Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solution set

In mathematics, a solution set is the complete collection of all values or vectors that satisfy a given equation, inequality, or system of equations.^[1] For a single equation, such as x^2 - 9 = 0, the solution set consists of the specific values that make the equation true when substituted, denoted in set notation as \{3, -3\}.^[1] Inequalities, like $2(z - 5) \leq 4z, yield solution sets expressed in set-builder notation, such as \{z \mid z \geq -5\}, representing an interval of real numbers.^[1] An equation or inequality may have an empty solution set, denoted \emptyset, if no values satisfy it—for instance, x^2 + 1 = 0 over the real numbers—or the entire set of real numbers if it is an identity, such as $2x + 1 = 2x + 1.^[1]^[2] In the context of systems of linear equations, represented as Ax = b where A is an m \times n matrix, x is a vector in \mathbb{R}^n, and b is a vector in \mathbb{R}^m, the solution set comprises all vectors x that satisfy the system.^[3] If the system is consistent, its solutions form an affine subspace: the sum of a particular solution p and the null space of A (solutions to the homogeneous equation Ax = 0).^[4] The dimension of this solution set equals the number of free variables in the row-reduced form of the augmented matrix, corresponding geometrically to a line, plane, or higher-dimensional flat in \mathbb{R}^n.^[5] Homogeneous systems (Ax = 0) always include the trivial solution x = 0, with nontrivial solutions existing if free variables are present.^[5] Solving such systems typically involves Gaussian elimination to express solutions in parametric vector form.^[4]

Core Concepts

Definition

In mathematics, the solution set of an equation, inequality, or system thereof is the collection of all values or tuples of variables that satisfy the given condition, making the equation(s) or inequality(ies) true when substituted.^[6]^[7] This concept forms the foundational framework for analyzing equations across various mathematical domains, serving as a prerequisite for exploring more specialized applications.^[1] For a single equation or inequality of the form f(x) = 0 or f(x) \leq 0 (or similar relations), where f is a function and x is an element from an appropriate domain (such as the real numbers), the solution set S is defined as

S = \{ x \mid f(x) \text{ satisfies the condition} \}.

This set comprises all elements x that satisfy the equation or inequality.^[6]^[1] In the case of a system of equations or inequalities, the solution set extends to the set of all n-tuples (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) in \mathbb{R}^n (or another suitable space) that simultaneously satisfy every condition in the system.^[6] This distinguishes it from the solution set of a single equation or inequality, which involves fewer variables and a potentially larger or simpler collection of solutions, whereas a system's solution set represents the common intersection of the individual solution sets.^[7] The general notation remains analogous, often expressed as the set of tuples satisfying the collective conditions f_i(x_1, \dots, x_n) for each i.^[1]

Notation

In mathematics, the solution set of an equation or system is commonly denoted by the symbol S, which encapsulates all values satisfying the given conditions. This notation provides a concise label for the collection of solutions, often used in both theoretical discussions and computational contexts.^[5] Set-builder notation offers a precise way to express solution sets, typically written as \{ x \in X \mid P(x) \}, where X is the universe or domain of possible solutions, and P(x) represents the predicate or condition that x must satisfy. This form, rooted in foundational set theory, allows for clear specification of membership without enumerating elements, making it ideal for infinite or abstract sets.^[8] For cases involving infinite solutions, such as in linear systems, parametric representations describe the solution set using parameters; a standard form is \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{x}_p + t \mathbf{v}, where \mathbf{x}_p is a particular solution and \mathbf{v} spans the null space, with t as a scalar parameter. This vector-based expression highlights the affine structure of the set, facilitating visualization and further analysis.^[9] Graphically, solution sets in \mathbb{R}^n are represented as loci for lower-dimensional cases or as manifolds for higher-dimensional ones, where the set forms a submanifold embedded in the ambient space, such as a line or plane in \mathbb{R}^3. These depictions emphasize the geometric interpretation, aiding intuition about the set's dimensionality and extent.^[10] The evolution of these notations traces back to the development of set theory in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, pioneered by Georg Cantor, whose work on infinite sets introduced foundational symbols like braces and predicates that underpin modern expressions for solution sets.^[11]

