Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Silage

Silage is a type of preserved forage feed produced through the anaerobic fermentation of high-moisture crops, typically containing 40-80% water, such as grasses, legumes, corn, or sorghum, which converts plant sugars into organic acids to lower pH and inhibit spoilage microorganisms, enabling long-term nutrient storage for livestock.^[1]^[2] This process, known as ensiling, results in a sour, pickled product that retains higher nutritional value compared to air-dried hay, with reduced harvest losses and greater yield potential from available land.^[3]^[3] The practice of silage production has ancient roots, dating back over 3,000 years to the Egyptians and Greeks who stored whole forage crops in pits or underground structures for preservation.^[4] Modern silage-making emerged in the late 19th century, pioneered by French agriculturist Auguste Goffart in 1877, who advocated for airtight storage to promote controlled fermentation, leading to widespread adoption in Europe and North America by the early 20th century.^[5] Today, silage serves as a staple in ruminant diets, particularly for dairy and beef cattle, comprising 50-75% of forage in many dairy operations due to its high energy content, digestibility, and ability to blend into total mixed rations.^[6] Production involves harvesting crops at optimal maturity—often when 30-35% dry matter for corn silage—to ensure sufficient sugars for fermentation, followed by chopping to 0.25-0.75 inch lengths, packing to exclude oxygen, and sealing in structures like upright tower silos, bunker silos, or plastic-wrapped bales.^[7]^[2] The fermentation process unfolds in four phases: an initial aerobic phase where plant respiration and microbial activity consume oxygen and sugars; a facultative anaerobic phase with lactic acid bacteria dominating to produce acids and drop pH to around 4.0-4.5 within 2-3 days; a stable anaerobic phase preserving the material; and a final aerobic phase upon feeding where proper management minimizes spoilage.^[3]^[2] Additives like inoculants or acids may be used to enhance fermentation, especially in challenging conditions such as low-sugar crops or variable weather.^[8] Common types include corn silage, valued for its high starch and energy from grain and stover, ideal for lactating dairy cows; grass or legume silage (e.g., alfalfa haylage at 40-60% moisture), providing protein-rich feed for beef cattle and sheep; and sorghum silage, a drought-tolerant alternative to corn with similar energy but lower starch content.^[9]^[10] Silage's benefits extend to sustainable farming by reducing waste, supporting year-round feeding in regions with seasonal growth limitations, and improving animal performance through consistent nutrition, though challenges like effluent management and aerobic deterioration require vigilant practices.^[3]^[11]

Introduction

Definition and Principles

Silage is a high-moisture fodder preserved through controlled anaerobic fermentation of green forage crops, such as grasses, legumes, or corn, where the crop's natural sugars are converted primarily into lactic acid to inhibit spoilage organisms.^[12] Typically harvested at 50-70% moisture content (or 30-50% dry matter), silage allows for the storage of nutrient-rich feed without extensive drying, making it an essential method for livestock nutrition in agriculture.^[13]^[2] The core principles of silage preservation rely on creating anaerobic conditions that favor beneficial lactic acid bacteria while suppressing aerobic decomposition and undesirable microbes. Under oxygen-limited environments, these bacteria rapidly ferment water-soluble carbohydrates in the forage, producing lactic acid that lowers the pH to approximately 3.8-4.2, stabilizing the material and preventing further breakdown.^[14]^[15] This acidification process, which occurs within days of ensiling, preserves the forage's nutritional integrity by minimizing losses from respiration and protein degradation.^[16] Unlike hay, which is preserved by drying to below 20% moisture to halt microbial activity, silage fermentation enables preservation at higher moisture levels, rendering it particularly suitable for regions with wet weather or for crops needing immediate post-harvest storage to avoid weather-related losses.^[12] This method retains more of the crop's original energy content compared to drying processes that can lead to leaf shatter and nutrient leaching in hay.^[3] The basic ensiling process involves chopping the forage to a particle length of about 3/8 to 3/4 inch for optimal packing, followed by compaction in storage structures to expel air and then sealing to maintain anaerobiosis.^[3] Successful preservation results in silage with retained energy, typically featuring 8-12% crude protein and 50-70% digestible dry matter on a dry basis, depending on the crop type and conditions.^[17]^[18]

Types and Variations

Silage is classified into primary types based on the crop source, each offering distinct nutritional profiles suited to different agricultural systems. Grass silage is commonly produced from temperate grasses such as perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), which thrives in cool, moist climates and provides high-quality forage with excellent digestibility and palatability for livestock. Corn silage, harvested from the entire maize (Zea mays) plant, serves as a high-energy option due to the substantial starch contribution from the kernels, making it a staple in dairy and beef rations. Legume silage, derived from crops like alfalfa (Medicago sativa) or red clover (Trifolium pratense), delivers protein-rich feed but poses fermentation challenges stemming from its high buffering capacity, which resists pH decline during ensiling. Silage variations also arise from moisture content at ensiling, influencing fermentation dynamics and storage suitability. High-moisture silage, typically ensiled at 60-80% moisture, is used for wetter crops to facilitate quick anaerobic conditions and lactic acid production, though it risks greater nutrient loss through effluent. Low-moisture or wilted silage, achieved by field drying to 40-60% moisture, minimizes seepage and improves stability, particularly beneficial for legumes that require concentration of fermentable sugars. Bale silage represents a practical variation for small-scale producers, where forage is wilted to 45-65% moisture, baled, and individually wrapped in plastic to create airtight units that preserve quality with reduced infrastructure needs. Emerging variants address specific nutritional and processing enhancements. Kernel-processed silage involves mechanically cracking corn kernels during harvest to increase starch accessibility and ruminal digestibility, potentially boosting animal performance without altering the base crop. Co-ensiled silage combines crops such as corn with legumes or grasses to optimize nutrient balance, enhancing protein levels in high-energy bases while distributing harvest labor across seasons.

History

Origins and Early Practices

The practice of ensiling forage dates back over 3,000 years, with the earliest archaeological evidence originating from ancient Egypt around the second millennium BCE, where murals illustrate the storage of green fodder in pits to prevent spoilage. In the Roman era, agricultural practices included burying crops in trenches or pits to extend usability beyond the growing season, though often combined with drying methods like haymaking.^[19] By the 18th century, ensiling reemerged in northern Europe as farmers sought alternatives to unreliable hay production in wet climates. In France during the late 18th century, agronomists experimented with burying legumes in pits to preserve them for winter feed, building on classical methods but adapting them to local crops like grasses and root tops.^[19] These efforts spread to Italy and Germany in the early 19th century, where farmers began experimenting with storage of green forage, particularly maize and clover, enabling more consistent livestock feeding amid variable weather. A pivotal advancement came in 1877 when French farmer Auguste Goffart published detailed accounts of his silo experiments, emphasizing rapid filling and compaction to minimize air exposure; his work, translated into English in 1880, significantly promoted the technique across Europe.^[20] Early adopters faced substantial hurdles, as improper sealing of pits or silos allowed oxygen infiltration, fostering mold growth and aerobic spoilage that rendered much of the stored fodder unusable.^[21] Additionally, the acidic off-odors produced during natural fermentation—reminiscent of sauerkraut—deterred many farmers accustomed to the neutral scent of dried hay, fostering skepticism and slow uptake despite demonstrated nutritional benefits for animals.^[22] These trial-and-error experiences in pre-industrial Europe paved the way for later scientific insights into controlled fermentation.

