Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Phase factor

The phase factor is a unit complex number of the form e^{i\phi}, where \phi is a real number representing the phase angle. It is commonly used in physics to describe phase shifts in waves and quantum states. In quantum mechanics, it multiplies a normalized state vector in Hilbert space without altering its normalization or physical interpretation.^[1] This factor arises naturally in the description of quantum states and wave functions, encoding rotational information in the complex plane while preserving the magnitude of probabilities.^[2] A key distinction in quantum mechanics is between the global phase factor, which applies uniformly to an entire state and has no observable physical effects—since measurement outcomes depend only on probability amplitudes' magnitudes—and the relative phase, which appears between different components of a superposition and governs interference patterns essential to quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement.^[3] For instance, in a qubit state |\psi\rangle = \alpha |[0](/page/0)\rangle + \beta e^{i[\theta](/page/Theta)} |[1](/page/1)\rangle, the phase \theta determines the relative orientation on the Bloch sphere, influencing outcomes in quantum gates and algorithms.^[2] The unobservability of the global phase underscores a fundamental gauge symmetry in quantum theory, where states differing only by such a factor represent the same physical reality.^[1] Beyond basic state descriptions, phase factors play a critical role in dynamical and geometric contexts. The dynamical phase accumulates from time evolution under the Schrödinger equation, proportional to the integral of the energy.^[2] The geometric phase, or Berry phase, emerges in adiabatic processes where a system cycles through parameter space, yielding a path-dependent shift independent of time taken.^[4] This geometric phase has implications in molecular physics and condensed matter systems like the quantum Hall effect.^[4]^[5] In quantum computing, it enables robust holonomic gates resistant to noise.^[6] Phase factors also describe propagation and interference in classical wave optics and electromagnetism, highlighting the wave-like nature of particles in quantum contexts.^[3]

Mathematical Foundations

Definition

The phase factor is a unit complex number expressed as the complex exponential e^{i\theta}, where \theta is a real-valued phase angle. This form ensures a magnitude of exactly 1, positioning it on the unit circle in the complex plane.^[7]^[8] In the polar form of a general complex number z = r e^{i\theta}, with r = |z| as the modulus, the phase factor isolates the directional component e^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta, as established by Euler's formula.^[7] This decomposition separates the scaling effect of r from the rotational effect encoded in the phase.^[8] Geometrically, the phase factor traces the unit circle, where \theta specifies the counterclockwise angular displacement from the positive real axis, corresponding to the argument of the complex number.^[8] The origins of this representation lie in 18th-century complex analysis, pioneered by Leonhard Euler, who introduced the notation i = \sqrt{-1} and the geometric interpretation of complex numbers in polar coordinates.^[9] Euler formalized the formula e^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta in his 1748 work Introductio in analysin infinitorum.^[9] Its formal adoption in physics occurred with early 20th-century developments in wave theory.

Properties

The phase factor, denoted as e^{i\theta} where \theta is a real number, exhibits key algebraic properties arising from its representation as a complex exponential. Multiplication of two phase factors is straightforward: e^{i\theta_1} \cdot e^{i\theta_2} = e^{i(\theta_1 + \theta_2)}, reflecting the additive property of the exponents.^[10] For addition, the sum can be expressed using trigonometric identities: e^{i\theta} + e^{i\phi} = e^{i(\theta + \phi)/2} \left( e^{i(\theta - \phi)/2} + e^{-i(\theta - \phi)/2} \right) = 2 \cos\left( \frac{\theta - \phi}{2} \right) e^{i(\theta + \phi)/2}, which highlights the role of the cosine function in capturing the magnitude of the resultant vector on the unit circle.^[11] Geometrically, the phase factor e^{i\theta} corresponds to a rotation in the complex plane by the angle \theta counterclockwise from the positive real axis, as it traces the unit circle while preserving the magnitude of 1.^[10] This rotation is invariant under scaling of the overall complex number's magnitude, since the phase factor isolates the angular component independent of radial distance.^[12] Functionally, the phase factor is periodic with period $2\pi, meaning e^{i(\theta + 2\pi)} = e^{i\theta} for any real \theta, due to the $2\pi-periodicity of the sine and cosine functions underlying Euler's formula.^[13] It is also differentiable, with the derivative given by \frac{d}{d\theta} e^{i\theta} = i e^{i\theta}, a direct consequence of the chain rule applied to the exponential form.^[14] This property underscores its smooth variation along the unit circle. The phase \theta is unique only modulo $2\pi, such that phases \theta and \theta + 2\pi n for integer n yield identical phase factors, reflecting the circular nature of the complex plane.^[13]

