Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Stephen Dank

Stephen Dank is an renowned for his controversial role in administering supplements programs to professional athletes, most notably as the central figure in the 2011-2012 doping scandals involving the in the (NRL) and the in the (AFL). Holding a degree in biochemistry from , Dank lacked formal medical or pharmaceutical qualifications but leveraged his background to consult on performance-enhancing regimens, including peptides and other substances later deemed prohibited. Dank's programs at in 2011 involved peptides such as , while at Essendon in 2012 they included substances such as , AOD-9604, and Hexarelin; both were investigated by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) for potential anti-doping rule violations (ADRVs) including trafficking and complicity. These scandals led to widespread suspensions for players and coaches, extensive , and significant reforms in Australian sports governance. In 2014, the NRL imposed a lifetime ban on Dank for his role in the program, followed by a similar lifetime ineligibility from the Anti-Doping Tribunal in 2015 after he was found guilty of ten breaches. Beyond sports, Dank's life has been marked by further controversies, including a 2016 drive-by shooting at his home that left him injured, his 2017 bankruptcy declaration, and ongoing legal troubles such as and charges from 2019, for which an remains active as of 2025. Despite these events, he has maintained claims of innocence and sought to resume work in consulting, though his bans have severely limited his professional opportunities in elite sports.

Early life and education

Background and family

Stephen Dank was born around 1963 in Australia. Public information regarding his family background, upbringing, and early personal life remains limited, with no widely reported details on his parents, siblings, or childhood influences.

Academic qualifications

Stephen Dank claims to hold a degree in biochemistry from , as stated in a 2013 interview with ABC's 7.30 program. He also pursued a in at the (UNSW) in the mid-1990s, where he passed coursework and co-authored a on with lecturer Kevin Norton. However, UNSW records do not confirm his graduation, with a university spokesperson stating in 2013 that no record of Stephen Dank completing the degree was found. Dank enrolled in a program at the , supervised by Associate Dean Ian Spence, with a focused on the use of lactiva—a pine bark extract with antioxidant properties—for rejuvenation purposes. The candidature was suspended in 2012, prior to the emergence of related controversies, and Spence later defended Dank's , describing him as knowledgeable in sports physiology. Despite his educational background and extensive practical experience in , Dank lacks formal accreditation as a sports scientist from Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA), the peak regulatory body, rendering him ineligible under their standards. He has frequently described himself as an in biochemistry and peptides, drawing on his to inform his work in performance enhancement.

Professional career

Early roles in sports science

Stephen Dank began his professional career in sports science in the early 2000s, leveraging his expertise in biochemistry to advise on athlete performance optimization through supplements and recovery strategies. In 2004, he joined the of the (NRL) as Director of Physiology and , a role in which he contributed to the club's high-performance programs during a period that culminated in their 2008 NRL Premiership win. He continued at Manly as a until 2010. From 2007 to 2008, Dank collaborated with performance staff on and enhancement protocols, emphasizing biochemical approaches to recovery and supplementation. Concurrently, in 2007, he was engaged as a consultant by the through high-performance manager Dean Robinson, with whom he had worked at Manly; this advisory role extended until 2010 and involved developing programs centered on analysis and applications for athlete recovery. Dank's early consulting work also included a stint starting October as a sports science advisor for the newly formed in the Australian Football League (), an emerging program where he focused on foundational performance strategies without a full-time , which ended before the 2011 season. Throughout these roles, he built a practical reputation in research and sports enhancement, drawing on biochemical knowledge despite holding no formal accreditation as a sports scientist. These initial positions in sports organizations established Dank's advisory profile in non-elite and professional settings, leading to subsequent contracts with major clubs.

