numbers from 1 to 366; men with lower numbers (typically under 195 for the 1944 cohort) faced higher induction risk, with the process televised to promote transparency. Subsequent lotteries covered later birth years, but calls declined after 1969 amid Vietnamization and anti-war protests. From August 1964 to February 1973, the Selective Service inducted 1,857,304 men into the armed forces, primarily the , out of approximately 27 million eligible males during the era. The final draft call occurred on December 7, 1972, with induction authority lapsing on June 30, 1973, after which the U.S. transitioned to an all-volunteer force. This system prompted widespread resistance, including over 200,000 documented cases, as registrants sought alternatives to combat deployment amid rising casualties and domestic opposition to the war.

Scale and Methods of Draft Evasion

During the era (1964–1973), draft evasion encompassed both legal deferments and illegal avoidance of obligations, with the latter affecting an estimated 210,000 individuals investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice for violations such as failure to register, report for induction, or comply with classification orders. Broader estimates suggest up to 600,000 men illegally evaded the draft through non-compliance, though many cases went unprosecuted due to resource constraints and policy shifts toward leniency by the early 1970s. Only about 3,250 convictions for draft offenses occurred between 1965 and 1973, reflecting amid overwhelming caseloads and public opposition to the war. These figures contrast with the 1.857 million inductions under the , highlighting evasion's impact on amid a pool of roughly 27 million draft-eligible men aged 18–26. Illegal methods predominated among prosecuted evaders and included outright refusal to report for induction or physical examinations, which accounted for the majority of Justice Department referrals. Many evaders destroyed or publicly burned their draft cards in acts of civil disobedience, with over 150 such incidents reported by 1965, prompting Congress to criminalize the practice via the 1965 amendment to the Universal Military Training and Service Act. Fleeing to Canada emerged as a prominent tactic, with U.S. officials estimating 40,000 to 70,000 draft dodgers and deserters relocating there by 1972, often via informal networks providing guidance on border crossing and false identities. Other evasion strategies involved fabricating disqualifications, such as claiming (CO) status under Selective Service classification I-O, though approval rates hovered below 20% due to stringent requirements for demonstrated predating the war. Medical deferments were sought by exaggerating conditions like psychiatric disorders, (disqualifying under military standards until 2011), or physical ailments (e.g., or ), with draft boards examining over 1 million such claims annually by the late . Some evaders lived "underground" domestically, using aliases or relocating to avoid detection, contributing to an undetermined number of unresolved cases estimated at 150,000 to 200,000 by administration analyses. While legal deferments—such as student (II-S), occupational (II-A), or paternal (III-A)—shielded millions and were criticized for class biases favoring educated or affluent men, these blurred into evasion when manipulated (e.g., strategic enrollments in substandard colleges or sudden fatherhood post-lottery). Joining the National Guard or Reserves served as a quasi-legal workaround, enlisting over 1 million men by 1970 to preempt active-duty drafts, though slots were limited and politically influenced. Organized resistance groups, like the Catholic Worker Movement or Clergy and Laymen Concerned About Vietnam, provided counseling on these tactics, amplifying evasion through seminars and legal aid that reached thousands. Overall, evasion reflected causal factors including war unpopularity, perceived inequities in the lottery system introduced in 1969, and moral opposition, rather than mere opportunism.