Applications in Wave Mechanics

Plane Waves and Phase Shifts

In wave mechanics, the general form of a monochromatic plane wave propagating in free space is given by

\psi(\mathbf{r}, t) = A e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)},

where A is the complex amplitude, \mathbf{k} is the wave vector determining the direction and wavelength (|\mathbf{k}| = k = 2\pi / \lambda), and \omega is the angular frequency related to the temporal oscillation.^[15] This form satisfies the wave equation \nabla^2 \psi = \frac{1}{v^2} \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2}, with phase velocity v = \omega / k.^[16] A phase factor e^{i\theta}, where \theta is a real constant, modifies the plane wave to

\psi(\mathbf{r}, t) = A e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t + \theta)}.

This introduces a constant phase shift \theta without altering the amplitude |A|, the propagation direction \hat{\mathbf{k}}, or the wavelength \lambda = 2\pi / k.^[15] Physically, such a shift corresponds to a time delay \Delta t = \theta / \omega in the wave's oscillation, equivalent to observing the original wave at an earlier time t - \Delta t, or a spatial shift \Delta \mathbf{r} = (\theta / k) \hat{\mathbf{k}} along the propagation direction, representing a displacement of the wave crests.^[16] These interpretations arise because the phase \phi = \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t + \theta maintains the same linear dependence on position and time, merely offsetting the reference point. The equivalence between the phase-shifted wave and a translated origin can be derived by considering a coordinate transformation \mathbf{r}' = \mathbf{r} - \Delta \mathbf{r}, where \Delta \mathbf{r} = (\theta / k) \hat{\mathbf{k}}. Substituting into the original unshifted wave yields

\psi(\mathbf{r}', t) = A e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r}' + \Delta \mathbf{r}) - \omega t)} = A e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}' - \omega t + \theta)},

which exactly matches the phase-shifted form in the new coordinates.^[15] For ideal infinite plane waves, this translation leaves the wave profile unchanged, as the structure is uniform and extends indefinitely; thus, the phase shift is observationally indistinguishable from redefining the spatial origin along the propagation axis.^[16]

Interference Patterns

In wave mechanics, the superposition principle governs the behavior of multiple waves interacting in a medium, where the total wave function is the sum of individual wave components. For coherent plane waves, this is expressed as

\psi(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_j A_j e^{i(\mathbf{k}_j \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega_j t + \theta_j)},

with A_j as the amplitude, \mathbf{k}_j the wave vector, \omega_j the angular frequency, and \theta_j the phase factor of the j-th wave. The observable intensity arises from the squared magnitude of this superposition, I \propto |\psi|^2, which reveals interference effects dependent on the relative phases among the components.^[17]^[18] For two coherent waves of equal frequency, the interference pattern is determined by their phase difference \Delta \theta = \theta_1 - \theta_2, augmented by any path-induced phase shift \Delta \phi from differing propagation distances. The resulting intensity at a point is given by

