Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Slashdot

Slashdot is an American technology news aggregation and discussion website founded in September 1997 by Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda and Jeff "Hemos" Bates, two computer science students at Hope College in Michigan, initially under the name Chips & Dips before rebranding to emphasize curated links to stories on open-source software, Linux, science, and geek culture. The platform quickly gained prominence for its user-submitted stories, editorially selected headlines, and innovative moderation system allowing registered users to score comments for quality and relevance, fostering a merit-based community discourse that predated and influenced modern social news sites. Slashdot's defining characteristic emerged as the "Slashdot effect," a phenomenon where external websites linked in its stories experienced sudden, overwhelming traffic spikes from its readership—often millions of tech-savvy visitors—leading to server crashes and temporary unavailability, which highlighted the site's influence and the infrastructural challenges of early internet scalability.

History

Founding and Early Growth (1997-2000)

Slashdot originated in 1997 when Rob Malda, using the pseudonym CmdrTaco, registered the domain slashdot.org and launched the site as a platform for aggregating links to technology news, with an initial focus on and Linux-related developments. The project evolved from a static "Chips & Dips" news section on Malda's personal homepage, transitioning to dynamic content generated via custom scripts that stored data in flat text files. , known as Hemos, provided funding for the domain registration and quickly joined as co-founder, with both operating the site from , while students at . Early features included user-submitted rants, reviews, URLs shared via email and IRC channels, and interactive polls introduced shortly after launch, fostering initial engagement among a small circle of friends and tech enthusiasts. Traffic began surging by late 1997, drawing visitors from domains like mit.edu and microsoft.com, which necessitated investments in upgrades, , and even to cover rising costs. The site's custom backend expanded to include user accounts and a submissions , while a group of early contributors dubbed "Blockstackers" assisted with code improvements and content, marking the shift from a solo endeavor to a collaborative effort. Growth accelerated in 1998, particularly after Netscape's announcement to open-source its browser, which reportedly doubled site traffic and amplified Slashdot's visibility within the burgeoning open-source and geek communities. By mid-1999, the platform had amassed a dedicated user base of around 200,000 members, who actively participated in discussions on , software, and broader technology topics from a shared living space known as the "Geek Compound." This period saw the refinement of moderation mechanisms to manage comment quality amid rising submissions, solidifying Slashdot's reputation as a community-driven . Entering 2000, Slashdot's influence continued to expand, supported by hundreds of thousands of regular users and millions of monthly page views, though exact early traffic metrics remain anecdotal due to the era's limited tools. The site's model of curating stories for reader commentary proved resilient, handling the ""—where linked sites experienced overload from sudden influxes of visitors—a phenomenon emblematic of its rapid ascent. These developments positioned Slashdot as a pivotal hub for tech , transitioning from a student hobby to a commercially viable entity by the end of the decade.

Expansion and Peak Influence (2001-2010)

In the early , Slashdot sustained growth amid the post-dot-com landscape as part of the Development Network (OSDN), formed after its 2000 integration with VA Linux Systems, which rebranded to VA Software in December 2001. The site introduced paid subscriptions in March 2002, offering ad-free browsing for $5 per 1,000 pages viewed, which by 2003 extended to to stories 10-20 minutes before public release, enhancing revenue and user retention. Traffic metrics reflected this expansion, with estimates placing monthly unique visitors near 5 million and page views at 50 million by the mid-, driven by its role as a central hub for technology professionals and open-source enthusiasts. The site's peak influence manifested in the "Slashdot effect," where links to external sites triggered massive influxes of visitors, often overwhelming servers; academic analyses documented spikes exceeding 100,000 page views in peak days for affected domains, underscoring Slashdot's referral power until competition from emerging platforms began diluting it around 2005. In 2004, OSDN rebranded to Open Source Technology Group (OSTG), followed by a 2006 site redesign from a community CSS contest winner, improving usability and accommodating higher volumes of user-generated content. Engagement peaked with stories like the November 2004 U.S. election concession, which drew over 5,600 comments— a record for discussion depth on topics spanning politics, software, and hardware. By 2007, OSTG had renamed to , Inc., but Slashdot's editorial model under Rob Malda maintained its focus on curated, community-moderated tech news, culminating in the 100,000th story published on December 11, 2009. Features like April Fool's Day experiments, including a 2006 "ponies" theme and 2009 user achievements, reinforced cultural norms of irreverence and within its user base, estimated at over 600,000 daily unique IP visitors around 2006. This era solidified Slashdot's status as a for geek culture, influencing debates on —such as its 2001 pivot to linking rather than hosting contested content amid legal pressures—while prioritizing empirical tech developments over mainstream narratives.

Ownership Transitions and Challenges (2011-2020)

In August 2011, Rob Malda, known as CmdrTaco and co-founder of , resigned as after 14 years, citing changes in the landscape and a desire to pursue new opportunities. His departure, announced on August 25, marked a significant transition, as Malda had been central to the site's voice and curation since its inception in 1997. This event signaled the end of an era, with subsequent editorial shifts contributing to user perceptions of declining authenticity. Ownership changed hands in September 2012 when Holdings, Inc. acquired Slashdot Media—including Slashdot.org, , and Freecode—from , Inc. for $20 million in cash. The acquisition aimed to expand Dice's reach into the global technology community, integrating Slashdot's audience with Dice's career-focused platforms. Under (later rebranded DHI Group), Slashdot faced challenges including a controversial site redesign in 2014, which drew widespread user backlash for altering the familiar layout and . SourceForge, bundled under the same ownership, encountered severe reputational damage in May 2015 when it was revealed to have inserted and bundles into developers' installers without consent, prompting mass project migrations to competitors like . This scandal eroded trust in Slashdot Media overall, as the sites shared infrastructure and branding, exacerbating user exodus and traffic declines for Slashdot. DHI announced plans to divest Slashdot Media in July 2015, stating it no longer aligned with their core recruitment business focus. In January 2016, BIZX, LLC—a San Diego-based web publisher—acquired through its subsidiary Media, LLC, aiming to revitalize the properties with investments in security and user features like support. The sale addressed ongoing challenges such as ad revenue pressures and competition from platforms like , which siphoned tech-savvy audiences. By December 2019, merged with BIZX, rebranding the entity and leveraging data platforms like Passport for targeted marketing, though user engagement continued to wane amid persistent moderation complaints and perceived commercialization. These transitions highlighted broader difficulties in sustaining a niche, community-driven model amid evolving dynamics through 2020.

