Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reduced pressure zone device

A reduced pressure zone device (RPZD or RPZ), also known as a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, is a mechanical backflow prevention device designed to protect potable water supplies from contamination by preventing the reverse flow of potentially hazardous substances due to backpressure or backsiphonage. It achieves this through two independently acting check valves that create a reduced pressure zone, separated by a hydraulically dependent differential relief valve that automatically discharges water to the atmosphere if the zone pressure drops to near atmospheric levels, thereby maintaining an air gap equivalent to protect against contamination. The assembly typically includes four test cocks for verification and resilient-seated shutoff valves at each end for isolation during maintenance. The RPZ operates by ensuring that the pressure in the zone between the s remains at least 2 lower than the supply pressure upstream; if either fails or backpressure exceeds the supply pressure, the opens to vent , alerting users to a malfunction and preventing cross-connection. This configuration provides the highest level of protection among testable backflow preventers, suitable for both high-hazard (e.g., toxic chemicals) and low-hazard applications where continuous pressure monitoring is required. Unlike simpler devices like valves, the RPZ's relief mechanism makes it effective against both backpressure and backsiphonage scenarios, though it discharges during faults, necessitating proper drainage. RPZ devices are commonly installed in fire protection systems, setups, and involving potential contaminants, as mandated by local water authorities for high-risk connections to isolate potable from non-potable lines. They must be tested annually by certified personnel to verify and functionality, with records maintained for compliance. Installation requires a horizontal orientation (unless manufacturer-approved otherwise), with the centerline 30 to 60 inches above the floor, at least 18 inches of clearance below the to prevent submersion, and drainage via an air gap sized at least twice the opening (minimum 1 inch) to handle discharge without flooding. Standards for RPZ assemblies emphasize protection from freezing, adequate support to prevent movement, and accessibility for testing, often aligning with guidelines from organizations like the (AWWA) and OSHA for elevated platforms if needed. While providing superior safeguards, their complexity and water discharge can increase operational costs, making them ideal for scenarios where maximum public health protection outweighs these factors.

History

Early Development

The recognition of backflow risks as a threat emerged in the early , driven by contamination incidents that highlighted vulnerabilities in municipal water systems. One pivotal event occurred in at the World's Fair, where cross-connections in two major hotels allowed contaminated water from rooftop cooling towers to backflow into the potable supply, causing an outbreak of amoebic that sickened hundreds and underscored the need for reliable prevention measures. These early episodes, including industrial cross-connections that led to widespread absenteeism from waterborne illnesses, spurred initial into backflow dynamics and design, laying the conceptual groundwork for advanced systems. By the 1930s, efforts to mitigate cross-connection hazards intensified in , where the city's expanding water infrastructure faced risks from industrial and commercial ties to the public supply. Rudimentary vacuum breakers were developed in this period to address backsiphonage in high-risk areas, such as the Bimini Baths, which had earlier drawn contaminated sodium-rich water from an accidental 1904 oil well strike into its systems. The Department of Water and Power (LADWP) responded by forming a cross-connection control group to tackle harbor-related threats, fostering innovations like early double-check assemblies that prioritized atmospheric breaks over continuous . The reduced pressure principle marked a significant advancement in 1945, when the E.C. Service Company—founded in 1933 by innovators Frank Carlton and Orien Kersey Entriken—applied for a on Model 6, the first to employ this method instead of traditional backpressure reliance. Model 6 integrated two check valves with a relief valve and vacuum-breaking elements, creating a sustained low-pressure to reliably discharge potential contaminants under both backsiphonage and backpressure conditions; the was granted in 1950 after the company relocated and partnered with Leonard Snyder. This prototype addressed limitations of prior vacuum breakers by providing continuous protection without relying on intermittent atmospheric vents, establishing the foundational architecture for modern reduced pressure devices.