Modern Developments

In the early 20th century, the development of airtight silos marked a significant advancement in silage preservation in the United States, with cement stave silos introduced around 1910 to better maintain anaerobic conditions and reduce spoilage compared to earlier wooden or masonry structures.^[23] This innovation facilitated a construction boom from 1910 to 1925, enabling farmers to store larger volumes of fermented forage reliably during winter months.^[24] By the 1960s, microbiological research advanced understanding of silage fermentation, as studies by Robert Whittenbury identified key lactic acid bacteria sources in grass silage, laying the groundwork for targeted microbial management. Post-World War II mechanization transformed silage production, with forage harvester designs improving in the late 1940s and 1950s to enhance efficiency and chop uniformity, such as Fox Manufacturing's lighter choppers with easier attachments.^[25] Companies like KRONE resumed and expanded harvester production after the war, contributing to faster field operations across Europe and North America.^[26] This era saw widespread adoption of silage in dairy farming during the 1950s to 1970s, driven by intensive grazing systems and the need for reliable winter feed, with tower silos becoming predominant in Europe and bunker systems common in North America; silage also spread to regions like Asia and South America with increasing mechanization.^[27] By the 1970s, innovations like big balers further integrated silage into conserved forage strategies, boosting overall dairy productivity.^[28] From 2000 onward, silage technology has incorporated precision additives, including homo-fermentative lactic acid bacteria inoculants that accelerate pH decline and improve fermentation stability in challenging conditions.^[29] These inoculants, applied at rates ensuring 10^5 to 10^6 colony-forming units per gram, have been shown to enhance silage quality in over 50% of field trials since 2000.^[30] Climate-adaptive practices have also emerged for drought-prone areas, emphasizing deeper-rooting crops like alfalfa and red clover to maintain yield and moisture retention under water stress.^[31] Additionally, integration of GPS-guided harvesting systems, such as those in CLAAS forage harvesters, enables uniform chop lengths of 10-20 mm, optimizing packing density and fermentation while generating yield maps for site-specific management.^[32] These developments have supported global silage expansion, particularly in arid regions, by improving resilience to variable weather patterns.^[33]

Production

Crop Selection and Harvesting

Crop selection for silage production involves choosing forage species that balance high yield, nutritional quality, and adaptability to local conditions. Common forages include corn (Zea mays), which offers high energy yields in temperate regions with well-drained soils and temperatures above 10°C for germination, typically harvested at 30-35% dry matter to maximize starch content. Cool-season grasses such as orchardgrass or timothy suit northern climates with moderate rainfall and fertile soils, providing fiber-rich forage, while warm-season options like sorghum thrive in hotter, drier areas with sandy soils. Legumes, including alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and clovers, are selected for their protein content and nitrogen-fixing benefits, performing best on neutral pH soils (around 6.2-7.0), with yields significantly reduced in acidic conditions below pH 5.4. Key factors influencing selection are yield potential, regional climate (e.g., C4 crops like corn for warmer zones), soil type (drainage and fertility), and management goals such as integrating mixtures for balanced nutrition. Harvesting timing is critical to achieve optimal moisture content of 60-70% for effective ensiling, ensuring adequate fermentation while minimizing losses. For corn, harvest occurs at the dent stage when the kernel milk line reaches approximately 50%, corresponding to about 40-50 days after silking, which aligns with 65-70% whole-plant moisture and near-maximum dry matter accumulation. Grasses are typically cut at the boot to early heading stage (or milk stage for small grains), when moisture is around 60-65%, to preserve digestibility before lignification reduces quality. Legumes like alfalfa are harvested pre-bloom or at early bloom, targeting 65-70% moisture to capture peak protein levels without excessive fiber development. Weather plays a pivotal role; rain during wilting can leach soluble nutrients and increase mold risk, so producers monitor forecasts to limit field exposure and avoid damage from excessive wetness exceeding 75% moisture. Field practices emphasize efficient crop severance and preparation for ensiling. Forages may be mowed and conditioned with mower-conditioners that crimp stems every 3-4 inches to accelerate wilting and juice release, or directly chopped in the field using forage harvesters for larger operations. The theoretical length of cut (TLC) is calculated based on chopper settings to promote compaction, generally 3/8 to 1/2 inch for unprocessed corn and legume silages, with shorter cuts (e.g., 3/8 inch) recommended for legumes to better release plant juices and enhance packing density. This particle size aids in excluding air during subsequent ensiling while maintaining sufficient fiber for rumen health.

Ensiling Process

The ensiling process begins immediately after harvesting, with the chopped forage being transported to the storage structure as rapidly as possible to minimize exposure to oxygen, which can initiate undesirable aerobic respiration. The filling sequence involves adding the material in thin layers, typically no more than 15-20 cm (6 inches) deep, to facilitate effective compaction and ensure uniform distribution across the silo or bunker floor.^[34]^[2] This layer-by-layer approach allows for progressive filling from one end to the other, maintaining a sloped face that supports ongoing compaction while preventing uneven settling or air entrapment. Rapid filling is critical, ideally completing the process within 1-2 days for bunker silos to limit dry matter losses from prolonged exposure.^[3] Compaction follows each layer's addition to expel air and achieve the necessary density for anaerobic conditions, targeting a bulk density of 200-700 kg/m³ depending on the crop and moisture content, with dry matter densities often recommended at a minimum of 225 kg DM/m³ for optimal preservation. Techniques typically employ heavy tractors, wheel-type packers, or specialized compaction vehicles that drive repeatedly over the surface in overlapping passes to significantly reduce the air present in the loose forage. Uniform distribution is essential to avoid air pockets, which can form in uneven areas and lead to localized spoilage; this requires careful spreading of the chopped material before each compaction cycle.^[35]^[36]^[3] Once filled to capacity, sealing is performed promptly to exclude oxygen and initiate preservation, commonly using heavy-duty plastic sheeting (typically 125-150 micron polyethylene) draped over the entire surface and secured at the edges with soil or sand-filled bags. The sheeting is then weighted down with tires, gravel bags, or other materials placed at intervals of about 1-2 m to prevent flapping and air infiltration, ensuring a tight seal along the sides and top. A successful seal is indicated by an initial pH drop to around 5.0 within 1-2 days, signaling the onset of anaerobic conditions before full fermentation stabilizes.^[3]^[37]^[38]

Equipment and Technology

Harvesting equipment for silage production primarily includes forage harvesters, which chop and collect crops directly in the field. Self-propelled forage harvesters are commonly used for large-scale operations exceeding 5,000 tons of forage annually, offering high throughput and integrated features like crop accelerators, while pull-type harvesters suit smaller capacities up to 2,000 tons and require a separate tractor for power.^[39] Chopper wagons, a variant of pull-type systems, combine chopping and transport functions for efficiency in field-to-storage workflows.^[7] For corn silage, kernel processors are often integrated into forage harvesters to crack the grain's pericarp, enhancing starch availability and rumen digestibility compared to unprocessed material.^[40] This processing reduces undigested starch passage, improving overall feed efficiency without altering chop length, which is typically set to 3/8 inch for optimal ensiling.^[41] Ensiling tools facilitate transport and compaction to minimize air pockets and promote anaerobic conditions. Silage wagons, including self-unloading models, efficiently move chopped forage from field to storage, with capacities often exceeding 20 tons to match harvester output rates.^[7] Compaction is achieved using tractors for initial layering or specialized packers attached to tractors, which apply targeted pressure—up to 50 psi—to achieve densities over 15 pounds of dry matter per cubic foot, reducing spoilage losses.^[42]^[43] Modern technologies enhance precision during ensiling, such as moisture sensors that provide real-time dry matter measurements to ensure optimal harvest windows of 65-70% moisture. Handheld near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) devices or on-harvester sensors like the John Deere HarvestLab™ quantify dry matter, starch, and fiber content on-the-go, allowing adjustments to avoid over- or under-fermentable silage.^[44]^[45] Post-2010 advancements include automated balers with integrated wrapping systems, such as the McHale Fusion series, which combine baling, wrapping, and density control in a single pass to streamline bale silage production and reduce labor by 50%. Drone-assisted field monitoring uses multispectral imaging to assess grass sward biomass and maturity, optimizing harvest timing for silage quality by predicting dry matter yields with 85-90% accuracy. Energy-efficient electric actuators in forage harvesters enable precise adjustments to crop flow and processing rolls, lowering fuel consumption by up to 20% and reducing the carbon footprint of operations compared to hydraulic systems.^[46]^[47]^[48]