Recent Operations and Adaptations (2021-Present)

Since 2021, Slashdot has maintained operations under the ownership of Slashdot Media, following its 2019 merger with BIZX, LLC, which positioned the entity as a provider of B2B software tools and communities. The site continues to function as a user-driven of , with submissions from readers forming the basis of daily stories edited by a small team including Beau Hamilton, Manish Singh, and others. Content publication remains active, as evidenced by stories posted through October 2025 covering topics such as reaching 5.03% desktop market share in June 2025 and AI-related developments like circular mega-deals among hardware firms. Slashdot's sustains through , including paid posts, while expanding its role as a B2B listing over 100,000 products for comparison and peer evaluation. This dual focus on and software directories has persisted without reported shifts in core or submission processes, relying on user-assigned to filter comments. No substantive site redesigns, feature overhauls, or asynchronous enhancements beyond pre-2021 mobile adaptations have been documented, indicating a strategy of operational continuity rather than radical evolution. Community engagement endures through threaded discussions on stories, though external analyses have questioned the site's and relative to its historical peak, attributing potential stagnation to broader shifts in online discourse platforms. Despite this, the platform upholds its emphasis on empirical tech reporting, with archives showing consistent output on verifiable metrics like operating system adoption rates and economic tech impacts into 2025.

Technical Foundation

Software Architecture and Development

Slashdot's core software, known as Slash, is an open-source web application framework designed for building discussion-oriented sites, initially developed to support its news aggregation and community features. Written primarily in Perl and leveraging Apache with mod_perl for dynamic content generation, Slash employs a modular architecture that separates concerns such as article posting, user authentication, comment threading, and administrative tools. The system uses the Template Toolkit for rendering HTML templates, enabling customizable themes and user interfaces without altering core logic. At its foundation, Slash relies on a database (with experimental support) to store relational data including stories, comments, user profiles, moderation queues, and poll results, facilitating efficient querying for high-volume interactions like the site's signature threaded discussions. Development began in 1997 under Rob Malda, evolving from ad hoc scripts handling basic to a robust, extensible platform by 1999, incorporating plugins for features such as feeds, slashboxes (modular side panels), and user journals. This progression addressed early scalability challenges, with ongoing refinements for performance amid surging traffic. To manage load from millions of monthly visits and the "Slashdot effect," the architecture incorporates caching via for frequently accessed elements like user sessions and recent comments, alongside segregated server pools—dedicated to static pages, dynamic homepages, comment rendering, and administrative scripts. Load balancing employs tools like (LVS) and Pound reverse proxies, while multi-master replication ensures through read replicas and failover mechanisms. Licensed under GPLv2, Slash was open-sourced early on, powering derivative sites and fostering community contributions through repositories like , though core updates have tapered since the mid-2000s.

Moderation and Quality Control Mechanisms

Slashdot employs a distributed user-based moderation system to evaluate and score comments on submitted stories, aiming to elevate high-quality contributions while suppressing low-value or disruptive ones. Eligible users, selected randomly based on their account activity and karma level, receive a limited number of moderation points—typically five, each expendable within three days—to apply to comments. Moderators choose from predefined adjectives such as "Insightful," "Informative," or "Offtopic," which adjust the comment's score, generally ranging from -1 (for negative ratings like "Flamebait" or "Troll") to +1 (for positive ones like "Underrated"), with cumulative effects determining visibility. This system, operational since Slashdot's early years, relies on scarcity of points to prevent overuse and encourages selective application. User karma serves as a gatekeeping mechanism for eligibility and influences comment visibility. Karma operates on a scale from "Terrible" to "," calculated from the net positive moderations received on a user's past comments; upward moderations increase karma, while downward ones decrease it. Users with neutral or higher karma qualify for duties, theoretically filtering out low-quality posters from influencing discussions. Additionally, new comments receive an initial "pre-rating" based on the poster's historical karma, starting them at scores like +1 for high-karma users or -1 for low ones, which helps rapid in high-volume threads. To mitigate biased or erroneous moderations, Slashdot implements meta-moderation, introduced in September 1999, where a secondary layer of users anonymously reviews a random sample of prior moderations and rates them as "Fair" or "Unfair." Consistent unfair ratings can revoke a moderator's privileges or adjust their future eligibility, fostering accountability without centralized oversight. Meta-moderators are drawn from active users, and the process runs continuously to refine the primary system's accuracy. Empirical analyses of this dual-layer approach indicate it effectively separates high-quality comments (often scoring +2 or higher) from noise, with studies showing consistent filtering even in threads exceeding thousands of posts. Readers exert additional quality control via customizable thresholds, sliders on comment sections that hide scores below user-set levels (e.g., displaying only "+2" or above), allowing of the discussion view. This combination of user-driven scoring, karma incentives, meta-checks, and filtering has been credited with sustaining coherent discourse amid scale, though it presumes a self-regulating of engaged, technically savvy participants.

Core Features and User Tools

Slashdot's core functionality revolves around user-submitted technology news stories, which are proposed via an online submission form accessible to both registered and anonymous users. Editors review these submissions daily, selecting those deemed timely and relevant for publication on the front page, often editing for clarity, grammar, or combining related entries while discouraging press releases. This process ensures a steady flow of content focused on , , science, and technology . The Firehose serves as a central user tool for accessing unfiltered content, including story submissions, comments, journal entries, and RSS feeds, introduced on August 2, 2007. Users can filter, vote on, and tag items within the Firehose, with color-coding indicating popularity—red for high-interest submissions—to aid discovery before editorial selection. This mechanism promotes community-driven curation, allowing users to interact with potential stories in real-time. Comment is a hallmark feature, where randomly selected registered users receive points (typically five, expiring after days) to adjust comment scores by +1 or -1 using labels such as "Insightful," "Funny," "," or "." To mitigate abuse, a layer enables eligible logged-in users (top 92.5% by account age) to rate the fairness of recent moderations, influencing moderator eligibility and system integrity. User karma, scaled from "Terrible" to "Excellent," derives from net received on one's and determines initial post scores, access, and overall privileges; positive karma increases with up-moderations, while negative trends trigger safeguards like 120-second posting delays or temporary bans. Registered users gain access to personalized tools, including adjustable comment thresholds (from -1 to +5) to hide low-quality replies, display modes (threaded, flat, or nested), and configurable "slashboxes" for mini-feeds of topics or sources. Additional features encompass journals for personal entries, a "Friends & Foes" system to ignore or highlight users, and abuse reporting via an "Anti" symbol for editor intervention against trolls or . Tags, limited to lowercase and 64 characters, further organize content, with abusive tagging impacting karma. These tools collectively enforce quality through distributed participation while accommodating diverse reading preferences, such as via the mobile site supporting iOS 5+ and 2.3+.

