Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Snob effect

The snob effect is a phenomenon in consumer economics where an individual's demand for a good decreases as more people consume it, driven by the desire to maintain exclusivity and differentiate oneself from the broader population.^[1] This inverse relationship between consumption by others and personal demand distinguishes it from standard price-driven utility maximization, as consumers prioritize social signaling over mere functionality.^[1] The concept was formalized by economist Harvey Leibenstein in his seminal 1950 paper, "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics.^[2] Leibenstein described the snob effect as a form of nonfunctional demand, contrasting it with the bandwagon effect—where demand rises with increasing popularity due to conformity—and the Veblen effect, where higher prices enhance perceived prestige independent of others' consumption.^[1] In graphical terms, the snob effect can result in an upward-sloping demand curve for exclusivity-seeking consumers, as reduced accessibility amplifies appeal, though it is typically bounded by the underlying price effect.^[3] The snob effect manifests prominently in luxury markets, where scarcity and limited availability reinforce status symbols.^[4] For example, high-end watches like the Rolex Daytona may lose desirability among affluent buyers if production increases and ownership becomes widespread, diminishing their role as markers of distinction.^[5] Empirical studies show this effect influences behaviors in fashion, automobiles, and artisanal products, often interacting with network externalities to shape market dynamics.^[6]

Definition and Concepts

Core Definition

The snob effect is an economic phenomenon in which the demand for a particular good or service declines as its popularity or the number of consumers increases, primarily because greater availability erodes its perceived exclusivity and prestige.^[7] This behavior arises among consumers who value items for their ability to signal social distinction, leading them to abandon a product once it becomes too commonplace.^[8] At its core, the snob effect is driven by the psychological desire for uniqueness and differentiation from the broader population, where individuals actively seek to avoid products associated with the masses to preserve a sense of superiority or elite status.^[7] This aversion to popularity stems from the symbolic role of goods in social signaling, where exclusivity enhances personal identity and interpersonal comparisons.^[9] Consumers exhibiting this effect prioritize rarity over mere utility, often shifting preferences toward alternatives that maintain an aura of inaccessibility.^[10] In terms of demand dynamics, the snob effect deviates from the conventional downward-sloping demand curve—where quantity demanded rises as price falls—by introducing interdependence among consumers, resulting in a segment where rising popularity (measured by the number of users) leads to falling individual demand at any given price.^[8] This creates a scenario in which the aggregate demand curve may exhibit reduced elasticity or even upward-sloping characteristics under strong snob influences, as exclusivity paradoxically sustains or boosts willingness to pay despite lower quantities consumed overall.^[7] Such patterns align with broader concepts of conspicuous consumption, where status display motivates non-standard economic choices.^[11]

Distinction from Bandwagon and Veblen Effects

The snob effect is fundamentally distinguished from the bandwagon effect by its underlying motivation and impact on demand. The bandwagon effect occurs when the demand for a commodity increases because other individuals are also consuming it, driven by a desire for conformity and social emulation, often described as the urge to "get into the swim of things."^[12] In contrast, the snob effect leads to a decrease in demand as more people consume the good, reflecting an anti-conformist drive for exclusivity and differentiation from the majority.^[12] This opposition highlights how the bandwagon effect amplifies consumption through group alignment, whereas the snob effect diminishes it to preserve personal distinction.^[12] Unlike the Veblen effect, which is primarily price-driven, the snob effect centers on the interpersonal dynamics of consumer numbers rather than cost alone. The Veblen effect describes a situation where demand for a good rises with its price because the higher cost signals status and prestige, independent of how many others purchase it.^[12] Snob behavior, however, responds inversely to the quantity of other consumers, where widespread adoption erodes the good's appeal as a marker of uniqueness, even if price remains a factor in initial attraction.^[12] Thus, while both may involve status signaling, the Veblen effect ties utility directly to price perception, not the crowd's involvement.^[12] A core differentiator of the snob effect lies in its emphasis on network externalities from the number of other consumers, inverting the "keeping up with the Joneses" dynamic typical of bandwagon pressures by motivating avoidance of popular choices to maintain social separation.^[12] This quantity-sensitive interpersonal influence sets the snob effect apart, fostering demand curves that become less elastic as adoption grows, in direct opposition to the bandwagon's elasticity increase and the Veblen's price insensitivity to user numbers.^[12]