Fermentation

Microbial Mechanisms

Silage fermentation relies on a consortium of microorganisms, primarily lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which drive the preservation process by converting plant sugars into acids under anaerobic conditions. Epiphytic bacteria naturally occurring on forage crops at harvest form the initial microbial population, influencing the fermentation trajectory based on their diversity and abundance; these include clostridia, enterobacteria, and yeasts that compete with LAB if conditions favor them.^[49] Among LAB, species such as Lactobacillus plantarum dominate successful ensiling due to their acid tolerance and efficiency. LAB are categorized as homofermentative, which produce primarily lactic acid from sugars, or heterofermentative (including facultative types), which yield lactic acid along with acetic acid, ethanol, and carbon dioxide, potentially enhancing aerobic stability but sometimes reducing dry matter recovery.^[50]^[51]^[52] The fermentation unfolds in sequential phases that reflect shifts in oxygen availability and microbial dominance. During the initial aerobic phase (typically 0-2 days), residual oxygen in the silage mass is consumed through plant respiration and activity of aerobic microbes like bacilli and pseudomonads, leading to a temporary rise in temperature and CO₂ production. This transitions to the anaerobic fermentation phase (days 2-21), where oxygen depletion allows LAB to proliferate rapidly, fermenting water-soluble carbohydrates into organic acids and dropping the pH below 4.5 to suppress undesirable microbes. The process culminates in a stable phase, where low pH (around 3.8-4.2) stabilizes the microbial community, halting significant fermentation and preserving the forage.^[53]^[54] Chemically, these microbial activities center on the anaerobic breakdown of hexose sugars like glucose and fructose present in the forage. Homofermentative LAB execute the core lactic acid fermentation via the Embden-Meyerhof pathway, represented by the equation:

\ce{C6H12O6 -> 2 CH3CH(OH)COOH}

This generates lactic acid (CH₃CH(OH)COOH), the principal preservative that inhibits spoilage organisms through acidity. Heterofermentative LAB, via the phosphoketolase pathway, also produce acetic acid and CO₂ alongside lactic acid, contributing to the pool of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that further modulate pH and microbial ecology. Overall, effective fermentation converts 3-6% of dry matter sugars into acids, ensuring nutritional integrity without excessive nutrient loss.^[55]

Additives and Inoculants

Additives and inoculants are substances applied during the ensiling process to enhance fermentation efficiency, promote desirable microbial activity, and improve silage stability and quality.^[56] These interventions target key aspects of the fermentation process, such as rapid pH reduction and inhibition of spoilage organisms, particularly in challenging conditions like low-sugar forages or high-moisture crops.^[57] Inoculants primarily consist of live microorganisms or enzymes, while chemical additives provide direct acidification or substrate supplementation. Application typically occurs via spraying or mixing during crop filling into silos, ensuring even distribution at targeted rates.^[58] Bacterial inoculants, such as Lactobacillus buchneri, are widely used to improve aerobic stability by converting lactic acid to acetic acid, which inhibits yeasts and molds upon exposure to air.^[59] These heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria are applied at rates of 10^5 to 10^6 colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of fresh forage to dominate the epiphytic microbiota and direct fermentation pathways.^[60] Enzyme inoculants, including cellulases, break down fibrous plant cell walls to release soluble sugars, supporting bacterial growth in sugar-deficient crops like alfalfa.^[58] Cellulases function optimally at pH 4.5 and 50°C, and are typically applied as liquid sprays at manufacturer-recommended doses during ensiling to enhance fiber digestibility without altering core fermentation dynamics.^[56] Acid-based inoculants, such as formic acid, rapidly lower pH to below 4.0, suppressing clostridial activity in wet, low-dry-matter forages; application rates range from 0.5% to 1% of fresh forage weight.^[61] Chemical additives complement biological inoculants by addressing specific limitations in crop composition. Molasses serves as a fermentable carbohydrate source for crops with insufficient water-soluble sugars, such as legumes, at rates of 40 to 100 pounds per ton of forage to boost lactic acid production and reduce dry matter losses.^[41] Propionic acid acts as a mold inhibitor under aerobic conditions, particularly in high-moisture grains or silages prone to heating, with effective rates of 0.2% to 0.5% of dry matter to limit fungal growth and extend shelf life.^[56]

Storage

Silage Structures

Silage storage structures are essential for preserving the quality of ensiled forage by providing controlled environments that facilitate compaction and anaerobic conditions. Traditional designs include upright silos and bunker silos, each suited to different farm scales and operational needs. These structures must balance capacity, structural integrity, and ease of management to minimize nutrient loss and support efficient feed distribution.^[62] Upright silos, also known as tower silos, are vertical cylindrical structures typically constructed from concrete staves, steel, or historically wooden staves and ceramic blocks. These silos range in height from 10 to 30 meters, allowing gravity to compact the silage as it is filled from the top, which promotes density and reduces air pockets. Ventilation systems are incorporated in upright silos to regulate internal gases during filling and storage, ensuring structural safety and forage preservation. They are ideal for medium-sized operations where space is limited, offering capacities from hundreds to thousands of tons depending on diameter and height.^[63]^[64] Bunker silos, in contrast, are ground-level horizontal structures consisting of excavated pits with concrete walls, designed for large-scale farms handling over 500 tons of silage annually. These open-ended enclosures facilitate rapid filling and compaction using tractors, with typical dimensions including lengths of 30 to 100 meters or more. Design factors emphasize a 2-5% surface slope for effective drainage of runoff, directing water away from the structure into vegetated areas to prevent contamination. Capacity is calculated using the formula volume = length × width × average depth, with widths of 15-20 meters recommended to achieve optimal compaction under tractor wheels, assuming a silage wet density of 35-45 pounds per cubic foot (corresponding to 12-16 lb dry matter per cubic foot) for 65% moisture content.^[62]^[65] Other structures include drive-over silage piles, which are open heaps of compacted silage on the ground without permanent walls, suitable for temporary storage on large operations; and wrapped bale silage, where forage is formed into round bales, wrapped in multiple layers of plastic film, and sealed for individual airtight units, ideal for smaller farms or distributed feeding.^[66]^[67] Material choices in silage structures prioritize durability and impermeability; concrete is favored for bunker walls and upright bases due to its resistance to pressure and corrosion, while steel provides lightweight strength for tower components. Plastic liners, such as polyethylene sheeting, are commonly applied to bunker floors and walls to prevent seepage of silage juices into the soil, thereby reducing environmental risks and maintaining structural integrity. Sealing techniques, such as covering with weighted plastic, complement these designs but are managed separately to ensure airtight conditions post-filling.^[68]^[62]

Sealing and Management

Once the silage is filled into storage structures, effective sealing is essential to exclude oxygen and promote anaerobic fermentation. For bunker silos, the standard method involves covering the silage mass with black polyethylene plastic sheeting, typically 5 to 6 mil thick, secured by weighting with old passenger car tires arranged to overlap and cover the entire surface without gaps.^[69] This tire-weighted approach ensures close contact between the plastic and silage, minimizing air pockets. Advanced options include lining bunker walls and tops with oxygen barrier (OB) films, such as coextruded black-on-white films 50 to 125 μm thick, which reduce oxygen permeation by up to 20 times compared to standard polyethylene, thereby limiting aerobic deterioration at the shoulders and top layers.^[70] For bag silos, vacuum sealing during filling expels air through the bagger machine, creating an airtight seal with the plastic tube that prevents oxygen ingress from the outset.^[71] Ongoing management focuses on preserving the anaerobic environment during the storage and feedout phases. To minimize oxygen exposure at the silage face, daily removal of 15 to 30 cm (6 to 12 inches) of material is recommended, with higher rates in warmer conditions to limit the time unprotected silage is exposed to air.^[72] A smooth, vertical face should be maintained using defacing equipment like bucket loaders or silage facers to avoid ruts that allow air penetration. Temperature monitoring is critical, as successful fermentation typically peaks at 30 to 40°C within the first few days due to microbial activity, then cools to below 20°C as acidity stabilizes the mass; probes inserted into the core or face can track these changes to confirm proper progression.^[73] Troubleshooting issues promptly helps maintain silage integrity. Hot spots, indicated by localized temperatures exceeding 40°C, signal aerobic microbial growth and can be detected using thermocouple probes inserted at multiple depths to identify oxygen infiltration areas.^[74] Effluent, a nutrient-rich liquid runoff from wet silage, is monitored visually for pooling at the base or via pH and conductivity probes in collection drains to prevent excessive leakage, which can lead to environmental pollution if sealing fails.^[75] Ideal oxygen levels within the silage mass remain below 1% to support lactic acid bacteria dominance and inhibit spoilage organisms.^[3]

