Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Queen excluder

A queen excluder is a selective barrier device employed in , consisting of a frame fitted with a grate of precisely spaced wires or perforations—typically 4.1 to 4.2 mm apart—that allows smaller worker bees to pass through freely while preventing the larger (with a thorax width of 4.8 to 5.0 mm) and most drones from doing so. Placed between the brood chamber and the honey supers of a , it confines the queen to the lower brood area, thereby inhibiting her from laying eggs in the upper honey storage sections and ensuring those areas remain free of brood for easier, cleaner . Invented in 1865 by the beekeeper Abbé Collin, the queen excluder emerged during a period of rapid innovation in apiculture that facilitated the shift toward commercial production. This simple yet effective tool built upon earlier advancements, such as movable frame , by providing a physical means to separate brood-rearing from storage, thereby improving management efficiency in managed colonies. Queen excluders are available in several types, including wire models made from welded metal rods for durability and good airflow, perforated metal or zinc sheets for sturdiness though with potentially reduced ventilation, and plastic versions that are lightweight, affordable, and easy to clean. Their primary benefits include streamlined honey harvesting without the need to inspect for hidden queens or brood, reduced risk of disease spread by isolating brood areas, and production of higher-quality honey and wax from uncontaminated combs. However, they are not without controversy; some beekeepers, including the influential 20th-century apiarist R.O.B. Manley, have dubbed them "honey excluders" due to observations that bees often hesitate to cross the barrier, leading to nectar buildup in the brood chamber, potential overcrowding, swarming risks, or even reduced overall honey yields. Despite these drawbacks, queen excluders remain a staple in modern beekeeping, particularly for queen rearing and large-scale operations.

History

Invention

The queen excluder was first invented by Petro Prokopovych (1775–1850), a and educator in the , around 1814 as a key component of his pioneering framed hive system. Prokopovych, who managed a growing starting with a small number of colonies around 1800—which expanded to 580 by 1808 and over 6,600 by the mid-19th century—developed this innovation during seven years of experimentation beginning in 1807, driven by the need to harvest honey without destroying bee colonies—a common practice at the time. His work laid foundational principles for rational, commercial in , then part of the , where traditional log hives limited efficient management. Prokopovych's crude excluder was a simple wooden integrated into the structure, featuring apertures narrow enough to permit worker bees to traverse while preventing the larger from passing. This barrier divided the into separate sections for brood rearing below and honey storage above, allowing workers to access the upper for filling with without the queen laying eggs there. The design was part of his overall "Prokopovych ," which used removable wooden he termed "sleeves," enabling and extraction without excessive disruption. In the historical context of early 19th-century beekeeping, Prokopovych's invention predated the widespread use of movable-frame hives in and , such as Lorenzo Langstroth's 1852 , and focused on scaling operations for commercial efficiency in the . By establishing a beekeeping school in 1828 that trained over 700 students and publishing instructional materials, Prokopovych disseminated these ideas, influencing apiary practices across despite limited initial recognition outside the region. This early excluder marked a shift toward humane and productive management, evolving later into more refined versions.

Development

Following the initial crude attempts at queen exclusion in the early , significant advancements occurred in the mid-1800s with Abbe Collin's 1865 design of the perforated zinc queen excluder in . This innovation introduced precise slot sizing of 4.1–4.3 mm, calibrated to prevent queens and drones from passing while allowing worker bees to traverse freely, marking a shift toward more reliable and manufacturable barriers. In the , European beekeepers, including members of the influential Dadant family, drove further refinements by transitioning to wired and versions, which enhanced durability and ease of handling compared to fragile sheets. These materials addressed issues like and breakage, facilitating broader adoption in commercial apiaries. The brought additional innovations, notably the later development of queen excluders, prized for their construction and reusability without the rust risks of metal predecessors. Concurrently, designs were standardized to fit Langstroth hives, which had gained prominence since the , ensuring compatibility with the dominant movable-frame system in modern .