Theoretical Foundations

Leibenstein's Original Model

Harvey Leibenstein introduced the snob effect in his 1950 paper "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, where it forms one of three primary social influences on consumer behavior, distinct from the bandwagon effect (which boosts demand through emulation) and the Veblen effect (which ties demand to status via price).^[1] Leibenstein's framework addresses the limitations of neoclassical demand theory by emphasizing interdependent preferences, where consumers' choices are shaped not only by personal factors but also by the actions of a reference group.^[1] At the core of Leibenstein's model is an expanded demand function that integrates social dynamics: the quantity demanded by an individual, denoted as u, depends on price p, income y, and the aggregate consumption U by the reference group, expressed as u = f(p, y, U).^[1] This formulation captures how social context modifies traditional economic variables, allowing for non-price determinants of demand that reflect group interactions.^[1] By including U, the model highlights that individual utility derives from both the good itself and its social implications, such as exclusivity or conformity.^[1] The snob effect specifically operates through a mechanism of differentiation, where rising aggregate consumption U prompts individuals to decrease their own demand u to preserve the good's uniqueness and signal superior status.^[1] This inverse relationship yields a "snob curve," characterized by negative cross-elasticity between an individual's consumption and the reference group's total, ensuring the good remains a marker of distinction rather than commonality.^[1] Leibenstein illustrated this qualitatively, showing how such effects could lead to upward-sloping demand curves under certain social conditions, diverging from standard downward-sloping ones.^[1]

Mathematical Formulations

In Leibenstein's foundational model of interdependent demand, the quantity demanded by the i-th individual, q_i, is expressed as a function of the good's price p, the individual's income y_i, and the aggregate quantity demanded by others, \sum_{j \neq i} q_j, such that q_i = f(p, y_i, \sum_{j \neq i} q_j). The snob effect is mathematically characterized by the condition \frac{\partial q_i}{\partial (\sum_{j \neq i} q_j)} < 0, indicating that an individual's demand decreases as the consumption of others increases, driven by a desire for exclusivity.^[13] To derive the aggregate snob demand curve, consider a market with n identical snob consumers where equilibrium requires aggregate demand Q = n q_i to equal the expected aggregate demand. Individual demands are constructed under varying expectations of total Q (denoted as Q^a, Q^b, \dots, Q^n with Q^a < Q^b < \dots < Q^n), yielding hypothetical demand curves D^a, D^b, \dots, D^n. The snob demand curve D_s is the locus of intersection points (virtual equilibria E_a, E_b, \dots, E_n) where expected and actual Q align for each scenario. Due to the negative interdependence, D_s shifts leftward as Q rises, resulting in a curve that is less elastic than the underlying functional (non-social) demand curve; if the snob effect is sufficiently strong, small increases in popularity can trigger cascading demand reductions, leading to discontinuities or instability in equilibrium, such as abrupt market contractions.^[13] Extensions of the snob effect incorporate it into utility maximization frameworks, where an individual's utility U_i depends on direct consumption x_i of the good and a status component inversely related to aggregate market consumption or share Q. A representative form is U_i(x_i, Q) = u(x_i) + v(R_i - s(Q)), with u(\cdot) increasing in own consumption, v(\cdot) increasing in relative resources R_i net of a status cost s(Q) that rises with total market activity Q (reflecting diminished exclusivity), and subject to the budget constraint z_i + p x_i = R_i where z_i is numeraire consumption. This setup yields snob-like behavior as consumers reduce x_i when Q grows, enhancing the incentive compatibility for signaling exclusivity through higher prices or lower quantities.^[14]