Preceding Pardon Efforts

Gerald Ford's 1974 Clemency Program

On September 16, 1974, President issued Proclamation 4313, establishing a conditional clemency program for Vietnam-era draft evaders and military deserters who had not yet been prosecuted or convicted. The initiative required eligible individuals to return to the voluntarily, affirm their allegiance to the country through an expressing remorse for their actions, and complete a period of alternative public service—typically ranging from 12 to 24 months—as assigned by the Presidential Clemency Board. This service could include work with charitable organizations, conservation projects, or community health efforts, with the duration determined based on the severity of the offense and individual circumstances. The program was implemented through Executive Order 11803, signed the same day, which created the nine-member Presidential Clemency Board—chaired by , a former Nixon aide—to review applications, recommend terms, and oversee discharges. Ford estimated around 50,000 deserters and 12,000 draft evaders remained in exile or under indictment, though actual figures were uncertain due to incomplete records; the program targeted those who had fled to avoid during the 1964–1973 conflict period. Convicted offenders were ineligible for this clemency but could apply for standard presidential , while non-indicted individuals in jeopardy of prosecution were encouraged to participate to clear their status. Upon successful completion, participants received a Certificate of Satisfactory in lieu of a full pardon, which did not restore full civil rights like voting or in all cases and carried no guarantee of honorable equivalence. Participation proved limited, with approximately 22,000 applications filed with the Clemency Board by early 1975, representing a small fraction of the estimated 125,000 potentially eligible individuals. Only about 6,000 to 13,000 clemency discharges were ultimately granted, as many applicants either withdrew due to the rigorous service requirements or faced delays in board processing; the program closed on January 20, 1975, with the end of 's initial term considerations, though some cases lingered. Critics, including veterans' groups, argued the conditional terms undermined military honor without equating to true , while defended it as a balanced step toward national reconciliation without blanket forgiveness. The low uptake highlighted divisions over accountability, setting the stage for subsequent full discussions.

Issuance and Provisions

Jimmy Carter's Campaign Commitment

During his 1976 presidential campaign, Jimmy Carter promised to issue an unconditional pardon to those who evaded the Vietnam War draft, positioning the action as essential for healing national divisions stemming from the conflict. This commitment differentiated draft evaders—civilian violators of the Selective Service Act—from military deserters, whom Carter stated should face military justice rather than presidential clemency. He articulated a preference for pardon over the limited clemency program implemented by President Gerald Ford in 1974, arguing in a Newsweek interview that a full pardon better addressed the underlying injustices perceived by evaders. Carter's pledge emerged amid ongoing debates over Vietnam-era , with the candidate framing it as a moral imperative to restore unity without excusing service in an unpopular war. Public statements, including during a February 1976 visit to , highlighted the promise but also sparked immediate controversy, as audiences there expressed anger over perceived leniency toward lawbreakers. Despite such backlash, the commitment aligned with Carter's campaign theme of ethical governance and was reiterated in platforms like the Democratic nominee's policy outlines, which listed pardoning draft evaders as a key initiative. The promise contributed to Carter's appeal among younger voters and anti-war constituencies, though it alienated segments of the military and conservative base, foreshadowing post-election criticisms. By election day on November 2, 1976, the pledge had become a defining element of his platform on Vietnam reconciliation, ultimately fulfilled through Proclamation 4483 shortly after his inauguration.

Details of Proclamation 4483

Proclamation 4483 was issued by President Jimmy Carter on January 21, 1977, his first full day in office, under the authority of Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which empowers the president to grant pardons for offenses against the United States except in cases of impeachment. The proclamation granted a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to all persons who committed any offense in violation of the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) or regulations promulgated pursuant thereto between August 4, 1964—the date of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution marking the escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam—and March 28, 1973, the date by which the last draft registrations were processed before the all-volunteer force transition. The pardon's scope encompassed draft evasion acts or omissions, such as failure to register for the draft, failure to report for induction or examination, or other non-compliance with Selective Service obligations during the specified period, whether the individuals had been convicted, indicted, or simply evaded detection. It restored to the pardoned individuals all political, civil, and other rights forfeited due to conviction or status as fugitives from such offenses, effectively clearing criminal records related solely to these violations and allowing reintegration into society without legal impediments from draft-related charges. The pardon applied retroactively and unconditionally, without requiring individual applications for forgiveness, though later administrative processes under the Department of Justice provided for certificates of pardon to document the relief for purposes like employment or passport applications. Explicit exclusions limited the proclamation's reach: it did not extend to offenses involving the or against persons or , nor to violations committed by agents, officers, or employees of the in connection with their official duties. This distinction ensured that acts of resistance escalating to criminal or internal corruption within the draft administration remained prosecutable. The proclamation took effect immediately upon Carter's signature on , 1977, and was published in the on January 24, 1977. Notably, it addressed civilian draft evaders but excluded military deserters, whose cases were handled separately through an accompanying requiring application for clemency.