Linear Systems

Homogeneous Systems

A homogeneous linear system consists of linear equations where the constant terms are all zero, formulated as Ax = 0, with A an m \times n matrix and x a vector in \mathbb{R}^n.^[5] This setup arises in contexts such as linear dependence of vectors or equilibrium conditions in applied problems.^[12] The solution set of such a system, known as the null space or kernel of A, is defined as \ker(A) = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid Ax = 0 \}.^[13] This set forms a subspace of \mathbb{R}^n, closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication, reflecting the vector space structure inherent to homogeneous systems.^[14] Every homogeneous system possesses at least the trivial solution x = 0, and non-trivial solutions exist if and only if \dim(\ker(A)) > 0.^[5] The dimension of the kernel is governed by the rank-nullity theorem, which states that \dim(\ker(A)) = n - \rank(A), where \rank(A) is the dimension of the column space of A.^[15] This relation quantifies the degrees of freedom in the solution set, with a basis for \ker(A) providing a complete parametric description of all solutions. For instance, consider the matrix A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}; here, \rank(A) = 1, so \dim(\ker(A)) = 1, and the kernel is spanned by the vector \begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}.^[16]

Non-homogeneous Systems

A non-homogeneous linear system is given by the equation Ax = b, where A is an m \times n matrix, x is an n-dimensional vector of unknowns, and b is an m-dimensional constant vector with b \neq 0.^[17] The solution set of such a system, if it exists, forms an affine subspace of \mathbb{R}^n, which is a translate of a linear subspace rather than a subspace passing through the origin.^[18] The general solution to a consistent non-homogeneous system can be expressed as x = x_p + v, where x_p is any particular solution satisfying A x_p = b, and v belongs to the kernel (null space) of A, denoted \ker(A) = \{ v \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid A v = 0 \}.^[19] This form arises because the difference between any two solutions to Ax = b lies in \ker(A), the solution set of the associated homogeneous system Ax = 0.^[17] For the system to be consistent (i.e., to have at least one solution), the vector b must lie in the column space of A. This condition is equivalent to the rank of the coefficient matrix A equaling the rank of the augmented matrix [A \mid b].^[20] Row reduction to echelon form can verify this: the system is inconsistent if the augmented matrix has a row where the coefficients of all variables are zero but the constant term is nonzero.^[19] If the system is consistent and \dim(\ker(A)) = 0 (i.e., A has full column rank and is injective), the solution is unique. Otherwise, if \dim(\ker(A)) > 0, there are infinitely many solutions, parametrized by the free variables corresponding to the basis of \ker(A).^[17] Consider the system with coefficient matrix

A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 2 \end{pmatrix}, \quad b = \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ 6 \end{pmatrix}.

This is consistent since \operatorname{rank}(A) = \operatorname{rank}([A \mid b]) = 1. A particular solution is x_p = \begin{pmatrix} 1.5 \\ 1.5 \end{pmatrix}, and \ker(A) is spanned by \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}, so the general solution is x = \begin{pmatrix} t + 1.5 \\ 1.5 - t \end{pmatrix} for t \in \mathbb{R}, yielding infinitely many solutions.^[19]

