Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Squeezed coherent state

A squeezed coherent state is a nonclassical quantum state of the electromagnetic field in quantum optics, formed by combining a coherent state—which minimizes the Heisenberg uncertainty product with equal variances in the amplitude and phase quadratures—with a squeezed state that reduces quantum noise below the standard quantum limit in one quadrature while increasing it in the conjugate quadrature to satisfy the uncertainty principle.^[1]^[2] Mathematically, it is generated by applying the squeezing operator \hat{S}(\zeta) = \exp\left[\frac{1}{2}(\zeta^* \hat{a}^2 - \zeta (\hat{a}^\dagger)^2)\right] with \zeta = r e^{i\theta} (squeezing parameter r and phase \theta) to the vacuum state |0\rangle, followed by the displacement operator \hat{D}(\alpha) = \exp(\alpha \hat{a}^\dagger - \alpha^* \hat{a}), where \alpha is a complex parameter representing the coherent amplitude, yielding |\alpha, \zeta\rangle = \hat{D}(\alpha) \hat{S}(\zeta) |0\rangle.^[2]^[3] These states exhibit properties such as a Gaussian wavefunction in position space with modified width due to squeezing, a photon number expectation value \langle \hat{n} \rangle = |\alpha|^2 + \sinh^2 r, and quadrature variances \Delta X = \frac{1}{2} e^{-r} (for amplitude squeezing when \theta = 0) and \Delta Y = \frac{1}{2} e^{r}, enabling noise reductions of up to 10–15 dB in experiments.^[2]^[3] The concept was theoretically introduced in the early 1980s to explore quantum noise reduction beyond coherent states, with the first experimental demonstration of squeezing achieved in 1985 using an optical cavity with sodium atoms.^[4]^[5] Squeezed coherent states are generated through nonlinear optical processes, such as parametric down-conversion in optical parametric oscillators, four-wave mixing in atomic vapors or fibers, or Kerr nonlinearities, which couple the field modes to produce the required correlations.^[1]^[6] They find critical applications in enhancing measurement precision, including gravitational wave detection in interferometers like Advanced LIGO, where injecting frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum states has improved sensitivity by reducing shot noise since observing run O3 in 2019.^[7] Additional uses include quantum-enhanced imaging, atomic spectroscopy, and quantum information protocols like continuous-variable quantum computing and secure communication, though optical losses can degrade the nonclassical features.^[2]^[6]

Mathematical Foundations

Definition

A squeezed coherent state, denoted as |\alpha, \xi\rangle, is a quantum state of the electromagnetic field in a single mode of the harmonic oscillator, assuming familiarity with the bosonic creation and annihilation operators \hat{a}^\dagger and \hat{a} satisfying [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^\dagger] = 1, and the vacuum state |0\rangle defined by \hat{a} |0\rangle = 0.^[8] This state is generated by applying the displacement operator \hat{D}(\alpha) = \exp(\alpha \hat{a}^\dagger - \alpha^* \hat{a}), where \alpha \in \mathbb{C} is the complex displacement amplitude, followed by the squeeze operator \hat{S}(\xi) = \exp\left[ \frac{1}{2} (\xi^* \hat{a}^2 - \xi (\hat{a}^\dagger)^2) \right], with \xi = r e^{i\theta} parameterizing the squeeze magnitude r \geq 0 and phase \theta.^[2] Thus, the general form is

|\alpha, \xi\rangle = \hat{D}(\alpha) \hat{S}(\xi) |0\rangle.

^[8] This construction combines the coherent displacement, which shifts the expectation value of the field amplitude away from the vacuum while preserving minimum uncertainty in both quadratures, with quadrature squeezing, which distorts the vacuum fluctuations such that the uncertainty in one quadrature falls below the vacuum level while the orthogonal quadrature increases to satisfy the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.^[8] The quadrature operators are defined as \hat{X} = \frac{\hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger}{\sqrt{2}} (amplitude or position-like) and \hat{P} = \frac{\hat{a} - \hat{a}^\dagger}{i\sqrt{2}} (phase or momentum-like), satisfying [\hat{X}, \hat{P}] = i with vacuum variances \langle (\Delta \hat{X})^2 \rangle = \langle (\Delta \hat{P})^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2}.^[9] For the squeezed vacuum (\alpha = 0, \theta = 0), the action of \hat{S}(\xi) yields \langle (\Delta \hat{X})^2 \rangle = \frac{e^{-2r}}{2} < \frac{1}{2} and \langle (\Delta \hat{P})^2 \rangle = \frac{e^{2r}}{2} > \frac{1}{2}, demonstrating noise reduction in \hat{X}.^[10] The theoretical origins of such states trace back to early quantum mechanics, where E. H. Kennard in 1927 constructed a Gaussian wave packet with time-oscillating width as an example of unequal position-momentum uncertainties, serving as the first antecedent of modern squeezed states, while H. Weyl in 1928 provided a rigorous proof of the uncertainty relation \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar/2 enabling such imbalances.^[11]^[12]

Operator Representation

The squeeze operator S(\xi), with complex parameter \xi = r e^{i\theta} where r \geq 0 is the squeeze magnitude and \theta is the squeeze phase, is defined as

S(\xi) = \exp\left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( \xi^* a^2 - \xi a^{\dagger 2} \right) \right],

where a and a^\dagger are the annihilation and creation operators satisfying [a, a^\dagger] = 1.^[13] This operator induces a Bogoliubov transformation on the annihilation operator,

S^\dagger(\xi) a S(\xi) = a \cosh r - a^\dagger e^{i\theta} \sinh r,

with the corresponding transformation for the creation operator obtained by taking the adjoint,

S^\dagger(\xi) a^\dagger S(\xi) = a^\dagger \cosh r - a e^{-i\theta} \sinh r.

The hyperbolic functions \cosh r and \sinh r ensure the canonical commutation relations are preserved, as |\cosh r|^2 - |\sinh r|^2 = 1.^[13] In terms of the quadrature operators X = \frac{a + a^\dagger}{\sqrt{2}} and P = \frac{a - a^\dagger}{i\sqrt{2}}, which satisfy [X, P] = i and have vacuum variances \langle (\Delta X)^2 \rangle = \langle (\Delta P)^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2}, the squeeze operator effects the linear transformations \begin{align*} S^\dagger(\xi) X S(\xi) &= (\cosh r - \sinh r \cos \theta) X - \sinh r \sin \theta , P, \ S^\dagger(\xi) P S(\xi) &= -\sinh r \sin \theta , X + (\cosh r + \sinh r \cos \theta) P. \end{align*} These correspond to the symplectic matrix

\begin{pmatrix} \cosh r - \sinh r \cos \theta & -\sinh r \sin \theta \\ -\sinh r \sin \theta & \cosh r + \sinh r \cos \theta \end{pmatrix},

which has determinant 1, preserving the symplectic structure of phase space. The squeeze operator is unitary, satisfying S^\dagger(\xi) = S^{-1}(\xi) = S(-\xi), as the argument of the exponential changes sign under Hermitian conjugation, making the generator anti-Hermitian for -\xi. This property can be verified directly from the definition or via the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula applied to the exponential form. The composition of two squeeze operators, S(\xi) S(\eta), is obtained using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula on their generators; since the generators do not commute in general, the result is S(\xi + \eta) multiplied by a phase factor arising from the commutator [\frac{1}{2}(\xi^* a^2 - \xi a^{\dagger 2}), \frac{1}{2}(\eta^* a^2 - \eta a^{\dagger 2})], which involves the number operator. For aligned phases (\theta = 0), the product simplifies to S(\xi + \eta). In the Fock basis \{ |n\rangle \}, the squeeze operator admits a matrix representation with elements \langle m | S(\xi) | n \rangle, which involve associated Laguerre polynomials and can be computed explicitly. For practical computations of state properties, the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is truncated to a finite dimension N \gg \langle n \rangle, yielding an approximate N \times N matrix that faithfully reproduces expectation values and variances for moderate squeezing (r \lesssim 2). This truncation is particularly useful in numerical simulations of quantum optical systems. Multimode extensions of the squeeze operator, involving transformations across multiple bosonic modes, are discussed in the classification section.

Statistical Properties

Photon Number Distributions

The photon number distribution for a squeezed coherent state |\alpha, \xi\rangle, where \xi = r e^{i\theta}, is governed by the photon number operator \hat{n} = \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}, with the probability P(n) = |\langle n | \alpha, \xi \rangle|^2. For the single-mode case, this distribution can be expressed analytically using associated Laguerre polynomials when the displacement \alpha is aligned appropriately with the squeezing phase, or in terms of modified Bessel functions for the pure squeezed vacuum limit (\alpha = 0). These expressions reveal non-classical features, such as oscillations in P(n) around the mean photon number for moderate squeezing parameters, contrasting with the smooth Poissonian profile of coherent states; for stronger squeezing, the distribution broadens in a thermal-like manner but with enhanced probabilities at even photon numbers in the vacuum-squeezed case.^[14] The mean photon number is given by \langle \hat{n} \rangle = |\alpha|^2 + \sinh^2 r, reflecting contributions from both the coherent displacement and the squeezing-induced vacuum fluctuations. The variance \Delta n^2 = \langle (\Delta \hat{n})^2 \rangle depends on the relative phase \psi between \alpha and \theta, and in general is \Delta n^2 = |\alpha|^2 + 2 |\alpha|^2 \sinh^2 r + 2 \sinh^2 r \cosh^2 r + 2 |\alpha| \sinh r \cosh r \cos \psi, which typically exceeds the Poissonian value \langle \hat{n} \rangle, indicating super-Poissonian statistics; however, for specific squeezing phases \theta aligned with the displacement (e.g., \psi = \pi for the reducing term), the variance can be reduced below \langle \hat{n} \rangle, enabling number squeezing. Qualitatively, plots of P(n) for squeezed coherent states show oscillatory behavior near the peak for small r and large |\alpha|, highlighting antibunching-like features, while increasing r leads to broader, asymmetric broadening compared to unsqueezed coherent states.^[15]^[16]^[14] The Mandel Q-parameter quantifies deviations from Poissonian statistics via Q = \frac{\Delta n^2 - \langle \hat{n} \rangle}{\langle \hat{n} \rangle}, where Q = 0 for coherent states, Q > 0 for super-Poissonian (bunching), and Q < 0 for sub-Poissonian (antibunching) distributions. For pure squeezed states (\alpha = 0), Q = 2 \sinh^2 r + 1 > 0 for all r > 0, indicating super-Poissonian photon statistics with bunching. In displaced cases with appropriate \theta, Q < 0 is possible for larger |\alpha|, useful for applications requiring reduced number fluctuations, such as precision measurements. These properties underscore the non-classical nature of squeezed coherent states, distinguishing them from classical light fields.^[15]

Phase Distributions

The phase operator in quantum optics is often approximated as φ ≈ arg(a), where a is the annihilation operator, though rigorous treatments employ the Pegg-Barnett formalism to define a Hermitian phase operator \hat{Φ} as the limit of a finite-dimensional unitary operator projected onto (s+1) phase states |Θ_m⟩ = (1/√(s+1)) ∑{n=0}^s exp(-inΘ_m) |n⟩, with Θ_m = Θ_0 + 2π m /(s+1). The phase probability distribution is then W(φ) = lim{s→∞} (s+1)/(2π) |⟨φ_m | ψ ⟩|^2, where |ψ⟩ is the state under consideration. For squeezed coherent states |α, ξ⟩ with ξ = r e^{iθ}, this distribution is W(φ) = (1/(2π)) ∑{m,m'=0}^∞ C_m C{m'}^* e^{i (m - m') φ}, with C_m = ⟨m | α, ξ ⟩ the photon number amplitudes. This formalism reveals non-uniform phase distributions, contrasting with approximate classical models. For amplitude-squeezed coherent states (r > 0, θ = 0), the phase distribution broadens, often developing a two-peak structure due to increased fluctuations in the phase quadrature, reflecting the trade-off inherent in squeezing. In contrast, for phase-squeezed cases (θ = π), the distribution narrows around the mean phase, exhibiting a single pronounced peak that becomes sharper with larger r, enabling sub-shot-noise phase resolution. These behaviors are quantified by the phase variance ⟨(Δ\hat{Φ})^2⟩ = π^2/3 + 4 Re ∑{m>m'} C_m C{m'}^* (-1)^{m-m'}/(m - m')^2 - [terms involving the mean phase], which decreases below the coherent state value for phase squeezing but increases for amplitude squeezing. The phase uncertainty relates directly to quadrature squeezing via the approximation Δφ ≈ ΔP / |⟨X⟩|, where X and P are the amplitude and phase quadratures with variances satisfying the minimum-uncertainty condition ΔX ΔP = 1/4 for pure states (in units where the vacuum variance is 1/4). This relation, valid for large mean photon number ⟨n⟩, shows that phase squeezing (ΔP < 1/2) reduces Δφ below the coherent state limit Δφ ∼ 1/√⟨n⟩, while amplitude squeezing broadens it, allowing violation of classical phase estimation bounds in non-classical regimes such as quantum metrology. For the pure squeezed vacuum (α = 0), the Husimi Q-function Q(α) = (1/π) ⟨α| S(r) |0⟩ ⟨0| S^\dagger(r) |α⟩ yields the marginal phase distribution W(φ) = ∫_0^∞ r dr Q(r e^{iφ}), resulting in a π-periodic distribution with circular variance V_φ = 1 - |∫ W(φ) e^{iφ} dφ|^2 that approaches 1 (maximum uncertainty) for small r but shows squeezing-induced narrowing along the phase axis for θ = π. Enhanced phase resolution in high-⟨n⟩ squeezed coherent states surpasses coherent state performance, with Δφ scaling as e^{-r}/√⟨n⟩ for phase-squeezed cases.^[17]

Classification

Single-Mode Squeezed States

Single-mode squeezed states represent a fundamental class of non-classical quantum optical states where the uncertainty in one quadrature of the electromagnetic field is reduced below the vacuum level at the expense of increased uncertainty in the conjugate quadrature. These states are generated by applying the single-mode squeeze operator S(\xi) = \exp\left[ \frac{1}{2} (\xi^* a^2 - \xi (a^\dagger)^2 ) \right] to the vacuum or a coherent state, with \xi = r e^{i\theta} parameterizing the squeezing strength r and phase \theta. For the pure single-mode squeezed vacuum state |\xi\rangle = S(\xi) |0\rangle, the Fock basis expansion is given by

|\xi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\cosh r}} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{ (- \tanh r )^k }{ \sqrt{2^k k!} } |2k\rangle,

which contains only even photon-number components due to the pairing effect of the squeezing operator. This structure leads to a super-Poissonian photon number distribution with mean photon number \sinh^2 r, highlighting the state's non-classical nature despite its Gaussian Wigner function. Non-classicality in single-mode squeezed states is evidenced by several criteria, including regions of negative values in the Wigner function for non-Gaussian variants such as photon-subtracted squeezed states, and violations of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality applied to intensity moments, such as |\langle a^2 \rangle|^2 > \langle a^\dagger a \rangle \langle a^\dagger{}^2 a^2 \rangle, which cannot occur for classical fields.^[18] The primary indicator for pure Gaussian squeezed states remains the quadrature variance reduction: the variance in the squeezed quadrature V_- = e^{-2r}/4 < 1/4 (in units where the vacuum variance is 1/4), violating the classical uncertainty limit while maintaining overall purity Tr(\rho^2) = 1. These features distinguish single-mode squeezing from classical field descriptions, enabling applications in precision measurements. Under linear loss, modeled as transmission through a beam splitter with transmittance \eta, the squeezing parameter degrades to an effective value r' = \artanh( \sqrt{\eta} \tanh r ), resulting in a mixed state with purity \mu = 1 / \sqrt{1 + (1-\eta) \sinh^2 r}. This evolution preserves the Gaussian character but reduces the observable squeezing, with the output state's covariance matrix scaled by \eta in the quadratures. Homodyne detection provides a direct measurement of these single-mode quadrature distributions, where balanced homodyne with a strong local oscillator projects the field onto the squeezed or anti-squeezed quadrature, revealing the variance asymmetry through the photocurrent difference. Recent experimental realizations of single-mode squeezing in circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) have advanced beyond optical domains, achieving high-fidelity generation using parametric drives in superconducting resonators coupled to qubits. For instance, in 2024, squeezing below the zero-point fluctuation was demonstrated in a gigahertz-frequency mechanical resonator via qubit-mediated nonlinear interactions, reaching up to 3 dB of squeezing.^[19] Theoretical proposals in 2025 have explored modulated qubit-resonator couplings for generating single-mode squeezed states.^[20] These cQED platforms highlight the robustness of single-mode squeezing for quantum information processing, surpassing earlier optical limitations in integration and control.

Two-Mode Squeezed States

Two-mode squeezed states arise from correlated squeezing between two distinct modes of a quantum field, often generated through parametric processes such as optical parametric amplification or down-conversion. The two-mode squeeze operator is given by

S(\xi) = \exp\left(\xi^* a b - \xi a^\dagger b^\dagger\right),

where a and b are the annihilation operators for the two modes, and \xi = r e^{i\theta} is the complex squeezing parameter, with r \geq 0 controlling the squeezing strength and \theta the phase.^[21] Applying this operator to the two-mode vacuum state |0\rangle_a |0\rangle_b yields the two-mode squeezed vacuum state

|\xi\rangle = S(\xi) |0\rangle_a |0\rangle_b = \sech^{1/2} r \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left( \tanh r \, e^{i\theta} \right)^n |n\rangle_a |n\rangle_b,

which features equal photon numbers in both modes with probabilities weighted by powers of \tanh r.^[22] These states display strong bipartite quadrature correlations, with reduced uncertainty in specific linear combinations of the mode quadratures X = (a + a^\dagger)/\sqrt{2} and P = -i(a - a^\dagger)/\sqrt{2}. For \theta = 0, the variances satisfy \Delta(X_a + X_b)^2 = e^{-2r} and \Delta(P_a - P_b)^2 = e^{-2r}, such that their sum \Delta(X_a + X_b)^2 + \Delta(P_a - P_b)^2 = 2 e^{-2r} falls below the vacuum limit of 2 (in units where the single-mode vacuum variance is 1/2). This sub-vacuum noise enables Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-like steering, where measurements on one mode infer the state of the other with precision exceeding classical limits.^[23] The inherent entanglement of two-mode squeezed states can be quantified using the logarithmic negativity E_N = \ln(2 \sinh^2 r + 1), which increases monotonically with r, or the concurrence, both capturing the bipartite entanglement that grows stronger with greater squeezing.^[24] In optical implementations, two-mode squeezed states manifest as twin beams from spontaneous parametric down-conversion, where the modes correspond to signal and idler frequencies. The intensity difference between the beams exhibits squeezing, with variance \Delta(n_a - n_b)^2 = 2 \langle n \rangle e^{-2r}, where \langle n \rangle = \sinh^2 r is the mean photon number per mode; this noise reduction below the shot-noise level of $2 \langle n \rangle highlights the inter-mode correlations. More generally, two-mode squeezed states belong to the class of continuous-variable Gaussian states, fully characterized by their mean vector (zero for the vacuum case) and 4×4 covariance matrix. The squeezing is revealed by diagonalizing the covariance matrix via symplectic transformations, yielding eigenvalues e^{\pm 2r} that encode the noise reduction and enhancement in conjugate quadratures. Recent advances have leveraged two-mode squeezed states in quantum networks for entanglement distribution and repeaters, with theoretical proposals for storage and purification using atomic noiseless amplifiers enabling scalable quantum communication protocols.^[25]

Displaced vs. Pure Squeezed States

Pure squeezed states, obtained by applying the squeezing operator to the vacuum with displacement parameter α = 0, possess a zero mean field ⟨â⟩ = 0 while exhibiting ⟨â²⟩ ≠ 0, a hallmark of maximal non-classicality since classical fields satisfy ⟨â²⟩ = ⟨â⟩² = 0.^[2] This correlation structure leads to super-Poissonian photon statistics and photon bunching, quantified by the second-order correlation function g^(2)(0) > 1, distinguishing them from classical vacuum fluctuations.^[11] Displaced squeezed states, with nonzero ⟨â⟩ = α, incorporate a coherent amplitude atop the squeezed vacuum, allowing the state to approximate classical coherent fields for sufficiently large |α|. In this regime, squeezing appears as reduced quadrature noise superimposed on a strong classical background, enabling applications where non-classical noise reduction enhances precision without dominating the overall field behavior.^[2] However, the presence of displacement does not eliminate the underlying non-classical correlations inherited from the pure squeezed component. A key distinction arises in the relative scale of the squeezing parameter r and displacement |α|: when r ≪ |α|, the state behaves like a noisy coherent state with minimal non-classical signatures, as the large mean field overwhelms squeezing-induced fluctuations, rendering it nearly classical in observable statistics. Conversely, for r > |α|, non-classical features reemerge prominently, including deviations from Poissonian statistics, reviving the quantum nature of the pure squeezed case. These states can exhibit either photon bunching or antibunching depending on the parameters. Squeezed coherent states, whether pure or displaced, overlap with thermal states in phase space but can be differentiated via majorization criteria, where the eigenvalue spectrum of the density operator for squeezed states exhibits greater order than for thermal mixtures, underscoring their non-classical purity.^[11] As pure states, they maintain Tr(ρ²) = 1 regardless of α or r, though the displacement influences the practical observability of non-classical effects by scaling the mean photon number ⟨n⟩ ≈ |α|² + sinh² r.^[2]

Quantum Phase Space Aspects

Relation to Phase Space Distributions

Squeezed coherent states are intimately connected to phase space distributions, which offer a geometric interpretation of their quantum properties in the position-momentum (or quadrature) plane. The Wigner function W(X, P), a quasi-probability distribution, quasi-probabilistically represents the state and can exhibit negative values indicative of non-classicality. For the squeezed vacuum state, a pure squeezed coherent state with zero displacement, the Wigner function takes the form of an anisotropic Gaussian, compressed along the squeezed quadrature X and elongated along the anti-squeezed quadrature P:

W(X, P) = \frac{1}{\pi} \exp\left[ - \left( X^2 e^{2r} + P^2 e^{-2r} \right) \right],

where r > 0 is the squeezing parameter. This distribution remains non-negative for all r, as expected for Gaussian states, but its distortion from the isotropic vacuum Gaussian W(X, P) = \frac{1}{\pi} \exp\left( -X^2 - P^2 \right) geometrically illustrates the quadrature variance imbalance: \langle (\Delta X)^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2} e^{-2r} and \langle (\Delta P)^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2} e^{2r}. The Husimi Q-function, defined as Q(\alpha) = \frac{1}{\pi} \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle where |\alpha\rangle is a coherent state, provides a positively defined, smoothed representation obtained by convolving the Wigner function with the vacuum Gaussian. For squeezed coherent states, which include displacement \alpha, the Q-function manifests as a positive oval in phase space, broader along the anti-squeezed direction and centered at \alpha, thus preserving the state's anisotropy without negativity. This smoothing effect, equivalent to applying a low-pass filter in phase space, suppresses fine quantum details but aids in visualizing the overall structure for displaced squeezed states. Phase space distributions are interconnected via the characteristic function \chi(\lambda) = \mathrm{Tr}[\rho D(\lambda)], where D(\lambda) = \exp(\lambda a^\dagger - \lambda^* a) is the displacement operator and \rho is the density operator. The Wigner function emerges as the Fourier transform of the symmetrically ordered characteristic function: W(\alpha) = \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \chi(\lambda) \exp(\alpha \lambda^* - \alpha^* \lambda) \, d^2\lambda. For squeezed coherent states, \chi(\lambda) incorporates squeezing through the Bogoliubov transformation, enabling efficient computation of distributions and highlighting how squeezing modulates the state's response to displacements in phase space. In superpositions of squeezed coherent states, such as squeezed Schrödinger cat states, the Wigner function reveals interference terms as oscillatory fringes between the component Gaussians, often resulting in negative regions that underscore quantum superposition effects. These interference patterns, modulated by the squeezing level r, become more pronounced with larger separation between the coherent displacements, providing a visual signature of non-classical coherence in phase space. Recent advances in quantum state tomography have enhanced the experimental reconstruction of these phase space distributions for squeezed states, surpassing limitations of earlier methods through techniques like balanced homodyne detection with optimized local oscillators. For instance, experiments using optical parametric oscillators have achieved high-fidelity Wigner function reconstructions of squeezed vacuum states, revealing squeezing dynamics with minimal artifacts.

Visualization and Interpretation

In phase space, squeezed coherent states are geometrically interpreted as the result of an affine transformation applied to the circular uncertainty region of the vacuum state, transforming it into an ellipse that represents the anisotropic distribution of quantum fluctuations. This shearing effect, induced by the squeezing operator, compresses the variance in one quadrature (e.g., amplitude or phase) while elongating it in the conjugate quadrature, providing a visual analogy to stretching a rubber sheet in one direction at the expense of the other. Such a representation highlights how squeezing redistributes but does not reduce the total uncertainty, maintaining the state's minimum-uncertainty character. The uncertainty ellipse associated with a squeezed coherent state has a fixed area of \frac{1}{2} in natural units where \hbar = 1, ensuring compliance with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle \Delta X \Delta P \geq \frac{1}{2}, regardless of the squeezing strength. The ellipse's major and minor axes correspond to the amplified and reduced variances, respectively, with the orientation determined by the squeezing phase, which dictates whether the amplitude quadrature X or phase quadrature P is squeezed. For instance, amplitude squeezing aligns the minor axis along X, reducing noise below the coherent state level in that direction. This geometric feature underscores the state's utility in precision measurements, where the narrowed dimension minimizes relevant fluctuations. Non-classical signatures of squeezed coherent states are evident in phase space quasi-probability distributions, particularly through the volume of negativity in the Wigner function, which quantifies the degree of "quantumness" by measuring deviations from classical probability densities. While pure squeezed states possess a Gaussian Wigner function that is entirely non-negative—placing them on the quantum-classical boundary alongside coherent states—the negativity volume is maximal for highly non-classical states like odd coherent superpositions, which exhibit interference-induced oscillations leading to negative regions. For pure squeezed states, this volume is reduced to zero, reflecting their lack of such interferences despite violating classical intensity correlations.^[26] Unlike classical Liouville distributions in phase space, which remain strictly positive and cannot achieve quadrature variances below the standard quantum limit due to the requirement of positive-definiteness, squeezed coherent states demonstrate non-classicality by forming uncertainty ellipses that extend beyond this limit in one direction while compensating in the other. Classical distributions, governed by Liouville's theorem, preserve phase space volumes without such anisotropic squeezing, as any attempt to narrow one quadrature would violate the incompressibility of classical flows. This violation highlights how quantum squeezing enables sub-shot-noise performance unattainable in semiclassical descriptions.^[27] Quantum tomography provides a practical means to visualize and interpret these phase space features by reconstructing the full Wigner function or uncertainty ellipse from homodyne measurements of quadratures at varied phases, offering direct empirical access to the state's non-classical structure. By sampling the field with a local oscillator and inverting the data via Radon transforms, tomography reveals the elliptical contours and confirms squeezing levels, bridging theoretical geometry with experimental verification. For multimode extensions, such as two-mode squeezed states, the phase space becomes four-dimensional, encompassing the quadratures of both modes (X_1, P_1, X_2, P_2), where squeezing manifests in correlated ellipsoidal distributions that entangle the modes while preserving an overall uncertainty volume bounded by the multimode uncertainty principle. This higher-dimensional geometry captures inter-mode correlations, such as reduced noise in the difference quadrature X_1 - X_2, extending the single-mode ellipse to a hyperellipsoid that illustrates entanglement without Wigner negativity in the Gaussian case.^[28]

Generation and Realization

Theoretical Methods

Theoretical methods for generating squeezed coherent states primarily rely on nonlinear optical interactions modeled through quantum Hamiltonians, which drive the system away from the vacuum or coherent state towards reduced uncertainty in one quadrature at the expense of the other. A foundational approach is the parametric approximation, applicable to processes like degenerate parametric down-conversion in a cavity. The interaction Hamiltonian in the rotating frame is

H = i \hbar \kappa (a^{\dagger 2} e^{-i \omega t} - a^2 e^{i \omega t}),

where a (a^\dagger) is the annihilation (creation) operator, \kappa is the coupling strength, and \omega is the pump frequency. Under this Hamiltonian, the time evolution operator is the squeeze operator U(t) = S(\xi(t)), with squeezing parameter \xi(t) = -i \kappa t e^{i \theta} (phase \theta), transforming an initial coherent state |\alpha\rangle into a squeezed coherent state S(\xi)|\alpha\rangle. This model assumes undepleted pump approximation and neglects higher-order effects, yielding arbitrary squeezing levels in ideal conditions.^[29] Another key theoretical framework involves Kerr nonlinearity for self-squeezing of coherent states, particularly useful in fiber optics or cavity systems without an external pump. The Hamiltonian is

H = \chi (a^\dagger a)^2,

where \chi is the nonlinearity strength. For an input coherent state |\alpha\rangle, the evolution induces phase diffusion, correlating amplitude and phase quadratures to produce squeezing, especially in the limit of short interaction times where the state approximates a squeezed coherent state with parameter r \approx \chi t |\alpha|^2 / 2. This method is approximate, as prolonged interaction leads to higher-order effects like cat states, limiting coherent squeezing to modest levels (typically <3 dB) before fragmentation.^[30] To incorporate realistic decoherence, such as photon loss or dephasing, numerical simulations employ the Lindblad master equation for the density operator \rho:

\dot{\rho} = -i [H, \rho] + \sum_k \gamma_k \left( L_k \rho L_k^\dagger - \frac{1}{2} \{ L_k^\dagger L_k, \rho \} \right),

where H is the system Hamiltonian (e.g., parametric or Kerr), \gamma_k are decay rates, and L_k are jump operators (e.g., L = \sqrt{\kappa} a for loss). This open-system description quantifies squeezing degradation, revealing optimal interaction times that balance generation and dissipation, often simulated via quantum Monte Carlo wave functions or direct matrix exponentiation for small Hilbert spaces.^[31] Adiabatic passage protocols offer robust generation by slowly varying Hamiltonian parameters to track an instantaneous eigenstate (e.g., a dark state decoupled from lossy modes), evolving from vacuum to a highly squeezed state. For instance, in a parametrically driven cavity, ramping the coupling \kappa(t) from zero follows the squeezed vacuum evolution. Shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques, such as counter-diabatic driving, add auxiliary terms to the Hamiltonian to suppress excitations, enabling fast preparation (on timescales \sim 1/\kappa) with fidelity >99% even under noise. These methods enhance robustness against parameter fluctuations compared to sudden quenches.^[32] In driven nonlinear systems, theoretical limits constrain maximal squeezing; for example, in parametrically driven resonators, the squeezing parameter r approaches infinity near the oscillation threshold but is practically bounded by stability, with optimal r_{\max} \sim \log \langle n \rangle (mean photon number \langle n \rangle) in regimes balancing gain and loss. This logarithmic scaling arises from the interplay of drive strength and quantum backaction, preventing unbounded squeezing in finite-power setups.^[33] Recent theoretical advances in the 2020s emphasize dissipative engineering for steady-state squeezing, where tailored loss channels stabilize squeezed coherent states without unitary evolution. For instance, coupling to a squeezed bath or using frequency-modulated drives in optomechanical systems generates two-mode mechanical squeezing with r > 10 dB in the long-time limit, robust against thermal noise via dark-state protection. These approaches outperform transient methods in scalability for multimode systems.^[34]^[35]

Experimental Techniques

The experimental realization of squeezed coherent states has primarily relied on nonlinear optical processes to generate quantum correlations that reduce noise in one quadrature below the shot-noise limit. One of the earliest and most established techniques involves optical parametric oscillators (OPOs), which use cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion in nonlinear crystals such as potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) or lithium niobate. In this method, a pump laser at frequency ω_p interacts with the crystal to produce signal and idler photons at ω_s and ω_i, where ω_p = ω_s + ω_i, leading to correlated photon pairs that enable quadrature squeezing. Degenerate OPOs operating below threshold have achieved squeezing exceeding 10 dB, with levels above 15 dB routinely produced through improvements in cavity design and crystal quality at room temperature since the late 2000s.^[36] Another prominent approach is four-wave mixing (FWM), which generates squeezing through third-order nonlinear interactions in atomic vapors or optical fibers. In atomic vapor cells, such as rubidium or cesium, a pump beam induces coherent Raman scattering between atomic levels, producing correlated photon pairs and achieving up to 8 dB of squeezing at low frequencies. In fiber-based systems, FWM in silica fibers pumped by lasers near 1550 nm has enabled compact, room-temperature squeezing, with recent experiments demonstrating up to about 8 dB in the audio-frequency band using high-power fiber lasers and dispersion-engineered fibers. These techniques benefit from the maturity of fiber optics, allowing integration into scalable quantum networks. Solid-state platforms have extended squeezing generation to non-optical domains, particularly through optomechanical systems and circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED). In optomechanics, radiation pressure from laser light on mechanical resonators, such as silicon nitride membranes or levitated nanoparticles, induces backaction that squeezes the optical field; demonstrations since the 2010s have achieved 3-5 dB squeezing in the megahertz regime. In cQED setups with superconducting qubits coupled to microwave cavities, parametric amplification via flux or charge tuning produces microwave squeezed states with up to 10 dB reduction in quadrature variance, operating at millikelvin temperatures. Detection of squeezed coherent states typically employs balanced homodyne detection, where the signal field interferes with a strong local oscillator (LO) on a beam splitter, and the resulting quadrature noise is measured via photodetectors subtracting common-mode noise. The LO, phase-locked to the desired quadrature, allows normalization against the shot-noise limit, enabling precise characterization of squeezing levels as low as 0.1 dB. This technique has been adapted for various wavelengths, from visible to microwave, and is essential for verifying the non-classical nature of the states. Key milestones include the 1985 demonstration by Slusher et al. using four-wave mixing in an optical cavity, which confirmed theoretical predictions of squeezing. In gravitational-wave detection, the GEO 600 detector integrated 3 dB squeezed vacuum injection in 2010, reducing shot noise and improving sensitivity. Recent experiments with atomic ensembles have achieved over 20 dB of spin squeezing for quantum sensing applications. More recent advances include frequency-dependent squeezing in Advanced LIGO, achieving over 6 dB reduction across detection bands as of 2024.^[37]^[38]^[39] Despite these advances, challenges persist in maintaining long decoherence times due to environmental coupling and in scaling to multi-mode or high-power regimes for practical applications. Fiber-based FWM has achieved records of around 8 dB post-2020.

Applications

Quantum Metrology

Squeezed coherent states play a pivotal role in quantum metrology by enabling measurements that surpass the standard quantum limit (SQL) imposed by shot noise in classical resources, approaching the fundamental Heisenberg limit (HL). In optical interferometry, coherent states achieve phase sensitivity scaling as \Delta \phi \approx 1/\sqrt{N}, where N is the mean photon number, defining the SQL. By contrast, two-mode squeezed states facilitate HL scaling of \Delta \phi \approx 1/N through entanglement-enhanced correlations that reduce uncertainty in one quadrature at the expense of the other.^[40] SU(1,1) interferometers leverage two-mode squeezing to boost phase sensitivity beyond the SQL by employing parametric amplifiers instead of beam splitters, amplifying the signal while suppressing vacuum noise. With a coherent state in one input and squeezed vacuum in the other, these devices achieve sub-SQL precision proportional to the squeezing level, as the output intensity variance is minimized for small phases. This configuration enhances the signal-to-noise ratio, making it ideal for detecting weak signals in noisy environments.^[41] A prominent application is in gravitational wave detection at LIGO, where frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum injection has been operational since 2023, reducing quantum radiation pressure and shot noise to improve overall sensitivity. Upgrades implemented in 2023 extended broadband squeezing via a 300-m filter cavity, yielding up to 3 dB noise reduction between 35–75 Hz and 5.6 dB at kilohertz frequencies, thereby elevating the signal-to-noise ratio for transient events.^[42] In atomic metrology, spin-squeezed states derived from squeezed coherent superpositions provide gain for ensemble-based sensors like clocks. The Wineland squeezing parameter is \xi^2 = N (\Delta J_\perp)^2 / \langle \mathbf{J} \rangle^2, where N is the atom number, \Delta J_\perp the variance of the spin component perpendicular to the mean spin \langle \mathbf{J} \rangle, and \xi^2 < 1 indicates reduction below the SQL phase uncertainty \Delta \phi = 1/\sqrt{N}. This enables \Delta \phi = \xi / \sqrt{N}, with metrological utility scaling as $1/\xi.^[43] For example, in Ramsey spectroscopy, spin-squeezed states suppress quantum projection noise during interrogation, directly lowering the Allan variance \sigma_y(\tau) in optical atomic clocks. Demonstrations have achieved improvements below the SQL, with further gains possible for ensembles under 1000 atoms given current laser noise levels.^[44] Recent advances in 2025 feature hybrid opto-atomic networks combining frequency-dependent squeezing with atomic spin ensembles, dynamically tailoring quadrature noise for broadband suppression beyond the SQL in precision sensing applications.^[45]

Quantum Information Processing

Squeezed coherent states play a pivotal role in continuous-variable quantum information processing, particularly due to their ability to generate entanglement and reduce noise in Gaussian protocols. These states, often realized as two-mode squeezed vacua, serve as resources for secure communication and computation by enabling the distribution of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR)-like correlations over lossy channels. In quantum key distribution (QKD), squeezed modulation enhances security against eavesdropping by exploiting the non-classical noise reduction properties of squeezed light, allowing for higher secret key rates compared to coherent-state protocols.^[46] A cornerstone application is continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD), where squeezed states are used to modulate quadratures for secure key generation. Seminal protocols like GG02 employ Gaussian-modulated coherent states, but incorporating squeezed states in the modulation process mitigates channel noise and improves tolerance to excess noise, particularly in reverse reconciliation schemes where the receiver's measurements are used as the reference for key extraction. This approach has enabled experimental implementations over metropolitan distances with secret key rates exceeding 1 Mbit/s, demonstrating robustness against realistic imperfections such as detection noise.^[47]^[46] Recent advancements further integrate squeezed states to counter side-channel attacks in trusted-node setups, ensuring information-theoretic security even with imperfect squeezing levels around 6-10 dB.^[48] In quantum teleportation, two-mode squeezed states function as EPR pairs to faithfully transfer unknown quantum states, surpassing the classical fidelity limit of 0.5 for continuous variables. The protocol, first theoretically outlined using squeezed vacuum entanglement, achieves high-fidelity teleportation by performing joint measurements on the input state and one half of the entangled pair, followed by conditional displacement on the output mode. Experimental demonstrations since 1998 have teleported squeezed states with fidelities up to 0.76, preserving broadband entanglement across optical frequencies and enabling applications in quantum networks. These setups typically use parametric down-conversion to generate the initial squeezing, with fidelities scaling with the degree of two-mode squeezing achieved, often exceeding 8 dB in modern experiments.^[49]^[50] Gaussian cluster states, constructed from squeezed coherent states via linear optics such as beamsplitters, underpin measurement-based quantum computing in the continuous-variable regime. These multipartite entangled resources allow universal Gaussian operations through local quadrature measurements, with non-Gaussian elements enabling full universality. Generation involves offline squeezing of individual modes followed by interferometric entanglement, yielding scalable cluster graphs for one-way computation; experimental realizations have produced four-mode linear clusters with entanglement verified by positive partial transpose criteria. This framework supports fault-tolerant scaling when combined with error correction, offering a photonic pathway to large-scale quantum processors.^[51]^[52] For error correction in bosonic systems, squeezed Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) codes encode logical qubits into superpositions of displaced squeezed states within an oscillator's infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, providing protection against small displacement errors common in continuous-variable platforms. These codes stabilize logical information against photon loss and dephasing by projecting onto a lattice in phase space, with squeezing levels above 10 dB enabling fault-tolerant thresholds when concatenated with surface codes. Experimental implementations in superconducting circuits have demonstrated stabilization of squeezed GKP states with lifetimes extended by factors of 10, crucial for maintaining coherence in quantum memories and processors.^[53]^[54] Entanglement distillation protocols purify noisy two-mode squeezed states into near-ideal EPR pairs, essential for long-distance quantum communication. These schemes employ local Gaussian operations like beamsplitters and homodyne measurements to concentrate entanglement from multiple imperfect copies, overcoming loss-induced degradation while respecting no-go theorems for purely Gaussian distillation. In practice, hybrid protocols incorporating non-Gaussian elements, such as photon subtraction, have distilled states with logarithmic negativity increased by up to 50% from initial squeezing of 5 dB, facilitating reliable entanglement swapping in repeater chains.^[55]^[56] Progress in the 2020s has advanced squeezed-state-based repeaters for continuous-variable quantum networks, addressing exponential loss in optical fibers through entanglement swapping and purification at intermediate nodes. These protocols distribute purified two-mode squeezed states over hundreds of kilometers by storing degraded entanglement in atomic ensembles and applying noiseless amplification, achieving end-to-end entanglement fidelity above 0.7 with repeater spacings of 50 km. Unlike discrete-variable architectures, CV repeaters leverage the Gaussian nature of squeezed light for compatible multiplexing, paving the way for scalable quantum internet infrastructures with demonstrated rates enabling secure multi-node connectivity.^[57]^[25]

References

[1]
Squeezed States of Light - RP Photonics
Squeezed states of light have noise below the standard quantum limit in one quadrature. They can be used for ultra-precise measurements.
[2]
[PDF] A pedestrian introduction to coherent and squeezed states - arXiv
Jul 6, 2020 · This review is intended for readers who want to have a quick understanding on the theoretical underpinnings of coherent states and squeezed ...
[3]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3068
[4]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817
[5]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2409
[6]
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.177
[7]
[PDF] Quantum Optics
The field of quantum optics today is very different form the field that Dan Walls and I surveyed in 1994 for the first Edition of this book.
[8]
[PDF] Introduction to quantum optics - arXiv
Mar 20, 2022 · Indeed, since the quadrature fluctuations are equal to 1 with our normalization of position and momentum, see (74), this means that qzpf = √ / ...
[9]
[PDF] Quantum-enhanced differential atom interferometers and clocks with ...
Mar 30, 2023 · 2, the state |S(ξ)ib is squeezed along the direction λ = π/4 + νE/2 in the quadra- ture plane, namely ∆2ˆxb(π/4 + νE/2) = e−2r/2, and anti ...
[10]
[PDF] Coherent and squeezed states: introductory review of basic notions ...
May 28, 2019 · ... Kennard's state, obtained in 1927, is in this form the first antecedent of what is nowadays called squeezed state!). A very useful ansatz to ...
[11]
A historical derivation of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation is flawed
Jun 1, 2008 · Kennard's 1927 demonstration of the uncertainty relation, cited by Heisenberg as the earliest derivation using the formalism of quantum theory, ...
[12]
https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/76/6/585/237139/A-historical-derivation-of-Heisenberg-s
[13]
[PDF] Note for Quantum Optics: Squeezed states
A squeezed coherent state |α, ξ> is obtained by first acting with the displacement operator ˆD(α) on the vacuum followed by the squeezed operator ˆS(ξ), i.e.. | ...
[14]
[PDF] Effect of Squeezing on the Atomic and the Entanglement Dynamics ...
The variance in the photon number distribution of the squeezed coherent state |α, zi can ... 8: Mandel's Q parameter versus NS for squeezed coherent state with NC ...
[15]
DF Walls GJ Milburn - Quantum Optics
Interest in the practical generation of squeezed states of light became significant when Caves [S.14] suggested in 19S1 that such light might be used to achieve.
[16]
[PDF] Statistical Properties of the Squeezed Displaced Number States
Finding the Mandel's Q,parameter is now a straightforward calculation. We ... the squeezing parameter r, we have that Q < 0; Q = 0 and Q > 0, and it is ...
[17]
Phase properties of squeezed states
### Summary of Phase Properties and Distributions for Squeezed States (Yuen et al., 1989, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 2423)
[18]
Non-classicality and coherence of squeezed states - ScienceDirect
Here we use this criterion for classicality to show that the squeezed states under consideration all are non-classical.
[19]
Quantum squeezing in a nonlinear mechanical oscillator - Nature
Jun 21, 2024 · Here we demonstrate squeezing below the zero-point fluctuations of a gigahertz-frequency mechanical resonator coupled to a superconducting qubit.
[20]
New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. I. Quadrature phases ...
May 1, 1985 · This paper introduces a new formalism for analyzing two-photon devices (eg, parametric amplifiers and phase-conjugate mirrors), in which photons in the output ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[21]
https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.3068
[22]
[1912.09321] Modes and states in Quantum Optics - arXiv
Dec 19, 2019 · Quantum optics involves light states with no classical equivalent, including spatial, temporal, frequency, and polarization modes. Each mode is ...
[23]
Two-mode squeezed vacuum state coupled to the common thermal ...
Nov 19, 2002 · To quantify entanglement we use the logarithmic negativity. We derive a condition, which assures that the state remains entangled in spite ...
[24]
Quantum repeater using two-mode squeezed states and atomic ...
We perform a theoretical investigation into how a two-mode squeezed vacuum state, which has undergone photon loss, can be stored and purified using noiseless ...
[25]
Measuring Photon Antibunching from Continuous Variable ...
Apr 13, 2007 · By preparing displaced-squeezed states with the appropriate parameters, we were able to observe photon antibunching as witnessed by g ( 2 ) ( 0 ) ...
[26]
Negativity of the Wigner function as an indicator of nonclassicality
Jun 2, 2004 · Abstract: A measure of nonclassicality of quantum states based on the volume of the negative part of the Wigner function is proposed.Missing: quantumness | Show results with:quantumness
[27]
Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville ...
Jul 10, 2012 · In a classical theory, any probability distribution on phase space, sometimes called a Liouville distribution, represents a possible description ...
[28]
Overview of the Phase Space Formulation of Quantum Mechanics ...
Apr 1, 2021 · One such case where this approach is insightful is when considering two-mode squeezed states. Such states are Gaussian and so have no negative ...
[29]
Squeezing of intracavity and traveling-wave light fields produced in ...
Sep 1, 1984 · This is applied to the problem of computing the squeezing produced by a degenerate parametric amplifier located inside a cavity.
[30]
Generation of quantum states with nonlinear squeezing by Kerr ...
In this paper we show how can the self-Kerr nonlinearity be straightforwardly used for the generation of quantum states with the cubic and quartic nonlinear ...
[31]
Decoherence and disentanglement for two qubits in a common ...
Oct 31, 2008 · We study the relation between the sudden death and revival of the entanglement of two qubits in a common squeezed bath and the decoherence.
[32]
Generation of atomic and field squeezing by adiabatic passage and ...
The squeezed state of the cavity mode can be produced from the vacuum state by adiabatically increasing the Rabi frequency Ω 2 from zero. It should be noted ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
[33]
[quant-ph/0105137] Limits to squeezing in the degenerate OPO - arXiv
May 28, 2001 · Abstract: We develop a systematic theory of quantum fluctuations in the driven parametric oscillator (OPO), including the region near threshold.Missing: maximal r_max systems
[34]
Dissipative Generation of Two‐Mode Mechanical Squeezing via ...
Dec 17, 2021 · In this article, a dissipative scheme is proposed to generate strong and robust two-mode mechanical squeezing via frequency modulation of ...
[35]
Programmable multi-mode entanglement via dissipative ... - Science
Jul 2, 2025 · We experimentally demonstrate the generation of multimode squeezed states across two, three, and five modes out of initial thermal states by ...
[36]
The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology - Nature
Sep 18, 2012 · In optical interferometric applications, it is common to use states of light with an unbounded number of photons, such as coherent or squeezed ...
[37]
The phase sensitivity of an SU(1,1) interferometer with coherent and ...
We theoretically study the phase sensitivity of an SU(1,1) interferometer with a coherent state in one input port and a squeezed-vacuum state in the other ...Missing: LIGO | Show results with:LIGO
[38]
Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector ...
Sep 19, 2024 · Measuring the position x of an object with uncertainty Δx inevitably perturbs its momentum by Δp ≥ ℏ/(Δx). After a time τ, the object with ...
[39]
[PDF] Spin-squeezed states for metrology - HAL
Spin-squeezing is a quantum technology where correlations reduce uncertainty in spectroscopic experiments, reducing uncertainty on one spin component.
[40]
Prospects and challenges for squeezing-enhanced optical atomic ...
Figure 3a shows the Allan deviation versus particle number for various levels of dead time achieved with coherent spin states (CSS) and optimized spin squeezed ...
[41]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/073020
[42]
Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated ...
Sep 25, 2012 · Here we propose and experimentally address a continuous variable quantum key distribution protocol that uses modulated fragile entangled states of light.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[43]
Continuous Variable Quantum Cryptography Using Coherent States
Jan 16, 2002 · Continuous Variable Quantum Cryptography Using Coherent States. Frédéric Grosshans and Philippe Grangier.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[44]
Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a leakage from ...
Dec 7, 2017 · We address side-channel leakage in a trusted preparation station of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with coherent and squeezed states.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[45]
Teleportation of Continuous Quantum Variables | Phys. Rev. Lett.
Jan 26, 1998 · A protocol is presented for teleporting the wave function of a single mode of the electromagnetic field with high fidelity using squeezed-state entanglement.
[46]
Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Teleportation of ...
Sep 14, 2007 · We demonstrate an unconditional high-fidelity teleporter capable of preserving the broadband entanglement in an optical squeezed state.
[47]
Universal Quantum Computation with Continuous-Variable Cluster ...
We describe a generalization of the cluster-state model of quantum computation to continuous-variable systems, along with a proposal for an optical ...
[48]
Building Gaussian Cluster States by Linear Optics - quant-ph - arXiv
Oct 15, 2006 · Abstract: The linear optical creation of Gaussian cluster states, a potential resource for universal quantum computation, is investigated.
[49]
[quant-ph/0008040] Encoding a qubit in an oscillator - arXiv
May 13, 2001 · Title:Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Authors:Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, John Preskill. View a PDF of the paper titled Encoding a ...
[50]
Quantum Error Correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Code
Jun 24, 2021 · The GKP codewords are coherent superpositions of periodically displaced squeezed vacuum states. Because of the challenge of merely preparing ...
[51]
Continuous-variable entanglement distillation of non-Gaussian ...
Jul 13, 2010 · It is important to note that this lower bound is very sensitive to excess noise of the two-mode squeezed state. Even for a small amount of ...
[52]
Distillation of Gaussian Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering ... - Nature
Apr 13, 2022 · We experimentally demonstrate the distillation of Gaussian EPR steering and entanglement in lossy and noisy environments using measurement-based noiseless ...
[53]
[2211.16343] Quantum Repeater using Two-Mode Squeezed States ...
Nov 28, 2022 · We perform a theoretical investigation into how a two-mode squeezed vacuum state, that has undergone photon loss, can be stored and purified ...Missing: 2020s progress CV networks