Evolution and Adoption

Following the initial patent application for the reduced pressure principle backflow preventer in 1945 by the E.C. Service Company, the device saw key refinements in the 1950s and 1960s to enhance reliability and testability. Early evaluations by the National Bureau of Standards in 1952 confirmed the device's ability to prevent back-siphonage even when check valves were fouled with debris, establishing a foundation for further improvements. Manufacturers such as the Watts Regulator Company began producing commercial RPZ assemblies during this era, incorporating strainers to mitigate debris issues and refining check valve seating for better performance under continuous pressure. These advancements addressed limitations in earlier designs, making the devices more suitable for high-hazard applications. By the late and into the , the inclusion of test cocks became a standard feature, allowing for field verification of the differential pressure across check valves and the relief valve's functionality. This refinement, driven by ongoing research from the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research at the , facilitated annual testing protocols that improved compliance and safety. Companies like Febco entered the market in this period, contributing to design variations that emphasized durability and ease of maintenance, further solidifying the RPZ's role in protecting potable water supplies. The 1970s marked a pivotal era for RPZ adoption, spurred by heightened awareness of water contamination risks. The passage of the in 1974 prompted U.S. municipalities to update plumbing codes, mandating RPZ devices for high-hazard connections such as those in industrial facilities and sewage treatment plants to prevent incidents. A key milestone was the publication of Standard 1013 in 1974, which formalized RPZ design specifications—including dual check valves, an intermediate , and four test cocks—ensuring consistent performance and driving widespread industry acceptance. By the mid-1970s, thousands of RPZ units were installed and tested annually in major cities like .

Design and Components

Primary Components

A reduced pressure zone device (RPZD), also known as a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention , is engineered to protect potable systems from high-hazard by incorporating key mechanical elements that maintain a hydraulic separation. The primary components form a compact compliant with standards such as ASSE 1013, ensuring reliable operation under continuous pressure conditions. At the heart of the RPZD are two independently acting check valves: the upstream (first) check valve positioned immediately after the inlet and the downstream (second) check valve before the outlet. These valves, typically spring-loaded and of the poppet or disc type, operate separately to establish and sustain the reduced pressure zone between them, preventing reverse flow while allowing forward passage of water. This zonal configuration is fundamental to the device's backflow prevention mechanism. Between the two check valves lies the differential pressure relief valve, a critical safeguard that automatically opens to vent to the atmosphere if the zone pressure drops below 2 above . This hydraulically operated ensures the zone remains at a lower than both the supply and downstream sides, discharging any potential contaminants externally rather than allowing . In many designs, the relief serves as a third check by opening under backpressure if either primary check fails, providing an additional layer of protection without spring assistance. The assembly also includes inlet and outlet shut-off valves, usually or types, which enable isolation of the device for servicing without disrupting the entire water line. Complementing these are four test cocks—typically numbered #1 through #4 and located strategically (before the first check, between the checks, after the second check, and at the )—that facilitate on-site and functionality testing to verify compliance with regulatory standards.

Construction Materials and Variations

Reduced pressure zone devices (RPZDs) are typically constructed with materials selected for durability, , and compatibility with potable systems. The main is commonly made of or lead-free , which provides effective to in standard environments. are also utilized, particularly in applications exposed to harsher conditions, offering superior due to the material's inherent properties. Internal components, such as the seals in the check valves, often employ elastomeric materials like EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer) for reliable sealing and flexibility under varying pressures and temperatures. Test cocks, used for assembly testing, are generally constructed from plastic for cost-effective, non-corrosive caps and plugs, or metal such as or for more robust, threaded fittings. Variations in RPZD design accommodate diverse applications and environmental demands. Sizes typically range from 3/4 inch to 10 inches in , allowing in residential, , and lines with varying capacities. versions are specifically engineered for corrosive environments, such as coastal or chemical-exposed sites, where traditional may degrade over time. For systems, certain RPZD models are designed to integrate with tanks, addressing pressure buildup in closed-loop configurations as required by codes. Some modern RPZDs incorporate low-lead components, with lead content limited to less than 0.25% in wetted surfaces, to comply with the 2014 amendments to the U.S. .