Nonlinear and Advanced Contexts

Polynomial Equations

A solution set for a single polynomial equation p(\mathbf{x}) = 0, where p is a polynomial in one or more variables over the real numbers \mathbb{R} or complex numbers \mathbb{C}, is known as the zero set V(p) = \{\mathbf{x} \mid p(\mathbf{x}) = 0\}. For univariate polynomials, this corresponds to the roots of p(x), which may be finite in number over \mathbb{C} but can differ significantly over \mathbb{R}. The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that every non-constant polynomial p(x) \in \mathbb{C} of degree n has exactly n roots in \mathbb{C}, counting multiplicities, ensuring the solution set is non-empty and finite. This theorem, first proved by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1799, underpins the completeness of the complex numbers as an algebraically closed field.^[21] For systems of polynomial equations f_1(\mathbf{x}) = \cdots = f_k(\mathbf{x}) = [0](/page/0), the solution set is the common zero set V(f_1, \dots, f_k) = \{\mathbf{x} \mid f_i(\mathbf{x}) = [0](/page/0) \ \forall i\}, which generalizes to the variety associated with an ideal I in the polynomial ring K[\mathbf{x}] (where K is \mathbb{R} or \mathbb{C}) as V(I) = \{\mathbf{x} \in K^m \mid f(\mathbf{x}) = [0](/page/0) \ \forall f \in I\}. In algebraic geometry, these varieties capture the geometric structure of polynomial solution sets, with affine varieties defined over algebraically closed fields like \mathbb{C} forming the foundation for studying intersections and dimensions. Hilbert's Nullstellensatz establishes a bijective correspondence between radical ideals and affine varieties over \mathbb{C}, linking algebraic properties of ideals to the geometry of their zero sets.^[22] The distinction between real and complex solution sets highlights field-dependent behaviors: for instance, the polynomial x^2 + 1 = 0 has an empty solution set over \mathbb{R} but \{i, -i\} over \mathbb{C}, illustrating how complex roots complete the count to the degree. Polynomials with real coefficients exhibit conjugate symmetry for non-real roots, ensuring complex solutions appear in pairs. A concrete multivariate example is p(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1 = 0, whose real solution set is the unit circle in \mathbb{R}^2, an irreducible algebraic curve of dimension 1 that serves as a basic affine variety. Over \mathbb{C}, this extends to a surface in \mathbb{C}^2.^[23]

Functional Equations

In functional equations, the solution set consists of all functions satisfying a given relation, often over infinite domains like \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}, leading to infinite-dimensional structures. A canonical example is the Cauchy functional equation f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) for functions f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}. Under the assumption of continuity, the solution set comprises all linear functions of the form f(x) = c x, where c = f(1) \in \mathbb{R}.^[24] This result, established by Cauchy in 1818, highlights how regularity conditions tame the solution set into a one-dimensional family parameterized by c.^[24] Without such assumptions, the solution set expands dramatically to include highly pathological, non-measurable functions that are linear over \mathbb{Q} but nonlinear over \mathbb{R}, constructed using the Axiom of Choice via Hamel bases for \mathbb{R} as a vector space over \mathbb{Q}.^[25] Differential equations extend this framework, where the solution set represents a family of functions satisfying the equation, typically infinite-dimensional without boundary conditions. For the ordinary differential equation y' = k y with constant k, the solution set is the one-parameter family \{ c e^{k x} \mid c \in \mathbb{R} \}, capturing exponential growth or decay. Initial value problems impose conditions at a single point, such as y(x_0) = y_0, which restrict the solution set to a unique element by fixing the parameter c = y_0 e^{-k x_0}.^[26] This uniqueness holds under Lipschitz conditions on the right-hand side, ensuring the solution set collapses from a continuum to a singleton.^[26] Partial differential equations further emphasize the infinite-dimensional nature of solution sets, as solutions must satisfy the equation across multiple variables while respecting domain boundaries. For the one-dimensional wave equation u_{tt} = c^2 u_{xx} on \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}, the solution set consists of all functions of the form u(x, t) = F(x - c t) + G(x + c t), where F and G are arbitrary twice-differentiable functions representing right- and left-propagating waves.^[27] Boundary or initial conditions, such as specifying u(x, 0) and u_t(x, 0), constrain this set by determining F and G via d'Alembert's formula, reducing the infinite-dimensional freedom to data-driven profiles.^[27] These examples illustrate how solution sets in functional and differential contexts form vector spaces or manifolds of functions, contrasting with finite-dimensional algebraic varieties.