Historical Development

Introduction in 1950

The snob effect was formally introduced by economist Harvey Leibenstein in his seminal 1950 article titled "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 64, Issue 2, pages 183–207.^[12] In this work, Leibenstein presented the snob effect as a form of interdependent consumer behavior where demand for a good decreases as its popularity increases, driven by individuals' desires for exclusivity and social differentiation.^[15] Leibenstein's model served as the analytical framework for articulating this concept, highlighting how social influences could invert traditional downward-sloping demand curves under certain conditions.^[16] This introduction occurred against the intellectual backdrop of post-World War II economic shifts, where critiques of neoclassical demand theory— which assumed consumer preferences were independent and solely determined by individual income and prices—gained traction.^[15] The war's end marked a surge in consumerism across the developed world, fueled by wartime production that lifted economies from depression and boosted spending power among young adults and the emerging middle class.^[17] This era's rising affluence and mass marketing amplified social influences on consumption, drawing economics toward integration with social psychology to explain behaviors like emulation and distinction.^[18] Upon publication, Leibenstein's article was recognized for bridging economics and sociology by formalizing social interdependence in demand theory, though it initially remained a niche contribution within academic circles.^[19] The snob effect built on precursor ideas from Thorstein Veblen's 1899 The Theory of the Leisure Class, which described conspicuous consumption as a means of social signaling and status display, providing an early conceptual foundation for exclusivity-driven demand.^[20]

Subsequent Contributions

In the decades following Harvey Leibenstein's introduction of the snob effect, economists in the 1960s and 1970s advanced its theoretical framework by incorporating interdependent consumer preferences, where individual utility depends on others' consumption choices. A key contribution came from Robert A. Pollak, who in his 1976 paper "Interdependent Preferences," formalized models of such preferences, demonstrating how snob effects arise from desires for social differentiation and can lead to upward-sloping demand curves under specific conditions.^[21] These developments facilitated integration into industrial organization theory, enabling analyses of market structures where firms exploit exclusivity to segment consumers and influence pricing strategies. By the 1980s, the snob effect gained prominence in discussions of status goods amid rising income inequality. Robert H. Frank's analysis linked snob-driven consumption to positional goods, arguing that such behaviors exacerbate inequality as individuals compete for relative status through visible expenditures, often at the expense of overall welfare. This work highlighted how snob effects perpetuate cycles of emulation and distinction in stratified societies. The 1980s and beyond saw a revival of the snob effect within behavioral economics, emphasizing psychological and social signaling in decision-making. Concurrently, extensions in luxury markets drew from Pierre Bourdieu's concept of cultural capital, portraying snob effects as mechanisms for accumulating symbolic distinction through tastes and possessions that reinforce class boundaries. Post-2000 integrations have embedded the snob effect in network economics, where negative externalities counteract bandwagon dynamics, as seen in analyses of compatibility and adoption in technology markets. Recent studies further explore its role in social media, showing how platforms amplify exclusivity signals, driving snob consumption among users seeking differentiation via curated displays of luxury. Game-theoretic models, such as those examining sophisticated consumer strategies, illustrate how snobs and followers interact to shape demand for conspicuous goods in digital environments.