Community Dynamics

User Base and Cultural Norms

The user base of Slashdot has historically been dominated by technology professionals and hobbyists, with early from site owner OSDN reporting 94% viewers. A 2007 survey of respondents revealed 98% participation, 62% holding or graduate degrees, and 71% employed in computer-related fields such as , systems , and IT. These users, often self-identified as "nerds" aligned with the site's tagline "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters," exhibit a strong affinity for programming, tinkering, and emerging trends, with many contributing or participating in open-source projects. Cultural norms within the Slashdot community prioritize open-source principles, technical depth, and unfiltered critique, stemming from the site's roots in advocacy and development. Discussions frequently feature skepticism toward proprietary vendors—particularly during the site's peak—and a preference for decentralized, community-driven solutions over corporate control. The karma system rewards sustained high-quality participation by granting moderation privileges to top users, who then evaluate comments on axes like "insightful," "funny," or "troll," enforcing emergent standards of wit, evidence-based argumentation, and aversion to unsubstantiated hype. Interactions are shaped by a friends-and-foes , where users designate allies for prioritized and adversaries for filtering, enabling personalized yet communal curation that reinforces in-group cohesion around shared technical values. Norms discourage overt commercialism and flame wars through penalties, though and in-jokes—such as references to "the Slashdot effect"—permeate threads, blending erudition with irreverence. Violations of these expectations, like or low-effort posts, risk downvoting or expulsion threats, maintaining a baseline of intellectual rigor amid the volume of user-submitted stories and replies.

Interactions and Emergent Behaviors

Users interact on Slashdot primarily through story submissions, threaded comments, and a distributed system that assigns numerical scores to evaluate contribution quality. Eligible users, determined by accumulated karma from prior moderated comments, are randomly selected to moderate others' posts by applying labels such as "+1 Insightful," "+1 Funny," or "-1 Troll," which adjust visibility thresholds and user karma accordingly. This , implemented since September 1999, relies on users viewing comments through adjustable score thresholds to filter noise, encouraging selective engagement with high-value content. Meta-moderation adds a secondary layer, where users rate the fairness of recent moderations to curb abuse and maintain system integrity, with unfair meta-moderations reducing the offender's karma and moderation privileges. Empirical analysis of over 1.8 million comments from demonstrates that this dual mechanism effectively separates high-quality discussions from low-value ones within minutes, as moderators collectively upvote substantive technical insights while downvoting off-topic or inflammatory remarks. The system's loops—combining moderation scores, reply chains, and personal viewing habits—shape adaptation, with studies showing new participants increasing insightful posts by up to 20% after receiving positive moderation, while reducing trolling behavior in response to downvotes. Emergent behaviors arise from these interactions, including karma optimization strategies where users craft comments to maximize upvotes, sometimes leading to overly formulaic but technically rigorous responses. Social networks extracted from reply and moderation patterns reveal small-world connectivity, with a core of high-karma "hubs" influencing through frequent interactions, fostering norms of toward and preference for open-source solutions. Over time, this has cultivated a culture of preemptive and meme-like humor in early comments, such as signatures or puns on tech jargon, which propagate virally within threads to signal insider status without derailing substantive debate. However, gaming attempts, like posting minimally to build karma before substantive contributions, occasionally emerge, though meta- mitigates their prevalence by penalizing inconsistent quality.

Societal Impact

The Slashdot Effect and Traffic Phenomena

The Slashdot effect denotes the abrupt surge in website traffic triggered by a hyperlink from Slashdot.org, frequently resulting in server overload and service disruption for underprepared sites. This unintended consequence arises from the simultaneous access by Slashdot's substantial readership, predominantly composed of technology enthusiasts capable of generating request volumes that exceed typical server capacities. The term emerged in 1999, capturing the era's nascent web infrastructure vulnerabilities to such popularity cascades. The primary mechanism involves a rapid influx of concurrent connections, often amplifying baseline traffic by factors of hundreds, as documented in analyses of affected logs. Smaller or shared-hosting sites prove especially susceptible, experiencing degraded or complete outages resembling denial-of-service incidents, though without malicious intent. Empirical observations from statistics reveal characteristic spikes, where hit rates escalate sharply post-linkage, sustaining elevated levels for hours before subsiding. Mitigation strategies have evolved alongside web technologies, encompassing scalable cloud hosting, content delivery networks (CDNs), and static caching to distribute load and preempt bottlenecks. Sites employing these measures, such as edge servers for static assets, demonstrate resilience against the effect's intensity. Over time, enhanced global and diversified linking practices have attenuated the phenomenon's potency, with studies indicating diluted per-link due to increased story volumes on sites. Related traffic phenomena, including the "Reddit hug of death," mirror this dynamic across other high-traffic platforms, underscoring broader challenges in handling viral referrals. Despite infrastructural advances, unprepared domains remain vulnerable, as evidenced by persistent reports of overloads from analogous surges.

