Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Prometaphase

Prometaphase is the transitional phase of mitosis between prophase and metaphase, characterized by the fragmentation of the nuclear envelope and the initial attachment of microtubules from the mitotic spindle to kinetochores on condensed chromosomes.^[1] During this stage, the breakdown of the nuclear envelope releases the chromosomes into the cytoplasm, enabling direct interaction with the assembling spindle apparatus.^[2] Kinetochores, specialized protein structures assembled at the centromeres of sister chromatids, serve as attachment sites for kinetochore microtubules, which emanate from opposite spindle poles to establish bipolar attachments.^[3] This process ensures that sister chromatids are oriented toward opposing poles, setting the stage for their equitable segregation.^[1] The mitotic spindle, a dynamic array of microtubules organized by centrosomes at the spindle poles, begins to capture and organize the chromosomes during prometaphase.^[4] Microtubules undergo rapid polymerization and depolymerization, probing the cytoplasm until they bind to kinetochores, often through a trial-and-error mechanism involving motor proteins like dynein and kinesins.^[3] Once attached, improper connections are corrected by tension-sensing mechanisms, such as those involving the Aurora B kinase, which destabilizes erroneous microtubule-kinetochore links to promote stable bipolar orientation.^[5] Chromosomes exhibit characteristic movements, oscillating back and forth as they congress toward the metaphase plate at the cell's equator, a process driven by microtubule dynamics and motor-driven forces.^[1] In most eukaryotic cells undergoing open mitosis, prometaphase is essential for accurate chromosome alignment and the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint, which delays anaphase onset until all kinetochores are properly attached.^[2] Disruptions in prometaphase events, such as errors in kinetochore assembly or spindle attachment, can lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy, contributing to diseases like cancer.^[6] While the duration of prometaphase varies by cell type—typically lasting several minutes in mammalian cells—it represents a critical window for ensuring genomic fidelity during cell division.^[4]

Overview and Context

Definition and Characteristics

Prometaphase is the second phase of mitosis, immediately following prophase and preceding metaphase, marked by the fragmentation and disassembly of the nuclear envelope. This breakdown, triggered by phosphorylation of nuclear lamina proteins by mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase (M-Cdk), exposes the condensed chromosomes to the cytoplasm and enables initial interactions between the mitotic spindle microtubules and chromosome kinetochores through a process known as search-and-capture.^[7]^[1] Key characteristics of prometaphase include the near-complete condensation of chromosomes initiated in prophase, rendering them visible as distinct structures with paired sister chromatids; the assembly and visibility of kinetochores, large protein complexes at centromeres that serve as attachment sites for microtubules; and the emanation of microtubule asters from the separated centrosomes, which organize into the bipolar spindle apparatus. These features facilitate the dynamic capture and initial alignment of chromosomes, setting the stage for their bipolar attachment.^[7]^[1] The duration of prometaphase typically lasts about 15 minutes in human somatic cells, though it varies by cell type and organism—for instance, it is shorter in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), where the phase lacks nuclear envelope breakdown due to closed mitosis and integrates into a more rapid overall mitotic progression of ~20-25 minutes from spindle pole body separation to anaphase onset.^[8]^[9] The stage was historically described by German biologist Walther Flemming in 1882, who, through detailed observations of chromosome behavior in animal cells, distinguished the period of nuclear envelope dissolution from the preceding prophase condensation, contributing to the foundational naming of mitotic phases despite the term "prometaphase" being formalized later to reflect this transition.^[10]^[11]

Role in the Cell Cycle

Prometaphase occupies a pivotal position in the mitotic phase of the cell cycle, serving as the transitional stage from prophase to metaphase and bridging the exit from interphase (specifically G2/M transition) to the onset of anaphase.^[12] During this phase, the cell undergoes rapid reorganization following nuclear envelope breakdown, enabling the mitotic spindle to interact with chromosomes and prepare for their alignment. This timing ensures that prometaphase acts as a critical checkpoint period, where initial attachments form before the irreversible commitment to chromosome separation in anaphase.^[12] The primary functional role of prometaphase is to facilitate the establishment of bipolar attachments between the mitotic spindle and chromosomes, ensuring their equitable distribution to daughter cells and thereby preventing aneuploidy—a condition associated with genomic instability and diseases such as cancer.^[13] In this phase, kinetochores on chromosomes capture microtubules from opposite spindle poles, promoting the correction of erroneous attachments and the congression of chromosomes toward the metaphase plate.^[13] Errors in these attachments during prometaphase can lead to chromosome missegregation, underscoring the phase's importance in maintaining genetic fidelity across cell divisions.^[13] Prometaphase integrates closely with cell cycle regulators, particularly through the activation of the cyclin B1-CDK1 complex, which drives mitotic entry and sustains progression.^[12] This kinase activity rises progressively during prophase and peaks in prometaphase, triggering events like centrosome separation and spindle nucleation while rendering mitotic progression irreversible. Defects or delays in prometaphase, such as improper microtubule capture, activate surveillance mechanisms that link to cell cycle arrest, halting progression until attachments are stabilized. Prometaphase exhibits evolutionary conservation across eukaryotes, from yeasts to humans, as a core mechanism for chromosome segregation, though variations exist in the timing of nuclear envelope breakdown.^[14] In many animal cells, breakdown occurs at the start of prometaphase to allow spindle access, whereas some fungi and protists maintain a closed mitosis with an intact envelope throughout, adapting the phase to intranuclear spindle formation.^[14] These differences highlight how conserved kinetochore-microtubule interactions have evolved alongside diverse envelope dynamics to support mitosis in varied cellular contexts.^[14]

