Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Selective Service System


The Selective Service System is an independent federal agency within the executive branch of the United States government, established to register eligible individuals for potential conscription into military service during national emergencies and to manage the processes for inducting personnel to meet Department of Defense requirements. Originating with the Selective Service Act of 1917, which authorized the first peacetime draft in response to World War I, the system has facilitated the mobilization of over 10 million men into the armed forces across major 20th-century conflicts, including World War II when it inducted approximately 10 million draftees to form the backbone of U.S. military expansion. Post-Vietnam War reforms in the 1970s shifted operations to a standby mode supporting the all-volunteer force, introducing lottery-based selection and limiting deferments to enhance fairness after widespread draft evasion and protests that highlighted inequities in the prior exemption-heavy structure. Currently, federal law mandates registration for nearly all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants aged 18 through 25, with non-compliance barring access to federal jobs, student aid, and other benefits, though no draft has occurred since 1973 and the system maintains a database of about 15 million registrants for rapid activation if authorized by Congress and the President. The agency's male-only registration requirement has sparked persistent legal and policy controversies, including Supreme Court challenges questioning its constitutionality under equal protection principles and repeated legislative proposals to either extend registration to women or abolish the system entirely amid debates over its relevance in an era of professionalized volunteer militaries. In 2025, ongoing modernization efforts include upgrading the registration system's architecture to FedRAMP standards for improved cybersecurity and efficiency, while fiscal year budget justifications emphasize readiness without active conscription.

Overview and Purpose

The constitutional foundation of the Selective Service System rests on Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the power "To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years." This authority has been judicially interpreted to include compulsory , as serves the broader congressional powers to declare , suppress insurrections, and provide for the common defense under Clauses 11, 15, and 1 of the same section. The two-year funding limit reflects the Framers' intent to prevent standing armies without ongoing legislative consent, yet it does not restrict the mechanisms, including drafts, by which armies may be raised. The first explicitly upheld federal conscription in the (Arver v. ), 245 U.S. 366 (1918), ruling unanimously that the —a statute requiring male registration and potential induction for —did not violate the Fifth Amendment's , the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition on , or other constitutional provisions. The Court reasoned that the war power, derived from the Constitution's structure and enumerated clauses, permits to compel citizen service, distinguishing military duty from prohibited servitude as it advances national sovereignty rather than private gain. Legally, the Selective Service System operates under the (MSSA), codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 3801 et seq., which authorizes the to require registration of males aged 18 through 25 for potential military induction and establishes classification, examination, and deferment processes. Enacted in its modern form through amendments in the Department of Defense Authorization Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-107), following Carter's reinstatement of registration on July 2, 1980, after its lapse post-Vietnam, the MSSA builds on precedents like the 1917 Act (Pub. L. 65-12, May 18, 1917) and the 1940 Selective Training and Service Act (Pub. L. 76-783, September 16, 1940). In Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), the Court sustained the MSSA's male-only registration against equal protection claims under the Fifth Amendment, holding that Congress's exclusion of women—then barred from roles—rationally advanced military readiness without unduly burdening men. Challenges to the MSSA's gender distinction persist, particularly after the 2015 Department of Defense policy opening all combat roles to women, with lower courts in cases like v. Selective Service System (N.D. Cal. 2019) deeming it unconstitutional under . However, the denied on June 7, 2021 (No. 20-928), preserving Rostker's precedent without revisiting its equal protection analysis. This judicial deference underscores Congress's plenary authority over draft mechanics, subject only to in non-combat contexts, though ongoing debates question its alignment with post-2015 gender-neutral military policies.

Role in National Defense and Readiness

The Selective Service System (SSS) serves as a critical standby mechanism to augment the U.S. Armed Forces during national emergencies when voluntary enlistments prove insufficient, enabling rapid mobilization of conscripted personnel to meet requirements. By maintaining a comprehensive database of over 100 million registrants since its inception, the SSS ensures equitable access to manpower, functioning as the sole federal source for drafted individuals in scenarios demanding large-scale expansion beyond the all-volunteer force. This role underscores a hedge against potential threats, preserving the capacity for mass induction without the delays of recruitment systems. In a declared national emergency, activation requires congressional authorization to amend the , followed by presidential proclamation to initiate the . The process begins with a public determining order of by birthdate, prioritizing 20-year-olds and expanding to ages 21-25, 19, and 18.6 as needed; registrants then to Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) for physical, mental, and moral evaluations. The commits to delivering the first inductees to the within 193 days of authorization, processing deferments, exemptions, and appeals through district and national boards to maintain fairness. This timeline supports surge planning, allowing integration of draftees into training pipelines while minimizing disruptions to ongoing operations. The system's readiness extends beyond to ongoing and interagency coordination, including annual updates to registrant records and exercises simulating full mobilization. As a low-cost entity—operating on approximately $30 million annually—it provides strategic depth, deterring adversaries by signaling the U.S. ability to scale forces quickly in existential conflicts, such as a peer-state requiring millions of personnel. Critics, including some analysts, argue that reliance on an untested since poses risks of administrative bottlenecks, yet empirical simulations affirm its viability as a constitutional backstop for common .

History

World War I Implementation (1917-1920)

The Selective Service Act of 1917, signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson on May 18, 1917, established the framework for conscripting men into the U.S. Army to meet World War I manpower needs following the American declaration of war against Germany on April 6, 1917. The act authorized the registration and induction of males aged 21 to 30, with provisions for later expansion, and emphasized local administration through over 4,600 draft boards to distribute the burden equitably across communities. Brigadier General Enoch H. Crowder, appointed Provost Marshal General on May 22, 1917, oversaw the system's implementation, drawing on his experience as Judge Advocate General to devise regulations that balanced national requirements with individual circumstances. Registration occurred in four waves to capture eligible men: the first on June 5, 1917, for those aged 21 to 31; the second on June 5, 1918, for men turning 21 after the initial date; the third on August 24, 1918, for ages 18 to 21; and the fourth on September 12, 1918, for ages 18 to 45, though the latter primarily served administrative purposes amid the war's nearing end. Approximately 24 million men registered nationwide, facilitated by local boards that verified eligibility and issued classification cards detailing personal details, occupations, and dependencies. Local boards then classified registrants into five divisions: Class I for those fully available (e.g., single men without dependents); Classes II-IV for deferred due to industrial, agricultural, or familial dependencies; and Class V for exemptions like ministers, officials, or physical unfitness. Selection proceeded via a national lottery system, with the first drawing on July 20, 1917, in , where capsules containing serial numbers determined the order of , starting with number 258. State quotas, allocated based on and needs, guided calls from local boards, which could grant appeals for deferments but faced pressure to meet targets, leading to some inconsistencies in exemption approvals for essential workers like farmers. Between September 1917 and November 1918, 2,810,296 men were inducted, comprising the bulk of the 4 million U.S. troops mobilized, though volunteers numbered around 2 million, reducing reliance on early on. Post-Armistice on , 1918, inductions ceased, but administrative functions persisted into 1919-1920 for processing discharges, appeals, and final records amid of over 3 million soldiers by mid-1919. Crowder's office concluded operations when he was relieved as Provost Marshal General on July 15, 1919, though residual tasks extended slightly beyond, marking the system's wind-down without renewal until later conflicts. The process demonstrated effective decentralized enforcement but highlighted tensions over equity, with rural areas bearing heavier proportional loads and conscientious objectors numbering about 2,000, mostly granted status or farm work exemptions.