Influence on Technology Discourse

Slashdot established a distinctive model for through its user-submitted stories, editorial curation, and moderated comment threads, which emphasized depth, skepticism toward authority, and collective scrutiny of . Launched in September 1997 by "CmdrTaco" Malda, the site quickly became a hub for "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters," fostering discussions that prioritized verifiable details over superficial . This format encouraged participants to dissect software architectures, vulnerabilities, and implications with snippets, benchmarks, and first-hand insights, setting a for rigorous, peer-reviewed-like online analysis in tech communities. The site's influence extended to amplifying open-source advocacy and critiquing proprietary systems, shaping narratives around (FOSS) during the late 1990s and early 2000s. Slashdot's coverage often highlighted developments, projects, and battles like the litigation against over alleged Unix code theft in , where commenters mobilized to debunk claims with evidence from source code repositories and legal filings. This discourse contributed to broader cultural shifts, reinforcing libertarian-leaning views on software freedom, , and corporate overreach in tech, as seen in viral threads mocking Microsoft's in 1998, which exposed internal strategies against open-source competition. By aggregating niche expertise, Slashdot democratized tech critique, influencing developers and policymakers to prioritize and modularity in system design. In broader , Slashdot pioneered elements of participatory that prefigured modern platforms, such as threaded debates with reputation-based (e.g., "+1 Insightful" or "+1 Funny" votes), which filtered noise and elevated substantive arguments. This mechanism cultivated a discourse norm of evidence-based rebuttals over attacks, impacting how tech topics like (DRM), privacy erosion, and early experiments were framed. For instance, its July 11, 2010, story on introduced the protocol to a technically savvy , sparking early debates on that echoed in subsequent discussions. Over time, however, as mainstream outlets adopted similar interactive features, Slashdot's niche influence waned, though its legacy persists in fostering distrust of unexamined tech hype and emphasis on empirical validation.

Reception Among Peers and Critics

Slashdot earned early recognition from technology awards organizations for its pioneering user-moderation system and community engagement. In May 2000, it received People's Voice in the categories of Best Community Site and Best Print/Zines, as announced during the ceremony in . Technology publications like Wired covered the event positively, emphasizing how the awards highlighted Slashdot's appeal to a dedicated audience of developers and enthusiasts, even as the site experienced crashes from resultant traffic spikes. Critics and peers in the tech journalism sphere praised Slashdot for democratizing curation and sparking in-depth discussions on open-source topics, positioning it as a model for participatory in the late . Academic analyses, such as a dissertation examining its conversational dynamics, credited the site with enabling large-scale, collaborative public discourse grounded in shared commitments to and critique. However, journalists raised concerns about its fostering echo chambers; a 1999 Salon article detailed how vehement user responses to a cyberterrorism piece compelled the outlet to rewrite the story, prompting debates over whether Slashdot's influence skewed external reporting toward appeasing its user base. By the 2010s, as social platforms proliferated, critics argued Slashdot's rigid format and emphasis on esoteric issues hindered adaptation to wider audiences. A 2010 ReadWriteWeb commentary noted its marginal impact on the , attributing this to an over-narrow focus on "heavy duty " that alienated broader users. commentators have since viewed it as a relic of pre-social media eras, with its once-vibrant comment sections criticized for devolving into repetitive, insider jargon rather than advancing .

Criticisms and Controversies

Alleged Decline in Quality

Following the acquisition of Slashdot by Andover.net in December 1999, which later evolved through ownership by VA Linux Systems, OSTG, and SourceForge Media in 2007, numerous users reported a perceptible drop in site quality, attributing it to shifts in editorial priorities and commercialization pressures. Long-time observers on forums like Reddit described the post-sale era as marking a transition from community-driven, original technology scoops to more formulaic aggregation, with increased duplication of stories already covered elsewhere. Rob Malda, Slashdot's co-founder known as CmdrTaco, reduced his involvement around 2011, coinciding with further staff departures including editors like Hemos and Samzenpus, which critics link to diminished -breaking capacity. In subsequent years, the site allegedly devolved into linking "dumbed down mainstream " rather than fostering insider discourse, eroding its edge in open-source and tech niches as those topics mainstreamed. Ownership transfers to and later entities exacerbated this, with stagnant feature development leaving the interface and commenting system feeling archaic, unresponsive to modern norms. Comment quality faced particular scrutiny, with users alleging a rise in low-effort jokes, unsubstantiated opinions, and amid declining efficacy. By 2014, backlash against a proposed redesign highlighted a decade-long erosion, trapped in a cycle where stricter rules alienated contributors while lax enforcement failed to cull noise. Overzealous comment deletions and user bans by administrators fostered perceptions of and "nerd-shaming," further driving engagement down—evidenced by reports of daily comments falling to about one-tenth of peak levels. Traffic metrics reflect this, with monthly unique visitors reportedly peaking around 3.7 million in before broader declines, including a 10.97% drop month-over-month as of September 2025. These allegations persist despite Slashdot's enduring niche appeal, with critics arguing that failure to innovate—such as slow adoption of social features—allowed competitors like to capture deeper discourse. User sentiment often frames the site as a "shell of its former self," sustained minimally without active investment.

Bias and Moderation Disputes

Slashdot's system, introduced in March 1999, relies on randomly selected registered users to assign scores from -1 to +1 to comments, influencing their visibility based on user-set thresholds; , added later that year, allows users to evaluate moderators' fairness to prevent abuse and maintain system integrity. This distributed approach aims to elevate insightful contributions while suppressing low-quality or ones, but it has faced criticism for enabling subjective biases and inconsistent application. Critics have accused the system of fostering an "old boys' club" dynamic, where long-time users with low numerical IDs receive preferential moderation, skewing visibility toward established voices and disadvantaging newcomers; empirical experiments have demonstrated that posts from veteran accounts garner higher scores, suggesting network effects amplify insider advantages. Moderation abuse, including retaliatory downvoting or suppression of dissenting technical opinions, has been reported, with meta-moderation intended as a but often insufficient against coordinated efforts or karma manipulation. Users have likened heavy downmoderation to censorship, particularly when comments challenging prevailing community norms—such as defenses of —are buried below thresholds. Story selection by editors has drawn charges of inherent bias toward open-source advocacy and against commercial entities like , with front-page content historically overrepresenting Linux-related topics to drive engagement rather than balance coverage. This pro-free software, anti-proprietary slant reflects the site's self-selected base of developers favoring communal and peer , which aligns with libertarian-leaning tech culture but excludes perspectives. Politically, early Slashdot exhibited U.S.-centric views and militant tones on issues like and IP law, evolving perceptions of a shift toward left-leaning under post-2012 ownership changes, where right-of-center comments face alleged disproportionate suppression—though such claims stem largely from anecdotal reports rather than systematic audits. Community exclusionary practices, including newbie hazing via low initial karma, exacerbate these disputes, prioritizing insider consensus over open discourse.