Design

Physical Structure

The queen excluder employs a grid-based featuring parallel horizontal bars or elongated slots spaced 4.1–4.3 mm apart, calibrated to permit passage of worker bees while restricting larger castes. This precise spacing aligns with the typical width of worker bees, measuring approximately 3.5–4.0 mm, enabling them to navigate through by slight , whereas the broader thoraces of (around 4.8–5.0 mm) and most drones prevent their transit. The grid pattern ensures uniform exclusion across the entire surface, with bars typically 2–3 mm thick to maintain structural integrity without impeding airflow or bee movement. Standard queen excluders are dimensioned to fit seamlessly within common hive configurations, such as the 10-frame , where the overall size measures approximately 16.25 x 19.75 inches to match the inner box dimensions. This sizing includes peripheral frame borders, often 0.5–1 inch wide, which provide rigidity and allow the excluder to rest stably on top of brood frames or within supers without shifting during hive manipulation. Layout variations enhance versatility in design, including slotted patterns with rectangular openings (e.g., 4.2 mm wide by 18–20 mm long) for efficient passage and round-hole configurations featuring circular apertures of about 4.2 mm to minimize resistance. Some models incorporate reversible layouts, where the grid can be flipped without affecting functionality, facilitating straightforward insertion and removal in the hive stack.

Materials

Queen excluders are primarily constructed from metal, , or wood-based materials, each chosen for specific properties that balance , bee safety, and functionality in environments. Metal options, often made from galvanized steel (zinc-coated for corrosion resistance) or , provide exceptional longevity and structural integrity, typically lasting over 10 years with proper care. These materials resist warping under normal hive temperatures but may develop sharp edges over time if not maintained, potentially posing risks to wings. Stainless steel variants, in particular, offer superior rust resistance compared to galvanized types, making them suitable for humid climates. Plastic queen excluders, commonly injection-molded from (PE) or (PP), emphasize lightweight design—often under 1 pound per unit—and affordability, with prices ranging from approximately $5 to $10. These polymers are rust-proof and feature smooth, rounded slots that minimize injury to bees, enhancing overall hive safety. However, they can become brittle in cold weather below freezing or warp in excessive heat above 100°F (38°C), reducing their precision and effectiveness over time. Historical and niche variants include wooden frames fitted with wire or perforated sheet , popular in the early for their customizability and natural integration with wooden . These designs used sheets with precisely cut slits or fine wire grids to exclude queens while allowing worker passage, though they required frequent maintenance to prevent or . In modern applications, emerging composite materials—such as reinforced plastics—offer enhanced flexibility and resistance to environmental stresses, bridging the gap between metal durability and plastic lightness for specialized needs. Selection of queen excluder materials depends on key criteria including corrosion resistance to withstand hive moisture, bee safety through avoidance of sharp edges or toxic coatings, and cost-effectiveness, with metal models priced around $15 to $25. Beekeepers in variable climates may prioritize for longevity, while those seeking portability opt for despite its temperature sensitivities.

Function and Usage

Primary Purpose

The primary purpose of a queen excluder in is to separate the brood nest from the honey storage areas within the , confining the queen bee to the lower brood box and preventing her from ascending into the honey supers to lay eggs. This restriction ensures that brood production, including eggs, larvae, and pupae, remains localized in the designated brood chamber, while worker bees can freely move through the excluder to access and fill the supers with . By maintaining this division, the excluder supports efficient hive management during the honey flow season. This separation facilitates cleaner honey harvesting by keeping the supers free of brood, excess pollen stores, and uncapped cells that would otherwise complicate and processing. Without brood in the supers, beekeepers can remove frames containing primarily capped , minimizing the need for additional straining or heating to separate impurities. The functional mechanism of the queen excluder relies on the biological size differences among castes: worker bees, with a thorax width of approximately 3.5–3.8 millimeters, can navigate the excluder's slots, which are typically 4.1–4.4 millimeters wide, whereas the queen's larger (about 4.5–4.8 millimeters) prevents her passage. This selective barrier allows workers to tend to the supers without permitting the queen to expand the brood nest upward.