World War II Mobilization (1940-1947)

The Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, enacted on September 16, 1940, instituted the first peacetime draft in U.S. history, mandating registration of male citizens and certain male residents aged 21 to 35 with local draft boards. This measure responded to escalating global threats, enabling rapid military expansion prior to formal U.S. entry into . Initial registrations began October 16, 1940, with subsequent waves expanding to include men born between 1897 and 1927 across multiple series. Local Selective Service boards, comprising over 6,000 civilian volunteers, classified registrants into categories such as I-A (available for immediate ), III-A (deferred for ), and IV-F (unfit for ), prioritizing inductions based on quotas and deferment needs for agriculture, industry, and family support. By , following U.S. entry into the war, the age range extended to 18-45 for liability and 18-65 for registration, with the system inducting personnel into the , , and Marine Corps. General Lewis B. Hershey, appointed director in July 1941, oversaw operations, ensuring equitable distribution amid wartime demands while managing appeals and exemptions. From November 1940 to October 1946, the Selective Service System facilitated the induction of 10,110,104 men, constituting the bulk of U.S. ground forces mobilized for combat in and the Pacific theaters. This conscription supplemented voluntary enlistments, filling critical manpower gaps as industrial production surged and voluntary recruitment proved insufficient for sustained operations. Deferments for essential civilian roles underscored the system's balance between military needs and domestic economic stability, with classifications adjusted via lottery sequences and physical examinations to minimize unqualified inductions. Postwar demobilization accelerated after Japan's surrender on September 2, 1945, with inductions tapering as veterans returned; the act received multiple congressional extensions but expired on March 31, 1947, ending compulsory service until its 1948 reenactment amid tensions. During this period, the system processed appeals for over 500,000 conscientious objectors, assigning many to camps for alternative contributions, reflecting administrative adaptations to legal and ethical challenges without undermining mobilization efficacy.

Cold War and Pre-Vietnam Era (1948-1969)

The Selective Service Act of 1948, enacted on June 24, 1948, by President Harry S. Truman, instituted a peacetime draft to address falling voluntary enlistments and sustain armed forces amid emerging Cold War threats, including the Soviet blockade of Berlin. It mandated registration for males aged 18 to 26, with induction liability primarily for those 19 to 25, and was originally limited to two years but extended indefinitely thereafter. Initial operations under Director Lewis B. Hershey focused on low-volume inductions, totaling around 20,000 men in 1948 and 10,000 in 1949, supplemented by volunteers to meet end-strength requirements. The North Korean invasion of on June 25, 1950, triggered rapid mobilization, with authorizing draft calls to bolster forces. responded with the Universal Training and Act of 1951, extending active duty to 24 months, authorizing inductions of 18-year-olds after older groups, and establishing the Doctor Draft for medical professionals. From June 1950 to June 1953, Selective Service inducted 1,529,539 men, comprising a substantial portion of personnel deployed to , though overall contributions to uniform strength reached 27% when including reserves and volunteers. Hershey's administration emphasized fair classification, granting deferments for college students, agriculture, and critical industries to minimize economic disruption. Post-armistice in 1953, the system shifted to standby readiness, with inductions tapering but persisting to support Cold War contingencies like the and crises. Between 1954 and 1964, approximately 1.4 million men were drafted at an average of 120,000 per year, reflecting sustained but reduced demands compared to wartime peaks. Local boards handled classifications, often prioritizing single men without dependents, while exemptions applied to conscientious objectors and hardship cases. By 1967, specialized drafts for physicians and dentists addressed shortages, and inductions climbed toward 300,000 annually as involvement intensified, though pre-escalation operations emphasized equity and minimal coercion. Hershey's tenure ensured administrative continuity, adapting to demographic shifts and technological aids in registration processing.

Vietnam War and Draft Resistance (1969-1975)

In response to criticisms of deferment inequities during the , the Selective Service System introduced a random lottery system in 1969 to establish the order of induction. The inaugural lottery, conducted on December 1, 1969, assigned numbers from 1 to 366 to birth dates for males born between 1944 and 1950, determining priority for potential 1970 draft calls. This reform, overseen by Director Lewis B. Hershey, aimed to replace discretionary local board decisions with chance-based selection, though Hershey himself had previously opposed lotteries as substituting "chance for merit." Hershey's tenure, spanning from 1941 to 1970, drew controversy for policies such as revoking student deferments for anti-war protesters and labeling resisters as "delinquents," which intensified public backlash amid escalating war casualties and domestic unrest. In 1970, Curtis W. Tarr succeeded as director, implementing further procedural changes to enhance perceived fairness, including computerized processing and reduced reliance on older registrants. Annual lotteries continued through 1975, but with diminishing relevance as draft calls declined. Draft inductions peaked earlier in the decade but fell sharply from 1969 onward as President implemented and reduced U.S. troop levels. The following table summarizes Selective Service inductions for the period:
YearInductions
1969283,586
1970162,746
197194,092
197249,514
1973646
19740
19750
The last draft call occurred on December 7, 1972, with induction authority expiring on June 30, 1973. Nixon's January 27, 1973, executive order formally ended , transitioning to an all-volunteer force amid widespread opposition. Resistance to the manifested in various forms, including conscientious objection claims, medical and occupational deferments, (with estimates of 60,000 to 100,000 men leaving the U.S.), and outright evasion. Approximately 570,000 men were designated as draft offenders during the war, but prosecutions were selective, resulting in only 8,750 convictions and 3,250 imprisonments. Local boards processed over half of the 27 million eligible men via deferments, contributing to perceptions of class-based disparities despite reforms. These dynamics reflected broader causal factors, including the war's unpopularity, high casualty rates, and eroding public trust in institutional equity.

Post-Vietnam Reforms and All-Volunteer Transition (1975-1980)

Following the cessation of inductions on January 27, 1973, and the establishment of the all-volunteer force on July 1, 1973, the Selective Service System shifted to a standby posture to support national defense readiness without active conscription. In March 1975, President Gerald Ford issued Proclamation 4360 on March 29, suspending mandatory registration for males aged 18 to 25, thereby eliminating ongoing registration requirements and transitioning the agency into "deep standby" mode. This reform reduced administrative operations, including the closure of most local boards, while preserving existing registrant data and planning capabilities for emergency mobilization; it reflected a post-Vietnam emphasis on minimizing the draft's footprint amid public opposition to conscription, yet maintained the legal framework under the Military Selective Service Act for potential reactivation. By late 1975, directed the implementation of streamlined administrative procedures for managing the standby system, including contingency planning for a one-time mass registration if proved necessary. Throughout the mid-to-late 1970s, the Selective Service System focused on internal reforms to enhance efficiency, such as updating classification processes and , in alignment with the all-volunteer force's reliance on voluntary recruitment supplemented by a dormant mechanism. These changes addressed criticisms of the Vietnam-era system's inequities and inefficiencies, including lottery-based selection, by prioritizing technological and organizational readiness over active operations; however, concerns over declining enlistment rates and geopolitical tensions prompted initial revival efforts by late to upgrade . The Soviet invasion of in December 1979 accelerated reforms under President , who viewed reinstated registration as essential for signaling resolve and ensuring rapid draft capability. On February 8, 1980, publicly announced plans to revitalize the Selective Service System, seeking authority for registration of both men and women—women specifically for non roles—to bolster defense preparedness without immediate . approved enabling legislation on June 25, 1980, authorizing registration of males aged 19 and 20 as an initial step. then signed 4771 on July 2, 1980, mandating that males born in 1960 register at designated sites or post offices during a six-day period beginning July 21, 1980, effectively ending the five-year registration suspension and recommencing data collection for 18- to 25-year-olds. Although 's proposal included women, limited implementation to men, preserving gender-specific requirements rooted in exclusion policies. This transition fortified the all-volunteer force's backup structure, with over 5.1 million men registering by September 1980, demonstrating renewed compliance mechanisms amid heightened threats.