Principles of Operation

Normal Flow Conditions

Under normal forward flow conditions, water enters the reduced pressure zone device (RPZD) from the supply side and passes through the first , which is held open by the flow momentum overcoming its preload. This passage creates a differential across the first check valve, typically ranging from 5 to 10 , as the valve's design incorporates a calibrated spring force that resists flow to establish the reduced pressure zone. The water then flows into the intermediate reduced pressure zone between the two check valves and proceeds through the second check valve, which also remains open during steady forward flow. The second check valve, featuring a lighter spring load, further contributes to maintaining the pressure in the reduced pressure zone at least 2 below the supply pressure, typically 5 to 10 lower and well above atmospheric pressure, ensuring the zone remains isolated from potential contaminants while allowing unimpeded downstream delivery. The overall pressure loss through the RPZD under these conditions averages 10 to 20 , depending on the device size and flow rate, which is attributable to frictional losses and spring resistances in both check valves per basic hydraulic principles. The , positioned between the check valves and connected to the reduced zone, remains closed during normal operation. This closure is maintained by the differential across a sensing , where the higher supply-side exceeds the zone sufficiently to keep the valve seated, preventing any spillage or discharge. The pressure differential across the first , denoted as \Delta P_1 = P_{\text{supply}} - P_{\text{zone}}, is fundamentally governed by the equilibrium between the upstream hydraulic pressure pushing the valve open and the spring force plus downstream pressure resisting it. In steady-state flow, this can be approximated using the orifice flow equation derived from for incompressible fluids: \Delta P_1 = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 + k \cdot F_{\text{spring}}/A where \rho is water density, v is flow velocity through the valve orifice, k is a valve-specific constant, F_{\text{spring}} is the preload spring force, and A is the effective valve area; however, manufacturers calibrate the spring such that \Delta P_1 \approx 5 to $10 psi across typical operating flows to reliably establish the reduced zone without excessive total head loss.

Backflow Prevention Mechanisms

The reduced pressure zone device (RPZD), also known as a reduced pressure principle backflow preventer, provides robust protection against both backpressure and backsiphonage, distinguishing it from simpler devices like assemblies that only mitigate backpressure. Backpressure occurs when downstream exceeds the supply , potentially forcing contaminants upstream, while backsiphonage results from a sudden drop in supply creating a vacuum that draws in pollutants. The RPZD's design incorporates two independently operating check valves separated by a reduced , with a hydraulically operated connected to the atmosphere, ensuring that contamination cannot reach the potable under these conditions. The opens when the supply minus zone is 2 or less (P_{\text{supply}} - P_{\text{zone}} \leq 2 ), discharging to maintain the reduced zone and alert to malfunction. During backsiphonage, a rapid reduction in upstream supply pressure causes the first check valve to close, isolating the supply. The relief valve then opens because the supply pressure drops to or below the zone pressure plus 2 , venting the zone to the atmosphere and creating an air gap that drains any while admitting air to break the , preventing contaminants from entering the supply. This mechanism ensures no reverse flow, as the open relief valve maintains the air gap until supply pressure stabilizes. In cases of backpressure, where downstream pressure surpasses the upstream supply, the second closes to block reverse flow, isolating the zone from downstream. If the second fails or leaks, the high downstream pressure enters the zone, raising the zone pressure. When the zone pressure approaches within 2 of the supply pressure (P_{\text{zone}} \geq P_{\text{supply}} - 2 ), the opens to discharge the potentially contaminated water from the zone to the atmosphere, preventing it from forcing past the first , which remains seated due to its pressure differential. This dual-check and relief system operates independently of normal flow conditions to provide protection.

Installation and Maintenance

Siting and Installation Guidelines

Reduced pressure zone devices (RPZDs) must be installed above ground level to ensure proper operation and accessibility. Specifically, the assembly requires a minimum clearance of 18 inches below the to facilitate drainage and prevent submersion during discharge events, which can occur at rates up to 125 gallons per minute. This elevation also protects against flooding risks, with installations generally positioned at least 1 foot above the plain elevation where applicable. Below-grade installations are generally discouraged due to potential submersion of the or test cocks, which could compromise the device's prevention integrity, as well as heightened risks from freezing temperatures and maintenance difficulties; however, they may be permitted with safeguards such as gravity drainage, alarms, or pumps sized for maximum discharge on emergency power. In cases requiring or installations for against freezing or , specialized enclosures must be used that maintain adequate drainage, provide at least 2 feet of side clearance for servicing, and prevent water accumulation around the device. Drainage must be by gravity with an air gap sized at least twice the opening (minimum 1 inch) to handle discharge without flooding. The preferred orientation for RPZDs is horizontal, though vertical or other configurations may be used if explicitly approved for the specific model by testing standards. Unions should be incorporated at the and outlet to allow for straightforward removal and of the assembly without disrupting the entire piping system. An upstream strainer is required to protect the check valves and internal components from , , and , ensuring long-term reliability. The device's sensitivity to differentials necessitates precise siting near the service connection or meter, with no intervening shutoff valves or interconnections that could introduce contaminants upstream.

