Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solar urticaria

Solar urticaria is a rare chronic acquired disorder characterized by the rapid onset of urticarial lesions, including , , and , on sun-exposed skin following exposure to (UV) or visible light, typically within minutes and resolving within hours. It affects less than 0.5% of patients with urticaria and about 7% of those with photodermatoses, with a age of onset around 35 years and a slight predominance in females. The condition arises from an immediate reaction, likely mediated by (IgE), where sunlight activates a in the skin that triggers and release of . Clinically, solar urticaria presents with intense itching, stinging, or burning sensations, along with red wheals or raised patches that appear on exposed areas such as the face, neck, arms, and hands shortly after brief sun exposure, often less than 30 minutes. In severe cases, systemic symptoms like , , or may occur if larger skin areas are affected, significantly impairing and limiting outdoor activities. The triggering wavelengths vary among individuals, spanning from UVB (around 300 nm) to visible light (up to 500 nm), and certain medications, such as , can exacerbate sensitivity. is confirmed through phototesting, which identifies the minimal dose of light required to induce symptoms and specifies the action spectrum. Management focuses on prevention and symptom control, beginning with strict sun avoidance, protective , and broad-spectrum sunscreens that block both and UVB rays. First-line involves oral antihistamines, such as H1-blockers, to inhibit release, often requiring higher doses than for typical urticaria. For refractory cases, options include phototherapy for gradual desensitization, cyclosporine, or biologic agents like , which has shown efficacy in reducing symptoms by targeting IgE. The prognosis is variable; while often chronic, occurs in about 15% of cases after 5 years and 25% after 10 years, though many patients experience persistent symptoms necessitating long-term management.

Overview

Definition

Solar urticaria is a rare chronic inducible urticaria classified as a photodermatosis, characterized by an abnormal immunologic reaction in the skin triggered by exposure to specific wavelengths of or artificial light sources. Urticaria, commonly known as , refers to transient, itchy wheals resulting from degranulation and vascular permeability changes, while photodermatoses encompass various cutaneous responses to , ranging from inflammatory to neoplastic. As a subtype of physical urticaria, solar urticaria accounts for less than 0.5% of all urticaria cases and approximately 7% of photodermatoses, typically manifesting in young adults but occasionally in neonates or the elderly. The condition features a rapid onset of symptoms within minutes of light exposure, including urticarial wheals, , pruritus, and a stinging or burning sensation confined to exposed areas. These lesions, often edematous papules or plaques, resolve spontaneously without scarring, with 75% fading within one hour and complete clearance within 24 hours after cessation of exposure. In severe cases, systemic symptoms such as , , or may occur with extensive exposure, highlighting its potential to impair significantly. Solar urticaria is considered an IgE-mediated reaction, where photoactivated chromophores in the skin or serum trigger via IgE binding to high-affinity receptors. This distinguishes it from other photosensitivities, such as polymorphic light eruption, which involves delayed T-cell-mediated responses rather than immediate wheal formation. The action spectrum varies by patient, commonly involving A, B, or visible (300–500 nm), underscoring its chromophore-dependent nature.

Epidemiology

Solar urticaria is a rare photodermatosis, accounting for approximately 4% of photosensitive disorders and 7% of photodermatoses worldwide, while representing less than 0.5% of all urticaria cases overall. Population-based estimates indicate a of 0.92 per 100,000 and 3.1 per 100,000 in , with regional variability possibly due to underdiagnosis in areas without specialized photobiology centers. The condition predominantly affects young adults, with a typical onset between 20 and 40 years of age and a age of 35 years, though cases have been reported from infancy to the elderly. There is a female predominance, with ratios approaching 2:1, and no significant racial or ethnic bias, as it occurs across all types and geographic regions, though more cases are documented in temperate climates with established photobiology centers. Risk factors include associations with other forms of chronic inducible urticaria in 16-30% of cases, such as or . A history of is present in less than 30% of patients, and potential links to autoimmune conditions have been noted in subsets, though these are not primary drivers. Incidence appears stable over decades, with recent registry-based studies from 2023-2025 reaffirming its rarity and consistent demographic patterns.

Clinical Features

Signs and Symptoms

Solar urticaria manifests primarily through local reactions following exposure to or specific wavelengths of light. Patients typically experience an intense pruritus, stinging, or burning sensation that begins within 1 to 5 minutes of exposure, often accompanied by and the formation of edematous wheals or on sun-exposed areas such as the face, neck, and arms. These wheals appear as raised, red or white lesions with sharp margins, delineating the borders of exposed and sometimes extending slightly beyond edges. In a of 854 cases, 87.4% of patients reported pruritus or burning as the predominant symptom, with 81.4% developing or wheals; symptom onset occurred within <15 minutes in 94.8% of cases. The condition's progression is characterized by rapid onset and relatively quick . Wheals generally peak in within 15 to 30 minutes and resolve spontaneously within 30 minutes to 2 hours after cessation of , though in severe cases, symptoms may persist up to 24 hours; occurred ≤1 hour in 64.1% of reviewed cases. Notably, there is no residual pigmentation, scarring, or long-term changes following . Symptoms are dose-dependent, with the minimal erythema dose varying by individual and influenced by factors like and ; triggers include natural as well as artificial sources such as beds or fluorescent lights emitting , visible , or rarely UVB. release contributes to the wheal-and-flare response observed in affected . Systemic symptoms are uncommon but can occur with extensive exposure, affecting approximately 4.4% of patients and including , , , wheezing, , or resembling . Anaphylactic shock is rare, with no reported fatalities in reviewed cases. The condition profoundly impacts , often leading to avoidance behaviors such as limiting outdoor activities, wearing protective clothing, and to prevent episodes.