Work with Australian sports clubs

Throughout the , Stephen Dank established himself as a sports scientist through consulting roles with several (NRL) clubs, focusing on performance enhancement and athlete recovery programs. Between 2004 and 2013, Dank consulted for several NRL teams, including Manly, and stated he had worked with at least five, providing advice on legal supplements and recovery techniques to optimize player performance without violating anti-doping rules at the time. Dank's programs emphasized evidence-based recovery strategies, such as and nutritional supplementation, tailored to high-intensity demands of professional . In these engagements, he advocated for the use of peptides like AOD-9604, a fragment developed for anti-obesity purposes, which was not explicitly listed as prohibited under the (WADA) code until a blanket ban on experimental substances took effect in January 2012. Prior to that, AOD-9604's status remained in a gray area, as it was still under clinical development and not approved for therapeutic use by any health authority, allowing its consideration in contexts for fat reduction and repair without formal doping classification. To support these initiatives, Dank built a professional network involving collaborations with medical doctors and compounding pharmacists for sourcing and administering legal substances, ensuring compliance with contemporary regulations. His expertise extended to the with consulting at the Gold Coast Suns starting in 2010, where he implemented similar enhancement protocols focused on player durability and legal supplementation. These pre-2012 experiences across NRL and clubs positioned Dank as a sought-after consultant for innovative , leading to his contract with later that year.

Essendon supplements saga

Involvement with Essendon Football Club

In late 2011, Stephen Dank was hired by the as a sports scientist under head coach , with responsibilities focused on enhancing player performance and recovery through innovative methods. Dank's role expanded in 2012 when he introduced a comprehensive supplements regime at the club, which involved over 1,000 injections administered to 34 players over the course of the year. The program was coordinated with club doctor and other staff, including high-performance manager Dean Robinson, as part of a broader effort to optimize athlete recovery and conditioning. Under Dank's oversight, the included sourcing supplements from external suppliers to support the injection-based protocols and other interventions. This approach marked a significant shift in Essendon's practices during the 2012 season. The program's implementation eventually drew initial attention from the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority in early 2013.

Supplements program details

The supplements program implemented by Stephen Dank at in 2012 involved the administration of various s and supplements to 34 players, primarily through injections and oral doses, as part of an initiative aimed at enhancing recovery and performance. Key substances included AOD-9604, a synthetic derived from human growth hormone intended for anti-obesity effects but unapproved for human therapeutic use, which was administered via around 1,500 injections across the group. , a associated with repair and recovery, was also provided, often listed simply as "thymosin" on documentation, with players receiving injections at off-site clinics. Additionally, , a synthetic analog of the alpha-melanocyte-stimulating used for , was injected into at least some individuals, including club coach , who experienced significant side effects such as . The program structure entailed weekly injections and supplement regimens conducted both on-site at the club's Windy Hill facility and at external locations like the Skinovate clinic, where intravenous treatments were also provided, totaling over 16,500 doses of colostrum and 8,000 doses of tribulus terrestris as complementary oral supplements. These sessions occurred without consistent involvement from the club's medical staff, leading to a lack of standardized oversight, and players were required to sign consent forms in February 2012 that included confidentiality clauses but often lacked detailed disclosure of specific substances administered. This resulted in widespread player uncertainty about the exact contents of the injections, with some reporting they were told the substances were merely "amino acids" or vitamins. Documentation for the program was notably inadequate, with records often incomplete or ambiguous, such as peptides being mislabeled to obscure their identity, which contributed to confusion over the precise nature and quantities of used. Dank maintained that all were legal, WADA-compliant, and based on peer-reviewed for safe performance enhancement, emphasizing their role in revolutionizing without any prohibited elements. However, the later clarified that AOD-9604 was prohibited under section S2 of the 2012 Prohibited List due to its developmental status and lack of regulatory approval, while was explicitly banned as a and .

ASADA investigation and charges

In February 2013, the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) launched a formal into the supplements program at the , stemming from concerns raised about the use of prohibited substances during the 2012 season. The probe involved extensive interviews with club staff, players, and external consultants including Stephen Dank, as well as the seizure of documents and records from Essendon and related parties to examine the nature and administration of the program. ASADA released interim reports throughout , highlighting potential anti-doping rule violations and outlining the scope of substances involved, which prompted further cooperation from the club. Essendon had self-reported irregularities in its supplements practices to ASADA in early , which facilitated a collaborative approach during the investigation and led to the issuance of show-cause notices to 34 players, club officials, and Dank by mid-2014. This cooperation was credited with streamlining the process, though it did not prevent the escalation to formal charges. In August 2014, ASADA issued charges against Stephen Dank for 34 breaches of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Act, primarily related to the trafficking and possession of prohibited substances such as (TB-4), a banned for its performance-enhancing properties. The charges alleged that Dank had supplied and administered these substances to Essendon players without proper authorization, violating rules on prohibited methods and compounding substances. Dank denied the allegations and contested the , but the charges marked a significant escalation in the probe, leading to subsequent .