Testing and Servicing Procedures

Testing and servicing of reduced pressure zone devices (RPZDs) are essential to ensure ongoing prevention efficacy and compliance with and standards. Annual testing is mandated for all installed RPZDs to verify the of the s and , typically performed by certified backflow assembly testers using a calibrated kit connected to the device's test cocks. The involves measuring differentials across the components under controlled conditions: the first must hold a differential of at least 5 , the second must be tight against back, and the must open at no less than 2 above (maintaining the reduced pressure zone at least 2 below supply ). Servicing routines focus on preventive to address wear on internal components, with disassembly recommended every 3-5 years depending on and usage intensity. This process includes removing the modules and , replacing , O-rings, and diaphragms, and cleaning springs and seats to remove or buildup that could impair . Only certified personnel should perform these tasks, as improper reassembly can compromise the device's performance and void certifications.

Applications

Suitable Use Cases

Reduced pressure zone devices (RPZDs) are primarily suitable for high-hazard applications where the potential for severe contamination of potable water supplies exists due to the introduction of toxic or hazardous substances. These devices provide robust protection against both backsiphonage and backpressure in continuous pressure systems, making them essential for scenarios where backflow could pose significant health risks. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), RPZDs are commonly installed in industrial settings such as plating plants and car washes, where chemicals or wastewater could reverse flow into the public water system. In agricultural and landscaping contexts, RPZDs are recommended for irrigation systems that incorporate fertilizers, pesticides, or other chemical additives, as these represent high-hazard connections to public water supplies. The (AWWA) guidelines emphasize the need for RPZDs or equivalent protection in such applications to prevent contaminant ingress. Similarly, fire sprinkler systems with chemical additives, such as or corrosion inhibitors, require RPZDs to safeguard against , particularly in buildings where system pressures may exceed supply pressures or chemical additives are used. For industrial processes involving potential contaminants, such as manufacturing facilities with boilers, cooling towers, or chemical handling, RPZDs are mandated for connections to public water supplies to isolate health hazards like toxic substances. Examples include hospital autopsy rooms and funeral parlors, where biological or chemical risks are present. RPZDs are not intended for low-hazard domestic services, such as standard residential plumbing, where simpler devices like double check valves suffice; instead, they are preferred over atmospheric vacuum breakers in sites prone to backpressure, as the latter only address backsiphonage. The EPA and AWWA standards highlight that RPZDs are required for any high-hazard tie-in to ensure compliance with backflow prevention protocols.

Advantages and Limitations

Reduced pressure zone devices (RPZDs) offer the highest level of protection, suitable for high-hazard applications where contamination could pose significant risks to . They are highly effective against both backpressure and backsiphonage, ensuring reliable in high-hazard applications by maintaining a reduced zone between two valves and discharging if integrity is compromised. Additionally, RPZDs are testable via integrated test cocks, allowing for straightforward compliance verification and malfunction detection through discharge. Despite these strengths, RPZDs have notable limitations in operational efficiency and practicality. They can incur higher water loss during relief valve discharge events, potentially up to several gallons per occurrence if check valves leak or during testing, as the relief mechanism activates to prevent backflow. RPZDs are generally more expensive than double check valve assemblies due to their complex design and higher material requirements. Installation is restricted to indoor or above-ground locations to avoid freezing and ensure accessibility, often necessitating protective enclosures. Furthermore, they introduce a pressure loss of typically 10-30 depending on and size—which may require booster pumps in low-pressure scenarios.