I = I_1 + I_2 + 2\sqrt{I_1 I_2} \cos(\Delta \theta + \Delta \phi),

where I_1 and I_2 are the individual intensities. Constructive interference occurs when \Delta \theta + \Delta \phi = 2m\pi (for integer m), maximizing intensity to (\sqrt{I_1} + \sqrt{I_2})^2, while destructive interference happens at \Delta \theta + \Delta \phi = (2m+1)\pi, minimizing it to (\sqrt{I_1} - \sqrt{I_2})^2. This cosine term encodes the phase factors' role in modulating the pattern's brightness variations.^[19]^[20] A classic demonstration is Young's double-slit experiment, where monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits, producing an interference pattern of alternating bright and dark fringes on a distant screen. The phase difference arises from the path length disparity \Delta L = d \sin \alpha (with slit separation d and angle \alpha from the central axis), yielding \Delta \phi = (2\pi / \lambda) \Delta L, where \lambda is the wavelength. Fringes form where this phase aligns for constructive or destructive superposition, with fringe spacing \Delta y = \lambda L / d (screen distance L), directly tying the pattern's visibility to relative phase control./University_Physics_III_-Optics_and_Modern_Physics(OpenStax)/03%3A_Interference/3.02%3A_Young%27s_Double-Slit_Interference) In diffraction gratings, multiple slits enhance this effect, creating sharper interference patterns through the collective phase contributions of numerous sources. For N slits spaced by d, the intensity involves a interference factor \left( \frac{\sin(N \beta / 2)}{\sin(\beta / 2)} \right)^2, where \beta = (2\pi d / \lambda) \sin \theta captures the phase progression across slits, producing principal maxima at \beta = 2m\pi and subsidiary minima elsewhere. This multi-slit arrangement amplifies peak intensities by a factor of N^2 while narrowing linewidths, making gratings essential for spectroscopy by resolving fine phase-dependent spectral lines.^[21]^[22] While phase factors dictate these observable patterns, absolute phases remain unmeasurable in isolated waves, as only relative phase differences influence the interference outcomes and thus the detectable intensity distributions.^[3]

Quantum Mechanical Interpretations

Phase in Wave Functions

In quantum mechanics, the wave function \psi(\mathbf{r}, t) describing a particle's state can be expressed in polar form as \psi(\mathbf{r}, t) = R(\mathbf{r}, t) e^{i S(\mathbf{r}, t)/\hbar}, where R(\mathbf{r}, t) is the real-valued amplitude and S(\mathbf{r}, t)/\hbar represents the phase factor, with \hbar being the reduced Planck's constant.^[23] This decomposition separates the modulus |\psi|^2 = R^2, which determines the probability density, from the phase, which encodes dynamical information.^[24] A key feature of quantum wave functions is global phase invariance: multiplying the entire wave function by a constant phase factor e^{i\theta}, where \theta is real, yields an equivalent physical state, as it leaves observable quantities unchanged.^[2] Specifically, transition probabilities remain invariant under this transformation, since |\langle \phi | e^{i\theta} \psi \rangle|^2 = |\langle \phi | \psi \rangle|^2, and expectation values of operators \hat{A} satisfy \langle e^{i\theta} \psi | \hat{A} | e^{i\theta} \psi \rangle = \langle \psi | \hat{A} | \psi \rangle.^[2] This invariance implies that the absolute phase of a wave function is unobservable in isolation, emphasizing the role of relative phases in quantum phenomena. In contrast, local phases that vary with position, such as e^{i\phi(\mathbf{r})}, can influence measurable effects like the probability current density \mathbf{j}. For a wave function in polar form, the current is given by \mathbf{j} = \frac{R^2}{m} \nabla S, where m is the particle mass, showing that spatial gradients in the phase \nabla \phi (with \phi = S/\hbar) directly contribute to the flow of probability.^[24] This position-dependent phase thus affects the dynamics of quantum particles, manifesting in phenomena such as interference patterns where relative phase differences determine constructive or destructive outcomes. An important example of a phase factor arises in the time evolution of stationary states, where the dynamical phase e^{-i E t / \hbar} accumulates due to the energy E of the system.^[25] This phase factor, derived from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, governs the temporal progression of the wave function without altering the probability density for energy eigenstates.