Real-World Applications

Luxury Goods and Branding

In luxury markets, the snob effect manifests through consumers' aversion to widespread adoption, where high prices and constrained supply erect barriers that enhance a product's prestige as a marker of distinction. This dynamic incentivizes brands to calibrate availability carefully, as scaling production can erode desirability; for instance, when Louis Vuitton pursued mass-market expansions in the late 20th century, including broader distribution and logo-heavy designs, it risked diluting its aura of rarity, leading affluent buyers to migrate toward less ubiquitous alternatives to sustain their sense of uniqueness.^[22] To preserve snob appeal amid such pressures, luxury houses deploy deliberate branding tactics centered on scarcity and authenticity. Waitlists and limited editions create artificial barriers, fostering anticipation and elevating perceived value, while robust anti-counterfeit measures—such as advanced authentication technologies and aggressive legal enforcement—ensure that only genuine items signal elite status. Hermès masterfully applies these with its Birkin bag, intentionally capping production and requiring prospective buyers to cultivate relationships through prior purchases, often resulting in wait times exceeding several years to underscore the bag's role as an exclusive status emblem.^[23] A parallel case is Rolex, where surging demand in emerging economies during the 2000s and 2010s broadened accessibility and softened its connotation of refined exclusivity, prompting the brand to introduce segmented, ultra-selective lines like the Daytona and Submariner variants with protracted waitlists and bespoke customizations. These strategies reaffirm the snob effect by repositioning the watches as attainable only to the most discerning clientele, thereby mitigating defection to even rarer competitors. In the realm of fashion, the snob effect manifests through the use of designer clothing and accessories as badges of distinction, allowing individuals to signal exclusivity and superior social standing within peer groups. When a fashion item gains widespread popularity, such as a pattern adopted by lower social classes, snob consumers often abandon it to preserve its rarity as a marker of elite taste, thereby maintaining interpersonal differentiation.^[24] Historically, this dynamic has driven shifts in elite preferences; for instance, fur coats, once a hallmark of wealth and status among upper classes due to their scarcity and craftsmanship, declined in prestige within elite circles as mass production in the 20th century made them accessible to broader audiences, prompting affluent consumers to seek alternative symbols of distinction.^[25] In contemporary contexts, the rise of "quiet luxury" trends exemplifies this effect, where high-status individuals favor unbranded or subtly marked garments from heritage brands like Loro Piana or The Row, eschewing visible logos to signal refined discernment to knowledgeable peers rather than broadcasting wealth to the masses.^[26] Within social groups, snob behavior in fashion reinforces hierarchies by encouraging switches to niche labels, such as artisanal or limited-edition pieces from emerging designers, which serve as subtle cues of cultural capital and taste superiority. This selective adoption not only excludes those outside the in-group but also perpetuates vertical social stratification, as consumers curate wardrobes to align with aspirational networks.^[27]^[28] Unlike the Veblen effect's emphasis on overt conspicuous consumption for broad status display, the snob effect in fashion prioritizes horizontal signaling among equals to affirm exclusivity.^[29]

Empirical Analysis

Key Studies and Findings

A meta-analysis of conspicuous consumption studies indicates that these effects are strongest in high-income segments, where social signaling is paramount.^[30] Recent empirical research, such as a 2023 study on luxury yachting in Fiji, utilized structural equation modeling on data from foreign tourists (n= unspecified in abstract, but focused sample) and found the snob effect to be a major determinant of patronage, alongside hedonic and bandwagon effects, highlighting exclusivity-seeking in experiential luxury consumption.^[31]

Criticisms and Limitations

One major challenge in studying the snob effect lies in accurately measuring it, as it is often confounded with related phenomena such as the Veblen effect (where demand rises with price due to perceived prestige) and income effects (where higher earnings enable luxury purchases). Researchers frequently rely on surveys, market share proxies, or self-reported motivations, but these methods introduce confounding variables like social desirability bias or unmeasured reference group influences, making isolation of the snob effect—defined as demand decreasing with increased popularity—particularly difficult. For instance, no fully validated instruments exist to disentangle it from bandwagon tendencies, where demand increases with popularity.^[32] Theoretically, the snob effect model assumes rational, universal status-seeking behavior among consumers, yet it overlooks significant cultural variations that can alter its applicability. Empirical evidence indicates that ethnic and regional differences influence the perceived snob value of luxury goods; for example, North Indian consumers exhibit higher snob and uniqueness motivations compared to South, East, or West Indian groups, suggesting that the effect is not uniform across diverse populations. This highlights a limitation in Leibenstein's framework, which does not account for how cultural norms around exclusivity and social differentiation vary globally, potentially overgeneralizing Western-centric assumptions of exclusivity-driven demand.^[33] Additionally, post-2000 globalization and the democratization of luxury markets—through wider accessibility via e-commerce and mass production—may dilute the snob effect by eroding perceived exclusivity, leading to reduced purchase intentions among traditional high-status consumers who value rarity. Studies show that when low-status groups adopt democratized luxury brands, it triggers abandonment and lowers desirability (e.g., purchase intentions dropping to M = 2.78 on a 7-point scale), countering the exclusivity premise central to the snob effect. However, this dilution is not universal, as high-status adoption can mitigate the impact, underscoring the model's sensitivity to market evolution.^[34] Empirically, many investigations suffer from small sample sizes and reliance on pre-digital era data, limiting generalizability to modern contexts. For example, surveys often draw from limited populations (e.g., n = 282 in online studies), which may not capture diverse behaviors and introduce selection biases. Emerging evidence from social media platforms indicates that increased visibility can influence conspicuous consumption through snob and bandwagon dynamics, with social media mediating the relationship and potentially amplifying prestige via sharing, particularly for aspirational luxury items. These limitations highlight the need for larger, longitudinal datasets incorporating digital consumption patterns to validate the effect's persistence.^[35]