Accompanying Executive Order 11967

Executive Order 11967, issued by President Jimmy Carter on January 21, 1977, provided the administrative framework for implementing Proclamation 4483 by addressing violations of the Military Selective Service Act from August 4, 1964, to March 28, 1973. The order directed the Attorney General to dismiss all pending indictments related to these violations, except in cases involving serious acts of force or violence or offenses committed by agents or employees of the Selective Service System. It further required the termination of any ongoing investigations into such matters and prohibited the initiation of new ones, subject to the same exceptions. The also facilitated the reentry of affected individuals into the who had been barred due to Selective Service violations, permitting them to return under terms applicable to other aliens while excluding the specified exceptional cases. Additionally, it extended full pardon relief to those who had previously received partial clemency under Gerald Ford's 11803 and Proclamation 4313, provided they qualified under the new criteria. Published in the on January 24, 1977 (42 FR 4393), the order ensured coordinated federal action to execute the pardon without further prosecutorial pursuit in eligible instances.

Implementation Process

Eligibility Criteria and Application Procedure

Proclamation 4483 applied to individuals who violated the (MSSA) between August 4, 1964, and March 28, 1973, encompassing acts or omissions of such as failure to register, report for , or comply with orders. Eligibility extended to both those convicted of such offenses and those who may have committed them but faced no charges, provided the violations did not involve the use of force or violence against persons or property, nor were perpetrated by officials or employees in the course of their duties. The pardon did not cover military deserters or those absent without leave, distinguishing it from prior efforts like Gerald Ford's clemency program. The pardon was unconditional and self-executing, requiring no formal application from eligible individuals for its legal effect. 11967 directed the Attorney General to administratively implement it by dismissing all pending indictments and prosecutions (except those involving excluded violent acts or SSS personnel misconduct), recalling outstanding warrants, terminating investigations, and halting new ones related to covered offenses. For non-citizens or exiles abroad, the order facilitated reentry into the under provisions, excluding those in excepted categories. To document the pardon for practical purposes, such as clearing criminal records for employment or licensing, affected individuals could request a Certificate of Pardon from the Office of the Pardon Attorney at the Department of Justice. Requests required a written application including the individual's full name, date and place of birth, Social Security number (if available), and details of the Selective Service violation, with no fee or extensive documentation needed beyond self-identification. Certificates were issued upon verification against records, aiding in expungement or correction of Selective Service files, though the pardon itself did not automatically upgrade military-related discharges or address state-level convictions.

Actual Participation and Outcomes

Approximately 100,000 draft evaders had fled the United States during the Vietnam War era, primarily to Canada, where they established lives amid a receptive political and social environment. Following the issuance of Proclamation 4483, only about 50,000 of these exiles returned to the U.S., indicating limited participation among those abroad despite the removal of legal impediments to reentry. The program's structure under Executive Order 11967 required applicants to submit forms to the Department of Justice attesting to their violations of the Military Selective Service Act, after which certificates evidencing the pardon were issued to facilitate practical benefits like passport renewal or employment clearance. Government records identified 209,517 men formally accused of draft violations, with an additional estimated 360,000 evaders never charged, yielding a potential pool exceeding 500,000 eligible individuals. However, comprehensive data on total certificate applications remains sparse, as many domestic evaders encountered no ongoing legal restrictions and thus saw little need to engage the process, while others harbored skepticism toward federal authorities. Initial processing in early 1977 affected around 10,000 cases immediately, primarily those with pending indictments or convictions, clearing records for approximately 9,000 who had been found guilty or pleaded guilty. The outcomes emphasized selective reintegration: applicants received unconditional pardons without further penalties, restoring civil rights and eligibility for federal benefits, but the exclusion of military deserters—estimated at nearly 100,000 who absconded after enlistment or —left their status unresolved pending separate administrative reviews. Low overall participation relative to the eligible population reflected both the pardon’s focus on nonviolent Selective Service offenses and the reality that evasion methods often avoided formal prosecution, minimizing repercussions for many. No widespread denials occurred for eligible draft evaders, as the applied blanket clemency, though administrative hurdles and non-participation constrained broader societal healing effects.