Classification

Solar urticaria is traditionally classified into six subtypes based on the action —the specific wavelengths of that provoke the urticarial response—a system established by Harber et al. in 1963 and further detailed in studies on wavelength dependence during the . This framework distinguishes variations in photoactivation mechanisms, such as photoallergen formation or involvement, and guides targeted phototesting and avoidance strategies, though overlaps between types are common. Type I is rare and triggered exclusively by UVB radiation (290–320 nm), involving immediate photoallergen formation in the patient's serum with positive passive transfer tests indicating an immunologic component. Type II, the most prevalent subtype (involving UVA in approximately 70% of cases), responds to UVA wavelengths (320–400 nm) and typically features IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to photoactivated chromophores present in normal skin. Type III is elicited by shorter visible light wavelengths (400–500 nm; blue-violet spectrum), allowing deeper dermal penetration and often co-occurring with other types due to broader solar exposure effects. Type IV, less frequent than Types II and III, is provoked by longer visible light (500–600 nm; yellow-orange spectrum) and may involve heat-independent mechanisms distinct from infrared sensitivity. Type V reacts to pure visible light across a broad range without reliance on a specific circulating , highlighting non-immunologic or direct activation pathways. Type VI demonstrates passive transfer of sensitivity via , suggesting a systemic circulating factor rather than solely local photoactivation, and is associated with visible light triggers around 400 nm.

Pathophysiology

Etiology

Solar urticaria is primarily triggered by exposure to specific wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, ranging from ultraviolet B (UVB, 280–315 nm) to ultraviolet A (UVA, 315–400 nm) and visible light (400–700 nm), which are absorbed by cutaneous chromophores such as skin proteins or porphyrins. The reaction typically manifests within minutes of exposure and resolves rapidly upon cessation, distinguishing it from other photosensitive disorders. The photoallergen hypothesis posits that light-induced alteration of an endogenous generates a photoantigen, which then binds to IgE antibodies on mast cells, triggering and release. This model is supported by observations such as positive intradermal tests with photoirradiated patient serum, indicating a circulating factor involved in . Although the exact remains unidentified and may vary between individuals, this mechanism underscores the immunologic basis of the condition. Genetic factors play a limited role, with rare familial cases reported that suggest an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. Approximately 30% of patients have a personal history of , such as or , indicating a possible predisposition in those with allergic backgrounds, though no specific genetic mutations like those in have been conclusively linked. The disorder is typically acquired and idiopathic, with onset often in adulthood and no clear precipitating event in most cases. Associations with exogenous factors include certain medications, such as tetracyclines or , which may exacerbate in susceptible individuals. Less commonly, it has been linked to underlying conditions like infections (e.g., hepatitis C) or in fewer than 10% of cases. Importantly, solar urticaria is not induced by heat alone, as demonstrated by reactions to monochromatic light sources without thermal components, differentiating it from .

Cellular Mechanisms

Solar urticaria is characterized by an IgE-mediated immunological pathway in which photoantigens, formed by the interaction of specific wavelengths of with cutaneous chromophores, bind to IgE antibodies on the surface of cells and , leading to rapid and the release of vasoactive mediators within seconds of exposure. This process triggers the characteristic urticarial wheals through cross-linking of high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) on these cells. The primary mediator released is , which induces and increased , while secondary mediators such as leukotrienes and prostaglandins contribute to prolonged inflammation and pruritus. Recent experimental findings from 2024 demonstrate that light exposure rapidly activates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 () in mast cells, particularly via at serine-727, which enhances proinflammatory production and recruitment, amplifying the local inflammatory response.00006-X/fulltext) In the , chromophores such as urocanic acid absorb ultraviolet radiation, generating or acting as haptens that form photoallergens capable of eliciting the IgE response in deeper dermal layers where mast cells reside. These photoallergens are thought to circulate or diffuse to interact with sensitized cells, though the exact chromophores remain unidentified in most cases. Longer exposures to certain wavelengths can induce a tolerance phenomenon through inhibitory spectra, where irradiation with longer wavelengths (e.g., or visible light) immediately following or preceding the action (e.g., UVB) suppresses wheal formation by modulating the photoallergen production or responsiveness. This biphasic spectral interaction suggests a regulatory mechanism that prevents excessive during prolonged sun exposure. In vitro models have confirmed the presence of photoallergen-specific IgE, as patient serum exposed to wavelengths induces degranulation when transferred to naive skin or cell cultures, supporting the photoallergic hypothesis. No direct genetic mutations have been identified as causative in solar urticaria, indicating it arises from acquired immunological dysregulation rather than inherited defects.

Diagnosis

Clinical Assessment

The clinical assessment of solar urticaria begins with a detailed history to establish the temporal relationship between sun exposure and symptom onset, typically occurring within minutes—often less than 30 minutes—of exposure to or visible light. Patients report symptoms confined to sun-exposed areas, such as the face, , and hands, though reactions may extend under thin ; covered regions remain unaffected. The urticarial lesions generally resolve spontaneously within 1 to 24 hours after cessation of exposure, without residual changes. Aggravating factors include higher light intensity, longer exposure duration, and conditions like clear weather that enhance penetration. Associated symptoms are primarily local, such as intense pruritus or burning, with systemic manifestations like , wheezing, or syncope being rare but noteworthy. During , appears normal in the absence of recent exposure, with no evidence of , , or scarring between episodes. Acute lesions manifest as transient erythematous wheals or edematous papules strictly in photo-exposed distributions, often demarcated sharply by edges, confirming the photo-induced nature. Patient-reported outcome measures aid in quantifying ; the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), adapted to assess wheal and severity in relation to light exposure over seven days (UAS7), evaluates symptom intensity. Additionally, the (DLQI) captures the impact on daily functioning, with mean scores around 7.4 indicating moderate impairment in affected individuals. Red flags in the history include reports of systemic involvement, such as or , signaling potential anaphylactic risk that warrants urgent evaluation. A personal history of atopy (e.g., allergic rhinitis) is present in less than 30% of cases and may suggest overlapping urticarial tendencies, while prior episodes of other physical urticarias should prompt consideration of mimics.