Tribunal outcomes and aftermath

Anti-doping tribunal verdict

In April 2015, following charges brought by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA), the Anti-Doping Tribunal found Stephen Dank guilty of 10 breaches of the Anti-Doping Code. These included trafficking, attempting to traffic, and complicity in the use of prohibited substances such as , hexarelin, , , and SARMs, among others. However, Dank was cleared of three charges related to the administration or attempted administration of and hexarelin to Essendon players, due to insufficient evidence linking him directly to injections. The tribunal's reasoning emphasized Dank's central role in designing and implementing Essendon's supplements program, where he deliberately introduced and trafficked prohibited substances to enhance performance, in violation of anti-doping rules. It highlighted his complicity in supplying these substances to club personnel and third parties, supported by records of communications and transactions, while noting his failure to adequately disclose or defend against the presented. On 26 June 2015, the imposed an initial lifetime on Dank, effective from 25 June 2015, prohibiting him from any involvement in sports governed by the or under the (WADA) code worldwide. This sanction was justified by the severity of his 10 proven violations and his pivotal position in orchestrating the program, underscoring the need to protect the integrity of sport.

Lifetime ban and appeals

Following the 2015 AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal verdict that found him guilty on multiple charges, Stephen Dank lodged an appeal against his lifetime ban with the AFL Anti-Doping Appeal Board. The appeal hearing was scheduled for November 2016, but Dank failed to attend and did not provide any substantive evidence or submissions to support his case. On November 27, 2016, the Appeal Board dismissed the appeal in its entirety, citing Dank's lack of engagement as rendering the process ineffective, thereby upholding the lifetime ban imposed by the tribunal. The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) described the appeal as a "farce" and withdrew its own cross-appeal to conserve resources, while confirming the ban's continuation. As the Anti-Doping Code aligns with the (WADA) Code, Dank's lifetime was recognized internationally, prohibiting his involvement in any sport governed by WADA rules worldwide. WADA did not pursue a separate against the final but supported its global enforcement through the harmonized anti-doping . Throughout the process, Dank publicly maintained that he had been "set up" by investigators and denied any wrongdoing, alleging a lack of in the proceedings. In February 2013, amid escalating media coverage of the Essendon supplements saga, he initiated a $10 million against multiple media outlets, claiming they had falsely portrayed him as supplying illegal drugs to athletes without evidence. The sought damages for reputational harm but was ultimately unsuccessful in key aspects, with courts upholding the media's defenses of truth and .

Impact on Essendon players and club

The Essendon supplements saga profoundly affected the club's 34 players, who were issued infraction notices by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) in November 2014 for the alleged use of the prohibited substance during the 2012 season. The AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal initially cleared all 34 players in March 2015, finding insufficient evidence of doping violations. However, following an appeal by the (WADA), the (CAS) ruled in January 2016 that the players were guilty, imposing two-year suspensions backdated to March 2015, which effectively sidelined 17 active players for the entire . Additionally, the club forfeited its first three picks in and the next two in 2014 as part of the penalties, limiting its ability to recruit young talent and contributing to roster challenges in subsequent years. The club itself faced severe immediate sanctions from the in August , including a record $2 million fine—the largest ever imposed on an organization at the time—and exclusion from the finals series despite finishing seventh on the . These measures, combined with the loss of selections, disrupted Essendon's competitive standing and financial stability, prompting an independent governance review led by former CEO that exposed systemic failures in oversight and led to significant internal restructuring. Under new CEO Xavier Campbell, appointed in July 2014, the club implemented a comprehensive overhaul of its administrative and compliance frameworks to restore trust and prevent future lapses. Long-term repercussions have lingered, with the saga's 10-year anniversary in 2023 prompting widespread reflections on its enduring stigma within the community, as former players and club figures described ongoing emotional and reputational scars that affected careers and fan relations. The controversy also catalyzed reforms in anti-doping policies, including enhanced protocols for supplements programs, greater athlete involvement in investigations, and strengthened collaboration between the , ASADA, and WADA to address evidentiary standards and prevent similar team-wide issues.