Geometric and Topological Phases

In quantum mechanics, geometric phases represent additional phase factors acquired by a quantum state during a cyclic evolution that depend solely on the geometry of the parameter space traversed, rather than on the dynamical details of the Hamiltonian.^[4] These phases arise in adiabatic processes where the system remains in an instantaneous eigenstate, and they are distinct from the usual dynamical phase, which accumulates due to the energy eigenvalues over time.^[4] The geometric origin stems from the holonomy of a connection in the bundle of eigenstates over the parameter manifold, making these phases path-dependent and gauge-invariant modulo 2π.^[4] The Berry phase is the canonical example of such a geometric phase, defined for an adiabatic cyclic evolution of a Hamiltonian parameter \mathbf{R}(t) that returns to its initial value after a period T. For a non-degenerate eigenstate |\psi_n(\mathbf{R})\rangle with energy E_n(\mathbf{R}), the total phase acquired is \phi_n = \delta_n + \gamma_n, where \delta_n = -\frac{1}{\hbar} \oint E_n dt is the dynamical phase and the Berry phase is given by

\gamma_n = i \oint_C \langle \psi_n(\mathbf{R}) | \nabla_{\mathbf{R}} \psi_n(\mathbf{R}) \rangle \cdot d\mathbf{R},

with the integral over the closed path C in parameter space.^[4] This phase is independent of the speed of the evolution, as long as the adiabatic approximation holds, and it can be interpreted as the flux of the Berry curvature through the surface enclosed by C.^[4] For example, in a spin-1/2 particle in a slowly rotating magnetic field, the Berry phase equals half the solid angle subtended by the field direction at the origin, manifesting as a monopole-like geometry in parameter space.^[4] Discovered by Michael Berry in 1984, the Berry phase generalized earlier observations of similar phases in specific systems, such as the monopole phase in the adiabatic approximation for spin systems, providing a unified framework applicable to diverse quantum phenomena.^[4] Berry's seminal work emphasized the geometric nature by drawing analogies to parallel transport in fiber bundles, highlighting how these phases emerge universally in adiabatic quantum evolutions without reliance on perturbation theory.^[4] A related geometric phase is the Aharonov-Bohm phase, which occurs when a charged particle encircles a region containing magnetic flux but experiences no magnetic field along its path, due to the influence of the vector potential \mathbf{A}. The phase shift in the wave function is

\phi = \frac{e}{\hbar} \oint \mathbf{A} \cdot d\mathbf{l},

where e is the particle charge and the line integral is over the closed path, equivalent to the enclosed magnetic flux \Phi via Stokes' theorem: \phi = \frac{e}{\hbar} \Phi. First predicted by Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm in 1959,^[26] this phase demonstrates the physical reality of gauge potentials in quantum mechanics, even in field-free regions, and has been experimentally verified using electron interferometry. Topological phases extend these concepts by linking geometric phases to global invariants of the system's band structure, particularly through Chern numbers in periodic quantum systems.^[27] The Chern number for an isolated band is the integral of the Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone, \nu_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{\text{BZ}} \mathbf{\Omega}_n(\mathbf{k}) \cdot d^2\mathbf{k}, where \mathbf{\Omega}_n = \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} \times \mathbf{A}_n and \mathbf{A}_n = i \langle u_n | \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} u_n \rangle is the Berry connection for the Bloch state |u_n(\mathbf{k})\rangle.^[27] In the quantum Hall effect, Thouless, Kohmoto, Nightingale, and den Nijs showed in 1982 that the Hall conductance is quantized as \sigma_{xy} = \frac{e^2}{h} \sum_n \nu_n, where the sum is over filled bands, directly tying the topological Chern invariant to observable transport properties in two-dimensional electron gases under magnetic fields and periodic potentials.^[27] This topological characterization explains the robustness of the quantum Hall plateaus against disorder. It has profound implications for topological insulators and Chern insulators in condensed matter physics.^[28]