Phototesting

Prior to phototesting, H1-antihistamines should be discontinued for at least 3 days, and systemic corticosteroids for 7 days, to avoid interference with results. Phototesting serves as the cornerstone for confirming the of solar urticaria by provoking urticarial reactions under controlled exposure, distinguishing it from other photosensitive disorders through objective assessment. The procedure typically involves exposing small areas of non-exposed , such as the back or , to incremental doses of and visible sources to elicit wheal formation. Common sources include broadband UVB (290-320 nm), (320-400 nm), and visible (400-700 nm), delivered via fluorescent tubes, arc lamps, monochromators, or solar simulators positioned 10-15 cm from the . Doses are administered in a graduated manner, starting from low levels—such as 0.4-6.3 J/cm² for , 1-10 J/cm² for UVA-1, and 17-40 J/cm² for UVB—and increasing stepwise to identify the for reaction, with exposures lasting from seconds to minutes depending on the source intensity. Reactions are observed immediately and monitored for up to 30 minutes post-exposure, or at intervals every 10 minutes for up to one hour, noting the onset of , pruritus, and wheal development that typically resolves within minutes to hours. A key objective of phototesting is to determine the action spectrum, the specific s triggering the urticaria, and calculate the minimal urticaria dose (), defined as the lowest required to produce a visible wheal of at least 5-10 mm in diameter. Testing systematically covers UVB, , and visible ranges, often using monochromatic light for precision, to map sensitivities—-1 (340-400 nm) implicated in about 89% of cases, in 70%, UVB in 44%, and visible light (e.g., at 543-550 nm) in 37%. The varies widely by patient and wavelength, guiding personalized avoidance strategies and therapeutic planning, such as photohardening. For instance, a positive response in the range may indicate Type II solar urticaria within the classification system based on action spectra. Safety protocols are essential during phototesting to mitigate risks of systemic reactions, including in severe cases. Exposures begin at subthreshold doses to avoid widespread flares, with sessions conducted in controlled clinical environments equipped for emergency resuscitation, such as epinephrine availability. from light sources is minimized using filters to prevent confounding responses. Interpretation hinges on the presence of a wheal exceeding the site's diameter, confirming light-induced ; negative results may require repeat testing with natural or alternative sources if artificial fails to replicate triggers. Limitations of phototesting include potential false negatives, particularly in mild or intermittent cases where reactions do not manifest despite clinical history, occurring in up to 12% of tested patients. Variability in and action spectra can occur over time due to factors like seasonal changes, disease progression, or prior treatments, necessitating serial testing for accuracy. Additionally, the use of artificial light may not fully mimic complex natural solar exposure, potentially underestimating sensitivities in the full spectrum.

Differential Diagnosis

Solar urticaria requires careful differentiation from other photosensitive disorders and urticarial conditions, as its rarity and rapid onset of wheals following light exposure can overlap with reactions to physical stimuli or systemic diseases. Among photosensitive disorders, polymorphic light eruption presents with delayed papules, plaques, or vesicles appearing hours to days after sun exposure and persisting longer, in contrast to the immediate urticarial wheals of solar urticaria that resolve within 1-2 hours. Hydroa vacciniforme, primarily affecting children, features vesicular eruptions on sun-exposed areas that evolve into umbilicated lesions and varioliform scars, without the transient whealing seen in solar urticaria. manifests as intense burning pain and edema shortly after light exposure but lacks prominent wheals and is marked by elevated protoporphyrin levels in erythrocytes or feces. Other urticarias include , which produces small, punctate wheals triggered by heat, exercise, or sweating rather than light itself, though solar heat may occasionally simulate it. develops upon skin contact with water, irrespective of light, resulting in burning or stinging without light specificity. Physical urticarias without light triggers, such as dermographism or , respond to mechanical or thermal stimuli but not reproducibly to photic exposure. Systemic mimics encompass , particularly acute cutaneous forms with malar , which is chronic, butterfly-distributed, and often accompanied by systemic features like arthralgias or positive antinuclear antibodies, differing from the acute, light-limited wheals of solar urticaria. Distinguishing features of solar urticaria include its immediate wheal-and-flare response to specific wavelengths of light (typically or visible light) within minutes, rapid resolution, and absence of scarring or porphyrin abnormalities in blood or urine, which help exclude delayed photosensitivities and porphyrias. Phototesting aids in confirmation by eliciting the reaction while ruling out mimics. Rare overlaps exist, with solar urticaria co-occurring with other physical urticarias, such as heat urticaria, in up to 16% of cases.

Management

First-Line Treatments

The first-line treatments for solar urticaria focus on pharmacological interventions to block -mediated responses, thereby reducing wheal formation, pruritus, and triggered by exposure. Second-generation H1-antihistamines, such as (typically initiated at 10 mg daily) or fexofenadine, are recommended as the initial therapy due to their efficacy in symptom control and favorable safety profile with minimal sedation. These agents work by antagonizing H1 receptors on mast cells and endothelial cells, interrupting the release cascade central to the of solar urticaria. Dosing can be escalated up to four times the standard dose (e.g., up to 40 mg daily) if initial treatment provides incomplete relief, following international guidelines for inducible urticarias. A and of 21 studies involving 376 patients reported a pooled response rate of 83% (partial or complete) with H1-antihistamines, though complete resolution was achieved in only 7.7%, indicating partial control in the majority of cases. For patients with severe pruritus unresponsive to non-sedating options, first-generation H1-antihistamines like hydroxyzine (25-50 mg at bedtime) may be added or substituted, particularly for nocturnal symptoms, despite their sedating effects. Adjunctive H2-antihistamines, such as famotidine (20-40 mg twice daily) or (150 mg twice daily), can be considered in combination with H1-blockers for incomplete responders, as they target gastric and vascular H2 receptors to enhance overall blockade, though evidence for this in solar urticaria specifically remains limited. In one cohort of 29 patients, H1-antihistamines provided partial efficacy in 58.6% and complete in 17.2%, while H2-antihistamines were effective in 42.9% of those trialed as add-ons. to higher doses or combinations should adhere to the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines, prioritizing up to fourfold H1 dosing before advancing therapies. Supportive non-pharmacological measures are integral to first-line management, emphasizing trigger avoidance to prevent symptom flares. Patients should use protective clothing, broad-spectrum sunscreens with SPF 50+ that block both UVA and UVB rays (ideally with high UVA protection factors like PA++++), and window UV filters to minimize exposure to eliciting wavelengths, often in the UVA range for solar urticaria. Cool compresses applied to affected areas provide immediate symptomatic relief by reducing inflammation and itching. Monitoring involves maintaining a symptom diary to track exposure, response to treatment, and quality-of-life impacts, alongside vigilance for side effects such as drowsiness from sedating antihistamines or gastrointestinal upset from H2-blockers. Regular follow-up assesses disease activity using tools like the Urticaria Control Test to guide adjustments.