Quality and Nutrition

Nutritional Composition

The nutritional composition of silage is primarily determined by the original crop material and modified through the ensiling process, with typical dry matter (DM) content ranging from 30% to 40% to facilitate proper fermentation and minimize effluent losses.^[17] Key macronutrients include crude protein (CP) at 8% to 18% of DM, which varies by crop type, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) at 35% to 50% of DM, reflecting the structural carbohydrates that influence digestibility.^[76] Energy content is commonly expressed as total digestible nutrients (TDN), typically 60% to 70% of DM, providing a measure of overall energy availability for livestock.^[18] Fermentation significantly alters silage composition by converting water-soluble carbohydrates into organic acids, resulting in lactic acid concentrations of 4% to 8% of DM and acetic acid at 1% to 3% of DM in well-fermented silage, which preserves nutrients but leads to some sugar loss.^[77] Protein quality can degrade during fermentation, with ideal soluble nitrogen (ammonia-nitrogen) levels below 10% of total nitrogen to minimize excessive breakdown by clostridial bacteria.^[78] Mineral content is also affected, particularly through potassium leaching in silage effluent if moisture levels are suboptimal. Compositional variability is pronounced across crop types; for instance, corn silage tends to have higher energy (TDN around 68%) but lower protein (CP 8-10%), while legume silages like alfalfa exhibit elevated protein (CP 15-18%) and fiber (NDF up to 50%).^[79] This variability informs feed value assessments, such as the relative feed value (RFV), calculated as RFV = (DDM × DMI) / 1.29, where DDM (digestible dry matter, %) is estimated as 88.9 - (0.779 × ADF%) with ADF as acid detergent fiber (%), and DMI (dry matter intake, % of body weight) as 120 / NDF (%), allowing comparison of silage quality relative to standards like full-bloom alfalfa (RFV = 100).^[80] Note that RFV is best suited for cool-season grasses and legumes; for broader applications including warm-season forages, relative forage quality (RFQ) is preferred, calculated as RFQ = (DMI × TDOM) / 1.00, where TDOM is total digestible organic matter (%).^[81]

Assessment and Feeding Value

Silage quality is initially assessed through sensory evaluation, which provides a quick, on-site indication of fermentation success and potential spoilage. Good-quality silage typically exhibits a green color, indicating minimal oxidation and heat damage, and emits a pleasant, slightly acidic or yogurt-like smell from lactic acid fermentation.^[74] In contrast, poor-quality silage may appear brown or black due to excessive heating or mold growth and have off-odors such as a rotten, vinegary, or burnt smell, signaling clostridial activity or aerobic deterioration.^[55] These sensory cues, while subjective, correlate with overall feed stability and palatability but should be confirmed with laboratory analysis for accuracy.^[82] Laboratory tests offer precise quantification of silage quality parameters, commonly including dry matter (DM) content, pH, and volatile fatty acids (VFA) such as lactic, acetic, and butyric acids. Near-infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy is a widely adopted non-destructive method that rapidly predicts these attributes along with nutrient profiles by analyzing light reflectance from silage samples, enabling high-throughput assessment in commercial labs.^[83] Ideal pH for well-fermented silage ranges from 3.8 to 4.2, reflecting effective lactic acid production, while VFA profiles should show lactic acid dominating (over 60% of total acids) and low butyric acid levels to minimize losses and toxicity risks.^[84] To ensure representative sampling, core sampling protocols involve using a coring probe to extract 10-20 cores from different heights and locations across the silage structure, such as bunker faces or bale interiors, then compositing and drying subsamples before analysis.^[85] The feeding value of silage centers on its digestibility and integration into balanced rations for ruminants, where it serves as a primary forage source providing fiber for rumen health and energy for production. Dry matter digestibility typically ranges from 60% to 75% in ruminants, influenced by fiber quality and fermentation end-products, allowing efficient nutrient extraction while supporting microbial fermentation in the rumen.^[86] In total mixed rations (TMR) for dairy cattle, silage is balanced with concentrates to achieve optimal energy (1.4-1.6 Mcal net energy for lactation [NEL] per kg DM) and protein levels, often comprising 40-60% of the ration on a DM basis to maintain rumen pH and prevent acidosis.^[87] Palatability, a key intake factor, is enhanced when ammonia nitrogen is below 5% of total nitrogen, as higher levels from protein breakdown reduce voluntary consumption and milk yield.^[88] Practical metrics for silage feeding value include NEL estimates of 1.4-1.6 Mcal/kg DM for typical corn silage in dairy diets, which guide ration formulation to support lactation yields of 30-40 kg per cow daily when combined with supplements.^[89] Additives like lactic acid bacteria inoculants can improve intake by 5-10% through better fermentation and reduced spoilage, thereby enhancing overall animal performance without altering base composition.^[90]

Environmental Considerations

Pollution and Waste

Silage production generates significant environmental pollutants, primarily through effluent runoff and gaseous emissions, which can adversely affect water and air quality. Effluent, a liquid byproduct from high-moisture silage, arises during the initial fermentation phase when excess water is expelled from the ensiled material. For wilted grass silage, effluent production typically ranges from 0 to 50 liters per ton of forage, though volumes can increase substantially with wetter direct-cut crops. This runoff is highly enriched in organic matter and nutrients, posing risks to aquatic ecosystems if not properly managed. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of silage effluent often exceeds 20,000 mg/L, with reported values ranging from 30,000 to 80,000 mg/L, making it one of the most potent agricultural pollutants—comparable to or exceeding that of raw sewage or slurry. High BOD levels deplete dissolved oxygen in receiving waters upon discharge, leading to hypoxic conditions that stress or kill aquatic life. Additionally, the effluent's elevated concentrations of nitrogen (up to 700 mg/L ammonia) and phosphorus contribute to eutrophication, promoting excessive algal growth, oxygen depletion, and disruption of aquatic food webs in rivers, lakes, and coastal areas. Gaseous emissions from silage primarily occur during aerobic spoilage, when oxygen exposure at the surface or during feed-out allows microbial activity to produce methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂). These greenhouse gases exacerbate climate change, with methane being particularly potent due to its high global warming potential. Ammonia (NH₃) volatilization represents another key emission pathway, accounting for 1-5% of total nitrogen loss from silage storage, primarily from poorly sealed structures or effluent evaporation; this contributes to atmospheric nitrogen deposition, acid rain, and secondary aerosol formation that impairs air quality and human health. In the 1990s, several incidents in Europe highlighted the acute risks of silage effluent pollution. In Ireland, agricultural runoff, including silage leachate, was linked to multiple fish kills, with 52 reported cases in 1990 alone—many attributed to oxygen-demanding effluents entering waterways. A notable 1993 event involved silage effluent directly causing fish mortality in streams, underscoring the era's challenges before stricter controls. These cases prompted heightened awareness, as even small volumes of effluent could devastate local fish populations due to rapid BOD-induced deoxygenation. Regulatory responses in Europe, driven by the EU Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC), aim to curb such pollution by designating nitrate-vulnerable zones and mandating action programs to limit agricultural nitrate inputs, including silage runoff. Member states enforce storage requirements for effluent—typically 4-6 months' capacity—to prevent direct discharge, with violations punishable under national water pollution laws. For instance, Ireland's Good Agricultural Practice Regulations (S.I. No. 605/2017, as amended by S.I. No. 42/2025) prohibit silage effluent release into waters and require containment systems, capping overall nitrate levels in surface and groundwater at 50 mg/L to mitigate eutrophication risks. As of November 2025, Ireland is consulting on the sixth Nitrates Action Programme to further enhance water protection measures.^[91]^[92]