Contemporary Reactions

Support from Anti-War and Progressive Groups

Anti-war organizations and advocacy groups, which had long campaigned against the and for for resisters, generally welcomed Proclamation 4483 as a step toward and validation of conscientious objection. The National Council for Universal, Unconditional Amnesty (NCUUA), a coalition formed in the mid-1970s that included the (ACLU), War Resisters League (WRL), , (VVAW), and the , had organized protests, conferences, and petitions urging broad pardons for evaders and deserters. These efforts, including a 1974 international conference in hosted by exiles and VVAW, pressured candidates like during the 1976 to address the estimated 210,000 evaders and thousands of deserters. Upon issuance of the proclamation on January 21, 1977, groups within the NCUUA celebrated it as enabling resisters to return and reintegrate without felony convictions, viewing it as partial fulfillment of their demands for healing the societal rifts caused by the war. The WRL and VVAW, in particular, highlighted the pardon's role in acknowledging the moral stand against an unjust war, with activists noting it allowed approximately 100,000 eligible individuals to apply for relief from Selective Service violations dating from August 4, 1964, to March 28, 1973. The American Veterans Committee, a progressive veterans' organization, praised the move for promoting national unity but advocated expansion to include deserters, arguing they represented disproportionately minority and disadvantaged groups excluded from the pardon. This support reflected broader anti-war sentiment that had urged pardons since the war's end, seeing Proclamation 4483 as a culmination of organizing rather than mere executive clemency, though some activists critiqued its limitations by not covering deserters or less-than-honorable discharges. Overall, these groups framed the pardon as a pragmatic acknowledgment of resistance's legitimacy, aiding the return of exiles from , , and elsewhere where up to 30,000 Americans had fled to avoid .

Criticisms from Veterans, Military, and Conservatives

Veterans' organizations vehemently opposed Proclamation 4483, perceiving it as a betrayal of those who served despite the war's unpopularity. The 's National Security Commission director, Michael Schlee, declared that the group "deeply regrets and protests" , asserting it was divisive rather than healing. This stance built on earlier backlash, as in August 1976, when faced boos from hundreds of members at their after pledging to issue such pardons. Similarly, chapters and other military advocacy groups criticized the measure for equating draft evaders with honorable service members, with some expelling internal supporters of to maintain organizational solidarity against perceived unpatriotic leniency. Conservative politicians amplified these military critiques, framing the proclamation as an erosion of accountability and respect for duty. Senator labeled it "the most disgraceful thing a president has ever done," arguing it dishonored the sacrifices of combatants. The echoed this, describing the pardon as a "slap in the face to all those Americans and their families who did their duty" amid the war's hardships. Senator , Carter's 1976 vice-presidential debate opponent, opposed blanket amnesty as overly permissive, contending it undermined legal obligations without requiring contrition or alternative service. Broader conservative commentary highlighted the pardon's failure to address deserters—estimated at over —who fled after enlisting, unlike the roughly 10,000 draft evaders covered, and viewed it as prioritizing political over for the war's 58,220 American fatalities. Critics within these circles argued the policy implicitly validated evasion as a moral equivalent to service, exacerbating resentment among those who endured , , or post-war societal without equivalent forgiveness.

Aftermath and Legacy

Short-Term Societal and Political Effects

The proclamation triggered swift political opposition from conservative figures and veterans' groups, who argued it dishonored those who served in Vietnam and signaled weakness in national defense. Organizations like the and issued statements decrying the blanket pardon as an injustice to combat veterans, with some leaders calling for or reversal. This backlash contributed to early criticisms of Carter's administration as overly conciliatory toward anti-war elements, though it fulfilled a key campaign pledge that had garnered support from during the 1976 election. Societally, the prompted limited immediate , as many of the estimated 100,000 evaders who had fled abroad—primarily to and —had integrated into local communities and showed reluctance to return despite the removal of legal barriers. Official reports indicated only a few hundred applications processed in the first weeks, with broader data later revealing that roughly half of exiles ultimately remained overseas rather than seeking reintegration. Public reactions ranged from relief among affected families to widespread resentment among the broader populace, exacerbating lingering Vietnam-era divisions without achieving stated goal of rapid national reconciliation.