Standards and Regulations

Certification Standards

The American Society of Sanitary Engineering () Standard 1013-2021 establishes performance requirements for reduced pressure principle backflow preventers, including both potable water and variants, ensuring they protect against through rigorous evaluation. Assemblies certified under ASSE 1013 must undergo hydrostatic pressure tests, where the complete device and its check valves withstand twice the manufacturer's maximum rated working pressure—typically 350 for devices rated at 175 —for a minimum of 10 minutes without visible leakage or permanent deformation. Additionally, these devices are subjected to prevention tests demonstrating no measurable leakage across the check valves under specified differentials: the first check must maintain at least 3.0 (20.7 kPa) above the opening point, while the second check prevents flow at 1.0 (6.9 kPa). Certification also requires validation of the relief valve's operation under simulated contamination scenarios, where the device must discharge water at rates outlined in the standard when the zone drops to 2.0 (13.8 kPa) or less below supply , ensuring no occurs while maintaining the reduced zone at least 2.0 below supply but not less than 1.0 above atmospheric. Shutoff valves integrated into the assembly must seal drip-tight at twice the rated for 10 minutes. ASSE 1013 harmonizes with testing protocols from the () Foundation's 10th Edition Manual of Cross-Connection Control. Beyond 1013, reduced pressure principle devices must appear on the Foundation's Approved List, which verifies compliance through independent laboratory testing for models from various manufacturers, ensuring ongoing approval based on performance in backsiphonage and backpressure conditions. In , certification under CSA B64 Series:21 aligns with ASSE 1013 requirements, mandating similar hydrostatic endurance, responsiveness at low differentials (no less than 2.0 below inlet), and zero leakage in simulations for systems. IAPMO provides compliance for these devices under ANSI/ASSE 1013, listing approved models that meet the standard's criteria for high-hazard applications, including field-testable configurations with no leakage under laboratory-simulated events. , the (UPC) Section 603.3.7 of the 2018 edition (updated in 2024) mandates the installation of reduced-pressure principle backflow prevention assemblies for protecting against high-hazard cross-connections, where could introduce contaminants posing a risk to the potable . Similarly, the 2021 Plumbing Code () requires these assemblies under Section 608.14.2 for high-hazard applications involving backpressure or backsiphonage, ensuring of potential sources such as chemical systems or . Internationally, regulations vary by region; in the , the Pressure Equipment Directive (2014/68/EU) sets general safety requirements for pressure-containing devices, while backflow protection for potable water is governed by standards such as EN 1717 and harmonized standard EN 12729:2023, which covers controllable backflow preventers with reduced pressure zones for fluid categories posing health hazards. Compliance obligations typically include periodic testing by certified professionals in most U.S. states and localities, aligning with standards for performance verification without delving into detailed protocols; frequency varies (e.g., annually in many jurisdictions). Non-compliance, as enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency under the , may lead to civil penalties up to approximately $70,000 per day per violation (as of 2024, adjusted annually for ) or immediate water service shutoff to mitigate risks.