Properties

Existence Conditions

The existence of a non-empty solution set for an equation or system depends on the mathematical context, with specific conditions ensuring that at least one solution exists within the defined domain. In topological settings, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem guarantees the existence of solutions for certain continuous mappings. Specifically, any continuous function from a closed ball in Euclidean space to itself has at least one fixed point, implying a non-empty solution set for the equation f(x) = x under these conditions.^[28] For linear systems of the form Ax = b, where A is an m \times n matrix and b is a vector in \mathbb{R}^m, the solution set is non-empty if and only if the rank of A equals the rank of the augmented matrix [A \mid b]. The Rouché–Capelli theorem states that the system is consistent under this rank condition, which is equivalent to b lying in the column space of A.^[29] In algebraic geometry, Hilbert's Nullstellensatz provides existence conditions for polynomial systems over algebraically closed fields. The weak form states that for an ideal I in the polynomial ring k[x_1, \dots, x_n] where k is algebraically closed, the variety V(I) is empty if and only if the radical of I is the entire ring, meaning that if I is proper, then V(I) is non-empty and thus the solution set exists.^[22] In the analytic context of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), the Peano existence theorem ensures local solutions for initial value problems of the form \dot{y} = f(t, y) with initial condition y(t_0) = y_0, provided that the right-hand side f is continuous in a neighborhood of (t_0, y_0). This guarantees a non-empty solution set on some interval around t_0, though uniqueness is not assured without additional Lipschitz conditions.^[30] Counterexamples illustrate cases where solution sets are empty due to domain restrictions. For instance, the equation x^2 + 1 = 0 has no solutions over the real numbers \mathbb{R}, as the parabola x^2 + 1 never intersects zero, resulting in an empty solution set.

Uniqueness Criteria

In the context of linear systems, uniqueness of the solution set for the equation Ax = b, where A is an n \times n matrix and b \in \mathbb{R}^n, holds if and only if A has full rank n, meaning A is invertible.^[31] This condition ensures that the homogeneous equation Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution x = 0, implying no nontrivial kernel to generate multiple solutions.^[31] For instance, if A is singular (rank less than n) but the system is consistent, the solution set contains infinitely many elements, as solutions differ by vectors in the null space of A.^[31] In nonlinear settings, local uniqueness near a solution point is established by the Implicit Function Theorem, which applies when the Jacobian matrix of the defining function is invertible at that point, allowing the solution to be expressed uniquely as a function of parameters in a neighborhood.^[32] For global uniqueness, the Contraction Mapping Principle guarantees a unique solution in a complete metric space if the mapping defining the problem is a contraction, meaning distances are strictly reduced by a factor less than 1.^[33] For initial value problems in ordinary differential equations of the form \dot{x} = f(t, x) with x(t_0) = x_0, the Picard-Lindelöf theorem ensures a unique solution on some interval around t_0 if f is continuous and Lipschitz continuous in x.^[34] This Lipschitz condition prevents branching of solutions, as it bounds the rate of change relative to perturbations in the initial data.^[34] These criteria build on the existence of at least one solution to isolate cases with exactly one.

Alternative Interpretations

In Logic

In mathematical logic, particularly within model theory, the solution set associated with a theory T is the class of all models that satisfy T, denoted \Mod(T) = \{ M \mid M \models T \}, where M is a structure interpreting the language of T such that every sentence in T holds true in M.^[35] This class represents all possible interpretations or realizations of the theory's axioms and theorems. In first-order logic, solution sets thus form classes of models, which are structures consisting of a non-empty domain equipped with interpretations for the language's constants, functions, and predicates, capturing the semantic content of the theory.^[35] A key result linking syntax and semantics is Gödel's completeness theorem, which states that a first-order theory T is consistent if and only if its solution set \Mod(T) is non-empty, meaning every consistent theory admits at least one model.^[36] This theorem ensures that logical consistency guarantees the existence of a structure realizing the theory, providing a foundational bridge between provability and truth in models. For instance, the solution set of the Peano axioms for arithmetic includes the standard model \mathbb{N} of the natural numbers, where the domain consists of the finite ordinals with the usual successor function, addition, and multiplication, but also encompasses non-standard models that extend beyond these finite elements, incorporating infinite "numbers" while still satisfying the axioms.^[37] These non-standard models arise from the compactness theorem and demonstrate the multiplicity of structures in the solution set.^[37] Unlike algebraic solution sets, which typically comprise individual elements satisfying equations within a fixed structure, logical solution sets in model theory consist of entire structures—complete interpretations with domains and relations—that realize the theory, emphasizing interpretive variety over elemental solutions.^[35]