Cellular Events

Nuclear Envelope Breakdown

Nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) marks the transition from prophase to prometaphase in eukaryotic cells undergoing open mitosis, characterized by the rapid disassembly of the nuclear envelope to expose condensed chromosomes to the cytoplasm. This process is primarily driven by the mitotic kinase CDK1, which, in complex with cyclin B (also known as maturation-promoting factor or MPF), phosphorylates key structural components of the nuclear envelope. Phosphorylation of lamins, the intermediate filament proteins forming the nuclear lamina, leads to their depolymerization and solubilization, destabilizing the envelope's scaffold.^[15] Concomitant with lamina disassembly, nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) undergo fragmentation through phosphorylation of nucleoporins (Nups) by CDK1 and polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). Specifically, hyperphosphorylation of Nup98, a central gatekeeper nucleoporin, disrupts NPC integrity, initiating disassembly as early as prometaphase, while Nup153 contributes by recruiting the COPI coatomer complex to facilitate membrane remodeling and envelope fenestration. The inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor (LBR) is also phosphorylated by CDK1, promoting its dissociation from the lamina and chromatin, which aids in the overall fragmentation of the envelope.^[16]^[17]^[18] NEBD occurs swiftly, typically within minutes after the completion of chromosome condensation in prophase, resulting in the disassembly, with nuclear membranes dispersing into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network. This exposure of chromatin-tethered kinetochores to cytoplasmic microtubules enables their initial capture by the nascent spindle apparatus, while the ER forms a discontinuous network around the mitotic structures. The process ensures spatial reorganization necessary for chromosome segregation, with integral membrane proteins dispersing uniformly into ER membranes post-breakdown.^[19]^[20]

Chromosome-Kinetochore Assembly

During prometaphase, the assembly of kinetochores on centromeric DNA proceeds through a hierarchical process, beginning with the recruitment of inner kinetochore proteins to establish the foundational structure. Centromeric DNA, marked by the histone H3 variant CENP-A, serves as the primary platform for assembly; CENP-A nucleosomes are deposited earlier in the cell cycle but facilitate the binding of constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) proteins such as CENP-C during mitotic entry.^[21] This inner kinetochore layer then recruits outer kinetochore components, including the Ndc80 complex, which forms part of the KMN network (comprising Knl1, Mis12, and Ndc80) essential for microtubule interactions.^[21] The recruitment of these outer layers is regulated by kinases like cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), ensuring timely assembly following nuclear envelope breakdown.^[22] Kinetochore maturation in prometaphase involves dynamic structural changes and tension-dependent stabilization of attachments. Initial interactions with microtubules often result in monopolar attachments, where sister kinetochores connect to the same spindle pole; these are inherently unstable and require correction to achieve bi-orientation.^[23] Tension generated across sister kinetochores upon bi-orientation stabilizes the outer kinetochore by enhancing Ndc80 complex binding and reducing Aurora B kinase-mediated phosphorylation, which otherwise promotes detachment of erroneous attachments. This maturation process enlarges and refines the kinetochore structure, increasing its capacity to bind multiple microtubules (typically 15–25 in human cells) for proper force transmission.^[22] Under electron microscopy, mature kinetochores appear as trilaminar, plate-like structures consisting of inner, middle, and outer plates, with dimensions typically ranging from 0.2 to 1 μm in diameter and 30–50 nm in thickness.^[24] These structures are visible as dense fibrous networks interfacing with microtubules, reflecting the layered protein organization.^[25] Species variations in kinetochore assembly highlight evolutionary adaptations in centromere organization. In humans and most vertebrates, kinetochores are monocentric, assembling at a single, localized centromeric region per chromosome to ensure precise bipolar attachment.^[26] In contrast, nematodes like Caenorhabditis elegans exhibit holocentric kinetochores, where assembly occurs along the entire chromosome length, distributing CENP-A and outer proteins diffusely to accommodate diffuse microtubule attachments and fragmented chromosome segregation.^[26]