References

  1. [1]
    Guidelines for Designing Backflow Prevention Assembly Installations
    All RPZ devices must have an 18 inch minimum clearance between the bottom of the relief valve and the floor to prevent submersion and provide access for ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Common Methods of Backflow Prevention
    Description: The Reduced Pressure Zone Assembly is a mechanical device consisting of two independent check valves and a differential pressure relief valve, ...Missing: definition function standards<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Backflow Preventer Types - NFPA
    Oct 28, 2022 · A Reduced Pressure Zone Assembly (RPZA) provide s the maximum protection and along with the DCVA is the most common type of backflow prevention ...
  4. [4]
    Chicago Backflow Incident of 1933 - Safe-T-Cover
    Jun 17, 2020 · Two of the main hotels used to house the World's Fair visitors had cross connections that badly contaminated the water supply.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Evaluation of backflow prevention devices: a state-of-the-art report
    This report evaluates backflow prevention devices to assess their suitability for high-hazard locations and to protect water supplies from contamination due to ...
  6. [6]
    The History of Backflow
    In 1945 the patent was applied for model 6. The patent was awarded in 1950. Model 6 had the novel concept of using the reduced pressure principle instead of ...Missing: zone | Show results with:zone
  7. [7]
    History of Cross Connection Control | Backflow Solutions, Inc.
    Nov 27, 2018 · Beginning in 1930, rudimentary pressure vacuum breakers were being designed and developed in the Los Angeles area. Double check assemblies ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] AGENDA REQUEST - Granicus
    Nov 16, 2015 · The model 6 had the novel concept of using the reduced pressure principle instead of backpressure. In 1945, E.C. Service Company with Entriken, ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] beeco - mifab
    concept of using the reduced pressure principle instead of backpressure. In 1945, E.C. Service. Company with Entriken, Carlton, and Snyder moved next to a ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Sayana - EPA
    Aug 4, 2023 · Section Includes: Reduced-pressure zone backflow preventers. ... Third check valve shall open under back pressure in case of diaphragm failure.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] MAINTENANCE MANUAL - Backflow Prevention Services
    The pressure differential relief valve must operate to maintain the “zone” between the two check valves at a minimum of 2 PSI less than the supply pressure.
  13. [13]
    Reduced Pressure Zone Assemblies - Watts
    Designed for use in health hazard cross-connections and continuous pressure applications subject to backpressure or backsiphonage incidents.
  14. [14]
    Febco LF825Y Series Bronze Reduced Pressure Zone Backflow ...
    1" Lead-Free Bronze Reduced Pressure Zone Backflow Preventer Assembly, Quarter Turn Shutoff, Y Pattern, Flood Sensor with SentryPlus Alert Technology for ...
  15. [15]
    SS009-AUS - Watts Australia
    Series SS009-AUS stainless steel reduced pressure zone assembly backflow preventers provide protection of the potable water supply.<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    SS009 - Watts
    Corrosion-resistant stainless steel body construction, two stainless steel check valves, and stainless steel check seats; Bolted-on, top-entry, single access ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Controllable reduced pressure zone backflow preventer, BA type
    Apr 3, 2025 · Check valve stems, relief seat and springs in stainless steel. EPDM seals. Maximum working temperature 65 °C. Maximum working pressure 10 bar.
  18. [18]
    Test Cocks - American Backflow
    1/2" Plastic Plugs - Bag of 50 | American Backflow. Part #: SHP8. Sign in ... Stainless Steel 1/4″ x 1/8″ Test Cock · Stainless Steel 1/4" x 1/8" Test Cock.Missing: RPZ material metal
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    3/4 - Backflow Preventers - The Home Depot
    4.5 4.7K · Free in-store returnsWatts3/​4 IN Bronze Reduced Pressure Zone Backflow Preventer Assembly, Quarter Turn Shutoff Valves, Tee Handles, Flood Sensor.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Zurn Wilkins 375ST Stainless Steel RPZ Backflow Preventers
    $$1,379.99 to $2,559.99 In stock Free deliveryAll-Stainless Steel & Engineered Plastics – Provides unmatched resistance to corrosion. Lead-Free Certified – Meets NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 and NSF/ANSI 372 standards.
  23. [23]
    RP03 RPZ Backflow Valve Assembly Stainless Threaded - FlowQuip
    NZ$867.80Suits all high-hazard backflow protection applications. Ideal for all external and corrosive environments. $ 867.80 $ 867.80 ...
  24. [24]
    Backflow and Cross Connection Control - the City of Fort Worth
    Installing an RPZ creates a closed water system on the property, triggering a Plumbing Code requirement for a thermal expansion tank on the cold water piping to ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Reduced Pressure Zone Specification Submittal Sheet Flomatic ...
    The device shall be ANSI 3rd party certified to comply with states lead plumbing law and shall be constructed from unleaded bronze with less than 0.05% lead.
  26. [26]
    Use of Lead Free Pipes, Fittings, Fixtures, Solder, and Flux for ... - EPA
    Learn about regulations to implement the Section 1417 of the Safe Drinking Water Act prohibiting the use of lead in plumbing components.Missing: RPZ | Show results with:RPZ
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Principles of Backflow Prevention - Zurn
    A RPDA is a specially designed assembly composed of a line- sized approved reduced pressure principle backflow assembly, with a specific by-pass water meter ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Methods and Devices for the Prevention of Backflow and Back ...
    There are six basic types of devices that can be used to correct cross- connections: air gaps, barometric loops, vacuum breakers—both atmospheric and pressure- ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  29. [29]
