Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

SourceForge

SourceForge is a web-based platform founded in 1999 for hosting, managing, and distributing projects, providing tools such as , forums, and download services to developers. Initially launched by VA Linux Systems as the first centralized repository for collaborative open-source development, it grew to host hundreds of thousands of projects and millions of downloads, becoming a cornerstone of the early open-source ecosystem. Over time, SourceForge expanded beyond pure open-source hosting to include a directory for comparing and reviewing business software and IT services, facilitating B2B discovery with features like user reviews and vendor listings. It supports over 500,000 projects and serves nearly 20 million users, though its role in active development has diminished with the rise of competitors like GitHub. Significant achievements include enabling widespread collaboration on projects like Freeciv and powering early adoption of tools such as Subversion for source code management. The platform faced major controversies in the mid-2010s under previous ownership, particularly for bundling and unwanted installers with downloads—sometimes hijacking inactive project mirrors, such as those for and —which eroded trust and prompted many projects to migrate elsewhere. Following acquisitions, including by BIZX in , reforms removed such practices, shifting focus toward legitimate software aggregation and demand generation for vendors while retaining core hosting capabilities.

Overview

Founding and Core Concept

SourceForge was founded in 1999 by VA Linux Systems, a company focused on hardware and software solutions, as a web-based platform to centralize . Initially developed to support collaborative coding efforts amid the growing popularity of and , it addressed the challenges of decentralized by offering integrated services under one roof. The core concept centered on providing a comprehensive "software "—a term borrowed from blacksmithing to evoke crafting code—that combined systems (initially CVS), issue tracking, , forums, and file release capabilities. This all-in-one approach aimed to streamline workflows for distributed developer teams, reducing reliance on lists or self-hosted servers, and fostering community-driven in an era when broadband access and web tools were expanding. By aggregating these functionalities, SourceForge enabled rapid project onboarding and visibility, quickly becoming the primary destination for hosting over 10,000 open-source projects within its first few years. This foundational model emphasized accessibility and no-cost hosting for non-commercial open-source initiatives, aligning with the era's ethos of software freedom while laying groundwork for VA Linux's commercial extensions, such as enterprise versions sold to corporations for internal use. The platform's success stemmed from its timing during the dot-com boom and the kernel's ascent, which drew contributors seeking structured collaboration absent in earlier ad-hoc methods.

Key Features and Services

SourceForge provides centralized hosting for projects, enabling developers to manage code repositories, track issues, and distribute releases to users worldwide. The platform supports systems including , , and , with features such as browser-based code browsing, commit linking to tickets, color-coded diffs, and graphical commit history views. Integrated issue tracking allows project maintainers to create tickets with Markdown formatting, file attachments, milestones, custom fields, advanced search capabilities, and threaded discussions, facilitating organized reporting and feature requests. Communication tools encompass forums with and subscriptions, moderation, and spam protection; blogs supporting threaded discussions, drafts, and Markdown; and optional mailing lists for team coordination. Documentation is handled via a wiki system that supports , attachments, syntax highlighting, tag-based browsing, and custom macros, with the option to install additional tools in project web space. Download services offer unlimited bandwidth for open-source projects, a global mirror network for load balancing, platform-specific detection (e.g., Windows, , ), and analytics on downloads by time, region, and platform. The platform includes an open-source directory for categorizing projects by topic, platform, and , along with user reviews, screenshots, videos, and malware-scanned downloads, plus promotion options like staff picks and featured projects. Built on the open-source Allura framework, SourceForge allows self-hosting and community contributions, while also serving as a comparison directory for , , and IT services to connect developers with buyers.

Historical Development

Inception and Early Expansion (1999–2005)

SourceForge was launched in November 1999 by VA Linux Systems, a company specializing in -based hardware and software services, as the first centralized online platform dedicated to facilitating collaborative . The service, developed by a team including Tony Guntharp, Uriah Welcome, Tim Perdue, and Drew Streib, offered free tools such as CVS , bug tracking, , mailing lists, and discussion forums, enabling developers to host projects, manage code repositories, and coordinate contributions without proprietary infrastructure. This initiative aligned with the burgeoning open-source movement, providing a unified alternative to fragmented lists and FTP sites that had previously dominated decentralized development efforts. The platform's early expansion capitalized on the dot-com era's enthusiasm for and , coinciding with VA Linux's high-profile IPO on December 9, 1999, which saw its stock surge 698% on the first trading day, elevating the company's visibility and resources for platform investment. SourceForge exited testing in early 2000, transitioning to full public availability and introducing enterprise-oriented offerings like SourceForge OnSite, a hosted solution for internal that adapted the core tools for use. That year, VA Linux's acquisition of Andover.net for approximately $185 million in stock integrated high-traffic sites like , whose editorial promotion of open-source projects drove increased traffic and registrations to SourceForge. These developments fueled rapid adoption, with the platform establishing itself as the world's largest open-source development center by hosting thousands of projects and serving as a for collaborative coding. Through 2005, SourceForge continued to expand its ecosystem, supporting key innovations in open-source tooling while navigating VA Linux's rebranding to VA Software in 2001 amid post-IPO market corrections. The service's model for projects, subsidized initially by VA's sales and later by and enterprise licensing, enabled sustained growth, with millions of downloads and a growing repository of software ranging from utilities to complex applications like early versions of tools that later evolved into industry staples. By mid-decade, it had solidified its role as the premier destination for open-source hosting, reflecting the maturation of collaborative development practices amid increasing developer participation.

