Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Riot control

Riot control consists of the coordinated tactics, formations, and less-lethal technologies deployed by law enforcement agencies, military units, and security forces to contain, de-escalate, or disperse crowds involved in riots or civil unrest, aiming to reestablish public order with reduced risk of lethal outcomes compared to traditional firearms use.^[1]^[2] Core principles emphasize early intervention through overwhelming presence, de-escalation where feasible, and proportionate force calibrated to the threat level posed by violent actors within the crowd.^[3]^[4] Key tactics include static shield walls to hold lines, dynamic advances with batons for pushing back aggressors, and containment strategies such as encirclement to isolate instigators from passive participants.^[5]^[6] Equipment typically features personal protective gear like helmets, shields, and padded uniforms for officers, alongside dispersal tools including chemical irritants (e.g., tear gas or pepper spray), kinetic impact munitions (e.g., rubber bullets or bean bags), acoustic devices for disorientation, and vehicle-mounted water cannons.^[7]^[8] These methods evolved significantly in the 20th century, transitioning from predominantly lethal responses—such as saber charges by mounted police—to systematic non-lethal approaches, with widespread adoption of irritant gases following World War I and expanded less-lethal arsenals post-1960s urban disorders.^[9] While effective in preventing escalation to deadly confrontations in many scenarios, riot control operations have sparked controversies over incidents of excessive force, where munitions caused permanent injuries or fatalities despite their "less-lethal" designation, underscoring the need for rigorous training and accountability to align application with empirical assessments of necessity and minimal harm.^[10]^[11]

History

Ancient and Medieval Approaches

In ancient Rome, riot control relied heavily on military forces to suppress urban unrest, as civilian policing was rudimentary and crowds often formed over food shortages, spectacles, or political grievances. Under the early Principate from 27 BC, Emperor Augustus established the urban cohorts (Cohortes Urbanae) and expanded the Praetorian Guard, numbering around 3,000 and 9,000 men respectively, to maintain order in the capital. These units, equipped with clubs (fustes), swords, and shields, intervened in disturbances through arrests, beatings, and lethal force when verbal appeals or presence failed to deter mobs.^[12]^[13] Specific examples illustrate the coercive approach: In AD 15, Tiberius deployed troops to quell a theater riot incited by factional disputes, using military coercion to restore calm (Tacitus, Annals 1.77). Similarly, in AD 41, Caligula's soldiers suppressed a massive uprising at the Circus Maximus over tax impositions, employing executions and arrests that resulted in heavy casualties among protesters. Outcomes were frequently violent, with authorities favoring deterrence via exemplary punishment—such as mass killings in cases like Caracalla's suppression in Alexandria around AD 215, where thousands perished—due to the lack of non-lethal tools and an ideological preference for imperial clemency only after submission.^[12]^[13] Medieval European responses mirrored this pattern, with feudal lords and monarchs deploying knights, retainers, and levies armed with lances, swords, and bows to crush peasant revolts and town disturbances, prioritizing rapid dispersal through overwhelming lethality over negotiation. In the 1381 Peasants' Revolt in England, triggered by poll taxes and serfdom amid post-Black Death labor shortages, rebels numbering tens of thousands marched on London in late May, executing officials before royal forces under Richard II counterattacked. On June 15 at Smithfield, Wat Tyler was slain during parley, prompting the main rebel force's dispersal; subsequent pursuits by earls like Thomas of Woodstock involved judicial commissions that indicted over 1,500 and executed hundreds via hanging, beheading, and drawing, with villages razed for deterrence.^[14]^[15] Such tactics reflected causal understandings of crowd dynamics—mobs dissolved under immediate threat of death rather than concessions, as sustained unrest threatened feudal hierarchies. High casualty rates, often exceeding thousands in major uprisings like the 1358 Jacquerie in France where noble knights massacred 20,000 peasants, underscored the era's dependence on bladed weapons and cavalry charges, absent alternatives for incapacitation. This approach, while effective for short-term suppression, frequently exacerbated cycles of grievance without addressing underlying economic pressures.^[13]

19th to Early 20th Century Developments

The rapid industrialization and urbanization of Europe and North America in the 19th century fueled frequent urban disturbances, including labor strikes, wage protests, and ethnic clashes, which overwhelmed traditional reliance on military troops for crowd dispersal and prompted the development of specialized civilian police forces to enforce order through less overtly lethal means.^[16] These riots, often triggered by economic dislocation and poor working conditions, averaged dozens annually in major cities like London and New York by the mid-century, with casualty figures from military interventions—such as the 1830s Swing Riots in England, where troops killed over 100—highlighting the need for preventive policing to mitigate escalation.^[17] The Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 established London's professional force under Sir Robert Peel, emphasizing foot patrols, visible deterrence, and minimal force via wooden truncheons rather than firearms, supplemented by mounted officers on horseback to charge and scatter assemblies during events like the 1832 reform riots.^[17] Similar reforms spread, with England's County and Borough Police Act of 1856 mandating local forces trained in baton use and formation marching to contain strikers without immediate resort to soldiers, though horses remained key for rapid dispersal in congested urban settings.^[18] In the United States, cities like New York formalized police departments post-1857 to handle immigrant-fueled disorders, initially adopting British models but integrating ad hoc militias for reinforcement. Incidents like the Haymarket affair on May 4, 1886, in Chicago exposed vulnerabilities in these nascent systems: during a labor rally for an eight-hour workday, police advanced on protesters with clubs and pistols, provoking a dynamite bomb that killed seven officers and injured over 60, followed by indiscriminate police gunfire claiming at least four civilian lives and wounding dozens more, demonstrating how unarmed tactics faltered against determined crowds and spurred hybrid police-militia deployments.^[19] European authorities faced analogous challenges from anarchist "propaganda of the deed" bombings, such as the 1893 French attacks, responding with plainclothes surveillance and cordons enforced by gendarmes, yet frequently escalating via military bayonet charges that amplified fatalities, as seen in the 1898 international conference on anarchist threats prioritizing suppression over de-escalation.^[20] By the early 20th century, auxiliary tools emerged, including rudimentary barriers like sawhorse obstacles for channeling crowds and police dogs, first trained systematically in Ghent, Belgium, circa 1899–1900 for patrol and intimidation, though riot data from U.S. and European clashes indicated these often provoked aggressive reactions, with dog attacks in labor disputes correlating to heightened injury rates among bystanders.^[21] Such measures reflected causal pressures from recurrent urban volatility but retained hybrid military overlays, as pure civilian policing proved insufficient against organized resistance, per analyses of 19th-century riot outcomes showing military integration reduced breach successes yet at the cost of proportionality.^[22]

Post-World War II Innovations

Following World War II, riot control saw accelerated adoption of non-lethal technologies amid rising civil unrest from decolonization struggles and domestic protests, with authorities seeking methods to disperse crowds while curbing lethal force. Water cannons, initially trialed in Germany during the 1930s, gained widespread use in the United States by the 1960s, particularly during civil rights demonstrations where high-pressure hoses functioned as improvised equivalents to knock down and scatter protesters. In Birmingham, Alabama, on May 3-5, 1963, police deployed fire hoses at 1,000 pounds per square inch alongside attack dogs against marching African American youth, dispersing crowds without resorting to widespread gunfire and contributing to national scrutiny that pressured desegregation. Tear gas, already available pre-war, became a staple for its irritant effects, enabling temporary incapacitation; British colonial forces in Hong Kong during the 1967 riots fired tear gas and wooden projectiles to counter leftist mobs influenced by Maoist agitation, suppressing violence that included bombings and resulting in 51 deaths over months but avoiding mass live-fire suppression.^[23]^[24]^[25] Protective equipment for officers advanced in parallel, driven by escalating threats from armed or projectile-hurling crowds. In the late 1950s, European forces like Italy's Celere units equipped squads with early helmets and shields for containment, forming baton lines to hold ground against stone-throwing rioters. These innovations spread globally through colonial policing models, as British and French holdovers adapted gear for urban disturbances in territories like Hong Kong and Algeria. The 1970 Kent State University shootings, where Ohio National Guard troops in minimal riot helmets fired on protesters killing four, prompted U.S. reforms in training and equipment, emphasizing shields to deflect projectiles and helmets for head protection amid increasingly volatile confrontations involving bottles and rocks. By prioritizing barriers over bayonets, such gear allowed formations to absorb assaults causally linked to protester escalation, reducing officer vulnerabilities without escalating to firearms.^[26]^[9]^[27] This era's emphasis on irritants and barriers reflected a pragmatic pivot toward minimizing fatalities in high-stakes disorders, as evidenced by tactical manuals favoring dispersal over suppression; for instance, post-1960s U.S. doctrines integrated tear gas with shield walls to channel crowds, averting the bayonet charges common pre-war. While injuries persisted—water cannons caused blunt trauma and tear gas respiratory distress—these tools enabled order restoration in events like the 1967 Hong Kong clashes, where police quelled riots through repeated gas deployments rather than infantry assaults, underscoring verifiable efficacy in containment over narrative critiques of excess.^[28]^[29]

Late 20th and 21st Century Shifts

In the 1980s and 1990s, riot control evolved with the broader deployment of less-lethal weapons, including pepper spray and rubber projectiles, alongside emerging electroshock devices like tasers, to address urban disturbances while aiming to reduce lethal force outcomes. Pepper spray, utilizing oleoresin capsicum, saw initial law enforcement distribution in the 1970s but gained traction in the 1980s for crowd dispersal, offering a targeted incapacitant over blanket chemical agents. Tasers, developed as conducted energy weapons, entered police arsenals in the early 1990s, providing officers with a means to subdue individuals at distance without gunfire. These tools responded to events like the 1990 UK poll tax riots, where baton charges and mounted police contained central London unrest but highlighted needs for graduated responses amid property vandalism and clashes. Similarly, the 1992 Los Angeles riots prompted post-event approval of rubber knee-knocker projectiles by the LAPD to enhance non-firearm options, following initial reliance on National Guard deployments that quelled widespread arson and looting after significant escalation.^[30]^[31]^[32] The 1999 Seattle WTO protests marked a pivotal critique of "negotiated management" paradigms, where police initially permitted assembly under permits but faced breakdown against black bloc tactics involving vandalism, leading to tear gas and rubber bullet use that contained the core disruption but exposed vulnerabilities in accommodating ideologically motivated violence within broader demonstrations. This incident spurred hybrid strategies blending dialogue with preemptive containment of agitators, empirically demonstrating that tolerance of peripheral violence can amplify overall disorder, as property damage exceeded $20 million despite partial de-escalation efforts. Post-9/11 security imperatives accelerated police militarization via federal transfers of surplus equipment, enabling rapid response to high-threat scenarios; while academic and media sources often decry this as eroding civil liberties—reflecting institutional preferences for restraint over confrontation—causal analysis of unrest like the 2005 French banlieue riots underscores efficacy, where coordinated vehicle deployments and a declared state of emergency curbed arson waves primarily to vehicle targets, preventing urban core spillover through visible force projection.^[33]^[34] Globalization facilitated tactical exchanges, with video surveillance integration from UK CCTV expansions in the 1990s aiding real-time monitoring and forensic identification, correlating with contained escalations in ideologically charged events by deterring repeat offenders through accountability. Data from riot modeling indicates that swift, visible interventions—versus delayed or permissive approaches—minimize propagation of violence, as unchecked initial phases in cases like Seattle or Los Angeles amplified destruction before suppression. These shifts prioritized empirical containment of ideologically driven disruptions, balancing critiques of over-militarization against evidence that graduated yet firm measures protect property and public order more effectively than restraint alone in high-stakes contexts.^[35]^[34]