Installation and Application

Queen excluders are placed between the top brood box and the first honey super to confine the queen and brood to the lower portion of the hive while allowing worker bees to access the supers above. This placement supports the primary goal of separating the brood nest from honey storage areas. In multi-super setups, the excluder remains between the brood chamber and the lowest honey super to control vertical expansion and prevent brood in upper boxes. They are compatible with standard hive designs such as Langstroth and Dadant, fitting over the frames in these systems. Installation timing aligns with colony strength and seasonal nectar flows, typically occurring during spring buildup when the brood box is nearly full and bees begin drawing comb in the honey super. In temperate zones, this often means late spring, ensuring the queen has sufficient comb for egg-laying before adding the excluder to avoid constraining the brood nest. The device should be removed in the fall prior to winter, allowing the queen to move freely into honey stores for clustering and preventing restrictions during cold weather. Failure to remove it at harvest can trap bees and complicate extraction. Practical application involves ensuring the excluder sits level and secure across the top bars of the brood frames, with no gaps that could allow to bypass it. When adding supers, position the excluder directly after confirming the colony's readiness to expand upward. For maintenance, excluders should be cleaned annually by scraping off accumulated and wax buildup using a scrubbing or heat to restore functionality and prevent obstruction. Beekeepers monitor for any bee-constructed bridges over the excluder, which can occur if fitting is imperfect, and address them promptly to maintain separation.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Benefits

Queen excluders simplify by preventing the queen from laying eggs in the supers, resulting in frames filled solely with and capped . This brood-free environment reduces the labor involved in uncapping and extracting honey, while minimizing risks from larval residues or brood diseases that could otherwise affect honey purity. By restricting to the lower brood box, queen excluders streamline inspections, as beekeepers can focus their search in a confined area, thereby speeding up the process and minimizing colony disturbance during routine checks. This confinement also enhances overall organization, promoting vertical growth patterns where workers efficiently store in upper supers, maximizing space utilization in managed apiaries. Research indicates productivity benefits from queen excluders, particularly through the redirection of colony resources toward storage rather than brood rearing during peak nectar flows. In a study of honey bee colonies, the use of excluders increased average honey yields by approximately 32%, from 9.44 kg per in controls to 12.51 kg in treated colonies, by limiting brood expansion and dedicating supers to honey accumulation.

Drawbacks

One notable limitation of queen excluders is their tendency to act as "honey excluders," where worker bees exhibit reluctance to pass through the narrow openings, preferring instead to store in the brood chamber until it is fully occupied. This behavior can delay the filling of honey supers and reduce overall yields, as bees may backfill the brood nest with , leading to congestion. The use of queen excluders also increases the labor required in hive management, as beekeepers must carefully time their installation—typically after bees have begun storing in the supers—and ensure timely removal, such as at , to avoid impeding bee movement during periods of low nectar flow or winter preparation. Failure to monitor and adjust can exacerbate issues, adding to the time-intensive nature of inspections and manipulations. Additionally, improper timing or placement of the excluder can induce on the by fragmenting area and causing in the lower boxes, which may prompt swarming behavior as bees perceive insufficient space for expansion. This risk is heightened if the excluder is introduced too early, constraining the queen's laying area and disrupting normal foraging patterns.

Reception

Adoption in Beekeeping

Queen excluders have become a standard component in commercial operations utilizing Langstroth , particularly in and , where they are routinely employed to separate brood chambers from honey supers. In these regions, they facilitate efficient honey production by confining the queen to the brood area, aligning with the scalable demands of industrialized apiaries. However, their adoption is notably lower in alternative systems such as top-bar or natural , where hive designs naturally promote brood-honey separation through comb placement and , often rendering excluders unnecessary or incompatible. Regional variations highlight differing management priorities; in , excluders see high usage as part of varroa control strategies, including brood break induction via to disrupt reproduction cycles following the pest's initial detection in 2022, with the spreading to additional states including , , and by late 2025. In contrast, among hobbyist setups, such as U.S. backyard apiaries, their application remains optional and varies widely based on hive strength and harvest goals. Queen excluders are frequently integrated with other management tools, including supersedure prevention techniques that maintain queen confinement to stabilize colony structure, and modern automated hive systems like Flow Hives, where they ensure brood-free honey collection zones. Post-2000, plastic variants have gained popularity for their cost efficiency and lightweight design compared to traditional metal ones, appealing to both commercial and hobbyist users seeking durable, affordable alternatives without compromising functionality. Adoption trends reflect the shift toward industrialized beekeeping, evolving from limited use in the early 1900s—primarily among experimental apiaries—to near-universal integration in large-scale honey production by the late 20th century, driven by the standardization of Langstroth systems and emphasis on yield optimization.