Other controversies and later life

Involvement with Cronulla Sharks

In 2011, Stephen Dank served as a sports scientist for the Sharks over a five-month period, advising the club on its supplements program, which included recommendations for peptides such as and GHRP-6. The club maintained that Dank was never paid for his services and was not formally employed. The program's details came under investigation in early 2013 by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) as part of a broader probe into performance-enhancing substances in Australian sport, prompted by leaks and insider claims that players had been offered banned peptides during Dank's tenure. Accusations centered on Dank providing prohibited substances to up to 14 players from the 2011 squad, though the cooperated fully with authorities and denied any knowledge of banned materials at the time. In August 2014, ASADA issued show-cause notices to 17 current and former players alleging possible anti-doping rule violations related to the program; all were later cleared with no suspensions imposed. The controversy, dubbed the "peptides scandal," led to significant NRL penalties against the club in December 2013, including a $1 million fine, the loss of 12 competition points for the 2014 season, and a 12-month suspension (with six months suspended) for head coach for failing to adequately oversee the program. While Dank was not directly issued infraction notices by ASADA in relation to , he was deemed central to the scandal and received a lifetime ban from the NRL in August 2014 for his role in administering the supplements. This episode paralleled the doping allegations from his concurrent work at the , which contributed to his broader lifetime exclusion from Australian sport.

Additional legal and personal incidents

In July 2016, Stephen Dank was injured in a at his home in Ascot Vale, Melbourne, when several shots were fired into the property in the early hours of the morning. A grazed his head, causing a minor , and he was treated at a before being discharged the same day. investigations linked the attack to a stolen and, by 2018, to members of the Comanchero outlaw motorcycle gang, with a bikie associate leading authorities to the weapon used, though no arrests were made at the time. Dank publicly speculated that the incident was connected to his involvement in sports doping scandals, including claims of protecting secrets related to a prominent NRL player. In October 2017, Dank was declared bankrupt by the Federal Circuit Court of after evading authorities for several months. The bankruptcy stemmed from an unpaid debt of approximately $98,500 owed to Bank, originating from a 2006 loan he used to invest in the collapsed Great Southern timber company scheme. Court documents also approved additional costs of over $12,000 against him related to the proceedings. In February 2016, Dank initiated a defamation lawsuit against Nationwide News Pty Ltd, publishers of and Sunday Telegraph, over a series of 2013 articles that alleged his involvement in supplying peptides to Sharks players, including claims linking the substances to the cancer relapse and death of player Jon Mannah. The trial in the Supreme Court lasted nearly a month, during which Dank argued the articles ruined his reputation, but the jury found in favor of the publishers on key imputations, awarding him no despite partially upholding one claim. In March 2016, Dank was ordered to pay the publishers' legal costs, estimated at over $2 million, and he vowed to appeal the decision. In April 2020, a tribunal revoked the medical registration of Dr. Alicia Meneghetti, who began supplying peptides and other substances to Dank in 2014, following his involvement in the Essendon and scandals. The Complaints found that Meneghetti's actions, including providing unapproved compounded drugs without proper oversight, posed a substantial risk to and safety, directly tying the revocation to her professional dealings with Dank. In September 2022, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal permitted her to apply for re-registration subject to conditions.

Recent developments and legacy

Following his declaration of bankruptcy in October 2017, stemming from a nearly $100,000 debt related to a failed agribusiness investment, Stephen Dank has maintained a low public profile, with limited involvement in sports science or media beyond sporadic defenses of his past actions. In a 2023 marking the 10-year anniversary of the Essendon supplements saga, Dank reiterated claims of being "set up" by investigators, asserting that the substances administered were not prohibited and that procedural errors invalidated the charges against him and the players. This appearance underscored his ongoing narrative of innocence, though it drew criticism for lacking new evidence and reigniting debates over accountability in sports supplementation programs. As of March 2025, an arrest warrant issued in 2020 for fraud and forgery charges—stemming from his work at a Darwin anti-aging clinic in 2017—remains unexecuted by Northern Territory police. Dank's legacy remains deeply intertwined with the Essendon and Cronulla controversies, serving as a pivotal catalyst for enhanced anti-doping oversight in Australian sport. The scandals prompted reforms including stricter protocols for supplement administration, mandatory education for support staff on prohibited substances, and greater scrutiny of sports scientists' roles by organizations like Sport Integrity Australia, aiming to prevent unregulated peptide use and ensure informed consent from athletes. His lifetime ban from sport, upheld in 2016, has positioned him as a cautionary figure for professionals in the field, highlighting the risks of pushing ethical boundaries in performance enhancement and fueling persistent discussions on the regulation of peptides under World Anti-Doping Agency codes.