    Cross-Connection Control Manual - epa nepis
    The primary purpose is to define, describe, and illustrate typical cross-connections and to suggest simple methods and devices by which they may be eliminated ...
  30. [30]
    Cross Connections - HarvestH2o
    A reduced-pressure-zone backflow preventer consists of two spring-check valves separated by a pressure-relief valve that can vent to the atmosphere. This ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Type Assemblies using a Differential Pressure Gauge Test Kit
    ... pressure drops to 2 psi, the pressure within the zone shall be atmospheric. As the supply pressure drops below 2 psi, the relief valve shall continue to open ...
  32. [32]
    None
    ### Summary of Siting and Installation Guidelines for Reduced Pressure Principle (RP) Backflow Prevention Assemblies
  33. [33]
    How to Install a Backflow Preventer: A Simple Step-by-Step Guide
    Oct 12, 2024 · Be sure to leave enough room to install any necessary fittings and unions. Deburr the Edges: After cutting the pipe, use a deburring tool or ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Installation, Maintenance, & Repair Series 909 and LF909 - Watts
    3. A strainer should be installed ahead of the backflow preventer to protect all internal components from unnecessary fouling. CAUTION.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] USC-RPA-Test-Procedures.pdf
    RPZ Test Procedures – Short Form. 1. Preliminary Steps: a. Notify b. Identify c. Inspect d. Observe. 2. Purge Test Cocks: a. Open # 4 test cock b. Open # 3 test ...
  36. [36]
    Product Standards - ASSE International
    The purpose of a Reduced Pressure Detector Backflow Prevention Assembly is to keep contaminated water from flowing back into a potable water distribution ...Missing: RPZ 1945 Febco 1972<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    How Often Should Backflow Devices Be Rebuilt or Replaced?
    Oct 31, 2025 · Rebuild: Every 3–5 years; poppet and seals are wear items. Replace: 10–12+ years or if exposed to sun/freezing damage, or repeated failures.Missing: preventer | Show results with:preventer
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Cross-Connection Control Manual, February 2003 - EPA
    Reduced pressure principle backflow preventers are commonly installed on high hazard installations such as ... AWWA Standard For Backflow. Prevention Devices ...
  39. [39]
    Irrigation RPZ for Backflow Preventer | Aluminum Enclosures
    Apr 25, 2018 · We agree with the AWWA that irrigation lines need an RPZ backflow preventer or air gap. Irrigation backflow prevention is a must.
  40. [40]
    AWWA C511-17 Reduced-Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention ...
    The purpose of this standard is to provide the minimum requirements for reduced-pressure principle backflow prevention assemblies for potable water applications ...Missing: M14 RPZ<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Cross-Connections & Backflow Prevention Manual - wvdhhr.org
    Requirement: The differential pressure relief valve must operate to maintain the zone between the two check valves at least 2 psi less than the pressure of the ...
  42. [42]
    DEP Cross Connection Guidelines - Monroeville Municipal Authority
    The RPZD provides protection from backflow caused by both backsiphonage and backpressure, and is recommended for health hazard risks. Limitations: RPZDs are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Right Valve to Prevent Backflow
    Jul 29, 2025 · Limitations include their inability to prevent back-siphonage under extreme conditions or to withstand high-pressure disruptions without risking ...Missing: RPZD | Show results with:RPZD
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Preventers and Reduced ...
    This edition was approved by the ASSE Board of Directors on August 9, 2011 as an ASSE standard. Copyright American Society of Sanitary Engineering. Provided by ...
  45. [45]
    What is a Cross Connection Control and Backflow Preventer?
    Feb 27, 2019 · 1930 - The first pressure vacuum breakers and early backflow preventers begin to be developed mostly in Los Angeles.
  46. [46]
    ASSE International History
    ASSE International began one cold morning in January 1906 as Henry B. Davis and some 25 plumbing inspectors from cities across the United States gathered in ...
  47. [47]
    USC List of Approved Backflow Prevention Assemblies
    Each approved backflow prevention assembly is listed by the type of assembly, manufacturer's name, model, size, edition of the manual under which the assembly ...
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    603.3.7 Reduced-Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention Assembly ...
    A reduced-pressure principle backflow prevention assembly consists of two independently acting internally loaded check valves, a differential pressure-relief ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
  50. [50]
    2021 International Plumbing Code (IPC) - 608.1 General.
    Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly and reduced pressure principle fire protection backflow assembly, High or low hazard, Backpressure or ...
  51. [51]
    Directive 2014/68/EU - pressure equipment - EU-OSHA
    Oct 20, 2023 · Directive 2014/68/EU applies to the design, manufacture and conformity assessment of stationary pressure equipment with a maximum allowable pressure greater ...Missing: backflow | Show results with:backflow
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Is Backflow Testing Required? Compliance Guide for 2025
    Backflow testing is legally required in most states and must be performed annually for all properties with cross-connection control devices.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Safe Drinking Water Act and Federal Facilities | US EPA
    Jul 22, 2025 · SDWA penalties against federal agencies may be up to $48,586 per day per violation. (The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of ...Missing: backflow | Show results with:backflow