Long-Term Evaluations and Debates

Over decades, evaluations of Proclamation 4483 have highlighted its limited success in fostering national reconciliation after the . While intended to address "unfinished business" by allowing evaders to reintegrate without legal penalties, failed to bridge divides between those who served and those who evaded, with many veterans perceiving it as an inequitable absolution that overlooked their sacrifices. Studies and analyses indicate persistent among communities, contributing to a where evaders received clemency without equivalent or accountability, unlike proposals for conditional under prior administrations. This tension endured, as evidenced by ongoing discussions in policy reviews framing as exacerbating post-war societal fractures rather than resolving them. Empirical data on outcomes reveal modest reintegration effects. Of approximately 100,000 draft evaders estimated to have fled to , only about 4,000 to 5,000 returned following the pardon, with roughly half of exiles overall choosing repatriation to rebuild lives in the U.S. Returnees regained rights such as and employment eligibility, but many encountered enduring and employment barriers from private sectors wary of their records, limiting broader societal healing. Long-term scholarly assessments note that the policy affected fewer than 10,000 immediate cases initially, with deferred actions for tens of thousands abroad, underscoring its narrow scope and failure to encompass deserters, whose discharges remained upgraded only through separate reviews. Debates center on the pardon’s implications for legal and ethos. Critics, particularly from conservative and veteran circles, contend it undermined respect for lawful authority by granting unconditional relief without reparative measures, potentially signaling to that resistance carries no enduring cost—a view echoed in analyses of its role in perpetuating Vietnam-era moral ambiguities. Supporters, including anti-war advocates, argue it exemplified merciful essential for closure, enabling personal redemption amid a war widely critiqued for its strategic flaws, though empirical evidence of reduced or enhanced civic participation remains anecdotal rather than robust. These contrasting perspectives persist in policy discourse, with some framing the legacy as a for executive clemency in divisive conflicts, while others highlight its exclusion of active-duty deserters as evidence of incomplete justice, leaving unresolved inequities in records that affected benefits for decades.