In Computer Science

In computer science, the concept of a solution set manifests prominently in constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), where it represents the collection of all variable assignments that satisfy a given set of constraints. A CSP is formally defined by a finite set of variables, each with a domain of possible values, and a set of constraints specifying allowable combinations; the solution set comprises those complete assignments where every constraint holds true.^[38] This framework underpins applications in scheduling, configuration, and resource allocation, with algorithms like backtracking systematically exploring the search space to identify or enumerate elements of the solution set.^[39] Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers provide another key computational lens on solution sets, particularly for propositional logic formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNF). Here, the solution set consists of all truth assignments to variables that render the formula true, with solvers determining satisfiability (non-empty solution set) or unsatisfiability (empty set, denoted UNSAT). Modern conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers, such as MiniSat or Glucose, efficiently prune the search space using unit propagation and clause learning to find satisfying assignments or prove emptiness.^[40] For the 3-SAT variant, where each clause involves exactly three literals, the solution set equates to the satisfying truth assignments for such restricted CNF formulas; for instance, the formula (\neg x_1 \vee x_2 \vee \neg x_3) \wedge (x_1 \vee \neg x_2 \vee x_3) has a non-empty solution set including the assignment x_1 = \text{true}, x_2 = \text{true}, x_3 = \text{true}. Numerical methods approximate solution sets for continuous problems, such as finding roots of nonlinear equations where the solution set is the set of inputs yielding zero output. The Newton-Raphson method iteratively refines an initial guess x_0 via the update x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)} to converge to a root, effectively isolating elements of the solution set for univariate functions; extensions like the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm handle multivariate cases by approximating the Jacobian.^[41] These techniques are vital in scientific computing for tasks like eigenvalue computation, though convergence depends on the initial guess and function smoothness, potentially requiring multiple starts to capture the full solution set.^[42] In optimization contexts, especially with big data, solution sets appear as feasible regions in linear programming (LP), defined by the intersection of half-spaces from inequality constraints. The feasible region is the polyhedral set of points satisfying Ax \leq b and x \geq 0, serving as the solution set for the primal problem before optimizing an objective; solvers like the simplex method traverse its vertices to find optimal solutions within this bounded or unbounded set.^[43] Interior-point methods, such as those based on barrier functions, approximate the entire feasible region for large-scale instances in machine learning and logistics, scaling to millions of variables via matrix factorizations.^[44]