Peak and Initial Challenges (2006–2012)

During the mid-2000s, SourceForge reached a peak in popularity and operational scale, hosting over 107,000 projects by summer and serving as a primary hub for open-source development. The platform achieved its first profitable quarter in , which enabled an influx of financial resources and staff expansion, facilitating upgrades to replace aging systems that had strained under earlier demand surges. These enhancements attracted additional developers, solidifying SourceForge's role in fostering major projects such as (later acquired by for $350 million), JBoss (acquired by ), and (which secured $26 million in funding and served clients including and ). By this period, the site supported centralized version control via CVS and , alongside features like forums, mailing lists, and download tracking, which contributed to its dominance in aggregating open-source repositories. Initial challenges emerged around 2008 with the launch of , a competitor emphasizing systems (DVCS) like and incorporating social coding elements such as pull requests and collaborative forking. SourceForge lagged in adopting —adding support only in 2009—allowing to capture developer preference for more fluid, decentralized workflows over SourceForge's traditional centralized model. This shift marked the onset of user migration, as 's user-friendly interface and focus on modern tools appealed to a growing segment of developers prioritizing ease of collaboration and rapid iteration. Despite these pressures, SourceForge maintained a substantial user base through 2012, hosting over 300,000 projects by early 2013, though growth began to plateau amid intensifying competition from platforms like , also launched in 2008.

Decline Amid Monetization Shifts (2013–2015)

Following its acquisition by Dice Holdings in September 2012 for $20 million, SourceForge introduced aggressive monetization strategies to boost revenue from its open-source hosting platform. In July , the site launched DevShare, an opt-in program allowing project maintainers to earn revenue by bundling third-party software offers—often or potentially unwanted programs—into installers. This shift prioritized advertiser partnerships over user trust, replacing generic installers with customized versions that promoted additional downloads during setup, sometimes without explicit user consent or project owner approval. The bundling practices escalated by 2014–2015, drawing widespread criticism for compromising software integrity and deceiving end-users. High-profile incidents included the GIMP for Windows project, where SourceForge allegedly seized control of an abandoned mirror in 2013 and distributed adware-laden installers by May 2015, prompting the official team to publicly denounce the platform and urge users to avoid its downloads. Similarly, the team severed ties with SourceForge after discovering unauthorized bundling attempts, citing ethical violations in revenue pursuits. SourceForge defended these actions by claiming opt-in status and project abandonment, but community backlash highlighted non-consensual modifications and the platform's policy of retaining hosted code even after developers migrated elsewhere, effectively locking projects into perpetual monetization. These tactics extended to malvertising on the site itself, where deceptive ads mimicked legitimate download prompts to install , further eroding credibility. The resultant distrust accelerated developer exodus to alternatives like , which offered cleaner, ad-free hosting without such intrusions, contributing to SourceForge's declining download volumes and active project metrics during this period. By mid-2015, the controversies had cemented SourceForge's reputation as unreliable for secure , prioritizing short-term gains over the collaborative ethos that defined its earlier success.

Acquisition and Strategic Pivot (2016–Present)

In January 2016, SourceForge and its sister site were acquired by SourceForge Media, LLC, a of BIZX, LLC, from DHI Group, Inc., for an undisclosed sum. The transaction marked a shift from prior ownership under DHI, which had overseen controversial practices contributing to user . Post-acquisition, the new management prioritized platform rehabilitation by immediately terminating the DevShare program, which had enabled bundling in Windows installers, and purging all such bundles from existing downloads. scanning was introduced for every hosted , alongside the removal of developer-facing advertisements to foster a cleaner environment and rebuild community trust eroded by prior incidents. These measures addressed core user complaints, aiming to reposition SourceForge as a reliable open-source amid competition from and . Strategic enhancements followed, including the addition of native support in subsequent years to accommodate modern workflows and attract projects migrating from rivals. In January 2018, a comprehensive site redesign was launched, featuring updated interfaces, granular project analytics for administrators, and improved discoverability tools to enhance and retention. Under BIZX's , the pivot emphasized sustainable revenue through non-intrusive models like premium hosting tiers, while maintaining free core services, though download volumes remained below historical peaks as of 2024. This era reflects a deliberate causal focus on user-centric reforms to counteract earlier decline drivers, with ongoing investments in and features signaling long-term viability for legacy and niche projects.