Phasors in Signal Processing

In signal processing, phasors provide a compact representation for sinusoidal signals, transforming time-domain analysis into algebraic operations in the complex plane. A sinusoidal signal of the form A \cos(\omega t + \theta) can be expressed as the real part of a complex exponential: A \cos(\omega t + \theta) = \Re \{ A e^{i(\omega t + \theta)} \}, where the phase factor e^{i\theta} encodes the signal's phase shift relative to a reference.^[29] This phasor \mathbf{V} = A e^{i\theta} rotates at angular frequency \omega in the complex plane, with its magnitude A representing the amplitude and argument \theta the phase.^[30] By suppressing the time-dependent e^{i\omega t} term for steady-state analysis (assuming the same frequency across signals), phasors simplify the handling of periodic waveforms in linear time-invariant systems.^[31] Phasor operations mirror vector algebra in the complex domain, facilitating straightforward computations for signal combinations and transformations. Addition of phasors corresponds to vector summation in the complex plane, yielding the resultant magnitude and phase of the combined signal; for instance, two phasors \mathbf{V_1} and \mathbf{V_2} sum to \mathbf{V} = \mathbf{V_1} + \mathbf{V_2}, which determines the net sinusoidal output.^[30] Phase shifts are achieved by multiplying a phasor by e^{i\Delta\theta}, rotating it by angle \Delta\theta without altering magnitude, a property that aligns with the multiplicative nature of phase factors in complex representations.^[29] These operations extend to scalar multiplication for amplitude scaling and conjugation for phase reflection, enabling efficient manipulation of signals in processing pipelines.^[32] In applications, phasors are essential for AC circuit analysis, where impedance incorporates phase: resistors contribute real impedance (zero phase), capacitors negative imaginary (phase lag), and inductors positive imaginary (phase lead)./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/15%3A_Alternating-Current_Circuits/15.03%3A_Simple_AC_Circuits) This allows Kirchhoff's laws to be applied algebraically using phasor voltages and currents, computing power factors and phase differences directly from the argument of the impedance phasor.^[30] In Fourier transforms, the transform coefficients are phasors encoding both amplitude and phase spectra of a signal; the discrete Fourier transform decomposes a time-domain sequence into a sum of these frequency-specific phasors, reconstructing the original via inverse transform.^[31] For example, the Fourier series of a periodic signal is a weighted sum of phasors at harmonic frequencies, each with phase factors determining alignment.^[32] The primary advantage of phasors lies in their ability to convert differential equations governing linear systems—such as those for filters or amplifiers—into algebraic equations, drastically reducing computational complexity for sinusoidal steady-state responses.^[29] This method, rooted in the eigenvalue property of complex exponentials under differentiation (where \frac{d}{dt} e^{i\omega t} = i\omega e^{i\omega t}), enables frequency-domain analysis without solving time-varying ODEs explicitly.^[31] In digital signal processing, phasor-based techniques underpin efficient algorithms like the fast Fourier transform, optimizing spectrum estimation and filtering for real-time applications.^[32]

Gauge Invariance

In gauge theories, phase factors play a central role in ensuring the invariance of physical laws under local transformations, particularly in electromagnetism and quantum electrodynamics (QED). The phase factor arises from the requirement that the theory remains unchanged when the wave function of a charged particle undergoes a position- and time-dependent phase shift. Specifically, under a gauge transformation, the scalar wave function transforms as \psi(\mathbf{r}, t) \to e^{i \alpha(\mathbf{r}, t)} \psi(\mathbf{r}, t), where \alpha(\mathbf{r}, t) is an arbitrary real function. To maintain invariance, the scalar potential transforms as \phi \to \phi - \partial_t \alpha, and the vector potential as \mathbf{A} \to \mathbf{A} + \nabla \alpha, preserving the form of the electromagnetic fields \mathbf{E} = -\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} and \mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}. This transformation preserves the form of the Schrödinger equation or the Dirac equation in the presence of electromagnetic fields, ensuring that observable quantities like probabilities and currents remain unaffected.^[33] The underlying symmetry group for this phase invariance in QED is the unitary group U(1), where phase factors correspond to elements e^{i\theta} with \theta real, forming an Abelian group under multiplication. This local U(1) gauge invariance is fundamental to QED, dictating the structure of the interaction between fermions and photons through the covariant derivative D_\mu = \partial_\mu + i e A_\mu, where A_\mu is the gauge field. The theory's Lagrangian is constructed to be invariant under these local phase rotations, which introduces the minimal coupling necessary for electromagnetic interactions. Globally, a constant phase shift \alpha (independent of position and time) leaves the theory unchanged without altering fields, but local variations necessitate the introduction of the gauge field to compensate.^[34] Physically, this gauge invariance ensures the covariance of Maxwell's equations under such transformations and the consistency of the quantum mechanical description of charged particles. It is intimately linked to charge conservation via Noether's theorem: the global U(1) symmetry implies a conserved current j^\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi, whose integral yields the total charge, while the local extension enforces the dynamical coupling to the electromagnetic field. In essence, local gauge invariance not only unifies the description of free particles and fields but also guarantees that electromagnetic interactions respect the principle of relativity and symmetry, forming the cornerstone of the Standard Model's electroweak sector as well.^[35]