Contemporary Operations and Reforms (1980-Present)

Following the suspension of draft inductions in 1973 and the transition to an all-volunteer force, the Selective Service System focused on maintaining standby mobilization capabilities without active conscription. In response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, President issued Presidential Proclamation 4771 on July 2, 1980, reinstating registration requirements for males born in 1960, with registration commencing on July 21, 1980, for those turning 18 that year. Congress appropriated $13.3 million to the on June 25, 1980, enabling operations to resume, and the system achieved approximately 95% compliance rates within four months of reinstatement. Since then, no lotteries or inductions have occurred, with the emphasizing data collection and infrastructure readiness for potential national emergencies under the . Contemporary operations center on mandatory registration for U.S. male citizens and immigrants aged 18 to 25, requiring notification within 30 days of turning 18 via online portals, mail, or in-person at U.S. locations and participating offices. The agency maintains a database of over 15 million registrants, integrating with federal systems like the and Department of Education for verification, while state directors oversee local appeals boards comprising over 11,000 volunteer members for potential classification reviews. Non-compliance can result in denial of , employment, or , though enforcement has been inconsistent, with estimates of 20% non-registration among eligible males in recent years. Annual appropriations hover around $25-30 million to sustain these functions, prioritizing administrative efficiency over active mobilization. Reforms since 1980 have addressed legal challenges, gender policies, and technological upgrades. The in Rostker v. Goldberg (1981) upheld male-only registration as constitutional, citing 's authority to prioritize combat roles amid an all-volunteer force's demands. Debates over extending registration to women intensified post-2013 combat role openings for females; a 2020 National Commission on , National, and Public Service recommended inclusion alongside automatic registration, but rejected full implementation in subsequent National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs), maintaining male-only requirements as of 2025. Critics, including some analysts, argue expansion would dilute readiness without addressing volunteer recruitment shortfalls, while abolition proposals cite the system's obsolescence given the all-volunteer force's success since 1973. Technological modernization efforts accelerated in the to enhance cybersecurity and efficiency. In March 2022, the Technology Modernization Fund awarded $5.9 million to migrate legacy systems to the cloud, implement DevSecOps practices, and upgrade the registrant database against cyber threats, with nearly $3.7 million expended by 2024. A FedRAMP-certified national registration system is slated for full deployment in 2025, enabling automated data intake from state DMVs and improved integrations for real-time compliance checks. These initiatives address vulnerabilities in outdated , ensuring the agency's capacity for rapid activation if authorized by and the .

Registration Requirements

Eligible Individuals and Age Criteria

The Selective Service System requires registration of nearly all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants residing in the United States who are between the ages of 18 and 25. This obligation stems from the (50 U.S.C. § 3802), which mandates that such individuals provide notice of availability for national service during potential mobilization. Registration applies regardless of , , or personal beliefs, encompassing U.S. citizens by birth or , as well as non-citizens such as lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, and undocumented immigrants present in the country. Individuals must register within 30 days of their 18th birthday, with the Selective Service System accepting late registrations up to age 26, after which the duty to register expires but prior non-compliance may still incur penalties. The age range ensures a pool of registrants who are generally physically capable of , with liability for induction extending from age 18 years and 6 months to 26 years under certain provisions of the Act. Failure to register during this window can result in ineligibility for , job training programs, government employment, and , enforced through cross-checks with agencies like the Department of Education and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Exceptions to the registration requirement are narrowly defined and include non-immigrant males holding valid visas for temporary purposes such as students, visitors, tourists, or diplomats; active-duty members of the U.S. Armed Forces; and certain incapacitated individuals certified as such by a . Elected officials and their immediate may also qualify for deferment during , but these do not broadly exempt the underlying obligation for most males in the eligible age cohort. Dual nationals residing abroad are not required to unless they live in the U.S., emphasizing the residency-based enforcement of the law.

Gender Requirements and Exemptions

The Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. §§ 3801 et seq.) mandates registration with the Selective Service System for nearly all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants residing in the United States who are aged 18 through 25. This requirement applies specifically to "male persons," thereby exempting females from registration obligations. The law's gender distinction reflects historical rationales tied to biological differences in physical capabilities for combat and Congress's exclusion of women from direct combat roles prior to 2015, though the registration framework has not been amended to include women despite their eligibility for combat assignments since then. The U.S. upheld the male-only registration in Rostker v. Goldberg (453 U.S. 57, 1981), ruling 6-3 that it did not violate equal protection under the Fifth Amendment, as men and women were not "similarly situated" given women's statutory ineligibility for combat at the time, which justified differential treatment for potential into combat units. Subsequent challenges, including National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System (2021), have not overturned this framework, with the Court dismissing the case without ruling on merits. Legislative efforts to extend registration to women, such as provisions debated in the Fiscal Year 2025 , have advanced in committees but failed to enact changes, leaving the male-only requirement intact as of October 2025. Selective Service determines registration based on biological sex assigned at birth, not , legal name changes, or medical transitions. Individuals assigned at birth must register even if they later identify as or undergo gender reassignment; conversely, those assigned at birth remain exempt regardless of identifying as or transitioning. No exemptions from registration apply to s on grounds of or related conditions, though such factors could qualify for deferments or exemptions (e.g., 4-F for medical unfitness) during an actual draft lottery and process. This birth-sex criterion aligns with the Act's focus on biological s for potential combat mobilization, prioritizing operational readiness over self-identified .

Registration Process and Compliance Mechanisms

Males aged 18 through 25 who are U.S. citizens or immigrants are required by law to register with the Selective Service System within 30 days of their 18th birthday or, for immigrants, within 30 days of entry into the if over 18. Registration can be completed online via the official website using full name, date of birth, current address, and (SSN); without an SSN, individuals must register by mail or in person. Printable registration forms (SSS Form 1) may be submitted by mail, or registration can occur at any U.S. location, where staff assist with form completion. Certain state departments of motor vehicles (DMVs) facilitate registration by transmitting applicant data directly to the Selective Service System during or ID applications, though this is not universal and depends on state agreements. Upon successful registration, the Selective Service System mails an acknowledgement letter and registration card to the provided within 30 days, confirming the registration number and date; individuals are responsible for updating contact information via the website or mail if circumstances change, such as or name updates. Dual citizens residing abroad or those without U.S. may register by mail, ensuring compliance to maintain eligibility for U.S. benefits. Late registrations are accepted up to age 26, but individuals over 26 who failed to register earlier must still attempt registration and may face scrutiny for prior non-compliance. Compliance is primarily enforced through verification checks and denial of benefits rather than routine criminal prosecution, with the system relying on self-reporting and institutional cross-checks. Registration status can be verified online using last name, SSN, and date of birth for men born after January 1, 1960, yielding a downloadable status letter; those without records must contact the agency by phone for assistance. Federal agencies, employers, and institutions routinely query the Selective Service database before granting benefits, such as , job opportunities in government or contracting, or citizenship applications, denying access to non-registrants. Non-registration constitutes a under the , punishable by up to five years and fines of $250,000, though active criminal has been minimal since the late , with fewer than a dozen prosecutions recorded since reinstatement in 1980. Instead, hinges on civil penalties, including lifelong ineligibility for employment, student loans, and grants in over 30 states, as well as barriers to professional licenses and . State laws in many jurisdictions mandate Selective Service checks for driver's licenses, public assistance, and education, amplifying through decentralized mechanisms rather than centralized pursuit. The reports an estimated rate above 90%, attributed to these benefit-denial incentives over direct legal action.

Organizational Structure and Operations

Agency Governance and Staffing

The Selective Service System functions as an independent agency within the executive branch of the United States federal government, established under the Military Selective Service Act to manage draft registration and contingency planning for personnel mobilization. It is headed by a Director, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, who serves without a fixed term and reports directly to the President on operational matters, including readiness assessments and policy recommendations for conscription if authorized by Congress. The Director holds authority to organize the agency's internal structure, appoint subordinate officials such as deputy directors and regional administrators, and direct the classification, examination, and induction processes in the event of activation. Governance emphasizes operational autonomy from the Department of Defense, with the coordinating but not subordinating to military branches during peacetime; funding derives from congressional appropriations rather than defense budgets, insulating it from direct departmental oversight. State-level implementation involves directors appointed by the national upon recommendation from each state's , ensuring localized administration while maintaining control over policy and appeals. No formal or external governing council exists under current statute, though the consults with interagency bodies like the for contingency planning. The agency's staffing model supports a lean, readiness-oriented framework, authorized for approximately 120 positions as of 2023, primarily civilians based at national headquarters in , , three regional headquarters (covering the Midwest, Northeast, and South/West), and the Data Management Center in . Key roles include specialists for database maintenance, legal counsel for compliance enforcement, and administrative personnel for registration processing; part-time or contract support augments this core during surges, but no active local boards are staffed in peacetime. This minimal footprint—totaling under 150 personnel including temporaries—reflects statutory limits on peacetime expenditures, prioritizing and over expansive .