Business Model

Revenue Strategies Over Time

SourceForge's revenue strategy from its 1999 launch under VA Linux Systems primarily relied on display , with banner ads and sponsorships targeting technology companies to capitalize on high traffic from open-source developers and downloaders. This approach supported free project hosting, , and collaboration tools without direct charges to users or projects. By the early 2010s, as competition from platforms like intensified and project migrations reduced download volumes, SourceForge sought to diversify income. In , it introduced DevShare, an opt-in program enabling project maintainers to append up to three third-party software offers to installers, sharing generated affiliate revenue to fund development. The strategy expanded aggressively under Dice Holdings' ownership (post-2012 acquisition), applying bundling—including —to downloads of inactive or orphaned projects without maintainer approval, aiming to monetize lingering search engine traffic and high-ranking listings. This yielded short-term gains but eroded trust, prompting widespread project exodus and criticism for prioritizing profit over platform integrity. After BIZX, LLC acquired SourceForge in January , the new management immediately terminated DevShare and eliminated all bundled installers, rejecting them as incompatible with long-term viability. Revenue reverted to standard web advertising, with commitments to reduce intrusive elements, implement user-flagged ad removal, and scan for to sustain free access. By the late 2010s and into 2025, SourceForge had pivoted toward a B2B software discovery model, functioning as a platform for tools alongside open-source hosting. Monetization emphasizes targeted ads, with software vendors likely contributing via sponsored placements and , though exact breakdowns remain undisclosed; this hybrid sustains operations amid reduced pure open-source dominance.

Current Monetization and Sustainability

SourceForge's primary revenue streams derive from and B2B lead services targeted at software vendors and technology companies. Display and native , including sponsored listings and campaigns, capitalize on the platform's substantial of approximately 20-30 million monthly visitors to deliver intent-driven promotions, such as calls to action for trials or downloads. Vendors pay for enhanced visibility through listing packages, which facilitate connections with potential customers via reviews, comparisons, and lead capture tools. Additional monetization includes performance-based demand generation, such as triple-verified leads and custom content like whitepapers and webinars, integrated into Media's broader ecosystem following the 2016 acquisition by BIZX (rebranded Slashdot Media in 2019). This model sustains free access to core services like project hosting and downloads—over 2.6 million daily—by offsetting costs through vendor partnerships, exemplified by collaborations with entities like for conversion-focused branding. The platform's sustainability is supported by its pivot to a B2B software review and comparison hub, leveraging 111,300+ titles and 500,000+ open-source projects to maintain relevance amid competition from and others. Post-acquisition reforms, including reduced intrusive ads, have stabilized operations, with ongoing traffic and 150 million B2B contacts enabling data-driven without reported financial distress as of 2024. However, reliance on ad exposes it to fluctuations in tech advertising markets, though diversification into lead services has mitigated prior declines.

Ownership and Governance

Major Acquisitions and Leadership Changes

In September 2012, Geeknet sold SourceForge, along with Slashdot and Freecode, to DHI Group, Inc. (operating as Dice), for $20 million, integrating the platforms into its career-focused operations. This acquisition followed Geeknet's rebranding from SourceForge, Inc. in November 2009 and marked a shift toward professional networking amid declining standalone viability. Prior to this, under (formerly VA Software), leadership saw significant turnover, including the resignation of president and CEO Scott Kauffman on August 4, 2010, amid strategic realignments. DHI Group's ownership lasted until January 2016, when it divested SourceForge and to BIZX, LLC, via its subsidiary SourceForge Media, LLC (later operating as ), as part of refocusing on core brands. The deal emphasized restoring user trust, with new management immediately removing bundled installers that had damaged the platform's reputation under prior ownership. Logan Abbott assumed the role of President of SourceForge concurrently, overseeing operational reforms and integration with . Under Slashdot Media's stewardship, stabilized around Abbott's and his dual role as , with Roger Sheppard serving as of Slashdot Media to coordinate broader portfolio strategy. These changes prioritized platform rehabilitation over aggressive monetization, though frequent prior ownership shifts—spanning VA origins to multiple sales—contributed to perceptions of instability among developers. No major outbound acquisitions by SourceForge occurred, as its model centered on hosting rather than expansion through buys.