Controversies

Critics of queen excluders contend that they constitute an unnatural intervention in honey bee colony behavior, as feral colonies typically store brood and honey in the same cavity without physical barriers, potentially disrupting natural foraging and storage patterns. This perspective is echoed in biodynamic beekeeping standards, such as those set by Demeter, which restrict excluder use due to concerns over altered colony dynamics and reduced honey quality from hindered ripening processes in supers. Studies supporting this view suggest that excluders can lead to slower filling of honey supers, as worker bees may hesitate to cross the barrier, preferring to backfill the brood chamber first, which mimics wild hive conditions but complicates managed hives. The debate surrounding queen excluders originated in the late 19th century following their invention, with early skepticism from naturalist beekeepers who viewed them as artificial constraints on bee instincts, as documented in periodicals like the British Bee Journal. This controversy persisted into the through organizations like the British Beekeepers Association, where discussions highlighted potential disruptions to colony expansion. In the 2010s, the debate experienced a modern revival within and biodynamic communities, emphasizing holistic, low-intervention approaches that prioritize mimicking natural hive structures over mechanical separations. Empirical research on queen excluders presents mixed results, fueling ongoing discussions in circles. A 2024 study across 64 biodynamic hives in found no significant differences in colony dynamics—such as worker populations or brood areas—between excluder and non-excluder groups, challenging claims of major disruptions. Conversely, a 2023 trial in involving 30 colonies demonstrated higher yields and reduced brood rearing during peak flow when excluders were installed in the second or third week of the honey flow, suggesting benefits in certain managed contexts without overall performance declines. Earlier work, including a 2018–2019 analysis, raised concerns about potential quality reductions due to environmental changes in supers, though yield impacts varied. These inconsistencies underscore the context-dependent nature of excluder effects, with no on their influence. In response to these criticisms, alternatives to permanent barriers have been proposed, including temporary queen rearing cages that confine for short periods to control brood placement without ongoing restrictions, and programs aimed at producing queens with traits like reduced swarming propensity or optimized laying patterns that lessen the need for excluders altogether. These methods align with natural philosophies by minimizing hardware interventions while achieving similar management goals.