Phototherapy

Phototherapy serves as a key desensitization strategy for solar urticaria patients who do not respond adequately to medications, involving controlled exposure to specific wavelengths of light to gradually build tolerance to . This approach aims to prevent urticarial reactions by raising the minimal urticaria dose (), established through prior phototesting, and is tailored to the patient's as determined by disease classification. The underlying mechanism of phototherapy in solar urticaria involves administering sub-urticarial doses of light that induce repeated, non-symptomatic , potentially leading to exhaustion of mast cell mediators and reduced reactivity over time. Additionally, it may promote immunomodulatory effects, such as the expansion of regulatory T-cells, which help suppress the response to photoactivated chromophores. These processes collectively enhance cutaneous tolerance to the inciting wavelengths without triggering full-blown urticaria. Standard protocols typically employ UVA1 phototherapy (340-400 nm) or PUVA (psoralen plus ), beginning at approximately 50% of the patient's baseline and escalating doses weekly to avoid flares. Treatments are administered 3-5 times per week, with a full course spanning 4-12 weeks, followed by maintenance sessions as needed to sustain tolerance. For UVA1, initial doses often start at 10-20 J/cm², increasing by 20-40% per session, while PUVA incorporates oral or topical 2 hours prior to UVA exposure at 0.5-2 J/cm² initially. A 2025 meta-analysis reported a partial or complete response in 89.8% of patients (11 studies, 145 patients), with complete response in 39.8%, often allowing increased tolerance to light exposure, though relapse is common upon discontinuation, often necessitating periodic booster sessions to maintain benefits. Treatment variants are selected based on the urticaria type; for Type I solar urticaria (primarily UVB-sensitive), narrowband UVB (311 nm) phototherapy is preferred, starting at 50% MUD and escalating to full tolerance over 2-4 weeks. In Type III cases (visible light-sensitive), desensitization using LED sources emitting visible light (400-700 nm) has shown success, with gradual exposure protocols mirroring UVA1 but focused on the visible spectrum to target the specific action spectrum. Potential risks include initial disease flares during early sessions, erythema, pruritus, or burns if doses exceed tolerance, particularly with PUVA due to psoralen photosensitization. Phototherapy is contraindicated in patients with coexisting photosensitive disorders, such as or , to avoid exacerbating underlying conditions.

Biological Therapies

Biological therapies represent a targeted approach for managing refractory solar urticaria, particularly when first-line antihistamines fail, by modulating key immunological pathways involved in mast cell activation. Omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, is the primary biologic agent used in this context. Administered subcutaneously at a dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks, omalizumab binds to free IgE, preventing its interaction with high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) on mast cells and basophils, thereby reducing free IgE levels and downregulating FcεRI expression on these cells. This mechanism attenuates IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation, which is central to the photoallergic response in solar urticaria. A 2025 of nine studies involving 76 patients demonstrated omalizumab's high efficacy, with a pooled response rate of 93.2% (95% CI, 73.8–98.5%) and complete remission in 68.4% (95% CI, 48.5–83.2%) of cases, typically achieved within 2–3 months. It shows particular superiority in patients unresponsive to antihistamines, with rapid onset of symptom relief often observed within weeks, as confirmed by 2024–2025 studies. Long-term use, extending up to 5 years, has been reported as safe, with no increased risk of severe adverse events compared to shorter durations. Common side effects are rare and primarily limited to mild injection-site reactions. Emerging alternatives include , an anti-IL-4/IL-13 , which may benefit patients with atopic overlaps, though data remain limited to case reports and small series for solar urticaria specifically. Monitoring during biologic therapy involves serial assessments of total IgE levels and Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) to evaluate response and guide dose adjustments. Per 2023 updates from the European Academy of and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), is recommended as a second-line option for refractory cases.