References

[1]
Algebra - Solutions and Solution Sets - Pauls Online Math Notes
Nov 16, 2022 · We call the complete set of all solutions the solution set for the equation or inequality. There is also some formal notation for solution sets ...
[2]
ORCCA Special Solution Sets - Portland Community College
This means that all real numbers are solutions to the equation 2x+1=2x+1. 2 x + 1 = 2 x + 1 . We say this equation's solution set contains all real numbers.
[3]
Systems of Linear Equations
The solution set of a system of equations is the collection of all solutions. Solving the system means finding all solutions with formulas involving some number ...
[4]
[PDF] 1.5 Solution Sets of Linear Systems - Berkeley Math
5. The solution set of Ax = b is the set of all vectors of the form w = p + vh, where vh is any solution of the equation Ax = 0. 2.
[5]
Solution Sets
The number of free variables is called the dimension of the solution set. We will develop a rigorous definition of dimension in Section 2.7, but for now the ...
[6]
12.1: Systems of Linear Equations - Mathematics LibreTexts
Aug 16, 2021 · In terms of logic, a solution set is a truth set of a system of equations, which is a proposition over n-tuples of real numbers. In general, if ...
[7]
Solution Sets - Varsity Tutors
Key Definition. A solution set is the set containing all the solutions of an equation or inequality. For example, the solution set for 3 x + 5 = 11 is 2 .
[8]
Parametric Form
Learn to express the solution set of a system of linear equations in parametric form. Understand the three possibilities for the number of solutions of a system ...
[9]
[PDF] 1 Sets
May 31, 2012 · Set theory is a branch of mathematics that has its origins in the late 19th century. The “Father of Set Theory” was Georg Cantor.
[10]
Homogeneous and Nonhomogeneous Systems
A homogeneous system of linear equations is one in which all of the constant terms are zero. A homogeneous system always has at least one solution, namely the ...
[11]
The Null Space of a Matrix
The Null Space of a Matrix. Definition. The null space (or kernel) of a matrix A is the set of vectors x such that $Ax = 0$ . The dimension of the null space ...
[12]
Linear Algebra, Part 3: Kernels or Null Spaces (Mathematica)
A x = 0 . This subset actually forms a subspace of Rn, called the kernel (or nullspace) of the matrix A and denoted ker(A). Let's suppose that the matrix A ...
[13]
[PDF] The Rank-Nullity Theorem - Purdue Math
Feb 16, 2007 · Our next theorem, often referred to as the Rank-Nullity Theorem, establishes that this is indeed the case. Ax = 0 is the trivial solution x = 0.
[14]
Homogeneous Systems of Equations
A system of linear equations, LS(A,b) L S ( A , b ) is homogeneous if the vector of constants is the zero vector, in other words, if b=0 b = 0 . Example AHSAC ...
[15]
[PDF] Systems of Linear Equations
Every nonhomogeneous system Ax = b has an associated or corresponding homogeneous system Ax = 0. Furthermore, each system Ax = b, homogeneous or not, has an.
[16]
[PDF] Notes on Solving Systems of Linear Equations - UC Davis Math
Mar 8, 2007 · In the following examples, we illustrate the process of determining the null space for a linear map having associated matrix in RREF. Example ...
[17]
[PDF] MTH 42 NOTES Contents 1. Linear systems 1 1.1. Systems of linear ...
The solution set of a linear homogeneous system with n variables is a vector subspace ... Solution sets of non-homogeneous systems. If we think of the ...
[18]
[PDF] Math 3321 - Systems of Linear Equations. Part II
A system of linear equations is consistent if and only if the rank of the coefficient matrix equals the rank of the augmented matrix. If the rank of the ...
[19]
Fund theorem of algebra - MacTutor History of Mathematics
Gauss produced the first proof that a polynomial equation of degree n n n with complex coefficients has n n n complex roots. The proof is similar to the first ...
[20]
Hilbert's nullstellensatz | What's new - Terry Tao
Nov 26, 2007 · The nullstellensatz offers an important correspondence between algebraic geometry (the conclusion 1 is an assertion that a certain algebraic variety is empty) ...
[21]
[PDF] Algebraic Geometry
Simple examples of affine plane algebraic curves are the lines V (ax+by −c) (with. (a, b) 6= (0,0)) or the “unit circle” V (x2 + y2 − 1), which is a special ...
[22]
[PDF] A Primer on the Functional Equation f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)
Cauchy showed that every contin- uous solution of (0.1) is linear, i.e., given by f(x) = xf(1), while Darboux observed that continuity at just one point is ...
[23]
[PDF] Probabilistic Cauchy Functional Equations - arXiv