Ownership and Commercialization Issues

Slashdot's ownership transitioned from independent founding to multiple corporate acquisitions, beginning with its sale to Andover.net in 1999, followed by integration into VA Linux Systems and subsequent rebranding under OSTG and Inc. by 2009. In September 2012, Geeknet sold Slashdot, along with and Freecode, to Holdings Inc. (later DHI Group Inc.) for $20 million, aiming to bolster the buyer's reach in global technology audiences. DHI announced plans to divest Slashdot Media in July 2015 as it no longer aligned with core job-focused brands, culminating in its sale to BIZX LLC (a called SourceForge Media LLC) on January 28, 2016. BIZX rebranded to Slashdot Media in December 2019, maintaining operation of the site alongside . These ownership shifts introduced commercialization pressures, particularly under publicly traded entities like , where fiduciary duties to shareholders prioritized generation over community-driven . Founder Rob Malda resigned as on August 25, 2011, citing the internet's evolution and Slashdot's entanglement with its historical form, while alluding to conflicts with management amid corporate oversight. Post-acquisition by Dice Holdings, efforts to enhance included expanding ad formats amid an industry-wide ad , alongside introducing a subscription model for ad-free access to sustain operations. Critics within the community argued that such corporate-driven commercialization eroded Slashdot's original ethos of unfiltered, nerd-centric discourse, with shared ownership of exacerbating reputational damage from the latter's controversial software bundling practices in 2013–2015, which inserted unwanted installers into open-source downloads. Frequent sales reflected ongoing struggles to achieve profitability without alienating users reliant on ad blockers, contributing to perceptions of instability and diminished . Despite these challenges, Slashdot Media has continued emphasizing B2B software comparison and tech news aggregation as revenue streams.