Advanced Interventions

In cases of solar urticaria refractory to first-line therapies and biological agents such as , advanced interventions including immunosuppressants and procedures may be considered under multidisciplinary supervision. Cyclosporine, an immunosuppressant that inhibits T-cell activation by blocking calcineurin-mediated signaling, has been used at doses of 3-5 mg/kg/day in severe instances. A seminal demonstrated reduced to UVA, UVB, and visible light with a dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day, allowing the patient to tolerate up to one hour of sun exposure with minimal symptoms, though effects waned 1-2 weeks after discontinuation. However, a 2025 systematic review of 11 patients reported only 18% response rate, with 45% experiencing adverse events like chest leading to treatment cessation. Close monitoring for , , and infection is essential due to these risks. Plasmapheresis, which removes circulating photoallergens and IgE from plasma, offers temporary relief in high-risk cases, particularly those with anaphylactic potential. Typically involving 4-6 sessions over 10-14 days, it has shown transient improvement lasting weeks in small series, with one achieving complete remission post-procedure. A 2024 highlighted sustained benefits from serial (42 sessions over five years, administered every 6-9 weeks), increasing minimal urticaria dose thresholds across UV and visible spectra and enabling 20 minutes of sun tolerance without symptoms in a unresponsive to prior therapies. Risks include hypotonic crises and anaphylactoid reactions, observed in up to two-thirds of treated cases in limited data. Other options for autoimmune-associated subsets include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab. IVIG, administered at 1.4-2.5 g/kg over 2-5 days in 1-3 courses, induced complete remission in 71% of seven severe cases, with durations of 4 to over 12 months alongside antihistamines. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting B cells, has shown efficacy in case reports of recalcitrant , achieving up to 10 months of remission in patients failing multiple therapies, though specific solar urticaria data remain anecdotal and limited. Limited data from small studies suggest variable efficacy: e.g., 71% complete remission with IVIG in 7 patients, 18% response with cyclosporine in 11 patients, and transient benefits with in case reports. These approaches are reserved for severe, therapy-resistant disease due to risks of infection, , and organ toxicity, emphasizing the need for specialist oversight.

Prognosis and Complications

Disease Course

Solar urticaria typically manifests in young adulthood, with a onset age of 35 years, though cases have been reported in neonates and the elderly. The condition follows a course characterized by recurrent episodes triggered by sun exposure, with symptoms resolving in about 75% of cases within one hour and fully within 24 hours if exposure ceases. Approximately 50% of patients remain symptomatic 10 to 15 years after disease onset, reflecting its persistent nature in the majority of cases. Spontaneous remission is uncommon but possible, occurring in an estimated 15% of patients after 5 years and 25% after 10 years. In a of 87 patients with idiopathic solar urticaria, the majority continued to experience symptoms beyond 5 and 10 years, underscoring the disease's tendency toward chronicity. A 2024 ambispective study of 41 patients reported complete remission in 36.6%, primarily among those managed with antihistamines alone, with a follow-up of 60 months; remission was associated with higher baseline urticaria control scores. Remission is associated with better initial disease control, as indicated by higher baseline urticaria control test scores. Factors associated with a more prolonged course include a longer duration of symptoms before evaluation and an age greater than 40 years at evaluation. The disease exhibits variability influenced by environmental factors, with seasonal worsening commonly observed in spring and summer due to heightened exposure, potentially exacerbating symptom frequency and severity. Some patients experience gradual improvement with advancing age, though this is not universal. Patient trajectories range from mild, intermittent episodes that minimally disrupt daily life to severe, persistent forms that significantly limit outdoor activities and quality of life. Therapeutic interventions can alter the course, with approximately 83% of patients achieving partial or complete response to antihistamines, rising to higher rates with escalated therapies like phototherapy or biologics; however, relapse occurs in up to 80% of cases following discontinuation.

Potential Risks

Solar urticaria, though primarily a dermatological condition, carries acute risks of systemic involvement in severe cases, including , , and syncope, which can occur following extensive skin exposure to . These complications arise due to massive release from mast cells, potentially leading to life-threatening reactions that require immediate intervention, such as epinephrine administration for management. Such events are rare but emphasize the need for prompt recognition and avoidance of triggers. Chronic avoidance of sunlight to prevent flares can result in , as natural synthesis of the vitamin relies on UV exposure, potentially leading to levels below 50 nmol/L in affected individuals. This deficiency may necessitate supplementation or dietary adjustments to maintain adequate stores. Additionally, the condition's impact on daily life often leads to significant psychological distress, with studies on chronic urticaria subtypes like solar urticaria showing anxiety and depression prevalence around 30-40% among patients, linked to restricted outdoor activities and impaired . No established association exists between solar urticaria and , distinguishing it from other disorders that may increase risk through chronic inflammation or genetic factors. Patients with solar urticaria may experience heightened risk when sunlight exposure overlaps with cofactors like exercise or nonsteroidal drugs (NSAIDs), potentially triggering pseudoallergic reactions in susceptible individuals. Ongoing monitoring includes periodic evaluation of levels for those practicing strict sun avoidance, alongside assessment for systemic symptoms, as rare cases may show progression or coexistence with .

History

Early Recognition

The earliest documented description of solar urticaria appeared in 1719, when Borsch reported cases of induced by sun , though the mechanism was not fully elucidated at the time. In 1887, Veiel provided further evidence by demonstrating through experimental that the reaction was triggered specifically by solar light rays rather than , distinguishing it from thermal-induced conditions. A more comprehensive clinical report emerged in 1904 from Merklen, who detailed recurrent pruritus, , and wheal formation on sun-exposed skin, referring to the condition as "urticaria " in early medical literature. Additional cases were noted sporadically in journals during the 1900s to 1920s, underscoring its rarity and association with photodermatoses. The term "solar urticaria" was formally coined in 1923 by , who described a severe case in a 43-year-old with debilitating symptoms upon . Early accounts often confused solar urticaria with heat urticaria or eczematous reactions due to their shared occurrence in warm, sunny conditions and similar wheal-like appearances. This misconception persisted into the early until controlled light exposure experiments, such as those using artificial sources, confirmed its photo-specific nature by , establishing it as a distinct physical urticaria. In the , key observational studies, including those by Sulzberger and Baer, documented the rapid onset of wheals—typically within minutes—following direct exposure, further emphasizing the condition's immediacy and infrequency in through small case series. These reports highlighted the transient of lesions, resolving within hours without sequelae, and reinforced urticaria's classification among rare inducible urticarias. Diagnosis in the pre-phototesting era depended heavily on detailed histories of reproducible symptoms tied to exposure, as objective verification was limited. The evolution toward more precise methods began in the 1950s with initial analyses; for instance, studies using early monochromators identified specific and visible wavelengths as triggers, laying groundwork for targeted phototesting.