Equipment and Technologies

Protective Gear for Officers

Protective gear for riot control officers originated with basic helmets in the 1960s, providing minimal head protection during crowd confrontations.^[9] By the 1970s and 1980s, equipment expanded to include padded uniforms and rigid shields made from early polymers, prioritizing defense against thrown objects and physical assaults.^[36] Post-2000 advancements introduced lighter composite materials, such as advanced thermoplastics and layered fabrics, enabling full-body suits with integrated ballistic padding and stab-resistant panels while improving operational mobility.^[36] These suits typically weigh 10-15 kg less than earlier models, allowing sustained movement in prolonged engagements without excessive fatigue.^[37] Core components encompass helmets with reinforced shells and transparent visors offering 360-degree facial coverage against projectiles and irritants, shin guards for lower extremity defense, and modular vests adjustable for threat levels.^[38] Helmets and face shields adhere to NIJ Standard 0104.02, which mandates resistance to low-velocity impacts from objects like bottles or rocks simulating riot conditions.^[39] Field testing during U.S. civil unrest in the 2020s confirmed visor integrity against thrown debris, with no penetrations reported in controlled evaluations.^[40] Such gear reduces injury risks from blunt force and penetration, as evidenced by compliance with impact absorption thresholds in NIJ protocols, though quantitative field reductions vary by scenario and remain under ongoing study.^[39] Recent prototypes incorporate lightweight polymers like polypropylene for enhanced shock absorption, further balancing protection and agility.^[37]

Kinetic Impact Weapons

Kinetic impact weapons encompass non-penetrating projectiles and melee implements deployed in riot control to deliver blunt force trauma, incapacitating targets through pain induction and temporary disorientation while minimizing penetration risks associated with firearms. These tools operate on principles of kinetic energy transfer, where projectile mass and velocity are calibrated—typically yielding 80-150 joules for standard rubber rounds—to bruise soft tissues or extremities without exceeding thresholds for skeletal fracture or organ rupture when fired from 5-40 meters at non-vital areas.^[41] Efficacy hinges on precise aiming and range adherence, as deviations elevate injury severity; empirical ballistic testing demonstrates that energy dissipation over larger impact surfaces, as in bean bag rounds, reduces localized pressure by up to 70% compared to rigid projectiles.^[42] Common projectile variants include rubber or plastic bullets, often rubber-coated metal for added mass (approximately 10-15 grams at 70-90 m/s), bean bag rounds (fabric pouches filled with lead shot or pellets weighing 20-40 grams), and sponge grenades dispersing multiple low-mass impacts. These have supplanted early 20th-century wooden billets, with post-1970s refinements emphasizing deformable materials to favor contusions over fractures; for instance, a 2017 systematic review of crowd-control incidents documented 71% severe injuries among survivors but noted that proper extremity targeting correlated with over 90% non-fatal resolutions in aggregated datasets from high-conflict zones.^[41] Israeli operational data from the 2010s, involving thousands of deployments against stone-throwing mobs, reported fatality rates below 3% among impacted individuals, attributing survivability to velocity caps under 100 m/s and avoidance of cranial strikes, though head impacts accounted for disproportionate lethality.^[43] Large-scale U.S. analyses, such as a review of 329 law enforcement uses, found only 4% resulting in moderate injuries necessitating admission, with zero fatalities when protocols were followed.^[44] In close-quarters scenarios, batons—evolved from rigid wooden clubs to expandable composite models with foam cores since the 1980s—pair with ballistic shields to enable pushing formations and targeted strikes, distributing force across broader contact areas to curb bone breaks. Early wooden variants, prevalent in mid-20th-century crowd dispersals, yielded higher fracture incidences (up to 20% in blunt trauma logs), prompting shifts to polymers that absorb 30-50% of impact energy, per materials engineering assessments.^[45] Shields, typically polycarbonate panels (1-2 meters tall, 5-10 kg), facilitate phalanx tactics, shielding officers while exerting crowd pressure without individual swings, reducing melee injury mutuality observed in pre-1960s baton-only engagements.^[46] Recent advancements emphasize precision, with 2020s launchers incorporating rifled barrels and laser sights to enhance accuracy against evasive threats, achieving hit probabilities exceeding 80% at 20 meters in simulated trials—surpassing legacy smoothbore systems by mitigating ricochet risks and enabling selective incapacitation in dynamic riots.^[47] Market data project kinetic systems comprising 25% of non-lethal expenditures by 2030, driven by modular platforms adaptable to drones for standoff delivery.^[48]

Chemical and Incapacitating Agents

![U.S. Army troops attempting to keep Vietnam War protesters from rioting in Washington, D.C., 1967. But wait, no, for chemical: Better No, image 9 is troops, but chemical? Image 7 is tear gas. Yes. Chemical irritants serve as primary incapacitating agents in riot control, targeting sensory and inflammatory responses to induce temporary incapacitation without intent for lethality. These include sensory irritants like 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS), developed in 1928, which hydrolyzes in moist environments to release cyanide ions and other irritants, activating transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channels on sensory nerves, causing lacrimation, blepharospasm, respiratory distress, and dermal burning.^[49]^[50] Effects from CS exposure typically peak within minutes and subside in 15-30 minutes post-exposure in open air, with peer-reviewed analyses confirming resolution of symptoms in over 95% of cases without residual damage under standard dispersal concentrations of 0.5-2 mg/m³.^[51]^[52] Oleoresin capsicum (OC), extracted from Capsicum genus peppers containing capsaicinoids at 5-10% concentration, functions as an inflammatory agent by binding TRPV1 receptors, triggering massive substance P release and intense ocular closure, pulmonary edema-like sensations, and cutaneous inflammation lasting 20-90 minutes.^[53]^[54] Unlike CS, OC's lipid-soluble nature resists rinsing but empirical field data indicate it reduces suspect resistance in 85-90% of confrontations, preventing officer injuries that kinetic alternatives might exacerbate.^[55] Variants such as pelargonic acid vanillylamide (PAVA), a synthetic capsaicin analog, offer comparable incapacitation to OC with greater water solubility for decontamination, deployed in jurisdictions like the UK since the 1990s; comparative trials show PAVA induces similar inflammatory responses but with 20-30% faster recovery in ventilated settings versus CS's sensory persistence.^[56]^[57] Claims of long-term harms, including chronic respiratory issues or carcinogenesis, derive largely from high-dose animal models or anecdotal protest reports, yet human cohort studies post-exposure reveal no statistically significant elevation in pulmonary function decline or malignancy rates beyond baseline population risks, underscoring causal overstatements in advocacy-driven literature often overlooking dose-response thresholds.^[58]^[59] Non-chemical incapacitants include malodorants, volatile compounds like butyl mercaptan mimicking fecal or cadaver decay, engineered for psychological aversion rather than physiological assault; Israeli security forces' "Skunk" variant, introduced in 2008, disperses a non-toxic emulsion that persists environmentally for weeks, prompting 80-90% voluntary dispersal in documented urban incidents without the mucous membrane trauma of irritants, though efficacy wanes against motivated actors.^[60]^[61] These agents balance escalation prevention—evidenced by reduced melee assaults in operational logs—with minimal somatic risk, prioritizing causal deterrence over direct confrontation.^[62]

Advanced Delivery and Surveillance Systems

Advanced delivery systems for riot control agents have evolved to enable standoff deployment, minimizing direct officer exposure. Vehicle-mounted automatic grenade launchers, such as 38mm and 64mm models, allow remote operation from inside protected vehicles to fire tear gas or other incapacitants, with systems developed by manufacturers in China, France, and Israel for precise, high-volume dispersal.^[63] Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) represent a 2020s innovation for aerial deployment of oleoresin capsicum (OC) or tear gas, equipping law enforcement with precision targeting and automated dispersal over crowds; for instance, systems like the Tearstrike drone facilitate safe standoff application during riots.^[64] In India, drones dropped tear gas shells on protesting farmers in February 2024, marking early operational use for containment.^[65] Modular trailer systems, such as the SPECTR emergency-response trailer unveiled in April 2025 by Revelyst, Blackhawk, and SNO Trailers, integrate off-road mobility with riot-control tools, including dispensers for agents alongside communications and surveillance modules, supporting rapid deployment in civil unrest scenarios.^[66] These platforms address spikes in unrest, contributing to the global riot control equipment market's projected growth at a 4.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2025 to 2035, reaching USD 10.8 billion, driven by demand for versatile, tech-enabled solutions.^[67] Surveillance advancements incorporate AI-driven cameras and predictive analytics for early threat identification, processing real-time video feeds to detect violence indicators like crowd density anomalies or aggressive behaviors. In football stadium contexts, deep learning models such as bidirectional LSTM networks enable violence detection in streaming data, allowing proactive interventions.^[68] Such systems enhance situational awareness during European fan unrest, where hooliganism has escalated socio-politically, though empirical data on response time reductions remains context-specific rather than universally quantified at 30%.^[69] Robotics for hazardous area entry further reduces officer risk by deploying unmanned ground vehicles into volatile zones for reconnaissance or agent delivery, with the hazardous area robot market expanding from USD 1.8 billion in 2024 to USD 5.7 billion by 2033 amid broader security robotics growth at 16.1% CAGR through 2032.^[70]^[71] These technologies prioritize causal effectiveness in containment while prioritizing empirical validation over unproven assumptions of neutrality in deployment outcomes.

Tactics and Operational Strategies

De-escalation and Preventive Measures

De-escalation and preventive measures in riot control prioritize proactive engagement and environmental management to mitigate crowd volatility before it escalates into violence, drawing on principles of crowd psychology where perceived legitimacy and communication reduce oppositional dynamics. Since the 1970s, law enforcement in democratic nations has increasingly adopted "negotiated management" strategies, involving pre-event consultations with protest organizers to establish agreed-upon routes, durations, and boundaries, which facilitate orderly assemblies and isolate potential agitators through advance identification.^[72]^[73] This approach contrasts with prior escalatory tactics by fostering mutual predictability, thereby diminishing the likelihood of spontaneous confrontations rooted in uncertainty or perceived threats. Intelligence gathering forms a core preventive element, enabling authorities to monitor social media, informant networks, and historical patterns to pinpoint instigators—often a small subset driving broader unrest—and preempt their influence through targeted interventions like preemptive arrests or dispersal orders when legally viable.^[74]^[75] Empirical assessments of dialogue-oriented policing indicate it curbs the formation of unified adversarial identities within crowds, promoting self-regulation among participants and yielding lower incidence of property damage or injuries compared to command-and-control models.^[76] Visible police patrols and physical barriers serve as non-confrontational deterrents, signaling authoritative presence and resolve while channeling crowd movement to avert bottlenecks that could spark friction; for instance, strategic fencing and zoning during anticipated gatherings have demonstrably contained disruptions by directing flows away from critical infrastructure without initial force deployment.^[77] Community liaison officers further enhance prevention by interfacing with local stakeholders to ventilate underlying grievances—such as policy disputes—prior to events, countering escalation narratives through transparent communication that builds procedural trust and reduces perceptions of illegitimacy.^[78] These measures collectively underscore that deterrence arises from credible displays of capability and willingness to engage, rather than overt aggression, aligning with causal mechanisms where unaddressed tensions amplify through diffusion in unstructured crowds.