Controversies and Reforms

Adware Bundling Incidents

In May 2015, SourceForge administrators seized control of inactive project accounts, including the for Windows mirror, and replaced official installers with customized versions bundled with third-party , prompting widespread condemnation from developers. The platform reassigned these projects to an internal account labeled "sf-editor1" and wrapped downloads in web-based installers that promoted up to three additional software offers during installation, a tactic applied without project owners' consent. Affected projects extended beyond to include mirrors or inactive versions of , Mozilla Firefox, , , , , , and , all subjected to the same adware injection process. maintainer stated that the bundling occurred "without our knowledge and permission, and we would never have permitted it," highlighting the unauthorized nature of the alterations. This practice built on prior opt-in bundling options like DevShare but escalated to mandatory interventions on dormant repositories to generate revenue from affiliate commissions. The incidents eroded trust, leading to mass project migrations to alternatives like and demands for SourceForge to relinquish seized code repositories, which the platform resisted citing "historical value." By June 1, 2015, following public backlash, SourceForge reverted the changes, removing wrappers from all hijacked projects and restoring clean download mirrors. The company announced via blog post that third-party offers would thereafter be limited to explicitly opt-in projects only. These events, occurring under Geeknet's ownership prior to the 2016 acquisition by BIZX, exemplified aggressive monetization that prioritized short-term gains over community norms in open-source hosting.

Community Backlash and Platform Responses

In response to the adware bundling practices implemented through the DevShare program starting in 2013, open-source developers and users expressed widespread outrage, accusing SourceForge of undermining project integrity by injecting unwanted software into installers without explicit consent. High-profile projects such as and publicly removed their mirrors from the platform in July 2013, citing concerns over deceptive download prompts and bundled toolbars that compromised user and . By mid-2015, further backlash erupted when SourceForge was found to have "adopted" orphaned projects—such as KeePass and —and repackaged their downloads with -laden installers, prompting developers to label the site as a vector for reputational harm and distribution. Community forums and tech discussions amplified these criticisms, with developers migrating en masse to alternatives like , resulting in a reported 50% drop in active projects by 2015. SourceForge's initial responses during 2013–2015 focused on mitigating ad visibility rather than core bundling issues, launching the "BlockThis" initiative in November 2013 to report and block misleading ads, which reportedly eliminated over 20% of problematic placements. However, these measures were deemed insufficient by critics, as bundling persisted and deceptive practices continued, leading to no significant reversal of community exodus. Following the January 2016 acquisition by BIZX, the new ownership immediately terminated the DevShare program and removed all bundled installers within 48 hours, a change explicitly aimed at restoring credibility and applauded by remaining stakeholders. Subsequent reforms included implementing full support by early 2016 and enhancing integration to align with modern development workflows, though full community trust recovery remained gradual amid lingering perceptions of past abuses.

Usage and Metrics

Project Hosting and Download Statistics

SourceForge hosts over 500,000 projects, enabling developers to manage code , track issues, and collaborate via integrated tools such as and forums. This figure reflects the platform's scale as a centralized , with more than 2.1 million registered users contributing to project development and maintenance. The hosting infrastructure supports diverse programming languages and project types, from utilities to enterprise tools, though many projects remain inactive, contributing to critiques of platform stagnation relative to competitors like . Download activity underscores SourceForge's role in software distribution, with the directory serving more than 2.6 million downloads daily to nearly 20 million monthly visitors. Recent weekly metrics indicate 19,000,525 downloads and 14,665 code commits, highlighting sustained but uneven engagement concentrated on popular legacy projects. These statistics, self-reported by the platform, demonstrate resilience post-controversies, though independent verification is limited, and download volumes have not scaled proportionally with modern open-source growth trends observed elsewhere.