Spindle Apparatus Formation

Microtubule Types and Organization

During prometaphase, the mitotic spindle assembles a diverse array of microtubules essential for chromosome alignment, classified into three primary types based on their attachments and functions. Kinetochore microtubules (kMTs), also known as k-fibers, form bundles that attach directly to kinetochores on chromosomes via their plus ends, providing the structural link for chromosome movement toward the spindle equator.^[27] Interpolar microtubules extend from opposite spindle poles and overlap in an antiparallel manner near the cell center, contributing to spindle elongation and stability through motor-mediated sliding.^[27] Astral microtubules radiate outward from the spindle poles toward the cell cortex, aiding in spindle positioning and orientation by interacting with the plasma membrane.^[27] The organization of these microtubules establishes the characteristic bipolar architecture of the spindle, nucleated primarily from centrosomes located at the spindle poles in vertebrate cells. Microtubules emanate from the pericentriolar material of each centrosome, with minus ends anchored there and plus ends exploring the cytoplasm to form the radial arrays that coalesce into the focused bipolar structure.^[28] In vertebrates, each kinetochore typically assembles 20-25 kMTs by late prometaphase, forming robust bundles that support initial chromosome capture.^[29] Microtubule dynamics are central to spindle organization, characterized by rapid polymerization and depolymerization that allow plus ends to search for targets. Polymerization rates average 12-13 μm/min for astral and non-kinetochore microtubules in mammalian cells, while depolymerization can reach 20-30 μm/min during catastrophe events.^[30] Plus-end tracking proteins, such as EB1, accumulate at growing microtubule tips to stabilize polymerizing ends and promote rescue from depolymerization, enhancing the efficiency of spindle assembly.^[30] Quantitatively, mammalian spindles incorporate approximately 6,000-10,000 microtubules in total, with kMTs comprising about 20-30% of this pool in human cells.^[31] Microtubule lengths vary but typically grow to 10-15 μm to span the emerging spindle, matching the pole-to-pole distance in cells like HeLa.31417-2)

Initial Chromosome Capture

The initial capture of chromosomes by the mitotic spindle in prometaphase follows the "search-and-capture" model, in which highly dynamic microtubules nucleated at centrosomes extend their plus-ends into the cytoplasm to stochastically encounter kinetochores on chromosomes. These encounters typically occur laterally along the microtubule lattice, though end-on attachments at the plus-end can also form, allowing the kinetochore to bind and initiate attachment.90358-1)^[32] The process is inherently inefficient, with models estimating a low initial success rate of approximately 1-10% per microtubule probe due to the small size of kinetochores relative to the cytoplasmic volume, but this is enhanced by chromosome oscillations that increase the effective capture radius and by astral microtubules, which guide kinetochores toward spindle poles via dynein-mediated transport. Primarily astral and polar microtubules participate in these early interactions, facilitating the initial connections before more stable bioriented attachments develop.^[33]^[32] Once established, these nascent attachments are stabilized to resist microtubule depolymerization forces; in budding yeast, the Dam1/DASH complex forms oligomeric rings around microtubule plus-ends, coupling kinetochores to depolymerizing tubulin for processive movement, while in human cells, the Ska1 complex performs an analogous role by tracking depolymerizing microtubule ends and promoting attachment stability through interactions with the Ndc80 complex and tubulin.^[34] Experimental validation from live-cell imaging in vertebrate cells reveals that initial kinetochore-microtubule captures occur rapidly, typically within 5-10 minutes after nuclear envelope breakdown, underscoring the efficiency of biased search mechanisms in ensuring timely spindle assembly.^[33]

Chromosome Dynamics

Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments

During prometaphase, kinetochores initially form lateral attachments to the sides of microtubules, allowing chromosomes to be captured and moved toward the spindle equator before transitioning to more stable end-on attachments at microtubule plus-ends.^[35] Lateral attachments are transient and unstable, facilitating initial interactions in the crowded prometaphase environment, while the shift to end-on attachments occurs as chromosomes align and tension develops across sister kinetochores. This transition is essential for generating the mechanical tension required for proper chromosome congression and segregation.^[36] The core molecular machinery for kinetochore-microtubule binding is provided by the conserved KMN network, comprising the KNL1, Mis12, and Ndc80 complexes, which directly interacts with microtubules to anchor kinetochores. The Ndc80 complex, in particular, forms electrostatic bonds with microtubule lattices, enabling both lateral and end-on attachments, while Mis12 and KNL1 scaffold additional regulators at the kinetochore outer plate.^[37] Additionally, plus-end-tracking proteins (+TIPs) such as CLASP1 and CLASP2 localize to kinetochores and promote microtubule capture by stabilizing plus-ends and suppressing catastrophes, thereby facilitating initial and sustained attachments during prometaphase.^[38]^[39] Poleward chromosome movement during attachments is powered by microtubule depolymerization at kinetochore-bound plus-ends, which generates pulling forces through the hydrolysis of GTP-tubulin subunits and the curling of protofilaments that displace attached couplers.^[40] This depolymerization-driven force is coupled to motor proteins like dynein, which walks along microtubules toward minus-ends, enhancing the overall traction and initial poleward flux of kinetochore fibers.^[41] Such mechanisms ensure efficient chromosome relocation without relying solely on polymerization-based pushing.^[42] Biomechanically, mature kinetochore-microtubule attachments are robust, capable of withstanding tensions on the order of hundreds of pN per kinetochore, which arises from bipolar spindle forces pulling sister kinetochores apart.^[43] This tension not only stabilizes end-on attachments but also provides the mechanical feedback necessary for alignment at the metaphase plate.^[44]