References

  1. [1]
    Proclamation 4483 - National Archives
    Proclamation 4483--Granting pardon for violations of the Selective Service Act, August 4, 1964, to March 28, 1973
  2. [2]
    [PDF] proclamation 4483—jan. 21, 1977 91 stat. 1719 - GovInfo
    hereby grant a full, complete and unconditional pardon to: (1) all persons who may have committed any offense beween August 4, 1964 and March 28, 1973 in ...
  3. [3]
    Office of the Pardon Attorney | Apply for Clemency
    On January 21, 1977, President Carter issued a pardon proclamation for certain violations of the Military Selective Service Act. Instructions and privacy ...President Trump’s... · Apply online · Privacy Act Statement
  4. [4]
    Carter Grants Pardon to Vietnam War Draft Evaders - CQ Press
    Proclamation. Following are the texts of President Carter's Jan. 21 proclamation and executive order granting pardons to draft evaders from the Vietnam War era.
  5. [5]
    Pardoning Vietnam War Draft Dodgers Was a No-Win Situation for ...
    Dec 30, 2024 · On Jan. 21, 1977, the day after his inauguration, Carter issued Executive Order 11967, granting a pardon to all Vietnam War draft dodgers.Missing: 4483 | Show results with:4483
  6. [6]
    President Carter pardons draft dodgers | January 21, 1977 | HISTORY
    During his 1976 presidential campaign, Jimmy Carter promised to pardon draft dodgers as a way of putting the war and the bitter divisions it caused firmly in ...Missing: Proclamation 4483
  7. [7]
    When President Carter Pardoned Draft Dodgers, Only Half Came Back
    ... pardon to Vietnam War draft evaders by executive order. Yet the draft had ... Vietnam War Draft Dodgers. Draft resisters marching at a demonstration ...Missing: Proclamation 4483<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    History and Records : Selective Service System
    A series of reforms during the latter part of the Vietnam conflict changed the way the draft operated to make it more fair and just. Learn more about our fair ...Vietnam Lotteries · Changes From Vietnam to Now · Historical Timeline · Draft Cards
  9. [9]
    Induction Statistics : Selective Service System
    The last man inducted entered the U.S. Army on June 30, 1973 during the last draft conducted. ... Vietnam War, Aug. 1964 – Feb. 1973, 1,857,304. Inductions by ...
  10. [10]
    Vietnam Lotteries : Selective Service System
    The last draft call was on December 7, 1972, and the authority to induct expired on June 30, 1973. The date of the last drawing for the lottery was on March 12 ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  11. [11]
    The Draft and the Vietnam War - Students of History
    According to the National Archives, there were about 27 million American men eligible for military service between 1964 and 1973. Of that number, 2,215,000 men ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Reflections on the Presidential Clemency Power
    Jan 1, 1985 · As one commentator has summarized: "Almost half of all draft evaders were ... " Of the 210,000 individuals referred to the Justice Department for.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Vietnam - ERIC - Department of Education
    What did the conscientious objectors and the draft evaders who left the country have in common? ... Nearly 600,000 illegally evaded the draft; about 200,000 were ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Amnesty: Repatriation for Draft Evaders, Deserters - CQ Press
    However, about 98,000 men deserted during fiscal 1971. U.S. officials estimated that between 40,000 and 70,000 draft dodgers and deserters have taken up ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  15. [15]
    Changing Opinions on the Draft | ROPER CENTER
    Jul 24, 2017 · In a 1980 ABC News/Louis Harris poll, 69% of likely voters agreed with the statement “the draft worked very unfairly during the Vietnam War, ...
  16. [16]
    Draft Resistance in the Vietnam Era - University of Washington
    Draft resistance included evasion, conscientious objector status, burning draft cards, and fleeing to Canada. By 1972, more were objectors than draftees.
  17. [17]
    The Demographic Effects of Dodging the Vietnam Draft - PMC - NIH
    This paper provides time series evidence that the availability of hardship deferments led to large increases in US fertility rates in the late 1960s.Missing: scale | Show results with:scale
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Veterans, Deserters, and Draft Evaders - Gerald R. Ford Museum
    An undeter- mined number of Vietnam-era draft evaders either are living "underground" ... VA statistics show that 15% of returning Vietnam-era veterans have less.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Evading and Resisting the Draft during the Vietnam War
    Oct 23, 2024 · 170 were convicted of draft law violations in California in 1967, the largest share in the nation at 23%, due in part to its significant ...Missing: scale | Show results with:scale
  20. [20]
    Proclamation 4313—Announcing a Program for the Return of ...
    Sep 16, 1974 · Proclamation 4313—Announcing a Program for the Return of Vietnam Era Draft Evaders and Military Deserters. September 16, 1974. By the President ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 2504 PROCLAMATION 4313-SEPT. 16, 1974 as well as ... - GovInfo
    Sep 16, 1974 · GERALD R. FORD. Proclamation 4313. •. September 16, 1974. Announcing a Program for the Return of Vietnam. Era Draft Evaders and Military ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] FPCD-76-64 The Clemency Program of 1974