User Engagement and B2B Focus

SourceForge facilitates user engagement primarily through its project hosting, download mechanisms, and review systems, supporting over 500,000 projects and attracting nearly 20 million monthly visitors. Registered users, numbering more than 2.1 million, interact via code commits—exceeding 14,665 in a recent week—and daily downloads surpassing 2.6 million, enabling developers to share, , and on repositories. These features sustain community involvement by providing tools for , issue tracking, and forums, though engagement has shifted from pure open-source collaboration toward broader software discovery. The platform's review and comparison tools further drive user participation, with thousands of ratings aggregated for listings like (over 60,000 reviews) and (3,472 reviews), allowing developers and IT professionals to evaluate options based on peer feedback. This interactive directory encourages ongoing contributions, as users not only consume but also rate and discuss software, fostering a feedback loop that influences project visibility and adoption. In parallel, SourceForge has emphasized a B2B orientation, positioning itself as a platform for and IT services to connect buyers with vendors. This focus targets intent-driven B2B professionals seeking solutions like SaaS tools and platforms, offering vendors lead-generation services, AI-optimized listings, and partnerships for customer acquisition—such as with POS Nation and —to expand reach amid millions of monthly visitors. By integrating open-source hosting with commercial software showcases, the monetizes through vendor tools and , appealing to businesses prioritizing over purely community-driven .

Impact and Reception

Contributions to Open Source

SourceForge, launched in 1999 by VA Linux Systems, pioneered centralized web-based hosting for open-source software projects, providing free tools for version control, bug tracking, mailing lists, and collaborative development at a time when such infrastructure was scarce. This facilitation enabled developers worldwide to share code, manage releases, and build communities without proprietary barriers, significantly lowering entry costs for open-source initiatives. By offering these services, SourceForge supported the growth of over 500,000 projects and attracted millions of registered users, serving as a primary distribution hub that connected developers with end-users through features like download statistics and project directories. It delivered more than 2.6 million downloads daily to nearly 20 million monthly users, amplifying the reach of and fostering innovation in areas such as graphics editing (e.g., ) and data compression (e.g., ). These tools promoted self-sustaining collaboration, where contributors could integrate resources like communication forums and , contributing to the maturation of projects from to deployment. SourceForge's recognition programs, including badges for milestones such as 2,000 monthly downloads or 100,000 total downloads, incentivized project sustainability and highlighted successful open-source efforts, thereby reinforcing community-driven development models. Its emphasis on open-source excellence helped democratize software creation, particularly for smaller teams, by providing scalable infrastructure that paralleled the rise of the broader ecosystem, even as competitors like emerged. Overall, these contributions solidified SourceForge's role in scaling open-source adoption, evidenced by its long-term hosting of high-impact tools that influenced industries from to .

Criticisms and Competitive Landscape

SourceForge has faced significant criticism for practices that prioritized revenue over user trust, particularly during its ownership by from 2012 to 2016. In May 2015, the platform began injecting bundles into installers for abandoned or inactive projects without developers' consent, despite a 2013 pledge to only do so with explicit permission. This included wrapping legitimate open-source downloads with third-party offers, prompting accusations of distribution and eroding community confidence. Additionally, SourceForge locked project repositories for teams attempting to migrate elsewhere, such as GIMP developers switching to , hindering transfers and further fueling perceptions of anti-competitive lock-in tactics. The fallout was immediate and widespread, with high-profile projects like GIMP, VLC, and FileZilla publicly abandoning the site and urging users to download from alternative mirrors. Community backlash highlighted how aggressive monetization—through malvertising and bundled installers—contradicted open-source principles of transparency and autonomy, leading to a sharp decline in active project hosting. Following its acquisition by BIZX in January 2016, SourceForge implemented reforms, including bans on unsolicited adware and malvertising, malware scanning for uploads, and commitments to facilitate project migrations. However, the reputational damage persisted, with ongoing skepticism about download safety and a shift toward enterprise-oriented features rather than grassroots developer needs. In the competitive landscape, SourceForge has been overshadowed by platforms offering modern and collaboration tools. , launched in 2008, gained dominance through native support, streamlined forking and pull requests, and integration with services, attracting migrations from SourceForge's older CVS and workflows. emerged as a strong open-core alternative in 2011, providing self-hosted options, built-in pipelines, and issue tracking without SourceForge's historical baggage, appealing to privacy-conscious teams. , acquired by in 2010, competes via integration and / support, targeting enterprise users with robust permissions and deployment tools. These rivals have captured the majority of active development workflows, relegating SourceForge to a niche for legacy project downloads and less -centric repositories, with its user base contracting as modern favors over centralized hosting.