Congress to the Metaphase Plate

During prometaphase, chromosomes achieve congression to the metaphase plate through the establishment of bi-orientation, characterized by amphitelic attachments where sister kinetochores connect to microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. This configuration generates opposing forces: poleward forces directed toward the spindle poles via minus-end-directed motors and anti-poleward forces, including polar ejection forces and plus-end-directed activities, which balance at the spindle equator to position chromosomes centrally. The net force on bi-oriented chromosomes approaches zero at this equatorial position, ensuring stable alignment equidistant from the poles.^[45] Key molecular motors drive this directed movement. Kinesin-5, a plus-end-directed motor, cross-links and slides antiparallel interpolar microtubules apart, contributing to spindle elongation and the force balance that facilitates chromosome positioning. Cytoplasmic dynein, localized at kinetochores, generates poleward pulling forces along astral and kinetochore microtubules, transporting peripheral chromosomes toward the spindle center. These motors work in concert to resolve initial attachments and promote central congression.^[45]^[46] As chromosomes congress, they exhibit oscillatory trajectories along microtubules, with movement amplitudes typically ranging from 1 to 2 μm and an average congression speed of approximately 0.5 to 1 μm/min. These oscillations reflect dynamic tension adjustments during attachment stabilization, allowing chromosomes to refine their positions iteratively toward the equator.^[45] The culmination of congression prefigures the metaphase configuration, where chromosomes align in a plate-like array, with most chromosomes achieving successful positioning in normal mammalian cells through this process. This high efficiency underscores the robustness of force-mediated dynamics in ensuring orderly progression to metaphase.^[47]

Regulation and Quality Control

Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) functions as a molecular surveillance mechanism during prometaphase, ensuring that all chromosomes achieve proper bipolar attachments to the mitotic spindle before progression to anaphase. Unattached kinetochores serve as the primary sensors, generating a diffusible "wait-anaphase" signal that inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). This signal is initiated when unattached kinetochores recruit the Mad1-Mad2 complex, where Mad1-bound Mad2 adopts a closed conformation (C-Mad2) that catalyzes the conversion of free cytosolic Mad2 to C-Mad2, amplifying the inhibitory signal. The resulting mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), comprising Mad2, BubR1, Bub3, and Cdc20, binds to and inhibits APC/C, preventing ubiquitination and degradation of securin and cyclin B1, thereby delaying anaphase onset.^[48]^[49]^[50] Key components of the SAC include the kinase Mps1, which initiates the checkpoint by phosphorylating kinetochore proteins such as Knl1, thereby recruiting downstream effectors like Bub1 and Mad1 to unattached kinetochores. BubR1, a core MCC subunit and kinase, further contributes by directly phosphorylating Cdc20, the APC/C co-activator, which enhances MCC assembly and stabilizes inhibition of APC/C activity. This phosphorylation event creates a catalytic barrier to APC/C activation, ensuring robust checkpoint signaling until all kinetochores are properly engaged.^[51]^[52]^[53] The SAC exhibits high sensitivity, capable of detecting and responding to even a single unattached kinetochore within the cell, which is sufficient to sustain the inhibitory signal and prevent premature anaphase. Upon achievement of bi-orientation, where sister kinetochores attach to microtubules from opposite spindle poles, the checkpoint is silenced through mechanisms including the stripping of Mad1-Mad2 from kinetochores and disassembly of the MCC, allowing APC/C activation. Defects in SAC function, such as mutations weakening the checkpoint, lead to chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy, a hallmark of genomic instability. In cancer, SAC dysregulation contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN); for instance, hyperactivation of the SAC in certain CIN-positive tumors delays mitosis and promotes survival of aneuploid cells.^[54]^[55]^[56]