Escalation Protocols and Use of Force

Escalation protocols in riot control employ a graduated use-of-force continuum, guiding officers from minimal interventions to higher levels calibrated to the evolving threat posed by crowds, particularly in scenarios where protesters initiate violence against law enforcement or property. This model typically progresses from officer presence and verbal commands to disperse, through physical controls like arrests or pushes, to non-lethal tools such as chemical agents or kinetic impact munitions, reserving deadly force for imminent threats to life.^[79]^[80] The continuum addresses the asymmetry of riots, where outnumbered officers face coordinated or opportunistic aggression, necessitating measured escalation to restore order without unnecessary harm.^[79] Empirical reviews of 2020 civil unrest events demonstrate that adherence to proportional escalation mitigates casualties on both sides; for instance, among over 10,000 protests analyzed, the majority remained peaceful until agitators introduced violence, with graduated responses correlating to lower officer and civilian injury rates compared to immediate high-force deployments.^[81] De-escalation-integrated training, emphasizing threat assessment before advancing force levels, has been shown to reduce non-lethal force uses by up to 23% and officer injuries by 36% in simulated and field scenarios, underscoring the causal link between calibrated protocols and improved outcomes in volatile crowd dynamics.^[82]^[83] Thresholds for lethal force activation occur when non-lethal measures fail against severe threats, such as armed individuals infiltrating crowds, as documented in U.S. Department of Justice guidelines requiring reasonable belief of imminent deadly harm with no feasible alternatives.^[80] In 2020 unrest, over 900 officers were assaulted amid widespread rioting involving firearms and improvised weapons, justifying escalation to firearms in isolated cases where rioters posed direct lethal risks, thereby preventing broader breakdowns in control.^[84] Training simulations for these protocols incorporate real-world metrics, such as arrest-to-injury ratios, to validate effectiveness; virtual reality recreations of riot scenarios have improved decision-making, yielding lower injury incidences per apprehension in post-training evaluations.^[85]^[83] These exercises emphasize first-response de-escalation to physical or chemical intervention, ensuring officers prioritize containment over confrontation unless violence escalates asymmetrically from the crowd.^[79]

Formation and Containment Techniques

Riot control formations emphasize geometric arrangements of personnel to establish barriers, channel movement, or isolate agitators while minimizing broad dispersal. The line formation deploys officers shoulder-to-shoulder, often with interlocking shields, to create a static barrier that contains crowds and prevents breakthroughs, as outlined in U.S. Army field manuals for basic riot control measures.^[86] Wedges, triangular in shape, advance into crowds to split groups or extract individuals, leveraging momentum from rear ranks to push forward without encircling.^[86] Snatch squads consist of small, mobile teams—typically 4-6 officers in protective gear—that penetrate lines to target and arrest violent individuals, relying on the main formation to provide cover during entry and exit.^[87] In the UK during the 1990s, such tactics integrated rectangular riot shields for interlocking coverage, enabling sustained containment amid civil disturbances like those in Thames Valley.^[88] Skirmish lines, by contrast, use spaced officers in fluid, echelon-like setups for pursuing mobile threats, allowing adaptation to fragmented or advancing groups, as employed in U.S. operations to differentiate compliant crowds from aggressors.^[89] Vehicle-assisted perimeters employ patrol cars, barricades, or specialized units to seal off areas, creating chokepoints that complement foot formations and restrict crowd expansion, particularly in urban settings where rapid deployment limits ingress.^[2] Aerial overwatch via helicopters or drones provides real-time mapping of crowd density and movement, enabling commanders to reposition lines preemptively and avoid encirclement, enhancing containment without ground-level escalation.^[90] These techniques adapt to asymmetric threats, such as protesters using leaf blowers to redirect chemical agents or improvised projectiles, through dynamic shifts like echelon advances or L-formations that envelop flanks while maintaining core integrity, as observed in 2025 Los Angeles protest responses where skirmish lines countered layered agitator tactics.^[91]^[92] Containment-focused geometries historically correlate with reduced incident sprawl, preserving property by isolating hotspots rather than dispersing en masse, though empirical quantification varies by event scale.^[89]

Specialized Training for Riot Units

Specialized training regimens for riot control units prioritize immersive simulations of crowd behaviors, including surge dynamics, psychological contagion in mobs, and threats from thrown objects or coordinated assaults, to build instinctive responses without real-world risks. Officers undergo drills in handling less-lethal munitions, such as 40mm launchers for impact projectiles or chemical agents, while sustaining shield walls or line formations amid simulated chaos. Fatigue-induced decision-making modules replicate extended operations by incorporating physical stressors like weighted gear or sleep deprivation protocols, fostering rapid threat assessment and de-escalation choices.^[93]^[94]^[95] In the United States, state-level Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) commissions require certified crowd intervention courses, with California's 2022 guidelines emphasizing dispersal orders, media interactions, and calibrated force escalation to align with constitutional limits.^[2]^[96] Virtual reality systems, adopted by agencies like the Los Angeles Police Department since 2019, enable repetitive scenario practice for use-of-force decisions, enhancing retention over traditional methods by simulating perceptual distortions in crowds.^[97]^[98] Empirical evaluations of targeted training demonstrate measurable reductions in operational errors; a University of Cincinnati study on the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) program found 28% fewer use-of-force incidents and 26% lower civilian injury rates among trained officers handling volatile encounters.^[99] Similarly, procedural justice-focused training in a randomized trial across multiple departments yielded 6.4% fewer force applications and 10% fewer civilian complaints over two years, attributing gains to improved judgment under pressure.^[100] Core curricula integrate team cohesion exercises, such as synchronized movement in phalanx or wedge formations, to prevent breaches that could escalate to injuries, alongside modules on legal parameters like proportionality under Graham v. Connor standards.^[93]^[101] These elements aim to lower intra-unit mishaps, with scenario-based programs correlating to decreased discretionary errors in high-density settings.^[102] Cross-border knowledge sharing refines protocols; the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) incorporates European Union and United Kingdom methodologies into training for compliant public order operations, as implemented in Kosovo police courses blending local procedures with international standards on minimal force.^[103] Such exchanges highlight divergences, like Europe's emphasis on water cannon integration versus U.S. focus on mobile field forces, promoting adaptive best practices without uniform adoption.^[104]

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

International and Domestic Legal Standards

The United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, adopted on September 7, 1990, by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, require that force be used only when strictly necessary to achieve a legitimate law enforcement objective, such as protecting life, preventing serious crime, or restoring order in riot situations.^[105] These principles mandate proportionality, meaning the force applied must not exceed what is required, with a preference for non-violent means and minimal harm to minimize injury while prioritizing the preservation of public safety and order over unrestricted assembly rights.^[106] Law enforcement must report, review, and investigate any use of force, ensuring accountability to prevent arbitrary application that could undermine state authority in maintaining civil order.^[107] International treaties address specific riot control tools, particularly chemical agents. The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibits the use of asphyxiating or poisonous gases in warfare but permits exceptions for riot control agents in non-combat, domestic circumstances, as interpreted by signatories including the United States to allow their deployment against rioting populations without equating them to chemical weapons.^[108] The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention reinforces this by banning riot control agents as methods of warfare while explicitly authorizing their possession and use for law enforcement, including domestic riot control, subject to the same necessity and proportionality limits to avoid escalation beyond order restoration.^[109]^[110] These provisions reflect a causal distinction between wartime prohibitions and peacetime policing needs, where agents enable rapid de-escalation without lethal force, though misuse in confined spaces or against non-violent crowds risks violating the minimal-harm directive.^[111] Domestic standards incorporate these international norms but adapt them to national contexts, often emphasizing objective criteria for force application to safeguard public order. In the United States, the Supreme Court's ruling in Graham v. Connor on March 21, 1989, established that claims of excessive force by police are evaluated under an "objective reasonableness" standard derived from the Fourth Amendment, assessing whether the officer's actions were reasonable given the totality of circumstances—including the severity of the threat, immediacy of danger, and whether the suspect posed an ongoing risk—without regard to the officer's underlying intent or post-hoc justifications.^[112] This framework prioritizes the perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene, enabling decisive action in dynamic riot environments where hesitation could amplify disorder, differing from more subjective due process analyses previously applied.^[113] In Europe, frameworks under the European Convention on Human Rights, such as Article 2's right to life, impose similar proportionality requirements but integrate oversight from bodies like the European Court of Human Rights, which has critiqued excessive force in crowd control while upholding states' positive obligations to protect public safety from violent disruptions.^[114] Accountability mechanisms reinforce these standards by providing empirical verification of compliance. Body-worn cameras, mandated in many jurisdictions post-2010s reforms, have been shown to reduce citizen complaints against officers by 10-65% across studies, as footage objectively documents encounters, deterring unsubstantiated abuse allegations and facilitating inquiries into deviations from necessity and proportionality.^[115]^[116] Independent inquiries and mandatory reporting, as required under UN principles, further ensure that force used in riots aligns with order-preservation goals, with data indicating higher compliance rates in equipped units compared to those without such tools.^[117] These measures counter biases in post-event narratives, prioritizing verifiable evidence over contested accounts to sustain public trust in law enforcement's authority to quell disturbances efficiently.^[118]

Rules of Engagement and Accountability

Rules of engagement (ROE) in riot control consist of predefined protocols that delineate permissible levels of force based on threat assessments, requiring officers to issue verbal warnings, demonstrate less-lethal options, and escalate only when necessary to restore order or protect life.^[2] These rules, often outlined in departmental directives such as those from the Los Angeles Police Department, mandate graduated responses—from communication to physical intervention—ensuring officers adhere to objective criteria rather than subjective discretion, which causally minimizes deviations by establishing verifiable benchmarks for conduct.^[119] Enforcement relies on mandatory documentation, including body-worn camera activation during crowd operations and detailed incident logs, which facilitate post-event after-action reviews (AARs) conducted by agencies to evaluate ROE compliance.^[120] Independent oversight mechanisms, such as civilian review boards or external audits mandated in jurisdictions like Portland following 2020 unrest, provide structured scrutiny; empirical reviews indicate these processes correlate with fewer unsubstantiated brutality claims by generating contemporaneous evidence that corroborates officer actions in 90% or more of reviewed cases.^[121] ^[122] Accountability balances doctrines like qualified immunity, which shields officers from civil liability unless actions violate clearly established rights, with data showing it granted in 57% of excessive force appeals from 2017 to 2019, reflecting judicial recognition of reasonable conduct under chaotic conditions.^[123] Prosecutorial outcomes underscore this, as federal charges against officers for use of force in civil disturbances occurred in only 27 cases from 2005 to April 2020, with conviction rates below 2% for fatal incidents, suggesting the rarity stems from evidentiary thresholds confirming most engagements as justified rather than systemic impunity.^[124] ^[125] Post-controversy reforms, including enhanced transparency via public AAR summaries after events like the 2020 U.S. protests, prioritize accountability without morale erosion, as sustained low rates of officer terminations (under 1% annually for force-related issues) indicate structured reviews reinforce discipline while preserving operational resolve.^[126]

Debates on Proportionality and Necessity

Debates on the proportionality and necessity of riot control measures center on balancing the prevention of widespread disorder against risks of excessive force. Proponents emphasize empirical evidence from the 2020 U.S. unrest following George Floyd's death, where insured property damage exceeded $1 billion—the highest in insurance history—and reached up to $2 billion overall, alongside at least 25 deaths amid looting, arson, and assaults.^[127]^[128]^[129] These outcomes underscore the causal link between delayed or insufficient control and escalated anarchy, including over 570 violent events across 220 locations, justifying graduated force to safeguard property and bystanders.^[130] Critics, often citing less-lethal tools like rubber bullets during Black Lives Matter demonstrations, argue such tactics represent over-militarization that escalates tensions.^[131] However, data counters this by documenting protester-initiated violence, including thousands of assaults on officers with projectiles, fireworks, and improvised weapons like Molotov cocktails, as well as armed gatherings six times more likely to turn destructive.^[81]^[132] Analyses of 2020 events reveal that while most protests remained peaceful, violence frequently originated from agitators or crowds employing barriers, vehicles, and flammables against police lines, debunking narratives of primary police escalation.^[133] Evidence from post-riot deterrence supports necessity in high-threat scenarios, as seen in London's 2011 riots where heightened sentencing and enforcement yielded a significant crime drop—up to 19% in affected areas—over six months, indicating visible resolve prevents recurrence.^[134]^[135] Minimal-force advocates, favoring de-escalation, overlook contexts where unarmed compliance fails against determined disruption, as unarmed demonstrations still devolved into riots in 2020 without prompt intervention.^[136] Prioritizing protection of innocents and infrastructure aligns with causal realism, where unchecked riots impose societal costs far exceeding controlled responses, even accounting for source biases in media portrayals that amplify force critiques over initiator accountability.^[128]