    Mar 18, 1975 · On Sptember 16, 1974, the President announced " A program for the return of Vietnam era draft evaders and military deserters." Included in ...
  23. [23]
    Executive Order 11803—Establishing a Clemency Board to Review ...
    Determination of any period of alternate service shall be in accord with the Proclamation announcing a program for the return of Vietnam era draft evaders and ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Amnesty - Gerald R. Ford Museum
    An additional. 2, 258 persons are under investigation for draft evasion. Thus, approximately 15, 500 draft evaders will potentially be eligible for the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Clemency Program - Executive Order, Proclamation and Fact Sheets ...
    D~serters and Evaders Already Convicted. Those already convicted of draft evasion or military absentee offenses during the Vietnam era may apply for a pardon to ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] ScholarWorks@UNO - The University of New Orleans
    Aug 6, 2018 · Through their applications to the Presidential Clemency Board, almost 22,000 deserters and evaders of the Vietnam era were able to share their ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Gerald Ford's Clemency Board: Revisited and Reassessed
    Oct 22, 2019 · Eight days later, Ford announced a clemency program for the hundreds of thousands of deserters and draft evaders spawned by the divisive Vietnam ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] News Clippings from the Dole Archives - 1976
    " , to Jimmy Carter's statement that he would pardon draft evaders and let military .jus- tice prevail for deserters if he were elected. President. ·. Dole's ...
  29. [29]
    Analysis: Pardon of Draft Evaders | Research Starters - EBSCO
    On his first day in office, Carter issued a pardon for all Vietnam draft evaders. ... President Carter's Proclamation 4483 begins by noting the presidential power ...
  30. [30]
    Remembering Jimmy Carter's blanket pardon for Vietnam War draft ...
    Jan 4, 2025 · Seeking to heal the country, Jimmy Carter pardoned men who evaded the Vietnam War draft · President Jimmy Carter waves to the crowd while walking ...
  31. [31]
    In 1976, Jimmy Carter angered thousands in Seattle after ... - Yahoo
    Feb 23, 2023 · In 1976, Jimmy Carter angered thousands in Seattle after suggesting pardon for draft evaders. Shawn Garrett. Thu, February 23, 2023 at 3:07 PM ...Missing: interview | Show results with:interview
  32. [32]
    The Campaign Promises of Jimmy Carter - jstor
    The Campaign Promises of Jimmy Carter: 1976. Campaign Promises Accomplished ... Pardon draft evaders from Vietnam. Revision of criminal justice system ...
  33. [33]
    President Carter pardons draft dodgers , Jan. 21, 1977 - POLITICO
    Jan 21, 2018 · Gerald Ford, Carter's predecessor in the White House, had offered conditional amnesty to some draft dodgers. Carter, however, seeking to heal ...Missing: Newsweek interview
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    EO 11967 - Federal Register :: Executive Order
    Relating to violations of the Selective Service Act, August 4, 1964 to March 28, 1973 ; Signed: January 21, 1977 ; Published: January 24, 1977 ; FR Citation: 42 FR ...
  36. [36]
    Executive Order 11967 - National Archives
    Executive Order 11967--Relating to violations of the Selective Service Act, August 4, 1964 to March 28, 1973Missing: 4483 | Show results with:4483
  37. [37]
    [PDF] VIETNAM WAR ERA PARDON INSTRUCTIONS
    ... pardoned certain persons who, during the. Vietnam War era, violated the Military Selective Service Act by draft-evasion acts or omissions committed between ...
  38. [38]
    10,000 AFFECTED NOW - The New York Times
    President Carter granted a pardon today to almost all draft evaders of the Vietnam war era, but he left unsettled the status of those ...
  39. [39]
    Why Jimmy Carter Pardoned Draft Resisters | Common Dreams
    Jan 6, 2025 · Remembering President Jimmy Carter's pardon of Vietnam War resisters and the fight for amnesty. It is right to resist unjust wars.
  40. [40]
    Reaction to the Pardon Runs Gamut From Joy to Outrage
    Jan 21, 1977 · As President Carter predicted, even the joyous reactions from those included in his pardon of Vietnam draft evaders appeared to be tempered ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    LEGIONNAIRES BOO CARTER ON PARDON FOR DRAFT DEFIERS
    Aug 25, 1976 · Jimmy Carter was vigorously booed by hundreds of American Legion members here today after he told them he would issue a pardon to Vietnam War draft resisters.Missing: evader | Show results with:evader
  42. [42]
    'On the Side of Leniency': The 1970s Battle Over Vietnam Draft ...
    Aug 19, 2021 · Even so, Republican Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater called Carter's decision “the most disgraceful thing a president has ever done,” adding ...
  43. [43]
    Carter pardons draft dodgers Jan. 21, 1977 - POLITICO
    Jan 21, 2008 · The Carter amnesty generated a good deal of criticism, especially from veterans' groups. Although the draft ended in 1973, desertion remains ...
  44. [44]
    Clemency for Vietnam draft evaders and deserters | Research Starters
    Clemency for Vietnam draft evaders and deserters refers to the policies and actions taken by US government leaders in the aftermath of the Vietnam War
  45. [45]
    [PDF] A Comparison of Presidential Narratives about the US Military after ...
    Despite these tensions, which his pardon was likely to inflame, Carter saw the draft evader pardon as a necessary step toward societal reconciliation and ...