Key Milestones

The earliest documented account of solar urticaria appeared in 1719, when Friedrich Borsch described the condition in his medical dissertation De purpura urticata, quam vocant “die Nesselsucht”, noting urticarial eruptions following sun exposure. In 1887, Theodor Veiel provided a critical advancement by experimentally demonstrating that the urticarial response was elicited specifically by solar rays rather than heat from sources like stoves or candles, distinguishing it from thermal urticaria. Pierre Merklen offered a more detailed clinical in 1904, recognizing solar urticaria as a distinct photodermatosis involving rapid-onset wheals and confined to sun-exposed . The term "solar urticaria" was formally proposed in 1923 by William W. Duke, who reported a case of a 43-year-old woman developing severe itching, , and after sunlight exposure, likening it to other physical urticarias. Mid-20th-century investigations, including passive transfer experiments first reported by E. Rajka in 1942 and further explored in the 1960s and 1970s, established an IgE-mediated photoallergic mechanism, where photoactivated chromophores trigger degranulation and release. A seminal classification emerged in 1989 from Horio et al., dividing solar urticaria into two types based on the presence of detectable photoallergens and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity.

References

  1. [1]
    Solar Urticaria - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Solar urticaria is a chronic acquired photosensitivity disorder. It consists of recurrent episodes of urticaria rash developed on areas of the skin exposed ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    Solar urticaria - DermNet
    A stinging, itchy rash develops within minutes after a short period (less than 30 minutes) of sun exposure. The rash may look like weals and be red and swollen.
  3. [3]
    Sun allergy - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic
    Jul 19, 2024 · It describes several conditions that cause an itchy rash to form on the skin after being in sunlight or other sources of ultraviolet (UV) ...
  4. [4]
    Solar Urticaria: Practice Essentials, Background, Epidemiology
    Feb 27, 2025 · Solar urticaria is a rare, IgE-mediated, photodermatosis characterized by pruritus, stinging, erythema, and wheal formation after a brief period of exposure to ...
  5. [5]
    Solar Urticaria | Fitzpatrick's Dermatology, 9e - AccessMedicine
    Solar urticaria (SolU) is defined by the appearance of a whealing response within minutes of exposure to sunlight. SolU is a rare type of physical urticaria.
  6. [6]
    Solar urticaria: clinical characteristics, treatment effectiveness, long ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · Solar urticaria (SU), a relatively rare photosensitivity disease (1), is characterized by edematous erythema and wheals on areas exposed to ...
  7. [7]
    Solar urticaria involves rapid mast cell STAT3 activation and ...
    Jan 4, 2024 · We demonstrate IgE and FcεRI involvement, alongside mast cell activation with STAT3 phosphorylation, marked proinflammatory cytokine activation, ...
  8. [8]
    Urticaria | Nature Reviews Disease Primers
    Sep 15, 2022 · Autoallergic IgE-mediated mast cell activation was suggested in symptomatic dermographism, ColdU, solar urticaria and CholU by passive transfer ...
  9. [9]
    Solar Urticaria: Epidemiology and Clinical Phenotypes in a Spanish ...
    A total of 224 patients (141 women and 83 men) were included from 9 photobiology units. The mean age of the patients was 37.9 years (range, 3-73 years).Missing: prevalence demographics
  10. [10]
    Solar Urticaria - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Solar urticaria is a very rare type of physical urticaria that is triggered by sunlight, has a chronic course, and can often be difficult to control.
  11. [11]
    Solar urticaria - Orphanet
    Exact, prevalence and incidence of solar urticaria are not known. It is reported as representing only 4-8% of all photodermatosis presentations and estimated ...
  12. [12]
    Solar urticaria: clinical characteristics, treatment effectiveness, long ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · Only a few studies have collected epidemiological and photobiological data for SU (15, 16). Ethnic differences in skin color affect SU incidence ...Missing: prevalence demographics
  13. [13]
    Solar urticaria - British Association of Dermatologists
    Solar urticaria occurs when light causes the release of histamine from cells in the skin called mast cells. The mechanism of the interaction between light and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    IMMUNOLOGIC AND BIOPHYSICAL STUDIES IN SOLAR URTICARIA
    IMMUNOLOGIC AND BIOPHYSICAL STUDIES IN SOLAR URTICARIA. J Invest Dermatol. 1963 Dec:41:439-43. doi: 10.1038/jid.1963.138. Authors. L C HARBER, R M HOLLOWAY ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
  16. [16]
    Solar Urticaria: Clinical Features and Wavelength Dependence
    Solar Urticaria: Clinical Features and Wavelength Dependence. Margaret Ravits, MD; Robert B. Armstrong, MD; Leonard C. Harber, MD. Author Affiliations. From ...
  17. [17]
    Solar Urticaria: Epidemiology and Clinical Phenotypes in a Spanish ...
    Solar urticaria is a chronic inducible urticaria also classified as an idiopathic dermatosis. The objective of this paper is to define the phenotypic ...
  18. [18]
    Pathogenesis of solar urticaria: Classic perspectives and emerging ...
    In this review, we discuss the current understanding of solar urticaria pathogenesis and, by incorporating recent scientific and clinical observations ...
  19. [19]
    Solar Urticaria - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Other Inducible Urticarias.​​ Solar urticaria is defined by mast cell activation by certain wavelengths of solar radiation.
  20. [20]
    Pathogenesis of solar urticaria: Classic perspectives and emerging ...
    Nov 2, 2021 · Full Access. Pathogenesis of solar urticaria: Classic perspectives and emerging concepts. Sheila Mary McSweeney,. Corresponding Author. Sheila ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
  21. [21]
    Solar urticaria involves rapid mast cell STAT3 activation and ...
    Solar urticaria is characterized by rapid signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation in mast cells and involvement of multiple chemotactic ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Detection of Action, Inhibition and Augmentation Spectra in Solar ...