Error Correction Mechanisms

During prometaphase, improper kinetochore-microtubule attachments can occur, including syntelic attachments where both sister kinetochores connect to microtubules emanating from the same spindle pole, and merotelic attachments where a single kinetochore binds microtubules from both poles.^[57] These errors, if unresolved, could lead to chromosome missegregation, but the cell employs active mechanisms to detect and correct them primarily through tension sensing at the kinetochore.^[58] The core of error correction involves Aurora B kinase, localized at the inner centromere as part of the chromosomal passenger complex, which phosphorylates key outer kinetochore components such as the Ndc80 complex to reduce its affinity for microtubules when attachments lack proper bipolar tension.^[59] In low-tension states typical of erroneous attachments, kinetochores remain close to the Aurora B source, enabling efficient phosphorylation of substrates like Ndc80/Hec1, which destabilizes the microtubule-kinetochore interface and promotes detachment for reattachment attempts.^[60] This process is tension-dependent: under high tension from correct bi-orientation, pulling forces stretch the kinetochore away from the inner centromere, creating a spatial gradient that limits Aurora B's access to outer kinetochore targets and thereby stabilizes attachments.^[61] Counteracting Aurora B's destabilizing activity are protein phosphatases PP1 and PP2A, which dephosphorylate kinetochore substrates to reinforce stable, tension-bearing attachments. PP1, recruited to the outer kinetochore via KNL1, and PP2A-B56, targeted by Shugoshin-1 at centromeres, actively oppose Aurora B phosphorylation, ensuring that only properly bi-oriented kinetochores achieve net dephosphorylation and microtubule stability.^[62] This kinase-phosphatase balance fine-tunes attachment dynamics, with the spatial separation of Aurora B enhancing phosphatase dominance under tension. The error correction system is highly efficient, rapidly resolving the majority of syntelic and merotelic attachments through this Aurora B-dependent mechanism, thereby minimizing segregation errors.^[63] The spatial gradient of Aurora B activity is crucial for this selectivity, as disruptions in kinase localization or phosphatase recruitment lead to persistent errors and increased aneuploidy.

Transition to Metaphase

Completion Criteria

Prometaphase concludes when all kinetochores achieve bi-orientation, characterized by stable end-on attachments to microtubules from opposite spindle poles, ensuring amphitelic orientation for proper chromosome segregation.^[64] This bi-orientation is confirmed by sustained stretching of the interkinetochore distance, typically exceeding 70% of the normalized maximum, indicating tension-mediated stabilization of attachments following error correction.^[64] Concurrently, chromosomes congress to form a metaphase plate, with kinetochores aligned within approximately 1 μm of the spindle equator, as observed in mammalian cells under high-resolution imaging.^[65] Key metrics signaling completion include uniform tension across sister kinetochores, which stretches the centromeric chromatin to about 2-3 times its resting length, from roughly 0.7 μm untensed to 1.5-2 μm under bi-orientation-induced forces.^[23] This tension uniformity reflects balanced pulling forces and cessation of large-scale kinetochore oscillations, transitioning to confined, low-amplitude movements around the plate that maintain alignment without further congression.^[65] Under fluorescence microscopy, the fully assembled spindle at this stage shows poles separated by 12-15 μm in human cells, with chromosomes compacted into a tight equatorial plate approximately 1-2 μm thick. Variations exist across species; in Drosophila melanogaster, partial congression suffices for metaphase entry, where bipolar attachment to just two kinetochores per chromosome enables alignment without requiring full bi-orientation of all attachments.^[66] These observables collectively mark the endpoint of prometaphase dynamics, distinguishing it from the ongoing congress process by confirming static, error-free positioning.^[64]

Progression Signals

Once the criteria for chromosome alignment are satisfied during prometaphase, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is silenced, allowing progression to metaphase through a series of biochemical signals. Silencing of the SAC primarily involves the disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which releases Cdc20 from inhibition. Free Cdc20 then binds to and activates the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), forming the APC/C^{Cdc20} complex that initiates ubiquitination of key substrates, including securin and cyclin B.^[67]^[68] The ubiquitination of securin by APC/C^{Cdc20} leads to its proteasomal degradation, thereby activating separase, an enzyme that cleaves cohesin complexes to enable sister chromatid separation. Simultaneously, the degradation of cyclin B reduces the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), which in turn promotes the dephosphorylation of mitotic substrates and facilitates the transition to metaphase. These events ensure that chromosome segregation is coordinated with the inactivation of the mitotic state.^[69]^[70] A critical component accelerating SAC silencing is p31^{comet}, which promotes the dissociation of Mad2 from the MCC, thereby enhancing Cdc20 release and APC/C activation. This process typically occurs within 10-20 minutes after initial SAC engagement in mammalian cells, ensuring timely mitotic progression once all kinetochores are properly attached. Depletion of p31^{comet} delays this dissociation, prolonging prometaphase and risking mitotic errors.^[71]^[72] Positive feedback loops further reinforce these signals, as interkinetochore tension generated by bipolar attachments stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule interactions, reducing erroneous signaling and sustaining SAC inactivation. This tension-dependent stabilization indirectly supports Cdc20 availability and APC/C activity, creating a self-reinforcing mechanism for efficient entry into metaphase.^[73]^[74]