References

[1]
[PDF] Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
Jan 17, 2012 · ◦ Normalized vectors can always be multiplied by a phase factor, a complex number of the form eiφ where φ is real, without changing the ...
[2]
[PDF] Quantum Computation and Quantum Information - Michael Nielsen
Nielsen, Michael A., and Chuang, Isaac L. Quantum Computation and Quantum ... together with a (global) phase shift – a constant multiplier of the form eiα.
[3]
[PDF] B Basic concepts from quantum theory - UTK-EECS
In quantum mechanics, global phase has no physical meaning; all that matters is relative phase. In other words, if you consider all the angles around the circle ...
[4]
[PDF] Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes
A quantal system in an eigenstate, slowly transported round a circuit C by varying parameters R in its Hamiltonian (R), will acquire a geo- metrical phase ...
[5]
[PDF] Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential
The number a is called the real part of a + bi, and b is called its imaginary part. Traditionally the letters z and w are used to stand for complex numbers.<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
[PDF] 6. The complex exponential
The exponential function is a basic building block for solutions of ODEs. Complex numbers expand the scope of the exponential function, and bring trigonometric ...Missing: phase | Show results with:phase
[7]
[PDF] A Short History of Complex Numbers - URI Math Department
Euler (1707-1783) introduced the notation i = √−1 [3], and visualized complex numbers as points with rectangular coordinates, but did not give a satisfactory ...
[8]
4. Polar and Exponential Forms - Pauls Online Math Notes
Nov 17, 2022 · ... the product or quotient of complex numbers. Given two complex numbers z1=r1eiθ1 z 1 = r 1 e i θ 1 and z2=r2eiθ2 z 2 = r 2 e i θ 2 , where θ1 θ ...
[9]
[PDF] Complex Variables Lecture Notes
Jun 2, 2021 · It follows from the definition and properties of eiθ that cos(θ) = 1. 2 eiθ + e−iθ = Re(eiθ),. (1.1.25) sin(θ) = 1. 2i eiθ − e−iθ = Im(eiθ). ( ...
[10]
Complex Numbers | Ultimate Electronics Book
Any complex number can be written in this form, where r and θ are real numbers specifying the magnitude and phase of the complex number. ex=1+x+x22! +x33!
[11]
[PDF] Notes on the complex exponential and sine functions (§1.5)
Clearly ei(θ+2π) = eiθ (because of the 2π periodicity of the sine and cosine functions of ordinary calculus). It's also clear—from drawing a picture of eiθ on ...
[12]
[PDF] Euler's Formula and Trigonometry - Columbia Math Department
(eiθ − e−iθ). = − sin θ and d dθ sin θ = d dθ. Im(eiθ). = d dθ. (. 1. 2i ... Euler's formula to rewrite them as integrals of complex exponentials, for. 8 ...Missing: iφ} | Show results with:iφ}
[13]
[PDF] Rotations in Quantum Mechanics, and Rotations of Spin-1
However, the search for a unitary representation of the classical rotations is educational, and the phase factors are not so much a difficulty as an opportunity ...
[14]
[PDF] introduction to electrodynamics
... Griffiths, David J. (David Jeffery), 1942-. Introduction to electrodynamics/. David J. Griffiths, Reed College. – Fourth edition. pages cm. Includes index ...
[15]
[PDF] Chapter 9: Electromagnetic Waves - MIT OpenCourseWare
May 9, 2011 · A wave with a planar phase fronts is a plane wave, and if its amplitude is constant across any phase front, it is a uniform plane wave. x.
[16]
[PDF] Chapter 14 Interference and Diffraction - MIT
According to the superposition principle, the net displacement is simply given by the vector or the algebraic sum of the individual displacements.
[17]
[PDF] Wave Superposition Principle
Feb 7, 2008 · This is an interference term, which is a function of the difference in phase between the two original waves. The crucial factor is δ, where.