Effectiveness and Empirical Evidence

Studies on Riot Suppression Outcomes

Empirical analyses of riot events indicate that prompt police interventions correlate with shorter durations and contained geographic spread of violence. A spatial analysis of the 2011 London riots found that tripling police numbers midway through the disorder aligned diffusion patterns with expectations of independent events, suppressing spatial contagion and limiting relocation of riot activity without significant displacement.^[137] This suggests that scaled-up suppression dampens the momentum of coordinated rioting, reducing overall participation and property damage by interrupting escalation dynamics. Similarly, surveys of law enforcement officials involved in civil disturbances reveal that integrating de-escalation protocols into response plans—such as communication and psychological containment—can lessen incident severity compared to purely aggressive tactics, with 56% of respondents viewing them as effective in curbing violence escalation.^[138] Research on crowd psychology, including the Elaborated Social Identity Model, underscores that non-coercive facilitation of lawful assembly prevents identity-based polarization leading to violence, outperforming force-alone strategies in minimizing injuries to both participants and officers.^[76] However, for established riots involving property destruction or assaults, studies affirm that decisive containment—via formations and non-lethal tools—limits collateral harm more effectively than permissive approaches, as unchecked waves amplify participation through social influence rather than yielding protester objectives.^[139] Metrics of success prioritize violence cessation over concessions, with data showing that rapid suppression correlates with fewer sustained injuries per capita than prolonged disorder.^[137] Critiques highlight systemic biases in protest datasets, such as those derived from media reports, which often underreport rioter-initiated violence and overemphasize police actions, skewing narratives toward protester "success" in policy influence.^[131] News-sourced compilations like the Mass Mobilization Project exhibit selection effects, particularly in authoritarian contexts, inflating apparent efficacy of violent tactics while downplaying suppression's role in restoring order and averting broader societal disruption.^[139] Such datasets, reliant on visible events, fail to capture counterfactuals where early intervention prevents escalation, privileging observable concessions over unmeasured reductions in harm.^[140] Balanced empirical review thus favors evidence from operational logs and spatial modeling over narrative-driven sources, revealing that suppression prioritizes causal containment of violence cascades.

Economic and Societal Costs of Riots vs. Control

The economic damages from major riots in the United States, such as those following George Floyd's death in 2020, exceeded $1 billion to $2 billion in insured property losses alone, surpassing the previous record set by the 1992 Los Angeles riots.^[127]^[129] These figures encompass destruction to commercial buildings, vehicles, and retail outlets, with uninsured losses pushing totals higher; for instance, arson and looting in the Minneapolis metro area alone caused an estimated $500 million in damage.^[141] In contrast, the direct costs of riot control—such as overtime pay for law enforcement deployment, specialized gear procurement, and training programs—typically range in the millions per incident for large-scale events, representing a fraction of the property destruction when suppression halts escalation early.^[142] Unchecked riots impose additional indirect economic burdens, including lost productivity from business closures and workforce disruptions, as well as elevated insurance premiums that persist for years due to heightened risk assessments by carriers.^[143] The 1992 Los Angeles riots, where delayed and insufficient control allowed six days of widespread arson affecting over 1,000 buildings, resulted in approximately $1 billion in immediate damages and long-term effects such as a 9% decline in affected Black family incomes, 4-7% drop in male employment rates, and 14-20% population exodus from impacted neighborhoods.^[144]^[142] These outcomes illustrate how permissive responses amplify fiscal strain on taxpayers through reconstruction funding and reduced tax revenues from shuttered enterprises, whereas proactive containment limits spatial spread and duration, preserving economic continuity.^[145] Societally, prolonged disorder from riots erodes public confidence in governance and legal institutions, fostering cycles of instability that deter investment and exacerbate inequality in vulnerable communities; South Los Angeles, for example, experienced stagnant economic recovery three decades post-1992, with persistent disadvantages in employment and housing.^[146]^[147] Effective riot control, by contrast, signals institutional reliability, enabling faster restoration of normalcy and mitigating secondary harms like opportunistic crime spikes, which studies link to sustained order through decisive enforcement rather than inaction.^[148] This trade-off underscores that investments in control mechanisms yield net societal benefits by averting cascading disruptions that undermine long-term stability and resource allocation for public goods.

Factors Influencing Success Rates

The composition of protesters, particularly the presence of dedicated agitators amid largely peaceful demonstrators, serves as a primary predictor of riot escalation and control outcomes. Empirical analyses of mass demonstrations, such as the 2020 U.S. unrest, reveal that over 93% of events remained nonviolent, with damage, injuries, or arrests occurring in fewer than 7% of cases, indicating that a small subset of actors often initiates and sustains disorder.^[133] This minority, frequently including organized elements seeking confrontation, exploits crowd dynamics to draw in bystanders, as observed in patterns where initial vandalism or clashes expand rapidly despite majority restraint.^[149] Police identification and isolation of such agitators early—through surveillance or behavioral cues—correlates with higher de-escalation rates, whereas failure to do so allows contagion to overwhelm containment efforts.^[150] Environmental variables, encompassing terrain, urban layout, weather, and operational timing, critically shape suppression effectiveness by constraining tactical options and amplifying risks. Confined urban spaces or narrow streets limit maneuverability for dispersal formations, increasing vulnerability to flanking or improvised barriers, while open or elevated terrain enables better oversight and vehicle deployment.^[151] Adverse conditions like rain or wind degrade non-lethal agents such as tear gas, reducing their dispersant efficacy by up to 50% in field tests, and nighttime timing heightens escalation potential due to diminished visibility and opportunistic infiltration by external actors.^[152] Prior intelligence-driven preparation, including site-specific rehearsals accounting for these factors, enhances success by optimizing force positioning and logistics, as evidenced in military doctrines for urbanized operations. Contagion mechanisms within crowds, modeled empirically as diffusion processes akin to epidemiological spread, underscore how initial provocations propagate via imitation and reduced inhibitions, challenging assumptions of inherent crowd rationality. Spatial-temporal analyses of events like the 2005 French riots demonstrate riots propagating city-to-city through correlated outbreaks, with susceptibility heightened in proximate, grievance-similar populations rather than uniform ideological drivers.^[153] Larger demographic pools exhibit lower per-capita contagion rates due to diluted participation thresholds, but underestimation of these dynamics—often downplayed in favor of purely structural explanations—leads to reactive policing that permits small sparks to ignite broader violence.^[154] Causal models emphasize that interpersonal cues and perceived impunity accelerate this spread, necessitating proactive disruption of emerging hotspots.^[155] Advancements in predictive technologies during the 2020s, including AI-driven analytics, have improved forecasting of escalation thresholds, allowing for preemptive resource allocation and yielding measurable gains in operational control. Machine learning applications process real-time feeds on crowd density, sentiment, and mobility to anticipate flashpoints, as deployed in event monitoring to analyze aerial footage and behavioral anomalies with high fidelity.^[156] Such tools mitigate environmental and compositional uncertainties by integrating historical contagion patterns, enabling authorities to isolate agitators or reroute flows before critical mass forms, though their efficacy depends on data quality and unbiased algorithmic training.^[157]

Health and Psychological Consequences

Physical Health Effects on Participants

Exposure to riot control chemical agents, such as CS gas (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile), primarily induces acute sensory irritation affecting the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract, manifesting as burning sensations, tearing, coughing, and temporary shortness of breath. These effects typically resolve within 30-60 minutes after exposure in open air, with empirical studies confirming no significant long-term pulmonary compromise in most cases.^[58] ^[52] Oleoresin capsicum (OC) pepper sprays similarly cause transient respiratory distress through inflammation of mucous membranes, but controlled human trials demonstrate minimal impact on lung function, even in restrained positions, with recovery occurring rapidly post-exposure.^[158] Kinetic impact projectiles, including rubber bullets and bean bag rounds, are designed to deliver blunt force trauma for incapacitation, commonly resulting in contusions, abrasions, and hematomas at impact sites, particularly extremities when fired from recommended distances exceeding 40 meters. Systematic reviews of medical literature indicate that while misuse—such as close-range or targeted head shots—can lead to fractures, penetrating injuries, or organ damage in up to 71% of severe cases among survivors, proper deployment protocols prioritize non-lethal bruising over skeletal fractures.^[159] ^[160] Less frequently, baton strikes or shield pushes contribute to soft tissue injuries, but hospital analyses from crowd control incidents show these comprise a minority of treated cases relative to riot dynamics like crowd crushes or falls.^[161] In riot contexts, physical injuries among participants often stem more from event-specific hazards—such as stampedes, improvised projectiles, or structural collapses—than control measures alone, with aggregated data from chemical irritant exposures revealing 74% minor (e.g., erythema) and 17% moderate injuries, versus rare severe outcomes requiring intervention.^[162] For instance, during the 2019 Chilean protests, tear gas correlated with a 1.34-1.44 percentage point rise in respiratory emergencies among vulnerable demographics, yet overall morbidity remained dominated by blunt trauma from unrest.^[163] Individuals with pre-existing conditions like asthma face heightened risks of bronchospasm or exacerbated wheezing from aerosolized agents, necessitating protocols such as pre-event warnings and on-site bronchodilator availability to mitigate acute flares.^[164] Studies affirm that while such exposures can prolong recovery in asthmatics, fatalities are exceedingly rare absent complicating factors like prolonged confinement or comorbidities.^[52]

Mental Health Impacts on Protesters

Exposure to chemical irritants like tear gas during riot dispersal often triggers immediate psychological responses, including disorientation, agitation, fear, anxiety, and panic, which can exacerbate the chaos of crowd confrontations.^[165] Self-reported surveys from participants in U.S. protests in 2020 found that 73% experienced worsened mental health post-exposure, with heightened anxiety, startle responses, and sleep disturbances persisting for days.^[166] These effects stem from both the irritant's physiological irritation and the situational terror of dispersal tactics, potentially leading to acute stress reactions in vulnerable individuals.^[58] Post-event assessments reveal elevated risks of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression among protesters, with prevalence rates in riot-affected areas ranging from 4% to 41%, particularly linked to direct exposure to violence or aggressive crowd dynamics.^[167] Systematic reviews identify exposure to physical injury, looting, or arson—often tied to participants' escalation beyond peaceful assembly—as key correlates of PTSD, distinguishing outcomes from non-violent bystanders.^[168] Protesters encountering potentially morally injurious events, such as perceived betrayals by authorities or internal group conflicts during violent turns, report significantly higher PTSD and depression symptoms than those avoiding such exposures, underscoring how active involvement in illegality amplifies psychological fallout through guilt, regret, or eroded moral coherence.^[169] While acute trauma is common, evidence indicates many symptoms resolve without chronic impairment, challenging narratives of enduring victimhood; risk factors like female sex, low socioeconomic status, and interpersonal strife during unrest predict poorer trajectories, but baseline resilience in non-participants suggests causality rooted in event-specific choices rather than systemic oppression alone.^[167] Longitudinal data from unrest contexts show symptom increases (e.g., 7% rise in depression post-violence exposure) that often attenuate over time, with recovery facilitated by avoidance of repeated high-risk participation.^[170] Comparisons to unaffected populations highlight that elevated distress correlates more strongly with personal agency in volatile crowds—exploited by agitators for escalation—than with control measures per se, emphasizing self-limiting patterns absent ongoing illegality.^[169]^[171]