References

  1. [1]
    Stephen Dank banned for life over Cronulla supplements programme
    Aug 23, 2014 · Controversial biochemist Stephen Dank has been banned for life by the NRL over his involvement in Cronulla's 2011 supplements programme.Missing: Bachelor Applied
  2. [2]
    Stephen Dank: former Essendon sports scientist banned for life by AFL
    Jun 26, 2015 · Controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank has been handed a lifetime ban by an AFL anti-doping tribunal for his role in the Essendon supplements affair.<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Director of Exercise and Sports Science Australia calls into question ...
    Apr 16, 2013 · In February Dank told an interview with the ABC's 7.30 that he had a degree in biochemistry from the Queensland University of Technology, and ...Missing: Bachelor Applied
  4. [4]
    Stephen Dank | Sport Integrity Australia
    Stephen Dank · Date of birth. 17 July 1985 · Sport. Australian Rules Football / AFL · Team. Essendon Football Club · Violation date. See notes · ADRV. Trafficking.Missing: Bachelor Applied Science biochemistry
  5. [5]
    Stephen Dank Lifetime Ban by AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal
    Jun 26, 2015 · The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) welcomed the lifetime period of ineligibility imposed on former Essendon support person, ...Missing: NRL | Show results with:NRL
  6. [6]
    Controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank injured in shooting
    Jul 23, 2016 · Stephen Dank has narrowly avoided possible death after being hurt by a bullet after shots were fired into his Melbourne home.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  7. [7]
    Biochemist Stephen Dank declared bankrupt - 9News
    Oct 10, 2017 · The demise of disgraced sports scientist Stephen Dank, infamously linked to the Essendon supplement scandal, has continued with a bankruptcy ...Missing: Applied Science
  8. [8]
    Darwin court issues warrant for banned sports scientist Stephen Dank
    Oct 21, 2020 · A court has issued a warrant for disgraced sports scientist Stephen Dank after he failed to appear on charges of fraud, forgery and causing serious harm.Missing: Bachelor Applied biochemistry
  9. [9]
    Essendon drugs saga 10 year anniversary, Stephen Dank says he ...
    Feb 5, 2023 · Stephen Dank, the man who led Essendon's 2012 supplements program, says he was “set up”. The declaration was published in the Herald Sun, ...
  10. [10]
    Life and times of Stephen Dank | The Courier | Ballarat, VIC
    Jul 24, 2016 · Controversial sports scientist suffered a grazed forehead after a shooting at his Melbourne home in the early hours...
  11. [11]
    Stephen Dank: Essendon supplement scandal figure has warrant for ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · Dank, 63, was in 2019 charged with a string of offences, including fraud, forgery and causing serious harm. The serious harm charges were mostly ...
  12. [12]
    The science of Stephen Dank - The Age
    Aug 24, 2013 · Reporter Nick McKenzie conducted an on-the-record interview with controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank.
  13. [13]
    Former Essendon sports scientist describes AFL supplement culture
    Feb 11, 2013 · Dank had previously worked for AFL club Essendon and five NRL clubs, including premiership winner Manly. Tonight, Steve Dank breaks his silence ...
  14. [14]
    Academic defends Dank's integrity | news.com.au
    Feb 13, 2013 · Dank's PhD centred on the use of lactiva - an extract from pine bark that could be used to help rejuvenation. Spence hopes Dank will finish the ...Missing: antioxidants | Show results with:antioxidants
  15. [15]
    Sports science: time for proper accreditation - The Conversation
    Feb 12, 2013 · Stephen Dank, the man at the centre of Essendon drug scandal has been widely quoted in the media as a sport scientist or performance scientist.Missing: biochemist | Show results with:biochemist
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Judgement.pdf
    same time Mr Dank commenced as a “sports science consultant” with the Suns. His role was terminated before the commencement of the 2011 AFL season. Issues ...
  17. [17]