    The exposure to longer wavelengths immediately after the exposure inhibited the development of urticaria. Conversely, the irradiation of longer wavelengths ...
  23. [23]
    Solar Urticaria Clinical Presentation: History, Physical Examination
    Feb 27, 2025 · An accurate history is important for the diagnosis of solar urticaria because of the transient nature of the eruption.Missing: atopy | Show results with:atopy
  24. [24]
    Clinical and photobiological response in eight patients with solar ...
    Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  25. [25]
    Solar urticaria: clinical characteristics, treatment effectiveness, long ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · Solar urticaria (SU), a relatively rare skin inflammatory and photosensitivity disease, is often resistant to standard urticaria treatment.Missing: causes | Show results with:causes
  26. [26]
    Solar Urticaria Workup: Phototesting, Laboratory Studies, Histologic ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · Solar urticaria has a wide action spectrum. Perform phototesting using broadband ultraviolet B (UV-B; 290-320 nm), UV-A (320-400 nm), and visible light sources.
  27. [27]
    Solar Urticaria: A Report of 25 Cases and Difficulties in Phototesting
    SOLAR URTICARIA can be defined as an idiopathic photodermatosis characterized by the occurrence of itchy erythematous or urticarial lesions that are provoked ...
  28. [28]
    Solar urticaria: Clinic, diagnostic, course and therapy management ...
    Nov 16, 2020 · The aim of the phototesting was to confirm the diagnosis, classify the action spectrum, and determine the minimum urticaria dose (MUD) which ...
  29. [29]
    Solar Urticaria Differential Diagnoses - Medscape Reference
    Feb 27, 2025 · Differential Diagnoses · Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (ACLE) · Acute Urticaria · Berloque Dermatitis · Cholinergic Urticaria · Congenital ...
  30. [30]
    Hydroa vacciniforme and solar urticaria - PubMed
    Hydroa vacciniforme (HV) and solar urticaria (SU) are uncommon immunologically mediated photodermatoses. HV occurs almost exclusively in children.Missing: differential | Show results with:differential
  31. [31]
    Erythropoietic Protoporphyria - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Solar urticaria: Solar urticaria is a condition in which exposure to sunlight causes urticaria. Like EPP, symptoms often develop within minutes. Symptoms of ...Continuing Education Activity · History and Physical · Differential Diagnosis<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Urticaria (Hives): a complete overview - DermNet
    Urticaria is characterised by very itchy weals (hives), with or without surrounding erythematous flares.Cholinergic Urticaria · Acute urticaria · Chronic urticaria · Heat urticaria
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Efficacy of Therapies for Solar Urticaria: A Systematic Review and ...
    Solar urticaria is a rare and debilitating photodermatosis classified as a subtype of inducible (physical) urticaria. It is characterized by the rapid onset of ...
  35. [35]
    Urticaria Treatment & Management - Medscape Reference
    Oct 15, 2025 · Adjunctive therapy​​ H2 antihistamines (eg, famotidine, cimetidine) may be added to H1 blockers. The combination may improve symptom control, ...Missing: ranitidine | Show results with:ranitidine
  36. [36]
    Solar Urticaria Treatment & Management - Medscape Reference
    Feb 27, 2025 · This is because the disease involves immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mast cell degranulation with consequent histamine release.Missing: photoantigens | Show results with:photoantigens
  37. [37]
    Urticaria - Dermatologic Disorders - Merck Manuals
    Evaluation of Urticaria. Because there are no definitive diagnostic tests for urticaria, evaluation largely relies on history and physical examination. History.Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  38. [38]
    Mechanisms of phototherapy and photochemotherapy for ... - PubMed
    The aim of treatment is to prevent the outbreak of disease by increasing the patient's tolerance to sunlight. The mechanisms by which ultraviolet B (UVB) and ...
  39. [39]
    Induction of Light Tolerance Using Narrowband UV-B in Solar Urticaria
    Induction of light tolerance with narrowband UV-B in solar urticaria is safe and effective in a high percentage of patients.
  40. [40]
    Studies on the mechanism of clinical tolerance in solar urticaria
    Tolerance to artificial ultraviolet radiation (UVR) was induced in three patients with solar urticaria by administering graded whole body exposures to ...
  41. [41]
    Studies on the mechanism of clinical tolerance in solar urticaria
    SUMMARY. Tolerance to artificial ultraviolet radiation (UVR) was induced in three patients with solar urticaria by administering graded whole body exposure.
  42. [42]
    UVA/UVA1 phototherapy and PUVA photochemotherapy in ...
    Sep 20, 2004 · UVA was administered by a maximum singe dose of 1.8 J/cm2 four times weekly for the first two months followed by maintenance on two treatments ...
  43. [43]
    Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is a suitable treatment option ...
    Objective: We sought to assess the efficacy of two protocols of NB-UVB therapy for the prophylaxis of UVB-sensitive and UVB-insensitive solar urticaria (SU).
  44. [44]
    Efficacy and Satisfaction of Low Doses UVA1 Phototherapy - MDPI
    UVA1 phototherapy uses the non-erythematogenic wavelength (340–400 nm), reducing the risk of light burns associated with UVA2 (320–340 nm) and UVB (290–320 nm) ...
  45. [45]
    Induction of Light Tolerance Using Narrowband UV-B in Solar Urticaria
    Conclusion: Induction of light tolerance with narrowband UV-B in solar urticaria is safe and effective in a high percentage of patients.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  46. [46]
    Solar urticaria to visible light triggered by light-emitting diode therapy
    A desensitization phototherapy, according to a well-defined protocol,1 allowed a marked regression of the symptoms. Fig 1.
  47. [47]
    Phototherapy in dermatological maladies (Review)