References

[1]
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
effect of the price change into a price effect and a snob effect. In. Figure 3 we see that the net increase in the quantity demanded due to the reduction in ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[2]
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand
- **Abstract**: Not directly accessible; content available only as a PDF requiring subscription.
[3]
[PDF] price elasticities with bandwagon, snob and veblen - Paul Ormerod
Section 5 describes the impact of the bandwagon and snob effects with a completely connected network, making them directly comparable to those of Leibenstein.
[4]
(PDF) The Snop Effect in the Consumption of Luxury Goods
Oct 30, 2025 · The snob effect (SE) happens when customers seek out exclusive luxury goods to separate themselves from the crowd and to deviate from accepted ...
[5]
[PDF] Network Externalities and Demand Concepts
Example of snob effect: If too many people already own a Rolex Daytona 1987 Special, my demand for that watch will diminish as it is no longer “cool” to own one ...
[6]
Snobs, bandwagons, and the origin of social customs in consumer ...
Socially inefficient consumption norms, giving rise to bandwagon and snob effects, are generated by producers that maximize their intertemporal profit. We ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[7]
[PDF] Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
Oct 1, 2001 · with our definition of snob behaviour. It therefore follows that the snob effect is never greater than the price effect. It follows, also ...
[8]
[PDF] Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers
In this case, the individual demand curves shift down or to the left as total demand rises, reflecting the snob effect: as other people's consumption rises, an ...<|separator|>
[9]
Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on ...
The unpopular choice tendency has significant direct effect on snob luxury consumption. The avoidance of similarity dimension enhances purchase intention of ...
[10]
[PDF] Snob Effects, Exclusivity, and Competition Intensity - Beck eLibrary
We introduce the concepts “degree of exclusivity” and snob-effect strength and show how firms can benefit from fostering exclusivity. Solving a duopoly model ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
The Snop Effect in the Consumption of Luxury Goods
Power of the snob effect may be resulting from the impact created upon the individual by rejecting his/her desire to improve his/her status. This effect type is ...
[12]
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
Leibenstein, Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 64, Issue 2, May 1950, Pages ...
[13]
[PDF] Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
This represents the desire of people to be exclusive; to be different; to dissociate themselves from the "common herd." By the Veblen effect we refer to the ...
[14]
Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption - jstor
Leibenstein, Harvey. "Bandwagon, Snob, and. Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers'. Demand." Quarterly Journal of Econom- ics, May 1950, 64(2), pp. 183 ...Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
[15]
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand ; Abstract, Conventional economic theory assumes that any individual's desires for goods ...
[16]
Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers ...
Snobs, bandwagons, and the origin of social customs in consumer behavior · Bandwagon and Snob effects : A Model of observable consumer behavior · Advertising, ...Missing: definitions | Show results with:definitions
[17]
The Rise of American Consumerism | American Experience - PBS
Wartime production had helped pull America's economy out of depression, and from the late 1940s on, young adults saw a remarkable rise in their spending power.
[18]
A Brief History of Consumer Culture | The MIT Press Reader
Jan 11, 2021 · Although the period after World War II is often identified as the beginning of the immense eruption of consumption across the industrialized ...
[19]
Harvey Leibenstein as a Pioneer of Our Time - jstor
At Princeton a paper he wrote for a departmental seminar, 'Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer ... ' Journal of Post Keynesian Economics ...