References

  1. [1]
    Queen Excluder: Managing Brood and Honey Production in ...
    Nov 27, 2023 · A queen excluder is essentially a barrier system that allows worker bees to pass through freely while preventing the larger queen bee from ...
  2. [2]
    The origin and impact of excluders - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · The queen excluder, a commonly used beekeeping appliance, is a grate made of welded wires precisely spaced to prevent the queen from leaving ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] ECTD_086 (ii) - Eva Crane Trust
    The perfection of the queen ex- cluder by Abbe Collin of France in 1865 enabled the beekeeper to keep the queen, and hence the brood, out of the honey chamber.
  4. [4]
    History of British Standards in Beekeeping - Dave Cushman
    Aug 18, 2018 · The queen excluder was invented by Abbe Collin. It was originally unknown, at least by myself, whether it was a wire type or a perforated ...
  5. [5]
    Important Dates In The History Of Beekeeping | Bee Glossary - Omlet
    Queen excluder designed by Abbe Collin. 1887. WBC Hive launched by William Broughton Carr. 1891. Porter Bee Escape invented by Edward Porter. 1928. Smith Hive ...
  6. [6]
    Queen Excluders | Heather Bell Honey Bees Ltd
    Queen excluders were invented in the late 19th century, along with much other equipment, to facilitate commercial honey production.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  7. [7]
    Queen excluder pros & cons | All your questions answered. (2025)
    Wikipedia credits Ukrainian Petro Prokopovych (1775 – 1850) with the invention of the queen excluder. He is also widely recognised as the inventor of the ...
  8. [8]
    Petro Prokopovych - Bee Culture
    Nov 20, 2023 · Simultaneously, Petro also designed the first Queen Excluder which was placed in his new invention. A. I. Root himself praised Prokopvych's ...
  9. [9]
    Petro Prokopovych and the commercialisation of beekeeping
    Jan 16, 2025 · Thus, Petro Prokopovych came up with the initial idea and design in 1814 ... queen excluder). Prior to this invention, beekeepers had struggled ...
  10. [10]
    Who Was Petro Prokopovych? Essential Facts Bee Professor
    ### Summary of Petro Prokopovych's Queen Excluder Invention
  11. [11]
    Israeli vegan honey could leave Russia & Ukraine holding the ...
    Mar 24, 2022 · Managing 580 beehives by 1808, Prokopovych in 1814 invented the wooden-framed beehive, ancestral to today's “supers,” and then improved it ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Langstroth on the hive and honey bee
    thousands oflarge bees, called Drones, or male-bees, whose sole function is to fertilize the young queens, or virgin females.
  13. [13]
    British bee journal & bee-keepers adviser - The Eye
    ... Celluloid for. Queen-excluders,. 162 ;. Early. Irhows ... Excluder Zinc below Sections,. 59. Exhibits ... Wired Frame, 385. Crystallisation of Bees-wax, 390 ...
  14. [14]
    Queen And Drone Excluders - Chest of Books
    Some credit this invention to Abbe Collin, of Paris, who published a "Guide" in 1865. (In an article in the French LaCulture, Nov. 11, 1877, Charles Dadant ...
  15. [15]
    Queen Excluder Types Used In Bee Hives - Dave Cushman
    The dimensions of the 'hole' are 4.38 mm x 18.3 mm. In my opinion these are a vast improvement on the previous punched plastic excluders. There are several ...
  16. [16]
    What Is A Queen Excluder? - Beekeeping For Newbies
    Nov 29, 2021 · Plain and simple, a queen excluder is a grill with openings 0.163 – 0.172 inches (4.14 – 4.37 mm) wide. These openings are large enough for ...
  17. [17]
    How Does A Queen Excluder Physically Work? Key Mechanics ...
    The (queen excluder)[/topic/queen-excluder] uses gaps (4.1–4.4 mm wide) that permit worker bees (smaller thoraxes) to pass but block the queen's larger body.
  18. [18]
    Mann Lake Plastic Queen Excluder, Fits 10 Frame Langstroth ...
    Product specifications. Product Dimensions, ‎16.25 x 19.75 x 0.06 inches ... Mann Lake HD584 Steel Standard Hive Tool, 9-Inch.
  19. [19]
    Parts of a Beehive and Langstroth Beehive Measurements
    Apr 5, 2021 · 10 Frame Langstroth Beehive Measurements. All 10 frame Langstroth Beehives have the same length and width – 19 ⅞ inches long and 16 inches wide.
  20. [20]
    How To Choose the Best Queen Excluder for Your Hive - Dadant
    Queen excluders make inspections, honey harvesting, and other fundamental tasks easier. Learn how to choose the best excluder for your hive in this guide.Missing: 1890s celluloid
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Advanced Beekeeping Methods - Purdue Extension
    If the queen was not seen, you could put a queen excluder between the boxes. ... kinds of honey, and learning more about the bee societies. The learning ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Plastic Queen Excluder Separates the Queen from Worker Bees
    Plastic Queen Excluder Separates the Queen from Worker Bees. Plastic queen excluder is made of injection-molded PP or PE materials.Missing: polyethylene polypropylene
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Plastic Queen Excluder
    ### Summary of Plastic Queen Excluder from Mann Lake Ltd.
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Beekeeping equipment – Mid-Atlantic Apiculture Research and ...
    Queen excluder – The primary function of the queen excluder is to confine the queen, brood rearing, and pollen storage to the broodnest. It is an optional ...Missing: physical | Show results with:physical
  29. [29]