References

  1. [1]
    Slashdot's 20th Anniversary: History of Slashdot
    Oct 19, 2017 · Slashdot started in 1997 as Chips and Dips by Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda. He posted links to news articles that interested him, mostly on open-source ...
  2. [2]
    Co-Founder Sees Slashdot As The Original Blog | InformationWeek
    Nov 8, 2005 · Jeff Bates co-founded Slashdot.org with Rob Malda in 1997. He's now the VP of editorial operations and executive editor of the site.
  3. [3]
    Nerd News - WIRED
    Mar 1, 1999 · Working from a low-rent house in Holland, Michigan, Rob Malda and Jeff Bates run Slashdot.org – a must-read news service for nerds who embrace ...Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  4. [4]
    A Brief History of Slashdot Part 1, Chips & Dips
    Oct 3, 2007 · And Slashdot was born. At first it had just a few thousand daily readers migrating over from Chips & Dips, but in a matter of weeks it had grown ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  5. [5]
    The Slashdot Supremacy - IEEE Spectrum
    Launched long before blogs and news aggregators ruled the Internet, Slashdot has spent the past decade cherry-picking and linking to what the site bills as ” ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    The Slashdot Effect LG #38 - Linux Gazette
    This effect is known as the spontaneous high hit rate upon a web server due to an announcement on a high volume news web site.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  7. [7]
    The Reddit Hug-of-Death & Other Causes of Website Crashes
    Jan 27, 2022 · The Reddit Hug of Death, also known as the Slashdot Effect, occurs when a popular site links to a smaller site, sending it a large (and sudden) influx of ...
  8. [8]
    A Pre-History of Slashdot on its 20th Birthday - freeCodeCamp
    Oct 5, 2017 · Slashdot went from from something with a stupid name that I was building into something we were building… with the help of thousands of nerds ...
  9. [9]
    Life in the Quiet Period - WIRED
    Apr 1, 2000 · Rob Malda, aka CmdrTaco, launchedwww.slashdot.org in 1997 while he was a student at Hope College in Holland, Michigan. By mid-1999, Malda […].
  10. [10]
    CmdrTaco Q&A: 10 years of Slashdot - CNET
    Oct 4, 2007 · Rob Malda, aka "CmdrTaco," founded Slashdot 10 years ago as a way to share online stories with a small group of close friends.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  11. [11]
    History of Slashdot | Dice.com Career Advice
    Oct 1, 2012 · Slashdot started in 1997 as Chips and Dips by Rob “CmdrTaco” Malda. He posted links to news articles that interested him, mostly on open-source software and ...
  12. [12]
    https://slashdot.org/faq/subscriptions.shtml
  13. [13]
    https://news.slashdot.org/story/03/03/06/1548245/slashdot-subscribers-now-see-the-future
  14. [14]
    [PDF] We Media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and ...
    it now attracts almost 5 million unique visitors and 50 million page views ... open-source journalism, is the story of Slashdot and Jane's Intelligence ...
  15. [15]
    https://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=8027898
  16. [16]
    https://slashdot.org/story/06/05/30/1531251/slashdot-css-redesign-winner-announced
  17. [17]
    https://news.slashdot.org/story/04/11/03/1637232/kerry-concedes-election-to-bush
  18. [18]
    https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2007/05/21/daily66.html
  19. [19]
    https://meta.slashdot.org/story/09/12/11/1615202/slashdot-turns-100000
  20. [20]
    https://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6056735-7.html
  21. [21]
    https://news.slashdot.org/story/09/03/31/1610228/slashdot-launches-user-achievements
  22. [22]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    https://slashdot.org/story/01/03/16/1256226/scientologists-force-comment-off-slashdot
  24. [24]
    Slashdot Founder Rob 'Cmdr Taco' Malda Resigns - WIRED
    Aug 25, 2011 · Rob Malda, known to nerds everywhere as CmdrTaco, has resigned as editor-in-chief of Slashdot, the influential website he founded 14 years ago.Missing: retirement 2010
  25. [25]
    Rob Malda, a.k.a. CmdrTaco, leaves Slashdot - Computerworld
    Aug 25, 2011 · It's the end of an era at Slashdot as Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda announced Thursday that he is leaving the site that he created.
  26. [26]
    CmdrTaco Leaves Slashdot - TechCrunch
    Aug 25, 2011 · His real name is Rob Malda and he started Slashdot, a news aggregation site and proto-blog in 1997 after building his own CMS in perl.
  27. [27]
    Dice Holdings Pays $20M Cash For Slashdot, SourceForge And ...
    Sep 18, 2012 · (Nasdaq: GKNT) today announced that Dice Holdings has acquired Geeknet's online media business, including Slashdot and SourceForge. “The ...
  28. [28]
    Dice Holdings, Inc. Acquires Online Media Business from Geeknet, Inc.
    Sep 18, 2012 · (Nasdaq: GKNT) today announced that Dice Holdings has acquired Geeknet's online media business, including Slashdot and SourceForge. ... The ...
  29. [29]
    Slashdot creator on redesign backlash: 'Every Slashdot change' met ...
    Feb 7, 2014 · Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, the creator of Slashdot who left the site in 2011, wasn't surprised by the outrage. "Pretty much every Slashdot change, ...Missing: 2011-2020 | Show results with:2011-2020
  30. [30]
    The SourceForge Controversy, and the Ongoing Fall of Slashdot ...
    In August 2011, Malda resigned from Slashdot and things haven't been the same since. The new Slashdot redesign received tons of complaints, and if you ...Missing: 2011-2020 | Show results with:2011-2020
  31. [31]
    Slashdot and SourceForge Sold, Now Under New Management
    Jan 28, 2016 · DHI first announced its plan to sell Slashdot Media in July 2015 as part of its strategy to focus on its core brands, as Slashdot Media no ...Missing: 2011-2020 | Show results with:2011-2020
  32. [32]
    DHI Group, Inc. Announces the Sale of Slashdot Media
    It completed the sale of its Slashdot and SourceForge businesses (together referred to as "Slashdot Media") to BIZX, LLC in a transaction that closed on ...
  33. [33]
    Slashdot Media Acquired by BIZX for Undisclosed Price
    Jan 28, 2016 · BIZX LLC has acquired Slashdot Media from DHI Group Inc., the companies announced on Jan. 28. The acquisition included the web properties ...
  34. [34]
    SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold - FOSS Force
    Jan 28, 2016 · Slashdot Media, which owns the popular websites SourceForge and Slashdot, has been sold to SourceForge Media, LLC, a subsidiary of web publisher BIZX, LLC.
  35. [35]
    Slashdot Media to Merge with BIZX, LLC, Creating a Market Leader ...
    Dec 20, 2019 · Slashdot Media also owns and operates its proprietary big-data and marketing intelligence platform, Passport, which intelligently drives ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  36. [36]
    FAQ - Slashdot
    Slashdot is the oldest tech news and discussion site on the web. Slashdot is also one of the largest business software comparison and review websites in the ...Why did you change my... · What are tags? · What are login sessions?Missing: aggregator | Show results with:aggregator
  37. [37]
    Linux Reaches 5% On Desktop - Slashdot
    Jul 16, 2025 · According to the latest StatCounter Global Stats for June 2025, Linux now holds 5.03% of the desktop operating system market share in the ...
  38. [38]
    'Circular' AI Mega-Deals by AI and Hardware Giants are ... - Slashdot
    Oct 12, 2025 · 2021 - 2025+ it is LLM and AI, rebuilding the electric grid, natural gas pipelines and having the home owners and apartment renters ...
  39. [39]
    Is Slashdot Still Relevant in 2024? Unveiling the Current State of the ...
    Apr 6, 2024 · Some are saying Slashdot is essentially dead in 2024. How did this once-popular hub of tech news and discussion wind up fading away?Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
  40. [40]
    Chronological Story Archive on Slashdot