[18]
[PDF] INTERFERENCE Review of Waves (Ch. 16) Interference of Two ...
Intensity Formula. Suppose two light waves have equal intensities I0 and a phase difference of φ. When these waves interfere, what will be the total intensity I ...
[19]
Intensity of a Two-Source Interference Pattern - Physics
E2 = Eo sin(ωt + φ). The intensity of the wave is proportional to E2. The phase difference depends on the path length difference.
[20]
Multiple Slit Diffraction | Physics - Lumen Learning
A diffraction grating is a large collection of evenly spaced parallel slits that produces an interference pattern similar to but sharper than that of a double ...
[21]
Lecture 36: Diffraction on multiple slits
For such gratings, diffraction on individual slit is not that important, we focus on interference factor. This pattern has maxima where all cosine terms are ...
[22]
Reconstruction of the Time-Dependent Wave Function Exclusively ...
Dec 2, 2011 · It is commonly known that the wave function can be written in polar form ψ = R e i S / ℏ for real and single-valued functions R and S . The ...
[23]
[PDF] arXiv:quant-ph/0510117v3 19 Aug 2009
Aug 19, 2009 · Next, putting the wave function into polar form, ψ = I exp(iS/h) ... Let us proceed to specify a class of wave functions whose quantum probability ...
[24]
[PDF] arXiv:gr-qc/0511083v1 16 Nov 2005
Nov 16, 2005 · We know that quantum mechanics has global phase invariance: multiply the wave function by exp(ia) where a is a real constant and nothing ...
[25]
Most probable wave function of a single free-moving particle
Oct 22, 2009 · Since quantum-mechanical energy is conserved, then it is sufficient to use the wave function at t = 0 . Putting the wave function in polar form ...
[26]
Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes - Journals
Cite this article. Berry Michael Victor. 1984Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changesProc. R. Soc. Lond. A39245–57http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa ...
[27]
Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential
Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential. D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto*, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs ... 49, 405 – Published 9 ...Missing: Chern | Show results with:Chern
[28]
Phasor Introduction and Demo - Linear Physical Systems Analysis
A phasor is a shorthand way to represent a sinusoidal signal as a complex number with magnitude and phase, simplifying analysis of systems with sinusoidal ...
[29]
Phasor Diagrams and Phasor Algebra used in AC Circuits
Generally, the length of a phasor represents the r.m.s. value of the sinusoidal quantity rather than its maximum value. Sinusoids of different frequencies ...
[30]
Why Phasors are Important | Mathematics of the DFT
The operation of the LTI system on a complex sinusoid is thus reduced to a calculation involving only phasors, which are simply complex numbers. Since every ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Harmonic Phasors and Fourier Series
Using the applet below you can generate periodic signals by defining a sum of phasors. Each click on the complex plane defines the amplitude and phase angle for ...
[32]
[PDF] Gauge Theory - DAMTP
The subject of quantum gauge dynamics is a rather mathematical one. These lectures makes no pretence at mathematical rigour. I have tried to put the physics ...
[33]
[PDF] Gauge Symmetry in QED - High Energy Physics |
This is an Abelian gauge symmetry, with gauge group U(1). Thus quantum electrodynamics is a U(1) gauge theory. ○ It is believed that all fundamental ...
[34]
[PDF] 3 Classical Symmetries and Conservation Laws
Noether's theorem: For every continuous global symmetry there exists a global ... The QED Lagrangian has a local gauge invariance. Hence, it also has a.