Legacy and Future Outlook

SourceForge's legacy as a pioneer in hosting is marked by its role in centralizing tools, including , forums, and download services, which facilitated for developers in the late 1990s and early 2000s when distributed version control systems like were not yet widespread. By providing free infrastructure for code repositories, bug tracking, and mailing lists, it enabled the growth of thousands of projects, serving as a primary distribution point for widely used open-source applications and contributing to the mainstream adoption of collaborative development models. Historical metrics underscore this impact: as of 2018, the platform supported over 3.7 million registered users and handled more than 100 million downloads monthly, reflecting its scale in democratizing access to software artifacts. The platform's enduring contributions include preserving a vast of legacy projects, with over ,000 open-source repositories still hosted, which supports ongoing and in software initiatives. However, its reputation suffered from mid-2010s controversies involving bundling and user lockouts, prompting a migration of active communities to competitors and diminishing its dominance in core hosting functions. Despite this, SourceForge's early model influenced subsequent platforms by demonstrating the viability of web-based services for non-commercial software ecosystems. Looking ahead, SourceForge has repositioned itself primarily as a B2B software and , cataloging over 111,300 titles and attracting nearly 20 million monthly visitors, which positions it as the largest such platform by traffic volume. This shift emphasizes vendor , user reviews, and discovery tools over traditional project hosting, with daily downloads steady at 2.6 million amid competition from , , and specialized directories like G2. Future developments are likely to focus on integrating for enhanced search and recommendations, while maintaining niche open-source support, though sustained relevance will depend on addressing user trust issues and adapting to cloud-native development trends. Ownership under Media since 2016 has stabilized operations, enabling incremental enhancements like performance awards for listed products, but the platform's growth trajectory remains tied to B2B monetization rather than recapturing developer-centric leadership.