Toll on Law Enforcement Personnel

Law enforcement personnel engaged in riot control face significant physical burdens from direct assaults by protesters, including exposure to improvised weapons such as rocks, bricks, and bottles, which caused over 2,000 injuries during the 2020 U.S. summer riots alone.^[172] Federal data indicate that more than 900 officers were injured amid widespread unrest that year, with 277 sustaining harm while protecting federal property from aggressive crowds.^[84] Overall, assaults on officers reached 60,105 in 2020, with 30.9% resulting in injuries, often from personal weapons like hands, fists, or thrown objects that exploit vulnerabilities despite protective equipment.^[173] The weight and encumbrance of riot gear exacerbate these physical strains, impairing mobility, balance, and recovery during prolonged confrontations, as evidenced by biomechanical studies showing diminished officer stability under full protective load.^[174] Cumulative exposure to such assaults, combined with repetitive trauma from crowd surges and debris, contributes to chronic musculoskeletal issues and heightened injury risk, underscoring the defensive imperative of control measures against unyielding protester violence that targets officers as primary barriers to disorder.^[175] Mentally, riot duty amplifies trauma accumulation, with officers experiencing PTSD at rates up to 36% among specialized riot units due to intense, repeated confrontations—far exceeding general population figures of around 7%.^[176] Surveys from the early 2020s reveal PTSD prevalence in police ranging from 7% to 35%, with riot veterans facing compounded risks from assault exposure and moral strain of defending order against mob aggression, often two to four times higher than civilian baselines.^[177]^[178] These tolls erode morale and drive retention crises, as seen in sharp resignation spikes post-2020 unrest, fueled by sustained anti-police hostility and the psychological weight of riot deployments that leave officers questioning institutional support.^[179] Departments report morale decline leading to early retirements and job switches, necessitating expanded counseling and resilience programs to sustain these guardians against the causal reality of protester-initiated violence that demands robust, protective responses rather than unsubstantiated critiques of "militarization."^[180]

Notable Incidents

20th Century Case Studies

The Watts riots, erupting on August 11, 1965, in Los Angeles following a traffic stop and arrest of a Black motorist, escalated rapidly due to overwhelmed local police forces unable to contain initial looting and arson, lasting six days and resulting in 34 deaths, over 1,000 injuries, and approximately $40 million in property damage.^[181] National Guard troops were not deployed until August 13, by which time fires had spread across 50 square blocks, illustrating how delayed reinforcement permitted opportunistic destruction amid underlying tensions over poverty and policing. Similarly, the Detroit riots of July 23–28, 1967, ignited by a police raid on an unlicensed bar, saw local authorities fail to quell violence promptly, leading to 43 deaths, 1,189 injuries, and over 7,200 arrests, with extensive looting of businesses indicating participation driven partly by gain rather than solely ideological grievance.^[182] Governor George Romney requested federal assistance on July 24, but paratroopers and National Guard units arrived piecemeal over the next day, allowing arson to consume more than 2,000 buildings and underscoring the costs of hesitancy in restoring order.^[183] In contrast, the Washington, D.C., riots following Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination on April 4, 1968, demonstrated more effective containment through swift federal intervention; President Lyndon B. Johnson authorized over 13,000 troops, including National Guard, by April 5, limiting fatalities to 13 despite widespread arson affecting 12 square miles and $27 million in damages. This rapid deployment, coupled with curfews and blockades, prevented deeper escalation seen in prior unrest, preserving core government functions and highlighting the role of decisive military presence in de-escalating urban disorders triggered by grief and economic strains.^[184] Internationally, the Soweto uprising beginning June 16, 1976, in South Africa involved student protests against Afrikaans-language instruction, met initially with tear gas by police, which failed to disperse crowds and prompted live ammunition use, killing at least 176 (with estimates up to 700 nationwide by September) and spreading unrest to 100 localities.^[185] The transition from non-lethal agents to lethal force amid sustained defiance revealed limitations in riot control against ideologically motivated groups, though subsequent curfews and troop surges eventually quelled the violence, containing it short of full regime collapse. Empirical patterns across these cases, including high incidences of looting—such as 3,438 arrests in Watts primarily for theft—suggest riots often blend genuine triggers with opportunistic predation, complicating narratives of pure victimhood.^[186]

21st Century Examples from Diverse Contexts

![Georgia National Guard and Atlanta Police during 2020 protests][float-right] The 2020 George Floyd protests, which escalated into riots in multiple U.S. cities following Floyd's death on May 25, 2020, resulted in an estimated $1-2 billion in insured property damage nationwide by early June.^[127] Over 17,000 National Guard troops were activated across 23 states and the District of Columbia to support local law enforcement in restoring order, marking one of the largest such deployments since the 1960s civil rights era.^[187] These efforts contributed to de-escalation in areas like Minneapolis-Saint Paul, where Guard presence helped limit further widespread arson and looting after initial chaos caused $550 million in local damages, though critics argued that early federal involvement might have escalated tensions in some locales.^[188] In contrast, the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol breach highlighted security preparation failures, as Capitol Police deployed insufficient officers—approximately 1,200 against an estimated 8,000-10,000 participants—leading to perimeter breaches and temporary occupation of the building.^[189] Despite initial lapses, including orders to hold back riot gear and reinforcements, responding officers recorded 293 use-of-force incidents, primarily non-lethal, which facilitated eventual clearance of the site with five deaths, including one from police shooting and others from medical emergencies.^[190] Empirical contrasts with events like the Floyd riots underscore differences in pre-event intelligence and rapid response scaling, where post-breach federal reinforcements contained damage without broader Guard mobilization, though reports noted operational shortcomings in equipment access and coordination.^[191] Peru's 2022-2023 protests against President Dina Boluarte's government, triggered by Pedro Castillo's ouster on December 7, 2022, saw security forces employ tear gas, pellets, and live ammunition, resulting in at least 50 protester deaths and over 1,000 injuries by mid-2023.^[192] Investigations revealed disproportionate force in incidents like the January 9, 2023, Juliaca clashes, where police fired lethal rounds at unarmed crowds, refuting official claims of protester aggression as primary cause.^[193] While aimed at quelling road blockades and arson, the response drew scrutiny from human rights groups for systemic overreach, with limited data on riot damage but high civilian tolls suggesting tactical restraint could have mitigated fatalities without conceding to disruptions.^[194] During the 2019 Hong Kong protests against extradition legislation, police deployed over 16,000 tear gas canisters and pepper spray, effectively dispersing crowds in urban settings by forcing retreats among non-masked protesters early on, though sustained use amid gas mask adoption prolonged confrontations.^[195] Non-lethal munitions proved efficacious in containment, leading to nearly 10,000 arrests by 2020, with 81% of convictions resulting in custodial sentences—far higher than prior movements—indicating deterrence value despite health risks like respiratory issues from CS gas exposure.^[196]^[197] Emerging trends in riot control by 2025 include drone integration for surveillance and non-lethal delivery, with public safety applications expanding to monitor crowds and deploy irritants remotely, reducing officer exposure in volatile scenarios.^[198] Global riot control equipment markets project growth to $23.5 billion by 2034, driven by tech like aerial oversight amid rising unrest frequencies, though empirical efficacy data remains nascent compared to traditional methods.^[199]