Sustainability Practices

Sustainability practices in silage production focus on minimizing environmental impacts through targeted strategies that enhance resource use and resilience. One key approach to waste reduction involves wilting forage to 30-40% dry matter (DM) content before ensiling, which significantly decreases effluent production by limiting excess moisture and associated nutrient runoff; for instance, achieving this DM level can cut effluent by up to 50% compared to unwilted material.^[93] Additionally, using oxygen barrier covers or nets over silage piles reduces oxygen ingress, thereby decreasing aerobic spoilage; these barriers can block up to 20 times more oxygen than standard covers, leading to up to 5% less dry matter loss.^[94] Resource efficiency is improved through precision agriculture techniques, such as real-time monitoring with near-infrared (NIR) sensors during harvesting, which optimize timing and chop length to maximize yield and quality while minimizing fuel and input use. Integrating cover crops into silage rotations further boosts soil health by enhancing carbon sequestration; for example, legume and non-legume cover crops can add 1-2 t C/ha annually, improving soil organic matter and reducing erosion without compromising main crop productivity.^[95] Post-2020 climate adaptations emphasize resilient crop varieties and additives to address changing weather patterns. Drought-tolerant maize hybrids for silage have shown potential but inconsistent performance under water stress, maintaining yields and forage quality compared to conventional hybrids in some rainfed systems.^[96] Incorporating biochar as a feed additive in silage-based rations can reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants by up to 15%, promoting lower greenhouse gas outputs without affecting digestibility.^[97] In a circular economy framework, silage production waste, such as spoiled material or effluent, is repurposed for biogas generation through anaerobic digestion with manure, converting it into renewable energy and nutrient-rich digestate for soil amendment.^[98]

Safety and Applications

Handling Hazards

Handling silage involves significant physical hazards, particularly from silo gases produced during fermentation. These gases, including carbon dioxide (CO₂) and nitrogen oxides such as nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), accumulate in silos and can displace oxygen, leading to asphyxiation without warning.^[99] Exposure to these colorless, odorless gases has resulted in numerous fatalities among farm workers, with silo filler's disease—a condition caused by nitrogen dioxide—exhibiting a case fatality rate of 29 percent based on reported medical cases.^[100] In the United States, hazardous atmospheres in silos contribute to ongoing risks, with extension services emphasizing that every farm operation handling silage faces potential injury or death from such exposures.^[101] Another physical risk arises from structural instability in bunker silos and silage piles, where the silage face can suddenly collapse, engulfing workers under tons of material. For instance, frozen or poorly compacted silage has led to collapses burying individuals, as documented in agricultural safety reports.^[102] Such incidents have caused deaths, including cases where workers were pinned or asphyxiated under fallen silage, highlighting the need for caution during feeding and sampling activities.^[103] Chemical and biological hazards further complicate silage handling. Spoiled silage often contains mycotoxins, such as aflatoxins produced by molds like Aspergillus species, which pose respiratory risks to farm workers through inhalation of dust during unloading or feeding.^[104] These toxins can cause epithelial damage in airways upon occupational exposure.^[104] Additionally, organic acids like lactic acid in silage effluent can irritate skin and eyes upon direct contact, prompting recommendations for protective equipment.^[105] Biological risks include Listeria monocytogenes contamination in effluent from poorly sealed silage, which can infect workers through skin breaks or poor hygiene practices on the farm.^[106] To mitigate these hazards, adherence to regulations such as those from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is essential for confined space entry in silos. OSHA standard 1910.146 classifies silos as permit-required confined spaces and mandates atmospheric testing prior to entry, ensuring oxygen concentrations remain between 19.5 and 23.5 percent.^[107] Mechanical ventilation must be provided to maintain safe air quality, with continuous monitoring required during work to prevent gas buildup or oxygen deficiency.^[107] These guidelines, including the use of personal protective equipment and rescue plans, aim to protect farm workers from the asphyxiation and engulfment risks inherent in silage operations.^[108]

Specialized Uses

Haylage represents a specialized form of silage produced from wilted grass-legume mixtures, typically achieving 45-55% dry matter content through partial field wilting before baling and wrapping in plastic to create anaerobic conditions.^[109] This process enables faster fermentation compared to traditional hay production, which relies solely on drying without microbial activity, reducing weather-related losses and preserving more nutrients in the forage.^[2] Haylage's limited fermentation—due to higher dry matter—results in a pH around 5.0 and less acid production than wetter silages, maintaining higher fiber digestibility while minimizing effluent. Particularly popular in equine nutrition, haylage provides a balanced, high-fiber feed that supports steady energy release, with studies showing equivalent growth rates in young thoroughbreds compared to concentrate-heavy diets.^[110] Its bale format allows for portion-controlled feeding, appealing to horse owners seeking convenient, nutrient-dense alternatives to imported hay, especially in regions with variable weather.^[111] Fish silage involves the acid- or enzyme-based fermentation of fish processing waste, such as viscera and heads, to produce a liquid protein-rich feed ingredient for aquaculture.^[112] In acid methods, formic or lactic acid is added to lower pH below 4, inhibiting spoilage bacteria and leveraging endogenous enzymes for autolysis, while enzyme methods use exogenous proteases to accelerate hydrolysis at neutral pH before acidification for stability.^[113] This process retains over 80% of the original protein as soluble peptides and free amino acids, preserving nutritional value without the high energy costs of fish meal drying.^[114] Originating in Norway during the 1970s as a response to fish waste disposal challenges in the growing salmon industry, fish silage has become a staple in aquaculture feeds, enhancing growth in species like shrimp and tilapia when blended with plant proteins.^[115] Norwegian innovations focused on acid preservation to achieve pH 3.5-4.0, enabling safe storage and transport, with applications expanding globally for sustainable feed production from byproducts.^[116] In anaerobic digestion, silage serves as a high-yield co-substrate in biogas plants, where its readily degradable carbohydrates boost methane production when mixed with manure or other wastes.^[117] Maize silage, for instance, typically yields 200-300 m³ of methane per ton of volatile solids, enhancing overall process stability through balanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratios and higher biogas output than mono-digestion of livestock manure.^[118] The 2023 revision of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) further enhanced post-2015 EU incentives, including amendments promoting farm-scale digesters through feed-in tariffs and subsidies, to meet at least 42.5% renewable energy targets by 2030.^[119] These policies have spurred over 21,000 biogas plants across the EU as of 2023, with silage co-substrates contributing to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and diversified farm income via biomethane upgrading.^[120]