    Slashdot Stories ; October 24 2025. Sweden's Crowd-Forecasting Platform 'Glimt' Helps Ukraine Make Wartime Predictions ; October 24 2025. October 23 2025.Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  41. [41]
    scc/slash: Slash is the code that runs Slashdot and other ... - GitHub
    Slash is an architecture for putting together web sites. It comes with functionality for posting articles, conducting polls, having discussions, and more.
  42. [42]
    Running Weblogs with Slash - PerlMonks
    Jul 3, 2002 · Slash is the software that runs sites like Slashdot and use.perl. It's all written in Perl using the Template Toolkit with MySQL at the back end ...
  43. [43]
    Slash download | SourceForge.net
    Download Slash for free. Slash is a database-driven web application server, using Perl, Apache and MySQL. It is the code that runs Slashdot.
  44. [44]
    Slashdot Architecture - How the Old Man of the Internet Learned to ...
    Nov 12, 2007 · -- Accesslog writer and accesslog reader. Separate databases are used because moderation and stats require a lot of CPU time for computation. -- ...
  45. [45]
    Slashdot Moderation
    Sep 9, 1999 · Moderation takes place by selecting an adjective from a drop down list that appears next to comments. Descriptive words like 'Flamebait' or ' ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  46. [46]
    Moderation and Metamoderation - FAQ - Slashdot
    Metamoderation is a second layer of moderation. It seeks to increase fairness by letting logged-in users "rate the rating" of randomly selected comment posts.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  47. [47]
    Karma, Thresholds, Abuse, etc. - FAQ - Slashdot
    Karma is structured on the following scale "Terrible, Bad, Neutral, Positive, Good, and Excellent." If a comment you post is moderated up, your karma will rise.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Distributed Moderation in a Large Online Conversation Space
    Slashdot assigns moderation points based on the number of comments in the system, so there is some scarcity of moderation points available and not all comments ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  49. [49]
    Slashdot's Meta Moderation
    Sep 7, 1999 · Essentially eligible users are presented with 10 comments the moderation done to them. They are then asked to rate the moderation as Fair, or ...
  50. [50]
    Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online ...
    A system of distributed moderation quickly and consistently separate high and low quality comments in an online conversation.
  51. [51]
    FAQ - Slashdot
    To counter unfair moderation, though, we've come up with a system of meta-moderation (moderating the moderation). What do the choices in the moderation drop ...
  52. [52]
    Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: the Website Slashdot
    This article details the workings of the website Slashdot, which labels itself “News for Nerds.” Commentators have presented Slashdot in different lights, ...
  53. [53]
    Submissions - FAQ - Slashdot
    This is a slightly more drawn-out attempt to explain how we look at the submissions which enter the system each day.
  54. [54]
    Editorial—Story Submissions, etc. - FAQ - Slashdot
    To submit stories, corrections, or updates, please use the submissions form. Submit corrections or updates just as if you were submitting any other news item.
  55. [55]
    Introducing the Slashdot Firehose
    Aug 2, 2007 · The Firehose has all data on Slashdot. RSS Feeds. Journal Entries. Story Submissions. And of course, accepted Slashdot Stories. The idea is that ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    The Firehose - FAQ - Slashdot
    The Firehose is powerful viewing tool for Slashdot content, from comments and journal entries to RSS feeds and story submissions.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Follow the Reader: Filtering Comments on Slashdot - Paul Resnick
    A reader can also sort messages based on their ratings; at each level of the response hierarchy. Page 3. 3 messages with the highest scores are displayed first, ...
  58. [58]
    Slashdot Struggles to Remain Relevant in The Social Web
    Jul 29, 2010 · The following monthly traffic chart from Quantcast suggests that users have migrated from Slashdot to other sites. The trend over the past few ...Missing: 2001-2010 | Show results with:2001-2010
  59. [59]
    Looking through a Window on Open Source Culture - AIS eLibrary
    Slashdot is a major virtual meeting ground for the Open Source development community. The discourse at Slashdot is interpreted in this study, and in ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The Slashdot Zoo: Mining a Social Network with Negative Edges
    In addition to the terms “friend” and “foe”, Slashdot also uses the terms “fan” and “freak”: A user is always the fan of his friends and the freak of his foes. ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The slashdot effect : analysis of a large-scale public conversation on ...
    This dissertation argues that Slashdot emerged from collaboration among a group that shares a cultural commitment to open discussion. This combination—the.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online ...
    Can a system of distributed moderation quickly and consistently separate high and low quality comments in an online conversation? Analysis of the site Slashdot ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on ... - ACM Digital Library
    Slashdot is a news and discussion site that has developed a system of distributed moderation to provide feedback about the value of posts on their site.
  64. [64]
    Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in ...
    We analyze the social network emerging from the user comment activity on the website Slashdot. The network presents common features of traditional social ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/39369/lampe_diss_revised.pdf?sequence=2
  66. [66]
    An experiment: gaming Slashdot's moderation system - TurnKey Linux
    Apr 18, 2011 · Let me back up a bit and tell how it all started. Slashdot have a pretty sophisticated moderation system that scores comments from -1 to +5. I ...
  67. [67]
    What is the Slashdot Effect? - Computer Hope
    Dec 11, 2024 · The Slashdot effect describes a web page overwhelmed by Internet traffic after being linked by the tech news site Slashdot.
  68. [68]
    What is the Slashdot Effect? - Managed Server
    Jun 7, 2024 · The Slashdot effect begins when a website is mentioned on a platform with a large following, such as Slashdot.org, Reddit, Hacker News, or even ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Collaborative News Networks: Distributed Editing, Collective Action
    Mar 20, 2002 · ... unique visitors per month. And Jupiter. Media Metrix ... sources that characterizes the construction of a daily news agenda on Slashdot.
  70. [70]
    Surviving The Slashdot Effect -- Enterprise Systems - ESJ
    The workload for Web-based systems, unfortunately, can jump several hundred times with the Slashdot Effect. The first hint of trouble arose in the first ...
  71. [71]
    Slashdot effect: has it claimed its first nation? (ABC News in Science)
    Jul 4, 2003 · ... spike in traffic," he said. At times, he added, this could result in an effect similar to malicious 'denial of service attacks', sometimes ...Missing: impacts | Show results with:impacts
  72. [72]
    The Slashdot Effect | Preparing Your Site for Web Traffic Increases
    The Slashdot effect occurs when a site crashes due to a sudden and unexpected spike in web traffic. Click here to learn how to protect your website and ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  73. [73]
    Questioning the Slashdot Effect — Getting to the Why not the What
    Mar 3, 2005 · The sheer growth of Slashdot unique visitors and page views negates this theory. If there is, in fact, a decline in the Slashdot Effect aside ...
  74. [74]
    Why Websites Crash Due to High Traffic & How to Prevent It - Queue-it
    Feb 13, 2025 · ... Slashdot would link to smaller sites, frequently causing them to crash. ... It's why the major sale is among the most common causes of traffic- ...
  75. [75]