References

  1. [1]
    A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
    Jun 2, 2018 · SourceForge was founded in 1999, and in the nearly two decades following has been serving the open source community as one of the world's largest open source ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  2. [2]
    SourceForge: Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open ...
    SourceForge is a complete business software and services comparison platform where buyers find, compare, & review business software and IT services.Open Source Software · About · Top Downloaded Projects · SourceForge Podcast
  3. [3]
    The Rise, Fall and Resurgence of SourceForge - Medium
    Nov 8, 2024 · In 2013, the platform was acquired by Geeknet, which introduced a controversial revenue model. In an attempt to generate additional income, ...
  4. [4]
    SourceForge | Civilization Wiki - Fandom
    It was founded by Geoffrey B. Jeffery, Tim Perdue, and Drew Streib in November 1999. Freeciv and FreeCol are available for download on SourceForge, ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  5. [5]
    Under new management, SourceForge moves to put badness in past
    Jun 17, 2016 · SourceForge moves to put badness in past. Adware installers and malvertising banished, the company looks to build user trust.
  6. [6]
    SourceForge Accused of Bundling GIMP with Adware - PetaPixel
    May 29, 2015 · In a post on Google+ two days ago, GIMP accused SourceForge of taking control of the “GIMP for Windows” account, of “distributing an ads-enabled ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    SourceForge 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Investors, Acquisition
    SourceForge was acquired on 01-Feb-2016. Who acquired SourceForge? SourceForge was acquired by BIZX (San Diego). Data Transparency.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  8. [8]
    VA Linux's SourceForge forges cash - ZDNET
    Dec 5, 2000 · VA Linux Systems originally developed SourceForge, a Web site for open-source programmers, as a way to save money. Now it has become a way to ...
  9. [9]
    Definition of SourceForge - PCMag
    A source code repository for open-source software from Slashdot Media. Founded in 1999 by VA Software, SourceForge was the first destination for open-source ...
  10. [10]
    The SourceForge Story | Datamation
    Oct 17, 2007 · Changing its name to VA Software, it sold an Enterprise Edition of SourceForge. (The fact that Enterprise Edition was closed source caused ...
  11. [11]
    Why Use SourceForge? Features and Benefits
    Downloads & Statistics · Open Source Directory · Forums, Blogs & Mailing Lists · Integrated Issue Tracking · Code Repositories · Documentation · And, it's Open Source.
  12. [12]
    https://www.ranker.com/list/famous-programmers-from-united-states-of-america/reference
  13. [13]
    VA Linux Unveils New Service - WIRED
    Jan 4, 2000 · SourceForge will provide tools and resources that open source developers need to develop and maintain software in a collaborative environment ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  14. [14]
    VA Linux -- Easy Come, Easy Go / Stock's dramatic rise and fall ...
    Jan 18, 2001 · On one day in December of 1999, VA Linux, a company with just 200 employees, shattered the record for a single day IPO. The stock, initially ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    VA Linux Systems to launch open source one-stop shop - The Register
    Jan 4, 2000 · VA Linux Systems will take its SourceForge open source software foundry out of beta and into the commercial mainstream later this month.
  16. [16]
    SourceForge Not Making A Graceful Exit - FOSS Force
    Jun 11, 2015 · The site was founded in 1999 by VA Linux Systems (now Geeknet). Not long after that, the company took control of Andover.net, which gave it ...
  17. [17]
    VA Linux launches 'SourceForge OnSite' enterprise solution
    Dec 5, 2000 · More information on SourceForge OnSite is available at http://www.valinux.com/services. Further information on SourceForge.net is available ...
  18. [18]
    Lessons Learned from an Empirical Study of SourceForge Projects
    ... SourceForge database, gathered in the summer of 2006, contained 107,747 projects. ... projects, we needed to sample a much larger number of SourceForge projects.
  19. [19]
    A SourceForge history lesson
    May 30, 2008 · He also tells of the time when SourceForge suddenly got an influx of cash and staff following its first profitable quarter in 2006. The aging ...
  20. [20]
    Ask HN: How did open source work before GitHub? - Hacker News
    May 20, 2017 · GitHub launched in 2008. SourceForge added git support in 2009. That year delay surely contributed to GitHub taking over. Git was an absolute breath of fresh ...
  21. [21]
    Why GitHub Actually Won | Butler's Log
    Sep 9, 2024 · ... GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code hosting platform”. ... From “The Total Growth of Open Source”, 2008, published by Amit Deshpande ...
  22. [22]
    SourceForge - Wikiwand
    SourceForge is a web service founded by Tony Guntharp, Uriah Welcome, Tim Perdue, and Drew Streib in November 1999. SourceForge provides a centralized ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Still reeling, SourceForge looks to the future - Opensource.com
    Mar 8, 2016 · A few months later, in July 2013, SourceForge announced DevShare, which it described as "a new opt-in, revenue-sharing program aimed at giving ...
  24. [24]
    SourceForge locked in projects of fleeing users, cashed in on ...
    Jun 1, 2015 · And because of SourceForge's policies, it's nearly impossible for open-source projects to get their code removed from the site. SourceForge is, ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  25. [25]
    What happened to Sourceforge? - etix's weblog
    Jun 2, 2015 · The full story between VLC and Sourceforge. In 2010 the VideoLAN team decided to delegate the binary distribution of VLC media player to Sourceforge.
  26. [26]
    GIMP-Win project wasn't hijacked, just abandoned - SourceForge
    May 27, 2015 · In 2013, the GIMP-Win author discontinued use of SourceForge for download delivery. Based on our prior outreach to the GIMP-Win author, we ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    SourceForge replacing GIMP Windows downloads - LWN.net
    May 28, 2015 · The program replaced the generic installer package that a project uploaded for users with a customized installer that bundled in several smaller ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    BIZX Subsidiary SourceForge Media, LLC Acquires Slashdot Media
    Jan 28, 2016 · SAN DIEGO, CA--(Marketwired - January 28, 2016) - SourceForge Media, LLC, a subsidiary of BIZX, LLC (BIZX), one of the fastest growing ...
  29. [29]
    SourceForge Acquisition and Future Plans
    Feb 9, 2016 · At the end of January, SourceForge and Slashdot were sold to BIZX, LLC by DHI Group, Inc. As the new owners of two iconic sites, ...