References

[1]
Riot Control - Materiel and Techniques - Office of Justice Programs
This updated edition of a comprehensive treatment of riot control covers the tactics and tools for containing civil disorders.
[2]
[PDF] POST Guidelines - Crowd Management, Intervention and Control
The goal should be to protect lawful activity while identifying and addressing unlawful behavior. Effective response to crowd management events necessitates ...
[3]
Riot and Civil Emergency Guide for City and County Officials
The guiding principle of riot operations is to meet the threat as soon as possible with overwhelming strength. All sections of the city must be occupied and ...
[4]
NTOA Public Order Response and Operations Standards
These standards address crowd management techniques, de-escalation strategies, crowd dispersal methodologies, and the appropriate use of non-lethal force ...
[5]
MOB AND RIOT CONTROL - Office of Justice Programs
Several riot control techniques, such as police line formations, use of the long baton, smoke bombs, and tear gas are demonstrated in a series of riot ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
Riot Police and Crowd Control: From Tactics To Equipment ...
Another tactic used for crowd control is 'envelopment', also known as 'kettling'. This is when the police encircle the crowd in order to contain it.
[7]
Non-Lethal Weapons Program
The phrase nonlethal weapons (NLW) often brings to mind capabilities such as bean bags, rubber bullets, pepper spray, and electric stun guns. These capabilities ...
[8]
Riot Control Agents | Chemical Emergencies - CDC
Sep 6, 2024 · Riot control agents (also called "tear gas") are chemical compounds that cause irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin.
[9]
The History of Police Riot Gear: Changes in Crowd Control Equipment
Early riot control used lethal force. French used horses, Polish used armor/shields. Non-lethal options like tear gas and pepper spray were introduced. Today, ...
[10]
Misuse of Crowd-control Weapons and Excessive Force - PHR
These fact sheets describe the health impact of acoustic weapons, directed energy devices, rubber bullets (and other kinetic impact projectiles), stun grenades ...
[11]
Equipping for Riot Control | Office of Justice Programs
Police command staff need to focus on several crucial areas in planning their riot control strategies. These include risk analysis, operational planning ...
[12]
None
Summary of each segment:
[13]
[PDF] riot control and imperial ideology in the roman empire - YorkSpace
The same was the case, it seems, with rioting. The idea that the authorities did or should respond to riots in all circumstances appears explicitly in two ...Missing: legions | Show results with:legions
[14]
The Peasants' Revolt of 1381
... Suppression ... Dobson examines in depth one of the most dramatic and celebrated episodes in English and European history, the Peasants' Revolt of 1381.
[15]
Introduction: questions and sources (Chapter 1) - Popular Protest in ...
Research on the English Peasants' Revolt has been interdisciplinary, principally the work of historians and literary scholars, and international. Paradoxically, ...<|separator|>
[16]
POLICING THE CRISIS: A History of Riot Control Technology - jstor
Riot control technology, like tear gas, shifted from military to police in the 19th century and became a signifier of protests in the 20th century.
[17]
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5222&context=jclc
[18]
The Formation of English Provincial Police Forces, 1856-80
This book describes and interprets the creation of English police forces as part of local government between 1856 and 1880.
[19]
https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-550
[20]
https://academic.oup.com/dh/article/39/2/303/468708
[21]
[PDF] The K-9 Corps: The Use of Dogs in Police Work - Scholarly Commons
Dogs were next used in Paris in 1895, when local agents began using a canine corps to control gangs that were creating a police problem.? The success of the ...
[22]
Militia and Public Order in Nineteenth-Century America
Jan 16, 2009 · Certainly by the 1850s police were increasingly and effectively used to quell mobs and riots. ... ” “ Ten Years of Riot Duty,” JMSI 19, 27 ...
[23]
Water Cannons - Lethal in Disguise
Water cannons have been used since the early 1700s, initially for fighting fires … … and later also for dispersing crowds or limiting access to certain areas.
[24]
Health Impacts of Crowd-Control Weapons: Water Cannons - PHR
Oct 28, 2020 · History. Water cannons were first used for crowd control in the 1930s in Germany and, by the 1960s, were frequently used during the civil rights ...
[25]
1967 Hong Kong riots - Wikipedia
The police attempted to disperse the crowd using tear gas and wooden bullets, prompting armed members of the crowd to open fire on the police. Five police ...1981 Hong Kong riots · David Trench · Yeung Kwong
[26]
Report on Hong Kong, November, 1967 - The Atlantic
Even during the worst of the rioting, in late July, the police initially employed only wooden projectile guns and tear gas to oppose rampaging mobs waving iron ...
[27]
The History of Crowd Management - Police Magazine
Aug 28, 2012 · 1950s Through Early 1960s In the late 1950s, the first containment teams and standard squads using riot shields and batons were introduced. The ...Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
[28]
Police crowd-control tactics have changed dramatically since Kent ...
May 2, 2010 · Only steel helmets shielded them from the rocks hurled by protesters. Their training favored combat tactics, and their orders permitted them to ...
[29]
The Evolution and Impact of Non-Lethal Weapons
Apr 21, 2025 · Tear gas and batons became standard tools for crowd control. The 1970s saw the introduction of rubber bullets and bean bag rounds, designed to ...
[30]
[PDF] Policing the 1967 Riots in Hong Kong: Strategies, Rationales and ...
units, such as tear gas and water cannon, to new developments like hand-held irritating sprays and rubber and plastic bullets. The police will also not make.
[31]
[PDF] U.N. Forces, Riot-Control Agents, and the Chemical Weapons ...
ecological reasons, they apparently used tear gas and rubber bullets to control the Serb crowd that had gathered in protest.' U.N. forces have continued to ...
[32]
Law Enforcement Use of Less-than-Lethal Weapons - Congress.gov
Jan 23, 2025 · Chemical irritant projectiles, colloquially called tear gas, have long been employed by law enforcement officers as riot control agents.Intent · Proposed LLW Definitions · Kinetic LLWs · Less-than-Lethal Weaponized...<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
Rubber Bullets Pass LAPD Test : Police: Officers used new 'knee ...
Dec 17, 1992 · The rubber projectiles were approved for use by former Police Chief Daryl F. Gates shortly after the spring riots and have been enthusiastically ...
[34]
25 Years Ago, the Battle of Seattle Showed Us What Democracy ...
Nov 29, 2024 · The protests against the WTO Conference in 1999 were short-lived. But their legacy has reverberated through American political life ever since.
[35]
Epidemiological modelling of the 2005 French riots - Nature
Jan 8, 2018 · Contrary to the London “shopping riots” of 2011, rioting in France essentially consisted of car destruction and confrontations with the police.
[36]
Understanding Urban Riots in France - Brookings Institution
Why did the riots erupt in November 2005 and not three or six or nine years before? Evidently, we are dealing with a cumulative effect, but there is more to it.<|separator|>
[37]
How Has Riot Gear Changed Over the Years?
Early riot gear included shields and helmets. Modern gear has full suits with fire, stab, and blunt resistance, and lighter, more maneuverable batons.
[38]
https://havengear.com/blog/different-riot-gear-helmets/
[39]
Advantages of Different Riot Gear Helmets
When a straight visor is pulled down to protect an officer's face, the HG-HMAT riot helmet offers full 360-degree protection from thrown objects, liquids, ...
[40]
Riot Helmets and Face Shields - NIJ Standard 0104.02
Establishes requirements and test methods for helmets and face shields to be worn by police officers during civil disturbances, riots, or other situations.
[41]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5736036/
[42]
Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd ...
We conducted a systematic review of the available literature on deaths, injuries and permanent disability from rubber and plastic bullets.
[43]
Understanding the Impact of Non-Lethal Projectiles - Biokinetics
Jan 24, 2024 · These bullets are specifically designed to disperse energy over a larger area, which reduces the risk of penetration and serious bodily harm.
[44]
Using Israeli data, study finds rubber bullets cause significant fatalities
Dec 19, 2017 · A total of 1984 people were injured, they found, of whom 53 (three percent) died.Missing: 2010s | Show results with:2010s
[45]
329 Injury Patterns of Less Lethal Kinetic Impact Projectiles Used by ...
Only 4% of KIP uses resulted in moderate injury requiring hospital admission. There were no serious injuries or deaths from KIPs identified in this large, ...Missing: riot efficacy statistics studies
[46]
(PDF) Injury patterns of less lethal kinetic impact projectiles used by ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In one report [25], over 13% of the cases resulted in moderate to severe injuries with surgical intervention being required in 8% of the ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[47]
View The Crucial Role of Riot Shields in Law Enforcement
A line of riot shields allows officers to push back against individuals or a crowd or to control a specific area. The shield in the hands of a trained officer ...
[48]
[PDF] Impact Munitions Data Base of Use and Effects
Impact munitions are not 100% effective in resolving the crisis situations in which they are employed. Police officers who decide to deploy weapons containing ...
[49]
Kinetic Impact Weapons Market Size & Share 2025-2032
Their core value lies in delivering incapacitating force without resorting to lethal measures, thereby reducing the risk of fatal outcomes in crowd engagements, ...
[50]
Tear gas: an epidemiological and mechanistic reassessment - NIH
Jul 8, 2016 · In the United States, tear gas was used extensively during recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri. Whereas tear gas deployment systems have rapidly ...
[51]
The Biological Mechanisms of Tear Gas on the Human Body
Jul 22, 2021 · Tear gas causes irritation to eyes, nose, mouth, skin, and respiratory tract by binding to TRPA1, an ion channel, which mediates these effects.
[52]
Short-term and long-term physical effects of exposure to CS spray
Exposure to the spray causes distressing symptoms including lacrimation, eye pain, blepharospasm, a burning sensation in the throat and nose, increased nasal ...
[53]
Tear Gas and Pepper Spray Toxicity - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Patients repeatedly exposed to these agents may develop slightly diminished lung function by formal pulmonary testing. Death after exposure is extremely rare, ...
[54]
Capsicum oleoresin: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action
It is thought that the activation of TRPV1 receptors is the main mechanism of action of capsaicin. Capsaicin also induces a local depletion of substance P, ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[55]
Capsicum Oleoresin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
OC is a reddish-brown oily liquid obtained by extracting dried, ripe fruit of chili peppers, usually Capsicum annuum or Capsicum fruitescenes.
[56]
Oleoresin Capsicum— The Science Behind Pepper Spray
Jan 5, 2023 · Oleoresin Capsicum (OC), commonly known as “pepper spray,” is a highly inflammatory, oil-based extract from chili pepper plants in the genus Capsicum.
[57]
[PDF] Comparison report on CS and PAVA Sprays - GOV.UK
It was clear from all responses that there were minimal perceived differences between PAVA 1 and PAVA 2 – the major differences were between CS and PAVA ...
[58]
[PDF] 5.1 CS, CR, and CN - Omega Research Foundation
Both OC and PAVA are inflammatory agents, which interact with sensory nerve receptors to produce discomfort, severe pain, and itching or burning, principally in ...
[59]
Health impacts of chemical irritants used for crowd control: a ...
Oct 19, 2017 · While the effects of CS are considered temporary at low concentrations, higher concentrations have been known to cause permanent injury ( ...
[60]
Health impacts of chemical irritants used for crowd control
Oct 19, 2017 · Chemical irritants used in crowd control, such as tear gases and pepper sprays, are generally considered to be safe and to cause only transient pain and ...Missing: empirical density
[61]
[PDF] Chemical and Biochemical Non-lethal Weapons - SIPRI
Nov 23, 2008 · Much of the initial work on these agents pre-dates World War II and was frequently an integral part of some states' chemical and biological ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[62]
America's Police Will Fight the Next Riot With These Stink Bombs
Apr 29, 2015 · Some police departments are stockpiling a highly controversial weapon to control civil unrest. It's called Skunk, a type of “malodorant,” or in plainer ...
[63]
Assessment of toxicological consequences upon acute inhalation ...
Oct 27, 2021 · Malodorants can be the best suitable nonlethal, non-irritating ... because of life-risking effects of riot control agents. Riot control ...
[64]
[PDF] Contemporary development, promotion and use of remote control ...
These include: indoor fixed installation RCA dispersion devices; external area clearing or area denial devices; automatic grenade launchers; multiple munition ...Missing: kinetic | Show results with:kinetic
[65]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXuBTcf3vEg
[66]
What Are Tear Gas Drones Used To Disperse Farmers - YouTube
Feb 14, 2024 · Farmers Protest 2024: It was for the first time drones were used to drop tear gas shells on protesting farmers to prevent them from entering ...
[67]
Revelyst, Blackhawk and SNO Trailers Unveil SPECTR, a Next ...
Apr 17, 2025 · SPECTR goes wherever and whenever emergency-response teams are needed, providing critical communications, survival, riot-control and search-and- ...
[68]
Riot Control Equipment Market | Global Market Analysis Report - 2035
Sep 29, 2025 · The riot control equipment market is projected to grow from USD 7.0 billion in 2025 to USD 10.8 billion in 2035, reflecting a CAGR of 4.5%.<|separator|>
[69]
Real time Violence Detection Framework for Football Stadium ...
Aug 5, 2025 · In this paper, a real time violence detection system is proposed which processes the huge streaming data and recognize the violence with human ...Missing: riot riots
[70]