    Slashdot | Tech News, Reviews & Community - Britannica
    Slashdot, Web site created by Rob Malda, an American college student, in September 1997 in order to provide technology news and information.
  76. [76]
    It's a Site for the Truly Geeky, And It Even Makes a Few Bucks
    Oct 14, 2002 · Slashdot.org, an online publication with a fanatical community of millions of readers that combines a rich view of technology with quick, off-kilter wit.
  77. [77]
    When Slashdot Was the Hub for FOSS News and Discussion
    Aug 4, 2016 · Slashdot media is owned by a microsoft shell company. It was bought out because microsoft wanted more leverage with open source opinions. Fact.Missing: shaped | Show results with:shaped<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB955937247607219151
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Stuff That Matters: Slashdot and the Emergence of Open News
    This indicates that the site's editors treat its users as equals rather than as a merely passive audience for whom news must be especially prepared and packaged ...
  80. [80]
    Slashdot, Or How Geeks and Mutants Invented Social Media
    It was called Slashdot. Slashdot was the first website of its kind—a tech news site where regular users provided the links and comments, and voted on each ...
  81. [81]
    Slashdot founder Rob Malda on why there won't be another Hacker ...
    Aug 7, 2013 · Rob Malda, the founder of Slashdot and now an employee at WaPo Labs, weighs in on the future of news and why nerds distrust authority.
  82. [82]
    A Pre-History of Slashdot - Hacker News
    Oct 5, 2017 · Slashdot was a major inspiration to us as we grew Ars Technica, not to mention a major source of critical traffic and growth in those early ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  83. [83]
    Glitz, goofiness mark Webby Awards ceremony - May 12, 2000 - CNN
    May 12, 2000 · Slashdot.org took People's Voice Awards in both categories for which it was nominated: Best Community Site and Best Print & Zines. "This is not ...
  84. [84]
    Slashdot Slashed Again | WIRED
    May 12, 2000 · May 12, 2000 10:35 AM. Slashdot Slashed Again ... After receiving a Webby award for best community site Thursday, the folks who run Slashdot.
  85. [85]
    Open-source journalism - Salon.com
    Oct 8, 1999 · Slashdot members' vicious response to a cyberterrorism story spurs a rewrite -- and questions about geek-influenced journalism.
  86. [86]
    Slashdot Case Study | Managing the Digital Enterprise
    Slashdot has won over 20 awards including a 2000 Webby award for Best Community Web site, a 2000 Webby Award for “Best Print/Zine”, voted one of Newsweek's ...
  87. [87]
    What happened to Slashdot? : r/geek - Reddit
    Sep 10, 2016 · In the 90's slashdot was a great site. When it sold out to Andover in 1999, which changed its name to VA Linux in 2000, which later became sourceforge in 2007.User Backlash to Slashdot.org Beta : r/socialmedia - RedditIAM Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, Founder of Slashdot, AMA. : r/IAmAMore results from www.reddit.com
  88. [88]
    Better alternative than Slashdot? : r/SoftwareEngineering - Reddit
    Sep 17, 2022 · Ive been following Slashdot on a semi-daily basis for some 20 years or so, but ever since it was sold, it's quality has dropped significantly.Decent slashdot replacements? : r/sysadmin - RedditThoughts on Slashdot? : r/Internet - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: Newsweek | Show results with:Newsweek
  89. [89]
    When did Slashdot ‘die’?
    ### Summary of Rob Malda's Views on Slashdot's Decline
  90. [90]
    Ask HN: Whatever Happened to Slashdot? - Hacker News
    It's clear the Slashdot product is kept around but not actively developed. Many sites from that era are in much the same state, or shut down entirely.Missing: decline quality
  91. [91]
    I guess Hacker News is the "new Slashdot", but Slashdot really was ...
    I guess Hacker News is the "new Slashdot", but Slashdot ... Slashdot comments are generally just toxic noise, dumb jokes and horrifically amateur analysis.<|control11|><|separator|>
  92. [92]
    User Backlash to Slashdot.org Beta : r/socialmedia - Reddit
    Feb 6, 2014 · the reason the quality comments are gone is because their system is outdated and people go elsewhere. No, the quality comments are gone because, ...Stack Overflow's Radical New Plan To Fight AI-Induced Death SpiralIAM Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, Founder of Slashdot, AMA. : r/IAmAMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  93. [93]
    slashdot.org Traffic Analytics, Ranking & Audience [September 2025]
    slashdot.org is ranked #312 in the Computers Electronics and Technology - Other category and #30360 globally in September 2025. Get the full slashdot.org ...Missing: 2001-2010 | Show results with:2001-2010
  94. [94]
    Slashdot, karma, Abusive users and Twitter - Chris's Substack
    Oct 22, 2024 · ... slashdot.org which was started as a site called Chips and Dips “by Rob “Cmdrtaco” Malda and Jeff “Hemos” Bates. This river-of-news site ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    The Effects of Censorship — a Tale of Two Websites - Slashdot
    May 19, 2008 · Slashdot doesn't use the same kind of moderating system that forums do, but I'd say nearly all downmoddings on Slashdot are "censorship" ...
  96. [96]
    Analysis: The Rise Of Open Media - Slashdot
    Open Media sites embrace interactivity; they reflect ideas, commentary and information from a wide range of sources, especially their readers. They were shaped ...
  97. [97]
    Slashdot and Sourceforge - Dan Luu
    May 24, 2015 · It's not that Slashdot wasn't biased back then; Slashdot used to be notorious for their pro-Linux pro-open source anti-MS anti-commercial bias.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  98. [98]
    Does Anyone Believe Slashdot - C2 wiki
    SlashDot lacks the basic decission making process story/no story which classical media like news papers have (not saying that newspapers are not biased).Missing: criticism journalists
  99. [99]
    Why is slashdot far left now? 20 years ago it was middle ...
    May 8, 2021 · Slashdot was taken over by a bunch of commies and is a leftist cesspool now. They are censoring anyone ever so slightly leaning right. My ...
  100. [100]
    HN is Becoming 2005 Slashdot | Hacker News
    Aug 4, 2013 · The community became diverse enough that a large group of users didn't like the posts the other groups up votes to the homepage. There were ...
  101. [101]
    Dreaming Big on the Open Web
    Oct 1, 2018 · And true to its open source roots, the CMS that ran the back-end of Slashdot, known simply as “Slash,” was an open source software project. One ...
  102. [102]
    Slashdot, SourceForge, FreeCode sold to jobs site company
    Sep 18, 2012 · Slashdot, SourceForge, FreeCode sold to jobs site company. Dice Holdings buys them for $20 million from Geeknet. Sean Gallagher – Sep 18, 2012 7 ...Missing: BIZX | Show results with:BIZX
  103. [103]
    Slashdot - Wikipedia
    The website was founded in 1997 by Hope College students Rob Malda, also known as "CmdrTaco", and classmate Jeff Bates, also known as "Hemos". In 2012, they ...
  104. [104]
    IAM Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, Founder of Slashdot, AMA. : r/IAmA
    Jul 17, 2012 · In 1997 I started Slashdot.org. For several years, we pioneered news aggregation and on-line communities while exploring our niche of the 'net ...
  105. [105]
    CmdrTaco Resigns From Slashdot, Sends Shock Waves Through ...
    “The internet has changed dramatically since I started here, and that's part of my reason for leaving. For me, the Slashdot of today is fused to the Slashdot of ...
  106. [106]
    Ad slump spurs Slashdot to experiment - CNET
    Slashdot's move to a larger ad format and a subscription service mirrors the decisions of many companies attempting to capture new revenue in a battered dot-com ...
  107. [107]
    Slashdot Media - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Slashdot Media is a tech company that owns Slashdot.org, and SourceForge, which is the largest B2B software comparison site in the world.