Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Project 985


Project 985 was a selective program initiated by the government of the People's Republic of China in 1998 to elevate a group of top universities to world-class status through concentrated investments in research, infrastructure, and talent development. The initiative derived its name from the date—May 4, 1998 (5·4·98)—of a speech by then-President Jiang Zemin at Peking University's centenary celebration, where he advocated for constructing several high-level universities to support national rejuvenation. It designated 39 institutions, primarily from the earlier Project 211 framework, as recipients of enhanced funding and policy support, aiming to foster innovation, international collaboration, and elite human capital formation.
The program allocated billions of renminbi across phases, with Phase I (1999–2003) distributing approximately 14 billion RMB to 34 universities for building research centers and facilities, while top recipients like and each received around 250 million USD equivalent. These resources enabled expansions in faculty recruitment, laboratory modernization, and global partnerships, significantly boosting publication rates in international journals and elevating several institutions' positions in global rankings. Empirical assessments attribute rapid advances in research output and competitiveness to the project's targeted incentives, though outcomes varied by discipline and emphasized quantitative metrics over qualitative breakthroughs. While Project 985 achieved measurable progress in enhancing China's profile, it drew scrutiny for concentrating resources among an elite subset, potentially widening disparities between designated and others, and for prioritizing scale over systemic reforms in areas like academic autonomy. The initiative concluded around 2016, succeeded by the broader plan in 2017, which shifted toward discipline-specific excellence and incorporated more institutions to address prior limitations.

Origins and Launch

Announcement and Historical Context

Project 985 was publicly announced on May 4, 1998, by then-President during his speech at the centennial celebration of , where he called for the development of a select number of world-class universities to bolster China's modernization efforts and support national rejuvenation. The project's name derives from the date of this address—combining "98" for the year, "5" for May, and implying a focus on elite institutions—reflecting the Chinese government's tradition of codifying major initiatives with numeric designations tied to key events. This occasion coincided with the symbolic legacy of 's role in intellectual movements, underscoring the state's intent to harness for strategic national advancement. The initiative emerged within China's broader reforms of the 1990s, which sought to address deficiencies in research capacity and global competitiveness amid accelerating economic expansion following Deng Xiaoping's opening-up policies. It built directly on the earlier , launched in 1995 by the Ministry of Education to prioritize approximately 100 key universities and disciplines for enhanced research and teaching standards, but Project 985 represented a more concentrated, elite-focused escalation. This progression aligned with central planning mechanisms inherited from the socialist era, emphasizing top-down resource allocation to cultivate innovation engines capable of sustaining double-digit GDP growth rates observed in the mid-1990s. External pressures, including preparations for China's anticipated accession to the (formalized in 2001 after negotiations intensifying in the late ), further underscored the perceived urgency to elevate domestic universities to international levels, reducing reliance on foreign talent and technology imports for knowledge-based industries. Jiang's directive explicitly framed the project as a state-orchestrated endeavor to produce "first-rate universities with first-rate disciplines" as pillars of scientific and technological , diverging from market-driven models in the by prioritizing national priorities over institutional autonomy.

Objectives and Strategic Rationale

Project 985 sought to establish approximately 10 to 20 world-class universities by concentrating national resources on a select group of elite, research-intensive institutions, as articulated in its launch during the 1998 centennial celebration of Peking University. This top-down approach prioritized enhancing research capabilities, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, to drive innovation and reduce dependence on foreign technological expertise. The initiative reflected a recognition that China's post-1978 higher education expansion under decentralized funding had produced uneven quality and outputs across institutions, necessitating centralized intervention to elevate metrics such as international publications and patents as indicators of progress. The strategic rationale was embedded in broader national objectives of socialist modernization, aiming to position as a global leader in and counteract the brain drain of talent to Western institutions by bolstering domestic prestige and competitiveness. Officials viewed the project as essential for fostering in key technologies amid geopolitical realities, where lagging behind advanced economies risked sustained economic subordination. By focusing resources on fewer high-potential universities rather than diffuse support, the program applied principles of concentrated development to accelerate causal pathways from investment to measurable advancements in productivity and institutional stature.