References

[1]
Determine the characteristics of good silage and the steps in ...
Silage is the end product of fermenting a high moisture crop (40-80% water) and storing the product is called ensiling.
[2]
Silage and Haylage Production | NC State Extension Publications
May 6, 2024 · Silage is the final product when forage of sufficient moisture (> ~50%) is conserved and stored anaerobically (oxygen-free), ...
[3]
From Harvest to Feed: Understanding Silage Management
Mar 8, 2023 · Silage is a staple forage on dairy farms. High-level management and sizeable financial outlays are necessary to efficiently produce, harvest, store and feed ...
[4]
Silage | Forage Information System | Oregon State University
Silage is anything stored in a silo, which may comprise a hole in the ground, a bunker, a tower, a covered heap, or a wrapped bale.
[5]
History of Silage - Wilkinson - 2003 - ACSESS - Wiley
Jan 1, 2003 · Silage is produced by ensilage, that is, the placing of crop material inside a vessel or a structure called a silo.
[6]
Hay and Silage | UT Beef & Forage Center
Corn silage comprises the largest percentage (50 to 75 percent) of forages in most dairy cow diets. To maximize digestibility and quality, corn silage needs to ...
[7]
Silage Harvesting and Storage - Wisconsin Corn Agronomy
More mature corn silage will have more, drier grain with harder seed coats, more starch and less sugars, and less digestible fiber than earlier harvested corn.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
[PDF] Silage Additives - Open PRAIRIE - South Dakota State University
Ensiling is a means of preserving a feed by fermentation. By definition, silage is a feed stored in a silo of some type and at a moisture level sufficient for ...
[9]
Silage Crops for Dairy and Beef Cattle II: Sorghum and Other Forage ...
Feb 1, 2022 · The primary types used for silage are forage sorghums, grain sorghums (milo), and sorghum-sudan crosses. The sorghum-sudan crosses and pearl ...
[10]
Comparing Sorghum Silage vs Corn Silage - Bayer Crop Science
Oct 19, 2023 · Introduction · Conventional – 10 to 12 ft tall grain-type forage that is often fed in beef feedlots or to dry dairy cows (not producing milk).
[11]
Silage preparation and sustainable livestock production of natural ...
Sep 8, 2023 · Silage fermentation is therefore a good way of preserving the nutrients of woody plants and ensuring a year-round supply of feed for livestock ...
[12]
[PDF] Principles of Silage Making - FSA3052
Silage is produced by harvesting a forage crop at a high moisture content (greater than 50 percent) and subsequently fermenting that crop in pit, tower, bunker ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[13]
Harvesting Silage on a Wet Year: Moisture is Critical
Oct 15, 2021 · More specifically, the optimum silage moisture ranges from 55-60% for upright oxygen-limiting solos, 60-65% for upright stave silos, 60-70% for ...
[14]
[PDF] THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING SILAGE Richard E. Muck
Dec 11, 2011 · Under anaerobic conditions, lactic acid bacteria ferment sugars in the crop primarily to lactic acid, which lowers the pH of the crop. I like to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[15]
[PDF] Interpretation and Use of Silage Fermentation Analysis Reports
Because of its normally low pH. (3.8), corn silage intake usually benefits from the addition of sodium bicarbonate prior to feeding to neutralize its acidity.
[16]
[PDF] Making silage from Iowa's forage crops - Iowa State University ...
When lactic acid bacteria have reduced the silage pH sufficiently to stop their growth (pH 4.0 - 4.2 or lower), the stable phase begins. As long as the silo ...
[17]
Silage Quality and Feeding - Wisconsin Corn Agronomy
Crude protein levels of untreated corn silage range from less than 6% to over 10% of dry matter depending on environmental conditions, fertilization, hybrid, ...
[18]
Silage is a high-moisture forage - Oregon State Ecampus
Silage is a high-moisture forage; 60 to greater than 70% moisture. Silage is produced from the controlled fermentation of high-moisture forages.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[19]
Ever Wondered Who Invented Silage? In This Post We Explain All
It is known that the Greeks and Egyptians were familiar with ensiling as a technique for storing fodder as far back as 1000 to 1500 BC.
[20]
Image 1 of Ensilage of green crops : from the French of Auguste Goffart
APA citation style: Goffart, A. & Brown, J. B. (1880) Ensilage of green crops: from the French of Auguste Goffart: with the latest facts connected with this ...
[21]
[PDF] Silage in Britain, I88o-I99o: The Delayed Adoption of an Innovation*
4. This paper seeks to describe the initial introduction of silage in the nineteenth century, trace its progress through the twentieth century, and explain the ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
[22]
Popular Science Monthly/Volume 25/June 1884/Ensilage and ...
In this paper the French terms "silo" and "ensilage" were introduced, as they had a definite meaning not well expressed by any English words, and they are now ...
[23]
The Legacy of the Disappearing Silo - Morning Ag Clips
Sep 14, 2020 · Utilizing Cement The cement stave silo was introduced around 1910. It is made up of masonry units that hook together with interlocking edges ...
[24]
Farm Horizions: The rise and fall of silos - Herald Journal
Silos first appeared in the state in the late 1880s, with a construction boom from 1910 to 1925, according to the Minnesota Historic Farms Study.
[25]
Forage Harvester Development Marked by Fits and Starts
Oct 14, 2015 · After World War II, Fox improved its chopper by making it lighter and the interchangeability of the attachments much easier. In 1950, Fox ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
[26]
More than 100 years of farm machinery from Spelle | Here » KRONE
The BiG X precision-chop forage harvester is currently the world's most powerful forage harvester. ... After the end of World War II KRONE quickly resumed ...
[27]
Fifty years progress in forage conservation and challenges for the fut
Nov 9, 2022 · Baled silage probably accounts for about 25% of total silage production in Europe. Tower silos, the predominant way of storing silage in Europe ...Missing: widespread | Show results with:widespread
[28]
[PDF] Fifty years progress in forage conservation and challenges for the ...
Baled silage probably accounts for about 25% of total silage production in Europe (Wilkinson, 2005). Tower silos, the predominant way of storing silage in ...
[29]
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives
This review covers research studies published since 2000 that have investigated the efficacy of silage additives.Review · Obligate Heterofermentative... · Chemical Additives
[30]
Effect of Homo-Fermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculants on ...
Nov 10, 2022 · Silages treated with homo-fermentative lactic acid bacteria (homo-LAB) have been shown to improve fermentation quality, indicated by a fast ...2. Materials And Methods · 2.1. Ensiling · 3. Results
[31]
Six tips for silage survival in a changing climate - Kelvin Cave
Choose deep-rooting crops ... If drought is a regular occurrence, deeper rooting crops such as red clover, lucerne and even multispecies swards can all be ...
[32]
CLAAS of America Showcases SILAGE TECH™ at World Ag Expo
Feb 18, 2019 · It includes a QUANTIMETER yield sensor to generate yield maps and control inoculant used, automatic chop length to adjust the length of the ...
[33]
Silage review: Unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold ...
Silage making is an old agricultural practice that started more than 3,000 yr ago (Wilkinson et al., 2003). However, a rapid increase in the application of this ...<|separator|>
[34]
Preventing Silage Storage Losses – Team Forage - Extension
The recommended procedure for filling a bunker silo or silage pile is to spread the forage in thin layers on the sloped filling face and driving over it several ...
[35]
[PDF] Factors Affecting Bunker Silo Densities - WWWRec sum 98a
Average dry matter densities were slightly higher than a recommended minimum density of 225 kg/m3. ... Silage dry matter density as related to crop layer.
[36]
[PDF] Density of silage in horizontal silos
"the mean bulk density of the tractor compacted silages. (568 + 127 kg/m3) was 46% higher than that ofthe self compacted (388 ± 174 kg/m3). When the contents ...
[37]
5 steps to covering silage pits for an airtight seal - Farmers Weekly
Mar 27, 2023 · 1. Never skimp on side sheets · 2. Use plenty of gravel bags · 3. Place as much weight as possible on the top of the clamp · 4. Pay attention to ...
[38]
[PDF] Fermentation Analysis of Silage: Use and Interpretation - Foragelab
By 2-3 days after ensiling, cell juices are available as a food source for silage bacteria, oxygen should be eliminated, and silage pH should have declined to a ...
[39]
[PDF] Harvesting and Storage
When ensiling forage in bunker silos, compact it in progressive wedges (figure 6) using a wheel tractor with a front end loader or blade to move and pack silage ...