Jun 4, 2024 · In fact, the assumption of continuity can be much further relaxed. Lebesgue [12] showed that any measurable solution to equation (1.1) is linear ...
[24]
Initial and Boundary Value Problems—Wolfram Documentation
IVPs and BVPs for linear differential equations are solved rather easily since the final algebraic step involves the solution of linear equations.
[25]
[PDF] PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
For example to see that u(t, x) = et-x solves the wave equation (1.5), simply substitute this function into the equation: (et-x)tt − (et-x)xx = et-x − et-x = 0.
[26]
[PDF] Using Brouwer's fixed point theorem - arXiv
Jan 14, 2017 · The fixed point theorem of Brouwer is one of the most widely known results of topology. It says that every continuous map f : Bd → Bd of the d- ...
[27]
[PDF] Section 3.5. Linear Systems of Equations
Jun 28, 2018 · A system Ax = b of n equations in m unknowns where n>m and rank([A | b]) > rank(A) is overdetermined. Note. In an overdetermined system, the ...
[28]
[PDF] Peano's Existence Theorem revisited - arXiv
Feb 6, 2012 · Abstract. We present new proofs to four versions of Peano's Existence Theo- rem for ordinary differential equations and systems.
[29]
ORCCA Special Solution Sets - Index of - Lane Community College
We'll now explore equations that have all real numbers as possible solutions or no real numbers as possible solutions.
[30]
[PDF] Linear Algebra Done Wrong Sergei Treil - Brown Math Department
We know that matrix A is invertible if and only if the equation. Ax = b has a unique solution for any right side b. This happens if and only if the echelon ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
The Implicit Function Theorem
(Steven George), 1951-. The implicit function theorem : history, theory, and applications / Steven G. Krantz and. Harold R. Parks. p.cm. Includes ...
[32]
The Banach Fixed Point Theorem: selected topics from its hundred ...
Jul 9, 2024 · On June 24, 1920 Stefan Banach presented his doctoral dissertation titled O operacjach na zbiorach abstrakcyjnych i ich zastosowaniach do ...
[33]
[PDF] The Picard-Lindelöf Theorem: Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions
Mar 13, 2025 · This completes the proof. References. [1] Marcelo Viana and José M Espinar. Differential equations: a dynamical sys- tems approach ...
[34]
Model Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 10, 2001 · Model theory is the study of the interpretation of any language, formal or natural, by means of set-theoretic structures, with Alfred Tarski's truth definition ...Basic notions of model theory · Expressive strength · Model theory as a source of...
[35]
Classical Logic (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Summary of each segment:
[36]
Kurt Gödel - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 13, 2007 · One of the main consequences of the completeness theorem is that categoricity fails for Peano arithmetic and for Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. In ...
[37]
[PDF] Constraint Satisfaction Problem
Jun 4, 2008 · A solution to the CSP is an assignment of values to S1..Sn that satisfies all constraints. Example 1. The eight queens puzzle is the problem of.
[38]
Class 7: Constraint Satisfaction Problems - GMU CS Department
Oct 26, 2004 · A constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is defined by a set of variables {X_1, ..., X_n}, and a set of constraints {C_1, C_2, ...,C_m}.1.2 Standard Search... · 2. Backtracking Search · 2.1. Algorithm
[39]
[PDF] Satisfiability Solvers - Cornell: Computer Science
The Boolean Satisfiability Problem (SAT) is the following: Given a CNF for- mula F, does F have a satisfying assignment? This is the canonical NP-complete.
[40]
[PDF] Problem Set 8 Solutions - MIT OpenCourseWare
Apr 29, 2015 · Solution: To show that TRIPLE-SAT is in NP, for any input formula φ, we need only guess three distinct assignments and verify that they satisfy ...
[41]
[PDF] The Newton-Raphson Method - UBC Mathematics
The Newton Method is used to find complex roots of polynomials, and roots of systems of equations in several variables, where the geometry is far less clear, ...
[42]
3.04: Newton-Raphson Method for Solving a Nonlinear Equation
Oct 5, 2023 · In the Newton-Raphson method, the root is not bracketed. In fact, only one initial guess of the root is needed to get the iterative process ...
[43]
Linear Programming Basics
The set of feasible solutions to a linear programming problem is called the feasible region. More formally, a linear programming problem is an optimization ...
[44]
[PDF] Linear Programming
A feasible solution is a solution that satisfies all of the constraints. The feasible set or feasible region is the set of all feasible solutions. Finally ...