    Beekeeping Equipment - Bee Program - UGA
    Queen excluder - placed between the brood nest and the honey supers. This device keeps the queen in the brood nest so brood will not occur in honey supers.
  30. [30]
    Colony Growth and Seasonal Management of Honey Bees
    Before adding the middle supers, place a queen excluder (metal or plastic device with spaces that permit the passage of workers but restrict the movement of ...
  31. [31]
    What Are the Benefits of Queen Excluders? | Beekeeping Learning ...
    Queen excluders are used to restrict the queen from laying eggs and raising brood in the hive body while the workers fill frames in the upper sections with ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  32. [32]
    Queen Excluder: Managing Brood and Honey Production in ...
    ... queen bees measure approximately 4.8-5.0 millimeters across their thorax. This biological difference is what makes the queen excluder such an effective tool.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Beginning With Bees - LSU AgCenter
    Jan 7, 2025 · Hive with queen excluder. Swarm prevention is accomplished by giving the bees room at the proper time so the young bees can move up out of ...
  34. [34]
    Beginning Honey Beekeeping Equipment and Associated Costs
    A queen excluder eliminates the chance the queen will place eggs in your honey box. If you do not anticipate doing a split of the hive, you may consider ...The Beehive · Setting Up A Beehive · Other Beekeeping ToolsMissing: placement tips
  35. [35]
    Beekeeping Calendar | Month by month to-do list for beekeepers
    Some beekeepers will add a queen excluder to prevent brood in the honey supers. Be sure that the queen has sufficient comb for egg-laying. Super all hives ...
  36. [36]
    Honey Bees and Beekeeping | CAES Field Report - UGA
    Let the colony remain queenless for 24 hours and then introduce the new queen in her cage as described in the section “Installing Packaged Bees.” With a new ...Missing: placement tips
  37. [37]
    Maximizing Honey Production | Mississippi State University ...
    For those who use queen excluders, it is imperative to remove the device at the time of harvest. Too many new beekeepers forget and leave the excluders on ...Missing: tips maintenance
  38. [38]
    Splitting the Hive - Beekeeping - Utah State University Extension
    The excluder allows bees, except the queen, to pass through, limiting the queen's movement in the hive. Queen bee. Figure 5. Queen bee (circled) surrounded by ...
  39. [39]
    Beekeeping Calendar for the Northeast - Cornell CALS
    Consider adding a queen excluder to manage the honey supers more easily. Set up bait hives if you want to catch a swarm. Foundation will be more likely to ...Missing: placement tips
  40. [40]
    [PDF] BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR HIVE HEALTH A GUIDE ...
    Jan 1, 2019 · Always keep tools clean by removing all of the propolis and wax using a chlorinated scrubbing cleanser. You can also use fire or rubbing ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Open any beekeeping equipment cata
    Oct 1, 2014 · (6) Queen excluders​​ Arguments for using queen excluders (Figure 6a) include keeping queens (and brood) out of your honey supers and limit- ing ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Queen excluders enhance honey production in African honey bees ...
    Based on the findings of this study, it is evident that the use of queen excluders may improve the honey yields of colonies that show strong and continuous ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Queen Excluder, or Honey Excluder… - Bee Culture
    Jun 1, 2022 · The queen excluder seems more like a honey excluder, since the bees refuse to go through it, and end up super-filling the brood chamber with honey.<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Effects of queen excluders on the colony dynamics of honeybees ...
    Feb 14, 2024 · This study focusses on queen excluders, a common hive addition in contemporary beekeeping. Its impacts are controversially discussed but have not been studied ...
  45. [45]
    Why top bar hives don't require queen excluder? - Beesource
    Mar 21, 2015 · Usually, and I say usually, a full bar of capped honey will act as a queen excluder in a top bar hive. With my top bars I let the brood nest ...
  46. [46]
    Queen Bee Isolation Cage for Forcing Brood Breaks for Varroa ...
    7-day returnsCage for Fighting Varroa through a Forced Brood Break. This kit provides an effective and easy-to-use Varroa control method: the Queen Bee Isolation Cage.
  47. [47]
    Queen Excluders: What They Are and Should You Use One?
    Jun 14, 2025 · Queen excluders are a common beekeeping tool used to manage where the queen bee can lay her eggs within the hive. By placing a queen ...
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Why do Beekeepers Use Queen Excluders - When to place them ...
    Queen excluders keep the queen in the lower hive, preventing her from laying eggs in the honey comb, and help focus her on brood. They are placed at the start ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  50. [50]
    Effect of Queen Excluder Placing on Honey Yield and Honeybee ...
    The partial limiting of queen egg laying using queen excluders significantly reduced the total brood comb area compared to the control group at peak honey flow.<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens ...
    Abstract. Here, we cover a wide range of methods currently in use and recommended in modern queen rearing, selection, and breeding.
  52. [52]