    Stephen Dank Appeals Life Ban | AFANA
    Jul 22, 2015 · Although he is not an accredited sports scientist, Dank is a qualified biochemist. However his employment with Essendon at the time conflicted ...
  18. [18]
    Sea Eagles never had 'concerns' about sport scientist - ABC News
    Feb 5, 2013 · "The Manly Warringah Sea Eagles employed Stephen Dank in an official capacity as a consultant between 2006 and 2010," the statement read. " ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  19. [19]
    NRL link with AFL drug scandal - News.com.au
    Feb 6, 2013 · "The Manly Warringah Sea Eagles employed Stephen Dank in an official capacity as a consultant between 2006 and 2010,'' said the statement ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  20. [20]
    Supplement at centre of scandal banned: WADA - AFL
    Apr 22, 2013 · However, WADA issued an updated blanket ban was introduced as of January 1, 2012. Former Bombers sports scientist Stephen Dank alleges he ...
  21. [21]
    The anti-obesity drug AOD-9604 is banned by WADA and ASADA in ...
    May 10, 2013 · But both ASADA and WADA revealed there were no loopholes, justifications or ways around the use of AOD-9604, officially banned in January 2011.
  22. [22]
    WADA statement on substance AOD-9604 | World Anti Doping Agency
    AOD-9604 is a substance still under pre-clinical and clinical development and has not been approved for therapeutic use by any government health authority in ...
  23. [23]
    Dank allegations prolong supplements saga - Sports Integrity Initiative
    Apr 13, 2016 · In June 2015 the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal issued Stephen Dank with a lifetime ban, after he was found guilty of ten breaches of its Anti-Doping ...
  24. [24]
    Dank made a doping scapegoat: lawyer - ABC News
    Feb 8, 2013 · Dank worked with the Bombers in 2012, while he has previously been employed with a number of other sporting organisations including NRL club ...
  25. [25]
    James Hird blames Stephen Dank and supplements team for ...
    Jan 14, 2016 · James Hird says Essendon walked through 'the sliding door' to the worlds of Dean Robinson and Stephen Dank, who ran the ill-fated supplements program.
  26. [26]
    Essendon's James Hird faces more claims he played a central role ...
    Jul 31, 2013 · Essendon has described an allegation that Stephen Dank was recruited to run a "black ops" supplement program as "nonsense and slanderous.
  27. [27]
    Essendon supplements saga: CAS judgement shows players fatal ...
    Jan 12, 2016 · On the WADA case, each of the 34 players received injections from Dank during the period of January to September 2012, with most players telling ...Missing: 1000 | Show results with:1000
  28. [28]
    Doping verdict takeout: Ask more questions - Pursuit
    Jan 12, 2016 · Despite the players receiving anti-doping education, and the supplements program not being administered by the club doctor Bruce Reid – he was ...
  29. [29]
    Essendon's supplement budget went in two months - Herald Sun
    Apr 13, 2013 · The Herald Sun has been told Dank began seeking cheaper alternative supplement suppliers in May, complaining that his department owed $20,000 to ...
  30. [30]
    Timeline: ACC doping investigation fallout - ABC News
    Mar 7, 2013 · Sports scientist Stephen Dank tells 7.30 that the Essendon coach James Hird was "well aware" of his supplement program. Dank says the ...
  31. [31]
    Inside the Bombers' drug regimen | Herald Sun
    Mar 27, 2015 · Dank was not a qualified doctor. He wasn't a pharmacist. He wasn't even an accredited sports scientist, although he'd had years of experience ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  32. [32]
    https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendon-coach-james-hird-allegedly-suffered-side-effects-after-self-injecting-a-tanning-drug/news-story/6ccbe562595a719f5969b848a6a7bd03
  33. [33]
    [PDF] AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE NOTICE OF CHARGE RULE 1.6
    Aug 13, 2013 · Thymosin Beta-4 and AOD-9604 are both peptides. 74. If Hird or any person at the Club had conducted any adequate inquiries in relation to ...
  34. [34]