Implementation Framework

Selection Process and Criteria

The selection process for Project 985 began on May 4, 1998, when the Chinese government, through a joint announcement by then-President and Premier at , identified nine elite universities—, , , , , University of Science and Technology of China, , , and —as initial participants, laying the foundation for the . These institutions were chosen based on their pre-existing prestige, strong faculty, and research output, reflecting a prioritization of established national leaders in . The process involved bottom-up proposals from universities collaborating with government entities, followed by top-down approval, but no formal application or competitive bidding mechanism was disclosed. Expansion occurred in phases, with a second phase launched in 2004 that increased the total to 39 universities by incorporating additional institutions demonstrating high research potential and alignment with national strategic priorities, such as , , and disciplines. Selections were overseen by the Ministry of Education and the State Council, which evaluated universities on qualitative factors including institutional history, academic infrastructure, and capacity for competitiveness, though these assessments remained internal and non-quantifiable in public records. Regional considerations were nominally factored to support balanced national development, yet the outcomes disproportionately favored universities in economically advanced eastern provinces. The absence of publicly detailed criteria or standardized evaluation protocols—such as specific metrics for quality, rates, or outputs—undermined procedural , prompting scholarly critiques that the process may have been influenced by administrative favoritism or political directives rather than pure meritocratic assessment. Decisions rested with central authorities without independent audits or disclosures, raising causal questions about whether selections reinforced elite networks tied to state priorities over broader competitive equity. This opacity contrasted with more open international models, potentially prioritizing loyalty to objectives in university governance over empirical performance data.

Funding Mechanisms and Allocations

The funding for Project 985 was primarily channeled through direct grants from the via the Ministry of Education, supplemented by matching contributions from provincial governments and participating universities to ensure aligned incentives and local commitment. These mechanisms emphasized state-directed resource concentration, with central allocations serving as the core while local funds amplified scale, often structured as contractual obligations requiring provinces and institutions to provide equivalent or proportional support. In Phase I (1999–2003), the disbursed 14 billion RMB in special funds to 34 selected universities, focusing on foundational investments such as laboratory construction and basic upgrades. Total investment for this phase, including matching funds, reached approximately 22.77 billion RMB. Phase II (2004–2007) expanded allocations to a total of 41 billion RMB across 39 institutions, with contributions comprising about 46.1% or roughly 18.9 billion RMB, the remainder drawn from provincial and institutional sources. A subsequent Phase III (2010–2013) continued this pattern, integrating funding into broader national priorities without a separately itemized total but building on prior contractual frameworks. Allocations were directed toward specific categories, including the development of state-of-the-art facilities and laboratories, and retention of high-caliber , and initiatives for partnerships to foster . disbursement operated through performance-oriented contracts negotiated between the Ministry of Education, local authorities, and , which stipulated measures such as progress reports and goal attainment to release tranches of support, embedding oversight to align expenditures with national objectives. This approach prioritized infrastructural and enhancements in early phases, shifting toward advanced capabilities in later ones.

Participating Institutions

Core Universities and Phased Inclusion

Project 985 commenced with the designation of nine core universities in its initial phase, announced in May 1998 during the centennial commemoration of , as part of efforts to concentrate resources on elite institutions already prominent under the preceding Project 211. These institutions, collectively forming the basis of the , received priority funding and support, with and each allocated approximately US$250 million in the first stage, representing a significant share of early resources directed toward enhancing research infrastructure and international competitiveness. The core universities were: Selection for this phase prioritized universities with established strengths in key disciplines, drawing exclusively from Project 211 participants, though the criteria emphasized potential for world-class status over uniform regional representation. In the second phase, initiated in , the program expanded to incorporate 30 additional universities, elevating the total to 39 by 2005, with no further inclusions thereafter despite ongoing developments. This phased inclusion fixed the roster by the mid-2000s, excluding numerous regional institutions that met basic eligibility but lacked the perceived elite trajectory, thereby reinforcing a hierarchical structure. The core nine continued to command disproportionate funding shares, accounting for over 40% of total allocations across both phases, as exemplified by Tsinghua University's elevated resource intake relative to later entrants. This approach underscored the project's elitist orientation, channeling investments toward a select cadre to accelerate global parity rather than broad diffusion.

Geographic and Institutional Distribution

The 39 universities selected for Project 985 are distributed across 18 provinces and municipalities in , demonstrating a pattern of geographic centralization toward major urban and economic hubs. contains the largest share with 8 institutions, including and , representing over 20% of the total participants. follows with 4 universities, such as and . This concentration in the capital and the eastern metropolis aligns with pre-existing advantages in talent aggregation, infrastructure, and economic development in these areas, which facilitated stronger institutional legacies prior to the project's launch. In contrast, inland and western provinces exhibit sparse representation, with regions like (Lanzhou University) and (University of Science and Technology of China) each hosting only one Project 985 university. Provinces such as and have 2 and 3 institutions, respectively, but overall, less developed inland areas account for a minority of selections, underscoring a bias toward coastal and central-eastern provinces where historical academic strengths were already pronounced. While the initiative spans diverse locales, this uneven spread perpetuated resource advantages in established urban centers rather than broadly elevating peripheral regions. Institutionally, the cohort comprises primarily comprehensive universities with broad disciplinary scopes, exemplified by and , alongside specialized entities emphasizing engineering, technology, and applied sciences, such as and Xi'an Jiao Tong University. Nonetheless, the selection overwhelmingly favored pre-eminent institutions that had long dominated national academic metrics, including admission competitiveness and research output, thereby reinforcing elite hierarchies rather than diversifying typological participation. This blend reflects the project's intent to build on existing foundational strengths, though it limited inclusion of niche or regionally focused specialized schools outside major hubs.

Key Achievements

Research Productivity and Publications

Empirical studies attribute measurable gains in research publication output to Project 985 funding, particularly in journals. A 2013 analysis of 24 participating universities employed linear mixed modeling, controlling for R&D expenditures, faculty size, and provincial income, revealing that overall annual publication growth rates accelerated significantly after project implementation (p < 0.001). This effect persisted across tiers, with lower-tier institutions (Tier 2: 15.7% annual growth; Tier 3: 15.5%) outpacing elite ones like Tsinghua and Peking Universities (9% annual growth), suggesting the initiative amplified productivity in non-top institutions through targeted resource boosts. Quasi-experimental designs further substantiate causal links, with difference-in-differences models indicating positive effects on total publication volumes for 985 universities relative to non-participants. Data from 1993–2010, drawn from Ministry of Education statistics, highlight this as distinct from baseline trends driven by general economic expansion. While citation indices like those from Thomson Reuters (now Clarivate) reflect heightened international output—evidenced by faster integration into SCI-indexed journals—raw metrics emphasize quantity surges over normalized quality adjustments. These productivity lifts, however, warrant caution regarding metric limitations; accelerated volumes may incentivize publication quantity at potential expense of or innovation depth, as unobserved factors like incentive structures could inflate outputs without proportional advances in foundational research. Nonetheless, verifiable empirics from peer-reviewed evaluations prioritize the project's role in elevating aggregate scholarly dissemination from select institutions.

Infrastructure and Capacity Building

The Project 985 initiative directed significant funding toward enhancing physical infrastructure at selected , including the of modern campuses, advanced laboratories, and specialized research facilities. Between 1999 and 2007, across Phases I and II, the central government allocated RMB 32.9 billion in special funds to support these developments, enabling participating institutions to establish new research centers and upgrade existing ones. This investment complemented local government contributions, focusing on creating environments conducive to high-level scientific inquiry, such as state-of-the-art labs integrated with national key laboratory programs. Complementing physical expansions, Project 985 emphasized human capital development through recruitment incentives and synergies with parallel programs like the , launched in 2008, which targeted experts and scholars for positions at . Participating institutions, prioritized under Project 985, benefited from enhanced eligibility for these talent programs, attracting thousands of high-caliber researchers and professors, many with international experience, thereby bolstering teaching and advisory capacities. This recruitment drive facilitated increased collaborations, as returning talents brought networks and joint projects that expanded research scopes beyond domestic boundaries. These investments translated into measurable capacity gains, including scaled-up enrollment in doctoral programs and expanded operations. By prioritizing Project 985 universities, the initiative concentrated resources that supported a disproportionate share of national training—elite institutions under the program hosted around 80% of doctoral students relative to broader efforts—enabling rapid growth in graduate cohorts and output potential. Overall, the chain from to human resources demonstrably enhanced institutional scale, with participating leveraging new facilities to accommodate larger student bodies and interdisciplinary teams.

Elevation in Global Rankings

Prior to Project 985's launch in 1998, Chinese universities exhibited minimal presence in emerging global rankings, with none securing consistent top-100 positions in early assessments like the initial iterations starting in 2004. This reflected limited international research outputs and visibility compared to established Western institutions. The project's focused funding—totaling billions of for —catalyzed improvements by enhancing research infrastructure, faculty recruitment, and publication rates, directly influencing ranking metrics such as citations and academic reputation. By the mid-2010s, flagship Project 985 institutions like and had ascended into the top 50 of , with Tsinghua reaching 47th in 2015 and Peking 57th, marking average positional gains exceeding 100 spots for the core 985 cohort relative to pre-2000 baselines. In (THE) rankings, Tsinghua climbed to 58th by 2010, while Peking secured 37th, underscoring accelerated progress amid the project's emphasis on research productivity. These advancements were linked to post-985 surges in international publications, where 985 universities outpaced non-participants in growth rates, validating the hypothesis of concentrated investment yielding measurable global competitiveness. Into the 2020s, sustained top-200 placements became normative for core 985 universities in both QS and THE metrics, with Tsinghua at 17th and Peking at 14th in QS 2026, and Tsinghua 12th in THE 2025. Peking advanced 28 positions in THE over the prior decade to 13th in 2026, reflecting enduring benefits from enhanced outputs and collaborations. While organic advancements occurred among global peers through incremental evolution, Project 985's causal role is evident in the disproportionate ranking elevations of its select institutions versus non-985 counterparts, as empirical analyses of trajectories confirm. This trajectory supports selective resourcing as a driver of stature, though rankings themselves emphasize quantifiable indicators like citations over holistic factors.

Criticisms and Shortcomings

Resource Concentration and Inequality

The 39 universities designated under Project 985 received concentrated allocations from national budgets, with elite institutions in Projects 211 and 985 collectively securing over 72% of government research funding between 2009 and 2013. This prioritization aimed to elevate select campuses to global standards but exacerbated funding disparities, as non-elite universities competed for the remaining resources amid expanding enrollment demands. Empirical data indicate that such concentration directly constrained development in lower-tier institutions, where per-student investments lagged, contributing to persistent gaps in and retention. Research productivity further highlighted these effects, with non-985 universities exhibiting minimal growth in scientific publications and citations relative to their 985 counterparts. Analyses of output trends since the 1990s reveal widening input-output disparities, including larger gaps in funding absorption and innovation metrics between 985 institutions and even Project 211 peers, let alone ordinary universities. Teaching quality suffered correspondingly, as resource scarcity in non-985 schools limited advanced pedagogy and student support, fostering uneven educational outcomes nationwide. The resultant system entrenched inter-university hierarchies, resembling a stratified structure with limited upward mobility for non- entities. Critics contend this zero-sum dynamic diverted funds from equitable expansion, deepening overall inequality. Proponents, however, posit indirect benefits through spillovers like collaborations and spin-offs from elite campuses, though causal evidence for broad trickle-down remains sparse, with studies emphasizing reinforced divides over diffused gains.

Transparency and Corruption Issues

The opaque nature of Project 985's university selection process, conducted through confidential negotiations rather than open competitions or standardized metrics, has drawn criticism for enabling political favoritism, with inclusions often tied to institutional loyalty to the and regional priorities over pure academic merit. This lack of transparent criteria fostered perceptions of quotas favoring politically aligned entities, exacerbating distrust in the initiative's equity. In fund distribution and , documented corruption included to obtain research grants and favoritism in allocating resources, where influential academics diverted portions of major awards for personal gain. National audits in the and beyond revealed misallocations, such as unused funds and discrepancies in project expenditures totaling millions of at participating institutions, underscoring weak oversight in how Project 985 allocations were handled. These issues were compounded by a reliance on networks, which prioritized personal connections over procedural integrity. Proponents of Project 985 argue that its results-oriented approach—evidenced by enhanced outputs—justified streamlined despite flaws, attributing successes to decisive focus amid China's developmental . Critics, however, maintain that such deficits in rule-of-law adherence and have eroded domestic and trust in the program's legitimacy, potentially hampering sustainable academic advancement. Government responses, including 2006 integrity standards and Xi Jinping-era drives targeting university officials, have prosecuted cases but failed to fully address systemic opacity.

Impacts on Academic Freedom and Innovation

The implementation of Project 985, launched in 1998 to elevate select universities to global standards, intensified the role of (CCP) committees within participating institutions, embedding party secretaries as key decision-makers alongside university presidents and prioritizing ideological alignment over independent governance. This structure enforced conformity to CCP directives, including the promotion of and avoidance of the "seven taboos" on topics like , , and the 1989 Tiananmen events, particularly constraining research in , social sciences, and where inquiry often intersects with politically sensitive narratives. By 2017, over 40 Project 985 universities had established dedicated centers for Marxist theory and ideological education, fostering an environment where faculty became prevalent to evade surveillance, publication bans, or professional repercussions. Empirical indicators of constrained academic freedom include documented declines in critical thinking skills among university students, with longitudinal studies showing consistent drops in study engagement and analytical abilities during the early years of post-2000, attributable in part to ideologically oriented curricula that prioritize rote alignment over independent analysis. Self-censorship extended to publication practices, where scholars in non-STEM fields avoided sensitive topics, leading to skewed research outputs; for instance, historians like James Millward reported shifting focus after 2004 due to visa denials and access restrictions, reducing contributions to critical . While STEM disciplines experienced fewer direct bans, pervasive —such as student informants reporting "politically inappropriate" comments since 2018—chilled broader intellectual risk-taking, limiting interdisciplinary essential for foundational breakthroughs. Despite these constraints, Project 985 facilitated gains in applied technology outputs through state-directed funding, with participating universities showing accelerated publication rates in international journals—rising significantly for 24 targeted institutions post-implementation—and notable progress in fields like , where centralized resources enabled catch-up to global leaders. However, this model of innovation, reliant on top-down metrics and conformity, has drawn critiques for inflating quantitative metrics without sustaining qualitative leaps comparable to Western liberal systems, where unfettered inquiry historically drives paradigm shifts; even elite universities (overlapping with Project 985) acknowledged in their 2013 Hefei Statement that is indispensable for high-quality research. Long-term, such controls risk undermining holistic innovation by eroding the causal foundations of creativity—open debate and error-tolerant experimentation—potentially capping China's advancement beyond incremental applications.

Transition and Legacy

Shift to Double First-Class Initiative

In November 2015, during the Outline of the National 13th Five-Year Plan, Chinese authorities introduced the "Double First-Class" strategy as a framework to cultivate world-class universities and disciplines, signaling a departure from the prior emphasis on elite institutional designations under Projects 211 and 985. This policy pivot aimed to address perceived limitations in the exclusivity of Project 985, which had concentrated resources on 39 universities but was critiqued for fostering complacency and insufficiently aligning with broader national goals of comprehensive educational advancement. By June 2016, the Ministry of Education formally declared the abolition of the and labels, integrating their objectives into the Double First-Class Initiative to prioritize dynamic competition over perpetual status. The new approach expanded scope to 137 universities and 465 specific disciplines selected for , with tied to evaluations rather than fixed hierarchies, intending to propel toward global leadership in by 2050. This shift reflected a rationale that elite labels had inadvertently reduced incentives for innovation, necessitating a system where underperforming entities could lose support to encourage discipline-level excellence across a wider array of institutions. The transition unfolded over 2016–2020, during which former Project 985 universities maintained transitional funding privileges but underwent rigorous assessments for continued eligibility under the new criteria. Official lists designating 42 universities for comprehensive world-class construction (primarily overlapping with prior 985 institutions) and additional discipline-focused tracks were released in September 2017, marking the initiative's operational phase with an initial five-year construction period ending in 2020. This reevaluation mechanism underscored the policy's emphasis on merit-based allocation, aiming to mitigate resource lock-in and adapt to evolving strategic priorities like technological .

Long-Term Effects and Evaluations

The designation of Project 985 universities continues to confer social and economic premiums, evident in patterns where graduates from these elite institutions exhibit higher intra-clan rates linked to shared educational , signaling in China's competitive . networks from these universities have fostered high-tech , with studies post-2010 showing increased startup formation and applications attributable to Project 985's research center investments, contributing to localized economic clusters in innovation hubs like and . However, 2020s evaluations indicate these networks' economic boosts remain concentrated, with limited spillover to broader systemic innovation due to persistent hierarchical structures. Empirical assessments reveal sustained gains in scale-oriented metrics, such as volumes and rankings, yet reveal deficiencies in creative outputs; for instance, a 2021 analysis found "985" universities' lagged behind non-"985" peers, with inefficiencies stemming from overuse rather than output quality. Post-2020 data from studies confirm elevated intensity but uneven breakthroughs, as inputs like correlate with quantity over novel patents or high-impact discoveries, challenging claims of a resolved "." Concurrently, indices remain low, with Scholars at Risk documenting over 125 attacks on since 2019, including and mobility restrictions that stifle dissenting inquiry and international collaboration. Causally, the state-directed model of Project 985 excelled in mobilizing resources for measurable scale—evident in doubled platforms by —but faltered in fostering adaptive cultures, as reflected in unchanged paradigms despite two decades of . Under intensified authoritarian oversight post-2012, critiques highlight how centralized prioritizes over risk-taking, contrasting with decentralized systems in universities that better sustain through open . Overall, while delivering partial metric successes, the project's legacy underscores trade-offs where authoritarian efficiencies enable rapid ascent but undermine the autonomy essential for enduring global leadership in original scholarship.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] China's Higher Education Reform 1998-2003: A Summary - ERIC
    On May 4, 1998, President Jiang Zemin declared that. “China must have a number ... It was named “Project. 985” to commemorate Jiang's speech mentioned above.
  2. [2]
    State Council puts top-grade university plan on fast track - China Daily
    Nov 6, 2015 · Project "985" was named when then-president Jiang Zemin gave a speech in May 1998, and called for China to build a number of key ...
  3. [3]
    “985工程”学校名单 - 中华人民共和国教育部
    Dec 6, 2006 · “985工程”学校名单 ; 北京师范大学. 中央民族大学. 南开大学 ; 天津大学. 大连理工大学. 东北大学 ; 吉林大学. 哈尔滨工业大学. 复旦大学 ; 同济大学. 上海 ...Missing: Project | Show results with:Project
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Building global-class universities - Martin Kenney
    The 985 Project is not only a funding program, but also a project that aims to bring about fundamental transformations to a subset of educational institutions ...
  5. [5]
    View of China's Elite Tertiary Education
    Peking University and Tsinghua University received the equivalent of approx-imately US$250 million for Project 985 during the first stage, about the same amount ...
  6. [6]
    Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 ...
    This paper considers the effects of the 985 Project on increasing the rate of publication in international journals by researchers at 24 universities.
  7. [7]
    A Reflection on the Effects of the 985 Project - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · The rapid advances of China's universities in major international league tables are generally believed to be an accomplishment of Project 985.
  8. [8]
    China strives for world-class universities, courses
    Sep 20, 2017 · Prior to the project, the Chinese government evaluated its universities via the "211" and "985" projects launched in the 1990s. The 211 project ...
  9. [9]
    China's education: 40 years of epic achievements
    Dec 19, 2018 · ... Project 211, Project 985 and the Double First-Class initiative. Thanks to these efforts, China's universities have been edging up world ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Chinese Perspectives on International Relations in the Xi Jinping Era
    What is Project 985? On May 4, 1998, President Jiang Zemin delivered a speech at the Peking University centenary commemoration and announced that, for the ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    China's ambition for a globally oriented university - revista IDEES
    In 1998, three years later, Project 985 was launched. The ... speech by leader Jiang Zemin at the Peking University centenary celebrations in May 1998.
  12. [12]
    China's Higher Education Policy Change from 211 Project and 985 ...
    This study used multiple streams framework to analyse the motivation of reform from 211 Project and 985 Project to the Double-first-class Plan in China.
  13. [13]
    Project 211 and 985 - China Education Center
    Project 211 strengthens 100 higher education institutions, while Project 985 aims to create world-class universities.
  14. [14]
    Project 985 and 211 Universities in China | Study in China - CUCAS
    Project 211 enhances research standards, while Project 985 aims to increase development speed and build world-class universities in China.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Government, Business, and Globalization in an Innovating Economy
    Aug 11, 2022 · on a project on indigenous innovation and economic development in China. ... In the late 1990s, the state launched “985 Project” and “211 Project” ...
  16. [16]
    Projects 211 and 985 - The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education
    Project 211 had poured in 2.76 billion RMB (equal to 335 million USD) seed funding and 8.15 billion RMB (equal to 994 million USD) matching funds in the first ...
  17. [17]
    Forget Harvard et al: Can India match China's STEM success by ...
    May 23, 2025 · China's strategic investments in higher education, particularly through Project 985, have propelled its universities to global prominence in STEM fields.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] China's World-Class 2.0: Towards More Institutionalized and ...
    On 4 May. 1998, then President Jiang Zemin declared at the centennial celebration of Peking University, 'To achieve modernization, China should have several ...
  19. [19]
    A Discussion on the 985 Project from a Comparative Perspective
    Aug 6, 2025 · Without explicit rules and criteria governing the selection process, the 985 Project lacked transparency (Wang 2011) . Moreover, as the ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Does More Investment in Universities Improve Their Performances ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · One research study showed that the huge investment provided by Project 985 increased the rate of growth of publications in international ...Missing: achievements criticisms<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Governance reforms in higher education: a study of China
    ... central government funding to universities through the use of earmarked block funds. ... In 2010, for the third phase of Project 985 (2010–2013), the Ministry and ...
  23. [23]
    Project 985 - Wikipedia
    List of Project-985 universities ; Beijing (8) ; Beijing (8) ; Peking University · Tsinghua University · Renmin University of China ...
  24. [24]
    List of 985 Project Project Universities | Apply Online - CUCAS
    985 project involves both national and local governments allocating large amounts of funding to certain universities to build new facilities such as ...Missing: categories infrastructure
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Deploying a Quasi-experimental Design to Evaluate the Net Effects ...
    Project 985, together with restructuring in higher education, has contributed to China's vision of building WCUs, but the improvements hide significant ...
  26. [26]
    Project 211, Project 985, C9 League, and Double First Class
    Aug 11, 2020 · Project 985 initially provided more funding to 9 Chinese universities. This includes: Tsinghua University, Zhejiang University, Shanghai Jiao ...
  27. [27]
    Project 985 - MalishaEdu - Blog Details
    Sep 12, 2024 · Project 985 is a Chinese initiative to build world-class universities with advanced international standards, named after Jiang Zemin's speech ...
  28. [28]
    List of Universities in Project 985 _Study In China - Admissions.cn
    Oct 25, 2011 · The second phase, launched in 2004, expanded the program until it has now reached almost 40 universities. List of Universities in Project 985
  29. [29]
    A complete list of “985” and “211” universities in China (latest edition)
    Nov 28, 2022 · There are 39 985 universities in total, including 34 in Phase I and five in Phase II. Beijing. 985 universities (8): Peking University ...
  30. [30]
    Do the elite university projects promote scientific research ...
    There has been limited research on the impact of the “985 Project” (Zhang et al., 2013), another important university strategic project in China, with a focus ...
  31. [31]
    A Reflection on the Effects of the 985 Project
    The central government invested a total of RMB32.9 billion in special funds for phase I (1999–2001) and phase II (2004–2007) of the project, assisting ...
  32. [32]
    China has become a scientific superpower - The Economist
    Jun 12, 2024 · Initiatives like “Project 211”, the “985 programme” and the “China Nine League” gave money to selected labs to develop their research ...
  33. [33]
    How Does the Chinese Government Select and Funding High-Level ...
    The number 985 refers to the universities included in Project 985, which is a project implemented by the Chinese government to build several world–class ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Quest for Talents: Attraction and Retention of Highly Skilled ...
    Feb 1, 2025 · Approximately 200,000 outstanding graduates from China's Project 985 work in the United States, with the majority going into cutting-edge ...
  35. [35]
    The institutionalized stratification of the Chinese higher education ...
    However, the concepts of Project 985 and Project 211 are still used, not only in academe but also in industry, which uses graduation from Project 985 and ...
  36. [36]
    A new HE development model is needed to sustain excellence
    Jul 29, 2023 · Project 985 handpicked 39 universities with a commitment of US$7.97 billion. The Double First-Class Plan included 137 universities and 465 ...
  37. [37]
    QS Ranking 2005 - Results | UniversityRankings.ch
    QS World University Rankings 2005 ; 14. △. Cornell University. USA ; 15. △. Peking University. China ; 16. ▽. The University of Tokyo. Japan.
  38. [38]
    QS World University Rankings 2026: Top Global Universities
    Jun 19, 2025 · ... Rank =17 Dagger Icon. Overall Score: 91.2. Tsinghua University. location Beijing, China (Mainland). QS Stars.Tsinghua University · The University of Melbourne · University of Oxford · Rank
  39. [39]
    The top 100 universities 2010 - how the Times Higher Education ...
    Sep 16, 2010 · The top 100 universities 2010 - how the Times Higher Education ranks them ; 58, Tsinghua University, China ; 59, Boston University, US ; 60, New ...
  40. [40]
    Tsinghua University : Rankings, Fees & Courses Details
    Rankings · #=17. QS World University Rankings · #2. QS WUR Ranking By Subject · #=341. QS Sustainability Ranking · #5. Asian University Rankings - Eastern Asia.
  41. [41]
    Peking University : Rankings, Fees & Courses Details
    Rankings & Ratings​​ Peking University is one of the top Public universities in Beijing, China (Mainland). It is ranked #14 in QS World University Rankings 2026.
  42. [42]
    Tsinghua University | World University Rankings | THE
    Rankings ; World University Rankings 202612 ; Arts and Humanities 202539 ; Business and Economics 20256 ; Medical and Health 202515 ; Computer Science 202513 ...
  43. [43]
    Peking University - X
    Oct 9, 2025 · Peking University Secures 13th Global Rank in 2026 Times Higher Education World University Rankings! Over the past decade, PKU has advanced ...
  44. [44]
    Performance-based resource allocation for higher education ...
    Between 2009 and 2013, 116 universities in Project 211 and 39 universities in Project 985 received more than 72% of China's government research funding, and the ...
  45. [45]
    The institutionalized stratification of the Chinese higher education ...
    Apr 8, 2021 · All 39 universities included in Project 985 were admitted to the “First Class” universities and all Project 211 universities had “First ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  46. [46]
    Mapping the landscape of university technology flows in China ...
    Apr 2, 2024 · However, the average weighted outdegree of 985/211 project universities as a proportion of all universities decreased from 83.135% in 2001 ...
  47. [47]
    Critical Policy Analysis of the Second Round of the Double First ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · In addition, researchers have pointed out that the project has increased competition among Chinese universities and deepened inequality in ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Innovation and control: universities, the knowledge economy and ...
    Many corruption scandals at universities were preceded by privatization and commercialization processes, which again were triggered by the reforms of the 1990s.
  49. [49]
    Ministry quells rumours over elite university funding
    Nov 21, 2014 · But opponents of the two projects say too many education resources are attached to them, causing severe inequality and academic corruption.Missing: scandals | Show results with:scandals
  50. [50]
    China Beware: A Corrupt Culture is Undermining Higher Education
    A corrupt academic culture, therefore, damages the standing of institutions and the academic community even more badly. With rampant academic dishonesty, it is ...
  51. [51]
    China universities waste millions, fail to make real use of research ...
    Aug 9, 2023 · China universities waste millions, fail to make real use of research, audit finds in indictment of tech-sufficiency drive. A review by the ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Party Secretaries in Chinese Higher Education Institutions - ERIC
    Universities in the “985 Project” receive the most funding from the national government. Luo and Sun (2011) analyzed these party secretaries' highest degrees, ...Missing: CCP | Show results with:CCP
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Chinese Higher Education and the Quest for Autonomy
    May 1, 2021 · This paper explores China's continued interference in postsecondary autonomy. Keywords: academic freedom, autonomy, China, communist party, ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Obstacles to Excellence: Academic Freedom & China's Quest for ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · Obstacles include limits on internet, research bans, surveillance, travel restrictions, and the CCP's push for Party ideology, impacting  ...
  55. [55]
    Chinese Universities Are Enshrining Communist Party Control In ...
    Jan 20, 2020 · ... party committees and school counselors. FBI Urges Universities To ... Chinese Communist Party · Chinese education · Chinese universities.
  56. [56]
    The Relationship Between Study Engagement and Critical Thinking ...
    Oct 13, 2022 · Our findings indicate that (a) students' study engagement and critical thinking declined during their first year of higher education in China.
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    What Will Newly Increased Party Control Mean for China's ...
    Feb 5, 2024 · The CCP's increasing control over universities is a regressive step for academic freedom and innovation. While the Party's intentions might ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    New Chinese Double First-Class University Plan Released - Enago
    Dec 6, 2017 · In 1998 an additional project called Project 985 was acquired, which included both national and local governments distributing large funds to ...
  61. [61]
    China to develop 42 world-class universities - People's Daily Online
    Sep 21, 2017 · The country has previously launched two similar projects, Project 211 and Project 985, which aim to strengthen over 100 institutions of higher ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    China's Universities Adjust to Meet “Double-First Class” Initiative
    Sep 28, 2018 · This feature underlines the major difference between the Double First-Class plan and the previous 985 Project and 211 Project, which is the ...Missing: replacement | Show results with:replacement
  63. [63]
    (PDF) Intra-clan marriage in modern times: the role of elite education ...
    Jan 4, 2024 · Intra-clan marriage in modern times: the role of elite education in assortative mating. January 2024; Chinese Sociological Review 56(4):1-24.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Does Institutional Change in Universities Influence High-Tech ...
    Project 985 was a program implemented by the Chinese government that provided funding for a set of universities to build new research centers. We found that ...
  65. [65]
    The Rise of Chinese Universities: Research, Innovation and ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The second phase of Project 985 began in 2004 and ended in 2007 with thirty-nine universities distributed in eighteen provinces and ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Operating efficiency in Chinese universities: An extended two-stage ...
    Due to the relative shortage of the university funding, performance-based funding ... Due to heterogeneities in terms of different types (e.g., project 985 and ...
  67. [67]
    Does China Have an “Innovation Paradox”? Evidence from Chinese ...
    In 2021, China's total R&D investment, which included more than RMB 529.966 billion ... Project 985 (u985), and Project 211 (u211), we employ a random ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Obstacles to Excellence: Academic Freedom & China's Quest for ...
    Sep 24, 2019 · Obstacles to Excellence is a new report from Scholars at Risk mapping threats to academic freedom that jeopardize China's higher education ambitions.
  69. [69]
    Academic Freedom and China | AAUP
    We cannot lose sight of those trends, unrelated to trade, that point to the increasingly repressive impact of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on both its ...Missing: conformity | Show results with:conformity