[40]
[PDF] FACT SHEET 1: Corn silage kernel processing - Cornell eCommons
In terms of starch, focus is often on total content and digestibility. However, kernel processing addresses a third factor: accessibility.
[41]
SS-AGR-177/AG180: Silage Harvesting, Storing, and Feeding
Wilting high-moisture forage to at least 35% dry matter is a good practice that reduces clostridial fermentations. Wilting usually results in good silage ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[42]
Bulletin #1070, Reducing Forage Shrink and Improving Milk ...
Packer for extra compaction on the back of a tractor to improve the density of silage. Packing the bunker to achieve a high density of the material is critical ...
[43]
[PDF] bunk silo filling tailgate meeting - Cornell University
Dense packing reduces dry matter losses, heating problems, and storage costs. The goal is to achieve more than 15 lbs. of dry matter per cubic foot for corn ...
[44]
John Deere HarvestLab™ 3000 and Constituent Sensing
The HarvestLab 3000 sensor enables an accurate measurement and documentation of dry matter, starch, protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber ...
[45]
https://extension.psu.edu/determining-forage-dry-matter
[46]
Fusion 2 – Integrated Baler Wrapper - McHale.net
The McHale Fusion combines two traditionally separate jobs and integrates them into a single operation which can be done by one man and one machine.Missing: automated post-
[47]
Machine learning estimators for the quantity and quality of grass ...
Sep 1, 2020 · This study investigates the utilisation of drone remote sensing for managing and monitoring silage grass swards.Missing: assisted | Show results with:assisted
[48]
Powerful precision in forage harvesters using electric actuators
LINAK electric actuators allow optimal positioning of crop accelerators and corn crackers, and provide perfect ergonomics in forage harvesters.
[49]
Trends in designing microbial silage quality by biotechnological ...
May 3, 2019 · Epiphytic microflora greatly determines the fermentation of ensiled material through the amount and type of organic acids produced, at the same ...Epiphytic Microflora Of A... · Inoculants Of Lactic Acid... · Table 1
[50]
Meta-analysis of Effects of Inoculation With Homofermentative and ...
Forages are usually inoculated with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to enhance lactic acid fermentation of ...
[51]
Microbial inoculants for silage - Crops and Soils
Consequently, legume silages tend to have higher pH's than corn and grass silages, making them more susceptible to clostridial fermentation when ensiled on the ...Missing: mixing | Show results with:mixing
[52]
The performance of lactic acid bacteria in silage production
This review elucidates the role of LAB inoculants in silage production as well as the modern biotechnology approaches.
[53]
Silage fermentation—updates focusing on the performance of micro ...
Sep 13, 2019 · The four main phases are the initial aerobic phase, the intense fermentation phase, the stable phase and the aerobic feed-out phase ...Lactic Acid Bacteria · Spore-Forming Bacteria · Phases Of The Silage...
[54]
Paper 2.0: Silage fermentation processes and their manipulation
A good fermentation process is not only dependent on the type and quality of the forage crop, but also on the harvesting and ensiling technique. In this paper, ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[55]
Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic ...
Aerobic spoilage of silage is accentuated in warm weather. Ammoniated corn ... Silages that are aerobically unstable may also present a musty or moldy smell and ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[56]
[PDF] A REVIEW ON SILAGE ADDITIVES AND ENZYMES
Feb 4, 2014 · Silage fermentation can be divided into 4 phases. The first phase is characterized by the presence of oxygen after forage is chopped and ...
[57]
[PDF] Role of LAB in Silage Fermentation: Effect on Nutritional Quality and ...
Jan 6, 2021 · Silage additives can be classified into six main groups: homofermentative LAB (hoLAB), heterofermentative LAB (heLAB), customized inoculants ( ...
[58]
Adding Enzymes to Silage – Team Forage - Extension
Their primary function is to break down forage fiber during fermentation, rendering the silage more digestible during feedout. The breakdown of fiber into ...
[59]
[PDF] Silage Inoculants – Are They Worth the Money?
increased to 503 hours for silage treated with L. buchneri at application rates greater than 100,000 cfu/g. Feed placed in a feedbunk should be consumed ...
[60]
[PDF] Inoculant Effects on Alfalfa Silage: Fermentation Products and ...
inoculants were applied at a rate of 1.0 × 106 cfu/g of crop (not label rates) to help ensure domination of fer- mentation. All inoculants were diluted with ...
[61]
[PDF] a technique to study the relative merits of - different silage additives
A study of 10 silage additives by Crawshaw (1979) showed that under conditions where it took 1.8 litres of formic acid (85%) to reduce the pH of herbage from ...
[62]
Role of Exposure to Lactic Acid Bacteria from Foods of Animal Origin ...
Inoculating forages with homo- and heterofermentative LAB inoculants improved silage ... multi-strain probiotics. Besides improving the health status of these ...
[63]
Microencapsulation technology for delivery of enzymes in ruminant ...
Jul 12, 2024 · The encapsulating material can accommodate a high concentration of enzymes, maximising their content within the microcapsules or microspheres.
[64]
Bunker Silo Sizing and Management | Oklahoma State University
Use a two to five percent surface slope to drain runoff away from bunkers, preferably into a grassed waterway for infiltration. For high moisture silage where ...
[65]
[PDF] Harvest and Storage Safety - K-State Animal Science
Silo Storage Methods. Silage storage structures are varied. Upright tower silos may be constructed of wooden staves, ceramic block, concrete staves, or metal.
[66]
Adapting Silage Silos for Dry Grain Storage - Purdue Extension
The silo must be in sound structural condition, and hooped or reinforced sufficiently to store dry shelled grain. 2. The silo must have a roof. 3. The silo must ...
[67]
[PDF] Management of Bunker Silos and Silage Piles - Extension
Silo floors should be sloped 0.5 to 1.0% (6 to 12 inches per 100 feet) towards the open end. This slope is sufficient to drain off precipitation and melted ...
[68]
[PDF] Silage Storage Structures1 - UFDC Image Array 2
There are three types of silos: conventional upright or tower, oxygen-limiting tower, and horizontal (pit, concrete bunker, or plastic bag). Tower silos ...
[69]
Bunker Silo Cover Alternatives – Team Forage - Extension
The tires should touch each other to obtain good, uniform weighting. Soil or sandbags are often used to seal the plastic edges. A new oxygen barrier system has ...
[70]
A New Oxygen Barrier Film Reduces Aerobic Deterioration in Farm ...
The most common material used to seal bunker silos and drive-over piles is polyethylene film. In the early 1990s, Daponte (1992) proposed the use of coextruded ...
[71]
https://www.agnition.com/post/4-key-factors-impacting-silage-quality
[72]
Managing corn silage harvest and feed bunk for nutrient retention
May 4, 2021 · Chopping at the proper length of cut, generally 3/8” for unprocessed and ¾” for processed silage will ensure proper compaction and minimize ...
[73]
How Hot Is Too Hot for Silage? A Guide to Ideal Temperatures
Optimal fermentation zone: 25–37°C · Caution zone: Above 40°C = risk of nutrient loss and less effective fermentation · Danger zone: Above 50°C = rapid silage ...Missing: peaks cooling
[74]
https://extension.psu.edu/troubleshooting-silage-problems
[75]
[PDF] Evaluation of Silage Leachate and Runoff Collection Systems on ...
Apr 11, 2016 · The selected probes were designed for wastewater systems and were also relatively low cost (approximately $200). The installation of the ...<|separator|>
[76]
Forage Quality | NC State Extension Publications
Aug 15, 2024 · The nutritive value of forages is assessed by measuring nutrient concentration and digestibility and by studying the nature of the end products ...
[77]
[PDF] EVALUATION OF CORN SILAGE QUALITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON ...
... 10% of DM, with lactic acid constituting. 5 to 8% of DM and acetic acid 1 to 4% of DM (Kung et al., 2018). Propionic acid is produced to a lesser extent ...
[78]
Troubleshooting Silage Problems - Penn State Extension
Jul 28, 2023 · Heat-damaged silages will have a caramelized or tobacco smell. No silage should have a musty, mildew or rotten smell due to molding.
[79]
[PDF] Successful Use of High Quality Corn Silage for Dairies ... - Symposium
This silage effluent, should it occur, carries valuable nutrients. Research tells us silage run-off typically contains 20 percent nitrogen compounds, 25 percent ...
[80]
[PDF] Survey of Silage Crop Nutritive Value in New Mexico and West Texas