Technological Infrastructure and Modernization Efforts

The Selective Service System maintains a centralized infrastructure that supports registrant data management, including online registration portals, verification services, and integration with federal partners such as the Department of Education for student aid eligibility checks. This includes a national database handling records for approximately 17 million registrants aged 18 to 25, with capabilities for status updates, proof issuance, and compliance tracking. The system's architecture has historically relied on legacy components, prompting ongoing upgrades to enhance , , and mobilization readiness for potential activation. Modernization efforts accelerated in 2022 with a $5.9 million from the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF), aimed at migrating core systems to the cloud, implementing DevSecOps practices, and strengthening cybersecurity to protect sensitive of tens of millions of registrants. By October 2024, nearly $3.7 million of the TMF funds had been expended on these initiatives, with the project on track for completion, including updates to data infrastructure for improved efficiency and resilience. The upgraded FedRAMP-authorized registration system is scheduled to go live in 2025, enabling more robust handling of daily operations and contingency scenarios like rapid induction processing. The agency's Strategic Plan for 2024-2026 emphasizes data-driven IT enhancements to address gaps in readiness, including lifecycle management of systems to support protocols and inter-agency communications. These reforms build on prior budgets, such as FY 2023's $3.0 million allocation for system sustainment and upgrades, prioritizing cost-effective delivery of end-to-end services while mitigating risks from outdated infrastructure. Overall, these efforts aim to transition from reactive maintenance to proactive, secure architectures capable of scaling during emergencies, though full depends on continued congressional and technical execution.

Draft Procedures

Mobilization and Activation Protocols

The mobilization and activation of the Selective Service System (SSS) requires congressional authorization to amend the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA), enabling the President to order inductions during a national emergency or war. Upon presidential proclamation, SSS shifts from peacetime registration maintenance to full operational activation, drawing on its standby infrastructure to facilitate rapid personnel delivery to the Department of Defense (DoD). This process prioritizes equity through random selection while accommodating classifications for deferments, exemptions, and alternative service. Activation begins with SSS issuing orders for all reserve force officers, selected military retirees, and civilian staff to report for duty, enabling the opening of approximately 96 area offices nationwide. Concurrently, around 2,000 local boards—staffed by roughly 11,000 citizen volunteers—are convened to handle registrant claims, alongside 96 district appeal boards and a national appeals board for reviews. These boards, dormant in peacetime, assess individual circumstances for classifications such as 1-A (available for service), 1-O ( eligible for civilian alternative service), 4-F (not qualified due to physical, mental, or moral reasons), or deferments for hardship, ministerial roles, or student status (e.g., high school until or age 20, college until academic year end). Exemptions apply to categories like ordained ministers, certain government officials, veterans with service obligations, and sole surviving sons. A national lottery, conducted publicly and televised within 10 days of , determines the order of by assigning random numbers to birth dates, starting with 20-year-olds, followed sequentially by ages 21-25, 19, and those 18 years and 6 months or older if additional manpower is required. Selected registrants receive notices by mail, directing them to report to a Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) for physical, mental, and moral evaluations, where they may file claims for postponements or reclassification. For specialized needs, the Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) enables targeted of up to 3.4 million health workers aged 20-45, prioritized by skill and minimizing disruption to civilian medical services. Under current DoD requirements, SSS must deliver the first inductees to within 193 days of the crisis onset and legislative authorization, with capacity to provide up to 100,000 inductees monthly thereafter once fully ramped up. This timeline assumes pre-existing registration data for over 15 million eligible males aged 18-25, enabling automated prioritization and notification via computerized systems integrated with DoD . Postponements for emergencies or ongoing allow temporary delays, but failure to report or comply can result in charges, though enforcement relies on local boards' discretionary processing. The protocols emphasize scalability, with SSS maintaining contingency plans for mass classification reviews and appeals to ensure operational readiness without peacetime overhead.

Lottery Selection and Prioritization

In the event of a draft activation authorized by and the , the Selective Service System conducts a national to establish the order of among eligible registrants. This process utilizes two Titan drawing machines: one containing 365 capsules inscribed with birth dates (month and day, with 366 for ) and another with capsules numbered sequentially from 1 to 365 (or 366). Capsules are drawn randomly and publicly, pairing each birth date with a unique sequence number, where lower numbers indicate higher priority for call-up. The is televised and observed to ensure transparency and fairness, with results transmitted to the agency's Center for processing notices starting from sequence number 1. Prioritization integrates the lottery sequence with age-based cohorts to determine the sequence of call-up. Eligible men are first drawn from the cohort turning 20 years old during the calendar year of the lottery (e.g., those born in 2005 for a 2025 draft), followed sequentially by those turning 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25. If quotas exceed the 20-25 age group, younger registrants are called next—first those turning 19, then those aged 18.6 years or older—while men over 26 are exempt from induction. Within each age cohort, the random sequence number governs the order, ensuring that only available registrants classified as 1-A (fit for service) receive induction orders until monthly quotas are met. This system differs from the Vietnam-era approach, which lacked a national and prioritized older registrants (19-25, oldest first) via board discretion, often leading to inconsistencies. Under current procedures, each man holds first-priority status for only one year—typically the calendar year he turns —reducing prolonged uncertainty and standardizing selection nationwide. Deferments or exemptions (e.g., for conscientious objectors classified 1-O or medical disqualifications as 4-F) are evaluated post- by boards, potentially delaying or exempting individuals from their assigned sequence.

Classification Categories

The Selective Service System categorizes registrants into classes that reflect their availability for , eligibility for deferments or exemptions, or other status upon activation. These classifications, codified in regulations, are determined by draft boards after reviewing individual claims based on factors such as physical and mental , occupational necessity, family hardship, conscientious objection, and prior service. Currently, no classifications are assigned to the approximately 17 million registered men aged 18-25, as the system operates in a standby mode without an active ; assignments would occur only if authorizes inductions and the issues a call-up order. Classifications are hierarchical, prioritizing those available for immediate while accommodating deferments for roles or exemptions for disqualifying conditions. Claims for reclassification must be substantiated with , and registrants may appeal decisions through district appeal boards. The system draws from the (50 U.S.C. §§ 3801 et seq.), which mandates classifications to balance national defense needs with individual circumstances. Key classification categories include:
ClassDescription
1-AAvailable for unrestricted military service, applicable to qualified registrants without deferments or exemptions.
1-A-OConscientious objector available only for noncombatant military service, based on sincerely held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs opposing war in any form but permitting alternative duties within the armed forces.
1-OConscientious objector opposed to all military service, requiring performance of civilian alternative service contributing to national health, safety, or interest, typically lasting 24 months.
1-CRegistrant serving in the Armed Forces, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or Public Health Service, exempt from further induction.
2-DDeferred due to ministerial studies, for registrants preparing for religious vocations.
3-ADeferred for extreme hardship to dependents, such as a spouse or children reliant on the registrant for support, limited to 365 days unless renewed.
4-ARegistrant who has completed military service, such as honorable discharge after at least six months or one year of active duty.
4-DMinister of religion, duly ordained and actively engaged in ministerial duties.
4-FNot acceptable for military service due to failure to meet physical, mental, or moral standards, or administrative reasons like prior disqualifying convictions.
Additional specialized classes address scenarios like treaty aliens (4-T), sole surviving sons (4-G), or those who have fulfilled alternative service (4-W), ensuring comprehensive coverage of exemptions under law. During historical drafts, such as (1964-1973), these categories processed millions of claims, with 4-F deferments rising due to medical disqualifications affecting about 15-20% of examined registrants annually. Reclassification processes emphasize , including personal appearances before boards for contested cases.

Controversies and Debates

In 1981, the in Rostker v. Goldberg upheld the constitutionality of male-only registration under the (MSSA), applying and deferring to Congress's judgment that excluding women from registration aligned with their categorical ineligibility for combat roles at the time, which served the government's objective of maintaining an effective fighting force. The 6-3 decision rejected equal protection claims under the Fifth Amendment, emphasizing that judicial deference to legislative choices in national defense matters precluded stricter scrutiny. Following the Department of Defense's 2015 decision to open all combat positions to women, legal challenges intensified, arguing that the elimination of gender-based combat restrictions undermined Rostker's rationale and rendered male-only registration discriminatory without a valid governmental interest. Challengers contended that the classification failed even , as it imposed burdens on men without corresponding benefits and contradicted equal protection principles applied in subsequent gender discrimination cases like United States v. Virginia (1996). The principal modern challenge arose in National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, filed in June 2019 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of by plaintiffs including the , , and James Lesmeister, who sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the MSSA's male-only requirement as facially discriminatory. On February 25, 2019, Judge Gray H. Miller granted for the plaintiffs, ruling that the gender classification no longer substantially advanced an important government interest post-combat integration, thus violating equal protection; however, he issued a stay to permit continued enforcement pending appeal. The Fifth Circuit reversed on August 13, 2020, holding that Rostker remained binding precedent and required deference to , which had not revisited the policy despite women's eligibility; the panel declined to apply heightened scrutiny, viewing the issue as one of legislative policy rather than judicial override. Plaintiffs petitioned the for (No. 20-928), which denied review on June 7, 2021, leaving the male-only requirement intact; Justices and Gorsuch dissented, arguing that intervening developments warranted reexamination of Rostker to determine if the classification still bore a rational relation to readiness. Subsequent litigation persists, including a May 2024 complaint by the in the Central District of California (No. 2:24-cv-04016), renewed before the Ninth Circuit in October 2025, reiterating equal protection arguments amid unchanged statutory policy and congressional inaction on gender-neutral registration proposals. These challenges highlight ongoing tension between constitutional equal protection mandates and in military and domains, where courts consistently affirm Congress's authority to maintain the absent legislative reform.

Gender Inclusion Proposals and Opposition

In 2020, the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service, established by in 2016, issued a final report recommending that women be required to register for the Selective Service System alongside men, citing the 2015 opening of all combat roles to women and the need for a broader pool of potential inductees in a major conflict. The commission argued that gender-neutral registration would enhance military readiness without mandating a , as registration serves primarily as an administrative database for planning. Legislative proposals to implement gender-inclusive registration have appeared in annual National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs). In July 2021, Senate Democrats proposed amending the to require women aged 18-25 to register, framing it as advancing in national service obligations. Similar provisions advanced in House Services votes, such as in 2021 and 2022, where amendments sought to replace male-specific language with gender-neutral terms, potentially adding 15-17 million women to the registration pool. The FY2025 NDAA included Section 598A for automatic registration of all citizens, encompassing women, though it faced hurdles; the Services version proposed exemptions for women from certain drafts, reflecting ongoing debates over implementation. Opposition to these proposals has come primarily from lawmakers and advocacy groups emphasizing biological differences in and the risks of lowering standards. In December 2024, eight senators urged rejection of women’s in the NDAA, arguing it would compel women into roles for which shows average physical disparities—such as lower upper-body strength and aerobic —render integration inefficient without adjusted requirements that compromise . The Center for Military Readiness has advocated abolishing draft registration entirely rather than expanding it, contending that modern volunteer forces, bolstered by technology, obviate the need for and that forcing women into drafts ignores from trials indicating higher injury rates and performance gaps. Feminist and pacifist organizations have also opposed inclusion, prioritizing draft abolition over extension. Groups like the and allied feminists denounced 2021 House votes for women’s registration, asserting that conscription inherently violates bodily and that expanding it entrenches without addressing root causes of inequities. Commentators in outlets like the New Hampshire Bulletin echoed this in 2021, recommending termination of the Selective Service System amid low compliance rates (estimated at 80-90% for men) rather than gender-neutral expansion, which they viewed as perpetuating an outdated Cold War-era mechanism. Legal challenges have indirectly influenced the debate. In v. Selective Service System, a 2019 federal district court initially ruled male-only registration unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment's , but the Fifth reversed this in 2020, upholding Congress's rationale tied to historical combat exclusions for women. The denied in June 2021 after vacating and remanding for reconsideration amid congressional activity, leaving the male-only system intact but highlighting tensions between claims and practical considerations. Proponents of inclusion, including the ACLU, maintain that excluding women constitutes sex discrimination, yet acknowledge no draft has occurred since 1973, rendering registration symbolic.

Enforcement Gaps and Societal Noncompliance

The Selective Service System estimates national registration compliance rates for males aged 18 through 25 at approximately 84% to 92% in recent years, based on data cross-checks with federal agencies like the , state motor vehicle departments, and voter rolls, though these figures rely on probabilistic modeling rather than universal verification and may overestimate actual compliance due to incomplete data matching. For calendar year 2019, the rate reached 92%, exceeding the agency's 90% target, but it declined to around 84% in 2022 and 2023 amid reduced outreach efforts and demographic shifts. Enforcement of the registration requirement under the remains minimal, with failure to register classified as a punishable by up to five years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine, yet the Department of Justice has pursued no criminal prosecutions since January 1986 despite identifying hundreds of thousands of potential nonregistrants annually. In alone, the Selective Service System referred over 112,000 suspected nonregistrants to authorities for , primarily through checks triggered by benefit applications or data mismatches, but these cases typically result in administrative notifications rather than legal action. This de facto policy prioritizes education and voluntary over punitive measures, reflecting resource limitations—a skeletal staff of about 100 employees focused on database maintenance—and the absence of an active draft, which reduces perceived urgency. Societal noncompliance manifests in both passive oversight and deliberate resistance, with estimates suggesting 600,000 to 1 million eligible males unregistered as of the early 1980s resurgence of the program, driven partly by anti-conscription sentiments lingering from the era and principled objections to mandatory registration as a form of coerced participation in potential . Public nonregistrants, often citing moral or constitutional grounds against under the Thirteenth Amendment, have included organized groups like the National Resistance Committee in the 1980s, though such overt defiance has waned without a draft; today, most gaps arise from unawareness, status ambiguities, or administrative hurdles, leading to collateral penalties like ineligibility for , jobs, or rather than direct enforcement. Congressional Research Service analyses note that while automatic registration proposals via federal databases could close these gaps, persistent under-enforcement undermines the system's readiness claims, as unverified nonregistrants could delay mobilization in a crisis.

Critiques of Effectiveness and Alternatives

Critics argue that the Selective Service System's mobilization timelines are inadequately slow for contemporary conflicts, with the Department of Defense's longstanding benchmark requiring 193 days to deliver the first inductees and 210 days for 100,000 personnel, a process untested since the all-volunteer force's inception in 1973. This delay stems from the need for induction, classification, medical screening, and basic training, during which the Army historically could train only about 50% of required personnel within 180 days, limiting utility in high-intensity scenarios demanding rapid surge capacity. Furthermore, the system's focus on mass-mobilizing primarily young combat troops overlooks modern warfare's emphasis on technical skills and experienced personnel, potentially mismatching inductees—who are often 20-year-olds lacking relevant expertise—with operational needs. Registration compliance undermines the system's reliability, achieving only 73% on-time participation and 88% overall as of 2015, down from 93% during the reinstatement, partly due to outdated and reliance on driver's license linkages that have declined in efficacy. Annual operating costs of approximately $23-25 million support a standby apparatus that generates 75,000-85,000 recruiting leads but duplicates data potentially available from other federal databases, raising questions about its value as "low-cost insurance" against threats. An estimated 70% of draft-age males are medically or otherwise unfit for , shrinking the viable and complicating equitable expansion, while historical precedents like Vietnam-era deferments highlighted inherent unfairness in allocation. In the context of an all-volunteer force that has sustained operations in and without conscription—drawing fewer than 2 million draftees amid 9 million total Vietnam servings—the Selective Service is viewed as vestigial, with draftees demanding extensive retraining that erodes and readiness compared to motivated volunteers. Political and societal resistance to activation, coupled with a doctrinal shift to "come-as-you-are" forces since , further diminishes its deterrence value, as adversaries may perceive as improbable amid public individualism and congressional hurdles. Alternatives include outright abolition of pre-registration to eliminate costs and , preserving congressional authority to enact a draft if existential threats arise, as the has proven sufficient for post-World War II conflicts. Reforms propose shifting to post-mobilization registration via electronic state data transfers or U.S. verification—potentially saving $5.7 million yearly—or a "deep standby" mode suspending operations for $11.3 million in savings, albeit extending inductee timelines to 374 days. Other options encompass relocating the system under the Department of for integration with active forces, developing voluntary inactive reserves for skilled surges, or reevaluating requirements toward targeted of occupational specialists, though the latter risks inefficiency in labor allocation. The has urged periodic reevaluations of these timelines and benefits, noting the Defense Department's inaction on prior 2012 recommendations.

References

  1. [1]
    About Selective Service : Selective Service System
    The Selective Service System is an independent federal agency that has been a distinguished part of America's history for over a century.
  2. [2]
    Frequently Asked Questions : Selective Service System
    The Selective Service System is a readiness organization charged with supporting America's All-Volunteer Force and the personnel needs of the Department of ...
  3. [3]
    Historical Timeline : Selective Service System
    The first national conscription system comes into being in 1917. Congress passes a draft law based on “the liability to military service of all male citizens.”
  4. [4]
    History and Records : Selective Service System
    Learn about the numbers of men who entered military service through the Selective Service System during major 20th century conflicts in which the US was ...Historical Timeline · Vietnam Lotteries · Draft Cards · Induction Statistics
  5. [5]
    Changes From Vietnam to Now : Selective Service System
    Changes include more limited student deferments, more representative boards, a lottery for call order, and guaranteed appeal appearances.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  6. [6]
    Who Needs to Register : Selective Service System
    Almost all male US citizens and male immigrants, who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service. It's important to know that even ...
  7. [7]
    The Selective Service System and Draft Registration - Congress.gov
    Aug 18, 2021 · The MSSA requires most males between the ages of 18 and 26 who are citizens or residents of the United States to register with Selective Service.The Selective Training and... · The Vietnam War and... · Selective Service System...
  8. [8]
    Going live in 2025: Modernizing the Registration System ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · The Selective Service System (SSS) is on track to complete a major upgrade to its FedRAMP-certified national registration system.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] FY-2025-SSS-Congressional-Budget ... - Selective Service
    In November 2023, the Selective Service System finalized an update to its Strategic Plan to align to its October 2022 Strategic Vision.<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Power to Raise and Support an Army: Overview - Law.Cornell.Edu
    The Congress shall have Power to raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.
  11. [11]
    Selective Draft Law Cases | 245 U.S. 366 (1918)
    The power of Congress to compel military service as in the Selective Draft Law, clearly sustained by the original Constitution, is even more manifest under the ...
  12. [12]
    Mobilizing for War: The Selective Service Act in World War I
    On May 18, 1917, Congress passed the Selective Service Act, which authorized the Federal Government to temporarily expand the military through conscription.
  13. [13]
    Rostker v. Goldberg | 453 U.S. 57 (1981)
    The Military Selective Service Act (Act) authorizes the President to require the registration for possible military service of males, but not females.
  14. [14]
    National Coalition for Men, et al. v. Selective Service System, et al.
    NCFM brought this case in the lower courts, where the district court agreed that the Military Selective Service Act is unconstitutional sex discrimination.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 20-928 National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System (6/07 ...
    Jun 7, 2021 · In. Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U. S. 57 (1981), this Court upheld the Act's gender-based registration requirement against an equal protection ...
  16. [16]
    Return to the Draft : Selective Service System
    Due to a lapse in appropriations, Selective Service will continue registering men online as required by Federal law, but most other operations are currently ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] SSS-Strategic-Plan-2024-2026-FINAL.pdf - Selective Service System
    Nov 15, 2023 · The Selective Service System (SSS) plays a vital role in supporting our nation's defense. We stand ready to support the Department of ...
  18. [18]
    Honoring America's Legacy of Readiness and Responsibility
    Sep 15, 2025 · From its deep standby days to its modern role in national preparedness, the Selective Service System continues to evolve—adapting to the times ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 2023 SSS 101 - Selective Service
    The Selective Service System is a trusted, actively engaged National. Defense partner and the sole source of conscripted talent for national security in the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Ongoing Review of the Military Selective Service Process Could ...
    Jan 10, 2018 · a national emergency requiring a mass mobilization, Congress and the ... Selective Service System that the department would need to mobilize ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] FY 2022 - Selective Service System
    To register men and maintain a system that, when authorized by the President and Congress, rapidly provides personnel in a fair and equitable manner while ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Contents - Selective Service
    The Selective Service stands ready and is prepared to meet and exceed its Constitutional mandate “to provide for the common defense,” to procure manpower in an ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
    The Selective Service System exists as a viable U.S. national security institution. The SSS registers young men when they reach age 18 and maintains an active ...
  24. [24]
    Selective Service System - U.S. Government Manual
    The Selective Service System (SSS) is a proven way to expand the U.S. Armed Forces in a national emergency. The SSS operates at low cost; it ensures that a ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Annual-Report-2022-Digital.pdf - Selective Service System
    The Selective Service System (SSS) supports the defense community, serving a critical role in ensuring that the nation's military personnel needs are met in.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Strategic-Plan-2022-2026-Final.pdf - Selective Service
    SSS is America's protection against DoD's need for both trained and untrained personnel in a national emergency. If needed, the Agency would implement a fair ...
  27. [27]
    U.S. Congress passes Selective Service Act - History.com
    Some six weeks after the United States formally entered the First World War, the U.S Congress passes the Selective Service Act on May 18, 1917, giving the ...
  28. [28]
    Records of the Selective Service System (World War I
    Textual Records: Draft registration cards for all registrants nationwide, containing vital statistics on each registrant, 1917- 18 (25,120 ft., in Atlanta).
  29. [29]
    World War I Draft Registration Cards | National Archives
    Jul 15, 2019 · During World War I there were three registrations. The first, on June 5, 1917, was for all men between the ages of 21 and 31. The second, on ...
  30. [30]
    U.S., World War I Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918 - Ancestry.com
    In 1917 and 1918, approximately 24 million men living in the United States completed a World War I draft registration card.
  31. [31]
    World War I Selective Service Draft Registrations
    Apr 22, 2020 · Over 24 million men were registered in the drafts for World War I. Of those, 2.8 million men were drafted; just over 500 thousand in the last half of 1917 and ...
  32. [32]
    Tiny capsules, national service: The draft during World War I
    Nov 8, 2017 · On July 20, 1917 , Baker was selected to draw the first capsule for the draft. He drew it at 9:30 a.m. It held the number 258. The drawing ...
  33. [33]
    Selective Service: Before the All-Volunteer Force
    Certain skills and professions were deemed so important to the economy and to the war effort that the act exempted workers who performed these tasks. Farmers ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Induction Statistics : Selective Service System
    Conflict and Number of Inductions ; World War I, Sept. 1917 – Nov. 1918, 2,810,296 ; World War II, Nov. 1940 – Oct. 1946, 10,110,104 ; Korean War, June 1950 – June ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] History of The Provost Marshal General of the Army
    Among the duties of the Provost Marshal General's office in World War I was administration of the selective service law. In November 1918, General John ...
  36. [36]
    World War I: Conscription Laws | Timeless - Library of Congress Blogs
    Sep 13, 2016 · Those exempted from the draft included federal and state officials and judges, religious ministers, seminary students and any person who was ...
  37. [37]
    First Peacetime Draft Enacted Just Before World War II
    Apr 7, 2020 · On Sept. 16, 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law the Selective Training and Service Act, which was another name for the draft.
  38. [38]
    President Roosevelt Signs Selective Training and Service Act
    The Selective Training and Service Act, signed on September 16, 1940, required men aged 21-35 to register with local draft boards, the first time the US ...
  39. [39]
    Selective Service Records | National Archives
    Apr 30, 2025 · The complete series of draft registration cards for the World War II era,1940-1947, from Record Group 147, Records of the Selective Service ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50a U.S.C. §§ 302 ... - Loc
    The Act requires male citizens and residents between 18 and 45 to be liable for training and service, and those between 18 and 65 to register. The President ...
  41. [41]
    Gen. Lewis Hershey, 83, Headed Selective Service
    May 20, 1977 · Gen. Hershey was named executive of the new Selective Service System that year and became its director in July 1941. By that time, he had begun ...
  42. [42]
    Background: 1948-1963 · The Draft in the Vietnam War, 1964-1973
    The Selective Service Act of 1948 was signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on June 24, 1948, as a result of the number of voluntary enlistments into the ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Selective Service Act of 1948, Conference Report - Loc
    The Selective Service Act of 1948 aims to maintain armed strength, requires registration for males 18-26, and those 19-26 are liable for service.
  44. [44]
    Selective Service Acts | History, Significance, & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 16, 2025 · Woodrow Wilson on May 18, 1917, created the Selective Service System, which managed the induction of some 2.8 million men into the armed forces ...
  45. [45]
    Lewis B. Hershey, Mr. Selective Service - UNC Press
    Serving as draft director under six different presidents, he played an important role in home-front mobilization, the evolution of Cold War politics, the ...
  46. [46]
    The Military Draft During the Vietnam War - Michigan in the World
    Between 1954-1964, from the end of the Korean War until the escalation in Vietnam, the “peacetime” draft inducted more than 1.4 million American men, an average ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
  47. [47]
    Vietnam Lotteries : Selective Service System
    The last draft call was on December 7, 1972, and the authority to induct expired on June 30, 1973. The date of the last drawing for the lottery was on March ...
  48. [48]
    Revision of Draft Law Studied - CQ Almanac Online Edition
    Hershey criticized proposals to base selection of inductees on a lottery system, calling such a system an “illusion” and saying it substituted “chance for ...Missing: controversies Vietnam
  49. [49]
    Director-Emeritus of U. S. Draft; Lewis Blaine Hershey
    By 1940 he had traveled all over the world studying draft systems. He was made deputy director of the infant Selective Service and became its director the ...
  50. [50]
    Curtis W. Tarr And The Draft "Lottery" - Richard Nixon Foundation
    Jun 29, 2013 · Tarr found himself in one of the hottest seats in government: the third director of the Selective Service System, the independent goverment ...
  51. [51]
    U.S. military draft ends, Jan. 27, 1973 - POLITICO
    Jan 27, 2012 · U.S. military draft ends, Jan. 27, 1973. By Andrew Glass01/27 ... In the 1968 presidential campaign, Nixon had promised to end the draft.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The U.S. Army's Transition to the All-Volunteer Force, 1968- 1974
    The US Army transitioned to an all-volunteer force from 1968 to 1974, with the draft ending in 1973. In 1968, over half of new enlistees were conscripts, but ...
  53. [53]
    Proclamation 4360—Selective Service Registration
    Mar 29, 1975 · Proclamation 4360—Selective Service Registration. March 29, 1975. By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Selective Service - Gerald R. Ford Museum
    In December 1975, at the direction of the President, the Selective. Service plans to institute new administrative procedures for the man- agement of a standby ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Gerald R. Ford Administration White House Press Releases
    President Ford signed Proclamation 4360 dated March 29, 1975, which changes the method by which young men, both citizens and aliens, fulfill their obligation ...
  56. [56]
    FORD IS PLANNING DRAFT REVISIONS - The New York Times
    Dec 15, 1975 · WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 (UPI) —President Ford is prepared to issue a Presidential proclamation that would radically restructure the Selective ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] What to Do With the Selective Service System? - RAND
    This Perspective starts with a short history of the current conscription system that resulted from the reforms enacted in 1971 by the Nixon administration as a ...
  58. [58]
    Jimmy Carter's Other Legacy: Registering for the Draft - Rolling Stone
    Jan 14, 2025 · Recalling another Jimmy Carter legacy: reinstating the signup for military service in 1980.
  59. [59]
    Selective Service Revitalization Statement on the Registration of ...
    Feb 8, 1980 · —I will seek additional authority to register women for noncombat service to our Nation. —I will take steps to enable the Selective Service ...Missing: 1979-1980 | Show results with:1979-1980
  60. [60]
    Congress Approves Draft Registration - CQ Almanac Online Edition
    Congress approved legislation June 25 allowing President Carter to register 19- and 20-year-old men for a future military draft.
  61. [61]
    Proclamation 4771 - National Archives
    Persons born in calendar year 1960 shall present themselves for registration on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 21, 1980.Missing: 1979-1980 | Show results with:1979-1980
  62. [62]
    The Selective Service System and Draft Registration - Congress.gov
    As a result, when President Carter reinstated Selective Service registration in July 1980, it applied to men only. Judicial Challenges. The first major court ...
  63. [63]
    The Role of Selective Service in Mobilization - U.S. Naval Institute
    ... mobilize forces in the event of national emergency ? ... Selective Service System with the capability to complete the mobilization timetable shown above.
  64. [64]
    The Selective Service System and Draft Registration
    Feb 27, 2019 · Congress responded by providing $13.3 million in appropriations for the Selective Service System on June 25, 1980. ... Current SSS Operating ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] selective service system - annual report
    SSS continued to modernize its essential capabilities, prioritizing three elements that advance the execution of the SSS mission and are at the center of ...
  66. [66]
    It's time to end—not expand—the Selective Service System
    Jun 16, 2022 · The United States has not drafted anyone since 1973, and the Selective Service system, which costs taxpayers about $26 million a year, collects ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] The Selective Service System and Draft Registration - Congress.gov
    Mar 3, 2020 · The first section of the report provides background and history on the Military Selective Service. Act, the Selective Service System, and the ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Will US draft women? An all-volunteer military is still right choice
    Jun 25, 2024 · US shouldn't draft women – or men. We need to keep an all-volunteer military. Making compensation more competitive with civilian careers is crucial.
  69. [69]
    The Technology Modernization Fund Announces $9 Million for ...
    Mar 10, 2022 · This TMF investment will modernize the PRC's website and key systems, allowing the public to more easily access and participate in the ...
  70. [70]
    Selective Service using TMF as springboard to DevSecOps
    Feb 17, 2025 · With an almost $6 million boost from the Technology Modernization Fund, the Selective Service is moving to the system to the cloud and updating ...
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Who Must Register - Selective Service
    NOTE: With only a few exceptions, the registration requirement applies to all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants residing in the. United States who are 18 ...
  73. [73]
    Men 26 and Older : Selective Service System
    According to law, a man must register with Selective Service within 30 days of his 18th birthday. Selective Service accepts late registrations up until a man ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] g:\comp\deflaws\military selective service act.xml
    The Military Selective Service Act aims to maintain armed strength, share service obligations, and requires males aged 18-26 to register for potential service.
  75. [75]
    Chapter 7 - Attachment to the Constitution - USCIS
    A. Attachment to the Constitution An applicant for naturalization must show that he or she has been and continues to be a person attached to the principles.
  76. [76]
    Rostker v. Goldberg | Oyez
    Mar 24, 1981 · The Court found that men and women, because of combat restrictions on women, were not "similarly situated" for the purposes of draft ...
  77. [77]
    Supreme Court rejects battle over male-only military draft registration
    Jun 7, 2021 · The Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal requirement that only men register for the draft when they become ...
  78. [78]
    FY2025 NDAA: Selective Service Registration Proposals
    Jan 29, 2025 · Congress considered changes to Selective Service registration and associated penalties for failure to register (see Table 1).
  79. [79]
    Everything You Need to Know About the Military Draft
    Jun 23, 2025 · Will there be a military draft in 2025? There's no concrete indication this could happen. While world events continue to evolve, there has been ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Who Must Register - Selective Service
    US citizens or immigrants who are assigned male at birth and changed their gender to female. *Must register within 30 days of release unless already age 26. ...
  81. [81]
    Register : Selective Service System
    Complete your registration with current and accurate information. The address you provide will be used to send your Registration Acknowledgement Letter.Who Needs to Register · Men 26 and Older · After Registering · Benefits & Penalties
  82. [82]
    Selective Service Registration (SSR) - AAMVA
    SSR is an automated system for MVAs to transmit Selective Service registration info when males apply for/renew licenses, linking it to state laws.
  83. [83]
    After Registering : Selective Service System
    Within 30 days of registering, you will receive the following in the mail: Acknowledgment letter; Change of Information form; Registration Acknowledgment ...
  84. [84]
    Compliance, noncompliance, and enforcement of Selective Service ...
    Since enforcement of the criminal penalties for nonregistration was abandoned in the late 1980s, the Selective Service System has depended on state laws in ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Verify Registration : Selective Service System