    https://www.theconversation.com/frankenfooty-essendons-mixed-bag-of-supplements-17323
  35. [35]
    The media and the madness: sport, drugs and Dank's defamation
    Feb 14, 2013 · Stephen Dank had worked with Essendon and coaches James Hird and Mark Thompson as well as high performance manager Dean Robinson. He had ...Missing: Sheep | Show results with:Sheep
  36. [36]
    [PDF] THE 2012 PROHIBITED LIST INTERNATIONAL STANDARD - WADA
    Aug 24, 2011 · BETA-BLOCKERS. Unless otherwise specified, beta-blockers are prohibited In-Competition only, in the following sports. • Aeronautic (FAI).Missing: AOD- 9604 thymosin
  37. [37]
    Dank found guilty by AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal
    Stephen Dank has been found guilty of 10 breaches of the AFL Anti-Doping Code, but has been cleared by the League's Tribunal on three charges.
  38. [38]
    AFL tribunal delivers bittersweet verdict for Stephen Dank | Sport
    Apr 17, 2015 · Stephen Dank has avoided the three crucial charges relating to the administration of banned peptide Thymosin Beta 4, but could still face a life-time ban from ...Missing: AOD- 9604 2000s
  39. [39]
    Stephen Dank found guilty of 10 breaches by AFL anti-doping tribunal
    Apr 17, 2015 · According to the statement, the prohibited substances in question include thymosin beta-4 and CJC-1295, the peptide former NRL player Sandor ...
  40. [40]
    https://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-04-17/full-statement-from-afl-antidoping-tribunal-chairman
  41. [41]
    Stephen Dank handed life ban by AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal
    Jun 26, 2015 · The AFL released a statement from Anti-Doping Tribunal chairman David Jones on Friday that said Dank's ban would start on June 25 this year.
  42. [42]
    Dank's appeal against life ban thrown out - AFL
    Nov 27, 2016 · STEPHEN Dank's appeal against a lifetime ban has been thrown out by the AFL Appeals Board because of the disgraced sports scientist's "lack ...
  43. [43]
    Stephen Dank's appeal dismissed - Sport Integrity Australia
    Nov 28, 2016 · After failing to attend his own scheduled hearing last week, Mr Dank failed to produce any documents to support his reasons for not attending.Missing: reasoning 2015
  44. [44]
    Stephen Dank's AFL appeal thrown out, labelled a 'farce' by Asada ...
    With Dank's lifetime ban remaining in place, McDevitt said Asada had withdrawn its cross-appeal in the interests of time and resources. Dank ...
  45. [45]
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-28/afl-anti-doping-appeal-board-dismisses-stephen-dank/8072340
  46. [46]
    WADA Statement on Stephen Dank Ruling | World Anti Doping Agency
    WADA has appealed the AFL Anti-Doping Appeals Tribunal decision to clear Mr. Stephen Dank, a named support person, of 21 charges of the league's drug code.Missing: verdict | Show results with:verdict
  47. [47]
    Sports scientist Stephen Dank launches $10m defamation claim
    Feb 10, 2013 · Lawyers for sports scientist Stephen Dank are launching a $10 million defamation claim against various media outlets.
  48. [48]
    $$10m defamation claim: Dank takes action over drug accusations
    Feb 11, 2013 · Lawyers for sports scientist Stephen Dank are launching a $10 million defamation claim against various media outlets, alleging he has been ...
  49. [49]
    Stephen Dank loses part of defamation challenge over NRL peptide ...
    Mar 14, 2016 · Sport scientist Stephen Dank loses part of defamation case · Reports linked peptide use and NRL player Jon Mannah's cancer relapse.
  50. [50]
    Timeline: How the Essendon anti-doping saga played out - AFL
    Jan 11, 2016 · ON TUESDAY morning, 34 past and present Essendon players were found guilty of taking banned substance Thymosin Beta-4 during the 2012 season.Missing: 1000 | Show results with:1000
  51. [51]
    Guilty: Court bans the Essendon 34 for 2016 - AFL
    Jan 11, 2016 · The Court of Arbitration for Sport finding 34 past and present players guilty of taking banned substance Thymosin Beta-4 and suspending them for the entire ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  52. [52]
    Bombers kicked out of finals, fined $2m and stripped of draft picks