References

[1]
The Events of M Phase - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf
During prometaphase the microtubules of the mitotic spindle attach to the kinetochores of condensed chromosomes. The kinetochores of sister chromatids are ...
[2]
Phases of mitosis | Mitosis | Biology (article) - Khan Academy
Early prophase. The mitotic spindle starts to form, the chromosomes start to condense, · Late prophase (prometaphase). The nuclear envelope breaks down and the ...
[3]
Prometaphase - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Prometaphase is characterized by breaking of the nuclear envelope with formation of mitotic spindle and centrosomes at each end of the cell; then, chromosomes ...
[4]
Mitosis with Fluorescence Microscopy - Prometaphase
Nov 13, 2015 · Late prophase, or prometaphase, begins with the disruption of the nuclear envelope, which is broken down into small membrane vesicles that closely resemble the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304419X07000455
[6]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978032334126400044X
[7]
Mitosis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
When the nuclear envelope breaks down at prometaphase, the microtubules of the spindle are able to capture the chromosomes, which eventually become aligned at ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[8]
Prometaphase - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
It typically lasts about 15 min in human somatic cells, but can be shorter (e.g., in early embryos) or longer (e.g., in unfertilized frog eggs). This steady ...
[9]
Centromere mechanical maturation during mammalian cell mitosis
Apr 15, 2019 · For example, when the centromere-spring of a late-prometaphase chromosome is stretched from 100 nm to 200 nm above its rest length, the ...
[10]
1879: Mitosis observed - National Human Genome Research Institute
Apr 22, 2013 · Flemming observed cell division in salamander embryos, where cells divide at fixed intervals. He developed a way to stain chromosomes to observe ...
[11]
The Role of Model Organisms in the History of Mitosis Research - PMC
The first person to observe mitosis in detail was a German biologist, Walther Flemming (1843–1905), who is the pioneer of mitosis research and also the founder ...
[12]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.013
[13]
https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-7-19
[14]
Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis - NIH
Instances of both types of mitosis within two evolutionary clades indicate multiple evolutionary transitions between open and closed mitosis, although the ...
[15]
A New Model for Nuclear Envelope Breakdown - PMC
The process of nuclear envelope breakdown is triggered by active maturation-promoting factor (MPF), which is thought to be a complex of cyclin B and cdc2/cdk1 ...
[16]
Mitotic Disassembly of Nuclear Pore Complexes Involves CDK1
Oct 23, 2017 · Here, we show that both CDK1 and polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) support mitotic NPC disintegration by hyperphosphorylation of Nup98, the gatekeeper nucleoporin, and ...
[17]
Nuclear pore proteins and the control of genome functions - PMC
Phosphorylation of Nup98 by multiple kinases is crucial for NPC disassembly during mitotic entry. ... nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear ...
[18]
Temporal control of nuclear envelope assembly by phosphorylation ...
Phosphorylation of lamin B receptor by Cdk1 not only prevents premature nuclear envelope assembly, but also facilitates complete dissociation of the nuclear ...
[19]
Integral Membrane Proteins of the Nuclear Envelope Are Dispersed ...
We found that at the resolution of this technique, the three nuclear envelope markers become completely dispersed throughout ER membranes during mitosis.
[20]
Ultrastructural analysis of mitotic Drosophila S2 cells identifies ...
After nuclear envelope disassembly, the mitotic apparatus becomes encased by a discontinuous network of endoplasmic reticulum membranes, which associate with ...
[21]
Kinetochore assembly throughout the cell cycle - PMC
The kinetochore plays an essential role in facilitating chromosome segregation during cell division. This massive protein complex assembles onto the centromere ...
[22]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.008
[23]
Measuring NDC80 binding reveals the molecular basis of tension ...
Jul 25, 2018 · We found that NDC80 binding is modulated in a chromosome autonomous fashion over prometaphase and metaphase, and is predominantly regulated by centromere ...
[24]
Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore ...
Nov 1, 2000 · Tension probably increases the number of kinetochore microtubules by slowing their turnover rate. The limited effect of tension at prometaphase ...
[25]
A new look at kinetochore structure in vertebrate somatic cells using ...
In general the kinetochore consists of a conspicuous, roughly circular 35–40 nm thick electron-opaque outer plate that is composed of a dense meshwork of 10–20 ...
[26]
Three-dimensional structure of kinetochore-fibers in human mitotic ...
Jul 27, 2022 · Similarly, kinetochore size in PtK1 cells was 0.157 ± 0.045 µm2 (mean ±STD) as observed by electron tomography (McEwen et al., 1998a), whereas ...
[27]
Here, There, and Everywhere: Kinetochore Function on Holocentric ...
May 16, 2001 · Monocentric chromosomes attach to microtubules at a particular region (the centromere) and move toward the pole during anaphase with the ...
[28]
The mechanics of microtubule networks in cell division - PMC - NIH
(A) Schematic depicting the three major classes of microtubules of the spindle. K-fibers (red), interpolar microtubules (green), and astral microtubules (purple) ...
[29]
Microtubule assembly during mitosis – from distinct origins to distinct ...
Jun 15, 2012 · (A) Schematic metaphase spindle, showing its three different MT subclasses: interpolar MTs (orange), K-fibers (red) and astral MTs (green).
[30]
Kinetochore Fiber Maturation in PtK1 Cells and Its Implications ... - NIH
At late prometaphase, the average number of Mts on fully congressed kinetochores is 19.7 ± 6.7 (n = 94), at late metaphase 24.3 ± 4.9 (n = 62), and at early ...
[31]
EB1 Targets to Kinetochores with Attached, Polymerizing Microtubules
These astral microtubule polymerization rates were similar to the rate of 12.8 ± 5.7 μm/min measured using GFP-α tubulin in mitotic LLCPK cells (Rusan et al., ...
[32]
https://rupress.org/jcb/article/211/6/1103/38243/Thirty-years-of-search-and-capture-The-complex
[33]
The complex simplicity of mitotic spindle assembly | Journal of Cell ...
Dec 14, 2015 · Cell division is enacted by a microtubule-based, self-assembling macromolecular machine known as the mitotic spindle. In 1986, Kirschner and ...
[34]
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0602249103
[35]
The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to ...
Jun 27, 2006 · The Dam1 complex, an essential component of kinetochores in yeast, may contribute directly to kinetochore–MT attachment and force production.
[36]
Lateral attachment of kinetochores to microtubules is enriched in ...
Mar 1, 2018 · We found that kinetochores form uniform lateral attachments in the prometaphase rosette. Many transient kinetochore components are maximally ...
[37]
Lateral to End-on Conversion of Chromosome-Microtubule ... - NIH
Jul 25, 2013 · We show that end-on conversion requires (1) the plus-end-directed motor CENP-E to tether the lateral kinetochore onto microtubule walls and (2) the microtubule ...
[38]
Structure of the human outer kinetochore KMN network complex
Mar 8, 2024 · The KMN network directly attaches CCAN to microtubules through MIS12C and NDC80C. Here, we determined a high-resolution cryo-EM structure of the ...
[39]
Human CLASP1 Is an Outer Kinetochore Component that Regulates ...
We show that CLASP1, a microtubule-associated protein, localizes preferentially near the plus ends of growing spindle microtubules and is also a component of a ...
[40]
CLASP2 binding to curved microtubule tips promotes flux and ... - NIH
Sep 14, 2019 · CLASPs are conserved microtubule plus-end–tracking proteins that suppress microtubule catastrophes and independently localize to kinetochores ...
[41]
MICROTUBULE-BASED FORCE GENERATION - PMC - NIH
As the microtubule depolymerizes, motion of the kinetochore towards the microtubule tip is energetically favored, because when the kinetochore is closer to the ...
[42]
Direct observation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores in ...
At anaphase onset, kinetochores switched to depolymerization of microtubule plus ends, resulting in chromosome-to-pole rates transiently greater than flux.Missing: prometaphase | Show results with:prometaphase
[43]
[PDF] Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule ...
Jan 12, 2010 · The goal of this review is to discuss the biophysical mechanisms of force generation coupled to MT polymer- ization and depolymerization, and ...
[44]
Chromosome biorientation produces hundreds of piconewtons at a ...
Oct 20, 2016 · In contrast to earlier measurements of 700 pN per kinetochore (50 pN per MT), a more recent optical trapping study in meiotic insect cells ...
[45]
Spindle microtubules generate tension-dependent changes in the ...
Apr 4, 2011 · Importantly, kinetochore–microtubule attachments are capable of generating as much as 700 pN of force (Nicklas, 1988), which functions to ...
[46]
Mechanisms of Chromosome Congression during Mitosis - PMC
Chromosome congression during prometaphase culminates with the establishment of a metaphase plate, a hallmark of mitosis in metazoans.
[47]
Kinetochore dynein generates a poleward pulling force to facilitate ...
Aug 7, 2007 · The MT minus end-directed motor dynein/dynactin binds kinetochores in prometaphase and has long been implicated in chromosome congression.
[48]
Complete Kinetochore Tracking Reveals Error-Prone Homologous ...
Aug 19, 2011 · Up to 2 hr after NEBD (corresponding to phases 1 and 2), most kinetochores were not attached to microtubule bundles but were contacted by very ...
[49]
Review The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint - ScienceDirect.com
Nov 20, 2012 · The spindle assembly checkpoint acts to maintain genome stability by delaying cell division until accurate chromosome segregation can be guaranteed.
[50]
Spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 are required for ... - NIH
Inhibition of the APC/C has been intensely studied as the mechanism whereby the spindle assembly checkpoint arrests cells in metaphase of mitosis in ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[51]
Mad2 and the APC/C compete for the same site on Cdc20 to ensure ...