    Required information: Last name; Social Security Number; Date of Birth. You will be able to download an official Registration Acknowledgement Letter after ...
  86. [86]
    Report to Congress on Selective Service and Draft Registration
    Aug 19, 2021 · Men who fail to register may be subject to criminal penalties, loss of eligibility for certain federal or state employment opportunities and ...
  87. [87]
    32 CFR Part 1605 -- Selective Service System Organization - eCFR
    The Director of Selective Service shall be responsible directly to the President. The Director of Selective Service is hereby authorized and directed:<|control11|><|separator|>
  88. [88]
    50 U.S. Code § 3809 - Selective Service System - Law.Cornell.Edu
    To appoint, upon recommendation of the respective governor or comparable executive official, a State director of the Selective Service System for each ...Missing: governance staffing
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Download - Selective Service System
    The connection to our state directors, RFOs, and volunteer board members originates from the agency's three regional headquarters located in. North Chicago, IL, ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] September 22, 2023
    Sep 22, 2023 · Chief of Staff. OD. Saif M. Khan. Acting Deputy. Director. OD. Craig T. Brown. General Counsel. OD. Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr. Equal Employment.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Download - Selective Service System
    Selective Service System is authorized a staff of. 124 full-time employees to support its National. Headquarters, three regional headquarters, and the Data ...Missing: chart | Show results with:chart
  92. [92]
    Selective Service System
    Selective Service System registration is required by law. By registering, a young man remains eligible for jobs, state-based student aid and employment in most ...Who Needs to Register · About · Men 26 and Older · Frequently Asked Questions
  93. [93]
    The Technology Modernization Fund Announces $9 Million ... - GSA
    Mar 7, 2022 · This TMF investment will bolster cybersecurity and protect the personal information of tens of millions of Selective Service registrants. The ...
  94. [94]
    Selective Service on Track to Complete TMF-Funded Cyber Project
    Oct 7, 2024 · Of the $5.9 million that SSS received in TMF funding, almost $3.7 million has been spent on modernization efforts, according to the General ...
  95. [95]
    Scott Jones on Selective Service System's IT Modernization Effort
    Feb 18, 2025 · In March 2022, SSS received $5.9 million in funding from the Technology Modernization Fund Board to safeguard the personal data of Selective ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Qualifications For Becoming a Local Board Member Join Our Team
    In the event of a draft, approximately 2,000 Selective Service local boards would be activated across America to decide which registrants in their respective ...Missing: mobilization plan
  97. [97]
    Lottery : Selective Service System
    The Selective Service System would conduct a National Draft Lottery to determine the order in which young men would be drafted.
  98. [98]
    32 CFR Part 1630 -- Classification Rules - eCFR
    Class 4-A: Registrant who has completed military service. ... Class 4-B: Official deferred by law. ... Class 4-C: Alien or dual national. ... Class 4-D: Minister of ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] REPORT ON EXEMPTIONS AND DEFERMENTS FOR A POSSIBLE ...
    Regulations promulgated in 1982 established Class 4-T for “treaty aliens” who have specifically requested an exemption from military service in the U.S. based ...
  100. [100]
    Bernard ROSTKER, Director of Selective Service, Appellant, v ...
    The Military Selective Service Act (Act) authorizes the President to require the registration for possible military service of males but not females.
  101. [101]
    U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs challenge to all-male military draft sign-up
    Jun 8, 2021 · Texas-based U.S. District Judge Gray Miller in 2019 ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and declared the law unconstitutional. The New Orleans- ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] 19-20272-CV0.pdf - United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    Aug 13, 2020 · Plaintiffs-Appellees James Lesmeister, Anthony Davis, and the. National Coalition for Men sued Defendant-Appellants the Selective Service.
  103. [103]
    National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, 2:24-cv-04016
    May 14, 2024 · The case, National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, was filed in the C.D. California on May 14, 2024, for a violation of civil ...
  104. [104]
    Expanding the Selective Service: Legal Issues Surrounding Women ...
    Sep 14, 2020 · The Commission recommended that women should be required to register with the Selective Service System and be included in any future draft. ...
  105. [105]
    The National Commission on Public Service Is Right to Endorse ...
    Mar 27, 2020 · A national commission just recommended mandatory draft registration for women. While proponents agree that this is good for the military, few have examined how ...
  106. [106]
    Senate Democrats propose requiring women to register for military ...
    Jul 19, 2021 · Senate Democrats are proposing a sweeping rewrite of the military draft laws aimed at requiring women to register for the Selective Service System.
  107. [107]
    Requirement for Women to Register for the Draft Back on the Table ...
    Jun 27, 2022 · A fight over whether women should be required to register for a potential draft has been revived in Congress.
  108. [108]
    FY2025 NDAA: Selective Service Registration Proposals
    Oct 23, 2024 · Section 598A would have required automatic Selective Service registration for “every citizen” (to include women) and every legal resident ...
  109. [109]
    GOP senators urge rejection of military draft for women
    Dec 5, 2024 · Eight Republican senators are fighting against a National Defense Authorization Act proposal pushed by Democrats to force young women to ...<|separator|>
  110. [110]
    Senate and House Should Oppose Selective Service Registration of ...
    Jul 24, 2021 · The House of Representatives ultimately rejected a “Draft Our Daughters” amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2017.
  111. [111]
    Quaker and feminist orgs denounce vote on drafting women
    Sep 2, 2021 · The House Armed Services Committee voted to pass an amendment that would expand draft eligibility to women.
  112. [112]
    Commentary: Abolish draft registration – don't expand it to include ...
    Dec 22, 2021 · Plans to mandate Selective Service registration for women were dropped in last-minute negotiations over the National Defense Authorization ...Missing: neutral | Show results with:neutral
  113. [113]
    Requiring Men but not Women to Register for the Draft is Sex ...
    Jan 8, 2021 · Goldberg. The Supreme Court reasoned that Congress could choose to require only men to register since the draft was aimed at replacing combat ...
  114. [114]
    Here's Why Lawmakers Want to Automatically Register Men for ...
    Jul 8, 2024 · In 2023 and 2022, the compliance rate for registering was about 84%, a 5% decrease from 2021, according to the annual reports and data obtained ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] 2021 ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS 1 - Selective Service
    Mar 11, 2022 · registration compliance rates and an absence of Selective. Service advertising efforts. In September 2021, over 73,000 postcards were ...
  116. [116]
    Registration Compliance Data by States, Territories, and the District ...
    Registration Compliance Data: CY 2023. Maintaining a high compliance rate is of great importance because it means that any future draft instituted by Congress ...
  117. [117]
    Benefits & Penalties : Selective Service System
    Penalties for Failing to Register ... If required to register, failure to register is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or 5 years imprisonment.
  118. [118]
    Selective Service Registration: Coercion of Conscience
    Oct 1, 2013 · As mentioned earlier, the government has prosecuted no one for violating Selective Service law since 1986, yet hundreds of thousands of US ...
  119. [119]
    Failing to register for draft has serious, long-term consequences
    Apr 2, 2019 · The penalty is up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Last year, Selective Service referred 112,051 names and addresses of suspected ...
  120. [120]
    [PDF] The Government's Enforcement of Draft Registration: Prosecution or ...
    By mid- 1982, Selective Service officials estimated that while approximately 8,365,000 young men had registered,. 674,000 had failed to do so. Federal law makes ...<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Deciding whether or not to register with the Selective Service System
    Public nonregistrants typically argue either (or both) that they feel a moral compulsion to tell the government what they have done or to make their action ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] A n n u a l R e p o r t - Selective Service System
    For. CY 2014, the Selective Service national overall estimated registration compliance rate of 88 percent decreased five percentage points from CY 2013 for men ...
  123. [123]
    Back to the Drafting Board - CNAS
    Jun 18, 2024 · ... 193 days to fully execute a draft, from the ... Selective Service System Annual Report to the Congress of the United States, Calendar ...
  124. [124]
    The Draft Should be Left Out in the Cold | The Heritage Foundation
    May 18, 2017 · The Selective Service's purpose is to enable a draft should the United States need more military power than exists in the current all volunteer force.
  125. [125]
    Selective Service: End It, Don't Mend It | Cato at Liberty Blog
    Feb 5, 2016 · The Selective Service System was open to criticism for being unfair, especially as the number of deferments expanded during the Vietnam War ...