    Feb 3, 2022 · UVA 1 phototherapy response rates range between 60 and 100% after 30 to 40 sessions (17). NB-UVB phototherapy may be an alternative especially ...
  48. [48]
    A Perspective on the Use of NB-UVB Phototherapy vs. PUVA ...
    Jul 1, 2018 · There is evidence that NB-UVB and PUVA may be effective for urticaria and indeed randomized controlled trial evidence to show the superior ...
  49. [49]
    Phototherapy - ScienceDirect.com
    Phototherapy consists of the therapeutic use of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. It can be performed with exposure to sunlight, ultraviolet A (UVA) or ultraviolet B ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Efficacy of Therapies for Solar Urticaria: A Systematic Review and ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · For studies that assessed response exclusively through phototesting, classification was performed using a predefined scale: a mean urticaria ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  51. [51]
    Omalizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic or Spontaneous ...
    Feb 24, 2013 · Studies have shown that omalizumab may suppress allergen-mediated skin reactions through its reduction of FcεRI function in basophils and mast ...
  52. [52]
    Proposed Mechanism of Action (MOA) - XOLAIR® (omalizumab)
    XOLAIR inhibits the binding of IgE to high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) on the surface of 4 Dendritic Cells, Basophils and Mast Cells.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Use of Omalizumab for the ...
    May 1, 2024 · We reviewed the current evidence on the potential benefits and harms of using omalizumab for 24 weeks or longer to treat patients with chronic ...Missing: 2024-2025 | Show results with:2024-2025
  54. [54]
    Treatment of refractory solar urticaria: could dupilumab fill ... - PubMed
    Treatment of refractory solar urticaria: could dupilumab fill the current gap?
  55. [55]
    Efficacy of Therapies for Solar Urticaria: A Systematic Review and ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · Antihistamines were evaluated in 21 studies (376 patients), with a pooled response rate (partial or complete) of 83.0% (95% CI, 70.4-91.1%) and ...
  56. [56]
    Chronic spontaneous urticaria guidelines: What is new?
    Feb 1, 2023 · The maximum recommended dose of omalizumab is 600 mg every 14 days, and up to 6 months should be allowed for patients to respond to omalizumab.
  57. [57]
    Characteristics and prognosis of idiopathic solar urticaria - PubMed
    Idiopathic SU is a chronic disease. The majority of this cohort was still affected after 5 and 10 years.
  58. [58]
    Solar Urticaria: An Ambispective Study in a Long-term Follow-up ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · This study analysed the clinical and therapeutic features of a long-term follow-up solar urticaria cohort, with a focus on omalizumab management and outcomes.
  59. [59]
    Solar Urticaria: Symptoms, Treatment, and More - Healthline
    Mar 11, 2020 · It's rare, but solar urticaria can also cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition that requires emergency treatment.Missing: bronchospasm syncope
  60. [60]
    The challenges of chronic urticaria part 1 - ScienceDirect.com
    It is more prevalent in women and represents an important burden that compromises patient's quality of life, interferes with routine daily activities, and ...
  61. [61]
    Anxiety, depression, and stress in patients with chronic urticaria
    HADS score was 12.92 ±6.48 in all subjects with CU, and the prevalence of depression and anxiety based on the HADS were 48.1% and 38.0%, respectively. The ...Missing: solar | Show results with:solar
  62. [62]
    Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis and Urticaria - AAFP
    Oct 15, 2001 · Exercise can produce a spectrum of allergic symptoms ranging from an erythematous, irritating skin eruption to a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction.Abstract · Exercise-Induced Disease Types · Pathophysiology · Diagnosis
  63. [63]
    Medically Challenging Case Shows NSAIDs Can Prompt Exercise ...
    Nov 5, 2021 · “The combination of NSAID use and exercise may predispose some people to anaphylaxis,” says allergist Taha Al-Shaikhly, MD, ACAAI member and co ...Missing: solar | Show results with:solar
  64. [64]
    Delayed-onset Solar Urticaria Coexisting With Spontaneous Chronic ...
    Solar urticaria (SU) is characterized by an immediate onset of erythema and itchy wheals within 5–10min of exposure to solar radiation, which disappear in a ...
  65. [65]
    The History of Urticaria and Angioedema - SFHD - Numerabilis
    Several physical urticarias were early mentioned: Solar urticaria was described by Borsch in 1799 but it was not until 1887 that Veiel showed that it was ...
  66. [66]
    Solar urticaria - ScienceDirect
    Urticaria is a common clinical condition presenting with wheals (hives), angioedema, or both. Urticaria has a complex pathogenesis, along with a high disease ...
  67. [67]
    Light urticaria - Altmeyers Encyclopedia - Department Allergology
    ... Urticaria solaris. History. This section has been translated automatically. Merklen, 1904; Duke coined the term "solar urticaria" in 1923 (cited by S. Goetze) ...
  68. [68]
    Studies in Hypersensitivity to Light: II. Urticaria Solare (λ < 3700)
    A preliminary report on this case appeared in the Journal of Invest. Dermat. 6: 345 (Dec.) 1945. (Sulzberger and Baer, Studies in Hypersensitivity to Light. I.).
  69. [69]
    [PDF] History
    Solar urticaria, for instance, was described by Borsch in 1799, but it was not until 1887 that. Veiel showed that it was solely solar rays and not heat from ...
  70. [70]
    Solar urticaria: the annoying photodermatosis - Wiley Online Library
    Dec 25, 2001 · One of the earliest descriptions of the induction of urticaria ... Urticaria solaris. Br J Dermatol 1954;, 66, 417 428. 10.1111/j.1365 ...
  71. [71]
    Pathogenesis of solar urticaria: Classic perspectives and emerging ...
    Nov 2, 2021 · Solar urticaria is a rare, immunologically mediated photodermatosis in which activation of cutaneous mast cells is triggered by specific wavelengths of solar ...
  72. [72]
    Urticaria - JAMA Network
    Solar urticaria: Investigation of pathogenic mechanisms. Arch Dermatol 99:390-397, 1969. 35. Sams WM: Solar urticaria: Studies of the active serum factor. J.