  30. [30]
    Good News, Sourceforge stops bundling adware with installers
    Feb 10, 2016 · Projects hosted on SourceForge could apply for the DevShare program to bundle adware with project installers for the Windows operating system.<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Introducing the new SourceForge
    Jan 9, 2018 · The new SourceForge significantly improves on not only the design, but the detail and granularity of the statistics we provide project admins with.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    What is SourceForge's business model? - Vizologi
    Furthermore, SourceForge offers premium services and features to project maintainers and development teams, such as enhanced storage, analytics, and project ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    http://sourceforge.net/blog/today-we-offer-devshare-beta-a-sustainable-way-to-fund-open-source-software/
  34. [34]
    Slashdot Media
    ### Summary of SourceForge's Role and Monetization Strategies
  35. [35]
    About SourceForge
    SourceForge provides a business software comparison platform, where B2B software buyers can compare business software, SaaS, and services across thousands of ...Missing: overview | Show results with:overview
  36. [36]
    SourceForge Business Software Listing Plans and Pricing
    View SourceForge Business Software Listings marketing packages and pricing for advertising business software and services on SourceForge.
  37. [37]
    https://prnewswire.com/news-releases/slashdot-media-to-merge-with-bizx-llc-creating-a-market-leader-in-b2b-software-technology-and-data-300978561.html
  38. [38]
    https://quora.com/Why-do-software-providers-choose-G2-over-SourceForge
  39. [39]
    Geeknet - Wikipedia
    SourceForge was released to the public at Comdex on November 17, 1999. VA began porting Linux to the new IA-64 processor architecture in earnest. Intel and ...History · VA Research · VA Software · SourceForge and OSDN
  40. [40]
    The State of SourceForge Since Its Acquisition in January - Reddit
    Jun 8, 2016 · We acquired SourceForge and Slashdot in January from DHI Group (also known as DICE). The first thing we did after we took over was remove bundled adware from ...what's the deal with sourceforge? : r/opensource - RedditHow GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code hosting ...More results from www.reddit.com
  41. [41]
    SourceForge Leadership Team
    Meet the people behind the world's largest complete software platform. ; Logan Abbott. President, SourceForge & COO, Slashdot Media ; Roger Sheppard. President of ...Missing: acquisitions key
  42. [42]
    “The Canary in the Coal Mine…” A cautionary tale from the decline ...
    Jul 14, 2020 · SourceForge changed ownership many times. One participant said “every 18 months we'll have a new owner and a new set of managers. At one ...
  43. [43]
    Sourceforge adds adware-installers to abandoned projects (and ...
    Jun 1, 2015 · Sourceforge, a prominent project hosting website, began to wrap some software downloads on the site in installers that included unrelated third-party offers.
  44. [44]
    Slashdot and Sourceforge - Dan Luu
    May 24, 2015 · SourceForge is injecting adware, causing user distrust. Slashdot, owned by the same company, is burying the story about SourceForge's actions.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  45. [45]
    https://sourceforge.net/blog/third-party-offers-will-be-presented-with-opt-in-projects-only/
  46. [46]
    https://www.infoworld.com/article/2242468/sourceforge-commits-reputational-suicide.html
  47. [47]
    SourceForge commits reputational suicide - InfoWorld
    Jun 2, 2015 · Despite seeming reformed last year, SourceForge has been caught red-handed abusing the reputations of open source projects.
  48. [48]
    SourceFAIL? SourceForge accused of shady practices (again)
    Jun 4, 2015 · Observers accuse the project repository of adding malware to compiled downloads and littering the site with deceptive ads. The two most recent ...
  49. [49]
    SourceForge BlockThis Initiative Update
    Nov 26, 2013 · This has resulted in SourceForge blocking +20% of misleading ads, with more work ongoing. This is just the beginning and we are fully ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  50. [50]
    Compare Business Software: October 2025 Reviews & Comparison
    Compare the best business software of 2025 for your company or organization. Find the highest rated business software pricing, reviews, free demos, trials, ...Business Apps for Android · Business Software for Cloud · Free Business Software
  51. [51]
    SourceForge Business Software Listings and Demand Generation
    Nov 20, 2023 · A set of powerful solutions to drive in-market buyers to your website, generate new customers build trust and authority, and gather intent data.
  52. [52]
    Analysis of Activity in the Open Source Software Development ...
    The last finding is that most of the OSS Projects are using Github, Sourceforge and Ohloh as their source code repositories. These results provide important ...
  53. [53]
    From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects
    In this paper we use a large data-set obtained from SourceForge.net to estimate the relationship between a series of different characteristics of OS projects ...Missing: facilitation | Show results with:facilitation
  54. [54]
    Open Source Community Awards and Recognition - SourceForge
    Our popular directory connects nearly 20 million monthly users with all of these open source projects and serves more than 2.6 million downloads a day.Missing: engagement statistics 2023-2025
  55. [55]
    Most downloaded projects in Sourceforge's history. - ResearchGate
    The strategy of selection of the sample of projects was to select the most downloaded projects from the whole SourceForge's history (Table 2). This choice had ...
  56. [56]
    Is SourceForge Safe? - JoinDeleteMe
    Jun 25, 2024 · Yes, SourceForge is generally considered safe, but that hasn't always been true. In the past, SourceForge faced criticism for bundling adware with some project ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  57. [57]
    Top GitHub Alternatives to Host Your Open Source Projects
    Top GitHub Alternatives to Host Your Open Source Projects · 1. GitLab · 2. Bitbucket · 3. SourceForge · 4. Launchpad · 5. Google Cloud Source Repositories · 6. AWS ...1. Gitlab · 2. Bitbucket · Other Github Alternatives...
  58. [58]
    Top 10 SourceForge Alternatives & Competitors in 2025 | G2
    The best overall SourceForge alternative is G2.com. Other similar apps like SourceForge are GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Capterra.Missing: landscape | Show results with:landscape
  59. [59]
    Top 29 GitHub Competitors & Alternatives in 2025
    Nov 29, 2024 · The top GitHub competitors are GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps (Visual Studio Team Services), SourceForge, AWS CodeCommit, Gerrit, ...