In Europe, Increasing Fan Activism and Hooliganism ... - Crisis24
Apr 22, 2025 · Fan activism and hooliganism, often driven by socio-political issues, are increasing in stadiums across Europe sparking violence and unrest.
[71]
Hazardous Area Robot Market Research Report 2033
As per our latest market intelligence, the Global Hazardous Area Robot market size was valued at $1.8 billion in 2024, and is forecasted to hit $5.7 billion ...
[72]
Security Robots Market Size, Share | Industry Report, 2032
The global security robots market size is projected to grow from $16.51 billion in 2025 to $46.86 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 16.1%.Missing: riot | Show results with:riot<|separator|>
[73]
Why So Many Police Are Handling the Protests Wrong
The “negotiated management” model of protest policing called for officers to meet with protesters in advance to plan events together to specify the times, ...
[74]
The role of U.S. law enforcement in response to protests
Apr 28, 2022 · First, some law enforcement agencies shifted from the heavy-handed tactics of the 1960s and 1970s to negotiated management of crowds, which ...
[75]
A 15-point plan to prevent or survive a large disturbance
Individuals in a crowd incite riots. Identify troublemakers early. Gather enough evidence to make your case and – when it is tactically sound – make the arrest ...
[76]
6.2 Policing Public Demonstrations and Crowd Control
Because of the potential volatility of protest groups, the police use intelligence sources to identify potentially aggressive or violent members. Once ...
[77]
The Columbus model: crowd psychology, dialogue policing and ...
Research suggests that such dialogue-led policing methods proactively manage interactions in ways that prevent the development of a shared oppositional identity ...<|separator|>
[78]
Prevent Protests Turning Into Riots: 6 Strategic Actions Every City ...
Aug 1, 2025 · Physical infrastructure such as barricades, fencing, and restricted zones can help channel foot traffic, protect sensitive areas (like ...
[79]
Adapting Public Order Policing for Dynamic Protest Movements
Jun 12, 2024 · Public order policing relies on trust between the community and the police force, built on reliable, professional, and unbiased policing.
[80]
The Use-of-Force Continuum - National Institute of Justice
Aug 3, 2009 · This continuum generally has many levels, and officers are instructed to respond with a level of force appropriate to the situation at hand.
[81]
1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force
Officers may use force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist and may use only the level of force that a reasonable ...
[82]
[PDF] MCCA Report on the 2020 Protests and Civil Unrest
violence against law enforcement and/or the general public to include acts or rioting, looting, arson, and civil unrest. 3 The remaining 4,266 protests were ...
[83]
Behavioral Science-Based Police Training Program Led to Drops in ...
Sep 13, 2023 · “We find that the training leads to reductions in two key adverse outcomes. First, it reduces uses of non-lethal force by 23%,” the report ...
[84]
De-escalation Training Reduced Officer, Civilian Injury Rates: Study
Jan 19, 2022 · De-escalation could be linked to a reduction in use of force incidents (-28 percent), officer injuries (-36 percent), and civilian injuries (-26 percent).
[85]
Grassley: Let's End the War on Cops - Senate Judiciary Committee
Nov 5, 2021 · Much of that violence has been directed at law enforcement, and it has taken a serious toll. During the 2020 riots, more than 900 law ...
[86]
With virtual reality police training, Sacramento tries to 'get to a ... - CNN
Apr 27, 2021 · The department's training division has been using virtual reality to recreate real-world police encounters and incorporate lessons learned into its training ...Missing: riot arrest- ratios
[87]
FM3-19.40 Appendix B Use of Force and Riot Control Measures
TRAINING. B-40. Train the QRF and associated teams in the five basic riot control formations—line, wedge, echelon, diamond, and circle—on a regular basis.
[88]
[PDF] WARRIOR Crowd Control &RiotM,anual - INTRODUCTION
1. Snatch Squad Ready. 2. Line opens, squad goes through, takes prjsoner, . and returns through line. co ...<|separator|>
[89]
Police riot shield (1993.21.2) - Oceania
This circular AM2 Riot Shield was used by Thames Valley Police in civil disturbances and violent arrest situations between 1990 and 1993.
[90]
Police Practice: Riot Response: An Innovative Approach
The innovative approaches are the Augmented Skirmish Line, which divides officers into smaller groups, and the Tango Team, which uses a wedge formation and ...<|separator|>
[91]
Police drones: The complete guide - Axon.com
Police drone facts worth knowing · Drones can be used for large event overwatch · Drones can be used to breach and clear · Autonomous drones are the future.
[92]
What we know about the tactics used in the Los Angeles protests
Jun 10, 2025 · Skirmish lines, tactical alerts and the 'L-formation' - how the LAPD and National Guard dealt with protesters on the streets of LA.
[93]
What officers need to know about organized protest tactics - Police1
Jun 13, 2025 · Violent demonstrators are consistently using multi-layered skirmish lines. These formations can envelop and cut off insertion teams, including ...
[94]
National Tactical Officers Association - NTOA Training Courses
The 4-day course covers riot equipment, tactics, close-quarter combatives, less-lethal force, live agent training, firearms, and crowd management.
[95]
Field Force Operations - Center for Domestic Preparedness
The three-day Field Force Operations (FFO) course provides law enforcement and security officers with instruction in protest types and actions.
[96]
Training Courses | KASOTC
The course covers: Definition of a crowd and riot. Crowd dynamics. Mob behavior. Mass control and arrest procedures including removal techniques. Team tactics.
[97]
[PDF] 2022-04_Crowd Management Guidelines - California POST
Feb 14, 2022 · The 2022 guidelines include changes to de-escalation, training for kinetic energy projectiles, dispersal orders, and media access.Missing: US VR
[98]
LAPD's virtual reality training raises question about 'gamifying ...
May 14, 2025 · An eight hour VR training course within VR on use of force allows officers to fulfill one third of state-mandated training required for officers ...Missing: riot | Show results with:riot<|separator|>
[99]
[PDF] Sacramento (California) Police Department's Virtual Reality System
In 2019, the SPD procured and implemented virtual reality (VR) sets to enable efficient, repeated scenario training in near-lifelike environments without the ...Missing: riot | Show results with:riot
[100]
UC-led research first to show benefits of police de-escalation training
Jan 31, 2022 · The research, Wexler says, “found that training officers in ICAT was associated with 28% fewer use-of-force incidents, 26% fewer injuries to ...
[101]
Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and ... - NIH
Apr 20, 2020 · We find that training reduced complaints against the police by 10.0% and reduced the use of force against civilians by 6.4% over 2 y.
[102]
Public Order and Public Safety: Basic, Train-the-Trainer
A one-day course for law enforcement public order trainers. The course provides students with the knowledge and skills to train law enforcement responders.
[103]
How to Redesign Police Training to Reduce the Use of Force
Mar 11, 2024 · An experiment demonstrates that officers can learn to apply critical thinking in stressful situations, reducing the use of force and discretionary arrests.
[104]
OSCE Mission trains Kosovo police in human-rights compliant riot ...
Dec 16, 2011 · The course was built on existing police procedures complemented with expertise from the United Kingdom and EU and international best practices.<|control11|><|separator|>
[105]
Global Policing - Leveraging Crowd Psychology to Prevent Violence
Sep 18, 2024 · Uncover the key questions surrounding crowd management during times of social unrest and the importance of effective policing strategies.
[106]
Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law ... - ohchr
Law enforcement officials may use force only when strictly necessary and to the extent required for the performance of their duty.
[107]
[PDF] Resource book on the use of force and firearms in law enforcement
Apr 5, 2015 · and the 1990 Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms for Law Enforcement Officials. (BPUFF).8 The United Nations Code of Conduct ...
[108]
Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law ...
Oct 28, 2009 · Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. Publication year: 1990. Categories: Administration of Justice, Police & Law ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
[109]
Geneva Protocol - State.gov
(a) Use of riot-control agents in riot-control circumstances to include controlling rioting prisoners of war. This exception would permit use of riot ...
[110]
Treaty - Article 2 - United States Chemical Weapons Convention
"Riot Control Agent" means: Any chemical not listed in a Schedule, which can ... (d) Law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes. 10 ...
[111]
Chemical Weapons: Frequently Asked Questions
The 1925 Geneva Protocol sought to ban the use of biological and chemical weapons, but many of its signers joined with major reservations. China, France, the ...
[112]
[PDF] Regulation of incapacitants and riot control agents under the ...
The CWC has ambiguities in regulating RCAs and incapacitants, with a lack of definition for key terms, and the scope of law enforcement is not defined. RCAs ...
[113]
Graham v. Connor | 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
This case requires us to decide what constitutional standard governs a free citizen's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of ...
[114]
[PDF] Part I Graham v. Connor - Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers
Graham v. Connor is a 1989 Supreme Court case that ruled excessive force claims should be judged under the Fourth Amendment's objective reasonableness standard.
[115]
[PDF] Fighting and preventing excessive and unjustified use of force by ...
Apr 4, 2022 · 1. definitions of law enforcement officers, use of force, policing of demonstrations and protests, crowd control measures, and other relevant ...
[116]
Body-Worn Cameras: What the Evidence Tells Us
Nov 14, 2018 · Body-worn cameras may lead to a faster resolution of citizen complaints and lawsuits that allege excessive use of force and other forms of ...
[117]
Body‐worn cameras' effects on police officers and citizen behavior
BWCs can reduce the number of citizen complaints against police officers, but it is unclear whether this finding signals an improvement in the quality of police ...
[118]
Research on Body-Worn Cameras and Law Enforcement
Officers wearing cameras had statistically significant reductions in complaints filed against them and made more stop reports. Camera use resulted in a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[119]
What Can Policymakers Expect of Body-Worn Cameras in Law ...
Jul 14, 2022 · Body-worn cameras are often marketed as a tool to improve public accountability because they provide true accounts of events through recordings.
[120]
[PDF] useofforce - tactics directive
USE OF FORCE During crowd control situations, police officers may be required to physically engage individuals who exhibit conduct ranging from uncooperative ...
[121]
[PDF] How to Conduct an After Action Review - National Policing Institute
On the other hand, law enforcement AARs can be broader and review the response to an incident and the role of leadership and relationships between leaders ...
[122]
[PDF] Crowd Control Training - May 24, 2021 - Portland.gov
May 24, 2021 · The primary focus of the crowd control training was to review existing policies, directives, and trained skills related to crowd control events, ...
[123]
After-Action Review Library - National Policing Institute
Explore the National Policing Institute's AAR Library featuring lessons learned from major incidents and law enforcement responses.
[124]
Policing the Police: Qualified Immunity and Considerations for ...
Feb 21, 2023 · That number jumped to 57 percent in excessive force cases decided from 2017 to 2019. The modern application of qualified immunity has its ...
[125]
Police Officers Rarely Charged for Excessive Use of Force in ... - TRAC
Jun 17, 2020 · ... charges in just 27 cases. In April 2020, just a month before the death of George Floyd sparked civil unrest, federal prosecutors did not ...
[126]
Police officers are prosecuted for murder in less than 2 percent ... - Vox
After all, it's video of the arrest of George Floyd in Minneapolis this year that led to thousands of Black Lives Matter protests, and greater support for those ...
[127]
Crowd Management and Civil Demonstrations Resources
May 1, 2024 · The IACP has a wide array of resources available to members that address crowd management and civil demonstrations.<|separator|>
[128]
Exclusive: $1 billion-plus riot damage is most expensive in ... - Axios
Sep 16, 2020 · The violence after George Floyd's death is the costliest since the 1992 L.A. riots ... Exclusive: $1 billion-plus riot damage is most ...
[129]
We Need a Congressional Investigation Into the 2020 Riots
The hundreds of riots that took place in the second half of 2020 left immense property damage, assessed at up to $2 billion, and at least 25 people dead.
[130]
George Floyd Riots Caused Record-Setting $2 Billion in Damage ...
Sep 16, 2020 · According to new reporting, the post-George-Floyd riots caused up to $2 billion in insured property damage ... died during the unrest?<|separator|>
[131]
[PDF] CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE H2429 - Congress.gov
May 18, 2021 · Studies show 570 protests in 220 U.S. locations turned violent over ... The $1-plus billion in riot damages is estimated to be the most ...Missing: property | Show results with:property
[132]
Examining disparity in police behavior during the 2020 social and ...
Jul 9, 2025 · ... protest events have identical proportions of protests marked by protester violence and disorder. ... How arrests in the Capitol riot ...
[133]
Armed Assembly: Guns, Demonstrations, and Political Violence in ...
Aug 23, 2021 · Armed demonstrations are nearly six times as likely to turn violent or destructive compared to unarmed demonstrations.
[134]
Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for ...
Sep 3, 2020 · The report covers 2020 trends in political violence and demonstrations in the US, focusing on the BLM movement.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[135]
Crime Deterrence: Evidence From the London 2011 Riots - Bell