Sep 24, 2012 · The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is essential to ensure proper chromosome segregation and thereby maintain genomic stability. The SAC ...
[52]
Human Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint ...
Budding yeast Mps1p kinase has been implicated in both the duplication of microtubule-organizing centers and the spindle assembly checkpoint.
[53]
Checkpoint Protein BubR1 Acts Synergistically with Mad2 to Inhibit ...
BubR1 is a kinase that phosphorylates Cdc20 ... The internal Cdc20 binding site in BubR1 facilitates both spindle assembly checkpoint signalling and silencing.Ubiquitination Assays · Results · Inhibition Of Cdc20 Does Not...
[54]
The Bub1–Plk1 kinase complex promotes spindle checkpoint ...
Feb 25, 2016 · Here we show that human checkpoint kinase Bub1 not only directly phosphorylates Cdc20, but also scaffolds Plk1-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc20.Human Plk1 And Bub1... · Bub1--Plk1 Phosphorylates... · Bub1/bubr1--Plk1 Mediate...
[55]
The spindle assembly checkpoint is satisfied in the absence of ... - NIH
As long as there is a single kinetochore in the cell that is not attached to microtubules, the SAC remains unsatisfied, and initiation of anaphase is inhibited ...
[56]
Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores
While a single unattached kinetochore is sufficient to elicit a SAC response [27], the strength of this diffusible SAC signal is proportional to the number ...
[57]
Exploiting the compromised spindle assembly checkpoint function of ...
Aneuploidy is a frequent property of cancer cells that arises as a consequence of chromosomal instability (CIN) ... CIN is the spindle assembly checkpoint ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[58]
Correction of Microtubule-Kinetochore Attachment Errors
Both merotelic and syntelic attachments are thought to be resolved by the error correction machinery, the principal component of which is Aurora B kinase.
[59]
Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects - PMC
Several observations suggest that the centromeric pool of the Aurora B kinase plays a central role in correcting kinetochore attachment errors including ...Preventing Merotelic... · Correcting Merotelic... · Future Directions And...
[60]
Correcting aberrant kinetochore microtubule attachments: an Aurora ...
Aurora B, part of the CPC, corrects erroneous microtubule attachments by phosphorylating Ndc80, destabilizing microtubules at kinetochores.
[61]
Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially ...
Here, we demonstrate that Aurora B kinase phosphorylates three spatially distinct targets within the conserved outer kinetochore KNL1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 ...
[62]
Aurora B kinase localization to centromeres and kinetochores
May 14, 2020 · Erroneous attachments include monotelic, syntelic and merotelic attachments ... Aurora B facilitates kinetochore attachment error correction in ...Aurora B Kinase Regulates... · Aurora B And The Cpc Are... · Aurora B Kinase Localizes To...
[63]
Aurora-B kinase pathway controls the lateral to end-on conversion of ...
Jul 28, 2017 · Aurora-B kinase pathway controls the lateral to end-on conversion of kinetochore-microtubule attachments in human cells.
[64]
Kinetochore life histories reveal an Aurora-B-dependent error ...
We show that the majority of lazy kinetochores are corrected rapidly in anaphase by Aurora B; if uncorrected, they result in a higher rate of micronuclei ...Missing: maturation | Show results with:maturation
[65]
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200909005
[66]
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80990-3
[67]
Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores
During mitosis, the APC/C is activated by its co-activator protein Cdc20 and the resulting APC/CCdc20 complex ubiquitinates the anaphase inhibitors securin and ...
[68]
Coupling of Cdc20 inhibition and activation by BubR1
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibits Cdc20 through the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). In addition, phosphorylation of Cdc20 by cyclin B1–Cdk1 ...
[69]
[PDF] The anaphase promoting complex/ cyclosome - UC Berkeley MCB
Aug 9, 2006 · In metaphase, when all kinetochores are attached to microtubules, APC/CCdc20 ubiquitylates securin and cyclin B and thereby activates the ...
[70]
APC/C: current understanding and future perspectives - PMC
May 23, 2019 · Cdc20 activates the APC/C in metaphase and anaphase to degrade substrates such as cyclin B and securin and then Cdh1 takes over to degrade APC/C ...
[71]
p31comet acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing ... - NIH
Depletion of p31comet prevents timely passage into anaphase, showing that mitotic progression requires an active mechanism for silencing the spindle checkpoint.
[72]
p31 comet acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing ...
Sep 30, 2011 · The modal time of anaphase entry was not affected by Mad1 depletion, but depletion of Mad2 cut the time in half, to ∼12 min, consistent with ...
[73]
Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule ...
Tension is thought to stabilize these bi-oriented attachments indirectly, by suppressing the destabilizing activity of a kinase, Aurora B. However, a complete ...Missing: loop | Show results with:loop