[20]
Conspicuous Consumption - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
As Leibenstein explains, the bandwagon effect refers to purchasing behavior in which consumer demand for a particular product is increased on the basis of other ...
[21]
Luxury brand management: keeping exclusivity in a competitive ...
Sep 12, 2025 · Once exclusivity is compromised, it's difficult (and expensive) to regain. Take Louis Vuitton, for instance. Its decision to limit the ...Why Exclusivity Matters In... · Managing The Luxury Product... · The Future Of Luxury...<|separator|>
[22]
[PDF] “It's Not a Bag. It's a Birkin!” Can the Demand for Hermès Birkin Bags ...
The conclusion focuses on the rise of social media and its effects on the snob value associated with the Birkin and its implications on demand. The model ...
[23]
[PDF] Buying Goods and Doing Good - University of Alabama School of Law
121. ROBERT H. FRANK, CHOOSING THE RIGHT POND: HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND THE QUEST FOR. STATUS (1985); see McAdams, supra note 34, at ...
[24]
[PDF] Cloak or Flaunt? The Fashion Dilemma
people is always detrimental to a product's signaling value and has a negative impact on consumers' social utility. This can be understood as the snob effect— ...
[25]
Design Innovation and Fashion Cycles - jstor
"bandwagon" and the "snob" effect. The bandwagon effect describes the idea that demand for a commodity may increase if others are consuming it, while the snob ...
[26]
History of fur in fashion - International Talent Support
Nov 17, 2016 · In the last century advancements in processing pelts made fur and leather available to the masses. This changed fur's status symbol connotation.Missing: snob effect elite circles
[27]
Quiet Luxury: The Art of Understated Wealth - EHL Insights
Aug 18, 2025 · As consumers become more experienced in luxury consumption, their inclination to signal status vertically to lower social classes diminishes.Missing: snob effect
[28]
The Tension Between Conspicuous Consumption and Quiet Luxury
Jun 24, 2024 · Quiet luxury renounces prominent logos and ostentatious displays of wealth by embracing the understated luxury fundamentals of quality with ...Missing: snob effect
[29]
[PDF] Luxury fashion brands on social media: a study of young consumers ...
Aug 26, 2013 · “social stratification” still existed. Luxury brands then became a way to recognize people that were of a higher social rank – due to their ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
Are Luxury Brand Labels and "Green" Labels Costly Signals of ...
Feb 7, 2017 · According to the theory, the extra cost of such products is a signal of social status and wealth and leads to advantages in social interactions ...
[31]
[PDF] 5. Fulfilling social needs through luxury consumption - INSEAD
Since Leibenstein's (1950) seminal article separating bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in consumers' demand for luxury goods, significant efforts have ...
[32]
Conspicuous Consumption, Pure Profits, and the Luxury Tax | NBER
Sep 1, 1992 · Under identifiable conditions, the model generates Veblen effects: utility is positively related to the price of the good consumed.
[33]
Conspicuous consumption: A meta-analytic review of its ...
Conspicuous consumption: A meta-analytic review of its antecedents ... View PDFView articleView in Scopus Google Scholar. Bearden and Etzel, 1982. W.O. ...
[34]
[PDF] Do followers think fast? Studying the relationship between the ... - http
Non-functional demands underlie the bandwagon effect, the snob effect and the Veblen effect. ... A number of possible methodological limitations can be identified ...
[35]
Influence of Ethnicity on Uniqueness & Snob Value in Purchase ...
Nov 20, 2014 · This study aims to study how ethnicity of people influences two main dimensions of luxury value namely uniqueness and snob value.
[36]
When Luxury Loses Its Luster: How Democratization Affects Traditional Luxury Consumers
### Summary of Main Findings on Democratization of Luxury Brands and Snob Effects/Exclusivity
[37]
[PDF] Effect of Social Media on Conspicuous Consumption through ...
Apr 12, 2023 · This study measures how individuals consume conspicuously by exhibiting the bandwagon effect or snob effects in social media. In the study, it ...