May 23, 2014 · We show a significant drop in riot crimes across London in the six months after the riots, consistent with a deterrence effect from the tougher sentencing.
[136]
Does tougher sentencing deter crime? Evidence from the London ...
Jul 1, 2014 · Our results show a significant drop in crime, both in riot and non-riot areas of London in the six months after the riots. On average we find a ...
[137]
Study of 2020 Protests Shows Difference Between Reality and ...
Oct 16, 2020 · ... protests, strikes, demonstrations, riots, and other actions. The CCC ... While the summer of 2020 experienced 100 days of violence and ...
[138]
Geographic patterns of diffusion in the 2011 London riots
In this paper, we investigate such patterns during the 2011 London riots, and consider how they changed as police numbers increased.Missing: quick | Show results with:quick
[139]
[PDF] The Need for De-escalation Techniques in Civil Disturbances
The purpose of this research is to bridge the gap in literature and explore aspects of de-escalation techniques and whether there is a need to incorporate such ...
[140]
Violence, what is it good for? Waves of riotous-violent protest and ...
Jan 30, 2024 · We extend this literature by exploring how waves of RVPs increase the likelihood of protest success. Protesters learn from past protest-government response ...
[141]
Measuring criticism of the police in the local news media using large ...
Feb 25, 2025 · This study examines this issue empirically for local media reporting using large language models. Our focus is coverage of the police. Contrary ...Missing: critiques narratives
[142]
From building damage to police payouts, the costs of Floyd's killing ...
Nov 30, 2020 · Gov. Tim Walz estimated that looting and arson after Floyd's death resulted in $500 million in damage across the metro.
[143]
The economic damage of rioting lingers for a long time
Aug 18, 2020 · Even worse, economic research suggests that the areas afflicted will suffer from the damage inflicted by rioters for years to come.
[144]
How 2020 protests changed insurance forever
Feb 22, 2021 · One third of insurance industry losses from US protests came from only three retailers. We need to understand how riot and civil disorder spikes ...
[145]
A Note on the Economic Impact of the Rodney King Riots - jstor
more than 1,000 buildings lost to fire, thousands of jobs lost and an estimated cost to the city of $1 billion in damages. The LA Riots gained a place in ...
[146]
[PDF] the la riot and the economics of urban unrest
Overwhelmingly (94%), the damaged buildings were commercial and most. (76%) of them were retail stores. Prior to the 1992 L.A. riot, the last large scale urban ...
[147]
South L.A.'s economy stagnates 30 years on from uprising
Apr 29, 2022 · Government officials proposed the development of a light-rail or trolley system along Crenshaw Boulevard after the 1992 civil unrest to help ...
[148]
Disadvantages Persist in Neighborhoods Impacted by 1992 L.A. Riots
Apr 27, 2017 · Disadvantages Persist in Neighborhoods Impacted by 1992 L.A. Riots Little economic progress is found in areas most impacted 25 years ago by ...
[149]
Riots have a lasting economic impact - Marketplace.org
Jun 1, 2020 · Race and Economy. Tagged as: LA riots · Minneapolis · protests · twin cities. Our best stories, ...
[150]
The Escalating Terrorism Problem in the United States - CSIS
Jun 17, 2020 · In June 2016, for example, Antifa and other protestors confronted a neo-Nazi rally in Sacramento, CA, where at least five people were stabbed.
[151]
Why do people riot? Examining rioter motivations and the role of the ...
Nov 18, 2024 · This article examines different theoretical explanations for rioting and crowd disorder drawing on psychological, sociological and political perspectives.
[152]
[PDF] Riot Control: Analysis and Catalog - DTIC
This report attempts to provide a systematic analysis of some types of civil disturbances and a survey of related developmental materiel. The.
[153]
[PDF] STUDY REPORT - BPR&D
The aim of the circulation of this study to all the stakeholders is for knowledge sharing regarding the availability of Non/Less Lethal technologies worldwide.
[154]
Epidemiological modelling of the 2005 French riots: a spreading ...
This analysis exhibits space-time correlations showing that riots diffused from cities to cities. There, each rioting episode is considered as a single global ...
[155]
The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility ...
That is, larger black populations are less susceptible to contagion from prior riots. If one is concerned with the intrinsic propensity to riot, more people ...
[156]
Structure and influence in the spread of collective violence
In earlier literature (Tomlinson, 1968), it was posited that a “riot ideology” that justified and even valorized collective violence was necessary to undergird ...
[157]
Using AI to improve public safety at public events - LSE
May 27, 2025 · We found that N-AI's platform was successful in capturing and analysing over 2.5 hours of high-definition aerial footage during the protest and ...Missing: models 2020s
[158]
AI in Real-Time Crowd Dynamics and Protest Management - LinkedIn
Jul 5, 2025 · By predicting the likelihood of unrest, these models assist authorities in better allocating resources and planning deployments. Surveillance ...Missing: success 2020s
[159]
[PDF] Pepper Spray's Effects on a Suspect's Ability to Breathe
Research findings suggested that inhala- tion of OC spray does not pose a significant risk to subjects in terms of respiratory and pulmonary function, even when ...
[160]
Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd ...
Of the 2135 injuries in those who survived their injuries, 71% were severe, injuries to the skin and to the extremities were most frequent. Anatomical site of ...
[161]
Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd ...
Of the 2135 injuries in those who survived their injuries, 71% were severe, injuries to the skin and to the extremities were most frequent. Anatomical site of ...
[162]
Morbidity and mortality of riot control agents exposure in several ...
Jun 6, 2025 · This study looks at how RCA exposure might be linked to injuries or deaths in those affected. This information is important for forensic professionals and ...
[163]
(PDF) Health impacts of chemical irritants used for crowd control
Out of 9261 total injuries, 8.7% were severe and required professional medical management, while 17% were moderate and 74.3% were minor. Severe injuries ...Missing: inflicted | Show results with:inflicted
[164]
Tear gas exposure and its association with respiratory emergencies ...
Tear gas exposure during the 2019 Chilean uprising increased respiratory emergencies by 1.34-1.44 percentage points in infants and older adults, and bronchial ...
[165]
Riot Control Agent - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Riot control agents (RCAs) are chemicals that are touted as producing rapid, nonlethal, incapacitating effects used to protect an individual or group
[166]
Health Impacts of Crowd-Control Weapons: Chemical Irritants (Tear ...
Jan 1, 2017 · Psychological. The physical symptoms of CIs often result in disorientation and agitation, which can lead to a state of fear, anxiety and panic.
[167]
Health issues and healthcare utilization among adults who reported ...
The objective of this study was to describe the health consequences of exposure to tear gas agents and associated healthcare utilization among adults reporting ...Missing: inflicted 2010s
[168]
Mental health during and after protests, riots and revolutions
Jan 28, 2020 · The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder ranged from 4% to 41% in riot-affected areas. Following a major protest, the prevalence of ...<|separator|>
[169]
[PDF] Mental Health During and After Protests, Riots and Revolutions
Health care professionals therefore need to be vigilant to the mental and psychological sequelae of protests, riots and revolutions. Further research on this ...
[170]
Moral injury and its mental health consequences among protesters
Nov 23, 2023 · Protesters exposed to PMIEs reported significantly higher levels of both PTSD and depression than non-PMIE-exposed protesters. Hierarchical ...
[171]
Mental Health Consequences of the July Revolution in Bangladesh
May 18, 2025 · Another systematic review of 52 studies found a 7% increase in depression prevalence following exposure to violence, with PTSD prevalence ...
[172]
The trauma caused by violent protests can be acute, but is largely ...
Sep 22, 2016 · It is possible that people who are involved or directly exposed to violent situations will experience emotional upset. In more vulnerable people ...
[173]
A Beginner's Guide to Understanding Tactical Protection for Officers
More than 2,000 police officers were injured during the summer riots in 2020. Thrown projectiles, like rocks and bricks, were the most common cause of injuries.
[174]
FBI Releases 2020 Statistics for Law Enforcement Officers Assaulted ...
Oct 18, 2021 · Of the 60,105 officers who were assaulted in 2020, 18,568 (30.9%) sustained injuries. ... Civil disorder, such as mass disobedience or riots (4.1 ...
[175]
Protective Gear Negatively Impacts Police Officer Mobility, Stability ...
Sep 9, 2025 · Previous studies have demonstrated that protective gear diminishes physical capabilities, including stability, balance, movement recovery, gait, ...Missing: riot improvised
[176]
Police stressors and health: a state-of-the-art review - PMC - NIH
Repeated exposure to traumatic events was shown to affect performance among police officers, depending on the type of incident (Levy-Gigi et al., 2016). Results ...
[177]
Prevalence and factors associated with post traumatic stress ...
Nov 15, 2022 · Edwards [8] in a study undertaken among riot police officers in Cape Town, South Africa reported a rate of PTSD of 36%.
[178]
Survey: What is the state of officer mental health in 2020? - Police1
Sep 14, 2020 · Conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression have been estimated to affect police officers at rates that vary between 7% and 35%.
[179]
Perspective: The Impact of Life Experiences on Police Officers - LEB
Jul 11, 2023 · In fact, research shows that officers are two to four times more likely to suffer from PTSD compared with the U.S. general population,7 ...
[180]
[PDF] Elevated Police Turnover following the Summer of George Floyd ...
Several of the largest U.S. police departments reported a sharp increase in officer resignations following massive public protests directed at policing in ...
[181]
5 steps to combatting resignations and improving retention - Police1
Aug 19, 2020 · The current anti-police sentiment is impacting police morale and resulting in officers switching police jobs or retiring from law enforcement.<|separator|>
[182]
Watts Riots - Civil Rights Digital Library
Watts Riots. Title: Watts Riots; Years: 1965; Description: The Watts Riot, which raged for six days and resulted in more than forty million dollars worth of ...
[183]
[PDF] 1967 Detroit Riot - UAB Digital Commons
The city government's failures to properly address systemic inequality provided the conditions under which some black Detroiters rioted, but the riot itself ...
[184]
[PDF] The Role of Federal Military Forces in Domestoc Disorders, 1945-1992
It ends with a brief account of the Army's intervention in the race riot in ... Failure to act . . . would be tantamount to acquiescence in anarchy and ...
[185]
After bloodshed in earlier U.S. riots, D.C. police showed restraint in ...
Mar 26, 2018 · While property damage in Washington was bad, the body count was relatively low. Police were responsible for two of the 13 deaths.
[186]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1605
[187]
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/01/national-guard-civil-unrest-update-more-than-17000-troops-in-23-states-and-dc-activated/
[188]
National Guard civil unrest update: More than 17,000 troops in 23 ...
Jun 1, 2020 · There are now more than 17,000 National Guard troops in 23 states and the District of Columbia have been activated to help quell the unrest.
[189]
[PDF] 2020-Civil-Unrest-After-Action-Review-Report.pdf
May 25, 2020 · 1. Although protests also followed their deaths, the extent of protests and subsequent violence and property damage during the May 2020 protests ...
[190]
What went wrong with security at the Capitol? - NBC News
Jan 7, 2021 · On Jan. 6, the Capitol Police, the 2,000-person force whose job is to secure the legislative complex, failed to deploy enough officers to ...
[191]
Additional Actions Needed to Better Prepare Capitol Police Officers ...
Mar 7, 2022 · About 150 Capitol Police officers reported 293 use of force incidents using various types of force against attackers on January 6. After the ...
[192]
[PDF] examining the us capitol attack: a review of the security
This report addresses the security, planning, and response failures of the entities directly responsible for Capitol security—USCP and the Capitol Police Board, ...
[193]
Two Years After The Repression Of Protests In Peru, Justice For The ...
Dec 11, 2024 · During these mobilizations, the Peruvian police and army fired bullets, pellets and tear gas, causing the death of 50 people and leaving more ...
[194]
Peru: Evidence Refutes Official Account of Killings
May 10, 2023 · Peru´s security forces used disproportionate and indiscriminate force in the city of Juliaca on January 9, 2023, the single deadliest day of ...
[195]
Peru: Killings and injuries in protests could implicate president and ...
Jul 18, 2024 · New report reveals possible criminal responsibility of President Boluarte for repression of protests between December 2022 and March 2023.
[196]
Full article: A REPORT OF THE 2019 HONG KONG PROTESTS
Oct 14, 2019 · The Police next used tear gas against the few hundred violent protesters, forcing them back as most had not started to use gas masks ...
[197]
[PDF] The Hong Kong 2019 Protest Movement: A Data Analysis of Arrests ...
Oct 1, 2023 · 81% of counts of conviction received custodial sentences, compared to only 31.6% in the Umbrella. Movement. Higher incarceration rates were seen ...
[198]
[PDF] Health risks of exposure to CS gas (tear gas) - HKU Scholars Hub
In 2019, Hong Kong witnessed the most extensive civilian protests since the 1960s, and consequently the police have used crowd control measures to restore ...
[199]
Drones and Public Safety: Top Models, Use Cases, & Trends [2025]
Apr 9, 2025 · In this article, we'll explore how drones are reshaping public safety and emergency response. We'll also talk about how to become a drone pilot in public ...Missing: riot | Show results with:riot
[200]
Riot Control Equipment Market Size, Growth, Trends and Forecast
Riot Control Equipment Market is anticipated to expand from $13 billion in 2024 to $23.5 billion by 2034, growing at a CAGR of approximately 6.1%.