DM = dry matter, ADF = acid detergent fiber, NDF = neutral detergent fiber, CP = crude protein, Ca = calcium, P = phosphorus, K = potassium, TDN = total.
[81]
Interpreting Forage and Feed Analysis Reports | Mississippi State ...
A sample feed analysis form shows 13.63% crude protein, which is excellent; 52.66. A sample feed and forage analysis report shows 88.5% dry matter (and 11.5% ...
[82]
Assessing Silage Quality through Sensory Evaluation - Dairy Herd
11 Nov 2020 · Learn more about the fermentation process and how to assess quality using sight, smell and feel.
[83]
NIR Analysis - Forage and Feed - Foragelab
NIR analysis uses Near Infrared Reflectance spectroscopy for rapid determination of multiple nutrients and characteristics of feed or forage.Missing: quality sensory
[84]
[PDF] SILAGE ANALYSIS - Hill Labs
The pH is an indication of the acidity of the silage, but does not give an indication of the organic acid composition that also affects the value of the silage.
[85]
[PDF] Sampling Hay, Silage, and Total Mixed Rations for Analysis (A2309)
The best place to core sample small rectangular bales is through the center of one end. For other square bale types, inspect each bale for the distribution of.
[86]
Effect of Particle Size of Corn Silage on Digestibility and Rumen ...
Digestibilities of dry matter were 71.8, 72.3, and 67.7% for the .62, 1.27, and 1.91 cm silage diets. There were no significant differences in any ...
[87]
https://extension.psu.edu/total-mixed-rations-for-dairy-cows
[88]
Corn Silage Production and Management - Penn State Extension
Jan 1, 2001 · Delaying harvest can reduce both the fiber and starch digestibility as the stover gets more lignified and the overmature kernels become harder ...
[89]
[PDF] Estimating the Energy Value of Corn Silage
Energy value is estimated using TDN, calculated from fat and NDF digestibility. In practice, a 30h in vitro NDF assay and a spreadsheet are used.<|control11|><|separator|>
[90]
Silage Additives: Review - Scientific Research Publishing
Maine researchers reported that dry matter intake increased by 10.7% and milk yield by 14.7% in one study [64] . However, [65] reported that the growth of ...
[91]
Wilting grass silage - Ecosyl
Effluent is reduced; almost completely above 30% DM – something which is especially important with tighter regulations. It reduces the amount of fermentation ...
[92]
Oxygen Barrier Film - Chinook Silage Covers
With the use of oxygen barriers you will block up to 20 times more oxygen from the silage pile. ... In addition to saving due to reduced spoilage the overall ...
[93]
Silage Protection Nets - Durable HDPE Covers for Efficient Storage
4.3 332 Reduces Waste and Spoilage: Studies show that proper netting can reduce silage spoilage by up to 20%, significantly lowering feed waste and improving feed ...
[94]
Dairy Yield Optimization on Farm with Advanced Technology
How does chop length affect silage quality? Chop length affects packing density and fermentation. Generally, a theoretical length of cut (TLC) between 3/8 ...
[95]
Quantifying soil carbon sequestration from regenerative agricultural ...
Jan 30, 2024 · Combining a cover crop and no-tillage (N = 2) had a mean sequestration rate of 1.43 t C/ha/yr., while the use of a cover crop alone (N = 6) had ...Missing: silage | Show results with:silage
[96]
Impacts of Irrigation Technology, Irrigation Rate, and Drought ... - MDPI
Apr 24, 2023 · Drought tolerant maize hybrids have higher yields and lower water use under drought conditions at a regional scale. Agric. Water Manag. 2022 ...3. Results · 3.2. Silage Corn Yield · 3.3. Silage Corn Forage...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-<|separator|>
[97]
Effect of fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, microbial ...
Nov 19, 2024 · Biochar has gained significant attention as a possible anti-methanogenic supplement for ruminants due to its potential to reduce methane (CH₄) ...
[98]
Implementing Circular Economy in the Production of Biogas ... - MDPI
We focused on a biogas production facility that utilizes both plant and animal waste, specifically animal manure and corn silage. This paper aims to assess the ...
[99]
[PDF] Silo Gases in Large Scale Pile Silos
Silo gases include carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxides of nitrogen (N), such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4), and dinitrogen trioxide (N2O3).
[100]
Silo Filler's Disease - Iowa Department of Health and Human Services
The severity of the hazard rests partially in the high case fatality rate: 29 percent of cases cited in medical literature have been fatal. D. Diagnosis, ...Missing: N2 | Show results with:N2
[101]
Silo Gases - the Hidden Danger
Sep 15, 2025 · As long as silage remains a common livestock feed, the risk of an injury or fatality from silo gases is present. Every farm worker must ...
[102]
Horizontal Silo Safety - Penn State Extension
Aug 26, 2025 · In one case, a chunk of frozen silage in a bunker silo broke loose, allowing the entire face to collapse, burying a worker under tons of silage.
[103]
[PDF] A Hazard Analysis of Three Silage Storage Methods for Dairy Cattle
One death was attributed to being pinned by a silage face collapse and one death was due to asphyxiation after a silage face collapsed and buried an individual.
[104]
Respiratory Exposure to Mycotoxins and Farming
Jun 27, 2024 · More recent studies indicate that aflatoxins in occupational environments could lead to epithelial damage in airways, which would also ...
[105]
Safety and efficacy of lactic acid and calcium lactate when used as ...
Dec 11, 2015 · The use of lactic acid and calcium lactate as feed additives is safe for the consumer. Lactic acid is considered an irritant to eyes and skin ...
[106]
Asymptomatic Carriage of Listeria monocytogenes by Animals and ...
Nov 1, 2022 · Poor hygiene on farms, such as inattention to boot cleaning, hand washing, failure to wear protective clothing and indifference to silage ...Missing: effluent | Show results with:effluent
[107]
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.146
[108]
https://www.osha.gov/confined-spaces
[109]
Forage Conservation: Troubleshooting Hay and Silage Production
Moisture should be between 45% and 55%. Try to make the bales as dense as possible and wrap immediately after bailing. If moisture is lower, for example 40%, ...
[110]
Where Are We Now? Feeds, Feeding Systems and Current ... - NIH
Furthermore, haylage can be an excellent feed for young, fast-growing thoroughbreds that achieved equal growth rates compared to those fed high levels of ...
[111]
[PDF] Forage Trends in the Equine Nutrition Industry
Haylage is much higher in moisture content than baled hay, and may be a higher risk of digestive upset or other health issues due to the possible presence of ...Missing: faster | Show results with:faster
[112]
Production and utilization of fish silage A manual on how to turn fish ...
Dec 19, 2018 · The fish silage process transforms fish waste into a liquid mix of hydrolysed proteins, lipids, minerals and other nutrients, easily digestible ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
[113]
[PDF] alaska-seafood-by-products-potential-products-markets-and ...
Jan 8, 2009 · ... for the production of crude (cold) silage, advanced silage, modified silage, bacteria fermented silage and fish protein hydrolyzate. There ...
[114]
Nutritive value of diets containing fish silage for juvenile ...
Sep 2, 2025 · In a five week feeding trial using Pacific white shrimp, fish waste silage processed with formic acid improved growth when combined with soybean ...
[115]
[PDF] THE STATE OF WORLD FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE 2008
World aquaculture production: change in growth by region since 1970 ... Fish silage and fish protein hydrolysates obtained from fish viscera are finding ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
[116]
[PDF] International Conference on Fish By-Products
This book was produced by the Alaska Sea Grant College Program and the. Alaska Fisheries Development Foundation, primary sponsor of the conference.
[117]
(PDF) Biogas Production from Maize Grains and Maize Silage
Aug 5, 2025 · The main objective of this work was anaerobic digestion of maize grains and maize silage and biogas production from these crops.
[118]
Effect of silage maize plant density and plant parts on biogas ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The results revealed that A. donax exhibits a biogas yield and methane content comparable to corn silage, indicating its potential as a viable ...
[119]
[PDF] DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/ 2001 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ...
Dec 21, 2018 · The increased use of energy from renewable sources or 'renewable energy' constitutes an important part of the package of measures needed to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[120]
[PDF] Bioenergy in the European Union
Dec 31, 2024 · Thermophilic conditions are applied mostly in large-scale centralised biogas co-digesters using feedstock mixtures of garden and food waste.