    Aug 27, 2013 · The AFL has slapped Essendon with the biggest penalty in the game's history, kicking the Bombers out of the finals and handing them a $2 million fine.
  53. [53]
    Record doping penalty for Australia's Essendon football club - BBC
    Aug 28, 2013 · The club was found guilty of using an "experimental" supplements programme on its players, the AFL said. ... Club doctor Bruce Reid - the ...Missing: Stephen Dank 2012 1000 injections 34
  54. [54]
    Essendon supplements case: analysis & timeline
    Jan 12, 2016 · 'The Supplements Program of 2012 was a mistake of the highest magnitude. That said, the penalty imposed on the 34 players is manifestly unfair.Missing: 1000 | Show results with:1000
  55. [55]
    Xavier Campbell reveals untold Essendon drugs saga pain
    Aug 3, 2025 · And when he was elevated from marketing boss to CEO in 2014, it became Campbell's job to firstly not only help lead the players' defence, but ...Missing: overhaul | Show results with:overhaul
  56. [56]
    ASADA chief David Sharpe says integrity reforms can end conflict ...
    but via a ...
  57. [57]
    After the Essendon saga, any reform to anti-doping regimes must ...
    Jan 18, 2016 · After the Essendon saga, any reform to anti-doping regimes must give athletes a greater say · Founding of anti-doping · Alternative drug control.
  58. [58]
    Dank received no money from us: Sharks - ABC News
    Mar 11, 2013 · A spokesman for the crisis-hit Cronulla Sharks says the controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank never received any money from the NRL club.
  59. [59]
    Tragic turn: Dank handed over peptides - The Sydney Morning Herald
    Apr 27, 2013 · The drugs in sport scandal has taken a dramatic turn with the controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank confirming footballer Jon Mannah, ...
  60. [60]
    Coach stood down by under-fire NRL Sharks
    Mar 8, 2013 · ... consultant Stephen Dank was involved with the club, according to Sharks deputy chairman Keith Ward. Ward headed a media conference at Sharks ...
  61. [61]
    Cronulla insider claims players were offered banned peptides while ...
    Feb 7, 2013 · Stephen Dank, the sports science guru embroiled in the scandal, consulted for half a dozen NRL clubs before crossing codes. He spent five ...
  62. [62]
    Heat on 14 Cronulla Sharks players as ASADA investigates links to ...
    Mar 7, 2013 · AS many as 14 NRL players from Cronulla implicated in ASADA's anti-doping investigation have been threatened with immediate suspension.
  63. [63]
    Paul Gallen among five Sharks given show-cause notices
    Aug 19, 2014 · The 17 past and present Cronulla players issued with show-cause notices by Asada have 48 hours to accept proposals offered to them by the anti-doping authority.Missing: infraction | Show results with:infraction
  64. [64]
    Essendon supplements saga: Court of Arbitration for Sport brings ...
    Jan 11, 2016 · The Essendon supplements saga has resulted in many senior figures leaving the club, including former coach James Hird and chairman Paul Little.Missing: explained | Show results with:explained
  65. [65]
    Cronulla Supplements Timeline - ABC News
    Dec 17, 2013 · March 12, 2013. Sharks deny paying Dank. The Sharks say controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank never received any money from the club.
  66. [66]
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-16/doctor-who-supplied-peptides-to-stephen-dank-has-licence-revoked/12153644
  67. [67]
    Catch me if you can: Stephen Dank made bankrupt after slipping the ...
    Oct 10, 2017 · The notorious sport scientist proved elusive after he was declared bankrupt over a debt of almost $100,000 lost in a failed agribusiness ...
  68. [68]
    Stephen Dank's astonishing 'set up' claim about Essendon drugs saga
    Stephen Dank claims he was 'set up' in the early stages of drugs investigation into Essendon, which first came to light in 2013.
  69. [69]
    Reform needed after Stephen Dank's AFL anti-doping tribunal verdict
    Apr 20, 2015 · Dank, who has been found guilty of 10 breaches of the AFL anti-doping code, will receive his penalty when AFL's anti-doping tribunal sits on May ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography